Skip to main content
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology logoLink to Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
letter
. 2024 Oct 26;72(11):1679–1680. doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_2958_23

Effect of Haab's striae on corneal parameters in primary congenital glaucoma

S Ramyashri 1, Sirisha Senthil 1,
PMCID: PMC11668202  PMID: 39462935

Dear Editor,

In congenital/infantile glaucoma, elevated intraocular pressure often leads to corneal enlargement and the development of Haab's striae (HS), causing disruptions in Descemet's membrane.[1] These striae can significantly impact corneal optics, potentially inducing irregular astigmatism and contributing to amblyopia.[2,3,4] Despite well-controlled intraocular pressure, visual outcomes in patients with HS may remain suboptimal compared to those without.[2,3,4]

Our prospective study aimed to assess the association between HS and corneal characteristics in primary congenital glaucoma. We compared 13 eyes with HS to 15 age-matched controls under anesthesia, analyzing various parameters, including refractive errors and HS patterns, by using Image J® software [Fig. 1]. We found that HS predominantly exhibited horseshoe and circumferential patterns, mainly located centrally or paracentrally, leading to with-the-rule astigmatism. Notably, the vertical pattern of HS correlated negatively with astigmatism orientation at J45, as indicated by vector analysis [Table 1].

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Shows different types of HS seen in our cohort. (a–c) Shows circumferential, (d–f) shows horseshoe, (g–i) shows vertical, (j) shows oblique, (k and l) shows the horizontal pattern and (m–o) shows combinations of HS patterns. (l) Shows markings of parameters: A = Width of Haab's Striae, B = Arc Length of Haab's Striae, C = Corneal center to HS distance, HS = Haab's Striae

Table 1.

Results of univariate analysis evaluating the effect of various patterns of HS on corneal parameters

Spherical Equivalent
J0
J45
K1
K2
Coefficient P Coefficient P Coefficient P Coefficient P Coefficient P
Circumferential −7.06 0.13 −0.51 0.20 −0.004 0.87 −0.97 0.5 1.74 0.12
Horizontal 5.17 0.19 1.14 0.68 0.17 0.42 −0.31 0.79 -1.46 0.12
Horse Shoe −4.48 0.30 −0.47 0.19 −0.004 0.98 −0.006 0.99 -1.038 0.32
Oblique 3.8 0.5 0.58 0.22 0.41 0.17 0.26 0.87 0.26 0.85
Vertical 2.5 0.6 0.48 0.23 −0.5 0.045 1.23 0.39 1.44 0.21

HS=Haab's Striae, J0 is the Jackson cross-cylinder power at axis 90° and 180°. In this representation, positive values of J0 indicate with-the-rule (WTR) astigmatism, and negative values indicate against-the-rule (ATR) astigmatism. J45 is the Jackson cross-cylinder power at axis 45° and 135° and represents oblique astigmatism

In light of these findings, understanding the impact of HS on corneal optics is crucial for optimizing visual outcomes in congenital glaucoma patients. Our study highlights the importance of considering HS patterns in treatment strategies, particularly in cases where visual acuity assessment remains challenging. Simple tests such as refraction and vector analysis can offer valuable insights into corneal astigmatism, guiding personalized visual rehabilitation approaches.

Considering the implications of HS on refractive outcomes, our study underscores the importance of further research to explore the effects of interventions such as trabeculectomy on these parameters. By elucidating the relationship between HS and corneal astigmatism, we aim to provide clinicians with valuable insights to enhance the management and visual rehabilitation of patients with congenital glaucoma.

Financial support and sponsorship

Hyderabad Eye Research Foundation, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgement

Dr. Shrikant Bharadwaj for manuscript revision, audio visual department for medical photography.

References

  • 1.Hertle RW. Primary congenital open angle glaucoma. In: Kahook MY, Schuman JS, editors. Chandler and Grant's Glaucoma. 6th. Thorofare, NJ: SLACK Incorportaed; 2021. pp. 661–82. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Moschos MM, Nitoda E, Fenzel I, Song X, Langenbucher A, Kaesmann B, et al. Prognostic factors of pediatric glaucoma: A retrospective study. Int Ophthalmol. 2019;39:359–73. doi: 10.1007/s10792-018-0819-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Patil B, Tandon R, Sharma N, Verma M, Upadhyay AD, Gupta V, et al. Corneal changes in childhood glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2015;122:87–92. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.07.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Haddad MA, Sampaio MW, Oltrogge EW, Kara-José N, Betinjane AJ. Visual impairment secondary to congenital glaucoma in children: Visual responses, optical correction and use of low vision AIDS. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2009;64:725–30. doi: 10.1590/S1807-59322009000800003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Indian Journal of Ophthalmology are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer -- Medknow Publications

RESOURCES