Abstract
Background
In 2022, the Obesity Medicine Association (OMA) published a Clinical Practice Statement (CPS) which provided an overview of bariatric surgery and related procedures, a discussion on gastrointestinal hormones and a review of the microbiome as it relates to patients with obesity. This update to the 2022 OMA CPS provides a focus on nutrition as it relates to the adult bariatric surgery patient, incorporating a detailed discussion on how to conduct a bariatric nutrition assessment and manage patients seeking metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) and postoperative nutrition care. In particular, the section on macronutrients, micronutrients, and bariatric surgery has been updated, highlighting practical approaches to nutrient deficiencies typically encountered in the bariatric surgery patient. Also included is a section on how to envision and develop an interdisciplinary team of medical providers with evidence-based nutrition knowledge and consistent information that improves the quality of nutrition care provided to MBS patients. This CPS adds to the series of OMA CPSs meant to provide guidance to clinicians in their care of patients with obesity.
Methods
The foundation of this paper is supported by scientific evidence in the medical literature and expert opinion derived from several bariatric nutrition resources, as well as from the 2022 OMA CPS focused on bariatric surgery.
Results
This OMA Clinical Practice Statement provides an overview of the current bariatric nutrition clinical guidelines and nutrition tools adapted for clinicians who may not have access to an MBS team or a registered dietitian knowledgeable about bariatric nutrition.
Conclusions
This evidence-based review of the literature includes an overview of current bariatric nutrition recommendations. It is intended to provide clinicians with more advanced knowledge and skills in nutrition assessment and management of the preoperative and post-surgical MBS patients. This CPS also addresses macronutrient and micronutrient deficiencies common in MBS patients, and treatment recommendations designed to help the clinician with clinical decision making.
Keywords: Bariatric nutrition assessment, Bariatric and metabolic surgery, Micronutrient deficiencies
Graphical abstract
1. Introduction/background
In 2022, the Obesity Medicine Association (OMA) published a Clinical Practice Statement (CPS) providing an overview of bariatric surgery and related procedures, a discussion on gastrointestinal hormones and a review of the microbiome as it relates to patients with obesity [1]. This update to the 2022 OMA CPS provides a focus on nutrition as it relates to the adult bariatric surgery patient, including how to conduct a bariatric macronutrient and micronutrient focused nutrition assessment, manage patients seeking metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS), and collaborate on postoperative nutrition care with an interdisciplinary team of medical providers. Guidelines specific to subpopulations of patients, such as adolescents, patients with renal or liver disease, other special needs, or those undergoing endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) are not addressed here.
Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is widely recognized as a highly effective treatment for the chronic disease of obesity. According to the American Society of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS), MBS may reduce the risk of premature death in some patients by 30 %–50 % [2]. Typically, patients lose the most weight in 1–2 years post-surgery and demonstrate significant improvement in weight-related comorbidities including type 2 diabetes, hypertension, obstructive sleep apnea, dyslipidemia, cardiovascular disease, as well as metabolic dysfunction-associated with steatotic liver disease and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASLD/MASH) [[2], [3], [4], [5]]. Most patients can anticipate a meaningful total weight loss of 25 %–45 % depending on MBS procedure type [6]. While the 2022 OMA CPS detailed for whom MBS is indicated, certain patient subpopulations should be considered for MBS and are mentioned here, including [[2], [3], [4], [5],7].
-
•
MBS performed >2 years before total joint arthroplasty in those with class II/III obesity improves post-operative orthopedic outcomes
-
•
MBS should be considered in individuals with heart failure before heart transplantation or before placement of left ventricular assist device (LVAD), because it is associated with a significant improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), improvement of functional capacity, and higher chances for receiving heart transplantation
-
•
There are no age limits, but consideration to frailty should be reviewed
-
•
In patients with severe obesity and an abdominal wall hernia requiring elective repair, MBS should be considered first to induce significant weight loss, and consequently reduce the rate of complications associated with hernia repair and increase durability of the repair
-
•
MBS should be considered to help increase eligibility and access of individuals with Class III obesity to organ transplantation (kidney, lung, heart)
-
•
MBS should be considered for individuals with Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD), Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatohepatitis (MASH), and cirrhosis as surgery has been shown to improve liver histology, regress fibrosis, reduce hepatocellular carcinoma, and is associated with an 88 % reduction of risk from MASH progressing to cirrhosis [[2], [3], [4], [5]].
The benefits of MBS also come with some nutritional risks. For example, different MBS procedures have significant variation in the amount of absorptive gastrointestinal tract and stomach partitioning. Approximately 80 % of the fundus is removed during a sleeve gastrectomy (SG), while leaving the pyloric sphincter and intestines intact [8]. More invasive procedures (i.e., Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), distal RYGB, biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD-DS), single anastomosis duodenal-ileostomy with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S)), however, alter both the fundus and shorten the length of the small intestine leaving 75 cm–300 cm [9,10]. This remaining segment of the small intestine is called the ‘common channel,’ the location where the food mixes with digestive enzymes [9,10]. The total length of the bypassed or excluded portion of the small intestine in more invasive procedures may lead to higher rates of nutrient malabsorption compared to other less invasive procedures such as the SG or adjustable gastric lap-band (AGLB) [6,9,10]. Nutrition issues after MBS may include food intolerance, drug-nutrient interactions, reduction in food quantity or quality, and an increased gastrointestinal transit time of digested foods [10]. The role of gut hormones with decreased hunger and increased satiety represents an additional combination of factors that may impact the postoperative nutritional status of the patient and MBS outcomes [11].
As discussed by Shetye et al. [1] in the 2022 OMA CPS focused on bariatric surgery, “patients should undergo nutritional assessments by trained dietitians and receive educational support with an understanding that even with bariatric surgery, lifelong adherence to healthful nutrition” is crucial for achieving and sustaining weight loss and metabolic health. Nutritional assessments include both preoperative optimization and postoperative chronic nutrition care. According to Carter et al. [12], preoperative optimization for patients seeking MBS refers to: 1) the management of modifiable risks prior to surgery, 2) reducing risks during the perioperative phase, and 3) improving patient outcomes. These recommendations set forth by the ASMBS include preoperative nutrition optimization [12]. Specifically, registered dietitians (RDs) are typically responsible for conducting the initial preoperative MBS nutrition assessment and evaluation including a weight history, review of the eating behaviors and patterns, medication review, nutrition-focused physical exam, and an assessment of micronutrient status to support the patient before and after MBS [6,11,12].
This clinical practice statement aims to describe the steps in conducting a nutritional assessment and evaluation to identify and treat the most common nutritional deficiencies in patients seeking MBS and postoperatively. Specifically, bariatric nutrition tools for providers will be reviewed including food records, screening of eating behaviors, nutrient laboratory reports, and physical exam findings. Nutrition therapy options are also described for mild to more severe forms of vitamin and mineral deficiencies and protein malnutrition. Recommendations from the most recent MBS and OMA bariatric guidelines are incorporated into this review, along with current evidence-based literature and expert opinion [1,6,13].
2. Target audience
Physicians, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, RDs, behavioral health specialists, nurses, exercise specialists, and others are involved with providing preoperative and post-surgical care for patients with obesity [6].
While RDs conduct preoperative and post-surgical nutrition assessments for MBS patients, a team-based and comprehensive approach to patient care is helpful to screen for nutritional concerns and improve outcomes. Table 1 identifies different clinical roles and responsibilities of those caring for MBS patients, either within an MBS program or referral to specialists within the community to coordinate comprehensive MBS patient care.
Table 1.
Metabolic and bariatric surgery healthcare providers [6].
Discipline | Role |
---|---|
MBS Surgeon |
|
Bariatrician/Obesity Medicine |
|
Registered Dietitians (RD) |
|
Behavioral Health Specialists |
|
Nurse Practitioner/Physician Assistant |
|
Exercise Physiologist/Athletic Trainer |
|
MBS Coordinator |
|
MBS: metabolic and bariatric surgery; MBSAQIP: Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program.
3. Preoperative nutrition assessment, evaluation and education
The number of preoperative nutrition visits by an RD is often set by the MBS program or by the patient's insurance requirements. The key elements of a preoperative nutrition assessment are included in Table 2 [6,12].
Table 2.
Document | Assess |
---|---|
Medical history |
|
Medication review |
|
Weight history |
|
Eating behaviors/patterns [14] |
|
Food insecurity [15] |
|
Physical activity [16] |
|
Micronutrient labs [6,17] |
|
DEXA: dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry; BIA: bioelectrical impedance analysis; MBS: metabolic and bariatric surgery.
3.1. Medication review
Medications contributing to potential weight gain and excess intake of calories or drug-nutrient interactions should be considered in the preoperative and post-surgical nutrition assessment. Table 3 provides a list of common medications that may require adjustment to mitigate the risk of weight gain. A detailed list of medications that may contribute to weight gain is reported in the Obesity Algorithm: Obesity Medicine Association, 2024 [18].
Table 3.
Preoperative nutrition screening for medications that may contribute to weight gain [18].
Drug Classification | Weight Gain | Weight Neutral/Loss |
---|---|---|
Anti-hypertensives |
|
|
Diabetes agents |
|
|
Hormones |
|
|
Antidepressants |
|
|
Migraines |
|
|
Anti-psychotics |
|
|
3.2. Chronological weight history
Fig. 1 is a chronological weight history tool that tells the story of an individual's life circumstances associated with weight change over time [12,19]. More importantly, the weight graph gives the patient an opportunity to share feelings and events that may be associated with various types of abuse or neglect during childhood, transitions associated with physical activity, illness, medication changes, divorce, pregnancy, stressful employment, food insecurity and more [20]. A weight history graph is also useful in identifying dieting attempts that may have followed periods of disordered eating behaviors [19].
Fig. 1.
Example of a chronological weight history graph.
3.3. Eating behaviors/patterns
Patients interested in MBS should be screened for maladaptive eating patterns (i.e., a brief or extended history of binge-eating disorder, night eating syndrome, bulimia nervosa, previous anorexia nervosa, and other maladaptive eating behaviors) [12,20]. The primary objective of the evaluation is to identify risk factors or potential postoperative challenges that may contribute to poor MBS outcomes [12,20]. Although a history of disordered eating behaviors should be taken into consideration prior to MBS, such maladaptive eating conditions are not universal exclusion criteria for MBS [12,20]. Preoperative screening and treatment of disordered eating behaviors by both RDs and behavioral health specialists are critical components in preparing patients for MBS [12]. Table 4 describes the most common disordered eating behaviors reported in preoperative screening of patients [14].
Table 4.
Preoperative screening criteria for eating disorders [14].
Disorder | Description |
---|---|
Binge-eating disorder |
|
Anorexia Nervosa |
|
Bulimia Nervosa |
|
Night Eating Syndrome |
|
In addition to screening for maladaptive eating behaviors, RDs also screen the preoperative diet for quality of food consumed, in addition to the frequency, location, and usual quantity of food consumed within a 24-h period [21]. This information is most often collected in food logs or 24-h food recalls that provide an overview of the eating environment, food availability, and the types of food contributing to macronutrient and micronutrient composition [21].
3.4. Physical activity [16]
An evaluation of physical activity, functional capacity, and limitations is an important aspect of a nutrition evaluation. Limitation of physical function can be identified in the clinic setting by a sit-to-stand test, hand grip, and visual cues such as wheelchairs, walkers, canes, and overall steadiness or balance [16,21]. A medical evaluation is recommended prior to beginning an exercise program to ensure the safety of the patient [6]. Once the patient is cleared to begin an exercise routine, the clinician may suggest physical activities with intensity and frequency according to the patient's cardiorespiratory health, functional capabilities, and mobility [16,21].
3.5. Micronutrient status and assessment recommendations
One of the critical elements in conducting a nutritional assessment in the MBS patient is understanding the function of the gastrointestinal tract and the absorption sites of the micronutrients. Fig. 2 identifies the length of each section of the small intestine and associated nutrient absorption, which is important for understanding how much of the small intestine is bypassed within the surgical procedure type. An increased risk of nutrient malabsorption occurs when the duodenum and the majority of the jejunum are bypassed in procedures such a distal RYGB, BPD/DS, or SADI-S [9,10]. Micronutrient depletion or deficiency documented by blood or plasma concentrations below the reference range may occur with no clinical signs or symptoms [13]. Patients may also be malnourished prior to an initial nutrition assessment due to historically poor dietary, prior efforts at dieting, or lack of compliance with multi- or bariatric vitamins associated with a prior MBS procedure [22].
Fig. 2.
Micronutrient absorption sites in the gastrointestinal tract.
Clinicians should be knowledgeable about the risk factors associated with common malnutrition states when screening preoperative MBS patients. Table 5 provides an overview of possible conditions that may be associated with suboptimal nutrition [6,11,12].
Table 5.
Anatomical, disease states, and environmental conditions that may lead to macronutrient and micronutrient deficiencies [6,11,12] |
|
3.5.1. Micronutrient diagnostic and biochemical reports
Preoperative and post-surgery micronutrient laboratory reports can provide evidence of mild to severe nutrient deficiencies and excessive nutrient storage. Table 6 identifies some of the diagnostic factors and conditions associated with micronutrient screening [1,17].
Table 6.
Micronutrient |
|
---|---|
Thiamin |
|
Vitamin B12 |
|
Vitamin A |
|
Vitamin E |
|
Vitamin D, Calcium |
|
Vitamin K |
|
Folate |
|
Iron, Ferritin |
|
Zinc- screen before RYGB, BPD/DS |
|
Copper- screen before RYGB, BPD/DS |
|
MMA: methyl malonic acid, PPI: proton pump inhibitors, DCP: des-gamma carboxy prothrombin, TIBC: total iron-binding capacity, RYGB: Roux-en-Y-Gastric Bypass, BPD/DS: biliopancreatic diversion/duodenal switch; ↓: decrease; ↑: increase; RBC: red blood cell; PTH: parathyroid hormone.
3.5.2. How accurate are micronutrient tests?
Abnormal micronutrient laboratory tests paired with physical signs or neurological symptoms can provide an accurate nutritional assessment of nutrient stores [13,17]. Appropriate use and interpretation of micronutrient reports are essential for correct management of nutrition problems. However, misinterpretation of lab reports or lack of knowledge about other underlying acute or chronic conditions can cause unnecessary treatment or concern for the patient [24]. Clinicians should be aware of the following conditions that may impact micronutrient status [24,25].
-
•
Elevated vitamin A may be associated with acute ingestion of ethanol or non-fasting state.
-
•
Low zinc level can be influenced by infection, inflammation, stress, oral contraceptives or pregnancy.
-
•
An elevated zinc level due to supplementation may interfere with copper absorption.
-
•
An elevated copper level may be a response to infection, inflammation, stress, copper supplementation, oral contraceptives, or pregnancy.
-
•
Serum copper may be reduced by corticosteroids, zinc, malnutrition, or malabsorption.
-
•
Falsely high serum vitamin B12 levels may be observed in myeloproliferative disease, acute hepatitis, severe alcoholic liver disease, and cirrhosis [26].
-
•
Taking high doses of supplements and not withholding supplements for at least 24 hours prior to blood draws may artificially elevate micronutrient levels.
-
•
During an acute phase response to trauma, infection, or inflammation, iron and selenium levels may be reduced [23].
3.5.3. Preoperative lab recommendations for MBS patients
Table 7 shows the ASMBS preoperative micronutrient labs recommended at baseline for each surgery type [6]. Patients should not take dietary supplements at least 24 hours in advance of blood draws to prevent an inaccurate assessment of nutrient stores [6,25].
Table 7.
Nutrient | Preferred test | Baseline prior to SG, RYGB | Baseline prior to SADI-S, BPD/DS |
---|---|---|---|
Vitamin A (retinol) | Retinol serum | x | |
Vitamin B1 (thiamin) | Whole blood thiamin | x | x |
Vitamin B9 (folate) | Red blood cell folate | x | x |
Vitamin B12 (cyanocobalamin) | B12 serum, methylmalonic acid (MMA) serum (provides early sign of B12 deficiency) | x | x |
Vitamin D (D2, (ergocalciferol) or D3, (cholecalciferol)) | 25-OH Vit D | x | x |
Vitamin E (A-Tocopherol) | Vit E serum | x | |
Vitamin K | Vit K serum | x | |
Calcium (citrate) | Calcium, ionized, serum | x | x |
Copper | Copper, serum | x | |
Iron | Iron and iron binding capacity | x | x |
Zinc | Zinc, serum | x |
SG: sleeve gastrectomy; RYGB: roux-en y gastric bypass; BPD-DS: biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch; SADI-S: single anastomosis duodenal-ileostomy with sleeve gastrectomy; OH: hydroxy.
4. Selecting bariatric multivitamin mineral supplements and patient education
Selecting bariatric supplements begins with preoperative education for those patients seeking MBS. Bariatric RDs with MBS experience have the most knowledge and skill in recommending bariatric multivitamin (MVM) supplements based on the MBS procedure type, anatomical changes associated with absorption issues, and the patient's dietary preferences (i.e., gluten-free, egg-free, tree nuts, soy-free, peanut-free, artificial sweeteners) [6]. A bariatric-specific MVM supplement should include the minimum nutrient recommendations established by the ASMBS [6]. Evidence supports the use of specialized bariatric supplement preparations due to the bioavailable absorption properties, special formulations, disintegration properties, caking agents, solubility factors, and combinations of the essential micronutrients in the correct amount to prevent deficiencies [27,28]. When educating patients on bariatric supplementation, the following questions should be addressed.
-
•
What type of MBS procedure will be performed (i.e., remaining gastrointestinal functionality, amount of absorption surface area available, consideration of sufficient hydrochloric acid affecting solubility of substances)?
-
•
Does the supplement meet the ASMBS recommendations? [6].
-
•
What type of MVM formulation is best?
-
•
Can the patient afford bariatric MVMs long-term?
-
•
What are the side effects from bariatric MVM supplements?
When selecting a bariatric product, patients should ensure that iron and calcium are not contained in the same supplement. Calcium, in the amount of 500 mg–600 mg, should be taken separately from a MVM containing iron, allowing at least 2 hours for adequate absorption of both iron and calcium ingestion [1,11,27,28]. If taken together, the elemental calcium will block iron absorption [17]. Also, patients should read the supplement label to ensure the proper zinc-to copper ratios follow the bariatric recommendations [6]. Table 8 identifies some of the characteristics associated with different types of MVM supplementation formulations.
Table 8.
Pros and cons of multivitamin mineral supplement formulations [28].
Formulation | Pros | Cons |
---|---|---|
Transdermal Patches [29,30] |
|
|
Tablets |
|
|
Capsules |
|
|
Gummies/Soft Chews |
|
|
Liquid Vitamins, Microgels, Soft-gel Capsules |
|
|
RTCs: randomized controlled trials; GI: gastrointestinal tract.
4.1. Vitamin and mineral recommendations for MBS patients
The ASMBS clinical practice guidelines provide basic recommendations for clinicians to follow for preoperative and post-surgical patient care [6]. Certain procedures may require a higher level of supplementation (Table 9). In some cases, additional micronutrient supplementation may be required including iron, calcium, vitamin B12, vitamin D, or a B-complex formulation [1,6,31]. For patients with more invasive MBS procedures (i.e., distal RYGB, BPD-DS, SADI-S), a bariatric-specific MVM should include fat soluble vitamins (i.e., vitamins A, D, E, K) in a water-miscible or dry formulation to enhance intestinal absorption [6].
Table 9.
Nutrient | Recommended supplementation SG or RYGB | Recommended supplementation BPD-DS, or SADI-S |
---|---|---|
Vitamin B1 (thiamin) | At least 12 mg oral daily | At least 12 mg oral daily |
Vitamin B9 (folate, folic acid) | 400 mcg oral daily (800 mcg oral daily for child-bearing women) | 400 mcg oral daily (800 mcg oral daily for child-bearing women) |
Vitamin B12 (cobalamin; cyanocobalamin synthetic form) | 350 mcg oral daily | 500 mcg oral daily |
Vitamin A (retinol) | 5000 IU (1500 mcg)/oral daily | 10,000 IU (3000 mcg)/oral daily |
Vitamin D (D3, cholecalciferol) | 3000 IU (75 mcg)/oral daily | 3000 IU (75 mcg)/oral daily |
Vitamin E (alpha-tocopherol) | 15 mg oral daily | 15 mg oral daily |
Vitamin K (phylloquinone) | 90 mcg oral daily | 300 mcg oral daily |
Calcium (citrate) | 1200 mg oral daily | 1800 mg oral daily |
Copper | 2 mg oral daily | 2 mg oral daily |
Iron | 45 mg oral daily | 45 mg oral daily |
Zinca | 16–22 mg oral daily | 16–22 mg oral daily |
Vitamin B2 (riboflavin) | 200 % DV, (2.6 mg) | 200 % DV, (2.6 mg) |
Vitamin B3 (niacin) | 20 mg daily (125 % DV) | 200 % DV, (F: 28 mg; M: 32 mg) |
Vitamin B5 (pantothenic acid) | 200 % DV, (10 mg) | 200 % DV, (10 mg) |
Vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) | 4 mg daily | 4 mg daily |
Vitamin B7 (biotin) | 200 % DV, (60 mcg) | 200 % DV, (60 mcg) |
Vitamin C | 120 mg daily | 180 mg daily |
RYGB: roux-en y gastric bypass; SG: sleeve gastrectomy, BPD-DS: biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch, SADI-S: single anastomosis duodeno-ileostomy with sleeve gastrectomy; DV: daily value; mg: milligrams; mcg: micrograms; IU: international units; F: female; M: male.
4.2. Replenishing micronutrient deficiencies
An individualized therapeutic approach to correcting mild to severe forms of micronutrient deficiencies is reported in Table 10. These recommendations follow the ASMBS guidelines and should be considered by clinicians when micronutrient deficiencies have been identified [1,6]. A range of therapeutic options, including length of time for treatment is suggested. Although some MBS programs have developed their own protocols for correcting MBS nutrient deficiencies, Table 10 provides an overview of MBS evidence-based therapies commonly cited in the literature [1,6,11].
Table 10.
American Society of Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery recommendations for micronutrient repletion [6].
Vitamin/Mineral | Repletion Therapy Options |
---|---|
Thiamin | Oral therapy: 100 mg 2–3x/d IV therapy: 200 mg 3x/d or 500 mg 1-2x/d for 3–5 d; then 250 mg/d for 3–5 d IM therapy: 250 mg 1x/d for 3–5 d or 100–250 mg monthly |
Folate | Oral therapy: 1000 mg/d |
Vitamin B12 [32] | Oral therapy: 1000 mg/d |
Vitamin A | IM therapy: 50,000–100,000 IU/3 d (with corneal changes). then 50,000 IU/d IM for 2 weeks |
Vitamin D | Oral therapy: 3000–6000 IU/d; or 50,000 IU/1–3x/weeks |
Vitamin E | Oral therapy: 100–400 IU/d (alpha-tocopherol) |
Vitamin K | Oral therapy: 1–2 mg/d IV therapy: 1–2 mg/week; Acute malabsorption: 10 mg week |
Calcium | Oral therapy: BPD/DS: 1800–2400 mg/d calcium citrate SG, RYGB: 1200–1500 mg/d calcium citrate |
Copper | Oral therapy: 3–8 mg/d copper gluconate or sulfate (mild-moderate deficiencies) IV therapy: 2–4 mg/d intravenous copper can be initiated for 6 d (severe deficiency) |
Iron | Oral therapy: 150–200 mg/d elemental iron; 300 mg 2–3x/d in severe cases IV therapy: may consider IV iron in severe cases [33] |
Zinc | Although there is insufficient evidence to support specific zinc replenishing recommendations, consider the following: 16–22 mg oral daily; ∗Zinc to copper ratio: 8–15 mg of zinc for every 1 mg of copper [1,6]. |
IV: intravenous; IM: intramuscular; mg: milligrams; IU: international units; d: day; RYGB: roux-en y gastric bypass; SG: sleeve gastrectomy, BPD-DS: biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch.
5. Postoperative nutrition care of the MBS patient
5.1. Postoperative diet progression and nutrition therapy
Postoperative nutrition care for bariatric surgery patients is a continuation of preoperative medical nutrition therapy typically managed by an RD [1,6]. The MBS postoperative eating pattern is often prescribed in stages from clear liquids to a regular diet progression that varies among surgical centers. Currently, there is no evidence to support a specific protocol of post-MBS diet progressions [6]. Most MBS protocols suggest a transition into different food textures, fluid, and protein recommendations, along with bariatric micronutrient supplementation [1,6,34]. The overall goal of a postoperative diet is to promote healing, weight loss, and to decrease the risk of gastrointestinal complications. The diet progression and recommendations should be modified according to the MBS procedure type and the patient's specific nutritional status [6,11,34,35]. (Table 11)
Table 11.
Diet stage | Suggested education for food texture progression |
---|---|
Clear Liquid Diet |
|
Full Liquid Diet |
|
Semisolid/Soft Textures |
|
Regular Textures |
|
In addition, nutrition education should include [11,36].
-
•
Reading food labels to limit added sugars, fats and highly processed ingredients
-
•
Distinguishing between protein supplements and meal replacements
-
•
Establishing an eating schedule to prevent grazing behaviors
-
•
Eating behaviors and food choices to prevent food intolerances and regurgitation
-
•
Allowing 20–30 minutes for meals
-
•
Recognizing different types of proteins within food sources for amino acid composition, sustained satiety, and absorption bioavailability.
5.2. Protein intake
Protein is a vital macronutrient that needs to be consumed in adequate quantity and of sufficient quality to support proper metabolic functioning and retention of muscle mass [37]. Table 12 provides some recommendations that can serve as a guide for the clinician and patient.
Table 12.
Complete Proteins Animal-based proteins are complete proteins with all nine essential amino acids.
|
Incomplete Proteins Plant-based proteins are considered incomplete proteins due to lacking one or more of the essential amino acids.
|
Protein Recommendations:
|
6. Postoperative nutrition assessment & monitoring [6,11,34,35]
6.1. ASMBS recommended schedule for post-MBS clinic visits [6]
Most MBS programs conduct nutrition assessments with close monitoring of postoperative patients on multiple occasions during the first 12 months post-MBS. A trained bariatric RD usually visits with patients during their hospital stay to reinforce the discharge diet progression, which is often modified according to the type of MBS procedure [6]. Patients return to the outpatient clinic usually 1-week post-MBS, and then follow up with scheduled appointments at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months depending on the MBS program requirements [6,11]. Micronutrient levels should be reevaluated according to the MBS procedure type and reviewed by the MBS team similar to the schedule in Table 13. Thereafter, patients should follow up with their MBS team or obesity medicine specialists annually, at the minimum.
Table 13.
Nutrient | Preferred test | SG, RYGB | SADI-S, BPD/DS |
---|---|---|---|
Vitamin A (retinol) | Retinol serum | Optional for RYGB | At least 1x w/in 1st yr; then annually |
Vitamin B1 (thiamin) | Whole blood thiamin | 1–3 mo; then every 3–6 mo during 1st yr; then annually | 1–3 mo; then every 3–6 mo during 1st yr; then annually |
Vitamin B9 (folate) | Red blood cell folate | Every 3–6 mo during 1st yr; then annually | 1–3 mo; then every 3–6 mo during 1st yr; then annually |
Vitamin B12 (cyanocobalamin) | B12 serum, methylmalonic acid (MMA) serum (provides early sign of B12 deficiency) | 1–3 mo (if indicated); then every 3–6 mo during 1st yr; then annually | 1–3 mo (if indicated); then every 3–6 mo during 1st yr; then annually |
Vitamin D (D2 or D3) | 25-OH Vit D | 1–3 mo; then every 3–6 mo during 1st yr; then annually | 1–3 mo; then every 3–6 mo during 1st yr; then annually |
Vitamin E (A-tocopherol) | Vit E serum | Optional w/in 1st yr; then annually | Optional w/in 1st yr; then annually |
Vitamin K | Vit K serum | Optional w/in 1st yr; then annually | Optional w/in 1st yr; then annually |
Calcium (citrate) | Calcium, ionized, serum | Every 3–6 mo during 1st yr; then annually | Every 3–6 mo during 1st yr; then annually |
Copper | Copper, serum | Optional | Optional |
Iron | Ferritin with c-reactive protein; full iron panel (iron, transferrin, % saturation, total iron-binding capacity) | 1–3 mo; then every 3–6 mo during 1st yr; then annually | 1–3 mo; then every 3–6 mo during 1st yr; then annually |
Zinc | Zinc, serum | Annually | Annually |
SG: sleeve gastrectomy; RYGB: roux-en y gastric bypass; BPD-DS: biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch, SADI-S: single anastomosis duodeno-ileostomy with sleeve gastrectomy; OH: hydroxy; mo: month(s); 1sr: first; yr: year.
6.2. Post-surgical bariatric nutrition assessment tool
At each follow up appointment, a general nutrition assessment and evaluation should be conducted. Table 14 is a general nutrition screening tool that can be used to identify overall nutritional adequacy and expose potential nutrition issues.
Table 14.
Consideration | Comment |
---|---|
Metabolic Bariatric Surgery Type |
|
Food Intake (detailed food record) Websites/Phone Apps: www.Baritastic.com www.Supertracker.usda.gov www.CalorieKing.com www.MyFitnessPal.com www.FitDay.com www.LoseIt.com |
|
Oral Supplements |
|
Medication Review Post-Surgery |
|
Changes in Food Knowledge, Beliefs, Attitudes, Skills |
|
Eating Behaviors Example: Hunger Scale Tool [38] <---------------------------------------------------> 1. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
|
|
Access to Foods |
|
Physical Activity/Function |
|
Anthropometric Measures |
|
Indirect Calorimetry (if available) |
|
Biochemical and Micronutrient Labs |
|
Nutrition-Focused Physical Findings and Symptoms |
|
DEXA: dual energy x-ray absorptiometry.
Further testing is recommended to diagnose protein malnutrition [11,41]. (Table 15)
Table 15.
Physical assessment of protein status [41].
A nutrition-focused malnutrition diagnosis involves: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MBS: metabolic and bariatric surgery.
7. Trouble-shooting nutrition-related concerns 0–12 months post-surgery
Some of the most common patient concerns following surgery include constipation, dehydration, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and lactose intolerance. Table 16 highlights common symptoms, potential triggers, and nutrition-related suggestions for providers.
Table 16.
Nutrition-related suggestions for patients 0–12 months post MBS with common symptoms and concerns [6,11,[42], [43], [44], [45], [46]].
Symptom | Potential Triggers | Nutrition-related suggestions |
---|---|---|
Constipation |
|
|
Dehydration |
|
|
Diarrhea |
|
|
Nausea |
|
|
Vomiting/Regurgitation |
|
|
Foods get “stuck” [35] |
|
|
Abdominal distension/flatulence |
|
|
Lactose intolerance |
|
|
Dumping syndrome Symptoms
|
|
|
Dizziness, Lightheadedness, or Headaches |
|
|
Fatigue or General Weakness |
|
|
Heartburn |
|
|
Leg Cramps |
|
|
High-Vitamin B12 Levels |
|
|
Excessive Hair Loss |
|
|
Weight Maintenance |
|
|
Pregnancy |
|
FODMAP: fermentable oligo-, di-, monosaccharides and polyols.
8. Nutrition-related deficiencies
Nutrition-related deficiencies may appear anytime following MBS. However, for those patients who no longer follow up with the MBS team, an annual nutrition evaluation by their obesity medicine specialist or primary care provider is essential. Table 17 identifies some more common nutrition-related concerns and symptoms reported by patients more than one-year post-surgery. Refer to Table 13, Table 14, Table 15 for annual nutrient assessment labs.
Table 17.
Common Nutrition Diagnoses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 18 may be used to identify physical findings that might be associated with signs of malnutrition. Physical signs of malnutrition can be very subtle, so providers should utilize laboratory data, when possible, to support their findings.
Table 18.
Nutrient | Signs and Symptoms Associated with Nutrient Deficiency |
---|---|
Vitamin A (retinol) | Night blindness due to corneal keratinization or necrosis, metabolic dysfunction of adipocyte, glucose |
Vitamin B1 (thiamin) | Beriberi, weakness, Wernicke-Korsakoff encephalopathy, heart failure, edema, anorexia, nausea/vomiting |
Vitamin B9 (folate) | Megaloblastic anemia, anorexia, fetal neural tube defects (if preconception deficiency) |
Vitamin B12 (cyanocobalamin) | Macrocytic anemia, peripheral neuropathy, glossitis, diarrhea, headaches, neuropsychiatric disturbances |
Vitamin D (D2 or D3) | Decreased bone mineralization, osteopenia, secondary hyperparathyroidism, hypocalcemia |
Vitamin E (A-Tocopherol) | Hyporeflexia, decreased night vision, loss/decreased vibratory sense, limb and truncal ataxia, profuse muscle gaze, cardiac arrhythmias, reduced cognition |
Vitamin K | Bleeding disorders, bruising, increased risk for bleeding |
Calcium (citrate) | Decrease bone mineralization, osteopenia, secondary hyperparathyroidism, tetany (i.e., muscle contractions, spasms, or paresthesia) |
Copper | Anemia, neutropenia |
Iron | Microcytic and hypochromic anemia, fatigue, weakness, tachycardia, dyspnea, pallor, cold intolerance, koilonychia (brittle spoon-shaped nails), glossitis |
Selenium | Impaired immune function, cardiovascular effects, reproductive/fertility problems, thyroid dysfunction, neurological symptoms, and musculoskeletal abnormalities |
Zinc | Dermatitis, impaired wound healing, impaired taste, decreased immune function |
Vitamin B2 (riboflavin) | Dermatitis, cheilosis and angular stomatitis (cracks or lesions on the lips or at the corners of the mouth), sore throat, inflammation and redness of the tongue (“magenta tongue”) |
Vitamin B3 (niacin) | Pellagra, 4Ds = diarrhea, dermatitis in sun exposed areas with scaling and keratosis, dementia, death |
Vitamin B5 (pantothenic acid) | Impaired metabolism of carbohydrates, proteins and fatty acids, paresthesias |
Vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) | Skin eruptions, atrophic glossitis, angular cheilitis, conjunctivitis, sideroblastic anemia, somnolence, confusion, peripheral neuropathy |
Vitamin B7 (biotin) | Hair loss, conjunctivitis, scaly rash, anemia, central nervous system disorders |
Vitamin C | Scurvy, bleeding gums, loose teeth, bruising, perifollicular hemorrhage, poor wound healing, fatigue |
9. Protein-energy undernutrition (PEU)
Metabolic bariatric surgery, known for dietary changes and physiological alterations of the digestive tract, increases the risk for undernutrition and protein malnutrition [49].
Protein-energy malnutrition (PEM), currently known as protein-energy undernutrition (PEU), includes a deficiency of all macronutrients, but primarily protein, due to insufficient caloric intake [41]. Undernutrition may be recognized by an inadequate intake of nutrients, malabsorption, impaired metabolism, loss of nutrients due to diarrhea, or increased nutritional requirements [41,50,51]. Severe cases of undernutrition described as an excessive loss of adipose tissue and muscle, are a form of malnutrition occasionally seen in post-MBS patients [6,41,49]. Some post-MBS patients experience severe protein malnutrition and micronutrient deficiencies associated with more invasive bariatric procedures such as a proximal or distal RYGB, BPD/DS, or SADI-S [6,49]. Protein malnutrition and vitamin/mineral deficiencies develop from deficits of total caloric intake or insufficient specific macronutrient and micronutrient quantities essential for adequate nutritional status [41,51]. Malnutrition severity in MBS patients ranges from subclinical micronutrient deficiencies to more physical signs of wasting with edema, hair loss, muscle and skin atrophy [41,49]. In MBS patients, protein malnutrition and micronutrient deficiency symptoms may develop slowly or very rapidly [6]. In general, signs of protein or micronutrient malnutrition depend on the patient's response to a particular MBS procedure, potential anatomical complications, severe diarrhea or dumping syndrome, gastrointestinal infections such as Clostridium difficile, food insecurity, disordered eating behaviors, or a combination of other wasting disorders (i.e., renal failure, heart disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cancer) [6,49]. Laboratory data should be collected if protein malnutrition is suspected (Table 15).
Protein malnutrition severity may need to be treated by correcting fluid and electrolyte levels with IV solutions [41]. Oral protein supplements and high bioavailable proteins in the diet, as typically prescribed by an RD, should be incorporated into the diet for mild to moderate form of protein malnutrition. The general protein recommendation for most post-MBS patients is at least 60 g of high quality protein/day or up to 1.5 g/kg of ideal body weight/day [6]. Severe cases of hypoalbuminemia may require 2 g of high-quality protein/kg body weight/day [41].
10. Factors associated with slow weight loss after metabolic and bariatric surgery
Rate of weight loss in the immediate postoperative phase varies significantly between individuals with severe obesity. When discussing the rate of weight loss during the first-year post-MBS and beyond with patients, consider the following factors in Table 19, and a description of problematic eating behaviors in Table 20.
Table 19.
Factors | Consideration |
---|---|
Anatomical or surgical factors |
|
Social demographics and anthropometrics |
|
Underlying disease and past medical history | |
Eating behaviors |
|
Social support |
|
Psychological factors |
|
Self-adherence to MBS recommendations |
|
Physical inactivity |
|
Medications |
|
Gastrointestinal hormones |
|
Gut microbiome |
|
Table 20.
Type | Characteristics |
---|---|
Anorexia Nervosa |
|
Loss of Control |
|
Night Eating Syndrome |
|
Grazing, Picking, Nibbling |
|
Dumping, Chewing/Spitting |
|
Pica [14] |
|
Maladaptive eating behaviors described in patients after MBS may be the same or differ from those eating behaviors identified in the preoperative screening in Table 4. Table 20 describes some of the more common types of maladaptive eating behaviors reported in postoperative MBS patients, some of which may be associated with slow weight loss or gradual recurrent weight gain.
11. Recurrent weight gain
A proportion of patients experience clinically significant recurrent weight gain following MBS. Anatomic complications such as slippage of the gastric band, gastro-gastric fistulas, dilated gastric fundus, an enlarged gastric pouch, or gastro-jejunal stoma may lead to recurrent weight gain [52,55]. Insufficient physiological changes to the gut microbiome, inadequate adaptation of gastrointestinal hormones, and adaptation of the body's neurohormonal energy regulation that favors return to a previously determined set point are partially responsible as well [1]. However, more common causes of recurrent weight gain in post-MBS patients appear to be maladaptive eating behaviors (i.e., loss of control eating, grazing behaviors), returning to old eating habits due to socioeconomical factors, plus noncompliance to dietary recommendations [[52], [53], [54], [55]].
Physical inactivity, stressful environment, history of depression, and changes in hormones that regulate energy intake have also been shown to increase appetite, enhance food cravings, and ultimately increase caloric intake [[52], [53], [54], [55]]. Therefore, the major maladaptive behavior leading to recurrent weight gain post-operatively appears to be a combination of physiological factors, increased caloric intake due to increased appetite, excessive eating, inadequate physical activity, hormonal changes, and psychosocial stressors [[52], [53], [54], [55]].
Table 21 shows the top 10 takeaway messages regarding bariatric nutrition and the MBS patient.
Table 21.
Bariatric nutrition and MBS patients |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MBS: metabolic and bariatric surgery; RYGB: roux-en y gastric bypass; SG: sleeve gastrectomy, BPD-DS: biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch, SADI-S: single anastomosis duodeno-ileostomy with sleeve gastrectomy; MVM: multivitamin mineral.
12. Limitations and acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge that MBS programs vary with institution protocols and bariatric nutrition recommendations for preoperative and post-surgical patients. The authors also recognize that patients receive much of their information from social media and the internet, which challenges both the provider and our efforts to promote evidence-based nutrition messages. As newer modifications of the current MBS procedures continue to evolve, so will our understanding of nutrition absorption sites, prevention of nutrient deficiencies, and our ability to assess and manage MBS patients with nutrition complications and challenges. Guidelines specific to subpopulations of patients, such as pediatric or older patients, those with renal or liver disease or other special needs, by ethnicity or race, or those who undergo endoscopic bariatric procedures such as endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty, are beyond the scope of this CPS but would make an excellent topic for a follow up CPS related to this topic. Future research in these specific areas is also needed.
13. Conclusion
This Obesity Medicine Association Clinical Practice Statement on metabolic and bariatric surgery nutrition therapy, an update to the 2022 OMA CPS focused on bariatric surgery [1], is designed to assist clinicians in caring for patients seeking bariatric surgery and postoperative nutritional management. Evidence-based nutrition recommendations for MBS procedures are provided to help clinicians in identifying and managing patients at risk for nutritional deficiencies preoperatively and post-surgery. Post-MBS patients should be evaluated annually at minimum, if not more frequently, to promote optimal nutritional health. Treating the disease of obesity involves more than just weight loss; it is about improving the quality of life of those individuals with obesity by educating patients on healthy eating and lifestyle behaviors.
Three Takeaway Messages.
-
1.
Perioperative optimization for patients seeking MBS includes the management of modifiable risks prior to and after surgery, reducing risks during the perioperative phase, and improving patient outcomes post-MBS.
-
2.
Micronutrient depletion or deficiency documented by blood or plasma concentrations below the reference range may occur with few if any clinical signs or symptoms.
-
3.
The development of an interdisciplinary team of medical providers with evidence-based nutrition knowledge and consistent information improves the quality of nutrition care provided to MBS patients.
14. Author contributions
The concept of the submission was suggested by the authors of the 2022 OMA CPS entitled “Obesity Medicine Association (OMA) Bariatric surgery, gastrointestinal hormones, and the microbiome Clinical Practice Statement (CPS) 2022” and the OMA Bariatric Medical Surgery Committee. SBD wrote the first draft, with input from KF, RP. SBD, KF reviewed and edited the draft.
Ethics review
This OMA Clinical Practice Statement manuscript was peer-reviewed and approved by the OMA Board of Trustee members prior to publication. Edits were made in response to reviewer comments and the final revised manuscript was approved by the authors prior to publication. Fictious case studies were used. This submission did not involve human test subjects or volunteers. Responsibility for editorial decisions and peer review process for this article was delegated to non-author Editors or non-author Associate Editors.
Evidence
The content of this manuscript is supported by citations, which are listed in the References section.
Conclusions and recommendations
This Clinical Practice Statement is intended to be an educational tool that incorporates the current medical science and the clinical experiences of obesity specialists. The intent is to better facilitate and improve the clinical care and management of patients with obesity. This Clinical Practice Statement should not be interpreted as “rules” and/or directives regarding the medical care of an individual patient. The decision regarding the optimal care of the patient with obesity is best reliant upon a patient-centered approach, managed by the clinician tasked with directing an individual treatment plan that is in the best interest of the individual patient.
Updating
It is anticipated that sections of this Clinical Practice Statement may require future updates. The timing of such an update will depend on decisions made by the Obesity Pillars Editorial team, with input from the OMA members and OMA Board of Trustees.
Disclaimer and limitations
In areas regarding inconclusive or insufficient scientific evidence, the authors used their professional judgment. This Clinical Practice Statement is intended to represent the state of obesity medicine at the time of publication. Thus, this Clinical Practice Statement is not a substitute for maintaining awareness of emerging new science. Finally, decisions by practitioners to apply the principles in this Clinical Practice Statement are best made by considering local resources, individual patient circumstances, patient agreement, and knowledge of federal, state, and local laws and guidance.
Transparency
Since 2022, the Obesity Medicine Association Clinical Practice Statements have represented a diverse range of clinicians, allied health professionals, clinical researchers, and academicians. The authors reflect a multidisciplinary and balanced group of experts in obesity science, patient evaluation, and clinical treatment.
Declaration of AI and AI-assisted technologies in the writing process
During the preparation of this work the authors did not use AI.
Funding
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Declaration of competing interests
Sue Benson-Davies: Obesity Pillars Associate Editor.
Kirsten Frederiksen: None.
Rutuja Patel: None.
Acknowledgement
The authors would like to thank Mary Dagen for proofreading earlier drafts of the manuscript.
Contributor Information
Sue Benson-Davies, Email: susan.davies@usd.edu.
Kirsten Frederiksen, Email: kirsten.fred@gmail.com.
Rutuja Patel, Email: rutuja.patel@nm.org.
Appendix A. Supplemental Cases [1,6,11,13,17,21,32]
The following supplementary cases illustrate recommendations made in this article.
Case 1: Pre-Bariatric Surgery Vitamin B12 Deficiency and Its Management
1.1. A 42-year-old female presented to the medical weight management clinic for evaluation
She had a body mass index (BMI) of 42 kg/m2, a history of hypertension, type 2 diabetes, and obstructive sleep apnea. Due to the patient's BMI and comorbidities, the patient was referred for vertical sleeve gastrectomy surgery. Pre-surgical evaluation including labs were performed.
The patient's laboratory workup revealed.
-
-
Hemoglobin: 10.8 g/dL (normal: 12–16 g/dL)
-
-
Mean corpuscular volume (MCV): 104 fL (normal: 80–100 fL)
-
-
Serum vitamin B12: 190 pg/mL (normal: 200–900 pg/mL)
-
-
Serum homocysteine: elevated at 20 μmol/L
-
-
Serum methylmalonic acid (MMA): elevated at 0.6 μmol/L
-
-
Stool hemoccult testing negative for occult blood
The patient exhibited mild fatigue but did not have any neurological symptoms or visible skin changes. The patient denied a history of gastrointestinal bleeding, melena, hematochezia, hematemesis, gastroesophageal reflux, alcohol use, chronic use of a proton pump inhibitor or antihistamine medication but had been on metformin for about two years. Metformin is known to reduce or block the absorption of Vitamin B12 in the terminal ileum. A diagnosis of vitamin B12 deficiency was made based on the low serum B12 levels and elevated MMA and homocysteine levels.
Management
.
1.2. Preoperative Optimization
Metformin was discontinued and blood glucose was monitored closely prior to surgery. Given the patient's upcoming bariatric surgery, prompt correction of vitamin B12 deficiency was important to avoid potential postoperative complications, such as neuropathy or worsening anemia and fatigue. After the initial course of intramuscular (IM) vitamin B12 injections, the plan included reassessment of serum B12 levels and continuing monthly IM injections for 6 months, after which the guideline recommendations of 1000 mcg vitamin B12 daily taken orally for repletion were to be considered.
1.2.1. Vitamin B12 Supplementation
The patient was started on IM injections of cyanocobalamin 1000 mcg weekly for 4 weeks, then 1000 mcg monthly for 6 months. IM injections were chosen due to potential issues with oral absorption in patients with obesity and the need for rapid repletion.
1.2.2. Iron and Folate Assessment
The patient's hemoglobin level suggested a potential concurrent iron deficiency, so additional labs for serum ferritin, iron, and folate were ordered. Folate and iron levels were normal, but ferritin was low, and the patient was also started on iron supplementation. The patient was advised to take ferrous sulfate 65 mg tablets daily for 3 months until her ferritin levels were above 100 mg/L.
After 4 weeks of IM B12 injections, the patient's serum B12 levels normalized to 500 pg/mL. Serum B12 levels were checked just prior to her next injection so as not to confound the improvement with recent dosing. Her hemoglobin increased to 12.2 g/dL. She reported improved energy levels and no adverse effects from the supplementation. Due to a significant reduction in nutrient intake as preparation for bariatric surgery, blood glucose levels normalized and no additional glucose lowering agent was required. The patient proceeded with sleeve gastrectomy without complications.
1.2.3. Long-term monitoring and recommendations
Following bariatric surgery, the patient will require lifelong monitoring of vitamin B12 levels due to the risk of malabsorption. The guidelines suggest 1, 3, 6, 12 months post SG, and then yearly.
The patient will continue monthly IM B12 injections for 6 months postoperatively, after which transition to oral supplementation will be considered based on her clinical status and absorption capacity.
1.3. Conclusion
This case highlights the importance of preoperative screening for vitamin B12 deficiency in bariatric surgery candidates and demonstrates that prompt correction with IM B12 injections can improve outcomes. Understanding the underlying etiology for the nutrient deficiency is also important for reducing risk of recurrence. Postoperative follow-up and continued supplementation are key to preventing long-term complications associated with B12 deficiency.
Case 2: Vitamin A Deficiency in a Post-Bariatric Surgery Patient
2.1. A 53 year-old female reported to the medical weight management clinic for weight recurrence
She had a history of obesity, underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) in 2011, had a pre surgery weight of 400 pounds, nadir weight of 175 pounds and weight settlement to 240 pounds, stable for the past 10 years. She maintained a 39 % total body weight loss (TBWL) for over 10 years. For the preceding 3 months, she noted trouble with night vision while driving and very dry skin despite using more moisturizing creams. She reported poor adherence to her prescribed multivitamin supplementation and admitted to occasional lapses in dietary intake, with a preference for low-fat foods and difficulty tolerating vegetables and meat due to early satiety.
The patient's surgical history was uncomplicated, and she did not report any other new health concerns aside from the vision and skin issues. Physical examination revealed dry, scaly skin, particularly on the extremities. There were no signs of conjunctival or corneal abnormalities on examination, but the patient did report progressive difficulty seeing in dim light. Visual acuity testing was normal.
The patient's laboratory workup revealed.
-
-
Serum vitamin A (retinol): 18 μg/dL (normal: 20–60 μg/dL)
-
-
Serum prealbumin: 15 mg/dL (normal: 15–36 mg/dL)
-
-
Liver function tests: normal
-
-
Vitamin D and calcium levels: normal
A diagnosis of vitamin A deficiency was made based on the low serum retinol levels and the patient's clinical symptoms, particularly night blindness. A nutrient-poor diet, malabsorptive state post RYGB, and lack of adequate supplementation with multivitamins specific for post-bariatric surgery patients were considered the etiology for this patient's vitamin A deficiency.
Management
.
2.2. Post-operative optimization
2.2.1. Vitamin A Supplementation
Given the severity of the symptoms, the patient was started on high-dose oral vitamin A supplementation (50,000 IU daily for 2 weeks) with a plan to taper to a maintenance dose (10,000 IU daily) after 2 weeks. Oral supplementation was chosen due to the patient's ability to absorb fat-soluble vitamins despite her malabsorptive procedure. Regular monitoring of serum retinol and liver function tests were planned to avoid hypervitaminosis A, especially due to the fat-soluble nature of vitamin A and potential for the buildup of excessive stores in fat tissue over time.
2.2.2. Dietary Counseling
The patient was referred to a dietitian to address the nutritional challenges post-surgery. Counseling focused on increasing dietary sources of vitamin A (e.g., liver, eggs, fortified dairy products, and orange-colored vegetables like carrots and sweet potatoes), as well as strategies to tolerate these foods despite early satiety. The dietitian also reviewed the importance of consistent and appropriate multivitamin use, with particular attention to the inclusion of fat-soluble vitamins.
2.2.3. Long-term monitoring and recommendations
The patient was advised to continue follow-up every 3–6 months to assess her vitamin A status and other fat-soluble vitamins (D, E, K), as deficiencies are common after RYGB. Ophthalmology referral was considered if her night blindness did not improve with supplementation.
After 4 weeks of high-dose vitamin A supplementation, the patient reported significant improvement in her night vision and dry skin. Repeat serum vitamin A levels increased to 40 μg/dL, and no signs of vitamin A toxicity were present. She was transitioned to a maintenance dose of 10,000 IU daily and advised to continue her bariatric multivitamin regimen consistently. Her immune function improved, with fewer respiratory infections noted over the following months.
2.3. Conclusion
Vitamin A deficiency is a known complication of bariatric surgery, particularly in malabsorptive procedures such as Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD-DS). Vitamin A is essential for vision, immune function, and epithelial integrity, and deficiency can lead to significant clinical symptoms. This case describes a patient with vitamin A deficiency following bariatric surgery and the management strategy employed to reverse the deficiency and associated symptoms.
Case 3: Calcium Deficiency in a Post-Bariatric Surgery Patient
3.1. A 48-year-old female, who underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) 18 months prior, presented to the clinic with complaints of muscle cramps, joint pain, and fatigue
She also reported occasional numbness and tingling in her fingers and toes. Despite following her prescribed multivitamin regimen, she admitted to inconsistently taking her calcium and vitamin D supplements.
The patient had experienced significant weight loss since surgery, with her BMI decreasing from 42 kg/m2 to 28 kg/m2. Her dietary intake was reported as predominantly plant-based, with low intake of dairy products or calcium-rich foods due to difficulty with portion sizes and gastrointestinal intolerance to some foods postoperatively. Physical examination revealed a positive Chvostek's sign (indicating neuromuscular irritability associated with hypocalcemia) and muscle tenderness in the lower extremities without focal deficits.
The patient's laboratory workup revealed.
-
-
Serum calcium: 7.8 mg/dL (normal: 8.5–10.5 mg/dL)
-
-
Ionized calcium: 3.9 mg/dL (normal: 4.6–5.3 mg/dL)
-
-
Serum parathyroid hormone (PTH): 120 pg/mL (normal: 10–65 pg/mL)
-
-
Serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D: 18 ng/mL (normal: 30–100 ng/mL)
-
-
Alkaline phosphatase: elevated at 190 U/L (normal: 40–130 U/L)
The high serum parathyroid hormone levels and alkaline phosphatase levels suggested secondary hyperparathyroidism with increased bone turnover and the low vitamin D level indicated concurrent vitamin D deficiency. A diagnosis of calcium deficiency with secondary hyperparathyroidism and vitamin D deficiency was made.
Management
.
3.2. Post-operative optimization
3.2.1. Calcium and Vitamin D Supplementation
The patient was started on calcium citrate 1200 mg daily, divided into two doses. Calcium citrate was chosen over calcium carbonate due to its better absorption in the low-acid environment post-RYGB. Vitamin D3 supplementation was initiated at a dose of 50,000 IU weekly for 8 weeks to replenish her stores, followed by a maintenance dose of 3000 IU daily.
3.2.2. Dietary Counseling
The patient was referred to a dietitian for counseling on incorporating calcium-rich foods that are better tolerated post-bariatric surgery, such as fortified plant-based milks, soft tofu, and leafy green vegetables. The dietitian also advised strategies to ensure adequate protein intake, as well as proper timing of calcium and iron supplements to prevent absorption interference.
3.2.3. Long-term monitoring and recommendations
The patient was instructed to return for repeat laboratory testing in 8 weeks to assess serum calcium, vitamin D, and PTH levels. Bone density testing (DEXA scan) was also recommended to evaluate bone health given the prolonged period of calcium deficiency and elevated PTH levels, which indicated potential bone loss.
The patient was encouraged to engage in weight-bearing exercises to promote bone health and prevent further demineralization. A physical therapist was consulted to help design an appropriate exercise regimen that would improve strength while accommodating any postoperative limitations.
After 8 weeks of calcium and high-dose vitamin D supplementation, the patient's serum calcium improved to 8.6 mg/dL, and her vitamin D level increased to 32 ng/mL. PTH levels began to normalize (70 pg/mL), indicating a reduction in secondary hyperparathyroidism. The patient reported significant improvement in muscle cramps and fatigue, with no further episodes of numbness or tingling.
The patient was maintained on daily calcium citrate (1200 mg) and vitamin D (3000 IU), with plans for ongoing monitoring every 6 months. Bone density testing showed early signs of osteopenia, so additional follow-up with an endocrinologist was recommended.
Calcium deficiency is a frequent issue after bariatric surgery, particularly in procedures like RYGB, where calcium absorption is impaired due to bypassing the duodenum and reduced gastric acid production. Secondary hyperparathyroidism occurs as a compensatory response to low calcium levels, leading to increased bone resorption and risk of bone disease. Concurrent vitamin D deficiency exacerbates calcium malabsorption, making supplementation with both calcium and vitamin D essential in post-bariatric patients.
Lifelong supplementation with calcium and vitamin D is necessary after bariatric surgery to prevent deficiencies and maintain bone health. Calcium citrate is the preferred form of calcium in bariatric patients due to its superior absorption in the absence of gastric acid. Regular monitoring of serum calcium, vitamin D, and PTH levels is recommended, along with bone density assessments as clinically indicated. Calcium and vitamin D levels are evaluated at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-surgery during the active weight loss phase and yearly thereafter.
3.3. Conclusion
This case underscores the importance of routine monitoring and adequate supplementation of calcium and vitamin D in post-bariatric surgery patients. Early identification and treatment of these common deficiencies are crucial to prevent complications such as secondary hyperparathyroidism and bone demineralization. Patients must be educated on the importance of consistent supplement use and dietary adjustments to support long-term health after bariatric surgery.
References
- 1.Shetye B., Hamilton F.R., Bays H.E. Bariatric surgery, gastrointestinal hormones, and the microbiome: an obesity medicine association (OMA) clinical practice statement (CPS) 2022. Obes Pillars. 2022;2 doi: 10.1016/j.obpill.2022.100015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery Fact Sheet . 2021. American society of metabolic and bariatric surgery.https://asmbs.org/resources/metabolic-and-bariatric-surgery/ [Google Scholar]
- 3.Machado M.V. MASLD treatment-a shift in the paradigm is imminent. Front Med. 2023;10 doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1316284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hwang J., Hwang H., Shin H., Kim B.H., Kang S.H., Yoo J.J., et al. Bariatric intervention improves metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis in patients with obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Mol Hepatol. 2024;30:561–576. doi: 10.3350/cmh.2023.0384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.European Association for the Study of the Liver Electronic address eee, European association for the study of D, European association for the study of O, European association for the study of the L. EASL-EASD-EASO clinical practice guidelines on the management of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) J Hepatol. 2024;81:492–542. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2024.04.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Mechanick J.I., Apovian C., Brethauer S., Garvey W.T., Joffe A.M., Kim J., et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the perioperative nutrition, metabolic, and nonsurgical support of patients undergoing bariatric procedures - 2019 update: cosponsored by American association of clinical endocrinologists/American college of endocrinology, the obesity society, American society for metabolic & bariatric surgery, obesity medicine association, and American society of anesthesiologists. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2020;16:175–247. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2019.10.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Eisenberg D., Shikora S.A., Aarts E., Aminian A., Angrisani L., Cohen R.V., et al. American society for metabolic and bariatric surgery (ASMBS) and international federation for the surgery of obesity and metabolic disorders (IFSO): indications for metabolic and bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2022;18:1345–1356. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2022.08.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bariatric Surgery Procedures . 2021. American society of metabolic and bariatric surgery.https://asmbs.org/patients/bariatric-surgery-procedures/ 6/25/2024. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Felsenreich D.M., Langer F.B., Eichelter J., Jedamzik J., Gensthaler L., Nixdorf L., et al. Bariatric surgery-how much malabsorption do we need?-A review of various limb lengths in different gastric bypass procedures. J Clin Med. 2021;10 doi: 10.3390/jcm10040674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Aleassa E.M., Papasavas P., Augustin T., Khorgami Z., Benson-Davies S., Ghiassi S., et al. American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery literature review on the effect of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass limb lengths on outcomes. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2023;19:755–762. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2023.04.298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Sherf Dagan S., Goldenshluger A., Globus I., Schweiger C., Kessler Y., Kowen Sandbank G., et al. Nutritional recommendations for adult bariatric surgery patients: clinical practice. Adv Nutr. 2017;8:382–394. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmaa121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Carter J., Chang J., Birriel T.J., Moustarah F., Sogg S., Goodpaster K., et al. ASMBS position statement on preoperative patient optimization before metabolic and bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2021;17:1956–1976. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2021.08.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Berger M.M., Shenkin A., Dizdar O.S., Amrein K., Augsburger M., Biesalski H.K., et al. ESPEN practical short micronutrient guideline. Clin Nutr. 2024;43:825–857. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2022.02.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Klein D.A., Sylvester J.E., Schvey N.A. Eating disorders in primary care: diagnosis and management. Am Fam Physician. 2021;103:22–32. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33382560 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Price J.A., Zickgraf H.F., Rigby A. Food insecurity in a pre-bariatric surgery sample: prevalence, demographics and food shopping behaviour. Public Health Nutr. 2019;22:2756–2765. doi: 10.1017/S1368980019001320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Jakicic J.M., Rogers R.J., Church T.S. Physical activity in the new era of antiobesity medications. Obesity. 2024;32:234–236. doi: 10.1002/oby.23930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Parrott J., Frank L., Rabena R., Craggs-Dino L., Isom K.A., Greiman L. American society for metabolic and bariatric surgery integrated health nutritional guidelines for the surgical weight loss patient 2016 update: micronutrients. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017;13:727–741. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2016.12.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Tondt J.F.M., Benson-Davies S., Dawkins C., Magee J., Karjoo S., Ortiz Page S.O., Pile H., Khan N., Hurtado Andrade M., Rajpal A., Petcu A., Antoun J., Haq H., Fryoux E., Gugnani K., Manek M., Aranas M.P., Afreen S. 2024. Obesity Algorithm: obesity medicine association.https://obesitymedicine.org/resources/obesity-algorithm/ [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kushner R.F., Blatner D.J. Risk assessment of the overweight and obese patient. J Am Diet Assoc. 2005;105:S53–S62. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2005.02.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Sogg S., Lauretti J., West-Smith L. Recommendations for the presurgical psychosocial evaluation of bariatric surgery patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12:731–749. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2016.02.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Sherf-Dagan S., Sinai T., Goldenshluger A., Globus I., Kessler Y., Schweiger C., et al. Nutritional assessment and preparation for adult bariatric surgery candidates: clinical practice. Adv Nutr. 2021;12:1020–1031. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmaa121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Bradley M., Melchor J., Carr R., Karjoo S. Obesity and malnutrition in children and adults: a clinical review. Obes Pillars. 2023;8 doi: 10.1016/j.obpill.2023.100087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Berger M.M., Shenkin A., Schweinlin A., Amrein K., Augsburger M., Biesalski H.K., et al. ESPEN micronutrient guideline. Clin Nutr. 2022;41:1357–1424. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2022.02.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Berger M.M., Talwar D., Shenkin A. Pitfalls in the interpretation of blood tests used to assess and monitor micronutrient nutrition status. Nutr Clin Pract. 2023;38:56–69. doi: 10.1002/ncp.10924. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Shenkin A. Micronutrients in health and disease. Postgrad Med J. 2006;82:559–567. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2006.047670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Sugihara T., Koda M., Okamoto T., Miyoshi K., Matono T., Oyama K., et al. Falsely elevated serum vitamin B(12) levels were associated with the severity and prognosis of chronic viral liver disease. Yonago Acta Med. 2017;60:31–39. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28331419 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Schijns W., Schuurman L.T., Melse-Boonstra A., van Laarhoven C., Berends F.J., Aarts E.O. Do specialized bariatric multivitamins lower deficiencies after RYGB? Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14:1005–1012. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2018.03.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Smelt H.J.M., Heusschen L., Theel W., van Rutte P.W.J., Nijboer T., Pouwels S., et al. Factors affecting patient adherence to multivitamin intake after bariatric surgery: a multicentre survey study from the patient's perspective. Obes Surg. 2021;31:4316–4326. doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05571-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Saurabh S., Gao Y., Maduka S., Smith L., Lasley R., Singh N. Is transdermal multivitamin patch effective in gastric bypass patients? Obes Surg. 2019;29:3818–3823. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-04070-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Grammatikopoulou M.G., Gkiouras K., Dardiotis E., Zafiriou E., Tsigalou C., Bogdanos D.P. Peeking into the future: transdermal patches for the delivery of micronutrient supplements. Metabol Open. 2021;11 doi: 10.1016/j.metop.2021.100109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Homan J., Schijns W., Aarts E.O., van Laarhoven C., Janssen I.M.C., Berends F.J. An optimized multivitamin supplement lowers the number of vitamin and mineral deficiencies three years after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a cohort study. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12:659–667. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2015.12.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Butler C.C., Vidal-Alaball J., Cannings-John R., McCaddon A., Hood K., Papaioannou A., et al. Oral vitamin B12 versus intramuscular vitamin B12 for vitamin B12 deficiency: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Fam Pract. 2006;23:279–285. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cml008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Baird-Gunning J., Bromley J. Correcting iron deficiency. Aust Prescr. 2016;39:193–199. doi: 10.18773/austprescr.2016.069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Mechanick J.I., Youdim A., Jones D.B., Garvey W.T., Hurley D.L., McMahon M.M., et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the perioperative nutritional, metabolic, and nonsurgical support of the bariatric surgery patient--2013 update: cosponsored by American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, the Obesity Society, and American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery. Obesity. 2013;21(Suppl 1):S1–S27. doi: 10.1002/oby.20461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Allied Health Sciences Section Ad Hoc Nutrition C. Aills L., Blankenship J., Buffington C., Furtado M., Parrott J. ASMBS allied health nutritional guidelines for the surgical weight loss patient. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2008;4:S73–S108. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2008.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Morgan-Bathke M., Raynor H.A., Baxter S.D., Halliday T.M., Lynch A., Malik N., et al. Medical nutrition therapy interventions provided by dietitians for adult overweight and obesity management: an academy of nutrition and dietetics evidence-based practice guideline. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2023;123 doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2022.11.014. 520-45 e10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Lim M.T., Pan B.J., Toh D.W.K., Sutanto C.N., Kim J.E. Animal protein versus plant protein in supporting lean mass and muscle strength: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Nutrients. 2021;13 doi: 10.3390/nu13020661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Hunger and Fullness Scale . 2023. U.S. Department of veterans affairs.www.nutrtiion.va.gov [Google Scholar]
- 39.Nuijten M.A.H., Eijsvogels T.M.H., Monpellier V.M., Janssen I.M.C., Hazebroek E.J., Hopman M.T.E. The magnitude and progress of lean body mass, fat-free mass, and skeletal muscle mass loss following bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2022;23 doi: 10.1111/obr.13370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Delsoglio M., Achamrah N., Berger M.M., Pichard C. Indirect calorimetry in clinical practice. J Clin Med. 2019;8 doi: 10.3390/jcm8091387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Protein-Energy Undernutrition (PEU) 2023. Merck manual professional version.https://www.merckmanuals.com/professional/nutritional-disorders/undernutrition/protein-energy-undernutrition-peu [Google Scholar]
- 42.Berg P., McCallum R. Dumping syndrome: a review of the current concepts of pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Dig Dis Sci. 2016;61:11–18. doi: 10.1007/s10620-015-3839-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Elias K., Bekhali Z., Hedberg J., Graf W., Sundbom M. Changes in bowel habits and patient-scored symptoms after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14:144–149. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2017.09.529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.van Beek A.P., Emous M., Laville M., Tack J. Dumping syndrome after esophageal, gastric or bariatric surgery: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management. Obes Rev. 2017;18:68–85. doi: 10.1111/obr.12467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Katsogridaki G., Tzovaras G., Sioka E., Perivoliotis K., Zachari E., Magouliotis D., et al. Hair loss after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2018;28:3929–3934. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3433-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Suhl E., Anderson-Haynes S.E., Mulla C., Patti M.E. Medical nutrition therapy for post-bariatric hypoglycemia: practical insights. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017;13:888–896. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2017.01.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Sacchetti A. Emergency department care of the post-metabolic and bariatric surgery patient. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2020;36:158–162. doi: 10.1097/pec.0000000000002051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Martel JL, Kerndt CC, Doshi H, Sina RE, Franklin DS. Vitamin B1 (Thiamine). StatPerals, 5/30/2024. Accessed. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29493982. [PubMed]
- 49.Kuin C., den Ouden F., Brandts H., Deden L., Hazebroek E., van Borren M., et al. Treatment of severe protein malnutrition after bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2019;29:3095–3102. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-04035-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Cederholm T., Bosaeus I., Barazzoni R., Bauer J., Van Gossum A., Klek S., et al. Diagnostic criteria for malnutrition - an ESPEN consensus statement. Clin Nutr. 2015;34:335–340. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2015.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Hegazi R., Miller A., Sauer A. Evolution of the diagnosis of malnutrition in adults: a primer for clinicians. Front Nutr. 2024;11 doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1169538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Kim E.Y. Definition, mechanisms and predictors of weight loss failure after bariatric surgery. J Metab Bariatr Surg. 2022;11:39–48. doi: 10.17476/jmbs.2022.11.2.39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Williams-Kerver G.A., Steffen K.J., Mitchell J.E. Eating pathology after bariatric surgery: an updated review of the recent literature. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2019;21:86. doi: 10.1007/s11920-019-1071-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.King W.C., Belle S.H., Hinerman A.S., Mitchell J.E., Steffen K.J., Courcoulas A.P. Patient behaviors and characteristics related to weight regain after roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a multicenter prospective cohort study. Ann Surg. 2020;272:1044–1052. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Noria S.F., Shelby R.D., Atkins K.D., Nguyen N.T., Gadde K.M. Weight regain after bariatric surgery: scope of the problem, causes, prevention, and treatment. Curr Diab Rep. 2023;23:31–42. doi: 10.1007/s11892-023-01498-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]