Skip to main content
BMC Genomics logoLink to BMC Genomics
. 2024 Dec 20;25:1231. doi: 10.1186/s12864-024-11151-y

Comparative transcriptomes and WGCNA reveal hub genes for spike germination in different quinoa lines

Liubin Huang 1,#, Lingyuan Zhang 1,#, Ping Zhang 1, Junna Liu 1, Li Li 1, Hanxue Li 1, Xuqin Wang 1, Yutao Bai 1, Guofei Jiang 1, Peng Qin 1,
PMCID: PMC11662621  PMID: 39707180

Abstract

Background

Quinoa, as a new food crop, has attracted extensive attention at home and abroad. However, the natural disaster of spike germination seriously threatens the quality and yield of quinoa. Currently, there are limited reports on the molecular mechanisms associated with spike germination in quinoa.

Results

In this study, we utilized transcriptome sequencing technology and successfully obtained 154.51 Gb of high-quality data with a comparison efficiency of more than 88%, which fully demonstrates the extremely high reliability of the sequencing results and lays a solid foundation for subsequent analysis. Using these data, we constructed a weighted gene co-expression network (WGCNA) related to starch, sucrose, α-amylase, and phenolic acid metabolites, and screened six co-expression modules closely related to spike germination traits. Two of the modules associated with physiological indicators were analyzed in depth, and nine core genes were finally predicted. Further functional annotation revealed four key transcription factors involved in the regulation of dormancy and germination processes: gene LOC110698065, gene LOC110696037, gene LOC110736224, and gene LOC110705759, belonging to the bHLH, NF-YA, MYB, and FAR1 gene families, respectively.

Conclusions

These results provide clues to identify the core genes involved in quinoa spike germination. This will ultimately provide a theoretical basis for breeding new quinoa varieties with resistance.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12864-024-11151-y.

Keywords: WGCNA, Quinoa, Spike germination, Physiological properties, Metabolites, Transcription factors

Background

Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) is a summer annual dicotyledonous plant in the Chenopodiaceae family [1, 2]. It is a highly drought-resistant, salt-tolerant, and cold-resistant C3 crop [35]. Quinoa was first domesticated in the Andean region of South America 7,000 years ago [6] and then spread from South America to the rest of the world [7]. According to the International Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), quinoa is the only plant that meets all the basic nutritional needs of humans and provides nutrients [8] such as antimicrobial, anticancer, antioxidant, and anti-obesity properties. Quinoa seeds are gluten-free [9], making them ideal for celiacs and diabetics [1012]. Quinoa seeds also contain fiber, vitamins and minerals such as calcium, zinc, magnesium and iron [13]. Due to these nutritional properties, quinoa is also known as a “superfood” [14]. The United Nations declared 2013 as the International Year of Quinoa, further increasing attention and interest in quinoa [15].

Spike germination is a phenomenon in which grains encounter rain before harvest, breaking the dormancy of the seeds and germinating directly on the spike [16, 17]. The most frequent cereals are wheat, barley, rice and sorghum [18]. The occurrence of spike germination can seriously affect food security issues [19]. In China, the United States, Russia, and Canada have begun to mitigate the damage caused by the occurrence of spike germination through breeding methods [20]. Multiple environments and genetics are the main factors that mainly affect spike germination, which increases the dormancy rate of seeds when the mother plant is under colder conditions during the maturity stage of the seeds [21]. It has been shown that kernel colour and seed coat affect dormancy [22],and red-grain wheat varieties tend to have better resistance to spike germination than white-grain wheat, and resistance genes on chromosomes 3A, 3B and 3D were shown to be associated with red seed coat [23]. However, some other studies have shown that resistance genes can also be obtained from white wheat [24]. In addition, degradation of storage starch is one of the energy-providing processes during spike germination [25],and requires the synergy of several enzymes, of which α-amylase is considered to be the main one [26]. Increasing attention is being paid to spike germination, which is a complex phenomenon influenced by genetic, physiological and environmental factors [27].

The phenomenon of spike germination was noticed as early as the 1980s. Many quantitative trait loci (QTLs) associated with spike germination have been identified and extensively studied [28]. In recent years, scientists have identified several genes related to spike germination in wheat and rice, such as OsPHS1 to OsPHS9, through meta-analysis and large-scale mutant screening. These genes are mostly involved in the synthesis and signaling of plant hormones such as abscisic acid (ABA) and gibberellin (GA) [29, 30]. In rice, it has been shown that mutations in the OsPHS1 to OsPHS7 genes lead to a spike germination phenotype, where OsPHS8 affects ABA signaling by regulating the accumulation of small-molecule sugars in the endosperm, whereas OsPHS9 encodes a CC-type glutaredoxin, which is unique to higher plants, and integrates reactive oxygen species signaling and ABA signaling by binding to OsGAP, the ABA receptor interacting protein, thus regulating the spike germination process in rice [31]. Recent studies have also revealed that genes such as OsFTIP1, OsMFT1, and OsMFT2 are involved in the spike germination regulatory mechanism in rice, affecting seed dormancy by regulating the expression of genes for key enzymes of ABA and GA biosynthesis [32]. In addition, the PHS1 to PHS9 genes in Arabidopsis have been shown to play an important role in seed dormancy and germination. These genes control seed dormancy by regulating ABA and other phytohormone signaling pathways [33].

Weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) is an algorithm for mining module information from gene chip expression data, which clusters genes from similar gene expression patterns to form modules and analyses module-specific features [34, 35]. Today, WGCNA is the most commonly used method to identify patterns of correlation between genes [36]. It is becoming more and more widely used in plant research applications: Zhu et al., in order to know the different co-expression modules of rice under salt stress, analysed 457 core DEGs by using WGCNA and successfully obtained three modules, concluding that the resultant three modules were positively correlated with rice salt stress, suggesting that the genes in the modules positively regulated the salt tolerance of rice [37]. Li et al., by analysing the transcriptomes of Cd-treated different maize varieties for WGCNA analysis, divided them into 37 different gene network modules and identified five candidate genes in maize kernels that respond to cadmium stress, which provides a useful dataset for the intrinsic mechanism of cadmium accumulation in maize [38]. WGCNA can efficiently identify collections of genes with similar expression patterns, which in turn reveal the correlation between these collections of genes and the sample phenotype. By mapping the regulatory network among genes, this technology helps to identify key regulatory genes. Meanwhile, WGCNA has been applied in various crop research and has achieved significant results, verifying its effectiveness and practicality.

Spike germination characteristics of quinoa, a crop with important economic value, directly affect yield and quality. Different quinoa lines show significant phenotypic variation during spike germination, which may involve different regulatory mechanisms and hub genes. However, although it is known that some genes may be involved in the regulation of spike germination in quinoa, the specific regulatory mechanisms and hub genes have not been fully elucidated. Therefore, this study aimed to systematically compare the gene expression changes of different quinoa lines during spike germination by transcriptome sequencing and WGCNA to reveal the potential regulatory networks and hub genes. This not only helps to understand the molecular basis of quinoa spike germination but also provides valuable genetic resources for quinoa breeding and trait improvement. Through this study, we expect to fill the existing knowledge gap and provide strong scientific support for the genetic improvement and yield enhancement of quinoa. In this study, two quinoa lines, Dianli-222 (sensitive) and Dianli-654 (resistant), were selected and labeled as group F (sensitive) and group S (resistant), respectively. By integrating data on starch, sucrose, alpha-amylase, and phenolic differential metabolites, a co-expressed gene network was constructed using WGCNA analysis. During this process, we focused on two key modules and identified the core genes of each module: the MYB transcription factor family, NF-YA transcription factor family, and bHLH transcription factor family. These transcription factor families play important roles in dormancy and germination. Therefore, the results of this study have reference value for quinoa breeding under conditions of spike germination.

Results and analyses

Transcriptomic analyses

The present study contained 18 samples (two strains were sampled in three time periods, and each time period was repeated three times) with raw reads ranging from 54,021,628 to 66,227,338 and filtered clean reads ranging from 51,851,606 to 64,042,540. The percentage of total bases in the reads with Q-Phred mass scores of not less than 20 and 30 was both above 90%. In addition, for these high-confidence data, the sum of the two bases, guanine (G) and cytosine (C), as a percentage of the total number of all nucleotides ranged from 42.73% to 43.95%, showing good sequence characterization and consistency (Fig. S1). A total of 154.51 Gb of high-quality sequencing data were obtained, and the sequencing reads of each sample were successfully aligned to the genome with an alignment efficiency higher than 88%. These results indicate that the quality of transcriptome sequencing is sufficient for further analysis.

Gene expression analyses

PCA analysis based on transcriptome data (Fig. 1A) was performed to know the differences between quinoa samples under high humidity treatment. The first principal component is 37.02%, the second principal component is 13.99%, and the third principal component is 8.98%. The samples are tightly clustered within groups and sparsely dispersed between groups, and the experimental data are stable and reliable for subsequent experimental analysis. It can be seen from the figure that the differentially expressed genes of both strains are continuously up-regulated over time. By visualizing the blue bars, we can clearly observe that the number of up-regulated genes among the differentially expressed genes shows a significant and continuous increase, while the number of down-regulated genes shows a gradual decrease. This phenomenon strongly suggests that up-regulated genes may play a more critical and dominant role, and their dynamics are important for understanding the mechanism of quinoa spike germination (Fig. 1B). F0 vs S0, with 2,066 differential genes, 783 up-regulated and 1,283 down-regulated; F6 vs S6, with 8,250 differential genes, 2,697 up-regulated and 5,553 down-regulated; and F12 vs S12, with 8,711 differential genes, 3,065 up-regulated and 5,646 down-regulated.

Fig.1.

Fig.1

Global view of gene expression profiling. (A) Principal component analysis (PCA) of the RNA-seq data. (B) Bar graph of differentially expressed genes. Note: (A) PC1 is the first principal component, PC2 is the second principal component and PC3 is the third principal component. (B) Horizontal coordinates represent groups and vertical coordinates represent the number of genes

Differential gene GO and KEGG analysis

After screening the differential genes, the distribution of the differential genes in Gene Ontology was investigated by enrichment analysis to elucidate the manifestation of sample differences in gene function in the experiment. GO is classified into Molecular Function, Biological Process, and Cellular Component. Differential genes are mainly involved in chitin binding (GO:0008061), glucosyl transferase activity (GO:0046527), secretory vesicle (GO:0099503), flavonoid biosynthetic process (GO:0009813), and isoprenoid biosynthetic process (GO:0008299) (Fig. 2A-C). We further analyzed differential gene enrichment in the KEGG pathway. The results showed that the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites, amino sugar and nucleotide sugar metabolism, plant hormone signal transduction, brassinosteroid biosynthesis, and starch and sucrose metabolism were significantly enriched (Fig. 3A-C).

Fig.2.

Fig.2

Differential Gene GO Enrichment Circle Map. A F0 vs S0. B F6 vs S6. C F12 vs S12. Note: From the outside to the inside, the first circle shows the entries of the three main GO categories; the second circle show the number of background genes in that category and the q-value; the third circle displays the bar graph of the proportion of up- and down-regulated genes; and the fourth circle presents the Rich Factor value (the number of foreground genes in the category divided by the number of background genes) for each category, with the background auxiliary line indicating 0.2 per cell

Fig.3.

Fig.3

Differential gene KEGG circle map. A F0 vs S0. B F6 vs S6. C F12 vs S12. Note: From the outside to the inside, the first circle is the KEGG_level_1 entry; the second circle is the number of background genes in that classification as well as the q-value; the third circle is the bar graph of the proportion of up- and down-regulated genes; and the fourth circle is the Rich Factor value for each classification (the number of foreground genes in the classification divided by the number of background genes), with each cell of the background auxiliary line indicating 0.2

Differences in seed germination between sensitive and resistant quinoa at different time points

In this study, in order to deeply explore the differences in spike germination behavior between the two quinoa lines Dianli-222 and Dianli-654, we systematically determined the germination rate and germination index of these two lines at different time periods (Fig. 4A-B). Through the experimental observations, it was clearly observed that the germination rate and germination index of both lines showed a significant increasing trend with time and reached the maximum value at 30 h. It is particularly noteworthy that Dianli-222 and Dianli-654 showed a large difference in the degree of change in germination rate and germination index during the early stages of germination, i.e., from zero to six hours and from six to 12 h. This finding indicates that the differences in physiological responses of the seeds were particularly significant during these two time periods, and therefore we chose these time points as standardized sampling times to more accurately assess and compare the differences in the performance of the two lines under spike germination conditions. By analyzing germination data at these key time points, this study revealed that Dianli-222 and Dianli-654 differed significantly in their biological behaviors and response patterns during early spike germination. These data are important for understanding the genetic and physiological mechanisms of spike germination and can provide a scientific basis for breeding for spike germination resistance traits in quinoa.

Fig.4.

Fig.4

Comparison of germination rate and germination index of different quinoa lines. A germination rate. B germination index

Changes in physiological parameters of quinoa under spike germination

In order to study the physiological response of quinoa spike germination, the physiological indexes of starch, sucrose, and α-amylase were determined. In the process of spike germination, it was noted that the starch and sucrose contents of both sensitive and resistant strains showed a downward trend. However, it was obvious from the data that the initial content of starch and sucrose in the resistant strain was significantly higher than that in the sensitive strain, which implied that the resistant strain had more abundant energy reserves in the early stage of spike germination. In addition, the starch content of the two strains after treatment was lower than that of their respective control groups (Fig. 5A-B). In the study of α-amylase activity, an unexpected phenomenon was found: the strains with higher starch content had less α-amylase content, indicating an inverse relationship between the two (Fig. 5C). This discovery provides a new perspective for understanding the physiological mechanism of quinoa spike germination and may provide a scientific basis for cultivating quinoa varieties with greater resistance to spike germination.

Fig.5.

Fig.5

Physiological changes in the germination of quinoa spike. A Starch. B Sucrose. C Alpha-amylase. Note: Identical letters (a-c) indicate no significant differences (P > 0.05), and groups with different letters indicate significant differences (P < 0.05)

Construction of quinoa weighted gene co-expression network and module identification

A total of 9519 genes were obtained through screening and filtering (Table. S1). Cluster analysis was performed on 18 samples. The results showed that there were no outlier samples in the data and all 18 samples were clustered (Fig. S2). The selection of soft threshold (Power) is a key step in network construction. When the soft threshold is 14, the scale-free topological fit index R2 > 0.8 and the average connectivity gradually converges to 0 (Fig. S3). The scale-free network distribution is fully conformed (Fig. S4). The network was established according to the determined soft threshold (β = 14), and the clustering tree was constructed relying on the expression correlation between genes (Fig. 6A), and nine modules were finally constructed. Different colours represent different modules, with the turquoise-coloured module having the highest number of genes (3431) and the pink-coloured module having the lowest number of genes (249) (Fig. S5). On the other side, 1538 metabolites were obtained (Table. S2), and the data were stable and reliable as shown from the clustering diagram (Fig. S6). When a soft threshold (β = 20) was constructed for the network (Fig. S7), the final 7 modules (Fig. 6B), among which the turquoise colour module had the highest number of genes (540) (Table. S3).

Fig.6.

Fig.6

Tree clustering diagram WGCNA. A Hierarchical clustering tree diagram of quinoa spike germination mRNA modules. Each individual colored row represents a coding module containing a set of highly connected genes. B Hierarchical clustering tree diagram of quinoa spike germination metabolite modules

Identification of specific modules related to quinoa spike germination

The correlation of each characterized gene with sample treatment conditions was calculated, and two gene co-expression modules were identified (at |r|> 0.50, p < 0.05) (Fig. S8A). The Red module (r = 0.97, p = 7.3e-12) was positively correlated with the sensitive material, and the Blue module (r = −0.97, p = 7.3e-12) was negatively correlated with resistant material. The core genes of the Red module, such as gene LOC110718721, gene LOC110718730, and gene LOC110718724, were identified (Fig. S9). In order to know the relationship between genes and physiological traits, we calculated the correlation between modular eigenvalues (ME) and physiological traits (Table. S4). A total of two co-expression significant modules were identified that were specifically associated with quinoa spike germination. The Blue module (r = 0.80, p = 0.00006) showed a positive correlation with Alpha-amylase, and the Green module (r = −0.74, p = 0.00042) showed a negative correlation with Sucrose (Fig. S8B). Overall, there were significant differences between genes and physiological indicators in the 2 modules (Fig. S10). By our observation of the degree of variation in the differential metabolites across subgroups, significant differences were noted for phenolics, which are hypothesized to play an important role in the onset of spike germination. By calculating the correlation (Fig. S8C) between genes and phenolic metabolites (Table. S5), we found that the positive and negative correlations were mainly concentrated in the Red module (|r|> 0.90, p < 0.01), and we found that some of the core genes belonged to the C3H, bZIP, Trihelix, and MYB-related gene families. By calculating the correlation between phenolic metabolites and physiological traits (Fig. S8D), it was found that the Brown module (r = 0.78, p = 0.00011) was positively correlated with presenting sucrose. These above modules safeguarded the subsequent research and mining of core genes.

Enrichment analysis of genes in modules of interest

To explore the functional classification and metabolic pathways of the responsive genes in different quinoa lines, we performed GO analysis of the genes in the red module and found that they were mainly enriched in pyridine-containing compound metabolic process (GO:0072524), tRNA aminoacylation for protein translation (GO:0006418), amino acid activation (GO:0043038), and tRNA metabolic process (GO:0006399) (Fig. S11). In order to have a more intuitive understanding of the main functions of the modular genes, two specific modular genes highly correlated at different physiological levels were annotated into the KEGG database and were found to be mainly enriched in Aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis and Biosynthesis of secondary metabolites (Fig. S12). To further understand the functional classification and metabolic pathways of different physiological indicator genes for quinoa spike germination, we analyzed the GO enrichment of genes in the blue and green modules. The genes in the blue module were classified into 163 significantly enriched GO terms, including 90 Biological processes, 32 Cellular components, and 41 Molecular functions (Fig. 7A, Table. S6), which were mainly enriched in peptidyl-prolyl cis–trans isomerase activity (GO:0003755), cis–trans isomerase activity (GO:0016859), protein peptidyl-prolyl isomerization (GO:0000413), peptidyl-proline modification (GO:0018208), and protein folding (GO:0006457) (Fig. 7C, Table. S7). The genes in the green module were classified into 1764 significantly enriched GO terms, including 1021 Biological processes, 312 Cellular components, and 431 Molecular functions (Fig. 7B, Table. S8), which were mainly enriched in response to hypoxia (GO:0001666), response to decreased oxygen levels (GO:0036293), response to oxygen levels (GO:0070482), chromatin DNA binding (GO:0031490), and Golgi cisterna (GO:0031985) (Fig. 7D, Table. S9). The blue module focuses on Amino sugar and nucleotide sugar metabolism (Ko00520), Alanine, aspartate and glutamate metabolism (Ko00250), Biosynthesis of nucleotide sugars (Ko01250), and Citrate cycle (TCA cycle) (Ko00020) were enriched (Fig. 7E, Table. S10). The green module was mainly enriched in Arachidonic acid metabolism (Ko00590), Glutathione metabolism (Ko00480), and Metabolic pathways (Ko01100) (Fig. 7F, Table. S11).

Fig.7.

Fig.7

Blue (A, C, E) and Green (B, D, F). GO annotation (A, B), GO enrichment (C, D) and KEGG enrichment (E, F) analyses

Identification of core genes in the significant co-expression module of quinoa spike germination and construction of gene interaction network

Scatter plots of GS and MM values were plotted for the blue and green modules (Fig. 8A-B). Key genes were screened by setting |GS| to > 0.7 and |MM| to > 0.8. We obtained 985 and 111 pivotal genes in the blue and green modules, respectively (Fig. 8C-D). The Analyze Network in Cytoscape 3.10.0 was subsequently used to select the top degree-ranked genes as hub genes. Finally the blue module identified genes LOC110698065, LOC110710184, LOC110696037, LOC110736224, and LOC110705759. The green module identified genes LOC110733400, LOC110728201, LOC110711488, and LOC110706505.

Fig.8.

Fig.8

Scatter plots of gene significance (GS) versus module membership (MM) in Blue (A) and Green (B) modules. Candidate hub genes for Blue (C) and Green (D) obtained from interaction network analysis with known core genes

Protein sequence comparison of the module hub genes through the plantTFDB website revealed that the core genes in the blue module belonged to the MYB transcription factor family, bHLH transcription factor family, NF-YA transcription factor family, and FAR1 transcription factor family, respectively. Most of the core genes in the blue module belonged to the MYB transcription factor family, LOB transcription factor family, WRKY transcription factor family, AP2/ERF-ERF transcription factor family, and the functions of the key candidate core genes were further understood by annotating them on the TAIR website (Table. S12).

Real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR validation

In order to determine the authenticity and reliability of the differential expression levels of the transcriptome data, randomly selected genes from the core genes in the key modules and the transcriptome were analyzed by qRT-PCR (Fig. 9) (Table. S13). The results showed that all qRT-PCR results were consistent with the expression patterns of RNA-seq data.

Fig.9.

Fig.9

Validation of the transcription levels for selected DEGs via RT-qPCR

Discussion

Quinoa is rich in nutritional value and loved by the public [39],but sprouting of spikes reduces its nutritional value, yield and quality [40]. Spike germination has often been studied through traits such as dormancy [41], seed color [42], germination rate [43], and α-amylase [44]. It has been shown that spike germination tolerance is associated with red kernels [45], and Tamyb10 affects spike germination resistance by activating flavonoid biosynthesis-related genes that regulate kernels to be red [46]. The materials in this study were all red quinoa, and by mining the core genes of the module, we can provide more theories for the study of the molecular mechanism of spike germination. Liu [47] et al. found that growth hormone and ABA are interdependent in dormancy, and interruption of growth hormone signaling releases seeds from dormancy, while vice versa increases dormancy. It was also demonstrated that seed dormancy is related to the uptake of endogenous ABA from seeds [4850], while ABA synthesis is critically regulated by 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase [51]. Zhang [52] et al. overexpressed wheat α-amylase TaAMY1 and found that elevation of TaAMY1 reduces seed dormancy and enhances ABA resistance, and is associated with α-glucose oligosaccharides and sucrose. Cong [53] et al. increased phosphorus utilization efficiency of crops by planting high phosphorus genotypes while reducing pressure on the environment. These studies have laid the foundation for subsequent selection of resistant varieties, and knowing the core genes of a crop provides a new tool for variety selection.

With the development of sequencing technology, RNA-seq has been widely used in plant analysis [54]. In this study, GO [55] and KEGG [56] were used to analyze the differential genes in the module, which were mainly enriched in amino acids, nucleotides, energy metabolism and glucose metabolism. After that by screening the module core genes with gene function annotation and transcription factor prediction, this experiment learned that most of the core genes are more important for the bHLH transcription factor family, NF-YA transcription factor family, MYB transcription factor family, FAR transcription factor family, WRKY transcription factor family etc.

It is well known that transcription factors are regulatory proteins that are involved in the regulation of crop growth, development, and environmental responses [57]. In our study, gene-LOC110710184 and gene-LOC110733400 belonged to the MYB family, and Yang [58] et al. identified two Arabidopsis thaliana MYB transcription factors, RVE1 and RVE2, and found that they were not only involved in seed germination but also regulated seed dormancy. Sabir [59] et al. investigated 69 sweet cherry genomes from the MYB genes and found that MYB genes may play an important role in bud dormancy through transcriptomic data. These suggest that the core genes we identified likewise play an important role in quinoa spike germination. Gene-LOC110696037 and gene-LOC110736224 belong to the NF-YA family. Ding [60] et al. identified and characterized the dormancy specific target gene paghap2-6 of mir169. Paghap2-6 was identified as a homolog of the NF-YA transcription factor, and overexpression in Arabidopsis can increase resistance to exogenous ABA. Recent studies have shown that [61] NF-YA subunits play an important role in ABA-mediated responses in plants, and NF-YA mutants and overexpressing strains also show ABA-related characteristics in seed germination. Next, we will study the composition, function and evolution of the NF-YA gene family in quinoa. Gene-LOC110698065 belongs to the bHLH family, and the change of bHLH family activity may affect the transformation process of seeds from dormant state to germination state. Gao [62] et al. found that tomato SIAN11 regulates flavonoid biosynthesis and seed dormancy by interacting with bHLH protein, rather than interacting with MYB protein. Liu [63] et al. showed that ODR1 negatively regulated seed dormancy by interacting with the transcription factor bHLH57 and preventing it from inducing the expression of NCED6 and NCED9 and ABA biosynthesis. These studies also showed that the core genes we identified also played an important role in the germination and dormancy of quinoa spike.

This study focuses on two gene modules that are closely related to physiological processes. In the blue positive correlation module, up-regulation of the expression of the core genes LOC110698065, LOC110710184, LOC110696037, LOC110736224, and LOC110705759 prompted a synchronized increase in the expression of other related genes, suggesting that these genes may synergistically promote the germination process of quinoa spike. In contrast, the high expression of the core genes LOC110733400, LOC110728201, LOC110711488, and LOC110706505 in the green negative correlation module was accompanied by a decrease in the expression of the other member genes, suggesting that they may play an inhibitory role in the quinoa spike germination process. This finding lays the foundation for an in-depth exploration of the specific functions of these genes and paves the way for our subsequent experiments, in which we will further validate the practical significance of the core genes in quinoa spike germination by means of knockdown [64] and overexpression [65] in order to reveal their precise biological contributions. Research on spike germination is now making remarkable progress in grain crops such as rice and wheat. Liu et al. [66] revealed gene expression changes during rice spike germination by transcriptome analysis. A total of 9,602 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified, and KEGG pathway enrichment analysis revealed that these genes were mainly involved in key pathways such as phytohormone signaling, carbon metabolism, starch and sucrose metabolism, and phenylpropanoid biosynthesis. Enrichment analysis of closely related gene modules for spike germination in quinoa in our study showed major enrichment in key pathways such as aminosugar and nucleotide sugar metabolism, starch and sucrose metabolism, and the citric acid cycle. These results further confirm the general importance of these metabolic pathways in the spike germination of different crops. Notably, our experimental approach is broadly similar to that of Wei et al. [67], who predicted wheat yield-related candidate genes and molecular networks based on a combination of QTL localization and WGCNA, and our results present unique findings. This could be attributed to differences in the selection of our samples, experimental conditions, or data analysis. This further validates the reliability and effectiveness of the experimental method.

Metabolites are not only the direct product of gene expression, but also the relationship between genotype and phenotype. We analyzed the correlation between genes and phenolic acid metabolites. Benincasa [68] et al. have studied that the content of phenolic substances in grain germination will increase significantly. In quinoa, sprouting increases the levels of phenolic compounds, unsaturated fatty acids, γ-aminobutyrate, and carotenoids [69]. In our study, we found that wayn001856, pmn001468, cmzn004594, mwsSmce675, mws0906, xmyn004302, lman002731, and hmtn001120 were highly correlated with quinoa spike germination genes. The differential genes found by analyzing the related specific red modules were mainly enriched for purine metabolism, aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis, biosynthesis of amino acids, and purine metabolism. By transcription factor family comparison, the above genes are involved in the occurrence of quinoa spike germination and play a role. We functionally annotated the core genes and found that quinoa spike germination mainly regulates seed dormancy and germination by regulating ABA signaling. The functional annotation of these genes further identified that these core genes play an important role in regulating quinoa spike germination.

Conclusion

In summary, quinoa responds to spike germination by regulating osmoregulatory substances such as starch, sucrose and α-amylase. In this study, we constructed a WGCNA co-expression network based on transcriptomic data and focused on screening key modules and core genes for physiological indicators and phenolic metabolites. Then, GO and KEGG analyses were carried out. The core genes mainly belonged to the gene families of bHLH, MYB, NF-YA, FAR1, and AP2/ERF-ERF. Through functional annotation, some of the core genes were found to be closely related to the reported dormancy and germination of seeds. This study lays a solid foundation for an in-depth exploration of the molecular mechanism of spike germination in quinoa and other similar plants and is expected to provide important guidance for breeding quinoa varieties with spike germination resistance.

Materials and methods

Plant materials and growing conditions

The sensitive spike germination line (Dianli-222) and the resistant spike germination line (Dianli-654) were provided by the Yunnan Agricultural University Modern Education and Research Base, located at E 102°41′, N 25°20′. The quinoa seedlings were grown in a greenhouse maintained at 24 °C with a 12-h light cycle. The experiment was conducted immediately after 120 days of maturity. Given the difficulty in observing quinoa spikes with numerous seeds covered by sepals, we randomly selected spikelets from the main quinoa spike and brought them back to the laboratory as experimental materials. To simulate a high humidity environment [66], we sprayed distilled water on the spikes of the two different lines we retrieved and continued this operation for two days. When determining the spike germination rate, the number of germinated seeds was observed and counted every six hours. The results showed that the sensitive strain began to germinate partially at six hours, while the resistant strain showed no germination phenomenon. The difference between the two strains was most pronounced at 12 h. At this time, it was considered to be the optimal sampling time, and samples were taken from both strains at zero, six, and 12 h. A total of 18 samples, each with three biological replicates, were frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored in a refrigerator at −80℃ (Wuhan MetWare Biotechnology Co. Ltd., Wuhan, China; https://www.metware.cn). In this study, quinoa lines Dianli-222 (sensitive) and Dianli-654 (resistant) are labeled as group F (sensitive) and group S (resistant), respectively. F0/S0 represents the zero-hour untreated control group, while F6/S6 and F12/S12 represent the six-hour and 12-h treated groups.

RNA isolation, library construction, and sequencing

In this experiment, six libraries were constructed to represent the seed samples of the two strains and their three repetitive sequences. Eighteen samples were sent to Wuhan Metware Biotechnology Co., Ltd. for transcriptome and metabolome profiling. The transcriptome analysis process includes RNA extraction, RNA detection, and RNA library construction. In this study, samples taken from two quinoa lines at three spike germination stages were used for analysis. The CTAB method used in this project were used to extract RNA [70]. The kit used was the Hieff NGS® Ultima Dual-mode mRNA Library Prep Kit. It was first determined by agarose gel electrophoresis; then, prior to library construction, the concentration and integrity of RNA were examined using a Qubit 2.0 fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) to detect RNA concentration and integrity. The library construction process includes RNA fragmentation, first- and second-strand cDNA synthesis, end repair, adenylation and aptamer ligation. Afterwards, 250–300 bp cDNA fragments were selected using the AMPure XP system and post-processed for size selection using the USER enzyme. Finally, after amplification and purification of the product by PCR, the library quality assessment was completed and sequenced on March 24, 2023; after library construction was completed, the library quality was initially quantified using the Qubit dye method. The insert size of the libraries was examined using a fragment analyzer, and the insert size met the expectation before proceeding to the next step of the experiments. The effective concentration of the libraries was accurately quantified by the Q-PCR method (effective concentration of the libraries > two nM), and the library check was completed. When the libraries were constructed to meet quality control standards, they were sequenced on the Illumina platform. The sequencing was performed using paired-end technology with a read length of 150 base pairs (bp) [71]. Fastp v0.19.3 [72] was used to process the raw reads based on the sequencing quality. Reads with adapter sequences, nitrogen content exceeding 10% of the alkali bases of the read, or bases of low quality (Q ≤ 20) exceeding 50% of the read were removed; both paired reads were removed in the latter two cases to obtain clean data. The reference genome used in this project was GCF_001683475.1_ASM168347v1_genomic.fna (weblink address: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/?term=quinoa). HISAT v2.1.0 [73] was used to build an index, compare clean reads with the specified reference genome, and obtain mapped data. Mapped data were obtained for subsequent structural level analysis and expression level analysis. StringTie v1.3.4 [74] was used to predict new genes, and FeatureCounts v1.6.2 [75] was used to calculate the gene alignment. Differential expression analysis between groups was performed using DESeq2 v1.22.1 [76], and p-values were corrected using the Benjamini–Hochberg method. After the analysis of variance, multiple hypothesis testing correction for hypothesis testing probability (P value) was also required to obtain the False Discovery Rate (FDR) using the Benjamini–Hochberg method. Differential genes were screened for |log2Fold Change|≥ 1 and FDR < 0.05.

Metabolite extraction and qualitative and quantitative analysis

In this study, the biological samples were placed in a lyophilizer (Scientz-100F) using vacuum freeze-drying technique, and then the samples (30 Hz, 1.5 min) were ground into powder using a grinder (MM 400, Retsch). Then, 50 mg quinoa seed sample powder was weighed using an electronic balance (MS105D Μ), and 1200 μL −20 °C pre-cooled 70% methanol aqueous internal standardized extract was added (less than 50 mg was added at the rate of 1200 μL extractant per 50 mg of sample). Vortexing was performed every 30 min for 30 s for a total of six times. After centrifugation (12,000 rpm, three min), the supernatant was aspirated, and the sample was filtered through a microporous membrane with a pore size of 0.22 μm and stored in an injection vial for UPLC-MS/MS analysis. Using ultra-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) technology, combined with the self-built database mwdb (software database), we successfully integrated the data of a variety of target metabonomics and quantitatively identified 1538 metabolites [77]. We screened out differential metabolites based on VIP ≥ 1, equivalent change ≥ 2, and equivalent change ≤ 0.5, which provided valuable data resources for subsequent research [78].

Germination measurement

The germination rate and germination index were recorded for Dianli-222 and Dianli-654 according to Eqs. (1 and 2) [79] as follows:

Germinationrate%=NumberofgerminatedseedsTotalnumberoftestedseeds×100% 1
Germinationindex%=GtDt×100% 2

Gt is the number of germinations at time t, and Dt is the corresponding days to germination.

Determination of starch, sucrose and α-amylase content

Physiological indices related to starch content, sucrose content and α-amylase content during the germination of quinoa ears were determined using the Starch Content Determination Kit, Sucrose Content Determination Kit and α-Amylase Content Determination Kit (Wuhan Puyinte Bioengineering Co., Ltd., http://www.pytbio.com). The experiments and calculations were performed strictly according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Construction of WGCNA co-expression network

Co-expression network analysis was performed using the WGCNA package in R version 4.1.1 [80]. Genes with low expression and no change were filtered, and the top 80% of expression variants in the samples were screened using the Genefilter package in R. A total of 9,519 genes were finally identified. Then, pickSoftThreshold in the WGCNA package was used to calculate the weight values so that the network conformed to the scale-free network distribution. The optimal soft threshold is chosen to be 14. Genes with similar expression patterns were classified into the same module, which was divided into nine modules, and the correlation of each module with physiological traits and related metabolites was calculated.

Functional annotation and enrichment analysis of modular genes

Correlation coefficients r and P-values were calculated for ME values of each module with different traits. r-values responded to the interrelationships of the events and P-values responded to the probability of occurrence of the events. In this study, gene ontology (http://www.geneontology.org/) [55] and KEGG [56] analysis (http://www.kegg.jp/kegg/pathway.html) were performed on the modules in order to understand the functioning of the particular module.

Screening of hub genes

The connectivity of genes within a module represents their regulatory relationships with other genes. Connectivity indicates a gene's role in the module; higher connectivity suggests a stronger regulatory role and potential to become a core gene. Thus, by calculating the KME (module eigengene-based connectivity) values within the module, the top 20 genes were initially selected as candidate core genes. Subsequently, Cytoscape 3.10.0 (https://www.cytoscape.org) was used to screen core genes in the relevant modules. Genes with high connectivity and expression were selected as central genes within the module, and these top-ranked genes were designated as hub genes [81].

Transcription factors

Transcription factors (TFs) play an important role in regulating various abiotic stress responses. We submitted the protein sequences of the core genes to the plantTFDB database for analysis to obtain the transcription factor families of each module, and then submitted them to the TAIR Arabidopsis website to understand the functions of the core genes.

Real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR analysis

To verify the accuracy of the module core gene expression and transcriptome, we designed primers for the relevant genes using Beacon Designer 7.9. The eLF-3 gene was selected as the internal reference gene [82]. RT-qPCR was performed using the StepOnePlus instrument (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) with PerfectStart SYBR qPCR Supermix (TransGen Biotech, Beijing, China). The reaction volume was 20 µL (Table.S14), and the thermal cycling conditions were set to 94℃ (30 s), 94℃ (5 s), 60℃ (30 s)for 40 cycles. Finally, the 2 − ∆∆Ct method was used to calculate the relative gene expression levels [83].

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Material 2. (252.5KB, pdf)
Supplementary Material 3. (174.1KB, pdf)
Supplementary Material 4. (180.5KB, pdf)
Supplementary Material 5. (367.9KB, pdf)
Supplementary Material 7. (163.2KB, pdf)

Acknowledgements

We wish to acknowledge the Wuhan Metware Biotechnology Co., Ltd., for professional technical services.

Abbreviations

TF

Transcription factor

WGCNA

Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis;

GO

Gene Ontology

KEGG

Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes

Authors’ contributions

L.B.H wrote the original draft and performed the methodology. L.Y.Z wrote the original draft and carried out the formal analysis. P.Z did the conceptualization, and wrote, reviewed, and edited the manuscript. J.N.L carried out the formal analysis, performed the methodology, and visualized the data. L.L collected the field samples and prepared the plant materials. H.X.L carried out the formal analysis and investigated the data. X.Q.W, Y.T.B, and G.F.J carried out the formal analysis and investigated the data. P.Q supervised the data and carried out the project administration and funding acquisition. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

We gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the Academician Expert Workstation (202405AF140012) and the Yunnan Expert Workstation (202205AF150001) and the "Xingdian Talent" Industry Innovation Talent Program in Yunnan Province (XDYCCYCX-2022–0029).

Data availability

The original contributions presented in the study are publicly available. This data can be found in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) SRA database under accession number SRP474959. The names of the repository and accession number(s) can be found below: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/SRP474959.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study complies with relevant institutional, national, and international guidelines and legislation. All procedures were conducted in accordance with the guidelines. We hereby declare that the materials used in this study (Dianli-222, Dianli-654) were independently selected and bred by Qin Peng’s group at Yunnan Agricultural University and that we have the right to use them. In this study, stable quinoa lines independently selected by Yunnan Agricultural University were used as materials and named Dianli-222 and Dianli-654 by Professor Qin Peng. The lines of quinoa seeds are cultivars, not wild. Quinoa seeds were collected with permission in accordance with institutional and national guidelines. The collection of quinoa lines is in line with institutional and national guidelines.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Liubin Huang and Lingyuan Zhang contributed equally to this work.

References

  • 1.Pathan S, Siddiqui RA. Nutritional Composition and Bioactive Components in Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) Greens: A Review. Nutrients. 2022;14(3):558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 2.Lin M, Han P, Li Y, Wang W, Lai D, Zhou L. Quinoa Secondary Metabolites and Their Biological Activities or Functions. Molecules. 2019;24(13):2512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 3.Tabatabaei I, Alseekh S, Shahid M, Leniak E, Wagner M, Mahmoudi H, Thushar S, Fernie AR, Murphy KM, Schmockel SM, et al. The diversity of quinoa morphological traits and seed metabolic composition. SCI DATA. 2022;9(1):323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Liu Y, Liu J, Li L, Zhang P, Wang Q, Qin P. Transcriptome and Metabolome Combined to Analyze Quinoa Grain Quality Differences of Different Colors Cultivars. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(21):12883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 5.Vega-Galvez A, Miranda M, Vergara J, Uribe E, Puente L, Martinez EA. Nutrition facts and functional potential of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa willd.), an ancient Andean grain: a review. J Sci Food Agric. 2010;90(15):2541–7. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 6.Lopez-Marques RL, Norrevang AF, Ache P, Moog M, Visintainer D, Wendt T, Osterberg JT, Dockter C, Jorgensen ME, Salvador AT, et al. Prospects for the accelerated improvement of the resilient crop quinoa. J EXP BOT. 2020;71(18):5333–47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Anuradha, Kumari M, Zinta G, Chauhan R, Kumar A, Singh S, Singh S: Genetic resources and breeding approaches for improvement of amaranth (Amaranthus spp.) and quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa). Front Nutr 2023, 10:1129723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 8.Li H, Wang Q, Huang T, Liu J, Zhang P, Li L, Xie H, Wang H, Liu C, Qin P. Transcriptome and Metabolome Analyses Reveal Mechanisms Underlying the Response of Quinoa Seedlings to Nitrogen Fertilizers. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(14):11580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 9.Bodrug-Schepers A, Stralis-Pavese N, Buerstmayr H, Dohm JC, Himmelbauer H. Quinoa genome assembly employing genomic variation for guided scaffolding. THEOR APPL GENET. 2021;134(11):3577–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mhada M, Metougui ML, El HK, El KK, Yasri A. Variations of Saponins, Minerals and Total Phenolic Compounds Due to Processing and Cooking of Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) Seeds. Foods. 2020;9(5):660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 11.Wu G, Peterson AJ, Morris CF, Murphy KM. Quinoa Seed Quality Response to Sodium Chloride and Sodium Sulfate Salinity. FRONT PLANT SCI. 2016;7:790. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Dakhili S, Abdolalizadeh L, Hosseini SM, Shojaee-Aliabadi S, Mirmoghtadaie L. Quinoa protein: Composition, structure and functional properties. FOOD CHEM. 2019;299: 125161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Abugoch JL: Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.): composition, chemistry, nutritional, and functional properties. Adv Food Nutr Res 2009, 58:1–31. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 14.Ain QT, Siddique K, Bawazeer S, Ali I, Mazhar M, Rasool R, Mubeen B, Ullah F, Unar A, Jafar TH. Adaptive mechanisms in quinoa for coping in stressful environments: an update. PeerJ. 2023;11: e14832. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hao Y, Hong Y, Guo H, Qin P, Huang A, Yang X, Ren G. Transcriptomic and metabolomic landscape of quinoa during seed germination. BMC PLANT BIOL. 2022;22(1):237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kou C, Peng C, Dong H, Hu L, Xu W. Mapping quantitative trait loci and developing their KASP markers for pre-harvest sprouting resistance of Henan wheat varieties in China. FRONT PLANT SCI. 2023;14:1118777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Park SY, Jung WJ, Bang G, Hwang H, Kim JY. Transcriptome and Proteome Co-Profiling Offers an Understanding of Pre-Harvest Sprouting (PHS) Molecular Mechanisms in Wheat (Triticum aestivum). Plants (Basel). 2022;11(21):2807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 18.Martinez SA, Godoy J, Huang M, Zhang Z, Carter AH, Garland CK, Steber CM. Genome-Wide Association Mapping for Tolerance to Preharvest Sprouting and Low Falling Numbers in Wheat. FRONT PLANT SCI. 2018;9:141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Chang C, Zhang H, Lu J, Si H, Ma C. Genetic Improvement of Wheat with Pre-Harvest Sprouting Resistance in China. Genes (Basel). 2023;14(4):837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 20.Lin M, Zhang D, Liu S, Zhang G, Yu J, Fritz AK, Bai G: Genome-wide association analysis on pre-harvest sprouting resistance and grain color in U.S. winter wheat. BMC GENOMICS 2016, 17(1):794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 21.Nakamura S, Abe F, Kawahigashi H, Nakazono K, Tagiri A, Matsumoto T, Utsugi S, Ogawa T, Handa H, Ishida H, et al. A wheat homolog of MOTHER OF FT AND TFL1 acts in the regulation of germination. Plant Cell. 2011;23(9):3215–29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Walker-Simmons M. ABA Levels and Sensitivity in Developing Wheat Embryos of Sprouting Resistant and Susceptible Cultivars. PLANT PHYSIOL. 1987;84(1):61–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Himi E, Maekawa M, Miura H, Noda K. Development of PCR markers for Tamyb10 related to R-1, red grain color gene in wheat. THEOR APPL GENET. 2011;122(8):1561–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Mares D, Mrva K, Cheong J, Williams K, Watson B, Storlie E, Sutherland M, Zou Y. A QTL located on chromosome 4A associated with dormancy in white- and red-grained wheats of diverse origin. THEOR APPL GENET. 2005;111(7):1357–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Zeeman SC, Kossmann J, Smith AM. Starch: its metabolism, evolution, and biotechnological modification in plants. ANNU REV PLANT BIOL. 2010;61:209–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Sun M, Yamasaki Y, Ayele BT. Comparative expression analysis of starch degrading genes between dormant and non-dormant wheat seeds. Plant Signal Behav. 2018;13(1): e1411449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Colmer J, O’Neill CM, Wells R, Bostrom A, Reynolds D, Websdale D, Shiralagi G, Lu W, Lou Q, Le Cornu T, et al. SeedGerm: a cost-effective phenotyping platform for automated seed imaging and machine-learning based phenotypic analysis of crop seed germination. NEW PHYTOL. 2020;228(2):778–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Borner A, Nagel M, Agacka-Moldoch M, Gierke PU, Oberforster M, Albrecht T, Mohler V: QTL analysis of falling number and seed longevity in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). J APPL GENET 2018, 59(1):35–42. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 29.Chen K, Li GJ, Bressan RA, Song CP, Zhu JK, Zhao Y. Abscisic acid dynamics, signaling, and functions in plants. J INTEGR PLANT BIOL. 2020;62(1):25–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Mizuno Y, Yamanouchi U, Hoshino T, Nonoue Y, Nagata K, Fukuoka S, Ando T, Yano M, Sugimoto K. Genetic dissection of pre-harvest sprouting resistance in an upland rice cultivar. Breed Sci. 2018;68(2):200–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Wang L, Cheng J, Lai Y, Du W, Huang X, Wang Z, Zhang H. Identification of QTLs with additive, epistatic and QTL x development interaction effects for seed dormancy in rice. Planta. 2014;239(2):411–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Zhang YC, Yu Y, Wang CY, Li ZY, Liu Q, Xu J, Liao JY, Wang XJ, Qu LH, Chen F, et al. Overexpression of microRNA OsmiR397 improves rice yield by increasing grain size and promoting panicle branching. NAT BIOTECHNOL. 2013;31(9):848–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kim D, Cho YH, Ryu H, Kim Y, Kim TH, Hwang I. BLH1 and KNAT3 modulate ABA responses during germination and early seedling development in Arabidopsis. PLANT J. 2013;75(5):755–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Liu K, Chen S, Lu R. Identification of important genes related to ferroptosis and hypoxia in acute myocardial infarction based on WGCNA. Bioengineered. 2021;12(1):7950–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Tian Z, He W, Tang J, Liao X, Yang Q, Wu Y, Wu G. Identification of Important Modules and Biomarkers in Breast Cancer Based on WGCNA. Onco Targets Ther. 2020;13:6805–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Tahmasebi A, Ashrafi-Dehkordi E, Shahriari AG, Mazloomi SM, Ebrahimie E. Integrative meta-analysis of transcriptomic responses to abiotic stress in cotton. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2019;146:112–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Zhu M, Xie H, Wei X, Dossa K, Yu Y, Hui S, Tang G, Zeng X, Yu Y, Hu P, et al. WGCNA Analysis of Salt-Responsive Core Transcriptome Identifies Novel Hub Genes in Rice. Genes (Basel). 2019;10(9):719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 38.Li Y, Zhang Y, Luo H, Lv D, Yi Z, Duan M, Deng M. WGCNA Analysis Revealed the Hub Genes Related to Soil Cadmium Stress in Maize Kernel (Zea mays L.). Genes (Basel). 2022;13(11):2130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 39.Zhao X, Wang S, Guo F, Xia P: Genome-wide identification of polyamine metabolism and ethylene synthesis genes in Chenopodium quinoa Willd. and their responses to low-temperature stress. BMC GENOMICS 2024, 25(1):370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 40.Lee CM, Park HS, Baek MK, Jeong OY, Seo J, Kim SM. QTL mapping and improvement of pre-harvest sprouting resistance using japonica weedy rice. FRONT PLANT SCI. 2023;14:1194058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Park M, Shin SY, Moon H, Choi W, Shin C: Analysis of the global transcriptome and miRNAome associated with seed dormancy during seed maturation in rice (Oryza sativa L. cv. Nipponbare). BMC PLANT BIOL 2024, 24(1):215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 42.Lang J, Jiang H, Cheng M, Wang M, Gu J, Dong H, Li M, Guo X, Chen Q, Wang J: Variation of TaMyb10 and their function on grain color and pre-harvest sprouting resistance of wheat. PLANT J 2024. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 43.Kumar M, Kumar S, Sandhu KS, Kumar N, Saripalli G, Prakash R, Nambardar A, Sharma H, Gautam T, Balyan HS, et al. GWAS and genomic prediction for pre-harvest sprouting tolerance involving sprouting score and two other related traits in spring wheat. Mol Breed. 2023;43(3):14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Rabieyan E, Bihamta MR, Moghaddam ME, Mohammadi V, Alipour H. Genome-wide association mapping and genomic prediction for pre-harvest sprouting resistance, low alpha-amylase and seed color in Iranian bread wheat. BMC PLANT BIOL. 2022;22(1):300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Groos C, Gay G, Perretant MR, Gervais L, Bernard M, Dedryver F, Charmet G. Study of the relationship between pre-harvest sprouting and grain color by quantitative trait loci analysis in a whitexred grain bread-wheat cross. THEOR APPL GENET. 2002;104(1):39–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Zhu Y, Lin Y, Fan Y, Wang Y, Li P, Xiong J, He Y, Cheng S, Ye X, Wang F, et al. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated restoration of Tamyb10 to create pre-harvest sprouting-resistant red wheat. PLANT BIOTECHNOL J. 2023;21(4):665–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Liu X, Zhang H, Zhao Y, Feng Z, Li Q, Yang HQ, Luan S, Li J, He ZH. Auxin controls seed dormancy through stimulation of abscisic acid signaling by inducing ARF-mediated ABI3 activation in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(38):15485–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Ali-Rachedi S, Bouinot D, Wagner MH, Bonnet M, Sotta B, Grappin P, Jullien M. Changes in endogenous abscisic acid levels during dormancy release and maintenance of mature seeds: studies with the Cape Verde Islands ecotype, the dormant model of Arabidopsis thaliana. Planta. 2004;219(3):479–88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Jacobsen JV, Pearce DW, Poole AT, Pharis RP, Mander LN. Abscisic acid, phaseic acid and gibberellin contents associated with dormancy and germination in barley. Physiol Plant. 2002;115(3):428–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Okamoto M, Kuwahara A, Seo M, Kushiro T, Asami T, Hirai N, Kamiya Y, Koshiba T, Nambara E. CYP707A1 and CYP707A2, which encode abscisic acid 8’-hydroxylases, are indispensable for proper control of seed dormancy and germination in Arabidopsis. PLANT PHYSIOL. 2006;141(1):97–107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Iuchi S, Kobayashi M, Taji T, Naramoto M, Seki M, Kato T, Tabata S, Kakubari Y, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K. Regulation of drought tolerance by gene manipulation of 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase, a key enzyme in abscisic acid biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. PLANT J. 2001;27(4):325–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Zhang Q, Pritchard J, Mieog J, Byrne K, Colgrave ML, Wang JR, Ral JF. Over-Expression of a Wheat Late Maturity Alpha-Amylase Type 1 Impact on Starch Properties During Grain Development and Germination. FRONT PLANT SCI. 2022;13: 811728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Cong WF, Suriyagoda L, Lambers H. Tightening the Phosphorus Cycle through Phosphorus-Efficient Crop Genotypes. TRENDS PLANT SCI. 2020;25(10):967–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Yu B, Liu J, Wu D, Liu Y, Cen W, Wang S, Li R, Luo J. Weighted gene coexpression network analysis-based identification of key modules and hub genes associated with drought sensitivity in rice. BMC PLANT BIOL. 2020;20(1):478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Lu Y, Rosenfeld R, Simon I, Nau GJ, Bar-Joseph Z. A probabilistic generative model for GO enrichment analysis. NUCLEIC ACIDS RES. 2008;36(17): e109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Du J, Li M, Yuan Z, Guo M, Song J, Xie X, Chen Y. A decision analysis model for KEGG pathway analysis. BMC Bioinformatics. 2016;17(1):407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Cheng X, Lei S, Li J, Tian B, Li C, Cao J, Lu J, Ma C, Chang C, Zhang H. In silico analysis of the wheat BBX gene family and identification of candidate genes for seed dormancy and germination. BMC PLANT BIOL. 2024;24(1):334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Yang L, Jiang Z, Liu S, Lin R. Interplay between REVEILLE1 and RGA-LIKE2 regulates seed dormancy and germination in Arabidopsis. NEW PHYTOL. 2020;225(4):1593–605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Sabir IA, Manzoor MA, Shah IH, Liu X, Zahid MS, Jiu S, Wang J, Abdullah M, Zhang C: MYB transcription factor family in sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.): genome-wide investigation, evolution, structure, characterization and expression patterns. BMC PLANT BIOL 2022, 22(1):2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 60.Ding Q, Zeng J, He XQ. MiR169 and its target PagHAP2-6 regulated by ABA are involved in poplar cambium dormancy. J PLANT PHYSIOL. 2016;198:1–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Siriwardana CL, Kumimoto RW, Jones DS, Holt BR. Gene Family Analysis of the Arabidopsis NF-YA Transcription Factors Reveals Opposing Abscisic Acid Responses During Seed Germination. Plant Mol Biol Report. 2014;32(5):971–86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Gao Y, Liu J, Chen Y, Tang H, Wang Y, He Y, Ou Y, Sun X, Wang S, Yao Y. Tomato SlAN11 regulates flavonoid biosynthesis and seed dormancy by interaction with bHLH proteins but not with MYB proteins. Hortic Res. 2018;5:27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Liu F, Zhang H, Ding L, Soppe W, Xiang Y. REVERSAL OF RDO5 1, a Homolog of Rice Seed Dormancy 4, Interacts with bHLH57 and Controls ABA Biosynthesis and Seed Dormancy in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2020;32(6):1933–48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Mei Y, Wang Y, Chen H, Sun ZS, Ju XD. Recent Progress in CRISPR/Cas9 Technology. J GENET GENOMICS. 2016;43(2):63–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Schropfer S, Lempe J, Emeriewen OF, Flachowsky H. Recent Developments and Strategies for the Application of Agrobacterium-Mediated Transformation of Apple Malus x domestica Borkh. FRONT PLANT SCI. 2022;13: 928292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Liu D, Zeng M, Wu Y, Du Y, Liu J, Luo S, Zeng Y. Comparative transcriptomic analysis provides insights into the molecular basis underlying pre-harvest sprouting in rice. BMC Genomics. 2022;23(1):771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Wei J, Fang Y, Jiang H, Wu XT, Zuo JH, Xia XC, Li JQ, Stich B, Cao H, Liu YX. Combining QTL mapping and gene co-expression network analysis for prediction of candidate genes and molecular network related to yield in wheat. BMC PLANT BIOL. 2022;22(1):288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Benincasa P, Falcinelli B, Lutts S, Stagnari F, Galieni A. Sprouted Grains: A Comprehensive Review. Nutrients. 2019;11(2):421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 69.Ramos-Pacheco BS, Choque-Quispe D, Ligarda-Samanez CA, Solano-Reynoso AM, Palomino-Rincon H, Choque-Quispe Y, Peralta-Guevara DE, et al. Effect of Germination on the Physicochemical Properties, Functional Groups, Content of Bioactive Compounds, and Antioxidant Capacity of Different Varieties of Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) Grown in the High Andean Zone of Peru. Foods. 2024;13(3):417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 70.Wang Q, Guo Y, Huang T, Zhang X, Zhang P, Xie H, Liu J, Li L, Kong Z, Qin P. Transcriptome and Metabolome Analyses Revealed the Response Mechanism of Quinoa Seedlings to Different Phosphorus Stresses. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(9):4704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 71.Huang T, Zhang X, Wang Q, Guo Y, Xie H, Li L, Zhang P, Liu J, Qin P. Metabolome and transcriptome profiles in quinoa seedlings in response to potassium supply. BMC PLANT BIOL. 2022;22(1):604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Chen S, Zhou Y, Chen Y, Gu J. fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics. 2018;34(17):i884–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Kim D, Langmead B, Salzberg SL. HISAT: a fast spliced aligner with low memory requirements. NAT METHODS. 2015;12(4):357–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Pertea M, Pertea GM, Antonescu CM, Chang TC, Mendell JT, Salzberg SL. StringTie enables improved reconstruction of a transcriptome from RNA-seq reads. NAT BIOTECHNOL. 2015;33(3):290–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Liao Y, Smyth GK, Shi W. featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(7):923–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Varet H, Brillet-Gueguen L, Coppee JY, Dillies MA. SARTools: A DESeq2- and EdgeR-Based R Pipeline for Comprehensive Differential Analysis of RNA-Seq Data. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(6): e157022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Li X, Zhang P, Liu J, Wang H, Liu J, Li H, Xie H, Wang Q, Li L, Zhang S, et al. Integrated Metabolomic and Transcriptomic Analysis of the Quinoa Seedling Response to High Relative Humidity Stress. Biomolecules. 2023;13(9):1352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 78.Xie H, Wang Q, Zhang P, Zhang X, Huang T, Guo Y, Liu J, Li L, Li H, Qin P. Transcriptomic and Metabolomic Analysis of the Response of Quinoa Seedlings to Low Temperatures. Biomolecules. 2022;12(7):977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 79.Wang C, Wu B, Jiang K. Allelopathic effects of Canada goldenrod leaf extracts on the seed germination and seedling growth of lettuce reinforced under salt stress. Ecotoxicology. 2019;28(1):103–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Zhang Y, Qu X, Li X, Ren M, Tong Y, Wu X, Sun Y, Wu F, Yang A, Chen S. Comprehensive transcriptome and WGCNA analysis reveals the potential function of anthocyanins in low-temperature resistance of a red flower mutant tobacco. Genomics. 2023;115(6): 110728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Shannon P, Markiel A, Ozier O, Baliga NS, Wang JT, Ramage D, Amin N, Schwikowski B, Ideker T. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. GENOME RES. 2003;13(11):2498–504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Zhu X, Wang B, Wang X, Wei X. Screening of stable internal reference gene of Quinoa under hormone treatment and abiotic stress. Physiol Mol Biol Plants. 2021;27(11):2459–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2001;25(4):402–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Material 2. (252.5KB, pdf)
Supplementary Material 3. (174.1KB, pdf)
Supplementary Material 4. (180.5KB, pdf)
Supplementary Material 5. (367.9KB, pdf)
Supplementary Material 7. (163.2KB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are publicly available. This data can be found in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) SRA database under accession number SRP474959. The names of the repository and accession number(s) can be found below: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/SRP474959.


Articles from BMC Genomics are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES