Summary
Histone 3 gene mutations are the eponymous drivers in diffuse midline gliomas (DMGs), aggressive pediatric brain cancers for which no curative therapy currently exists. These recurrent oncohistones induce a global loss of repressive H3K27me3 residues and broad epigenetic dysregulation. In order to identify therapeutically targetable dependencies within this disease context, we performed an RNAi screen targeting epigenetic/chromatin-associated genes in patient-derived DMG cultures. This identified AFF4, the scaffold protein of the super elongation complex (SEC), as a molecular dependency in DMG. Interrogation of SEC function demonstrates a key role for maintaining clonogenic potential while promoting self-renewal of tumor stem cells. Small-molecule inhibition of SEC using clinically-relevant CDK9 inhibitors restores regulatory RNA polymerase II pausing, promotes cellular differentiation, and leads to potent anti-tumor effect both in vitro and in patient-derived xenograft models. These studies present a rationale for further exploration of SEC inhibition as a promising therapeutic approach to this intractable disease.
Keywords: Diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG), diffuse midline glioma (DMG), super elongation complex (SEC), AFF4, CDK9, atuveciclib, AZD4573
Graphical Abstract

Introduction
Diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) is a uniformly fatal pediatric brain tumor with extraordinarily limited treatment options. The median survival for DIPG remains 11 months, with fewer than 5% of patients alive at 2 years from time of diagnosis (Hoffman et al., 2018). Curative surgery is not possible, radiation therapy provides only temporary relief, and chemotherapies have thus far proven wholly ineffective (Jansen et al., 2012, Bartels et al., 2011). The current World Health Organization (WHO) diagnostic classification of diffuse midline glioma (DMG) is now categorically defined by the presence of the H3K27M mutation (Louis et al., 2016), and the clinical relevance ascribed to this genetic lesion highlights its unifying role as the biologic driver across a range of midline glial tumors involving the thalamus, cerebellum, brainstem (DIPG), and spinal cord (Nakata et al., 2017, Ryall et al., 2016, Jones and Baker, 2014). The presence of the H3K27M mutation in these tumors conveys a uniformly dismal prognosis regardless of tumor location or histologic grade (Ryall et al., 2016, Khuong-Quang et al., 2012). There exists a compelling need to understand the mechanisms by which H3K27M-mediated epigenetic perturbation disrupts normal neuroglial development in order to develop targeted therapies to benefit this high-risk subset of patients.
Mutations to the H3.3, H3F3A, or HIST1H3B histone genes have been identified in approximately 80% of pediatric DIPG (Wu et al., 2012, Wu et al., 2014). This characteristic lysine-to-methionine (K27M) substitution leads to a profound global hypomethylation at H3K27-trimethyl-bound promotors and a subsequent loss of transcriptional repression at these loci (Bender et al., 2013). The epigenetic aberrancies defined in this context encompass not only direct alterations to histone post-translational modifications but also indirect impacts on chromatin reader and writer function (Grasso et al., 2015, Piunti et al., 2017). This observation has prompted prior preclinical investigations into the efficacy of transcriptional disruption in DMG, an effective strategy in many experimental models of transcriptionally addicted malignancies (Loven et al., 2013, Hagenbuchner and Ausserlechner, 2016, Shahbazi et al., 2016, Sharifnia et al., 2019, Franco and Kraus, 2015). Both chromatin targeting via bromodomain and extra-terminal (BET) family protein BRD4 inhibition using JQ1 (Filippakopoulos and Knapp, 2014, Taylor et al., 2015, Piunti et al., 2017) and CDK7-mediated transcription initiation using THZ1 (Nagaraja et al., 2017) have demonstrated promise as druggable targets in patient-derived DMG cell cultures and xenograft models. These compounds, however, have proved challenging to adapt for clinical use. The relatively nonspecific approach of inhibiting genome-wide transcription may also impart off-target consequences given the comparatively restricted transcriptomic changes observed in H3K27M-mutant tumors (Larson et al., 2019). In this study, we set out to identify specific epigenetic regulators which represent critical cellular dependencies within the context of an H3K27M+ transformed cell state, to understand how they might mediate the altered developmental phenotype observed in DMG cell populations, and to determine whether these represented vulnerabilities that might be amenable to disruption using clinically relevant compounds.
Results
Epigenome screening identifies AFF4 as an epigenetic dependency in DMG
In order to identify specific epigenetic machinery with a critical function in the presence of the H3K27M mutation, we performed a functional shRNA screen using 4188 unique shRNA sequences targeting 408 genes classified as epigenetic or chromatin-associated molecules (4-12 individual shRNA sequences per gene). SU-DIPG4 cells were stably transduced in triplicate via a pooled lentiviral vector system and passaged for 21 days before isolating genomic DNA from surviving cells. Incorporated shRNA sequences were quantified in comparison to an immediate post-transduction sampling, with depleted sequences representing candidate essential genes (Fig 1A). shRNAs were ranked by the observed decrease in cell viability (Fig 1B), identifying 47 candidate genes with a fold change <0.8 and p <0.05 (Fig 1C and Table S1). These hits were enriched in genes involved in chromatin reading and writing functions with previously reported biologic relevance in DMG, including histone deacetylases, histone methyltransferases, polycomb repressive complex 1 members, and bromodomain family proteins. We prioritized genes which had not been previously characterized within a DMG model and which had related pharmacologic inhibitors in clinical use or preclinical development. Secondary validation of hits using individual shRNA constructs was performed in two additional H3K27M+ DMG cell lines (SF8628 and SF7761)(Fig 1D). Analysis of this screening approach identified depletion of AFF4 as a lethality in DMG.
Figure 1. Functional epigenome-wide screen identifies AFF4 as an epigenetic dependency in H3K27M+ DMG.

A. Pooled epigenomic shRNA library is transduced into SU-DIPG4 cells, and genomic DNA is isolated and sequenced to identify individual shRNA amplification or loss. B. Aggregate normalized sequencing data showing depleted shRNAs (fold change </= 0.8 in red). C. Leading edge of depleted shRNAs ordered by fold change. D. Secondary validation of screening hits by growth rate (SF8628, left) or colony formation (SF7761, right). Data displayed as mean ± SD. E. Model of the SEC in which CDK9 phosphorylates the carboxyl-terminal domain of RNA Pol II, resulting in release from promotor-proximal pause site. Experiments A-C reflect n=3 independent biological replicates. Experiments in D were performed with minimum n=3 technical replicates.
The AFF4 protein forms the scaffold to which other SEC subunits bind, including AF9/ENL, ELL2, and the CycT1-CDK9 pairing collectively termed positive transcription elongation factor b (P-TEFb) (Luo et al., 2012, Lin et al., 2010). The SEC acts as a positive regulator of the release of RNA polymerase II (Pol II) from promoter-proximal pausing, a key regulatory step conserved across metazoan development (Chen et al., 2018, Jonkers and Lis, 2015). Phosphorylation of Pol II C-terminal domain (CTD) at the serine 2 position by P-TEFb, the catalytic subunit of the SEC, allows for release of Pol II from this paused state and for productive transcriptional elongation to occur (Zhou et al., 2012, Peterlin and Price, 2006) (Fig 1E). SEC mediation of Pol II pausing release is vital for the dynamic induction of developmentally-regulated genes in response to cellular differentiation signals and can be misregulated in states of cellular transformation (Lin et al., 2011, Smith et al., 2011, Lin et al., 2010, Bradner et al., 2017). The role of SEC misregulation in DMG is not known.
SEC is critical for DMG cell proliferation and mediates stem-like phenotype
In order to interrogate the role of the SEC in DMG, we employed two nonoverlapping shRNA lentiviral constructs to deplete AFF4 (shAFF4) in three H3K27M-mutant DIPG (SU-DIPG4, HSJD-DIPG007, SF8628) and one H3K27M-mutant thalamic DMG (BT245) cell lines (Fig 2A and Fig S1A). We first examined DMG cell clonogenic potential by performing colony focus assays in SU-DIPG4 and HSJD-DIPG007 cells and observed a marked decrease in colony formation following shRNA-mediated reduction of AFF4 expression in comparison to non-targeting shRNA control (shNull) (Fig 2B and Fig S1C–D). We likewise found that AFF4 knockdown led to a significant decrease in proliferation across multiple patient-derived H3K27M+ cell cultures (Fig 2C–D). Though AFF4 is not known to have SEC-independent functions (Luo et al., 2012, Lin et al., 2010), we confirmed its residence within an intact P-TEFb-containing complex in DMG by anti-AFF4 co-immunoprecipitation (Fig 2E). To further support that our observations reflected a complex-dependent phenotype, we used a similar lentiviral shRNA approach to deplete CDK9, the catalytic subunit of the SEC, in HSJD-DIPG007, SF8628, and BT245 cells (Fig S1B). Following transduction with both nonoverlapping shCDK9 constructs, comparable decreases in cell proliferation were observed (Fig 2F).
Figure 2. SEC is critical for DMG cell proliferation and clonogenic potential.

A. Decrease in AFF4 mRNA levels in SU-DIPG4, HSJD-DIPG007, BT245, and SF8628 cell lines following transduction with two non-overlapping shRNA lentiviral constructs in comparison to shNull control (two-tailed t-test, *p<0.05, **p<0.001, ***p<0.0001). B. Clonogenic potential following shAFF4 knockdown as measured by adherent colony formation (two-tailed t-test, *p<0.05, **p<0.001, ***p<0.0001). C. Rate of adherent growth in SU-DIPG4, HSJD-DIPG007, and SF8628 cells treated with shNull or shAFF4. Data are displayed as mean ± SEM. D. Representative fluorescent live-cell imaging from HSJD-DIPG007 cells following respective lentiviral transduction (scale bar, 400 μm). E. Co-immunoprecipitation with either anti-AFF4 or IgG control antibodies followed by immunoblot for P-TEFb member proteins. F. Rate of growth in BT245, HSJD-DIPG007, and SF8628 cells treated with shNull or shCDK9 constructs. Data are displayed as mean ± SEM. Experiments A-D and F were repeated for at least two cell lines, with all data shown representing minimum n=3 replicates.
To identify the transcriptional programs under SEC regulatory control in H3K27M-mutant DMG, we evaluated the effect of AFF4 depletion on the transcriptional landscape via RNA sequencing (RNA-seq). We compared BT245 cells transduced with either shNull or shAFF4 and identified 600 upregulated and 1391 downregulated genes (fold change </> 2 and p-value <0.01) (Fig 3A). Similar to previous studies (Liang et al., 2018, Fowler et al., 2014), we observed that SEC regulates MYC and Myc-dependent programs, with decreases in MYC and Myc targets such as NPM2, CCND2, and FASN seen following AFF4 knockdown. Upregulated Myc signaling may harbor relevance in a subset of DMGs (Saratsis et al., 2014), but the changes we observed downstream of Myc following AFF4 depletion in this model were comparatively modest. In contrast, in addition to the expected defects in processive transcription, Gene Ontology (GO) and Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) of differentially-expressed genes demonstrated a higher-ranked enrichment in transcriptional programs involved in neuroglial differentiation (Fig 3B–C). We observed a decrease in expression of genes important for regulating progenitor cell state and self-renewal, including the Shh-responsive elements PTCH2, GLI1, and SIX5. Reciprocal increases in markers of neuroglial differentiation, such as GFAP, NGFR, and NRN1, as well as mediators of proliferation and differentiation, including CDKN1A and CDKN2B, were likewise noted following depletion of AFF4 (Fig 3D). In order to validate these findings, we seeded both control and AFF4-depleted cells in neurosphere conditions, a surrogate environment for assaying self-renewal, and observed a significant decrease in both the frequency of neurosphere initiating cells (BT245, Fig 3E) and neurosphere growth (SU-DIPG4, HSJD-DIPG007, BT245, Fig 3F–G). Studies in Drosophila have described Pol II pausing release as a critical regulatory mechanism for developmental control genes, including tissue specification and CNS midline patterning (Levine, 2011, Zeitlinger et al., 2007, Chopra et al., 2009). Multiple groups have shown that H3K27M-mutant DMG tumors are enriched in proliferative, stem-like cells with a relative paucity of mature, differentiated astrocytes or oligodendrocytes (Filbin et al., 2018). Our data suggests that the SEC may play a role in maintaining this observed differentiation arrest.
Figure 3. AFF4 depletion induces transcriptional profiles of cellular differentiation and decreases potential for self-renewal.

A. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering of 1,671 differentially expressed genes from BT245 cells treated with either shNull or shAFF4 (n=3, fold change </> 2 and p-value <0.01). Gene set enrichment analysis results (B) and select enrichment plots (C) of differentiation- and Myc-associated gene sets, ordered by normalized enrichment score (NES). D. Differentially-expressed genes in differentiation-, stemness-, or Myc target-associated gene sets as defined by GSEA. Select illustrative genes with fold change </> 1 and p-value <0.01 are labeled. E. Neurosphere formation efficacy by extreme limiting dilution assay (X2 shNull vs shAFF4 #1 p=0.035, vs shAFF4 #2 p=0.008). F. Normalized growth in neurosphere size of cells grown in suspension following transduction with shRNA constructs. Data are displayed as mean ± SEM. (two-tailed t-test, *p<0.05, **p<0.001). G. Representative images of neurospheres from SU-DIPG4 cells transduced with shRNA constructs containing a GFP reporter (scale bar, 400 μm). Experiments A-E performed with n=3 technical replicates. Experiments F and G were independently repeated for at least two cell lines with minimum n=3 technical replicates.
CDK9 pharmacologic inhibition recapitulates phenotypic effects of SEC genetic depletion
AFF4 functions as a scaffold protein to which other SEC member units bind. It contains a long, intrinsically disordered N-terminal region responsible for interaction with other SEC subunits as well as a highly conserved C-terminal homology domain that interfaces with DNA and RNA (Chen and Cramer, 2019). It is not, as of yet, directly targetable with clinically relevant compounds (Liang et al., 2018). CDK9, however, serves as the catalytic subunit of the SEC (Fig 4A) (Luo et al., 2012, Lin et al., 2010). Dysregulated CDK9-mediated signaling has been described in numerous malignancies, prompting continued development of several CDK9 pharmacologic inhibitors (CDK9i) with increasing specificity (Morales and Giordano, 2016, Bradner et al., 2017, Lin et al., 2010, Narita et al., 2017, Huang et al., 2014). We sought to determine whether our findings from SEC genetic depletion could be replicated using a small-molecule therapeutic agent. We screened five commercially-available CDK9i compounds against a panel of six H3K27M-mutant cell lines and observed broad sensitivity in the sub- to low-micromolar range (Fig 4B). From this we chose two highly-selective agents currently in phase I clinical trials, atuveciclib and AZD4573 (median IC50 769 nM and 9.5 nM, respectively), for further study (Fig 4C). We then performed RNA-sequencing following atuveciclib treatment in three H3K27M+ cell lines (SU-DIPG4, HSJD-DIPG007, and BT245) and identified approximately 1000 genes differentially expressed following CDK9 inhibition (range 918 – 1,447 genes, log fold change >1 and p < 0.05) (Fig S2). Gene Ontology meta-analysis revealed significant enrichment in gene sets involved in neuroglial differentiation programs, most notably synaptic signaling and cell projection or axonogenesis, along with signatures associated with cellular proliferation that were conserved across all three cell lines (Fig 4D). When compared within a given cell line, CDK9i treatment effectively phenocopied the transcriptomic effects of AFF4 shRNA knockdown on differentiation programs, with Metascape gene ontology analysis of common genes up- or downregulated by both genetic depletion and drug treatment again underscoring core signatures involved in regulating neuroglial morphogenesis (Fig 4E and Table S2). Atuveciclib treatment likewise diminished capacity for self-renewal in DMG cultures as assessed by both aldehyde dehydrogenase activity, a marker of the brain tumor initiating cell fraction with a given cell population (Choi et al., 2014) (Fig 4F), and neurosphere formation efficacy (Fig 4G).
Figure 4. CDK9i treatment recapitulates phenotypic effects of SEC genetic depletion.

A. CDK9 catalyzes phosphorylation of serine 2 in the carboxyl-terminal domain of RNA Pol II. B. Screen of five commercially available CDK9 inhibitors (atuveciclib, LDC000067, flavopiridol, PHA-767491, and AZD4573) against six H3K27M-mutant cell lines. Heatmap shown as relative cell viability vs DMSO. C. Sensitivity of DMG cultures to atuveciclib (left) and AZD4573 (right) as measured by half maximal inhibitory concentrations. D. Gene ontology terms significantly enriched across all three cell lines following atuveciclib treatment, ordered by −log10(p value). E. Metascape gene ontology network cluster constructed from common genes up- or downregulated by both shAFF4 knockdown and atuveciclib treatment. Each node denotes an enriched term, and networked clusters are indicated by different colors. F. Identification of brain tumor initiating cell fraction in SU-DIPG4 and BT245 cells by ALDH expression (ALDEFLUOR assay) demonstrates decrease in ALDH+ fraction following atuveciclib treatment compared to DMSO. G. Neurosphere formation efficacy by extreme limiting dilution assay following atuveciclib treatment of SU-DIPG4 (X2 p=0.008) and HSJD-DIPG007 (χ2 p=0.01) cells. Experiments B, C, and G performed with minimum n=3 biological replicates. Experiments in C were independently repeated for at least two cell lines. Experiment D reflects n=3 independent biological replicates in each of three cell lines. Experiments E and F performed with minimum n=3 technical replicates.
The H3K27M mutation perturbs epigenetic regulation of AFF4
We then asked why normal developmental regulation by the SEC might be perturbed within the context of the H3K27M mutation. An interplay of activating and repressive histone post-translational modifications contributes to the net epigenetic signature and final transcriptional output from a given locus. H3K27M-mediated loss of the repressive H3K27-trimethyl mark is frequently accompanied by reciprocal gains of the activating H3K27-acetylation residue as a driver of gene expression changes in H3K27M+ DMG (Lewis et al., 2013, Krug et al., 2019, Piunti et al., 2017). Isogenic models examining H3K27M-mediated H3K27ac changes have shown that the majority of this deposition is restricted to cell state and lineage genes rather than affecting de novo genomic elements (Krug et al., 2019). To begin examining the role that H3K27 modifications might play in normal AFF4 regulation, we first analyzed reference chromatin-immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIP-seq) datasets from neuroepithelial stem cells (ENCODE Project ENCSR978RSW), hPSC-derived oligodendrocyte precursor cells (iOPCs) (Nagaraja et al., 2019), and surgical samplings of mature brain from various anatomical regions (ENCODE Project ENCSR107PPJ, ENCSR374BLY, ENCSR528DQE, ENCSR234PGX)(2012). In either the neuroepithelial stem cell or iOPC state, the AFF4 promoter bears an activating signature with broad H3K27ac deposition. In contrast, these H3K27ac peaks are markedly decreased across differentiated brain tissues (Fig 5A), suggesting a role for measured epigenetic downregulation during normal CNS development. When compared to the pattern of deposition observed in multiple patient-derived H3K27M+ DMG samples, the AFF4 promotor consistently shows broad H3K27ac occupancy, partially recapitulating the activating precursor cell signature (Fig 5B). We then tested whether this predicted pattern of H3K27M-mediated AFF4 expression could be replicated experimentally. We utilized a lentiviral vector to introduce the H3.3K27M oncohistone into both H3 wild-type pediatric glioblastoma cells (HSJD-GBM001) and immortalized normal human astrocytes. In each case, the expected histone post-translational modifications were accompanied by a corresponding increase in AFF4 mRNA and protein product (Fig 5C).
Figure 5. The H3K27M mutation alters epigenetic regulation of AFF4 promoter.

A. H3K27ac deposition at the AFF4 promoter in neuroepithelial stem cells, OPCs, and differentiated brain regions (identical reads and scale for each sample tract). B. H3K27ac deposition at the AFF4 promoter in patient-derived DMG cultures (identical reads and scale for each sample tract). C. AFF4 mRNA transcripts (left) and protein expression (right) in H3F3A wild-type HSJD-GBM01 and normal human astrocytes following lentiviral transduction of the H3K27M transgene. Vertical lines indicate additional lanes removed for clarity. D. Genome-wide occupancy of H3K27me3 and H3K27ac before and after wild-type H3F3A re-expression in H3K27M mutant cells. E. Average distribution of H3K27me3 and H3K27ac peaks surrounding the transcription start site (TSS). F. AFF4 promotor region before and after wild-type H3F3A re-expression demonstrates partial restoration of H3K27me3 peak, decrease in H3K27ac residue, and decrease in transcript by RNA-seq. G. Decrease in AFF4 mRNA transcripts (left) and protein (right) following wild-type H3F3A re-expression. H. Half-maximal inhibitory concentrations of atuveciclib across H3K27M+ DMG cultures, H3F3A WT pediatric glioblastoma (GBM01), immortalized astrocytes (NHA), fibroblasts (NIH3T3), and epithelial cells (RPE-NEO). I. Half-maximal inhibitory concentrations of atuveciclib in immortalized human astrocytes before and after H3K27M expression. Experiments C and G (qPCR), F (RNA-seq) performed with n=3 technical replicates. Experiment H and I performed with minimum n=3 biological replicates.
In order to more granularly characterize the effect of the H3K27M mutation on AFF4 epigenetic repression specifically within DMG, we next created an isogenic experimental model by re-expressing a wild-type H3F3A transgene in H3K27M-mutant HSJD-DIPG007 cells. While not completely excising the dominant-negative effect of the H3K27M mutation, this resulted in a transient window of a genome-wide restoration of H3K27me3 and decrease in H3K27ac at transcriptional start sites as measured by ChIP-seq (Fig 5D–E). Partial restoration of H3K27me3 marks at the AFF4 gene locus was accompanied by a significant concordant loss of H3K27ac and a decrease in AFF4 mRNA transcripts and protein expression (Fig 5F–G), consistent with reversion to a histone-modification-mediated repressed state.
Finally, we then examined sensitivity to CDK9 inhibition across a range of H3K27M-mutant DMG, H3 wild-type GBM, immortalized astrocyte, and non-glial cell cultures, and we observed a gradation of CDK9i response (Fig 4H). Normal astrocytes were modestly sensitized to CDK9i therapy following expression of the H3K27M mutation, consistent with an oncohistone-mediated effect (Fig 5G). Taken together, these data support a model in which the H3K27M mutation perturbs the epigenetic regulation AFF4 undergoes across neuroglial development and instead may allow the aberrantly-expressed SEC to contribute to DMG stem-like state maintenance. The presence of the H3K27M mutation exaggerates, but is not required for, response to CDK9 pharmacologic inhibition, suggesting this may reflect a lineage or cell state dependency, similar to observations from other epigenetic agents with therapeutic promise in DMG (Anastas et al., 2019, Krug et al., 2019).
Permissive CDK9 mediation of transcriptional elongation facilitates cell growth and impedes terminal morphogenesis
Given the mechanistic role of CDK9 in Pol II pausing release, we next examined the consequences of CDK9i treatment on processive transcriptional elongation. Productive transcription by RNA Pol II requires stepwise regulatory inputs. An initiation signal is first provided by CDK7 phosphorylation of Pol II CTD at the serine 5 position (Ser5). An elongation signal is then provided by CDK9 mediated phosphorylation at serine 2 (Ser2) (Malumbres, 2014). Following CDK9 inhibition by atuveciclib treatment, we observed a dose-dependent abrogation of the phospho-Ser2 elongation signal with a relative preservation of the phospho-Ser5 signal for transcriptional initiation (Fig 6A). Together, these suggest that CDK9 inhibition by atuveciclib results in a highly selective targeting of RNA Pol II pausing release without a broader disruption of transcription initiation.
Figure 6. Permissive CDK9 mediation of transcriptional elongation impairs normal morphogenesis in DMG.

A. Immunoblot of RNA Pol II CTD phosphorylation at the serine 2 (Ser2) and serine 5 (Ser5) positions following increasing doses of atuveciclib. Quantification (right) of pausing release at increasing doses of atuveciclib as measured by the ratio of Pol II phosphorylation at Ser2 relative to total Pol II. B. Heatmap of Pol II ChIP-seq in HSJD-DIPG007 clustered by distribution relative to transcriptional start site (TSS). Average distribution across gene body shown for each cluster. C. Average distribution and empirical cumulative distribution function (ECDF) plot of pausing indices for CDK9i-responsive clusters show significant increase in promoter-proximal pausing following atuveciclib treatment (two-sided Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, HSJD-DIPG007 p=8.3x10−8 and SU-DIPG4 p=2.2x10−16). C. Circos plot of gene ontology meta-analysis of genes with decreased expression by RNA-seq or increased Pol II pausing by ChIP-seq in HSJD-DIPG007. Purple connections indicate shared genes in both lists. Blue connections indicated common enriched biological processes. D. Meta-analysis reveals enrichment in networks mediating synaptic signaling and glioneuronal morphogenesis. Each node denotes an enriched term, and node color indicates enrichment contribution from respective gene list. E. Illustrative promoters at NES, PCDH1, and NDRG4 loci demonstrate increased RNA Pol II pausing and decreased mRNA transcript following atuveciclib treatment. Experiments in A were independently repeated. Experiments B-F performed in two cell lines (see also Fig S3).
To assess the impact of CDK9 inhibition on Pol II distribution across the chromatin landscape, we then performed ChIP-seq using Pol II antibody in DMSO- or atuveciclib-treated HSJD-DIPG007 and SU-DIPG4 cells. Consistent with whole-cell immunoblots of Pol II phosphorylation, while a modest decrease in global Pol II occupancy was observed, more than 81% and 74% of peaks present in the control state were preserved following atuveciclib treatment within a respective cell line. Unsupervised clustering of genes by distribution of Pol II occupancy revealed a hierarchy in the transcriptional architecture of DMG while clearly identifying a subset of CDK9i-responsive, pausing-mediated genes (Fig 6B, Fig S3A, and Table S3A). The majority of the genome displayed either an absence of Pol II (10,192 or 12,201 genes, HSJD-DIPG007 and SU-DIPG4 respectively) or detectable Pol II loading without evidence of downstream elongation (5,388 or 4,251 genes). The remaining genes with active Pol II procession into the gene body reflected both genes involved in essential cellular processes as well as a neuroglial cell lineage, but these clustered into three broad categories. The cluster (990 or 538 genes) characterized by the greatest Pol II occupancy distributed broadly across the gene body was enriched for both housekeeping genes (GAPDH, mitochondrial and ribosomal proteins) as well as markers of oligodendrocyte-lineage commitment (OLIG2, NKX2.2)(Table S3B) and was largely unaffected by atuveciclib treatment. A second cluster (1,284 or 1,001 genes) exhibited engaged Pol II elongation without as markedly constitutive deposition. This cluster contained genes evidencing further lineage specification (OLIG1, SOX10) as well as a strong anterior-posterior regionalization signature (ALX3, HOXA4, HOXB1, and other HOX genes)(Table S3C), and it exhibited a comparatively modest shift towards increased promoter-proximal pausing following atuveciclib exposure. The final cluster of 1,950 (or 1,812) genes, however, showed a marked reduction in Pol II egress into the gene body in comparison to normalized loading at the TSS. This transcriptional pausing may be quantified by defining a pausing index as a ratio of Pol II occupancy within the promoter-proximal region as compared to the gene body (Muse et al., 2007). Empirical cumulative distribution function (ECDF) analysis of pausing indices within this cluster of genes confirmed a significant shift towards increased promoter-proximal pausing after atuveciclib treatment in both cell lines (Fig 6C).
We then examined this cluster of CDK9i-responsive, pausing-mediated genes in comparison to expression changes observed by RNA-seq. Gene ontology meta-analysis delineated a subset of shared pausing-mediated genes at the core of common enriched biologic processes (Fig 6C, Fig S3B, and Table S3D). These processes reflected a network of gene programs with significant enrichment for neuroglial morphogenesis, with highest-ranked common enrichment in terms associated with synaptic signaling, regulation of synaptic plasticity, and the cellular morphogenesis involved in neuron projection and axonogenesis (Fig 6D–E, Fig S3C, and Table S3E). Together, these data affirm that the CDK9-mediated permissive regulation of transcriptional elongation at these genes contributes to the differentiation arrest observed in DMG and support the possibility that this might be reversed through CDK9i treatment.
CDK9 inhibition can be employed for therapeutic effect in orthotopic xenograft models of DMG
Finally, we sought to determine whether this transcriptional dependency might be exploited for therapeutic effect in vivo. BT245 cultures were transduced with a luciferase-expressing construct and injected stereotactically into athymic nude mouse pons, generating orthotopic xenografts which anatomically and histopathologically model DIPG (Fig 7A). Mice were randomized sequentially 6-8 days following tumor cell implantation to either CDK9i treatment or vehicle control. An initial xenograft cohort receiving atuveciclib therapy (30 mg/kg/dose OG, three daily doses followed by a two-day break) showed only modest survival benefit in comparison to those receiving vehicle control (median survival increase of 2 days or 5%, log-rank *p=0.043). However, a second cohort treated with AZD4573 (20 mg/kg IP, three times weekly) exhibited a more dramatic benefit to overall survival (median survival increase of 8.5 days or 25%, log-rank *p=0.034) (Fig 7B–C), perhaps suggestive of a greater translational potential for this agent. A patient-analogous response characterization of murine xenografts using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with volumetric analysis was performed and showed decreased tumor growth, reduced peritumoral edema, and less invasion of surrounding anatomic structures in mice receiving CDK9i therapy (Fig 7D and Fig S4). CDK9i-treated mice experienced lymphopenia, but no significant weight loss or other treatment-associated toxicities were observed (Fig S5). Histologically normal-appearing neurons were observed throughout the remainder of the pons, with no evidence of treatment-related effect on uninvolved pontine tissue.
Figure 7. CDK9i therapy demonstrates anti-tumor effect in orthotopic xenograft models of DMG.

A. Whole-brain sagittal H&E staining of engrafted BT245 cells shows diffusely infiltrative tumor centered in the pons (arrow) with invasion into the midbrain and thalamus. Arrows in high-power field indicate normal pontine axons surrounded by infiltrating glioma cells (asterisks). Immunohistochemical staining demonstrates H3K27M, Olig2-positive infiltrating tumor cells with normal endothelial cells, neurons, and glia seen in the background (scale bar, 20 μm). B. Survival analysis of atuveciclib- (median 43 days vs 41 days, log-rank test *p=0.043, n=9 and 10, respectively) and AZD4573-treated cohorts vs vehicle control (median 43 days vs 34.5 days, log-rank test *p=0.034, n=4 and 6, respectively). C. Bioluminescent flux values from vehicle control, atuveciclib, and AZD4573-treated cohorts. Data are displayed as mean ± SEM. D. Sagittal (left) and axial (middle) T2-weighted turboRARE MRI sequences with concurrent bioluminescent imaging (right) of selected mice from vehicle control (top) and CDK9i-treated (bottom) cohorts. White text insert represents tumor volume at given timepoint. MRI volumetric analysis (right) demonstrates trend towards decreased tumor volume in each CDK9i-treated cohort (n=3 each, atuveciclib v control one-tailed t-test p=0.15, AZD4573 v control 0.056).
Discussion
Decades of clinical trials have failed to improve outcomes or identify effective medical therapies for children diagnosed with DMG (Jansen et al., 2012, Bartels et al., 2011). Insights stemming from the identification of the oncohistone H3K27M as the unifying driver of these tumors, however, have introduced the potential for therapies targeting the dysregulated epigenetic milieu imparted by these recurrent mutations. Recognition of the aberrancies introduced across the epigenetic regulatory landscape by the H3K27M mutation has led several groups to explore and define epigenetic therapies such as histone demethylase inhibition (Hashizume et al., 2014) or histone deacetylase inhibition (Grasso et al., 2015, Nagaraja et al., 2017, Lin et al., 2019, Anastas et al., 2019) as promising therapeutic strategies for DMG. Several of these agents are now moving forward in phase I clinical trials (NCT02717455, NCT03632317, NCT03566199) but have yet to demonstrate clinical efficacy. As such, there exists continued interest in alternative means of targeting these tumors, including the proximate transcriptional dependencies of this disease state (Nagaraja et al., 2017). Our data establishes that machinery involved in the positive control of transcriptional elongation may be aberrantly regulated in DMG, identifying a consequent dependency that can be targeted for therapeutic effect.
Transcriptional regulation is a complex synthesis of numerous oppositional or enhancing regulatory inputs. In normal cellular contexts, the super elongation complex incorporates the CDK9-containing P-TEFb from an inactive, sequestered pool in order to promote rapid transcriptional induction (Chen et al., 2018, Zhou et al., 2012). Many developmentally-regulated genes are marked by paused RNA Pol II within their promotor-proximal regions (Lin et al., 2011, Muse et al., 2007, Boettiger and Levine, 2009, Zeitlinger et al., 2007, Core et al., 2008, Levine, 2011), which may allow for the synchronous induction of gene programs within a distinct cell population (Lin et al., 2011, Boettiger and Levine, 2009). In Drosophila, genes containing promotor-paused Pol II are highly overrepresented by developmental control genes, including Hox genes, tissue specification determinants, and morphogenic signaling pathways. Systematic studies of segmentation and tissue specification in these models have suggested that organized pausing release may serve as a key regulatory strategy for embryonic developmental checkpoints (Levine, 2011, Chopra et al., 2009, Zeitlinger et al., 2007). Our data suggests that in DMG, disordered SEC-mediated signaling may disrupt the carefully orchestrated, context-dependent activation under which pausing-regulated expression programs ought to normally proceed.
The SEC was originally characterized as a consequence of the frequent in-frame MLL-SEC-member fusions identified in MLL-rearranged childhood leukemias, where it was found to mediate the transcriptional changes observed in that disease (Lin et al., 2010, Luo et al., 2012). Misregulation of transcriptional elongation checkpoint control has since been implicated in several neoplastic models, including leukemias, lymphomas, hepatocellular carcinoma, and breast cancer (Smith et al., 2011, Lin et al., 2010, Narita et al., 2017, Huang et al., 2014, Liang et al., 2018). Consistent with these studies, we find that models of DMG are likewise exquisitely dependent on processive transcriptional elongation mediated by permissive SEC signaling. While we observe a connection between H3K27M-induced epigenetic reprogramming and AFF4 expression in our culture systems, this does not appear to be necessary to confer sensitivity to CDK9 inhibition. In light of the differential sensitivity we observe comparing a range of pediatric glioma cultures to differentiated non-glial cells, this suggests that CDK9-mediated transcriptional dependency may be a common feature shared across transformed glial-lineage models and not an H3K27M-specific phenomenon. This mirrors responses seen with preclinical modeling of other epigenetically-directed therapies such as histone deacetylase or BET inhibition, in which sensitivity appears to be lineage constrained but H3-mutation status agnostic (Krug et al., 2019, Anastas et al., 2019).
As a result of the growing clinical interest in more nuanced therapeutic manipulation of cellular transcription, multiple CDK9 small-molecule pharmacologic inhibitors have entered the drug development pipeline (Morales and Giordano, 2016, Bradner et al., 2017). Unlike the chemical tools often used to study transcription, many of these are clinically relevant compounds. To date, at least six CDK9 inhibitors have demonstrated sufficient antineoplastic activity to be carried forward in phase I or II clinical trials (Morales and Giordano, 2016, Karp et al., 2012, Lanasa et al., 2015, Dickson et al., 2011, Fabre et al., 2014, Heath et al., 2008). Of the newer generation, highly-selective inhibitors, atuveciclib and AZD4573 are both advancing in clinical development, with adult phase I trials currently in progress (NCT01938638, NCT02345382, NCT03263637). The clinical progress and safety of these agents attests to a therapeutic window between transcriptionally-addicted malignancies and the basal transcriptional needs of normal, differentiated cells. The efficacy and in vivo tolerability of AZD4573 demonstrated in this study, in light of the growing clinical experience with the dosing and safety profiles of this class of medications, positions this agent as ideally suited for rapid translation to pediatric trials.
In summary, we have used a targeted, unbiased screening approach to epigenetic regulation in H3K27M-mutant DMG to identify the SEC as a targetable dependency. Permissive SEC signaling appears to drive a transcriptional program which contributes to DMG stem-cell maintenance. Inhibition of this pro-oncogenic signaling via CDK9i treatment restores promotor-proximal pausing of Pol II and permits cellular differentiation programs to proceed. The anti-tumor activity demonstrated in orthotopic xenograft models of DMG using clinically-relevant CDK9 inhibitors could prove transformative if translated into clinical trials for children diagnosed with this devastating disease.
STAR Methods
Lead Contact and Materials Availability
Further information and requests for resources and reagents should be directed to and will be fulfilled by the Lead Contact, Rajeev Vibhakar (rajeev.vibharkar@ucdenver.edu).
This study did not generate new unique reagents.
Experimental Models and Subject Details
Cell lines and primary patient samples.
DMG cells were maintained as previously described (Amani et al., 2016). Briefly, SU-DIPG4 cells were provided by Dr. Michelle Monje (Stanford University, California) and cultured in tumor stem media (TSM) consisting of Neurobasal(-A) (Invitrogen), B27(-A) (Invitrogen), human-basic FGF (20 ng/mL; Shenandoah Biotech), human-EGF (20 ng/mL; Shenandoah Biotech), human PDGF-AB (20 ng/mL; Shenandoah Biotech) and heparin (10 ng/mL). HSJD-DIPG007 cells were provided by Dr. Angel Montero Carcaboso (Sant Joan de Déu, Barcelona) and maintained in TSM media as above with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS)(Atlanta Biologicals). SF8628 cells were provided by Dr. Nalin Gupta (University of California, San Francisco) and maintained in Dulbecco’s modified eagle medium (DMEM)(Gibco/ThermoFisher) and supplemented with 10% FBS, MEM non-essential amino acids (Gibco/ThermoFisher) and antibiotic/antimicotic (Gibco/ThermoFisher). BT245 cells were provided by Dr. Adam Green (University of Colorado) and grown in NeuroCult NS-A media (Stemcell Technologies) supplemented with penicillin-streptomycin (1:100), heparin (2 μg/mL), human epidermal growth factor (EGF; 20 ng/mL), and human basic fibroblast growth factor (FGFb; 10 ng/mL). Cells were grown in either adherent monolayer conditions (Falcon/Corning) or as tumor neurospheres (ultra-low attachment flasks, Corning) as indicated. All cell lines were validated by DNA fingerprinting through the University of Colorado Molecular Biology Service Center utilizing the STR DNA Profiling PowerPlex-16 HS Kit (DC2101, Promega)(Table S4).
Orthotopic xenograft model.
Female athymic nude mice aged 4 to 8 weeks were anesthetized with 4% and maintained with 1 to 3% isoflurane (1 L/min oxygen flow). Mice were immobilized on a Kopf Model 940 Stereotaxic Frame with a Model 923 mouse gas anesthesia head holder and Kopf 940 Digital Display. Artificial Tears ophthalmic ointment was applied to the eyes. A linear incision was made to expose the skull and 30% hydrogen peroxide used to identify lambda. To target the pons, a 1.0 mm diameter burr was drilled in the cranium using a Dremel drill outfitted with a dental drill bit at 1.000 mm to the right and 0.800 mm posterior to lambda. A suspension of BT245 cells was prepared by suspending in NeuroCult NS-A serum-free media as described above to a concentration of 100,000 cells/2 μl/injection and slowly injected 5.000 mm ventral to the surface of the skull using an UltraMicroPump III and a Micro4 Controller (World Precision Instruments) equipped with a Hamilton syringe and a 26 gauge needle. The burr hole was sealed with bone wax and 1 mg/kg bupivacaine applied. The incision closed with 5-0 poly vicryl sutures (Ethicon) and a topical antibiotic applied. Post-surgical pain was controlled with SQ carprofen (5 mg/kg/daily) on the day of and for 2 days following the procedure. University of Colorado Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) approval was obtained and maintained throughout the conduct of the study.
Method Details
shRNA screening.
SU-DIPG4 cell line was transduced with a pooled lentiviral shRNA library consisting of ~4200 shRNAS targeting 408 epigenetic genes (approximately 4–10 shRNAs per gene, 4188 total shRNAs). Cells were infected with the pooled shRNA lentiviral library with a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 0.3 using polybrene on day 1. One aliquot (control) of cells was collected for isolating genomic DNA at 4 days, and the transduced cells were selected with puromycin treatment. These cells were maintained for a further 21 days (passaging every 3 days). Cells were passaged to maintain an MOI of 0.3 at all times to ensure that each transduced cell had a single genomic integration from the shRNA expressing the same gene. The cells were then collected at 9 days and finally at 21 days (approximately 6 doubling times) after transduction. Genomic DNA was isolated from these transduced cells 4 and 21 days after transduction, processed to amplify individual shRNAs with two rounds of PCR, and sequenced with an Illumina Hiseq instrument. The sequencing results were analyzed using R2 by comparing the shRNAs present on day 4 to day 21, with FDRs of 0.5 and 0.1, respectively.
shRNA transduction.
HEK293 FT cells were used to produce the viral particles by packaging the vectors, PSPAX2 and PMD2.G with the shRNA plasmids. shNull and shAFF4 plasmids were purchased from transOMIC (RLGH-GU01145 and ULTRA-3271665). shCDK9 plasmids were purchased from the University of Colorado Functional Genomics Core Facility (TRCN0000000494 and TRCN0000000498). H3K27M transgene and H3F3A-overexpression vectors were kindly provided by Dr. C. David Allis (Rockefeller University, NY). Approximately 750,000 target DMG cells were seeded onto a 10 cm2 tissue culture plate (Falcon/Corning, Durham NC) and transduced using polybrene. Virus-containing media was removed at 24 hours, and cells were selected in puromycin 1 ug/mL after 48 hours and subsequently maintained in puromycin-containing media.
Proliferation assays.
Cell proliferation assessed using xCELLigence Real-Time Cell Analysis (RTCA) machine and software. Cells (2,000 – 6,000 cell/well) were seeded onto a gold-plated 16- or 96-well E-plate, and impedance of cells are measured over time. Cell index calculations performed using RTCA software.
Colony focus assay.
Cells were treated to achieve stable shRNA transductions as described above. Then 500 cells/well were seeded on a 6-well tissue culture plate (Corning Costar/Fisher) and allowed to grow for 14 days. At that time, cells were stained with 0.25% crystal violet, and colonies containing >25 cells were manually counted under light microscopy.
Neurosphere assay.
Cells were treated to achieve stable shRNA transductions as described above. 250 cells/well were seeded on a 96-well ultra-low-attachment round-bottom tissue culture plate (Corning) and centrifuged to promote neurosphere formation. Plates were then monitored on IncuCyte S3 Live Cell Analysis System for 14 days. Measurements of neurosphere size over time using GFP reporter were calculated by the IncuCyte S3 software and normalized against day 1 values to determine growth.
Aldehyde dehydrogenase assay.
The ALDH activity of was measured using Aldefluor kit (Stem Cell Technologies) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. Briefly, 1 × 105 cells were resuspended in 0.5 ml Aldefluor buffer, separated equally into two tubes, one of which was added 5 ul of DEAB reagent as negative control. Then 1.25 ul of Aldefluor Reagent was added to each tube and mixed well. After incubation at 37°C for 45 min and centrifugation, cells were stained with propidium iodide and then analyzed on the Guava easyCyte HT flow cytometer (Luminex).
Extreme limiting dilution assay (ELDA).
For shRNA studies, cells were treated to achieve stable shRNA transductions as described above. For drug treatment studies, cells were treated with indicated concentration prior to re-plating. Limiting dilution assay was then performed as previously described(Hu and Smyth, 2009). Briefly, cells were seeded on a 96-well ultra-low-attachment round-bottom tissue culture plate (Corning) in serum-free media at increasing numbers from 1 cell/well to 250 cells/well. Cells were seeded from n=5 wells (250 cells/well, 100 cells/well), n=10 wells (10-50 cells/well), or n=30 wells (1 cell/well) per condition. Cells were allowed to grow for 14 days, and the number of wells containing neurospheres was counted manually under light microscopy. Published ELDA software (http://bioinf.wehi.edu.au/software/elda/) was used to calculate comparative self-renewal potential of cells.
Co-Immunoprecipitation.
Immunoprecipitation experiments were performed with whole cell extracts. Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated using Universal Magnetic Co-IP Kit (Active Motif 54002), then analyzed by western blot. Immunoprecipitation was performed using anti-AFF4 antibody and normal rabbit IgG (see Key Resources Table). Antibody/extract mixtures were incubated with complete Co-IP/wash buffer on a 4 degree shaker for 4 hours. Magnetic protein G beads were added and incubated another hour, then washed using the complete co-IP/wash buffer and a magnetic stand. Bead pellets were re-suspended in 1X reducing loading buffer for immunoblotting.
KEY RESOURCES TABLE
| REAGENT or RESOURCE | SOURCE | IDENTIFIER |
|---|---|---|
| Antibodies | ||
| AFF4 mouse mAb (Western) | Santa Cruz | Santa Cruz (G-1): sc-390310 |
| AFF4 rabbit pAb (Co-IP) | Atlas Antibodies | HPA029634 RRID: AB_2673129 |
| CDK9 rabbit mAb | Abcam | Abcam [EPR3119Y] (ab76320) RRID:AB_1267054 |
| phospho-Rbp1 CTD (Ser2) rabbit mAb | Cell Signaling | Cell Signaling (E1Z3G) #13499 |
| phospho-Rbp1 CTD (Ser5) rabbit mAb | Cell Signaling | Cell Signaling (D9N5I) #13523S |
| α-Tubulin mouse mAb | Cell Signaling | Cell Signaling (DM1A) #3873S |
| Olig2 rabbit Ab | Immuno-Biological | IBL #18953 RRID:AB_2267671 |
| Histone 3.3, K27M mutant rabbit pAb | Millipore | EMD Millipore ABE419 RRID:AB_2728728 |
| Histone H3 rabbit pAb | Active Motif | Active Motif #39163 RRID:AB_2614978 |
| Histone H3 (acetyl K27) rabbit pAb (ChIP grade) | Abcam | Abcam (ab4729) |
| Tri-Methyl-Histone H3 (Lys27) rabbit mAb | Cell Signaling | Cell Signaling (C36B11) #9733 |
| RNA polymerase II CTD mouse mAb (ChIP grade) | Abcam | Abcam [8WG16] (ab817) RRID:AB_306327 |
| Chemicals, Peptides, and Recombinant Proteins | ||
| Atuveciclib (BAY-1143572) | MedChemExpress | HY-12871 CAS 1414943-88-6 |
| AZD4573 | MedChemExpress | HY-112088 CAS 2057509-72-3 |
| PHA-767491 | SelleckChem | S2742 CAS 942425-68-5 |
| Flavopiridol | SelleckChem | S1230 CAS 146426-40-6 |
| LDC000067 | SelleckChem | S7461 CAS 1073485-20-7 |
| Critical Commercial Assays | ||
| RNeasy Plus Mini Kit | Qiagen | Cat #74136 |
| Aldefluor Kit | Stemcell | Cat #01700 |
| High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit | Applied Biosystems | Cat #4368813 |
| Deposited Data | ||
| ChIP sequencing mapped raw data | This paper | GEO: GSE129777 |
| RNA sequencing mapped raw data | This paper | GEO: GSE129777 |
| Neuroepithelial stem cell ChIP-seq reference data | ENCODE project | https://www.encodeproject.org/reference-epigenomes/ENCSR978RSW/ |
| ENCODE reference epigenome brain ChIP-seq | ENCODE project | https://www.encodeproject.org/search/?type=ReferenceEpigenome |
| Published SU-DIPG4 and SF8628 ChIP-seq data | Piunti A, et al., 2017 | GEO: GSE78801 |
| Published iOPC and DIPG patient ChIP-seq data | Nagaraja et al., 2019 | GEO: GSE126319 |
| Experimental Models: Cell Lines | ||
| SU-DIPG4 | Michelle Monje (Nagaraja et al., 2017) | RRID:CVCL_IP14 |
| SU-DIPG13 | Michelle Monje (Nagaraja et al., 2017) | NA |
| HSJD-DIPG007 | Angel Montero Carcaboso | NA |
| SF7761 | Nalin Gupta (Olow et al., 2016) | RRID:CVCL_IT45 |
| SF8628 | Nalin Gupta (Olow et al., 2016) | RRID:CVCL_IT46 |
| BT245 | Adam Green (Green et al., 2015) | RRID:CVCL_IP13 |
| Experimental Models: Organisms/Strains | ||
| Athymic nude mice, nu/nu | Jackson Lab | JAX: #007850 |
| Oligonucleotides | ||
| shRNA AFF4 sequence #1: TGCTGTTGACAGTGAGCGCGAAGATTGACCTGAATCTTTATAGTGAAGCCACAGATGTATAAAGATTCAGGTCAATCTTCATGCCTACTGCCTCGGA | Transomic | Clone ID: RLGH-GU01445 |
| shRNA AFF4 sequence #2: TGCTGTTGACAGTGAGCGCCTGGAGAACAAAAAAGATATATAGTGAAGCCACAGATGTATATATCTTTTTTGTTCTCCAGTTGCCTACTGCCTCGGA | Transomic | Clone ID: ULTRA-3271665 |
| Non-targeting shRNA control | Transomic | Clone ID: TLNSU4420 |
| shRNA CDK9 #1 | University of Colorado Functional Genomics | TRCN0000000494 |
| shRNA CDK9 #2 | University of Colorado Functional Genomics | TRCN0000000498 |
| Non-targeting shRNA control | University of Colorado Functional Genomics | Clone ID: SHC002 |
| Human LVX-ZsGreen lentiviral shRNA-mir, Epigenetics-related gene pool | Transomic | TRH6110 |
| Software and Algorithms | ||
| Bowtie v2 | (Langmead et al., 2009) | http://bowtie-bio.sourceforge.net/index.shtml |
| Samtools v.1.5 | (Li et al., 2009) | https://github.com/samtools/samtools |
| BBDuk | N/A | http://igi.doe.gov/data-and-tools/bb-tools |
| MACS2 v2.1.1.20160309 | (Zhang et al., 2008) | http://liulab.dfci.harvard.edu/MACS/ |
| valr R package | N/A | https://cloud.r-project.org/package=valr |
| Bioconductor GenomicAlignments 1.18.1 | N/A | https://www.bioconductor.org/ |
| STAR 2.4.0.1 | N/A | https://github.com/alexdobin/STAR |
| R 3.3.3 | N/A | https://www.r-project.org/ |
| Extreme Limiting Dilution Analysis | (Hu and Smyth, 2009) | http://bioinf.wehi.edu.au/software/elda/ |
| Metascape | (Zhou et al., 2019) | http://metascape.org/gp/index.html |
| IGV v2.3.82 | (Thorvaldsdottir et al., 2013) | http://software.broadinstitute.org/software/igv/ |
| ImageJ with IHC Toolbox plugin | (Rueden et al., 2017) | https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/plugins/ihc-toolbox/index.html |
| GSEA | (Subramanian et al., 2005) | http://software.broadinstitute.org/gsea/index.jsp |
| Illustrator 23.0.3 | Adobe | NA |
| Prism 8.0 | GraphPad | NA |
| Other | ||
| xCELLigence RTCA E-Plate 16 | ACEA Biosciences | Cat 5469830001 |
Drug screening.
The small molecule inhibitors PHA-767491, flavopiridol, and LDC000067 were obtained from SelleckChem. The small molecule inhibitors atuveciclib (BAY-1143572) and AZD4573 were obtained from MedChemExpress. All drugs were dissolved in DMSO per vendor instructions to make stock concentrations for use in in vitro experiments. 5000 cells were seeded per well (n=4) in a 96 well plate, and the corresponding drug or DMSO control was added 24 hours later. Cells were allowed to grow for 5 days before adding an MTS reagent (Promega) and measuring absorbance at 492 nM on a BioTek Synergy H1 microplate reader (BioTek Instruments, VT). A ratio of absorbance in treated vs DMSO samples was used to generate a heatmap of screening results.
Transcriptome sequencing (RNA-seq).
Ribonucleic acid was isolated from cells in indicated experimental conditions using a Qiagen miRNAeasy kit (Valencia, CA) and measured on an Agilent Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies). Illumina Novaseq 6000 libraries were prepared and sequenced by Novogene (CA, USA) or Genomics and Microarray Core Facility at the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus. High-quality base calls at Q30 ≥ 80% were obtained with ~40 M paired-end reads. Sequenced 150bp pair-end reads were mapped to the human genome (GRCh38) by STAR 2.4.0.1, read counts were calculated by R Bioconductor package GenomicAlignments 1.18.1, and differential expression was analyzed with DESeq2 1.22.2 in R. Further analysis by GSEA was performed in GSEA v2.1.0 software with 1,000 data permutations.
Chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIP-seq).
The growth medium was aspirated from cells (70% confluence) and replaced with a 1% formaldehyde in 1X DPBS for 9 min at room temperature. The cross-linking was terminated by addition of glycine to a final concentration of 0.125 M and incubation for 5 min. The cells were washed twice with cold PBS and scraped in ChIP lysis buffer (1% SDS, 10 mM EDTA and 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.1) containing COmplete EDTA free protease inhibitors (Sigma). The cell lysates were sonicated with a Bioruptor Plus (Diagenode) for 25 cycles (30 seconds ON and 30 seconds OFF). The size of the sonicated DNA fragments was checked on an 1X TAE1 % agarose gel electrophoresis and ranged between 250 to 500 bp. After removing the debris via centrifugation, chromatin extracts were collected and protein concentration was determined by BCA protein assay reagents (Pierce).
For immunoprecipitation, chromatin extracts with 1 mg of total protein for each sample were incubated with primary antibodies (dilution 1:50) overnight at 4°C. Primary antibodies used are included in table under “Western blotting” below. After incubation with the primary antibody, 20 uL of pre-washed magnetic beads (Magna ChIP Protein A+G Magnetic Beads, Millipore Sigma) were added to each sample for 2 hours at 4°C. Using a magnetic rack, the immunoprecipitates were washed successively with 1 ml of low salt buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.0], 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% SDS, 1% triton X-100, 2 mM EDTA), high salt buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.0], 500 mM NaCl, 0.1% SDS, 1% triton X-100, 2 mM EDTA), LiCl washing buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.0], 250 mM LiCl, , 1.0% NP40, 1.0% deoxycholate, 1 mM EDTA) and twice with TE buffer. The DNA-protein complexes were eluted with 300 μl of IP elution buffer (1% SDS, 0.1 M NaHCO3). The eluents were pooled together and the cross-links were reversed by adding NaCl (a final concentration 0.2 M) into the eluents and incubating them at 65 °C overnight. The DNAs were recovered by proteinase K and RNase A digestion, followed by phenol/chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation. Pellets were resuspended in 50 μl of 10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.0]. ChIP-DNA was quantified using the Qubit dsDNA High Sensitivity Assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
ChIP-seq libraries were sequenced on the Illumina NovaSEQ6000 platform. To remove Illumina adapters and quality-trim the read ends, reads were filtered using BBDuk (http://jgi.doe.gov/data-and-tools/bb-tools). Bowtie2 was used to align the 150-bp paired-end sequencing reads to the hg38 reference human genome. Samtools (v.1.5) was used to remove unmapped mapped reads and to randomly extract the same number of reads for all samples. Peaks were called using MACS2 (v2.1.1.20160309)(Zhang et al., 2008) with default parameters. Peak locations were further annotated using the ChIPseeker R package (Yu et al., 2015). For pausing indices, the promoter region was defined as −200 bp upstream to +400 bp downstream and the body region was the remainder of the entire gene body. The pausing index was defined as the ratio of the average coverage of the promoter over the average coverage of the gene body. The average coverage of each promoter and each gene body was calculated with the valr R package (https://cloud.r-project.org/package=valr) using the bed_coverage function. ECDF plots were made in R version 3.5.0 using the ecdf function.
Quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
Ribonucleic acid was isolated from cells in indicated conditions using a Qiagen miRNAeasy kit (Valencia, CA). TaqMan gene expression primers and proves for AFF4 (Hs00969465_m1), CDK9 (Hs00977896_g1), and GAPDH (Hs02758991_g1) were purchased from Applied Biosystems (Carlsbad, CA). Assays were performed in triplicate according to manufacturer recommendations. GAPDH was used as an endogenous control and the gene expression relative quantity was calculated using the ΔΔCt method. Gene expression assays were performed on an ABI StepOnePlus Real-Time PCR system.
Western blotting.
Whole-cell protein lysates were harvested in lysis buffer (RIPA buffer supplemented with protease inhibitor (Roche), sodium vanadate and sodium molybdate) from cells in indicated experimental conditions. Histone proteins were isolated by acid extraction from cells. Protein concentrations were determined by BCA assay, and 1 - 3 μg of histone proteins and ~25-50 μg of non-histone proteins were used for western blotting. Protein was separated on a 4-20% PROTEAN TGX Gels (Biorad) and blotted using a wet transfer system (Biorad). See Key Resources table for antibodies utilized.
Xenograft model treatment.
Mice were randomized sequentially at 6-8 days following injection. Atuveciclib was suspended in DMSO per vendor recommendations. Treatment dosages were prepared with 80% polyethylene glycol 400 (Millipore), 10% sterile water, and 10% DMSO stock. Mice were treated with 30 mg/kg/dose via oral gavage daily for three days followed by two days break per cycle. Mice were treated with a total of 9 cycles or until they reached protocol endpoint. AZD4573 was prepared to 10% DMSO stock and diluted in 40% sterile water, 39% polyethylene glycol 400, and 1% Tween 80. Mice were treated with 20 mg/kg/dose IP three times weekly for total of 6 cycles or until reaching protocol endpoint. University of Colorado Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) approval was obtained and maintained throughout the conduct of the study.
Animal imaging.
All non-invasive MRI scans were performed on an ultra-high field Bruker 9.4 Tesla BioSpec MR scanner (Bruker Medical, Billerica, MA) equipped with a mouse head-array RF cryo-coil. The mouse was anesthetized with 2% isoflurane and placed on a temperature-controlled animal bed. Non-gadolinium multi-sequential MRI protocol was applied to acquire (i) high-resolution 3D T2-weighted turboRARE (Rapid Acquisition with Relaxation Enhancement, 52 micron in-plane resolution); (ii) sagittal FLAIR (Fluid Attenuated Inversion Recovery) for CSF suppression and edema; and (iii) axial fast spin echo DWI (Diffusion Weighted Imaging) with six b-values for tumor cellularity and edema. All MRI acquisitions and image analysis were performed using Bruker ParaVision 360NEO software. For volumetric assessments, free-hand drawn regions of interests (ROIs) were placed over the tumor or edema region on each axial slice. The total tumor or edema volume was reported in mm3 as the sum of all ROIs from individual slices multiplied by a slice thickness (0.7 mm, no slice gap). Oval or circular ROI were used for DWI analysis and calculations of the apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) in the tumor. The frankly hemorrhagic foci were excluded from ADC analysis. All MRI acquisitions and image analysis was performed by a radiologist blinded to the treatment assignment of the mice.
Immunohistochemistry.
Tissue was fixed in 10% formalin, sectioned by A.G., and submitted to the University of Colorado Denver Tissue Histology Shared Resource for staining.
Quantification and Statistical Analysis
Unless indicated otherwise in the figure legend, all in vitro data are presented as mean ± SEM. In vitro proliferation, clonogenic, neurosphere, qPCR, and aldehyde dehydrogenase assays, as well as drug screens and RNA sequencing were performed with a minimum of three independent samples, and key experiments were successfully replicated with independent samples on separate days. Value of n indicates independent culture plate/well or animal for in vitro and in vivo experiments, respectively. Unless otherwise specified, all statistical analysis was performed on GraphPad Prism 8.0 software (GraphPad, La Jolla, CA). For purposes of RNA-sequencing analysis, genes were considered significantly differentially expressed if meeting fold change </> 2 and p-value <0.01. Normalized enrichment scores and estimated false discovery rate as defined by GSEA are listed in figure panels. Kaplan-Meier survival curve comparisons were performed by log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test using GraphPad Prism 8.0 software.
Data and Code Availability
The accession number for the raw and processed ChIP-seq and RNA-seq data reported in this paper is GEO: GSE129777.
Supplementary Material
Table S1. Related to Figure 1. Epigenomic shRNA screen in DMG. Spreadsheet providing full list of genes included in shRNA screen, statistical cut-offs, and list and functional enrichment of hits.
Table S2. Related to Figure 4. Gene-ontology meta-analysis of common differentially expressed genes in shAFF4 depletion and atuveciclib treatment. Spreadsheet providing full annotation and enrichment statistics of meta-analysis comparing shAFF4 depletion and atuveciclib treatment in BT245 cells.
Table S3. Related to Figure 6. RNA Pol II pausing and meta-analysis. Spreadsheet containing full list of genes by Pol II clustering in HSJD-DIPG007 and SU-DIPG4 cells, as well as gene-ontology meta-analysis correlating Pol II pausing with observed RNA-seq expression changes.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the following individuals for generously providing the cell lines used for this work: Michelle Monje (Stanford University) for SU-DIPG4 and SU-DIPG13, Angel Montero Carcaboso (Sant Joan de Déu) for HSJD-DIPG007, and Nalin Gupta (University of California, San Francisco) for SF8268. We likewise thank the University of Colorado Functional Genomics Facility, Genomics and Microarray Shared Resource, Research Histology Shared Resource, and Animal Imaging Shared Resource for their contributions to this work.
This work was generously supported by grants through the St. Baldrick’s Foundation (Fellowship Award 606095, N.D. and R.V.), Golfer’s Against Cancer (N.D., A.L.G., and S.V.), Cancer League of Colorado (N.D. and R.V.), the Morgan Adams Foundation (N.D., S.V., and R.V.), Curing Kid’s Cancer (N.D. and R.V.), and the Luke Morin Family (N.D., S.V., and R.V.). The University of Colorado Research Histology Shared Resource is supported by a Cancer Center Support Grant (P30 CA046934). The University of Colorado Animal Imaging Shared Resource is supported by the NCI P30 CA046934 and NIH S10 OD023485 grants (N.J.S).
Footnotes
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
References
- 2012. An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature, 489, 57–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- AMANI V, PRINCE EW, ALIMOVA I, BALAKRISHNAN I, BIRKS D, DONSON AM, HARRIS P, LEVY JM, HANDLER M, FOREMAN NK, VENKATARAMAN S & VIBHAKAR R 2016. Polo-like Kinase 1 as a potential therapeutic target in Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma. BMC Cancer, 16, 647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- ANASTAS JN, ZEE BM, KALIN JH, KIM M, GUO R, ALEXANDRESCU S, BLANCO MA, GIERA S, GILLESPIE SM, DAS J, WU M, NOCCO S, BONAL DM, NGUYEN QD, SUVA ML, BERNSTEIN BE, ALANI R, GOLUB TR, COLE PA, FILBIN MG & SHI Y 2019. Re-programing Chromatin with a Bifunctional LSD1/HDAC Inhibitor Induces Therapeutic Differentiation in DIPG. Cancer Cell, 36, 528–544.e10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- BARTELS U, HAWKINS C, VEZINA G, KUN L, SOUWEIDANE M & BOUFFET E 2011. Proceedings of the diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) Toronto Think Tank: advancing basic and translational research and cooperation in DIPG. J Neurooncol, 105, 119–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- BENDER S, TANG Y, LINDROTH AM, HOVESTADT V, JONES DT, KOOL M, ZAPATKA M, NORTHCOTT PA, STURM D, WANG W, RADLWIMMER B, HOJFELDT JW, TRUFFAUX N, CASTEL D, SCHUBERT S, RYZHOVA M, SEKER-CIN H, GRONYCH J, JOHANN PD, STARK S, MEYER J, MILDE T, SCHUHMANN M, EBINGER M, MONORANU CM, PONNUSWAMI A, CHEN S, JONES C, WITT O, COLLINS VP, VON DEIMLING A, JABADO N, PUGET S, GRILL J, HELIN K, KORSHUNOV A, LICHTER P, MONJE M, PLASS C, CHO YJ & PFISTER SM 2013. Reduced H3K27me3 and DNA hypomethylation are major drivers of gene expression in K27M mutant pediatric high-grade gliomas. Cancer Cell, 24, 660–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- BOETTIGER AN & LEVINE M 2009. Synchronous and stochastic patterns of gene activation in the Drosophila embryo. Science, 325, 471–3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- BRADNER JE, HNISZ D & YOUNG RA 2017. Transcriptional Addiction in Cancer. Cell, 168, 629–643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- CHEN FX, SMITH ER & SHILATIFARD A 2018. Born to run: control of transcription elongation by RNA polymerase II. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 19, 464–478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- CHEN Y & CRAMER P 2019. Structure of the super-elongation complex subunit AFF4 C-terminal homology domain reveals requirements for AFF homo- and heterodimerization. J Biol Chem, 294, 10663–10673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- CHOI SA, LEE JY, PHI JH, WANG KC, PARK CK, PARK SH & KIM SK 2014. Identification of brain tumour initiating cells using the stem cell marker aldehyde dehydrogenase. Eur J Cancer, 50, 137–49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- CHOPRA VS, HONG JW & LEVINE M 2009. Regulation of Hox gene activity by transcriptional elongation in Drosophila. Curr Biol, 19, 688–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- CORE LJ, WATERFALL JJ & LIS JT 2008. Nascent RNA sequencing reveals widespread pausing and divergent initiation at human promoters. Science, 322, 1845–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- DICKSON MA, RATHKOPF DE, CARVAJAL RD, GRANT S, ROBERTS JD, REID JM, AMES MM, MCGOVERN RM, LEFKOWITZ RA, GONEN M, CANE LM, DIALS HJ & SCHWARTZ GK 2011. A phase I pharmacokinetic study of pulse-dose vorinostat with flavopiridol in solid tumors. Invest New Drugs, 29, 1004–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- FABRE C, GOBBI M, EZZILI C, ZOUBIR M, SABLIN MP, SMALL K, IM E, SHINWARI N, ZHANG D, ZHOU H & LE TOURNEAU C 2014. Clinical study of the novel cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor dinaciclib in combination with rituximab in relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol, 74, 1057–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- FILBIN MG, TIROSH I, HOVESTADT V, SHAW ML, ESCALANTE LE, MATHEWSON ND, NEFTEL C, FRANK N, PELTON K, HEBERT CM, HABERLER C, YIZHAK K, GOJO J , EGERVARI K, MOUNT C, VAN GALEN P, BONAL DM, NGUYEN QD, BECK A, SINAI C, CZECH T, DORFER C, GOUMNEROVA L, LAVARINO C, CARCABOSO AM, MORA J, MYLVAGANAM R, LUO CC, PEYRL A, POPOVIC M, AZIZI A, BATCHELOR TT, FROSCH MP, MARTINEZ-LAGE M, KIERAN MW, BANDOPADHAYAY P, BEROUKHIM R, FRITSCH G, GETZ G, ROZENBLATT-ROSEN O, WUCHERPFENNIG KW, LOUIS DN, MONJE M, SLAVC I, LIGON KL, GOLUB TR, REGEV A, BERNSTEIN BE & SUVA ML 2018. Developmental and oncogenic programs in H3K27M gliomas dissected by single-cell RNA-seq. Science, 360, 331–335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- FILIPPAKOPOULOS P & KNAPP S 2014. Targeting bromodomains: epigenetic readers of lysine acetylation. Nat Rev Drug Discov, 13, 337–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- FOWLER T, GHATAK P, PRICE DH, CONAWAY R, CONAWAY J, CHIANG CM, BRADNER JE, SHILATIFARD A & ROY AL 2014. Regulation of MYC expression and differential JQ1 sensitivity in cancer cells. PLoS One, 9, e87003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- FRANCO HL & KRAUS WL 2015. No driver behind the wheel? Targeting transcription in cancer. Cell, 163, 28–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- GRASSO CS, TANG Y, TRUFFAUX N, BERLOW NE, LIU L, DEBILY MA, QUIST MJ, DAVIS LE, HUANG EC, WOO PJ, PONNUSWAMI A, CHEN S, JOHUNG TB, SUN W, KOGISO M, DU Y, QI L, HUANG Y, HUTT-CABEZAS M, WARREN KE, LE DRET L, MELTZER PS, MAO H, QUEZADO M, VAN VUURDEN DG, ABRAHAM J, FOULADI M, SVALINA MN, WANG N, HAWKINS C, NAZARIAN J, ALONSO MM, RAABE EH, HULLEMAN E, SPELLMAN PT, LI XN, KELLER C, PAL R, GRILL J. & MONJE M. 2015. Functionally defined therapeutic targets in diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma. Nat Med, 21 , 555–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- GREEN AL, RAMKISSOON SH, MCCAULEY D, JONES K, PERRY JA, HSU JH, RAMKISSOON LA, MAIRE CL, HUBBELL-ENGLER B, KNOFF DS, SHACHAM S, LIGON KL & KUNG AL 2015. Preclinical antitumor efficacy of selective exportin 1 inhibitors in glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol, 17, 697–707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- HAGENBUCHNER J & AUSSERLECHNER MJ 2016. Targeting transcription factors by small compounds--Current strategies and future implications. Biochem Pharmacol, 107, 1–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- HASHIZUME R, ANDOR N, IHARA Y, LERNER R, GAN H, CHEN X, FANG D, HUANG X, TOM MW, NGO V, SOLOMON D, MUELLER S, PARIS PL, ZHANG Z, PETRITSCH C, GUPTA N, WALDMAN TA & JAMES CD 2014. Pharmacologic inhibition of histone demethylation as a therapy for pediatric brainstem glioma. Nat Med, 20, 1394–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- HEATH EI, BIBLE K, MARTELL RE, ADELMAN DC & LORUSSO PM 2008. A phase 1 study of SNS-032 (formerly BMS-387032), a potent inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinases 2, 7 and 9 administered as a single oral dose and weekly infusion in patients with metastatic refractory solid tumors. Invest New Drugs, 26, 59–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- HOFFMAN LM, VELDHUIJZEN VAN ZANTEN SEM, COLDITZ N, BAUGH J, CHANEY B, HOFFMANN M, LANE A, FULLER C, MILES L, HAWKINS C, BARTELS U, BOUFFET E, GOLDMAN S, LEARY S, FOREMAN NK, PACKER R, WARREN KE, BRONISCER A, KIERAN MW, MINTURN J, COMITO M, BROXSON E, SHIH CS, KHATUA S, CHINTAGUMPALA M, CARRET AS, ESCORZA NY, HASSALL T, ZIEGLER DS, GOTTARDO N, DHOLARIA H, DOUGHMAN R, BENESCH M, DRISSI R, NAZARIAN J, JABADO N, BODDAERT N, VARLET P, GIRAUD G, CASTEL D, PUGET S, JONES C, HULLEMAN E, MODENA P, GIAGNACOVO M, ANTONELLI M, PIETSCH T, GIELEN GH, JONES DTW, STURM D, PFISTER SM, GERBER NU, GROTZER MA, PFAFF E, VON BUEREN AO, HARGRAVE D, SOLANKI GA, JADRIJEVIC CVRLJE F, KASPERS GJL, VANDERTOP WP, GRILL J, BAILEY S, BIASSONI V, MASSIMINO M, CALMON R, SANCHEZ E, BISON B, WARMUTH-METZ M, LEACH J, JONES B, VAN VUURDEN DG, KRAMM CM & FOULADI M 2018. Clinical, Radiologic, Pathologic, and Molecular Characteristics of Long-Term Survivors of Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma (DIPG): A Collaborative Report From the International and European Society for Pediatric Oncology DIPG Registries. J Clin Oncol, 36, 1963–1972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- HU Y & SMYTH GK 2009. ELDA: extreme limiting dilution analysis for comparing depleted and enriched populations in stem cell and other assays. J Immunol Methods, 347, 70–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- HUANG CH, LUJAMBIO A, ZUBER J, TSCHAHARGANEH DF, DORAN MG, EVANS MJ, KITZING T, ZHU N, DE STANCHINA E, SAWYERS CL, ARMSTRONG SA, LEWIS JS, SHERR CJ & lOwE SW 2014. CDK9-mediated transcription elongation is required for MYC addiction in hepatocellular carcinoma. Genes Dev, 28, 1800–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- JANSEN MH, VAN VUURDEN DG, VANDERTOP WP & KASPERS GJ 2012. Diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas: a systematic update on clinical trials and biology. Cancer Treat Rev, 38, 27–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- JONES C & BAKER SJ 2014. Unique genetic and epigenetic mechanisms driving paediatric diffuse high-grade glioma. Nat Rev Cancer, 14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- JONKERS I & LIS JT 2015. Getting up to speed with transcription elongation by RNA polymerase II. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 16, 167–77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- KARP JE, GARRETT-MAYER E, ESTEY EH, RUDEK MA, SMITH BD, GREER JM, DRYE DM, MACKEY K, DORCY KS, GORE SD, LEVIS MJ, MCDEVITT MA, CARRAWAY HE, PRATZ KW, GLADSTONE DE, SHOWEL MM, OTHUS M, DOYLE LA, WRIGHT JJ & PAGEL JM 2012. Randomized phase II study of two schedules of flavopiridol given as timed sequential therapy with cytosine arabinoside and mitoxantrone for adults with newly diagnosed, poor-risk acute myelogenous leukemia. Haematologica, 97, 1736–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- KHUONG-QUANG DA, BUCZKOWICZ P, RAKOPOULOS P, LIU XY, FONTEBASSO AM, BOUFFET E, BARTELS U, ALBRECHT S, SCHWARTZENTRUBER J, LETOURNEAU L, BOURGEY M, BOURQUE G, MONTPETIT A, BOURRET G, LEPAGE P, FLEMING A, LICHTER P, KOOL M, VON DEIMLING A, STURM D, KORSHUNOV A, FAURY D, JONES DT, MAJEWSKI J, PFISTER SM, JABADO N & HAWKINS C 2012. K27M mutation in histone H3.3 defines clinically and biologically distinct subgroups of pediatric diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas. Acta Neuropathol, 124, 439–47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- KRUG B, DE JAY N, HARUTYUNYAN AS, DESHMUKH S, MARCHIONE DM, GUILHAMON P, BERTRAND KC, MIKAEL LG, MCCONECHY MK, CHEN CCL, KHAZAEI S, KONCAR RF, AGNIHOTRI S, FAURY D, ELLEZAM B, WEIL AG, URSINI-SIEGEL J, DE CARVALHO DD, DIRKS PB, LEWIS PW, SALOMONI P, LUPIEN M, ARROWSMITH C, LASKO PF, GARCIA BA, KLEINMAN CL, JABADO N & MACK SC 2019. Pervasive H3K27 Acetylation Leads to ERV Expression and a Therapeutic Vulnerability in H3K27M Gliomas. Cancer Cell, 35, 782–797.e8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- LANASA MC, ANDRITSOS L, BROWN JR, GABRILOVE J, CALIGARIS-CAPPIO F, GHIA P, LARSON RA, KIPPS TJ, LEBLOND V, MILLIGAN DW, JANSSENS A, JOHNSON AJ, HEEREMA NA, BUHLER A, STILGENBAUER S, DEVIN J, HALLEK M, BYRD JC & GREVER MR 2015. Final results of EFC6663: a multicenter, international, phase 2 study of alvocidib for patients with fludarabine-refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Leuk Res, 39, 495–500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- LANGMEAD B, TRAPNELL C, POP M & SALZBERG SL 2009. Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol, 10, R25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- LARSON JD, KASPER LH, PAUGH BS, JIN H, WU G, KWON CH, FAN Y, SHAW TI, SILVEIRA AB, QU C, XU R, ZHU X, ZHANG J, RUSSELL HR, PETERS JL, FINKELSTEIN D, XU B, LIN T, TINKLE CL, PATAY Z, ONAR-THOMAS A, POUNDS SB, MCKINNON PJ, ELLISON DW & BAKER SJ 2019. Histone H3.3 K27M Accelerates Spontaneous Brainstem Glioma and Drives Restricted Changes in Bivalent Gene Expression. Cancer Cell, 35, 140–155.e7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- LEVINE M 2011. Paused RNA polymerase II as a developmental checkpoint. Cell, 145, 502–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- LEWIS PW, MULLER MM, KOLETSKY MS, CORDERO F, LIN S, BANASZYNSKI LA, GARCIA BA, MUIR TW, BECHER OJ & ALLIS CD 2013. Inhibition of PRC2 activity by a gain-of-function H3 mutation found in pediatric glioblastoma. Science, 340, 857–61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- LI H, HANDSAKER B, WYSOKER A, FENNELL T, RUAN J, HOMER N, MARTH G, ABECASIS G & DURBIN R 2009. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics, 25, 2078–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- LIANG K, SMITH ER, AOI Y, STOLTZ KL, KATAGI H, WOODFIN AR, RENDLEMAN EJ, MARSHALL SA, MURRAY DC, WANG L, OZARK PA, MISHRA RK, HASHIZUME R, SCHILTZ GE & SHILATIFARD A 2018. Targeting Processive Transcription Elongation via SEC Disruption for MYC-Induced Cancer Therapy. Cell, 175, 766–779.e17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- LIN C, GARRETT AS, DE KUMAR B, SMITH ER, GOGOL M, SEIDEL C, KRUMLAUF R & SHILATIFARD A 2011. Dynamic transcriptional events in embryonic stem cells mediated by the super elongation complex (SEC). Genes Dev, 25, 1486–98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- LIN C, SMITH ER, TAKAHASHI H, LAI KC, MARTIN-BROWN S, FLORENS L, WASHBURN MP, CONAWAY JW, CONAWAY RC & SHILATIFARD A 2010. AFF4, a component of the ELL/P-TEFb elongation complex and a shared subunit of MLL chimeras, can link transcription elongation to leukemia. Mol Cell, 37, 429–37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- LIN GL, WILSON KM, CERIBELLI M, STANTON BZ, WOO PJ, KREIMER S, QIN EY, ZHANG X, LENNON J, NAGARAJA S, MORRIS PJ, QUEZADA M, GILLESPIE SM, DUVEAU DY, MICHALOWSKI AM, SHINN P, GUHA R, FERRER M, KLUMPP-THOMAS C, MICHAEL S, MCKNIGHT C, MINHAS P, ITKIN Z, RAABE EH, CHEN L, GHANEM R, GERAGHTY AC, NI L, ANDREASSON KI, VITANZA NA, WARREN KE, THOMAS CJ & MONJE M 2019. Therapeutic strategies for diffuse midline glioma from high-throughput combination drug screening. Sci Transl Med, 11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- LOUIS DN, PERRY A, REIFENBERGER G, VON DEIMLING A, FIGARELLA-BRANGER D, CAVENEE WK, OHGAKI H, WIESTLER OD, KLEIHUES P & ELLISON DW 2016. The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary. Acta Neuropathol, 131, 803–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- LOVEN J, HOKE HA, LIN CY, LAU A, ORLANDO DA, VAKOC CR, BRADNER JE, LEE TI & YOUNG RA 2013. Selective inhibition of tumor oncogenes by disruption of superenhancers. Cell, 153, 320–34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- LUO Z, LIN C & SHILATIFARD A 2012. The super elongation complex (SEC) family in transcriptional control. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 13, 543–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- MALUMBRES M 2014. Cyclin-dependent kinases. Genome Biol, 15, 122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- MORALES F & GIORDANO A 2016. Overview of CDK9 as a target in cancer research. Cell Cycle, 15, 519–27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- MUSE GW, GILCHRIST DA, NECHAEV S, SHAH R, PARKER JS, GRISSOM SF, ZEITLINGER J & ADELMAN K 2007. RNA polymerase is poised for activation across the genome. Nat Genet, 39, 1507–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- NAGARAJA S, QUEZADA MA, GILLESPIE SM, ARZT M, LENNON JJ, WOO PJ, HOVESTADT V, KAMBHAMPATI M, FILBIN MG, SUVA ML, NAZARIAN J & MONJE M 2019. Histone Variant and Cell Context Determine H3K27M Reprogramming of the Enhancer Landscape and Oncogenic State. Mol Cell. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- NAGARAJA S, VITANZA NA, WOO PJ, TAYLOR KR, LIU F, ZHANG L, LI M, MENG W, PONNUSWAMI A, SUN W, MA J, HULLEMAN E, SWIGUT T, WYSOCKA J, TANG Y & MONJE M 2017. Transcriptional Dependencies in Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma. Cancer Cell, 31, 635–652.e6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- NAKATA S, NOBUSAWA S, YAMAZAKI T, OSAWA T, HORIGUCHI K, HASHIBA Y, YAOITA H, MATSUMURA N, IKOTA H, HIRATO J, YOSHIMOTO Y & YOKOO H 2017. Histone H3 K27M mutations in adult cerebellar high-grade gliomas. Brain Tumor Pathol, 34, 113–119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- NARITA T, ISHIDA T, ITO A, MASAKI A, KINOSHITA S, SUZUKI S, TAKINO H, YOSHIDA T, RI M, KUSUMOTO S, KOMATSU H, IMADA K, TANAKA Y, TAKAORI-KONDO A, INAGAKI H, SCHOLZ A, LIENAU P, KURODA T, UEDA R & IIDA S 2017. Cyclin-dependent kinase 9 is a novel specific molecular target in adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma. Blood, 130, 1114–1124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- OLOW A, MUELLER S, YANG X, HASHIZUME R, MEYEROWITZ J, WEISS W, RESNICK AC, WAANDERS AJ, STALPERS LJ, BERGER MS, GUPTA N, JAMES CD, PETRITSCH CK & HAAS-KOGAN DA 2016. BRAF Status in Personalizing Treatment Approaches for Pediatric Gliomas. Clin Cancer Res, 22, 5312–5321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- PETERLIN BM & PRICE DH 2006. Controlling the elongation phase of transcription with P-TEFb. Mol Cell, 23, 297–305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- PIUNTI A, HASHIZUME R, MORGAN MA, BARTOM ET, HORBINSKI CM, MARSHALL SA, RENDLEMAN EJ, MA Q, TAKAHASHI YH, WOODFIN AR, MISHARIN AV, ABSHIRU NA, LULLA RR, SARATSIS AM, KELLEHER NL, JAMES CD & SHILATIFARD A 2017. Therapeutic targeting of polycomb and BET bromodomain proteins in diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas. Nat Med, 23, 493–500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- RUEDEN CT, SCHINDELIN J, HINER MC, DEZONIA BE, WALTER AE, ARENA ET & ELICEIRI KW 2017. ImageJ2: ImageJ for the next generation of scientific image data. BMC Bioinformatics, 18, 529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- RYALL S, KRISHNATRY R, ARNOLDO A, BUCZKOWICZ P, MISTRY M, SIDDAWAY R, LING C, PAJOVIC S, YU M, RUBIN JB, HUKIN J, STEINBOK P, BARTELS U, BOUFFET E, TABORI U & HAWKINS C 2016. Targeted detection of genetic alterations reveal the prognostic impact of H3K27M and MAPK pathway aberrations in paediatric thalamic glioma. Acta Neuropathol Commun, 4, 93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- SARATSIS AM, KAMBHAMPATI M, SNYDER K, YADAVILLI S, DEVANEY JM, HARMON B, HALL J, RAABE EH, AN P, WEINGART M, ROOD BR, MAGGE SN, MACDONALD TJ, PACKER RJ & NAZARIAN J 2014. Comparative multidimensional molecular analyses of pediatric diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma reveals distinct molecular subtypes. Acta Neuropathol, 127, 881–95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- SHAHBAZI J, LIU PY, ATMADIBRATA B, BRADNER JE, MARSHALL GM, LOCK RB & LIU T 2016. The Bromodomain Inhibitor JQ1 and the Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor Panobinostat Synergistically Reduce N-Myc Expression and Induce Anticancer Effects. Clin Cancer Res, 22, 2534–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- SHARIFNIA T, WAWER MJ, CHEN T, HUANG QY, WEIR BA, SIZEMORE A, LAWLOR MA, GOODALE A, COWLEY GS, VAZQUEZ F, OTT CJ, FRANCIS JM, SASSI S, COGSWELL P, SHEPPARD HE, ZHANG T, GRAY NS, CLARKE PA, BLAGG J, WORKMAN P, SOMMER J, HORNICEK F, ROOT DE, HAHN WC, BRADNER JE, WONG KK, CLEMONS PA, LIN CY, KOTZ JD & SCHREIBER SL 2019. Small-molecule targeting of brachyury transcription factor addiction in chordoma. Nat Med, 25, 292300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- SMITH E, LIN C & SHILATIFARD A 2011. The super elongation complex (SEC) and MLL in development and disease. Genes Dev, 25, 661–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- SUBRAMANIAN A, TAMAYO P, MOOTHA VK, MUKHERJEE S, EBERT BL, GILLETTE MA, PAULOVICH A, POMEROY SL, GOLUB TR, LANDER ES & MESIROV JP 2005. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 102, 15545–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- TAYLOR IC, HUTT-CABEZAS M, BRANDT WD, KAMBHAMPATI M, NAZARIAN J, CHANG HT, WARREN KE, EBERHART CG & RAABE EH 2015. Disrupting NOTCH Slows Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma Growth, Enhances Radiation Sensitivity, and Shows Combinatorial Efficacy With Bromodomain Inhibition. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol, 74, 778–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- THORVALDSDOTTIR H, ROBINSON JT & MESIROV JP 2013. Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV): high-performance genomics data visualization and exploration. Brief Bioinform, 14, 17892. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- WU G, BRONISCER A, MCEACHRON TA, LU C, PAUGH BS, BECKSFORT J, QU C, DING L, HUETHER R, PARKER M, ZHANG J, GAJJAR A, DYER MA, MULLIGHAN CG, GILBERTSON RJ, MARDIS ER, WILSON RK, DOWNING JR, ELLISON DW & BAKER SJ 2012. Somatic histone H3 alterations in pediatric diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas and non-brainstem glioblastomas. Nat Genet, 44, 251–3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- WU G, DIAZ AK, PAUGH BS, RANKIN SL, JU B, LI Y, ZHU X, QU C, CHEN X, ZHANG J, EASTON J, EDMONSON M, MA X, LU C, NAGAHAWATTE P, HEDLUND E, RUSCH M, POUNDS S, LIN T, ONAR-THOMAS A, HUETHER R, KRIWACKI R, PARKER M, GUPTA P, BECKSFORT J, WEI L, MULDER HL, BOGGS K, VADODARIA B, YERGEAU D, RUSSELL JC, OCHOA K, FULTON RS, FULTON LL, JONES C, BOOP FA, BRONISCER A, WETMORE C, GAJJAR A, DING L, MARDIS ER, WILSON RK, TAYLOR MR, DOWNING JR, ELLISON DW & BAKER SJ 2014. The genomic landscape of diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma and pediatric non-brainstem high-grade glioma. Nat Genet, 46, 444–450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- YU G, WANG LG & HE QY 2015. ChIPseeker: an R/Bioconductor package for ChIP peak annotation, comparison and visualization. Bioinformatics, 31, 2382–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- ZEITLINGER J, STARK A, KELLIS M, HONG JW, NECHAEV S, ADELMAN K, LEVINE M & YOUNG RA 2007. RNA polymerase stalling at developmental control genes in the Drosophila melanogaster embryo. Nat Genet, 39, 1512–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- ZHANG Y, LIU T, MEYER CA, EECKHOUTE J, JOHNSON DS, BERNSTEIN BE, NUSBAUM C, MYERS RM, BROWN M, LI W & LIU XS 2008. Model-based analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS). Genome Biol, 9, R137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- ZHOU Q, LI T & PRICE DH 2012. RNA polymerase II elongation control. Annu Rev Biochem, 81, 119–43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- ZHOU Y, ZHOU B, PACHE L, CHANG M, KHODABAKHSHI AH, TANASEICHUK O, BENNER C & CHANDA SK 2019. Metascape provides a biologist-oriented resource for the analysis of systems-level datasets. Nat Commun, 10, 1523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Table S1. Related to Figure 1. Epigenomic shRNA screen in DMG. Spreadsheet providing full list of genes included in shRNA screen, statistical cut-offs, and list and functional enrichment of hits.
Table S2. Related to Figure 4. Gene-ontology meta-analysis of common differentially expressed genes in shAFF4 depletion and atuveciclib treatment. Spreadsheet providing full annotation and enrichment statistics of meta-analysis comparing shAFF4 depletion and atuveciclib treatment in BT245 cells.
Table S3. Related to Figure 6. RNA Pol II pausing and meta-analysis. Spreadsheet containing full list of genes by Pol II clustering in HSJD-DIPG007 and SU-DIPG4 cells, as well as gene-ontology meta-analysis correlating Pol II pausing with observed RNA-seq expression changes.
Data Availability Statement
The accession number for the raw and processed ChIP-seq and RNA-seq data reported in this paper is GEO: GSE129777.
