Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The EMBO Journal logoLink to The EMBO Journal
. 1986 Mar;5(3):511–518. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1986.tb04240.x

The organisation of chromatin loops: characterization of a scaffold attachment site

S M Gasser 1, U K Laemmli 1
PMCID: PMC1166792  PMID: 16453673

Abstract

Previous experiments have identified a 657-bp restriction fragment in the non-transcribed region of the Drosophila histone gene cluster that is specifically associated with the histone-depleted nuclear scaffold. The remaining fragments of the 5-kb histone repeat were shown to be readily released from the scaffold; hence it was proposed that the tandemly repeated cluster of histone genes forms a series of 5-kb loops restrained by a nuclear substructure at the sites of attachment. Here we show that the attachment fragment is tightly associated with protease-sensitive material, whereas the solubilized fragments are relatively protein-free. Exonuclease III digestion has been used to map the location of protein complexes on the attachment fragment. We have defined two regions of ∼200 bp whose borders provide kinetic barriers to exonuclease III degradation. They are separated by a nucleaseaccessible region of ∼100 bp. The protected regions are sufficient to mediate association of the fragment with the histonedepleted nuclei. Sequence analysis reveals an enrichment for sequences closely related to the topoisomerase II cleavage consensus in these two domains.

Keywords: nuclear structure, chromatin loops, Drosophila histone repeat, topoisomerase II

Full text

PDF
511

Images in this article

512Fig. 1.
on p.512
513Fig. 2.
on p.513
513Fig. 3.
on p.513
514Fig. 4.
on p.514
515Fig. 5.
on p.515
516Fig. 6.
on p.516

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adolph K. W., Cheng S. M., Laemmli U. K. Role of nonhistone proteins in metaphase chromosome structure. Cell. 1977 Nov;12(3):805–816. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(77)90279-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Adolphs K. W., Cheng S. M., Paulson J. R., Laemmli U. K. Isolation of a protein scaffold from mitotic HeLa cell chromosomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Nov;74(11):4937–4941. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.11.4937. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Benyajati C., Worcel A. Isolation, characterization, and structure of the folded interphase genome of Drosophila melanogaster. Cell. 1976 Nov;9(3):393–407. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(76)90084-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Berezney R., Coffey D. S. Identification of a nuclear protein matrix. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1974 Oct 23;60(4):1410–1417. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(74)90355-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Berrios M., Osheroff N., Fisher P. A. In situ localization of DNA topoisomerase II, a major polypeptide component of the Drosophila nuclear matrix fraction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Jun;82(12):4142–4146. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.12.4142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Capco D. G., Wan K. M., Penman S. The nuclear matrix: three-dimensional architecture and protein composition. Cell. 1982 Jul;29(3):847–858. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90446-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ciejek E. M., Tsai M. J., O'Malley B. W. Actively transcribed genes are associated with the nuclear matrix. Nature. 1983 Dec 8;306(5943):607–609. doi: 10.1038/306607a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Comings D. E., Okada T. A. Nuclear proteins. III. The fibrillar nature of the nuclear matrix. Exp Cell Res. 1976 Dec;103(2):341–360. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(76)90271-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cook P. R., Brazell I. A. Mapping sequences in loops of nuclear DNA by their progressive detachment from the nuclear cage. Nucleic Acids Res. 1980 Jul 11;8(13):2895–2906. doi: 10.1093/nar/8.13.2895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cook P. R., Brazell I. A. Supercoils in human DNA. J Cell Sci. 1975 Nov;19(2):261–279. doi: 10.1242/jcs.19.2.261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Cook P. R., Lang J., Hayday A., Lania L., Fried M., Chiswell D. J., Wyke J. A. Active viral genes in transformed cells lie close to the nuclear cage. EMBO J. 1982;1(4):447–452. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1982.tb01189.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. DiNardo S., Voelkel K., Sternglanz R. DNA topoisomerase II mutant of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: topoisomerase II is required for segregation of daughter molecules at the termination of DNA replication. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 May;81(9):2616–2620. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.9.2616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Earnshaw W. C., Halligan B., Cooke C. A., Heck M. M., Liu L. F. Topoisomerase II is a structural component of mitotic chromosome scaffolds. J Cell Biol. 1985 May;100(5):1706–1715. doi: 10.1083/jcb.100.5.1706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Earnshaw W. C., Heck M. M. Localization of topoisomerase II in mitotic chromosomes. J Cell Biol. 1985 May;100(5):1716–1725. doi: 10.1083/jcb.100.5.1716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Finch J. T., Klug A. Solenoidal model for superstructure in chromatin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1976 Jun;73(6):1897–1901. doi: 10.1073/pnas.73.6.1897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Fisher P. A., Berrios M., Blobel G. Isolation and characterization of a proteinaceous subnuclear fraction composed of nuclear matrix, peripheral lamina, and nuclear pore complexes from embryos of Drosophila melanogaster. J Cell Biol. 1982 Mar;92(3):674–686. doi: 10.1083/jcb.92.3.674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Harland R. M., Weintraub H., McKnight S. L. Transcription of DNA injected into Xenopus oocytes is influenced by template topology. Nature. 1983 Mar 3;302(5903):38–43. doi: 10.1038/302038a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Holm C., Goto T., Wang J. C., Botstein D. DNA topoisomerase II is required at the time of mitosis in yeast. Cell. 1985 Jun;41(2):553–563. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(85)80028-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Igó-Kemenes T., Zachau H. G. Domains in chromatin structure. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1978;42(Pt 1):109–118. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1978.042.01.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Igó-Kemenes T., Zachau H. G. Domains in chromatin structure. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1978;42(Pt 1):109–118. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1978.042.01.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Laemmli U. K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970 Aug 15;227(5259):680–685. doi: 10.1038/227680a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lebkowski J. S., Laemmli U. K. Evidence for two levels of DNA folding in histone-depleted HeLa interphase nuclei. J Mol Biol. 1982 Apr 5;156(2):309–324. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(82)90331-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Lebkowski J. S., Laemmli U. K. Non-histone proteins and long-range organization of HeLa interphase DNA. J Mol Biol. 1982 Apr 5;156(2):325–344. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(82)90332-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Lewis C. D., Laemmli U. K. Higher order metaphase chromosome structure: evidence for metalloprotein interactions. Cell. 1982 May;29(1):171–181. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90101-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lifton R. P., Goldberg M. L., Karp R. W., Hogness D. S. The organization of the histone genes in Drosophila melanogaster: functional and evolutionary implications. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1978;42(Pt 2):1047–1051. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1978.042.01.105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Linxweiler W., Hörz W. Sequence specificity of exonuclease III from E. coli. Nucleic Acids Res. 1982 Aug 25;10(16):4845–4859. doi: 10.1093/nar/10.16.4845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Maniatis T., Jeffrey A., Kleid D. G. Nucleotide sequence of the rightward operator of phage lambda. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Mar;72(3):1184–1188. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.3.1184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Mirault M. E., Goldschmidt-Clermont M., Artavanis-Tsakonas S., Schedl P. Organization of the multiple genes for the 70,000-dalton heat-shock protein in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Oct;76(10):5254–5258. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.10.5254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Mirkovitch J., Mirault M. E., Laemmli U. K. Organization of the higher-order chromatin loop: specific DNA attachment sites on nuclear scaffold. Cell. 1984 Nov;39(1):223–232. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90208-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Paulson J. R., Laemmli U. K. The structure of histone-depleted metaphase chromosomes. Cell. 1977 Nov;12(3):817–828. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(77)90280-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Robinson S. I., Nelkin B. D., Vogelstein B. The ovalbumin gene is associated with the nuclear matrix of chicken oviduct cells. Cell. 1982 Jan;28(1):99–106. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90379-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Samal B., Worcel A., Louis C., Schedl P. Chromatin structure of the histone genes of D. melanogaster. Cell. 1981 Feb;23(2):401–409. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90135-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Sander M., Hsieh T. S. Drosophila topoisomerase II double-strand DNA cleavage: analysis of DNA sequence homology at the cleavage site. Nucleic Acids Res. 1985 Feb 25;13(4):1057–1072. doi: 10.1093/nar/13.4.1057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Small D., Nelkin B., Vogelstein B. The association of transcribed genes with the nuclear matrix of Drosophila cells during heat shock. Nucleic Acids Res. 1985 Apr 11;13(7):2413–2431. doi: 10.1093/nar/13.7.2413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Sonnenbichler J., Riedel B. Concerning chromatin subunits. Hoppe Seylers Z Physiol Chem. 1974 Nov;355(11):1477–1478. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Southern E. M. Detection of specific sequences among DNA fragments separated by gel electrophoresis. J Mol Biol. 1975 Nov 5;98(3):503–517. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(75)80083-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Udvardy A., Schedl P., Sander M., Hsieh T. S. Novel partitioning of DNA cleavage sites for Drosophila topoisomerase II. Cell. 1985 Apr;40(4):933–941. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90353-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Uemura T., Yanagida M. Isolation of type I and II DNA topoisomerase mutants from fission yeast: single and double mutants show different phenotypes in cell growth and chromatin organization. EMBO J. 1984 Aug;3(8):1737–1744. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1984.tb02040.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Villeponteau B., Lundell M., Martinson H. Torsional stress promotes the DNAase I sensitivity of active genes. Cell. 1984 Dec;39(3 Pt 2):469–478. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90454-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Worcel A., Gargiulo G., Jessee B., Udvardy A., Louis C., Schedl P. Chromatin fine structure of the histone gene complex of Drosophila melanogaster. Nucleic Acids Res. 1983 Jan 25;11(2):421–439. doi: 10.1093/nar/11.2.421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Wu C. An exonuclease protection assay reveals heat-shock element and TATA box DNA-binding proteins in crude nuclear extracts. Nature. 1985 Sep 5;317(6032):84–87. doi: 10.1038/317084a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Wu C. Two protein-binding sites in chromatin implicated in the activation of heat-shock genes. Nature. 1984 May 17;309(5965):229–234. doi: 10.1038/309229a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Yang L., Rowe T. C., Nelson E. M., Liu L. F. In vivo mapping of DNA topoisomerase II-specific cleavage sites on SV40 chromatin. Cell. 1985 May;41(1):127–132. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90067-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The EMBO Journal are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES