In Table 1, the reference period for the results indicated in the last row are incorrect. Please see the correct Table 1 here.
Table 1. Associations between post-April 1 and contraceptive referral / contraceptive receipt.
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contraceptive referral | Contraceptive receipt | |||
| Post-April 1 | 0.921 | 0.927 | 0.889* | 0.798*** |
| (0.813–1.042) | (0.805–1.067) | (0.782–1.012) | (0.701–0.908) | |
| Observations | 109,129 | 39,473 | 35,828 | 13,762 |
| Dates | 1/21-5/20 | 3/1-4/15 | 1/21-5/20 | 3/1-4/15 |
Notes: The table reports unadjusted odds ratios from logistic regressions, as well as the 95% confidence interval. The outcome variables are dichotomous variables for contraceptive referral and contraceptive receipt. The independent variable is a binary variable for post-April 1. Standard errors are clustered at the level of the week. Asterisks indicate significance at the ten, five and one percent level.
Reference
- 1.Leight J, Hensly C, Chissano M, Ali L (2021) Short-term effects of the COVID-19 state of emergency on contraceptive access and utilization in Mozambique. PLOS ONE 16(3): e0249195. 10.1371/journal.pone.0249195 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
