Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2024 Dec 19;19(12):e0315838. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315838

Sequentially bidirectional gastrovascular flows in intricately branched digestive tract of planocerid flatworms

Po-Chun Hsu 1, Yu-Hsun Chang 1, Yu-Ning Chiu 1, Wei-Ban Jie 1,*
Editor: Petr Heneberg2
PMCID: PMC11658467  PMID: 39700202

Abstract

Polyclad flatworms possess an intricately branched digestive system combining features of a gastrovascular cavity as well as a gastrointestinal tract. Nonetheless, the functions of this system remain unconfirmed, due to a lack of effective observation methods. This paper presents a novel staining method to facilitate the analysis of this highly branched digestive system. Video recordings obtained during ingestion revealed sequentially bidirectional gastrovascular flows and a corresponding occurrence of regular contractions. Tissue sections revealed that the contractions can be attributed to a radial arrangement of muscles around the gastrointestinal tract. The highly branched digestive system of the flatworm revealed evidence of bidirectional flow and sequential peristalsis, which may allow for a diet of greater diversity than is possible in animals with only a gastrovascular cavity. The proposed staining technique opens up new avenues for research on the digestive behavior of lower organisms.

Introduction

The gastrovascular cavity, part of the basic body plan of cnidarians (e.g., jellyfish, corals, and hydras), is integral to digestion and nutrient distribution [1,2]. Shimizu et al. (2004) provided evidence of digestive movement in hydras, based on the way that a diffuse nerve net controls digestion and circulation through segmentation movement [3,4]. Although the gastric cavity of hydra is a blind sac, it is likely that segmentation movement in the cavity is a back-and-forth transference following contact with the end of the cavity [3].

Harmata et al. (2013) delved into gastrovascular flows in the cnidaria phylum, with a focus on hydroids and octocorals [5]. They described ciliary motion which was visible in image sequences, and sequentially bidirectional flow or simultaneously bidirectional flow separated by baffles [5]. In the absence of a true circulatory system, the gastrovascular cavity distributes partially digested material throughout the body. In hydroid species, myoepithelial contractions from the center of the colony drive sequentially bidirectional flows [5]. Using resin endocasts and 3D X-ray computed microtomography, Avian et al. (2022) characterized the branched gastrovascular system of Rhizostoma pulmo (Rhizostomatidae) as simultaneous inward and outward flows in a peculiar double hemi-canal structure. These findings suggest that in cnidarians, the various openings of the gastrovascular system may function as a through-gut apparatus [6].

Polyclad flatworms are free-living animals with branched intestines radiating into a peripheral network [7]. Previous research on the digestive structures of flatworms has focused on the gastrovascular cavity or the gastrointestinal tract. Similar to cnidarians, these flatworms feature an incomplete gut, described as a gastrovascular cavity [8]. In 1970, Koopowitz described the feeding behavior of the polyclad Planocera gilchristi collected from intertidal zones and held in a container with periwinkle (Oxystele) as prey. These organisms displayed complex feeding behaviors, such as prey recognition, stalking, capture, extraction, and swallowing [9]. Jennings (1957) described the digestive system of Leptoplana tremellaris, an acotylean flatworm that feeds on small animals, such as polychaetes, isopods, and amphipods. In that system, food entering the branched gut is partially broken down by enzymatic activities in the lumen before entering the cells [10]. In their work on Pericelis flavomarginata, a cotylean flatworm, Tsuyuki et al. (2020) reported that the intestinal branches gradually changed to a reddish hue at 1–2 hours after consuming red scaleworms, making the gut branches of the polyclad worm more visible [11]. Newman and Cannon (2003) described the predation behavior of Planocera sp., which can feast on cowrie in the waters off Micronesia [12]. Ritson-Williams et al. (2006) reported on the use of the deadly neurotoxin tetrodotoxin by a previously undescribed Planocera sp. for the capture of prey [13]. Taken together, these findings provide strong evidence that some polyclad flatworms are active predators.

In a previous analysis of Planocerid flatworms, our research team observed rhythmic contractions of the highly branched digestive system, associated with unknown ingestion patterns in the gastrovascular cavity. Newman and Cannon (2003) posited that the branches of the digestive system are lined with small muscular valves (sphincters) regulating flow in the form of contractions (peristaltic movement) to fill or clear the gut [12]. This raises questions pertaining to the peristaltic activity of polyclad flatworms compared to cnidarians as well as to the functional role of the small muscular valves along the branched digestive tracts. Nonetheless, there have been no further reports on this topic since 2003.

In the current study, we collected Paraplanocera oligoglena (Schmarda, 1859 [14]) from intertidal pools in Taiwan. P. oligoglena is a globally distributed polyclad flatworm [12,15,16], initially documented in Taiwan by Kato (1943) [17]. It has been featured in various field guide publications written in Chinese, [18]. Our objective was to unravel the mechanisms underlying the gastrovascular flows in the highly branched digestive system by employing the method proposed by Wells and Sebens (2017) for the staining of clams [19].

Materials and methods

Ethics statement

All the specimens used in this thesis do not involve endangered or invasive species and under the permission of the Kenting National Park or the other areas where specific permissions are not needed. These thesis had received the approval of National Taiwan Science Education Center (NTSEC) and the International Science and Engineering Fair (ISEF) 2024.

Collection of specimens

Paraplanocera oligoglena, totally 13 samples were gathered from tidal pools in various locations of Taiwan, including 4 specimens from Longdong Bay (25°06’48.1"N 121°55’13.1"E), 6 specimens from Magang (25°01’03.0"N 122°00’00.8"E), and 3 specimens from Houbihu (21°56’19.3"N 120°44’44.1"E). The animals were held in a glass tank equipped with a circulating filtration system with seawater salinity maintained at 32–34‰ at a temperature of 24–26°C. The quality of the artificial seawater was maintained by regularly removing food residue and adding nitrifying bacteria.

Bait preparation

This study prepared clams as bait in accordance with the methods outlined by Teng et al. (2022) for the study of oyster leech behavior [20]. Note that clams are not a natural prey of Paraplanocera oligoglena in the wild; however, we determined that market-sourced Asian hard clams (Meretrix taiwanica) provided a suitable food substitute for the observation of wild flatworms under laboratory conditions.

Clam meat removed via dissection was stained overnight using methylene blue and fluorescein in accordance with the staining technique proposed by Wells and Sebens (2017) to facilitate the in vivo observation of the digestive tract [19]. For extended video recording, the illuminated transparent glass tank and video camera JVC GZ-RX500BTW, Olympus TG6 were used. Video clips showing the ventral sides of the flatworms were captured after staining to observe the movement of food within the highly branched digestive system. All clips were recorded and transformed into the form of MP4 files as partially shown in S1 Video, and time-lapse video was converted in 2 times play speed as shown in S2 Video.

Image processing and tracking

Static images and video clips were subjected to image processing, including image transformation [21] and adaptive thresholding based on the Open Source Computer Vision Library (OpenCV) [22].

The flatworms were photographed during the post-feeding ingestion period on a petri dish lined with white paper beneath a uniform light source. The resulting images underwent background removal, conversion to grayscale, and noise filtering via Gaussian blurring. Adaptive thresholding was used to create a binary image in which blue-stained regions were depicted as white lines on a black background. The binary image was then converted into a BGR color image matching the dimensions of the original image. We also created a blank red image with identical dimensions, which was combined with the binary image to create a final image with the blue-stained regions highlighted as red lines.

We also captured video clips of the flatworms as stained food passed through the digestive tract. This involved moving the flatworms to the side of a transparent glass tank in front of a backlit white plastic divider providing a uniform light source. Selecting one specimen with the most pronounced process of food transport was used for the study. The recorded videos were sped up 10-fold for analytic convenience. We selected a region of interest (ROI) containing a small stretch of the digestive tract for continuous tracking. The lower and upper bounds of the object of interest, in this case, the stretch of tract in the selected ROI, were determined with Otsu’s method [23]. Our use of CSRT (Discriminative Correlation Filter with Channel and Spatial Reliability) enabled the tracking of a selected area even under sudden movements. The stained-blue color in the frame was isolated via conversion to the HSV color space. The video clips then underwent graphing using Matplotlib [24] and Pandas [25] to determine the percentage of the stained areas in each frame as an indication of tract volume, wherein a higher percentage indicated tract expansion, while a lower percentage indicated contraction.

Histological studies

Cross-sections of the tracts were obtained to observe the anatomy of the digestive tissue at the microscopic scale. Histologic analysis was performed in accordance with the standard protocols outlined by Jie et al. (2013) [26]. Briefly, the tissues were fixed via embedding in paraffin following dehydration via serial passage using 30%, 50%, 70%, 95%, and 99.5% alcohol over a period of 2–4 hours.

Results

Paraplanocera oligoglena (collected at Longdong Bay on Aug. 5th, 2022) presented an oval to circular body shape, which appeared somewhat translucent with a reticulated pattern of white and brown irregular spots over a light brown background color (Fig 1) [27]. The translucency and thin cross-section of the animals made it easy to observe the pharynx and main intestine from the ventral side. Note that this nearly transparent branched digestive system was so thin that it was barely detectable by the naked eye.

Fig 1. Paraplanocera oligoglena (Schmarda, 1859) specimen collected at Longdong Bay, Taiwan on August 5th, 2022.

Fig 1

(A) Dorsal view with anterior end on the right; (B) Ventral view with anterior end on the left. b, brain; ph, pharynx; s, sexual organ; t, tentacle; u, uterus.

Digestive system shown by stained food

The translucency of the body was also conducive to tracking the passage of digested food within the gastrointestinal tract (Fig 2A). Initial imaging results revealed that fluorescein staining had no effect, due to the autofluorescence of the flatworm, which eliminated any contrast between the digestive system and rest of the body (Fig 2B). Thus, methylene blue was selected for all subsequent experiments (Fig 2C).

Fig 2. Images of Paraplanocera oligoglena.

Fig 2

(A) Before staining, (B) after staining with fluorescein, and (C) after staining with methylene blue, which shows the digestive system comprising blind sacs, simple circulative loops, and extensive branching.

Fig 2C illustrates the digestive system of Paraplanocera oligoglena comprising blind sacs, simple circulative loops, and extensive branching. The blind sacs distributed along the digestive tracts resembled tubes that come to a dead end. The simple circulative loops connected adjacent branches to form ring-like formations distributed sporadically along the digestive tract (S1 and S2 Videos).

A defining characteristic of the digestive system of flatworms is the main intestine, which radiates as a series of branches from the pharynx toward the distal margin, resulting in fork-like bifurcations evenly distributed around most of the body. Note that the diameter of the digestive tract gradually diminishes as the branches bifurcate (Fig 3). Unlike the through-gut apparatus described by Avian et al. (2022) [6], the branched tract in this study appeared not to have any openings at the outermost ends.

Fig 3. Consecutive ordering of tract branches from the pharynx toward the distal margin.

Fig 3

The pharynx is indicated as 0, and then the numbers from 1 to 5 correspond to every segment of the digestive tract in each order.

The widest tract, originating from the central (i.e., pharyngeal) region, branched into a narrower secondary tract, which radiated into an even narrower tertiary tract. We devised a hierarchy describing the order of branches, wherein the branch originating from the pharynx was deemed the first-order (n), with the number increasing by 1 each time a bifurcation was passed (i.e., n+1, n+2…). Based on this system, it was determined that the narrowest tract was sixth-order branches. Note that the smallest branches were difficult to detect, such that the hierarchy may have extended even further (Fig 3).

As shown in Fig 4, the still images, Fig 2C were converted to grayscale and thresholded to identify areas stained with methylene blue, which were then highlighted using a red mask. Fig 4 illustrates a whole-body image with ROIs clearly illustrating the extreme complexity of the gastrovascular cavity.

Fig 4. Post-staining image of Paraplanocera oligoglena after image processing.

Fig 4

The red color indicates regions containing stained food. It shows a whole-body image with ROIs clearly illustrating the extreme complexity of the gastrovascular cavity.

Post-staining active tracking: Gastrovascular flow

Shimizu et al. (2004) reported that the digestive system of hydra presents an esophageal-like segmented movement, similar to that of defecation [3]. In the current study, Paraplanocera oligoglena presented distinct digestive movements involving spontaneous contractions of the pharynx, gradually pushing the food along the digestive tract to the most remote margins (Fig 4).

Note that both static images and video recordings revealed sequentially bidirectional gastrovascular flows via peristalsis, which has not previously been reported. Unlike the segmented movement of hydra, the flatworms exhibited regular centrifugal sphincter contractions inward toward the outermost branches (i.e., highest order end) (Fig 5A and 5B). The organisms then exhibited centripetal movement from the outermost (narrowest) branches back to the pharynx (i.e., first-order digestive tract) (Fig 5C and 5D). This process exhibited a rhythmic pattern (S1 and S2 Videos). We obtained no evidence of flow originating from any of the blind sacs distributed along any of the tracts.

Fig 5. Sequential video captures of bidirectional flow.

Fig 5

From (A) to (B) shows the inward gastrovascular flow and from (C) to (D) shows the outward flow in the same track. Red arrows indicate the direction of flow.

The tracker package in OpenCV was used to track the movement of food bidirectionally along the consecutive branches of orders n, n+1, n+2, and n+3. Matplotlib was then used to plot the stained area as a percentage of the selected region over time (S1 Table). The video clips revealed that the contractions began when the digestive tract of the flatworms narrowed. From this, we deduced that the wave trough of the curve represents the duration of the contraction, whereas the period between two peaks and wave troughs indicates the length of a contraction cycle (Fig 6).

Fig 6. Post-staining video tracking of dyed food passing through consecutive branches n, n+1, n+2, and n+3.

Fig 6

The timing of the events was as follows: Inward peristalsis (0 to 40 sec); change in the direction of gastrovascular flow (40 to 55 sec.); outward peristalsis (55 to 85 sec.). The wave trough of the curve indicates the duration of each contraction, while the period between two peaks and wave troughs represents a single peristalsis cycle.

As shown in Fig 7 (S2 Table), the ANOVA of the designated inward flows show no significant differences in consecutive n, n+1, n+2 branches in ANOVA (n = 30, d.f. = 2, F = 0.70, p = 0.50). The designated outward flows also show no significant differences in consecutive n+2, n+1, n branches in ANOVA (n = 30, d.f. = 2, F = 0.39, p = 0.67). The frequency and speed of the contractions remained constant, regardless of the branch level (n+1, n+2…), which indicates that P. oligoglena does not rely exclusively on pharynx contraction for the transport of food. The segmented movements also indicate that the tract itself is involved in the contraction. We observed contractions occurring sequentially from one fixed position to another fixed position, resulting in peristalsis (rhythmic wave-like contractions), first in one direction and then in the opposite direction. Regardless of the direction, the movement remained consistent and sequentially bidirectional, albeit at an uneven rate. This is the first study to describe peristaltic segmented contractions and sequentially bidirectional movement in the gastrovascular cavity of polyclad flatworms.

Fig 7. Contraction period in consecutive order of the tract branches, n, n+1, and n+2 during the inward and outward flows.

Fig 7

The seconds of contraction in order ’n’ are marked as circle dots, in ’n+1’are marked as solid squares, and in ’n+2’ are marked as triangles. The ANOVA shows that designated inward flows have no significant differences in consecutive branches(n = 30, p = 0.50). The outward flows also show no significant differences between consecutive branches (n = 30, p = 0.67).

As shown in Fig 8, the activity of the digestive system decreased dramatically after roughly one day and came to a complete stop within two days (S3 Table), after which the remaining food residue was moved back to the pharynx and expelled, in a manner similar to the termination of regular oscillatory behavior of post-feeding in isolated polyps [2] and the defecation reflex observed in hydra [3].

Fig 8. Variations in tract volume on the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd days.

Fig 8

Radial muscles inside the digestive tract

We also performed microscopic analysis of sections of the digestive tract to elucidate the constituent anatomical structures. We identified radial muscle structures evenly distributed along the tract (Fig 9). This finding aligns with the description of small muscular valves along the branches of Planocera sp. proposed by Newman and Cannon in 2003 [12].

Fig 9. Radial muscle within the digestive tract of Paraplanocera oligoglena.

Fig 9

(A) Longitudinal section highlighting the radial muscles with arrows. (B) Cross-section of a radial structure.

Furthermore, it was determined that the average distance between radial muscles was inversely proportional to the position of the sample within the hierarchical tract structure. In other words, the arrangement of radial muscles along narrower tracts (close to the distal margin) was denser than along larger tracts (close to the pharynx) (Fig 9B). From this, it can be inferred that the contractions of the radial muscles provide stable inward forces right from the utmost marginal branched digestive tract. Then, the sequentially bidirectional flows proceed back and forth within the branched digestive tract.

Discussion

Over fifty species of polyclad flatworm can be found in the waters around Taiwan [27]. There has been a dearth of research on most of these relatively rare species; however, this study focused on Paraplanocera oligoglena, which is commonly found in intertidal zones throughout the region.

In our laboratory analysis of flatworms, we employed a bait that does not necessarily match the prey typically consumed by P. oligoglena; however, the widespread availability of clams in local markets made them a convenient substitute. The clams were also shown to extend the duration of digestion, which is crucial when seeking to observe the rate of predation on fresh bait and the bidirectional movements associated with digestion.

Wells and Sebens (2017) marked sea anemones by injecting them with methylene blue, neutral red, and fluorescein for laboratory analysis and field studies [19]. In the current study, we modified this procedure by using the same dyes to stain the clams consumed by P. oligoglena. Note that staining the food with fluorescein proved ineffective in enhancing the contrast between ROI and the rest of the body, even under blue light within a dark room. We also avoided neutral red during bait preparation due to its potential interference with the brownish patterns on the semi-transparent body. Thus, it was determined that methylene blue was the best option for staining the digestive tract. We anticipate that these dyeing methods could be used for future research on food chains in the wild.

In post-stain feed tracking, methylene blue dye proved highly effective in revealing both the widest (primary) tract as well as the narrowest (high-order) tract along this highly branched digestive system. ImageJ software proved largely ineffective in detecting the digestive pathway, due largely to the fact that many of the branches did not appear as continuous structures. Our use of adaptive thresholding in the image analysis of samples stained with methylene blue revealed continuous branches widely distributed across the entire body of the organisms. Note also that during the ingestion period, polyclad flatworms remain nearly stationary for extended durations of up to 6 hours [20,28]. This novel approach to analysis allowed tracking throughout this ingestion period in real-time or accelerated time. It is likely that this approach could be applied to other flatworm species in the future.

The sequentially bidirectional flow observed in P. oligoglena involves dual-directional peristalsis induced by radial muscles along the digestive tract. Newman and Cannon (2003) initially described the multibranched system of Planocera sp., suggesting the presence of small muscular valves along the branches [12]. In the current study, we identified radial muscle structures (Fig 9) distributed along the digestive branches. It appears that these structures regulate flow within the tract by providing waves of contractions to fill or clear the gut. This mechanism parallels previous descriptions of cnidarians [5]; however, it has not previously been identified in flatworms. Note that the transport of partially digested food back and forth along branches of various diameters at a constant speed suggests the corporations of the nerve system with those muscular valves along a tract during ingest process.

Koopowitz and Keenan (1982) claimed that flatworms are the most primitive animals with a true brain, based on the fact that an ipsilateral turn toward food requires intact connections between the brain and the main longitudinal nerve cords [29]. Accordingly, the feeding behavior of flatworms necessitates coordinated regulation between the brain and nervous system. If diffuse nerve net regulation is indeed required for feeding, then it can be inferred that contractions of the intestinal tract during ingestion may also be regulated by the nervous system. While the basis for the assumption about the role of the nervous system in regulating peristalsis in many branches of the digestive system is not entirely clear. Meanwhile the integral effect of the magistral hydroplasma flows in colonial hydroid is remaining one of the drive mechanism needed to be considered which might include dynamics of cell movement in the body, pulsations of hydrants and coenosarc, and movement of hydroplasma in the gastrovascular cavity [30].

A brain and nervous system with this degree of complexity should have the capacity to coordinate rhythmic contractions in the digestive tract more effectively than hydrozoans. Since the flatworms still exist on all levels of blind sacs distributed between its lowermost and highmost branches, the cause of peristaltic movement of flatworms may also bear the possibility of coordinating hydraulic relationships between different parts of the digestive tract. We infer that the peristaltic movement might function simultaneously with the nerve system and hydraulic relationships between different parts of the digestive tract, especially the hydroplasma flow in colonial hydroids have already been described by Marfenin and Dementyev (2024) in sufficient detail [30].

It is also possible that the movement of flatworms during ingestion could reveal the origin of sympathetic and parasympathetic nerve regulation. Contractions in the digestive tract during feeding are automatically regulated to facilitate the movement of food through the system. With the focus on the processing and movement of ingested food, it is not possible for the organism to exert voluntary control over these muscles during feeding. The regulation of muscular activity must wait until feeding is finished. These processes indicate the inhibition of sympathetic nerve regulation and the excitation of parasympathetic nerve regulation during ingestion.

The gastrovascular cavity functions as the primary organ of digestion and circulation in cnidarians and other animal phyla; however, those animals are unable to coordinate efficient digestion due to a lack of directional peristalsis. Previous laboratory studies on feeding revealed that these organisms enjoy a diverse diet, including various gastropods, such as sea snails and sea hares, and this broad range of food sources may contribute to the widespread distribution of flatworms in Taiwan. Bidirectional flow in the branched tracts of polyclads may provide survival advantages by allowing for digestion of greater efficiency. This might explain why polyclad flatworms are larger and more mobile than other flatworms or lower organisms, such as cnidarians.

The cessation of digestion-related movement at day 2 after feeding provides evidence that the peristaltic and segmented movements primarily serve digestive functions, rather than circulatory functions (Fig 8). This may also explain why polyclad flatworms tend to be larger and more mobile than other flatworms [12] but still require an extremely thin body plan for efficient diffusion and interchange of materials with their environment.

The flatworms that received methylene blue (as indicated by the lingering presence of the dye) did not demonstrate any reluctance in subsequent feeding tests. This provides further evidence indicating the effectiveness of this marking scheme in identifying prey-predator relationships, particularly when implemented using the proposed image processing techniques aimed at enhancing contrast. In the future, these experiments should be performed in their natural habitat, such as tidal pools. These methods could also be used to elucidate the digestive mechanisms of other lower organisms.

Supporting information

S1 Video. Continuous video recording of Paraplanocera oligoglena after feeding with methylene blue dyed baits.

(MP4)

Download video file (18.7MB, mp4)
S2 Video. Time-lapse video converted from 120 seconds of continuous taping of the Paraplanocera oligoglena into 60 seconds clips after feeding with methylene blue dyed baits.

(MP4)

Download video file (18.7MB, mp4)
S1 Table. The data set of post-staining video tracking of dyed food passing through consecutive branches n, n+1, n+2, and n+3.

The acquired time of the events from the start (0.3 second) to the end (85.1 second).

(DOC)

pone.0315838.s003.doc (160KB, doc)
S2 Table. The data set of contraction periods in consecutive order of the tract branches, n, n+1, and n+2 during the inward and outward flows.

(DOCX)

pone.0315838.s004.docx (8.1KB, docx)
S3 Table. The data set of variations in tract volume on the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd days.

(DOCX)

pone.0315838.s005.docx (21.4KB, docx)

Acknowledgments

The authors express their sincere appreciation to Mr. Shang-Chi Wu for his generosity in collecting and transporting the flatworms. The authors are also deeply grateful to Mr. Shih-Chieh Kuo at the Chinese Culture University for specimen preservation.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript.

Funding Statement

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Campbell NA, Reece JB. Biology. Pearson Education. International edition. US. 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Dudgeon S, Wagner A, Vaišnys JR, Buss LW. Dynamics of gastrovascular circulation in the hydrozoan Podocoryne carnea: the one-polyp case. Biol Bull. 1999;196(1): 1–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Shimizu H, Koizumi O, Fujisawa T. Three digestive movements in Hydra regulated by the diffuse nerve net in the body column. J Comp Physiol. 2004;190: 623–630. doi: 10.1007/s00359-004-0518-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Shimizu H, Okabe M. Evolutionary origin of autonomic regulation of physiological activities in vertebrate phyla. J Comp Physiol. 2007;193: 1013–1019. doi: 10.1007/s00359-007-0256-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Harmata KL, Parrin AP, Morrison PR, McConnell KK, Bross LS, Blackstone NW. Quantitative measures of gastrovascular flow in octocorals and hydroids: toward a comparative biology of transport systems in cnidarians. Invertebr Biol. 2013;132: 291–304. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Avian M, Mancini L, Voltolini M, Bonnet D, Dreossi D, Macaluso V, et al. A novel endocast technique providing a 3D quantitative analysis of the gastrovascular system in Rhizostoma pulmo: An unexpected through-gut in cnidaria. PLoS ONE. 2022;17: e0272023. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Faubel A. The Polycladida, Turbellaria. Proposal and establishment of a new system. Part I. The Acotylea. Mitt hamb zool Mus Inst. 1983; 81:189–259. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Brusca RC, Moore W, Shuster SM. Invertebrates. Sinauer Associates Incorporated. Third edition. UK. 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Koopowitz H. Feeding behaviour and the role of the brain in the polyclad flatworm, Planocera gilchristi. Anim Behav. 1970;18: 31–35. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Jennings JB. Studies on feeding, digestion, and food storage in free-living flatworms (Platyhelminthes: Turbellaria). Biol Bull. 1957;112: 63–80. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Tsuyuki A, Oya Y, Jimi N, Kajihara H. Description of Pericelis flavomarginata sp. nov. (Polycladida: Cotylea) and its predatory behavior on a scaleworm. Zootaxa. 2020; 4894(3): 403–412. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.4894.3.6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Newman LJ, Cannon LRG. Marine Flatworms: the world of polyclad flatworms. CSIRO Publishing, Collinwood, Australia. 2003. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ritson-Williams R, Yotsu-Yamashita M, Paul VJ. Ecological functions of tetrodotoxin in a deadly polyclad flatworm. PANS. 2006;103(9): 3176–3179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Schmarda LK. 1859. Neue wirbellose Thiere beobachtet und gesammelt auf einer Reise urn die Erde 1853 bis 1857. Bd 1: Turbellarien, Rotatorien und Anneliden. 1 Halite: 66 pp. W. Engelmann, Leipzig. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hyman LH. The polyclad flatworms of the Pacific coast of North America. Bull Am Mus Nat Hist. 1953;100: 265–392. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Soutullo P, Cuadrado D, Norena C. First study of the Polycladida (Rhabditophora, Platyhelminthes) from the Pacific Coast of Costa Rica. Zootaxa. 2021;4964: 363–381. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.4964.2.7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kato K. Polyclads from Formosa. Bull Biogeogr Soc Jap. 1943;13: 69–77. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Jie WB, Kuo SC. Flamboyant dancers: Taiwan polyclad flatworms. National Museum of Marine Biology and Aquarium. (in Chinese) 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Wells CD, Sebens KP. Individual marking of soft-bodied subtidal invertebrates in situ–A novel staining technique applied to the giant plumose anemone Metridium farcimen (Tilesius, 1809). PLoS ONE. 2017;12: e0188263. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188263 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Teng CJ, Su YJ, Yeh CY, Jie WB. Predation of Oysters Using an Autonomic Pharynx in the Oyster Leech Cryptostylochus sp. (Polycladida: Stylochidae). Zool Stud. 2022;61. doi: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Harris CR, Millman KJ, van der Walt SJ, Gommers R, Virtanen P, Cournapeau D et al. Array programming with NumPy. Nature. 2020;585:357–362. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Bradski G. The openCV library. Dr. Dobb’s Journal: Software Tools for the Professional Programmer. 2000;25: 120–123. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Otsu N. A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. IEEE transactions on systems, man, and cybernetics. 1979;9(1): 62–66. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hunter JD. Matplotlib: A 2D graphics environment. Comput Sci Eng. 2007;9: 90–95. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.McKinney W. Data structures for statistical computing in python. In Proceedings of the 9th Python in Science Conference. 2010; 445: 51–56. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Jie WB, Kuo SC, Wu SC, Lee KS. Unreported predatory behavior on crustaceans by Ilyella gigas (Schmarda, 1859) (Polycladida: Ilyplanidae), a newly-recorded flatworm from Taiwan. Platax. 2013;10:57–71. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Jie WB. Taxonomy and Phylogeny of Polyclad Flatworms (Platyhelminthes) of Taiwan. Ph.D. Dissertation, National Sun Yat-sen University. 2017. Available from: https://hdl.handle.net/11296/888sj3.
  • 28.Gammoudi M, Ben Ahmed R, Bouriga N, Ben‐Attia M, Harrath AH. Predation by the polyclad flatworm Imogine mediterranea on the cultivated mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis in Bizerta Lagoon (northern Tunisia). Aquac Res. 2017;48: 1608–1617. doi: 10.1111/are.12995 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Koopowitz H, Keenan L. The primitive brains of platyhelminthes. Trends in Neurosciences. 1982;5: 77–79. doi: 10.1016/0166-2236(82)90035-2  [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Marfenin NN, Dementyev VS. Integral effect of interaction of parts of a noncentralized biosystem by the example of magistral hydroplasma flow formation in the shoots of colonial hydroid Dynamena pumila (L., 1758). Biol Bull Rev. 2024;14(3): 344–359. doi: 10.1134/S207908642403006X [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Petr Heneberg

20 Sep 2024

PONE-D-24-33814Sequentially bidirectional gastrovascular flows in intricately branched digestive tract of Planocerid flatwormsPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Jie,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Nov 04 2024 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Petr Heneberg

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements: When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements. 1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf 2. PLOS requires an ORCID iD for the corresponding author in Editorial Manager on papers submitted after December 6th, 2016. Please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field. This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager. 3. Please include your full ethics statement in the ‘Methods’ section of your manuscript file. In your statement, please include the full name of the IRB or ethics committee who approved or waived your study, as well as whether or not you obtained informed written or verbal consent. If consent was waived for your study, please include this information in your statement as well.

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Partly

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: N/A

Reviewer #2: N/A

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: A deceptively simple study that elucidates the in vivo functioning of the flatworm digestive tract. The authors develop a method that allows visualizing the gastrovascular system and examine the behavior of this system after feeding. The observed sequentially bidirectional flow is consistent with muscular action. (It might be worth mentioning in the introduction that simultaneously bidirectional flow suggests ciliary action, while sequentially bidirectional flow indicates muscular action.) Several comments and questions follow:

Line 92 - : What camera was used to capture images?

Line 192: Feeding apparently stimulates activity of the gastrovascular system. Hydroids behave similarly (see Dudgeon et al., 1999, Biol Bull 196, 1).

Line 292: Author contributions section is blank.

Reviewer #2: Review of manuscript #PONE-D-24-33814,

“Sequentially bidirectional gastrovascular flows in intricately branched digestive tract of Planocerid flatworms,” submitted by the authors for publication in PLOS ONE

The manuscript, in my opinion, must definitely be published, but first it needs to be substantially revised, correcting some omissions.

The manuscript submitted for publication in PLOS ONE describes the transport of food particles through the branched digestive system of one species of flatworms of the order Polycladida. Any data on the functioning of closed (not through) digestive systems are of great interest. The movement of food through a digestive tract that ends in a blind ends, rather than an anus, would theoretically seem impossible or at least difficult. Nevertheless, among invertebrates there are examples of successful solutions to this problem in nature. Some of these examples allow us to study non-centralized self-organization, when parts of the system are quite independent, and their interaction is equifinal in outcome.

Therefore, the research topic is promising, although the number of publications in this area is rare. It seems that the authors are not aware of some publications in which a similar phenomenon is described in colonial hydroids, whose digestive system is also quite extensive, and the movement of food particles is alternately bidirectional. A list of some publications is given below.

The authors have developed a suitable method for studying the functioning of the digestive system in a translucent, thin flatworm, and the results they obtained are impressive.

There are several questions regarding the contents of the manuscript.

The authors do not provide sufficient evidence to interpret the observed pulsations of the digestive tract segments as peristalsis. It is important to remember that a similar effect of transportation in other invertebrates with a pulsating digestive tract is achieved without peristalsis (see the recommended publications at the end of the review).

The description of food movement through the digestive tract is very superficial: without clarifications and quantitative indicators. The authors of the manuscript do not provide answers to the usual questions:

What is the speed of food movement from the pharynx to the distal parts of the digestive system?

How evenly and simultaneously does food move in different branches of the digestive system?

How equal in speed are the food supplies to the head and tail ends of the animal's body?

How do different branches of the digestive system relate to each other in terms of the speed of food movement?

The manuscript does not clearly indicate the samples. Or rather, there is no mention of samples at all.

The basis for the assumption about the leading role of the nervous system in regulating peristalsis in many branches (spurs) of the digestive system is not entirely clear. Thus, in the Discussion section (lines 252–255) it is written: “If diffuse nerve net regulation is indeed required for feeding, then it can be inferred that contractions of the intestinal tract during ingestion may also be regulated by the nervous system.

A brain and nervous system with this degree of complexity should have the capacity to coordinate rhythmic contractions in the digestive tract more effectively than hydrozoans».

And further (lines 255-256): "A brain and nervous system with this degree of complexity should have the capacity to coordinate rhythmic contractions in the digestive tract more effectively than hydrozoans". This statement does not take into account the possibility of coordinating local peristaltic activity without the participation of the nervous system, but only on the basis of hydraulic relationships between different parts of the digestive tract, especially since this has already been described in sufficient detail in hydroids. I believe that the authors should at least mention an alternative solution to the problem of transporting particles in closed systems.

I was unable to find a video in the material proposed for review, although the main conclusions of the future article are based on the video.

Further some comments.

Line or Fig. Question/Comment Explanation

Data availability The authors believe that “... all data are fully available without restriction ”, however, the manuscript lacks the primary data from which the authors arrived at the conclusions of the study.

There is no video, no choice with options for staining the subject after feeding, and no choice of digital data from which the graphs are plotted (Figures 6 and 7)

14 The reviewer did not find a video from which the authors drew important conclusions. How to check the objectivity of the authors if the material on which they base their conclusions is not presented?

96 - 118 There is no information on samples in the study of food particle transportation and in the study of histological preparations.

On the basis of what number of study objects (specimens of the species) are the results of the study derived? If only one specimen with the most pronounced process of food transport was used for the study, then this should be written about in the manuscript. In such a case, it is better for the researcher to use an Idiographic Approach (Marfenin, & Dementyev. 2022. Influence of Food Consumption...)

If conclusions are drawn from the study of several or many samples, the degree of variation in the process being studied should be clearly described in terms of the of peristalsis, regularity of contractions, amplitude of pulsation, etc..

116 What is the error of Matplotlib and Pandas methods ? Has the method been calibrated, i.e., verified its accuracy on images specially created by the authors for known volumes in advance ? Without specifying the error, any method, especially for pattern recognition, is questionable.

169 The authors should clarify the criteria on the basis of which they consider the pulsations they describe to be peristalsis.

How do the authors explain the difference in periods of retraction during pulsations of the digestive tract between inward flows and outward flows ? ( see Fig . 7)

361 Why does the caption to the picture #1 say specimens and not specimen ? How many samples did you study in total? The manuscript nowhere states the number of samples used in the study.

The manuscript does not end with clear conclusions, i.e. proven statements. For this article, conclusions section would be very relevant.

375 The figure caption does not explain the numerical designations. It is not clear whether these designations refer to a segment of the digestive tract with several sections or only to an individual section of the segment.

Fig. 5 Figure 5 is not sufficient to prove or even illustrate peristalsis. The same effect of pulsations of the digestive tract can occur without peristalsis, as, for example, in colonial hydroids.

Fig. 6 Is it correct to call the “Y” axis “Tract volume” when in fact it is “% of the colored part of the digestive trust” ?

Fig. 7 The caption to Figure 7 clearly lacks information: there is no explanation of the symbols: circles, squares, triangles, Could it be variation in sampling? Then it seems to be the only indication of sampling in the manuscript.

Suggested publications on the topic of the manuscript for comparison of two possible mechanisms of food transport in a closed digestive system:

Marfenin, N.N., Dementyev, V.S. Integral Effect of Interaction of Parts of a Noncentralized Biosystem by the Example of Magistral Hydroplasma Flow Formation in the Shoots of Colonial Hydroid Dynamena pumila (L., 1758). Biol Bull Rev 14, 344–359 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1134/S207908642403006X

Dementyev, V.S., Marfenin, N.N. Express Transport of Particles in the Stolon of the Colonial Hydroid Dynamena pumila (L., 1758). Biol Bull Rev 13, 9–19 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079086423010024

Marfenin, N.N., Dementyev, V.S. Influence of Food Consumption on the Functioning of the Pulsator-Reversible Transport System in Hydroids—An Idiographic Approach. Biol Bull Rev 12, 483–503 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1134/S207908642205005X

Dementyev, V.S., Marfenin, N.N. Efficiency of the Transport System of the Hydroid Dynamena pumila (L., 1758) under Different Abiotic Impacts. Biol Bull Rev 12, 266–278 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079086422030021

Marfenin, N.N., Dementyev, V.S. Paradox of Extended Flows in Dynamena pumila (Linnaeus, 1758) Colonial Hydroid. Biol Bull Rev 8, 212–226 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079086418030088

Marfenin, N.N., 2016. Decentralized Organism Exemplified with Colonial Hydroid Species. Biosphere 8, 315–337 (2016). http://dx.doi.org/10.24855/biosfera.v8i3.264 second link: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331716150_DECENTRALIZED_ORGANISM_EXEMPLIFIED_WITH_COLONIAL_HYDROID_SPECIES_NN_Marfenin

I believe that after the manuscript has been revised, it can be recommended for publication.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2024 Dec 19;19(12):e0315838. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315838.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


13 Nov 2024

We are very appreciative of the reminder offered by reviewers. We have read through those references and carefully discussed them. A lot of revisions are based on whose perspective aside just from polyclads'. Thanks.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Responses.docx

pone.0315838.s006.docx (19.5KB, docx)

Decision Letter 1

Petr Heneberg

3 Dec 2024

Sequentially bidirectional gastrovascular flows in intricately branched digestive tract of planocerid flatworms

PONE-D-24-33814R1

Dear Dr. Jie,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice will be generated when your article is formally accepted. Please note, if your institution has a publishing partnership with PLOS and your article meets the relevant criteria, all or part of your publication costs will be covered. Please make sure your user information is up-to-date by logging into Editorial Manager at Editorial Manager® and clicking the ‘Update My Information' link at the top of the page. If you have any questions relating to publication charges, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Petr Heneberg

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: N/A

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: As I pointed out in my previous review this is a deceptively simple study that elucidates the in vivo functioning of the flatworm digestive tract. The authors develop a method that allows visualizing the gastrovascular system and examine the behavior of this system after feeding. The observed sequentially bidirectional flow is consistent with muscular action, and muscular valves are identified. I find the revisions suitable and have no further concerns except the following very small ones:

Line 60: “Planocerid”: This is not a formal taxonomic name. So, it should not be capitalized or italicized.

Lines 278-281: “Since the flatworms still exist on all levels of blind sacs distributed between its lowermost and highmost branches, the cause of peristaltic movement of flatworms may also bear the possibility of coordinating hydraulic relationships between different parts of the digestive tract.”: The writing of this sentence is confusing. Minimally, it seems that it should be “highermost.”

Reviewer #2: The authors have taken into account a significant part of the comments. At present, the manuscript more closely meets the requirements for the publication of scientific articles and may be preferable for printing.

It is a pity that the authors did not provide a table with responses to the reviewer's comments. This is not typical when correcting a manuscript and partially complicates the reviewer's work and increases the likelihood of misunderstanding each other.

The absence of conclusions to the article obviously reduces its significance. Conclusions do not repeat the abstract or summary, but present the results in a more rigorous form.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

Acceptance letter

Petr Heneberg

9 Dec 2024

PONE-D-24-33814R1

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Jie,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

If revisions are needed, the production department will contact you directly to resolve them. If no revisions are needed, you will receive an email when the publication date has been set. At this time, we do not offer pre-publication proofs to authors during production of the accepted work. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few weeks to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Petr Heneberg

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Video. Continuous video recording of Paraplanocera oligoglena after feeding with methylene blue dyed baits.

    (MP4)

    Download video file (18.7MB, mp4)
    S2 Video. Time-lapse video converted from 120 seconds of continuous taping of the Paraplanocera oligoglena into 60 seconds clips after feeding with methylene blue dyed baits.

    (MP4)

    Download video file (18.7MB, mp4)
    S1 Table. The data set of post-staining video tracking of dyed food passing through consecutive branches n, n+1, n+2, and n+3.

    The acquired time of the events from the start (0.3 second) to the end (85.1 second).

    (DOC)

    pone.0315838.s003.doc (160KB, doc)
    S2 Table. The data set of contraction periods in consecutive order of the tract branches, n, n+1, and n+2 during the inward and outward flows.

    (DOCX)

    pone.0315838.s004.docx (8.1KB, docx)
    S3 Table. The data set of variations in tract volume on the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd days.

    (DOCX)

    pone.0315838.s005.docx (21.4KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Responses.docx

    pone.0315838.s006.docx (19.5KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES