Abstract
Treatment for malignant primary brain tumors, including glioblastoma, remains a significant challenge despite advances in therapy. CAR-T cell immunotherapy represents a promising alternative to conventional treatments. This review discusses the landscape of clinical trials for CAR-T cell therapy targeting brain tumors, highlighting key advancements like novel target antigens and combinatorial strategies designed to address tumor heterogeneity and immunosuppression, with the goal of improving outcomes for patients with these aggressive cancers.
Subject terms: Cancer immunotherapy, CNS cancer
Introduction
Gliomas comprise a diverse group of brain tumors that arise from glial cells and span a wide range of grades, from less aggressive forms to highly malignant tumors such as glioblastoma (GBM). GBM accounts for more than half of all malignant central nervous system (CNS) tumors, with a five-year survival rate of less than 10%1. The current standard-of-care for GBM consists of surgical resection followed by radiation and temozolomide chemotherapy. When these tumors invariably recur, even fewer options are available for treatment; although anti-angiogenic agents such as bevacizumab are often used, they have not been shown to improve overall survival compared to best supportive care. Depending on their location, gliomas can also drastically impair or disrupt vital functions. In children, these tumors can develop in midline structures like the brainstem (e.g., diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas or DIPG), and due to their anatomic location, they are often unresectable and associated with significant morbidity.
Immune-based strategies, particularly the use of adoptive T-cell therapy with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells, have rapidly emerged as a promising approach to treating brain tumors. This is due to their theoretical capacity to specifically target cancer cells while bypassing the need for endogenous tumor-specific T-cell responses, which are often absent or impaired in the context of glioma. CAR-T cells are T cells engineered to express molecules that allow them to identify and eliminate cells expressing specific surface targets of interest. Since their first approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 2017, several CAR-T cell products have been successfully implemented for various hematologic cancers (Table 1). However, translating these therapies for solid tumors has been limited. The challenges to effective CAR-T cell therapy for solid tumors are under active investigation and include the identification of ideal target antigens and antigenic heterogeneity, subsequent tumor antigen escape, T-cell trafficking to and within solid tumors, and the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME)2,3.
Table 1.
FDA Approved CAR-T cell therapy
| Name | Target antigen | FDA approval | Year |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kymriah® (tisagenlecleucel) | CD19 | Relapsed or refractory B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) | 2017 |
| Relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) after ≥2 lines of systemic therapy | 2018 | ||
| Relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma (FL) after ≥2 lines of systemic therapy | 2022 | ||
| Yescarta® (axicabtagene ciloleucel) | CD19 | Relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) after ≥2 lines of systemic therapy | 2017 |
| Relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma (FL) after ≥2 lines of systemic therapy | 2021 | ||
| Large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) refractory to first-line chemoimmunotherapy or relapses < 12 months of first-line chemoimmunotherapy | 2022 | ||
| Tecartus® (brexucabtagene autoleucal) | CD19 | Relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) | 2020 |
| Relapsed or refractory B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) | 2021 | ||
| Breyanzi® (lisocabtagene maraleucel) | CD19 | Relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) after ≥2 lines of systemic therapy | 2021 |
| Large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) refractory to first-line chemoimmunotherapy or relapses < 12 months of first-line chemoimmunotherapy and not eligible for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) | 2022 | ||
| Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) or small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) after ≥2 lines of systemic therapy | 2024 | ||
| Abecma® (idecabtagene vicleucel) | BCMA | Relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma after ≥4 prior lines of therapy (2021) | 2021 |
| Carvykti® (ciltacabtagene autoleucel) | BCMA | Relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma after ≥4 prior lines of therapy (2022) | 2022 |
In this review, we provide an overview of the current landscape of clinical trials and the development of novel strategies aimed at optimizing CAR-T cell therapy for brain tumors. This discussion highlights key advancements, such as the identification and characterization of novel target antigens and innovative combinatorial approaches designed to enhance efficacy in the context of tumor heterogeneity and associated immunosuppression.
Adoptive T-cell therapy for solid tumors
To bypass the need for endogenous T-cell priming, adoptive cell strategies can be employed to produce large numbers of tumor-specific T-cells for therapeutic purposes. One approach is the use of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), which entails the isolation and expansion of a subgroup of intratumoral lymphocytes followed by reinfusion. Promising results have been reported with TIL therapy in solid tumors, including those for cervical carcinoma4,5, colorectal cancer6, cholangiocarcinoma7, non-small cell lung cancer8, breast cancer9, and nasopharyngeal cancer10. However, TILs in glioma are often limited in quantity, dysfunctional, or difficult to isolate due to structural characteristics.
As a result, the adoptive transfer of T cells engineered to express transgenic T cell receptors (TCRs) has been developed as a potential method for artificially generating tumor-specific T cells. TCR-T cells have demonstrated efficacy in treating melanoma11–13 and metastatic colorectal cancer14. However, several cancers, such as GBM, downregulate the expression of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I and II molecules as a mechanism of immune cell escape15,16, thereby impeding the efficacy of strategies that rely on the presentation of antigens in the context of MHC.
Unlike endogenous TILs or transgenic TCRs, CAR-T cells can be activated through interaction with specific targets independently of antigen presentation by MHC17,18. The use of CAR-T cell therapy targeting solid tumors outside of the CNS has shown promising results in clinical studies. For example, Claudin18.2-redirected CAR-T cells have been utilized in the setting of digestive system cancers, wherein the overall response rate was 48.6%, and the 6-month overall survival rate was 81.2%, as reported in phase 1 interim results (NCT03874897)19. In addition, GD2-CART01, a third-generation gene-edited autologous CAR-T cell therapy targeting GD2 in patients with high-risk neuroblastoma, was tested in 27 patients, 17 of whom achieved at least a partial response, resulting in an overall response rate of 63%. Patients receiving the recommended phase 2 dose of GD2-CART01 had a 3-year overall survival rate of 60% and a 3-year event-free survival rate of 36%20.
CAR-T cell structure and function
CAR molecules consist of an antigen-binding domain and intracellular activation domains derived from T-cell signaling components (Fig. 1). The ectodomain typically comprises an extracellular single-chain antibody fragment (scFv), which, in some cases, has been optimized for binding affinity or to minimize nonspecific toxicity against non-tumor tissues. This process is also streamlined by carefully selecting tumor-specific targets.
Fig. 1. Structure of CAR-T cell.
The CAR structure includes antigen-binding domains, hinges, transmembrane domains, and signaling domains. This structural framework collectively influences the specificity, activation, and function of CAR-T cells. MHC major histocompatibility complex, TCR T cell receptors.
The hinge region within CAR molecules serves as a bridge between the antigen-recognition domain and T-cell membrane, providing a degree of flexibility to accommodate spatial and steric constraints. This region also regulates the intermembrane space between a T cell and target cancer cells21. Tailoring the hinge region has been shown to be relevant for several CAR-T cells targeting both solid and hematologic cancers21–27. In addition to altering the size of the hinge region, biochemical aspects of this domain (e.g., dimerization capacity, FcγR interactions) can also heavily influence T-cell activation, proliferation, and anti-tumor efficacy28.
The transmembrane domain assists in positioning the CAR molecule on the T-cell surface and facilitates the connection between the extracellular and intracellular domains, enabling the intracellular transmission of ligand recognition via the signaling endodomain. First-generation CARs employed an intracellular domain derived from CD3ζ; however, this approach was limited by poor long-term T-cell activity and function29. Over time numerous modifications have been made to the original CAR structure, with the most substantial changes occurring in the choice or combination of signaling endodomains, giving rise to the so-called “second- and third-generation” CARs. Although various co-stimulatory signals have been tested30–33, CD28 and 4-1BB remain the most commonly utilized endodomains in clinical trials to date.
Challenges in glioma immunotherapy
Tumor heterogeneity
One of the primary challenges in CAR-T cell therapy for glioma is the relative dearth of surface target antigens that are frequently and specifically expressed. Moreover, gliomas exhibit significant cellular and molecular heterogeneity, which can lead to partial or complete loss of antigen expression and, ultimately, tumor recurrence (Fig. 2). This has been observed after CD19 CAR-T cell therapy, where decreased CD19 expression and disease recurrence has been reported in 30–70% of patients34,35. Similar occurrences can also be noted, albeit less frequently, after treatment with BCMA CAR-T cells for multiple myeloma36–38. This mechanism of resistance has also been observed in the context of GBM, where recurrent tumors have displayed reduced cognate target antigen expression following treatment with either interleukin-13 receptor α chain variant 2 (IL-13Rα2) or epidermal growth factor receptor variant III (EGFRvIII) CAR-T cell therapy39,40.
Fig. 2. CAR-T cell therapies in brain tumors and their limitations.
a and b CAR-T cell therapy targeting brain tumors face multiple challenges, including tumor heterogeneity, antigen loss, immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, blood–brain barrier, limited trafficking, and CAR-T cell-associated cell toxicity. CNS cytokine release syndrome, ICANS immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome, TLS tumor lysis syndrome, TIAN tumor inflammation-associated neurotoxicity.
Immunosuppressive microenvironment
The TME is a complex and dynamic space that surrounds and interacts with solid tumors, potentiating counterproductive cellular infiltrates consisting of regulatory T cells, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, and other populations that work together to actively impede anti-tumor immune responses41,42. The milieu also drives the production of tumor-signaling molecules, growth factors, cytokines, chemokines, and immunomodulatory factors such as transforming growth factor β (TGF-β), interleukin 10 (IL-10), indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO), macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF), and prostaglandin E-2 (PGE2)43–49 (Fig. 2). Tumor cells utilize critical immune checkpoint molecules and signaling axes, such as those mediated through programmed death ligand 1 (PD-1) or cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4), to enhance the inhibitory pathways of T cells, thereby further abrogating effective anti-tumor immune responses50. Finally, intratumoral hypoxia associated with the TME in gliomas may additionally drive tumor-associated impairment of immune cell function, particularly through increased expression of hypoxia-inducible factor 1-α (HIF1-α)51.
CNS immune privilege
Immunotherapies targeting intracerebral tumors face unique challenges related to the phenomenon of immune privilege in the CNS. The concept of limited immune surveillance in the CNS was first introduced by Sir Peter Medawar in 194752, and since then, investigators have further refined these observations, highlighting unique characteristics that are now generally associated with the CNS, including the presence of a specialized blood–brain barrier (BBB), the absence of conventional draining lymph nodes, and the dearth of professional antigen-presenting cells within the brain53–55.
The BBB plays a key role in protecting the brain from harmful toxins and chemicals, as well as fine-tuning brain homeostasis, given its unique ability to tightly regulate the movement of ionic substances and large molecules, as well as immune cells, into the CNS56–58. In addition to the BBB, another structure referred to as the blood–cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) barrier is formed by the choroid plexus epithelium and also plays a role in limiting communication between these respective anatomical compartments59. Evolving data suggest that the CNS, especially in the context of tumors, may not be as isolated from the immune system as once believed. In particular, immune cells are known to migrate to and throughout the brain relatively frequently despite the presence of the BBB60–65. When activated, T cells appear to readily cross the capillary tight junctions of the BBB66,67. How these mechanisms might be exploited to ultimately inform adoptive T-cell strategies is under active investigation.
CAR-T cell toxicity
Common toxicities observed after CAR-T cell therapy include cytokine release syndrome (CRS), immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), tumor lysis syndrome (TLS), and acute anaphylaxis68,69 (Fig. 2). CRS and ICANS are well-characterized phenomena in the treatment of hematological cancers and often occur in the absence of CNS tumor involvement. CRS is the most common type of toxicity after CAR-T cell therapy and is characterized by fever, hypotension, tachycardia, hypoxia, and, in severe cases, multiorgan dysfunction. It typically occurs within hours to days following CAR-T cell administration, although there have been reports of late onset70–73. The release of inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin-6 (IL-6), interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) contribute to its pathogenesis.
The second most common toxicity related to CAR-T cell administration is ICANS, which affects ~40% of CAR-T cell recipients74. ICANS involves a complex interplay of mechanisms, including blood-brain barrier disruption, microangiopathy, thrombotic microangiopathy, and amplification of the inflammatory response. The integrity of the BBB is compromised by cytokine-induced activation of brain endothelial cells, leading to increased permeability and neuroinflammation. Disruption of the BBB and subsequent cerebral edema through systemic CAR-T cell-induced cytokine release appear to be key features of ICANS73,75. Additionally, thrombotic microangiopathy and inflammatory response amplification contribute to the pathophysiology of ICANS. Clinical manifestations include confusion, delirium, aphasia, seizures, and, in severe cases, cerebral edema and elevation of intracranial pressure. These symptoms are mediated by elevated levels of cytokines such as IL-6 and IFN-γ, which induce neuroinflammation and endothelial damage.
The mechanisms underlying CAR-T cell-associated neurotoxicity are not yet fully understood. However, in the CNS, upon infusion into patients, CAR-T cells encounter target cancer cells and subsequently release inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α and IFN-γ. These cytokines then activate monocytes and macrophages to secrete additional cytokines, including IL-1, IL-6, and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS). Elevated levels of IL-6 have been observed in patients experiencing CRS. Additionally, IL-1β, which is released earlier than other major cytokines, promotes IL-6 production and has been implicated in the pathogenesis of CRS and ICANS76,77.
In the setting of tumors in the CNS, a potential emerging syndrome of neurotoxicity has been reported, which is thought to be related to localized tumor-associated inflammation (i.e., tumor inflammation-associated neurotoxicity or TIAN). The manifestations of TIAN tend to depend on the neuroanatomical location of the tumor and its proximity to eloquent regions of the brain78. Two subtypes of TIAN have been proposed78; Type 1 TIAN consists of inflammation-induced mechanical aspects of neurotoxicity, which may manifest as symptoms such as headache, focal neurological deficits, or changes in consciousness. Type 2 TIAN is characterized by inflammation-induced electrophysiological changes, potentially resulting in symptoms such as seizures, confusion, or altered mental status. These two subtypes can occur simultaneously within days to weeks of receiving therapy and may not be mutually exclusive, with symptoms often consistent with concurrent cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and elevated inflammatory markers. However, clinical and radiographic markers of TIAN may be subtle, vary from patient to patient, and may evolve rapidly, underscoring the need for additional investigation and characterization.
CAR-T cells for glioma: clinical studies
CAR-T cell therapy for brain tumors represents a promising and rapidly growing area of research; however, successful translation remains a challenge due to the aforementioned low mutational burden associated with brain tumors and the relative dearth of feasible tumor-specific target antigens3,79. Ongoing clinical trials exploring potential antigens for glioma include those targeting B7-H3, EGFRvIII, CD70, chlorotoxin, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), IL-13Rα2, interleukin-7Rα (IL-7Rα), GD2, MMP-2, and NKG2D. Here, we provide a brief review of these antigens that are currently in clinical trials and have been published (“Published Clinical Trials”), as well as those that are in clinical trials but have not yet been published (“Unpublished Clinical Trials”) for CAR-T cells in glioma (Table 2 and Supplementary Table 1).
Table 2.
Published clinical trials using CAR-T cell therapies for Glioma
| Target antigen | ID | Phase | # Patient | Title | Generation | Results | Sponsor | Route | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B7-H3 | NCT04185038 | I | 3 | Study of B7-H3-specific CAR T cell locoregional immunotherapy for diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma/diffuse midline glioma and recurrent or refractory pediatric central nervous system tumors | 2 (BBζ) |
* 3 patients with DIPG * One patient had sustained clinical and radiographic improvement through 12 months of study |
Seattle Children’s Hospital, WA, USA | ICT | 84 |
| EGFRvIII | NCT01454596 | I, II | 18 | CAR T cell receptor immunotherapy targeting EGFRvIII for patients with malignant gliomas expressing EGFRvIII | 3(28BBζ) |
2 PR Median OS: 6.9 months Median PFS: 1.3 months |
National Cancer Institute, MD, USA | IV | 173 |
| NCT02209376 | I | 10 | Increased expression of inhibitory molecules and loss of EGFRvIII expression following therapy; Patients with residual or reccurent EGFRvIII+ glioma | 2 (BBζ) |
5 SD Median OS: 251 days |
University of Pennsylvania, PA, USA | IV | 40 | |
| NCT03726515 | I | 7 | CART-EGFRvIII + pembrolizumab in GBM | 2 (BBζ) |
Median OS: 11.8 months Median PFS: 5.2 months |
University of Pennsylvania, PA, USA | IV | 95 | |
| NCT05660369 | I | 3 | CARv3-TEAM-E T cells in glioblastoma | 2 (BBζ) | 2 PR | Massachusetts General Hospital, MA, USA | ICV | 96 | |
| EphA2 | NCT03423992 | I | 3 | Personalized chimeric antigen receptor T cell immunotherapy for patients with recurrent malignant gliomas | 3(8BBζ) |
1 SD & 2 PD OS: 86–181 days |
Fuda Cancer Hospital, Guangdong, China | IV | 100 |
| GD2 | NCT03170141 | I | 8 | Immunogene-modified T (IgT) cells against glioblastoma multiforme | 4 (28BBζ & inducible suicide caspase 9 gene) |
5 PR & SD Median OS: 10 months |
Shenzhen Geno-Immune Medical Institute, Guangdong, China | IV or ICT | 108 |
| HER2 | NCT01109095 | I | 17 | CMV-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes expressing CAR targeting HER2 in patients with GBM | 3(28BBζ) |
1 PR & 7 SD Median OS: 11.1 months Median PFS: 2.5 months |
Baylor College of Medicine, TX, USA | IV | 110 |
| NCT03500991 | I | 3 | HER2-specific CAR T cell locoregional immunotherapy for HER2-positive recurrent/refractory pediatric CNS tumors | 2 (BBζ) | no dose-limiting toxicity | Seattle Children’s Hospital, WA, USA | ICT | 112 | |
| IL-13Rα2 | NCT00730613 | I | 3 | Cellular adoptive immunotherapy using genetically modified T-lymphocytes in treating patients with recurrent or refractory high-grade malignant glioma | 1 (ζ) |
1 PR Median OS: 10.3 months |
City of Hope Medical Center, CA, USA | ICT | 114 |
| NCT01082926 | I | 6 | Phase I study of cellular immunotherapy for recurrent/ refractory malignant glioma using intratumoral infusions of GRm13Z40-2, an allogeneic CD8+ cytolitic T-cell line genetically modified to express the IL 13-zetakine and HyTK and to be resistant to glucocorticoids, in combination with Interleukin-2 | N/A | Median OS: 2.9 months | City of Hope Medical Center, CA, USA | ICT | 174 | |
| NCT02208362 | I | 1 | Genetically modified T-cells in treating patients with recurrent or refractory malignant glioma | 2 (BBζ) |
1 CR Median OS: 7.5 months |
City of Hope Medical Center, CA, USA | ICT or ICV | 39 | |
| I | 65 | Genetically modified T-cells in treating patients with recurrent or refractory malignant glioma | 2 (BBζ) |
29 SD & 2 PR Median OS: 8 months |
City of Hope Medical Center, CA, USA | ICT or ICV | 115 | ||
| IL-13Rα2 & EGFR | NCT05168423 | I | 6 | CART-EGFR-IL13Ra2 in EGFR amplified recurrent GBM | N/A |
Tumor shrinkage >30% 3 SD |
University of Pennsylvania, PA, USA | ICT | 175 |
Information obtained from ClinicalTrials.gov using keywords “CAR-T” AND “Glioblastoma” or “Glioma”, accessed on 1 October 2024. The antigens are arranged alphabetically.
ICT intratumoral/intracavitary, ICV intracerebroventricular, IV intravenous, CR complete response, PR partial response, SD stable disease, PD progressive disease
Published clinical trials
B7-H3
B7 homolog 3 protein (B7-H3; also known as CD276) is a member of the B7 family of molecules, consisting of type I transmembrane immune checkpoint proteins encoded by human chromosome 1580,81. B7-H3 is significantly overexpressed in gliomas compared to normal brain tissue. It is also found in several primary GBM cells isolated from clinical samples and associated cell lines80,82. Several CARs have been designed to target B7-H3 and these have shown promising results in preclinical studies80,83. B7-H3 CAR-T cells are currently being studied in patients with malignant glioma, including two clinical trials specifically for DIPG (Supplementary Table 1).
In a recent Phase I trial with B7-H3 CAR-T cells, three children with recurrent/refractory CNS tumors and DIPG were administered with repeated locoregional B7-H3 CAR-T cells84. No dose-limiting toxic effects were reported after 40 infusions in the first three DIPG patients. The patients showed evidence of a correlation between B7-H3 CAR T cells and local immune activation, as well as the persistence of CAR T cells in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) (NCT04185038).
EGFRvIII
EGFRvIII is a tumor-specific variant of EGFR present in approximately 30% of newly diagnosed GBM cases, making it the second most frequent EGFR variant in these tumors after wild-type EGFR amplification. Because EGFRvIII is specifically expressed in GBM and not expressed in any healthy tissues85, this antigen has been extensively studied as a possible target for antibody-redirected T cell therapy, among other immunotherapeutic strategies55,86–94.
A first-in-human study with intravenous delivery of EGFRvIII-specific CAR-T cells was conducted on 10 recurrent GBM patients. The CAR-T cells showed active localization to tumors in the brain, where they mediated on-target effects40 (NCT02209376). A follow-up trial investigated a combination of EGFRvIII CAR-T cell therapy with pembrolizumab on patients with recurrent glioblastoma. This approach was also shown to be safe without dose-limiting toxicity95, but it did not demonstrate clinical efficacy, which may be partly due to the limitations of targeting a single antigen in a heterogeneous disease (NCT03726515). To address this barrier to translation, EGFRvIII CAR-T cells have been engineered to secrete T-cell-engaging antibody molecules (TEAMs) against EGFR90. These TEAMs enhance the functionality of CAR-T cells by promoting the engagement of endogenous T cells with tumor cells, thereby increasing the overall anti-tumor immune response. In a clinical trial with the use of EGFRvIII CAR-T-secreting TEAMs, three patients with recurrent glioblastoma received a single intraventricular infusion of the engineered CAR-T cells. The treatment led to dramatic and rapid radiographic tumor regression, although responses were transient in two participants. Adverse events were minimal, with no grade 3 or dose-limiting toxic effects reported (NCT05660369)96.
EphA2
The EphA2 receptor is a member of the Eph receptor family of tyrosine kinase receptors. This family consists of fifteen members, classified into classes A and B according to the degree of homology of their extracellular domains97. Typically, these domains include a globular NH2-terminal ligand-binding domain, followed by a cysteine-rich domain and two fibronectin type III repeats. EphA2 plays a critical role in modulating signal transduction pathways, including those that regulate migration, differentiation, and growth98. Approximately 90% of GBM tissues and cell lines overexpress EphA2, while relatively low levels are present in normal brain tissue99.
In a recent clinical trial involving three EphA2-postive recurrent GBM patients, EphA2-redirected CAR-T cells were administered intravenously100. Two patients experienced grade 2 cytokine release syndrome with pulmonary edema; otherwise, there were no other organ toxicities, including neurotoxicity. In one patient, a transient reduction in tumor size was observed. Among these three patients, one reported stable disease, while two exhibited progressive disease, with overall survival durations ranging from 86 to 181 days (NCT 03423992).
GD2
Gangliosides are molecules composed of glycosphingolipids coated with sugar chains that are widely expressed in normal tissues. However, the disialoganglioside GD2 is present in several tumor types, including GBM101,102, while its expression in normal tissue is primarily limited to the CNS and peripheral nerve tissues, accounting for less than 4% of all gangliosides103–105. In preclinical trials, GD2-targeting CAR-T cells have successfully demonstrated potent cytotoxicity against GBM and DIPG in both in vitro and murine models102,106,107. Several ongoing clinical trials are in Phase I, three of which are designed for DIPG.
In a recent clinical trial, eight patients with GD2-positive GBM received autologous fourth-generation GD2-specific CAR-T cells (4SCAR), which were designed with safety in mind and included CD28 transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains, the co-stimulatory 4-1BB intracellular TRAF binding domain, the CD3ζ chain intracellular domain, and an inducible suicide caspase-9 gene, allowing for controlled elimination of CAR-T cells if necessary. Among the eight patients, four experienced a partial response lasting between 3 and 24 months, three showed progressive disease with durations of 6–23 months, and one had stable disease for 4 months. The median overall survival was 10 months from the infusion. Importantly, there were no severe adverse events reported, including neurotoxicity or off-target effects. This approach has been associated with the loss of GD2 antigen and an activated immune response within the TME108 (NCT03170141).
HER2
HER2 is a receptor tyrosine kinase that is normally expressed at low levels in epidermal tissue but is overexpressed in a variety of cancers. In GBM, HER2 levels are upregulated in up to 80% of tumors109. One clinical trial studying a second-generation HER2 CAR-T cell therapy on patients with GBM showed that the approach was safe and did not result in dose-limiting toxicities110. However, targeting HER2 with CAR-T cells has also been reported to mediate fatal toxicity and multiorgan system failure in a patient with colon cancer metastatic to the lungs and liver111. The unique characteristics of CAR-T cell therapies, such as their design and targeting mechanisms, as well as the conditions surrounding cell infusion, may be critical contributing factors.
In a recent clinical trial, three young adults aged 19–26 who had gliomas were given repeated, localized doses of these HER2 CAR-T cells for four weeks112. Two patients were treated intrathecally, and one was treated intracerebroventricularly without first undergoing lymphocyte reduction. None of the patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity, except for headache, pain at the metastatic site, and neurologic impairment (NCT03500991).
IL-13Rα2
In the immune system, IL-13 typically works in conjunction with its homolog, IL-4, to regulate immune responses through shared receptors present in many normal tissues. Notably, the IL-13 receptor is associated with the IL-13Rα2 protein chain, which is highly expressed in 50–80% of GBMs113 but, unlike IL-4, is rarely detectable in normal tissues. To date, several IL-13Rα2-specific CARs have differed structurally from traditional CARs in that they co-opt the natural IL-13 ligand as the antigen-recognition domain instead of using an antibody-based fragment. Early clinical trials studying intracranial infusion of IL-13Rα2 CAR-T cells for recurrent GBM were safe114, with one patient demonstrating a remarkable response in the setting of multifocal glioblastoma, but only after serial intraventricular infusions. In this case, the disease had spread along the leptomeninges, which may have made the tumor tissue more susceptible to treatment39. Recently, Phase 1 trials involving locoregional delivery of IL-13Rα2 CAR-T cells for recurrent GBM patients were published115. In this clinical trial, 50% of participants achieved stable disease or better. Additionally, 22% of patients maintained confirmed stable disease or better for at least 90 days, with two patients exhibiting a partial response, although these responses were limited to IDH-mutant glioma. This trial indicates that a significant proportion of patients experienced either stable disease or an improvement in their disease status following treatment with IL-13Rα2-targeted CAR-T cells (NCT02208362). Furthermore, IL-13Rα2 CAR-T cells have also been engineered to simultaneously target EGFR through bicistronic constructs for six patients with multifocal, treatment-refractory GBM (NCT05168423). In this trial, half of the patients showed at least 30% tumor shrinkage and 75% of patients showed stable disease at least 2 months after CAR-T cell therapy95.
Unpublished clinical trials
CD44 and CD133
CD44 is a hyaluronan receptor expressed in both low-grade glioma and GBM116. CD133, a pentaspan membrane glycoprotein, has been used as a marker for cancer stem cells in GBM117. Co-expression of CD133 and CD44 has been linked to certain GBM subtypes and clinical outcomes, as revealed by gene expression profiles obtained from large patient datasets118. Clinical studies of CAR-T cells targeting both CD44 and CD133 are currently underway, in some cases with the introduction of a truncated IL-7 receptor α chain (IL-7Rα) within the intracellular signaling domain. IL-7 receptor regulates survival, proliferation, and differentiation of T cells119. In the GBM microenvironment, IL-7 signaling is reduced by methylation of IL7/IL7R genes, which in turn affects T cells function and survival120. A phase 1 clinical trial involving 10 patients with recurrent glioblastoma is currently underway (NCT05577091).
CD70
As a member of the tumor necrosis factor superfamily, CD70 mediates tumor progression and immune escape by recruiting immunosuppressive regulatory T cells and inducing T-cell exhaustion. CD70 exhibits aberrant, constitutive expression in a variety of cancers, including GBM121–123. Although CD70 expression in normal tissue is limited, it is present on the cell surface of mature dendritic cells (DCs) and antigen-activated T and B lymphocytes124. A phase 1 clinical trial with CD70 CAR-T cell therapy for recurrent GBM cases is underway (NCT05353530).
CD147
CD147 is a glycoprotein that is involved in tumor growth, invasion, and metastasis. It is known as an inducer of extracellular matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), which trigger the degradation of the extracellular matrix125. CD147 is overexpressed in various cancers, including gliomas, and is associated with tumor grade and prognosis126,127. A phase 1 clinical trial is currently investigating the use of CD147-targeted CAR-T cells to treat recurrent malignant glioma. However, CD147 is also expressed in several normal tissues, including those of the CNS, which may lead to off-target effects128,129. To minimize this on-target/off-tumor toxicity, CD147-CAR-T cells have been incorporated into the synNotch-inducible system, a synthetic receptor system that only activates CAR-T cells in the presence of a specific antigen, thereby improving targeting precision. This system has shown promising preclinical results130. Currently, a phase 1 clinical trial with CD147 CAR-T cells is underway (NCT04045847).
MMP-2
Matrix metalloproteinase 2 (MMP-2) is part of a family of proteolytic enzymes that degrade various components of the extracellular matrix. Overexpression of MMP-2 has been associated with intrinsic glial malignancies and has also been shown to play a role in metastasis formation131. Chlorotoxin (CLTX), a naturally occurring small peptide found in the venom of the deathstalker scorpion Leiurus quinquestriatus132, binds to MMP-2 expressed on the surface of glioma cells. This binding is rarely detectable in normal brain tissue, as well as many other normal human tissues, including skin, kidneys, and lungs133–136. Due to its binding specificity, CAR-T cells have been engineered to incorporate CLTX as an antigen recognition domain. Two phase 1 clinical trials studying CLTX-CAR-T in MMP-2 positive recurrent glioblastoma are currently underway (NCT04214392 and NCT05627323).
Muc1
Muc1 is a member of the transmembrane mucin family, consisting of highly glycosylated tandem repeats. The survival and prognosis of patients with lung, stomach, colorectal, and pancreatic cancer are associated with elevated expression of Muc1137–139. A specific glycosylation pattern on membrane proteins, including Muc1, has been shown to be a marker for tumorigenesis and metastasis140–143. The most prevalent glycosylation patterns include Tn (GalNAcα1-O-Ser/Thr) and sialyl-Tn (STn) (NeuAcα2-6-GalNAcα1-O-Ser/Thr) glycoforms144, which are present in many types of cancer, including GBM145–147. Glycosylation and elevated expression of Muc1 have been shown to form nanoscale physical barriers against immune cells, thereby reducing immune cell killing by CAR-T cells148. Tn-Muc1 targeting CAR-T cells have shown promise in the preclinical setting for Muc1-positive solid tumors149. One clinical trial with CAR-T cells targeting Muc1 is currently underway (NCT02617134).
NKG2D
NKG2D is a C-type lectin-like receptor in the NKG2 family, involved in the activation and regulation of natural killer (NK) cells. This receptor plays an essential role in NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity by binding to the homolog of the stress-inducible MHC class I chain-related protein A and B (MICA, MICB)150. NKG2D ligands are typically not expressed in normal cells but are upregulated in malignantly transformed or infected cells151. GBMs are known to express NKG2D ligands; however, immunosuppressive changes in the TME can lead to reduced expression, which may ultimately impair the effectiveness of NK cells or other therapeutic modalities targeting this receptor152. CAR-T cell approaches targeting NKG2D are currently being tested in patients with GBM and other solid tumors (NCT04270461, NCT04717999, NCT05131763)153.
PD-L1
Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) is a type 1 transmembrane protein that acts as a pro-tumorigenic factor in cancer cells and can modulate the induction of T cell-mediated immune tolerance. Interaction between PD-L1 and PD-1 on the surface of activated T cells leads to tumor immune escape and tumor growth154. PD-L1 is highly expressed in glioblastoma multiforme155 and other malignancies. While checkpoint therapy has emerged as a proven strategy for cancer immunotherapy, its effectiveness in brain tumors, including glioblastoma, has been limited156. In a phase III clinical trial for patients with recurrent GBM, there was no discernible improvement in survival benefit attributed to nivolumab156. Using the interaction between PD-L1 and PD-1, the extracellular domain of PD-1 is fused to the transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains of CD28 in CAR molecules. The CAR molecule containing the extracellular domain of PD-1 can recognize PD-L1-expressing tumor cells and transduce signals to activate T cells. With this structure, a clinical trial is ongoing for patients with recurrent GBM (NCT02937844).
Next-generation CAR-T cell targeting GBM
A variety of strategies have emerged to enhance the anti-tumor activity and durability of response in CAR-T cell treatment for GBM. These approaches build on lessons learned from early clinical experiences and pave the way for the next generation of cell therapies currently being investigated in the preclinical setting. These innovations can be grouped into three main categories: antigen receptor engineering, genome engineering, and payload delivery157 (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3. Engineering approaches for GBM.
Next-generation CAR-T cell therapies integrate antigen receptor engineering, genome engineering, and payload delivery. Antigen receptor engineering includes multiple CAR constructs (Dual CAR), tandem CARs with two different scFvs, universal CARs for versatile scFv switching, SynNotch CARs that detect target antigens and trigger T-cell signaling, and logic gate approaches. Payload engineering enables CAR-T cells to secrete enzymes, cytokines, and antibodies, such as T-cell engagers. In addition, CAR-T cells utilize CRISPR-Cas9-based gene editing to target negative regulators of T-cell function to optimize treatment outcomes.
Antigen receptor engineering for GBM
CAR-T cell therapies have historically targeted single antigens, but the antigenic heterogeneity of GBM presents a challenge for long-term efficacy. Recent studies have focused on engineering CAR constructs that target multiple antigens simultaneously to mitigate this issue. Specifically, several engineered CARs, including tandem, bispecific, and universal CARs, may offer enhanced fine-tuning for specific anti-tumor effects158–161. Tandem CARs targeting IL-13Rα2 and HER2 or EGFRvIII have demonstrated superior anti-tumor responses and reduced antigen escape compared to single-targeted therapies in preclinical glioblastoma models92,162. A phase 1 trial is currently testing a bicistronic CAR targeting both IL-13Rα2 and EGFR in GBM patients (NCT04661384).
Many target antigens expressed on the surface of tumor cells, especially brain tumors, are also expressed on healthy cells, thus limiting the potential for safe, tumor-specific treatment. To address this challenge, several synthetic biology strategies are being employed, often incorporating multiple antigen-specific Boolean logic gates163,164. The Synthetic Notch (SynNotch), an engineered receptor system that functions as a molecular switch to control gene expression in response to specific antigens, has been used to address the tumor heterogeneity, persistence, and specificity issues associated with glioblastoma165,166. In the context of CAR-T cell therapy, SynNotch receptors are used to trigger the expression of CAR molecules targeting solid tumor antigens in a Boolean AND-gate fashion when SynNotch recognizes its corresponding antigen166–168. This SynNotch CAR-T technology is currently being tested in patients with EGFRvIII-positive glioblastoma in a phase I clinical trial by inducing anti-IL-13Rα2 and EphA2 CAR molecules through the anti-EGFRvIII SynNotch receptor (NCT06186401).
Engineering CAR-T cells to overcome the brain tumor microenvironment
One of the main challenges in treating brain tumors is the immune-suppressive nature of the tumor microenvironment. Several approaches are being developed to enable the delivery of immune-modulating factors, such as cytokines, directly to the TME. For example, CAR-T cells engineered to secrete cytokines IL-12 and IL-18 have shown increased activation of surrounding immune cells, such as NK, NKT, and γδ T cells169. Similarly, CAR-T cells designed to secrete IL-15 have exhibited improved effector functions, elevated levels of the anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-2, decreased expression of PD-1, and superior tumor control and persistence in preclinical GBM models170.
Additionally, CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing techniques have been used to engineer CAR-T cells that resist TGF-β-mediated immunosuppression, a common feature of the GBM tumor microenvironment171. Also, CAR-T cells have been engineered to prevent the expression of immune checkpoint molecules such as PD-1, which are often upregulated in the TME of GBM and contribute to T cell exhaustion. By knocking out these checkpoint molecules, CAR-T cells can resist the suppressive signals in the TME, improving their persistence and anti-tumor efficacy172.
Concluding remarks
Advances in gene and protein engineering continue to drive the development of translationally relevant CAR-T cell therapies. As the field progresses, integrating innovative strategies and ongoing research efforts will lead to safer, more precise, and potent CAR-T cell therapies for brain tumors. This review highlights early clinical experience for CAR-T cell therapy in patients with brain malignancies. Efforts are underway to address the challenges impacting the efficacy of CAR-T cell therapy in this context, including tumor heterogeneity, the tumor microenvironment, the structural complexities of the brain that hinder immune cell infiltration, and the limited understanding of post-CAR-T therapy toxicities affecting the CNS. Strategies to overcome these obstacles include the development of engineered CAR constructs and the exploration of novel cancer-associated antigens. As our experience with these approaches expands, collaborative efforts across multiple disciplines, including engineering, immunology, and patient clinical care, will be critical to fully realizing the potential of CAR-T cell therapy for aggressive brain tumors where the need for effective treatments is great.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by Swim Across America (B.D.C.), The Jenny Fund (B.D.C.) and A Shot for Life (B.D.C.). S.P. is a Merck Fellow of the Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation (DRG-2529-24).
Author contributions
S.P. and B.D.C. searched for the relevant literature and wrote the manuscript. S.P., M.V.M., and B.D.C. reviewed and/or edited the manuscript before submission. All authors made a significant contribution to the discussion.
Competing interests
M.V.M. is an inventor on patents related to adoptive cell therapies held by Massachusetts General Hospital (some licensed to Promab) and the University of Pennsylvania (some licensed to Novartis). M.V.M. holds equity in 2SeventyBio, Century Therapeutics, Neximmune, Oncternal, and TCR2, and has served as a consultant for multiple companies involved in cell therapies. M.V.M. is a member of the Board of Directors of 2SeventyBio. B.D.C. is an inventor of patents and patent applications relating to T-cell engineering approaches.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41698-024-00753-0.
References
- 1.Stupp, R. et al. Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N. Engl. J. Med.352, 987–996 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Patel, A. P. et al. Single-cell RNA-seq highlights intratumoral heterogeneity in primary glioblastoma. Science344, 1396–1401 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Barish, M. E. et al. Spatial organization of heterogeneous immunotherapy target antigen expression in high-grade glioma. Neoplasia30, 100801 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Stevanović, S. et al. Complete regression of metastatic cervical cancer after treatment with human papillomavirus-targeted tumor-infiltrating T cells. J. Clin. Oncol.33, 1543–1550 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Stevanović, S. et al. A Phase II study of tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte therapy for human papillomavirus-associated epithelial cancers. Clin. Cancer Res.25, 1486–1493 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Tran, E. et al. T-cell transfer therapy targeting mutant KRAS in cancer. N. Engl. J. Med.375, 2255–2262 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Tran, E. et al. Cancer immunotherapy based on mutation-specific CD4+ T cells in a patient with epithelial cancer. Science344, 641–645 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Creelan, B. C. et al. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte treatment for anti-PD-1-resistant metastatic lung cancer: a phase 1 trial. Nat. Med.27, 1410–1418 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Zacharakis, N. et al. Immune recognition of somatic mutations leading to complete durable regression in metastatic breast cancer. Nat. Med.24, 724–730 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Comoli, P. et al. Cell therapy of stage IV nasopharyngeal carcinoma with autologous Epstein-Barr virus-targeted cytotoxic T lymphocytes. J. Clin. Oncol.23, 8942–8949 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Johnson, L. A. et al. Gene therapy with human and mouse T-cell receptors mediates cancer regression and targets normal tissues expressing cognate antigen. Blood114, 535–546 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Morgan, R. A. et al. Cancer regression in patients after transfer of genetically engineered lymphocytes. Science314, 126–129 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Robbins, P. F. et al. A pilot trial using lymphocytes genetically engineered with an NY-ESO-1-reactive T-cell receptor: long-term follow-up and correlates with response. Clin. Cancer Res.21, 1019–1027 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Parkhurst, M. R. et al. T cells targeting carcinoembryonic antigen can mediate regression of metastatic colorectal cancer but induce severe transient colitis. Mol. Ther.19, 620–626 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Zagzag, D. et al. Downregulation of major histocompatibility complex antigens in invading glioma cells: stealth invasion of the brain. Lab. Investig.85, 328–341 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Dhatchinamoorthy, K., Colbert, J. D. & Rock, K. L. Cancer immune evasion through loss of MHC Class I antigen presentation. Front. Immunol.12, 636568 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Eshhar, Z., Waks, T., Gross, G. & Schindler, D. G. Specific activation and targeting of cytotoxic lymphocytes through chimeric single chains consisting of antibody-binding domains and the gamma or zeta subunits of the immunoglobulin and T-cell receptors. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA90, 720–724 (1993). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Maher, J., Brentjens, R. J., Gunset, G., Rivière, I. & Sadelain, M. Human T-lymphocyte cytotoxicity and proliferation directed by a single chimeric TCRζ /CD28 receptor. Nat. Biotechnol.20, 70–75 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Qi, C. et al. Claudin18.2-specific CAR T cells in gastrointestinal cancers: phase 1 trial interim results. Nat. Med.28, 1189–1198 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Del Bufalo, F. et al. GD2-CART01 for relapsed or refractory high-risk neuroblastoma. N. Engl. J. Med.388, 1284–1295 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Xiao, Q. et al. Size-dependent activation of CAR-T cells. Sci. Immunol.7, eabl3995 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Guest, R. D. et al. The role of extracellular spacer regions in the optimal design of chimeric immune receptors: evaluation of four different scFvs and antigens. J. Immunother.28, 203–211 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Haso, W. et al. Anti-CD22-chimeric antigen receptors targeting B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood121, 1165–1174 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.James, S. E. et al. Antigen sensitivity of CD22-specific chimeric TCR is modulated by target epitope distance from the cell membrane. J. Immunol.180, 7028–7038 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.James, J. R. & Vale, R. D. Biophysical mechanism of T-cell receptor triggering in a reconstituted system. Nature487, 64–69 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Hombach, A. A. et al. T cell activation by antibody-like immunoreceptors: the position of the binding epitope within the target molecule determines the efficiency of activation of redirected T cells. J. Immunol.178, 4650–4657 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Hudecek, M. et al. The nonsignaling extracellular spacer domain of chimeric antigen receptors is decisive for in vivo antitumor activity. Cancer Immunol. Res.3, 125–135 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Alabanza, L. et al. Function of novel anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptors with human variable regions is affected by hinge and transmembrane domains. Mol. Ther.25, 2452–2465 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Milone, M. C. et al. Chimeric receptors containing CD137 signal transduction domains mediate enhanced survival of T cells and increased antileukemic efficacy in vivo. Mol. Ther.17, 1453–1464 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Guedan, S. et al. ICOS-based chimeric antigen receptors program bipolar TH17/TH1 cells. Blood124, 1070–1080 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Guedan, S. et al. Enhancing CAR T cell persistence through ICOS and 4-1BB costimulation. JCI Insight3, e96976 (2018). 96976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Pulè, M. A. et al. A chimeric T cell antigen receptor that augments cytokine release and supports clonal expansion of primary human T cells. Mol. Ther.12, 933–941 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Zhang, H. et al. A chimeric antigen receptor with antigen-independent OX40 signaling mediates potent antitumor activity. Sci. Transl. Med.13, eaba7308 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Majzner, R. G. & Mackall, C. L. Tumor antigen escape from CAR T-cell therapy. Cancer Discov.8, 1219–1226 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Maude, S. L., Teachey, D. T., Porter, D. L. & Grupp, S. A. CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood125, 4017–4023 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Green, D. J. et al. Fully human bcma targeted chimeric antigen receptor T cells administered in a defined composition demonstrate potency at low doses in advanced stage high risk multiple myeloma. Blood132, 1011–1011 (2018). [Google Scholar]
- 37.Brudno, J. N. et al. T cells genetically modified to express an anti-B-cell maturation antigen chimeric antigen receptor cause remissions of poor-prognosis relapsed multiple myeloma. J. Clin. Oncol.36, 2267–2280 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Cohen, A. D. et al. B cell maturation antigen-specific CAR T cells are clinically active in multiple myeloma. J. Clin. Investig.129, 2210–2221 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Brown, C. E. et al. Regression of glioblastoma after chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy. N. Engl. J. Med.375, 2561–2569 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.O’Rourke, D. M. et al. A single dose of peripherally infused EGFRvIII-directed CAR T cells mediates antigen loss and induces adaptive resistance in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Sci. Transl. Med.9, eaaa0984 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Gabrusiewicz, K. et al. Characteristics of the alternative phenotype of microglia/macrophages and its modulation in experimental gliomas. PLoS ONE6, e23902 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Wesolowska, A. et al. Microglia-derived TGF-β as an important regulator of glioblastoma invasion—an inhibition of TGF-β-dependent effects by shRNA against human TGF-β type II receptor. Oncogene27, 918–930 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Hishii, M. et al. Human glioma-derived interleukin-10 inhibits antitumor immune responses in vitro. Neurosurgery37, 1160–1167 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Nduom, E. K., Weller, M. & Heimberger, A. B. Immunosuppressive mechanisms in glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol.17, vii9–vii14 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Ikushima, H. et al. Autocrine TGF-β signaling maintains tumorigenicity of glioma-initiating cells through Sry-related HMG-Box factors. Cell Stem Cell5, 504–514 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Joseph, J. V., Balasubramaniyan, V., Walenkamp, A. & Kruyt, F. A. E. TGF-β as a therapeutic target in high grade gliomas—promises and challenges. Biochem. Pharmacol.85, 478–485 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Avril, T. et al. Distinct effects of human glioblastoma immunoregulatory molecules programmed cell death ligand-1 (PDL-1) and indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) on tumour-specific T cell functions. J. Neuroimmunol.225, 22–33 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Wainwright, D. A. et al. IDO expression in brain tumors increases the recruitment of regulatory T cells and negatively impacts survival. Clin. Cancer Res.18, 6110–6121 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Mittelbronn, M. et al. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) expression in human malignant gliomas contributes to immune escape and tumour progression. Acta Neuropathol.122, 353–365 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Grosser, R., Cherkassky, L., Chintala, N. & Adusumilli, P. S. Combination immunotherapy with CAR T cells and checkpoint blockade for the treatment of solid tumors. Cancer Cell36, 471–482 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Kumar, V. & Gabrilovich, D. I. Hypoxia‐inducible factors in regulation of immune responses in tumour microenvironment. Immunology143, 512–519 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Medawar, P. B. Immunity to homologous grafted skin; the fate of skin homografts transplanted to the brain, to subcutaneous tissue, and to the anterior chamber of the eye. Br. J. Exp. Pathol.29, 58–69 (1948). [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Fabry, Z., Raine, C. S. & Hart, M. N. Nervous tissue as an immune compartment: the dialect of the immune response in the CNS. Immunol. Today15, 218–224 (1994). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Hart, D. N. & Fabre, J. W. Demonstration and characterization of Ia-positive dendritic cells in the interstitial connective tissues of rat heart and other tissues, but not brain. J. Exp. Med.154, 347–361 (1981). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Choi, B. D. et al. EGFRvIII-targeted vaccination therapy of malignant glioma. Brain Pathol.19, 713–723 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Daneman, R. & Prat, A. The blood-brain barrier. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol.7, a020412 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Balda, M. S., Flores-Maldonado, C., Cereijido, M. & Matter, K. Multiple domains of occludin are involved in the regulation of paracellular permeability. J. Cell. Biochem.78, 85–96 (2000). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Razpotnik, R., Novak, N., Čurin Šerbec, V. & Rajcevic, U. Targeting malignant brain tumors with antibodies. Front. Immunol.8, 1181 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Nau, R., Sörgel, F. & Eiffert, H. Penetration of drugs through the blood–cerebrospinal fluid/blood–brain barrier for treatment of central nervous system infections. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.23, 858–883 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Hickey, W. F. Migration of hematogenous cells through the blood–brain barrier and the initiation of CNS inflammation. Brain Pathol.1, 97–105 (1991). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Engelhardt, B. & Ransohoff, R. M. The ins and outs of T-lymphocyte trafficking to the CNS: anatomical sites and molecular mechanisms. Trends Immunol.26, 485–495 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Owens, T., Renno, T., Taupin, V. & Krakowski, M. Inflammatory cytokines in the brain: does the CNS shape immune responses? Immunol. Today15, 566–571 (1994). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Lossinsky, A. S. et al. Mechanisms of inflammatory cell attachment in chronic relapsing experimental allergic encephalomyelitis: a scanning and high-voltage electron microscopic study of the injured mouse blood–brain barrier. Microvasc. Res.41, 299–310 (1991). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Greenwood, J., Howes, R. & Lightman, S. The blood-retinal barrier in experimental autoimmune uveoretinitis. Leukocyte interactions and functional damage. Lab. Investig.70, 39–52 (1994). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Wolburg, H., Wolburg-Buchholz, K. & Engelhardt, B. Diapedesis of mononuclear cells across cerebral venules during experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis leaves tight junctions intact. Acta Neuropathol.109, 181–190 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Reese, T. S. & Karnovsky, M. J. Fine structural localization of a blood–brain barrier to exogenous peroxidase. J. Cell Biol.34, 207–217 (1967). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Brightman, M. W. & Reese, T. S. Junctions between intimately apposed cell membranes in the vertebrate brain. J. Cell Biol.40, 648–677 (1969). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Shaikh, S. & Shaikh, H. CART Cell Therapy Toxicity-StatPearls (StatPearls Publishing, Treasure Island, FL, 2023). [PubMed]
- 69.Logue, J. M. et al. Early cytopenias and infections after standard of care idecabtagene vicleucel in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Blood Adv.6, 6109–6119 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Maus, M. V. et al. Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) clinical practice guideline on immune effector cell-related adverse events. J. Immunother. Cancer8, e001511 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Maude, S. L. et al. Tisagenlecleucel in children and young adults with B-cell lymphoblastic leukemia. N. Engl. J. Med.378, 439–448 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Schuster, S. J. et al. Tisagenlecleucel in adult relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. N. Engl. J. Med.380, 45–56 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Neelapu, S. S. et al. Axicabtagene ciloleucel CAR T-cell therapy in refractory large B-cell lymphoma. N. Engl. J. Med.377, 2531–2544 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Gust, J. et al. Endothelial activation and blood–brain barrier disruption in neurotoxicity after adoptive immunotherapy with CD19 CAR-T cells. Cancer Discov.7, 1404–1419 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Santomasso, B. D. et al. Clinical and biological correlates of neurotoxicity associated with CAR T-cell therapy in patients with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cancer Discov.8, 958–971 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Hunter, C. A. & Jones, S. A. IL-6 as a keystone cytokine in health and disease. Nat. Immunol.16, 448–457 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Norelli, M. et al. Monocyte-derived IL-1 and IL-6 are differentially required for cytokine-release syndrome and neurotoxicity due to CAR T cells. Nat. Med.24, 739–748 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Mahdi, J. et al. Tumor inflammation-associated neurotoxicity. Nat. Med.29, 803–810 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Nejo, T., Yamamichi, A., Almeida, N. D., Goretsky, Y. E. & Okada, H. Tumor antigens in glioma. Semin. Immunol.47, 101385 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Tang, X. et al. B7-H3 as a novel CAR-T therapeutic target for glioblastoma. Mol. Ther. Oncolytics14, 279–287 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Yang, S., Wei, W. & Zhao, Q. B7-H3, a checkpoint molecule, as a target for cancer immunotherapy. Int. J. Biol. Sci.16, 1767–1773 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Zhang, C. et al. Large-scale analysis reveals the specific clinical and immune features of B7-H3 in glioma. OncoImmunology7, e1461304 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Nehama, D. et al. B7-H3-redirected chimeric antigen receptor T cells target glioblastoma and neurospheres. EBioMedicine47, 33–43 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Vitanza, N. A. et al. Intraventricular B7-H3 CAR T cells for diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma: preliminary first-in-human bioactivity and safety. Cancer Discov.13, 114–131 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Wikstrand, C. J. et al. Monoclonal antibodies against EGFRvIII are tumor specific and react with breast and lung carcinomas and malignant gliomas. Cancer Res.55, 3140–3148 (1995). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Congdon, K. L. et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor and variant III targeted immunotherapy. Neuro Oncol.16, viii20–25 (2014). Suppl 8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Thorne, A. H., Zanca, C. & Furnari, F. Epidermal growth factor receptor targeting and challenges in glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol.18, 914–918 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Chistiakov, D. A., Chekhonin, I. V. & Chekhonin, V. P. The EGFR variant III mutant as a target for immunotherapy of glioblastoma multiforme. Eur. J. Pharm.810, 70–82 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Choi, B. D., O’Rourke, D. M. & Maus, M. V. Engineering chimeric antigen receptor T cells to treat glioblastoma. J. Target Ther. Cancer6, 22–25 (2017). [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Choi, B. D. et al. CAR-T cells secreting BiTEs circumvent antigen escape without detectable toxicity. Nat. Biotechnol.37, 1049–1058 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Choi, B. D., Gedeon, P. C., Sanchez-Perez, L., Bigner, D. D. & Sampson, J. H. Regulatory T cells are redirected to kill glioblastoma by an EGFRvIII-targeted bispecific antibody. Oncoimmunology2, e26757 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Schmidts, A. et al. Tandem chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells targeting EGFRvIII and IL-13Rα2 are effective against heterogeneous glioblastoma. Neuro-Oncol. Adv.5, vdac185 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Choi, B. D. et al. Systemic administration of a bispecific antibody targeting EGFRvIII successfully treats intracerebral glioma. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA110, 270–275 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Choi, B. D. et al. Human regulatory T cells kill tumor cells through granzyme-dependent cytotoxicity upon retargeting with a bispecific antibody. Cancer Immunol. Res.1, 163–167 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Bagley, S. J. et al. Repeated peripheral infusions of anti-EGFRvIII CAR T cells in combination with pembrolizumab show no efficacy in glioblastoma: a phase 1 trial. Nat. Cancer10.1038/s43018-023-00709-6 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 96.Choi, B. D. et al. Intraventricular CARv3-TEAM-E T cells in recurrent glioblastoma. N. Engl. J. Med.390, 1290–1298 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Eph Nomenclature Committee Unified nomenclature for Eph family receptors and their ligands, the ephrins. Cell90, 403–404 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.van der Geer, P., Hunter, T. & Lindberg, R. A. Receptor protein-tyrosine kinases and their signal transduction pathways. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol.10, 251–337 (1994). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Wykosky, J., Gibo, D. M., Stanton, C. & Debinski, W. EphA2 as a novel molecular marker and target in glioblastoma multiforme. Mol. Cancer Res.3, 541–551 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Lin, Q. et al. First-in-human trial of EphA2-redirected CAR T-cells in patients with recurrent glioblastoma: a preliminary report of three cases at the starting dose. Front. Oncol.11, 694941 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Nazha, B., Inal, C. & Owonikoko, T. K. Disialoganglioside GD2 expression in solid tumors and role as a target for cancer therapy. Front. Oncol.10, 1000 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Golinelli, G. et al. Targeting GD2-positive glioblastoma by chimeric antigen receptor empowered mesenchymal progenitors. Cancer Gene Ther.27, 558–570 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Navid, F., Santana, V. M. & Barfield, R. C. Anti-GD2 antibody therapy for GD2-expressing tumors. Curr. Cancer Drug Targets10, 200–209 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Cavdarli, S., Groux-Degroote, S. & Delannoy, P. Gangliosides: the double-edge sword of neuro-ectodermal derived tumors. Biomolecules9, 311 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Traylor, T. D. & Hogan, E. L. Gangliosides of human cerebral astrocytomas. J. Neurochem.34, 126–131 (1980). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Prapa, M. et al. A novel anti-GD2/4-1BB chimeric antigen receptor triggers neuroblastoma cell killing. Oncotarget6, 24884–24894 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Mount, C. W. et al. Potent antitumor efficacy of anti-GD2 CAR T cells in H3-K27M+ diffuse midline gliomas. Nat. Med.24, 572–579 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Liu, Z. et al. Safety and antitumor activity of GD2-specific 4SCAR-T cells in patients with glioblastoma. Mol. Cancer22, 3 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Ahmed, N. et al. HER2-specific T cells target primary glioblastoma stem cells and induce regression of autologous experimental tumors. Clin. Cancer Res.16, 474–485 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Ahmed, N. et al. HER2-specific chimeric antigen receptor-modified virus-specific T cells for progressive glioblastoma: a phase 1 dose-escalation trial. JAMA Oncol.3, 1094–1101 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Morgan, R. A. et al. Case report of a serious adverse event following the administration of T cells transduced with a chimeric antigen receptor recognizing ERBB2. Mol. Ther.18, 843–851 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Vitanza, N. A. et al. Locoregional infusion of HER2-specific CAR T cells in children and young adults with recurrent or refractory CNS tumors: an interim analysis. Nat. Med27, 1544–1552 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Sattiraju, A. et al. IL13RA2 targeted alpha particle therapy against glioblastomas. Oncotarget8, 42997–43007 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Brown, C. E. et al. Bioactivity and safety of IL13Rα2-redirected chimeric antigen receptor CD8+ T cells in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Clin. Cancer Res.21, 4062–4072 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Brown, C. E. et al. Locoregional delivery of IL-13Rα2-targeting CAR-T cells in recurrent high-grade glioma: a phase 1 trial. Nat. Med.10.1038/s41591-024-02875-1 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 116.Xiao, Y. et al. CD44-mediated poor prognosis in glioma is associated with M2-polarization of tumor-associated macrophages and immunosuppression. Front. Surg.8, 775194 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Liu, G. et al. Analysis of gene expression and chemoresistance of CD133+ cancer stem cells in glioblastoma. Mol. Cancer5, 67 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Brown, D. V. et al. Coexpression analysis of CD133 and CD44 identifies proneural and mesenchymal subtypes of glioblastoma multiforme. Oncotarget6, 6267–6280 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Drake, A. et al. Interleukins 7 and 15 maintain human T cell proliferative capacity through STAT5 signaling. PLoS ONE11, e0166280 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Tompa, M. et al. Epigenetic suppression of the IL-7 pathway in progressive glioblastoma. Biomedicines10, 2174 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Jacobs, J. et al. Unlocking the potential of CD70 as a novel immunotherapeutic target for non-small cell lung cancer. Oncotarget6, 13462–13475 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Adam, P. J. et al. CD70 (TNFSF7) is expressed at high prevalence in renal cell carcinomas and is rapidly internalised on antibody binding. Br. J. Cancer95, 298–306 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Ge, H. et al. Tumor associated CD70 expression is involved in promoting tumor migration and macrophage infiltration in GBM. Int. J. Cancer141, 1434–1444 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Grewal, I. S. CD70 as a therapeutic target in human malignancies. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets12, 341–351 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Xiong, L., Edwards, C. K. & Zhou, L. The biological function and clinical utilization of CD147 in human diseases: a review of the current scientific literature. Int. J. Mol. Sci.15, 17411–17441 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Bu, X. et al. CD147 confers temozolomide resistance of glioma cells via the regulation of β-TrCP/Nrf2 pathway. Int. J. Biol. Sci.17, 3013–3023 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Xin, X. et al. CD147/EMMPRIN overexpression and prognosis in cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci. Rep.6, 32804 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Li, H. et al. CD147 and glioma: a meta-analysis. J. Neurooncol.134, 145–156 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Yang, M. et al. Prognostic significance of CD147 in patients with glioblastoma. J. Neurooncol.115, 19–26 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Tseng, H. et al. Efficacy of anti-CD147 chimeric antigen receptors targeting hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat. Commun.11, 4810 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Sincevičiūtė, R. et al. MMP2 is associated with glioma malignancy and patient outcome. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol.11, 3010–3018 (2018). [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.DeBin, J. A., Maggio, J. E. & Strichartz, G. R. Purification and characterization of chlorotoxin, a chloride channel ligand from the venom of the scorpion. Am. J. Physiol.264, C361–369 (1993). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Soroceanu, L., Gillespie, Y., Khazaeli, M. B. & Sontheimer, H. Use of chlorotoxin for targeting of primary brain tumors. Cancer Res.58, 4871–4879 (1998). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Deshane, J., Garner, C. C. & Sontheimer, H. Chlorotoxin inhibits glioma cell invasion via matrix metalloproteinase-2. J. Biol. Chem.278, 4135–4144 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.McFerrin, M. B. & Sontheimer, H. A role for ion channels in glioma cell invasion. Neuron Glia Biol.2, 39–49 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Tatenhorst, L., Rescher, U., Gerke, V. & Paulus, W. Knockdown of annexin 2 decreases migration of human glioma cells in vitro. Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol.32, 271–277 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Xu, F., Liu, F., Zhao, H., An, G. & Feng, G. Prognostic significance of mucin antigen MUC1 in various human epithelial cancers: a meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore)94, e2286 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Bose, M. et al. Overexpression of MUC1 induces non-canonical TGF-β signaling in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Front. Cell Dev. Biol.10, 821875 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Khodabakhsh, F., Merikhian, P., Eisavand, M. R. & Farahmand, L. Crosstalk between MUC1 and VEGF in angiogenesis and metastasis: a review highlighting roles of the MUC1 with an emphasis on metastatic and angiogenic signaling. Cancer Cell Int.21, 200 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Ohtsubo, K. & Marth, J. D. Glycosylation in cellular mechanisms of health and disease. Cell126, 855–867 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Tamura, F. et al. RNAi-mediated gene silencing of ST6GalNAc I suppresses the metastatic potential in gastric cancer cells. Gastric Cancer19, 85–97 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Tarp, M. A. & Clausen, H. Mucin-type O-glycosylation and its potential use in drug and vaccine development. Biochim. Biophys. Acta1780, 546–563 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Taylor-Papadimitriou, J., Burchell, J., Miles, D. W. & Dalziel, M. MUC1 and cancer. Biochim. Biophys. Acta1455, 301–313 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Springer, G. F. T and Tn, general carcinoma autoantigens. Science224, 1198–1206 (1984). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Dusoswa, S. A. et al. Glioblastomas exploit truncated O-linked glycans for local and distant immune modulation via the macrophage galactose-type lectin. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA117, 3693–3703 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Tong, F. et al. MUC1 promotes glioblastoma progression and TMZ resistance by stabilizing EGFRvIII. Pharm. Res.187, 106606 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Finn, O. J. et al. Importance of MUC1 and spontaneous mouse tumor models for understanding the immunobiology of human adenocarcinomas. Immunol. Res.50, 261–268 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Park, S. et al. Immunoengineering can overcome the glycocalyx armour of cancer cells. Nat. Mater. 10.1038/s41563-024-01808-0 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 149.Posey, A. D. et al. Engineered CAR T cells targeting the cancer-associated Tn-glycoform of the membrane mucin MUC1 control adenocarcinoma. Immunity44, 1444–1454 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Bauer, S. et al. Activation of NK cells and T cells by NKG2D, a receptor for stress-inducible MICA. Science285, 727–729 (1999). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Duan, S. et al. Natural killer group 2D receptor and its ligands in cancer immune escape. Mol. Cancer18, 29 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Crane, C. A. et al. Immune evasion mediated by tumor-derived lactate dehydrogenase induction of NKG2D ligands on myeloid cells in glioblastoma patients. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA111, 12823–12828 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Curio, S., Jonsson, G. & Marinović, S. A summary of current NKG2D-based CAR clinical trials. Immunother. Adv.1, ltab018 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Wei, F. et al. Strength of PD-1 signaling differentially affects T-cell effector functions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA110, E2480–2489 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Heiland, D. H. et al. Comprehensive analysis of PD-L1 expression in glioblastoma multiforme. Oncotarget8, 42214–42225 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Reardon, D. A. et al. Effect of nivolumab vs. bevacizumab in patients with recurrent glioblastoma: the CheckMate 143 Phase 3 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol.6, 1003 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Irvine, D. J., Maus, M. V., Mooney, D. J. & Wong, W. W. The future of engineered immune cell therapies. Science378, 853–858 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Newick, K., O’Brien, S., Moon, E. & Albelda, S. M. CAR T cell therapy for solid tumors. Annu. Rev. Med.68, 139–152 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Cho, J. H., Collins, J. J. & Wong, W. W. Universal chimeric antigen receptors for multiplexed and logical control of T cell responses. Cell173, 1426–1438.e11 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Grada, Z. et al. TanCAR: a novel bispecific chimeric antigen receptor for cancer immunotherapy. Mol. Ther.—Nucleic Acids2, e105 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Wilkie, S. et al. Dual targeting of ErbB2 and MUC1 in breast cancer using chimeric antigen receptors engineered to provide complementary signaling. J. Clin. Immunol.32, 1059–1070 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Hegde, M. et al. Tandem CAR T cells targeting HER2 and IL13Rα2 mitigate tumor antigen escape. J. Clin. Investig.126, 3036–3052 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Zhu, I. et al. Modular design of synthetic receptors for programmed gene regulation in cell therapies. Cell185, 1431–1443.e16 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Roybal, K. T. et al. Engineering T cells with customized therapeutic response programs using synthetic notch receptors. Cell167, 419–432.e16 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Morsut, L. et al. Engineering customized cell sensing and response behaviors using synthetic notch receptors. Cell164, 780–791 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Choe, J. H. et al. SynNotch-CAR T cells overcome challenges of specificity, heterogeneity, and persistence in treating glioblastoma. Sci. Transl. Med.13, eabe7378 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167.Roybal, K. T. et al. Precision tumor recognition by T cells with combinatorial antigen-sensing circuits. Cell164, 770–779 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Srivastava, S. et al. Logic-gated ROR1 chimeric antigen receptor expression rescues T cell-mediated toxicity to normal tissues and enables selective tumor targeting. Cancer Cell35, 489–503.e8 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Chmielewski, M., Kopecky, C., Hombach, A. A. & Abken, H. IL-12 release by engineered T cells expressing chimeric antigen receptors can effectively muster an antigen-independent macrophage response on tumor cells that have shut down tumor antigen expression. Cancer Res.71, 5697–5706 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Lanitis, E. et al. Optimized gene engineering of murine CAR-T cells reveals the beneficial effects of IL-15 coexpression. J. Exp. Med.218, e20192203 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171.Kloss, C. C. et al. Dominant-negative TGF-β receptor enhances PSMA-targeted human CAR T cell proliferation and augments prostate cancer eradication. Mol. Ther.26, 1855–1866 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172.Choi, B. D. et al. CRISPR-Cas9 disruption of PD-1 enhances activity of universal EGFRvIII CAR T cells in a preclinical model of human glioblastoma. J. Immunother. Cancer7, 304 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173.Goff, S. L. et al. Pilot trial of adoptive transfer of chimeric antigen receptor-transduced T cells targeting EGFRvIII in patients With glioblastoma. J. Immunother.42, 126–135 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174.Brown, C. E. et al. Off-the-shelf, steroid-resistant, IL13Rα2-specific CAR T cells for treatment of glioblastoma. Neuro-Oncology24, 1318–1330 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175.Bagley, S. J. et al. Intrathecal bivalent CAR T cells targeting EGFR and IL13Rα2 in recurrent glioblastoma: phase 1 trial interim results. Nat Med (2024) 10.1038/s41591-024-02893-z. [DOI] [PubMed]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.



