Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The EMBO Journal logoLink to The EMBO Journal
. 1997 Apr 15;16(8):2072–2085. doi: 10.1093/emboj/16.8.2072

The binding of a Fos/Jun heterodimer can completely disrupt the structure of a nucleosome.

K W Ng 1, P Ridgway 1, D R Cohen 1, D J Tremethick 1
PMCID: PMC1169810  PMID: 9155033

Abstract

An important first step in the chromatin remodelling process is the initial binding of a transcriptional activator to a nucleosomal template. We have investigated the ability of Fos/Jun (a transcriptional activator involved in the signal transduction pathway) to interact with its cognate binding site located in the promoter region of the mouse fos-related antigen-2 (fra-2) promoter, when this site was reconstituted into a nucleosome. Two different nucleosome assembly systems were employed to assemble principally non-acetylated or acetylated nucleosomes. The ability of Fos/Jun to interact with an acetylated or an unacetylated nucleosome differed markedly. Fos/Jun bound to an unacetylated nucleosome with only a 4- to 5-fold reduction in DNA binding affinity compared with naked DNA. Strikingly, the binding of Fos/Jun to a single high-affinity site incorporated into an acetylated nucleosome resulted in the complete disruption of nucleosomal structure without histone displacement. Moreover, this disruption was sufficient to facilitate the subsequent binding of a second transcription factor.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (568.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Abate C., Luk D., Gagne E., Roeder R. G., Curran T. Fos and jun cooperate in transcriptional regulation via heterologous activation domains. Mol Cell Biol. 1990 Oct;10(10):5532–5535. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.10.5532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Adams C. C., Workman J. L. Binding of disparate transcriptional activators to nucleosomal DNA is inherently cooperative. Mol Cell Biol. 1995 Mar;15(3):1405–1421. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.3.1405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Angel P., Karin M. The role of Jun, Fos and the AP-1 complex in cell-proliferation and transformation. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1991 Dec 10;1072(2-3):129–157. doi: 10.1016/0304-419x(91)90011-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Archer T. K., Cordingley M. G., Wolford R. G., Hager G. L. Transcription factor access is mediated by accurately positioned nucleosomes on the mouse mammary tumor virus promoter. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Feb;11(2):688–698. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.2.688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bauer W. R., Hayes J. J., White J. H., Wolffe A. P. Nucleosome structural changes due to acetylation. J Mol Biol. 1994 Feb 25;236(3):685–690. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1994.1180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Becker P. B. The establishment of active promoters in chromatin. Bioessays. 1994 Aug;16(8):541–547. doi: 10.1002/bies.950160807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bergers G., Graninger P., Braselmann S., Wrighton C., Busslinger M. Transcriptional activation of the fra-1 gene by AP-1 is mediated by regulatory sequences in the first intron. Mol Cell Biol. 1995 Jul;15(7):3748–3758. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.7.3748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Berta P., Hawkins J. R., Sinclair A. H., Taylor A., Griffiths B. L., Goodfellow P. N., Fellous M. Genetic evidence equating SRY and the testis-determining factor. Nature. 1990 Nov 29;348(6300):448–450. doi: 10.1038/348448A0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Foletta V. C., Sonobe M. H., Suzuki T., Endo T., Iba H., Cohen D. R. Cloning and characterisation of the mouse fra-2 gene. Oncogene. 1994 Nov;9(11):3305–3311. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Glover J. N., Harrison S. C. Crystal structure of the heterodimeric bZIP transcription factor c-Fos-c-Jun bound to DNA. Nature. 1995 Jan 19;373(6511):257–261. doi: 10.1038/373257a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kamakaka R. T., Bulger M., Kadonaga J. T. Potentiation of RNA polymerase II transcription by Gal4-VP16 during but not after DNA replication and chromatin assembly. Genes Dev. 1993 Sep;7(9):1779–1795. doi: 10.1101/gad.7.9.1779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Karin M. The regulation of AP-1 activity by mitogen-activated protein kinases. J Biol Chem. 1995 Jul 14;270(28):16483–16486. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.28.16483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lee D. Y., Hayes J. J., Pruss D., Wolffe A. P. A positive role for histone acetylation in transcription factor access to nucleosomal DNA. Cell. 1993 Jan 15;72(1):73–84. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90051-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Li B., Adams C. C., Workman J. L. Nucleosome binding by the constitutive transcription factor Sp1. J Biol Chem. 1994 Mar 11;269(10):7756–7763. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Li Q., Wrange O. Accessibility of a glucocorticoid response element in a nucleosome depends on its rotational positioning. Mol Cell Biol. 1995 Aug;15(8):4375–4384. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.8.4375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Li W., Nagaraja S., Delcuve G. P., Hendzel M. J., Davie J. R. Effects of histone acetylation, ubiquitination and variants on nucleosome stability. Biochem J. 1993 Dec 15;296(Pt 3):737–744. doi: 10.1042/bj2960737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Norton V. G., Marvin K. W., Yau P., Bradbury E. M. Nucleosome linking number change controlled by acetylation of histones H3 and H4. J Biol Chem. 1990 Nov 15;265(32):19848–19852. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Pennings S., Meersseman G., Bradbury E. M. Mobility of positioned nucleosomes on 5 S rDNA. J Mol Biol. 1991 Jul 5;220(1):101–110. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(91)90384-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Peterson C. L., Tamkun J. W. The SWI-SNF complex: a chromatin remodeling machine? Trends Biochem Sci. 1995 Apr;20(4):143–146. doi: 10.1016/s0968-0004(00)88990-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Pruss D., Wolffe A. P. Histone-DNA contacts in a nucleosome core containing a Xenopus 5S rRNA gene. Biochemistry. 1993 Jul 13;32(27):6810–6814. doi: 10.1021/bi00078a002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Schwarz P. M., Hansen J. C. Formation and stability of higher order chromatin structures. Contributions of the histone octamer. J Biol Chem. 1994 Jun 10;269(23):16284–16289. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Simpson R. T. Structure of chromatin containing extensively acetylated H3 and H4. Cell. 1978 Apr;13(4):691–699. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(78)90219-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Taylor I. C., Workman J. L., Schuetz T. J., Kingston R. E. Facilitated binding of GAL4 and heat shock factor to nucleosomal templates: differential function of DNA-binding domains. Genes Dev. 1991 Jul;5(7):1285–1298. doi: 10.1101/gad.5.7.1285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Tsukiyama T., Wu C. Purification and properties of an ATP-dependent nucleosome remodeling factor. Cell. 1995 Dec 15;83(6):1011–1020. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90216-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Van Lint C., Emiliani S., Ott M., Verdin E. Transcriptional activation and chromatin remodeling of the HIV-1 promoter in response to histone acetylation. EMBO J. 1996 Mar 1;15(5):1112–1120. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Vettese-Dadey M., Walter P., Chen H., Juan L. J., Workman J. L. Role of the histone amino termini in facilitated binding of a transcription factor, GAL4-AH, to nucleosome cores. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Feb;14(2):970–981. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.2.970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Wallrath L. L., Lu Q., Granok H., Elgin S. C. Architectural variations of inducible eukaryotic promoters: preset and remodeling chromatin structures. Bioessays. 1994 Mar;16(3):165–170. doi: 10.1002/bies.950160306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Weischet W. O., Allen J. R., Riedel G., Van Holde K. E. The effects of salt concentration and H-1 depletion on the digestion of calf thymus chromatin by micrococcal nuclease. Nucleic Acids Res. 1979;6(5):1843–1862. doi: 10.1093/nar/6.5.1843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Workman J. L., Buchman A. R. Multiple functions of nucleosomes and regulatory factors in transcription. Trends Biochem Sci. 1993 Mar;18(3):90–95. doi: 10.1016/0968-0004(93)90160-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Workman J. L., Taylor I. C., Kingston R. E. Activation domains of stably bound GAL4 derivatives alleviate repression of promoters by nucleosomes. Cell. 1991 Feb 8;64(3):533–544. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90237-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Zucker K., Worcel A. The histone H3/H4.N1 complex supplemented with histone H2A-H2B dimers and DNA topoisomerase I forms nucleosomes on circular DNA under physiological conditions. J Biol Chem. 1990 Aug 25;265(24):14487–14496. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The EMBO Journal are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES