Abstract
During reproduction, multiple species such as insects and all mammals undergo extensive physiological and morphological adaptions to ensure health and survival of the mother and optimal development of the offspring. Here we report that the intestinal epithelium undergoes expansion during pregnancy and lactation in mammals. This enlargement of the intestinal surface area results in a novel geometry of expanded villi. Receptor activator of nuclear factor-κΒ (RANK, encoded by TNFRSF11A) and its ligand RANKL were identified as a molecular pathway involved in this villous expansion of the small intestine in vivo in mice and in intestinal mouse and human organoids. Mechanistically, RANK–RANKL protects gut epithelial cells from cell death and controls the intestinal stem cell niche through BMP receptor signalling, resulting in the elongation of villi and a prominent increase in the intestinal surface. As a transgenerational consequence, babies born to female mice that lack Rank in the intestinal epithelium show reduced weight and develop glucose intolerance after metabolic stress. Whereas gut epithelial remodelling in pregnancy/lactation is reversible, constitutive expression of an active form of RANK is sufficient to drive intestinal expansion followed by loss of villi and stem cells, and prevents the formation of Apcmin-driven small intestinal stem cell tumours. These data identify RANK–RANKL as a pathway that drives intestinal epithelial expansion in pregnancy/lactation, one of the most elusive and fundamental tissue remodelling events in mammalian life history and evolution.
Subject terms: Reproductive biology, Small intestine, Genetics research, Intestinal stem cells, Stem-cell research
The RANK–RANKL pathway drives intestinal epithelial expansion in pregnancy and lactation.
Main
Pregnancy is an important transient physiological state that coincides with substantial metabolic and cellular shifts to support maternal health and optimal growth and survival of offspring1–3. This adaptation is a conserved driving force on an evolutionary scale in probably all reproductive species, including insects4,5 and mammals1–3. Although such adaptation events are critical for the health of mother and offspring, many remodelling aspects are still poorly understood, particularly in mammals. As pregnancy and nourishment of the babies necessitates increased nutritional efficacy in the mothers, a fundamental, unanswered question relates to the cellular and molecular changes of the gut epithelial lining and its orchestration during pregnancy and lactation.
RANKL (encoded by TNFSF11, also known as ODF, TRANCE and OPGL) and its receptor RANK (also known as TRANCE-R and ODF-R) are essential for the development and activation of osteoclasts and therefore have a critical role in bone remodelling6,7. The RANK–RANKL system also controls lymph node organogenesis8, development of thymic medullary epithelial cells9,10, central thermoregulation11 and, in pregnancy, the formation of a lactating mammary gland12 as well as rewiring of the thymic epithelium13. Expression of RANKL is strongly induced by inflammatory cytokines and hormones involved in reproduction, such as prolactin and progesterone14–16. An imbalance of sex hormones, either due to reduced ovarian function or synthetic progesterone derivatives in hormone replacement therapies and contraceptives, disrupts the RANK–RANKL system and can thereby promote osteoporosis or breast cancer16.
Hormones involved in pregnancy and lactation have similarly been implicated in intestinal functions17. Notably, osteoprotegerin, a decoy receptor for RANKL, was first cloned from a fetal rat intestinal cDNA library, suggesting that the RANK–RANKL system might also function in the intestine. Indeed, RANK–RANKL is required for the differentiation of microfold cells (M cells) in Peyer’s patches, contributing to microbial sampling and promoting IgA production in the intestine18–20. Besides M cells, little is known about the role of intestinal RANK–RANKL. Here we identify RANK and RANKL as regulators of intestinal stem cells and intestinal epithelial expansion in pregnancy and lactation.
RANK–RANKL control expansion of gut organoids
We assessed RANK expression in the intestine. RANK was found on the cell surface of almost all mouse intestinal epithelial cells in the intestine including differentiated enterocytes and stem cells, except for epithelial cells located at the top of villi (Fig. 1a and Extended Data Fig. 1a). To directly test whether RANK has a functional role in the intestinal epithelium, we exposed mouse intestinal organoids to RANKL. Stimulating jejunal organoids with RANKL enhanced their growth; however, at around day 3, the numbers of organoid buds decreased, and we observed aberrant budding elongation (Fig. 1b and Extended Data Fig. 1b,c). Organoids can be passaged nearly indefinitely as they contain functional stem cells that correlate with bud numbers21. RANKL stimulation resulted in markedly decreased passaging capacities, and a complete inability to maintain organoids beyond passage 3, depending on the dose of RANKL (Extended Data Fig. 1d,e). We demonstrated that RANKL treatment resulted in an initial expansion of CD44+ cells, followed by a marked decrease in Lgr5-eGFP+CD44+ and OLFM4+ stem cells (Fig. 1c,d and Extended Data Fig. 1f–h), providing a cellular correlate for the impaired passaging capacity. RANKL-driven changes can be observed in gut organoids from male and female mice. RANK activation of mouse intestinal organoids results in early growth stimulation followed by stem cell exhaustion and/or enhanced terminal differentiation.
We next performed gene expression profiling using bulk RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq). RANK stimulation of small intestinal organoids resulted in activation of the NF-κB pathway and induction of multiple anti-apoptotic genes (Extended Data Fig. 2a–c). It also resulted in upregulation of the BMP and MAPK–ERK pathways (Extended Data Fig. 2d,e). RANK-dependent induction of the BMP pathway, in particular Bmp2 and the BMP2 downstream genes Id2 and Id3, and anti-apoptotic genes such as Birc2, Birc3, Tnfaip3 and Bcl2l1 was confirmed using quantitative PCR (qPCR; Extended Data Fig. 2f,g). By contrast, RANKL treatment of organoids suppressed expression of the stem cell signature genes Lgr5, Smoc2, Ephb2 or Axin2. Notably, expression of some progenitor cell markers such as Scn2b, Ascl2 or Cd44 was induced by RANK stimulation (Extended Data Fig. 2f,g). Single-cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq) profiling of control and RANK-stimulated mouse organoids stratified nine distinct epithelial populations22. After RANK stimulation, we observed an additional population constituting M cells (Extended Data Fig. 3a,b) as reported previously22,23. In control organoids, Rank mRNA expression was found primarily in progenitor cell populations (Extended Data Fig. 3c), indicating, together with our protein expression data, that RANK is transcribed in intestinal progenitors and RANK protein is subsequently maintained in the differentiated intestinal epithelium. Induction of anti-apoptotic genes was detected in stem cells, transit-amplifying (TA) cells and absorptive enterocyte lineage cells (Fig. 1e and Extended Data Fig. 3d). RANKL-treated organoids exhibited enhanced survival in response to radiation injury (Fig. 1f). The marked upregulation of BMP2 was primarily observed in enterocyte (immature as well as mature) progenitors, but was also found at low levels in cycling stem cells; the BMP2-regulated target genes Id2 and Id3 were prominently induced in stem cells, TA cells and absorptive enterocytes (Fig. 1g and Extended Data Fig. 3e). Moreover, similar to bulk RNA-seq we observed enhanced NF-κB as well as increased MAPK–ERK pathway activation in these intestinal cell populations, with the exception of enteroendocrine, Paneth and tuft cells (Extended Data Fig. 3f,g).
The BMP pathway is known to inhibit intestinal stem cell maintenance24,25. To assess whether Bmp2 upregulation might be responsible for the observed phenotype, we treated RANK-stimulated organoids with the BMP receptor-blocker LDN-193189 (BMPi)26 as well as with NOGGIN, which antagonizes BMP signalling21. BMPi treatment rescued the stem cell exhaustion phenotype of RANKL-treated organoids and the intestinal organoids could be maintained in culture (Fig. 1h and Extended Data Fig. 4a,b). NOGGIN also alleviated RANK-mediated stem cell exhaustion in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 1i and Extended Data Fig. 4c). We next investigated whether RANK-induced stem cell exhaustion is caused by the attenuation of WNT β-catenin signalling, which is critical for stem cell renewal. Inhibition of GSK3β, which negatively regulates WNT–β-catenin signalling27, using the drug CHIR99021 had only a minor impact on the detrimental effects of RANK–RANKL on intestinal stem cell maintenance (Extended Data Fig. 4d). We also treated organoids from Rnf43/Znrf3 double-mutant mice; these double-mutant mice show enhanced WNT signalling in the intestine28. We again observed no rescue of the RANK-induced stem cell exhaustion in Rnf43/Znrf3 double-mutant organoids (Extended Data Fig. 4e). Besides WNT, EGFR signalling has been shown to drive proliferation of intestinal stem cells21. At low EGF levels, we observed an even stronger RANKL effect on proliferation and growth, particularly in organoids generated from the lower ileum (Extended Data Fig. 4f–m). However, RANKL treatment still induced stem cell exhaustion irrespective of low or high EGF levels (Extended Data Fig. 4n–p). These data show that RANK–RANKL stimulation alters the stem cell niche through BMP2 signalling and enhances anti-apoptotic pathways as well as cell proliferation, resulting first in larger organoids of differentiated intestinal epithelial cells but, after prolonged stimulation, resulting in reduced stem cell numbers and disrupted organoid maintenance (Extended Data Fig. 4q).
Constitutive activation of RANK in vivo
To investigate whether prolonged RANK activation leads to intestinal stem cell exhaustion in vivo, we generated a transgenic mouse line that conditionally expresses a constitutively active RANK mutant (Rosa26-LSL-caRANK) in the intestinal epithelium using Villin1-promoter-driven Cre (Villin1-cre) (hereafter, caRANKvil-Tg mice) (Extended Data Fig. 5a,b). This activating mutation in the cytosolic domain (amino acid 240) of human RANK was recently identified in a patient with malignant lymphoma29. The caRANKvil-Tg mice appeared to be normal at birth and initially exhibited normal growth until weaning age. At 3 weeks of age, caRANKvil-Tg mice exhibited a marked expansion of small intestinal villi; 3D reconstruction revealed increased villous length and enhanced villous volumes and surface areas (Fig. 2a and Extended Data Fig. 5c). Immunostaining showed reduced apoptosis in villi of 3-week-old caRANKvil-Tg mice compared with the controls (Extended Data Fig. 5d,e). Proliferation of in vivo phosphorylated histone H3 labelled crypt cells appeared normal at 3 weeks of age (Extended Data Fig. 5f,g). From weaning age, caRANKvil-Tg mice progressively lost weight and needed to be euthanized due to excessive weight loss (Extended Data Fig. 5h). In the older caRANKvil-Tg mice, we observed reduced numbers of OLFM4+ intestinal stem cells (Fig. 2b and Extended Data Fig. 5i). Consequently, older caRANKvil-Tg mice exhibited markedly compromised proliferation of crypt cells (Extended Data Fig. 5f,g) and, as expected from diminished stem cell numbers, the villi were reduced in length and these mice exhibited decreased numbers of crypts and villi (Fig. 2c and Extended Data Fig. 5j–l). Phenocopying our observations on sustained RANK–RANKL activation in vitro, expression of a constitutive active form of RANK in the intestinal epithelium, results first in villous expansion followed by stem cell loss, altered villous structures and premature death of the mice.
To further explore the underlying mechanism, we generated intestinal organoids from caRANKvil-Tg mice. Constitutive activation of RANK resulted in enhanced organoid growth, yet again reduced numbers of proliferating cells in the buds and impaired maintenance of stem cells as determined by their passaging capacity (Extended Data Fig. 5m–o). Notably, as our constitutively active RANK mutant is still inducible by RANKL, addition of RANKL resulted in rapid growth arrest and even disintegration of all organoids (Extended Data Fig. 5p). Moreover, organoids from caRANKvil-Tg mice were more resistant to radiation injury (Extended Data Fig. 5q). Bulk RNA-seq profiling showed that constitutive RANK activation resulted in upregulation of an anti-apoptotic program, NF-κB activation, and induction of Bmp2 and its target genes Id2 and Id3, whereas expression of defined stem cell markers such as Lgr5, Olfm4, Smoc2 and Ephb2 was downregulated (Extended Data Fig. 6a–d). Thus, expression of constitutively active RANK recapitulates results in RANKL-stimulated wild-type intestinal organoids.
We next assessed the in vivo functional relevance of NF-κB signalling, which was markedly deregulated after RANK activation. We observed substantial induction of phosphorylated IκB in intestinal epithelial cells isolated from caRANKvil-Tg mice, indicative of activated NF-κB signalling (Extended Data Fig. 6e). Addition of the NF-κB inhibitor sc-514 rescued the RANK-driven BMP and anti-apoptotic gene expression phenotypes (Extended Data Fig. 2g), indicating that NF-κB acts a key signalling pathway downstream of RANK. One key molecular adapter that couples RANK to the canonical NF-κB activation is TRAF6 (ref. 30) (Extended Data Fig. 6f). We deleted Traf6 in intestinal cells by crossing Traf6floxed mice31 to Villin1-cre mice (hereafter, Traf6Δvil mice). Stimulation of Traf6Δvil intestinal organoids partially rescued the effects of RANK–RANKL activation on stem cell exhaustion compared with organoids from control littermates (Extended Data Fig. 6g). We crossed the Traf6Δvil mice to caRANKvil-Tg mice. Deletion of Traf6 in intestinal epithelial cells enhanced the numbers of OLFM4+ stem cells and restored the decreased villus length observed in older caRANKvil-Tg mice (Fig. 2d,e and Extended Data Fig. 6h). Thus, the effects of constitutively active RANK are partially driven by TRAF6 and NF-κB.
To determine whether constitutively active RANK regulates WNT-dependent aberrant stem cell expansion and adenoma initiation induced by loss of APC function, we crossed caRANKvil-Tg mice to Apcmin/+ mice. APC acts downstream of WNT and the Apcmin mutation drives aberrant WNT activation, resulting in uncontrolled proliferation and intestinal adenomatous polyposis in mice32. Apcmin/+ mice exhibited premature death when RANK signalling was constitutively active in the caRANKvil-TgApcmin/+ mice (Extended Data Fig. 6i). Importantly, whereas Apcmin/+ mice developed hundreds of adenomas in the small intestine, the numbers and sizes of adenomas were reduced in the surviving caRANKvil-TgApcmin/+ mice (Fig. 2f and Extended Data Fig. 6j–l). Notably, tumour organoids from Apcmin/+ mice were still sensitive to the RANK–RANKL-driven exhaustion phenotype and were challenging to maintain for more than two passages in the presence of RANKL (Fig. 2g). Thus, in vivo constitutively active RANK suppresses the growth of Apcmin mutant intestinal stem cell tumours.
RANK controls gut expansion in reproduction
To assess the physiological role of RANK-driven villous expansion in intestinal homeostasis, we generated intestinal-epithelium-specific Rank-knockout mice (RankΔvil mice)33. Intestinal RANK expression was abolished in RankΔvil mice (Fig. 1a and Extended Data Figs. 1a and 7a,b). Notably, we did not observe Cre expression in the mammary tissue; moreover RankΔvil mice exhibited normal expansion of the mammary tissue in pregnancy and lactation (Extended Data Fig. 7c,d). Villous morphology was apparently not affected by Rank deletion in nulliparous RankΔvil mice (Fig. 3a and Extended Data Fig. 7e). The numbers of villous epithelial cells undergoing apoptosis and of OLFM4+ intestinal stem cells and stem cell divisions were also unchanged (Fig. 3b and Extended Data Fig. 7f–j). In vitro intestinal organoid formation was comparable between RankΔvil and Rank wild-type mice (RankWT mice), and organoids generated from RankΔvil mice could be passaged in the presence of RANKL (Extended Data Fig. 7k,l). Thus, the inactivation of RANK in intestinal epithelial cells does not disrupt intestinal stem cell homeostasis.
We next examined the physiological function of the RANK–RANKL system in the intestine. In pregnancy and lactation, it has been reported that the intestine adapts to the increased nutrient demands in multiple species34,35. Although this is one of the most fundamental adaptions in all mammals and many non-mammalian species4,5, the molecular signals driving this expansion have never been identified. Moreover, in mammals, very few studies have followed up on initial reports describing larger intestines in pregnancy, with sometimes opposing findings36–38. We therefore repeated decade-old experiments in wild-type and RankΔvil mice. We observed markedly larger intestines in late-stage pregnancy and in particular in lactating wild-type mice (Fig. 3a and Extended Data Fig. 7e,m,n). Food intake was increased in pregnancy with a sharp surge at the onset of lactation (Extended Data Fig. 8a,b). We also detected crypt expansion in lactation and increased ratios of villus height to crypt depth (Extended Data Fig. 8c,d). We performed pregnancy experiments in germ-free mice at two different experimental sites and found that intestinal epithelial expansion still occurred in the absence of an intestinal microbiome (Fig. 3c and Extended Data Fig. 8e,f). Furthermore, it is independent of the antigenic properties of the fetus, as we observed the same changes in syngenic and semiallogenic breeding (Extended Data Fig. 8f). Moreover, removal of offspring at day 1 after birth to cease lactation resulted in smaller villi in the mothers (Fig. 3d and Extended Data Fig. 8g), suggesting that a prolactin feedback loop controls this expansion and involution. Treatment of lactating mice with cabergoline, a clinically used drug to reduce prolactin levels39, resulted in a reduction in the intestinal villi and, as a control, the mammary gland (Fig. 3e and Extended Data Fig. 8h,i). The morphological changes of the intestine in pregnancy/lactation is an intrinsic process that is primarily driven by pregnancy/lactation hormones that engage the RANK–RANKL pathway.
Using three-dimensional (3D) reconstructions, this expansion resulted in substantially longer villi and enhanced surface areas; the 3D villus volumes were increased in late-stage pregnancy (day 18.5 of pregnancy, P18, 5) and in lactating mice (Fig. 3a and Extended Data Fig. 7e). This enlargement also resulted in a more flattened geometry of the expanded villi, where the flat villi surface predominantly positions perpendicular to the flow of the intestinal content (Fig. 3a, Extended Data Figs. 7e and 8j and Supplementary Videos 1 and 2). In RankΔvil female mice, this intestinal villous expansion was impaired at late stages of pregnancy (P18.5) and lactation (lactation day 5 (L5)) compared with littermate and Cre controls (Fig. 3a, Extended Data Figs. 7e and 8k,l and Supplementary Videos 3 and 4). Notably, whereas loss of RANK expression had no apparent effect on the increased crypt depth in pregnancy, increased villus height-to-crypt depth ratios were RANK–RANKL dependent (Extended Data Fig. 8c,d). Previously it has been shown that RANK–RANKL is critical for the development of M cells in Peyer’s patches18–20, which were absent in our RankΔvil female mice; however, we did not observe increased numbers of M cells in lactation (L5) nor ectopic M cells in villi (Extended Data Fig. 8m–p). This lack of M cell expansion in pregnancy may be due to the fact that RANKL is highly expressed under the M cell domes of Peyer’s patches in nulliparous as well as lactating mice (Extended Data Fig. 8q). Deletion of Traf6 in intestinal epithelial cells phenocopied the impaired epithelial expansion of lactating RankΔvil dams (Fig. 3f and Extended Data Fig. 8r).
Gene expression profiling of intestinal epithelium at L5 showed upregulation of BMP signalling as well as induction of anti-apoptotic genes, dependent on RANK expression (Extended Data Fig. 9a), paralleling our findings in organoids and caRANKvil-Tg mice. We therefore observed reduced cell death in the intestinal cells of lactating dams (Extended Data Fig. 7g,h). Gene expression profiling at L5 further showed RANK-dependent expression of the molecular machineries involved in the uptake of lipids, amino acids, sugar or vitamins as well as induction of the prolactin activation pathway (Extended Data Fig. 9b). Among the upregulated genes in lactation that were dependent on RANK were lipid receptors (such as Cd36, Scarb1 (encoding SR-BI) or Npc1l1) and lipid transporters (including Apob-48, Apoa1 and Apoa4) (Extended Data Fig. 9c). Thus, RANK promotes differentiation of functional absorptive enterocytes during lactation. Notably, during lactation, stem cell proliferation was slightly upregulated as determined by migration of EdU-labelled cells, dependent on RANK–RANKL (Extended Data Fig. 7i,j). Finally, we assessed expression of the intestinal stem cell marker OLFM4; we observed a small, albeit substantial, reduction in OLFM4+ stem cells in the upper small intestine of lactating (L5) controls compared with RankΔvil dams (Fig. 3b and Extended Data Fig. 7f), suggesting that lactating RankΔvil mice have more intestinal stem cells but they require RANK for proliferation and differentiation. These changes in OLFM+ stem cells were reversible and returned to non-pregnant baseline numbers after weaning (Fig. 3b and Extended Data Fig. 7f). Thus, RANK–RANKL, in part through TRAF6 signalling, constitutes a molecular pathway for intestinal epithelial adaptation during pregnancy and lactation.
The source of RANKL for intestinal expansion
In intestinal epithelial cells, we did not detect any apparent changes in Rank expression between nulliparous and lactating females, indicating that the system is controlled by RANKL levels. When we assessed RANKL in intestinal epithelial cells in lactating dams, there was no measurable RANKL protein. However, in lactating dams, we observed a trend towards increased RANKL-expressing cells in the lamina propria of the small intestine (Extended Data Fig. 10a,b). When we treated ex vivo cultured lamina propria cells with prolactin, we observed induction of RANKL expression (Extended Data Fig. 10c). To identify the RANKL expressing cell type(s), we performed scRNA-seq analysis of mouse lamina propria cells; in lactating mice, Rankl expression was observed in T cells, innate ILC2 and ILC3 cells, and a small fraction of mesenchymal cells (Extended Data Fig. 11a–d). Recently, it has been shown that RANKL is expressed in parenchymal Twist2-expressing cells19. When we deleted Rankl using the Twist2-cre mouse line, RANKL+ cells in the lamina propria of lactating females were only sparsely present in lactating RanklΔTwist2 dams (Extended Data Fig. 10a,b,d). Importantly, in RanklΔTwist2 dams, villous expansion was impaired compared with in the control mice (Extended Data Fig. 10e–h). Similarly, deletion of Rankl in T cells using Cd4-cre40 (RanklΔCd4 mice) resulted in impaired villous expansion in lactating RanklΔCd4 dams (Extended Data Fig. 10i,j). By contrast, when we crossed Ranklfloxed mice to Rorgt-cre mice to delete RANKL in innate ILC3 cells (RanklΔRorc), we did not observe an effect on intestinal epithelial expansion in lactation (Extended Data Fig. 10k,l). Not excluding other cell types or the contribution of soluble RANKL, these data show that RANKL expression is induced in gut lamina propria cells during pregnancy/lactation and indicate that Twist2-cre expressing mesenchymal cells and T cells are local sources for RANKL, which then activates RANK signalling on intestinal epithelial cells to drive adaptive villous expansion.
Transgenerational effects
Adaptation of the intestinal epithelium in pregnancy has been proposed to allow for enhanced nutritional demands in pregnancy and lactation34,35,41. In the intestines of lactating female mice, we observed RANK-dependent expression of molecular machines involved in the uptake of lipids, amino acids, sugar or vitamins (Extended Data Fig. 9b). Consequently, in serum of RankWT dams, we detected an increase in defined lipids as well as iron compared with in nulliparous females; this increase in lactating dams was in part dependent on RANK expression in the gut epithelium (Extended Data Fig. 12a,b). Free amino acids in the serum were largely unchanged (Extended Data Fig. 12c). We next collected the milk of lactating RankΔvil mothers. Compared with the controls, the milk of RankΔvil dams contained reduced levels of multiple fatty acids, triglycerides and lipid soluble vitamin A, whereas amino acids or the hydrophilic vitamins B1, B2 and B4 appeared normal (Fig. 4a and Extended Data Fig. 13a–c). Importantly, we also observed a strong reduction in mucosal IgA, but not IgG, in the milk of lactating RankΔvil female mice (Fig. 4b). Ablation of RANK in the intestinal epithelium of dams results in metabolic and immunological alterations in the milk of the lactating mother.
In humans, children born to mothers with reduced nutrient intake in pregnancy, as observed in the Dutch famine of 1944, can experience long-term health complications, such as proclivity to insulin intolerance42. We therefore followed the fate of pups born to RankΔvil mothers. At embryonic day 18.5, the fetuses of RankΔvil dams already exhibited substantially decreased body weights compared with embryos from RankWT dams (Extended Data Fig. 14a). After birth, the pups born to RankΔvil dams continued to exhibit reduced weights, in particular during the nursing period, and remained smaller throughout life (Fig. 4c and Extended Data Fig. 14b,c). The numbers of offspring were comparable among RankWT and RankΔvil mothers (Extended Data Fig. 14d). When we exposed offspring born to RankΔvil and RankWT mothers to a high-fat diet (HFD), both groups gained weight, although the offspring of RankΔvil mothers exhibited lower absolute weights throughout the observation period (Extended Data Fig. 14e). Importantly, we observed impaired glucose tolerance and increased fasting glucose in the offspring of RankΔvil mothers on the HFD (Fig. 4d–f). Calculation of the HOMA-IR index resistance confirmed pronounced insulin resistance in the offspring of RankΔvil female mice (Fig. 4g,h). Glucose metabolism appeared unaffected in the offspring of RankΔvil dams that were fed a normal chow diet (Extended Data Fig. 14f,g). Thus, RANK-dependent villous expansion in the mothers is required for efficient nourishment of their offspring and results in transgenerational glucose intolerance under metabolic stress.
RANK controls human intestinal stem cells
Data mining43 in humans showed that, similar to mice, RANK, but not RANKL, is expressed on stem cells, TA cells and absorptive enterocytes (Extended Data Fig. 15a,b). We therefore examined whether RANK-mediated intestinal epithelial expansion also occurs in humans. We generated human duodenal organoids from a healthy female donor and RANKL stimulation indeed triggered morphological changes (Fig. 5a). RANKL stimulation of the human duodenal organoids again induced anti-apoptosis genes and the BMP pathway (Extended Data Fig. 15c). Consistent with the induction of an anti-apoptotic program, RANKL treatment promoted cell survival after irradiation of these human intestinal organoids (Fig. 5b).
RANK stimulation also affected cell division (Fig. 5c) and abrogated passaging of human duodenal organoids (Fig. 5d). Notably, when cultured under suboptimal growth conditions, RANKL initially triggered enhanced proliferation, followed by growth arrest and stem cell exhaustion within 3 days of culture (Extended Data Fig. 15d–g). OLFM4 immunostaining revealed a reduced number of intestinal stem cells in RANKL-treated human organoids (Extended Data Fig. 15g,h). We were able to rescue RANK-induced reduction of OLFM4+ stem cells and the proliferation defect using the BMP receptor-blocker LDN-193189 (BMPi) (Fig. 5e and Extended Data Fig. 15h). To validate the role of BMP signalling in RANK-induced stem cell exhaustion, we exposed BMPR1A-knockout44 human intestinal organoids to RANKL; genetic inhibition of the BMP signalling pathway completely rescued RANK-driven stem cell exhaustion (Fig. 5d,f). Thus, our observations in mice hold true in humans: RANK–RANKL drives growth of intestinal organoids and, at the same time, controls the self-renewal ability of intestinal stem cells through BMP signalling.
Discussion
How mothers adapt to the demands of pregnancy remains a central question of evolution and human health. During pregnancy and lactation, hormone dynamics affect several organs to control and change their morphologies and functions, critically required for the health of the mother and the development of the offspring2,3. Our data reveal that, during pregnancy and lactation, RANKL is induced in parenchymal T cells and mesenchymal cells in the intestine. Whether membrane-bound and/or soluble RANKL from other cell types also contributes to the intestinal phenotype needs to be established. RANKL activates its receptor RANK on intestinal stem cells and differentiated enterocytes. RANK activation induces survival of the intestinal epithelial cells, in part through TRAF6 coupling to the NF-κB pathway, and through BMP signalling critically controls stem cell differentiation and the self-renewal capacity of intestinal stem cells, both of which appear to contribute to the expansion of small intestinal epithelial cells in pregnancy and lactation (Extended Data Fig. 15i). A potential cross-talk between BMP and apoptotic pathways on intestinal stem cells cannot be excluded. Furthermore, RANK is expressed on multiple types of intestinal epithelial cells and its role in these cells needs to be investigated.
In mouse and human organoids and, importantly, in pregnancy in mice, RANK stimulation triggers induction of the BMP2 pathway that suppresses self-renewal of intestinal stem cells and promotes differentiation24,25. In vivo constitutive RANK activation also results in the expansion of intestinal villi followed by stem cell exhaustion, villus shrinkage and death of about 50% of these mice. Notably, chronic activation of the RANK–RANKL system in caRANKvil-Tg mice abolished WNT-driven intestinal tumorigenesis when crossed to an Apcmin/+ background. Intestinal tumour organoids from Apcmin/+ mice were still sensitive to RANKL-triggered stem cell exhaustion; whether this could be exploited for future intestinal cancer treatment needs to be explored. Importantly, whereas permanent induction of RANK signalling drives stem cell exhaustion in vivo, RANK-mediated changes in stem cells and villus expansion in pregnancy/lactation are reversible, regulated by the prolactin axis, a known and very strong inducer of RANKL expression12. Whether such reversibility is controlled by the duration of the RANK stimulus in vivo or might be regulated by additional signals needs to be determined. As we observed effects of RANK stimulation in both male and female mouse gut organoids, and male human organoids have not been tested yet, it might be interesting to examine whether this system controls gut remodelling only in female pregnancy or whether it also affects intestinal homeostasis in male individuals.
Multiple maternal tissues change during and after pregnancy to maintain the health of the mother and to facilitate the development of the fetus and nurturing of babies1–3. Such changes also occur in non-mammalian species making it a universal hallmark of evolutionary fitness4. Mothers need to respond to the increased nutritional demand in pregnancy and, in the case of mammals, lactation45. Although such nutritional demands are fundamental for the short- and long-term health of mothers and their offspring, little was known about the adaption of the mammalian intestine. Our results show that, in pregnancy and lactation, RANK–RANKL controls intestinal stem cell differentiation and promote enterocyte survival, thereby expanding differentiated epithelial cells. RNA-seq showed strong upregulation of multiple machineries involved in nutrient uptake. Indeed, multiple lipids and vitamins are altered in the serum19,46 and the milk and, importantly, IgA in the milk of RankΔvil dams; IgA secreted in the milk has a key role in protecting suckling infants from microbial infections47. Our data show that villous expansion is triggered by female pregnancy hormones and the RANK–RANKL axis based on experiments with organoids and germ-free mice. Alterations in the microbiome, M cells and/or altered IgA levels might also contribute to the observed effects in pregnancy and lactation, and thereby affect the nutritional state of mothers and offspring, which remains an open question. Unfortunately, we did not test direct nutrient absorption in pregnancy/lactation owing to ethical and technical constraints, and this will be important to address in future experiments. It is important to note that milk is not a simple product of intestinal nutrient absorption and that there are differences between rodents and humans in nutrient absorption during pregnancy and lactation, for example, for calcium absorption important for bone health48,49. As observed in malnutrition and famines such as the Dutch famine42, proper nutrition of mothers during pregnancy and lactation affects the long-term metabolism of the babies50. Our data now show that RANK–RANKL-dependent intestinal epithelial expansion in the mothers is important not only for offspring growth but also for their metabolic health in adult life.
The elongation and volume expansion of the villi result in the formation of more sheet-like geometries, where, similar to non-pregnant mice, the flat villi surfaces are positioned to face the flow of the intestinal content. Thus, it appears that villi expansion not only enhances the epithelial surface in the key intestinal region involved in nutrient uptake, but this morphological alignment presumably further facilitates nutritional absorption through biomechanical slowing of food movement. Our findings on RANK–RANKL-driven expansion of the intestinal epithelium through reduced cell death and stem cell maintenance identify a pathway for maternal adaptation to increased nutrient demand during pregnancy and lactation, with vital relevance to evolution and human health.
Methods
Mice
Rank conditional mice (Rankflox) were generated in our laboratory and have been previously described11. The following additional mouse strains were used: Rankl conditional mice (Ranklflox)51, Traf6 conditional mice (Traf6flox)31, constitutively active RANK mutant over-expressing mice (caRANKLSL)29, Rnf43 conditional mice (Rnf43flox) and Znrf3 conditional mice (Znrf3flox)28. Vilcre mice33. Apcmin/+ mice32, Twist2cre mice52, Cd4cre mice40, Rorgtcre mice53, tdTomato reporter mice54 and Lgr5-eGFP-IRES-creERT2 mice55 were purchased from the Jackson laboratories. All mouse lines were maintained on a C57BL/6J genetic background and housed under specific pathogen-free conditions. Mouse cages were individually ventilated and subjected to ambient temperature of 22 ± 1 °C under a 14 h–10 h light–dark cycle. Mouse genotypes were assessed by PCR. For all experiments, only littermate and sex-matched mice were used, unless otherwise specified. Control littermates of caRANKvil-Tg mice were defined as Vilcre mice, heterozygous caRANKLSL mice or wild-type mice (negative for Vilcre and negative for caRANKLSL).
We did not observe any apparent differences among control littermates with different genotypes in any experiments. To exclude the potential effects of the Rank deletion in the intestine in timed pregnancy/lactation studies, RankWT and RankΔvil female littermates were crossed to wild-type syngeneic C57BL/6J male breeders, resulting in RANK-sufficient fetuses with a comparable genetic background. For the offspring analysis, we used the RankWT and RankΔvil female littermates who delivered more than five mice to avoid the effects of different offspring numbers. All mice were bred, maintained, examined and euthanized in accordance with institutional animal care guidelines and ethical animal license protocols approved by the legal authorities. All experimental animal projects performed at Institute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Sciences (IMBA), Vienna BioCenter were approved by the Federal Ministry of Education, Science and Research. Animal experiments using Germ-free mice at the University of British Columbia were approved by the University of British Columbia Animal Care Committee. Animal experiments using germ-free mice at Kiel University were approved prior to the study by the committee for animal welfare of the state of Schleswig-Holstein (V242-7224.121-33). Timed matings were performed in germ-free and specific-pathogen-free mice to achieve syngenic (both parents C57BL/6) and semiallogenic breedings (male BALB/C, female C57BL/6).
Mouse intestinal organoids
Mouse intestinal organoids were established as described previously21. In brief, freshly isolated intestinal crypts were mixed with 10 μl Matrigel (Corning, 356231) and placed on a warmed 24-well plate dish to let them polymerize. The crypts were then cultured with a ROCK inhibitor (Y-27632; Sigma-Aldrich, Y0503, 10 μM) and ENR (EGF/NOGGIN/R-spondin) medium composed of advanced Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium/F12 (DMEM) supplemented with penicillin–streptomycin, 10 mM HEPES, GlutaMAX, N2 (Life Technologies), B27 (Life Technologies) and 1 mM N-acetylcysteine (Sigma-Aldrich), 50 ng ml−1 mouse recombinant epidermal growth factor (EGF; Peprotech), R-spondin1 (conditioned medium from 293T-HA-RspoI-Fc cells, 10% final volume), and 100 ng ml−1 NOGGIN (Peprotech). Passage was performed weekly at a 1:6 split ratio. To explore ERK/MAPK-dependent phenotypes, we cultured organoids using a low concentration of EGF (50 ng ml−1 to 50 pg ml−1) in ENR medium (ElowNR medium).
To assess organoid survival (Fig. 1f), 25 irradiated organoids were dissociated into single cells by TrypLE (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and DNase I (Worthington Biochemical) treatments for 5 min at 37 °C and subsequent vigorous pipetting through a p200 pipette. The dissociated cells were mixed with 15 μl Matrigel and seeded into each well of a 48-well plate. The organoids were then further cultured in WENR medium. WENR medium was composed of WNT3A (conditioned medium (CM) from WNT3A L-cells, 50% final volume), 10 μM Y-27632 (ROCK inhibitor, StemCell Technologies) and 10 μM nicotinamide (Sigma-Aldrich), on the basic ENR medium. Bright-field images of organoids were taken using a Carl Zeiss Axiovert.A1 microscope. For the measurement of organoid size, organoid areas in horizontal cross sections were measured using Fiji software (ImageJ, v.2.3.0).
Human intestinal organoids
Patient recruitment and sample collection
Intestinal biopsy specimens were collected from the duodenum of children undergoing diagnostic endoscopy. This study was conducted with informed patient and/or caretaker consent as appropriate, and with full ethical approval by East of England - Cambridge South Research Ethics Committee (REC-12/EE/0482).
Human organoid cultures
Human intestinal organoids were generated from mucosal biopsy specimens by isolating intestinal crypts and culturing those in Matrigel (Corning) using medium described previously56. The medium was replaced every 48–72 h. Once organoids were established, they were further cultured in an expansion medium composed of advanced DMEM/F12 supplemented with penicillin–streptomycin, 10 mM HEPES, GlutaMAX, N2 (Life Technologies), B27 (Life Technologies), 1 mM N-acetylcysteine (Sigma-Aldrich), R-spondin1 (conditioned medium from 293T-HA-RspoI-Fc cells, 10% final volume), 100 ng ml−1 NOGGIN (Peprotech), 10 nM human gastrin I (Sigma-Aldrich), 500 nM A83-01 (Tocris), WNT3A (conditioned medium from WNT-producing L-cell line, 50% final volume), 50 ng ml−1 mouse recombinant epidermal growth factor (EGF; Peprotech), 100 ng ml−1 human insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1; BioLegend), and 50 ng ml−1 human recombinant fibroblast growth factor-basic (FGF-2; Peprotech)43. To test the role of RANKL under suboptimal growth conditions, we used a growth-factor-reduced condition lacking EGF, IGF-1 and FGF-2 from the expansion medium. To assess organoid survival, organoids were irradiated and subsequently dissociated into single cells using TrypLE (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and DNase I (Worthington Biochemical) treatments for 5 min at 37 °C and subsequent vigorous pipetting using a p200 pipette. The dissociated cells were mixed with 15 μl Matrigel (Corning, 356231) and seeded into a 48-well plate. The organoids were then further cultured in expansion medium supplemented with the ROCK inhibitor Y-27632 (10 μM, StemCell Technologies). Human BMPR1A mutant organoids have been described previously44.
Apcmin/+ tumoroids
Small intestinal adenomas were collected from Apcmin/+ heterozygous mice. Tissues were incubated with Gentle Cell Dissociation Reagent (StemCell Technologies) for 15 min at room temperature and vortexed vigorously to remove non-transformed crypts surrounding the tumour. The remaining tissue was minced into 2–5 mm fragments, and further digested in TrypLE (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and DNase I (Worthington Biochemical) for 10 min at 37 °C. The supernatant was collected and centrifuged at 300g for 5 min, suspended in Matrigel and seeded into a 24-well plate. The seeded cells were cultured with advanced DMEM/F12 supplemented with penicillin–streptomycin, 10 mM HEPES, GlutaMAX, N2 (Life Technologies), B27 (Life Technologies) and 50 ng ml−1 mouse recombinant epidermal growth factor (EGF; Peprotech). The medium was replaced every 2 days. Tumoroids were passaged every 5 days.
Ex vivo maintenance of mesenchymal cell of the lamina propria
The protocol was adapted from a previous study57. In brief, half of the upper small intestinal tissue from nulliparous female mice was washed with cold PBS, Peyer’s patches were removed manually, and then the remaining specimens were incubated in 10 ml of gentle dissociation solution (HBSS with 10 mM EDTA and 1 mM DTT (Sigma-Aldrich)) on ice for 20 min. The tissues were shaken vigorously, and the supernatant was discarded. The remaining tissue fragments were cut into 2–5 mm fragments and seeded in DMEM/F12 supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 50 ng ml−1 mouse recombinant epidermal growth factor (EGF; Peprotech). Once mesenchymal cells started outgrowth from the tissue fragment, attached cells were dissociated with trypsin, seeded in six-well dishes and subsequently grown to expand mesenchymal cells. Then, 3 days before stimulation with recombinant mouse prolactin (rmProlactin) (Peprotech), the culture medium was changed to DMEM with 10% charcoal-stripped FBS and 50 ng ml−1 of EGF.
MTT assay
Organoid growth was assessed using the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium (MTT) assay. Organoids were incubated with MTT (0.5 mg ml−1, final concentration; Sigma-Aldrich) for 4 h at 37 °C and the cells containing formazan were subsequently solubilized with 10% SDS in 0.01 M HCl. The absorbance of the formazan product was measured at 550 nm using BioTek Synergy 2. Absorbance at 720 nm was subtracted from sample values measured at 550 nm. Furthermore, the absorbance values of wells containing Matrigel and medium, but not organoids, were subtracted as background controls.
Flow cytometry
Intestinal organoids
For flow cytometry, organoids were dissociated with TrypLE (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and DNase I (Worthington Biochemical) for 5 min at 37 °C and subsequent vigorous pipetting. The cell suspension was washed with DMEM/F12 medium containing 10% FBS. Dead cells were fluorescently labelled using a fixable viability dye (eBioscience, 1:1,200). Antibody labelling of cells was performed in FACS staining buffer (PBS supplemented with 2% FCS and 2 mM EDTA) on ice for 30 min after blocking Fc receptors. Fc receptors were blocked with anti-CD16/32 antibodies (BD Pharmingen, 1:100). The following antibody was used: anti-CD44 (IM7, eBioscience, 1:200). Lgr5-eGFP+CD44+ cells were assessed on an LSRII cytometer (BD Biosciences) using FACSDiva (BD Biosciences). The data were analysed using the FlowJo software (Treestar).
Mouse lamina propria cells
A total of 20 cm of upper small intestinal tissue was washed with cold PBS, Peyer’s patches were removed manually and the remaining specimens were then incubated in 10 ml of gentle dissociation solution (HBSS with 10 mM EDTA and 1 mM DTT (Sigma-Aldrich)) on ice for 20 min. The tissues were shaken vigorously, and the supernatant was discarded. The remaining tissue fragments were washed with 10 ml of HBSS buffer, cut into 2–5 mm fragments and further digested in dissociation solution (advanced DMEM with 0.15 mg ml−1 of collagenase P (Roche), 0.8 mg ml−1 of dispase (Gibco) and 400 IU ml−1 of DNase I (Worthington)) using the GentleMACS dissociator (Miltenyi) at 37 °C for 1 h. The cell suspension was filtered through a 100 μm cell strainer into a 50 ml tube, then centrifuged at 300g for 5 min and the supernatant was discarded. Dead cells were fluorescently labelled using a fixable viability dye (eBioscience, 1:1,200). Antibody labelling of cells was performed in DMEM supplemented with 2%) on ice for 30 min after blocking Fc receptors. Fc receptors were blocked with anti-CD16/32 antibodies (BD Pharmingen, 1:100). The following antibodies was used: anti-CD31 (MEC13.3, BioLegend, 1:300) and anti-podoplanin (8.1.1, BioLegend, 1:300). TdTomato expression in podoplanin+CD31− mesenchymal cells was assessed on the LSRII cytometer (BD Biosciences) using FACSDiva (BD Biosciences). The data were analysed using the FlowJo software (Treestar).
3D-imaging and quantifications of intestinal tissue
Tissue preparation and imaging
Intestinal tissues were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde at 4 °C for 20 h. The fixed samples were then incubated in 1% Triton X-100 solution at 4 °C overnight for permeabilization. The tissues were subsequently incubated in DAPI (1:500; Invitrogen, D3571), phalloidin (1:400; Invitrogen, A30107) or 1,1′-dioctadecyl-3,3,3′,3′-tetramethylindodicarbocyanine, 4-chlorobenzenesulfonate salt (DiD, 1: 500: Invitrogen, D7757) at 4 °C for 48 h, followed by three washes with fresh PBS over 30 min periods. The labelled samples were transferred into RapiClear 1.49 (Sunjin Lab) overnight. The samples were mounted in a 0.50 mm i-spacer (Sunjin Lab) for confocal imaging. Images were acquired using the Zeiss LSM 700 confocal microscope. The z-step size was set to 2.15 μm. Arivis Vision 4D was used for 3D Image visualization as shown in Figs. 2a,c and 3a,c and Extended Data Figs. 8j and 10d,e. Imaris was used for the image visualization shown in Supplementary Videos 1–4.
Measurement of volume, surface area and length of villi
For measuring the volume, surface and length of the villi from three-dimensional images, a custom ImageJ macro was created. The MorpholibJ library (v.1.4.1) (https://imagej.net/plugins/morpholibj) and ImageScience library (v.3.1.0) (https://imagescience.org/meijering/software/imagescience/) were used. In the first step, the image was downsampled, the crypt region was annotated manually on several 2D-slices, then interpolated to cover the volume in 3D. The crypts were removed to focus on the villi only. To create seed objects and separate the individual villi, a combination of binary operations and Laplacian of Gaussian filtering was used iteratively. The resulting objects were then regrown to their original size by 3D watershed and villi were analysed separately. Length measurement was performed using a distance map starting at the base of the villi, then reading out the maximum intensity. Volume and surface measurements were also performed on the segmented objects using MorpholibJ library.
EdU incorporation assay
Cell cycle analysis in organoids
For cell cycle analysis, organoids were incubated with 10 μM 5-ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine (EdU) for 1 h and subsequently dissociated with TrypLE and DNase I. After dead cells were fluorescently labelled with a viability dye (eBioscience, 1:1,200), dissociated cells were fixed, permeabilized using a fixation/permeabilization kit (eBioscience) and finally stained using the Click-iT EdU kit (Life Technologies). Cell cycle stages were analysed using flow cytometry. For whole-mount imaging of EdU labelling, organoids were incubated with 10 μM EdU for 2 h and subsequently fixed and counterstained with DAPI to visualize nuclei. Images were acquired using a Zeiss LSM 700 confocal microscope.
In vivo labelling of epithelial cells in the mouse intestine
EdU (Sigma-Aldrich) was administered at 100 mg per kg body weight intraperitoneally. The time of day for EdU delivery was consistent for all the animals used. Then, 24 h after administration, mouse intestinal tissues were collected and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde at 4 °C for 20 h. Whole-mount tissues were incubated in 1% Triton X-100 solution at 4 °C overnight for permeabilization. The EdU-incorporated cells were labelled using the Click-iT Edu kit (Life Technologies). The tissues were subsequently incubated in DAPI (1:500; Invitrogen, D3571) at 4 °C for 48 h, followed by three washes with fresh PBS over 30 min periods. The labelled samples were transferred into RapiClear 1.49 (Sunjin Lab) overnight. The samples were mounted in a 0.50 mm i-spacer (Sunjin Lab) for confocal imaging. Images were acquired using the Zeiss LSM 700 confocal microscope. The z-step size was set to 2.15 μm. Intestinal epithelial cell migration distance was defined as the distance from the crypt base to the EdU-positive cells that had migrated the farthest and was measured using Imaris software.
Histology and immunohistochemistry
For histological analysis, the dissected mouse intestines or human intestinal organoids were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde overnight at 4 °C, dehydrated and embedded in paraffin. 2 μm paraffin-sections were deparaffinized by xylene substitute (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Shandon) and rehydrated. Rehydrated sections were stained with H&E for morphological assessment. For immunohistochemistry, after rehydration of the sections, epitopes were retrieved using sodium citrate pH 6 with 0.05% Tween-20 for 30 min or using the BOND Enzyme Pretreatment Kit (Leica AR9551) for 5 min. The sections were blocked for 1 h in 5% BSA (VWR Life Science) and 10% goat serum (Sigma-Aldrich, 9023) and incubated with primary antibodies against phospho-histone H3 (1:100; CellPath, PBC-ACI3130C), mouse OLFM4 (1:800; Cell Signaling Technology, 39141), human OLFM4 (1:100; Cell Signaling Technology, 14369), cleaved caspase-3 (1:100; Cell Signaling Technology, 9661) or CRE (1:100, Cell Signaling Technology, 15036), all diluted in blocking solution. For detecting M cells, sections were blocked for 1 h in 2% BSA (ready to use; VWR Life Science) and 5% rabbit serum (Sigma-Aldrich, R9133) and incubated with a primary antibody against glycoprotein 2 (1:150, MBL Life Science, D278-3). The sections were subsequently incubated with a secondary antibody (HRP-polymer rabbit, DCS (PD000POL-K)) and DAB (Abcam, ab64238). Finally, the sections were counter-stained with non-acidified haematoxylin (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 6765002). For detecting CRE, TMB substrate (SZABO SCANDIC) was used as replacement for DAB, in combination with Nuclear fast red. Slides were then scanned using the Mirax Scanner (Zeiss) and representative images were acquired using the Panoramic Viewer Software v.2.4.0 (3DHistech). The sections were examined with blinding to the genotype of the mice.
Immunofluorescence staining of frozen intestinal sections and organoids
Intestinal tissues were isolated from mice following trans-cardiac perfusion with PBS containing heparin and snap-frozen in Optimal Cutting Temperature (OCT) compound (Sakura). 14 μm cryosections were prepared, air-dried at room temperature for 1 h and subsequently fixed in ice-cold acetone at −20 °C for 10 min. The slides were blocked in 0.3% H2O2 for 60 min, Avidin/Biotin blocking buffer (Vector Laboratories) for 15 min and 10% goat serum (Alexa Fluor Tyramide SuperBoost Kit) for 60 min at room temperature, and subsequently stained with biotinylated anti-RANK antibodies (BAF692; R&D systems; 1:50) or biotinylated anti-RANKL antibodies (13-5952-82; Invitrogen; 1:150) at 4 °C overnight. The Tyramide Signal Amplification (TSA) System (Alexa Fluor Tyramide SuperBoost Kit) was used according to the manufacturer’s protocol. For further multiplexing, additional stainings were performed after the TSA fluorescence protocol. In brief, slides were stained at 4 °C overnight with anti-PDGFRα antibodies (AF1062, R&D Systems, 1:150) in 2% BSA/PBST (0.1% Tween-20), followed by donkey anti-goat Alexa Fluor 555 (A21432, Invitrogen, 1:500) as the secondary antibody. For the detection of intestinal epithelial cells, anti-EPCAM Alexa Fluor 488 (118210, BioLegend, 1:100) was used. Phalloidin and DAPI were used for membrane staining and nuclear counterstaining, respectively. Confocal images were obtained using the Zeiss LSM 700 and Zeiss LSM 710 microscopes.
For the whole-mount staining of mouse and human organoids, organoids were fixed with 4% PFA at room temperature for 15 min, followed by incubation with blocking and permeabilization solution consisting of 0.2% Triton X-100, 0.1% Tween-20, 2% BSA and 2% normal goat serum in PBS at room temperature for 1 h. Mouse organoids were stained at 4 °C overnight with anti-mouse OLFM4 (1:400; Cell Signaling Technology, 39141) in blocking and permeabilization solution. Goat anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 633 (1:500; Invitrogen, A21072) was used as a secondary antibody. Human organoids were stained with anti-human OLFM4 antibodies (1:100; Cell Signaling, 14369) at 4 °C overnight and the TSA Fluorescence System (Alexa Fluor Tyramide SuperBoost Kit) was used according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Phalloidin and DAPI were used for membrane staining and nuclear counterstaining, respectively. Confocal images were obtained using Zeiss LSM 700 and Zeiss.
Whole-mount imaging of the mammary gland
Mammary glands were dissected from mice, spread on glass slides and fixed in Carnoy’s fixative (60% ethanol, 30% chloroform and 10% glacial acetic acid) overnight. The slides were washed in 70% ethanol for 15 min, 30% for 15 min, rinsed in distilled water for 5 min, stained in carmine alum stain (2.5 g alum potassium sulfate and 1.0 g carmine in 500 ml of double-distilled H2O) and then washed in 70% ethanol until fat was clear and glands still visible. Subsequently, the slides were dehydrated in 95% ethanol and 100% ethanol for 1 h, respectively, followed by 1 h in xylene. The dehydrated samples were mounted with EukitNeo mounting medium. Whole-mount images were obtained using Zeiss Axio Zoom.V16.
Western blotting
Western blotting was performed using standard protocols. Total protein was extracted from isolated intestinal epithelial cells. To isolate intestinal epithelial cells, intestinal tissues were minced into around 5 mm fragments and further incubated with Gentle Cell Dissociation Reagent (StemCell Technologies) for 15 min at room temperature. The tissue fragments were vigorously resuspended and isolated intestinal epithelial cells collected by passing through a 70 µm cell strainer (SZABO SCANDIC). Isolated intestinal epithelial cells were then lysed in RIPA buffer containing a cocktail of protease and phosphatase inhibitors (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 78440). Blots were blocked for 1 h with 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in TBST (1× Tris-buffered saline (TBS) and 0.1% Tween-20) and then incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibodies, diluted in 5% BSA in TBST (1:1,000 dilution). Blots were washed three times in TBST for 15 min, then incubated with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibodies (1:5,000 dilution; GE Healthcare, NA9340V) for 45 min at room temperature, washed three times in TBST for 15 min and visualized using enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL Plus, Pierce, 1896327). The following primary antibodies were used: anti-β-actin (1:1,000; Sigma-Aldrich, A5316); anti-IκBα (1:1,000; Cell Signaling, 9247) and anti-phospho-IκBα (Ser32/36) (1:1,000; Cell Signaling, 9246). Secondary antibodies were anti-rabbit IgG HRP (1:5,000; GE Healthcare, NA9340V) and anti-mouse IgG HRP (1:5,000; Promega, W4021).
qPCR
Total RNA was extracted from intestinal organoids or intestinal epithelial cells. To isolate intestinal epithelial cells, intestinal tissues were minced into around 5 mm tissue pieces and then incubated with Gentle Cell Dissociation Reagent (StemCell Technologies) for 15 min at room temperature. The tissue fragments were vigorously resuspended and the isolated intestinal epithelial cells collected by passing through a 70 µm cell strainer (SZABO SCANDIC). Total RNA isolation was performed using the RNA isolation kit (VBCF) which uses a lysis step based on guanidine thiocyanate (adapted from ref. 58) and magnetic beads (GE Healthcare, 65152105050450) applied on a KingFisher instrument (Thermo Fisher Scientific). After 5 min incubation at room temperature, DNA was digested with DNase I (New England BioLabs) for 15 min at room temperature, followed by a series of washing steps. RNA was eluted from the beads in 50 μl RNase-free water for 2 min at room temperature. Equivalent quantities of total RNA were reverse transcribed to synthesize cDNA using a LunaScript RT SuperMix Kit (New England BioLabs). qPCR was performed using Luna Universal qPCR master Mix (New England BioLabs). Primer sequences were as follows: Gapdh forward, CATCACTGCCACCCAGAAGACTG; Gapdh reverse, ATGCCAGTGAGCTTCCCGTTCAG; Rank forward, CCCAGGAGAGGCATTATGAG; Rank reverse, CACACACTGTCGGAGGTAGG; Rankl forward, GTGAAGACACACTACCTGACTCC; Rankl reverse, GCCACATCCAACCATGAGCCTT; Birc2 forward, CCACTTCAGACACCCCAGGA; Birc2 reverse, TTCCGAACTTTCTCCAGGGC; Birc3 forward, GCGTTCAGAGCCTAGGAAGT; Birc3 reverse, GTGAGATGACAGGGAGGGGA; Tnfaip3 forward, AGCAAGTGCAGGAAAGCTGGCT; Tnfaip3 reverse, GCTTTCGCAGAGGCAGTAACAG; Bcl2 forward, CCTGTGGATGACTGAGTACCTG; Bcl2 reverse, AGCCAGGAGAAATCAAACAGAGG; Bcl2l1 forward, GCCACCTATCTGAATGACCACC; Bcl2l1 reverse, AGGAACCAGCGGTTGAAGCGC; Lgr5 forward, CGGGACCTTGAAGATTTCCT; Lgr5 reverse, GATTCGGATCAGCCAGCTAC; Bmp2 forward, TGCTTCTTAGACGGACTGCG; Bmp2 reverse, TGGGGAAGCAGCAACACTAG; Id2 forward, CCAGAGACCTGGACAGAACC; Id2 reverse, CGACATAAGCTCAGAAGGGAAT; Id3 forward, AGCTCACTCCGGAACTTGTG; Id3 reverse, AGAGTCCCAGGGTCCCAAG; GABDH forward, AATGAAGGGGTCATTGATGG; GABDH reverse, AAGGTGAAGGTCGGAGTCAA; BIRC2 forward, CAGACACATGCAGCTCGAATGAG; BIRC2 reverse, CACCTCAAGCCACCATCACAAC; BIRC3 forward, GCTTTTGCTGTGATGGTGGACTC; BIRC3 reverse, CTTGACGGATGAACTCCTGTCC; TNFAIP3 forward, CTCAACTGGTGTCGAGAAGTCC; TNFAIP3 reverse, TTCCTTGAGCGTGCTGAACAGC; BCL2L1 forward, GCCACTTACCTGAATGACCACC; BCL2L1 reverse, AACCAGCGGTTGAAGCGTTCCT; BMP2 forward, TGTATCGCAGGCACTCAGGTCA; BMP2 reverse, CCACTCGTTTCTGGTAGTTCTTC; ID2 forward, TTGTCAGCCTGCATCACCAGAG; ID2 reverse, AGCCACACAGTGCTTTGCTGTC; OLFM4 forward, GACCAAGCTGAAAGAGTGTGAGG; OLFM4 reverse, CCTCTCCAGTTGAGCTGAACCA.
QuantSeq 3′ mRNA-seq
Library preparation
The protocol for total RNA extraction was performed as described above in the ‘qPCR’ section. RNA quantification and quality control were performed using a DNF-471 Standard Sensitivity RNA Analysis kit (Agilent) with a fragment analyzer. Equivalent quantities of total RNA were used for library preparation using the Lexogen QuantSeq 3′ mRNA-Seq Library Prep Kit FWD from Illumina. The DNF-474 High Sensitivity NGS Fragment Analysis Kit (1–6,000 bp) (Agilent) was used to determine the quality of the library with a fragment analyzer. 3′ RNA-seq (QuantSeq) reads were prepared for analysis by removing adaptor contamination, poly(A) read through and low-quality tails using bbmap v.36.92. Libraries were pooled at an equimolar ratio and sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq 2500 instrument using the single-read 50-read mode.
Data analysis
RNA-seq reads were trimmed using BBDuk v38.06 (ref=polyA.fa.gz,truseq.fa.gz k=13 ktrim=r useshortkmers=t mink=5 qtrim=r trimq=10 minlength=20). Reads mapping to abundant sequences included in the iGenomes UCSC GRCm38 reference (mouse rDNA, mouse mitochondrial chromosome, phiX174 genome, adapter) were removed using bowtie2 v.2.3.4.1 alignment. The remaining reads were analysed using genome and gene annotation for the GRCm38/mm10 assembly obtained from Mus musculus Ensembl release 94. Reads were aligned to the genome using star v.2.6.0c and reads in genes were counted with featureCounts (subread v.1.6.2) using strand-specific read counting for QuantSeq experiments (-s 1). Differential gene expression analysis on raw counts was performed using DESeq2, over-representation analysis with clusterProfiler v.4.4.4 and gene set enrichment analysis with fgsea v.1.22.0. The relevant signalling processes and biological functions were evaluated using the commercial QIAGEN’s Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA, Qiagen; www.qiagen.com/ingenuity) software. The z score was applied to predict a cellular process’ directional change, such as activating or inhibiting a cellular pathway. The Benjamini–Hochberg method was used to adjust canonical pathway P values.
Single-cell sorting of mouse intestinal lamina propria cells for sequencing
The protocol was modified from a previous study26. In brief, 20 cm of upper small intestinal tissue was carefully washed with cold PBS, Peyer’s patches were removed manually, and then the remaining specimens were incubated in 10 ml of gentle dissociation solution (HBSS with 10 mM EDTA and 1 mM DTT (Sigma-Aldrich)) on ice for 20 min. The tissues were shaken vigorously, and the supernatant was collected in a new conical tube, washed with HBSS buffer and suspended in 10 ml of HBSS buffer, suspension ‘A’. The remaining tissue fragments were washed with 10 ml of HBSS buffer, cut into 2–5 mm fragments and were further digested in dissociation solution (advanced DMEM with 0,15 mg ml−1 of collagenase P (Roche), 0.8 mg ml−1 of dispase (Gibco), and 400 IU ml−1 of DNase I (Worthington)) using a GentleMACS dissociator (Miltenyi) at 37 °C for 1 h. The cell suspension was filtered through a 100 μm cell strainer into a 50 ml tube, then centrifuged at 300g for 5 min, and the supernatant was discarded. The cell pellets were then combined with the cell suspension ‘A’. Dead cells were fluorescently labelled using a fixable viability dye (eBioscience, 1:1,200). Antibody labelling of cells was performed in DMEM supplemented with 2%) on ice for 30 min after blocking Fc receptors. Fc receptors were blocked with anti-CD16/32 antibodies (BD Pharmingen, 1:100). The following antibodies were used: anti-CD45 (IM7, eBioscience, 1:400) and EPCAM (G8.8, BioLegend, 1:800). Using FACSAria III Cell Sorter (BD), CD45-positive and EPCAM-negative cells (Immune cells) and CD45− and EPCAM− cells (mesenchymal cells) were enriched by cell sorting.
scRNA-seq
Library preparation from mouse intestinal organoids
Control mouse intestinal organoids and organoids cultured in the presence of recombinant mouse RANK ligand (rmRANKL, Oriental Yeast) for 12 h were dissociated with TrypLE (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and DNase I (Worthington Biochemical) for 5 min at 37 °C and subsequent vigorous pipetting through a p200 pipette. The cell suspension was washed with DMEM/F12 medium containing 10% FBS. Cell viability and efficiency of dissociation were determined using Nucleocounter NC-250 (Chemometec) before the single cells were loaded into one channel of a 10x Chromium microfluidics chip to package them into one library. scRNA-seq libraries were generated using 10x Genomics kits. The libraries were sequenced on an Illumina NovaSeq 6000.
Library preparation from mouse intestinal lamina propria cells
For each sample, 1 million cells were fixed for 22 h at 4 °C, quenched and stored at −80 °C according to 10x genomic Fixation of Cells & Nuclei for Chromium Fixed RNA profiling (CG000478, 10X Genomics, Pleasanton, CA) using the Chromium Next GEM Single Cell Fixed RNA Sample preparation kit (PN-1000414, 10X Genomics). In total, 250,000 cells per sample were used for probe hybridization using the Chromium Fixed RNA Kit, mouse WTA probes (PN-1000496, 10X Genomics), pooled at equal numbers and washed following the Pooled Wash Workflow following the Chromium Fixed RNA Profiling Reagent kit protocol (CG000527, 10X Genomics). GEMs were generated using Next GEM ChipQ (PN-1000422, 10X Genomics) on the Chromium X (10X Genomics) system with a target of 10,000 cells recovered and libraries prepared according to the manufacturer instructions (CG000527, 10x Genomics). Sequencing was performed using NovaSeq S4 lane PE150 (Illumina) with a target of 15,000 reads per cell. Alignment of the samples was performed using the 10x Genomics Cell Ranger 7.1.0 multi pipeline.
Data analysis (mouse intestinal organoids)
Reads were aligned to the reference mouse genome (mm10) downloaded from the 10x Genomics website (v.2020-A) using the Cell Ranger (v.5.0.1) count function with the default parameters. Genome annotation corresponded to Ensembl v98. The median number of unique molecular identifiers (UMIs) per cell was between 23,501 and 25,058, with a median of 3,808–4,300 genes detected per condition. The computational analysis of the 10x Genomics UMI count matrices was performed using the R package Seurat (v.4.0.5). Cells were subjected to a quality-control step, keeping those cells expressing more than 1,000 genes and with less than 20% of UMIs assigned to mitochondrial genes. Those thresholds were chosen after visual inspection of the distributions. Using this filtering, we retained between 844 and 2,299 cells, with a median of 3,877–4,512 genes per cell detected per condition. Genes expressed in less than three cells for a sample independently or in less than five cells when the samples were merged, were removed from the analyses. Each dataset was subjected separately to normalization, identification of highly variable genes and scaling using the SCTransform function. After obtaining principal components with RunPCA for each sample independently, we integrated them using reciprocal PCA (RPCA) to identify anchors with the FindIntegrationAnchors function (setting the reduction parameter to rpca), as we expect some cell type differences after rmRANKL treatment, therefore avoiding a possible overintegration.
To annotate cell populations, we performed an unsupervised clustering analysis using the Louvain algorithm with a resolution of 0.7 in a shared nearest neighbours graph constructed with the first 20 principal components, as implemented in the FindClusters and FindNeighbors Seurat functions. Nonlinear dimensional reduction for visualization was performed using the RunUMAP function with the same principal components. Cluster 6 was further subdivided in an unsupervised manner using the FindSubCluster function with a 0.6 resolution, enabling us to separate goblet and Paneth cells without splitting the rest of the clusters any further. Markers in each cluster were identified using the FindConservedMarkers and FindAllMarkers functions in the log-normalized counts by using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Genes with P value < 0.05 (adjusted by Bonferroni’s correction) and a log2-transformed fold change of >0.25 were retained. Clusters were annotated in accordance with those makers, as well as considering small intestinal cell-type markers from previous studies22,26,59. To further confirm our classifications, cell type annotations from the small intestine scRNA-seq dataset from a previous study22 were transferred using the TransferData function in Seurat after removing distal cells and simplifying the TA annotation in the reference. We used UCell to obtain scores for gene sets of interest in each cell. The plots were generated using the DimPlot and VlnPlot functions from Seurat as well as the ggplot2 and pheatmap R libraries.
Data analysis (human intestinal crypt cells)
For the computational analysis of scRNA-seq data from human intestinal crypt cells, the 10x Genomics scRNA-seq expression matrix of human intestinal crypt cells from a previous study43 was downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GSM3389578). Cells were already filtered in the dataset. Clustering and UMAP dimensionality reduction were performed with Seurat using similar parameters as in their study, that is, considering the first 25 principal components and a k.param of 20 for FindNeighbors and a resolution of 0.6 in FindClusters. A small cluster corresponding to non-epithelial cells was detected and removed from the analyses, redoing the downstream analyses and unsupervised clustering with a 0.8 resolution. The clusters were annotated considering markers and labels from the original paper.
Data analysis (mouse lamina propria cells)
Sample demultiplexing and read alignment were performed using the Cell Ranger (v.7.2.0) multi-function with the default parameters, considering the reference mouse genome (mm10) downloaded from the 10x Genomics website (v.2020-A) and the Chromium_Mouse_Transcriptome_Probe_Set_v1.0.1_mm10-2020-A.csv probe set. The median number of UMIs per cell was between 4,063 and 5,902, with a median of 2,050–2,589 genes detected per condition. The computational analysis of the 10x Genomics UMI count matrices was performed using Seurat (v.4.2.0). Cells were subjected to a quality control step, keeping those cells expressing more than 500 genes, 1,000 UMIs and with less than 5% of UMIs assigned to mitochondrial genes and cells considered singlets by scDblFinder (v.1.12.0) with the default parameters. Using this filtering, we retained between 6,822 and 9,396 cells, with a median of 2,008–2,451 genes per cell detected per condition. Genes expressed in less than three cells for a sample independently were removed from the analyses. Each dataset was subjected separately to normalization, identification of highly variable genes and scaling using the SCTransform function with vst.flavor v.2. We integrated the data using canonical correlation analysis.
To annotate cell populations, we performed an unsupervised clustering analysis using the Louvain algorithm with a resolution of 0.5 in a shared nearest-neighbours graph constructed with the first 17 principal components. Cluster 5 and 12 were subset, reintegrated with canonical correlation analysis after normalization with SCTransform and reclustered in an unsupervised manner with a 0.8 resolution and 15 principal components, allowing to further separate CD4 T cells and ILCs. Markers in each cluster were identified using the FindConservedMarkers and FindAllMarkers functions in the log-normalized counts by using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Genes with P value < 0.05 (adjusted by Bonferroni’s correction) and a log2-transformed fold change of >0.25 were retained. Clusters were annotated in accordance with those markers, as well as considering small intestinal cell type markers as follows; naive CD4 T cells: Ccr7, Klf2, Sell. Activated T cells: Cd40Ig, Cd4. Th1 cells: Il12rb2, Ccr5. T helper 17 cells: Il17a, Il17f, Rora. Regulatory T cells: Foxp3, Ctla4, Il10, Tnfrsf4. Memory T cells: Zbtb16, Zfp683. CD8 T cells: Cd8a, Itgae, Gzma. CD4−CD8− T cells: Trdc, Cd163l1, Ly6g5b, Cd3e. ILC1: Tbx21, Tyrobp, Ccl3, Xcl1, Il13. ILC2: Gata3, IL17rb, Hs3st1. ILC3: Rorc, Il22, Slc6a20a. B cells: Cd79a, Cd19, Pax5. Plasma cells: Igha, Igkc, Jchain, Xbp1, Mzb1. Macrophage: Cd14, Unc93b1, Lyz2, Il1b. PDGFRAlowCD81+ trophocytes: Cd81, Ackr4, Cd34, Grem1, Col14a1, Dcn. PDFGRAlowGREM1med stromal cells: Dkk2, Wnt2b. PDGFRAlowGREM1− stromal cells: Sfrp1, Frzb, Fgfr2. PDGFRAhigh telocytes: Pdgfra, Bmp7, Bmp5, Wif1, Chrd, Dkk3. Myofibroblast: Myh11, Hhip, Npnt. Smooth muscle cells: Atp1b2, Des, Fhl5, Rgs4. Vascular endothelial cells: Pecam1, Plvap, Flt1. Lymphatic endothelial cells: Lyve1, Mmrn1, Rspo3. Glia cells: Gpr37l1, Sox10, Kcna1.
Collection of milk and serum
Lactating female mice were separated from their offspring at lactation day 8 and fasted for 5 h from 10:00 to 15:00. Subsequently, they were anaesthetized with isoflurane (2% induction and 1% maintenance) and injected with 2 IU of oxytocin (Sigma-Aldrich, O3251) intraperitoneally. Expressed milk was collected with a P20 pipette. Serum was collected from inferior vena cava from mice anaesthetized with ketamine–xylazine and pooled into Micro sample tube Lithium heparin (Sarstedt). Serum samples were centrifuged at 2,000g for 10 min at room temperature twice to separate from cells. All samples were then stored at −80 °C for further analysis. The concentrations of milk IgA and IgG were measured with an ELISA kit (Bethyl Laboratories).
MS analysis
Samples were prepared by adding 100 μl of a methanol/ethanol mixture (4:1, v/v) to 25 μl of the respective serum or milk samples in a 1.5 ml tube, followed by vortexing, incubation and centrifugation. The supernatants were transferred to HPLC vials and measured consecutively with reversed-phase (RP) and hydrophilic interaction chromatography (HILIC) on-line coupled to liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS). Then, 2.5 μl of each sample was pooled for quality control. Metabolite extracts were separated (HILIC) on a SeQuant ZIC-pHILIC HPLC column (Merck, 100 × 2.1 mm; 5 µm) or a RP-column (Waters, ACQUITY UPLC HSS T3 150 × 2.1; 1.8 μm) with a flow rate of 100 µl min−1, using the Ultimate 3000 HPLC system coupled to a Q-Exactive Focus (both Thermo Fisher Scientific). In HILIC, the gradient was ramped up in 21 min from 90% A (100% acetonitrile) to 60% B (25% ammonium bicarbonate in water). In RP, the 20 min gradient started with 99% A (0.1% formic acid in water) and ramped up to 60% B (0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile). Eluting compounds were directly ionized by electrospray ionization in polarity switching mode. Spectra were acquired in data-dependent acquisition mode using high-resolution tandem mass spectrometry. The ionization potential was set to +3.5/−3.0 kV, the sheath gas flow was set to 20, and an auxiliary gas flow of 5 was used. Obtained datasets were processed by Compound Discoverer 3.0 (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Annotation was conducted by searching the metabolite databases (mzCloud, our in-house database, ChemSpider, BioCyc, Human Metabolome Database, KEGG, MassBank and MetaboLights) with a mass accuracy of 3 ppm for precursor masses and, if applicable, 10 ppm for fragment ion masses.
For measurement of triglycerides with LC–MS, lipids were extracted using chloroform–methanol extraction from each sample. The chloroform phase was removed and diluted 1:1 with methanol and 1 μl of each sample was directly injected on a Kinetex C8 column (100 Å, 150 × 2.1 mm) using a 20 min gradient of 80% A (60% acetonitrile, 10 mM ammonium acetate, 0.1% formic acid, 40% water) to 95% B (90% isopropanol, 10 mM ammonium acetate, 0.1% formic acid and 5% water) using a flow rate of 100 µl min−1 and a 60 °C column temperature. Triglycerides were detected and quantified in the positive-ion mode as their ammonium adducts.
Metabolic studies
For analysis of offspring delivered from RankWT or RankΔvil female mice, the mice were fed normal chow from weaning age until 4 weeks of age, after which they were fed normal chow or HFD (60% kcal% fat, Research Diets, D12492i) for up to 25 weeks. The pups were weekly weighed starting from postnatal day 7 until 25 weeks. For oral glucose-tolerance tests, mice (aged 25 weeks) were fasted overnight and were then administrated an oral glucose bolus by gavage (2 g per kg for normal chow-fed mice and 1 g per kg for HFD-fed mice). Glucose concentrations were measured using glucometers from blood taken by tail nick at 0, 15, 30, 45, 60 and 120 min after glucose ingestion, using a handheld blood glucose meter (One Touch UltraEasy; Lifescan). The area under the glucose-tolerance test curve was calculated for each mouse using GraphPad Prism v.9.3.1c (GraphPad Software). For analysis of insulin levels, tail-vein blood samples were added to Micro sample tube Lithium heparin (Sarstedt) to avoid blood clotting. Plasma insulin levels were measured using the Alpco Mouse Ultrasensitive Insulin ELISA (80-INSMSU-E10). For each litter of offspring, blood samples were taken the same time of the day.
Statistics and reproducibility
All values are expressed as means ± s.e.m. GraphPad Prism 8 software was used to perform statistical analyses. All details of the statistical tests used are stated in the figure legends. Two-tailed Student’s t-tests, two-tailed Mann–Whitney U-tests and one-way ANOVA with two-tailed Tukey’s test were used as described in the figure legends. Two-way ANOVA was used to compare two groups over time. Survival curves were compared using the log-rank (Mantel–Cox) test. Unless otherwise specified in the main text or figure legends, all experiments reported in this study were repeated at least two independent times.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Online content
Any methods, additional references, Nature Portfolio reporting summaries, source data, extended data, supplementary information, acknowledgements, peer review information; details of author contributions and competing interests; and statements of data and code availability are available at 10.1038/s41586-024-08284-1.
Supplementary information
Source data
Acknowledgements
We thank all of the members of the Penninger laboratory for discussions and technical support; D. Hoffmann for assistance with bulk RNA-seq library preparation; Y. Rauchensteiner and E. Miyakoda for assistance for animal experiments; I. Tancevski for discussions; P. Pasierbek and other members of the IMP-IMBA Biooptics service facility for assistance in imaging; staff of the VBCF histopathology department, particularly M. Grivej, A. Piszczek and A. Kavirayani for histology support; staff of the animal facility and all other IMP/IMBA service facilities; F. Calzone, W. Boyle and E. Rideout for feedback and pointing out the literature in insect. MS, QuantSeq and scRNA-seq were performed at the VBCF Metabolomics Facility and Next Generation Sequencing units, funded by the City of Vienna through the Vienna Business Agency. Gene expression profiling was performed at the VBCF Next Generation Sequencing unit (www.vbcf.ac.at). We also thank the staff of the animal facility and all other service facilities. J.M.P. and M.O. were supported by the T. von Zastrow foundation, the Austrian Academy of Sciences and grants from the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) Wittgenstein award (Z 271-B19), a Canada 150 Research Chairs Program (F18-01336), Helmsley Trust (Care-for-Rare VEOIBD Alliance), 2021 Allen Distinguished Investigator Program and Fundacio La Marato de TV3 (202125-31). We also acknowledge funding by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) under the project ‘Microbial Stargazing—Erforschung von Resilienzmechanismen von Mikroben und Menschen’ (01KX2324) and DFG RG 5042 miTarget P3. A.U.-A. was supported by a Sara Borrell grant (CD22/00027) from the Instituto Carlos III and NextGenerationEU.
Extended data figures and tables
Author contributions
Most of the experiments were performed by M.O. with the help of V.S., who performed in vivo experiments and organoid cultures as well as confocal imaging; A.A.-R., who performed experiments using BMPR1A-knockout human intestinal organoids; I.K., who performed western blotting; R.K., who helped with the maintenance of mouse colony and metabolic studies; D.L., who performed qPCR analysis; T.-P.P., who performed whole-mount staining and imaging; S.J.F.C., who performed primary cell culture; A.H., who performed tissue isolations; S.S., who performed animal experiments; and T.L., who performed image analysis. M.N. performed bioinformatic analyses on the QuantSeq data and GSEA analyses. A.U.-A. performed scRNA-seq and bioinformatic analyses. K.N. and M.Z. provided human intestinal organoids. N.A.C.G., L.C.O., L.K.S. and M.F.-P. helped with experiments using germ-free mice. P.R. provided expertise. J.R. provided constitutively active RANK-mutant overexpressing mice (caRANKLSL). M.P. provided Traf6 conditional mice. H.C. provided expertise in training and data analysis of mouse intestinal organoids. H.T. provided the Rankl conditional mice. B.-K.K. provided the Rnf43 and Znrf3 conditional mice and as well as key reagents. M.O. together with J.M.P. conceived and designed the experiments and wrote the manuscript.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature thanks Koji Hase, Christopher (S) Kovacs, Omer Yilmaz and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Funding
Open access funding provided by Helmholtz-Zentrum für Infektionsforschung GmbH (HZI).
Data availability
Datasets generated in this study are available at the Gene Expression Omnibus (GSE225514). The 10x Genomics scRNA-seq expression matrix of human intestinal crypt cells was downloaded from the NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSM3389578). Source data are provided with this paper.
Code availability
A GitHub repository (https://github.com/AsierUllate/Intestinal_Organoids) is available for this study.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Masahiro Onji, Email: masahiro.onji@meduniwien.ac.at.
Josef M. Penninger, Email: josef.penninger@helmholtz-hzi.de
Extended data
is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41586-024-08284-1.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41586-024-08284-1.
References
- 1.Arck, P. C. & Hecher, K. Fetomaternal immune cross-talk and its consequences for maternal and offspring’s health. Nat. Med.19, 548–556 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Napso, T., Yong, H. E. J., Lopez-Tello, J. & Sferruzzi-Perri, A. N. The role of placental hormones in mediating maternal adaptations to support pregnancy and lactation. Front. Physiol.9, 1091 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Costantine, M. M. Physiologic and pharmacokinetic changes in pregnancy. Front. Pharmacol.5, 65 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Reiff, T. et al. Endocrine remodelling of the adult intestine sustains reproduction in Drosophila. eLife4, e06930 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ahmed, S. M. H. et al. Fitness trade-offs incurred by ovary-to-gut steroid signalling in Drosophila. Nature584, 415–419 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lacey, D. L. et al. Osteoprotegerin ligand is a cytokine that regulates osteoclast differentiation and activation. Cell93, 165–176 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Simonet, W. S. et al. Osteoprotegerin: a novel secreted protein involved in the regulation of bone density. Cell89, 309–319 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kong, Y. Y. et al. OPGL is a key regulator of osteoclastogenesis, lymphocyte development and lymph-node organogenesis. Nature397, 315–323 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Rossi, S. W. et al. RANK signals from CD4+3− inducer cells regulate development of Aire-expressing epithelial cells in the thymic medulla. J. Exp. Med.204, 1267–1272 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hikosaka, Y. et al. The cytokine RANKL produced by positively selected thymocytes fosters medullary thymic epithelial cells that express autoimmune regulator. Immunity29, 438–450 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hanada, R. et al. Central control of fever and female body temperature by RANKL/RANK. Nature462, 505–509 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Fata, J. E. et al. The osteoclast differentiation factor osteoprotegerin-ligand is essential for mammary gland development. Cell103, 41–50 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Paolino, M. et al. RANK links thymic regulatory T cells to fetal loss and gestational diabetes in pregnancy. Nature589, 442–447 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ross, F. P. RANKing the importance of measles virus in Paget’s disease. J. Clin. Invest.105, 555–558 (2000). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Karsenty, G. The genetic transformation of bone biology. Genes Dev.13, 3037–3051 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Schramek, D. et al. Osteoclast differentiation factor RANKL controls development of progestin-driven mammary cancer. Nature468, 98–102 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Chen, D. et al. Oxytocin evokes a pulsatile PGE2 release from ileum mucosa and is required for repair of intestinal epithelium after injury. Sci. Rep.5, 11731 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Knoop, K. A. et al. RANKL is necessary and sufficient to initiate development of antigen-sampling M cells in the intestinal epithelium. J. Immunol.183, 5738–5747 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Nagashima, K. et al. Identification of subepithelial mesenchymal cells that induce IgA and diversify gut microbiota. Nat. Immunol.18, 675–682 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kanaya, T. et al. The Ets transcription factor Spi-B is essential for the differentiation of intestinal microfold cells. Nat. Immunol.13, 729–736 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Sato, T. et al. Single Lgr5 stem cells build crypt-villus structures in vitro without a mesenchymal niche. Nature459, 262–265 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Haber, A. L. et al. A single-cell survey of the small intestinal epithelium. Nature551, 333–339 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.de Lau, W. et al. Peyer’s patch M cells derived from Lgr5+ stem cells require SpiB and are induced by RankL in cultured “miniguts”. Mol. Cell. Biol.32, 3639–3647 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Qi, Z. et al. BMP restricts stemness of intestinal Lgr5+ stem cells by directly suppressing their signature genes. Nat. Commun.8, 13824 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Haramis, A. P. et al. De novo crypt formation and juvenile polyposis on BMP inhibition in mouse intestine. Science303, 1684–1686 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Yum, M. K. et al. Tracing oncogene-driven remodelling of the intestinal stem cell niche. Nature594, 442–447 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Rubinfeld, B. et al. Binding of GSK3β to the APC-β-catenin complex and regulation of complex assembly. Science272, 1023–1026 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Koo, B. K. et al. Tumour suppressor RNF43 is a stem-cell E3 ligase that induces endocytosis of Wnt receptors. Nature488, 665–669 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Alankus, B. et al. Pathological RANK signaling in B cells drives autoimmunity and chronic lymphocytic leukemia. J. Exp. Med.218, e20200517 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Darnay, B. G., Ni, J., Moore, P. A. & Aggarwal, B. B. Activation of NF-κB by RANK requires tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor (TRAF) 6 and NF-κB-inducing kinase. Identification of a novel TRAF6 interaction motif. J. Biol. Chem.274, 7724–7731 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Polykratis, A., van Loo, G., Xanthoulea, S., Hellmich, M. & Pasparakis, M. Conditional targeting of tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 6 reveals opposing functions of Toll-like receptor signaling in endothelial and myeloid cells in a mouse model of atherosclerosis. Circulation126, 1739–1751 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Moser, A. R., Pitot, H. C. & Dove, W. F. A dominant mutation that predisposes to multiple intestinal neoplasia in the mouse. Science247, 322–324 (1990). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.el Marjou, F. et al. Tissue-specific and inducible Cre-mediated recombination in the gut epithelium. Genesis39, 186–193 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Casirola, D. M. & Ferraris, R. P. Role of the small intestine in postpartum weight retention in mice. Am. J. Clin. Nutr.78, 1178–1187 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Meyer, A. M. & Caton, J. S. Role of the small intestine in developmental programming: impact of maternal nutrition on the dam and offspring. Adv. Nutr.7, 169–178 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Fell, B. F., Smith, K. A. & Campbell, R. M. Hypertrophic and hyperplastic changes in the alimentary canal of the lactating rat. J. Pathol. Bacteriol.85, 179–188 (1963). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Boyne, R., Fell, B. F. & Robb, I. The surface area of the intestinal mucosa in the lactating rat. J. Physiol.183, 570–575 (1966). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Şensoy, E. & Öznurlu, Y. Determination of the changes on the small intestine of pregnant mice by histological, enzyme histochemical, and immunohistochemical methods. Turk. J. Gastroenterol.30, 917–924 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Ferrari, C. et al. Long-lasting prolactin-lowering effect of cabergoline, a new dopamine agonist, in hyperprolactinemic patients. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.63, 941–945 (1986). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Lee, P. P. et al. A critical role for Dnmt1 and DNA methylation in T cell development, function, and survival. Immunity15, 763–774 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Jouanne, M., Oddoux, S., Noël, A. & Voisin-Chiret, A. S. Nutrient requirements during pregnancy and lactation. Nutrients13, 692 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Ravelli, A. C. et al. Glucose tolerance in adults after prenatal exposure to famine. Lancet351, 173–177 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Fujii, M. et al. Human intestinal organoids maintain self-renewal capacity and cellular diversity in niche-inspired culture condition. Cell Stem Cell23, 787–793 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Beumer, J. et al. BMP gradient along the intestinal villus axis controls zonated enterocyte and goblet cell states. Cell Rep.38, 110438 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Young, M. F. & Ramakrishnan, U. Maternal undernutrition before and during pregnancy and offspring health and development. Ann. Nutr. Metab.10.1159/000510595 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 46.Rios, D. et al. Antigen sampling by intestinal M cells is the principal pathway initiating mucosal IgA production to commensal enteric bacteria. Mucosal Immunol9, 907–916 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Weaver, L. T., Arthur, H. M., Bunn, J. E. & Thomas, J. E. Human milk IgA concentrations during the first year of lactation. Arch. Dis. Child.78, 235–239 (1998). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Kovacs, C. S. Maternal mineral and bone metabolism during pregnancy, lactation, and post-weaning recovery. Physiol. Rev.96, 449–547 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Winter, E. M. et al. Pregnancy and lactation, a challenge for the skeleton. Endocr. Connect.9, R143–R157 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Abu Samra, N. et al. Genomics and epigenomics of gestational diabetes mellitus: understanding the molecular pathways of the disease pathogenesis. Int. J. Mol. Sci.23, 3514 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Nakashima, T. et al. Evidence for osteocyte regulation of bone homeostasis through RANKL expression. Nat. Med.17, 1231–1234 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Šošić, D., Richardson, J. A., Yu, K., Ornitz, D. M. & Olson, E. N. Twist regulates cytokine gene expression through a negative feedback loop that represses NF-κB activity. Cell112, 169–180 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Eberl, G. & Littman, D. R. Thymic origin of intestinal αβ T cells revealed by fate mapping of RORγt+ cells. Science305, 248–251 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Madisen, L. et al. A robust and high-throughput Cre reporting and characterization system for the whole mouse brain. Nat. Neurosci.13, 133–140 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Barker, N. et al. Identification of stem cells in small intestine and colon by marker gene Lgr5. Nature449, 1003–1007 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Edgar, R. D. et al. Culture-associated DNA methylation changes impact on cellular function of human intestinal organoids. Cell. Mol. Gastroenterol. Hepatol.10.1016/j.jcmgh.2022.08.008 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 57.Farin, H. F., Van Es, J. H. & Clevers, H. Redundant sources of Wnt regulate intestinal stem cells and promote formation of Paneth cells. Gastroenterology143, 1518–1529 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Boom, R. et al. Rapid and simple method for purification of nucleic acids. J. Clin. Microbiol.28, 495–503 (1990). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Biton, M. et al. T helper cell cytokines modulate intestinal stem cell renewal and differentiation. Cell175, 1307–1320 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Gersemann, M. et al. Olfactomedin-4 is a glycoprotein secreted into mucus in active IBD. J. Crohn’s Colitis6, 425–434 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Datasets generated in this study are available at the Gene Expression Omnibus (GSE225514). The 10x Genomics scRNA-seq expression matrix of human intestinal crypt cells was downloaded from the NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSM3389578). Source data are provided with this paper.
A GitHub repository (https://github.com/AsierUllate/Intestinal_Organoids) is available for this study.