Abstract
Background
Adolescents face numerous challenges that influence their sexual behaviors. Among these, bullying victimization is a critical yet understudied factor that may impact engagement in unprotected sex. This study investigated the correlates of condom use among school-going Thai adolescents, with a main focus on bullying victimization.
Methods
This study is a secondary analysis of the Global School-based Student Health Survey (GSHS) conducted in 2021 among a nationally representative sample of students in grades 7–12 in Thailand. The analysis included all the sexually active students with condom use in the last sex as the main outcome variable. Bivariate binary logistic regression analysis was used to examine the odds of using condom across various explanatory variables. Additional adjusted logistic regression models were constructed to examine the association between bullying experiences and condom use while controlling for the potential confounding effect of other explanatory variables.
Results
Among sexually active participants, 416 (69%) reported using condoms in their last sex and more than half of them reported bullying experiences. Besides bullying, this study identifies several factors such as older age (< 14) and higher grades that were associated with lower use of condoms. Additionally, other psychosocial factors such as suicidal ideation and attempts as well as physical violence, and lack of close friends decrease the odds of condom use. Substance use, particularly marijuana and amphetamine/methamphetamine, was also associated with lower condom use. Although all types of bullying experiences were associated with lower condom use in bivariate analyses, the association remained significant only for bullying at school in the adjusted model (AOR = 0.39, 95% CI: 0.18–0.86).
Conclusion
The findings emphasize a holistic approach to addressing bullying, particularly within schools, and promoting protected sexual behaviors among school-going adolescents through early anti-bullying interventions and incorporating tailored sex education into school curricula, and at Thai schools.
Keywords: Bullying, Condom use, Thailand, Adolescents, Correlates
Introduction
Adolescents face numerous challenges that influence their sexual behaviors and experiences. Among these, bullying victimization has emerged as a critical yet understudied factor that may significantly impact adolescents’ engagement in unprotected sexual practices [1, 2]. Bullying is a prevalent issue among adolescents worldwide, with detrimental effects on the mental, emotional, and physical health of adolescents [3–5]. Research has consistently shown a link between bullying and engagement in risky sexual behaviors among adolescents [6–8]. Both bullies and bully victims are more likely to engage in casual sex and sex under the influence of alcohol or drugs [6]. Moreover, bullying is associated with HIV-risk behaviors among young men who have sex with men [7]. Additionally, bullied students reported higher levels of engagement in various risk behaviors, including substance use and self-harm [8].
In Thailand, the prevalence of bullying is high, with approximately a fifth of school-going adolescents reporting being bullied in 2021 [9]. This can have profound effects on their behaviors and attitudes, including health-related behaviors such as condom use [3]. Additionally, cyberbullying is a growing concern among the Thai population, with adolescents being both perpetrators and victims [10]. While existing research has predominantly focused on identifying correlates of bullying and its implications on self-reported mental health among Thai adolescents [11, 12], there is a notable gap in exploring the intricate relationship between bullying incidents and risky sexual behaviors such as condom use.
Given these gaps in the literature, this study aims to examine the associations between various forms of bullying victimization (at school, outside school, and cyberbullying) and condom use among Thai adolescents, both in unadjusted and adjusted analyses. Specifically, we hypothesize that bullying victimization can be associated with a reduced likelihood of condom use during the last sexual encounter among Thai adolescents. The rationale behind this study lies in the potential implications for developing targeted interventions that address both bullying prevention and promotion of condom use among Thai adolescents, ultimately improving their overall well-being and reducing their risk of negative sexual health outcomes.
Methods
Survey setting
The Thailand GSHS 2021 is a nationally representative survey of school-based participants in grades 7–12, typically targeting adolescents aged 13–17 years. The survey encompassed several areas, including alcohol use, dietary habits, drug use, hygiene, mental health, physical activity, protective factors, sexual behaviors, tobacco use, and experiences of violence and unintentional injury.
Sampling and response rate
After informed consent, students were approached in the classroom and provided with the questionnaire and recorded their responses on a computer-scannable answer sheet. The GSHS 2021 employed a two-phase cluster sampling approach to ensure the comprehensive representation of students in grades 7–12 across Thailand. Initially, schools were chosen based on their enrollment size using a probability proportional to their size. Subsequently, classes were randomly selected, and all students within those classes were eligible to participate. The survey achieved a school response rate of 92% and a student response rate of 90%, culminating in an overall response rate of 83%. A total of 5,661 students took part in the Thailand GSHS 2021 survey.
Study variables
Outcome variable
Condom use in the last sex was considered as the protected sex. It is defined by asking the question “The last time you had sexual intercourse, did you or your partner use a condom?” with the alternative responses of “yes” or “no”.
Explanatory variables
The explanatory variables were selected based on their relevancy and effects on bullying and condom use as well as the availability of the data from Thailand GSHS 2021. These include demographic variables including age, sex, and grade; psychosocial harms and support-related variables including felt lonely and anxiety-induced insomnia in the past year (rarely/never, most of time/always), suicide ideation/attempt or being physically attacked/engage in a physical fight in the past year (yes, no), missed school/classes without permission in the past month, parent understand their problem/know about the free time (rarely/never, most of time/always), have a close friend (yes, no); and lastly substance use related variables including currently use marijuana/cigarette (in the past month), ever amphetamine use (yes, no), and tried cigarette/alcohol/drugs before age 14 (yes, no).
Traditional bullying was assessed through inquiries such as " During the past 12 months, have you ever been bullied on school property?” and “Have you encountered bullying outside of school grounds in the last year?” with response options of “yes” (1) or “no” (0). Cyberbullying was evaluated by asking, " During the past 12 months, have you ever been cyberbullied? (Count being bullied through texting, Instagram, Snapchat, Facebook, Twitter, TikTok, or other social media.). Responses to this question were also binary, with options of “yes” (1) or “no” (0).
Statistical analysis
The descriptive statistics described the distribution of demographic characteristics, psychosocial and substance use-related variables, those who ever-had sex, and those who used a condom in their last sex among the study sample. Bivariate binary logistic regression analysis was used to examine the odds of using condom across various explanatory variables. Subsequently, additional adjusted logistic regression models were constructed, incorporating the significant variables identified in bivariate analysis (p < 0.05), to examine the association between bullying experiences and condom use while controlling for the potential confounding effect of other explanatory variables. The optimal model was determined using a stepwise backward approach, retaining covariates that provided the best fit. The likelihood ratio test was employed to select the most suitable model among nested models. Multicollinearity was assessed using the “collin” command in STATA to ensure model integrity. Results were presented as odds ratios (OR) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). To address the survey design, appropriate adjustments such as defining survey strata, primary sampling unit, and weight were applied using STATA 17. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05.
Results
A total of 5358 students in grades 7-12th participated in Thailand GSHS 2021. Of those, 902 reported ever having sex. Among sexually active participants, 416 students reported using a condom in their last sex.
The association of psychosocial factors and substance use with condom use
Adolescents aged over 14 were more likely to have had sex compared to those aged 14 or younger (24.44% vs. 13.39%, respectively). Among those who had sex, older adolescents (> 14) were significantly more likely to have used a condom in their last sexual encounter compared to younger ones (OR = 2.09, 95% CI: 1.43–3.03). Males were more likely to report having had sex compared to females (23.77% vs. 16.65%, respectively). However, among sexually active participants, there were no significant differences in condom use between the opposite sex (p > 0.05). The likelihood of using a condom increased with higher grades. students in the 12th grade had the highest rate of condom use (76.56%), followed by 11th graders (76.78%). The odds of using a condom were significantly higher for students in the 9th, 10th, 11th, and 12th grades compared to those in the 7th grade (Table 1).
Table 1.
Ever had sex | Used condom in last sex | ||
---|---|---|---|
N (%) | N (%) | OR (95%CI) | |
Total | 902 (19.8) | 416 (69.0) | - |
Age group | |||
≤ 14 | 275 (13.39) | 70 (55.85) | Ref |
> 14 | 627 (24.44) | 346 (72.51) | 2.09 (1.43, 3.03)** |
Sex | |||
Male | 462 (23.77) | 221 (70.77) | Ref |
Female | 439 (16.65) | 195 (66.86) | 0.83 (0.54, 1.28) |
Grade | |||
7th | 156 (10.76) | 28 (44.43) | Ref |
8th | 126 (17.74) | 44 (57.01) | 1.66 (0.63, 4.33) |
9th | 193 (16.18) | 91 (67.09) | 2.55 (1.18, 5.49)* |
10th | 75 (18.07) | 36 (73.34) | 3.44 (1.11, 10.63)* |
11th | 121 (31.71) | 63 (76.78) | 4.14 (1.74, 9.84)* |
12th | 227 (38.45) | 152 (76.56) | 4.09 (1.71, 9.78)* |
* p-value < 0.05. **p-value < 0.001
There was no significant difference in the odds of engaging in sex among adolescents who reported feeling lonely and experiencing anxiety-induced insomnia as compared to those who did not (Table 2). Adolescents reporting suicide ideation, suicide attempts, being physically attacked, or engaging in physical fights were significantly less likely to have used condoms compared to their counterparts, as indicated by odds ratios below 1 and statistically significant p-values (p < 0.05, Table 2). Adolescents who reported having no close friends (28.04%) were significantly less likely to have used condoms (compared to those who reported having close friends (52.33% vs. 19.24%, respectively; OR = 0.46), indicating a potential protective effect of social support on condom use.
Table 2.
Ever had sex | Used condom in last sex | ||
---|---|---|---|
N (%) | N (%) | OR (95%CI) | |
Felt lonely | |||
No | 694 (18.35) | 311 (69.89) | Ref |
Yes | 196 (25.29) | 99 (66.74) | 0.86 (0.48, 1.54) |
Anxiety-induced insomnia | |||
No | 701 (18.37) | 324 (70.76) | |
Yes | 189 (26.67) | 87 (65.33) | 0.78 (0.49, 1.23) |
Suicide ideation | |||
No | 676 (17.97) | 317 (73.37) | Ref |
Yes | 184 (26.10) | 79 (58.21) | 0.51 (0.33, 0.78)* |
Suicide attempt | |||
No | 697 (17.92) | 329 (73.02) | Ref |
Yes | 197 (31.10) | 84 (57.95) | 0.51 (0.29, 0.88)* |
Being physically attacked | |||
No | 664 (18.09) | 327 (73.64) | Ref |
Yes | 221 (27.66) | 82 (54.31) | 0.43 (0.25, 0.73)* |
Engage in a physical fight | |||
No | 604 (17.28) | 282 (74.39) | Ref |
Yes | 297 (28.74) | 134 (59.62) | 0.51 (0.28, 0.93)* |
Missed classes/school without permission | |||
No | 583 (16.01) | 262 (72.10) | Ref |
Yes | 306 (37.01) | 147 (62.97) | 0.65 (0.37, 1.12) |
Parent understand problem | |||
No | 673 (20.94) | 294 (67.96) | Ref |
Yes | 202 (15.91) | 112 (76.87) | 1.57 (0.93, 2.63) |
Have no close friend | |||
No | 809 (19.24) | 384 (70.37) | Ref |
Yes | 81 (28.04) | 28 (52.33) | 0.46 (0.24, 0.91)* |
* p-value < 0.05. **p-value < 0.001
Adolescents currently using marijuana were significantly less likely to use condoms during their last sexual encounter compared to non-users (OR = 0.36, 95% CI: 0.21–0.62). Similarly, adolescents who had ever used amphetamine/methamphetamine were less likely to use condoms compared to non-users (OR = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.27–0.83). Although not statistically significant, there was a trend suggesting that current cigarette smokers were less likely to use condoms during their last sexual encounter compared to non-smokers (OR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.47–1.30). No significant association was found between current alcohol use and condom use during the last sexual encounter (Table 3). Initiating alcohol consumption and cigarette smoking before the age of 14 was associated with decreased odds of condom use during the last sexual encounter (OR = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.32–0.89 and OR = 0.38, 95% CI: 0.20–0.76, respectively). However, there was no significant association between initiating drug use before the age of 14 and condom use during the last sexual encounter (Table 3).
Table 3.
Ever had sex | Used condom in last sex | ||
---|---|---|---|
N (%) | N (%) | OR (95%CI) | |
Currently use marijuana | |||
No | 763 (17.90) | 349 (73.37) | Ref |
Yes | 84 (54.04) | 39 (49.40) | 0.36 (0.21, 0.62)** |
Ever used amphetamine/methamphetamine | |||
No | 781 (18.11) | 361 (71.05) | Ref |
Yes | 75 (66.28) | 40 (53.78) | 0.47 (0.27, 0.83)* |
Currently use cigarette | |||
No | 661 (16.63) | 293 (71.11) | Ref |
Yes | 207 (46.00) | 112 (65.86) | 0.78 (0.47, 1.30) |
Currently use alcohol | |||
No | 467 (13.48) | 168 (71.23) | Ref |
Yes | 407 (35.55) | 238 (68.31) | 0.87 (0.62, 1.22) |
Drank alcohol before age 14 | |||
No | 310 (28.77) | 197 (75.57) | Ref |
Yes | 307 (28.53) | 151 (62.26) | 0.53 (0.32, 0.89)* |
Tried a cigarette before age 14 | |||
No | 155 (48.28) | 106 (79.60) | Ref |
Yes | 248 (29.66) | 116 (59.99) | 0.38 (0.20, 0.76)* |
Used drugs before age 14 | |||
No | 67 (52.14) | 45 (71.02) | Ref |
Yes | 129 (43.36) | 45 (71.02) | 0.41 (0.11, 1.49) |
* p-value < 0.05. **p-value < 0.001
The association between bullying experiences and condom use
As shown in Table 4, adolescents who reported experiencing bullying at school had a significantly lower rate of condom use in their last sexual encounter compared to those who were not bullied at school (49.9% vs. 74.2%). The odds of using a condom in the last sexual encounter were significantly lower for those bullied at school than for those who were not (OR = 0.35, 95% CI: 0.19–0.64), and this association remained statistically significant after adjusting for potential confounders (AOR = 0.39, 95% CI: 0.18–0.86). Conversely, while adolescents who reported being bullied outside school also showed a lower rate of condom use in last sex compared to those not bullied outside school (59.1% vs. 71.8%), the association was significant only in unadjusted analysis (OR = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.37–0.87) and became non-significant after adjustment (AOR = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.20–1.84). Similar patterns were observed with cyberbullying: while the odds of condom use were lower among cyberbullied adolescents (57.97% vs. 72.80%; OR = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.31–0.85), this association was no longer significant in adjusted models (AOR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.26–1.43).
Table 4.
Ever had sex | Used condom in last sex | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
N (%) | N (%) | OR (95%CI) | AOR (95%CI) a | |
Bullied at school | ||||
No | 669 (19.1) | 340 (74.2) | Ref | Ref |
Yes | 199 (20.6) | 61(49.9) | 0.35 (0.19, 0.64)* | 0.39 (0.18, 0.86)* |
Bullied outside school | ||||
No | 729 (18.3) | 353 (71.8) | Ref | Ref |
Yes | 141 (29.8) | 52 (59.1) | 0.57 (0.37, 0.87)* | 0.60 (0.20, 1.84) |
Cyberbullied | ||||
No | 676 (17.69) | 322 (72.80) | Ref | Ref |
Yes | 192 (30.18) | 78 (57.97) | 0.52 (0.31, 0.85)* | 0.61 (0.26, 1.43) |
a AOR: Adjusted odds ratio, adjusted for age, suicide attempt, being physically attached, currently using marijuana, tried alcohol before age 14, tried cigarette before 14. * p-value < 0.05. **p-value < 0.001
Discussion
Although the study primarily focused on the association between bullying victimization and condom use, it also shed light on potential psychosocial factors and substance use that correlate with condom use among school-going Thai students, offering valuable insights for public health interventions targeting adolescent sexual health in Thailand. One notable finding was the significant association between age and condom use, with older adolescents (> 14 years) being more likely to utilize condoms during sexual encounters compared to their younger counterparts. In addition, although insignificant, the rate of condom use among females was slightly lower among females (66.86%) compared to males (70.77%) which has significant implications for current sex education at schools. Thailand formally introduced sex education into its compulsory education curriculum in 2001, shifting the responsibility from homes to schools due to societal taboos [13]. Sex education is often combined with health education in Thai schools, typically starting in the third grade, when children are around 8 to 9 years old [14]. However, despite the efforts, there are concerns about the adequacy and comprehensiveness of sex education in Thai schools. These include outdated and age-inappropriate curricula, lack of emphasis on gender equality and sexual rights, and insufficient teacher training [14], which contributes to various issues, including misinformation, lack of awareness, and increased incidents related to sexual health [15]. In line with previous reports [16–18], the findings of the present study also highlight the importance of an age-appropriate sexual education tailored to adolescents at different developmental stages. It is also crucial to address gender norms and power dynamics in sexual relationships in sex education curricula to ensure equitable access to and utilization of preventive measures such as condoms among Thai adolescents [19–21].
Furthermore, the association between psychosocial factors and condom use revealed intriguing patterns. Despite the documented link between feelings of loneliness or experiencing anxiety with risky sex behaviors [22, 23], adolescents reporting these symptoms in our study did not show significant differences in condom use compared to their counterparts. Cultural factors such as stigma surrounding mental health disorders and societal taboos around sex as well as the sampling limitations such as the exclusion of out-of-school adolescents who exhibit higher depressive symptoms may contribute to divergent results. Despite that, in line with previous studies [24–26], adolescents reporting extreme psychological issues such as suicidal ideation and suicide attempts as well as those exhibiting interpersonal violence such as physical violence, or engagement in physical fights were significantly less likely to use condoms, which reinforce the potential impact of mental health in addition to interpersonal violence on sexual risk behaviors among Thai adolescents. On the other hand, social support emerged as a protective factor, with adolescents reporting close friendships demonstrating higher rates of condom use. It has been shown that supportive friendships can moderate the impact of stressful life events on sexual risk-taking [27]. However, the role of social support is complex, as it can also act as a stressor [28]. Nonetheless, this finding underscores the importance of fostering supportive social networks among adolescents to promote positive sexual health outcomes.
Another notable finding in our study was lower odds of condom use among those with current substance use, particularly marijuana and amphetamine/methamphetamine. This has been attributed to impaired judgment and decision-making regarding safe sex practices under the influence of drugs [29, 30]. Surprisingly, no significant association was found between current alcohol use and condom use during the last sexual encounter. This contradicts the previous studies that have found a relationship between alcohol consumption and risky sexual behaviors [31–33] and might be due to previously mentioned reasons such as sampling limitations and exclusion of out-of-school students as well as stigma around the drinking and having sex under the influence of alcohol which warrant further research. Despite that, initiating alcohol consumption and cigarette smoking before the age of 14 were associated with decreased odds of condom use during the last sexual encounter. This might be due to the higher risk-taking behaviors among those who initiate drinking and smoking at younger ages [34]. Early initiation of substance use may also lead to impaired decision-making abilities and struggling to make responsible choices regarding sexual health practices, such as condom use [33]. Further research is needed to explore this relationship more comprehensively and understand the nuances involved. Nonetheless, this underscores the importance of early intervention and prevention efforts targeting substance use initiation in adolescence to promote safer sexual practices.
Lastly, the most critical finding of this study is the significant association between bullying victimization at school and condom use, which has important implications for targeted intervention strategies. Adolescents who experienced bullying at school were significantly less likely to use a condom during their last sexual encounter, even after adjusting for confounding factors. This effect was not observed for bullying outside school or cyberbullying in the adjusted models, suggesting that the structured and peer-intensive school environment may amplify the psychological impact of bullying, leading to increased risk-taking behaviors such as unprotected sex. Consistent with previous research, these findings underscore the heightened vulnerability of adolescents who face bullying within school settings to engage in risky sexual health behaviors [1, 2, 6]. The stronger, adjusted association between bullying victimization at school and condom use during the last sex, compared to bullying outside of school, likely reflects the distinct psychological and social impacts of bullying within the structured school environment. Bullying at school occurs within a consistent peer setting, where daily interactions can intensify stress, reduce self-esteem, and heighten vulnerability to peer pressures, all of which are linked to increased risk-taking behaviors, including inconsistent condom use [6]. In contrast, bullying outside school may occur less frequently or across varied settings, resulting in less cumulative psychological impact on decision-making related to sexual health [35]. Moreover, in addition to condom use, studies have also indicated that adolescents who report bullying victimization fail to use other contraceptives, underscoring the complex relationship between sexual behaviors and experiences of bullying. The attenuation of the association between bullying outside school and cyberbullying with condom use in the adjusted model, however, warrants further research to elucidate the underlying mechanisms through which different types of bullying might affect mental health and consequent risky behaviors among adolescents.
Given these findings, intervention strategies should comprehensively address bullying in all its forms, with particular attention to school-based bullying. Anti-bullying programs in schools should promote a positive, inclusive culture and educate students on respectful relationships and conflict resolution. Mental health support should be accessible to students who have experienced bullying to help mitigate the emotional impact of victimization [36]. Additionally, mental health support services should be readily available for students who have experienced bullying, addressing the emotional and psychological effects of victimization [2]. To enhance condom use behaviors specifically, comprehensive sexual health education programs should be integrated into school curricula, emphasizing the importance of safe sex practices, including condom use. Furthermore, peer support groups or mentoring programs could be established to provide adolescents with a supportive network to navigate the challenges associated with bullying and promote healthy sexual decision-making. Lastly, collaboration between schools, parents, healthcare providers, and community organizations is essential to ensure a holistic approach to addressing bullying and promoting protected sexual behaviors among adolescents [2].
Limitation
While this study offers valuable insights into the factors associated with condom use among Thai adolescents, it is important to consider several limitations. Firstly, relying on self-reported data could introduce biases such as recall and social desirability bias, potentially affecting the accuracy of responses, especially on sensitive topics like sexual behavior and bullying experiences. Additionally, the use of a cross-sectional design limits our ability to establish causality and temporal relationships between variables, making it challenging to infer causal effects. Furthermore, focusing solely on school-going adolescents may overlook the experiences of out-of-school youth, who may face different challenges related to sexual health. Moreover, the absence of data on certain psychosocial factors, including cultural norms, societal values, and the total population from which the sample was drawn, limits the scope of the analysis. Additionally, the lack of detailed information on the profiles of sex partners and other key contextual factors might have overlooked significant determinants of condom use among adolescents. Lastly, the generalizability of the findings may be restricted to the Thai context, cautioning against extrapolating results to other cultural or geographic settings.
Conclusion
Although the study primarily focused on the association between bullying victimization and condom use, it also identified several other significant factors associated with condom use among Thai students. Notably, older age and being in higher grades were associated with increased condom use, highlighting the importance of tailoring sex education at Thai schools to different age groups. The findings also underscored the complex relationship between psychosocial factors, such as extreme psychological issues and experiences of interpersonal violence, and condom use behaviors necessitating appropriate interventions. Substance use, particularly marijuana and amphetamine/methamphetamine, emerged as significant barriers to condom use, emphasizing the importance of early intervention strategies targeting substance use initiation. Moreover, the detrimental impact of both traditional and cyberbullying on condom use underscores the critical role of intervention strategies aimed at bullying prevention.
Acknowledgements
This paper analyzed data from the Thailand GSHS 2021 which received support from the World Health Organization and the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Author contributions
OD contributed to the conception of the study, data analysis, and writing the manuscript.
Funding
Open access funding provided by University of Bergen.
The analysis received no funding.
Data availability
The GSHS 2021 is a publicly available dataset and is available on the World Health Organization NCD Microdata Repository website at: https://extranet.who.int/ncdsmicrodata/index.php/catalog/.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The protocol for Thailand GSHS 2021 was reviewed and received ethics approval from the relevant national authorities and ethics committees. Therefore, the secondary analysis of the data does not require further ethical approval. Written informed consent was obtained from the participants or their guardians before the survey.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Kim J, Lee Y, Leban L, Jennings WG. Association between School Bullying Victimization and sexual risk-taking among South Korean adolescents: the role of teacher and parental relationships. Arch Sex Behav. 2023;52(7):2811–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Smith L, Grabovac I, Jacob L, López-Sánchez GF, Yang L, Shin JI et al. Bullying victimization and sexual behavior among adolescents aged 12–15 years from 53 countries: A Global Perspective. J Sex Med. 2020. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 3.Vikneswaran S, Idayu BI, Halim I, Norfazilah A, Hanizah Y, BULLYING AMONG ADOLESCENTS, AND IT’S ASSOCIATED FACTORS. Int J Public Health Clin Sci. 2018;5:1–16. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Man X, Liu J, Xue Z. Effects of Bullying Forms on Adolescent Mental Health and protective factors: A Global Cross-regional Research based on 65 countries. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(4). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 5.Källmén H, Hallgren M. Bullying at school and mental health problems among adolescents: a repeated cross-sectional study. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Mental Health. 2021;15:1–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Holt MK, Matjasko JL, Espelage DL, Reid GM, Koenig BW. Sexual risk taking and bullying among adolescents. Pediatrics. 2013;132:e1481. e7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Li MJ, Distefano A, Mouttapa M, Gill JK. Bias-motivated bullying and psychosocial problems: implications for HIV risk behaviors among young men who have sex with men. AIDS Care. 2014;26:246–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Smalley KB, Warren JC, Barefoot KN. Connection between experiences of bullying and risky behaviors in Middle and High School Students. School Mental Health. 2017;9:87–96. [Google Scholar]
- 9.WHO. Thailand Global School-Based Student Health Survey. 2021 2021 [Available from: https://extranet.who.int/ncdsmicrodata/index.php/catalog/946
- 10.Charoenwanit S, editor. Cyber Bullying: Impacts and Preventions in Adolescents.
- 11.Pengpid S, Peltzer K. Bullying and its associated factors among school-aged adolescents in Thailand. ScientificWorldJournal. 2013;2013:254083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Aunampai A, Widyastari DA, Chuanwan S, Katewongsa P. Association of bullying on happiness at school: evidence from Thailand’s national school-based survey. Int J Adolescence Youth. 2022;27(1):72–84. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kay NS, Jones MR, Jantaraweragul S. Teaching sex education in Thailand. ICHPER-SD J Res. 2010;5(2):10–6. [Google Scholar]
- 14.World TP. The problem with sex education in Thailand 2021 [Available from: https://www.thaipbsworld.com/the-problem-with-sex-education-in-thailand/
- 15.Sukparangsee L, Opinion. Thailand’s lack of sexual education leads to incidents like the ones this past week. 2021.
- 16.Kar SK, Choudhury A, Singh AP. Understanding normal development of adolescent sexuality: a bumpy ride. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2015;8(2):70–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.NCSBY. CHILDHOOD SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT. National Center on the Sexual Behavior of Youth; 2024 [.
- 18.Vinayraj NV, Eljo X JOJG, editors. ATTITUDE OF ADOLESCENT BOYS ABOUT SEX EDUCATION FOR HEALTHY SEXUAL BEHAVIOUR2020.
- 19.Lefkowitz ES, Shearer CL, Gillen MM, Espinosa-Hernandez G. How gendered attitudes relate to women’s and men’s sexual behaviors and beliefs. Sex Cult. 2014;18(4):833–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Wetzel G, Cultice R, Cipollina R, Sanchez D. Masculinity and Condom Use: Using a Rejection Sensitivity Framework to Understand Women’s Condom Negotiation in Mixed-Gender Sexual Encounters. sex role. 2024.
- 21.Duby Z, Jonas K, McClinton Appollis T, Maruping K, Dietrich J, Mathews C. Condoms are boring: navigating relationship dynamics, gendered power, and motivations for condomless sex amongst adolescents and young people in South Africa. Int J Sex Health. 2021;33(1):40–57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Averett SL, Wang Y. Identification of the Effect of Depression on Risky sexual behavior: exploiting a natural experiment. Am Econ Rev. 2012;102 3:570–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Torres HL, Gore-felton C, Compulsivity. Substance use, and loneliness: the loneliness and sexual risk model (LSRM). Sex Addict Compulsivity. 2007;14:63–75. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Sánchez-SanSegundo M, Alarcó-Rosales R, Zaragoza-Martí A, Quesada-Rico JA, Gabaldón-Bravo E, Hurtado-Sánchez JA. The Associations of Mental Health Disturbances, Self-Esteem, and Partner Violence victimization with Condom Use in Spanish adolescents. J Clin Med. 2022;11(9). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 25.Yang N, Xu Y, Chen X, Yu B, Yan H, Li S. Acculturative stress, poor mental health and condom-use intention among international students in China. Health Educ J. 2018;77(2):142–55. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Eaton L, Flisher AJ, Aarø LE. Unsafe sexual behaviour in South African youth. Soc Sci Med. 2003;56(1):149–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Brady SS, Dolcini MM, Harper GW, Pollack LM. Supportive friendships moderate the association between stressful life events and sexual risk taking among African American adolescents. Health Psychology: Official J Div Health Psychol Am Psychol Association. 2009;28:2238–48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Cámara M, Bacigalupe G, Padilla P. The role of social support in adolescents: are you helping me or stressing me out? Int J Adolescence Youth. 2017;22:123–36. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Walsh JL, Fielder RL, Carey KB, Carey MP. Do Alcohol and Marijuana Use decrease the probability of Condom Use for College women? J Sex Res. 2014;51:145–58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Leigh BC, Ames SL, Stacy AW. Alcohol, drugs, and condom use among drug offenders: an event-based analysis. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2008;93(1–2):38–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ajayi AI, Ismail KO, Akpan W. Factors associated with consistent condom use: a cross-sectional survey of two Nigerian universities. BMC Public Health. 2019;19:1–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Brown JL, Gause NK, Northern N. The Association between Alcohol and Sexual Risk Behaviors among College students: a review. Curr Addict Rep. 2016;3(4):349–55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Cho HS, Yang Y. Relationship between Alcohol Consumption and Risky sexual behaviors among adolescents and young adults: a Meta-analysis. Int J Public Health. 2023;68:1605669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Hansen BT, Kjær SK, Munk C, Tryggvadottir L, Sparén P, Hagerup-Jenssen M, et al. Early smoking initiation, sexual behavior and reproductive health—a large population-based study of nordic women. Prev Med. 2010;51(1):68–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Shamsi NI, Andrades M, Ashraf H. Bullying in school children: how much do teachers know? J Family Med Prim Care. 2019;8(7):2395–400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Roca-Campos E, Duque E, Ríos O, Ramis-Salas M. The Zero Violence Brave Club: a successful intervention to prevent and address bullying in schools. Front Psychiatry. 2021:855. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The GSHS 2021 is a publicly available dataset and is available on the World Health Organization NCD Microdata Repository website at: https://extranet.who.int/ncdsmicrodata/index.php/catalog/.