ABSTRACT
Symbiotic marine bacteria that are transmitted through the environment are susceptible to abiotic factors (salinity, temperature, physical barriers) that can influence their ability to colonize their specific hosts. Given that many symbioses are driven by host specificity, environmentally transmitted symbionts are more susceptible to extrinsic factors depending on conditions over space and time. In order to determine whether the population structure of environmentally transmitted symbionts reflects host specificity or biogeography, we analysed the genetic structure of Sepiola atlantica (Cephalopoda: Sepiolidae) and their Vibrio symbionts ( V. fischeri and V. logei ) in four Galician Rías (Spain). This geographical location is characterized by a jagged coastline with a deep‐sea entrance into the land, ideal for testing whether such population barriers exist due to genetic isolation. We used haplotype estimates combined with nested clade analysis to determine the genetic relatedness for both S. atlantica and Vibrio bacteria. Analyses of molecular variance (AMOVA) were used to estimate variation within and between populations for both host and symbiont genetic data. Our analyses reveal a low percentage of variation among and between host populations, suggesting that these populations are panmictic. In contrast, Vibrio symbiont populations show certain degree of genetic structure, demonstrating that the hydrology of the rías is driving bacterial distribution (and not host specificity). Thus, for environmentally transmitted symbioses such as the sepiolid squid‐Vibrio association, abiotic factors can be a major selective force for determining population structure for one of the partners.
1. Introduction
In marine ecosystems, species distribution can be affected by biotic factors such as mating systems, life history strategy and dispersal methods (Almeida et al. 2022; Araújo and Louto 2007; Riascos et al. 2020). Abiotic factors, such as marine currents, coastline topography, salinity and temperature can also have dramatic effects on where species are distributed (Kool et al. 2011). Subsequently, the presence of geographic barriers or marine currents in the ocean constitutes an opportunity to examine dispersal and consequently species distribution in a particular location that oftentimes gives rise to new taxa (Strugnell, Allcock, and Watts 2017). Earlier studies have revealed how closely related populations undergo speciation events due to the existence of geographic barriers (Monahan, Pereira, and Wake 2012; Young et al. 2015). However, less is known about how allopatric speciation events affect species that coexist together, as is the case of symbiotic associations (Hellberg et al. 2002; Palumbi 1994).
One approach that is commonly used to discern how various barriers shape the distribution of a species is by analysing the genetic structure of the population (Jahnke et al. 2019; Heras et al. 2019; Yan et al. 2020). The historic Northwestern coast of the Iberian Peninsula in Galicia has a uniquely jagged coastline, with many inlets or ‘rías’ that provide an appropriate locality for testing hypothesis on whether such topologies are barriers to gene flow between populations. Examples such as the Mediterranean mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis (Diz and Presa 2009), which have planktonic larvae that are transported through currents (Pickett and David 2018), the macro alga Fucus serratus , with part of its life cycle including mobile antherozoid gametes (Duarte and Viejo 2018) or the marine seagrass Zostera noltii (Coyer et al. 2004), which has a high dispersal potential via vegetative fragmentation (Berković et al. 2014) have shown how gene flow can be influenced by both abiotic and biotic factors. Yet none of these studies have examined whether the microbiota associated with these populations mirror similar genetic fractionation. Therefore, in order to test the hypothesis that symbiotic partners share similar patterns of genetic structuring leading to speciation, we focused on the symbiotic relationship established between Vibrio sp. and the Atlantic bobtail squid, Sepiola atlantica from the Galician coast.
The Atlantic bobtail squid ( Sepiola atlantica , d'Orbigny 1839–1842), is a nektobenthic species that is widely distributed in the northeastern Atlantic from latitudes 65° N to 35° N, from Iceland to Morocco (Guerra 1992; Reid and Jereb 2005). This species has been caught unintentionally by fishing nets, preferring sandy bottoms covered by algae ranging from 2 to 40 m in depth. S. atlantica inhabits the most central and outer portions of the Rías of Galicia (Figure 1), which are proximal to the open Atlantic Ocean. S. atlantica has been found to be more abundant in the northern part of the Rías and are absent from the internal portions furthest away from the coastline (Cacabelos, Gestoso, and Troncoso 2008; Guerra 1986; Rodrigues et al. 2011; Yau and Boyle 1996). Mature males and females can be found throughout the year (Guerra et al. 1986) and their life history strategy has been well documented (Russell 1922; Stephen and Scottish 1944; Rodrigues et al. 2010, 2011; Rodrigues, Guerra, and Troncoso 2012).
FIGURE 1.

Sampling location in each of the Galician Rías (NW coast of the Iberian Peninsula). Each coloured dot represents the geographical location where samples were taken at each of the five Rías during the years 2007, 2008 and 2009.
Bobtail or bottletail squids (Cephalopoda: Sepiolidae) are cosmopolitan, and form symbiotic associations with bioluminescent bacteria from the genera Vibrio and Photobacterium (γ‐Proteobacteria: Vibrionaceae [Herring 1977]). Juvenile squids are colonized environmentally within hours by Vibrio species present in seawater and are housed in a specialised internal organ called the light organ (LO) (McFall‐Ngai and Ruby 1991; Montgomery and McFall‐Ngai 1994; Nishiguchi 2000). Here, the host provides an appropriate nutrient‐rich habitat for the symbiont, while in return, the bacteria provide luminescence to the squid utilised in a behaviour known as counterillumination (Jones and Nishiguchi 2004). Light produced by Vibrio bacteria helps camouflaging the squid host silhouette during the evening, increasing the fitness in terms of survivability and predation success during the nocturnal hours (Young and Roper 1976; Pipes and Nishiguchi 2022). At dawn, approximately 95% of the bacteria are vented out into the surrounding seawater, releasing viable Vibrios into the local habitat, while the remaining population (~5%) of bacterial cells inside the light organ multiply during the day, ready for a new cycle the following night (Boettcher, Ruby, and Mcfall‐Ngai 1996). Once released, the free‐living Vibrios are exposed to a wide range of biotic and abiotic factors that can affect their predisposition to infect new hosts, and can also migrate to other areas where they colonie different populations of sepiolids (Nyholm et al. 2000; Nyholm and McFall‐Ngai 2004; Nyholm and Nishiguchi 2008). Although many studies have focused on the reproduction, behaviour and ecology of S. atlantica , very few have focused on the actual symbioses and how both partners shape the association. Therefore, the main objective of this study is to examine the genetic variation in the Atlantic bobtail squid‐Vibrio symbiosis from the Galician Rías to determine how abiotic factors can affect the genetic structure of both host and symbiont populations using a combined phylogeographic approach. The dynamic geomorphology and subsequent currents present in the area as well as the unique characteristics of each Ría allow for the investigation of what roles abiotic factors or host specificity have in the distribution of these mutualistic associations.
2. Material and Methods
2.1. Specimen Collection and Bacterial Isolation
Table 1 lists all sites sampled and analysed in this study. A total of five different populations were collected from waters along the NW Iberian Peninsula in Galicia, Spain (Figure 1). These populations correspond to five different sampling locations (north to south): Ría de Ferrol, Ría de Corcubión, Ría de Arousa, Ría de Aldán and Ría de Vigo. The Southmost Rías, Vigo, Aldán and Arousa are within an area of 30 km, and approximately 100 and 150 km away from Corcubión and Ferrol. Samples were obtained via SCUBA during the daytime at approximately 6–10 m deep at each site. This limited the number of specimens that could be caught since the species is nocturnal and difficult to find due to their burying behaviour during the day (Guerra 1986; Rodrigues et al. 2010). Animals were transported and maintained at the Centro de Investigación Mariña‐Estación de Ciencias Mariñas de Toralla (CIM‐ECIMAT) facilities and subsequently euthanised 1 day later following protocols previously approved by the Animal Experimentation Ethics Committee from the University of Vigo (Spain) and the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at New Mexico State University (NMSU; Andrews et al. 2013; Moltschaniwskyj et al. 2007). Single colonies of Vibrio bacteria were isolated from host light organs that were removed via ventral dissection and homogenized and diluted onto seawater tryptone agar (SWT; 0.5% tryptone, 0.3% yeast extract, 0.3% glycerol, 1.5% agar and 70% seawater at 32 ppt). SWT used for light organ isolation at CIA‐ECIMAT was made with local seawater, whereas isolations at NMSU were made with artificial seawater containing a mixture of Instant Ocean (21 g/L of seawater; Spectrum Brands, VA) and Marine Mix (7 g/L of seawater; Wiegandt GmbH, Germany). Squid tissues were preserved in 95% ethanol for fixation and subsequent DNA extraction for Sanger sequence analysis at NMSU.
TABLE 1.
Geographic location where S. atlantica specimens and their symbionts were collected. Theta, (Θ) a base‐pair‐by‐base‐pair measure of polymorphism from the host and the Vibrio sp. populations from each location is calculated for each collection site.
| Host | Population location | Host N | Latitude | Longitude | Host theta | Vibrio theta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sepiola atlantica | Ría de Vigo | 2 | 42.249 | 8.795 | 0.00185 | 0.22434 |
| Ría de Aldán | 3 | 42.288 | 8.822 | 0.00123 | 0.18521 | |
| Ría de Arousa | 2 | 42.542 | 8.909 | 0.0000 | 0.03494 | |
| Ría de Corcubión | 10 | 42.910 | 9.148 | 0.00065 | 0.06559 | |
| Ría de Ferrol | 10 | 43.447 | 8.305 | 0.00065 | 0.004936 |
Light organ homogenates isolated at CIA‐ECIMAT were grown for 24–48 h. at 15°C, after which ~15 individual colonies from each plate were stab‐inoculated into vials containing SWT agar and sealed for transport back to NMSU. After transport, each sample was re‐grown on SWT agar plates at 15°C for 24–48 h. Single colonies were isolated and cultured in liquid SWT at 15°C and shaken at 225 rpm for 24–48 h in an Innova 43 shaking incubator (New Brunswick Scientific, NJ). Each overnight culture was sub‐cultured and allowed to reach log phase (2–3 h. at 15°C and 225 rpm), and the log‐phase cultures were used for DNA extraction and frozen in 40% glycerol for long‐term storage at −80°C.
2.2. DNA Extraction and Amplification
S. atlantica DNA was extracted using approximately 25 mg of ethanol‐preserved tissue that was dissected from the gill or mantle of each squid. Dissected tissues were washed with 100 μL of nuclease‐free water to remove any residual ethanol. S. atlantica DNA was extracted using the DNeasy blood and tissue protocol for animal tissues (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). All genomic DNA extractions were visualized on a 1% agarose gel and quantified using a Nanodrop 9600 (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). Total DNA extracted from each individual squid sample was used to amplify a 658‐bp fragment of the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI, Table S1) (Coryell et al. 2018; Folmer et al. 1994; Jones et al. 2006; Zamborsky and Nishiguchi 2011). The cytochrome c oxidase subunit I gene has been shown to be highly variable across invertebrate taxa (Folmer et al. 1994; Jacobs and Grimes 1986) and has been used in previous studies to determine population structure (Calderón, Garrabou, and Aurelle 2006; Fogliata et al. 2022; Wang et al. 2023; Kise et al. 2023). Isolation of DNA from Vibrio light organ isolates was completed using the Qiagen DNeasy blood and tissue kit (Valencia, CA) gram‐negative bacterial protocol. Approximately 2 × 109 cells were transferred from each log‐ phase culture for DNA extraction. Purified Vibrio DNA was visualized on a 1% agarose gel and quantified using a Nanodrop 9600 (ThermoFisher Scientific). Isolated DNA extracted from each symbiotic bacterial isolate was used to PCR amplify the 16S rRNA locus for identification and a portion of the glyceraldehyde phosphate dehydrogenase (gapA) locus (~600 bp) for the population genetics analysis using previously described Vibrio‐specific primers (Table S1; Ast, Urbanczyk, and Dunlap 2009; Nishiguchi and Nair 2003). The gapA locus has been used reliably to estimate deep phylogenetic connections between bacterial families (Nelson, Whittam, and Selander 1991) within the Vibrionaceae (Nishiguchi and Nair 2003), as well local population structure of symbiotic V. fischeri (Coryell et al. 2018; Jones et al. 2006).
Each PCR amplification reaction (25 μL) contained 2–20 ng of template DNA (0.08–0.8 ng/μL), GoTaq DNA polymerase (0.05 U/μL) (Promega, Fitchburg, WI), 5× GoTaq buffer (1×) (Promega, Fitchburg, WI), a 10 mM deoxynucleoside triphosphate mix of each nucleotide (Promega, Fitchburg, WI), and both forward and reverse primers (0.5 μM each) (Table S1). All amplification reactions were run using anobtraine MJ Research Dyad Disciple thermocycler (Waltham, MA) and BIO‐RAD C1000 Touch Thermal Cycler (Hercules, CA). PCR conditions for gapA locus amplification had an initial denaturation of 2 min at 95°C followed by 30 s at 95°C, annealing temperature 45°C for 1 min, extension temperature for 1 min at 72°C, and a final extension temperature 72°C for 5 min. The PCR conditions for each COI locus amplification had an initial denaturation of 2 min at 95°C, followed by 30 s at 95°C, annealing temperature 50°C for 1 min, extension temperature for 1 min at 72°C, and a final extension temperature 72°C for 5 min. Amplicons were purified using QIAquick PCR purification kit (Qiagen) and quantified using a Thermo Scientific NanoDrop One Microvolume UV–Vis Spectrophotometer (ThermoFisher Scientific). Purified amplicons were pre‐sequenced using BigDye Terminator v3.1 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) and amplified on an MJ Research Dyad Disciple thermocycler (Waltham, MA). Pre‐sequencing samples were cleaned using 96‐well Sephadex plates (Edge Biosystems, St. Louis, MO). Samples were sequenced at the NMSU Molecular Biology Sequencing facility using the Applied Biosystems 3130XL sequencer (Applied Biosystems) and at the UC Berkeley DNA Sequencing Facility (Berkeley, CA). Sequences were assembled and aligned using Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 11, MEGA 11 (Tamura, Stecher, and Kumar 2021).
2.3. Haplotype Networks, Nested Clade and Molecular Variance Analysis
Haplotype networks for both squid and symbiont were generated using TCS v1.12 and ANeCA (Clement, Posada, and Crandall 2000; Panchal and Beaumont 2007) using statistical parsimony methods outlined by Templeton (Templeton and Sing 1993). These haplotype networks were visualised using the software PopArt (Leigh and Bryant 2015). Nested clade analyses were performed using Templeton's nesting algorithm as implemented in GEODIS (Posada, Crandall, and Templeton 2000). Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) was executed using the population genetics software platform ARLEQUIN (Excoffier and Lischer 2010) and DNAsp v5 (Librado and Rozas 2009). All analyses were run for measures of within‐ and among‐population variation along with a separate analysis assessing variation by each Ría for both host and symbiont data. Concurrently, theta (Θ), a base‐ pair‐ by‐ base‐ pair measure of polymorphism was calculated for each mutualist population at each sample site (Table 1).
3. Results
3.1. Nested Clade and Molecular Variance Analysis of S. atlantica
A total of 27 host cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) sequences were used to delineate the haplotype network and test the nested clade analysis, yielding a unique network with four different squid haplotypes (Figure 2). Haplotype 1 is the predominant one and includes sequences from all the rías (Vigo, Aldán, Arousa, Corcubión and Ferrol). Sequences from Ferrol and Corcubión located farther north have the greatest number in haplotype 1, along with Arousa and Aldán rías. Haplotype 2 contains a sequence from Ferrol. It is connected to haplotype 1 by one mutational step (Figure 2). Haplotype 3 contains one sequence from Vigo, which is the southernmost ría, and it is also connected to haplotype 1 by one mutational step.
FIGURE 2.

TCS nested haplotype network generated from S. atlantica molecular data obtained from the animals captured in the five sampling locations during the years 2007, 2008 and 2009. Each line in the diagram represents one‐base‐pair mutational step between haplotypes. Black solid circles represent unsampled mutational steps connecting haplotypes. The size of the circles conveys information about the number of sequences that comprise a particular haplotype, while the colour of each circle signifies the geographic source of the sequence data and its relative contribution to the overall haplotype. Each haplotype is denoted by a two‐digit code enclosed within dotted lines, which illustrates their hierarchical relationships. Each level of this hierarchy is marked with a two‐digit label in a dashed format.
Haplotype 4 contains sequences from Corcubión and Aldán, with both being equally represented in this haplotype. Haplotype 4 is connected to haplotype 1 by one mutational step. Each of the four haplotypes are contained in their own 0‐level ranked nest and a higher rank clade, which combines all haplotypes sampled in this study.
The final nested clade analysis of host genetic data was performed with no detectable loops according to the rules established by Templeton and Sing (1993). The nested clade phylogenetic analysis of host genetic data demonstrates that the null hypothesis of panmixia cannot be rejected (Table 2).
TABLE 2.
S. atlantica clades that demonstrated significance during either a permutation contingency analysis or geographic distance analysis. Location of significance is indicated by (D n), nested clade distance and/or (D c), the within‐clade distance. I–T indicates the average distance between a tip clade and an interior clade. S or L indicates that the distance measure is significantly smaller or larger at the 5% inference level. Inference steps were performed using the automated inference key in GEODIS, part of the AneCA v1.2 population genetics analysis software platform (Posada, Crandall, and Templeton 2000; Panchal and Beaumont 2007).
| Clade | Nested clade | Distance | Value (S or L) | Chi square statistics | Inference key steps | Inference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total cladogram | 0–0 T | D c | 38.8831 | 2.4791 | — | Null hypothesis cannot be rejected. Moving on to next clade |
| D c | 39.1988 | |||||
| 0–1 T | D c | 10.1639 | ||||
| D c | 0.0 | |||||
| 0–2 T | D c | 37.4794 | ||||
| D c | 28.7409 | |||||
| 0–3 T | D c | 46.5731 | ||||
| D c | 0.0 | |||||
| I–T |
Note: "*" means p value < 0.001.
Analysis of molecular variance of host genetic data revealed a level of genetic fixation of the population, with an F ST = 0.0000* (p value < 0.01; Table 3). The within‐population variation, reported as Θ, was the same in two locations, Corcubión and Ferrol (0.00065; Table 1). The lowest Θ value (Θ = 0) was reported from Arousa. Interestingly, the highest value of genetic diversity was from Vigo (0.00185).
TABLE 3.
Percentage of variation among and within S. atlantica populations.
| Source of Sepiola sp. variation | df | Sum of squares | Variance components | Percentage of variation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Among population | 4 | 101.367 | 1.32652* | 0.000 |
| Within population | 49 | 247.092 | 2.12002* | 100 |
| Total | 51 | 348.459 | 3.44654 | |
| Overall (F ST) | 0.000* |
Note: "*" means p value < 0.001.
3.2. Nested Clade and Molecular Variance Analysis of Vibrio
Conversely, the genetic population structure of the Vibrio symbionts exhibited a different configuration compared to their host squids. A total of 70 glyceraldehyde dehydrogenase (gapA) sequences were analyzed, yielding three non‐continuous networks of 39 haplotypes (Figure 3, Table S2). Identical sequences isolated from the same light organ were removed from our analysis. The number of mutational steps and unsampled haplotypes observed are shown in Figure 3. This haplotype network is more diverse and differentiated compared to the one observed from the host populations. Haplotypes 1, 2 and 3 only contain sequences from Arousa. Interestingly, haplotype 1 is nested with haplotype 28 and haplotype 39 that only contain sequences from Ferrol and Corcubión respectively. These are nested in two correlatively ranked clades, 2–14 and 3–9, forming their own separated network. The next largest network (number of haplotypes) contains haplotypes 10 and 11, separated by three mutational steps: haplotype 15, nested with haplotypes 10 and 11 in clade 3–8 and representing sequences only from Aldán, and haplotype 21 which possesses sequences only from Vigo nested in its own clade, 3–7. Haplotype 21 is separated by 10 mutational steps from clade 3–8. These four haplotypes form the higher ranked clade 4–7, which constitutes its own network unit.
FIGURE 3.

TCS haplotype network generated from Vibrio sp. symbionts molecular data acquired from isolates harvested from squid light organs in the Galician Rías during the years 2007, 2008 and 2009. Each line in the diagram represents one‐base‐pair mutational step between haplotypes. Black solid circles represent unsampled mutational steps connecting haplotypes. The size of the circles conveys information about the number of sequences that compose a particular haplotype, while the colour of each circle signifies the geographic source of the sequence data and its relative contribution to the overall haplotype. Each haplotype is denoted by a two‐digit code enclosed within dotted lines, which illustrate their hierarchical relationships. Each level of this hierarchy is marked with a two‐digit label in a dashed format. The resolution of the loop structure is resolved at the point marked with an arrow.
The biggest network contains the majority of haplotypes and shows the highest rank of nesting in clade 5–7, which groups three separated clades into two large clusters of haplotypes, clade 4–6, 4–8, and 4–9. In clade 4–6 there are two larger haplotypes, haplotype 4 with most sequences isolated from Aldán and a small contribution of sequences from Corcubión. Haplotype 6 shows a similar distribution in terms of abundance of sequences from these two locations, being separated from haplotype 4 by 14 mutational steps. Haplotypes 5 and 8 have sequences only from Aldán and are both connected to haplotype 6 by one mutational step. Additionally, haplotype 22 which only contains sequences from Vigo is connected to haplotype 6 by three mutational steps. This cluster of haplotypes is nested within clade 2–5, which in turn is nested with clade 2–6 containing haplotypes 23 and 34 in the higher ranked clade 3–4. Haplotype 34 contains only sequences from Corcubión. Haplotype 24 contains the same proportion of sequences from the northernmost rías, Corcubión and Ferrol, and is connected to haplotype 4 and haplotype 7, unique from Aldán, by one mutational step. These three haplotypes form the clade 2–3. Haplotype 12, exclusive from Aldán, and haplotype 25, which contains sequences only from Ferrol, are separated by one mutational step. They are nested within nest 3–10, along with two unsampled haplotypes (Figure 3).
In clade 4–8, no haplotypes containing sequences from Arousa or Vigo are found. Alternatively, one major unique haplotype, 30, with sequences from Ferrol is represented and nested within its own clade, 2–26. Haplotypes 36 and 37, which form their own clade, 3–13, are exclusive from Corcubión and are connected to an unsampled haplotype by three and one mutational steps respectively. This unsampled haplotype is separated by five mutational steps from haplotype 30. Haplotype 13 has sequences from Aldán and Ferrol, with a majority from the first location. Haplotype 13 is connected to haplotype 32 by a single mutational step. Along with haplotype 30, they form clade 3–12.
Within clade 4–9, clade 3–5 nests clades 2–7 and 2–22. Clade 2–7 groups haplotypes 9 and 14, which are unique from Aldán and are separated from each other by three mutational steps. Clade 2–22 contains haplotype 27, with only sequences from Ferrol. It is connected to an unsampled haplotype by two mutational steps, with a second unsampled haplotype by a total of three mutational steps. The loop formed by haplotypes 13 and 27 and the two unsampled haplotypes is resolved at the point the arrow indicates (Figure 3) according to the rules established by Templeton and Sing (1993).
Clade 3–6, which contains haplotypes 17, 18, and 38 and two unsampled haplotypes is not included in the highest rank clade 5–7. Haplotypes 17 and 18 contain sequences uniquely from Vigo, with more sequences from haplotype 18. They are both separated by six and four mutational steps, respectively, from an unsampled haplotype. Haplotype 38 is separated by one mutational step from haplotype 18. Finally, haplotype 35, which is unique from Corcubión is not included in any nest, and is separated by three and four mutational steps from two distinct unsampled haplotypes.
Contingency analyses of symbiotic Vibrio nesting exhibited significant evidence of restricted gene flow with isolation by distance in clade 2–5, which includes haplotypes 5, 6, 8, and 22, and comprises a geographical isolated unit encompassing the southern rías Vigo and Aldán, with a small contribution from the centrally located Corcubión ría (Table 4). Clade 3–5 exhibits contiguous range expansion, and comprises populations from Aldán and Ferrol, which are distant rías. Inference from the total cladogram, was inconclusive for past genetic history.
TABLE 4.
Vibrio clades that demonstrated significance during either a permutation contingency analysis or geographic distance analysis. Location of significance is indicated by (D n), nested clade distance and/or (D c), the within‐clade distance. I–T indicates the average distance between a tip clade and an interior clade. S or L indicates that the distance measure is significantly smaller or larger at the 5% inference level. Inference steps were performed using the automated inference key in GEODIS, part of the AneCA v1.2 population genetics analysis software platform (Posada, Crandall, and Templeton 2000; Panchal and Beaumont 2007).
| Clade | Nested clade | Distance | Value (S or L) | Chi square statistics | Inference key steps | Inference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2–3 | 1–2 T | D n | 49.85*l | 7.95* | 1‐2 IO | I–T Status undetermined: Inconclusive outcome |
| D c | 38.9164 | |||||
| 1–3 T | D n | 30.1481*s | ||||
| D c | 15.6138*s | |||||
| 2–5 | 1–5 T | D n | 14.5031 | 16.6667* | 1‐2‐3‐4 NO | Restricted gene flow with isolation by distance |
| D c | 0.0 | |||||
| 1–6 I | D n | 36.4419 | ||||
| D c | 23.8062*s | |||||
| 1–22 I | D n | 50.2167*l | ||||
| D c | 33.1001 | |||||
| I–T | D n | 26.5304 | ||||
| D c | 26.9042 | |||||
| 3–5 | 2–7 T | D n | 60.5609*l | 8.0* | 1‐19‐20‐2‐11‐12 NO | Contiguous range of expansion |
| D c | 0.0 | |||||
| 2–22 | D n | 13.4493*s | ||||
| D c | 0.0*s | |||||
| I–T | D n | −47.1116*s | ||||
| D c | 0.0 | 1‐2 IO | ||||
| Total Cladogram | 5–7 | D n | 40.5398*l | 153.2982* | I–T Status undetermined: Inconclusive outcome | |
| D c | 36.3931 |
Note: “*” means p value < 0.001.
An identical AMOVA performed on symbiont genetic data revealed a higher value (F ST = 0.21314*, p value < 0.001; Table 5) when compared with host genetic data. Base‐pair‐by‐base‐pair nucleotide diversity of symbiont populations was highest in samples from Aldán and Vigo (0.18521, 0.22434; Table 1), which are both from the southernmost rías. The lowest amount of genetic diversity was observed in the population from Ferrol (0.004936; Table 1).
TABLE 5.
Percentage of variation among and within Vibrio sp. populations.
| Source of Vibrio sp. variation | df | Sum of squares | Variance components | Percentage of variation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Among population | 4 | 112.367 | 2.16499* | 21.314 |
| Within population | 55 | 167.750 | 3.05000* | 78.686 |
| Total | 59 | 280.117 | 5.21499 | |
| Overall (F ST) | 0.21314* |
Note: "*" means p value < 0.001.
4. Discussion
4.1. Host Genetic Architecture
Sepiold squids and their Vibrio symbionts form highly specific associations, yet both allopatric and sympatric populations are influenced by abiotic factors such as salinity, temperature, marine currents, and changes in the pH due to the transmission (environmental) strategy that they employ (Bongrand et al. 2022; Koch et al. 2014; Nourabadi and Nishiguchi 2021; Soto and Nishiguchi 2021). For example, Euprymna‐Vibrio populations in the Philippine archipelago demonstrated how marine currents have a central role in the establishment and configuration of these associations (Coryell et al. 2018). These results demonstrate how geographic location impacts the genetic structure of the host, while having less significance for symbiont populations. This is due to differences in the method of dispersal between the two partners of the association, with host squids having limited dispersal range as adults and rarely travel far from where they hatch (Jones et al. 2006; Kimbell, Mcfall‐Ngai, and Roderick 2002; Villanueva et al. 2016; Zamborsky and Nishiguchi 2011). In contrast, viable symbiotic Vibrio cells are vented every day, and once in the water column they are subject to environmental factors such as dispersal by currents to different locations where they can infect new hosts (Soto, Punke, and Nishiguchi 2012). Similar to the Philippines, the NW coast of Spain is also influenced by oceanographic currents. Particularly, the Eastern North Atlantic Central Water (ENACW) combines two currents, the ENACWp (polar) from the north and ENACWt (tropical) from the south. These two currents converge on the Corcubión ría, creating a vortex which pulls water out to sea and away from the mainland (Figure 4).
FIGURE 4.

(Modified from Ríos et al. 1992). The Eastern North Atlantic Central Water Current (ENACW) with its two components from polar origin (ENACWp) and tropical origin (ENACWt). The subsuperficial front is shaded in grey, marking the area of confluence of the two components.
Analysis of Molecular Variance (AMOVA) yields interesting results for the genetic structure of S. atlantica populations in this area. The F ST value (F ST = 0.0000, p < 0.0001, Table 3) observed for host populations indicate that there is gene flow between the populations from the different rías, and it can be considered that the S. atlantica population in this area of the Iberian Peninsula is in panmixia. This result reinforces previously reported studies (Villanueva et al. 2016), where they demonstrate that species with planktonic hatchlings reach broader distributional ranges in comparison with species with benthic hatchlings. Species with smaller hatchlings have broader latitudinal distribution ranges, and notably S. atlantica has the smallest hatchling size (1.7 mm) among all Sepiola members measured (Jones and Richardson 2010; Rodrigues et al. 2011).
The data provided by the nested clade analysis reinforces our earlier findings where the major haplotype in this area is haplotype 1 (Figure 2). This haplotype is distributed among individuals mostly belonging to the Ferrol and Corcubión rías, where the majority of sequences were from these two rías (Table 1). Sequences belonging to individuals from Arousa, Aldán and Vigo were also found in haplotype 1.
The influence of the polar component of the ENACW whose north–south direction could be distributing Sepiola juveniles in a southerly direction may have an important role in the passive migration of this species. This may facilitate encounters with other juveniles from the southern rías of Vigo, Aldán and Arousa. In contrast, the tropical component of the ENACW, which in turn moves individuals from the southern areas corresponding to Vigo, Aldán, and Arousa rías, may facilitate the mixing of individuals from the south with those from the north in the Corcubión confluence area (Figure 4). The confluence of these two currents suggests a substantial amount of gene flow occurring between both northern and southern populations.
It is interesting to mention the presence of two local haplotypes with unique sequences from the most distant rías, haplotype 2 corresponding to Ferrol, the northernmost ría, and haplotype 3 corresponding to Vigo, the southernmost ría. The fact that these two rías are the farthest from the area of current convergence in Corcubión may have contributed to the emergence of these unique haplotypes. However, the fact that they are separated from the main haplotype (1) by only one mutational step and the nested clade analysis together with the contingency analysis did not yield significant results suggests that the individuals belonging to these unique haplotypes are not isolated. Further studies in the area are needed in the future to determine whether these haplotypes have established themselves significantly in the respective rías to ascertain if the distance from the area of current convergence in Corcubión plays any role in the process of allopatric speciation. This supports the idea that despite the presence of physical facilitators such as water movement, the distances between populations, and the existence of geographical barriers such as the rías have an important role in shaping the genetic structure of host‐symbiont populations.
Additionally, S. atlantica abundance is low year‐round, and seasonal behaviour is variable (Rodrigues et al. 2011). As previously reported by Yau and Boyle (1996) and Guerra et al. (1986), the abundance of S. atlantica in Firemore Bay (west coast of Scotland) and in the ría of Vigo varied from 0.006 to 0.001 individuals per square meter (individuals/m2). This is a scarce species whose variability in number of individuals over time can also be influenced by biological processes such as predation, competition, recruitment, or abiotic factors. Although our study involved only a singlea fe year of sampling (2011), cohort effects are unlikely to influence our results. A comparable study in a similar system involving the bobtail squid Euprymna albatrossae and their Vibrio fischeri symbionts in the Philippine archipelago (Coryell et al. 2018) found that genetic variation in symbiont populations was driven primarily by abiotic factors, such as geographic barriers, water temperature, salinity, and marine currents rather than temporal effects. Despite conducting sampling over multiple years (2010–2015), no significant temporal variation was detected in the genetic structure of the symbionts. This suggests that cohort effects were not a significant factor in the system, as abiotic factors played a more dominant role in determining the genetic structure of the population of both the symbiont and the host.
During the summer months, adults migrate to deeper and colder waters in this area (Guerra 1986) and to the North Sea (Oesterwind et al. 2010). Although no direct observations have been made, it has been hypothesized that these same populations migrate to a geographical location close to their origin, facilitating increased genetic exchange. Rossia macrossoma (Delle Chiaje, 1830) and Rondeletiola minor (Naef, 1912) two closely related sepiolids that primarily live in deeper waters of the Atlantic Ocean and Mediterranean Sea, have also exhibited the same migratory behaviour (Lefkaditou and Kaspiris 2005). These species concentrate in deeper waters during summer and early autumn, whereas recruitment is mainly observed in November at depths shallower than 200 m. Given the geographic topology of this area, Atlantic bobtail squid species provide a clear example of allopatric speciation, with individual genetic units observed in each of the rías. However, our results from both AMOVA and NCA indicate the genetic variability found within S. atlantica is minimum due to prevailing seasonal currents in the area.
4.2. Symbiont Genetic Architecture
Symbiont genetic data indicates that Vibrio bacteria are subject to certain barriers that restrict their genetic exchange. This is contrary to most hypotheses regarding bacterial plankton distribution in the ocean, where most microorganisms are subjected to currents and other abiotic factors (Abreu et al. 2023; Sousa et al. 2021). Open marine environments have few physical barriers for dispersal and microbes are expected to exist as well‐mixed populations, based on the classical assumption in microbial biogeography that ‘everything is everywhere, but the environment selects’ (Baas Becking 1934). However, AMOVA of total symbiont genetic data reveals that a higher percentage of variation relies among populations (df = 4, SS = 112.367, VC = 2.16499, PV = 21.314%; Table 5, Figure S1) when compared to the host (df = 4, SS =101.367, VC = 1.32652, PV = 0%; Table 3). The level of genetic diversity for the total symbiont population in the region value is indicative of more restricted gene flow between populations (F ST = 0.21314, p < 0.0001, Table 5, Figure S1) than the F ST value reported for host populations (F ST = 0.000, p < 0.0001, Table 3). One main contiguous haplotype network was detected in the symbiont genetic data revealing connections between Vibrio populations from all the rías (Figure 3); however, two more networks were revealed with no connections with the main one or between them. The existence of three haplotype networks in this area for the symbiont suggests that there are at least three different genetic units. The distance between them in terms of mutational steps is > 12, so the ANeCA software categorizes them as separate networks. The network corresponding to clade 4–7 encompasses haplotypes from Aldán and Vigo. These rías are closer to each other than to any other ría, which may facilitate the movement of bacterial cells between these rías. This connection would make it possible for the symbionts present in this area to adapt to local salinity and temperature conditions, facilitating the emergence of unique haplotypes. Additionally, if we observe the nested clades within clade 4–7, clade 3–7 contains a unique haplotype from Vigo, haplotype 21, while clade 3–8 comprises haplotypes present only in Aldán. This suggests that even at the level of individual rías, the unique environmental conditions of each one can lead to the emergence of unique haplotypes corresponding to locally adapted populations.
The smallest network, which corresponds with clade 3–9, contains unique haplotypes from Arousa, Corcubión and Ferrol, with these rías geographically situated consecutively from south to north. The configuration of this network can be explained by the same reasons that shape the network of clade 4–7. The proximity of these rías would have facilitated the movement of symbionts between them, promoting the emergence of genetically similar haplotypes. The presence of the tropical component of the ENACW would transport bacterial cells from Arousa northward, while the polar component of the ENACW would transport bacterial cells from the populations of the Ferrol southward, favouring the mixing of these populations in the convergence area of Corcubión. This is where the tropical and polar components of the Eastern North Atlantic Central Water (ENACW) current meet, which acts as a geographical barrier between the southern and northern rías, preventing, but not entirely precluding, the mixing of Vibrio populations from the northern and southern rías. The observed patterns of genetic variation follow the direction of these ocean currents, indicating that passive transport through the water is a key driver of genetic connectivity between populations. For instance, haplotypes found in northern and southern rías align with the direction of current flow, suggesting that the mixing of bacterial populations is facilitated by abiotic factors (i.e., the currents) rather than solely by genetic drift due to geographic isolation. If genetic drift were the primary driver, we would expect more random divergence patterns that do not align with the directionality of currents. Instead, the structured pattern of haplotype distribution, especially across physically separated but hydrologically connected rías, strongly suggests that abiotic factors, such as currents, play a significant role in shaping the genetic diversity of these Vibrio populations.
Results of the permutation contingency analysis revealed that the formation of clade 2–5 is determined by restricted gene flow with isolation by distance (Table 4). This clade contains unique haplotypes from Vigo and Aldan, as well as a dominant haplotype with sequences mostly from Aldán and a small contribution from Corcubión. This result reinforces the hypothesis of geographical isolation of this area from the other rías. Compared to the haplotype network of the host, S. atlantica , it is interesting to note that while the S. atlantica population is in panmixia, the Vibrio symbiont population is affected by abiotic factors such as ocean currents and the geographical configuration of the habitat. Given that the entire Galician coast is an upwelling zone, a phenomenon that affects sea surface temperature, content of organic matter in the water column and sediments, and other important abiotic conditions, these factors can also influence the settlement of cephalopods and consequently their Vibrio populations. S. atlantica prefers exposed coasts, typically in the outer parts of ría where the sediment is coarser than the inner part, with a preference for grain sizes between 0.25–0.125 mm. (fine sand). Depth varies between 3 and 12 m, and the temperature ranges from 11°C–19°C, with low percentages of organic matter in the sediment. Essentially, all Galician estuaries have the same granulometric distribution, following a gradient from coarse sand at the most exposed areas of the ría mouth to mud in the internal areas. This gradient means that locally, although separated by several kilometres, we find optimal benthic bottoms similar from north to south for the settlement of different populations. The Corcubión Inlet, oriented southwest, is the western‐most point of the Iberian Peninsula. It serves as a transition zone separating the Rías Baixas from the Costa da Morte and Rías Altas. Although it is not an estuarine system, some locations, due to currents, granulometric conditions, and other abiotic variables, make this inlet suitable for settlement of Sepiola. All locations in the southern rías (Arousa, Aldán and Vigo) have a southwest orientation, except for the northern Ría de Ferrol, which is oriented east to west. Thus, the panmixia observed in Sepiola populations may be due to habitat preference, and reinforces the observation that the genetic structure of the symbiont population is directly influenced more by abiotic factors and not to host location in the Iberian Peninsula.
Strikingly, the permutation contingency analysis demonstrated that the formation of clade 3–5 is due to contiguous range expansion (Table 4). This pattern refers to a population expanding its range continuously and uniformly from an ancestral location. This infers that as the population expands, new individuals colonize adjacent areas, leading to a scenario of continuous and gradual spread rather than isolated jumps or long‐distance dispersal events. However, the haplotypes found in this clade are unique and belong to two geographically distant locations, Aldán and Ferrol (Figure 3). Therefore, the presence of the contiguous range expansion pattern could be explained by a possible event of local extinctions in the rías existing between Ferrol and Aldán, after a historical range expansion event. The population might have historically expanded continuously across the entire area, but subsequent local extinctions in the intermediate areas could have eliminated those haplotypes. Due to the dynamic nature of bacterial populations and their ease of transport in marine environments, the ocean currents present in the area could have transported individuals from locally adapted populations between the rías of Ferrol and Aldan and the rías between them, persisting only in the estuaries with suitable conditions for these locally adapted populations, in this case, Ferrol and Aldán.
Another explanation to this gap existing between Ferrol and Aldán in a clade that shows continuous range of expansion can be the presence of the ENACW current in this area, which would prevent migration among the rías. Therefore, any genetic exchange between bacteria of these two geographical units is highly unlikely since the vortex created between the two components of the current (ENACWt and ENACWp) would passively transport Vibrio cells out to sea. Additionally, each ría is subject to different hydrological regimes (Álvarez et al. 2003; DeCastro et al. 2000) that feature different depths and bottom configurations, which are each affected by different sources of fresh water (DeCastro et al. 2006). These intrusions of fresh water, such as the mouth of nearby rivers, can alter the pattern of circulation within each estuary (Alvarez et al. 2006). For example, the proximity of the Miño river to the Vigo ría can reverse the pattern of water circulation in the Vigo and Pontevedra rías, making fresh water intrude superficially into them and preventing the movement of microorganisms through this route (Sousa et al. 2013, 2014). The Arousa ría specifically has a series of characteristics that make it unique compared to its neighbouring Aldán and Vigo rías. The southern orientation and shallowness at the mouth of the estuary contribute more fresh water that is cooler in winter, with upwelling events less frequent in summer (Alvarez et al. 2007), potentially preventing the recruitment of new Vibrio cells from the open ocean. Characteristics such as salinity and temperature, along with isolation from the ocean, can lead to populations of symbionts locally adapted to those conditions to form a unique genetic unit, like haplotypes 2 and 3 which are unique to Arousa (Soto and Nishiguchi 2021; Soto et al. 2009).
Our study is not the first study demonstrating the genetic structure in a beneficial symbiont population and the low genetic variability observed in their corresponding host populations. Previous studies of zoantharian endosymbionts demonstrated high genetic variation over small geographic scales around the Okinawa‐jima Island in Japan (Noda et al. 2017). Gould and Dunlap (2019) used a genomic approach to measure how populations of the facultative light organ symbiont, Photobacterium mandapamensis exhibit genetic structure at spatial scales of tens of kilometres despite the absence of physical barriers to dispersal and in contrast to the population structure of its coral reef fish host Siphamia tubifer . In the Galician rías region, general physical barriers such as the geomorphology of the region and the specific conditions of each ría such as temperature differences, salinity gradients, and different hydrological regimes change throughout each season. These conditions shape unique environments leading to locally adapted Vibrio strains in each ría, creating a different pool of symbionts over time. Studies in other symbiotic systems demonstrate how locally adapted symbiont strains in deep‐sea hydrothermal vents are specifically associated with their hosts with no host differentiated populations across an ~800 km. gradient (Breusing et al. 2022). Additionally, polyclonal symbiont populations in hydrothermal vent tubeworms had less variability than their free‐living counterparts (Polzin et al. 2019). For bobtail squids, Vibrio bacteria are acquired from the environment within the first few hours post hatching, with 95% of the population subsequently vented each day at dawn. The vented Vibrio bacteria can then diversify before infecting a new host, which may explain the higher genetic diversity observed in these beneficial symbionts (Soto and Nishiguchi 2021; Soto, Rivera, and Nishiguchi 2014; Soto et al. 2019).
In conclusion, we observed how the influence of abiotic factors, in particular seasonal marine currents, influence the configuration of the genetic structure of both Atlantic bobtail squid and their beneficial symbiotic Vibrio counterparts. For bobtail squids, marine currents seem to be facilitating the encounter of juveniles coming from northern and southern rías increasing their genetic variability. In Vibrio bacteria, marine currents, along with the particular isolation and conditions of each ría could be influencing the existence of locally adapted symbionts which remain isolated from one another. These findings are in accordance with previous studies of host‐symbiont co‐speciation, and increase our understanding of the evolution of beneficial symbioses in the marine environment (Jones et al. 2006; Zamborsky and Nishiguchi 2011; Soto, Punke, and Nishiguchi 2012; Coryell et al. 2018). In particular, our study is a fresh perspective examining both host and environmentally transmitted symbionts and the roles that the environment has on establishing the symbiosis. These results have the potential to establish a fundamental basis for how environmentally transmitted symbioses are affected by changes in seasonal and subsequent dramatic abiotic fluctuations, and eventually global climate change. Understanding the dynamics between beneficial bacteria and their animal hosts has greater consequences on how ecosystems are impacted by climate change and the bacteria that are responsible for the overall health and survival of all living eukaryotes.
Author Contributions
P. A. Pérez‐Ferrer performed the research, analysed the data, and wrote the paper. M. Ashraf performed the research, M. Rodrigues performed the research, J. Troncoso contributed reagents and provided research space and M. K. Nishiguchi designed the research, contributed new reagents and analytical tools, and wrote the paper.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Supporting information
Figure S1. Phylogenetic analysis of Vibrio haplotypes. Refer to Figure 3 for haplotype designations. Calculated using Neighbour—Joining method. It supports the separation between the clades 4–6, 4–7 and 4–9.
Table S1. Primer names, sequence and sequence source used in the amplification of the glyceraldehyde phosphate dehydrogenase (gapA) locus from Vibrio sp. and the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) locus from Sepiola atlantica collected in Galicia.
Table S2. Number of isolates (n) from each animal from each location that make up each haplotype. The animal codes are represented as the sampling site initials: Areamilla beach in Ría de Vigo (AM), Areacova beach in Ría de Aldan (AC), Arousa beach in Ría de Arousa (A), Gures beach in Ría de Corcubión (G), Chanteiro beach in Ría de Ferrol (C).
Acknowledgements
We thank the staff at the University of Vigo marine station for help in collecting and husbandry of all sepiolids collected in this study. This work was funded by NSF‐DBI 2214038, NASA EXO‐80NSSC18K1053, College of Arts and Sciences at New Mexico State University, and the Quantitative Systems Biology program and School of Natural Sciences at UC Merced.
Handling Editor: Kayla King
Funding: This work was funded by NSF‐DBI 2214038, NASA EXO‐80NSSC18K1053, College of Arts and Sciences at New Mexico State University, and the Quantitative Systems Biology program and School of Natural Sciences at UC Merced.
Data Availability Statement
Genetic data: Raw sequence reads are deposited in the SRA (BioProject Sepiola‐ PRJNA1081930). Individual genotype data are http://datadryad.org/stash/share/b5YjT7zpdDBnXonlqlj6M0g4CN0ScGB‐NEd6oPS9mPY and doi:10.5061/dryad.9cnp5hqsz. Unique haplotype data are deposited to NCBI Nucleotide Database. Vibrio haplotype accession numbers are SAMN42497480—SAMN42497518 and SAMN40347782—SAMN40347870/. Sepiola haplotype accession numbers are SAMN42469291—SAMN42469294 and SAMN40194858—SAMN40194884.
Benefit sharing statement: Benefits Generated: A research collaboration was developed with scientists from the countries providing genetic samples; all collaborators are included as co‐authors; the results of research have been shared with the provider communities and the broader scientific community (see above), and the research addresses a priority concern, in this case the conservation of organisms being studied. More broadly, our group is committed to international scientific partnerships, as well as institutional capacity building. Benefits from this research accrue from the sharing of our data and results on public databases as described above.
References
- Abreu, C. I. , Dal Bello M., Bunse C., Pinhassi J., and Gore J.. 2023. “Warmer Temperatures Favor Slower‐Growing bacteria in Natural Marine Communities.” Science Advances 9, no. 19: eade8352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Almeida, B. A. , Lukács B. A., Lovas‐Kiss Á., Reynolds C., and Green A. J.. 2022. “Functional Traits Drive Dispersal Interactions Between European Waterfowl and Seeds.” Frontiers in Plant Science 12: 795288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Alvarez, I. , Decastro M., Gomez‐Gesteira M., and Prego R.. 2006. “Hydrographic Behavior of the Galician Rías Baixas (NW Spain) Under the Spring Intrusion of the Miño River.” Journal of Marine Systems 60, no. 1: 144–152. [Google Scholar]
- Álvarez, I. , deCastro M., Prego R., et al. 2003. “Hydrographic Characterization of a Winter‐Upwelling Event in the Ría of Pontevedra (NW Spain).” Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 56, no. 3: 869–876. [Google Scholar]
- Alvarez, I. , Gomez‐Gesteira M., deCastro M., and Prego R.. 2007. “Variation in Upwelling Intensity Along the Northwest Iberian Peninsula (Galicia).” Journal of Atmospheric & Ocean Science 10, no. 4: 309–324. [Google Scholar]
- Andrews, P. L. R. , Darmaillacq A. S., Dennison N., et al. 2013. “The Identification and Management of Pain, Suffering and Distress in Cephalopods, Including Anaesthesia, Analgesia and Humane Killing.” Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 447: 46–64. [Google Scholar]
- Araújo, M. B. , and Louto M.. 2007. “The Importance of Biotic Interactions for Modelling Species Distributions Under Climate Change.” Global Ecology and Biogeography 16: 743–753. [Google Scholar]
- Ast, J. C. , Urbanczyk H., and Dunlap P. V.. 2009. “Multi‐Gene Analysis Reveals Previously Unrecognized Phylogenetic Diversity in Aliivibrio.” Systematic and Applied Microbiology 32, no. 6: 379–386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baas Becking, L. G. M. 1934. Geobiologie of Inleiding tot de Milieukunde. Den Haag, the Netherlands: W.P. Van Stockum & Zoon N.V. [Google Scholar]
- Berković, B. , Cabaço S., Barrio J. M., Santos R., Serrão E. A., and Alberto F.. 2014. “Extending the Life History of a Clonal Aquatic Plant: Dispersal Potential of Sexual and Asexual Propagules of Zostera noltii .” Aquatic Botany 113: 123–129. [Google Scholar]
- Boettcher, K. J. , Ruby E. G., and Mcfall‐Ngai M. J.. 1996. “Bioluminescence in the Symbiotic Squid Euprymna scolopes Is Controlled by a Daily Biological Rhythm.” Journal of Comparative Physiology A 179: 65–73. [Google Scholar]
- Bongrand, C. , Koch E., Mende D., et al. 2022. “Evidence of Genomic Diversification in a Natural Symbiotic Population Within Its Host.” Frontiers in Microbiology 13: 854355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Breusing, C. , Genetti M., Russell S. L., Corbett‐Detig R. B., and Beinart R. A.. 2022. “Horizontal Transmission Enables Flexible Associations With Locally Adapted Symbiont Strains in Deep‐Sea Hydrothermal Vent Symbioses.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 119, no. 14: e2115608119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cacabelos, E. , Gestoso L., and Troncoso J.. 2008. “Macrobenthic Fauna in the Ensenada de San Simón (Galicia, North‐Western Spain).” Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the UK 88: 237–245. [Google Scholar]
- Calderón, I. , Garrabou J., and Aurelle D.. 2006. “Evaluation of the Utility of COI and ITS Markers as Tools for Population Genetic Studies of Temperate Gorgonians.” Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 336, no. 2: 184–197. [Google Scholar]
- Clement, M. , Posada D., and Crandall K. A.. 2000. “TCS: A Computer Program to Estimate Gene Genealogies.” Molecular Ecology 9, no. 10: 1657–1659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Coryell, R. L. , Turnham K. E., de Jesus Ayson E. G., et al. 2018. “Phylogeographic Patterns in the Philippine Archipelago Influence Symbiont Diversity in the Bobtail Squid–Vibrio Mutualism.” Ecology and Evolution 8, no. 15: 7421–7435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Coyer, J. A. , Diekmann O. E., Serrão E. A., et al. 2004. “Population Genetics of Dwarf Eelgrass Zostera noltii 577 Throughout Its Biogeographic Range.” Marine Ecology Progress Series 281: 51–62. [Google Scholar]
- DeCastro, M. , Alvarez I., Varela M., Prego R., and Gómez‐Gesteira M.. 2006. “Miño River Dams Discharge on Neighbor Galician Rías Baixas (NW Iberian Peninsula): Hydrological, Chemical and Biological Changes in Water Column.” Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 70, no. 1–2: 52–62. [Google Scholar]
- DeCastro, M. , Gómez‐Gesteira M., Prego R., et al. 2000. “Wind and Tidal Influence on Water Circulation in a Galician Ría (NW Spain).” Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 51, no. 2: 161–176. [Google Scholar]
- Diz, A. P. , and Presa P.. 2009. “The Genetic Diversity Pattern of Mytilus galloprovincialis in Galician Rías (NW Iberian Estuaries).” Aquaculture 287, no. 3–4: 278–285. [Google Scholar]
- Duarte, L. , and Viejo R. M.. 2018. “Environmental and Phenotypic Heterogeneity of Populations at the Trailing Range‐Edge of the Habitat‐Forming Macroalga Fucus serratus .” Marine Environmental Research 136: 16–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Excoffier, L. , and Lischer H. E. L.. 2010. “Arlequin Suite Ver 3.5: A New Series of Programs to Perform Population Genetics Analyses Under Linux and Windows.” Molecular Ecology Resources 10, no. 3: 564–567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fogliata, S. V. , Perera M. F., Alves‐Pereira A., Zucchi M. I., and Murúa M. G.. 2022. “Unraveling the Population Structure of the Sugarcane Borer, Diatraea Saccharalis, in Argentina.” Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 170, no. 6: 530–545. [Google Scholar]
- Folmer, O. , Black M., Hoeh W., Lutz R., and Vrijenhoek R.. 1994. “DNA Primers for Amplification of Mitochondrial Cytochrome C Oxidase Subunit I from Diverse Metazoan Invertebrates.” Molecular Marine Biology and Biotechnology 3, no. 5: 294–299. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gould, A. L. , and Dunlap P. V.. 2019. “Shedding Light on Specificity: Population Genomic Structure of a Symbiosis Between a Coral Reef Fish and Luminous Bacterium.” Frontiers in Microbiology 10: 2670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guerra, Á. 1986. “Sepiolinae (Mollusca, Cephalopoda) de la Ría de Vigo.” [In Spanish.] Iberus 6: 175–184. [Google Scholar]
- Guerra, Á. 1992. “Mollusca, Cephalopoda.” In Fauna Ibérica I, edited by Ramos M. A., 327. Madrid, Spain: Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales. [Google Scholar]
- Guerra, Á. , Alonso‐Allende J. M., Pérez‐Gándaras G., Ferreiro M., Figueras A. J., and Labarta U.. 1986. Especies Bentónicas y Demersales de la Ría de Vigo. Pescas de Arrastre de Fondo (1982–1984), 188. Barcelona, Spain: Datos Informativos, Instituto de Investigaciones Pesqueras CSIC. [Google Scholar]
- Hellberg, M. E. , Burton R. S., Neigel J. E., and Palumbi S. R.. 2002. “Genetic Assessment of Connectivity Among Marine Populations.” Bulletin of Marine Science 70, no. 1: 273–290. [Google Scholar]
- Heras, S. , Planella L., García‐Marín J. L., Vera M., and Roldán M. I.. 2019. “Genetic Structure and Population Connectivity of the Blue and Red Shrimp Aristeus antennatus .” Scientific Reports 9, no. 1: 13531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Herring, P. J. 1977. “Bioluminescence of Marine Organisms.” Nature 267: 788–793. [Google Scholar]
- Jacobs, H. T. , and Grimes B.. 1986. “Complete Nucleotide Sequences of the Nuclear Pseudogenes for Cytochrome Oxidase Subunit I and the Large Mitochondrial Ribosomal RNA in the Sea Urchin Strongylocentrotus purpuratus .” Journal of Molecular Biology 187, no. 4: 509–527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jahnke, M. , Gullström M., Larsson J., et al. 2019. “Population Genetic Structure and Connectivity of the Seagrass Thalassia hemprichii in the Western Indian Ocean Is Influenced by Predominant Ocean Currents.” Ecology and Evolution 9, no. 16: 8953–8964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jones, B. W. , Lopez J. E., Huttenburg J., and Nishiguchi M. K.. 2006. “Population Structure Between Environmentally Transmitted Vibrios and Bobtail Squids Using Nested Clade Analysis.” Molecular Ecology 15, no. 14: 4317–4329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jones, B. W. , and Nishiguchi M. K.. 2004. “Counterillumination in the Hawaiian Bobtail Squid, Euprymna scolopes Berry (Mollusca: Cephalopoda).” Marine Biology 144: 1151–1155. [Google Scholar]
- Jones, N. J. E. , and Richardson C. A.. 2010. “Laboratory Culture, Growth, and the Life Cycle of the Little Cuttlefish Sepiola atlantica (Cephalopoda: Sepiolidae).” Journal of Shellfish Research 29: 241–246. [Google Scholar]
- Kimbell, J. R. , Mcfall‐Ngai M. J., and Roderick G. K.. 2002. “Two Genetically Distinct Populations of Bobtail Squid, Euprymna scolopes , Exist on the Island of O'ahu.” Pacific Science 56, no. 3: 347–355. [Google Scholar]
- Kise, H. , Iguchi A., Ikegami T., et al. 2023. “Genetic Population Structures of Common Scavenging Species Near Hydrothermal Vents in the Okinawa Trough.” Scientific Reports 13: 2348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Koch, E. J. , Miyashiro T., McFall‐Ngai M. J., and Ruby E. G.. 2014. “Features Governing Symbiont Persistence in the Squid–Vibrio Association.” Molecular Ecology 23, no. 6: 1624–1634. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kool, J. T. , Paris C. B., Barber P. H., and Cowen R. K.. 2011. “Connectivity and the Development of Population Genetic Structure in Indo‐West Pacific Coral Reef Communities.” Global Ecology and Biogeography 20, no. 5: 695–706. [Google Scholar]
- Lefkaditou, E. , and Kaspiris P.. 2005. “Distribution and Abundance of Sepiolids (Mollusca: Cephalopoda) off the North‐Eastern Greek Coasts.” Belgian Journal of Zoology 135: 199–204. [Google Scholar]
- Leigh, J. W. , and Bryant D.. 2015. “POPART: Full‐Feature Software for Haplotype Network Construction.” Methods in Ecology and Evolution 6, no. 9: 1110–1116. [Google Scholar]
- Librado, P. , and Rozas J.. 2009. “DNASP v5: A Software for Comprehensive Analysis of DNA Polymorphism Data.” Bioinformatics 25, no. 11: 1451–1452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McFall‐Ngai, M. J. , and Ruby E. G.. 1991. “Symbiont Recognition and Subsequent Morphogenesis as Early Events in an Animal‐Bacterial Mutualism.” Science 254, no. 5037: 1491–1494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moltschaniwskyj, N. , Hall K., Lipinski M., et al. 2007. “Ethical Considerations of Cephalopods as Experimental Animals.” Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 17: 455–476. [Google Scholar]
- Monahan, W. B. , Pereira R. J., and Wake D. B.. 2012. “Ring Distributions Leading to Species Formation: A Global Topographic Analysis of Geographic Barriers Associated With Ring Species.” BMC Biology 10: 20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Montgomery, M. K. , and McFall‐Ngai M.. 1994. “Bacterial Symbionts Induce Host Organ Morphogenesis During Early Postembryonic Development of the Squid Euprymna scolopes .” Development 120, no. 7: 1719–1729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nelson, K. , Whittam T. S., and Selander R. K.. 1991. “Nucleotide Polymorphism and Evolution in the Glyceraldehyde‐3‐Phosphate Dehydrogenase Gene (gapA) in Natural Populations of Salmonella and Escherichia coli (PCR/Substitution Rates/Codon bias/Enzyme Electrophoresis/Gene Phylogeny).” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA 88: 6667–6671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nishiguchi, M. K. , and Nair V. S.. 2003. “Evolution of Symbiosis in the Vibrionaceae: A Combined Approach Using Molecules and Physiology.” International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology 53, no. 6: 2019–2026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Noda, H. , Parkinson J. E., Yang S. Y., and Reimer J. D.. 2017. “A Preliminary Survey of Zoantharian Endosymbionts Shows High Genetic Variation Over Small Geographic Scales on Okinawa‐Jima Island, Japan.” PeerJ 5: e3740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nourabadi, N. , and Nishiguchi M. K.. 2021. “pH Adaptation Drives Diverse Phenotypes in a Beneficial Bacterium‐Host Mutualism.” Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 9: 611411. [Google Scholar]
- Nyholm, S. , and McFall‐Ngai M.. 2004. “The Winnowing: Establishing the Squid–Vibrio Symbiosis.” Nature Reviews Microbiology 2: 632–642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nyholm, S. V. , and Nishiguchi M. K.. 2008. “The Evolutionary Ecology of a Sepiolid Squid‐Vibrio Association: From Cell to Environment.” Vie et Milieu 58, no. 2: 175–184. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nyholm, S. V. , Stabb E. V., Ruby E. G., and McFall‐Ngai M. J.. 2000. “Establishment of an Animal‐Bacterial Association: Recruiting Symbiotic Vibrios From the Environment.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 97, no. 18: 10231–10235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Oesterwind, D. , ter Hofstede R., Harley B., Brendelberger H., and Piatkowski U.. 2010. “Biology and Meso‐Scale Distribution Patterns of North Sea Cephalopods.” Fisheries Research 106, no. 2: 141–150. [Google Scholar]
- Palumbi, S. R. 1994. “Genetic divergence, Reproductive Isolation and Marine.” Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 25: 547–572. [Google Scholar]
- Panchal, M. , and Beaumont M. A.. 2007. “The Automation and Evaluation of Nested Clade Phylogeographic Analysis.” Evolution: International Journal of Organic Evolution 61, no. 6: 1466–1480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pickett, T. , and David A. A.. 2018. “Global Connectivity Patterns of the Notoriously Invasive Mussel, Mytilus galloprovincialis Lmk Using Archived CO1 Sequence Data.” BMC Research Notes 11, no. 1: 231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pipes, B. L. , and Nishiguchi M. K.. 2022. “Nocturnal Acidification: A Coordinating Cue in the Euprymna scolopes ‐ Vibrio fischeri Symbiosis.” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 7: 3743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Polzin, J. , Arevalo P., Nussbaumer T., Polz M. F., and Bright M.. 2019. “Polyclonal Symbiont Populations in Hydrothermal Vent Tubeworms and the Environment.” Proceedings. Biological sciences 286, no. 1896: 20181281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Posada, D. , Crandall K. A., and Templeton A. R.. 2000. “GeoDis: A Program for the Cladistic Nested Analysis of the Geographical Distribution of Genetic Haplotypes.” Molecular Ecology 9, no. 4: 487–488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reid, A. , and Jereb P.. 2005. “Family Sepiolidae.” In Cephalopods of the World. An Annotated and Illustrated Catalogue of Species Known to Date. Chambered Nautiluses and Sepioids (Nautilidae, Sepiidae, Sepiolidae, Sepiadariidae, Idiosepiidae and Spirulidae), edited by Jereb P. and Clyde F. E. R., 153–203. Rome, Italy: FAO Species Catalogue for Fishery Purposes. [Google Scholar]
- Riascos, J. M. , Marn N., Smallegange I. M., Flotats Avilés M., and Eustache K.. 2020. “Unusually Paced Life History Strategies of Marine Megafauna Drive Atypical Sensitivities to Environmental Variability.” Frontiers in Marine Science 7: 597492. [Google Scholar]
- Ríos, A. F. , Pérez F. F., and Fraga F.. 1992. “Water Masses in the Upper and Middle North Atlantic Ocean East of the Azores.” Deep Sea Research Part A. Oceanographic Research Papers 39, no. 3: 645–658. [Google Scholar]
- Rodrigues, M. , Garcí M. E., Troncoso J. S., and Guerra A.. 2010. “Burying Behaviour of the, Atlantic Bobtail Squid Sepiola atlantica (Cephalopoda: Sepiolidae).” Italian Journal of Zoology 77: 247–251. [Google Scholar]
- Rodrigues, M. , Garcí M. E., Troncoso J. S., and Guerra Á.. 2011. “Spawning Strategy in Atlantic Bobtail Squid Sepiola atlantica (Cephalopoda: Sepiolidae).” Helgoland Marine Research 65: 43–49. [Google Scholar]
- Rodrigues, M. , Guerra Á., and Troncoso J. S.. 2012. “Reproduction of the Atlantic Bobtail Squid Sepiola atlantica (Cephalopoda: Sepiolidae) in Northwest Spain.” Invertebrate Biology 131, no. 1: 30–39. [Google Scholar]
- Russell, E. S. 1922. “Report on the Cephalopoda Collected by the Research Steamer ‘Goldseeker’, During the Years, 1903–1908.” Scientific Investigations. Fishery Board of Scotland 3: 1–45. [Google Scholar]
- Soto, W. , Gutierrez J., Remmenga M. D., and Nishiguchi M. K.. 2009. “Salinity and Temperature Effects on Physiological Responses of Vibrio fischeri From Diverse Ecological Niches.” Microbial Ecology 57, no. 1: 140–150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Soto, W. , and Nishiguchi M. K.. 2021. “Environmental Stress Selects for Innovations That Drive Vibrio Symbiont Diversity.” Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 9: 616973. [Google Scholar]
- Soto, W. , Punke E. B., and Nishiguchi M. K.. 2012. “Evolutionary Perspectives in a Mutualism of Sepiolid Squid and Bioluminescent Bacteria: Combined Usage of Microbial Experimental Evolution and Temporal Population Genetics.” Evolution: International Journal of Organic Evolution 66, no. 5: 1308–1321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Soto, W. , Rivera F. M., and Nishiguchi M. K.. 2014. “Ecological Diversification of Vibrio fischeri Serially Passaged for 500 Generations in Novel Squid Host Euprymna tasmanica .” Microbial Ecology 67, no. 3: 700–721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Soto, W. , Travisano M., Tolleson A. R., and Nishiguchi M. K.. 2019. “Symbiont Evolution During the Free‐Living Phase Can Improve Host Colonization.” Microbiology (Reading, England) 165, no. 2: 174–187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sousa, M. C. , Mendes R., Alvarez I., Vaz N., Gomez‐Gesteira M., and Dias J. M.. 2014. “Unusual Circulation Patterns of the Rías Baixas Induced by Minho Freshwater Intrusion (NW of the Iberian Peninsula).” PLoS One 9, no. 11: 112587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sousa, M. C. , Vaz N., Alvarez I., and Dias J. M.. 2013. “Effect of Minho Estuarine Plume on Rías Baixas: Numerical Modeling Approach.” Journal of Marine Systems 65, no. 2: 2059–2064. [Google Scholar]
- Sousa, R. , Vasconcelos J., Vera‐Escalona I., et al. 2021. “Major Ocean Currents May Shape the Microbiome of the Topshell Phorcus Sauciatus in the NE Atlantic Ocean.” Scientific Reports 11, no. 1: 12480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stephen, A. G. , and Scottish R.. 1944. “IX.—The Cephalopoda of Scottish and Adjacent Waters.” Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 61: 247–270. [Google Scholar]
- Strugnell, J. M. , Allcock A. L., and Watts P. C.. 2017. “Closely Related Octopus Species Show Different Spatial Genetic Structures in Response to the Antarctic Seascape.” Ecology and Evolution 7, no. 19: 8087–8099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tamura, K. , Stecher G., and Kumar S.. 2021. “MEGA11: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 11.” Molecular Biology and Evolution 38, no. 7: 3022–3027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Templeton, A. R. , and Sing C. F.. 1993. “A Cladistic Analysis of Phenotypic Associations with Haplotypes Inferred from Restriction Endonuclease Mapping. IV. Nested Analyses with Cladogram Uncertainty and Recombination.” Genetics 134, no. 2: 659–669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Villanueva, R. , Vidal E. A., Fernández‐Álvarez F. Á., and Nabhitabhata J.. 2016. “Early Mode of Life and Hatchling Size in Cephalopod Molluscs: Influence on the Species Distributional Ranges.” PLoS One 11, no. 11: e0165334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang, Q. , Liu Y., Peng Z., Chen L., and Li B.. 2023. “Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of the Sea Star Asterias amurensis in the Northern Coast of China.” Journal of Oceanology and Limnology 41: 1593–1601. [Google Scholar]
- Yan, R. J. , Schnabel K. E., Rowden A. A., Guo X. Z., and Gardner J. P. A.. 2020. “Population Structure and Genetic Connectivity of Squat Lobsters (Munida Leach, 1820) Associated With Vulnerable Marine Ecosystems in the Southwest Pacific Ocean.” Frontiers in Marine Science 6: 791. [Google Scholar]
- Yau, C. , and Boyle P.. 1996. “Ecology of Sepiola Atlantica (Mollusca: Cephalopoda) in the Shallow Sublittoral Zone.” Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 76, no. 3: 733–748. [Google Scholar]
- Young, E. F. , Belchier M., Hauser L., et al. 2015. “Oceanography and Life History Predict Contrasting Genetic Population Structure in Two Antarctic Fish Species.” Evolutionary Applications 8, no. 5: 486–509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Young, R. E. , and Roper C. F. E.. 1976. “Bioluminescent Countershading in Midwater Animals: Evidence From Living Squid.” Science 191, no. 4231: 1046–1048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zamborsky, D. J. , and Nishiguchi M. K.. 2011. “Phylogeographical Patterns Among Mediterranean Sepiolid Squids and Their Vibrio Symbionts: Environment Drives Specificity Among Sympatric Species.” Applied and Environmental Microbiology 77, no. 2: 642–649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Figure S1. Phylogenetic analysis of Vibrio haplotypes. Refer to Figure 3 for haplotype designations. Calculated using Neighbour—Joining method. It supports the separation between the clades 4–6, 4–7 and 4–9.
Table S1. Primer names, sequence and sequence source used in the amplification of the glyceraldehyde phosphate dehydrogenase (gapA) locus from Vibrio sp. and the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) locus from Sepiola atlantica collected in Galicia.
Table S2. Number of isolates (n) from each animal from each location that make up each haplotype. The animal codes are represented as the sampling site initials: Areamilla beach in Ría de Vigo (AM), Areacova beach in Ría de Aldan (AC), Arousa beach in Ría de Arousa (A), Gures beach in Ría de Corcubión (G), Chanteiro beach in Ría de Ferrol (C).
Data Availability Statement
Genetic data: Raw sequence reads are deposited in the SRA (BioProject Sepiola‐ PRJNA1081930). Individual genotype data are http://datadryad.org/stash/share/b5YjT7zpdDBnXonlqlj6M0g4CN0ScGB‐NEd6oPS9mPY and doi:10.5061/dryad.9cnp5hqsz. Unique haplotype data are deposited to NCBI Nucleotide Database. Vibrio haplotype accession numbers are SAMN42497480—SAMN42497518 and SAMN40347782—SAMN40347870/. Sepiola haplotype accession numbers are SAMN42469291—SAMN42469294 and SAMN40194858—SAMN40194884.
Benefit sharing statement: Benefits Generated: A research collaboration was developed with scientists from the countries providing genetic samples; all collaborators are included as co‐authors; the results of research have been shared with the provider communities and the broader scientific community (see above), and the research addresses a priority concern, in this case the conservation of organisms being studied. More broadly, our group is committed to international scientific partnerships, as well as institutional capacity building. Benefits from this research accrue from the sharing of our data and results on public databases as described above.
