Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2024 Dec 30;19(12):e0309929. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309929

Geospatial distribution and predictors of postnatal care utilization during the critical time in Ethiopia using EDHS 2019: A spatial and geographical weighted regression analysis

Muluken Chanie Agimas 1,*, Tigabu Kidie Tesfie 1, Nebiyu Mekonnen Derseh 1, Meron Asmamaw 1, Habtamu Wagnew Abuhay 1, Getaneh Awoke Yismaw 1
Editor: Ranjan Kumar Prusty2
PMCID: PMC11684686  PMID: 39774511

Abstract

Introduction

Postnatal care within 2 days after delivery is classified as early postnatal care. Maternal and neonate mortality during the early postnatal period is a global health problem. Sub-Saharan Africa contributes the highest maternal and newborn mortality rates. To reverse this problem, early postnatal care is the best strategy, but there is no study to show the spatial distribution and application of geographical weighted regression to show the effect of each predictor on early postnatal care across the geographic areas in Ethiopia using the recent EDHS 2019 data.

Objective

To assess the geospatial distribution and predictors of postnatal care utilization during the critical period in Ethiopia using EDHS 2019.

Method

A secondary data analysis of a cross-sectional study was used among 2105 women. The data for this analysis was taken from the 2019 EDHS, and missing data was managed by imputation. The spatial variation of postnatal care during the critical time was assessed using the Getis-Ord Gi* statistic; Moran’s I statistics were conducted to test the autocorrelation; and Sat Scan statistics were also used to show the statistically significant clusters of early PNC utilization in Ethiopia. The ordinary least squares method was used to select factors explaining the geographical variation of postnatal care during the critical time. Finally, the geographical weighted regression was used to show the spatial variation of the association between predictors and outcomes. Predictors at 95% CI with a p-value <0.05 were statistically significant factors for PNC during the critical time.

Results

The overall prevalence of PNC utilization during critical time was 713 (34%, 95%CI: 31.5%–36.5%). The spatial distribution of postnatal care utilization during critical times was not randomly distributed across the area of Ethiopia. The hotspot areas of postnatal care utilization during the critical period in Ethiopia were found to be in Benishangul, Gumuz, and the western part of Tigray. Whereas, the cold spot area was in the western part of the southern nation and nationality of Ethiopia. Women with antenatal care visits, facility delivery, no education, and media exposure were the predictors of postnatal care utilization during the critical time in the hotspot areas of Ethiopia.

Conclusion and recommendation

In Ethiopia, one-third of women utilize the PNC during critical times. Postnatal care utilization during critical times was not randomly distributed across the regions of Ethiopia. Antenatal care visits, facility delivery, lack of education, and media exposure were the predictors of postnatal care utilization during the critical time in Ethiopia. Therefore, encouraging facility delivery, awareness creation by expanding media access, and literacy are highly recommended to improve the utilization of PNC services during this critical time in Ethiopia.

Introduction

Postnatal care is the most important health service provided for the mother and newborns immediately after birth, up to 42 days [1, 2]. According to the recommendations of the World Health Organization, regardless of the place where birth occurs, women should attend the PNC service within 24 hours after birth, within 48–72 hours, and between 7–14 days and 6 weeks after birth to improve maternal and newborn health [3]. Postnatal care (PNC) within 2 days after delivery is classified as early PNC [4]. Early PNC is responsible for the high rate of maternal and child deaths [5]. PNC utilization is a very important health outcome for both maternal and child survival, and the majority of maternal and neonatal mortality can be reduced by timely PNC services [6]. According to the previous report, about 88% to 98% of all maternal deaths can be reduced by PNC service [7]. In Ethiopia, just using PNC utilization, newborn deaths can be reduced by 10–27% [5]. But according to a global report, within 24 hours of birth, about 4 million neonates and 287,000 maternal deaths occurred each year, and the majority of deaths occurred in low-income countries, including Ethiopia [8]. The maternal mortality ratio and neonatal mortality are higher in Ethiopia, which accounts for about 412 per 1,000 live births and 30 per 1,000 live births, respectively [9]. In Ethiopia, 50% and 40% of all maternal and neonatal deaths occur within 24 hours [5]. The majority of deaths are overcome through immediate PNC service [811]. Evidence showed that PNC utilization was significantly associated with institutional delivery utilization, place of residence, ethnicity, pregnancy intention, antenatal care visit, place of delivery, marital status, wealth quintile, maternal education, education of partner, skilled delivery, and age [810]. The majority of the previous studies were focused on factors associated with PNC in general, whereas studies on PNC utilization during the critical period were not adequate. Even though one national-level study was conducted on early PNC in Ethiopia using EDHS 2016 data and another local-level study was conducted in Sidama, Ethiopia [12, 13], it did not allow us to know about the effects of each predictor across the geographical areas of Ethiopia. Because all possible factors are not equally statistically significant for PNC utilization during the critical time across the regions. Additionally, the spatial distribution of PNC utilization during the critical time is not equally distributed across the corner of Ethiopia. So the spatial distribution of PNC utilization during the critical time is highly important to policymakers, planners, and other stakeholders for evidence based practices. As far as we know, there is no study about the spatial distribution and application of geographical weighted regression to show the effect of each predictor across the geographic areas of Ethiopia. Therefore, the current study aimed to assess the geospatial distribution and predictors of postnatal care utilization during the critical time in Ethiopia using EDHS 2019 using a spatial and geographical weighted regression analysis.

Methods

Study design and setting

The cross-sectional study design was conducted in Ethiopia using the EDHS-2019 data set. Ethiopia is located in east Africa at 30–150 N latitude and 330–480 E longitude [14]. Ethiopia occupies about 1.1 million square kilometres, and its latitude ranges from 148 meters below sea level (Dallol, Afar, Ethiopia) to the maximum peak at Ras Dashen (Amhara, Ethiopia), with an above-sea level of 4,620 meters [5] (Fig 1).

Fig 1. Map of Ethiopia.

Fig 1

Population

All women who gave birth in the previous 2 years were the source population, and all women who gave birth in the previous 2 years in the enumeration area were the source population.

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Women whose ages 15–49 who gave birth prior to the 2019 EDHS survey were either permanent residents or visitors who slept in the household the night before the survey were eligible to be interviewed.

  • This study included women who had given birth within 2 years preceding the survey and had at least one postnatal check, whether before discharge from a health facility after birth or after home delivery or discharge from the health facility.

Exclusion criteria

  • Women who were seriously ill during the data collection period were excluded.

Variables

The dependent variable for this study was PNC utilization during the critical time (yes/no) and the independent variables are shown in (Table 1).

Table 1. Study variables for the study of postnatal care utilization during the critical time hot spots in Ethiopia using EDHS 2019.

Variable Description
Dependent variable
PNC utilization during the critical time (early PNC) In this study, it refers to mother who have at least one postnatal visit within 48 hours following delivery [4].
Critical time: the time in which maternal and new-born deaths are high, or the time of the first two days after delivery.
Independent variables
wealth index The wealth index is defined by the wealth of the participant using principal component analyses and factor analyses, which are classified as poor, middle, and rich. 
Educational status The educational achievement of the participant can be classified as no education, primary education, secondary education, or above educational level. 
Place of delivery Defined by the actual living place of the participants, either urban or rural.
Religion The religion of the participant was assessed by the structured response options as Orthodox Christian, Muslim, protestant, Catholic, traditional religion, and others. 
cesarean delivery Women who delivered surgically. If she has a history of surgical delivery labelled as yes and otherwise classified as no.
Media exposure: Was assessed based on whether people had access to read newsletters, listen to the radio, and watch TV. Accordingly, if they have access to all three media (newsletter, radio, and TV) at least once a week, we categorized them as “yes”, otherwise “no” [14].
Age of the women The age of the participant was collected in years (numerically). Then the numerical value was categorized as <20 years, 20–34 years, and 35–49 years.
ANC visit Mothers were asked about the history of ANC service utilization, which has been classified as either ‘yes’ or ‘no visit’.
Place of delivery We asked women about where they give birth and labelled them as “at home” or “at health institutions.”
current pregnant Women were asked about the status of their pregnancy and classified as “yes” or “no”.
Region The region is the administrative structure or boundary of Ethiopia, which is Amhara, Tigray, Oromo, Afar, Somalia, Harari, Benishangul Gumuz, Gambela, the south nation and nationality of people, and two self-governed cities such as Diredawa and Addis Ababa. 
Birth order Women were asked about their birth order and classified as "1," "2–3," "4–5,” and "≥6.”

Possible bias in the measurement of PNC during the critical time

Recall and interviewer bias may affect the accuracy of the classification.

Sampling procedure and sampling technique

The EDHS 2019 of Ethiopia was used for the current spatial and geographical weighted regression and two-stage sampling, such as cluster selection and selection of the enumeration areas (EAs). The second step was the systematic sampling of households in the selected EAs, leading to a total of 9160 households. The data used for the current analysis was from households and women’s questionnaires. From 9160 households, there were 8,855 reproductive women ages 15–49. Among these 8,855 women, 2105 women (a weighted sample) had given birth within 2 years preceding the survey and had at least one postnatal check, whether before discharge from a health facility after birth or after home delivery or discharge from the health facility. These 2105 women were the total sample size (486 from urban areas and 1619 from rural areas) for the current study and were selected by the multistage sampling method. We used this sampling technique more than other techniques because of the wide geographical area. Other sampling methods can be used. The detailed sampling method and procedure were reported in the 2019 EDHS report [15].

Data source

The data for this analysis was taken from the 2019 EDHS.

Data collection procedures and data quality assurance

Initially, the current utilized data was collected during EDHS 2019, and for the purpose of the current secondary data analysis, such data was requested online from the International Demographic Health Survey (DHS) and accessed on the DHS’s official website link at, https://www.dhsprogram.com/data/dataset/Ethiopia_Interim-DHS_2019.cfm?flag=1. The data was also collected through a pretested, structured interview-administered method. Training for field workers and pretests were conducted to assure the quality of the data. The geographic coordinates of each cluster or the location data were collected by the Global Positioning System receivers. The displacement of urban clusters was 2 kilometres and 5 kilometres for rural clusters, and to assure the confidentiality of the participants’ information, the geographic positioning system’s (GPS) latitude and longitude of all clusters were random. The detailed part about data collection and quality assurance was reported in EDHS 2019 [15].

Data management and analysis

After the data was accessed, the dependent and independent variables were extracted, cleaned, and recoded for further analysis. The frequency of both the dependent and independent variables was also weighted using the sampling weight technique before analysis. For descriptive analysis, STATA software version 17 was used. After weighting the data, the data was exported to ArcGIS version 10.3 for spatial and geographical weighted regression analysis.

Spatial analysis

Autocorrelation

Using ArcGIS version 10.3, Moran’s I statistics were conducted to test the autocorrelation. We used the global Moran’s I statistics to show a holistic characterization, providing a single value for each region. Moran’s I statistics range from 1 to -1. Moran’s I value close to -1 indicated that the distribution of early PNC is dispersed across the regions of Ethiopia, and its value close to +1 indicated that the distribution of early PNC is clustered, whereas Moran’s I value of zero showed that early PNC is distributed randomly. Moran’s p-value less than 0.05 was the cutoff point for the significance of spatial autocorrelation [16].

Hot/cold spot analysis

The Getis-Ord statistic was also used to show the degree of clustering or to show the hot or cold spot area of early PNC utilization in Ethiopia.

Spatial interpolation

Showing the early PNC utilization of all parts of Ethiopia is difficult. Therefore, based on the sampled data or area, predicting the non-sampled area is a critical issue. To achieve this objective, the ordinary Kriging spatial interpolation technique was used to predict the non-sampled area. Closer things are more related than distant ones, and so the spatial dependence of early PNC utilization was also considered. We used this method because it has the advantages of being the best linear unbiased estimator and because it accounts for clustering and screening effects.

Sat scan analysis

Sat Scan statistics using Kuldorff Sat Scan version 9.6 software were also used to show the statistically significant clusters of early PNC utilization in Ethiopia [17]. The maximum cluster size per population was 50%. Spatial incremental autocorrelation was also assessed to estimate the appropriate distance threshold of the spatial process, which promotes clustering to calculate an appropriate.

Spatial regression

Ordinary least squares regression

After identifying the hot spot of PNC utilization during the critical time, the observed spatial patterns of the predictors of early PNC were identified by spatial regression modeling. The trustworthiness of ordinary least squares regression (OLS) depends on the fluffiness of all the necessary assumptions [18]. In the OLS regression model, the coefficient of each independent variable should be significantly associated with either a protective or risk factor for the outcome variable. The OLS model also should be free from Multicollinearity, non-stationary, the residual must not have a spatial pattern, a model should have key predictors, and the residual must be free from spatial autocorrelation [1820]. The Multicollinearity between independent variables was assessed by the variance inflation factor (VIF). Independent variables with a VIF less than 7.5 are declared to have no Multicollinearity.

The data mining tool and explanatory regression were used to select a model that fulfilled the assumptions of OLS regression. The explanatory regression can select those models with a better adjusted R2 score and select a model that satisfies all the OLS regression assumptions [18]. The final model was validated by internal cross-validation. For a better prediction of the model, use a mean error close to zero, a small root-mean-square error, and an average standard error. The root-mean-squared standardized error must be approaching one [21]. Our model satisfies all the former assumptions.

Geographically weighted regression

The effect of each predictor may vary across the clusters. This non-stationary characteristic can be assessed by using geographically weighted regression (GWR). The single linear regression equation for the study area is possible using GWR but not using OLS. For each cluster, the equation can be formulated using GWR. But OLS uses the data from all clusters. Therefore, for each cluster, different GWR coefficients can be considered. The GWR model [22] can be written as:

Yi=β0(uivi)+k=1pβk(uivi)xik+εi

Where:

Yi = observation of response

(uivi) = latitude and longitude

βk (uivi) (k = 0, 1, … p,) are p unknown functions of geographic locations (uivi).

xik = independent variables at location (uivi), i = 1,2,…n

εi = residuals with zero mean and homogeneous variance σ2.

Ethical declaration

Since it was a secondary data analysis of EDHS, informed consent from the participants was not applicable. Rather, data requests and approval for access were obtained from DHS International. All data was fully anonymized before we accessed informed consent from DHS International.

Results

A total of 2105 participants were included in the analysis. About 1051 (49.9%) gave birth at a health facility, and about 1271 (60.4%) of the participants had a history of ANC visits. Furthermore, 1673 (79.5%) of them had media exposure (Table 2).

Table 2. Characteristics of the women aged 15–49 years who give birth in the 2 years preceding to 2019 EDHS in Ethiopia.

Variable Category Weighted frequency %
Wealth index Poor 1547 73.5
Middle 392 18.6
Rich 166 7.9
Education status No education 1305 62
Primary education 512 24.3
Secondary and above 288 13.7
Place of delivery Home 1054 50.1
Health facility 1051 49.9
Religion Orthodox Christian 590 28.02
Muslim 1088 51.69
Catholic 12 0.56
Protestant 385 18.3
Traditional 23 1.08
Other 7 0.35
Cesarean delivery Yes 128 6.1
No 1977 93.9
Residence Urban 486 23.08
Rural 1619 76.92
Age of women <20 621 29.5
20–34 720 34.2
35–49 764 36.3
ANC visit Yes 1271 60.4
No 834 39.6
Birth order 1 669 31.8
2–3 792 37.6
4–5 381 18.1
≥6 263 12.5
media exposure Yes 1673 79.5
No 432 20.5
Current pregnant Yes 438 20.8
No 1667 79.2
Region Amhara 185 8.8
Oromia 263 12.5
Somali 232 11
Afar 240 11.4
SNNPR 242 11.5
Gambela 166 7.9
Benishangul Gumuz 196 9.3
Tigray 166 7.9
Harari 162 7.7
Addis Ababa 105 5
Dire Dawa 148 7

Note, others = none believer

Prevalence of PNC utilization during critical time

The overall prevalence of PNC utilization during critical times in Ethiopia was 34% (95% CI: 31.5%–36.5%).

Spatial analysis

Spatial autocorrelation

The spatial distribution of PNC utilization during the critical time in Ethiopia was none-randomly distributed across the clusters, with Moran’s I statistics of 0.027 (p = 0.023) (Fig 2).

Fig 2. Spatial Autocorrelation of PNC utilization during the critical time in Ethiopia using EDHS-2019.

Fig 2

Spatial distribution and hot spot analysis

A total of 305 clusters were used for the spatial distribution of PNC utilization during the critical time in Ethiopia. Thus, the highest proportion of PNC utilization during the critical time in Ethiopia was in the western part of Amhara (Fig 3B). Additionally, the hotspot area of PNC utilization during the critical time in Ethiopia was found to be in Benishangul Gumuz and the western part of Tigray (Fig 3A). Whereas, the cold spot area was in the western part of the southern nation and nationality of Ethiopia. For more detail, see Fig 3A.

Fig 3. Spatial distribution and hot spot analysis of PNC utilization during the critical time in Ethiopia using EDHS 2019.

Fig 3

Incremental autocorrelation

The number of bands for the incremental autocorrelation was ten. At a distance of 150 kilometers (km) with a significant z-score value, the spatial clustering PNC utilization during the critical time was highly pronounced (Fig 4).

Fig 4. Incremental autocorrelation of PNC utilization during the critical time in Ethiopia using EDHS 2019.

Fig 4

Spatial interpolation

As the spatial ordinary kriging method showed, the highly predicted utilization of PNC during the critical time in Ethiopia was in the Benishangul Gumuz region. Whereas, the lower predicted utilization of PNC during the critical time was in the Somalia region, the south-eastern part of the Oromia region, some parts of the eastern part of the Amhara region, and the southern Afar region (Fig 5A).

Fig 5. Spatial interpolation and Sat scan analysis of PNC utilization during the critical time in Ethiopia using EDHS 2019.

Fig 5

SaT scan analysis

Out of a total of 305 clusters, 28 were statistically significant clusters. As presented in Fig 5B, the red window represents the primary clusters of PNC utilization during critical times in Ethiopia. Of the total statistically significant clusters, 8 clusters were primary (most likely) cluster types; the rest 20 clusters were secondary, tertiary, and quarterly and fifthly clusters. The primary cluster was located at 10.196300 N and 34.606731 E within a 41.99 km radius in Benishangul Gumuz. Furthermore, the PNC utilization during critical times in Ethiopia was 3.69 times higher than outside the window (RR = 3.69, LLR = 28.77, p-value < 0.001) (Table 3 and Fig 5B).

Table 3. Significant clusters for PNC utilization during critical time in Ethiopia using 2019 EDHS data.

Cluster type Significant Enumeration Areas (clusters) detected Coordinate/radius Population Cases RR LLR P-value
Primary 157, 151, 153, 147, 152, 149, 154, 150 (10.196300 N, 34.606731 E) / 41.99 km 104 42 3.69 28.77 <0.001
Secondary 203 (7.596968 N, 38.357304 E) / 0 km 19 12 5.51 14.21 0.00027
Tertiary 14, 2, 11, 13, 17, 12, 5 (13.668519 N, 39.013447 E) / 52.49 km 88 27 2.72 11.59 0.0027
Quarterly 273, 264, 267, 270, 271, 276, 263, 275, 265, 266, 268 (8.995815 N, 38.793907 E) / 6.96 km 90 27 2.66 11.12 0.0041

Factors of PNC utilization during critical time

The variables used in the OLS model explained the model by 56.4%, and the model fulfils all assumptions (17). The overall model’s fitness was evaluated using joint Wald statistical significance (p < 0.001). The significant predictors were selected by the robust probabilities, which had a p-value of < 0.01. Thus, the predictors for PNC utilization during the critical time were the ANC visit, place of delivery, and media exposure (Tables 4 and 5).

Table 4. Summary of OLS results for PNC utilization during critical time in Ethiopia, using EDHS 2019.

Variable Coefficient Standard error t-Statistic Probability Robust_SE Robust_t Robust_Pr VIF
Intercept 0.26754 0.12187 1.65987 0.07784 0.0104778 2.7982 0.006358 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
No education -0.07023 0.03786 -1.5679 0.08350 0.035417 -0.931413 0.0015* 3.412
Facility delivery 0.324 0.015038 2.879 0.001 0.00554 3.76 0.00532* 1.786
Media exposure 0.0245 0.0349 1.5934 0.001084 0.03675 0.07834 0.0037* 2.963
ANC visit 0.02682 0.014587 1.4424 0.0180503 0.00324 2.04833 0.0012* 3.26

Table 5. OLS diagnosis and model comparison of PNC utilization during the critical time using EDHS 2019.

Numbers of observation 305 Akaike’s information criteria(AIC) 1305.39
Multiple R2 56.7 Adjusted R2 55.8
Joint F-statistics 30.49 Prob (>F), (5,299) degree <0.001
Joint wald statistics 48.26 Prob (>chi-square), (5) degree of freedom <0.001
Koenker (BP) statistics 70.43 Prob (>chi-square), (5) degree of freedom <0.001
Jarque-bera statistics 2.45 Prob (>chi-square), (2) degree of freedom 0.127
Model comparisons
Fitness parameter OLS model MGWR model
AICc 1301 867.4
R2 57.5% 68.8%
Adjusted R2 56.4% 66.7%

Geographic weighted regression

The predictors of PNC utilization during the critical time were not stationary across the clusters in Ethiopia. To consider this non-stationary effect, the local regression method was more advantageous and preferable than the global method [23]. Thus, the adjusted R2 for OLS regression was 56.4%, whereas it was improved to 66.7% in GWR regression. Additionally, the AIC value was reduced from 1301 in OLS to 867.4 in GWR. In general, the local method of analysis (GWR) improves the current model as compared to OLS regression (Table 5).

Regarding the predictors of PNC utilization during the critical time, women who had a history of ANC visits had a positive relationship with PNC utilization during the critical time in Ethiopia. Alternatively, as the proportion of women who had a history of ANC visits increased, the utilization of PNC during the critical time increased as well. The larger the beta coefficient, the stronger the relationship between predictors and outcomes [20]. The red colour in Fig 6B indicates ANC visits were the strongest predictors of PNC utilization during the critical time in Benishangul, Gumuz, and Gambela (0.187772–0.23626). But it had a lower effect on the southern nation and nationality of Ethiopia, southern Somalia, and eastern Oromia (0.0069988–0.09861) (Fig 6B).

Fig 6. Women with facility delivery and ANC visit GWR coefficients for predicting PNC utilization during the critical time in Ethiopia, EDHS 2019.

Fig 6

Also, as the proportion of women who had media exposure increased, the utilization of PNC during critical times increased. Geographically, having media exposure had a positive and strong relationship with PNC utilization during the critical time in Diredawa, Harari, the western part of Benishangul Gumuz, and Gambela (0.166868–0.572251). Whereas, a lower positive relationship was observed in Amhara, Tigray, Afar, Addis Ababa, Oromia, and the southern part of the Somalia region (0.0328–0.2498) (Fig 7A). Furthermore, as the proportion of women who had no education increased, the utilization of PNC during critical times decreased. Thus, no education had a negative and strong relationship with PNC utilization during the critical time in Benishangul Gumuz, the Amhara region, and western Tigray (-0.260170–0.082595). Whereas, a lower negative relationship was observed in Diredawa, northern Tigray, western Oromia, the western part of the south nation and nationality, Oromia, and Somalia (-0.059575–0.034849) (Fig 7B).

Fig 7. Women with no education and media access GWR coefficients for predicting PNC utilization during the critical time in Ethiopia, EDHS 2019.

Fig 7

Discussion

PNC utilization during the critical period (within 2 days) is a very vital service for the mother’s and the newborn’s health. To reverse the complications associated with health problems during the postnatal period, evidence-based, area-specific interventions are very important by assessing the spatial distribution and identifying the predictors in the specific geographical area using geographic weighted regression. Thus, the current study was aimed at assessing the spatial distribution and application of geographical weighted regression analysis to assess the predictors of postnatal utilization during the critical time hot spots in Ethiopia using the EDHS 2019 data set. Hence, the prevalence of PNC utilization during the critical time in Ethiopia was 34% (95% CI: 31.5%–36.5%). This finding was higher than the EDHS 2011 (6.4%) and EDHS 2016 reports of Ethiopia (16.3%) [24], Rwanda (12.8%) [8]. and in southern Ethiopia, 24.9% [13]. The possible reason may be because of the increase in awareness, accessibility of the health service, and health-seeking behavior across time. But the current finding was lower than the 2016 demographic survey of Uganda (49.5%) [25] and Nigeria (37%) [26]. This might be associated with the differences in cultural, socioeconomic, and accessibility of the health service across the countries.

The spatial distribution of PNC utilization during the critical time in Ethiopia was non-randomly distributed across the regions and clusters, with a global Moran’s index statistics value of 0.027 (p-value = 0.023). Which indicated that the distribution of PNC utilization during the critical time was clustered across the area of Ethiopia. Benishangul Gumuz and the western part of Tigray were the hot spots for PNC utilization during the critical time, and the western part of the southern nation and nationality of Ethiopia were the cold spots. The possible reasons for this variation might be variations in awareness about PNC services, socio-economic differences, variations in access to health services, and security problems across the enumeration area of Ethiopia.

The highly predicted region for the utilization of PNC during the critical period in Ethiopia was Benishangul Gumuz. This might be because access to health services is high in Benishangul Gumuz [27]. In return, it can improve the utilization of PNC services during critical times. Whereas, the lower predicted utilization of PNC during the critical time in Ethiopia was in Somalia, the south-eastern part of Oromia, and the southern Afar region. This may be because of the variation in infrastructure, health-seeking behavior, and culture. Additionally, the majority of the Somali Region and Afar Region are pastoralists, and their lifestyle is characterized by seasonal mobility [28]. People in the pastoralist regions have low access to services and infrastructure, live in a traditional setting, and are influenced by cultural and religious values [29]. Because of their cultural and religious practices, pastoralist people have low acceptance of using health services, or PNC utilization during critical times is highly influenced. The primary cluster area of PNC utilization during the critical time in Ethiopia was located at 10.196300 N, 34.606731 E within a 41.99 km radius in Benishangul Gumuz. This is because access to health services in Benishangul Gumuz is high [27], which enables us to improve the utilization of PNC during this critical time. Which was 3.69 times higher than outside the window (RR = 3.69, LLR = 28.77, p-value < 0.001). It was also found that ANC visits, facility delivery, lack of education, and media exposure were the predictors of PNC utilization during the critical time hot spot. As the proportion of women who had a history of ANC visits increased, the utilization of PNC during the critical time increased. Which was supported by a study done in Ethiopia using EDHS 2016 and a study done in southern Ethiopia [4, 30]. This could be because women with ANC visits have an opportunity to get counselling services about PNC utilization. The strong GWR coefficient of women with ANC visits ranges from 0.187772 to 0.23626 in the Benishangul Gumuz, and Gambela. This could be related to high awareness creation, access to health services, and mobilization activities about PNC utilization during the critical time in these regions [27].

Regarding women with facility delivery, as the proportion of women who deliver at health institutions increased, the utilization of PNC during critical times increased. Which was supported by a study done in Ethiopia using EDHS 2016 [31] and Sidama zone Malga district, southern Ethiopia [13]. This could be due to the fact that women who give birth at the health institution have the chance to access health education and counselling services. The strongest GWR coefficient of facility delivery ranged from 0.215478 to 0.49773 in the eastern part of Amhara, Tigray, and the southern nation and nationality of Ethiopia. This may be associated with the better coverage of delivery service in this area, which provides a good opportunity to counsel PNC utilization during critical times.

Again, as the proportion of women who have media exposure increased, the utilization of PNC during critical time increased. This finding is consistent with another study done in Ethiopia [12], studies in Adwa, Southern Ethiopia, Jabitena Amhara, Kenya and Nepal [3236]. This may be because media exposure increases the chance of getting information or knowledge about PNC utilization during critical times, and in return, it enables women to utilize this service [37]. Alternatively, media exposure plays a key role in decision-making for women and positively affects health service utilization [38]. In this study, the stronger GWR coefficient of women with media exposure ranges from 0.166868 to 0.572251 in Diredawa, Harari, the western part of Benishangul Gumuz, and Gambela. Whereas, a lower positive relationship was observed in Amhara, Tigray, Afar, Addis Ababa, Oromia and the southern part of Somalia which ranges from 0.0328 to 0.2498. This variability might be related to the difference in media access and habit of attending media across the region of Ethiopia.

Furthermore, as the proportion of women who had no education increased, the utilization of PNC during critical times decreased. A study conducted in Ethiopia, Indonesia, Uganda, and India [12, 3941] reported the same result. This can be justified by the fact that women with no education lack knowledge about the advantages of early PNC service and have lower health-seeking behavior than women with better educational status. The other possible reason may be that uneducated women can reduce maternal health-seeking behavior and access to the service indirectly through its influence on maternal income. of health services [42]. The stronger negative GWR coefficient of women with media exposure ranges from -0.260170 to -0.082595 in Benishangul Gumuz, the Amhara region, and the western Tigray region. Whereas, a lower negative relationship was observed in Diredawa, northern Tigray, western Oromia, the western part of the south nation and nationality, Oromia, and Somalia, which ranges from -0.059575 to -0.034849. This study provides important information or knowledge for decision-makers or policymakers to expand PNC utilization during critical times by designing key strategies. Additionally, the current study gives important knowledge about the cold spots of PNC utilization during the critical period in Ethiopia, which enables the government and non-governmental organizations to make fair allocations of resources and select the prioritized areas for interventions. The current study identifies the effect of each predictor across the clusters using the most recent, representative, and generalizable sample. But it has limitations, such as the fact that the current study used the geographic coordinates of clusters (2 kilometers for urban areas and 5 kilometers for most clusters in rural areas), which makes it difficult to estimate the cluster effect in the spatial analysis. Secondly, the current study used secondary data, and thus, additional important public health variables were not included.

Conclusion

In Ethiopia, one-third of women utilize the PNC during critical times. The hot spot area of PNC utilization during the critical time was in Benishangul Gumuz and the western part of Tigray, whereas the western part of the southern nation and nationality of Ethiopia was the cold spot area. Antenatal care visits, facility delivery, lack of education, and media exposure were the predictors of postnatal care utilization during the critical time in the hot-spot areas of Ethiopia. Considering the socio-demographic characteristics, women’s empowerment can be a powerful tool for increasing the uptake of early PNC, tracking change over time, and uncovering the needs or strengths of a community to guide planning, policy development, or decision-making. Alternatively, it has the implication of providing an input tool for designing policies and strategies for early PNC utilization. Therefore, in light of the study, the government of Ethiopia should increase access to antenatal care, facility delivery, education, and media to improve the utilization of PNC services during this critical time. Furthermore, future researchers should conduct research by considering additional clinical and public health-important variables through primary data collection techniques.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to give thanks to DHS International for accessing the data.

Abbreviation and acronym

AIC

Akaike information criteria

ANC

Antenatal Care

DHS

Demographic Health Survey

EDHS

Ethiopian Demographic Health Survey

GWR

Geographic Weighed Regression

LLR

Log Likelihood Ratio

OLS

Ordinary Least Square

PNC

Postnatal Care

RR

Relative Risk

Data Availability

All relevant data is within the manuscript

Funding Statement

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Module O.P.C., 1. Postnatal Care at the Health Post and in the Community. Open University. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Organization, W.H. WHO technical consultation on postpartum and postnatal care. 2010, World Health Organization. [PubMed]
  • 3.Organization, W.H., WHO recommendations on postnatal care of the mother and newborn. 2014: World Health Organization. [PubMed]
  • 4.Gebre G., et al., Early Postnatal Care Service Utilization and Associated Factors among Mothers who Gave Birth in the Last One Year Preceding the Survey in Sidama Zone Malga District, Southern Ethiopia. 2019. 11(4): p. 12–12. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.MOH E.J.O., Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Ministry of health health sector development program IV October 2010 contents. 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.WHO, Global technical strategy for malaria 2016–2030. World Health Organization;. 2015 4 November.
  • 7.Organization, W.H., Mother- Baby Package. Implementing safe motherhood in countries. Department of Reproductive Health Research. WHO; Geneva: WHO/RH /MSM/94.11 Rev. 1; 1–20.
  • 8.Rwabufigiri B.N., et al., Factors associated with postnatal care utilisation in Rwanda: A secondary analysis of 2010 Demographic and Health Survey data. 2016. 16: p. 1–8. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-0913-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kanté A.M., et al., Factors associated with compliance with the recommended frequency of postnatal care services in three rural districts of Tanzania. 2015. 15: p. 1–10. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0769-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wudineh K.G., et al., Postnatal care service utilization and associated factors among women who gave birth in Debretabour town, North West Ethiopia: a community-based cross-sectional study. 2018. 18: p. 1–9. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-2138-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.IJEd, C.J.C.s.a. and ICF, health survey AA, Ethiopia, Calverton M, USA. 2016.
  • 12.Tsegaye B., Amare B., and Reda M.J.I.J.o.W.s.H., Prevalence and factors associated with immediate postnatal care utilization in ethiopia: Analysis of Ethiopian demographic health survey 2016. 2021: p. 257–266. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S294058 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Alemu T., et al., Early Postnatal Care Utilization and Associated Factors Among Mothers Who Gave Birth in The Last Twelve Months in Lemmo District, Hadiya Zone, Southern Ethiopia. 2021. 11(5): p. 380. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Fetene S.M., Gebremedhin T.J.B.P., and Childbirth, Uptake of postnatal care and its determinants in Ethiopia: a positive deviance approach. 2022. 22(1): p. 601. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04933-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Alemu T.G., et al., Spatial variation and determinates of dietary diversity among children aged 6–23 months in Ethiopia: spatial and multilevel analysis using Ethiopian Demography Health Survey (EDHS) 2019. 2022. 80(1): p. 1–13. doi: 10.1186/s13690-022-00905-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hu Y., et al., Completeness and timeliness of vaccination and determinants for low and late uptake among young children in eastern China. 2014. 10(5): p. 1408–1415. doi: 10.4161/hv.28054 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kulldorff, M.J.C.i.S.-T. and methods, A spatial scan statistic. 1997. 26(6): p. 1481–1496.
  • 18.Esri, Common Regression Problems, Consequences, and Solutions in Regression Analysis Basics. 2011.
  • 19.Poole M.A. and O’Farrell P.N.J.T.o.t.I.o.B.G., The assumptions of the linear regression model. 1971: p. 145–158. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Haque U., et al., Modelling malaria treatment practices in Bangladesh using spatial statistics. 2012. 11(1): p. 1–11. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-11-63 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Johnston K., et al., Using ArcGIS geostatistical analyst. Vol. 380. 2001: Esri Redlands. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Mei C.-L., et al., Testing the importance of the explanatory variables in a mixed geographically weighted regression model. 2006. 38(3): p. 587–598. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Fotheringham A.S., Brunsdon C., and Charlton M., Geographically weighted regression: the analysis of spatially varying relationships. 2003: John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hussen A.M., et al., Trends and factors associated with immediate postnatal care utilisation in Ethiopia: analysis of the demographic and health surveys, 2011–2019. 2023. 7: p. e2023022. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ndugga P., Namiyonga N.K., and Sebuwufu D., Determinants of early postnatal care attendance in Uganda: further analysis of the 2016 demographic and health survey. 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Somefun O.D. and Ibisomi L.J.B.r.n., Determinants of postnatal care non-utilization among women in Nigeria. 2016. 9: p. 1–11. doi: 10.1186/s13104-015-1823-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Demsash A.W., Walle A.D.J.B.H., and Informatics C., Women’s health service access and associated factors in Ethiopia: application of geographical information system and multilevel analysis. 2023. 30(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2022-100720 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lakew Y., et al., Geographical variation and factors influencing modern contraceptive use among married women in Ethiopia: evidence from a national population based survey. 2013. 10: p. 1–10. doi: 10.1186/1742-4755-10-52 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Henok A. and Takele E.J.E.j.o.h.s. Assessment of barriers to reproductive health service utilization among Bench Maji Zone Pastoralist Communities. 2017. 27(5): p. 523–530. doi: 10.4314/ejhs.v27i5.11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Asratie M.H., et al., Spatial distribution and determinants of newborn care within 2 days of postpartum period among women with at least one antenatal care visit in Ethiopia: Mixed effect multilevel analysis. 2023. 18(2): p. e0282012. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Asmamaw D.B., et al., Early Postnatal Home Visit Coverage by Health Extension Workers and Associated Factors Among Postpartum Women in Gidan District, Northeast Ethiopia. 2023. 68: p. 1605203. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2023.1605203 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Khanal V., et al., Factors associated with the utilisation of postnatal care services among the mothers of Nepal: analysis of Nepal demographic and health survey 2011. 2014. 14(1): p. 1–13. doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-14-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Otunga C.L., Mathenge S., and Ongecha F.J.E.A.M.J., Assessment of utilization of postpartum care services among women in Webuye West, Bungoma County, Kenya. 2017. 94(10): p. 826–845. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Berhe H., et al., Utilisation and associated factors of postnatal care in Adwa Town, Tigray, Ethiopia—a cross sectional study. 2013. 3(1): p. 353–359. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Endriyas M., et al., Contraceptive utilization and associated factors among women of reproductive age group in Southern Nations Nationalities and Peoples’ Region, Ethiopia: cross-sectional survey, mixed-methods. 2017. 2(1): p. 1–9. doi: 10.1186/s40834-016-0036-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Workineh Y.G. and Hailu D.A.J.S.J.P.H., Factors affecting utilization of postnatal care service in Jabitena district, Amhara region, Ethiopia. 2014. 23(3): p. 169–176. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Aboagye R.G., et al., Association between frequency of mass media exposure and maternal health care service utilization among women in sub-Saharan Africa: Implications for tailored health communication and education. 2022. 17(9): p. e0275202. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275202 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Viswanath K., Ramanadhan S., and E.Z.J.M.d.o.p.h. Kontos, Mass media. 2007: p. 275–294. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Uppadhaya S.K., et al., Utilization of postnatal care services in rural area of Western Rajasthan, India. 2016. 7(07): p. 569–572. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Aminah K.J.U.D. and Survey H., Factors determining the utilization of postpartum care services in Uganda. 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Nayan S.K., et al., Utilization of postnatal care services among the rural women in Bangladesh. 2017. 8(2): p. 208–212. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Filippi V., et al., Maternal health in poor countries: the broader context and a call for action. 2006. 368(9546): p. 1535–1541. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69384-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Nigusie Selomon Tibebu

20 Feb 2024

PONE-D-23-41347Spatial distribution and application of geographical weighted regression analysis to assess the predictors of postnatal utilization during the critical time hot spots in Ethiopia using EDHS 2019PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Agimas,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Apr 05 2024 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Nigusie Selomon Tibebu, MSc

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

1. When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. We note that your Data Availability Statement is currently as follows: All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Please confirm at this time whether or not your submission contains all raw data required to replicate the results of your study. Authors must share the “minimal data set” for their submission. PLOS defines the minimal data set to consist of the data required to replicate all study findings reported in the article, as well as related metadata and methods (https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-minimal-data-set-definition).

For example, authors should submit the following data:

- The values behind the means, standard deviations and other measures reported;

- The values used to build graphs;

- The points extracted from images for analysis.

Authors do not need to submit their entire data set if only a portion of the data was used in the reported study.

If your submission does not contain these data, please either upload them as Supporting Information files or deposit them to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. For a list of recommended repositories, please see https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/recommended-repositories.

If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially sensitive information, data are owned by a third-party organization, etc.) and who has imposed them (e.g., an ethics committee). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent. If data are owned by a third party, please indicate how others may request data access.

3. Your ethics statement should only appear in the Methods section of your manuscript. If your ethics statement is written in any section besides the Methods, please move it to the Methods section and delete it from any other section. Please ensure that your ethics statement is included in your manuscript, as the ethics statement entered into the online submission form will not be published alongside your manuscript. 

4. Please include your tables as part of your main manuscript and remove the individual files. Please note that supplementary tables (should remain/ be uploaded) as separate "supporting information" files.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

Reviewer #2: Partly

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Dear editors for PLOS ONE

Thank you for allowing me to review this paper. The paper is addressed important public health topic. I have provided some question and comments as outlined below.

General question

1. Is it really necessary to conduct additional research when a comparable study was completed in Ethiopia?

2. What will it add to the already known facts?

3. What was the gap in the previous study?

4. Why you select geographical weighted regression analysis for this study?

5. Since EMDHS 2019 the data were not collected all variable like the variables; Media exposure such as (internet use, watching TV, listening radio, and reading newspaper), husband education status, maternal working status and so on. These variables were the most significant factor for postnatal utilization during the critical time

General comment

In abstract section particularly in result and conclusion part, it is too lengthy & try to summarize the sentence and it should incorporate the mothed that you used for spatial analysis.

Study design and setting section you should study area map. Since your study, analysis was spatial regression so it is better to show your study area within a single map

In your Sampling procedure and sampling technique section, “2105 women aged 15-49 years who give birth preceding 2019 EDHS survey were included for the study”. It is weighted sample size or not? It should be clear it maybe weighted or unweighted sample size.

In your method section especially spatial analysis part, you should write all spatial analysis technique separately like spatial auto-correlation, hotspot analysis, and interpolation and SaTScan analysis and cite appropriate citation. In addition, why you select ordinary kriging interpolation technique from other interpolation technique like deterministic like inverse distance weighted(IDW) and geostatistical interpolation methods among those methods simple, ordinary Kriging and universal Kriging?

Note: See the results section, especially table 3 for the OLS result. Since your explanatory variables, such as primary education and delivery by CS, were not statically significant variables, your OLS result is unreliable and incorrect. As a result, you should reanalyze your spatial regression by removing those two variables in OLS and GWR analysis and map out all statically significant variables. This breaks the assumption of OLS analysis that violet explanatory variables are statically significant. Rewrite your abstract, results, discussion, and conclusions section overall in light of the updated data.

Reviewer #2: Title: Spatial distribution and application of geographical weighted regression analysis to assess the predictors of postnatal utilization during the critical time hot spots in Ethiopia using EDHS 2019. This article contains some good points but has many limitations and concerns that should be solved before consideration.

Abstract

Introduction: The introduction in the third line states the death rate which does indicate what death. In the next line, it expresses maternal and child mortality. Thus, can you please write the idea sequentially?

The other next statement shows the highest death but not much attention was given. Even considering the research published maternal and child issues account for more than 80% of all articles. If considering several NGOs, government programs, and other aids the issue related to maternal and child health takes the greater portion. Thus, can rewrite the whole abstract in a more plausible scientific way of writing?

Please follow the following more common method of writing an abstract:

The first two lines must encompass the context of the study and the research problem, further two lines must be covered the objective of the papers with unfolding the description of the title. In the next 2 to 4 lines the methodology will be covered. Afterward, the next two lines are for result and performance. In these lines, the author must define how the results and performance are being achieved, for instance, by conducting either simulation or physical implementation. Please mention the name of the simulation or the physical method. The result statistics must be mentioned in the last two lines and either in percentage or with real-time values.- Objective should be clear and precise.

Method: The method mentions the source of data but does not any method of how the data is handled(extracted, missing handled…etc).

The result section even misses the major finding like in proportion or whatever in the very first line.

Conclusion: The conclusion is comprehensive but could be more specific about the optimal PNC and what to do to improve because you just said to improve PNC. Thus, be more practical in both conclusions.

Introduction

- The introduction could be clearer and more concise but still contain more important facts that could clearly show the gap in the literature.

- It provides less extensive background information about PNC and child and its potential impact on maternal health. It might be more effective if the text is more concise and focused on the most crucial information, including clearly identifying the gap in knowledge that this study is addressing. Many studies already discussed this information and it is already overwhelming, if not only for using geographically weighted regression. Reorganizing ideas could be very important and language editing might be also crucial.

-

Method section

The method section could include a brief note on

- Data Preparation

- Brief description of population, sampling, and how the final sampling arrived on

- Description and definition of included variables in table form

- The inclusion and exclusion criteria are well outlined, but the section could be more concise. For easier readability, the extensive list could be presented in a more summarized and organized format, possibly in a table or listed format.

- Brief description of the selected method and its advantages over another method i.e. reason for picking it. Those sections should be under specific subheadings.

- The source of data was mentioned but there is no clear guide other people can access and conduct other studies or there is the link to access the datasets. The link you provided is not the right link. It is the link to the page not to data. just refer to this, it is available in the resource used in this dataset.

- Explanation regarding the possibility of bias and multicollinearity needs addressed

-

Results:

This section look well write, but could benefited from more editing of language, combination of numbers and texts.

Discussion

- The section could provide a more in-depth comparison with existing literature, especially contrasting findings and methodologies. Further, discussing how this study adds to the existing body of knowledge could be more explicit

- The limitations section should be expanded to include limitations related to the methodology used, data, sampling, representatively, inclusion criteria, or analysis methods.

Conclusion:

- The main conclusions of the study should be presented more clearly and concisely. It's essential to summarize the key findings and their implications straightforwardly to ensure that readers can easily grasp the main takeaways from the research.

- The conclusion should include more detailed recommendations for future research, specifically addressing the gaps and limitations identified in the review. Clear and actionable suggestions for future research would enhance the usefulness of the conclusion

- The conclusion could elaborate more on the policy implications of the findings. How should policymakers approach

- Provide more explicit conclusions regarding the importance of considering contextual factors such as socio-demographic characteristics, women’s empowerment, and partner support

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: review PNC_EDHS2019.docx

pone.0309929.s001.docx (16.5KB, docx)

Decision Letter 1

Ranjan Kumar Prusty

30 Jul 2024

PONE-D-23-41347R1Spatial distribution and application of geographical weighted regression analysis to assess the predictors of postnatal utilization during the critical time hot spots in Ethiopia using EDHS 2019PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Agimas,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

==============================

ACADEMIC EDITOR:

  • I agree to the comments from the reviewer this paper requires a major revision in terms of conceptual clarity e.g. critical time and language.

  • The author may consider the comments from Reviewer 3 and add a graph/section conceptual framework of the paper. 

==============================

Please submit your revised manuscript by Sep 13 2024 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Ranjan Kumar Prusty, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments:

I agree to the comments from the reviewer this paper requires a major revision in terms of conceptual clarity e.g. critical time and language.

The author may consider the comments from Reviewer 3 and add a graph/section conceptual framework of the paper.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #3: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #3: Partly

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #3: No

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #3: (No Response)

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #3: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Plos one review.docx

pone.0309929.s003.docx (13.9KB, docx)

Decision Letter 2

Ranjan Kumar Prusty

21 Aug 2024

Geospatial distribution and predictors of postnatal care utilization during the critical time in Ethiopia using EDHS 2019: A spatial and geographical weighted regression analysis

PONE-D-23-41347R2

Dear Dr. Agimas,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice will be generated when your article is formally accepted. Please note, if your institution has a publishing partnership with PLOS and your article meets the relevant criteria, all or part of your publication costs will be covered. Please make sure your user information is up-to-date by logging into Editorial Manager at Editorial Manager® and clicking the ‘Update My Information' link at the top of the page. If you have any questions relating to publication charges, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Ranjan Kumar Prusty, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Ranjan Kumar Prusty

1 Oct 2024

PONE-D-23-41347R2

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Agimas,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

If revisions are needed, the production department will contact you directly to resolve them. If no revisions are needed, you will receive an email when the publication date has been set. At this time, we do not offer pre-publication proofs to authors during production of the accepted work. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few weeks to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Ranjan Kumar Prusty

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: review PNC_EDHS2019.docx

    pone.0309929.s001.docx (16.5KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: respose to reviewers.pdf

    pone.0309929.s002.pdf (463.6KB, pdf)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Plos one review.docx

    pone.0309929.s003.docx (13.9KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: respose to reviewers.pdf

    pone.0309929.s004.pdf (406.8KB, pdf)

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data is within the manuscript


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES