Skip to main content
Microbiology Spectrum logoLink to Microbiology Spectrum
. 2017 Dec 7;5(6):10.1128/microbiolspec.arba-0021-2017. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.arba-0021-2017

Antimicrobial Resistance in Corynebacterium spp., Arcanobacterium spp., and Trueperella pyogenes

Andrea T Feßler 1, Stefan Schwarz 2
Editors: Frank Møller Aarestrup3, Stefan Schwarz4, Jianzhong Shen5, Lina Cavaco6
PMCID: PMC11687552  PMID: 29219109

ABSTRACT

There is currently only limited information on the antimicrobial susceptibility and resistance of Corynebacterium spp., Arcanobacterium spp., and Trueperella pyogenes from animals. The comparability of the data is hampered by the use of different antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods and interpretive criteria. To date, standard broth microdilution methods and clinical breakpoints that are approved by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute and are applicable to Corynebacterium spp., Arcanobacterium spp., and T. pyogenes are available. The lack of species-specific clinical breakpoints for the different animal species reduces the explanatory power of the data. Among the isolates of the three genera, elevated MICs for different classes of antimicrobial agents (e.g., β-lactams, macrolides, lincosamides, tetracyclines, aminoglycosides, phenicols, sulfonamides/diaminopyrimidines, and fluoroquinolones) have been described. The most comprehensive data set is available for T. pyogenes, which also includes information about genes and mutations involved in antimicrobial resistance. In T. pyogenes isolates, the macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B resistance genes erm(B) and erm(X) were identified. Tetracycline resistance in T. pyogenes was based on the resistance genes tet(W), tet(Z), and tet(33), whereas the aminoglycoside resistance genes aacC, aadA1, aadA2, aadA5, aadA24, and aadB have been described in T. pyogenes. So far, only single genes conferring either phenicol resistance (cmlA6), trimethoprim resistance (dfrB2a), or β-lactam resistance (blaP1) are known to occur in T. pyogenes isolates. Various 23S rRNA mutations, including A2058T, A2058G, and G2137C, were identified in macrolide/lincosamide-resistant T. pyogenes.

THE GENERA CORYNEBACTERIUM, ARCANOBACTERIUM, AND TRUEPERELLA

The genus Corynebacterium was introduced in 1896 by Lehmann and Neumann. It belongs to the family Corynebacteriaceae and was listed with 30 species in the “approved lists of bacterial names” from 1980 (1) including also later reclassified species. To date, the genus Corynebacterium includes more than 90 species (www.bacterio.net), some of which play a role as pathogens in veterinary medicine. Corynebacteria are Gram-positive, pleomorphic rods that grow as small white colonies on blood agar after 24 to 48 h of incubation (2). In veterinary medicine, Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis and the Corynebacterium renale complex are the most widespread bacterial pathogens. C. pseudotuberculosis causes caseous lymphadenitis in goats and sheep; ulcerative lymphangitis in horses, cattle, and sheep; as well as mastitis in cattle (2, 3). C. renale is associated with urinary tract infections in ruminants and pigs (2).

The genus Arcanobacterium was introduced in 1982 by Collins et al. (4) and belongs to the family Actinomycetaceae, which includes eight species: Arcanobacterium canis, Arcanobacterium haemolyticum, Arcanobacterium hippocoleae, Arcanobacterium phocae, Arcanobacterium phocisimile, Arcanobacterium pinnipediorum, Arcanobacterium pluranimalium (www.bacterio.net), and the recently described Arcanobacterium wilhelmae sp. nov. (5). Arcanobacteria are facultatively anaerobic, and their growth is enhanced by blood or serum (4).

The comparatively new genus Trueperella also belongs to the family Actinomycetaceae. In 2011, Yassin et al. (6) published a comparative chemotaxonomic and phylogenetic study of the genus Arcanobacterium and showed that it is not monophyletic. As a consequence, the taxonomy was revised and the new genus Trueperella established. It currently comprises five species—namely, Trueperella abortisuis, Trueperella bernardiae, Trueperella bialowiezensis, Trueperella bonasi, and Trueperella pyogenes (www.bacterio.net). Bacteria of the genus Trueperella are Gram-positive, pleomorphic rods that grow under facultatively anaerobic conditions on blood agar and produce hemolytic colonies of 0.5 to 1 mm after 48 h (2). Among the genus Trueperella, T. pyogenes is the most important veterinary pathogen, being commonly involved in a wide variety of diseases in domestic animals, including mastitis, pneumonia, metritis, arthritis, lymphadenitis, otitis, peritonitis, pyodermatitis, endocarditis, abscesses, osteomyelitis, and urinary and genital tract infections, with bovine mastitis being the most common disease in livestock (7).

SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING OF CORYNEBACTERIUM, ARCANOBACTERIUM, AND TRUEPERELLA

As outlined in reference 8, antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) has to follow an internationally accepted performance standard. For bacteria of animal origin, the standards of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) are most frequently used worldwide. So far, there is only a standard broth microdilution method approved for “Corynebacterium spp. (including Corynebacterium diptheriae) and related coryneform genera” from humans, which is described in the human-specific CLSI document M45 (9). For isolates of “Corynebacterium spp. and Coryneforms” from animals, there is also only a broth microdilution method available in the recently published veterinary document VET06 (10). The “related coryneform genera” or “Coryneforms” include the genera Arcanobacterium, Arthrobacter, Brevibacterium, Cellulomonas, Cellulosimicrobium, Dermabacter, Leifsonia, Microbacterium, Oerskovia, Rothia (excluding Rothia mucilaginosa), Trueperella, and Turicella (9, 10). It should be noted that all clinical breakpoints listed for these bacteria in the aforementioned documents are from human medicine. Since pharmacological properties of antimicrobial agents may differ between humans and animals, the use of breakpoints adopted from human medicine may result in misclassifications of veterinary isolates (11). A specific method for AST of T. pyogenes of animal origin has been developed (12) and included in the VET06 document. Based on MIC distributions (12), breakpoints for the category “susceptible” have been proposed for penicillin, ampicillin, erythromycin, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (10).

Since studies of the susceptibility of coryneform bacteria date back to the 1960s, a variety of susceptibility testing methods and interpretive criteria has been used, making it difficult—if not impossible—to compare the results of the different studies (Table 1) (11). Another problem arises with studies that only report the classification as susceptible, intermediate, or resistant without indicating quantitative values or the interpretive criteria used. These studies were not included in the description of resistance properties given below. Moreover, an evaluation of data obtained by agar disk diffusion is not possible because no interpretive criteria for this method are available in the current CLSI documents M45 and VET06 (9, 10). Therefore, these studies have also been excluded from the analysis of the resistance properties.

TABLE 1.

Examples of different AST methods and test conditions

Method Bacterial species Medium Temperature Incubation time Reference
Broth microdilution Arcanobacterium spp., Corynebacterium spp., Trueperella spp. (except T. pyogenes) Cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth + 2.5 to 5% lysed horse blood 35 ± 2°C 24–48 h ambient air 9, 10
T. pyogenes Cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth + 2.5 to 5% lysed horse blood 35 ± 2°C 20–24 h with 5% CO2 10
C. camporealensis, C. bovis, C. mastitidis. C. pseudotuberculosis, C. pseudodiptheriticum, T. pyogenes Mueller-Hinton broth + 1% Tween 80 37°C 48 h 14
T. pyogenes Mueller-Hinton broth + TES biological buffer + lysed horse blood and 10% fetal calf serum 35–37°C 18–24 h 46
T. pyogenes Serum-free medium 39°C 36 h with 5% CO2 38
T. pyogenes Modified chopped meat medium 37°C 24 h anaerobically 37
Agar dilution C. pseudotuberculosis Mueller-Hinton agar + 5% laked horse blood 37°C Overnight 19
T. pyogenes Mueller-Hinton agar + 5% defibrinated horse blood 37°C 48 h 55
T. pyogenes Mueller-Hinton agar + 5% fetal calf serum 37°C 24 h with 5% CO2 57
C. pseudotuberculosis, T. pyogenes Mueller-Hinton agar + 0.001% NAD + 5% chocolatized calf blood 37°C 24 or 48 h in air 20
T. pyogenes Iso-Sensitest agar + 7% hemolyzed sheep blood 36°C 1–2 days 53
Agar disk diffusion A. haemolyticum, A. pluranimalium Mueller-Hinton agar + 5% sheep blood 37°C 48 h (candle jar) 34, 35
T. pyogenes Mueller-Hinton agar with 0.5% sheep blood and 0.5% Tween 80 48 h 7
T. pyogenes Columbia agar with 5% sheep blood 37°C Overnight 5% CO2 64
C. ovis, T. pyogenes Bacto tryptose blood agar plates 37°C 24 h 22
Calgary Biofilm Device C. renale, C. pseudotuberculosis, T. pyogenes Tryptic soy broth + 2% fetal calf serum 37°C 24 h + 10% CO2 21

RESISTANCE PROPERTIES OF CORYNEBACTERIUM SPP.

AST studies of Corynebacterium spp. are available for at least the past 50 years, but varying AST methods, test media, incubation times and conditions, as well as interpretive criteria have been used. Antimicrobial susceptibility data have been obtained by broth microdilution in six studies (1318), with five of them referring to a methodology approved by CLSI or its previous organization, the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) (Table 2) (1315, 17, 18). One of these studies reported all 45 canine Corynebacterium ulcerans isolates as susceptible to 14 antimicrobial agents without giving exact MIC values (17). The same situation was seen in a study of equine Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis, which described all isolates as susceptible to a panel of 16 antimicrobial agents (15). Agar dilution tests were performed in three studies, conducted by Adamson et al. (19) using Mueller-Hinton agar supplemented with 5% laked horse blood, Judson and Songer (3) using blood agar base supplemented with 3% citrated bovine blood, and Prescott and Yielding (20) using Mueller-Hinton agar supplemented with 0.001% NAD and 5% chocolatized calf blood. Moreover, Olson et al. (21) measured MICs and minimum bactericidal concentrations using the Calgary Biofilm Device. Ten studies (2231) described the use of agar disk diffusion. Although five studies referred to NCCLS or CLSI methods (24, 2831), to date there is no approved agar disk diffusion method for corynebacteria, resulting in a lack of approved interpretive criteria.

TABLE 2.

Corynebacterium spp. AST data determined by broth microdilution according to CLSI/NCCLS standards

Animal origin Bacterial species Disease Years of isolation Number of isolates tested MICs (in mg/liter) of selected antimicrobial agentsa Reference
PEN AMP ERY CLI TET CHL ENR SXT GEN
Cattle C. bovis Mastitis 46 ≤0.06–0.25 ≤0.06–≥128 0.125–0.5 0.125–≥64 ≤0.03–≥64 13
Cattle C. amycolatum Mastitis 13 ≤0.06–0.25 ≤0.06–≥128 0.25–64 0.125–32 0.06–0.25 13
Sheep C. camporealensis Mastitis 4 0.06 0.125 2 4 0.008–0.125 14
Sheep C. bovis Mastitis 4 0.05 0.06–4 1 4 0.008–0.125 14
Sheep C. pseudotuberculosis Mastitis 10 0.125 0.25–2 1 2 0.5 14
Sheep C. pseudodiptheriticum Mastitis 13 0.5 0.06–1 0.5–8 2 0.07–0.5 14
Sheep C. mastitidis Mastitis 14 0.06–0.5 0.06–16 1 0.03–2 0.008–0.125 14
Horses (n = 49), cattle (n = 4), sheep (n = 1) C. pseudotuberculosis Infections (internal, external abscesses) 2000–2003 54 15
Dogs C. ulcerans Throat swabs 2007–2008 45 2 17
Horses C. pseudotuberculosis Naturally infected 1996–2012 b ≤0.06–4 (n = 178) ≤0.25–16 (n = 204) ≤0.12–2 (n = 146) ≤0.25–2 (n = 148) ≤0.25–4 (n = 203) ≤0.06–4 (n = 182) ≤0.25–4 (n = 203) ≤0.25–8 (n = 206) 18
a

PEN, penicillin; AMP, ampicillin; ERY, erythromycin; CLI, clindamycin; TET, tetracycline; CHL, chloramphenicol; ENR, enrofloxacin; SXT, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole; GEN, gentamicin.

b

In this study, not all isolates were tested for susceptibility to all antimicrobial agents; thus, the numbers of isolates tested are given for each antimicrobial agent.

Resistance to β-Lactams

Rhodes et al. (18) determined a ceftiofur MIC90 of 2 mg/liter for equine C. pseudotuberculosis isolates, which the authors considered a poor choice for treatment since plasma concentrations of 2 mg/liter could not be achieved for >50% of the dosing interval using the labeled dosage. In comparison, ampicillin (MIC90: 0.5 mg/liter) was considered a good choice for intravenous administration, but the abscess penetrability needs to be considered due to the low lipid solubility of ampicillin (18). For penicillin, Rhodes et al. (18) measured a MIC90 value of 0.25 mg/liter, which is below the plasma concentrations that can be reached via intramuscular injection for adequate duration. The current CLSI breakpoints classify isolates with MICs of 0.25 to 2 mg/liter as intermediate (10). Watts and Rossbach (13) determined MIC90 values for Corynebacterium bovis from bovine mastitis of 0.25 mg/liter (ampicillin), 4 mg/liter (oxacillin), 0.5 mg/liter (cephalothin), and 0.5 mg/liter (ceftiofur). Except for oxacillin with a slightly lower MIC90 of 2 mg/liter, Corynebacterium amycolatum isolates had the same values as the C. bovis isolates (13). Fernández et al. (14) investigated corynebacteria from mastitis in ewes including the species Corynebacterium camporealensis, C. bovis, C. pseudotuberculosis, Corynebacterium pseudodiphteriticum, and Corynebacterium mastitidis. The penicillin MICs ranged from 0.06 to 0.5 mg/liter, resulting in C. pseudodiphteriticum and C. mastitidis isolates, with MICs of 0.5 mg/liter being classified as intermediate according to the CLSI (10, 14). The MIC values ranged from 0.03 to 8 mg/liter for amoxicillin and cephalothin, and from 8 to 16 mg/liter for ceftazidime (14).

Resistance to Macrolides and Lincosamides

In their study of equine C. pseudotuberculosis isolates, Rhodes et al. (18) determined MIC90 values of ≤0.25 mg/liter, ≤1 mg/liter, and ≤0.25 mg/liter for azithromycin, clarithromycin, and erythromycin, respectively. The use of macrolides for treatment was considered appropriate for Corynebacterium abscesses or lymphangitis due to the lipophilicity of the drugs (18). For C. bovis and C. amycolatum, macrolide and lincosamide MIC values are available for bovine mastitis isolates, ranging from ≤0.06 to 64 mg/liter (13). While the MIC90 values for erythromycin, clindamycin, and pirlimycin did not exceed 0.5 mg/liter, the MIC90 values for tilmicosin were ≥64 mg/liter for C. bovis and 32 mg/liter for C. amycolatum (13). In some of the isolates, Fernández et al. (14) found elevated MICs of up to 16 mg/liter and 128 mg/liter for erythromycin and lincomycin, respectively. When applying the CLSI breakpoints for erythromycin, isolates with MICs of ≥2 mg/liter are classified as resistant (10, 14).

Resistance to Tetracyclines

MIC90 values of 2 mg/liter for tetracycline and ≤2 mg/liter for doxycycline were determined for equine C. pseudotuberculosis isolates (18). Despite the lipophilic character of the drugs and the attainable plasma concentration, the authors recommend a treatment only for isolates with MICs of up to 0.25 mg/liter (18). Due to the different test panels used, only part of the collection from Rhodes et al. (18) (isolates from 2007 to 2012) was tested for lower doxycycline concentrations than 2 mg/liter. A MIC90 value of ≤0.25 mg/liter was determined for these isolates (18). For the C. bovis and C. amycolatum isolates from the strain collection investigated by Watts and Rossbach (13), tetracycline MIC50 values of 0.25 mg/liter were determined for both species, whereas tetracycline MIC90 values of 0.25 mg/liter and 16 mg/liter were seen for C. bovis and C. amycolatum, respectively. It should be noted that isolates with MICs of ≥32 mg/liter were seen in both species (13), suggesting the presence of resistant isolates (10). Fernández et al. (14) found a single Corynebacterium pseudodiphtheriticum isolate that was classified as intermediate to tetracycline when applying CLSI breakpoints (10).

Resistance to Aminoglycosides

For gentamicin, Rhodes et al. (18) found a MIC90 value of 2 mg/liter, while the MIC90 value for amikacin was 8 mg/liter. Since hydrophilic characteristics of the drugs complicate the treatment of abscesses, aminoglycosides are not a first choice for the treatment of corynebacterial infections (18). The corynebacterial isolates from mastitis in ewes had kanamycin MICs ranging from 0.06 to 16 mg/liter and gentamicin MICs from 0.008 to 0.5 mg/liter, suggesting a reduced susceptibility for kanamycin in a single C. mastitidis isolate with a kanamycin MIC of 16 mg/liter, whereas all isolates were gentamicin-susceptible when applying the CLSI breakpoints (10, 14).

Resistance to Phenicols

Equine C. pseudotuberculosis isolates had chloramphenicol MIC50 and MIC90 values of 2 mg/liter and ≤4 mg/liter, respectively (18). Among C. bovis isolates, florfenicol MIC50 and MIC90 values of 1 mg/liter and 2 mg/liter, respectively, have been detected (13). In comparison, the C. amycolatum isolates had MIC50 and MIC90 values of 32 mg/liter each for florfenicol (13). The chloramphenicol MICs of the corynebacteria from mastitis in ewes ranged from 0.03 to 4 mg/liter (14).

Resistance to Sulfonamides and Diaminopyrimidines

C. pseudotuberculosis from horses had a MIC90 value of 0.5/9.5 mg/liter for trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, and isolates with MICs of up to 4/76 mg/liter were also detected (18). According to the CLSI breakpoints, isolates with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole MICs of ≥4/76 mg/liter are classified as resistant (10). Fernández et al. (14) found trimethoprim MICs between 1 and 128 mg/liter, while the MICs for sulfisoxazole ranged from 0.03 to 64 mg/liter.

Resistance to Fluoroquinolones

For equine C. pseudotuberculosis isolates, the achievable plasma concentrations in horses were above the enrofloxacin MIC90 value of 0.25 mg/liter (18). Only 2 of the 92 isolates had MIC values of >0.5 mg/liter (18). Enrofloxacin MIC90 values of 0.25 mg/liter were detected for C. bovis and C. amycolatum isolates from bovine mastitis (13). For the other fluoroquinolones tested—namely, sarafloxacin, danofloxacin, and premafloxacin—the MIC90 values ranged from 0.015 to 0.5 mg/liter (13). Ciprofloxacin MICs of the corynebacterial isolates from ewes ranged between 0.03 and 3 mg/liter (14), indicating the presence of resistant isolates of C. camporealensis, C. bovis, C. pseudotuberculosis, C. pseudodiptheriticum, and C. mastitidis when applying the breakpoints of the human-specific CLSI document M45 (9).

Resistance to Other Antimicrobial Agents

Vancomycin resistance could not be detected in corynebacteria from mastitis in ewes when using CLSI breakpoints (10, 14). Rifampicin resistance was not detected in corynebacteria from ewes with mastitis (14) when using the CLSI breakpoints (10). The rifampicin MIC90 value obtained by Rhodes et al. (18) was ≤1 mg/liter, which would also classify the respective isolates as susceptible (10).

RESISTANCE PROPERTIES OF ARCANOBACTERIUM SPP.

In veterinary medicine, arcanobacteria are of minor importance, and susceptibility data are limited to A. phocae isolates from marine mammals obtained from tissue sites with abnormal discharge or signs of inflammation (32), an odontogenic abscess from a rabbit (33), A. pluranimalium isolates from a dog with pyoderma (34), and A. haemolyticum isolates from diseased horses (35). While the study by Tyrrell and coworkers (33) used agar dilution as the AST method, the latter two studies (34, 35) used agar disk diffusion, another method currently not approved for Arcanobacterium spp. by the CLSI.

During 1994 to 2000, Johnson et al. (32) investigated A. phocae isolates from marine mammals, such as sea lions, harbor seals, elephant seals, sea otters, and a dolphin, from the central California coast and tested 18 A. phocae isolates for their antimicrobial susceptibility by broth microdilution. They followed document M31-A from the NCCLS. However, the breakpoints given in this document are for a variety of livestock and companion animals but not specifically for marine mammals. Consequently, the reliability of the classification of these isolates as being susceptible, intermediate, or resistant is questionable.

The A. phocae isolates from marine mammals were tested for their susceptibility to β-lactams including penicillin (MICs: ≤0.03 to 0.12 mg/liter), ampicillin (MICs: ≤0.25 mg/liter), amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (MICs: ≤2 mg/liter), ticarcillin/clavulanic acid (MICs: ≤8 mg/liter), oxacillin (MICs: ≤2 mg/liter), cefazolin (MICs: ≤2 mg/liter), ceftiofur (MICs: ≤0.06 to 0.5 mg/liter), and ceftizoxime (MICs: ≤0.5 to 4 mg/liter) (32). When re-evaluating the results using the clinical breakpoints for penicillin (10), the isolates would still be classified as susceptible. The erythromycin and tetracycline MICs of all A. phocae isolates from marine mammals were ≤0.12 mg/liter and ≤0.5 mg/liter, respectively (32). They were classified as susceptible to erythromycin and tetracycline, which is in accordance with the current CLSI-approved breakpoints (10). Testing of the aminoglycosides amikacin and gentamicin yielded MIC values of ≤0.5 to 16 mg/liter and ≤0.25 to 4 mg/liter for the A. phocae isolates. All isolates were considered susceptible, based on the NCCLS breakpoints of ≤64 mg/liter for amikacin and ≤16 mg/liter for gentamicin. The recent CLSI document classifies isolates with gentamicin MICs of 8 mg/liter as intermediate and ≥16 mg/liter as resistant (10). The chloramphenicol MIC values of the A. phocae isolates from marine mammals ranged between ≤0.25 and 1 mg/liter, and thus, all isolates were classified as susceptible (32). The A. phocae isolates with MICs of ≤0.25/4.75 mg/liter were classified as susceptible to the combination trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (10, 32). The enrofloxacin MICs of the A. phocae isolates varied between ≤0.25 and 1 mg/liter (32). The rifampicin MICs were ≤0.12 mg/liter, which classified the isolates as susceptible (32). This is in accordance with the current clinical breakpoints for corynebacteria and related species (10).

RESISTANCE PROPERTIES OF T. PYOGENES

T. pyogenes is an important pathogen in veterinary medicine, commonly involved in various diseases of domestic animals (7). As already mentioned, the susceptibility testing method for corynebacteria and related species also includes Trueperella spp. (9, 10). However, a broth microdilution susceptibility testing method for T. pyogenes of animal origin has been developed (12) and has been included in CLSI document VET06 (10). Based on the MIC distributions shown (12), clinical breakpoints for penicillin, ampicillin, erythromycin, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole have been proposed (10).

In 17 studies the antimicrobial susceptibility of T. pyogenes was tested using broth microdilution (12, 14, 3650), with 14 of them referring to NCCLS or CLSI methodology (Table 3) (12, 14, 36, 4050). Eight studies used agar dilution as the susceptibility testing method (20, 5157), with three of them referring to NCCLS or CLSI (53, 54, 57), and in another two studies the MICs were determined by the Calgary Biofilm Device or E-test (21, 54). The agar disk diffusion method was used in 14 studies (7, 22, 5869). Despite the lack of an accepted agar disk diffusion method and the respective interpretive criteria for T. pyogenes, five studies referred to CLSI or NCCLS methods (7, 63, 65, 66, 68).

TABLE 3.

T. pyogenes AST data determined by broth microdilution according to CLSI/NCCLS standards

Animal origin Disease Years of isolation Number of isolates tested MICs (in mg/liter) of selected antimicrobial agentsa Reference
PEN AMP ERY CLI TET CHL ENR SXT GEN STR
Cattle Mastitis 1 0.125 0.5 0.25 36
Sheep Mastitis 5 0.008–0.5 0.008–0.25 16 4 2 14
Cattle (n = 27), pigs (n = 17), dogs (n = 2), cat (n = 1), macaw (n = 1) 48 ≤0.06–≥128 ≤0.06–≥128 ≤0.06–16 41
Cattle (n = 76), pigs (n = 24), birds (n = 5), dogs (n = 2), deer (n = 1), sheep (n = 1), cat (n = 1) 11 0.06–1,024 43
Cattle Urinary, genital tract infections 2004–2006 43 ≤0.015 ≤0.03–0.06 ≤0.015–≥64 ≤0.03–≥128 0.12–64 1–2 0.25–8 ≤0.015–0.25 0.25–32 12
Cattle Umbilical cord infections, septicemia 2004–2006 35 ≤0.015 ≤0.03 ≤0.015–≥64 ≤0.03–≥128 0.12–64 1–2 0.5–1 ≤0.015–0.12 0.5–2 12
Pigs Infections of the central nervous system, musculoskeletal system 2004–2006 12 ≤0.015 ≤0.03 ≤0.015 ≤0.03–0.06 0.12–16 1–2 1 ≤0.015–0.06 0.5 12
Cattle Endometritis 2006 32 0.125–16 0.0625–≥32 0.125–≥32 0.5–32 0.25–1 0.25–≥32 1–≥64 44
Cattle Infections of the uterus 2008 72 ≤0.06–32 ≤0.06–≥64 1–≥64 8–≥64 0.5–≥64 45
White-tailed deer Infections of the lung 2009–2010 29 ≤0.12–2 ≤0.25–4 ≤0.25–16 0.5–2 2 46
Cattle Mastitis 2008–2011 55 ≤0.06 ≤0.06–0.125 ≤0.125–≥4 ≤0.5–≥8 47
Cattle Endometritis 0.125-16 0.125–64 48
Cattle Infections of the uterus 35 ≤0.06–0.125 ≤0.06–0.25 0.5–1 49
a

PEN, penicillin; AMP, ampicillin; ERY, erythromycin; CLI, clindamycin; TET, tetracycline; CHL, chloramphenicol; ENR, enrofloxacin; SXT, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole; GEN, gentamicin; STR, steptomycin.

Resistance to β-Lactams

Using a breakpoint of ≥2 mg/liter, resistance to penicillin (MICs: 0.125 to 16 mg/liter), amoxicillin (MICs: 0.125 to 16 mg/liter), and oxacillin (MICs: 0.125 to 32 mg/liter) was determined in isolates from bovine uterine samples at dairy farms in Inner Mongolia (44). The finding of resistant isolates is in accordance with the lower CLSI breakpoints for coryneforms classifying isolates with MICs of ≤0.12 mg/liter and T. pyogenes with MICs of ≤0.03 mg/liter as susceptible (10). Cephalosporin resistance has been observed using the breakpoints of ≥16 mg/liter for cefazolin and 4 mg/liter for ceftiofur (44). In another study, de Boer et al. (49) found cloxacillin MICs of ≤0.06 to 4 mg/liter in T. pyogenes of bovine uterine samples, while the MIC values for ampicillin and ticarcillin/clavulanic acid were ≤0.013 mg/liter. For ceftiofur, the MIC values ranged between 0.25 and 4 mg/liter, while the MIC values for cefuroxime and cephapirin were ≤0.5 mg/liter (49). In a study by Santos et al. (45), T. pyogenes isolates from uterine secretions of postpartum dairy cows showed MIC distributions of ≤0.06 to 32 mg/liter for penicillin and amoxicillin, as well as ≤0.06 to ≥64 mg/liter for ampicillin and ceftiofur. With resistance breakpoints of ≥0.125 mg/liter for penicillin and ≥2 mg/liter for the other β-lactams tested, resistant isolates could be detected (45). Resistance would be also detected when applying the current CLSI breakpoints (10). Zastempowska and Lassa (47) described isolates from bovine mastitis being susceptible to the β-lactams, penicillin, ampicillin, ceftiofur, and cephalothin, with all isolates having MIC values of ≤1 mg/liter. For penicillin, all isolates had MICs of ≤0.06 mg/liter (47). Since the T. pyogenes breakpoint of penicillin or ampicillin is ≤0.03 mg/liter, isolates with a MIC of 0.06 mg/liter may be misclassified (10). MICs of up to 0.12 mg/liter result in the detection of ampicillin resistance (10).

In the German BfT-GermVet study, T. pyogenes isolates from bovine infections of the umbilical cord and the urinary and genital tract and septicemia, as well as porcine infections of the central nervous system and the musculoskeletal system revealed MIC90 values of ≤0.015 to 0.5 mg/liter for the β-lactams tested (penicillin, ampicillin, oxacillin, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, cephalothin, cefazolin, cefoperazone, ceftiofur, and cefquinome) (12). Tell et al. (46) identified T. pyogenes isolates from white-tailed deer with MICs of ≥0.5 mg/liter and ≥0.25 mg/liter as being resistant to ampicillin and penicillin, respectively, while resistance to ceftiofur was not detected (MICs: ≤1 mg/liter). Using the CLSI-proposed penicillin breakpoint (10) resistance would be seen among T. pyogenes from ewe’s mastitis (14). The amoxicillin MIC was 0.25 mg/liter, while the MICs for ceftazidime and cephalothin were 8 mg/liter (14). A single T. pyogenes isolate from dairy heifers had MICs of 0.125 mg/liter, 0.5 mg/liter, 0.5 mg/liter, and 1 mg/liter for penicillin, cloxacillin, cefapirin, and ceftiofur, respectively (36). Applying CLSI breakpoints for penicillin would result in the classification as susceptible using the breakpoint for the coryneforms, but as resistant using the T. pyogenes breakpoints (10). Zhang et al. (48) found high MIC values of up to 64 mg/liter for ampicillin, up to 32 mg/liter for ceftiofur and oxacillin, and up to 16 mg/liter for penicillin, amoxicillin, and cefazolin in isolates from cattle with endometritis. Testing bovine T. pyogenes from mastitis samples in China identified isolates that were resistant to penicillin (MIC: ≥0.25 mg/liter), ampicillin (MIC: ≥0.5 mg/liter), and cefaclor (MIC: ≥32 mg/liter) (10, 50). Zhao et al. (57) investigated T. pyogenes isolates from forest musk deer by agar dilution and found 16 isolates that were resistant to cefazolin and 17 resistant to cefotaxime, based on a breakpoint of 16 mg/liter for both substances. The β-lactam resistance gene blaP1 has been detected in only eight of the resistant isolates (57).

Resistance to Macrolides and Lincosamides

In T. pyogenes from bovine uterine samples, de Boer et al. (49) determined clindamycin MIC values of ≤0.25 mg/liter, which classify the isolates as susceptible according to the breakpoints for the coryneforms (susceptible: ≤0.5 mg/liter), whereas it cannot be interpreted by using breakpoints for T. pyogenes due to the lack of interpretive criteria for lincosamides (10). Liu et al. (44) found all bovine metritis and endometritis isolates from dairy farms in Inner Mongolia to be susceptible to tilmicosin (MICs: 0.25 mg/liter) and azithromycin (MICs: 0.5 to 2 mg/liter) using ≥2 mg/liter and ≥8 mg/liter as breakpoints for the two macrolides, respectively. Resistance to erythromycin (MICs: 0.0625 to 32 mg/liter) and clindamycin (MICs: 0.125 to 32 mg/liter) was seen when using 1 mg/liter and ≥2 mg/liter as breakpoints, respectively (44). Resistance to clindamycin (resistance breakpoint ≥4 mg/liter) was detected in isolates from white-tailed deer investigated by Tell et al. (46). The detection of erythromycin and clindamycin resistance in the latter two studies is in accordance with the current CLSI breakpoints (10). T. pyogenes isolates were classified as intermediate to tulathromycin (MIC: 64 mg/liter) and either resistant (MIC: ≥32 mg/liter) or intermediate (MIC: 16 mg/liter) to tilmicosin (46). The tylosin MICs of the corresponding isolates ranged from 0.5 to 64 mg/liter (46). AST of 48 T. pyogenes isolates of bovine and porcine origin revealed MIC50 and MIC90 values for erythromycin, tylosin, and clindamycin of ≤0.06 and ≥64 mg/liter, respectively, resulting in resistant isolates for all three antimicrobial agents, when using 8 mg/liter as the resistance breakpoint (41).

Induction tests were performed for isolates with erythromycin MICs of 1 to 8 mg/liter, and inducible macrolide/lincosamide resistance was seen in all isolates tested (41). Three isolates with tylosin MICs of 0.5 to 8 mg/liter were tested, and two showed an inducible phenotype, while the single isolate with a clindamycin MIC of 8 mg/liter was noninducible as confirmed by its tylosin and clindamycin MICs (41). While resistance to erythromycin, tylosin, and clindamycin might point towards a resistance mechanism due to a macrolide-, lincosamide-, and streptogramin B resistance gene, the single noninducible strain had an erythromycin MIC of ≥64 mg/liter and might be resistant via a different mechanism (41). Fernández et al. (14) found erythromycin MICs of 0.008 to 0.25 mg/liter, which indicates the presence of nonsusceptible isolates when using the CLSI-proposed breakpoint for T. pyogenes of ≤0.03 mg/liter (10). The lincomycin MICs were up to 16 mg/liter (14). Watts et al. (36) found an erythromycin MIC of 0.5 mg/liter for the bovine mastitis isolate, which would classify it as susceptible by the breakpoints for coryneforms but as nonsusceptible by the T. pyogenes breakpoints (10). The corresponding pirlimycin MIC was 0.25 mg/liter (36). In bovine T. pyogenes isolates from China, resistance to azithromycin (MICs: ≥8 mg/liter), erythromycin (MICs: ≥8 mg/liter), and clindamycin (MICs: ≥4 mg/liter) was detected (50).

Jost et al. (43) investigated T. pyogenes isolates for the genetic basis of tylosin resistance. In total, 10 of the 32 resistant isolates carried the erm(B) gene. Among the erm(B)-carrying isolates, no inducible resistance was detected, but five bovine strains already had MICs of ≥2,048 mg/liter without induction, and therefore a possible increase of the MICs might not be detectable (43). The constitutive expression of erm(B) in porcine strains with a MIC of 128 mg/liter is in accordance with the missing leader peptide being involved in inducible resistance (43). Differences of the MIC values of bovine and porcine isolates might be due to an additional resistance determinant present in the bovine strains, which could be confirmed by the preparation of erm(B) knockout mutants of one of the bovine strains, which showed an increase of the tylosin MICs from ≤0.06 to ≥2,048 mg/liter after tylosin induction (43). Jost et al. (42) found tylosin-resistant (MICs: ≥64 mg/liter) T. pyogenes harboring the resistance gene erm(X), showing also elevated MICs for erythromycin, oleandomycin, spiramycin, clindamycin, and lincomycin. This finding indicates that the erm(X) gene confers a macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B phenotype (42). The erm(X) gene on plasmid pAP2 (AY255627) was colocated with the tetracycline resistance gene tet(33) (42). An inducible phenotype was detected for all but one of the erm(X)-carrying isolates, while for the remaining isolate the MIC was above the detection limit (42). Seven isolates with tylosin MICs of 128 to 1,024 mg/liter showed MICs of ≥2,048 mg/liter after induction, whereas the remaining two isolates with MICs of 2 mg/liter and 8 mg/liter showed MIC values of 128 mg/liter after induction (42). The finding of the different MIC values of the erm(X)-carrying isolates might be due to the presence of additional macrolide resistance determinants or differences in the plasmid copy numbers (42). Cloning of the erm(X) gene in the vector pEP2 in the T. pyogenes strain BBR1 revealed an increase of the tylosin MIC from ≤0.06 mg/liter for the empty vector to 64 mg/liter for the vector carrying erm(X) (42).

The T. pyogenes erm(X) gene had significant identity with the erm(X) genes of C. diptheriae (97.7%), Corynebacterium striatum (97.5%), Corynebacterium jeikeium (94.7%), and Propionibacterium acnes (97.5%) (42). Moreover, the erm(X) gene was also detected in 23 of the 32 T. pyogenes isolates in a subsequent study by Jost et al. (43). In another study, Jost et al. (70) found T. pyogenes isolates with high MICs for erythromycin (>64 mg/liter), oleandomycin (>64 mg/liter), and spiramycin (≥8 mg/liter) and differences in the resistance properties regarding tylosin and clindamycin. These isolates [negative for the erm(B) and erm(X) genes] were investigated for mutations in the 23S rRNA gene, which are known to mediate resistance to different macrolides (70). One strain had the 23S rRNA mutation A2058T; it was considered clindamycin-resistant because of its MIC of 8 mg/liter but had a tylosin MIC of only 0.5 mg/liter (70). Tylosin and clindamycin MICs of 8 mg/liter were seen in an isolate with the 23S rRNA mutations A2058T and G2137C (70). The 23S rRNA mutation A2058G was seen in an isolate with high-level clindamycin resistance (MIC: >64 mg/liter) and a tylosin MIC of 0.25 mg/liter, while the 23S rRNA mutation C2611G was found in an isolate with low MICs for tylosin (0.125 mg/liter) and clindamycin (1 mg/liter) (70). In the BfT-GermVet study the MIC values for erythromycin (≤0.016 to ≥64 mg/liter), tilmicosin (≤0.03 to ≥128 mg/liter), spiramycin (≤0.06 to ≥256 mg/liter), tulathromycin (0.06 to ≥128 mg/liter), and clindamycin (≤0.03 to ≥128 mg/liter) included a wide range of dilution steps (12), and identified erythromycin- and clindamycin-resistant isolates (10). In total, six isolates with erythromycin MICs of ≥64 mg/liter were positive for the erm(X) gene (12). The resistance genes erm(X) and erm(B) were also detected in T. pyogenes from bovine mastitis (47).

Resistance to Tetracyclines

Resistance to tetracyclines was observed in bovine isolates from uterine samples, including resistance to oxytetracycline (breakpoint ≥64 mg/liter), tetracycline (breakpoint ≥4 mg/liter), and doxycycline (breakpoint ≥8 mg/liter) (44). However, the CLSI breakpoints for tetracycline and doxycycline classify isolates with ≤4 mg/liter as susceptible and those with 8 mg/liter as intermediate (10). Tell et al. (46) classified isolates from white-tailed deer as resistant (MIC: ≥8 mg/liter) or intermediate (MIC: 4 mg/liter) to oxytetracycline and chlortetracycline. In a study by de Boer et al. (49), two bovine uterine T. pyogenes isolates revealed elevated oxytetracycline MICs of 16 mg/liter and 128 mg/liter, respectively. MIC ranges of 1 to ≥64 mg/liter for tetracycline and 0.125 to ≥64 mg/liter for oxytetracycline were detected in bovine uterine isolates, suggesting the presence of resistant isolates (10, 45). Tetracycline MICs of 16 mg/liter were seen in T. pyogenes from ewes with mastitis (14). Among the isolates from the BfT-GermVet study, tetracycline MIC90 values of 32 mg/liter and 16 mg/liter were observed for the bovine and porcine isolates, respectively (10, 12). Tetracycline resistance was detected in 70% of the bovine mastitis isolates from four farms in China when using a breakpoint of ≥16 mg/liter (10, 50).

Billington et al. (40) investigated tetracycline-resistant isolates from pigs, cattle, and a macaw for the genetic basis of the resistance and found the tet(W) gene in a bovine strain. This tet(W) gene had 92% sequence identity to tet(W) from Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens (40). Despite the detection of sequences similar to those involved in the regulation of tet(M) in transposon Tn916, an induction of tet(W) was not seen in the T. pyogenes isolates tested (40). The tetracycline-resistant isolates, as well as tetracycline-susceptible control isolates, were tested for the presence of the tet(W) gene via dot blot and a specific PCR assay, confirming the presence of this gene in all resistant isolates, while it was not seen in the susceptible ones (40). Trinh et al. (41) found T. pyogenes MIC90 values of 8 mg/liter for chlortetracycline and oxytetracycline, while the MIC90 for tetracycline was 16 mg/liter. Using 4 mg/liter as the breakpoint, a resistance rate of 41.7% was seen for all three substances, with the same 20 isolates being classified as resistant and carrying the tet(W) gene (41). However, the resistance breakpoint in the most recent CLSI document is ≥16 mg/liter (10). Isolates with MICs in the range of 0.5 to 8 mg/liter were tested for an inducible phenotype, which was not present in any of the isolates (41). Jost et al. (42) detected the tetracycline resistance gene tet(33) colocated with the erm(X) gene on plasmid pAP2. The tet(33) gene was detected in 55.6% of the erm(X)-carrying isolates but in only 5.1% of the erm(X)-negative isolates (42). The tet(33) gene conferred tetracycline MICs of 1 mg/liter, compared to ≤0.06 mg/liter for susceptible strains (42). In contrast to the tetracycline resistance gene tet(W), which confers tetracycline MICs of up to 8 mg/liter, tet(33) apparently only confers low-level resistance, whereas the presence of both genes resulted in a MIC value of up to 16 mg/liter (42). Zastempowska and Lassa (47) found the tet(W) gene in all bovine T. pyogenes isolates that showed a tetracycline MIC of at least 4 mg/liter. In her study, Alešík (71) investigated the tetracycline susceptibility of T. pyogenes isolates and found 36 isolates with tetracycline MICs of ≥8 mg/liter. The resistance gene tet(W) was detected alone or in combination with tet(33) (71). Moreover, the tet(Z) gene, present in a single isolate, has been described for the first time in T. pyogenes (71) but was previously detected in Corynebacterium glutamicum (72).

Resistance to Aminoglycosides

Among the T. pyogenes isolates from ewes with mastitis, gentamicin MICs of 2 mg/liter were determined, while the kanamycin MICs ranged from 0.5 to 8 mg/liter (14). Gentamicin resistance in T. pyogenes isolates from bovine mastitis was detected when applying a breakpoint of ≥16 mg/liter (10, 50). Isolates from white-tailed deer with a MIC of 8 mg/liter were classified as intermediate to gentamicin (10, 46), while all isolates were susceptible to spectinomcin (MIC: ≤16 mg/liter) (46). The neomycin MIC distribution ranged from 4 to 32 mg/liter (46). Testing of T. pyogenes from the BfT-GermVet study for gentamicin, neomycin, and spectinomycin resulted in MIC90 values of 1 mg/liter, 4 mg/liter, and 4 mg/liter for the bovine and 0.5 mg/liter, 8 mg/liter, and 1 mg/liter for the porcine isolates, respectively (12). A single bovine isolate with a MIC of 32 mg/liter was classified as gentamicin-resistant (10, 12). The streptomycin susceptibility testing of bovine uterine isolates revealed a MIC90 of 16 mg/liter (45). For spectinomycin, a MIC90 value of ≥64 mg/liter was determined (45).

Zhao et al. (57) detected kanamycin and amikacin resistance in isolates from forest musk deer by agar dilution, using a breakpoint of 16 mg/liter for both substances. Gentamicin resistance based on a breakpoint of 2 mg/liter, which is below the resistance breakpoint from the CLSI (≥16 mg/liter) (10). Aminoglycoside resistance was observed in 17 isolates (60.7%), while the total detection rate for the resistance genes aacC, aadA1, and aadA2 was 57.1% (57). Liu et al. (44) found MICs of up to ≥64 mg/liter for streptomycin, 0.25 to ≥32 mg/liter for gentamicin, and 0.5 to ≥64 mg/liter for amikacin in isolates from bovine metritis and endometritis. Investigations of the genetic basis of aminoglycoside resistance identified gene cassettes with the resistance genes aadA1, aadA5, aadA24, and aadB (44).

Resistance to Phenicols

High MIC90 values of ≥64 mg/liter for chloramphenicol and 32 mg/liter for florfenicol were detected in T. pyogenes from bovine uterine samples (45). Resistant isolates were detected when using ≥8 mg/liter as the breakpoint (45). Among the isolates from the BfT-GermVet study, the MIC90 values for chloramphenicol and florfenicol were 2 mg/liter and 1 mg/liter for the bovine isolates and 1 mg/liter and 1 mg/liter for the porcine isolates, respectively (12). Fernández et al. (14) found chloramphenicol MICs of 4 mg/liter in ovine T. pyogenes isolates. Florfenicol resistance was detected in three bovine uterine isolates based on a breakpoint of 8 mg/liter, and the phenicol resistance gene cmlA6 was detected (44).

Resistance to Sulfonamides and Diaminopyrimidines

In the BfT-GermVet study, bovine isolates were found to be resistant to sulfamethoxazole based on human breakpoints (≥512 mg/liter), while all porcine isolates were classified as susceptible (12). In comparison, all bovine and porcine isolates had MICs of ≤0.12/2.38 to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (12), which classifies them as susceptible by using the T. pyogenes breakpoint of ≤0.12/2.38 mg/liter (10). Liu et al. (44) classified all T. pyogenes isolates in their study as resistant to sulfadiazine and sulfamethoxydiazine, since the MIC50 and MIC90 values were ≥128 mg/liter for both substances. Zastempowska and Lassa (47) found that all bovine mastitis isolates in their collection also had sulfadimethoxine MICs of ≥128 mg/liter. Tell et al. (46) found all isolates with MICs of 2/38 mg/liter to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and classified them as susceptible. Fernández et al. (14) tested trimethoprim and sulfisoxazole as separate compounds, resulting in MICs of 0.5 mg/liter and 64 mg/liter, respectively. Resistance to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole was seen in 90% of the T. pyogenes isolates from four Chinese dairy farms, with MICs of ≥4/76 mg/liter (10, 50).

Trimethoprim resistance was detected by agar dilution in 46.4% of the T. pyogenes isolates from forest musk deer, using 16 mg/liter as breakpoint; the resistance gene dfrB2a was detected in only 28.6% of the isolates (57). This suggests the presence of another resistance determinant in these isolates.

Resistance to Fluoroquinolones

The enrofloxacin MICs obtained for T. pyogenes isolates from bovine uterine samples were 0.5 mg/liter or 1 mg/liter (49). Tell et al. (46) found all isolates from white-tailed deer to be resistant to danofloxacin (MICs: 0.5 mg/liter and 1 mg/liter) and resistant (MIC: 2 mg/liter) or intermediate (MICs: 0.5 mg/liter and 1 mg/liter) to enrofloxacin. Liu et al. (44) reported T. pyogenes from bovine metritis and endometritis exhibiting MIC90 values of 2 mg/liter, 2 mg/liter, 1 mg/liter, and 0.5 mg/liter to ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, enrofloxacin, and gatifloxacin, respectively. For the first two substances, ≥16 mg/liter and for the latter two, ≥4 mg/liter were used as resistance breakpoints (44). Ciprofloxacin MICs of 2 mg/liter were seen in ovine mastitis isolates (14). The human-specific ciprofloxacin breakpoints available for coryneforms would classify isolates with MICs of 2 mg/liter as intermediate (9). A bovine mastitis isolate showed an enrofloxacin MIC of 0.25 mg/liter (36). Werckenthin et al. (12) described an enrofloxacin MIC90 of 1 mg/liter for both the bovine and the porcine T. pyogenes isolates from the BfT-GermVet study. Resistance to fluoroquinolones was detected among isolates with ciprofloxacin MICs of ≥4 mg/liter and enrofloxacin MICs of ≥1 mg/liter (50).

Resistance to Other Antimicrobial Agents

Rifampicin MICs of up to 2 mg/liter were seen in ovine T. pyogenes isolates (14). In the study conducted by Alkasir et al. (50), resistance to rifampicin has been detected in only two of the 50 bovine mastitis isolates. These isolates had MICs of ≥4 mg/liter, which is in accordance with the CLSI breakpoints for coryneform bacteria (10). Liu et al. (44) found all bovine T. pyogenes isolates from metritis and endometritis to be resistant to Zn-bacitracin, with MICs of ≥32 mg/liter. Fernández et al. (14) found vancomycin MICs of 0.5 mg/liter in isolates from ewes with mastitis, which would be classified as susceptible according to the CLSI breakpoint of ≤2 mg/liter for coryneform bacteria (10). Tell et al. (46) found all isolates from white-tailed deer to be susceptible to tiamulin (MIC: ≤2 mg/liter). A novobiocin MIC of 0.25 mg/liter was determined by Watts et al. (36). Zastempowska and Lassa (47) reported that all 55 bovine mastitis isolates had MICs of 0.5 to 1 mg/liter for the combination of penicillin and novobiocin. The colistin MIC90 value of ≥64 mg/liter detected among all bovine and porcine T. pyogenes isolates (12) confirmed that colistin is not active against Gram-positive bacteria.

CONCLUDING REMARKS

This article has provided an overview of the antimicrobial susceptibility of Corynebacterium spp., Arcanobacterium spp., and T. pyogenes. However, the interpretation and comparability of the results is hampered by the use of different AST methods and test parameters. As described, agar disk diffusion, agar dilution, and broth microdilution using different media, supplements, incubation times, and incubation temperatures have been applied for these bacteria (Table 1). In recent years, the CLSI has provided major improvements with regard to the harmonization of AST of bacteria of the genera Corynebacterium, Arcanobacterium, and Trueperella by approving and publishing standard broth dilution methods accompanied by clinical breakpoints for Corynebacterium spp. and related coryneform genera/coryneforms (9, 10), as well as an additional method with different test conditions for T. pyogenes (10). For the T. pyogenes AST method, which requires a CO2 atmosphere for incubation, only a few breakpoints are available, with the ones for penicillin, erythromycin, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole differing from those for the coryneform bacteria (10). Moreover, there is a gap of knowledge with regard to the genetic basis of antimicrobial resistance in Corynebacterium spp., Arcanobacterium spp., and T. pyogenes. Expanded studies have been conducted on macrolide/lincosamide- and tetracycline resistance genes in T. pyogenes, while reports of genes and mutations accounting for other resistance properties are rare.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank PD Dr. Christiane Werckenthin for critical reading of the manuscript and many helpful comments.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Skerman VBD, McGowan V, Sneath PHA. 1980. Approved lists of bacterial names. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 30:225–420 10.1099/00207713-30-1-225. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Markey B, Leonard F, Archambault M, Cullinane A, Maguire D. 2013. Clinical Veterinary Microbiology, 2nd ed. Mosby Elsevier, Edinburgh, United Kingdom. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Judson R, Songer JG. 1991. Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis: in vitro susceptibility to 39 antimicrobial agents. Vet Microbiol 27:145–150 10.1016/0378-1135(91)90005-Z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Collins MD, Jones D, Schofield GM. 1982. Reclassification of ‘Corynebacterium haemolyticum’ (MacLean, Liebow & Rosenberg) in the genus Arcanobacterium gen.nov. as Arcanobacterium haemolyticum nom.rev., comb.nov. J Gen Microbiol 128:1279–1281. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sammra O, Rau J, Wickhorst JP, Alssahen M, Hassan AA, Lämmler C, Kämpfer P, Glaeser SP, Busse HJ, Kleinhagauer T, Knauf-Witzens T, Prenger-Berninghoff E, Abdulmawjood A, Klein G. 2017. Arcanobacterium wilhelmae sp. nov., isolated from the genital tract of a rhinoceros (Rhinoceros unicornis). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 67:2093–2097 10.1099/ijsem.0.001784. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Yassin AF, Hupfer H, Siering C, Schumann P. 2011. Comparative chemotaxonomic and phylogenetic studies on the genus Arcanobacterium Collins et al. 1982 emend. Lehnen et al. 2006: proposal for Trueperella gen. nov. and emended description of the genus Arcanobacterium. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 61:1265–1274 10.1099/ijs.0.020032-0. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ribeiro MG, Risseti RM, Bolaños CA, Caffaro KA, de Morais AC, Lara GH, Zamprogna TO, Paes AC, Listoni FJ, Franco MM. 2015. Trueperella pyogenes multispecies infections in domestic animals: a retrospective study of 144 cases (2002 to 2012). Vet Q 35:82–87 10.1080/01652176.2015.1022667. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Watts JL, Sweeney MT, Lubbers BV. 2017. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of bacteria of veterinary origin. In Aarestrup FM, Cavaco L, Schwarz S, Shen Y (ed), Antimicrobial Resistance in Bacteria from Livestock and Companion Animals. ASM Press, Washington, DC. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.CLSI. 2016. Methods for antimicrobial dilution and disk susceptibility testing of infrequently isolated or fastidious bacteria, 3rd ed. CLSI guideline M45. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.CLSI. 2017. Methods for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of infrequently isolated or fastidious bacteria isolated from animals. CLSI supplement VET06. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Schwarz S, Silley P, Simjee S, Woodford N, van Duijkeren E, Johnson AP, Gaastra W. 2010. Assessing the antimicrobial susceptibility of bacteria obtained from animals. Vet Microbiol 141:1–4 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.12.013. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Werckenthin C, Alesík E, Grobbel M, Lübke-Becker A, Schwarz S, Wieler LH, Wallmann J. 2007. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from dogs and cats as well as Arcanobacterium pyogenes from cattle and swine as determined in the BfT-GermVet monitoring program 2004–2006. Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr 120:412–422. [PubMed] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Watts JL, Rossbach S. 2000. Susceptibilities of Corynebacterium bovis and Corynebacterium amylocolatum isolates from bovine mammary glands to 15 antimicrobial agents. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 44:3476–3477 10.1128/AAC.44.12.3476-3477.2000. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Fernández EP, Vela AI, Las Heras A, Domínguez L, Fernández-Garayzábal JF. Moreno MA. 2001. Antimicrobial susceptibility of corynebacteria isolated from ewe’s mastitis. Int J Antimicrob Agents 18:571–574 10.1016/S0924-8579(01)00424-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Foley JE, Spier SJ, Mihalyi J, Drazenovich N, Leutenegger CM. 2004. Molecular epidemiologic features of Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis isolated from horses. Am J Vet Res 65:1734–1737 10.2460/ajvr.2004.65.1734. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bailiff NL, Westropp JL, Jang SS, Ling GV. 2005. Corynebacterium urealyticum urinary tract infection in dogs and cats: 7 cases (1996–2003). J Am Vet Med Assoc 226:1676–1680 10.2460/javma.2005.226.1676. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Katsukawa C, Komiya T, Yamagishi H, Ishii A, Nishino S, Nagahama S, Iwaki M, Yamamoto A, Takahashi M. 2012. Prevalence of Corynebacterium ulcerans in dogs in Osaka, Japan. J Med Microbiol 61:266–273 10.1099/jmm.0.034868-0. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Rhodes DM, Magdesian KG, Byrne BA, Kass PH, Edman J, Spier SJ. 2015. Minimum inhibitory concentrations of equine Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis isolates (1996–2012). J Vet Intern Med 29:327–332 10.1111/jvim.12534. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Adamson PJ, Wilson WD, Hirsh DC, Baggot JD, Martin LD. 1985. Susceptibility of equine bacterial isolates to antimicrobial agents. Am J Vet Res 46:447–450. [PubMed] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Prescott JF, Yielding KM. 1990. In vitro susceptibility of selected veterinary bacterial pathogens to ciprofloxacin, enrofloxacin and norfloxacin. Can J Vet Res 54:195–197. [PubMed] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Olson ME, Ceri H, Morck DW, Buret AG, Read RR. 2002. Biofilm bacteria: formation and comparative susceptibility to antibiotics. Can J Vet Res 66:86–92. [PubMed] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Farrag H, Oof F. 1967. Sensitivity of organisms isolated from cases of bovine and goat mastitis to various antibiotics. Indian Vet J 44:640–646. [PubMed] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wilkins RJ, Helland DR. 1973. Antibacterial sensitivities of bacteria isolated from dogs with tracheobronchitis. J Am Vet Med Assoc 162:47–50. [PubMed] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Swartz R, Jooste PJ, Novello JC. 1984. Antibiotic susceptibility patterns of mastitis pathogens isolated from Bloemfontein dairy herds. J S Afr Vet Assoc 55:187–193. [PubMed] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Gomez A, Nombela C, Zapardiel J, Soriano F. 1995. An encrusted cystitis caused by Corynebacterium urealyticum in a dog. Aust Vet J 72:72–73 10.1111/j.1751-0813.1995.tb15338.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Guedeja-Marrón J, Blanco JL, Ruperez C, Garcia ME. 1998. Susceptibility of bacterial isolates from chronic canine otitis externa to twenty antibiotics. Zentralbl Veterinarmed B 45:507–512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Lin CT, Petersen-Jones SM. 2007. Antibiotic susceptibility of bacterial isolates from corneal ulcers of dogs in Taiwan. J Small Anim Pract 48:271–274 10.1111/j.1748-5827.2007.00348.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Aalbæk B, Bemis DA, Schjærff M, Kania SA, Frank LA, Guardabassi L. 2010. Coryneform bacteria associated with canine otitis externa. Vet Microbiol 145:292–298 10.1016/j.vetmic.2010.03.032. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kireçci E, Ozkanlar Y, Aktas MS, Uyanik MH, Yazgi H. 2010. Isolation of pathogenic aerobic bacteria from the blood of septicaemic neonatal calves and the susceptibility of isolates to various antibiotics. J S Afr Vet Assoc 81:110–113 10.4102/jsava.v81i2.115. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Henneveld K, Rosychuk RA, Olea-Popelka FJ, Hyatt DR, Zabel S. 2012. Corynebacterium spp. in dogs and cats with otitis externa and/or media: a retrospective study. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 48:320–326 10.5326/JAAHA-MS-5791. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Oliveira M, Barroco C, Mottola C, Santos R, Lemsaddek A, Tavares L, Semedo-Lemsaddek T. 2014. First report of Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis from caseous lymphadenitis lesions in Black Alentejano pig (Sus scrofa domesticus). BMC Vet Res 10:218 10.1186/s12917-014-0218-3. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Johnson SP, Jang S, Gulland FM, Miller MA, Casper DR, Lawrence J, Herrera J. 2003. Characterization and clinical manifestations of Arcanobacterium phocae infections in marine mammals stranded along the central California coast. J Wildl Dis 39:136–144 10.7589/0090-3558-39.1.136. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Tyrrell KL, Citron DM, Jenkins JR, Goldstein EJ. 2002. Periodontal bacteria in rabbit mandibular and maxillary abscesses. J Clin Microbiol 40:1044–1047 10.1128/JCM.40.3.1044-1047.2002. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Ülbegi-Mohyla H, Hassan AA, Alber J, Lämmler C, Prenger-Berninghoff E, Weiss R, Zschöck M. 2010. Identification of Arcanobacterium pluranimalium isolated from a dog by phenotypic properties and by PCR mediated characterization of various molecular targets. Vet Microbiol 142:458–460 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.09.058. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Hassan AA, Ülbegi-Mohyla H, Kanbar T, Alber J, Lämmler C, Abdulmawjood A, Zschöck M, Weiss R. 2009. Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of Arcanobacterium haemolyticum isolates from infections of horses. J Clin Microbiol 47:124–128 10.1128/JCM.01933-08. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Watts JL, Salmon SA, Yancey RJ Jr, Nickerson SC, Weaver LJ, Holmberg C, Pankey JW, Fox LK. 1995. Antimicrobial susceptibility of microorganisms isolated from the mammary glands of dairy heifers. J Dairy Sci 78:1637–1648 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(95)76788-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Morck DW, Olson ME, Louie TJ, Koppe A, Quinn B. 1998. Comparison of ceftiofur sodium and oxytetracycline for treatment of acute interdigital phlegmon (foot rot) in feedlot cattle. J Am Vet Med Assoc 212:254–257. [PubMed] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Narayanan S, Nagaraja TG, Staats J, Chengappa MM, Oberst RD. 1998. Biochemical and biological characterizations and ribotyping of Actinomyces pyogenes and Actinomyces pyogenes-like organisms from liver abscesses in cattle. Vet Microbiol 61:289–303 10.1016/S0378-1135(98)00190-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Nagaraja TG, Beharka AB, Chengappa MM, Carroll LH, Raun AP, Laudert SB, Parrott JC. 1999. Bacterial flora of liver abscesses in feedlot cattle fed tylosin or no tylosin. J Anim Sci 77:973–978 10.2527/1999.774973x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Billington SJ, Songer JG, Jost BH. 2002. Widespread distribution of a tet W determinant among tetracycline-resistant isolates of the animal pathogen Arcanobacterium pyogenes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 46:1281–1287 10.1128/AAC.46.5.1281-1287.2002. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Trinh HT, Billington SJ, Field AC, Songer JG, Jost BH. 2002. Susceptibility of Arcanobacterium pyogenes from different sources to tetracycline, macrolide and lincosamide antimicrobial agents. Vet Microbiol 85:353–359 10.1016/S0378-1135(01)00524-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Jost BH, Field AC, Trinh HT, Songer JG, Billington SJ. 2003. Tylosin resistance in Arcanobacterium pyogenes is encoded by an erm X determinant. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 47:3519–3524 10.1128/AAC.47.11.3519-3524.2003. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Jost BH, Trinh HT, Songer JG, Billington SJ. 2004. A second tylosin resistance determinant, Erm B, in Arcanobacterium pyogenes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 48:721–727 10.1128/AAC.48.3.721-727.2004. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Liu MC, Wu CM, Liu YC, Zhao JC, Yang YL, Shen JZ. 2009. Identification, susceptibility, and detection of integron-gene cassettes of Arcanobacterium pyogenes in bovine endometritis. J Dairy Sci 92:3659–3666 10.3168/jds.2008-1756. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Santos TM, Caixeta LS, Machado VS, Rauf AK, Gilbert RO, Bicalho RC. 2010. Antimicrobial resistance and presence of virulence factor genes in Arcanobacterium pyogenes isolated from the uterus of postpartum dairy cows. Vet Microbiol 145:84–89 10.1016/j.vetmic.2010.03.001. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Tell LA, Brooks JW, Lintner V, Matthews T, Kariyawasam S. 2011. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Arcanobacterium pyogenes isolated from the lungs of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) with pneumonia. J Vet Diagn Invest 23:1009–1013 10.1177/1040638711416618. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Zastempowska E, Lassa H. 2012. Genotypic characterization and evaluation of an antibiotic resistance of Trueperella pyogenes (Arcanobacterium pyogenes) isolated from milk of dairy cows with clinical mastitis. Vet Microbiol 161:153–158 10.1016/j.vetmic.2012.07.018. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Zhang DX, Tian K, Han LM, Wang QX, Liu YC, Tian CL, Liu MC. 2014. Resistance to β-lactam antibiotic may influence nanH gene expression in Trueperella pyogenes isolated from bovine endometritis. Microb Pathog 71-72:20–24 10.1016/j.micpath.2014.04.006. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.de Boer M, Heuer C, Hussein H, McDougall S. 2015. Minimum inhibitory concentrations of selected antimicrobials against Escherichia coli and Trueperella pyogenes of bovine uterine origin. J Dairy Sci 98:4427–4438 10.3168/jds.2014-8890. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Alkasir R, Wang J, Gao J, Ali T, Zhang L, Szenci O, Bajcsy ÁC, Han B. 2016. Properties and antimicrobial susceptibility of Trueperella pyogenes isolated from bovine mastitis in China. Acta Vet Hung 64:1–12 10.1556/004.2016.001. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Guérin-Faublée V, Flandrois JP, Broye E, Tupin F, Richard Y. 1993. Actinomyces pyogenes: susceptibility of 103 clinical animal isolates to 22 antimicrobial agents. Vet Res 24:251–259. [PubMed] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Cohen RO, Bernstein M, Ziv G. 1995. Isolation and anti-microbial susceptibility of Actinomyces pyogenes re-covered from the uterus of dairy cows with retained fetal membranes and post parturient endometritis. Theriogenology 43:1389–1397 10.1016/0093-691X(95)00124-Q. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Jousimies-Somer H, Pyörälä S, Kanervo A. 1996. Susceptibilities of bovine summer mastitis bacteria to antimicrobial agents. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 40:157–160. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Chirino-Trejo M, Woodbury MR, Huang F. 2003. Antibiotic sensitivity and biochemical characterization of Fusobacterium spp. and Arcanobacterium pyogenes isolated from farmed white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) with necrobacillosis. J Zoo Wildl Med 34:262–268 10.1638/02-019. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Yoshimura H, Kojima A, Ishimaru M. 2000. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Arcanobacterium pyogenes isolated from cattle and pigs. J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health 47:139–143 10.1046/j.1439-0450.2000.00315.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Sheldon IM, Bushnell M, Montgomery J, Rycroft AN. 2004. Minimum inhibitory concentrations of some antimicrobial drugs against bacteria causing uterine infections in cattle. Vet Rec 155:383–387 10.1136/vr.155.13.383. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Zhao KL, Liu Y, Zhang XY, Palahati P, Wang HN, Yue BS. 2011. Detection and characterization of antibiotic-resistance genes in Arcanobacterium pyogenes strains from abscesses of forest musk deer. J Med Microbiol 60:1820–1826 10.1099/jmm.0.033332-0. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Kunter E. 1963. Sensitivity of mastitis pathogens to antibiotics and sulfonamides and mastitis pathogens. MhVet Med 18:88–92. (In German.) [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Kunter E. 1975. Sensitivity of mastitis pathogens to antibiotics and chemotherapeutic agents. Arch Exp Veterinarmed 29:1–32. (In German.) [PubMed] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Hariharan H, Barnum DA, Mitchell WR. 1974. Drug resistance among pathogenic bacteria from animals in Ontario. Can J Comp Med 38:213–221. [PubMed] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Mohan K, Uzoukwu M. 1980. Certain characteristics of Corynebacterium pyogenes infection. Vet Rec 107:252–253 10.1136/vr.107.11.252. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Lämmler C, Blobel H. 1988. Comparative studies on Actinomyces pyogenes and Arcanobacterium haemolyticum. Med Microbiol Immunol (Berl) 177:109–114 10.1007/BF00189532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Vogel G, Nicolet J, Martig J, Tschudi P, Meylan M. 2001. Pneumonia in calves: characterization of the bacterial spectrum and the resistance patterns to antimicrobial drugs. Schweiz Arch Tierheilkd 143:341–350. (In German.) [PubMed] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Martel A, Meulenaere V, Devriese LA, Decostere A, Haesebrouck F. 2003. Macrolide and lincosamide resistance in the Gram-positive nasal and tonsillar flora of pigs. Microb Drug Resist 9:293–297 10.1089/107662903322286508. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Wettstein K, Frey J. 2004. Comparison of antimicrobial resistance pattern of selected respiratory tract pathogens isolated from different animal species. Schweiz Arch Tierheilkd 146:417–422 10.1024/0036-7281.146.9.417. (In German.) [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Kidanemariam A, Gouws J, van Vuuren M, Gummow B. 2005. In vitro antimicrobial susceptibility of Mycoplasma mycoides mycoides large colony and Arcanobacterium pyogenes isolated from clinical cases of ulcerative balanitis and vulvitis in Dorper sheep in South Africa. J S Afr Vet Assoc 76:204–208 10.4102/jsava.v76i4.427. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Schröder A, Hoedemaker M, Klein G. 2005. Resistance of mastitis pathogens in northern Germany. Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr 118:393–398. (In German.) [PubMed] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Markowska-Daniel I, Urbaniak K, Stepniewska K, Pejsak Z. 2010. Antibiotic susceptibility of bacteria isolated from respiratory tract of pigs in Poland between 2004 and 2008. Pol J Vet Sci 13:29–36. [PubMed] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Brodzki P, Bochniarz M, Brodzki A, Wrona Z, Wawron W. 2014. Trueperella pyogenes and Escherichia coli as an etiological factor of endometritis in cows and the susceptibility of these bacteria to selected antibiotics. Pol J Vet Sci 17:657–664 10.2478/pjvs-2014-0096. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Jost BH, Trinh HT, Songer JG, Billington SJ. 2004. Ribosomal mutations in Arcanobacterium pyogenes confer a unique spectrum of macrolide resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 48:1021–1023 10.1128/AAC.48.3.1021-1023.2004. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Alešík E. 2006. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Arcanobacterium pyogenes: Evaluation and application of a broth micro-dilution method for susceptibility testing and genotypic characterization of tetracycline resistant strains. (In German with English summary.) Thesis, Ludwig-Maximilians University, Munich, Germany. [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Tauch A, Pühler A, Kalinowski J, Thierbach G. 2000. TetZ, a new tetracycline resistance determinant discovered in Gram-positive bacteria, shows high homology to Gram-negative regulated efflux systems. Plasmid 44:285–291 10.1006/plas.2000.1489. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Microbiology Spectrum are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES