Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Anatomy logoLink to Journal of Anatomy
. 1996 Jun;188(Pt 3):541–546.

Lectin histochemical evaluation of glycoconjugates in dog efferent ductules.

S Wakui 1, M Furusato 1, H Takahashi 1, M Motoya 1, S Ushigome 1
PMCID: PMC1167482  PMID: 8763471

Abstract

Glycoconjugates in the epithelial cells of the efferent ductules in the dog were investigated using lectin histochemistry. These ductules connect the extratesticular rete with the epididymis. The epithelium of the ductules consisted both of ciliated and nonciliated cells. Whereas the apical zone of ciliated cells showed selective binding with WGA, SWGA, SNA, MAA and neuraminidase-PNA, that of nonciliated cells bound to all lectins used in the present study: WGA, SWGA, SNA, MAA, PNA, neuraminidase-PNA, RCA1, DBA and SBA. The nonciliated cells were divided into 3 types: type A cells which lacked both specific granules and vacuoles, type B cells which were characterised by a few specific apical vacuoles and many large specific granules, and type C cells which were characterised by some specific apical vacuoles and small basal granules. The specific granules and vacuoles of type B cells showed binding with WGA, SWGA and MAA. The specific granules of type C cells showed binding with WGA, SWGA, SNA, MAA, PNA and neuraminidase-PNA, while their specific vacuoles showed binding with WGA, SWGA, SNA and MAA. The Golgi zone both of ciliated and type A cells did not bind with any lectins used in this study, while type B and C cells showed similar lectin binding patterns between the Golgi zone and their specific granules. Specific lectin binding patterns revealed a different carbohydrate composition of each type of cell, indicating a biological difference between the ciliated cells and the 3 types of nonciliated cells in dog efferent ductules.

Full text

PDF
541

Images in this article

543Fig. 1
on p.543
544Fig. 2
on p.544
545Fig. 3
on p.545
545Fig. 4
on p.545
545Fig. 5
on p.545
546Fig. 6
on p.546

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Arya M., Vanha-Perttula T. Comparison of lectin-staining pattern in testis and epididymis of gerbil, guinea pig, mouse, and nutria. Am J Anat. 1986 Apr;175(4):449–469. doi: 10.1002/aja.1001750405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Burkett B. N., Schulte B. A., Spicer S. S. Histochemical evaluation of glycoconjugates in the male reproductive tract with lectin-horseradish peroxidase conjugates: I. Staining of principal cells and spermatozoa in the mouse. Am J Anat. 1987 Jan;178(1):11–22. doi: 10.1002/aja.1001780103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chandler J. A., Sinowatz F., Pierrepoint C. G. The ultrastructure of dog epididymis. Urol Res. 1981;9(1):33–44. doi: 10.1007/BF00256837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Flickinger C. J., Howards S. S., English H. F. Ultrastructural differences in efferent ducts and several regions of the epididymis of the hamster. Am J Anat. 1978 Aug;152(4):557–585. doi: 10.1002/aja.1001520409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Goyal H. O., Hutto V., Robinson D. D. Reexamination of the morphology of the extratesticular rete and ductuli efferentes in the goat. Anat Rec. 1992 May;233(1):53–60. doi: 10.1002/ar.1092330108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Goyal H. O., Vig M. M. Histochemical activity of alkaline phosphatase and acid phosphatase in the epididymis of mature intact and androgen-deprived bulls. Am J Vet Res. 1984 Mar;45(3):444–450. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gray B. W., Brown B. G., Ganjam V. K., Whitesides J. F. Effect of deprival of rete testis fluid on the morphology of efferent ductules. Biol Reprod. 1983 Sep;29(2):525–534. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod29.2.525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. HOLSTEIN A. F. ELEKTRONENMIKROSKOPISCHE UNTERSUCHUNGEN AN DEN DUCTULI EFFERENTES DES NEBENHODENS NORMALER UND KASTRIERTER KANINCHEN. Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat. 1964 Dec 3;64:767–777. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hoffer A. P., Greenberg J. The structure of the epididymis, efferent ductules and ductus deferens of the guinea pig: a light microscope study. Anat Rec. 1978 Mar;190(3):659–677. doi: 10.1002/ar.1091900304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ilio K. Y., Hess R. A. Structure and function of the ductuli efferentes: a review. Microsc Res Tech. 1994 Dec 15;29(6):432–467. doi: 10.1002/jemt.1070290604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Jones C. J., Dantzer V., Stoddart R. W. Changes in glycan distribution within the porcine interhaemal barrier during gestation. Cell Tissue Res. 1995 Mar;279(3):551–564. doi: 10.1007/BF00318167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Jones C. J., Morrison C. A., Stoddart R. W. Histochemical analysis of rat testicular glycoconjugates. 3. Non-reducing terminal residues in seminiferous tubules. Histochem J. 1993 Oct;25(10):711–718. doi: 10.1007/BF00211766. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Morita I. [Some observations on the fine structure of the human ductuli efferentes testis]. Arch Histol Jpn. 1966 May;26(4):341–365. doi: 10.1679/aohc1950.26.341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ramos A. S., Jr, Dym M. Ultrastructure of the ductuli efferentes in monkeys. Biol Reprod. 1977 Oct;17(3):339–349. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod17.3.339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Roth J. Cellular sialoglycoconjugates: a histochemical perspective. Histochem J. 1993 Oct;25(10):687–710. doi: 10.1007/BF00211765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Sata T., Lackie P. M., Taatjes D. J., Peumans W., Roth J. Detection of the Neu5 Ac (alpha 2,3) Gal (beta 1,4) GlcNAc sequence with the leukoagglutinin from Maackia amurensis: light and electron microscopic demonstration of differential tissue expression of terminal sialic acid in alpha 2,3- and alpha 2,6-linkage. J Histochem Cytochem. 1989 Nov;37(11):1577–1588. doi: 10.1177/37.11.2478613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Schulte B. A., Spicer S. S. Light microscopic histochemical detection of terminal galactose and N-acetylgalactosamine residues in rodent complex carbohydrates using a galactose oxidase--Schiff sequence and peanut lectin--horseradish peroxidase conjugate. J Histochem Cytochem. 1983 Jan;31(1):19–24. doi: 10.1177/31.1.6187799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ueno K., Ohyama M., Lim D. J. Expression of sialic acids in the developing murine tubotympanum. Acta Otolaryngol. 1992 Sep;112(5):824–830. doi: 10.3109/00016489209137480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Wakui S., Furusato M., Nomura Y., Asari M., Kano Y. Lectin histochemical study of the prostate gland of the rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta). J Anat. 1992 Aug;181(Pt 1):127–131. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Wakui S., Furusato M., Ushigome S., Kano Y. Coexpression of different cytokeratins, vimentin and desmin in the rete testis and epididymis in the dog. J Anat. 1994 Feb;184(Pt 1):147–151. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Anatomy are provided here courtesy of Anatomical Society of Great Britain and Ireland

RESOURCES