Skip to main content
Microbiology Spectrum logoLink to Microbiology Spectrum
. 2017 Jun 9;5(3):10.1128/microbiolspec.funk-0043-2017. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.funk-0043-2017

Sex and the Imperfect Fungi

Paul S Dyer 1, Ulrich Kück 2
Editors: Joseph Heitman3, Neil A R Gow4
PMCID: PMC11687501  PMID: 28597816

ABSTRACT

Approximately 20% of species in the fungal kingdom are only known to reproduce by asexual means despite the many supposed advantages of sexual reproduction. However, in recent years, sexual cycles have been induced in a series of emblematic “asexual” species. We describe how these discoveries were made, building on observations of evidence for sexual potential or “cryptic sexuality” from population genetic analyses; the presence, distribution, and functionality of mating-type genes; genome analyses revealing the presence of genes linked to sexuality; the functionality of sex-related genes; and formation of sex-related developmental structures. We then describe specific studies that led to the discovery of mating and sex in certain Candida, Aspergillus, Penicillium, and Trichoderma species and discuss the implications of sex including the beneficial exploitation of the sexual cycle. We next consider whether there might be any truly asexual fungal species. We suggest that, although rare, imperfect fungi may genuinely be present in nature and that certain human activities, combined with the genetic flexibility that is a hallmark of the fungal kingdom, might favor the evolution of asexuality under certain conditions. Finally, we argue that fungal species should not be thought of as simply asexual or sexual, but rather as being composed of isolates on a continuum of sexual fertility.

INTRODUCTION

Sexual reproduction is a ubiquitous feature of the eukaryotic kingdom with the many benefits of sex in generating genetic diversity as substrates for evolutionary selection being well known. When two different partners come together, there is the generation of genetic variation in the offspring, through the processes of crossover and recombination during meiosis, enabling response of future generations to environmental selection pressures (14). Sexual reproduction also allows the repair of random epigenetic or conventional genetic damage by recombination with homologous chromosomes and can mask lethal mutations (4, 5). In addition, sexual recombination alleviates clonal interference and prevents deleterious mutations hitchhiking to fixation (6). Indeed, there are so many benefits to sexual reproduction that exceptions that are purely asexual have been termed “evolutionary scandals” (7). As a result, supposed ancient asexual species such as the bdelloid rotifers (an exclusively female class of over 460 rotifer species thought to date back several million years) and darwinulid ostracods (a family of around 30 crustacean species thought to have been exclusively female and asexual for over 200 million years, but for which very rare living males have recently been described) have gained notoriety (810). It therefore comes as a great surprise that, until recently, approximately 20% of all fungal species were considered to reproduce only by asexual means, with no recognized sexual cycle, based on knowledge of described fungal species (11, 12). Indeed, in some phylogenetic groupings such as the Ascomycotina, up to 40% of taxa surveyed were deemed to be asexual (13). This is despite the fact that sexual reproduction in fungi can have additional benefits such as the production of fruit bodies and sexual spores that are resistant to adverse environmental conditions, thereby promoting survival of sexual offspring; it can provide a transient diploid arena for selection of genes; and sex can favorably impact genome evolution (1417). Asexual species are also proposed to be short-lived evolutionary “dead ends” subject to rapid extinction (12, 18). Fungal species lacking a known sexual cycle have been referred to as “imperfect” or “mitosporic” fungi and have been grouped into the “Fungi Imperfecti” or “Deuteromycota,” although phylogenetic analysis has shown that these are artificial groupings not based on taxonomic relationship (19). The terms “asexual” and “imperfect” are used synonymously in this review.

Therefore, the imperfect fungi appear to present an evolutionary paradox. However, in the past few decades, there has been accumulating evidence that many of these supposedly asexual species might actually have the potential for sexual reproduction and thus exhibit what has been termed “cryptic” (20, 21), “clandestine” (22), or “covert” (23) sexuality, i.e., having the presence of a sexual cycle that has not yet been directly observed. There are various lines of evidence to support this assertion such as analysis of population genetic markers and the recent, fast-growing number of sequencing data sets from asexual yeasts and filamentous fungi indicating that they harbor mating-type loci, and thus have the potential for a sexual life cycle (see further details below). Indeed, the suggestion of cryptic sexuality has been fulfilled or “consummated” recently for several previously considered asexual fungal species when mating and sexual cycles were conclusively demonstrated for the first time. Prominent examples include the discovery of mating in the opportunistic yeast pathogen Candida albicans (24, 25), and both mating and complete sexual cycles in the opportunistic filamentous fungal pathogens Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus fumigatus, and Aspergillus parasiticus (2628), as well as the biotechnologically relevant species Penicillium chrysogenum, Penicillium roqueforti, and Trichoderma reesei (2932; S. S. Swilaiman, H. Darbyshir, J. Houbraken, R. Samson, and P. S. Dyer, unpublished results).

This article will review how these recent advances were made. It will also speculate on the evolution of asexuality in fungi, including consideration of whether there are any truly imperfect fungi, what characteristics they might have, and the factors that could favor their appearance. Special attention is given to the ascomycete group of fungi from which most discoveries have been made.

EVIDENCE FOR SEXUAL POTENTIAL

Various complementary approaches or “sex tests” (33) have been used to provide evidence of the potential for sexual reproduction in asexual species as will now be described.

Population Genetics

One of the first indirect lines of evidence for sexual recombination in supposed asexual species came from population genetic studies. It would be expected that the genetic diversity, both in terms of genotype and phenotype, is higher in sexually propagating populations than in exclusively asexually propagating clonal species. Various molecular and physiological markers have been used in such population genetic analyses. For example, sequencing with arbitrary primer pairs (SWAPP) provides a molecular method to find and characterize genetic markers with nucleotide-level resolution. In the human pathogen Coccidioides immitis this technique provided molecular evidence for recombination in a fungus for which no sexual stage has so far been described (34). Alternatively, the distribution of alleles of unlinked loci or microsatellite markers has been analyzed in field populations. It would be expected that if a species were freely sexually recombining, then this would result in most unlinked loci being associated randomly in populations, whereas if there were a predominantly clonal and asexual reproduction, then nonrandom association of alleles (“linkage disequilibrium”) would be observed. Thus, evidence of recombination through random association can be taken as an indication of a sexual life cycle. For example, a total of 236 isolates from Diplodia pinea, a haploid opportunistic plant pathogen, were characterized using 13 microsatellite markers. Analysis of these markers confirmed previous results that D. pinea has a high level of gene and genotypic diversity (35). In parallel, sequencing of seven molecular markers from 31 isolates of the animal-associated asexual Penicillium dipodomyis provided evidence of genetic diversity and recombination suggesting cryptic promiscuity (36). In previous work, evidence of recombination had also been observed in populations of A. flavus, A. parasiticus, and A. fumigatus based on DNA fingerprinting and the large number of vegetative compatibility groups present within populations (reviewed in reference 37), and in P. chrysogenum based on microsatellite analysis (38)—all species that were, at the time, considered purely asexual. However, it is cautioned that there are possibly other explanations for genetic diversity in populations such as parasexual reproduction (see Daskalov et al. [176]).

Mating-Type Genes

Mating-type (MAT) genes have provided fundamental insights into the reproductive status of asexual fungi through studies both of their distribution and also functional activity. By way of background, two main types of fungal sexual breeding systems can be distinguished: (i) heterothallism, involving two individuals of opposing mating type, and (ii) homothallism, which refers to sexual reproduction by selfing of an individual strain. Heterothallic sex maintains genetic variation due to mixing of genotypes, whereas homothallic sex can lead to clonality, similar to that observed in asexual reproduction (12). In heterothallic species, sexual recombination occurs between morphologically identical partners containing opposite MAT loci, which, in the case of ascomycetes, consist of dissimilar sequences occupying the same locus on the chromosome. In contrast, homothallic species normally contain genes for both MAT loci, which can either be located at a single MAT locus or on different chromosomes (21, 39). In most fungi, the mating-type locus represents a relatively small region of the genome, less than a few thousand base pairs, expressing transcription factors that determine both the haploid cell type specificity and/or the diploid zygote fate. Only very few fungi possess larger dimorphic sex chromosomes analogous to those of animals (reviewed by Heitman [40]).

For the most part, our general understanding of mating-related processes in ascomycetes is based on knowledge obtained from studies with the hemiascomycete baker’s yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and the filamentous euascomycete (Pezizomycotina) Neurospora crassa (39). In S. cerevisiae, two alternative mating-type (MAT) loci, namely MATα and MATa, determine the sex of individual strains (41). These loci are termed idiomorphs to indicate that they do not represent alleles of a single gene (42). In addition, each yeast strain carries silent mating-type loci of both MATα and MATa, thus allowing infrequent switching of the mating-type identity. In N. crassa, MAT loci are designated mata and matA, whereas in most other euascomycetes the terms MAT1-1 and MAT1-2 are used (21, 4345). MAT loci from euascomycetes harbor one or more open reading frames (ORFs), of which at least one codes for a MAT transcription factor (TF) (21, 46). In contrast to yeasts, euascomycetes normally have only one active mating-type locus, with no extra silent mating-type loci. MAT loci have been characterized from a broad range of homo- and heterothallic euascomycetes (21, 39, 43, 47). Mating-type loci in sordariomycetes seem to be more complex with more than one open reading frame per mating-type locus. Heterothallic members of the Eurotiales are usually less complex and normally contain only a single functional open reading frame as depicted for various Aspergillus and Penicillium species in Fig. 1. This latter group can be considered to provide ideal experimental systems for gaining mechanistic and functional insights into MAT TFs and their various cellular functions as will be focused on below (4851).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Comparison of MAT loci from homo- and heterothallic members of the Eurotiales. Blue arrows indicate a MATα-domain gene, red arrows indicate a MAT high-mobility group gene, black bars indicate intronic sequences, gray bars homologous sequences (48, 49, 51, 173). For A. nidulans, the gene designation is as previously published by Paoletti et al. (49). Note that, whereas isolates of heterothallic species contain only one MAT idiomorph (either MAT1-1 or MAT1-2), isolates of homothallic species contain both types of MAT gene in the same genome (i.e., both MAT1-1 and MAT1-2).

As a rule, the MAT1-1 locus encodes an α-domain TF, and the alternative idiomorph, MAT1-2, is characterized by a gene coding for a TF with a high-mobility group (HMG) domain. The corresponding genes are generally referred to as MAT1-1-1 and MAT1-2-1 (45, 47). While DNA-binding HMG proteins are ubiquitous and found in a wide range of eukaryotes, α1-domain proteins seem to be limited to the fungal kingdom. The prototype of an α-domain protein is Matα1p from S. cerevisiae, whose function has been studied by genetic dissection (52). From this study the α domain was shown to act as a degradation signal for a pathway defined by the SUMO-targeted ligase Slx5–Slx8, which suggested a coordinated regulation in the turnover of regulatory transcription factors to ensure rapid mating-type switch in yeast. Extensive sequence comparisons, phylogenetic analyses, and in silico predictions of secondary and tertiary structures of α and HMG transcription factors supported the hypothesis that the α1 domain is related to the HMG domain (53). This study concluded that fungal α1-box genes originated from an ancestral HMG gene.

Distribution of mating-type genes

First, mating-type genes have provided insights into the nature of asexual fungi through a population genetics approach investigating the distribution of MAT genes in natural populations of supposedly asexual fungi. It might be predicted that truly asexual species would be composed of near-clonal populations consisting of isolates of only one mating type as a result of speciation from a founder of a single mating type. Alternatively, genetic drift could lead to loss of a complementary mating type because there would be no selection pressure to maintain both mating types within a species. And rarely, some fungal species have been found in which isolates of only one mating type have been found (reviewed by Dyer et al. [21]). For example, all isolates of the plant pathogens Rhynchosporium lolii and Rhynchosporium orthosporum from a diverse range of geographical locations and plant hosts throughout Europe were exclusively of the MAT1-1 genotype (54), whereas all individuals of the lichen-forming fungus Thamnolia vermicularis sampled from the Northern, and parts of the Southern, Hemisphere were entirely of the MAT1-2 genotype (55). However, almost always, when studies of MAT distribution have been made in asexual fungal species, it has been found that isolates of both mating types can be found (i.e., the presence of both MAT1-1 and MAT1-2 idiomorphs), and often these are present in a near 1:1 distribution (reviewed in reference 21). This is consistent with a heterothallic sexual breeding system and has been used as strong evidence for the potential for sexual reproduction in the respective asexual species. Such studies have been made with a wide taxonomic diversity of fungi including Aspergillus, Cochliobolus, Fusarium, Penicillium, Rhynchosporium, and Trichoderma species as listed in Table 1. As an example, both MAT1-1 and MAT1-2 isolates of P. chrysogenum have been found worldwide in near equal distribution (Fig. 2). It is noted that the term heterothallic should only strictly be used for outcrossing species where a sexual state has been observed, and the term “proto-heterothallic” has been suggested to describe such asexual species where genetic evidence (e.g., the presence of complementary MAT loci) indicates the presence of a sexual cycle (56).

TABLE 1.

Evidence for mating-type loci, their distribution, functional characterization, and induction of a sexual cycle in representative euascomycete species that have been presumed to be asexuala

Organism Identification of MAT loci 1:1 distribution of MAT locib Functional MAT locusc Induction of a sexual cycled Reference(s)
Acremonium chrysogenum MAT1-1 No Yes No 77
Aspergillus flavus MAT1-1, MAT1-2 Yes Yes 26, 80, 158
Aspergillus fumigatus MAT1-1, MAT1-2 Yes Yes 28, 48
Aspergillus niger MAT1-1 No 70
Aspergillus nomius MAT1-1, MAT1-2 Yes 104
Aspergillus oryzae MAT1-1, MAT1-2 Yes 57
Aspergillus parasiticus MAT1-1, MAT1-2 Yes Yes 27, 80, 159
Aspergillus sclerotiocarbonarius MAT1-1, MAT1-2 Yes Yes 108
Aspergillus terreus MAT1-1, MAT1-2 Yes 106
Aspergillus tubingensis MAT1-1, MAT1-2 Yes 107
Coccidiodes immitis, C. posadasii MAT1-1, MAT1-2 Yes Yes 160, 161
Cochliobolus victoriae MAT1-2 No? 162
Diplodia pinea (Sphaeropsis sapinea) MAT1-1, MAT1-2 Yes 163
Fusarium avenaceum, F. culmorum, F. poae, F. senitectum MAT1-1, MAT1-2 Yes 164
Fusarium tucumaniae MAT1-1, MAT1-2 Yes 165
Fusarium azukicola, F. brasiliense, F. phaseoli MAT1-1, MAT1-2 Yes No 150
Fusarium virguliforme MAT1-1 No 150
Penicillium biforme, P. camemberti MAT1-2 117
P. nalgiovense
Penicillium chrysogenum MAT1-1, MAT1-2 Yes Yes Yes 30, 51, 61
Penicillium digitatum MAT1-1 No 166
Penicillium expansum MAT1-1, MAT1-2 Yes 166
Penicillium fuscoglaucum, P. paneum, MAT1-1 117
Penicillium pinophilum MAT1-1 MAT1-2 Yes? 167
Penicillium roqueforti MAT1-1 MAT1-2 Yes Yes 31, 32
Phialocephalia fortinii – Acephala applanata MAT1-1 MAT1-2 Yes 168
Talaromyces (Penicillium) marneffei MAT1-1, MAT1-2 No 169
Rhynchosporium agropyri, R. secalis MAT1-1, MAT1-2 Yes Yes 54
Rhynchosporium lolii, R. orthosporum MAT1-1 No No 54
Septoria passerinii MAT1-1, MAT1-2 Yes Yes 170
Talaromyces amestolkiae MAT1-1, MAT1-2 Yes Yes 171
Trichoderma reesei (syn. Hypocrea jecorina) MAT1-1, MAT1-2 Yes 29
Ulocladium spp. MAT1-1, MAT1-2 Yes 172
a

This list is not exhaustive but aims to provide an overview of the taxonomic diversity of species that have been examined.

b

Where studies have been undertaken of the distribution of MAT1-1 and MAT1-2 idiomorphs in sample populations.

c

As assessed by gene expression and/or functional characterization by gene manipulation.

d

A question mark indicates some signs of sexual development, but no viable sexual spores formed.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Occurrence of both MAT idiomorphs in wild-type isolates from Penicillium chrysogenum. Blue and red dots represent strains with the MAT1-1 or MAT1-2 locus, respectively (C. M. O’Gorman and U. Kück, unpublished data).

Function and regulatory impact of mating-type locus encoded transcription factors

Second, mating-type genes have provided insights into the nature of asexual fungi through an investigation of their expression and functional activity. The majority of studies have been limited to examining whether or not MAT genes are expressed at the mRNA level as an indication of activity. In almost all cases, MAT gene expression has indeed been demonstrated in imperfect fungi where assayed, which has been interpreted as providing evidence of sexual potential because the MAT genes would appear to be conferring sexual identity in the respective species under examination (see examples listed in Table 1). There have been some rare exceptions. For instance, it was not possible to detect MAT1-1-1 gene expression in R. lolii and R. orthosporum, although MAT gene expression was detected in other supposed asexual Rhynchosporium species (54), but such cases are highly unusual, so far.

However, more in-depth research over recent years has revealed a rather more complex scenario, with expression analysis, providing evidence for a regulatory impact of MAT-encoded TFs beyond specifically sexual reproduction. Therefore, it has become clear that MAT gene expression alone does not necessarily indicate sexual potential, and caution should be exercised in interpreting such data, because MAT genes are likely to have other important functions in asexual fungi beyond mating and sexual development. This was demonstrated by pioneering MAT-locus-dependent expression analysis in the asexual Aspergillus oryzae, which showed that MAT1-1 and MAT1-2 specifically regulated over a thousand genes, including many of unknown function, with 33 genes differentially regulated over 10-fold between the different mating types (57). This was interpreted, in part, as evidence for MAT gene functional activity and therefore sexual potential, but this study also indicated that MAT loci are involved in the regulation of genes beyond those strictly involved in a putative sexual cycle. Similarly, gene manipulation of the MAT1-1-1 gene from the then considered asexual P. chrysogenum revealed that the MAT1-1 α-domain TF impacted developmental processes of biotechnological relevance such as penicillin biosynthesis, light-dependent asexual sporulation, and hyphal morphology, in addition to any role in sex (30). This work was extended, when the MAT1-1-1 gene from P. chrysogenum was analyzed by ChIP-seq analysis. This investigation led to the identification of 254 putative direct MAT1-1-1 target genes and a highly specific MAT1-1-1 DNA-binding sequence (58). Interestingly, some of the most highly bound regions in ChIP experiments occurred near homologs of known functional targets of the S. cerevisiae MATα1 protein, such as Pcppg1, a homolog of MFα1, encoding the α-pheromone, and Pcpre1, a homolog of STE3, coding for the a-factor receptor (59, 60). In addition, this analysis confirmed a large number of new MAT1-1-1 target genes, which had never been related to any MAT TF before and were assigned to functional categories beyond mating, such as asexual development, morphogenesis, amino acid metabolism, secondary metabolism, and iron metabolism (58). A summary of MAT1-1-1 target genes is depicted in Fig. 3. In parallel work, it was later shown that the MAT1-2 HMG domain TF from P. chrysogenum also impacted a variety of developmental processes, including light-dependent asexual sporulation, conidiospore germination, and surface properties, again in addition to any role in sex (61). A summary of MAT-controlled processes in P. chrysogenum is shown in Fig. 4. Comparable results were obtained with the homothallic cereal pathogen Fusarium graminearum which contains both MAT1-1 and MAT1-2 loci in the same genome. Unlike Sordaria macrospora, another well-studied homothallic euascomycete (62), F. graminearum requires all the transcripts from both MAT loci for sexual development. The regulatory mechanisms controlled by MAT genes in F. graminearum were explored by several strategies, including genome-wide transcriptional profiling in various genetic backgrounds, and high-throughput gene deletions (63). Genome-wide microarray with total RNAs from F. graminearum mutants that lacked each MAT locus individually or together revealed 1,245 differentially expressed genes, including those involved in metabolism, cell wall organization, cellular response to stimuli, cell adhesion, fertilization, development, chromatin silencing, and signal transduction.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Target genes of the MAT1-1-1 locus encoded transcription factors from Penicillium chrysogenum, deduced from functional genomics experiments (58, 61). In particular, ChIP-seq analysis has shown that MAT1-1-1 regulates gene expression far beyond their described function as regulator of sexual development (modified from reference 174).

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

Summary of the regulatory functions of MAT locus encoded transcription factors MAT1-1-1 and MAT1-2-1 in Penicillium chrysogenum (modified according to reference 175).

Another example of MAT genes regulating nonsexual processes comes from Fusarium verticillioides, where deletion of the MAT1-2-1 gene led to a drastic reduction in carotenoid production in parallel with a severe decrease in photo-induced expression of genes encoding key enzymes of the carotenoid biosynthesis pathway (64). Moreover, F. graminearum MAT1-1-1 and MAT1-2-1 deletion mutants were shown to be reduced in virulence, although none of the MAT locus genes was important for plant infection, indicating that the MAT proteins may play a host-specific role in colonization of corn stalks (65). Another interesting demonstration of MAT TFs acting outside the sexual life cycle was found for the human pathogenic basidiomycete Cryptococcus neoformans, where the heterodimers of MAT TFs Sxi2a and Sxi1α were shown to be involved in regulation of several well-studied virulence genes (66). Based on these observations, it can be proposed that MAT TF target genes in hemiascomycetes are restricted to genes relevant for mating, whereas MAT-mediated regulation beyond sexual development might be a common feature in euascomycetes. It is conceivable that comprehensive rewiring of gene regulatory networks controlled by MAT TFs has occurred since the division of these two subclasses.

Genome Studies

Whole-genome sequencing projects have been completed for several asexual fungi over the past decade. This has allowed the genomes to be screened for the presence of genes known to be required for sexual reproduction as a way to evaluate whether the species are truly asexual. The rationale for this work is that, if a species is genuinely asexual, then it would be predicted that genes required for sexual reproduction would either accumulate deleterious mutations, or even be lost, in asexual species due to random mutation and lack of selective pressure to maintain the functional forms of the gene. Furthermore, those genes involved with the earliest stages of mating might be the most obvious candidates for mutation and/or loss to avoid unnecessary downstream metabolic investment in sex. This is based on the understanding that asexual species have evolved from sexual ancestors (e.g., reference 67), sex being a basal characteristic of the fungal kingdom (68).

Perhaps surprisingly, almost all genome projects to date have revealed that supposedly asexual fungi do have apparently intact sets of genes known to be required for sexual reproduction, with no evidence of gene mutation or loss. In the first study for the Pezizomycotina, the genomes of the then considered asexual A. fumigatus and A. oryzae were screened for the presence of over 200 genes linked to sex (from mating through to meiosis), and it was found that all genes were present. Furthermore, a heterothallic mating system was indicated based on the presence of a characteristic MAT idiomorph (69). Soon afterward, genome sequencing of the asexual Aspergillus niger, used widely in the biotechnological industries, again revealed the presence of a suite of genes linked to mating and sexual development (70). An apparent mutation in the pro1 gene was found in the latter study, but this was later discounted because of an incorrect annotation of an intron. Concurrent genome screening of the then asexual A. flavus also revealed a full complement of apparently functional genes required for sexual reproduction (C. E. Eagle and P. S. Dyer, unpublished results). Furthermore, BLAST analysis of the genome sequence of the basidiomycete yeast Malassezia globosa, a causal organism of dandruff, revealed the presence of a MAT locus containing pheromone, pheromone receptor, and sex-linked homeodomain genes, together with other pheromone signaling pathway genes elsewhere in the genome of this presumed asexual species (71). Most recently, genome analysis of asexual Rhynchosporium species has again failed to detect any loss or mutation in genes related to sexual reproduction (54; International Rhynchosporium Genome Project, unpublished results). A further revelation from genome analysis of P. chrysogenum was the discovery of mutations apparently caused by a RIP-like (repeat-induced point mutation) process, again linked to sexual reproduction (72).

However, some caution must again be exercised in interpreting such evidence. Genome analysis of eight Candida genomes revealed that certain species with known sexual states were missing some orthodox components of mating and meiotic pathways. For example, the homothallic Lelongisporus elongisporus lacked any known MAT gene, having a syntenic MAT locus but which only contained noncoding DNA, and also lacked a pheromone precursor and receptor (73). Similarly, evidence of a degenerated MAT1-1-1 pseudogene has been reported for the heterothallic Cordyceps takaomontana (74). Therefore, the lack of sex-related genes is not conclusive proof of asexuality, whereas the presence of such genes is arguably circumstantial evidence for sexual potential.

Functionality of Sex-Related Genes

Further evidence that imperfect fungi have the potential for sexual reproduction has come from studies where sex-related genes from certain asexual species have been expressed heterologously in model fungal species known to be sexual, and have been shown to be functionally active. This provides evidence of a conserved sexual function in the respective asexual host species. Genes assayed in this way include MAT genes and members of pheromone signaling pathways as will now be described.

Cross-species mating-type gene exchange provides a powerful method to demonstrate the functionality of mating-type locus-encoded proteins. Different approaches are feasible. For example, mating-type loci of the α domain or HMG type can be introduced into isolates of a heterothallic species carrying the opposite mating-type locus. In this case, the triggering of sexual development leading to formation of fruiting bodies (although not necessarily sexual spore formation) provides good evidence of MAT gene functionality. This approach was successfully demonstrated in pioneering studies of known sexual species when MAT loci from the homothallic fungus S. macrospora were shown to induce sexual development (although not ascospore formation) in the heterothallic fungus Podospora anserina (75). An alternative approach is to use deletion mutants, lacking a mating-type locus. Complementation of the deletion mutant may be performed with a DNA fragment carrying the MAT locus from a heterologous host. For example, MAT1-2-1 from A. fumigatus, encoding a HMG box mating transcriptional factor, was introduced into a mating-type deletion mutant of the homothallic fungus A. nidulans (76). Using a MAT1-2-1 gene under the expressional control of the Aspergillus nidulans MAT2 (matA) promoter, it was demonstrated that the MAT1-2-1 gene from A. fumigatus, at that point only known to be asexual, was able to drive sexual reproduction in A. nidulans. In parallel studies, it was shown that the MAT1-1-1 gene from A. fumigatus was able to complement an A. nidulans MAT1 (matB) deletion mutant and restore sexual fertility (50). Comparable results were reported for Acremonium chrysogenum, the fungal producer of the pharmaceutically relevant β-lactam antibiotic cephalosporin C. This filamentous fungus is classified as asexual, because no direct observation of mating or meiosis has yet been reported. The investigated strains were shown to carry a MAT1-1 mating-type locus with a MAT1-1-1 α-domain gene and a MAT1-1-2 gene, encoding an HPG domain protein, defined by the presence of the three invariant amino acids histidine, proline, and glycine. In addition, a MAT1-1-3 gene was detected, encoding a high-mobility group (HMG) domain protein (77). So far, only a single wild-type isolate has been characterized, and no reports are available that strains with opposite mating-type loci exist. To assess the potential of A. chrysogenum for sexual reproduction, the entire A. chrysogenum MAT locus was transferred into a MAT1-1 deletion strain of the heterothallic ascomycete P. anserina. After fertilization with a P. anserina MAT1-2 (MAT2) strain, the corresponding transformants developed fruiting bodies with mature ascospores. These results demonstrated that the MAT genes of A. chrysogenum were functional and supported the hypothesis of an extant sexual cycle in this species.

Other evidence for a sexual cycle stems from functional studies of pheromone and pheromone receptor genes, using the heterologous S. cerevisiae system as a genetic tool. Successful pheromone binding and signaling would be expected to result in cell cycle arrest and change in cell morphology and lead to formation of a halo in lawns of S. cerevisiae (78). Based on similarity to the S. cerevisiae MFα proteins, the P. chrysogenum Pcppg1 gene was predicted to produce a decapeptide pheromone of sequence KWCGHIGQGC, expected to bind to the cognate PcPRE2 receptor protein. And indeed, S. cerevisiae wild-type cells (ScSTE2p) or yeasts heterologously expressing PcPRE2 exhibited polarized growth, leading to pear-shaped forms (shmoos, originally named after a cartoon character of this shape drawn by Al Capp) of unconjugated haploid cells, in response to either the native S. cerevisiae α factors or the synthetic decapeptide pheromone PcPPG1, respectively (30). This result was complemented by bioassays in which adding synthetic PcPPG1 pheromone to lawns of yeast cell, expressing PcPRE2, resulted in halo formation. Thus, PcPRE2 and PcPPG1 represent a functional pheromone-receptor pair likely involved in the mating of P. chrysogenum, which was later observed by Böhm et al. (30). These data were consistent with microarray analyses demonstrating the expression of the genes for a pheromone precursor (Pcppg1) and two pheromone receptors (Pcpre1, Pcpre2) in P. chrysogenum (30).

As well as the examples above, a STE12 homolog from the asexual Penicillium marneffei (renamed Talaromyces marneffei) was able to complement a steA gene deletion mutation of A. nidulans and restore sexual fertility (79). Meanwhile, overexpression of the A. fumigatus nsdD gene led to increased development of sexual structures (cleistothecia) in A. nidulans (50). Finally, before the identification of any sexual stage, pheromone precursor and receptor genes were shown to be expressed in A. fumigatus, A. flavus, A. parasiticus, A. oryzae, and P. chrysogenum in what was termed “sexual posturing” (22, 48, 51, 57, 80). Most recently, similar expression of pheromone signaling genes has been demonstrated in several other asexual aspergilli including Aspergillus aculeatus, A. brasiliensis, A. clavatus, A. niger, A. sydowii, A. wentii, and A. zonatus (178). However, as above, some caution must be used when interpreting such results because it appears that some aspects of the cellular sexual machinery can be subverted for other purposes in fungi. For example, the STE2 pheromone receptor of the asexual Fusarium oxysporum has been shown to play a role in detection of plant exudates (81). Therefore, detecting expression of sex-related genes is not necessarily a sign of cryptic sexuality.

Formation of Sex-Related Structures and Lichen Species Pairs

One final line of evidence that imperfect fungi have the potential for sexual reproduction comes from the observation that certain asexual species have been observed to form developmental structures representing the initial stages of sexual reproduction. This suggests that they might have the potential for sexual fertility if correct conditions can be identified to induce the complete sexual cycle (56). For example, several asexual Aspergillus and Penicillium species are known to form sclerotia, a necessary prerequisite for sexual reproduction in closely related species (82, 83). This phenomenon was recently observed for certain isolates of A. niger which were able to form sclerotia when they were incubated on certain organic substrates including raisins (Fig. 5) (84) (G. Ashton and P. S. Dyer, unpublished results).

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5

Sclerotia formation (arrowed large gray-brown spheres) in Aspergillus niger, an indication of the potential for sex in this biotechnologically important species? Scale bar indicates 500 μm. Note that this species is predominantly of the MAT1-1-1 genotype (H. Darbyshir, G. Ashton, and P. S. Dyer, unpublished data).

A particularly intriguing phenomenon related to this is the occurrence of so-called “species pairs” in lichen biology. This refers to the situation where two morphologically and phylogenetically very closely related pairs of lichen species have been described which differ solely in the fact that one species bears sexual structures on the thallus, whereas the sister species lacks any sexual structures (8587). It is tempting to speculate that the reason for asexuality in the sterile partner species might be principally because of the lack of a suitable mating partner to induce sex, rather than these being genuinely separate species as per received orthodoxy. In related examples from lichen-forming fungi, Seymour et al. (86) reported finding the first fertile example of Usnea sphacelata (as evidenced by formation of sexual fruiting bodies [ascomata] on the thalli), and Greenaway (88) described the first fertile thalli of Normandina pulchella; both species had previously been considered to reproduce only by asexual means.

DISCOVERY OF MATING AND SEXUAL REPRODUCTION—AND IMPLICATIONS

The above lines of evidence have provided, and these continue to give, an indication of the potential for sexual reproduction in the imperfect fungi, although such evidence has at best been circumstantial because the elusive sexual states were still missing. However, a series of major breakthroughs have been reported since 2000 for yeasts and 2009 for filamentous fungi, where modern molecular approaches combined with classical microbiology laboratory culture have been used to demonstrate the existence of either mating and/or a complete functional sexual reproductive cycle in a series of supposed asexual species from different genera. In most cases, a key first step was the use of molecular diagnostic tools to identify potential sexual mating partners and then the setting up of directed crosses between parental isolates of complementary mating type under a range of incubation conditions (56). Some notable examples are described below.

Mating in C. albicans

There had been strong indications that the opportunistic human pathogen C. albicans might have sexual potential following the identification of a mating-type locus similar to that seen in the model sexual yeast S. cerevisiae, together with the detection of other genes that had high homology to sexual pathway genes in S. cerevisiae (89) (see also Bennett and Turgeon [177]). These indications were confirmed when two different groups were able to induce mating between a or α strains of C. albicans to produce a tetraploid state. Hull et al. (24) made artificial a or α strains by deletion of the alternative MTL α or a locus, respectively, and crossed these under selective conditions in mice, while Magee and Magee (25) induced chromosome loss to produce a or α strains by deletion of one of the MTL loci and then crossed auxotrophic strains on agar media using selective conditions. Although both groups therefore reported the first success in mating strains of C. albicans, the rates of mating were rather low and led to a tetraploid state without any meiotic division. A second major advance then followed, being the discovery that homozygous a/a or α/α C. albicans cells must undergo a phenotypic transition from a “white” traditional yeast-like morphology to an “opaque” morphology to achieve mating competency (9092). However, even under these conditions, meiosis has still not yet been observed in C. albicans. Instead, tetraploids appear to undergo stochastic concerted chromosome loss to return to a diploid or near-diploid state, particularly under stressful conditions (93, 94). Furthermore, even when mating-competent haploid strains of C. albicans were produced under in vitro and in vivo conditions, it was still not possible to induce meiosis (95). Therefore, true sex involving meiotic nuclear recombination has still not yet been observed in C. albicans; instead, this is best described as mating and a parasexual process. It is also noted that the intriguing phenomenon of same-sex mating has also been observed in C. albicans, but again with no evidence of meiosis (96).

Sex in Aspergillus Species

The genus Aspergillus comprises over 340 species (97) and includes a series of species of great economic, medical, and scientific importance. Members of the genus share the common feature of an “aspergillum,” a branching head conidiogenous structure for the production of asexual spores. In addition, about one-third of species (36% according to reference 33) are known to reproduce sexually. All the latter species produce fruiting bodies known as cleistothecia, but a variety of cleistothecial forms are evident, meaning that under traditional taxonomic classification, different teleomorphic genera have been assigned according to morphological features such as whether cleistothecia are enclosed, the color of cleistothecia, and whether they are surrounded by accessory cells (33, 37, 97). The fact that the remaining majority of Aspergillus species (64% according to reference 33) are only known as imperfect fungi has attracted research interest both from an applied and fundamental perspective, because many species of biotechnological and pathological interest were only known as asexual organisms. If it were possible to induce sexual cycles in such species, then this would provide a valuable tool for strain improvement and classical genetic analysis, as well as providing insights into the population biology and evolutionary potential of species. Research into this area has been reviewed (see reference 37), with a summary and updates provided below.

Initial investigations involved the use of population genetic approaches, which revealed evidence of high levels of genetic diversity and recombination in nature for the spoilage and aflatoxin producing A. flavus and A. parasiticus (98, 99), and the opportunistic pathogen A. fumigatus (28, 48, 100, 101). Mating-type genes were then identified for the first time from the aspergilli (102, 103), which allowed PCR diagnostics to be developed. This led to the identification of alternative MAT1-1 and MAT1-2 idiomorphs and the discovery of a near 1:1 distribution of compatible mating types both within global and regional populations of A. fumigatus (28, 48). Similar results were later reported for both A. flavus and A. parasiticus for a local field population from the United States (80). All these observations provided evidence of cryptic sexuality in these species.

A major breakthrough then came when laboratory work led to a sexual stage being induced for the first time in A. fumigatus. This was achieved by crossing known MAT1-1 and MAT1-2 isolates from a population in Ireland (which had shown evidence of recombination) on oatmeal agar in a barrage formation under specific environmental conditions. Cleistothecia characteristic of the teleomorph genus Neosartorya were produced after 6 to 12 months, and the sexual stage named Neosartorya fumigata under existing taxonomic rules. Recombination was demonstrated in the ascospore offspring using molecular markers (28). Soon afterward, similar crossing efforts were rewarded with A. flavus and A. parasiticus, when incubation of strains of opposite mating type for between 6 and 12 months led to the production of hardened sclerotia found to contain sexual ascospores, although recombination was not assayed. The two sexual stages were assigned to the teleomorph genus Petromyces (26, 27).

The studies with A. fumigatus, A. flavus, and A. parasiticus provided a precedent for ensuing research in which attempts were made to cross MAT1-1 and MAT1-2 isolates of other asexual Aspergillus species under conditions conducive to sex in the aspergilli. A sexual cycle was subsequently induced in A. nomius (104), A. lentulus (105), A. terreus (106; A. E. Ahmed and P. S. Dyer, unpublished results), A. tubingensis (107), A. sclerotiicarbonarius (108), and A. clavatus (S. Swilaiman and P. S. Dyer, unpublished results). The discovery of sexual reproduction in A. tubingensis and A. sclerotiicarbonarius is particularly notable, because these are members of the black aspergilli and therefore related to the economically important species A. niger, which is much used in the biotechnology sectors. However, all efforts to induce sexual reproduction have so far failed in this species, although the ability to induce sclerotial production in certain strains, together with identification of a TF linked to this process, is a promising sign (Fig. 5) (84; T. R. Jørgensen, J. Frisvad, K. F. Nielsen, P. S. Dyer, and A. F. J. Ram, unpublished results).

Sex in Penicillium Species

The genus Penicillium comprises over 360 species that have a ubiquitous distribution (83). Morphologically, they are characterized by the production of an asexual reproductive structure, called the penicillius (83, 109). Together with species of the genus Aspergillus, penicillia belong to the order Eurotiales (97) and are among the most prevalent fungi on earth. Taxonomically, Penicillium species are the asexual (anamorphic) forms of sexual (teleomorphic) species from the genera Eupenicillium and Talaromyces (83, 97). However, the majority of Penicillium species (73% according to reference 33) have no known sexual state.

Because of their widespread beneficial usage in food production and biotechnology, penicillia are of outstanding economic and medical importance. For example, P. camemberti and P. roqueforti are used in the making of white mold (e.g., Brie and Camembert) and blue mold-ripened cheeses (e.g., Roquefort and Stilton) (110). In the pharmaceutical industry, P. brevicompactum is used for large-scale production of the immunosuppressant mycophenolic acid, P. griseofulvum for the industrial production of the broad-spectrum antibiotic griseofulvin, and P. citrinum for production of the cholesterol-lowering drug compactin (111113). Last but not least, P. chrysogenum, perhaps the most renowned representative of the genus Penicillium, constitutes the only industrial producer of the β-lactam antibiotic penicillin. Today, penicillin is the most commonly used drug in the treatment of bacterial infections and one of the most valued products in the global anti-infective market. As with the aspergilli, the economic importance of certain asexual Penicillium species has meant that they have attracted research interest regarding the possibility of inducing sexual reproduction for strain improvement and classical genetic applications as will now be described for P. chrysogenum and P. roqueforti.

Initial investigations of the sexual potential of P. chrysogenum (reclassified recently as P. rubens by Houbraken et al. [97, 114]) were made using DNA and genome-sequencing approaches (51, 115). Interestingly, the strain originally discovered by Sir Alexander Fleming (116) was found to contain a MAT1-2 locus, while later, industrially used strains were found to carry the MAT1-1 locus. The latter observation can be explained by the fact that they all are derivatives of a wild-type isolate, obtained in the late 1940s in Peoria, Illinois. Hoff and coworkers showed that these strains retained transcriptionally expressed pheromone and pheromone receptor genes required for sexual reproduction (51). A further survey showed that P. chrysogenum isolates from diverse global locations contain either the MAT1-1 or the MAT1-2 locus with an almost equal distribution (Fig. 1).

In order to induce the sexual life cycle in P. chrysogenum, 17 MAT1-1 wild-type or mutant strains were crossed in various combinations with 10 MAT1-2 wild-type isolates using a range of different growth media and conditions. Finally, a MAT1-1 strain derived from a strain development program in the 1950s was found to generate cleistothecia in crosses with a MAT1-2 wild-type strain (30). The culture conditions were similar to those described for A. fumigatus (28), but the oatmeal agar had to be supplemented with biotin, which accelerated the formation of mature cleistothecia, which appeared after 5 weeks. Measurement of the penicillin titer on plate test and examination of restriction fragment length polymorphism of 11 genes, which differed between the two parental strains, proved that genetic recombination has occurred in all ascospore isolates investigated. In a subsequent analysis, the chromosome constitution of selected ascospore isolates was determined by whole genome sequencing (61). Included in these studies were the functional analyses of deletion strains, lacking either the MAT1-1 or the MAT1-2 locus. From these studies, it became evident that both mating-type loci have functions beyond sexual development (see discussion above).

Meanwhile the sexual potential of P. roqueforti has also been investigated. P. roqueforti is widespread in the natural environment and is a common spoilage agent in stored foods and meat products. In food production, this ascomycete is used as a starter culture for blue-veined cheese production. A survey of several world isolates from P. roqueforti revealed the presence of both mating types, and the detection of repeat-induced point mutation (RIP) within repeated sequences and transposable elements indicated strongly that sexual recombination had occurred or was ongoing in P. roqueforti (31, 117). This indirect evidence for a sexual cycle was recently confirmed when a sexual cycle was induced under laboratory conditions (31, 117; Swilaiman et al., unpublished). In one study, four MAT-1-1 and MAT1-2 strains were tested in eight possible mating combinations. Although many combinations were not fully fertile (only empty fruiting bodies were produced), typical sexual structures such as cleistothecia, asci, and ascospores were detected in some crosses (32). In a parallel study, sexual reproduction was induced in a higher number of crosses, including when crossing isolates from different types of blue cheese (31; Swilaiman et al., unpublished). Interestingly, the conditions developed for P. chrysogenum (30) to induce sex were identical, indicating that these conditions are valid for a wide range of Penicillium species. Recombination of ascospore progeny from P. roqueforti was demonstrated with either microsatellite or DNA fingerprint markers (31, 32; Swilaiman et al., unpublished). The sexual cycle of P. roqueforti offers the exciting potential to select for progeny with altered flavor and mycotoxin characteristics for novel blue cheese strains (H. Darbyshir, J. Frisvad, and P. S. Dyer, unpublished results).

Sex in Trichoderma and Other Genera

The ascomycete T. reesei is used in the biotechnology industry for applications such as the decomposition of diverse substrates through to the production of second-generation biofuels from cellulosic waste. Moreover, efficient biocontrol strains have been developed as biological fungicides (118). T. reesei, the anamorph of the ascomycete Hypocrea jecorina, was believed for more than 50 years to propagate strictly asexually. However, Seibel and coworkers succeeded in inducing sexual development in the industrial production strain QM6a (29). This strain contains the MAT1-2 mating-type locus, but was found to be female sterile, i.e., unable to produce the specialized hyphal tissues needed for fruit body development (in this case, perithecia). Thus, in mating, this strain was only able to act as a male fertilizing partner, but was then able to undergo a heterothallic reproductive cycle with wild-type isolates carrying the MAT1-1 locus. Perithecia embedded in stroma were generated under different light conditions. Interestingly, visible light is dispensable for stroma formation, and constant light even inhibited stroma formation. Further studies indicated that the light-regulatory protein Envoy 1, a homolog of the light-oxygen-voltage (LOV) domain-containing protein vivid from N. crassa, is essential for female fertility (119). In follow-up studies, further parental strains were crossed with T. reesei. The analysis of unusual 16-spore asci, which were produced when parental strains showed chromosomal heterogeneities, revealed the formation of a considerable number of inviable ascospores. This indicated that chromosomal homogeneity is crucial for highest sexual fertility (120). These results correspond well with the sequencing data of ascospore progeny of P. chrysogenum that were derived after crossing of parental strains that exhibited heterogeneous chromosomal configurations (121).

There are further reports of sex being induced in other genera such as Fusarium (122) and Trichophyton (123) species by utilizing MAT diagnostic tools and particular crossing conditions, but a full discussion is beyond the scope of the present review.

Implications of the Discovery of Fungal Sex

The presence of a sexual cycle offers many potential benefits. First, the discovery of a sexual cycle in biotechnologically relevant species provides an exciting new tool in addition to conventional breeding approaches to genetically engineer industrial production strains in the laboratory. Thus, fungal mating systems may be appropriate for the improvement of industrial production strains similar to established animal and plant-breeding programs (124). This strategy was recently implemented for T. reesei, when a female sterile strain was engineered to female fertility (125). By introduction of the ham5 gene, it was possible to restore female fertility of the QM6a T. reesei wild-type strain, which is the progenitor strain of all industrially used derivatives. The generation of this strain, which may serve as male as well as female partner in mating experiments, provides the basis for further breeding of this cellulose-producing fungus. As an indication of the potential for this work, a crossing experiment with different wild-type mating partners of T. reesei showed that ascospore isolates were obtained that produced a higher level of xylanases than either parental strain, despite chromosomal heterogeneity (120). In comparable work, low-penicillin-producing strains could be crossed with P. chrysogenum wild-type isolates to give rise to ascospore isolates with an increased penicillin titer (61). By crossing different isolates of P. chrysogenum it was also possible to select for ascospore progeny with minimal production of a secondary metabolite chrysogenin, which can interfere with penicillin purification (30). However, it might prove to be a general problem in future mating experiments to obtain mating partners with compatible karyotypes. Previous crossing experiments with isolates from different locations of the pseudohomothallic ascomycete Neurospora tetrasperma resulted frequently in sexual dysfunction, with abnormalities ranging from reduced ascospore viability to complete sterility (126). Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis and mating of different geographic strains from the homothallic fungus S. macrospora showed a correlation between karyotype heterogeneity and reduced sexual fertility (127). Similarly, one investigation of mating with P. roqueforti strains from noncheese and cheese habitats belonging to different genetic clusters found that highest fertility was only achieved when strains from the same genetic cluster were crossed. Fertility was significantly reduced when strains isolated from cheese were crossed with those from noncheese habitats, possibly as a result of domestication and clonal selection (128). However, parallel studies found comparable levels of fertility when crossing different isolates of P. roqueforti used in blue cheese production, so this might be a strain-specific effect (31; Swilaiman et al., unpublished). In future strain improvement programs, the combination of conventional mating experiments and contemporary molecular tools, such as ChIP-Seq or forward genetic analysis, will generate novel approaches to engineer genetically industrial producer strains. One prerequisite for the success of these breeding experiments might therefore be to select or design mating partners with compatible karyotypes to ensure breeding success.

Second, the discovery of a sexual cycle provides a very valuable tool for classical genetic analysis. By crossing of partners showing different traits and analysis of the sexual progeny, it is possible to determine whether a trait is mono- or polygenic in basis. The sexual cycle can also be used for gene mapping, verification of gene function, and identification of genes of interest through techniques such as bulk segregant analysis (124).

Finally, the discovery of a sexual cycle provides important insights into the evolutionary potential of species. Species undergoing sexual recombination are likely to generate and maintain considerable genetic diversity within populations. This is predicted to lead to more rapid breakdown of control measures for fungal pathogens (129). Therefore, having knowledge about the reproductive mode of a species can inform disease management strategies. This might, for example, involve removal of suitable substrates to reduce the risk of occurrence of the sexual cycle—as can be achieved by removal of straw stubble after harvest to prevent the sexual cycle of plant pathogenic Tapesia species (130), and melon debris infected with Monosporascus cannoballus after crop termination (131).

POTENTIAL FOR SEX IN OTHER ASEXUAL SPECIES—CONSIDERATIONS

As will be apparent from the examples given above, in almost all cases where asexual fungal species have been studied in depth, evidence can be obtained of cryptic sexuality, and, in many instances, a fully functional sexual cycle can be induced. This raises the question of whether there are any truly imperfect fungi. We offer some considerations about this topic below.

First, we contend that there are some genuinely long-lived asexual fungal species, which is made possible by the genetic flexibility that is an especial characteristic of the fungal kingdom (132). Fungi exist in nature in a variety of ploidy states, from haploid to diploid to tetraploid, they can exhibit accessory chromosomes, and some species can even manipulate the genome to duplicate localized chromosome regions in the face of environmental pressures (132, 133). In tandem with this, fungi have developed alternative methods to heterothallic sex to allow gene flow both within and between species. Fungi are able to undergo vegetative fusion with hyphae of partners of the same heterokaryon compatibility group, thereby allowing nuclear exchange, and this can even lead to nuclear fusion and gene recombination via the parasexual cycle (see Daskalov et al. [176]). In recent years there have been reports of same-sex mating in human pathogenic fungi (92, 96). Also, there is accumulating evidence of horizontal gene transfer in the fungal kingdom both from fungi and also prokaryotic organisms (134). In early reports, transfer of low-molecular extrachromosomal DNA was reported between Neurospora species, between the distantly related ascomycetes Ascobolus immersus and P. anserina, and from the zygomycete mycoparasite Parasitella parasitica to its host Absidia glauca (135137). Therefore, there is arguably less pressure on fungi to be sexually “perfect” to provide new sources of genetic variation than in many other eukaryotic organisms where there is an obligate requirement for sex.

What characteristics might such long-lived imperfect fungal species have? We would suggest factors such as the lack of any observed sexual cycle or developmental structures despite sustained investigative studies; a high degree of clonality in populations; loss of genes normally associated with sexual development or their subversion to other cellular functions; dominance of one mating type (if MAT loci could even be detected); and development of alternative methods for generating or sustaining genetic variation as an adaptation to asexuality. The predicted long-term genomic effects of the loss of sex have even been classified and include possible congruent divergence of nuclear loci (the “Meselson effect” in asexual diploids), decrease in mutation rate, and loss of transposable element activity (see Table 1 in Normak et al. [4]). As a prime example in the fungal kingdom, we propose the group of fungi involved with vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal (VAM) symbioses from the phylum Glomeromycota (138). No morphological evidence of sexual structures has ever been observed in this group, which, combined with clonal population structures and conservation of asexual spore morphology, has led to the suggestion that they have been asexual for over 400 million years, even though some core meiotic genes have been detected (7, 139141). Instead, it appears that individuals can arise from heterokaryotic spores composed of a mosaic of nuclei, which can maintain and promote genetic variation that helps explain occasional signs of recombination seen in the VAM fungi (142, 143). Such nuclear variation might provide a useful way to buffer these apparently asexual organisms against the effects of accumulating mutations (144) and maintain genetic diversity in the absence of sex. Most recently, a putative mating-type locus has been identified from genome sequencing of the model species Rhizophagus irregularis, suggesting a sexual origin for the observed heterokaryosis (145).

Second, we suggest that certain human activities have resulted in an increased likelihood of the evolution of asexual fungal species. Despite the many benefits of sexual reproduction, there are also costs to sexual reproduction leading to fungal “sexual hang-ups” (15). In outcrossing sex for every good, enhanced individual in the sexual offspring, there will be a corresponding poorly adapted one with less favorable sets of genes compared with the parents. Indeed, there is some evidence from comparing offspring of outcrossing and selfing in A. nidulans that outcrossing can result in progeny with an overall mean reduction in fitness, albeit that some offspring have significantly increased fitness (146). Thus, sex involving outcrossing has the risk of breaking up favorable sets of genes, a factor that can provide strong selection pressure for either the evolution of asexuality and/or homothallism in organisms well adapted to their environment (147). Human activities can exacerbate this phenomenon by establishing large, relatively uniform environments in which well-adapted organisms might evolve away from sex to avoid the risk of dilution of favorable genomes. There are also increased metabolic costs to sexual reproduction compared with asexual reproduction as a result of the investment needed for mating and development of fruiting bodies. In addition, the number of sexual spores produced is normally far less than can be produced by an equivalent investment in asexual reproduction, and development of such sexual spores needs a longer time period because of the complexity of sexual morphogenesis, all further reasons for the evolution of asexuality. Thus, there can be benefits to an asexual lifestyle. As Ross (148) wryly commented, the thought that the absence of sex is an imperfection, and that sex is perfection, might be an assumption of the human observer, rather than the fungus!

An example of such human activity perhaps favoring the evolution of asexuality is the deployment over wide geographic regions of crop plants with a narrow genetic base that has provided the opportunity for the clonal spread of fungal plant pathogens, which if well adapted to their host have an incentive to lose sex for all the factors listed above. And, indeed, there is evidence of what has been termed a “slow decline” in sexual fertility in populations of some fungal phytopathogens (149). F. oxysporum has evolved to be pathogenic on a wide variety of plant hosts and exhibits clonal spread on some crops such as banana. Despite concerted efforts, it has not been possible to induce a sexual cycle in this species complex, and pheromone-signaling sex-related genes now appear to be involved with pathogenicity processes detecting a plant host (81). A similar evolution away from sex is apparent for several other Fusarium species (122, 150). Similarly, different Rhynchosporium species (causing leaf blotch disease) are thought to have evolved on various graminaceous hosts as a result of human agricultural activities linked to crop selection, cultivation, and then dispersal over recent millennia (151, 152). These host-specialized species are only known to reproduce asexually, and sampling of R. lolii and R. orthosporum has so far only detected isolates of a single mating type (54). Finally, the rice pathogen Magnaoporthe oryzae is considered to be a heterothallic sexual species. However, there are reports of extensive loss of sexual potential in field populations worldwide, both due to loss of female fertility (i.e., the ability to produce maternal fruit body tissues, while rudimentary male ability to donate nuclei is retained) or total loss of any mating ability (153, 154). The slow decline in sexual ability might be attributable to various factors, as previously discussed (149), and the loss of sexual fertility seen in the field mirrors that seen under laboratory conditions when isolates are subcultured long-term by asexual means (149, 155). The long-term future of such asexual species is unclear; it may be speculated that they are still likely to be relatively short-lived evolutionary dead ends (18) because they are dependent on human activity.

Third, we suggest that although some asexual species do exist and others are currently evolving, overall such species are still likely to be very rare. Therefore there is likely to be the occurrence of a sexual cycle in the majority of 20% of all fungi that are currently only known in the imperfect state. We suggest that there are various reasons for the failure to detect sex in such species. Many might need very specific conditions to induce a sexual cycle, requiring much painstaking work to identify (56). A further obstacle is that almost all are likely to exhibit heterothallic breeding systems, requiring the identification of a possibly rare compatible mating type as is the case for C. neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii (92), whereas it will be much easier to induce sex in homothallic species where no mating partner is needed. For some species, many isolates might have low sexual fertility as a result of a slow decline in sexual potential in the species overall (149). Therefore, it might take dedicated sampling to find rare isolates of a species that are a remnant that maintain sexual potential. But such isolates would be important in evolutionary terms to generate variation episodically within populations. Indeed, given the argument that “a little sex goes a long way,” (7) it may only be necessary to retain a low proportion of isolates that retain the ability to reproduce sexually, i.e., that a very low rate of sexual recombination is sufficient to overcome evolutionary problems associated with asexuality.

CONCLUSIONS

With the advent of the “one species, one name” ruling in fungal biology (156), whether a species is perfect or imperfect has less taxonomic relevance than the past, because only one Latin binomial is needed for a species regardless of sexuality. But a knowledge of the reproductive mode remains a critical feature for an understanding of the biology of a species. There has been a sexual revolution in the understanding of asexuality over recent years, with a number of studies revealing sexual cycles in species that were previously considered imperfect. This implies that the majority of asexual fungal species will be shown to exhibit cryptic sexuality with the potential for sexual reproduction. However, there is a danger of simply thinking of fungi as either “perfect” sexual or “imperfect” asexual species. Indeed, we finish by echoing the comments of Dyer and Paoletti (149) that species should not be viewed as either sexual OR asexual, but, rather, they should be thought of as consisting of isolates on a continuum of sexual fertility, with the potential presence of isolates within a species with a range of abilities to undergo sexual reproduction from high to low fertility to even apparent asexuality. A thought to ponder over a cup of coffee, appropriate given that caffeine can induce sex in some fungal species (157).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

P.S.D. thanks the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council and Wellcome Trust (UK) for providing support for research work. U.K. thanks Gabriele Frenßen-Schenkel for the skillful artwork, and the Christian Doppler-Society (Vienna, Austria) and Sandoz (Kundl, Austria) for supporting research in Bochum.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Barton NH, Charlesworth B. 1998. Why sex and recombination? Science 281:1986–1990. 10.1126/science.281.5385.1986 [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Rieseberg LH, Archer MA, Wayne RK. 1999. Transgressive segregation, adaptation and speciation. Hered Edinb 83:363–372. 10.1038/sj.hdy.6886170 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Otto SP, Lenormand T. 2002. Resolving the paradox of sex and recombination. Nat Rev Genet 3:252–261. 10.1038/nrg761 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Normark BB, Judson OP, Moran NA. 2003. Genomic signatures of ancient asexual lineages. Biol J Linn Soc Lond 79:69–84. 10.1046/j.1095-8312.2003.00182.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gorelick R, Carpinone J. 2009. Origin and maintenance of sex: the evolutionary joys of self sex. Biol J Linn Soc Lond 98:707–728. 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2009.01334.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.McDonald MJ, Rice DP, Desai MM. 2016. Sex speeds adaptation by altering the dynamics of molecular evolution. Nature 531:233–236. 10.1038/nature17143 [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Judson OP, Normark BB. 1996. Ancient asexual scandals. Trends Ecol Evol 11:41–46. 10.1016/0169-5347(96)81040-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Smith RJ, Kamiya T, Horne DJ. 2006. Living males of the “ancient asexual” Darwinulidae (Ostracoda: crustacea). Proc Biol Sci 273:1569–1578. 10.1098/rspb.2005.3452 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hayden EC. 2008. Evolution: scandal! Sex-starved and still surviving. Nature 452:678–680. 10.1038/452678a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Flot JF, Hespeels B, Li X, Noel B, Arkhipova I, Danchin EGJ, Hejnol A, Henrissat B, Koszul R, Aury JM, Barbe V, Barthélémy RM, Bast J, Bazykin GA, Chabrol O, Couloux A, Da Rocha M, Da Silva C, Gladyshev E, Gouret P, Hallatschek O, Hecox-Lea B, Labadie K, Lejeune B, Piskurek O, Poulain J, Rodriguez F, Ryan JF, Vakhrusheva OA, Wajnberg E, Wirth B, Yushenova I, Kellis M, Kondrashov AS, Mark Welch DB, Pontarotti P, Weissenbach J, Wincker P, Jaillon O, Van Doninck K. 2013. Genomic evidence for ameiotic evolution in the bdelloid rotifer Adineta vaga. Nature 500:453–457. 10.1038/nature12326 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hawksworth DL, Kirk PM, Sutton BC, Pegler DN. 1995. Ainsworth & Bisby’s Dictionary of the Fungi, 8th ed. CABI, Wallingford, United Kingdom. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Taylor J, Jacobson D, Fisher M. 1999. The evolution of asexual fungi: reproduction, speciation and classification. Annu Rev Phytopathol 37:197–246. 10.1146/annurev.phyto.37.1.197 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Reynolds DR. 1993. The fungal holomorph: an overview, p 15–25. In Reynolds DR, Taylor JW (ed), The Fungal Holomorph: Mitotic, Meiotic and Pleomorphic Speciation in Fungal Systematics. CABI, Wallingford, United Kingdom. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Dyer PS, Ingram DS, Johnstone K. 1992. The control of sexual morphogenesis in the Ascomycotina. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 67:421–458. 10.1111/j.1469-185X.1992.tb01189.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Aanen DK, Hoekstra RF. 2007. Why sex is good: on fungi and beyond, p 527–534. In Heitman J, Kronstad JW, Taylor JW, Casselton LA (ed), Sex in Fungi: Molecular Determination and Evolutionary Implications. ASM Press, Washington, DC. 10.1128/9781555815837.ch32 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Dijksterhuis J. 2007. Heat-resistant ascospores, p 101–117. In Dijksterhuis J, Samson R (ed), Food Mycology: A multifaceted Approach to Fungi and Food. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida. 10.1201/9781420020984.ch6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Whittle CA, Nygren K, Johannesson H. 2011. Consequences of reproductive mode on genome evolution in fungi. Fungal Genet Biol 48:661–667. 10.1016/j.fgb.2011.02.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.LoBuglio KF, Taylor JW. 2002. Recombination and genetic differentiation in the mycorrhizal fungus Cenococcum geophilum Fr. Mycologia 94:772–780. 10.2307/3761692 [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Schoch CL, et al. 2009. The Ascomycota Tree of Life: a phylum-wide phylogeny clarifies the origin and evolution of fundamental reproductive and ecological traits. Syst Biol 58:224–239. 10.1093/sysbio/syp020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kück U, Pöggeler S. 2009. Cryptic sex in fungi. Fungal Biol Rev 23:86–90. 10.1016/j.fbr.2009.10.004 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Dyer PS, Inderbitzin P, Debuchy R. 2016. Mating-type structure, function, regulation and evolution in the Pezizomycotina, p 351–385. In Wendland J (ed), Growth, Differentiation and Sexuality, The Mycota I, 3rd ed. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland. 10.1007/978-3-319-25844-7_14 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Gow NAR. 2005. Fungal genomics: forensic evidence of sexual activity. Curr Biol 15:R509–R511. 10.1016/j.cub.2005.06.034 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Heitman J. 2010. Evolution of eukaryotic microbial pathogens via covert sexual reproduction. Cell Host Microbe 8:86–99. 10.1016/j.chom.2010.06.011 [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hull CM, Raisner RM, Johnson AD. 2000. Evidence for mating of the “asexual” yeast Candida albicans in a mammalian host. Science 289:307–310. 10.1126/science.289.5477.307 [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Magee BB, Magee PT. 2000. Induction of mating in Candida albicans by construction of MTLa and MTLalpha strains. Science 289:310–313. 10.1126/science.289.5477.310 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Horn BW, Moore GG, Carbone I. 2009. Sexual reproduction in Aspergillus flavus. Mycologia 101:423–429. 10.3852/09-011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Horn BW, Ramirez-Prado JH, Carbone I. 2009. Sexual reproduction and recombination in the aflatoxin-producing fungus Aspergillus parasiticus. Fungal Genet Biol 46:169–175. 10.1016/j.fgb.2008.11.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.O’Gorman CM, Fuller H, Dyer PS. 2009. Discovery of a sexual cycle in the opportunistic fungal pathogen Aspergillus fumigatus. Nature 457:471–474. 10.1038/nature07528 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Seidl V, Seibel C, Kubicek CP, Schmoll M. 2009. Sexual development in the industrial workhorse Trichoderma reesei. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:13909–13914. 10.1073/pnas.0904936106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Böhm J, Hoff B, O’Gorman CM, Wolfers S, Klix V, Binger D, Zadra I, Kürnsteiner H, Pöggeler S, Dyer PS, Kück U. 2013. Sexual reproduction and mating-type-mediated strain development in the penicillin-producing fungus Penicillium chrysogenum. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:1476–1481. 10.1073/pnas.1217943110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Swilaiman SS. 2013. Sexual potential and population biology of fungal Aspergillus and Penicillium species. Ph.D. thesis. University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ropars J, López-Villavicencio M, Dupont J, Snirc A, Gillot G, Coton M, Jany JL, Coton E, Giraud T. 2014. Induction of sexual reproduction and genetic diversity in the cheese fungus Penicillium roqueforti. Evol Appl 7:433–441. 10.1111/eva.12140 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Dyer PS, O’Gorman CM. 2011. A fungal sexual revolution: Aspergillus and Penicillium show the way. Curr Opin Microbiol 14:649–654. 10.1016/j.mib.2011.10.001 [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Burt A, Carter DA, Koenig GL, White TJ, Taylor JW. 1996. Molecular markers reveal cryptic sex in the human pathogen Coccidioides immitis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:770–773. 10.1073/pnas.93.2.770 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Bihon W, Slippers B, Burgess T, Wingfield MJ, Wingfield BD. 2012. Diverse sources of infection and cryptic recombination revealed in South African Diplodia pinea populations. Fungal Biol 116:112–120. 10.1016/j.funbio.2011.10.006 [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Henk DA, Fisher MC. 2011. Genetic diversity, recombination, and divergence in animal associated Penicillium dipodomyis. PLoS One 6:e22883. 10.1371/journal.pone.0022883 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Dyer PS, O’Gorman CM. 2012. Sexual development and cryptic sexuality in fungi: insights from Aspergillus species. FEMS Microbiol Rev 36:165–192. 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2011.00308.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Henk DA, Eagle CE, Brown K, Van Den Berg MA, Dyer PS, Peterson SW, Fisher MC. 2011. Speciation despite globally overlapping distributions in Penicillium chrysogenum: the population genetics of Alexander Fleming’s lucky fungus. Mol Ecol 20:4288–4301. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05244.x [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Ni M, Feretzaki M, Sun S, Wang X, Heitman J. 2011. Sex in fungi. Annu Rev Genet 45:405–430. 10.1146/annurev-genet-110410-132536 [PubMed][CrossRef] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Heitman J. 2015. Evolution of sexual reproduction: a view from the Fungal Kingdom supports an evolutionary epoch with sex before sexes. Fungal Biol Rev 29:108–117. 10.1016/j.fbr.2015.08.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Astell CR, Ahlstrom-Jonasson L, Smith M, Tatchell K, Nasmyth KA, Hall BD. 1981. The sequence of the DNAs coding for the mating-type loci of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell 27:15–23. 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90356-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Metzenberg RL, Glass NL. 1990. Mating type and mating strategies in Neurospora. BioEssays 12:53–59. 10.1002/bies.950120202 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Coppin E, Debuchy R, Arnaise S, Picard M. 1997. Mating types and sexual development in filamentous ascomycetes. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 61:411–428. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Pöggeler S. 2001. Mating-type genes for classical strain improvements of ascomycetes. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 56:589–601. 10.1007/s002530100721 [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Turgeon BG, Yoder OC. 2000. Proposed nomenclature for mating type genes of filamentous ascomycetes. Fungal Genet Biol 31:1–5. 10.1006/fgbi.2000.1227 [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Kück U, Böhm J. 2013. Mating type genes and cryptic sexuality as tools for genetically manipulating industrial molds. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 97:9609–9620. 10.1007/s00253-013-5268-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Lee SC, Ni M, Li W, Shertz C, Heitman J. 2010. The evolution of sex: a perspective from the fungal kingdom. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 74:298–340. 10.1128/MMBR.00005-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Paoletti M, Rydholm C, Schwier EU, Anderson MJ, Szakacs G, Lutzoni F, Debeaupuis JP, Latgé JP, Denning DW, Dyer PS. 2005. Evidence for sexuality in the opportunistic fungal pathogen Aspergillus fumigatus. Curr Biol 15:1242–1248. 10.1016/j.cub.2005.05.045 [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Paoletti M, Seymour FA, Alcocer MJC, Kaur N, Calvo AM, Archer DB, Dyer PS. 2007. Mating type and the genetic basis of self-fertility in the model fungus Aspergillus nidulans. Curr Biol 17:1384–1389. 10.1016/j.cub.2007.07.012 [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Grosse V, Krappmann S. 2008. The asexual pathogen Aspergillus fumigatus expresses functional determinants of Aspergillus nidulans sexual development. Eukaryot Cell 7:1724–1732. 10.1128/EC.00157-08 [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Hoff B, Pöggeler S, Kück U. 2008. Eighty years after its discovery, Fleming’s Penicillium strain discloses the secret of its sex. Eukaryot Cell 7:465–470. 10.1128/EC.00430-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Nixon CE, Wilcox AJ, Laney JD. 2010. Degradation of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae mating-type regulator alpha1: genetic dissection of cis-determinants and trans-acting pathways. Genetics 185:497–511. 10.1534/genetics.110.115907 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Martin T, Lu SW, van Tilbeurgh H, Ripoll DR, Dixelius C, Turgeon BG, Debuchy R. 2010. Tracing the origin of the fungal α1 domain places its ancestor in the HMG-box superfamily: implication for fungal mating-type evolution. PLoS One 5:e15199. 10.1371/journal.pone.0015199 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.King KM, West JS, Fitt BDL, Dyer PS. 2015. Differences in MAT gene distribution and expression between Rhynchosporium species on grasses. Plant Pathol 64:344–354. 10.1111/ppa.12265 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Brännström IO, Ament SL, Spribille T, Scofield DG, Johannesson H. 2015. Constraints on sex by a single mating-type: a case study from lichenized fungi. Fungal Genet Rep 60(Suppl):40. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Houbraken J, Dyer PS. 2015. Induction of the sexual cycle in filamentous ascomycetes, p 23–46. In Van den Berg M, Maruthachalam K (ed), Genetic Transformation Systems in Fungi, vol 2. Fungal Biology. Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland. [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Wada R, Maruyama J, Yamaguchi H, Yamamoto N, Wagu Y, Paoletti M, Archer DB, Dyer PS, Kitamoto K. 2012. Presence and functionality of mating type genes in the supposedly asexual filamentous fungus Aspergillus oryzae. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:2819–2829. 10.1128/AEM.07034-11 [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Becker K, Beer C, Freitag M, Kück U. 2015. Genome-wide identification of target genes of a mating-type α-domain transcription factor reveals functions beyond sexual development. Mol Microbiol 96:1002–1022. 10.1111/mmi.12987 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Ammerer G, Sprague GF Jr, Bender A. 1985. Control of yeast α-specific genes: evidence for two blocks to expression in MATa/MATα diploids. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 82:5855–5859. 10.1073/pnas.82.17.5855 [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Galgoczy DJ, Cassidy-Stone A, Llinás M, O’Rourke SM, Herskowitz I, DeRisi JL, Johnson AD. 2004. Genomic dissection of the cell-type-specification circuit in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:18069–18074. 10.1073/pnas.0407611102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Böhm J, Dahlmann TA, Gümüşer H, Kück U. 2015. A MAT1-2 wild-type strain from Penicillium chrysogenum: functional mating-type locus characterization, genome sequencing and mating with an industrial penicillin-producing strain. Mol Microbiol 95:859–874. 10.1111/mmi.12909 [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Klix V, Nowrousian M, Ringelberg C, Loros JJ, Dunlap JC, Pöggeler S. 2010. Functional characterization of MAT1-1-specific mating-type genes in the homothallic ascomycete Sordaria macrospora provides new insights into essential and nonessential sexual regulators. Eukaryot Cell 9:894–905. 10.1128/EC.00019-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Kim HK, Jo SM, Kim GY, Kim DW, Kim YK, Yun SH. 2015. A large-scale functional analysis of putative target genes of mating-type loci provides insight into the regulation of sexual development of the cereal pathogen Fusarium graminearum. PLoS Genet 11:e1005486. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005486 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Ádám AL, García-Martínez J, Szücs EP, Avalos J, Hornok L. 2011. The MAT1-2-1 mating-type gene upregulates photo-inducible carotenoid biosynthesis in Fusarium verticillioides. FEMS Microbiol Lett 318:76–83. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2011.02241.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Zheng Q, Hou R, Juanyu, Zhang, Ma J, Wu Z, Wang G, Wang C, Xu JR. 2013. The MAT locus genes play different roles in sexual reproduction and pathogenesis in Fusarium graminearum. PLoS One 8:e66980. 10.1371/journal.pone.0066980 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Mead ME, Stanton BC, Kruzel EK, Hull CM. 2015. Targets of the Sex Inducer homeodomain proteins are required for fungal development and virulence in Cryptococcus neoformans. Mol Microbiol 95:804–818. 10.1111/mmi.12898 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Geiser DM, Timberlake WE, Arnold ML. 1996. Loss of meiosis in Aspergillus. Mol Biol Evol 13:809–817. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025641 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Dyer PS. 2008. Evolutionary biology: genomic clues to original sex in fungi. Curr Biol 18:R207–R209. 10.1016/j.cub.2008.01.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Galagan JE, Calvo SE, Cuomo C, Ma LJ, Wortman JR, Batzoglou S, Lee SI, Baştürkmen M, Spevak CC, Clutterbuck J, Kapitonov V, Jurka J, Scazzocchio C, Farman M, Butler J, Purcell S, Harris S, Braus GH, Draht O, Busch S, D’Enfert C, Bouchier C, Goldman GH, Bell-Pedersen D, Griffiths-Jones S, Doonan JH, Yu J, Vienken K, Pain A, Freitag M, Selker EU, Archer DB, Peñalva MA, Oakley BR, Momany M, Tanaka T, Kumagai T, Asai K, Machida M, Nierman WC, Denning DW, Caddick M, Hynes M, Paoletti M, Fischer R, Miller B, Dyer P, Sachs MS, Osmani SA, Birren BW. 2005. Sequencing of Aspergillus nidulans and comparative analysis with A. fumigatus and A. oryzae. Nature 438:1105–1115. 10.1038/nature04341 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Pel HJ, et al. 2007. Genome sequencing and analysis of the versatile cell factory Aspergillus niger CBS 513.88. Nat Biotechnol 25:221–231. 10.1038/nbt1282 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Xu J, Saunders CW, Hu P, Grant RA, Boekhout T, Kuramae EE, Kronstad JW, Deangelis YM, Reeder NL, Johnstone KR, Leland M, Fieno AM, Begley WM, Sun Y, Lacey MP, Chaudhary T, Keough T, Chu L, Sears R, Yuan B, Dawson TL Jr. 2007. Dandruff-associated Malassezia genomes reveal convergent and divergent virulence traits shared with plant and human fungal pathogens. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:18730–18735. 10.1073/pnas.0706756104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Braumann I, van den Berg M, Kempken F. 2008. Repeat induced point mutation in two asexual fungi, Aspergillus niger and Penicillium chrysogenum. Curr Genet 53:287–297. 10.1007/s00294-008-0185-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Butler G, et al. 2009. Evolution of pathogenicity and sexual reproduction in eight Candida genomes. Nature 459:657–662. 10.1038/nature08064 [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Yokoyama E, Yamagishi K, Hara A. 2003. Structures of the mating-type loci of Cordyceps takaomontana. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:5019–5022. 10.1128/AEM.69.8.5019-5022.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Pöggeler S, Risch S, Kück U, Osiewacz HD. 1997. Mating-type genes from the homothallic fungus Sordaria macrospora are functionally expressed in a heterothallic ascomycete. Genetics 147:567–580. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Pyrzak W, Miller KY, Miller BL. 2008. Mating type protein Mat1-2 from asexual Aspergillus fumigatus drives sexual reproduction in fertile Aspergillus nidulans. Eukaryot Cell 7:1029–1040. 10.1128/EC.00380-07 [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Pöggeler S, Hoff B, Kück U. 2008. Asexual cephalosporin C producer Acremonium chrysogenum carries a functional mating type locus. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:6006–6016. 10.1128/AEM.01188-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Cross F, Hartwell LH, Jackson C, Konopka JB. 1988. Conjugation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Annu Rev Cell Biol 4:429–457. 10.1146/annurev.cb.04.110188.002241 [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Borneman AR, Hynes MJ, Andrianopoulos A. 2001. An STE12 homolog from the asexual, dimorphic fungus Penicillium marneffei complements the defect in sexual development of an Aspergillus nidulans steA mutant. Genetics 157:1003–1014. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Ramirez-Prado JH, Moore GG, Horn BW, Carbone I. 2008. Characterization and population analysis of the mating-type genes in Aspergillus flavus and Aspergillus parasiticus. Fungal Genet Biol 45:1292–1299. 10.1016/j.fgb.2008.06.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Turrà D, El Ghalid M, Rossi F, Di Pietro A. 2015. Fungal pathogen uses sex pheromone receptor for chemotropic sensing of host plant signals. Nature 527:521–524. 10.1038/nature15516 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Raper KB, Fennell DI. 1965. The Genus Aspergillus. The Williams & Wilkins Company, Baltimore, MD. [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Pitt JI. 1979. The Genus Penicillium and Its Teleomorphic States Eupenicillium and Talaromyces. Academic Press, London, United Kingdom. [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Frisvad JC, Petersen LM, Lyhne EK, Larsen TO. 2014. Formation of sclerotia and production of indoloterpenes by Aspergillus niger and other species in section Nigri. PLoS One 9:e94857. 10.1371/journal.pone.0094857 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Buschbom J, Mueller GM. 2006. Testing “species pair” hypotheses: evolutionary processes in the lichen-forming species complex Porpidia flavocoerulescens and Porpidia melinodes. Mol Biol Evol 23:574–586. 10.1093/molbev/msj063 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Seymour FA, Crittenden PD, Wirtz N, Øvstedal DO, Dyer PS, Lumbsch HT. 2007. Phylogenetic and morphological analysis of Antarctic lichen-forming Usnea species in the group Neuropogon. Antarct Sci 19:71–82. 10.1017/S0954102007000107 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Crespo A, Pérez-Ortega S. 2009. Cryptic species and species pairs in lichens: a discussion on the relationship between molecular phylogenies and morphological characters. An Jard Bot Madr 66S1:71–81. [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Greenaway T. 2014. Fertile Normandina pulchella. Br Lichen Soc Bull 115:71. [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Hull CM, Johnson AD. 1999. Identification of a mating type-like locus in the asexual pathogenic yeast Candida albicans. Science 285:1271–1275. 10.1126/science.285.5431.1271 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Miller MG, Johnson AD. 2002. White-opaque switching in Candida albicans is controlled by mating-type locus homeodomain proteins and allows efficient mating. Cell 110:293–302. 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00837-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Lockhart SR, Daniels KJ, Zhao R, Wessels D, Soll DR. 2003. Cell biology of mating in Candida albicans. Eukaryot Cell 2:49–61. 10.1128/EC.2.1.49-61.2003 [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Heitman J, Carter DA, Dyer PS, Soll DR. 2014. Sexual reproduction of human fungal pathogens. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 4:a019281. 10.1101/cshperspect.a019281 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Forche A, Alby K, Schaefer D, Johnson AD, Berman J, Bennett RJ. 2008. The parasexual cycle in Candida albicans provides an alternative pathway to meiosis for the formation of recombinant strains. PLoS Biol 6:e110. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Berman J, Hadany L. 2012. Does stress induce (para)sex? Implications for Candida albicans evolution. Trends Genet 28:197–203. 10.1016/j.tig.2012.01.004 [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Hickman MA, Zeng G, Forche A, Hirakawa MP, Abbey D, Harrison BD, Wang YM, Su CH, Bennett RJ, Wang Y, Berman J. 2013. The “obligate diploid” Candida albicans forms mating-competent haploids. Nature 494:55–59. 10.1038/nature11865 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Alby K, Schaefer D, Bennett RJ. 2009. Homothallic and heterothallic mating in the opportunistic pathogen Candida albicans. Nature 460:890–893. 10.1038/nature08252 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Houbraken J, Samson RA.Yilmaz N. 2016. Taxonomy of Aspergillus, Penicillium and Talaromyces and its significance for biotechnology, p 1–15. In de Vries RP, Gelber IB, Andersen MR (ed), Aspergillus and Penicillium in the Post-Genomic Era. Caister Academic Press, Norfolk, United Kingdom. [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Geiser DM, Pitt JI, Taylor JW. 1998. Cryptic speciation and recombination in the aflatoxin-producing fungus Aspergillus flavus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:388–393. 10.1073/pnas.95.1.388 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Carbone I, Jakobek JL, Ramirez-Prado JH, Horn BW. 2007. Recombination, balancing selection and adaptive evolution in the aflatoxin gene cluster of Aspergillus parasiticus. Mol Ecol 16:4401–4417. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03464.x [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Varga J, Tóth B. 2003. Genetic variability and reproductive mode of Aspergillus fumigatus. Infect Genet Evol 3:3–17. 10.1016/S1567-1348(02)00156-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Bain JM, Tavanti A, Davidson AD, Jacobsen MD, Shaw D, Gow NAR, Odds FC. 2007. Multilocus sequence typing of the pathogenic fungus Aspergillus fumigatus. J Clin Microbiol 45:1469–1477. 10.1128/JCM.00064-07 [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Pöggeler S. 2002. Genomic evidence for mating abilities in the asexual pathogen Aspergillus fumigatus. Curr Genet 42:153–160. 10.1007/s00294-002-0338-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Dyer PS, Paoletti M, Archer DB. 2003. Genomics reveals sexual secrets of Aspergillus. Microbiology 149:2301–2303. 10.1099/mic.0.C0119-0 [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Horn BW, Moore GG, Carbone I. 2011. Sexual reproduction in aflatoxin-producing Aspergillus nomius. Mycologia 103:174–183. 10.3852/10-115 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Swilaiman SS, O’Gorman CM, Balajee SA, Dyer PS. 2013. Discovery of a sexual cycle in Aspergillus lentulus, a close relative of A. fumigatus. Eukaryot Cell 12:962–969. 10.1128/EC.00040-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Arabatzis M, Velegraki A. 2013. Sexual reproduction in the opportunistic human pathogen Aspergillus terreus. Mycologia 105:71–79. 10.3852/11-426 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Horn BW, Olarte RA, Peterson SW, Carbone I. 2013. Sexual reproduction in Aspergillus tubingensis from section Nigri. Mycologia 105:1153–1163. 10.3852/13-101 [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Darbyshir HL, van de Vondervoort PJI, Dyer PS. 2013. Discovery of sexual reproduction in the black aspergilli. Fungal Genet Rep 60(Suppl):687. [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Raper K, Thom C. 1949. A Manual of the Penicillia. The Williams & Wilkins Company, Baltimore, MD. [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Le Dréan G, Mounier J, Vasseur V, Arzur D, Habrylo O, Barbier G. 2010. Quantification of Penicillium camemberti and P. roqueforti mycelium by real-time PCR to assess their growth dynamics during ripening cheese. Int J Food Microbiol 138:100–107. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.12.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Torres M, Canela R, Riba M, Sanchis V. 1987. Production of patulin and griseofulvin by a strain of Penicillium griseofulvum in three different media. Mycopathologia 99:85–89. 10.1007/BF00436910 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Chakravarti R, Sahai V. 2004. Compactin-a review. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 64:618–624. 10.1007/s00253-003-1553-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Regueira TB, Kildegaard KR, Hansen BG, Mortensen UH, Hertweck C, Nielsen J. 2011. Molecular basis for mycophenolic acid biosynthesis in Penicillium brevicompactum. Appl Environ Microbiol 77:3035–3043. 10.1128/AEM.03015-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Houbraken J, Frisvad JC, Samson RA. 2011. Fleming’s penicillin producing strain is not Penicillium chrysogenum but P. rubens. IMA Fungus 2:87–95. 10.5598/imafungus.2011.02.01.12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.van den Berg MA, Albang R, Albermann K, Badger JH, Daran JM, Driessen AJ, Garcia-Estrada C, Fedorova ND, Harris DM, Heijne WH, Joardar V, Kiel JA, Kovalchuk A, Martín JF, Nierman WC, Nijland JG, Pronk JT, Roubos JA, van der Klei IJ, van Peij NN, Veenhuis M, von Döhren H, Wagner C, Wortman J, Bovenberg RA. 2008. Genome sequencing and analysis of the filamentous fungus Penicillium chrysogenum. Nat Biotechnol 26:1161–1168. 10.1038/nbt.1498 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Fleming A. 1929. On the antibacterial action of cultures of a penicillium with special reference to their use in the isolation of B. influenza. Br J Exp Pathol 10:226–236. [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Ropars J, Dupont J, Fontanillas E, Rodríguez de la Vega RC, Malagnac F, Coton M, Giraud T, López-Villavicencio M. 2012. Sex in cheese: evidence for sexuality in the fungus Penicillium roqueforti. PLoS One 7:e49665. 10.1371/journal.pone.0049665 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Schuster A, Schmoll M. 2010. Biology and biotechnology of Trichoderma. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 87:787–799. 10.1007/s00253-010-2632-1 [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Seibel C, Tisch D, Kubicek CP, Schmoll M. 2012. ENVOY is a major determinant in regulation of sexual development in Hypocrea jecorina (Trichoderma reesei). Eukaryot Cell 11:885–895. 10.1128/EC.05321-11 [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Chuang YC, Li WC, Chen CL, Hsu PW, Tung SY, Kuo HC, Schmoll M, Wang TF. 2015. Trichoderma reesei meiosis generates segmentally aneuploid progeny with higher xylanase-producing capability. Biotechnol Biofuels 8:30. 10.1186/s13068-015-0202-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Dahlmann TA, Kück U. 2015. Dicer-dependent biogenesis of small RNAs and evidence for microRNA-like RNAs in the penicillin producing fungus Penicillium chrysogenum. PLoS One 10:e0125989. 10.1371/journal.pone.0125989 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Short DPG, O’Donnell K, Thrane U, Nielsen KF, Zhang N, Juba JH, Geiser DM. 2013. Phylogenetic relationships among members of the Fusarium solani species complex in human infections and the descriptions of F. keratoplasticum sp. nov. and F. petroliphilum stat. nov. Fungal Genet Biol 53:59–70. 10.1016/j.fgb.2013.01.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Anzawa K, Kawasaki M, Mochizuki T, Ishizaki H. 2010. Successful mating of Trichophyton rubrum with Arthroderma simii. Med Mycol 48:629–634. 10.3109/13693780903437884 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Ashton G, Dyer PS. 2016. Sexual development in fungi and its uses in gene expression systems, p 335–350. In Schmoll M, Dattenböck C (ed), Gene Expression Systems of Fungi: Applications and Advancements. Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland. 10.1007/978-3-319-27951-0_15 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Linke R, Thallinger GG, Haarmann T, Eidner J, Schreiter M, Lorenz P, Seiboth B, Kubicek CP. 2015. Restoration of female fertility in Trichoderma reesei QM6a provides the basis for inbreeding in this industrial cellulase producing fungus. Biotechnol Biofuels 8:155. 10.1186/s13068-015-0311-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Jacobson DJ. 1995. Sexual dysfunction associated with outcrossing in Neurospora tetrasperma, a pseudohomothallic ascomycete. Mycologia 87:604–617. 10.2307/3760805 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Pöggeler S, Masloff S, Jacobsen S, Kück U. 2000. Karyotype polymorphism correlates with intraspecific infertility in the homothallic ascomycete Sordaria macrospora. J Evol Biol 13:281–289. 10.1046/j.1420-9101.2000.00174.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Ropars J, Lo YC, Dumas E, Snirc A, Begerow D, Rollnik T, Lacoste S, Dupont J, Giraud T, López-Villavicencio M. 2016. Fertility depression among cheese-making Penicillium roqueforti strains suggests degeneration during domestication. Evolution 70:2099–2109. 10.1111/evo.13015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.McDonald BA, Linde C. 2002. Pathogen population genetics, evolutionary potential, and durable resistance. Annu Rev Phytopathol 40:349–379. 10.1146/annurev.phyto.40.120501.101443 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Dyer PS, Bateman GL, Wood HM. 2001. Development of apothecia of the eyespot pathogen Tapesia on cereal crop stubble residue in England. Plant Pathol 50:356–362. 10.1046/j.1365-3059.2001.00575.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Radewald KC, Ferrin DM, Stanghellini ME. 2004. Sanitation practices that inhibit reproduction of Monosporascus cannoballus in melon roots left in the field after crop termination. Plant Pathol 53:660–668. 10.1111/j.0032-0862.2004.01055.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Dyer PS, Munro C, Bradshaw RE. Fungal genetics. In Kibbler C, Barton R, Gow N, Howell S, Maccallum D, Manuel R (ed), Oxford Textbook of Medical Mycology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom, in press. [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Stukenbrock EH, Croll D. 2014. The evolving fungal genome. Fungal Biol Rev 28:1–12. 10.1016/j.fbr.2014.02.001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Ropars J, de la Vega RCR, López-Villavicencio M, Gouzy J, Dupont J, Swennen D, Dumas E, Giraud T, Branca A. 2016. Diversity and mechanisms of genomic adaptation in Penicillium, p 27–42. In deVries RP, Gelber IB, Andersen MR (ed), Aspergillus and Penicllium in the Post-Genomic Era. Caister Academic Press, Norfolk, United Kingdom. 10.21775/9781910190395.03 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Collins RA, Seville BJ. 1990. Independent transfer of mitochondrial chromosomes and plasmids during unstable vegetative fusion in Neurospora. Nature 345:177–179. 10.1038/345177a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Kellner M, Burmester A, Wöstemeyer A, Wöstemeyer J. 1993. Transfer of genetic information from the mycoparasite Parasitella parasitica to its host Absidia glauca. Curr Genet 23:334–337. 10.1007/BF00310895 [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Kempken F. 1995. Horizontal transfer of a mitochondrial plasmid. Mol Gen Genet 248:89–94. 10.1007/BF02456617 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Rosendahl S. 2008. Communities, populations and individuals of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytol 178:253–266. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02378.x [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.den Bakker HC, Vankuren NW, Morton JB, Pawlowska TE. 2010. Clonality and recombination in the life history of an asexual arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus. Mol Biol Evol 27:2474–2486. 10.1093/molbev/msq155 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Halary S, Malik SB, Lildhar L, Slamovits CH, Hijri M, Corradi N. 2011. Conserved meiotic machinery in Glomus spp., a putatively ancient asexual fungal lineage. Genome Biol Evol 3:950–958. 10.1093/gbe/evr089 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Sanders IR. 2011. Fungal sex: meiosis machinery in ancient symbiotic fungi. Curr Biol 21:R896–R897. 10.1016/j.cub.2011.09.021 [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Hijri M, Sanders IR. 2005. Low gene copy number shows that arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi inherit genetically different nuclei. Nature 433:160–163. 10.1038/nature03069 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Croll D, Sanders IR. 2009. Recombination in Glomus intraradices, a supposed ancient asexual arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus. BMC Evol Biol 9:13. 10.1186/1471-2148-9-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Pawlowska TE, Taylor JW. 2004. Organization of genetic variation in individuals of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Nature 427:733–737. 10.1038/nature02290 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Ropars J, Toro KS, Noel J, Pelin A, Charron P, Farinelli L, Marton T, Krüger M, Fuchs J, Brachmann A, Corradi N. 2016. Evidence for the sexual origin of heterokaryosis in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. New Microbiol 1:16033. 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.33 [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.López-Villavicencio M, Debets AJM, Slakhorst M, Giraud T, Schoustra SE. 2013. Deleterious effects of recombination and possible nonrecombinatorial advantages of sex in a fungal model. J Evol Biol 26:1968–1978. 10.1111/jeb.12196 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Murtagh GJ, Dyer PS, Crittenden PD. 2000. Sex and the single lichen. Nature 404:564. 10.1038/35007142 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Ross IK. 1979. Biology of the Fungi – Their Development, Regulation and Associations. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY. [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Dyer PS, Paoletti M. 2005. Reproduction in Aspergillus fumigatus: sexuality in a supposedly asexual species? Med Mycol 43(Suppl 1):S7–S14. 10.1080/13693780400029015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Hughes TJ, O’Donnell K, Sink S, Rooney AP, Scandiani MM, Luque A, Bhattacharyya MK, Huang X. 2014. Genetic architecture and evolution of the mating type locus in fusaria that cause soybean sudden death syndrome and bean root rot. Mycologia 106:686–697. 10.3852/13-318 [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Zaffarano PL, McDonald BA, Linde CC. 2008. Rapid speciation following recent host shifts in the plant pathogenic fungus Rhynchosporium. Evolution 62:1418–1436. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00390.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.King KM, West JS, Brunner PC, Dyer PS, Fitt BDL. 2013. Evolutionary relationships between Rhynchosporium lolii sp. nov. and other Rhynchosporium species on grasses. PLoS One 8:e72536. 10.1371/journal.pone.0072536 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Notteghem GL, Silué D. 1992. Distribution of the mating type alleles in Magnaporthe grisea populations pathogenic on rice. Phytopathology 82:421–424. 10.1094/Phyto-82-421 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Takan JP, Chipili J, Muthumeenakshi S, Talbot NJ, Manyasa EO, Bandyopadhyay R, Sere Y, Nutsugah SK, Talhinhas P, Hossain M, Brown AE, Sreenivasaprasad S. 2012. Magnaporthe oryzae populations adapted to finger millet and rice exhibit distinctive patterns of genetic diversity, sexuality and host interaction. Mol Biotechnol 50:145–158. 10.1007/s12033-011-9429-z [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Xu J. 2002. Estimating the spontaneous mutation rate of loss of sex in the human pathogenic fungus Cryptococcus neoformans. Genetics 162:1157–1167. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Hawksworth DL, et al. 2011. The Amsterdam declaration on fungal nomenclature. IMA Fungus 2:105–112. 10.5598/imafungus.2011.02.01.14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Kakkar RK, Mehrotra BR. 1971. Induced production of cleistothecia in Aspergillus unguis. Experientia 27:710–711. 10.1007/BF02136978 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Olarte RA, Horn BW, Dorner JW, Monacell JT, Singh R, Stone EA, Carbone I. 2012. Effect of sexual recombination on population diversity in aflatoxin production by Aspergillus flavus and evidence for cryptic heterokaryosis. Mol Ecol 21:1453–1476. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05398.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Horn BW, Ramirez-Prado JH, Carbone I. 2009. The sexual state of Aspergillus parasiticus. Mycologia 101:275–280. 10.3852/08-205 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Mandel MA, Barker BM, Kroken S, Rounsley SD, Orbach MJ. 2007. Genomic and population analyses of the mating type loci in Coccidioides species reveal evidence for sexual reproduction and gene acquisition. Eukaryot Cell 6:1189–1199. 10.1128/EC.00117-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Fraser JA, Stajich JE, Tarcha EJ, Cole GT, Inglis DO, Sil A, Heitman J. 2007. Evolution of the mating type locus: insights gained from the dimorphic primary fungal pathogens Histoplasma capsulatum, Coccidioides immitis, and Coccidioides posadasii. Eukaryot Cell 6:622–629. 10.1128/EC.00018-07 [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Christiansen SK, Wirse S, Yun SH, Yoder OC, Turgeon BG. 1998. The two Cochliobolus mating type genes are conserved among species but one of them is missing in C. victoria. Mycol Res 102:919–929. 10.1017/S0953756297005674 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Bihon W, Wingfield MJ, Slippers B, Duong TA, Wingfield BD. 2014. MAT gene idiomorphs suggest a heterothallic sexual cycle in a predominantly asexual and important pine pathogen. Fungal Genet Biol 62:55–61. 10.1016/j.fgb.2013.10.013 [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Kerényi Z, Moretti A, Waalwijk C, Oláh B, Hornok L. 2004. Mating type sequences in asexually reproducing Fusarium species. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:4419–4423. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Covert SF, Aoki T, O’Donnell K, Starkey D, Holliday A, Geiser DM, Cheung F, Town C, Strom A, Juba J, Scandiani M, Yang XB. 2007. Sexual reproduction in the soybean sudden death syndrome pathogen Fusarium tucumaniae. Fungal Genet Biol 44:799–807. 10.1016/j.fgb.2006.12.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Julca I, Droby S, Sela N, Marcet-Houben M, Gabaldón T. 2016. Contrasting genomic diversity in two closely related postharvest pathogens: Penicillium digitatum and Penicillium expansum. Genome Biol Evol 8:218–227. 10.1093/gbe/evv252 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.López-Villavicencio M, Aguileta G, Giraud T, de Vienne DM, Lacoste S, Couloux A, Dupont J. 2010. Sex in Penicillium: combined phylogenetic and experimental approaches. Fungal Genet Biol 47:693–706. 10.1016/j.fgb.2010.05.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Zaffarano PL, Queloz V, Duò A, Grünig CR. 2011. Sex in the PAC: a hidden affair in dark septate endophytes? BMC Evol Biol 11:282. 10.1186/1471-2148-11-282 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Woo PC, Chong KT, Tse H, Cai JJ, Lau CC, Zhou AC, Lau SK, Yuen KY. 2006. Genomic and experimental evidence for a potential sexual cycle in the pathogenic thermal dimorphic fungus Penicillium marneffei. FEBS Lett 580:3409–3416. 10.1016/j.febslet.2006.05.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Ware SB, Verstappen ECP, Breeden J, Cavaletto JR, Goodwin SB, Waalwijk C, Crous PW, Kema GHJ. 2007. Discovery of a functional Mycosphaerella teleomorph in the presumed asexual barley pathogen Septoria passerinii. Fungal Genet Biol 44:389–397. 10.1016/j.fgb.2006.12.005 [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Yilmaz N, Hagen F, Meis JF, Houbraken J, Samson RA. 2016. Discovery of a sexual cycle in Talaromyces amestolkiae. Mycologia 108:70–79. 10.3852/15-014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Geng Y, Li Z, Xia LY, Wang Q, Hu XM, Zhang XG. 2014. Characterization and phylogenetic analysis of the mating-type loci in the asexual ascomycete genus Ulocladium. Mycologia 106:649–665. 10.3852/13-383 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Pöggeler S, O’Gorman CM, Hoff B, Kück U. 2011. Molecular organization of the mating-type loci in the homothallic Ascomycete Eupenicillium crustaceum. Fungal Biol 115:615–624. 10.1016/j.funbio.2011.03.003 [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Becker K. 2015. Functional genomics provide new insights into regulation of morphogenesis and secondary metabolism in the industrial penicillin producer Penicillium chrysogenum. Ph.D. thesis. Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany. [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Böhm J. 2014. Mating-type genes and the sexual cycle of the penicillin producer Penicillium chrysogenum. Ph.D. thesis. Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany. [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Daskalov A, Heller J, Herzog S, Fleißner A, Glass NL. 2017. Molecular mechanisms regulating cell fusion and heterokaryon formation in filamentous fungi. Microbiol Spectrum 5(1):FUNK-0015-2016. 10.1128/microbiolspec.FUNK-0015-2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177.Bennett RJ, Turgeon BG. 2016. Fungal sex: the Ascomycota. Microbiol Spectrum 4(5):FUNK-0005-2016. 10.1128/microbiolspec.FUNK-0005-2016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178.de Vries RP, et al. 2017. Comparative genomics reveals high biological diversity and specific adaptations in the industrially and medically important fungal genus Aspergillus. Genome Biol 18:28. 10.1186/s13059-017-1151-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Microbiology Spectrum are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES