Skip to main content
PeerJ logoLink to PeerJ
. 2024 Dec 18;12:e18667. doi: 10.7717/peerj.18667

Comparative analysis of Hymenasplenium (Aspleniaceae) chloroplast genomes from China

Yanfen Chang 1,2,, Zhixin Wang 1,2, Guocheng Zhang 1,2, Na Wang 1,2, Limin Cao 1,2
Editor: Mikhail Gelfand
PMCID: PMC11662895  PMID: 39713145

Abstract

Hymenasplenium is one of the two genera in the large fern family Aspleniaceae. A previous study explored the molecular phylogeny of this genus using several chloroplast DNA fragments and identified three major clades, one of which is the monophyletic Old World clade with southwestern China as its diversity center. To date, there were only a few studies conducted on chloroplast genomes in Hymenasplenium or Aspleniaceae, limiting the understanding of the plastome features and its role in evolution of this group. Here, we studied the complete chloroplast genomes of 12 Hymenasplenium species covering all four subclades of the Old World clade distributed in China. The length of the Hymenasplenium plastomes ranged from 151,617 to 151,930 bp, and contained 129 genes in total, comprising 87 protein-coding, 34 tRNA, and eight rRNA genes. The GC content ranged from 41.8% to 42.1%. Comparative analyses of the Hymenasplenium chloroplast genomes displayed conserved genomic structure and identical gene arrangement. A total of 1,375 simple sequence repeats and 1,639 large repeats were detected. In addition, we detailed hypervariable regions that can be helpful for further phylogenetic research and species delimitation in Hymenasplenium. Furthermore, we supported phylogenetic relationships among major groups as well as possible cryptic speciation found in previous research in the genus. Our study provides new insights into evolutionary history and basic resources for phylogenetic and taxonomic studies of the genus Hymenasplenium.

Keywords: Hymenasplenium, Chloroplast genome, Hypervariable regions, Phylogenomics, Relationship

Introduction

The genus Hymenasplenium Hayata is one of the two genera in the species-rich and nearly globally distributed fern family Aspleniaceae (The Pteridophyte Phylogeny Group I, 2016; Xu et al., 2020). Unlike the large genus Asplenium L., which has more than 700 species, Hymenasplenium contains only about 60 species (The Pteridophyte Phylogeny Group I, 2016; Xu et al., 2020). Most species of Hymenasplenium are distributed in southwestern China, with some outliers extending to the tropical regions of the New World, Afro-Madagascar, and tropical Asia (Xu et al., 2018). Morphologically, members of this genus can be easily recognized by distinguishing characteristics, such as long-creeping rhizomes and mostly 1-pinnate laminae (Xu et al., 2018).

Three major clades including several subclades were identified in a previous phylogenetic study of Hymenasplenium using six chloroplast DNA fragments (Xu et al., 2018). One of the major clades is the monophyletic Old World clade with southwestern China as its diversity center. Some species in the subclades of this paleotropical clade are highly polyphyletic or paraphyletic, and thus have been regarded as complexes or aggregates, including H. excisum (C. Presl) S. Lindsay, H. hondoense (N. Murak. & Hatan.) Nakaike, H. cheilosorum (Kunze ex Mett.) Tagawa, H. unilaterale (Lam.) Hayata, and H. obliquissimum (Hayata) Sugimoto (Ching, 1965; Murakami, 1995; Lin & Viane, 2013; Xu et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 2021; Chang et al., 2022). Species delimitation and relationships within these complexes or aggregates remain obscure. Moreover, recent phylogenetic studies have showed incongruences between the plastid and nuclear topologies, suggesting hybridization and reticulate evolution, leading to confusion about the evolutionary history of Hymenasplenium (Chang et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 2021). However, there were only a small number of nuclear gene or plastid fragments that were used for the above mentioned phylogenetic studies, which generally resulted in poor resolution of phylogenetic trees. Thus, more suitable and informative polymorphic regions are needed to be identified for further investigation of species delimitation and evolution of the genus Hymenasplenium.

The whole chloroplast genomes usually contain a larger number of phylogenetic information with a sufficient mutation rate for species delimitation and phylogenetic inference than short DNA sequences (Moore et al., 2010; Zhang et al., 2017). Therefore, plastome sequences are useful for generating phylogenetic trees with robust support, particularly for those taxa in low taxonomic levels that normally only have weak support in traditional sequencing analyses (Mower & Vickrey, 2018). In recent years, an increasing number of comparative analyses of complete chloroplast genomes have been used for phylogenetic research in many land plants including ferns (Wolf & Karol, 2012; Lu et al., 2015; Wei et al., 2017; Li et al., 2018). However, a few chloroplast genomes have been reported for Hymenasplenium or Aspleniaceae species. To date, only one plastome sequence of a Hymenasplenium species is available in NCBI GenBank database (H. laterepens N. Murak. & X. Cheng ex Y. Fen Chang & K. Hori, accession number NC035856) (Wei et al., 2017), and there are no comparative chloroplast genome analyses of Hymenasplenium yet.

In this study, in order to investigate the chloroplast genome features of Hymenasplenium species and enrich the information of its complicated evolutionary history, we sequenced and assembled plastomes from species of the monophyletic Old World clade in the genus, with sampling covering all four subclades distributed in southwestern China where have proved to be the most diverse place for the clade. We aimed (1) to investigate the structural characteristics and compositional variations in Hymenasplenium chloroplast genomes from China, (2) to identify highly variable regions that can be useful for phylogenetic study and species delimitation in the genus, and (3) to construct phylogenetic trees for Hymenasplenium based on the whole chloroplast genomes. The results of this study will improve our understanding of chloroplast genome features and their contribution to species delimitation and evolution in the genus Hymenasplenium.

