Skip to main content
PMC home page
The EMBO Journal logoLink to The EMBO Journal
. 1997 Feb 3;16(3):555–565. doi: 10.1093/emboj/16.3.555

Histone acetyltransferase activity and interaction with ADA2 are critical for GCN5 function in vivo.

R Candau 1, J X Zhou 1, C D Allis 1, S L Berger 1
PMCID: PMC1169659  PMID: 9034338

Abstract

Yeast GCN5 is one component of a putative adaptor complex that includes ADA2 and ADA3 and functionally connects DNA-bound transcriptional activators with general transcription factors. GCN5 possesses histone acetyltransferase (HAT) activity, conceptually linking transcriptional activation with enzymatic modification at chromatin. We have identified the minimal catalytic domain within GCN5 necessary to confer HAT activity and have shown that in vivo activity of GCN5 requires this domain. However, complementation of growth and transcriptional activation in gcn5- cells required not only the HAT domain of GCN5, but also interaction with ADA2. The bromodomain in GCN5 was dispensable for HAT activity and for transcriptional activation by strong activators; however, it was required for full complementation in other assays. Fusion of GCN5 to the bacterial lexA DNA binding domain activated transcription in vivo, and required both the HAT domain and the ADA2 interaction domain. These results suggest that both functions of GCN5, HAT activity and interaction with ADA2, are necessary for targeting and acetylation of nucleosomal histones.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (573.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barlev N. A., Candau R., Wang L., Darpino P., Silverman N., Berger S. L. Characterization of physical interactions of the putative transcriptional adaptor, ADA2, with acidic activation domains and TATA-binding protein. J Biol Chem. 1995 Aug 18;270(33):19337–19344. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.33.19337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Berger S. L., Cress W. D., Cress A., Triezenberg S. J., Guarente L. Selective inhibition of activated but not basal transcription by the acidic activation domain of VP16: evidence for transcriptional adaptors. Cell. 1990 Jun 29;61(7):1199–1208. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90684-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Berger S. L., Piña B., Silverman N., Marcus G. A., Agapite J., Regier J. L., Triezenberg S. J., Guarente L. Genetic isolation of ADA2: a potential transcriptional adaptor required for function of certain acidic activation domains. Cell. 1992 Jul 24;70(2):251–265. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90100-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brent R., Ptashne M. A eukaryotic transcriptional activator bearing the DNA specificity of a prokaryotic repressor. Cell. 1985 Dec;43(3 Pt 2):729–736. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90246-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brownell J. E., Allis C. D. An activity gel assay detects a single, catalytically active histone acetyltransferase subunit in Tetrahymena macronuclei. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Jul 3;92(14):6364–6368. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.14.6364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Brownell J. E., Allis C. D. Special HATs for special occasions: linking histone acetylation to chromatin assembly and gene activation. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1996 Apr;6(2):176–184. doi: 10.1016/s0959-437x(96)80048-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Brownell J. E., Zhou J., Ranalli T., Kobayashi R., Edmondson D. G., Roth S. Y., Allis C. D. Tetrahymena histone acetyltransferase A: a homolog to yeast Gcn5p linking histone acetylation to gene activation. Cell. 1996 Mar 22;84(6):843–851. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81063-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Candau R., Berger S. L. Structural and functional analysis of yeast putative adaptors. Evidence for an adaptor complex in vivo. J Biol Chem. 1996 Mar 1;271(9):5237–5245. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.9.5237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Candau R., Moore P. A., Wang L., Barlev N., Ying C. Y., Rosen C. A., Berger S. L. Identification of human proteins functionally conserved with the yeast putative adaptors ADA2 and GCN5. Mol Cell Biol. 1996 Feb;16(2):593–602. doi: 10.1128/mcb.16.2.593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Chevray P. M., Nathans D. Protein interaction cloning in yeast: identification of mammalian proteins that react with the leucine zipper of Jun. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Jul 1;89(13):5789–5793. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.13.5789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chrivia J. C., Kwok R. P., Lamb N., Hagiwara M., Montminy M. R., Goodman R. H. Phosphorylated CREB binds specifically to the nuclear protein CBP. Nature. 1993 Oct 28;365(6449):855–859. doi: 10.1038/365855a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Csordas A. On the biological role of histone acetylation. Biochem J. 1990 Jan 1;265(1):23–38. doi: 10.1042/bj2650023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Dynlacht B. D., Hoey T., Tjian R. Isolation of coactivators associated with the TATA-binding protein that mediate transcriptional activation. Cell. 1991 Aug 9;66(3):563–576. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90019-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Farmer G., Bargonetti J., Zhu H., Friedman P., Prywes R., Prives C. Wild-type p53 activates transcription in vitro. Nature. 1992 Jul 2;358(6381):83–86. doi: 10.1038/358083a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Fields S., Jang S. K. Presence of a potent transcription activating sequence in the p53 protein. Science. 1990 Aug 31;249(4972):1046–1049. doi: 10.1126/science.2144363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Georgakopoulos T., Thireos G. Two distinct yeast transcriptional activators require the function of the GCN5 protein to promote normal levels of transcription. EMBO J. 1992 Nov;11(11):4145–4152. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05507.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Gill G., Ptashne M. Negative effect of the transcriptional activator GAL4. Nature. 1988 Aug 25;334(6184):721–724. doi: 10.1038/334721a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Gill G., Tjian R. Eukaryotic coactivators associated with the TATA box binding protein. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1992 Apr;2(2):236–242. doi: 10.1016/s0959-437x(05)80279-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Goodrich J. A., Cutler G., Tjian R. Contacts in context: promoter specificity and macromolecular interactions in transcription. Cell. 1996 Mar 22;84(6):825–830. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81061-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Grunstein M. Nucleosomes: regulators of transcription. Trends Genet. 1990 Dec;6(12):395–400. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(90)90299-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Guarente L. Transcriptional coactivators in yeast and beyond. Trends Biochem Sci. 1995 Dec;20(12):517–521. doi: 10.1016/s0968-0004(00)89120-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Guarente L., Yocum R. R., Gifford P. A GAL10-CYC1 hybrid yeast promoter identifies the GAL4 regulatory region as an upstream site. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982 Dec;79(23):7410–7414. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.23.7410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Haynes S. R., Dollard C., Winston F., Beck S., Trowsdale J., Dawid I. B. The bromodomain: a conserved sequence found in human, Drosophila and yeast proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992 May 25;20(10):2603–2603. doi: 10.1093/nar/20.10.2603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Jackson S. P. The recognition of DNA damage. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1996 Feb;6(1):19–25. doi: 10.1016/s0959-437x(96)90005-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kim Y. J., Björklund S., Li Y., Sayre M. H., Kornberg R. D. A multiprotein mediator of transcriptional activation and its interaction with the C-terminal repeat domain of RNA polymerase II. Cell. 1994 May 20;77(4):599–608. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90221-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kleff S., Andrulis E. D., Anderson C. W., Sternglanz R. Identification of a gene encoding a yeast histone H4 acetyltransferase. J Biol Chem. 1995 Oct 20;270(42):24674–24677. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.42.24674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Kuo M. H., Brownell J. E., Sobel R. E., Ranalli T. A., Cook R. G., Edmondson D. G., Roth S. Y., Allis C. D. Transcription-linked acetylation by Gcn5p of histones H3 and H4 at specific lysines. Nature. 1996 Sep 19;383(6597):269–272. doi: 10.1038/383269a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kwok R. P., Lundblad J. R., Chrivia J. C., Richards J. P., Bächinger H. P., Brennan R. G., Roberts S. G., Green M. R., Goodman R. H. Nuclear protein CBP is a coactivator for the transcription factor CREB. Nature. 1994 Jul 21;370(6486):223–226. doi: 10.1038/370223a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Laurent B. C., Treich I., Carlson M. The yeast SNF2/SWI2 protein has DNA-stimulated ATPase activity required for transcriptional activation. Genes Dev. 1993 Apr;7(4):583–591. doi: 10.1101/gad.7.4.583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Loidl P. Histone acetylation: facts and questions. Chromosoma. 1994 Dec;103(7):441–449. doi: 10.1007/BF00337382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Luo Y., Fujii H., Gerster T., Roeder R. G. A novel B cell-derived coactivator potentiates the activation of immunoglobulin promoters by octamer-binding transcription factors. Cell. 1992 Oct 16;71(2):231–241. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90352-d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Marcus G. A., Horiuchi J., Silverman N., Guarente L. ADA5/SPT20 links the ADA and SPT genes, which are involved in yeast transcription. Mol Cell Biol. 1996 Jun;16(6):3197–3205. doi: 10.1128/mcb.16.6.3197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Marcus G. A., Silverman N., Berger S. L., Horiuchi J., Guarente L. Functional similarity and physical association between GCN5 and ADA2: putative transcriptional adaptors. EMBO J. 1994 Oct 17;13(20):4807–4815. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06806.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Meisterernst M., Roy A. L., Lieu H. M., Roeder R. G. Activation of class II gene transcription by regulatory factors is potentiated by a novel activity. Cell. 1991 Sep 6;66(5):981–993. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90443-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Peterson C. L., Herskowitz I. Characterization of the yeast SWI1, SWI2, and SWI3 genes, which encode a global activator of transcription. Cell. 1992 Feb 7;68(3):573–583. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90192-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Piña B., Berger S., Marcus G. A., Silverman N., Agapite J., Guarente L. ADA3: a gene, identified by resistance to GAL4-VP16, with properties similar to and different from those of ADA2. Mol Cell Biol. 1993 Oct;13(10):5981–5989. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.10.5981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Ptashne M., Gann A. A. Activators and targets. Nature. 1990 Jul 26;346(6282):329–331. doi: 10.1038/346329a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Ptashne M. Gene regulation by proteins acting nearby and at a distance. Nature. 1986 Aug 21;322(6081):697–701. doi: 10.1038/322697a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Ptashne M. How eukaryotic transcriptional activators work. Nature. 1988 Oct 20;335(6192):683–689. doi: 10.1038/335683a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Pugh B. F., Tjian R. Mechanism of transcriptional activation by Sp1: evidence for coactivators. Cell. 1990 Jun 29;61(7):1187–1197. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90683-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Roberts S. M., Winston F. SPT20/ADA5 encodes a novel protein functionally related to the TATA-binding protein and important for transcription in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1996 Jun;16(6):3206–3213. doi: 10.1128/mcb.16.6.3206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Sadowski I., Ma J., Triezenberg S., Ptashne M. GAL4-VP16 is an unusually potent transcriptional activator. Nature. 1988 Oct 6;335(6190):563–564. doi: 10.1038/335563a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Strubin M., Newell J. W., Matthias P. OBF-1, a novel B cell-specific coactivator that stimulates immunoglobulin promoter activity through association with octamer-binding proteins. Cell. 1995 Feb 10;80(3):497–506. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90500-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Taunton J., Hassig C. A., Schreiber S. L. A mammalian histone deacetylase related to the yeast transcriptional regulator Rpd3p. Science. 1996 Apr 19;272(5260):408–411. doi: 10.1126/science.272.5260.408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Triezenberg S. J., Kingsbury R. C., McKnight S. L. Functional dissection of VP16, the trans-activator of herpes simplex virus immediate early gene expression. Genes Dev. 1988 Jun;2(6):718–729. doi: 10.1101/gad.2.6.718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Vidal M., Gaber R. F. RPD3 encodes a second factor required to achieve maximum positive and negative transcriptional states in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Dec;11(12):6317–6327. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.12.6317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Wolffe A. P. Nucleosome positioning and modification: chromatin structures that potentiate transcription. Trends Biochem Sci. 1994 Jun;19(6):240–244. doi: 10.1016/0968-0004(94)90148-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Wolffe A. P., Pruss D. Targeting chromatin disruption: Transcription regulators that acetylate histones. Cell. 1996 Mar 22;84(6):817–819. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81059-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Zawel L., Reinberg D. Common themes in assembly and function of eukaryotic transcription complexes. Annu Rev Biochem. 1995;64:533–561. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.64.070195.002533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The EMBO Journal are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES