Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2025 Jan 2;20(1):e0316709. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316709

Spatial analysis of socioeconomic data and its relationship with illicit crops in Nariño-Colombia

Andrés Fernando Grajales-Marín 1, Fabio Humberto Sepúlveda-Murillo 1,*, Alex Tapia 1, Alexander Tabares 2
Editor: Martin Ramirez-Urquidy3
PMCID: PMC11694976  PMID: 39746030

Abstract

The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) aim to eradicate poverty and promote sustainable development; however, socioeconomic disparities persist globally, particularly in Colombia. With a Gini index of 0.556 in 2022, Colombia ranks among the most unequal countries in Latin America, with its southwest region of Nariño facing severe socioeconomic challenges. Concurrently, Nariño registers the highest levels of coca cultivation in Colombia, accounting for 65% of national cocaine production, reflecting the region’s precarious conditions. This study investigates the extent to which the spatial distribution of socioeconomic factors explains coca cultivation patterns in Nariño. Grounded in conflict economics, social capital, and social marginalization theories, the research constructs composite indices representing education, health, public services, economic conditions, and vulnerability. Using spatial analysis, it identifies areas with heightened poverty and vulnerability and examines their relationship with illicit crops. The findings highlight spatial non-stationarity in the factors influencing coca cultivation, offering region-specific insights and policy recommendations to combat illicit crops and foster sustainable development. These results provide a foundation for targeted interventions and contribute to broader strategies addressing inequality and illegal economies in Colombia.

1. Introduction

In the contemporary global context, the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) have established themselves as an essential guide to address society’s most pressing challenges. The SDGs, adopted by the United Nations, seek to eradicate poverty, protect the planet and ensure dignity and rights for all by 2030 [1]. However, despite global efforts, significant inequalities persist in the distribution of resources, opportunities and access to fundamental goods and services, perpetuating socioeconomic disparities around the world. These inequalities manifest themselves in a variety of ways, including income, education, health and employment, underscoring the urgent need to understand their causes in order to move towards a more equitable and sustainable society.

In Colombia, socioeconomic inequality remains a central challenge for the fulfillment of the SDGs. The country’s Gini index reached a value of 0.556 in 2022, placing Colombia among the most unequal nations in Latin America [2]. In addition, various poverty indicators reveal the precariousness of the population’s living conditions, such as the Monetary Poverty Index, which in 2022 affected 36.6% of Colombians, and the Multidimensional Poverty Index, which showed that 12.9% lacked the necessary conditions for individual development [3]. In this context, the state of Nariño, located in the southwest of the country, faces one of the most complex socioeconomic inequality situations in the region, characterized by limited economic development, especially in its agricultural sector, and a high level of unsatisfied basic needs [4,5].

Besides these socioeconomic disparities, Nariño faces an additional challenge related to the informal economy, specifically coca cultivation. According to the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime report [6], the coastal regions of Nariño register the highest growth of illicit crops in Colombia, accounting for 65% of national cocaine production. This phenomenon reflects the precarious socioeconomic conditions in the region, which facilitates the expansion of illegal activities such as drug trafficking.

In this context, the central question of this research is: To what extent does the spatial distribution of socioeconomic conditions explain coca cultivation patterns in the state of Nariño? This question is posed because of the need to understand how socioeconomic conditions directly affect the prevalence of coca cultivation in the region, which could provide clues to develop more effective public policies aimed at eradicating illicit crops and promoting sustainable development alternatives.

The theoretical framework supporting this research is based on several fundamental theories that explain the socioeconomic factors associated with coca cultivation. The conflict economics theory suggests that armed conflict and violence have a direct impact on the economy and development, and in the case of Colombia, helps to understand how illegal armed groups control areas of coca cultivation, generating an environment conducive to drug trafficking [7,8]. Social capital theory highlights the importance of social networks and trust as key factors for economic and social development. In coca-growing communities, the lack of social capital hinders the implementation of crop substitution programs and the development of economic alternatives, lacking support networks [9,10]. Finally, social marginalization theory argues that social exclusion and lack of economic opportunities lead people to engage in illegal activities such as coca cultivation. In Colombia, the historical marginalization of rural communities and the lack of access to basic services such as education, health and employment contribute to perpetuate this phenomenon [11,12].

This study seeks to answer the research question by constructing composite indices that reflect key dimensions such as education, health, public services, economy and vulnerability in Nariño. Through a spatial analysis of these socioeconomic conditions, it aims to identify areas with higher rates of poverty and vulnerability and examine how these directly affect the prevalence of illicit crops. In addition, the study will model the spatial non-stationarity of the factors associated with coca cultivation and provide detailed results on the most relevant factors in each area of Nariño, which will allow the formulation of specific recommendations for public policies.

The structure of the article is as follows: Section 2 describes the methodology employed in the research; Section 3 presents the results and discussion of the findings; and Section 4 concludes with a discussion of the implications of the results and recommendations for future research and for government decision-making.

2. Methodology

2.1 Area of study, variables, and information sources

This investigation was conducted in the state of Nariño, located in the southwestern region of the Republic of Colombia. Encompassing an area of 33,268 km2, the state, as per recent data from DANE, is inhabited by a total population of 1,627,589 individuals. The administrative territorial structure comprises 64 municipalities, which constitute the units under scrutiny in this study. The Municipality of Pasto serves as the capital of the state (Fig 1).

Fig 1. Location of the state of Nariño in Colombia (inserted small map).

Fig 1

Nariño, as a state, exists within the dichotomy of being strategically positioned for Colombia owing to its geographical location, agricultural potential, and prospective industrial development, for example, [13] in which the potential of the Nariño in terms of biodiversity and national and international connectivity is presented. Simultaneously, it unfortunately garners recognition in regional and international contexts for issues related to drugs and violence, as evidenced by reports and studies conducted by various offices of multilateral organizations [1416]. These reports, particularly those from national entities [17], acknowledge its potential as a special border zone due to its proximity to Ecuador in the south and its possession of the port of Tumaco, connecting it to the Pacific Ocean in the northwest. However, the region currently attains global recognition primarily due to illegal activities that have detrimental effects on people’s well-being, contributing to a pervasive stigma across various levels. Moreover, several municipalities within the state of Nariño contend with highly intricate conditions of economic and social marginalization.

To measure the economic and social development of the state of Nariño, six composite indices were meticulously constructed for each of its 64 municipalities. Each index integrates multiple quantitative variables corresponding to the unique characteristics of each municipality. The Educational Performance Index (EPI) captures information from the results of a national test (called Prueba Saber 11) in Mathematics and Spanish Language. The variables related to education coverage in both transitional and secondary education contributed to the construction of the Education Coverage Index (ECI). The Health Coverage Index (HCI) was formulated using data on the population affiliated with one of Colombia’s health regimes and the demographic segment under one year of age that received the third dose of the pentavalent vaccine. The Public Services Coverage Index (PSCI) was crafted by considering critical services such as electricity, internet, aqueduct, and sewerage coverage. The Economic Index (EI) is contingent upon metrics related to GDP per capita and the employed population of the municipality. To construct the Vulnerability Index (VI), parameters such as overcrowding, the population in a state of misery, and instances of child labor were systematically integrated.

Furthermore, three pivotal variables integral to the dynamics of the state’s economy were taken into consideration. Firstly, an examination of the homicide rate (HOMI) in each municipality was conducted. Secondly, an evaluation of the connectivity and infrastructure within the state was undertaken, with a specific focus on the variable ’Roads’. This variable was systematically constructed by factoring in the length of primary roads in each municipality. Lastly, an assessment of the production of cocaine cultivation in each of the state’s municipalities was included. The homicide rate, connectivity variables, along with the meticulously constructed indices, served as the independent variables in the initial phase to analyze their correlation with cocaine cultivation as the response variable.

Data for this study were provided from various sources of information. Specifically, the socioeconomic variables for the state of Nariño were extracted from the DANE database. Information related to cocaine production was provided by the Ministry of Justice and Law. Data concerning the length of primary roads in each of the state’s municipalities were obtained from OpenStreetMap (OSM) [18], a collaborative project for the creation of open-access maps. Table 1 provides a detailed overview of the six indices, their associated variables, and sources of information. It is important to note that the databases originate from various sources, which means the data were collected in different years due to the country’s policies.

Table 1. Description of the variables considered to construct the indices.

Index / Abbreviation Variable / Abbreviation Description Source of Information / Year
Educational Performance Index/ EPI Mathematics / Math Average score in the mathematics module of the national test (Prueba Saber 11) based on students residing in the municipality. Colombian Institute for the Evaluation of the Quality of Education (ICFES) / 2021
Language / Lang Average score in the Spanish language module of the national test (Prueba Saber 11) based on students residing in the municipality. Colombian Institute for the Evaluation of the Quality of Education (ICFES) / 2021
Educational Coverage Index/ ECI Transition / Tran The ratio between the number of students enrolled in an educational level who are theoretically old enough to attend it and the total population corresponding to the same age. Ministry of Education (Integrated Enrollment System–SIMAT) / 2021
Media / Me The ratio between the number of students enrolled in an educational level who are theoretically old enough to attend it and the total population corresponding to the same age. Ministry of Education (Integrated Enrollment System–SIMAT) / 2021
Health Coverage Index/ HCI Health / Salt Proportion of the population enrolled in one of the health systems Ministry of Health / 2021
Pentavalent / Pent Proportion of the population under 1 year of age that has received the third dose of pentavalent vaccine. Ministry of Health / 2020
Public Service Coverage Index / PSCI Rural electric power / EnerRural Percentage of electricity coverage in rural areas. Mining and Energy Planning Unit (UPME) / 2019
Internet / Inter Percentage of subscribers with dedicated Internet access out of total population Ministry of Information and Communications Technologies (MINTIC) / 2021
Aqueduct / Acue Percentage of coverage of the water service reported by the territorial entities in the Stratification and Coverage Report. Superintendencia de Servicios Públicos Domiciliarios (Stratification and Coverage Report–REC) / 2021
Sewerage / Water Supply Percentage of coverage of the Sewerage service reported by the territorial entities in the Stratification and Coverage Report. Superintendencia de Servicios Públicos Domiciliarios (Stratification and Coverage Report–REC) / 2021
Economic Index / EI Value added per capita / GDP Measures GDP per capita DANE/ 2020
Employment / Emp Percentage of people formally employed as a percentage of total population DANE/ 2016
Vulnerability Index / VI Overcrowding / Hacin Percentage of households facing housing resource deprivation DANE/ 2020
Misery / Mise Percentage of people in each municipality living in extreme poverty DANE/ 2018
Child Labor / TraInf Percentage of households with at least one child between 12 and 17 years of age working DANE/ 2020
Homicide / HOMI Ratio of homicide cases per 10,000 inhabitants Ministry of Defense / 2021
Roads / Road Proportion of primary roads in each municipality OpenStreetMap (OSM) / 2023
Cocaine / Coca Proportion of land under cocaine cultivation in each municipality Ministry of Justice and Law / 2021

2.2 Statistical analysis

Given the disparate origins of the data, an initial merge was executed, consolidating all information into a unified spatial database that encompasses records for each municipality. The statistical analysis of the dataset involved the computation of summary statistics, providing a comprehensive overview of both the variables employed in the study and the constructed indices. Additionally, traditional, and spatial statistical graphs, some of which are presented in this paper, were employed to analyze the global and local dynamics of variables and indices.

To elucidate the dynamics of cocaine production in the state of Nariño with respect to the indices, homicide rate, and roads, an econometric model was systematically formulated. In the following subsections, we present a succinct overview of the theory guiding index construction and a brief description of the econometric model designed to explore their relationship with cocaine production.

2.1.1 Constructing composite indices

Initially, 6 synthetic composite indices were estimated for the 64 municipalities of the state of Nariño. The procedure used to construct the indices was based on the Distance-Learning (DL2) proposed by [19].

Let X denote a matrix of size m × n, where the m columns represent the quantitative variables and the n rows represent the observations or spatial units (municipalities, countries, regions, etc.). Initially the variables are normalized by a change of scale. Subsequently, let Z denote the matrix of size m × n containing the standardized variables. Then, the DL2 is defined as follows:

DL2Zs,Zt=j=1mZsjZtj2ωj1/2 (1)

where s and t are two compared units or observations and ωj are the weights that are calculated using iterative machine learning algorithms. This definition (function) considers the concept of proximity between units, allowing comparisons to be made between the spatial units (in our case municipalities) studied and territorial disparities to be identified. According to its construction, the values taken by all indices are between 0 and 1.

Once the six indices were calculated for all municipalities, they were combined (summed) to determine a single Multidimensional Index (MI) for each municipality j. The MI was calculated as follows [20].

MIj=EPIj+ECIj+HCIj+PSCIj+EIj+VIj (2)

Finally, to better interpret the results, the MI is scaled between 0 and 1 using the following expression:

MIscalej=MIjminMIjmaxMIjminMIj (3)

A value close to 0 means low living conditions of the population and low economic growth, and a value close to 1 indicates good living conditions of the population and high economic growth of the municipalities of the state of Nariño. Both the descriptive analysis and the spatial distribution of each index in the study area were visualized and analyzed.

2.1.2 Econometric models

This research employs global and local regression models to explore the relationship between the proportion of hectares dedicated to cocaine cultivation (response variable) and the indices, homicide rate and road (explanatory variables) in the state of Nariño. To compare and select significant independent variables, initially a global regression was used followed by a local extension called geographically weighted regression (GWR). The latter method facilitated the examination of spatial heterogeneity of the relationship between the response variable and the explanatory variables.

In the examination of the relationship between a response variable Y, and a set of independent variables X1, X2,…,Xp, the analytical framework involves an Ordinary Linear Regression (OLR) model:

yi=β0+k=1pβkxik+εi (4)

where β0, β1, ,βp are the parameters and ε1, ε2,…, εn are the error terms. In this global model, the estimated coefficients βk are considered constant throughout the study area. However, the hypothesis of spatial uniformity of the effect of the explanatory variables on the dependent variable is often unrealistic [21]. Then, to consider the geographical non-stationarity of the relationship and incorporate the spatial structure, an extension of the model represented by the Eq (1), referred to as GWR, is introduced. This extension involves the estimation of local parameters for each geographic location in the dataset, as defined by [22]:

yi=β0ui,νi+k=1pβkui,νixik+εi (5)

where (ui,vi) denotes the geographic coordinates at location i (in this study, these were the coordinates of the centroids of each of the municipalities of Nariño), yi is the value of the dependent variable at location i; xik is the value of the kth independent variable at location i; p is the number of independent variables; βik is the local regression coefficient for the kth independent variable at location i; and εi is the random error at location i. In the calibration of Eq (5), it is implicitly assumed that data observed near the location have more influence on the estimation than data located farther away from. Next, the model measures the inherent relationships around each regression point i, where each set of regression coefficients is estimated using a weighted least squares approach. Thus, the matrix expression for this estimation is given by [23]:

β^ui,vi=XTWui,viX1XTWui,viy (6)

where X is the matrix of predictor variables with a column of 1s for the intercept, y is the vector of response variable, and W(ui,vi) is a weighting matrix of size n × n whose off-diagonal elements are zero and whose diagonal elements denote the geographic weighting of each of the n observed data for regression point i at location (ui,vi). There are three key elements in the construction of this weighting matrix: (i) the type of distance, (ii) the kernel function, and (iii) its bandwidth. For this work considering the irregular topography of the state of Nariño, the Euclidean distance, the Bi-squared function and an adaptive bandwidth were used [2426].

Since extreme values can generate biased results, the GWR was performed with a robust analysis to mitigate this issue [24]. Furthermore, for constructing the spatial database, estimating, and mapping various measurements, R software was employed [27].

3. Results and discussion

3.1 Descriptive analysis and spatial distribution

Table 2 provides an overview of the behavior of the response variable (Coca) and the independent variables (Indices, HOMI, and Roads) through eight global descriptive statistics:

Table 2. Global descriptive statistics of variables and constructed indices.

Response Variable Min Q1 Median Mean Q3 Max CV (%) CA
Coca 0,0000 0,0000 0,0000 0,0100 0,0085 0,0600 178,5000 2,0700
Explanatory Variables
EPI 0,0312 0,6031 0,7035 0,6400 0,7759 0,9605 33,0800 -1,2700
ECI 0,0015 0,3992 0,5356 0,5000 0,6058 0,9501 38,6700 -0,3800
HCI 0,3155 0,6490 0,7503 0,7300 0,8431 1,0000 19,5600 -0,5600
PSCI 0,0736 0,6235 0,6845 0,6700 0,8008 0,8927 24,1300 -1,2500
EI 0,0000 0,0981 0,1417 0,1600 0,1585 0,7592 85,9500 2,9600
VI 0,1710 0,3141 0,3958 0,4300 0,5177 0,9343 41,4200 0,8500
HOMI 0,0000 0,6225 1,7250 3,5589 5,3750 18,8100 122,1316 1,7303
Roads 0,0000 0,0000 0,0000 0,2200 0,3654 1,3122 144,3900 1,4700

minimum (Min), quartile 1 (Q1), median (Median), mean (Mean), quartile 3 (Q3), maximum (Max), coefficient of variation (CV), and coefficient of asymmetry (CA). Fig 2 displays the statistical distribution of the indices using box-and-whisker plots.

Fig 2. Statistical distribution of the indices.

Fig 2

The EPI, HCI, PSCI and VI indices exhibit values relatively close to 1. According to the Q1 of these indices, 75% of the municipalities have a high mean value. These results indicate that municipalities have a good educational performance, with good coverage in education, public services, and health. Along with low vulnerability. However, these indices display left-skewed distribution with the presence of outliers (CA), signifying the existence of municipalities with lower values and, consequently, indicating areas with inadequate protection.

The EI is characterized by values close to 0, with most municipalities not surpassing a value of 0.1585 (Q3). This indicates a generally low economic performance across the municipalities. However, the corresponding box-and-whisker diagram exhibits an asymmetric trend towards the right side with extreme values (as indicated by CA value). This asymmetry reflects a few municipalities with notably higher economic performance in the state of Nariño. Furthermore, based on the CV values, all indices and variables display a high degree of dispersion. The descriptive metrics and the statistical distribution show the existence of significant developmental differences (educational, social, economic, health, etc.) among the municipalities under investigation.

The spatial distribution of the proportion of hectares of cultivated cocaine and the location of primary roads in the state of Nariño is depicted in Fig 3. This distribution reveals the geographic variability of cocaine production in the state, showing a concentration of high values in the northwestern part of the state of Nariño. This concentration can be attributed to the significant pressure exerted by non-government armed groups aiming to control several municipalities in this area [14]. Additionally, the proximity of these municipalities to the Pacific Ocean facilitates illegal exportation to other countries.

Fig 3. Spatial distribution of cocaine cultivation (in blue) associated with main roads and trunk roads (red lines).

Fig 3

In contrast, municipalities with lower cocaine production tend to be situated in the southeast, closer to Pasto city, the capital of Nariño. Furthermore, a notable observation is the poor road infrastructure in most municipalities of the state, with many of these coinciding with areas of high cocaine production. This observation aligns with findings from other studies indicating that municipalities with limited roads, infrastructure, connectivity, and access tend to experience an increase in illicit crops [2830].

Fig 4 illustrates the spatial distribution of the constructed indices and the homicide rate, revealing the spatial non-stationarity of these characteristics in the state of Nariño. The distributions of the indices EPI, ECI, HCI, PSCI, VI, and the HOMI variable exhibit a consistent spatial pattern from northwest to southeast, dividing the state into two segments. The southeastern part comprises municipalities with favorable living conditions and economic development, while the northwestern part faces social and economic fragility. The EI index demonstrates a distinctive spatial distribution, indicating a prevalence of municipalities with low economic performance, except for Potosi and Pasto, the capital of Nariño. The spatial distribution of MI (Fig 3h) summarizes the behavior of these indices, reinforcing the observed division and emphasizing the socioeconomic inequality prevalent in the state of Nariño.

Fig 4. Spatial distribution of the indices and HOMI.

Fig 4

The color bar to the right of the maps shows the values of each one.

3.2 Spatial econometric model

Initially, a global regression model (Ordinary Least Square) as a benchmark, performance comparison and attribute selection were applied. Table 3 shows the results of the global and GWR models: significant estimated coefficients, variance inflation (VIF), the R2, adjusted R2 and residual sum of squares. According to these results, two variables were significant in explaining cocaine production in the state of Nariño: EPI and HOMI. Collinearity was tested by analyzing the VIF, with values below the common threshold, indicating no multicollinearity issue.

Table 3. Global and local model results.

Response Variable: Coca
Explanatory Variables OLS coefficient estimates Summary of GWR coefficient estimates VIF
Min Median Max
EPI - 0.025 ** - 0.031 - 0.003 0.022 1.130
HOMI 0.026 *** 0.002 0.023 0.048 1.130
Model statistics
R2 0.468 0.647
Adjusted R2 0.450 0.539
Residual sum of squares 0.006 0.004

Notes:

**p<0.001,

***p<0.0001;

VIF = Variance Inflation Factors.

The estimated coefficients in both global and local models were consistent with their expected signs. Assessing goodness-of-fit measures, R2 and adjusted R2 in the GWR notably improved from 0.468 and 0.450 to 0.647 and 0.539, respectively. The analysis of residuals (sum of squares residuals) indicated a superior fit in the GWR. Moreover, the examination of spatial variation in the explanatory power of the model revealed notable improvements (spatial distribution not presented in the paper). The comparative results underscored that the explanatory power of the local regression model was significantly higher than that of the global regression model, which is consistent with the results of the reviewed studies.

Undoubtedly, the most important results of the modeling reside in the estimated local coefficients of each of the explanatory variables. These coefficients provide a means to comprehend the spatial variation visually and analytically in the influence of each variable on cocaine production. The spatial distribution of the parameter estimates, and their significance are shown in Fig 5. According to these spatial distributions and based on the descriptive statistics (Min, Median, Max) of the local estimates of the GWR coefficients (Table 3), there are significant variations in the relationships between the two independent variables (EPI and HOMI) and cocaine production in the State of Nariño.

Fig 5. Spatial distribution of GWR coefficients and their significances.

Fig 5

The negative sign of the estimated coefficients on the EPI variable (Fig 4a) is expected and it indicates that there is an inverse relationship between EPI and cocaine production (although a change in the sign of the EPI coefficients is observable, it lacks significance). This correlation is consistent with findings in existing literature, indicating that cocaine crop production tends to decrease with higher levels of education [28,3133]. Notably, this relationship is not uniform across all municipalities (Fig 5a), and the effect of EPI is more pronounced and statistically significant in a considerable number of municipalities in the state of Nariño (Fig 5b). The region where this relationship holds significance corresponds to municipalities exhibiting low educational performance (Fig 4a), coinciding with the area of high cocaine production (Fig 3) and representing the less developed part of the state, as illustrated by the spatial distribution of the MI (Fig 4h). This pattern can be attributed to a demand that surpasses the educational resources in this zone, characterized by difficult access (distant from the capital city of Nariño). Consequently, some municipalities lack the necessary infrastructure for providing educational services and often face a shortage of qualified educators, leaving numerous young individuals susceptible to engaging in activities such as cocaine production.

Finally, Fig 5c reveals a direct and spatially non-uniform correlation between the homicide rate and cocaine production. This finding aligns with the outcomes of previous studies that highlight a positive connection between increased illicit crop cultivation in regions marked by security issues and a limited government presence [31,3439]. Specifically in Colombia, the evidence indicates that, on average, the homicide rate tends to rise in municipalities with cocaine cultivation since 2015 [36,40,41].

Nevertheless, the impact of the homicide rate on cocaine production does not demonstrate significance uniformly across all municipalities in the state of Nariño. Fig 5d delineates the municipalities where the association is statistically significant at a 95% confidence level. Notably, it is evident that municipalities primarily situated in the northwest of the state exhibit a substantial and statistically significant correlation between the homicide rate and cocaine cultivation. This region corresponds to municipalities characterized by elevated homicide rates (Fig 4g) aligning with the areas of heightened cocaine production (Fig 3). Thus, the findings of this study corroborate the assertions of the referenced authors, affirming that municipalities with elevated homicide rates also exhibit increased cocaine cultivation.

4. Conclusions

The SDGs serve as a crucial framework for tackling global imbalances and striving toward a more inclusive and sustainable future. However, entrenched socioeconomic disparities pose a substantial challenge to realizing these objectives. To inform the design and implementation of comprehensive solutions addressing the root causes of inequality and fostering sustainable and just development, this study quantified and spatially analyzed the socioeconomic and territorial conditions of municipalities in the state of Nariño, one of the most unequal and least developed states in Colombia. The initial segment of this article employed statistical methodologies to construct diverse composite indices. Subsequently, in the latter part of the study, an econometric analysis was conducted utilizing these indices and additional variables, such as the homicide rate and road infrastructure to elucidate their potential role in explaining cocaine production across the municipalities.

The DL2 was used to create the indices. These indices were combined to build a single index called MI, serving as a comprehensive summary that encapsulates the information encompassed by the individual indices. The spatial distributions of all the indices reveal a discernible spatial heterogeneity in social and economic inequality. This spatial diversity substantiates the existing disparities in opportunities among municipalities, indicating that their populations do not experience optimal conditions and lack basic capabilities such as education, health, and public services, as per the framework outlined by [42,43]. The observed spatial pattern distinctly divides the state into two zones: one exhibiting favorable social and economic conditions (Southeast) and another manifesting suboptimal performance (Northwest). The delineated spatial heterogeneity provides valuable insights for the formulation of targeted public policies and the implementation of programs aimed at enhancing the overall quality of life for the populace.

The econometric analysis employed both global and local regression methodologies. Initial application of global regression served a dual purpose: variable selection based on significance and as a benchmark for comparison. Two variables, EPI and HOMI, emerged as statistically significant. Subsequently, GWR was employed to delve into the spatial nuances of the relationship between cocaine production and the inherent characteristics of each municipality. The findings indicated that GWR outperformed global regression in explaining cocaine production in the state of Nariño. This suggests that all estimated parameters exhibit a discernible spatial variation pattern, enabling nuanced conclusions specific to each municipality.

The anticipated type of dependence between cocaine production and the two explanatory variables, EPI and HOMI, manifested as expected: negative for EPI and positive for HOMI. However, the impact of these variables on cocaine production did not achieve significance across all spatial units within the study area. GWR mapping results illustrated municipalities in the northwestern part of the state exhibiting a noteworthy correlation between cocaine cultivation issues and education as well as homicide cases. These outcomes align with the findings of the [16], highlighting a consistent rise in cocaine cultivation in this region over the past decade. The report identifies various factors contributing to this increase, some of which are related to EPI and HOMI, including the heightened global demand for cocaine, expectations stemming from peace agreements, an increase in illegal drug trafficking actors, the persistence of territorial vulnerability, and heightened incentives for cocaine production.

This study provides evidence suggesting a close relationship between socioeconomic conditions and the spatial distribution of coca cultivation in the state of Nariño, Colombia. The results support the social marginalization theory by showing that areas with high poverty and exclusion have a higher concentration of illicit crops, suggesting that the lack of access to basic services and economic opportunities creates a favorable environment for the informal economy and activities related to drug trafficking. This finding is consistent with social capital theory, as it indicates that the lack of social cohesion in these communities could limit the effectiveness of development programs that seek to replace coca cultivation. Based on the theory of conflict economics, the results also indicate that socioeconomic factors in Nariño not only influence coca cultivation but are also related to conflict dynamics in areas where coca cultivation is controlled by illegal armed groups. This conflict-prone environment, in combination with social marginalization and lack of social capital, contributes to the perpetuation of dependence on coca cultivation as the main livelihood in certain areas.

In addition, the results suggest that illicit crop reduction policies must be adapted to the specific conditions of each area and cannot be uniform. Intervention in Nariño requires a comprehensive approach that addresses socioeconomic conditions and improves community cohesion to facilitate viable and sustainable economic alternatives. Limitations of this study include the lack of detailed local data on social capital and armed group activity, which could enrich the analysis in future research.

In conclusion, this study helps to understand how socioeconomic conditions affect the distribution of coca cultivation in Nariño, underscoring the importance of specific interventions that consider the particular social and economic dynamics of the region. Public policies should be designed in a way that not only addresses socioeconomic conditions, but also promotes the strengthening of social capital and the reduction of armed conflict, creating an environment more conducive to sustainable development and peace.

Data Availability

The data supporting the findings of this study are publicly available in PONE-Narino-2024 and can be accessed through the following link: https://github.com/amtapia/PONE-Narino-2024.

Funding Statement

The first author (Andres) received specific funding for this work from Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Colombia. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.United Nations. The Sustainable Development Goals Report. 2016.
  • 2.World Bank. Índice de Gini—Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income), Colombia. https://datos.bancomundial.org/indicador/SI.POV.GINI?locations=XJ-CO. Published 2023.
  • 3.DANE. Necesidades Básicas Insatisfechas (NBI). https://www.dane.gov.co/index.php/estadisticas-por-tema/pobreza-y-condiciones-de-vida/necesidades-basicas-insatisfechas-nbi. Published 2021.
  • 4.MINSALUD. Indicadores básicos de salud 2022. Published 2022.
  • 5.PCC, University of Rosario. Departmental Competitiveness Index for Colombia. Published 2023.
  • 6.UNODC. Sistema Integrado de Monitoreo de Cultivos Ilícitos (SIMCI), Monitoreo de territorios afectados por cultivos ilícitos Colombia 2022. Published 2023.
  • 7.Restrepo P, Vargas JF. Coca and conflict in Colombia: A spatial analysis. J Dev Econ. 2015; 114: 193–211. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Dube O, Vargas JF. Commodity price shocks and civil conflict: Evidence from Colombia. Rev Econ Stud. 2013; 80(4): 1384–1421. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Acemoglu D, García-Jimeno C, Robinson JA. State capacity and economic development: A network approach. Am Econ Rev. 2015; 105(8): 2364–2409. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Özcan B, Bjørnskov C. Social trust and economic development: A meta-analysis. Public Choice. 2018; 176(3–4): 383–413. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sen A. Nuevo examen de la desigualdad. S. Comercial Grupo ANAYA; 1999.
  • 12.Justino P. Social exclusion and poverty: A multidimensional perspective. J Dev Stud. 2016; 52(10): 1383–1400. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Acosta Puertas J, Misión Futuro, U. AL. Where the future of investment is green. Investigación en Nariño, visión de desarrollo productivo para Colombia. 2020.
  • 14.ACNUDH. Violencia Territorial en Colombia: Recomendaciones para el Nuevo Gobierno. 2022.
  • 15.OCHA. Tendencias e Impacto Humanitario en Colombia 2023. 2023.
  • 16.UNODC. Sistema Integrado de Monitoreo de Cultivos Ilícitos (SIMCI), Monitoreo de territorios afectados por cultivos ilícitos 2021. 2022.
  • 17.UNOAA, ADR. Plan integral de desarrollo agropecuario y rural con enfoque territorial (PIDARET), tomo II. Departamento de Nariño. 2019.
  • 18.Openstreetmap.org. Colaboradores de OpenStreetMap. Base de datos OpenStreetMap [PostgreSQL vía API]. Fundación OpenStreetMap: Cambridge, Reino Unido; 2021 [consultado entre julio y diciembre de 2023]. © Colaboradores de OpenStreetMap. Disponible bajo la licencia Open Database en: openstreetmap.org. Minería de datos mediante Overpass turbo. Disponible en overpass-turbo.eu.
  • 19.Jiménez-Fernández E, Sánchez A, Ortega-Pérez M. Dealing with weighting scheme in composite indicators: An unsupervised distance-machine learning proposal for quantitative data. Socio-Econ Plann Sci. 2022;83:101339. doi: 10.1016/j.seps.2022.101339 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Sharma G, Patil GR. Spatial and social inequities for educational services accessibility—A case study for schools in Greater Mumbai. Cities. 2022;122:103543. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103543 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Brunsdon C, Fotheringham AS, Charlton ME. Geographically weighted regression: a method for exploring spatial nonstationarity. Geogr Anal. 1996;28(4):281–298. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-4632.1996.tb00936.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Brunsdon C, Fotheringham ASF, Charlton M. Geographically weighted summary statistics—a framework for localised exploratory data analysis. Comput Environ Urban Syst. 2002. www.elsevier.com/locate/compenvurbsys.
  • 23.Fotheringham AS, Brunsdon C, Charlton M. Geographically weighted regression: the analysis of spatially varying relationships. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2002. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Gollini I, Lu B, Charlton M, Brunsdon C, Harris P. GWmodel: an R Package for Exploring Spatial Heterogeneity using Geographically Weighted Models. http://arxiv.org/abs/1306.0413. 2013.
  • 25.Harris P, Clarke A, Juggins S, Brunsdon C, Charlton M. Enhancements to a geographically weighted principal component analysis in the context of an application to an environmental data set. Geogr Anal. 2015;47(2):146–172. doi: 10.1111/gean.12048 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Sepúlveda Murillo FH, Chica Olmo J, Soto Builes NM. Spatial variability analysis of quality of life and its determinants: A case study of Medellín, Colombia. Soc Indic Res. 2019;144(3):1233–1256. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2023. https://www.R-project.org/.
  • 28.Davalos E. New answers to an old problem: Social investment and coca crops in Colombia. Int J Drug Policy. 2016;31:121–130. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.02.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Rincón Ruiz A, Pascual U, Romero M. An exploratory spatial analysis of illegal coca cultivation in Colombia using local indicators of spatial association and socioecological variables. Ecol Indic. 2013;34:103–112. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Zuleta H. Coca, cocaína y narcotráfico. http://economia.uniandes.edu.co. 2017.
  • 31.Dávalos E, Dávalos LM. Social Investment and Smallholder Coca Cultivation in Colombia. J Dev Stud. 2020;56(6):1118–1140. doi: 10.1080/00220388.2019.1650167 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Garcia-Yi J. Heterogeneous motivations for coca growing: The case of an indigenous Aymara community in Peru. Int J Drug Policy. 2014;25(6):1113–1123. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2014.05.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Vargas GA, Restrepo-Jaramillo N. Child Soldiering in Colombia: Does Poverty Matter? Civil Wars. 2016;18(4):467–487. doi: 10.1080/13698249.2017.1297051 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Jiménez-García WG, Arenas-Valencia W, Bohorquez-Bedoya N. Violent Drug Markets: Relation between Homicide, Drug Trafficking and Socioeconomic Disadvantages: A Test of Contingent Causation in Pereira, Colombia. Soc Sci. 2023;12(2):54. doi: 10.3390/socsci12020054 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kronick D. Profits and Violence in Illegal Markets: Evidence from Venezuela. J Confl Resolut. 2020;64(7–8):1499–1523. doi: 10.1177/0022002719898881 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Martinez Ferro T, Zuleta H. Cultivos de Coca y Violencia: El cambio después de iniciados los diálogos de paz. http://economia.uniandes.edu.co. 2019.
  • 37.Raffo López L, Castro AJ, España Díaz A. Apuntes del Cenes. Apuntes Del Cenes. 2016;35:207–236. Available from: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=479555352008. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Rocha R, Martínez H. Coca en Colombia- efecto balón, vulnerabilidad e integralidad de políticas. DNP Arch Econ. 2015. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Silveira Neto R da M, Firmino Costa da Silva D, Cavalcanti FM. The spatial association between drugs and urban violence: an analysis for the Metropolitan Region of Recife, Brazil. Spat Econ Anal. 2023;18(4):486–506. doi: 10.1080/17421772.2023.2186474 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Arias Barrera CJ, Nuñez Gómez NA, Muñoz Velasco LA. Cultivos de Coca: Economía y Violencia en Municipios de Colombia 2012–2019. ECONÓMICAS CUC. 2022;44(1):9–30. doi: 10.17981/econcuc.44.1.2023.econ.3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Garzón J, Gélvez J, Bernal J. ¿En qué va la sustitución de cultivos ilícitos? Desafíos, dilemas actuales y la urgencia de un consenso. Fundación Ideas Para la Paz; 2019. Technical Report.
  • 42.Nussbaum MC. Philosophy and Economics in the Capabilities Approach: An Essential Dialogue. J Hum Dev Capabilities. 2015;16(1):1–14. doi: 10.1080/19452829.2014.983890 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Nussbaum MC. Introduction: Aspiration and the Capabilities List. J Hum Dev Capabilities. 2016;17(3):301–308. doi: 10.1080/19452829.2016.1200789 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Martin Ramirez-Urquidy

16 Oct 2024

PONE-D-24-24934Spatial Analysis of Socioeconomic Data and its Relationship with Illicit Crops in Nariño-ColombiaPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Sepúlveda-Murillo,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

The reviewers have opposing opinion on the merits of the paper. On the one hand, reviewer 1 suggests that the paper provides valuable insights into the complex relationship between socioeconomic factors and cocaine cultivation, and its findings have important implications for policy-making in Colombia. I do agree with reviewer 1´s appreciation. However, reviewer 2 rises some concerns of the paper and provides feedback. I am biased to a Major revision decision, because I think the paper has merits. I find some strengths but I agree with reviewer 2 in some respects. In particular I think the paper lacks of a theoretical background which is hindering the model specification and interpretation of results. You might address this and other concerns in the review, which would improve the paper substantially.      When reviewing the comments made by the reviewers, I note that reviewer 2 has used some unprofessional language that fall below the expected standards for professional conduct and communication at PLOS ONE. Please accept our apologies and be assured that this has been escalated to the Editorial Office. 

Please submit your revised manuscript by Nov 30 2024 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Martin Ramirez-Urquidy, PhD. Economics

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

1. When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. We note that the grant information you provided in the ‘Funding Information’ and ‘Financial Disclosure’ sections do not match. 

When you resubmit, please ensure that you provide the correct grant numbers for the awards you received for your study in the ‘Funding Information’ section.

3. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure: 

The first author (Andres) received specific funding for this work from Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Colombia.

Please state what role the funders took in the study.  If the funders had no role, please state: "The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript." 

If this statement is not correct you must amend it as needed. 

Please include this amended Role of Funder statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

4. When completing the data availability statement of the submission form, you indicated that you will make your data available on acceptance. We strongly recommend all authors decide on a data sharing plan before acceptance, as the process can be lengthy and hold up publication timelines. Please note that, though access restrictions are acceptable now, your entire data will need to be made freely accessible if your manuscript is accepted for publication. This policy applies to all data except where public deposition would breach compliance with the protocol approved by your research ethics board. If you are unable to adhere to our open data policy, please kindly revise your statement to explain your reasoning and we will seek the editor's input on an exemption. Please be assured that, once you have provided your new statement, the assessment of your exemption will not hold up the peer review process.

5. We note that Figures 1, 3 and 4 in your submission contain map images which may be copyrighted. All PLOS content is published under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which means that the manuscript, images, and Supporting Information files will be freely available online, and any third party is permitted to access, download, copy, distribute, and use these materials in any way, even commercially, with proper attribution. For these reasons, we cannot publish previously copyrighted maps or satellite images created using proprietary data, such as Google software (Google Maps, Street View, and Earth). For more information, see our copyright guidelines: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/licenses-and-copyright.

We require you to either present written permission from the copyright holder to publish these figures specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license, or remove the figures from your submission:

a. You may seek permission from the original copyright holder of Figures 1, 3 and 4 to publish the content specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license.  

We recommend that you contact the original copyright holder with the Content Permission Form (http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=7c09/content-permission-form.pdf) and the following text:

“I request permission for the open-access journal PLOS ONE to publish XXX under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CCAL) CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Please be aware that this license allows unrestricted use and distribution, even commercially, by third parties. Please reply and provide explicit written permission to publish XXX under a CC BY license and complete the attached form.”

Please upload the completed Content Permission Form or other proof of granted permissions as an "Other" file with your submission.

In the figure caption of the copyrighted figure, please include the following text: “Reprinted from [ref] under a CC BY license, with permission from [name of publisher], original copyright [original copyright year].”

b. If you are unable to obtain permission from the original copyright holder to publish these figures under the CC BY 4.0 license or if the copyright holder’s requirements are incompatible with the CC BY 4.0 license, please either i) remove the figure or ii) supply a replacement figure that complies with the CC BY 4.0 license. Please check copyright information on all replacement figures and update the figure caption with source information. If applicable, please specify in the figure caption text when a figure is similar but not identical to the original image and is therefore for illustrative purposes only.

The following resources for replacing copyrighted map figures may be helpful:

USGS National Map Viewer (public domain): http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/

The Gateway to Astronaut Photography of Earth (public domain): http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/sseop/clickmap/

Maps at the CIA (public domain): https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/index.html and https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/cia-maps-publications/index.html

NASA Earth Observatory (public domain): http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/

Landsat: http://landsat.visibleearth.nasa.gov/

USGS EROS (Earth Resources Observatory and Science (EROS) Center) (public domain): http://eros.usgs.gov/#

Natural Earth (public domain): http://www.naturalearthdata.com/

Additional Editor Comments:

The reviewers have opposing opinion on the merits of the paper. On the one hand, reviewer 1 suggests that the paper provides valuable insights into the complex relationship between socioeconomic factors and cocaine cultivation, and its findings have important implications for policy-making in Colombia. I do agree with reviewer 1´s appreciation. However, reviewer 2 rises some concerns of the paper and provides feedback. I am biased to a Major revision decision, because I think the paper has merits. I find some strengths but I agree with reviewer 2 in some respects. In particular I think the paper lacks of a theoretical background which is hindering the model specification and interpretation of results. You might address this and other concerns in the review, which would improve the paper substantially.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: This research article examines the spatial disparities in socioeconomic conditions in Nariño, Colombia, and their relationship with cocaine cultivation. The study uses various socioeconomic variables and constructs composite indices to analyze the spatial distribution of these conditions. It employs Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR) to model the spatial non-stationarity of factors influencing cocaine production.

The study identifies education and homicide rate as significant factors influencing cocaine cultivation. It reveals a strong relationship between low education levels and high levels of cocaine cultivation, particularly in the less developed northwestern part of Nariño. The study also finds a positive correlation between homicide rate and cocaine production, mainly in the northwestern region.

The authors suggest that implementing public policies aimed at improving education and social investment in Nariño would be instrumental in mitigating socioeconomic disparities and reducing cocaine cultivation.

The key points of this research can be summarized as:

- The study used a combination of methods to analyze the spatial patterns of socioeconomic disparities and their relationship with cocaine cultivation in Nariño, Colombia.

- It found that socioeconomic conditions vary significantly across different parts of the state.

- The study highlights the important role of education and homicide rate in influencing cocaine cultivation.

- The authors suggest that targeted interventions are needed to address the issue of socioeconomic disparities and illicit crop cultivation in the region.

This study provides valuable insights into the complex relationship between socioeconomic factors and cocaine cultivation, and its findings have important implications for policy-making in Colombia.

Reviewer #2: The manuscript would greatly benefit from a native English speaker's proofreading, as it is crucial to ensure the accuracy and clarity of your work.

Ensuring the coherence of your document is of utmost importance. I advise you to focus on a single research question, as the current ones lack a cohesive thread. This will significantly improve the readability and quality of your manuscript.

In section 3.1, the authors refer to a figure displayed six pages before.

There is a pressing concern about constructing indices with data from different years. Authors should promptly address this issue, which could be included in a footnote, to ensure the accuracy and reliability of your work.

There is no mention of the spatial weight matrix used for GWR.

It is unclear why the authors excluded the rest of the regressors and considered EPI and HOMI. They mention selecting variables based on significance; however, a theoretical background should support them.

Conclusions are poor and tedious. This section seems to be an extension of the results section because none of the results is linked to theory or some context. An isolated paragraph mentioning the need for public policy to increase investment in education lacks sense because no documentation in the manuscript supports this affirmation. The authors do not provide data on education investment or something that carries on that idea.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2025 Jan 2;20(1):e0316709. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316709.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


28 Nov 2024

General comment from the authors:

First, we would like to thank the editor and reviewers for their insightful comments, which have greatly contributed to improving our paper.

In what follows, we provide a point-by-point explanation of how we revised the paper to address the issues raised by the reviewers. If the paper still needs improving, we would be very grateful if you would let us know, and we will immediately revise it again.

Editor Comments:

The reviewers have opposing opinion on the merits of the paper. On the one hand, reviewer 1 suggests that the paper provides valuable insights into the complex relationship between socioeconomic factors and cocaine cultivation, and its findings have important implications for policy-making in Colombia. I do agree with reviewer 1´s appreciation. However, reviewer 2 rises some concerns of the paper and provides feedback. I am biased to a Major revision decision, because I think the paper has merits. I find some strengths but I agree with reviewer 2 in some respects. In particular I think the paper lacks of a theoretical background which is hindering the model specification and interpretation of results. You might address this and other concerns in the review, which would improve the paper substantially.

Response:

Thanks for your recommendation.

We have revised the introduction to follow a typical academic structure for a research article, providing a clearer overview, a justification of the study, a precise formulation of the research question, and a theoretical framework to support the analysis.

Moreover, in the new version of the article you can see the other changes introduced throughout the document.

Response to Reviewers' Questions

Reviewer 1

1. ¿Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

Response:

We have made efforts to ensure that the manuscript is presented in an intelligible manner. We have focused on clarity in both writing and structure, organizing the content in a logical and coherent way to facilitate reader comprehension. Additionally, we have carefully reviewed the text to eliminate ambiguities and improve flow, so that the main ideas and findings are conveyed clearly and accessibly.

On the other hand, we acknowledge the importance of clear and accurate language, and we have taken steps to ensure this by having the manuscript thoroughly reviewed by a native English speaker. This review was conducted to refine the text for clarity, coherence, and precision, addressing any potential language nuances to ensure that our findings are communicated as effectively as possible. We trust that these efforts will contribute to the overall quality and readability of our work.

Reviewer 2

1. ¿Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

Response:

We have made the necessary adjustments to ensure that the manuscript meets technical and scientific standards in terms of methodology, analysis, and accuracy. We have reviewed and refined our methods to guarantee that they are robust and rigorous, and we have carefully validated the data to ensure its correct use and interpretation. These improvements have been implemented to uphold the highest standards of technical quality and scientific integrity throughout the manuscript.

Regarding the second question, the conclusions of the manuscript are fully supported by the data presented in the results. We have carefully ensured that the analysis is consistent with the data, and the interpretation of the findings directly aligns with the evidence provided. No conclusions have been drawn beyond what the data can substantiate, and we have made sure to highlight the key patterns and relationships that emerged from the results.

2. ¿Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Response:

The statistical analysis was developed under a rigorous methodological approach, following standard practices in quantitative research to ensure the validity and reliability of the results. The step-by-step approach we followed for the statistical analysis is explicitly outlined in session 2, the methodology. This rigorous approach ensures that the findings are statistically sound and useful for decision making in policy development and illicit crop control in Nariño.

3. ¿Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

Response:

We have made efforts to ensure that the manuscript is presented in an intelligible manner. We have focused on clarity in both writing and structure, organizing the content in a logical and coherent way to facilitate reader comprehension. Additionally, we have carefully reviewed the text to eliminate ambiguities and improve flow, so that the main ideas and findings are conveyed clearly and accessibly.

On the other hand, we acknowledge the importance of clear and accurate language, and we have taken steps to ensure this by having the manuscript thoroughly reviewed by a native English speaker. This review was conducted to refine the text for clarity, coherence, and precision, addressing any potential language nuances to ensure that our findings are communicated as effectively as possible. We trust that these efforts will contribute to the overall quality and readability of our work.

Response to Reviewers' Comments

Reviewer 2

1. The manuscript would greatly benefit from a native English speaker's proofreading, as it is crucial to ensure the accuracy and clarity of your work.

Response:

Thank you very much for your suggestion. We acknowledge the importance of clear and accurate language, and we have taken steps to ensure this by having the manuscript thoroughly reviewed by a native English speaker. This review was conducted to refine the text for clarity, coherence, and precision, addressing any potential language nuances to ensure that our findings are communicated as effectively as possible. We trust that these efforts will contribute to the overall quality and readability of our work.

2. Ensuring the coherence of your document is of utmost importance. I advise you to focus on a single research question, as the current ones lack a cohesive thread. This will significantly improve the readability and quality of your manuscript.

Response:

Thanks for this recommendation.

As you see in the new introduction we have posed a single research question. This question allows to explore how socioeconomic factors affect coca cultivation in different areas, which gives you scope to analyze the spatial distribution of socioeconomic conditions, identify specific determinants, and observe the consistency of the impact in different areas. Our new question is:

¿To what extent does the spatial distribution of socioeconomic conditions explain cocaine cultivation patterns in the state of Nariño?

3. In section 3.1, the authors refer to a figure displayed six pages before.

Response:

Thanks for the recommendation, we add one figure show the ubication of Nariño and another figure show the cocaine spatial distribution and road over the state.

4. There is a pressing concern about constructing indices with data from different years. Authors should promptly address this issue, which could be included in a footnote, to ensure the accuracy and reliability of your work.

Response:

Some, but not all, databases differ in the year of collection, for a fundamental reason, they are databases that come from different sources of information and these sources make their collection at different times. Not all databases of this nature are collected in the same year for our country. However, they are data that do not differ by more than two years, except for Percentage of people formally employed as a percentage of total population which is from 2016. There are a large number of papers in the literature that have this problem.

Moreover, the submission guidelines of the Plos One journal are not permitted the footnotes, but we have added one sencence clarifying this point in the last part of section 2.1.

5. There is no mention of the spatial weight matrix used for GWR.

Response:

As you recommended, we have added one more paragraph in section 2.2.2 (Econometric models) on coefficient estimation where we have mentioned the spatial weight matrix used.

6. It is unclear why the authors excluded the rest of the regressors and considered EPI and HOMI. They mention selecting variables based on significance; however, a theoretical background should support them.

Response:

Although the variables involved in the study were supported by the literature reviewed, given their possible influence on the dynamics of illicit crops. This does not imply that all of them explain coca production for the state of Nariño. It is well known that the study of phenomena of this type is characterized by the existence of spatial heterogeneity; therefore, a variable that may be significant for any other part of the world may not be so for our study area.

Therefore, and in response to your observation, the variables that were finally included in the model were those that were found to be significant using OLR statistical theory.

7. Conclusions are poor and tedious. This section seems to be an extension of the results section because none of the results is linked to theory or some context. An isolated paragraph mentioning the need for public policy to increase investment in education lacks sense because no documentation in the manuscript supports this affirmation. The authors do not provide data on education investment or something that carries on that idea.

Response:

Thanks for this observation.

We have rewritten the conclusions section. The conclusions now include a deeper analysis linked to the theories applied and the recommendations suggested, offering a theoretical and contextualized approach, in accordance with the results of the study. This approach allows the conclusions to be not only an extension of the results, but a grounded interpretation that links the findings to the socioeconomic context of Nariño.

On the other hand, when the need for public policies to increase investment in education is mentioned, it is from the point of view of our econometric modeling results, where the relationship of the EPI variable and coca are significant and with a negative sign, indicating that there is a negative relationship between these two variables. This correlation is consistent with existing literature findings, which indicate that cocaine crop production tends to decrease with higher levels of education (Davalos, 2016; Dávalos & Dávalos, 2020; Dávalos et al., 2016; Garcia-Yi, 2014; Vargas & Restrepo-Jaramillo, 2016). And therefore, it is true that we do not provide data on investment in education, since that is not the objective of the article.

Journal Requirements

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming.

Response:

Sure, we updated our manuscript with the guidelines of style and format.

2. We note that the grant information you provided in the ‘Funding Information’ and ‘Financial Disclosure’ sections do not match. When you resubmit, please ensure that you provide the correct grant numbers for the awards you received for your study in the ‘Funding Information’ section.

Response:

We accepted the recommendation. This information was completed in the resubmission form.

We changed: The first author (Andres) received specific funding for this work from Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Colombia.

For: AG is supported by Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Colombia grant BPIN 2020000100601

3. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure:

The first author (Andres) received specific funding for this work from Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Colombia.

Please state what role the funders took in the study. If the funders had no role, please state: "The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript."

If this statement is not correct you must amend it as needed.

Please include this amended Role of Funder statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

Response:

Thank you, the statement: "The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript." is correct for us.

4. When completing the data availability statement of the submission form, you indicated that you will make your data available on acceptance. We strongly recommend all authors decide on a data sharing plan before acceptance, as the process can be lengthy and hold up publication timelines. Please note that, though access restrictions are acceptable now, your entire data will need to be made freely accessible if your manuscript is accepted for publication. This policy applies to all data except where public deposition would breach compliance with the protocol approved by your research ethics board. If you are unable to adhere to our open data policy, please kindly revise your statement to explain your reasoning and we will seek the editor's input on an exemption. Please be assured that, once you have provided your new statement, the assessment of your exemption will not hold up the peer review process.

Response:

We are agree with the recommendation, we will share our data following the next plan: Once the article is accepted, the data will be publicly available in an open account of the repository called GitHub, the link will be provided in the section of the article called Supporting information or data availability.

5. We note that Figures 1, 3 and 4 in your submission contain map images which may be copyrighted. All PLOS content is published under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which means that the manuscript, images, and Supporting Information files will be freely available online, and any third party is permitted to access, download, copy, distribute, and use these materials in any way, even commercially, with proper attribution.

Response:

We declared these figures (maps) are of our own creation, created from the results of statistical analysis of this work.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

pone.0316709.s001.docx (27.9KB, docx)

Decision Letter 1

Martin Ramirez-Urquidy

17 Dec 2024

Spatial Analysis of Socioeconomic Data and its Relationship with Illicit Crops in Nariño-Colombia

PONE-D-24-24934R1

Dear Dr. Sepúlveda-Murillo,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice will be generated when your article is formally accepted. Please note, if your institution has a publishing partnership with PLOS and your article meets the relevant criteria, all or part of your publication costs will be covered. Please make sure your user information is up-to-date by logging into Editorial Manager at Editorial Manager® and clicking the ‘Update My Information' link at the top of the page. If you have any questions relating to publication charges, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Martin Ramirez-Urquidy, PhD. Economics

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Martin Ramirez-Urquidy

21 Dec 2024

PONE-D-24-24934R1

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Sepúlveda-Murillo,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

If revisions are needed, the production department will contact you directly to resolve them. If no revisions are needed, you will receive an email when the publication date has been set. At this time, we do not offer pre-publication proofs to authors during production of the accepted work. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few weeks to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Martin Ramirez-Urquidy

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Attachment

Submitted filename: pone.0316709.docx

pone.0316709.s002.docx (175.5KB, docx)

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    pone.0316709.s001.docx (27.9KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: pone.0316709.docx

    pone.0316709.s002.docx (175.5KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    The data supporting the findings of this study are publicly available in PONE-Narino-2024 and can be accessed through the following link: https://github.com/amtapia/PONE-Narino-2024.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES