Abstract
By use of a time-kill methodology, the antipneumococcal activity of telithromycin was determined against macrolide-resistant S. pneumoniae isolates having mutations in the 23S rRNA gene and changes in the ribosomal proteins L4 and L22. Telithromycin had MICs ranging between 0.03 and 0.25 μg/ml and was bactericidal against four of seven strains after 24 h at two times the MIC.
Resistance to macrolides is being increasingly reported in clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae worldwide (2). In Germany, a sharp rise in resistance among pneumococcal strains isolated from patients with invasive and noninvasive disease was observed with the macrolides only recently (10, 11). The most prevalent mechanisms of macrolide resistance in S. pneumoniae are mediated by mef(A), a gene encoding an efflux pump, and erm(B), a 23S rRNA methylase that methylates adenine in position 2058, resulting in macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B resistance (13). In addition, mutations in the 23S rRNA gene and ribosomal proteins L4 and L22 have been shown to account for resistance in pneumococci (3, 4, 14). Such isolates have recently been described to be prevalent in Germany (12).
Ketolides are a new class of semisynthetic agents derived from erythromycin A which were designed to overcome erythromycin A resistance in S. pneumoniae. Ketolides are characterized by the replacement of the l-cladinose sugar at position 3 of the erythronolide A moiety by a keto group.
Telithromycin is the first ketolide available in Europe and the United States (since 2001 and 2004, respectively). Approved indications for its use in Europe are mild and moderate respiratory tract infections, including those caused by antibiotic-resistant S. pneumoniae (9). In this paper, the activity of telithromycin against macrolide-resistant S. pneumoniae isolates having mutations in the 23S rRNA gene and changes in the ribosomal proteins L4 and L22 was investigated by time-kill studies with seven pneumococcal strains.
(Portions of the data were previously presented [A. Al-Lahham, S. Da Conceicao Barbosa, R. Lütticken, and R. R. Reinert, Abstr. 44th Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., abstr. E-2066, 2004]).
MICs and characteristics of the seven strains are presented in Table 1. Only some of the 23S rRNA gene mutations, such as A2060G and A2061G (pneumococcal numbering), have been clearly shown to confer macrolide resistance in S. pneumoniae. The relevance to macrolide resistance of most of the other 23S rRNA gene mutations reported for the seven strains needs further investigation. Details of the resistance mechanism and the molecular epidemiology of these strains have been provided previously (12). Microbroth MICs were determined according to NCCLS recommendations (5) using cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth with 5% lysed, defibrinated horse blood. Time-kill testing was performed as described previously (7, 8). Only initial inocula of 5 × 105 to 5 × 106 CFU/ml were acceptable. The lower limit of sensitivity of colony counts in viability testing was 300 CFU/ml. Time-kill results were analyzed by determining the change in log10 numbers of CFU/ml of −1, −2, and −3 at 0, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 h, compared to counts at 0 h. Antimicrobials were considered bactericidal at the lowest concentration that reduced the size of the original inoculum by ≥3 log10 CFU/ml (99.9%) over each of the time periods and were considered bacteriostatic if the inoculum's size was reduced by 0 to <3 log10 CFU/ml. The problem of bacterial carryover was addressed by dilution (7, 8). Results of the time-kill studies for the seven strains are presented in Table 2.
TABLE 1.
Characteristics of macrolide-resistant pneumococcal strains with mutations in 23S rRNA gene and changes in ribosomal proteins L4 and L22
| Strain | Mutation(s) in 23S rRNA gene ata: | TELd MIC (μg/ml) | Change(s) in protein L4b | Change in protein L22b | Acquired macrolide resistance gene |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NRZ 288 | A138G, T389C, A2060G | 0.25 | S20N, A197V | WTe | None |
| NRZ 796 | A138G, A682G, A2061G | 0.03 | S20N | WT | None |
| PS 2938 | G211A, T389C, A2937Gc | 0.03 | R95H | WT | None |
| PS 2909 | T389C | 0.06 | Multiple changes | C117T | None |
| PW 555 | A2937Gc, G2939Tc, C3096Tc | 0.03 | WT | WT | None |
| NRZ 462 | A138G, A376T, T389C, G2135T, G2939Ac | 0.125 | WT | WT | erm(B) |
| NRZ 810 | A138G, T139C, T389C, A2939Gc | 0.06 | WT | WT | mef(A) |
According to S. pneumoniae 23S rRNA numbering.
According to the sequence of S. pneumoniae R6 (GenBank accession no. AF 126059).
Mutations are outside the 23S rRNA.
TEL, telithromycin.
WT, wild type (no change).
TABLE 2.
Time-kill results of pneumococcal strains with mutations in 23S rRNA gene and changes in ribosomal proteins L4 and L22
| Strain | Telithromycin concn | Change in log10 no. of CFU/ml at:
|
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 h | 4 h | 6 h | 8 h | 12 h | 24 h | ||
| NRZ 288 | 0.5 times MIC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 times MIC | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | |
| 2 times MIC | −1 | −1 | −2 | −2 | −3 | −3 | |
| 4 times MIC | −1 | −2 | −2 | −3 | −3 | −3 | |
| 8 times MIC | −1 | −3 | −3 | −3 | −3 | −3 | |
| NRZ 796 | 0.5 times MIC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 times MIC | 0 | 0 | −1 | −1 | −2 | −1 | |
| 2 times MIC | 0 | −1 | −2 | −2 | −3 | −3 | |
| 4 times MIC | −1 | −2 | −3 | −3 | −3 | −3 | |
| 8 times MIC | −1 | −2 | −3 | −3 | −3 | −3 | |
| PS 2938 | 0.5 times MIC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 times MIC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2 times MIC | 0 | 0 | 0 | −1 | 0 | 0 | |
| 4 times MIC | 0 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | |
| 8 times MIC | 0 | −1 | −1 | −2 | −3 | −3 | |
| PS 2909 | 0.5 times MIC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 times MIC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2 times MIC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 4 times MIC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | −2 | −3 | |
| 8 times MIC | 0 | 0 | 0 | −1 | −2 | −3 | |
| PW 555 | 0.5 times MIC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 times MIC | −1 | −3 | −3 | −3 | −2 | 0 | |
| 2 times MIC | −3 | −3 | −3 | −3 | −3 | −3 | |
| 4 times MIC | −3 | −3 | −3 | −3 | −3 | −3 | |
| 8 times MIC | −3 | −3 | −3 | −3 | −3 | −3 | |
| NRZ 462 | 0.5 times MIC | −2 | −3 | −3 | −3 | −1 | 0 |
| 1 times MIC | −3 | −3 | −3 | −3 | −3 | 0 | |
| 2 times MIC | −3 | −3 | −3 | −3 | −3 | −1 | |
| 4 times MIC | −3 | −3 | −3 | −3 | −3 | −3 | |
| 8 times MIC | −3 | −3 | −3 | −3 | −3 | −3 | |
| NRZ 810 | 0.5 times MIC | −1 | −3 | −3 | −3 | −2 | 0 |
| 1 times MIC | −2 | −3 | −3 | −3 | −3 | −3 | |
| 2 times MIC | −2 | −3 | −3 | −3 | −3 | −3 | |
| 4 times MIC | −2 | −3 | −3 | −3 | −3 | −3 | |
| 8 times MIC | −3 | −3 | −3 | −3 | −3 | −3 | |
Telithromycin was bactericidal for four of seven macrolide-resistant S. pneumoniae strains after 24 h at two times the MIC. S. pneumoniae PS 2938, a strain with a combination of an L4 alteration and a mutation in the 23S rRNA gene, showed a bacteriostatic effect as well as a very slow bactericidal effect after 12 h at eight times the MIC. Similar results were observed with strain PS 2909, which possesses an L22 mutation along with multiple alterations in the L4 protein. However, in contrast, the two pneumococcal strains with the S20N alteration in L4 (NRZ 288 and NRZ 769) showed a relatively rapid bactericidal effect.
Ortega and coworkers performed kill studies with 120 clinically significant S. pneumoniae isolates (60 susceptible and 60 highly resistant to erythromycin) and showed 99.9% killing of all erythromycin-resistant strains after 18 to 24 h of incubation (6). Even for strains with erythromycin MICs of ≥64 μg/ml, telithromycin was uniformly bactericidal at 0.25 μg/ml (6); however, the collection of macrolide-resistant S. pneumoniae isolates of Ortega et al. did not include strains with the newly described macrolide resistance determinants included in the present investigation.
Abbanat and coworkers tested the in vitro activities of erythromycin A, telithromycin, and two investigational ketolides, JNJ-17155437 and JNJ-17155528, against the erm- or mef-containing pneumococci (1). Cell counts in telithromycin-treated broth cultures decreased by at least 3 log10 CFU over 24 h, indicating that the ketolides were bactericidal against these isolates over this time period (1). This effect was also observed with the erm- and mef-containing pneumococci included in the present investigation.
In summary, the characterization of ketolides with respect to their bacteriostatic or bactericidal activity may be important for dosing and ultimately for clinical utility. Macrolides and ketolides may be classified as bacteriostatic agents, with slow bactericidal activity observed at higher concentrations against selected clinical pathogens (9). However, as shown by the present study, the killing by telithromycin of S. pneumoniae isolates having the rare combination of mutations in the 23S rRNA gene and changes in the ribosomal proteins L4 and L22 is relatively low. Thus, the efficacy of telithromycin for such infections requires further investigation.
Acknowledgments
We thank Sandra Da Conceicao Barbosa for excellent technical assistance and André Bryskier for providing the telithromycin.
The study was supported by grant RKI-415/1369235 from the German Ministry of Health (Bundesminister für Gesundheit).
REFERENCES
- 1.Abbanat, D., G. Webb, B. Foleno, Y. Li, M. Macielag, D. Montenegro, E. Wira, and K. Bush. 2005. In vitro activities of novel 2-fluoro-naphthyridine-containing ketolides. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49:309-315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hyde, T. B., K. Gay, D. S. Stephens, D. J. Vugia, M. Pass, S. Johnson, N. L. Barrett, W. Schaffner, P. R. Cieslak, P. S. Maupin, E. R. Zell, J. H. Jorgensen, R. R. Facklam, and C. G. Whitney. 2001. Macrolide resistance among invasive Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates. JAMA 286:1857-1862. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Musher, D. M., M. E. Dowell, V. D. Shortridge, R. K. Flamm, J. H. Jorgensen, P. Le Magueres, and K. L. Krause. 2002. Emergence of macrolide resistance during treatment of pneumococcal pneumonia. N. Engl. J. Med. 346:630-631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Nagai, K., P. C. Appelbaum, T. A. Davies, L. M. Kelly, D. B. Hoellman, A. T. Andrasevic, L. Drukalska, W. Hryniewicz, M. R. Jacobs, J. Kolman, J. Miciuleviciene, M. Pana, L. Setchanova, M. K. Thege, H. Hupkova, J. Trupl, and P. Urbaskova. 2002. Susceptibilities to telithromycin and six other agents and prevalence of macrolide resistance due to L4 ribosomal protein mutation among 992 pneumococci from 10 Central and Eastern European countries. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46:371-377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 2004. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Supplement M100-S14. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa.
- 6.Ortega, M., F. Marco, M. Almela, J. Puig, A. Soriano, and J. Mensa. 2004.Activity of telithromycin against erythromycin-susceptible and -resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates from adults with invasive infections. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 24:616-618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Pankuch, G. A., M. R. Jacobs, and P. C. Appelbaum. 1996. MIC and time-kill study of antipneumococcal activities of RPR 106972 (a new oral streptogramin), RP 59500 (quinupristin-dalfopristin), pyostacine (RP 7293), penicillin G, cefotaxime, erythromycin, and clarithromycin against 10 penicillin-susceptible and -resistant pneumococci. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 40:2071-2074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Pankuch, G. A., M. R. Jacobs, and P. C. Appelbaum. 1994. Study of comparative antipneumococcal activities of penicillin G, RP 59500, erythromycin, sparfloxacin, ciprofloxacin, and vancomycin by using time-kill methodology. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 38:2065-2072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Reinert, R. R. 2004. Clinical efficacy of ketolides in the treatment of respiratory tract infections. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 53:918-927. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Reinert, R. R., A. Al-Lahham, M. Lemperle, C. Tenholte, C. Briefs, S. Haupts, H. H. Gerards, and R. Lütticken. 2002. Emergence of macrolide and penicillin resistance among invasive pneumococcal isolates in Germany. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 49:61-68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Reinert, R. R., R. Lütticken, A. Bryskier, and A. Al-Lahham. 2003. Macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae and Streptococcus pyogenes in the pediatric population in Germany during 2000-2001. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47:489-493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Reinert, R. R., A. Wild, P. Appelbaum, R. Lütticken, M. Y. Cil, and A. Al-Lahham. 2003. Ribosomal mutations conferring resistance to macrolides in Streptococcus pneumoniae clinical strains isolated in Germany. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47:2319-2322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Sutcliffe, J., A. Tait-Kamradt, and L. Wondrack. 1996. Streptococcus pneumoniae and Streptococcus pyogenes resistant to macrolides but sensitive to clindamycin: a common resistance pattern mediated by an efflux system. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 40:1817-1824. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Tait-Kamradt, A., T. Davies, M. Cronan, M. R. Jacobs, P. C. Appelbaum, and J. Sutcliffe. 2000. Mutations in 23S rRNA and ribosomal protein L4 account for resistance in pneumococcal strains selected in vitro by macrolide passage. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44:2118-2125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