Materials and methods

Taxon sampling, DNA extraction, and sequencing

A total of 22 samples of 12 species from four subclades (H. hondoense subclade, H. excisum subclade, H. cheilosorum subclade and H. obliquissimum subclade) in the Old World clade of Hymenasplenium were collected from China in their native ranges (Table 1). For DNA extraction, the fresh leaf tissues of all samples were collected and properly stored, and voucher specimens were preserved in the herbarium at Hengyang Normal University (HYNU). In addition, one publicly available complete chloroplast genome of Hymenasplenium (H. laterepens, accession number NC035856), was downloaded with annotations from NCBI GenBank.

Table 1. Samples information and accession numbers that were investigated in the present study.

Species Subclade Location Voucher no. Accession number
H. laterepens H. hondoense subclade Guizhou 7191 NC035856
H. laterepens H. hondoense subclade Xishuangbanna, Yunnan chang1156 PQ187905
H. apogamum H. hondoense subclade Xishuangbanna, Yunnan chang995 PQ187899
H. apogamum H. hondoense subclade Xishuangbanna, Yunnan chang1040 PQ187901
H. apogamum H. hondoense subclade Xishuangbanna, Yunnan chang1037 PQ187903
H. apogamum H. hondoense subclade Xishuangbanna, Yunnan chang1155 PQ187904
H. apogamum H. hondoense subclade Xishuangbanna, Yunnan chang1354 PQ187915
H. chingii H. hondoense subclade Gongshan, Yunnan chang1082 PQ187898
H. chingii H. hondoense subclade Miyi, Sichuan chang1144 PQ187913
H. wangpeishanii H. hondoense subclade Zhangjiajie, Hunan chang1341 PQ187902
H. wangpeishanii H. hondoense subclade Nanyue, Hunan chang1337 PQ187906
H. murakami-hatanakae H. hondoense subclade Taiwan chencc1089 PQ187900
H. cheilosorum H. cheilosorum subclade Xishuangbanna, Yunnan chang994 PQ187896
H. cheilosorum H. cheilosorum subclade Xishuangbanna, Yunnan chang1272 PQ187909
H. cheilosorum H. cheilosorum subclade Xishuangbanna, Yunnan chang1280 PQ187910
H. excisum H. excisum subclade Xishuangbanna, Yunnan chang992 PQ187897
H. excisum H. excisum subclade Xishuangbanna, Yunnan chang1045 PQ187914
H. obtusidentatum H. excisum subclade Xishuangbanna, Yunnan chang1258 PQ187907
H. obtusidentatum H. excisum subclade Xishuangbanna, Yunnan chang1261 PQ187908
H. furfuraceum H. obliquissimum subclade Gongshan, Yunnan chang1072 PQ187895
H. sinense H. obliquissimum subclade Jinping, Yunnan chang1108 PQ187911
H. wuliangshanense H. obliquissimum subclade Jingdong, Yunnan chang1102 PQ187894
H. retusulum H. obliquissimum subclade Yongde, Yunnan chang1064 PQ187912

Using a Plant Genomic DNA Kit (Tiangen Biotech, Beijing, China), the total genomic DNA was extracted following the manufacturer’s protocol. A Qubit 2.0 (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) was used to quantify the extracted DNA. The qualified DNA (≥50 ng) was then sequenced on a HiSeq platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA), and a paired-end (150 bp) DNA library was constructed.

Plastome sequence assembly and annotation

To remove low-quality reads from the sequenced raw data, the fastp v.0.23.1 software (Chen et al., 2018) was used to filter the raw reads. NOVOPlasty 3.7 (Dierckxsens, Mardulyn & Smits, 2016) pipeline was used to assemble the filtered reads of genome-related chloroplasts, with the ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (rbcL) gene from H. laterepens (accession number KY427350) used as a seed sequence, and the chloroplast genome sequence of H. laterepens (accession number NC035856) used as the reference genome. After aligning with the reference genome sequence, Geneious Prime 2024.0 (Kearse et al., 2012) was used to annotate the plastome sequences of Hymenasplenium, with necessary manual adjustments. The assembled and annotated plastome sequences were all deposited in NCBI GenBank (see Table 1 for accession numbers). OrganellarGenomeDRAW (OGDRAW) (Greiner, Lehwark & Bock, 2019) was then used to visualize the circular chloroplast genome maps.

Chloroplast genome comparative analyses

MAFFT v.7 (Katoh & Standley, 2013), with default parameters, was performed to align the 22 newly sequenced chloroplast genome sequences, along with the single sequence downloaded from NCBI GenBank (H. laterepens, accession number NC035856). The trimAI v1.2 (Capella-Gutiérrez, Silla-Martinez & Gabaldón, 2009) was then performed for the alignment for further trimming, with the “-gappyout” setting used. The IRscope online tool (Amiryousefi, Hyvönen & Poczai, 2018) was used to visualize expansions and contractions of IR regions. DnaSP v.5 (Librado & Rozas, 2009) was used to calculate the nucleotide diversity (Pi), with a window length set to 800 bp and a step size set to 200 bp. The mVISTA online tool (Frazer et al., 2004) in Shufe-LAGAN mode was used to analyze the plastome divergence of all 23 Hymenasplenium chloroplast genomes, using H. laterepens (accession number NC035856) as a reference.

Repeat sequence identification

The REPuter online tool (Kurtz et al., 2001) was used to look for the short-dispersed repeats (SDRs) of the 23 Hymenasplenium chloroplast genome sequences. With the cutoff point set to ≥30 bp, sequence identities set to 90%, minimum repeat size set to 30 bp, and Hamming distance value set to three, the palindromic, forward, complementary, and reverse repeats were then identified. To analyze the tandem repeat sequences, a Tandem Repeat Finder (Benson, 1999) was used, with default parameters. The MIcroSAtellite (MISA) identification tool (Beier et al., 2017) was applied to identify simple sequence repeats (SSRs), with 10, five, four, three, three, and three selected for the minimum number of SSRs for mono-, di-, tri-, tetra-, penta-, and hexanucleotides, respectively.

Phylogenomic analysis

To investigate the relationships between the 12 Hymenasplenium species, we performed phylogenomic analyses with the 23 complete plastome sequences. Based on the study of Xu et al. (2020), Asplenium pekinense Hance, A. komarovii Akasswa and A. scolopendrium L. from closely related genus in Aspleniaceae with complete chloroplast genomes available from GenBank, were selected as the outgroup. MAFFT v.7 (Katoh & Standley, 2013) was used to align all sequences, and trimAI v1.2 (Capella-Gutiérrez, Silla-Martinez & Gabaldón, 2009) was used to trim the alignment, with the “-gappyout” setting used.

Maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI) were conducted for phylogenetic analyses for Hymenasplenium. IQ-TREE (Nguyen et al., 2015) was used to reconstruct the ML tree, before that, ModelFinder (Kalyaanamoorthy et al., 2017) was used to select the best-fit nucleotide substitution model. The supports of ML tree branches were evaluated using 10,000 ultrafast bootstrap (UFBS) replicates (Minh, Nguyen & Von Haeseler, 2013). BI analysis was performed using MrBayes version 3.2 (Ronquist et al., 2012), with 2,000,000 generations under the GTR + F + I + G4 model and four chains (one cold and three heated). Run convergence was accepted when the average standard deviation (d) of split frequencies was below 0.01. In order to construct consensus trees in BI analysis, the first 25% of the trees were discarded as burn-in, and then the remaining trees were applied to build majority-rule consensus trees. FigTree v.1.4.2 (Rambaut, 2012) was used to visualize the final trees from both ML and BI analyses.

Results

Structure and features of Hymenasplenium plastomes

The size of the Hymenasplenium plastomes ranged from 151,617 (chang994: H. cheilosorum) to 151,930 bp (chang995: H. apogamum (N. Murak. & Hatan.) Nakaike) (Table 2), and showed a typical quadripartite structure, consisting of two single-copy regions (LSC and SSC) and a pair of inverted repeats (IRa and IRb) (Fig. 1). The length of the LSC region ranged from 83,366 (chang994: H. cheilosorum) to 83,554 bp (chencc1089: H. murakami-hatanakae Nakaike), and that of the SSC region ranged from 21,249 (chang1272: H. cheilosorum) to 21,394 bp (chang1072: H. furfuraceum (Ching) Viane & S. Y. Dong) (Table 2). The length of the IR regions ranged from 23,453 (chang1072: H. furfuraceum) to 23,558 bp (chang995: H. apogamum). Furthermore, the GC content of the genomes varied in a range of 41.8% to 42.1% (Table 2). All chloroplast genomes of Hymenasplenium shared the same gene arrangement and order, and kept the same number of genes, containing 129 genes, including 87 protein-coding, 34 tRNA, and eight rRNA genes (Table 2).

Table 2. Summary of the 23 complete chloroplast genomes of Hymenasplenium.

Species Sample/voucher No. Size (bp) LSC (bp) SSC (bp) IR (bp) Number of protein-coding genes Number of tRNA genes Number of rRNA genes GC content (%)
H. laterepens NC035856 151,723 83,380 21,299 23,522 87 34 8 42.0
H. laterepens chang1156 151,725 83,388 21,295 23,521 87 34 8 42.0
H. apogamum chang995 151,930 83,504 21,310 23,558 87 34 8 42.0
H. apogamum chang1040 151,902 83,506 21,310 23,543 87 34 8 42.0
H. apogamum chang1037 151,906 83,510 21,308 23,544 87 34 8 42.0
H. apogamum chang1155 151,923 83,522 21,305 23,548 87 34 8 42.0
H. apogamum chang1354 151,904 83,510 21,308 23,543 87 34 8 42.0
H. chingii chang1082 151,742 83,457 21,272 23,505 87 34 8 41.8
H. chingii chang1144 151,767 83,486 21,271 23,505 87 34 8 41.9
H. wangpeishanii chang1341 151,674 83,475 21,271 23,464 87 34 8 41.8
H. wangpeishanii chang1337 151,676 83,475 21,269 23,466 87 34 8 41.8
H. murakami-hatanakae chencc1089 151,892 83,554 21,298 23,520 87 34 8 41.8
H. cheilosorum chang994 151,617 83,366 21,255 23,498 87 34 8 42.1
H. cheilosorum chang1272 151,631 83,368 21,249 23,507 87 34 8 42.1
H. cheilosorum chang1280 151,765 83,439 21,276 23,525 87 34 8 42.1
H. excisum chang992 151,779 83,523 21,296 23,480 87 34 8 42.0
H. excisum chang1045 151,867 83,531 21,298 23,519 87 34 8 42.0
H. obtusidentatum chang1258 151,798 83,455 21,269 23,537 87 34 8 42.0
H. obtusidentatum chang1261 151,793 83,463 21,256 23,537 87 34 8 42.1
H. furfuraceum chang1072 151,707 83,407 21,394 23,453 87 34 8 42.1
H. sinense chang1108 151,734 83,367 21,317 23,525 87 34 8 42.1
H. wuliangshanense chang1102 151,778 83,410 21,293 23,538 87 34 8 42.1
H. retusulum chang1064 151,840 83,431 21,295 23,557 87 34 8 42.1

Figure 1. Representative chloroplast genome of Hymenasplenium.

Figure 1

The coloured bars indicate different functional groups. The thick lines of the large circle indicate the extent of the inverted repeat regions (IRa and IRb), which separate the genome into small (SSC) and large (LSC) single-copy regions. Genes shown on the outside of the circle are transcribed counterclockwise, and genes inside are transcribed clockwise. The darker grey in the inner circle corresponds to the GC content, and the lighter grey corresponds to the AT content.

Hypervariable region in Hymenasplenium species

The mutational hotspot regions among Hymenasplenium chloroplast genomes were revealed by aligning and comparing of the plastome sequences using the mVISTA online tool. The results suggested that the chloroplast genomes of Hymenasplenium were highly conserved (Fig. S1). However, hypervariable regions were also detected, including matK-rps16, chlB-trnR(UCU), rpoB-trnD(GUC), psbM-petN, trnG(GCC)-trnS(UGA), psbD-trnT(GGU), trnL(UAA)-trnF(GAA), petA-psbL, psbE-petL, rps8-rpl14, rpl16-rps23, trnT(UGU)-trnR(ACG), rpl32-trnP(GGG), trnP(GGG)-trnL(UAG), ccsA-ndhD, rps15-ycf1, and trnN(GUU)-ycf2 (Fig. S1). These regions mainly distributed in intronic and intergenic parts of the genome. Still, in protein-coding regions, a few variabilities were also detected, such as matK, rpoC2, and ycf1 (Fig. S1).

Analyses of sequence divergence by DnaSP showed that the nucleotide diversity (π) of the Hymenasplenium plastomes is from 0.0 to 0.00923. With a cutoff value of π ≥ 0.007, we observed six highly variable regions in non-coding regions: three in the LSC region (matK-rps16, chlB-trnR(UCU) and psbM-petN), and the other three in the SSC region (rpl32-trnP(GGG), trnP(GGG)-trnL(UAG), and rps15-ycf1) (Fig. 2). No highly variable regions were identified in the IR regions. The π values in the IR regions were lower than that of the LSC and SSC regions, which were all below 0.0035.

Figure 2. Nucleotide diversity (π) by sliding window analysis in the multiple alignments of the 23 Hymenasplenium plastomes.

Figure 2

Window length: 800 bp, step size: 200 bp. X-axis: the position of the midpoint of a window. Y-axis: the nucleotide diversity of each window.

Expansion and contraction of the IR regions

Analysis of the comparison of IR/SC borders showed that the gene arrangements and contents of Hymenasplenium chloroplast genomes were highly conserved (Fig. 3). Lengths of the IR regions were relatively consistent among all samples analyzed. The LSC/IRb border of all plastomes had a distance of 83–91 bp from the trnI gene. The junction of SSC/IRb was located in ndhF gene, but extended into the IRb region with a range from 40 to 41 bp, except for chang1072 (H. furfuraceum), which had a distance of 12 bp away from the ndhF gene. The junction of IRa/SSC was located in the chlL gene, but extended into the IRa region with a range from 54 to 55 bp, except for chang1072 (H. furfuraceum) too, which had a distance of three base pairs away from the chlL gene. The LSC/IRa junctions of all analyzed Hymenasplenium chloroplast genomes had a distance of 737–738 bp away from the trnT gene.

Figure 3. Comparison of the SC/IR junctions among the 23 Hymenasplenium plastomes.

Figure 3

The figure shows the gene arrangements and contents of Hymenasplenium chloroplast genomes were highly conserved except for chang1072 (H. furfuraceum) in the junctions of IRa/SSC and SSC/IRb. JLB, LSC/IRb boundary; JSB, SSC/IRb boundary: JSA, SSC/IRa boundary; and JLA, LSC/IRa boundary.

SSR polymorphisms and long repeat sequence analysis

Using MISA identification tool, 1,375 SSRs of five types (mononucleotides, dinucleotides, trinucleotides, tetranucleotides, and compound repeats) were identified among the 23 Hymenasplenium chloroplast genomes (Fig. 4). The total number of SSRs ranged from 50 (chang1064 H. retusulum) to 64 (chang1354 H. apogamum). The most abundant SSRs were the mononucleotides, primarily consisting of A and T bases. The second-most abundant SSRs were the dinucleotides, primarily consisting of AT and TA bases. The third-most abundant SSRs were the compound repeats. There were only a small number of trinucleotides and tetranucleotides that had been detected.

Figure 4. Analysis of simple sequence repeat (SSR) types detected in the 23 Hymenasplenium plastomes showing the number of mononucleotides, dinucleotides, trinucleotides, tetranucleotides, and compound repeats.

Figure 4

We identified 1,639 large repeats among the 23 samples of the Hymenasplenium plastomes, with chang1108 (H. sinense K. W. Xu, Li Bing Zhang & W. B. Liao) having the most (79), and chang1354 (H. apogamum) having the least (61) (Fig. 5). Forward, palindromic, and tandem repeats were found among all samples, but only changg1082 (H. chingii K. W. Xu, Li Bing Zhang & W. B. Liao), chang1258 (H. obtusidentatum Y. Fen Chang & G. Cheng Zhang), chang1280 (H. cheilosorum), and chang1108 (H. sinense) had complementary repeats. The following showed no reverse repeats: chang1102 (H. wuliangshanense (Ching) Viane & S. Y. Dong), chang1072 (H. furfuraceum), chang1108 (H. sinense), and chang1064 (H. retusulum) (Fig. 5).

Figure 5. Analysis of long repeats in the 23 Hymenasplenium plastomes showing the number of complementary, forward, palindromic, reverse, and tandem long repeats.

Figure 5

Phylogenomic analyses

We reconstructed phylogenetic trees for the 12 Hymenasplenium species using both ML and BI methods, based on a 154,861 bp long alignment of plastome sequences. Phylogenetic trees generated from ML and BI analyses displayed identical topology, all with significant bootstrap support (BS) and posterior probabilities (Fig. 6; ML BS: 100%; BI PP: 1.00). Hymenasplenium was resolved as monophyletic, and relationships of interspecific lineages were well resolved.

Figure 6. Maximum likelihood phylogeny based on complete chloroplast genome sequences.

Figure 6

Maximum parsimony and Bayesian analyses recovered identical topologies with respect to the relationships among the main clades of the paleotropical Hymenasplenium. Numbers near the nodes are ML bootstrap support values (BS, left of the slashes) and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP, right of the slashes). Asterisks indicate 100% BS or 1.00 PP. Columns on the right refer to the subclades described in the study of Xu et al. (2018).

Based on the phylogenetic analyses, four highly supported clades were recognized within Hymenasplenium (Fig. 6). Each of the four clades was resolved as monophyletic and corresponded to the four southwestern China distributed subclades identified by Xu et al. (2018) in the Old World clade of the genus. H. hondoense subclade comprised five species (H. laterepens, H. apogamum, H. murakami-hatanakae, H. chingii and H. wangpeishanii Li Bing Zhang & K. W. Xu). H. excisum subclade contained two species (H. obtusidentatum and H. excisum). H. obliquissimum subclade comprised four species (H. wuliangshanense, H. retusulum, H. furfuraceum, and H. sinense), and is sister to H. cheilosorum subclade, which contained only one species (H. cheilosorum).

Discussion

Conserved plastome structure and hypervariable regions in Hymenasplenium

The chloroplast genomes of the 12 Hymenasplenium species were quadripartite, a typical genome structure of most land plants (Mower & Vickrey, 2018) (Fig. 1). Specifically, the 23 plastomes analyzed here were extremely conserved because they were quite consistent across genome size, structure, gene order and content (Table 2, Fig. 3). The difference in the chloroplast genome sizes of Hymenasplenium species was only 207 bp. Expansion and contraction of the IR regions are usually associated with the plastome size variation within a genus (Ravi et al., 2007; Wicke et al., 2011). However, there were only a few variations of gene distribution and contents among all IR boundary regions in Hymenasplenium (Fig. 3), which might have led to the minor differences in plastome size in the genus.

Although the 23 chloroplast genomes of Hymenasplenium showed high conservation, several hypervariable regions were detected based on sliding window and mVISTA analyses (Fig. 2, Fig. S1). In general, as observed in other fern groups and some angiosperms (Mower & Vickrey, 2018; Luo et al., 2021; Wu et al., 2021), the non-coding and single-copy regions exhibited higher levels of divergence than that of the coding and IR regions in Hymenasplenium. High mutational regions in chloroplast genome normally offer plenty of phylogenetic information, and hence can be widely used for the delimitation of closely related plant species (Li et al., 2015; Bi et al., 2018; Zeng et al., 2018). To date, phylogenetic analyses of Hymenasplenium have been based only on a small number of plastid markers, such as the rbcL gene, the atpB gene, the trnL intron, the trnL-trnF intergenic space, the rps4 gene, the rps4-trnS intergenic space, the trnH-psbA intergenic space and the psbA gene (Murakami & Schaal, 1994; Murakami et al., 1999; Chang et al., 2018; Xu et al., 2018, 2019, 2020; Zhang et al., 2021; Qiu et al., 2022). However, none of the markers mentioned above are from the highly variable regions identified here. To better resolve problems of species delimitation and DNA barcoding in those complexes or aggregates in Hymenasplenium, it would be helpful to use the hypervariable regions detected in this study for phylogenetic analyses in the genus.

Repetitive sequence analysis

SSRs in chloroplast genomes usually contain a high rate of polymorphism and rich variation at species level (Ebert & Peakall, 2009), therefore, they can be useful molecular markers for genotyping (Yang et al., 2011; Xue, Wang & Zhou, 2012) and population genetics studies (Doorduin et al., 2011). In this work, a total of 1,375 SSR loci were detected among the 23 Hymenasplenium chloroplast genomes. These newly identified SSR loci can be widely applied in future research on phylogeography and genetic diversity at the intra/interspecific and population levels for the genus. Similar to some angiosperms (Wakasugi, Tsudzuki & Sugiura, 2001), mononucleotides (A/T) were the most abundant SSRs in Hymenasplenium plastomes (Fig. 4). The number of SSRs varied wildly among species, such as that observed in H. apogamum, H. wangpeishanii and H. excisum, which all had more than 60 SSRs, and that of the other species were all less than 60 (Fig. 4). Differences in SSRs were also noted within species, such as in H. laterepens, H. chingii and H. cheilosorum (Fig. 4). Gao et al. (2018) has found that differences of repeat structures are molecular basis in response to severe environments in Dryopteris fragrans (L.) Schott. Future studies are needed to find out if SSRs varies in Hymenasplenium are associated with its environmental adaption mechanisms.

In addition to SSRs, large repeats (lengths longer than 30 bp), which usually create insertion/deletion rearrangements and mismatches (Weng et al., 2014; Asaf et al., 2018), contain great genomic variation too. A large number of long repeats (1,639) were detected in the Hymenasplenium plastomes. As with angiosperms (Huang et al., 2019; Li et al., 2021), palindromic, forward, and tandem repeats were found to be common among these large repeats, whereas reverse and complementary repeats were rare (Fig. 5). In Hymenasplenium, specifically, all species in the four subclades had palindromic, forward, tandem and complementary repeats, but four samples from the H. obliquissimum subclade had no reverse repeats (Fig. 5). Therefore, further studies are necessary for evaluating the roles of different kinds of large repeats in exploring the evolutionary history in Hymenasplenium.

Phylogenetic inference

A well-resolved phylogeny for Hymenasplenium with limited number of species sampled was presented in this study (Fig. 6). The results strongly supported the monophyly of the four subclades identified in a previous study based on chloroplast DNA fragments (Xu et al., 2018). Relationships among species found in this study were largely consistent with previous plastid phylogenies (Xu et al., 2018), such as the closely related H. laterepens and H. apogamum (Chang et al., 2018), and the sister group of H. cheilosorum subclade and H. obliquissimum subclade (Xu et al., 2018). In addition, our phylogenetic results provided strong support for species in the H. obliquissimum subclade that were previously well supported only in BI analysis (Zhang et al., 2021). These findings supported the notion that plastomes can be good markers to construct the phylogeny of Hymenasplenium or Aspleniaceae with a larger species sampling.

Although H. cheilosorum was monophyletic, three samples included in this study were resolved into two well supported groups (Fig. 6). Our results could support the point of view of Xu et al. (2018) that H. cheilosorum contains more than one species. Similar situations existed in H. apogamum of H. hondoense subclade in which five samples were resolved into three groups (Fig. 6). The taxonomy of these groups still needs further attention to confirm if they represent distinct taxa because cryptic speciation including hybridization/polyploidization was found to be common in Hymenasplenium (Xu et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 2021). In that case, phylogenetic analyses of nuclear DNA will be necessary, because the chloroplast sequences usually possess lower mutation rate and have limitations in studying reticulate evolution. In addition, samples in H. apogamum, H. excisum and H. cheilosorum were all from the same location of Xishuangbanna, south of Yunnan province. This reinforces that southwestern China is the most diverse place of Hymenasplenium and suggests that additional detailed sampling at population levels for further taxonomy and phylogenetic study is required for the genus.

Conclusions

This study is the first attempt to comprehensively examine plastome features and infer phylogeny using plastome data for Hymenasplenium. The results revealed a highly conserved chloroplast genome structure of the genus, and displayed six hypervariable regions and a large number of repeat sequences. The genomic mutational regions identified here can be widely used as high-resolution DNA markers in future phylogeographic and phylogenetic studies in Hymenasplenium. Results of phylogenomic analyses were generally consistent with previous research, and might approve of the possibly existing cryptic speciation in the genus. For a better understanding of the complex evolutionary history of Hymenasplenium, future studies should focus on phylogenetic reconstructions based not only on complete chloroplast genomes but also on nuclear genes from genome-skimming data, and should also incorporate molecular data, as well as evidence from distribution, chromosome and morphology.

Supplemental Information

Supplemental Information 1. Chloroplast genome global comparison map of Hymenasplenium using mVISTA.

X-axis: coordinate in the chloroplast genome; Y-axis: level of variation (50%–100%). Genome regions are color-coded, distinguishing between exons (purple), introns (blue), and intergenic-spacers (IGS) (red)

peerj-12-18667-s001.pdf (317.5KB, pdf)
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18667/supp-1
Supplemental Information 2. Plastome sequences deposited in NCBI GenBank.
peerj-12-18667-s002.fasta (3.2MB, fasta)
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18667/supp-2

Acknowledgments

We thank several colleagues who assisted with the collections, including ChiChuan Chen, Huafeng Hong and Changle Zhang in China.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31500171), the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province, China (Nos. 2022JJ30097 and 2022JJ40012) and the Scientific Research Fund of Hunan Provincial Education Department, China (Nos. 20A067 and 21B0642). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Additional Information and Declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Yanfen Chang conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.

Zhixin Wang analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, and approved the final draft.

Guocheng Zhang performed the experiments, prepared figures and/or tables, and approved the final draft.

Na Wang performed the experiments, prepared figures and/or tables, and approved the final draft.

Limin Cao analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.

Data Availability

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The plastome sequences are available at NCBI GenBank: PQ187894PQ187915.

References

  • Amiryousefi, Hyvönen & Poczai (2018).Amiryousefi A, Hyvönen J, Poczai P. IRscope: an online program to visualize the junction sites of chloroplast genomes. Bioinformatics. 2018;34(17):3030–3031. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Asaf et al. (2018).Asaf S, Khan AL, Khan MA, Shahzad R, Lubna L, Kang SM, Al-Harrasi A, Al-Rawahi A, Lee I. Complete chloroplast genome sequence and comparative analysis of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) with related species. PLOS ONE. 2018;13:e0192966. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Beier et al. (2017).Beier S, Thiel T, Munch T, Scholz U, Mascher M. MISA web: a web server for microsatellite prediction. Bioinformatics. 2017;33(16):2583–2585. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Benson (1999).Benson G. Tandem repeats finder: a program to analyze DNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Research. 1999;27(2):573–580. doi: 10.1093/nar/27.2.573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bi et al. (2018).Bi Y, Zhang MF, Xue J, Dong R, Du YP, Zhang XH. Chloroplast genomic resources for phylogeny and DNA barcoding: a case study on Fritillaria. Scientific Reports. 2018;8:1184. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-19591-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Capella-Gutiérrez, Silla-Martinez & Gabaldón (2009).Capella-Gutiérrez S, Silla-Martinez JM, Gabaldón T. trimAl: a tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(15):1972–1973. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Chang et al. (2018).Chang YF, Hori K, Murakami N, Cao LM, Lu SG, Schneider H. Validation of Hymenasplenium laterepens (Aspleniaceae): evidence from morphology and molecular analyses. Phytotaxa. 2018;374:277–290. doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.374.4.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Chang et al. (2022).Chang YF, Zhang GC, Wang ZX, Cao LM. Molecular and morphological evidence reveals a new fern species of Hymenasplenium (Aspleniaceae) from south and southwestern China. PhytoKeys. 2022;211:93–106. doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.211.90363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Chen et al. (2018).Chen SF, Zhou YQ, Chen YR, Gu J. Fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics. 2018;34(17):1884–1890. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ching (1965).Ching RC. Asplenium unilaterale Lam. and its confused species in China. Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica. 1965;10(3):183–191. [Google Scholar]
  • Dierckxsens, Mardulyn & Smits (2016).Dierckxsens N, Mardulyn P, Smits G. NOVOPlasty: de novo assembly of organelle genomes from whole genome data. Nucleic Acids Research. 2016;45:e18. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Doorduin et al. (2011).Doorduin L, Gravendeel B, Lammers Y, Ariyurek Y, Chin-A-Woeng T, Vrieling K. The complete chloroplast genome of 17 individuals of pest species Jacobaea vulgaris: SNPs, microsatellites and barcoding markers for population and phylogenetic studies. DNA Research. 2011;18:93–105. doi: 10.1093/dnares/dsr002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ebert & Peakall (2009).Ebert D, Peakall R. Chloroplast simple sequence repeats (cpSSRs): technical resources and recommendations for expanding cpSSR discovery and applications to a wide array of plant species. Molecular Ecology Resources. 2009;9:673–690. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2008.02319.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Frazer et al. (2004).Frazer KA, Pachter L, Poliakov A, Rubin EM, Dubchak I. VISTA: computational tools for comparative genomics. Nucleic Acids Research. 2004;32:W273–W279. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Gao et al. (2018).Gao R, Wang WZ, Huang QY, Fan RF, Wang X, Peng F, Zhao GM, Bian S, Ren HL, Chang Y. Complete chloroplast genome sequence of Dryopteris fragrans (L.) Schott and the repeat structures against the thermal environment. Scientific Reports. 2018;8:16635. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-35061-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Greiner, Lehwark & Bock (2019).Greiner S, Lehwark P, Bock R. OrganellarGenomeDRAW (OGDRAW) version 1.3. 1: expanded toolkit for the graphical visualization of organellar genomes. Nucleic Acids Research. 2019;47:W59–W64. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Huang et al. (2019).Huang YY, Yang ZR, Huang S, An WL, Li J, Zheng XS. Comprehensive analysis of Rhodomyrtus tomentosa chloroplast genome. Plants. 2019;8(4):89. doi: 10.3390/plants8040089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kalyaanamoorthy et al. (2017).Kalyaanamoorthy S, Minh BQ, Wong TKF, Von Haeseler A, Jermiin LS. ModelFinder: fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nature Methods. 2017;14(6):587–589. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Katoh & Standley (2013).Katoh K, Standley DM. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2013;30:772–780. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kearse et al. (2012).Kearse M, Moir R, Wilson A, Stones-Havas S, Cheung M, Sturrock S, Buxton S, Cooper A, Markowitz S, Duran C, Thierer T, Ashton B, Meintjes P, Drummond A. Geneious basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2012;28(12):1647–1649. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kurtz et al. (2001).Kurtz S, Choudhuri JV, Ohlebusch E, Schleiermacher C, Stoye J, Giegerich R. REPuter: the manifold applications of repeat analysis on a genomic scale. Nucleic Acids Research. 2001;29(22):4633–4642. doi: 10.1093/nar/29.22.4633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Li et al. (2018).Li FW, Brouwer P, Carretero-Paulet L, Cheng S, de Vries J, Delaux PM, Eily A, Koppers N, Kuo LY, Li Z, Simenc M, Small I, Wafula E, Angarita S, Barker MS, Bräutigam A, dePamphilis C, Gould S, Hosmani PS, Huang YM, Huettel B, Kato Y, Liu X, Maere S, McDowell R, Mueller LA, Nierop KGJ, Rensing SA, Robison T, Rothfels CJ, Sigel EM, Song Y, Timilsena PR, van de Peer Y, Wang H, Wilhelmsson PKI, Wolf PG, Xu X, Der JP, Schluepmann H, Wong GKS, Pryer KM. Fern genomes elucidate land plant evolution and cyanobacterial symbioses. Nature Plants. 2018;4(7):460–472. doi: 10.1038/s41477-018-0188-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Li et al. (2015).Li XW, Yang Y, Henry RJ, Rossetto M, Wang YT, Chen SL. Plant DNA barcoding: from gene to genome. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society. 2015;90(1):157–166. doi: 10.1111/brv.12104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Li et al. (2021).Li XP, Zhao YM, Tu XD, Li CR, Zhu YT, Zhong H. Comparative analysis of plastomes in Oxalidaceae: phylogenetic relationships and potential molecular markers. Plant Diversity. 2021;43(4):281–291. doi: 10.1016/j.pld.2021.04.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Librado & Rozas (2009).Librado P, Rozas J. DnaSP v5: a software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(11):1451–1452. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lin & Viane (2013).Lin YX, Viane R. Aspleniaceae. In: Wu ZY, Raven PH, Hong DY, editors. Flora of China. 2–3. Beijing and St. Louis: Science Press and Missouri Botanical Garden Press; 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • Lu et al. (2015).Lu JM, Zhang N, Du XY, Wen J, Li DZ. Chloroplast phylogenomics resolves key relationships in ferns. Journal of Systematics and Evolution. 2015;53:448–457. doi: 10.1111/jse.12180. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Luo et al. (2021).Luo C, Huang WL, Sun HY, Yer H, Li XY, Li Y, Yan B, Wang Q, Wen YH, Huang MJ, Huang HQ. Comparative chloroplast genome analysis of Impatiens species (Balsaminaceae) in the karst area of China: insights into genome evolution and phylogenomic implications. BMC Genomics. 2021;22:571. doi: 10.1186/s12864-021-07807-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Minh, Nguyen & Von Haeseler (2013).Minh BQ, Nguyen MA, Von Haeseler A. Ultrafast approximation for phylogenetic bootstrap. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2013;30:1188–1195. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Moore et al. (2010).Moore MJ, Soltis PS, Bell CD, Burleigh JG, Soltis DE. Phylogenetic analysis of 83 plastid genes further resolves the early diversification of eudicots. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2010;107:4623–4628. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0907801107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Mower & Vickrey (2018).Mower JP, Vickrey TL. Structural diversity among plastid genomes of land plants. In: Chaw SM, Jansen RK, editors. Plastid Genome Evolution. Amsterdam and New York: Academic Press; 2018. [Google Scholar]
  • Murakami (1995).Murakami N. Systematics and evolutionary biology of the fern genus Hymenasplenium (Aspleniaceae) Journal of Plant Research. 1995;108:257–268. doi: 10.1007/BF02344351. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Murakami et al. (1999).Murakami N, Nogami S, Watanabe M, Iwatsuki K. Phylogeny of Aspleniaceae inferred from rbcL nucleotide sequences. American Fern Journal. 1999;89:232–243. doi: 10.2307/1547233. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Murakami & Schaal (1994).Murakami N, Schaal BA. Chloroplast DNA variation and the phylogeny of Asplenium sect. Hymenasplenium (Aspleniaceae) in the new world tropics. Journal of Plant Research. 1994;107:245–251. doi: 10.1007/BF02344251. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Nguyen et al. (2015).Nguyen LT, Schmidt HA, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2015;32(1):268–274. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msu300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Qiu et al. (2022).Qiu YL, Xu KW, Ju WB, Zhao WL, Zhang L. Hymenasplenium tholiformis (Aspleniaceae), a new fern species from southeastern Xizang, China based on morphological and molecular evidence. PhytoKeys. 2022;204:43–56. doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.204.85746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Rambaut (2012).Rambaut A. FigTree V1.4.2. 2012. http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/ http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/
  • Ravi et al. (2007).Ravi V, Khurana JP, Tyagi AK, Khurana P. An update on chloroplast genomes. Plant Systematics and Evolution. 2007;271(1):101–122. doi: 10.1007/s00606-007-0608-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Ronquist et al. (2012).Ronquist F, Teslenko M, Van der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Höhna S, Larget B, Liu L, Suchard M, Huelsenbeck JP. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology. 2012;61(3):539–542. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/sys029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • The Pteridophyte Phylogeny Group I (2016).The Pteridophyte Phylogeny Group I A community-derived classification for extant lycophytes and ferns. Journal of Systematics and Evolution. 2016;54:563–603. doi: 10.1111/jse.12229. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Wakasugi, Tsudzuki & Sugiura (2001).Wakasugi T, Tsudzuki T, Sugiura M. The genomics of land plant chloroplasts: gene content and alteration of genomic information by RNA editing. Photosynthesis Research. 2001;70(1):107–118. doi: 10.1023/A:1013892009589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wei et al. (2017).Wei R, Yan YH, Harris AJ, Kang JS, Shen H, Xiang QP, Zhang XC. Plastid phylogenomics resolve deep relationships among eupolypod II ferns with rapid radiation and rate heterogeneity. Genome Biology and Evolution. 2017;9(6):1646–1657. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evx107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Weng et al. (2014).Weng M, Blazier JC, Govindu M, Jansen RK. Reconstruction of the ancestral plastid genome in Geraniaceae reveals a correlation between genome rearrangements, repeats, and nucleotide substitution rates. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2014;31(3):645–659. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wicke et al. (2011).Wicke S, Schneeweiss GM, De Pamphilis CW, Müller KF, Quandt D. The evolution of the plastid chromosome in land plants: gene content, gene order, gene function. Plant Molecular Biology. 2011;76:273–297. doi: 10.1007/s11103-011-9762-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wolf & Karol (2012).Wolf PG, Karol KG. Plastomes of bryophytes, lycophytes and ferns. In: Bock R, Knoop V, editors. Genomics of Chloroplasts and Mitochondria. Dordrecht: Springer-Netherlands; 2012. pp. 89–102. [Google Scholar]
  • Wu et al. (2021).Wu L, Cui Y, Wang Q, Xu Z, Wang Y, Lin Y, Song J, Yao H. Identification and phylogenetic analysis of five Crataegus species (Rosaceae) based on complete chloroplast genomes. Planta. 2021;254(1):14. doi: 10.1007/s00425-021-03667-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Xu et al. (2019).Xu KW, Lorence D, Wood KR, Liao WB, Zhang LB. A revision of the Hymenasplenium unilaterale subclade (Aspleniaceae; Pteridophyta) with the description of nine new species. Phytotaxa. 2019;419:1–27. doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.419.1.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Xu et al. (2020).Xu KW, Zhang L, Rothfels C, Smith A, Viane R, Wood K, Chen CW, Knapp R, Zhou L, Ngan Lu, Zhou XM, Wei HJ, Fan Q, Chen SF, Cicuzza D, Gao XF, Liao WB, Zhang LB. A global plastid phylogeny of the fern genus Asplenium (Aspleniaceae) Cladistics. 2020;36:22–71. doi: 10.1111/cla.12384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Xu et al. (2018).Xu KW, Zhou XM, Yin QY, Zhang L, Lu NT, Knapp R, Luong TT, He H, Fan Q, Zhao WY, Gao XF, Liao WB, Zhang LB. A global plastid phylogeny uncovers extensive cryptic speciation in the fern genus Hymenasplenium (Aspleniaceae) Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 2018;127:203–216. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2018.05.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Xue, Wang & Zhou (2012).Xue JH, Wang S, Zhou SL. Polymorphic chloroplast microsatellite loci in Nelumbo (Nelumbonaceae) American Journal of Botany. 2012;99:e240–e244. doi: 10.3732/ajb.1100547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Yang et al. (2011).Yang AH, Zhang JJ, Yao XH, Huang HW. Chloroplast microsatellite markers in Liriodendron tulipifera (Magnoliaceae) and cross-species amplification in L. chinense. American Journal of Botany. 2011;98:e123–e126. doi: 10.3732/ajb.1000532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zeng et al. (2018).Zeng CX, Hollingsworth PM, Yang J, He ZS, Zhang ZR, Li DZ, Yang JB. Genome skimming herbarium specimens for DNA barcoding and phylogenomics. Plant Methods. 2018;14(1):1–14. doi: 10.1186/s13007-018-0300-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhang et al. (2021).Zhang GC, Hong HF, Chen GH, Lu SG, Chang YF. Species delimitation of Hymenasplenium obliquissimum group (Aspleniaceae) in southwestern China. Phytotaxa. 2021;480:29–44. doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.480.1.3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhang et al. (2017).Zhang SD, Jin JJ, Chen SY, Chase MW, Soltis DE, Li HT, Yang JB, Li DZ, Yi TS. Diversification of Rosaceae since the late cretaceous based on plastid phylogenomics. New Phytologist. 2017;214(3):1355–1367. doi: 10.1111/nph.14461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Information 1. Chloroplast genome global comparison map of Hymenasplenium using mVISTA.

X-axis: coordinate in the chloroplast genome; Y-axis: level of variation (50%–100%). Genome regions are color-coded, distinguishing between exons (purple), introns (blue), and intergenic-spacers (IGS) (red)

peerj-12-18667-s001.pdf (317.5KB, pdf)
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18667/supp-1
Supplemental Information 2. Plastome sequences deposited in NCBI GenBank.
peerj-12-18667-s002.fasta (3.2MB, fasta)
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18667/supp-2

Data Availability Statement

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The plastome sequences are available at NCBI GenBank: PQ187894PQ187915.


Articles from PeerJ are provided here courtesy of PeerJ, Inc

RESOURCES