Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2024 Dec 31;19(12):e0315996. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315996

Comparative transcriptome analysis of albino northern snakehead (Channa argus) reveals its various collagen-related DEGs in caudal fin cells

Shixi Chen 1,2,#, Ning Li 3,#, Fardous Mohammad Safiul Azam 1,4,*, Li Ao 1, Na Li 1, Jianlan Wang 1, Yuanchao Zou 1,2,*, Rui Li 1, Zakaria Hossain Prodhan 1
Editor: Karolina Goździewska-Harłajczuk5
PMCID: PMC11687805  PMID: 39739744

Abstract

The albino northern snakehead (Channa argus) is an aquaculture species characterized by heritable albino body color, in contrast to the typical coloration. Additionally, there are gray- and golden-finned individuals, which exhibit distinct coloration in their caudal fins. We performed RNA-seq to profile the transcriptome of caudal fin tissues in albino gray-finned and golden-finned C. argus, contrasting these with normal morphs to elucidate the differences between the two groups. A total of 137,130 unigenes were identified in this study. Gene Ontology (GO) analysis showed that the identified DEGs were significantly enriched in cellular components related to cytoplasm. So far, 379 common DEGs have been identified in all three groups. Notably, we observed more DEGs in golden-finned individuals compared to gray-finned individuals. We also revealed that golden-finned individuals were enriched in collagen-related pathways compared with normal individuals. The enriched DEGs of collagen components include collagen I of COL1A1 and COL1A2, collagen II of COL2A1, collagen V of COL5A1 and COL5A2, collagen VI of COL6A1 and COL6A3, collagen IX of COL9A3, collagen X of COL10A1, collagen XI of COL11A2, collagen XII of COL12A1, collagen XVI of COL16A1, collagen XVIII of COL18A1 and decorin (DCN), all of which play a role in modulating the collagen matrix. In golden-finned albino fish, collagen-related genes were downregulated, suggesting that despite the abundance of collagen types in their caudal fin cells, gene expression was slightly limited. This work provides valuable genetic insights into collagen variation in albino C. argus, lays the foundation for research on collagen genes and is crucial for the development and utilization of fish-derived collagen as a biomaterial for tissue engineering and biomedical applications.

1 Introduction

Collagens, the most abundant proteins in the animal kingdom, are best recognized for providing mechanical strength to skin, bones, and other tissues [1]. It plays a key role in retaining the texture of fish muscles [2, 3], and increased collagen content in muscle enhances the firmness of fish fillets [4, 5], which is a vital feature in determining the acceptability of aquatic products. Owing to high water absorption capacity, high biocompatibility, low immunogenicity, biodegradability, high porosity, ease of processing, ability to penetrate a lipid-free interface, limited disease transmission, natural ability to combine with other materials (synthetic polymers), and options for industrial-scale extraction, collagen has limited or no ethical or religious constraints. Because of these properties, collagen has become a key multifunctional protein used in the food, cosmetics, pharmaceutical and biomedical industries [6]. Compared with porcine and bovine collagen is more readily absorbed and has higher bioavailability [7]. Altogether, they have become valuable biomaterials and have received significant attention from biomedical researchers [8]. In its therapeutic aspects, collagen derivatives are used for tissue engineering, cell culture, and drug delivery and have shown an ability to inhibit bacterial growth and promote wound healing [9, 10]. For instance, wound contraction rate and histological examination demonstrated that the prepared collagen effectively promoted wound healing, resulting in improved wound resolution and closure [9, 11]. The evidence reviewed above suggests that fish collagen is a promising option for wound healing and other therapeutic applications. In general, three collagen chains are assembled into a left-handed triple helix to form a protein complex, which is then built into higher-order structures [12, 13]. To date, 28 distinct forms of collagen (collagen I–XXVIII) have been identified [1315]. In fish, type I collagen is the most frequent type; however, certain species contain type II collagen [10].

The northern snakehead (Channa argus) is a Channa species from the Channidae family of Perciformes, found in Asia and Africa [16, 17]. Moreover, in China, the annual production of this species is estimated to be approximately 510,000 tons, with a value of 1.6 billion US dollars [18]. However, it is classified as an invasive species in North America that threatens many other species [19]. This species is the most important snakehead species, with only a few bone spurs cultured in China and Malaysia. It has an edible rate of up to 63% and has gained popularity among people in these countries due to its high nutritional content [2022]. It is also sold in ethnic live-food fish markets in New York and St. Louis, Missouri [17]. The northern snakehead albino phenotype is a unique heritable albino that is found exclusively in China. It was first recorded in Neijiang City, Sichuan Province, China [23, 24]. The natives of this city believe that albino C. argus with golden caudal fins has medicinal value, such as healing wounds and promoting lactation [25]. Considering its unique features and significant uses, several molecular studies have been conducted, including studies on the draft whole genome [18], genome characterization [26], molecular diversity [27], disease and pathogenesis [28], skin color and albinism [29], sex chromosomes [30], feeding behavior [24, 31] and surimi products [32].

Transcriptome sequencing analysis is widely utilized to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and further investigate the molecular mechanisms involved in metabolic pathways [3335]. Multiple studies have identified DEGs associated with collagen metabolism, such as palatal organ development in bighead carp (Hypophthalmichthys nobilis) [36], flesh pigmentation in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) [37], collagen synthesis genes for connective tissue growth factor (Nibea coibor) [38], and collagen deposition in zebrafish [3]. DEG analysis, for example, has shown the up- and downregulation of skin color genes, as well as the identification of five causative genes for albinism in this species via whole transcriptome sequencing [39]. To further elucidate the mechanism of albino features in albino-type (AT) and bicolor-type (BT) fish, histological and transcriptome analyses were conducted to identify pigment-related genes in C. argus [40]. Their study uncovered a comprehensive process in the regulation of genes associated with color and albinism in the skin and spine tissues of C. argus. Nevertheless, the distinctive golden-colored caudal fin trait has hitherto not been explored in transcriptome studies. In addition, the hunt for novel collagen sources from fish, particularly fins, is a growing trend in the development of biomaterials for medical and tissue engineering applications [41, 42]. Thus, studying collagen metabolism in C. argus caudal fins might lead to the discovery of a novel biomaterial source since albino C. argus with golden caudal fins possesses wound healing capabilities that set it apart from the gray-fined albino. To the best of our knowledge, no research has been performed on collagen metabolism in northern snakeheads. This is the first report on albino C. argus, which revealed the presence of collagen-rich caudal fin cells.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Experimental fish

The fish used in this study were healthy, one-year-old C. argus collected from the Guiming Aquaculture Family Farm in Chaoyang Town, Neijiang City, Sichuan Province, China. Caudal fin tissues were obtained from nine C. argus (three repeats per group), comprising the W group of three black-white C. argus, H group of three gray-finned albino C. argus, and J group of three golden-finned albino C. argus (Fig 1). The tissues from the three replicates were collected in liquid nitrogen to generate three biological replicates, which were then preserved in a -80°C freezer until needed. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Neijiang Normal University (protocol code SK1729 and approved on 2021-10-05). All methods were performed following relevant guidelines and regulations. The study was conducted under the ARRIVE guidelines [43].

Fig 1. Chana argus was used in this study.

Fig 1

Three distinct color morphs of C. argus were identified: Group H included three gray-finned albinos, Group J included three golden-finned albinos, and Group W included three black-whites.

2.2 RNA extraction, library construction and sequencing

Caudal fin tissue from each sample was crushed into a powder in liquid nitrogen, and total RNA was extracted using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA quality and concentration were measured via 1% agarose gel electrophoresis and a Nanodrop (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). A Fragment Analyzer 5400 (Agilent Technologies, CA, USA) was used to analyze RNA integrity. Index-coded samples were clustered using a cBot Cluster Generation System with a TruSeq PE Cluster Kit v3-cBot-HS (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Next, we sequenced the library preparations using an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 platform and generated 150 bp paired-end reads.

2.3 Bioinformatics analysis of the nonparticipating transcriptome

The original fluorescence image files obtained from the Illumina platform were transformed into short reads (raw data) by base calling, and these short reads were recorded in FASTQ format, which includes both sequence and sequencing quality data [44]. Raw reads were trimmed to obtain high-quality, clean reads. Trimmomatic software was used to filter the sequencing data [45] and clean reads were assembled via Trinity [46]. The assembly quality of Trinity.fasta, unigene.fa and cluster.fasta was evaluated using the BUSCO software (S1 Fig) [47]. The unigene sequence acquired by Trinity assembly was used as the reference sequence, and the clean reads from each sample were compared to Ref., filtering out the reads with a comparison quality of less than 10, non-comparable reads, and reads compared to multiple regions of the genome. We extracted and merged the read count data to get the read count values for each sample, and the transcripts per kilobase million (TPM) values were computed using RNA-Seq via expectation maximization (RSEM) software with the default threshold. We collected and combined TPM data from each sample to determine gene expression levels [48]. Davidson and Oshlack [49] used the Corset to perform hierarchical transcript clustering. DEGs were defined as having an adjusted P-value <0.05, and a |log2(fold change)| > 1. To detect DEGs in the samples, we performed DESeq2 at different time points compared with the control group [50]. We utilized Cluster Profiler to analyze DEG enrichment in Gene Ontology (GO) and the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) [51, 52].

2.4 Phylogenetic tree construction

Each collagen-related transcript identified in C. argus was subsequently analyzed using BLASTn to search for homologous genes in the NCBI database (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi?PROGRAM=blastn&PAGE_TYPE=BlastSearch&LINK_LOC=blasthome; accessed date: April 5, 2024). For the phylogenetic analysis, we selected the top 15 homologous genes from the search results for each collagen gene (S1 Table). Multiple sequence alignments were carried out, and phylogenetic analysis was performed using MEGA11 software to construct a neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree, which was validated by a 1000-iteration bootstrap test [53]. Later, the linked fish species and families of each homologous gene were examined to ascertain the prevalence of each collagen-related gene within these families. The data were then tallied and shown as a stack bar graph.

3 Results

3.1 Transcriptome assembly

The current study categorized the C. argus specimens into three groups: H, J, and W. Groups H and J possessed hereditable white body coloring of C. argus, whereas group W had both black and white coloration. The disparity in body coloration among the three groups was significant at the caudal fin, with group J differing from the other two by its golden hue. Despite the sequencing of three transcriptome sets, the ensuing research primarily concentrated on the variation between groups W and J due to their pronounced body color features and transcriptome variations.

For each fish examined, transcriptome sequencing of C. argus produced a raw base of 5.97 to 7.46 Gb; the quantity of clean data was 54.12 Gb, including 174,779 assembled sequences, 137,130 unigenes, 86827 predicted coding sequences (CDSs) and 2,532 clusterSeqs. The GC content of each transcriptome ranged from 45 to 46%. A summary of the caudal fin transcriptome data for C. argus is presented in Table 1.

Table 1. Sequencing data list of Channa argus.

mple id raw base (Gb) raw sequences clean reads (Gb) clean bases q30 (%) GC (%) Assembled sequences unigene
H1 6.26 41704178 5.83 39432270 99.9 45.5(%)
H2 6.39 42584530 5.97 40468492 99.9 46.0(%)
H3 7.46 49740560 6.97 47218788 99.9 46.0(%)
J1 6.27 41829506 5.87 39783606 99.91 46.0(%)
J2 6.53 43564594 6.1 41357768 99.9 46.0(%)
J3 6.37 42467434 5.93 40201484 99.9 46.0(%)
W1 5.97 39784420 5.56 37660476 99.9 45.0(%)
W2 6.2 41312750 5.8 39229648 99.9 45.5(%)
W3 6.48 43183456 6.09 41173154 99.91 45.0(%)
Total 57.93 54.12 174779 137130

Five functional databases were used to classify these unigenes, and 86,828 NR (63.32%), 105,747 NT (77.11%), 71,814 SwissProt (52.37%), 70,693 KOG (51.55%), and 71,751 UniProt (52.32%) genes were identified; 68,700 of these unigenes were commonly annotated, and 56,615 KEGG (41.29%) and 55,175 GO (40.24%) were annotated (Fig 2A). The stronger the correlation coefficient between the samples, the more similar their expression patterns. The samples for the H, J and W groups were 0.9 ~ 1.0 and were closely correlated (Fig 2B). The sequencing data generated in this study were deposited in the Sequence Read Archive of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) (accession number: PRJNA913664).

Fig 2.

Fig 2

A. Venn diagram based on 5 databases: NR, NT, SwissProt, KOG and UniProt; numbers in the overlapping regions refer to those unigenes that were expressed in more than one database, and 68700 shared unigenes matched with all five databases; B. Correlations of the samples between the H (H1, H2, H3), J (J1, J2, J3) and W (W1, W2, W3) groups. The change in the correlation coefficient is indicated by the change in color from blue (1.0) to red (-1.0), and a deeper color indicates a higher correlation between samples.

3.2 Functional annotation of DEG genes and their variations

Gene Ontology (GO) annotation and enrichment analysis of the DEGs in C. argus demonstrated that the DEGs were associated with the terms biological process (BP), cellular component (CC), and molecular function (MF), with the most enriched term being the processes related to the cytoplasm of CC (Fig 3).

Fig 3. Genes were classified according to three major GO categories: Biological process (BP), cellular component (CC), and molecular function (MF).

Fig 3

The y-axis indicates the number of genes in each category.

We identified and clustered them to investigate variations in DEG expression modalities. Expression patterns of the same gene clusters were comparable. DEGs were significantly separated into groups J, H and W as shown in the heatmap. Group J was in a separate cluster compared to groups H and W, indicating a greater disparity between the two groups (Fig 4).

Fig 4. Heatmap of differentially expressed gene clustering.

Fig 4

The colors can only be compared horizontally with the same clustering of genes for expression values (TPM) in the high (blue) and low (yellow) colors. Axes: Bottom, variable groups; top, hierarchical clusters for closeness between groups; left, hierarchical clustering among the expressed genes.

The overlap of DEGs across different comparison combinations is depicted in a Venn diagram (Fig 5A). This study compared the DEGs of groups J or H with those of group W to identify common DEGs, revealing 2098 DEGs in group J, 1603 DEGs in group H, and a total of 379 common DEGs. The GO enrichment analysis indicated that the quantities of upregulated genes, downregulated genes, and total genes within each of the three GO categories (cellular component, biological process, and molecular function) were counted individually and are displayed as bar graphs (Fig 5B and 5C). The results revealed that both groups H and J exhibited more downregulated DEGs compared to group W.

Fig 5. Differential genetic Venn diagram of groups J and H compared with group W and GO enrichment histogram of differentially expressed genes.

Fig 5

A. Venn diagram between group J vs. group W and group H vs. group W. The number of genes expressed uniquely within each group is shown and overlapping regions indicate the number of genes expressed in both groups. B. Comparison of GO enrichment analysis for up-and down-regulated genes between groups H and W. C. Comparison of GO enrichment analysis for up- and downregulated genes between groups J and W. X-axis: number of genes; Y-axis: GO categories.

The heatmap and Venn diagram revealed that the DEGs in group J compared to group W exceeded those in group J compared to group H. Consequently, the following analysis was conducted between groups J and W.

3.3 Distinct collagen-related pathways in white C. argus with golden fins

Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis confirmed that DEGs from group J, compared with W, were significantly enriched in collagen-related pathways (p-value < 0.05). These pathways encompassed collagen trimer, fibrillar collagen, banded collagen fibril, a complex of collagen trimers, collagen-activated tyrosine kinase receptor signaling pathway, collagen-activated signaling pathway and collagen type I trimer (Fig 6). Additional pathways included cellular responses to vitamins, synthesis of molecular mediators involved in the inflammatory response, protein heterodimerization, binding platelet-derived growth factor, tooth mineralization, positive regulation of long-term synaptic depression, cellular responses to vitamin E, CDP-alcohol phosphatidyl transferase activity, CDP-diacylglycerol-serine O-phosphatidyl transferase activity, tooth eruption, cardiac neuron differentiation, cardiac neuron development and negative regulation of monocyte chemotactic protein-1 production.

Fig 6. Bubble diagram of the GO enrichment analysis results for group J compared with those for group W.

Fig 6

The 20 most significantly enriched GO pathway entries are presented in this figure. The value of p-adjust ranges from 0 to 1, and the closer it is to zero, the more significant the enrichment. GeneRatio is the ratio of the number of differentially expressed genes in pathway entry to the total number of genes involved in pathway entry for all annotated genes.

The directed acyclic graph illustrates the outcomes of the differential gene GO enrichment analysis, with branches representing inclusion relationships and progressively specific functional ranges defined from top to bottom (Fig 7). Colored shades denote the degree of enrichment, with darker colors indicating higher enrichment. The J-W CC top GO-directed acyclic network showed distinctive enrichment of the cellular component (1145/52530). The collagen components included a collagen-containing extracellular matrix (60/711), a complex of collagen trimers (16/69), collagen trimers (28/169), fibrillar collagen trimers (16/39), banded collagen fibrils (16/39), collagen type I trimers (7/10), and collagen type V trimers (5/17).

Fig 7. Directed acyclic graph (DAG) of topGO in group J compared to group W for classification of CCs (cell components).

Fig 7

The branches represent inclusion relationships and the functional descriptions defined from top to bottom become increasingly specific. Each node represents a GO term. The specific DEGs involved in enrichment are shown alongside functional descriptions. The most important terms are represented by red nodes, whereas the less significant terms are represented by elliptical nodes. Colors represent the degree of enrichment, with darker colors representing higher enrichment.

The DEGs associated with collagen component terms included collagen I of COL1A1 and COL1A2, collagen II of COL2A1, collagen V of COL5A1 and COL5A2, collagen VI of COL6A1 and COL6A3, collagen IX of COL9A3, collagen X of COL10A1, collagen XI of COL11A2, collagen XII of COL12A1, collagen XVI of COL16A1, collagen XVIII of COL18A1 and decorin (DCN) for modulation of the collagen matrix. The DEGs of the J group exhibited a greater abundance of collagen component terms than those in the W group.

The analysis of log2-fold changes in expression levels among the collagen-related genes included six transcripts for COL1A1, one for COL1A2, two for COL2A1, one for COL5A1, four for COL5A2, one for COL6A1, four for COL6A3, one for COL9A3, one for COL10A1, one for COL11A12, two for COL12A1, one for COL16A1 and one for COL18A1 (Fig 8). In comparing the log2-fold changes in expression levels between the W and J groups, the J group was found to have significantly downregulated for collagen-related genes. COL2A1, COL10A1, COL11A2, and COL18A1 exhibited a downward trend exceeding threefold in the J group.

Fig 8. Downregulation of collagen genes in golden-finned C argus.

Fig 8

Axis: x-axis, gene expression level based on log2-fold change value; y-axis, gene names.

3.4 Homologous genes reveal diverse collagen-rich fish families

A homology search in the NCBI database using BLASTn was conducted for each of the 13 collagen-related genes to further predict and understand the relationships among various fish families. A phylogenetic tree was subsequently constructed, revealing two distinct species clusters for each gene (Fig 9). Analysis of the 13 trees indicated that C. argus grouped with homologous genes from other species, implying that these sets are notable sources of collagen (Fig 9A–9M). Collagen-specific genes, including COL1A1, COL1A2, COL6A1, COL6A3, COL9A3, COL11A1, COL16A1 and COL18A1, showed a close association between C. argus and Lates calcarifer (Fig 9A), Micropterus salmoides (Fig 9B), Scatophagus argus (Fig 9F), Chelmon rostratus (Fig 9G), Seriola lalandi dorsalis (Fig 9H), Dicentrarchus labrax (Fig 9J), Lates calcarifer (Fig 9L), and Solea senegalensis (Fig 9M). Nonetheless, C. argus exhibited a distant genetic link with species concerning the genes COL2A1 (Fig 9C), COL5A1 (Fig 9D), COL5A2 (Fig 9E), COL10A1 (Fig 9I), and COL12A1 (Fig 9K).

Fig 9.

Fig 9

(A-M). Phylogenetic studies of collagen-related genes. These correspond to A. COL1A1, B. COL1A2, C. COL2A1, D. COL5A1, E. COL5A2, F. COL6A1, G. COL6A3, H. COL9A3, I. COL10A1, J. COL11A1, K. COL11A2, L. COL16A1 and M. COL18A1.

Interestingly, these homologous genes were found across twenty-four fish families derived from 13 phylogenetic trees, each displaying a unique collagen gene variant (S2 Fig). Fig 9 illustrates the diversity of collagen-related genes in different species among these families including eleven in Centrarchidae and Latidae; ten in Sinipercidae; nine in Anabantidae and Moronidae; eight in Serranidae; seven in Carangidae and Xiphiidae; six in Toxotidae; five in Chaetodontidae; four in Scombridae; three in Mastacembelidae, Percidae, Pomacentridae and Sciaenidae; two in Apogonidae and Synbranchidae; and one in Bovichtidae, Echeneidae, Labridae, Paralichthyidae, Pomacentridae, Scatophagidae and Soleidae. Distinct type of collagen genes were prominent in various fish families, including COL2A1 in Serranidae (n = 4), COL5A1 in Pomacentridae (n = 5), COL6A3 in Chaetodontidae (n = 5) and Serranidae (n = 4), COL11A2 in Moronidae (n = 5) and Sinipercidae (n = 6), COL16A1 in Anabantidae (n = 5) and Sinipercidae (n = 5), and COL18A1 in Centrarchidae (n = 5).

4 Discussion

Numerous species of albino fish exist, including Silurus glanis, Corydoras aeneus, Danio rerio, Hydrolagus colliei, Oryzias latipes, Macropodus opercularis, Rhamdia quelen, Ictalurus punctatus, Senegalese sole, Scophthalmus maximus, Paralichthys olivaceus, Triplophysa rosa, Carassius auratus, Apostichopus japonicus and C. argus [5463]. Recent genomic research on albino fish, including whole-genome sequencing of snakeheads [64] and RNA sequencing, has been performed to analyze the transcriptome associated with skin pigmentation in this species [39]. Our work presents two phenotypes of heritable albino C. argus, designated as groups J and H, and compares their DEGs with those of normal C. argus (group W). The body coloration of golden-finned albino C. argus in group J was markedly different from that in the normal group. Our study concentrated on three specific color variations in snakehead caudal fins and compared their DEGs, which were similar to those of Aulonocara baenschi, an albino cichlid fish [65]. The identified and clustered DEGs provided additional evidence of a significant difference between groups J and W in the present investigation. In comparison with the W group, the DEGs in group J showed mostly enriched cytoplasmic processes inside the cellular component (CC), particularly for collagen components. Likewise, the DEGs in the albino yellow catfish (Pelteobagrus fulvidraco) [66] and Oryzias species [67] accounted for the highest quantity of genes related to cellular processes and cells and binding cellular components.

Additionally, collagen-related genes were found to be downregulated in the present study, representing a significant discovery in understanding the relationship between albinism and collagen. A recent study reported that albino golden snakehead fish possesses five causative genes associated with albinism, namely TYR (tyrosinase), SOX10 (SRY-box transcription factor 10), S-100 (S100 calcium-binding protein A1), and NLRC3 (NLR family CARD domain containing 3), which are significantly downregulated in golden albino C. argus [39]. The receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) shares its receptors with the S100 family proteins, collagen (type I and IV) and several other ligands. S100A11 signaling via RAGE activates p38 MAPK kinase, thereby enhancing the synthesis of human collagen X [68]. In the present study on albino snakeheads, the downregulation of COL10A1 may be linked to S100 proteins, leading to reduced expression of collagen genes, necessitating further investigation for confirmation.

Structural collagen genes are tightly associated with skeletogenesis and are expressed in osteoblasts of fish (gars and zebrafish) [69]. Our study uncovered their complex regulatory mechanism. The DEGs related to the collagen component included COL1A1 and COL1A2 for collagen I, COL2A1 for collagen II, COL5A1 and COL5A2 for collagen V, COL6A1 and COL6A3 for collagen VI, COL9A3 for collagen IX, COL10A1 for collagen X, COL11A2 for collagen XI, COL12A1 for collagen XII, COL16A1 for collagen XVI, and COL18A1 for collagen XVIII, along with decorin (DCN), which were highly enriched in the caudal fins of golden-finned albino C. argus. The set of DEGs identified in this study has not been previously documented in other fish species.

Fish collagen derived from diverse sources may contain different components. Collagens from finfish and shellfish are classified as major and minor types I and V, respectively [70]. Types I and V are ideal for biomedical applications because of their superior biocompatibility and low immunogenicity [71]. Fibril-forming collagens are categorized into Types I, II, III and V because a considerable percentage of homologous sequences are not species-dependent [7274]. Collagen type I trimers consist of two α1 chains and one α2 chain, resulting in triple helices that form banded fibrils [7577]. This collagen type constitutes the primary protein component of the bone extracellular matrix, accounting for up to 90% of the organic matrix [78, 79]. These are necessary for bone tissue engineering [80]. It is an essential component of skin tissue and has been utilized for several purposes, including anti-inflammatory properties, skin enhancement, connective tissue strengthening and bone health [81, 82]. In most species, genes encoding for collagen type I trimers are COL1A1 and COL1A2. The data reported in this study may facilitate further investigation of skin and skeletal disorders associated with abnormal type I collagen synthesis. However, in zebrafish, three type I collagen genes have been identified: COL1A1a, COL1A1b, and COL1A2, which encode α1(I), α2(I) and α3(I) chains, respectively [76].

The collagen type V trimer is a minor, low-abundance, yet crucial structural protein present in the extracellular matrix of diverse tissues that governs the morphology and tensile strength of collagen fibrils [83]. It is composed of three α1(V) chains and one α2(V) chain, referred to as the α1(V)2α2(V) heterotrimer. These chains form fibrils that regulate their diameter [70]. Imamura et al. [84] reported that COL5A1, COL5A2, and COL5A3 encode collagen type V trimers. This heterotrimer is essential for dermal fibrillogenesis and aids in the formation of a functional skin matrix [85]. The main chain of type V collagen is COL5A1, which is expressed in the connective tissue surrounding ray fibroblasts and is partially connected to skeletal precursor cells [86]. It is found in several tissues, including skin, bones, muscles, and blood vessels. Nucleation of type I collagen fibrils relies on type V collagen fibrillar type I collagen assembly in the presence of fibronectin and integrins [87]. Collagen type V trimers promote cell migration and proliferation and participate in several critical biological processes [8890]. In a joint effort, primary fibril-forming collagens (types I, II and III) together with a minor presence of collagen types V and XI form connective tissues, with types V and XI acting to regulate fibril-forming collagens [91].

Collagen types II, VI, VII, X, XI, XII, XVI, XVIII, and DCN are important proteins that confer structural support to many tissues, including skin, bone, cartilage, and tendons [92]. Collagen II is the key component of cartilage, required for maintaining its tensile strength and elasticity [11, 93]. It is also found in the eyes and other connective tissues [94]. Collagen VI connects the extracellular matrix to cells in several tissues such as muscles, cartilage, and skin [95]. Collagen VII is located in the basement membrane of epithelial cells and binds to the underlying tissues [77]. Collagen XI is present in the cartilage, bone, and cornea of the eye, and contributes to their structural stability. [96]. Furthermore, collagen coexists with type II collagen in cartilage tissues [97]. Collagen X plays a significant role in bone growth and mineralization as well as cartilage formation, particularly in jawed vertebrates [98, 99]. Tendons, ligaments, and other connective tissues contain collagen XII, which facilitates the anchoring of cells to the extracellular matrix [100]. Collagen XVI involves the formation of fibrils inside connective tissues and may also be found in the skin and other organs [101]. Collagen XVIII plays a role in angiogenesis and is present in the cornea of the eye [102]. DCN, or decorin, is a proteoglycan that modulates collagen fiber assembly and functionality across several tissues, such as skin, tendons, and cartilage [103].

While collagen genes in osteoblasts have been extensively studied in humans, mice, and chicks, little is known about these genes in fish [69]. Consequently, our findings concerning collagen-encoded genes expressed in snakehead caudal fins provide a novel avenue for in-depth research on cartilage- or bone-forming cells, with insights into the extracellular matrix composition in finned fish [86]. Moreover, our phylogenetic analysis identified similar marine resources for exploring the potential of collagen-base biomaterials, as highlighted by Senadheera et al. [104] and Pozzolini et al. [105]. The global marine collagen market was evaluated at USD 685 million and USD 633 million in 2020 and 2022, respectively, with projections indicating growth to USD 1123 million by 2032 [106]. Collagen is highly sought after in industries such as cosmetics, food and nutraceuticals, wound healing, food packaging, pharmaceuticals and biomedicine, with the skin and other byproducts of cattle, pigs and birds serving as key sources [107]. Conversely, fish and other marine resources are gaining popularity [108], due to the reduced risk of disease transmission to humans from mammals and birds. Therefore, they may serve as alternatives to bovine collagen [41, 109]. In tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, type I collagen is widely utilized as the preferred biomaterial for manufacturing cell-instructive scaffolds [110, 111], which are artificial matrices that act as replacements for temporary extracellular matrices. These scaffolds aid in the delivery of specific signals to cells, hence stimulating cellular processes, such as tissue regeneration and matrix remodeling [97]. Improvement and sustained collagen extraction from marine and freshwater fish necessitates an understanding of the molecular basis of collagen synthesis and the identification of genetic resources [112]. Indeed, our present study on C. argus explains collagen regulation and may offer valuable molecular and genomic insights into a substantial volume of fish collagen.

Numerous studies have revealed the beneficial and functional properties of fish-derived collagen [9, 25, 42, 113]. Wound-healing properties have been observed in the common C. argus (group W) [114, 115]. In contrast, albino fish with a golden caudal fin (group J), utilized in the current investigation, showed wound healing characteristics [25]; yet, a greater number of genes are involved in collagen pathways compared to group W. Our findings on collagen-related genes may enhance the wound-healing capacity of collagen from this albino fish. Although we discovered that collagen-related genes are downregulated in golden albino C. argus, they may enrich collagen in areas exhibiting diverse gene expression patterns, necessitating further comprehensive studies. Sveen et al. similarly noted distinct collagen-related gene expression in the caudal fins of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) [116].

Several researchers have used marine-derived biomaterials [117119]. Our current research has broadened the scope of further investigations to determine the physicochemical properties of collagen in C. argus, including its composition, extraction methods, processing factors, molecular and evolutionary foundations, as well as novel physical, chemical, and enzymatic changes in the collagen structure of this species, to develop suitable biomaterials for tissue engineering and other biomedical applications in near future.

5 Conclusion

This study examined two phenotypes of the heritable albino C. argus (gray-finned and golden-finned) and compared their DEGs to those of normal-morph individuals. The transcriptome sequencing of C. argus yielded 174,779 assembled sequences and 137,130 unigenes. In the golden-finned albino group, DEGs were mostly enriched in gene ontology related to cytoplasm and collagen, a finding that has not been previously documented in fish species. The heatmap indicates that the DEGs were significantly segregated, with black-white and gray-finned albinos clustering together, whereas golden-finned albinos were distinctly grouped apart. A total of 379 common DEGs were identified across all three groups. Furthermore, GO enrichment analysis revealed that both gray-finned and golden-finned albino individuals showed a greater number of downregulated DEGs compared to black-white individuals. In addition, DEGs were predominantly enriched in collagen-related pathways. The collagen components identified included collagen I of COL1A1 and COL1A2, collagen II of COL2A1, collagen V of COL5A1 and COL5A2, collagen VI of COL6A1 and COL6A3, collagen IX of COL9A3, collagen X of COL10A1, collagen XI of COL11A2, collagen XII of COL12A1, collagen XVI of COL16A1, collagen XVIII of COL18A1 and decorin (DCN), all of which play a role in modulating the collagen matrix. Notably, the expression of these genes was reduced in golden albino C. argus, demonstrating a correlation between albinism and gene expression. These findings open avenues for further research on the regulation of collagen-related genes in fish. Fish collagen, derived from various sources, contains various components, with collagen types I and V being particularly desirable for biomedical applications. Our findings shed light on the genetic and molecular mechanisms underlying collagen metabolism in fish, which may lead to the development of novel biotechnological applications and provide an intuitive understanding of vertebrate regenerative capabilities.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Search results (Hit-tables) of homologous genes for each collagen-related gene of C. argus using blastn tool.

(XLSX)

pone.0315996.s001.xlsx (39.2KB, xlsx)
S1 Fig. Percentage of completeness of the core set of genes in BUSCO for the assemblies obtained in this study.

Light blue: complete (C) and single copy genes (S); dark blue: complete (C) and duplicated genes (D); yellow: fragmented genes (F); red: missing genes (M).

(TIF)

pone.0315996.s002.tif (12.6MB, tif)
S2 Fig. Stackbar graphical representation on diversity of genes present in fish families homologous to collagen-related genes of C. argus.

(TIFF)

pone.0315996.s003.tiff (1.8MB, tiff)

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the support provided by the Wekemo Tech Group Co., Ltd. Shenzhen, China for sequencing and data analysis services. We are also thankful to Farhana Tasnim and Krishal Pradhan for their support in graph preparation, editing and illustration of the figures.

Data Availability

The data supporting these findings is available in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession numbers are as follows: Bioproject number PRJNA913664 and BioSample number SAMN32303246 with accession number of SRX18894708-SRX18894716.

Funding Statement

This study was funded by the Natural Science Foundation of Sichuan Province (http://202.61.89.120/) (No. 2022NSFSC1721 to SC, 2021YFN0033 to YZ), Central Guided Local Science and Technology Development Funding (23ZYZYTS0356 to SC) of Science and Technology Department of Sichuan Province (http://202.61.89.120/), Science and Technology Program Projects of Sichuan Provincial Science and Technology Department (2021YFN0028 to RL) ((http://202.61.89.120/), Neijiang Normal University Science and Technology Foundation (http://www.njtc.edu.cn) (2019FM05 to SC), and the Neijiang Normal University School-level Research project (http://www.njtc.edu.cn) (2023YB12 to LA). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Dunsmore SE. Extracellular Matrix | Collagens. Encyclopedia of Respiratory Medicine, ed. Laurent G. J., Shapiro S.D. Oxford: Academic Press; 2006. pp. 168–175. doi: 10.1016/b0-12-370879-6/00145-9 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ando M, Toyohara H, Sakaguchi M. Three-dimensional structure of collagen fibrillar network of pericellular connective tissue in association with firmness of fish muscle. Nippon Suisan Gakk. 1992;58(7):1361–1364. doi: 10.2331/suisan.58.1361 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lin F, Ye X, Lin J, Liu X, Yuan Y, Guo H, et al. Comparative transcriptome analysis between muscle and swim bladder reveals key genes regulating collagen deposition in zebrafish. Aquaculture Reports. 2022. Apr 1;23:101053. doi: 10.1016/j.aqrep.2022.101053 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Johnston IA. The biological basis of variability in the texture of fish flesh. Improving seafood products for the consumer. ed. Børresen T. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing Limited; 2008. pp. 465–489. doi: 10.1533/9781845694586.5.465 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Song D, Yun Y, Mi J, Luo J, Jin M, Nie G, et al. Effects of faba bean on growth performance and fillet texture of Yellow River carp, Cyprinus carpio haematopterus. Aquaculture Reports. 2020. Jul 1;17:100379. doi: 10.1016/j.aqrep.2020.100379 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Tylingo R, Mania S, Panek A, Piątek R, Pawłowicz R. Isolation and characterization of acid soluble collagen from the skin of African catfish (Clarias gariepinus), Salmon (Salmo salar) and Baltic cod (Gadus morhua). Journal of Biotechnology and Biomaterials. 2016;6(234):2. doi: 10.4172/2155-952X.1000234 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sripriya R, Kumar R. A novel enzymatic method for preparation and characterization of collagen film from swim bladder of fish Rohu (Labeo rohita). Food and Nutrition Sciences. 2015;6(15):1468. doi: 10.4236/fns.2015.615151 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Jeevithan E, Qingbo Z, Bao B, Wu W. Biomedical and pharmaceutical application of fish collagen and gelatin: a review. Journal of Nutritional Therapeutics. 2013;2(4):218–27. doi: 10.6000/1929-5634.2013.02.04.6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Shalaby M, Agwa M, Saeed H, Khedr SM, Morsy O, El-Demellawy MA. Fish scale collagen preparation, characterization and its application in wound healing. Journal of Polymers and the Environment. 2020. Jan;28:166–78. doi: 10.1007/s10924-019-01594-w [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Subhan F, Hussain Z, Tauseef I, Shehzad A, Wahid F. A review on recent advances and applications of fish collagen. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 2021. Mar 26;61(6):1027–37. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2020.1751585 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lai CS, Tu CW, Kuo HC, Sun PP, Tsai ML. Type II collagen from cartilage of Acipenser baerii promotes wound healing in human dermal fibroblasts and in mouse skin. Marine Drugs. 2020. Oct 11;18(10):511. doi: 10.3390/md18100511 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gordon MK, Hahn RA. Collagens. Cell Tissue Research, 2010; 339, 247. doi: 10.1007/s00441-009-0844-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ricard-Blum S. The collagen family. Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology. 2011. Jan 1;3(1):a004978. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a004978 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Felician FF, Xia C, Qi W, Xu H. Collagen from marine biological sources and medical applications. Chemistry & Biodiversity. 2018. May;15(5):e1700557. doi: 10.1002/cbdv.201700557 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Liu C, Liu X, Xue Y, Ding T, Sun J. Hydrolyzed tilapia fish collagen modulates the biological behavior of macrophages under inflammatory conditions. RSC Advances. 2015;5(39):30727–36. doi: 10.1039/c5ra02355f [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Cheng QT, Zheng BS. Systematic Search of Fish in China. Beijing: Science Press; 1987. pp. 456. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Courtenay WR Jr, Williams JD. Snakeheads (Pisces, Channidae): a biological synopsis and risk assessment. US Geological Survey; 2004;43:1251. doi: 10.3133/cir1251 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Xu J, Bian C, Chen K, Liu G, Jiang Y, Luo Q, et al. Giga Science. 2017. Apr;6(4):gix011. doi: 10.1093/gigascience/gix011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Jiao Y, Lapointe NW, Angermeier PL, Murphy BR. Hierarchical demographic approaches for assessing invasion dynamics of non-indigenous species: an example using northern snakehead (Channa argus). Ecological Modelling. 2009. Jul 17;220(13–14):1681–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.04.008 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Duan R, Zhang J, Wu J, Wang J. Preparation and characterization of collagens from the skin of Northern snakehead (Channa argus). Journal of Polymers and the Environment. 2018. Mar;26:867–72. doi: 10.1007/s10924-017-1005-6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Chen FD, Yang LF. Channa argus: Nutritional Value and the Intensive Processing Development Prospect. Academic Periodical of Farm Products Processing. 2013;4, 51–3. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-9646(x).2013.04.042 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Zuraini A, Somchit MN, Solihah MH, Goh YM, Arifah AK, Zakaria MS, et al. Fatty acid and amino acid composition of three local Malaysian Channa spp. fish. Food Chemistry. 2006. Aug 1;97(4):674–8. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.04.031 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Shi BN, Deng QX. The history and formation of fish species in Jialing river. Journal of Southwest China Normal University (Natural Science). 1980;2:34–44. doi: 10.1378/j.cnki.xsxb.1980.02.004 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Yang S, Wen ZY, Zou YC, Qin CJ, Wang J, Yuan DY, et al. Molecular cloning, tissue distribution, and effect of fasting and refeeding on the expression of neuropeptide Y in Channa argus. General and Comparative Endocrinology. 2018. Apr 1;259:147–53. doi: 10.1016/j.ygcen.2017.11.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Chen S, Lu M, Xiang H, Xue Y, Huang H, Li L, et al. Research Progress on Nutritional Evaluation of and Processing and Preservation Technologies for Channa argus. Meat Research. 2023;37:40–45. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Zhou C, Li Y, Zhou Y, Zou Y, Yuan D, Deng X, et al. Chromosome-Scale Assembly and Characterization of the Albino Northern Snakehead, Channa argus var. (Teleostei: Channidae) Genome. Frontiers in Marine Science. 2022. Apr 6;9:839225. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2022.839225 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Fan W, Zhang L, Su J, Luo Y, Jiao XL, Huang ZP, et al. Genetic diversity of two color morphs of Northern snakehead (Channa argus) unveiled by the mitochondrial DNA D-loop region. Mitochondrial DNA Part B. 2022. Mar 4;7(3):515–20. doi: 10.1080/23802359.2022.2029601 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Zhang DX, Kang YH, Song MF, Shu HP, Guo SN, Jia JP, et al. Identity and virulence properties of Aeromonas isolates from healthy Northern snakehead (Channa argus) in China. Letters in Applied Microbiology. 2019. Aug 1;69(2):100–9. doi: doi.org/10.1111/lam.13172 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Sun D, Qi X, Wen H, Li C, Li J, Chen J, et al. The genetic basis and potential molecular mechanism of yellow-albino northern snakehead (Channa argus). Open Biology. 2023. Feb 15;13(2):220235. doi: 10.1098/rsob.220235 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Wang L, Xie N, Shen Y, Ye B, Yue GH, Feng X. Constructing high-density genetic maps and developing sexing markers in northern snakehead (Channa argus). Marine Biotechnology. 2019. Jun 15;21:348–58. doi: 10.1007/s10126-019-09884-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Qin CJ, Wen ZY, Wang J, He Y, Yuan DY, Li R. Uncoupling protein 1 in snakehead (Channa argus): Cloning, tissue distribution, and its expression in response to fasting and refeeding. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Molecular & Integrative Physiology. 2018. Nov 1;225:1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2018.06.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wu F, Zhang G, Huo Y, Xiong S, Du H. Rheology and texture properties of surimi gels of northern snakehead (Channa Argus) as Affected by Angelica Sinensis (Oliv.) Diels. (Danggui) Powder. Journal of Aquatic Food Product Technology. 2018. Apr 21;27(4):486–95. doi: 10.1080/10498850.2018.1449151 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Amparyup P, Charoensapsri W, Samaluka N, Chumtong P, Yocawibun P, Imjongjirak C. Transcriptome analysis identifies immune-related genes and antimicrobial peptides in Siamese fighting fish (Betta splendens). Fish & Shellfish Immunology. 2020. Apr 1;99:403–13. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2020.02.030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Lu X, Chen HM, Qian XQ, Gui JF. Transcriptome analysis of grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella) between fast-and slow-growing fish. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part D: Genomics and Proteomics. 2020. Sep 1;35:100688. doi: 10.1016/j.cbd.2020.100688 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Wentzel AS, Petit J, van Veen WG, Fink IR, Scheer MH, Piazzon MC, et al. Transcriptome sequencing supports a conservation of macrophage polarization in fish. Scientific Reports. 2020. Aug 10;10(1):13470. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-70248-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Wang J, Chen G, Yu X, Zhou X, Zhang Y, Wu Y, et al. Transcriptome analyses reveal differentially expressed genes associated with development of the palatal organ in bighead carp (Hypophthalmichthys nobilis). Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part D: Genomics and Proteomics. 2023. Jun 1;46:10107. doi: 10.1016/j.cbd.2023.101072 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Vo TT, Amoroso G, Ventura T, Elizur A. Histological and transcriptomic analysis of muscular atrophy associated with depleted flesh pigmentation in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) exposed to elevated seawater temperatures. Scientific Reports. 2023. Mar 14;13(1):4218. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-31242-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Lin F, Yuan Y, Ye X, Lv J, Liu X, Guo H, et al. Characterization and role of connective tissue growth factor gene in collagen synthesis in swim bladder of chu’s croaker (Nibea coibor). International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2023. Feb 1;227:1336–45. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.12.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Mao L, Zhu Y, Yan J, Zhang L, Zhu S, An L, et al. Full-length transcriptome sequencing analysis reveals differential skin color regulation in snakeheads fish Channa argus. Aquaculture and Fisheries. 2024. 9,4: 590–596. doi: 10.1016/j.aaf.2022.11.008 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Zhou A, Xie S, Feng Y, Sun D, Liu S, Sun Z, et al. Insights into the albinism mechanism for two distinct color morphs of Northern Snakehead, Channa argus through histological and transcriptome analyses. Frontiers in Genetics. 2020. Sep 18;11:830. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2020.00830 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Xu N, Peng XL, Li HR, Liu JX, Cheng JS, Qi XY, et al. Marine-derived collagen as biomaterials for human health. Frontiers in Nutrition. 2021. Aug 24;8:702108. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.702108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Geahchan S, Baharlouei P, Rahman A. Marine collagen: a promising biomaterial for wound healing, skin anti-aging, and bone regeneration. Marine Drugs. 2022. Jan 10;20(1):61. doi: 10.3390/md20010061 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Percie du Sert N, Ahluwalia A, Alam S, Avey MT, Baker M, Browne WJ, et al. Reporting animal research: Explanation and elaboration for the ARRIVE guidelines 2.0. PLoS Biol. 2020;18(7): e3000411. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000411 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Thrash A, Arick M II, Peterson DG. Quack: A quality assurance tool for high throughput sequence data. Analytical Biochemistry. 2018. May 1;548:38–43. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2018.01.028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014. Aug 1;30(15):2114–20. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Grabherr MG, Haas BJ, Yassour M, Levin JZ, Thompson DA, Amit I, et al. Trinity: reconstructing a full-length transcriptome without a genome from RNA-Seq data. Nature Biotechnology. 2011. Jul;29(7):644. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1883 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Seppey M, Manni M, Zdobnov EM. BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness. Gene prediction: methods and protocols. 2019:227–45. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-9173-0_14 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Li B, Dewey CN. RSEM: accurate transcript quantification from RNA-Seq data with or without a reference genome. BMC Bioinformatics. 2011. Dec;12:1–6. 10.1186/1471-2105-12-323 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Davidson NM, Oshlack A. Corset: enabling differential gene expression analysis for de novoassembled transcriptomes. Genome Biology. 2014. Jul;15(7):1–4. doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0410-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biology. 2014. Dec;15(12):1–21. doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Kanehisa M, Furumichi M, Sato Y, Kawashima M, Ishiguro-Watanabe M. KEGG for taxonomy-based analysis of pathways and genomes. Nucleic Acids Research. 2023. Jan 6;51(D1):D587–92. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac963 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Mi H, Muruganujan A, Ebert D, Huang X, Thomas PD. PANTHER version 14: more genomes, a new PANTHER GO-slim and improvements in enrichment analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Research. 2019. Jan 8;47(D1):D419–26. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1038 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Tamura K, Stecher G, Kumar S. MEGA11: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 11. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2021, 38:3022–3027. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msab120 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Bondari K. Performance of albino and normal channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) in different water temperatures. Aquaculture Research. 1984. Jul;15(3):131–40. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2109.1984.tb00844.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Dalton HC, Goodrich HB. Chromatophore Reactions in the Normal and Albino Paradise Fish, Macropodus opercularis L. The Biological Bulletin. 1937. Dec;73(3):535–41. doi: 10.2307/1537612 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Fabacher DL, Little EE, Ostrander GK. Tolerance of an albino fish to ultraviolet-B radiation. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 1999. Jun;6:69–71. doi: 10.1007/BF02987550 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Parodi TV, Cunha MA, Becker AG, Zeppenfeld CC, Martins DI, Koakoski G, et al. Anesthetic activity of the essential oil of Aloysia triphylla and effectiveness in reducing stress during transport of albino and gray strains of silver catfish, Rhamdia quelen. Fish Physiology and Biochemistry. 2014. Apr;40:323–34. doi: 10.1007/s10695-013-9845-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Reum JC, Paulsen CE, Pietsch TW, Parker-Stetter SL. First record of an albino chimaeriform fish, Hydrolagus colliei. Northwestern Naturalist. 2008. Apr 1:60–2. doi: 10.1898/1051-1733(2008)89[60:froaac]2.0.co;2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Shiraki T, Kawakami K. A tRNA-based multiplex sgRNA expression system in zebrafish and its application to generation of transgenic albino fish. Scientific Reports. 2018. Sep 6;8(1):13366. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-31476-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Slavík O, Horký P, Valchářová T, Pfauserová N, Velíšek J. Comparative study of stress responses, laterality and familiarity recognition between albino and pigmented fish. Zoology. 2022. Feb 1;150:125982. doi: 10.1016/j.zool.2021.125982 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Lechner W, Ladich F. How do albino fish hear? Journal of Zoology. 2011. Mar;283(3):186–92. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.2010.00762.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Xing L, Sun L, Liu S, Li X, Zhang L, Yang H. Transcriptome analysis provides insights into the mechanism of albinism during different pigmentation stages of the albino sea cucumber Apostichopus japonicus. Aquaculture. 2018. Feb 3;486:148–60. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2017.12.016 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Wishkerman A, Boglino A, Darias MJ, Andree KB, Estévez A, Gisbert E. Image analysis-based classification of pigmentation patterns in fish: A case study of pseudo-albinism in Senegalese sole. Aquaculture. 2016. Nov 1;464:303–8. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2016.06.040 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Resh CA, Galaska MP, Mahon AR. Genomic analyses of Northern snakehead (Channa argus) populations in North America. PeerJ. 2018. Apr 4;6:e4581. doi: 10.7717/peerj.4581 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Lee SY, Lee HJ. Comprehensive RNA-seq analysis to evaluate the pigmentation-related genes involved in albinism of cichlid fish, Aulonocara baenschi. Frontiers in Marine Science. 2020. Aug 25;7:723. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2020.00723 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Zou M, Zhang X, Shi Z, Lin L, Ouyang G, Zhang G, et al. A comparative transcriptome analysis between wild and albino yellow catfish (Pelteobagrus fulvidraco). PLoS One. 2015. Jun 26;10(6):e0131504. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131504 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Ngamniyom A. Molecular assessment and transcriptome profiling of wild fish populations of Oryzias mekongensis and O. songkhramensis (Adrianichthyidae: Beloniformes) from Thailand. PLoS One. 2020. Nov 19;15(11):e0242382. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242382 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.He H, Li J, Weng S, Li M, Yu Y. S100A11: Diverse Function and Pathology Corresponding to Different Target Proteins. Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics. 2009, 55:117–126 (2009). doi: 10.1007/s12013-009-9061-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Eames BF, Amores A, Yan YL, Postlethwait JH. Evolution of the osteoblast: skeletogenesis in gar and zebrafish. BMC Evolutionary Biology. 2012. Dec;12(1):1–3. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-12-27 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Benjakul S, Nalinanon S, Shahidi F. “Fish Collagen” in Food Biochemistry and Food Processing, ed. Simpson B.K. (Ames, Iowa: Wiley-Blackwell; ), 2012;365–387. doi: 10.1002/9781118308035.ch20 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Meena C, Mengi SA, Deshpande SG. Biomedical and industrial applications of collagen. In Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Sciences-Chemical Sciences; 1999. Apr: 111:319–329. Springer India. doi: 10.1007/bf02871912 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Timpl R. “Immunology of the collagens” in Extracellular matrix biochemistry, ed. Piez K.A., Reddi A.H. New York: Elsevier. 1984. pp. 159–190. [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Krieg T, Aumailley M, Koch M, Chu M, Uitto J. Collagens, elastic fibers, and other extracellular matrix proteins of the dermis. Fitzpatrick’s dermatology in general medicine. ed. Goldsmith L.A, Katz S.I., Gilchrest B.A, Paller A.S, Leffell D.J, Wolff K. New York: McGraw Hill. 2012. (Accessed May 04, 2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Bella J, Hulmes D. “Fibrillar Collagens”, in Fibrous Proteins: Structures and Mechanisms, Subcellular Biochemistry, vol 82., ed. Parry D.A.D., Squire J.M. Cham: Springer. 2017. pp. 457–490. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-49674-0_14 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Sorushanova A, Delgado LM, Wu Z, Shologu N, Kshirsagar A, Raghunath R, et al. The collagen suprafamily: from biosynthesis to advanced biomaterial development. Advanced Materials. 2019. Jan;31(1):1801651. doi: 10.1002/adma.201801651 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Gistelinck C, Gioia R, Gagliardi A, Tonelli F, Marchese L, Bianchi L, et al. Zebrafish collagen type I: molecular and biochemical characterization of the major structural protein in bone and skin. Scientific Reports. 2016. Feb 15;6(1):21540. doi: 10.1038/srep21540 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Karsdal M. Biochemistry of collagens, laminins and elastin: structure, function and biomarkers. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 2019. May 28. doi: 10.1016/c2015-0-05547-2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Maia FR, Correlo VM, Oliveira JM, Reis RL. Natural origin materials for bone tissue engineering: Properties, processing, and performance. In Principles of Regenerative Medicine. Boston: Academic Press. 2019. Jan 1. pp. 535–558. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-381422-7.10032-x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Fedarko NS. Osteoblast/Osteoclast Development and Function in Osteogenesis Imperfecta. Osteogenesis Imperfecta. 2013; 45–56. doi: [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Nguyen TT, Gobinet C, Feru J, Pasco SB, Manfait M, Piot O. Characterization of type I and IV collagens by Raman microspectroscopy: Identification of spectral markers of the dermo-epidermal junction. Journal of Spectroscopy. 2012. Jan 1;27(5–6):421–7. doi: 10.1155/2012/686183 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Katsnelson A. Cosmetics: molecular beauty. Nature. 2015. Oct 8;526(7572):S4–5. doi: 10.1038/526S4a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Subhan F, Kang HY, Lim Y, Ikram M, Baek SY, Jin S, et al. Fish scale collagen peptides protect against CoCl 2/TNF-α-induced cytotoxicity and inflammation via inhibition of ROS, MAPK, and NF-κB pathways in HaCaT cells. Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity. 2017. Oct; 2017: 1–17. doi: 10.1155/2017/9703609 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Huang G, Ge G, Wang D, Gopalakrishnan B, Butz DH, Colman RJ, et al. Greenspan DS. α3 (V) collagen is critical for glucose homeostasis in mice due to effects in pancreatic islets and peripheral tissues. The Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2011. Feb 1;121(2):769–83. doi: 10.1172/jci45096 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Imamura Y, Scott IC, Greenspan DS. The Pro-α3 (V) Collagen Chain: complete primary structure, expression domains in adult and developing tissues, and comparison to the structures and expression domains of the other types V and XI procollagen chains. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2000. Mar 24;275(12):8749–59. doi: 10.1074/jbc.275.12.8749 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Jarrold BB, Osborne R, Tamura M, Chan W, Bascom CC, Isfort RJ, et al. Collagen type V expression and localization in aging skin. Journal Of The American Academy Of Dermatology. 2017. Jun 1;76(6):AB75–AB75. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.04.308 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Duran I, Csukasi F, Taylor SP, Krakow D, Becerra J, Bombarely A, et al. Collagen duplicate genes of bone and cartilage participate during regeneration of zebrafish fin skeleton. Gene Expression Patterns. 2015. Sep 1;19(1–2):60–9. doi: 10.1016/j.gep.2015.07.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Potekaev NN, Borzykh OB, Medvedev GV, Petrova MM, Gavrilyuk OA, Karpova EI, et al. Genetic and epigenetic aspects of skin collagen fiber turnover and functioning. Cosmetics. 2021. Sep 29;8(4):92. doi: 10.3390/cosmetics8040092 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Babraj JA, Cuthbertson DJ, Smith K, Langberg H, Miller B, Krogsgaard MR, et al. Collagen synthesis in human musculoskeletal tissues and skin. American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2005. Nov;289(5):E864–9. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00243.2005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Birk DE. Type V collagen: heterotypic type I/V collagen interactions in the regulation of fibril assembly. Micron. 2001. Apr 1;32(3):223–37. doi: 10.1016/s0968-4328(00)00043-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Chanut-Delalande H, Bonod-Bidaud C, Cogne S, Malbouyres M, Ramirez F, Fichard A, et al. Development of a functional skin matrix requires deposition of collagen V heterotrimers. Molecular and Cellular Biology. 2004. Jul 1;24(13):6049–57. doi: 10.1128/MCB.24.13.6049-6057.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Birk DE, Brückner P. Collagens, suprastructures, and collagen fibril assembly. InThe extracellular matrix: an overview. Heidelberg: Springer. 2010. Dec 10. pp. 77–115. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-16555-9_3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Jafari H, Lista A, Siekapen MM, Ghaffari-Bohlouli P, Nie L, Alimoradi H, et al. Fish collagen: Extraction, characterization, and applications for biomaterials engineering. Polymers. 2020. Sep 28;12(10):2230. doi: 10.3390/polym12102230 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Eyre D. Articular cartilage and changes in arthritis: collagen of articular cartilage. Arthritis Research & Therapy. 2001. Oct;4:1–6. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-12-27 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Noma Y, Asakawa Y. “Biotransformation of Monoterpenoids”, in Comprehensive Natural Products II, ed. Liu H-W. Oxford: Elsevier. 2010. pp. 669–801. doi: [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Zanotti S, Magri F, Salani S, Napoli L, Ripolone M, Ronchi D, et al. Extracellular Matrix Disorganization and Sarcolemmal Alterations in COL6-Related Myopathy Patients with New Variants of COL6 Genes. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023. Mar 14;24(6):5551. doi: 10.3390/ijms24065551 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Luo YY, Karsdal MA. “Type XI Collagen”, in Biochemistry of Collagens, Laminins and Elastin: structure, function and biomarkers, ed. Karsdal M.A. Cambridge: Academic Press. 2019. may 28. pp. 77–80. doi: [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Salvatore L, Gallo N, Natali ML, Terzi A, Sannino A, Madaghiele M. Mimicking the hierarchical organization of natural collagen: Toward the development of ideal scaffolding material for tissue regeneration. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology. 2021. Apr 27;9:644595. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.644595 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Shen G. The role of type X collagen in facilitating and regulating endochondral ossification of articular cartilage. Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research. 2005. Feb;8(1):11–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-6343.2004.00308.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Debiais-Thibaud M, Simion P, Ventéo S, Muñoz D, Marcellini S, Mazan S, et al. Skeletal mineralization in association with type X collagen expression is an ancestral feature for jawed vertebrates. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2019. Oct 1;36(10):2265–76. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msz145 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Manon-Jensen T, Karsdal MA. “Type XII Collagen”, in Biochemistry of Collagens, Laminins and Elastin: structure, function and biomarkers, ed. Karsdal M.A. Cambridge: Academic Press. 2016. pp. 81–85. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-809847-9.00012-x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Purcel G, Meliţă D, Andronescu E, Grumezescu AM. Collagen-based nanobiomaterials: Challenges in soft tissue engineering. In Nanobiomaterials in Soft Tissue Engineering. Oxford: William Andrew Publishing. 2016. Jan 1. pp. 173–200. doi: [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Bächinger HP, Mizuno K, Vranka JA, Boudko SP. “Collagen Formation and Structure”, in Comprehensive Natural Products II, ed. Liu H.B. and Mander L. Oxford: Elsevier. 2010. pp. 469–530. doi: [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Järvinen TA, Prince S. Decorin: a growth factor antagonist for tumor growth inhibition. BioMed Research International. 2015. Oct;2015. doi: 10.1155/2015/654765 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Senadheera TRL, Dave D, Shahidi F. Sea Cucumber Derived Type I Collagen: A Comprehensive Review. Marine Drugs. 2020, 18: 471. doi: 10.3390/md18090471 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Pozzolini M, Scarfì S., Giovine M., 2020. Marine Collagen and its Biotechnological Applications. Encyclopedia of Marine Biotechnology, 2020 2:1007–1030. doi: 10.1002/9781119143802.ch39 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Rajabimashhadi Z, Gallo N, Salvatore L, Lionetto F. Collagen derived from fish industry waste: progresses and challenges. Polymers. 2023. Jan 20;15(3):544. doi: 10.3390/polym15030544 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.León-López A, Morales-Peñaloza A, Martínez-Juárez VM, Vargas-Torres A, Zeugolis DI, Aguirre-Álvarez G. Hydrolyzed collagen—Sources and applications. Molecules. 2019. Nov 7;24(22):4031. doi: 10.3390/molecules24224031 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Mearns-Spragg A, Tilman J, Tams D, Barnes A. The biological evaluation of jellyfish collagen as a new research tool for the growth and culture of iPSC derived microglia. Frontiers in Marine Science. 2020. Aug 31;7:689. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2020.00689 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Lupi O. Prions in dermatology. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 2002. May 1;46(5):790–3. doi: 10.1067/mjd.2002.120624 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Walters BD, Stegemann JP. Strategies for directing the structure and function of three-dimensional collagen biomaterials across length scales. Acta Biomaterialia. 2014. Apr 1;10(4):1488–501. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.08.038 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Terzi A, Gallo N, Bettini S, Sibillano T, Altamura D, Madaghiele M, et al. Sub‐and supramolecular X‐ray characterization of engineered tissues from equine tendon, bovine dermis, and fish skin type‐I collagen. Macromolecular Bioscience. 2020. May;20(5):2000017. doi: 10.1002/mabi.202000017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Reátegui-Pinedo N, Salirrosas D, Sánchez-Tuesta L, Quiñones C, Jáuregui-Rosas SR, Barraza G, et al. Characterization of collagen from three genetic lines (gray, red and F1) of Oreochromis niloticus (tilapia) skin in young and old adults. Molecules. 2022. Feb 8;27(3):1123. doi: 10.3390/molecules27031123 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Elbialy ZI, Atiba A, Abdelnaby A, Al-Hawary II, Elsheshtawy A, El-Serehy HA, et al. Collagen extract obtained from Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus L.) skin accelerates wound healing in rat model via up regulating VEGF, bFGF, and α-SMA genes expression. BMC Veterinary Research. 2020. Dec;16(1):1–1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Sahid NA, Hayati F, Rao CV, Ramely R, Sani I, Dzulkarnaen A, et al. Snakehead consumption enhances wound healing? From tradition to modern clinical practice: A prospective randomized controlled trial. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2018. Jan 1;2018:3032790. doi: 10.1155/2018/3032790 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Baie SH, Sheikh KA. The wound healing properties of Channa striatus-cetrimide cream—tensile strength measurement. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2000. Jul 1;71(1–2):93–100. doi: 10.1016/s0378-8741(99)00184-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Sveen LR, Robinson N, Krasnov A, Daniels RR, Vaadal M, Karlsen C, et al. Transcriptomic landscape of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) skin. G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics. 2023. November 13(11), p.jkad215. doi: 10.1093/g3journal/jkad215 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Felician FF, Yu RH, Li MZ, Li CJ, Chen HQ, Jiang Y, et al. The wound healing potential of collagen peptides derived from the jellyfish Rhopilema esculentum. Chinese Journal of Traumatology. 2019. Feb 1;22(01):12–20. doi: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2018.10.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Zata HF, Chiquita P, Shafira K. Collagen from marine source for regenerative therapy: A literature review. In AIP Conference Proceedings; 2020. Dec 9 (Vol. 2314, No. 1). AIP Publishing. doi: 10.1063/5.0036110 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Yamada S, Yamamoto K, Nakazono A, Matsuura T, Yoshimura A. Functional roles of fish collagen peptides on bone regeneration. Dental Materials Journal. 2021. Nov 25;40(6):1295–302. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2020-446 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Karolina Goździewska-Harłajczuk

21 Feb 2024

PONE-D-23-30448Comparative transcriptome analysis of albino northern snakehead (Channa argus) reveals its distinct collagen-enriched DEGs in caudal fin cells: a resource for biomedical usePLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Safiul Azam,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

==============================

ACADEMIC EDITOR: In my opinion and based on the reviewers` comments I suggest the deep revision of the paper. I would like to give the opportunity to the Authors to make a correction of their manuscript. The main concern is the methodology, while the second  is that the conclusions are not supported by the results. Thus all these aspects should be improved. Please make a correction according to the attached comments of the Reviewers.

==============================

Please submit your revised manuscript by Apr 06 2024 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Karolina Goździewska-Harłajczuk

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Note from Emily Chenette, Editor in Chief of PLOS ONE, and Iain Hrynaszkiewicz, Director of Open Research Solutions at PLOS: Did you know that depositing data in a repository is associated with up to a 25% citation advantage (https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230416)? If you’ve not already done so, consider depositing your raw data in a repository to ensure your work is read, appreciated and cited by the largest possible audience. You’ll also earn an Accessible Data icon on your published paper if you deposit your data in any participating repository (https://plos.org/open-science/open-data/#accessible-data).

3. We noticed you have some minor occurrence of overlapping text with the following previous publication(s), which needs to be addressed:

https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2405844023021448

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10408398.2020.1751585

In your revision ensure you cite all your sources (including your own works), and quote or rephrase any duplicated text outside the methods section. Further consideration is dependent on these concerns being addressed.

4. In the online submission form, you indicated that the data supporting these findings will be available in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession numbers are as follows: Bioproject number PRJNA913664 and BioSample number SAMN32303246, which will be released on October 5, 2023. Before the above date, the raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors upon reasonable request without undue reservation.

All PLOS journals now require all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript to be freely available to other researchers, either 1. In a public repository, 2. Within the manuscript itself, or 3. Uploaded as supplementary information.

This policy applies to all data except where public deposition would breach compliance with the protocol approved by your research ethics board. If your data cannot be made publicly available for ethical or legal reasons (e.g., public availability would compromise patient privacy), please explain your reasons on resubmission and your exemption request will be escalated for approval. 

5. We notice that your supplementary figures are included in the manuscript file. Please remove them and upload them with the file type 'Supporting Information'. Please ensure that each Supporting Information file has a legend listed in the manuscript after the references list.

Additional Editor Comments:

In my opinion and based on the reviewers` comments I suggest the deep revision of the paper. I would like to give the opportunity to the Authors to make a correction of their manuscript. The main concern is the methodology, while the second is that the conclusions are not supported by the results. Thus all these aspects should be improved. Please make a correction according to the attached comments of the Reviewers.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: N/A

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The authors performed transcriptome sequencing of caudal fins to compare normal and albino northern snakehead. Although numerous data were generated, the overall writing of this manuscript is poor, and the conclusions or manuscript title cannot be supported by these data. The reviewer would recommend rejection of the present version of this manuscript.

Extra editing is required since the overall writing is poor.

Line 123: Provide a reference for “the ARRIVE guidelines”.

Fig 1: Pick out one fish image as a representative for each group.

Lines 127-136: Provide more details (such as city and country names) for the companies when necessary.

Line 150: Provide the full name for TPM and a reference for “RSEM software”.

Lines 159-162: Move this figure to the supplementary section.

Line 164: Rewrite this subtitle.

Lines 173-174: Change “GB” to “Gb”. What is “CDS predictions”?

Table 1: Add more data for those missing details.

Lines 182-185: Rewrite these sentences.

Lines 228-230: Why? It doesn’t make sense.

Lines 265-270: The authors may provide more details about these collagen genes, such as transcription difference (ratios) and protein sequences. Is these any premature termination or mismatch of certain important DEG? This may explain the albinism color.

Discussion: These documents can not support the manuscript even the title, since DEG differences or biomedical uses are missing.

Supplementary Fig 1: Why are the percentages of complete BUSCOs too low?

Reviewer #2: Manuscript can be accepted after minor changes

I am of the opinion that if the keywords include words other than the words in the title, it may increase the citation and recognition of the article.

Complete line 147 in manuscript file.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Plose review.docx

pone.0315996.s004.docx (11.8KB, docx)
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 31;19(12):e0315996. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315996.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


15 Aug 2024

The response to Editor and the reviewer's comment, both as been uploaded in the system.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

pone.0315996.s005.docx (31KB, docx)

Decision Letter 1

Karolina Goździewska-Harłajczuk

15 Sep 2024

PONE-D-23-30448R1Comparative transcriptome analysis of albino Northern Snakehead (Channa argus) reveals its downregulated collagen-enriched DEGs in caudal fin cellsPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Safiul Azam,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

The manuscript was corrected according to the reviewers` suggestions, however the paper still needs some revision.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Oct 30 2024 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Karolina Goździewska-Harłajczuk

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments:

The manuscript was corrected according to the reviewers` suggestions, however the paper still needs some revision.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The authors performed a comparative transcriptome analysis to revela down-regulated college –enriched DEGs in the caudal fins of albino Northern snakehead. It seems that collagen gene expression is limited. In general, the overall writing of this manuscript can be improved with extra editing, although numerous data were generated to support the main conclusions.

1. Why did the authors select caudal fins? It would be much better to collect muscle samples for transcriptome sequencing and comparative analysis. The authors should provide some descriptions in the Introduction or Discussion.

2. Rewrite the subtitles in the Results section, since they look more like those for Materials and Methods.

3. Although the authors performed transcriptome sequencing in triplications, they are recommended to validate at least collage expression by additional qRT-PCR.

4. Make sure that related transcriptome data are released.

Reviewer #2: The manuscript is accepted in its current form. The abstract is clear and concise, effectively summarizing the key points. The introduction provides a thorough overview of the subject matter, and the literature review is both comprehensive and well-integrated into the discussion. Each section of the paper is well-explained, leaving no unanswered questions. Overall, the manuscript is well-structured and demonstrates a strong grasp of the topic.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Plose review finaI.docx

pone.0315996.s006.docx (11.4KB, docx)
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 31;19(12):e0315996. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315996.r004

Author response to Decision Letter 1


30 Nov 2024

Response to the Reviewers:

Thanks to the reviewers for the comments and suggested revisions to this manuscript. The author's responses are shared below in a table, and the manuscript is revised according to the track changes.

Moreover, we have made an extensive English language improvement in the manuscript as per advice from the Editor.

Apart from that, we did a minor revision to the title of our manuscript. Moreover, we have revised Figure 9 (made scientific names in italics) and then uploaded the new image into the system.

Moreover, the lines mentioned (as per with track change mood version) in the table below are according to the revised manuscript.

Reviewer 1

Reviewer’s Comments 1 : Why did the authors select caudal fins? It would be much better to collect muscle samples for transcriptome sequencing and comparative analysis. The authors should provide some descriptions in the Introduction or Discussion

Response from Author: Thanks for your comment. Our study focuses on the distinctive characteristics of the color morph of C. argus, specifically targeting the unique color differences in their fins. Although previous research has explored various aspects of this species—such as whole genome analysis, genome characterization, molecular diversity, disease and pathogenesis, skin color and albinism, sex chromosomes, feeding behavior, and surimi products—none have investigated the specific color variation in the most manifest part of caudal fins. To address this gap, we collected caudal fin tissues, intentionally excluding scales, skin, or muscle. The golden-finned C. argus stands out from other color morphs, and recent studies have identified fin tissues as a promising source of collagen. We have elucidated this in the Introduction section.

Please see lines: 575 to 836.

Reviewer’s Comments 2: Rewrite the subtitles in the Results section, since they look more like those for Materials and Methods Response from Author: Thanks for your comment. We have revised them all.

Reviewer’s Comments 3: Although the authors performed transcriptome sequencing in triplications, they are recommended to validate at least collagen expression by additional qRT-PCR.

Response from Author: Thanks for your comment. We appreciate the reviewer's suggestion to validate collagen expression with additional qRT-PCR. However, due to resource constraints—including limited access to fish samples and funding—we are unable to conduct further experiments. Our study utilized robust transcriptome sequencing in triplicate, ensuring reliable data for collagen expression analysis. Additionally, we have established thorough phylogenetic evidence to support our findings, confirming the evolutionary relevance and consistency of the observed patterns. We are confident that the combination of high-quality transcriptomic data and phylogenetic analysis provides a solid foundation for our conclusions. Moreover, collagen-enriched caudal fins were also been observed in Atlantic salmon by Saveen et al. (2023). Please see lines: 4142 to 4144.

Reviewer’s Comments 4: Make sure that related transcriptome data are released.

Response from Author: Thanks for your comment. We have deposited and released the data in NCBI under Bioproject number PRJNA913664 and BioSample number SAMN32303246 with accession number of SRX18894708-SRX18894716. Please see lines: 4689 to 4692.

Reviewer 2: No comments observed -

Thank you.

Sincerely yours,

Shixi Chen, Ph.D. and Fardous Mohammad Safiul Azam, Ph.D.

College of Life Sciences, Neijiang Normal University, Neijiang, 641100, China.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

pone.0315996.s007.docx (30.8KB, docx)

Decision Letter 2

Karolina Goździewska-Harłajczuk

5 Dec 2024

Comparative transcriptome analysis of albino Northern Snakehead (Channa argus) reveals its various collagen-related DEGs in caudal fin cells

PONE-D-23-30448R2

Dear Dr. Azam,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice will be generated when your article is formally accepted. Please note, if your institution has a publishing partnership with PLOS and your article meets the relevant criteria, all or part of your publication costs will be covered. Please make sure your user information is up-to-date by logging into Editorial Manager at Editorial Manager® and clicking the ‘Update My Information' link at the top of the page. If you have any questions relating to publication charges, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Karolina Goździewska-Harłajczuk

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

All comments have been addressed, thus the manuscript can be accept in its current form.

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: N/A

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The authors made reasonable responses and corrections in the revised manuscript. The present version of this manuscript is acceptable.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

**********

Acceptance letter

Karolina Goździewska-Harłajczuk

15 Dec 2024

PONE-D-23-30448R2

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Safiul Azam,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

If revisions are needed, the production department will contact you directly to resolve them. If no revisions are needed, you will receive an email when the publication date has been set. At this time, we do not offer pre-publication proofs to authors during production of the accepted work. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few weeks to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Karolina Goździewska-Harłajczuk

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Table. Search results (Hit-tables) of homologous genes for each collagen-related gene of C. argus using blastn tool.

    (XLSX)

    pone.0315996.s001.xlsx (39.2KB, xlsx)
    S1 Fig. Percentage of completeness of the core set of genes in BUSCO for the assemblies obtained in this study.

    Light blue: complete (C) and single copy genes (S); dark blue: complete (C) and duplicated genes (D); yellow: fragmented genes (F); red: missing genes (M).

    (TIF)

    pone.0315996.s002.tif (12.6MB, tif)
    S2 Fig. Stackbar graphical representation on diversity of genes present in fish families homologous to collagen-related genes of C. argus.

    (TIFF)

    pone.0315996.s003.tiff (1.8MB, tiff)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Plose review.docx

    pone.0315996.s004.docx (11.8KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    pone.0315996.s005.docx (31KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Plose review finaI.docx

    pone.0315996.s006.docx (11.4KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    pone.0315996.s007.docx (30.8KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    The data supporting these findings is available in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession numbers are as follows: Bioproject number PRJNA913664 and BioSample number SAMN32303246 with accession number of SRX18894708-SRX18894716.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES