Skip to main content

This is a preprint.

It has not yet been peer reviewed by a journal.

The National Library of Medicine is running a pilot to include preprints that result from research funded by NIH in PMC and PubMed.

bioRxiv logoLink to bioRxiv
[Preprint]. 2024 Dec 12:2024.12.09.627578. [Version 1] doi: 10.1101/2024.12.09.627578

Modernizing histopathological analysis: a fully automated workflow for the digital image analysis of the intestinal microcolony survival assay

Alexander Baikalov, Ethan Wang, Denae Neill, Nihar Shetty, Trey Waldrop, Kevin Liu, Abagail Delahousessaye, Edgardo Aguilar, Nefetiti Mims, Stefan Bartzsch, Emil Schüler
PMCID: PMC11661163  PMID: 39713436

Abstract

Background

Manual analysis of histopathological images is often not only time-consuming and painstaking but also prone to error from subjective evaluation criteria and human error. To address these issues, we created a fully automated workflow to enumerate jejunal crypts in a microcolony survival assay to quantify gastrointestinal damage from radiation.

Methods and Materials

After abdominal irradiation of mice, jejuna were obtained and prepared on histopathologic slides, and crypts were counted manually by trained individuals. The automated workflow (AW) involved obtaining images of jejunal slices from the irradiated mice, followed by cropping and normalizing the individual slice images for resolution and color; using deep learning-based semantic image segmentation to detect crypts on each slice; using a tailored algorithm to enumerate the crypts; and tabulating and saving the results. A graphical user interface (GUI) was developed to allow users to review and correct the automated results.

Results

Crypts counted manually exhibited a mean absolute percent deviation of (34 ± 26)% between individuals vs the group mean across counters, which was reduced to (11 ± 6)% across the 3 most-experienced counters. The AW processed a sample image dataset from 60 mice in a few hours and required only a few minutes of active user effort. AW counts deviated from experts’ mean counts by (10 ± 8)%. The AW thereby allowed rapid, automated evaluation of the microcolony survival assay with accuracy comparable to that of trained experts and without subjective inter-observer variation.

Highlights

  • We fully automated the digital image analysis of a microcolony survival assay

  • Analyzing 540 images takes a few hours with only minutes of active user effort

  • The automated workflow (AW) is just as accurate as trained experts

  • The AW eliminates subjective inter-observer variation and human error

  • Human review possible with built-in graphical user interface

Full Text Availability

The license terms selected by the author(s) for this preprint version do not permit archiving in PMC. The full text is available from the preprint server.


Articles from bioRxiv are provided here courtesy of Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Preprints

RESOURCES