Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2024 Dec 31;19(12):e0315677. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315677

Knowledge regarding human monkeypox among a sample of undergraduate and post-graduate students from selected tertiary institutions in Bangladesh: An online-based cross-sectional study

Md Hasan Al Banna 1,*, Abdul-Aziz Seidu 2, Trisha Mallick 3, Nahidur Rahman 4, Mst Sadia Sultana 5, Humayra Alam Mouly 6, Najim Z Alshahrani 7, Nargees Akter 8, Tareq Mahmud 9, Susmita Hossain 10, Anannya Sheikh 11, Ashish Biswas 12, Sumaia Sahrin 13, Md Nazmul Hassan 3, Md Shafiqul Islam Khan 14
Editor: Jan Rychtář15
PMCID: PMC11687903  PMID: 39739877

Abstract

Background

The recent human monkeypox (mpox) outbreak in 2022 has become a serious concern due to its rapid expansion to various non-endemic countries. There is limited information about the knowledge regarding mpox among the Bangladeshi population. Therefore, this study’s objectives were to: (i) determine the level of knowledge regarding mpox among undergraduate and post-graduate students in Bangladesh, and (ii) assess the determinants of knowledge regarding mpox among the study sample.

Methods

An online-based cross-sectional study was conducted among 879 tertiary-level students from selected tertiary institutions (n = 13) in Bangladesh. The structured questionnaire consisted of two parts: (i) socio-demographic information and (ii) an assessment of knowledge regarding mpox. The Kruskal-Wallis test, Mann-Whitney test, and multivariable quantile regression model were employed.

Results

The median age of the study participants was 23 years (IQR: 25–22). Low knowledge of mpox was found among study participants (20.7%, 23.2% and 56.1% had good, moderate and poor knowledge, respectively). The overall median knowledge score for mpox was 11 (IQR: 16–6). The median knowledge score of mpox significantly differed by participants’ gender, study major, and academic education about mpox. In the quantile regression analysis, the association between gender and mpox knowledge was observed at the 25th= 1.343), 50th= 2.00) and 75th= 1.59) quantiles with females having more knowledge compared to males. The effects of study group were significant at 25th= 1.746), 50th= 1.5), 75th= 1.361) and 90th= 1.248) quantiles. Thus, those in medical or public health programs were likely to have more knowledge about mpox relative to those who were in non-medical related study groups. Students who received information about mpox during their education were more knowledgeable compared to those who had not, with statistical significance occurring at 10th (β = 3.711), 25th (β = 6.656), 50th (β = 5.75), 75th (β = 3.404) and 90th (β = 2.592) quantiles.

Conclusion

These findings imply that educational interventions about mpox should consider the gender dynamics and program of study among the students in Bangladesh.

Introduction

This past century has seen rapid population growth, and greater levels of mobility. In addition, urban areas are undergoing an unprecedented expansion, transcending traditional boundaries. However, these changes have fostered an upsurge in the spread of zoonotic illnesses [1]. Zoonotic diseases can be viral, bacterial, or parasitic, and they can be transmitted to humans by food, drink, or direct contact [2]. The sheer variety of these ailments constitutes a substantial hazard to public health and must be closely monitored, examined, and prevented. Knowledge and awareness can play a crucial role in preventing the spread of the next global pandemic. Human monkeypox (mpox) is a zoonotic disease (part of the Orthopoxviral genus) characterized by clinical manifestations similar to those of smallpox [3]. Public health experts are concerned that the emergence of a new mpox outbreak could pose a new threat when the world is still dealing with the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic [4].

Several more cases have been recorded in areas where mpox is commonly found [3, 5, 6]. Since the start of May 2022, mpox cases have been identified in countries which are not typically susceptible to the virus. This has been a growing public health concern, considering the fact that this disease could be developed and disseminated through interactions between humans and animals [5]. Consequently, the WHO that confirmed the current global outbreak of mpox is a public health crisis emergency as of July 23, 2022 [7, 8]. The initial occurrence of mpox was documented in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) in 1970. However, other outbreaks of the disease have emerged and it has become prevalent in central and western African nations [9].

In contrast to the prevalence of the mpox virus in western and central Africa, a significant proportion of the confirmed cases with documented travel history have reported journeys to North America and Europe. The incidence of mpox cases has exhibited a substantial and notable escalation during the past two decades [10, 11]. As of March 7, 2023, a total of 81,000 confirmed cases and 55 fatalities had been recorded across 110 countries [12]. There is yet to be a confirmed case of mpox in Bangladesh, but nonetheless in May 2022, Bangladesh issued a health warning owing to the worldwide mpox outbreak [6].

The primary origin of mpox is attributed to wild animals, leading to potential transmission to humans through two distinct pathways: animal-to-human zoonotic transmission in endemic countries and human-to-human transmission in both endemic and non-endemic nations [14]. However, mpox is transferred mostly through respiratory droplets, bodily fluids, and close contact with infected animals’ skin lesions. The transmission of the disease to people can also occur through close physical proximity, direct face-to-face interaction, or intimate skin-to-skin contact [15, 16]. The incubation period of mpox varies between 4 and 21 days, during which patients may exhibit either asymptomatic or symptomatic conditions [17, 18]. Following the incubation phase, a significant proportion of individuals exhibit prodromal symptoms, including feelings of general discomfort, elevated body temperature, and enlargement of lymph nodes. The observed clinical manifestations of mpox include fever, discomfort in the back and head regions, the presence of a rash, general feelings of illness, and excessive fatigue [3]. Historically, the fatality rates associated with mpox cases is variable, ranging from 0% to 11% within the general population. In addition, it has been observed that young children are more susceptible to this disease [11, 19].

The question of mpox re-emergence remains unsolved, but the reason for a potentially alarming situation in the near future is due to the adaptability and the wide range of animal hosts of mpox [5, 7]. Furthermore, several risk factors such as lack of awareness, smallpox vaccination discontinuation, and increasing globalization may indicate that mpox will become a greater global public health concern in the future [8]. The recent growing incidence of mpox cases requires early detection, prompt response, management, and prevention. Although mpox has not yet been recorded in Bangladesh, the community must be vigilant to tackle an outbreak of mpox. Available data on the level of awareness and understanding of mpox within the Bangladeshi population is currently insufficient [912]. Therefore, the study was undertaken with the following aims: (i) to determine the level of knowledge regarding mpox among a sample of undergraduate and post-graduate students from selected tertiary institutions in Bangladesh, and (ii) to assess the determinants of knowledge regarding human mpox among the study population.

Methods and materials

Study design, participants and procedures

A cross-sectional study was conducted among tertiary-level students (i.e., undergraduate and post-graduate levels) who were studying medical science, public health, and other non-medical-related subjects at six private and seven public institutions in Bangladesh. The participants had to meet the following eligibility criteria: (i) be of age 18 years or older, (ii) currently be an enrolled student, and (iii) be a Bangladeshi citizen by birth. Eligibility criteria for the study were stated on the opening page of the survey questionnaire, and participants were instructed to consider these criteria before participating in the survey. Individuals under 18 years of age and those who were unwilling to participate were excluded from the study. In addition, any participant with missing information was excluded from the study. Missing values were handled using a list wise deletion technique, where a case is removed from an analysis if at least one of the specified variables had a missing value.

To determine sample size, we used the Cochran’s formula as a guide [13]. This formula allows us to calculate an ideal sample size (n) given a desired level of precision (e), desired confidence level (Z), and the estimated proportion of the attribute present in the population (p). The following assumptions were considered to calculate the sample size of this study: (i) Since there was no data on knowledge of mpox among Bangladeshi students when we designed our study protocol, a predicted prevalence of 50% was used (p = 0.5), (ii) 95% level of confidence (Z = 1.96), and (iii) 5% margin of error (e = 0.05). The calculation procedure is as follows: Sample size, n=z2×p×(1p)e2=1.962×0.5×(10.5)0.052=384.16385.

Accordingly, the minimum required sample of 385 participants was calculated. To strengthen the external validity and generalizability of the study, we intended to include more participants than the calculated sample size [14]. Initially, a total of 927 responses were recorded, but 31 responses had missing information for certain observations and 17 respondents did not provide their consent. Thus, 879 participants made up the final study sample in this survey.

Recruitment was conducted using social networking sites (i.e. Facebook) and data was collected using Google Forms accessed via a survey link. There was no specific sampling technique; the purpose was to reach as many students as possible to collect the minimum calculated sample size or greater. The study team disseminated the survey link to different public Facebook pages or groups of the selected institutions, where university or medical students connect virtually. The data for this study was gathered between 20 May 2023 and 10 July 2023.

A pilot study was carried out to assess the accessibility and consistency of the questionnaire before its administration. Perneger et al. [15] suggested a default sample size of 30 participants for pre-testing the questionnaire to give sufficient power to detect fairly typical problems. In order to pre-test the questionnaire, 30 university students were randomly selected from the lead author’s institution. During the pilot survey, no significant problems with the questionnaire were brought up by the respondents. Filling in the questionnaire took on average 8 to 10 minutes to complete. The English version of the questionnaire was used, since English is the medium of instruction in universities and medical colleges in Bangladesh, there were no linguistic barriers with the survey items from the respondents. The results of the pilot study were not included in the final analysis. To minimize the possibility of double participation, pilot-survey respondents were requested not to take part in the final study, even if they received the survey link.

Study variables and measures

Respondents’ demographic information such as gender, age, study major, study level, institution type, residency, parent’s education and occupation, and whether they had ever heard about mpox were collected as independent variables.

A set of 21 questions was used to evaluate the respondents’ knowledge of mpox [16], which is the outcome variable of this study. The knowledge items are as follows: Five questions assessed knowledge of the source, definition, and incubation period; two questions assessed the transmission mechanism of mpox; seven questions assessed the signs and symptoms; five questions assessed the preventative measures; and two questions assessed the treatment methods. The participants were to choose one of three possible answers to each of the 21 questions: "Yes," "No," or "I don’t know." To reduce the possibility of selecting the correct answer by chance, the option “I don’t know” was used. The reliability of this scale was good (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.74).

One point was allocated for the correct answer, and zero points were allocated for the incorrect answer. The overall knowledge score ranged from 0 to 21. A higher score indicated higher knowledge regarding mpox. The knowledge score (a continuous variable) was used as outcome variable in this study to assess factors that predict knowledge score of mpox.

To better understand respondent’s overall knowledge about mpox, a percentage of knowledge score was c0mputed and classified as good, moderate, or poor. The percentage (%) knowledge score was calculated using the following formula [16]:

%ofknowledgescore=Numberofquestionscorrectlyansweredbytheparticipant21×100.

Several previous studies used modified Bloom’s cut-off range to categorize the level of overall knowledge (i.e., good vs. moderate vs. poor) on a specific disease [16, 17]. Thus, participants’ overall knowledge of mpox was rated as "good" if they scored between 80% and 100% (i.e., 17 to 21 points), "moderate" if they scored between 60% and 79% (i.e., 16.5 and 13 points), and "poor" if they scored below 60% (<13 points) [16, 17]. This classification was used to illustrate participants’ general knowledge of mpox, not for predictor analysis.

Statistical approach

Both enumerative statistics (such as frequencies, percentages, median, etc.) and inferential statistics (such as regression analysis) were employed to analyze the data. Inferential statistics employ a sample to draw reasonable conclusions about the population if the sample was selected using random and unbiased sampling methods (i.e., probability sampling) [18]. However, non-probability sampling technique was used in our study because of its feasibility, ease of usage, and low cost [19]. We performed an inferential analysis of our survey data to make a fair conclusion about the population from a sample by assuming that our study sample was representative of the population. Previous studies have adopted a similar approach [9, 2024].

A Breusch-Pagan/Cook-Weisberg test for heteroscedasticity was performed and the test observed heteroscedasticity (Chi-square = 2.06, p = 0.025). In addition, a Shapiro-wilk W test showed that the distribution of knowledge scores departed significantly from normality (W = 0.871, p < 0.001); therefore, a non-parametric test was used. A Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney test were utilized to compare knowledge scores across the explanatory variables. In this comparison, data were presented as the median and interquartile range (IQR).

Quantile regression, an extension of linear regression, is often suitable to apply when the assumptions of ordinary least square (OLS) regression such as homoscedasticity and normality are not fulfilled [2527]. Since our data violated the potential criteria of OLS regression, multiple quantile regression models were fitted to identify the predictors of knowledge regarding mpox. Multivariable quantile regression model was used to display the distribution of knowledge scores across the explanatory variables in different quantiles (10th, 25th, 50th, 75th and 90th quantiles). The goodness of fit in quantile regression was checked using Pseudo R2 (Pseudo R2 for 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th and 90th quantiles model was 0.0777, 0.1411, 0.0916, 0.0842 and 0.0717, respectively). Regression coefficient (β) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated for the selected quantiles of the knowledge scores based on 500 bootstrap replications. Five hundred bootstrap replications were performed to obtain unbiased estimates and representativeness of the population [28, 29]. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant throughout the analysis. All statistical analysis was performed by STATA (BE version 17.0, StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA).

Ethics

The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Ethical Committee (IEC) of Patuakhali Science and Technology University, Bangladesh (reference number: PSTU/IEC/2022/51). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. Anonymity and confidentiality of participant information was assured.

Results

Sample characteristics

A total of 879 students from the selected 13 tertiary institutions participated in this study. The median age of the study population was 23 years (IQR: 25–22). The majority of participants were aged 22 to 24 years (47.9%). More than half of the participants were female (53.2%), and the rest of them were male (46.8%). Nearly 40% of the participants (39.7%) were studying medical science or public health. Three-quarters of the participants (74.2%) were studying at an undergraduate level. One third of the participants (33.1%) were studying in private institutions and the rest, up to two-thirds (66.9%) of the participants were studying in public institutions. The majority of the participants resided in urban areas (73.0%). More than one-third (34.2%) of the participants’ mothers had an education level of honors or above. The majority of the participants’ mothers were housewives (77.4%). More than half of the participants’ fathers had an education level of honors or above (58.8%). Over one-third of the respondents’ fathers were businessmen (35.0%). Around two-thirds of the participants (66.8%) had received information regarding human mpox during academic education. The detailed socio-demographic features of study participants are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1. The proportion of respondents based on their socio-demographic characteristics (N = 879).

Variables Frequency Percentage
Gender
 Male 411 46.8
 Female 468 53.2
Age (in years)
 18–21 198 22.5
 22–24 421 47.9
 25 and above 260 29.6
Study major
 Medical or public health 349 39.7
 Non-medical science 530 60.3
Study level
 Undergraduate 652 74.2
 Post-graduate 227 25.8
Institution type
 Private 291 33.1
 Public 588 66.9
Residency
 Rural area 237 27.0
 Urban area 642 73.0
Mothers’ education level
 Illiterate 17 1.9
 Primary 74 8.4
 Secondary 209 23.8
 Higher secondary 278 31.6
 Honors and above 301 34.2
Mother’s occupation
 Housewife 680 77.4
 Employed 175 19.9
 Others 24 2.7
Father’s education level
 Illiterate 10 1.1
 Primary 55 6.3
 Secondary 110 12.5
 Higher secondary 187 21.3
 Honors and above 517 58.8
Father’s occupation
 Governmental job 289 32.9
 Private job 141 16.0
 Business 308 35.0
 Others 141 16.0
Received information of mpox during education
 Yes 587 66.8
 No 292 33.2

Knowledge of mpox among study participants

The assessment of participants’ knowledge regarding mpox is summarized in Table 2. The majority of respondents (77.8%) were aware that mpox is caused by a virus. Approximately one-third of participants (33.2% to 37.2%) reported that they did not know the transmission mechanism of mpox. More than half of the respondents (52.9%) were aware that flu-like syndrome is one of the early signs or symptoms of mpox, while 38.1% of them stated they did not know about the early signs or symptoms of the disease. Around half of the respondents (47.2% and 49.9%, respectively) indicated they did not know that vesicles and pustules on the skin are one of the signs or symptoms of mpox. Nearly one-third to half of the respondents (30.5% to 49.1%) reported that they did not know about the different preventive measures for mpox (15 to 19 number items). More than half of the participants (53.5%) wrongly answered that mpox can be treated with the available antiviral medications (Table 2).

Table 2. Responses to knowledge items regarding human mpox by study participants (N = 879).

Questions Response, n (%)
Yes No Don’t Know
Source, definition, and incubation time
1. Mpox is a viral disease infection. 684 (77.8) 23 (2.6) 172 (19.6)
2. Mpox is a bacterial disease infection. 189 (21.5) 430 (48.9) 260 (29.6)
3. Mpox occurs in primarily in tropical rainforest areas of Africa and is occasionally exported to another region. 501 (57.0) 58 (6.6) 320 (36.4)
4. Mpox and smallpox have similar signs and symptoms. 407 (46.3) 147 (16.7) 325 (37.0)
5. The interval from infection to onset of symptoms is usually from 6 to 13 days but can range from 5 to 21 days. 344 (39.1) 58 (6.6) 477 (54.3)
Route of transmission
6. Mpox is easily transmitted animal-to-human, through direct contact with the blood, bodily fluid, cutaneous or mucosal lesions of infected animal or eating insufficiently cooked meat from an infected animal. 461 (52.4) 91 (10.4) 327 (37.2)
7. Mpox is easily transmitted human -to-human through close contact with respiratory secretions, skin lesions of the infected person, or contaminated objectives. 528 (60.1) 59 (6.7) 292 (33.2)
Signs and symptoms
8. Flu-like syndrome is one of the early signs or symptoms of human mpox. 465 (52.9) 79 (9.0) 335 (38.1)
9. Skin rashes usually begin within 1–3 days of fever are one of the signs or symptoms of human mpox. 496 (56.4) 40 (4.6) 342 (39.0)
10. Papules on the skin are one of the signs or symptoms of human mpox. 406 (46.2) 40 (4.6) 343 (39.0)
11. Vesicles on the skin are one of the signs or symptoms of human mpox. 368 (41.9) 96 (10.9) 416 (47.2)
12. Pustules on the skin are one of the signs or symptoms of human mpox. 357 (40.6) 83 (9.4) 439 (49.9)
13. Lymphadenopathy (swollen lymph nodes) is one clinical sign or symptom that could be used to differentiate mpox and smallpox cases. 375 (42.7) 53 (6.0) 451 (51.3)
14. Fever, Exhaustion, back and muscle ache and intense headache are the signs or symptoms of human mpox. 528 (60.1) 48 (5.5) 303 (34.5)
Preventive measures
15. Mpox could be prevented by cooking meat properly. 303 (34.5) 144 (16.4) 432 (49.1)
16. Avoiding contact with any objectives that have been in contact with sick animals can prevent spread of disease. 508 (57.8) 70 (8.0) 301 (34.2)
17. Avoiding contact with any person that has a rash can prevent the spread of disease. 494 (56.2) 92 (10.5) 293 (33.3)
18. Avoiding contact with any objective that has been in contact with sick people can prevent spreading disease. 492 (56.0) 75 (8.5) 312 (35.5)
19. Reporting symptoms of mpox to local health authorities is important to prevent further disease transmission. 572 (65.1) 39 (4.4) 268 (30.5)
Treatment
20. Mpox is usually a self-limited disease with the symptoms lasting from 2 to 4 weeks. 302 (34.3) 117 (13.3) 460 (52.3)
21. Mpox can be treated with the available antiviral medications. 408 (46.4) 97 (11.0) 374 (42.5)

Based on the modified Bloom’s cut-off point, 20.7% of the participants had a good level of knowledge about mpox, 23.2% had moderate knowledge and 56.1% had poor knowledge (Fig 1).

Fig 1. The proportions of respondents by their level of knowledge based on the modified Bloom’s categorization of knowledge levels (N = 879).

Fig 1

Overall, the median knowledge score for mpox was 11 out of 21 (IQR: 16–6). The median knowledge score of mpox significantly differed in function to participants’ gender (p = 0.008) and study major (p < 0.001), and participants who received information regarding mpox during academic education (p < 0.001). The median knowledge score of mpox was not significantly varied by participants’ age, study level, institution type, residency, and parents education and occupation (p > 0.05) (see Table 3).

Table 3. Differences in mpox-related median knowledge score by the respondents’ socio-demographic characteristics.

Variables Mann-Whitney Test Kruskal—Wallis Test P value
Median IQR Median IQR
Gender 0.008
 Male 11 15–5
 Female 12 16–6.5
Age (in years) 0.180
 18–21 11 15–4
 22–24 11 15–6
 25 and above 12 17–6
Study major <0.001
 Medical or public health 13 16–8
 Non-medical science 11 15–5
Study level 0.062
 Under graduate 11 15–6
 Post-graduate 12 16–6
Institution type 0.126
 Private 12 16–6
 Public 11 15–6
Residency 0.591
 Rural area 12 16–5
 Urban area 11 16–6
Mothers’ education level 0.135
 Illiterate 11 16–4
 Primary 13 18–6
 Secondary 12 16–5
 Higher secondary 11 15–5
 Honors and above 12 16–7
Mother’s occupation 0.409
 Housewife 12 16–6
 Employed 11 16–7
 Others 8.5 14.5–5
Father’s education level 0.575
 Illiterate 8 14–3
 Primary 12 16–5
 Secondary 11 16–5
 Higher secondary 11 15–6
 Honors and above 12 16–6
Father’s occupation 0.496
 Governmental job 12 16–6
 Private job 11 16–6
 Business 11 15–5.5
 Others 12 16–5
Received information of mpox during education <0.001
 Yes 13 17–8
 No 8 13.5–1

Note: IQR = Interquartile range. Bolded values indicate statistically significance.

Table 4 presents the results of the multivariable quantile regression analysis. In the multivariate analysis, the effect of gender on mpox knowledge was observed at the 25th= 1.343; 95%CI = 0.19, 2.49), 50th= 2; 95%CI = 0.77, 3.22) and 75th= 1.59; 95%CI = 0.46, 2.72) quantiles with females having more knowledge compared to males. Nonetheless, the effects of study group were significant at 25th= 1.746; 95%CI = 0.58, 2.90), 50th= 1.5; 95%CI = 0.09, 2.90), 75th= 1.361; 95%CI = 0.29, 2.43) and 90th= 1.248; 95%CI = 0.41, 2.08) quantiles. Those in medical or public health programs were likely to have more knowledge about mpox relative to those who were in non-medical groups. In terms of study level, there was an effect at the 75th quantile (β = 1.617; 95%CI = 0.13, 3.10) with those in post-graduate level having more knowledge about mpox.

Table 4. Multivariable quantile regression analysis showing the predictors of knowledge regarding human mpox among study participants.

Variables 10th quantile 25th quantile 50th quantile 75th quantile 90th quantile
β (95%CI) β (95%CI) β (95%CI) β (95%CI) β (95%CI)
Gender
Male Ref. Ref.
Female 0.678 (-0.43, 1.78) 1.343 (0.19, 2.49)* 2 (0.77, 3.22)** 1.59 (0.46, 2.72)** 0.941 (-0.035, 1.91)
Age (in years)
18–21 Ref. Ref.
22–24 0.525 (-0.89, 1.94) 0.447 (-1.12, 2.025) -0.875 (-2.51, 0.76) -1.085 (-2.36, 0.19) -0.171 (-1.37, 1.02)
25 and above -0.050 (-1.89, 1.78) 0.701 (-1.22, 2.63) 0.5625 (-1.67, 2.79) -0.404 (-2.10, 1.29) -0.312 (-1.67, 1.05)
Study group
Medical or public health 1.203 (-0.28, 2.68) 1.746 (0.58, 2.90)** 1.5 (0.09, 2.90)* 1.361 (0.29, 2.43)* 1.248 (0.41, 2.08)**
Non-medical science Ref. Ref.
Study level
Under graduate Ref. Ref.
Post-graduate 0.389 (-1.22, 2.00) 1.179 (-0.35, 2.71) 0.5 (-1.36, 2.36) 1.617 (0.13, 3.10)* 0.855 (-0.39, 2.09)
Institution type
Private Ref. Ref.
Public 0.305 (-1.06, 1.67) -0.164 (-1.44, 1.11) -0.812 (-2.23, 0.60) -1.382 (-2.42, -0.34)** -1.402 (-2.41, -0.39)**
Residency
Rural area Ref. Ref.
Urban area 0.423 (-0.99, 1.84) 0.059 (-1.47, 1.6) -0.625(-2.11, 0.86) -0.893 (-2.21, 0.42) 0.135 (-0.95, 1.22)
Mothers’ education level
Illiterate Ref. Ref.
Primary 2.661(-4.47, 9.79) 1.029 (-5.15, 7.21) 0.375 (-4.41, 5.16) -0.468 (-5.80, 4.86) -0.058 (-3.87, 3.75)
Secondary 0.050 (-7.27, 7.37) -0.925 (-7.16, 5.30) -1.5 (-6.36, 3.36) -3.319 (-8.45, 1.81) -2.217 (-6.18, 1.75)
Higher secondary 0.644 (-6.85, 8.14) -0.761 (-6.92, 5.40) -2.625 (-7.58, 2.33) -4.702 (-9.99, 0.59) -3.158 (-7.29, 0.98)
Honors and above 1.627 (-5.86, 9.12) -0.253 (-6.43, 5.92) -2.312 (-7.59, 2.97) -3.914 (-9.39, 1.56) -1.909 (-6.03, 2.21)
Mother’s occupation
Housewife Ref. Ref.
Employed 0.559 (-1.17, 2.29) -0.104(-1.62, 1.42) -0.375 (-2.31, 1.56) -0.787 (-2.50, 0.93) 0.217 (-0.85, 1.28)
Others -0.254 (-3.58, 3.08) -2.910(-5.58, -0.24)* -3.18(-6.97, 0.597) -2.446 (-5.27, 0.38) -3.525 (-6.65, -0.40)*
Father’s education level
Illiterate Ref. Ref.
Primary -3.542 (-10.92, 3.84) -0.074(-6.67, 6.52) 3.25 (-2.72, 9.22) 3.361 (-3.59, 10.31) 1.226 (-4.61, 7.06)
Secondary -2.016 (-9.18, 5.15) 0.283 (-5.89, 6.45) 3.5(-2.70, 9.70) 2.425 (-4.57, 9.43) 1.570 (-4.52, 7.66)
Higher secondary -1.237 (-8.75, 6.28) 0.582 (-5.89, 7.05) 3.5(-2.74, 9.74) 2.957(-4.10, 10.02) 1.719 (-4.23, 7.67)
Honors and above -1.949 (-9.51, 5.61) 0.985 (-5.33, 7.30) 5.062(-1.11, 11.23) 4.042 (-2.99, 11.07) 1.276 (-4.64, 7.19)
Father’s occupation
Governmental job Ref. Ref.
Private job 0.101 (-1.8, 2.03) -0.402 (-1.93, 1.12) -1.5(-3.72, 0.72) -0.510 (-2.17, 1.15) -0.542 (-1.67, 0.58)
Business 0.118 (-1.38, 1.62) 0.313 (-1.17, 1.79) -0.68(-2.32, 0.94) -1.31 (-2.70, 0.06) -0.429 (-1.65, 0.79)
Others -0.322 (-2.09, 1.45) 1.223(-1.19, 3.63) 0.875(-1.09, 2.84) -0.382 (-2.01, 1.25) -0.787 (-2.19, 0.61)
Received information of human mpox during education
Yes 3.711 (2.27, 5.15)*** 6.656(5.37, 7.94)**** 5.75(4.03, 7.46)*** 3.404 (2.26, 4.54)*** 2.592 (1.41, 3.77)***
No Ref. Ref.

Note: β = regression coefficient, CI = Confidence Interval and Ref.: reference category. Asterisk values indicate statistically significant (p value <0.05).

* p value <0.05,

** p value <0.01 and

*** p value <0.001.

With institution type, it was observed that participants from public institutions had low knowledge compared to those at the private institutions with significant results occurring at 75th (β = -1.382; 95%CI = -2.42, -0.34) and 90th quantiles (β = -1.402; 95%CI = —2.41, -0.39). The results further showed that students who received information of mpox during their education were more knowledgeable compared to those who had not, with statistical significance occurring at 10th (β = 3.711; 95%CI = 2.27, 5.15), 25th (β = 6.656; 95%CI = 5.37, 7.94), 50th (β = 5.75; 95%CI = 4.03, 7.46), 75th (β = 3.404;95%CI = 2.26, 4.54) and 90th (β = 2.592; 95%CI = 1.41, 3.77) quantiles (Table 4).

Discussion

This study assessed the level of knowledge regarding mpox among tertiary-level students in Bangladesh. It was found that more than half (56.1%) of the students had poor knowledge and only one-fifth (20.7%) had good knowledge. The findings on the low knowledge score is consistent with the findings in several previous studies in Jordan [30], Iraq [31], Kuwait [32], Indonesia [33] and Pakistan [34]. Specifically, the study by Kumar et al. [34] showed that only 6.3% had good knowledge on mpox transmission. Nonetheless, our findings are different from what was found in a Nigerian study by Al-Mustapha et al. [35] where 58.7% of participants had a good knowledge of the incubation period, symptoms, route of transmission, and preventive practices on mpox. The possible variation in the study findings could be differences in the study population, locations and periods. The Nigerian study was conducted among the general population and the general population in Nigeria was more knowledgeable about mpox (58.7%) than what we found among Bangladeshi students in tertiary institutions (20.7%). The plausible explanation could be that the public awareness campaigns that were conducted during an mpox outbreak in Nigeria led to a more informed population.

At the multivariate level the quantile regression analysis showed statistically significant results in terms of gender, study group, study level, institution type and exposure to mpox education. With gender, our results showed significant variations in knowledge at various quantiles of mpox knowledge distribution. Females had statistically significant higher knowledge compared to males at 25th, 50th and 75th quantiles. The effect size was moderate at the 25th percentile and increased at the 50th percentile suggesting that gender gaps in the knowledge score is more pronounced at the 50th percentile among males and females. This finding suggests that gender differences in knowledge score are not the same across the knowledge spectrum. This finding is consistent with previous a study [16] that also found that female students had a higher knowledge score of mpox compared to their male counterparts. The possible reason for this finding is that females are usually more concerned about health conditions compared to males. Existing research has consistently demonstrated that, as a general trend, females exhibit higher levels of health literacy when compared to males [36]. This necessitates the importance of gender specific interventions in mpox knowledge interventions paying more attention to males.

In terms of study group, our results showed significant variations in knowledge at various quantiles of mpox knowledge distribution. For example, this was significant at 25th, 50th, 75th, and 90th quantiles. The strongest effect was observed at the 25th quintile suggesting that differences in terms of study group and mpox knowledge score are more evident in those with low knowledge scores. Specifically, those in medical or public health programs were more likely to have knowledge about mpox relative to those who were in non-medical groups. This is similar to the findings obtained by Jairoun et al. [16] among university students in United Arab Emirates and Hassan et al. [6] among medical doctors in Bangladesh. There are several pathways to explain this association. First, students in health sciences have basic knowledge on diseases transmission from their previous education [37]. Second, in their present education, some of them are introduced to courses such as emerging and reemerging diseases, and epidemiology in general.

Relatedly, the study showed that students in public institutions have lower knowledge about mpox compared to those at the private institutions with significant effects at 75th and 90th quantiles suggesting differences widens at higher quantiles of mpox knowledge distribution. These differences could be attributed to differences in access to educational resources, curriculum type and emphasis on public health threats and pandemics. This underscores the need to increase awareness of mpox among students in public universities.

The findings also revealed that students who received information about mpox as part of their education were consistently more knowledgeable compared to those who had not, with statistically significant effects observed across the 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, and 90th quantiles. The effect was most pronounced at the 25th quantile, indicating that among students with lower baseline knowledge, those who received mpox-related education had substantially higher knowledge levels. Even at the 10th quantile where knowledge levels were generally the lowest, students who had been exposed to mpox information had significantly higher knowledge. As explained by Jairoun et al. [16] the resurgence of mpox globally has underscored the necessity for media outlets to prioritize risk communication efforts, particularly in advocating for zoonotic diseases. A consistent stream of daily updates can play a crucial role in enhancing the general public’s understanding and awareness of mpox. Consequently, it is plausible that individuals exposed to education on mpox attain higher knowledge scores due to their enhanced accessibility to precise and comprehensive information about mpox. Further, Ibrahim and Zaghamir’s [38] study underscores the importance of educational interventions in enhancing knowledge and fostering positive attitudes towards infectious diseases such as mpox.

Strength and limitations

This study has various strengths and limitations. First, the study employed a cross-sectional survey, therefore the findings could only be viewed in terms of association but not causal inferences. Second, since the study used non-probability sampling to enroll participants, the study findings could not generalize to the entire student population in Bangladesh. Third, the study, conducted among educated participants with internet access, may only reflect educated youths in Bangladesh, particularly university/college students. Selection bias was also possible since this was an online survey therefore, only those who showed interest and saw it convenient participated. Despite these limitations, to the best of our knowledge this is one of the first studies to assess the knowledge level of mpox among undergraduate and post-graduate students in Bangladesh. A strength of this study was that the study was not limited to only one university but included different types of university students from different backgrounds within Bangladesh.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the study revealed relatively poor overall knowledge status on mpox. There was also poor knowledge on preventive measures of mpox. Gender, study major, institution type and information during academic education were associated with knowledge score on mpox. Since there is low knowledge on mpox, it is important to increase awareness and knowledge among university students in Bangladesh to help them prepare for a possible future mpox outbreak. These findings imply that educational interventions about mpox should consider the gender dynamics and program of study among the students. Further studies employing different study designs, including intervention study designs, are required especially for students in public institutions.

Supporting information

S1 Data

(XLS)

pone.0315677.s001.xls (735KB, xls)

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank our study participants who humbly responded to our all questions and gave their valuable time. We are grateful to Jacob Camia Paredes (PhD student at University of California, Irvine) for reviewing the manuscript.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting information files.

Funding Statement

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Jamil H, Tariq W, Tahir MJ, Mahfooz RS, Asghar MS, Ahmed A. Human monkeypox expansion from the endemic to non-endemic regions: Control measures. Ann Med Surg. 2022;79: 104048. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104048 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Rahman MT, Sobur MA, Islam MS, Ievy S, Hossain MJ, El Zowalaty ME, et al. Zoonotic diseases: etiology, impact, and control. Microorganisms. 2020;8: 1405. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8091405 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ophinni Y, Frediansyah A, Sirinam S, Megawati D, Stoian AM, Enitan SS, et al. Monkeypox: Immune response, vaccination and preventive efforts. Narra J. 2022;2(3):e90. doi: 10.52225/narra.v2i3.90 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Rizk JG, Lippi G, Henry BM, Forthal DN, Rizk Y. Prevention and treatment of monkeypox. Drugs. 2022;82: 957–963. doi: 10.1007/s40265-022-01742-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Alrasheedy AA, Aldawsari AH, Alqasir MI, Alsawyan OA, Alalwan OA, Alwaker SA, et al. Knowledge of Community Pharmacists in Saudi Arabia Regarding Human Monkeypox, Its Management, Prevention, and Vaccination: Findings and Implications. Vaccines. 2023;11: 878. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11040878 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hasan M, Hossain MA, Chowdhury S, Das P, Jahan I, Rahman MF, et al. Human monkeypox and preparedness of Bangladesh: A knowledge and attitude assessment study among medical doctors. J Infect Public Health. 2023;16: 90–95. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2022.11.032 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Nath SD, Islam AMK, Majumder K, Rimti FH, Das J, Tabassum MN, et al. Assessment of Knowledge on Human Monkeypox Virus among General Population in Bangladesh: A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study. Medrxiv. 2022; 2008–2022.
  • 8.Najeeb H, Huda Z. Monkeypox virus: A spreading threat for Pakistan? Ann Med Surg. 2022;79. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103977 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Islam MA, Sathi NJ, Setu SP, Nahar MT, Khan MNA, Hasan M, et al. Knowledge, attitude, and practice of university students towards monkeypox in Bangladesh. PLoS One. 2023;18: e0287407. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287407 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Khatri G, Mir SL, Hasan MM. Outbreak of monkeypox in south east asia; spotlight on bangladesh, pakistan and india. Ann Med Surg. 2022;82: 104361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Nazmunnahar, Haque MA, Ahamed B, Tanbir M, Suhee FI, Islam MR. Assessment of risk perception and subjective norms related to Mpox (monkeypox) among adult males in Bangladesh: A cross‐sectional study. Heal Sci Reports. 2023;6: e1352. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1352 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Rony MKK, Sharmi P Das, Akter D, Parvin MR, Alamgir HM. Knowledge and Attitude Regarding Human Monkeypox Virus Infection among Nurses: A Cross-Sectional Study. SAGE Open Nurs. 2023;9: 23779608231216620. doi: 10.1177/23779608231216619 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kotrlik J, Higgins C. Organizational research: Determining appropriate sample size in survey research appropriate sample size in survey research. Inf Technol Learn Perform J. 2001;19: 43. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Cavana R, Delahaye B, Sekeran U. Applied business research: Qualitative and quantitative methods. John Wiley & Sons; 2001. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Perneger T V, Courvoisier DS, Hudelson PM, Gayet-Ageron A. Sample size for pre-tests of questionnaires. Qual life Res. 2015;24: 147–151. doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0752-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Jairoun AA, Al-Hemyari SS, Abdulla NM, El-Dahiyat F, Shahwan M, Hassan N, et al. Awareness and preparedness of human monkeypox outbreak among university student: Time to worry or one to ignore? J Infect Public Health. 2022;15: 1065–1071. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2022.08.015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Feleke BT, Wale MZ, Yirsaw MT. Knowledge, attitude and preventive practice towards COVID-19 and associated factors among outpatient service visitors at Debre Markos compressive specialized hospital, north-west Ethiopia, 2020. PLoS One. 2021;16: e0251708. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251708 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Stapor K, Stapor K. Descriptive and inferential statistics. Introd to Probabilistic Stat Methods with Examples R. 2020; 63–131. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Vehovar V, Toepoel V, Steinmetz S. Non-probability sampling. The Sage handbook of survey methods; 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Islam MS, Sujan MSH, Tasnim R, Mohona RA, Ferdous MZ, Kamruzzaman S, et al. Problematic smartphone and social media use among Bangladeshi college and university students amid COVID-19: the role of psychological well-being and pandemic related factors. Front psychiatry. 2021;12: 647386. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.647386 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Sayeed A, Islam MS, Christopher E, Zubayer A Al, Kundu S, Tariq MR, et al. Investigating problematic uses of Facebook and other Internet activities among university students in Bangladesh during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sci Rep. 2023;13: 1307. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-27394-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Jamil H, Idrees M, Idrees K, Tariq W, Sayyeda Q, Asghar MS, et al. Socio-demographic determinants of monkeypox virus preventive behavior: a cross-sectional study in Pakistan. PLoS One. 2023;18: e0279952. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279952 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Islam MS, Sujan MSH, Tasnim R, Ferdous MZ, Masud JHB, Kundu S, et al. Problematic internet use among young and adult population in Bangladesh: Correlates with lifestyle and online activities during the COVID-19 pandemic. Addict Behav reports. 2020;12: 100311. doi: 10.1016/j.abrep.2020.100311 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Alshahrani NZ, Alzahrani F, Alarifi AM, Algethami MR, Alhumam MN, Ayied HAM, et al. Assessment of knowledge of monkeypox viral infection among the general population in Saudi Arabia. Pathogens. 2022;11: 904. doi: 10.3390/pathogens11080904 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Huang Q, Zhang H, Chen J, He M. Quantile regression models and their applications: a review. J Biom Biostat. 2017;8: 1–6.30555734 [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hao L, Naiman DQ. Quantile regression. Sage; 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Siddiqa M, Zubair A, Kamal A, Ijaz M, Abushal T. Prevalence and associated factors of stunting, wasting and underweight of children below five using quintile regression analysis (PDHS 2017–2018). Sci Rep. 2022;12: 20326. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-24063-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hossain MM, Abdulla F, Rahman A. Prevalence and determinants of wasting of under-5 children in Bangladesh: Quantile regression approach. PLoS One. 2022;17: e0278097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278097 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Mungai IG, Baghel SS, Soni S, Vagela S, Sharma M, Diwan V, et al. Identifying the know-do gap in evidence-based neonatal care practices among informal health care providers—A cross-sectional study from Ujjain, India. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20: 1–9. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05805-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Sallam M, Al-Mahzoum K, Dardas LA, Al-Tammemi AB, Al-Majali L, Al-Naimat H, et al. Knowledge of human monkeypox and its relation to conspiracy beliefs among students in Jordanian health schools: filling the knowledge gap on emerging zoonotic viruses. Medicina (B Aires). 2022;58: 924. doi: 10.3390/medicina58070924 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ahmed SK, Abdulqadirb SO, Omar RM, Hussein SH, M-Amin HI, Chandran D, et al. Study of knowledge, attitude and anxiety in Kurdistan-region of Iraqi population during the monkeypox outbreak in 2022: An online cross-sectional study. 2022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 32.Alsanafi M, Al-Mahzoum K, Sallam M. Monkeypox knowledge and confidence in diagnosis and management with evaluation of emerging virus infection conspiracies among health professionals in Kuwait. Pathogens. 2022;11: 994. doi: 10.3390/pathogens11090994 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Harapan H, Setiawan AM, Yufika A, Anwar S, Wahyuni S, Asrizal FW, et al. Knowledge of human monkeypox viral infection among general practitioners: a cross-sectional study in Indonesia. Pathog Glob Health. 2020;114: 68–75. doi: 10.1080/20477724.2020.1743037 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Kumar N, Ahmed F, Raza MS, Rajpoot PL, Rehman W, Khatri SA, et al. Monkeypox cross-sectional survey of knowledge, attitudes, practices, and willingness to vaccinate among university students in Pakistan. Vaccines. 2022;11: 97. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11010097 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Al-Mustapha AI, Ogundijo OA, Sikiru NA, Kolawole B, Oyewo M, El-Nadi H, et al. A cross-sectional survey of public knowledge of the monkeypox disease in Nigeria. BMC Public Health. 2023;23: 1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Clouston SAP, Manganello JA, Richards M. A life course approach to health literacy: the role of gender, educational attainment and lifetime cognitive capability. Age Ageing. 2017;46: 493–499. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afw229 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Mullan J, Burns P, Weston K, McLennan P, Rich W, Crowther S, et al. Health literacy amongst health professional university students: a study using the Health Literacy Questionnaire. Educ Sci. 2017;7: 54. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Ibrahim AM, Zaghamir DF. Knowledge and attitudes towards mpox and effect of intervention among College of Applied Medical Sciences students. Libyan J Med. 2023;18: 2222448. doi: 10.1080/19932820.2023.2222448 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

S1 Data

(XLS)

pone.0315677.s001.xls (735KB, xls)

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting information files.


Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES