Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2025 Jan 3;20(1):e0310478. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310478

Research on hydrodynamic performance of S-type turbine based on linear wave

LingJie Bao 1, Ying Wang 1,*, JunHua Chen 2, Hao Li 1, ChuHua Jiang 2, Yue Zhuo 1, Siru Wu 1
Editor: Niaz Bahadur Khan3
PMCID: PMC11698312  PMID: 39752397

Abstract

The hydrodynamic performance of a Savonius type turbine (S-type turbine) in wave field is studied. The method of combining numerical simulation with physical experiment is adopted.Based on linear wave theory and turbulence model, Star CCM+numerical simulation software is used for digital modeling, and overlapping grid technology is used for grid modeling. Dynamic Fluid Body Interaction (DFBI) model is called to control the movement of S-type turbine, and second-order time discretization is adopted to establish a two-dimensional wave field model and conduct numerical simulation. At the same time, the physical test system of S-type turbine was developed for physical experiment verification, and the rotating performance of S-type turbine under different wave heights and pe-riods was measured, and the results of numerical simulation and physical experiment were com-prehensively evaluated. The results show that in wave field, the inverted S-shape arrangement of horizontal axis is better than the positive S-shape arrangement of horizontal axis and the vertical axis arrangement, and the captured energy is more than 3 times. At the same time, the fluctuating rotation speed of S-type turbine in wave field needs to be close to the wave frequency to capture more wave energy, which has guiding significance for practical engineering.

1. Introduction

The oceans are rich in renewable resources. Capturing tidal current energy and wave energy is of great significance to the exploitation of Marine resources. Domestic and foreign experts and scholars study the optimization of turbine structure to capture renewable energy.Narendra et al. [1] evaluated the performance of the improved turbine and compared it with the simple two-blaked Savonius turbine and some well-known Savonius turbine designs by using CFD software Fluent. Kumar et al. [2] discussed that the vertical axis turbine can start at a very low fluid speed in rivers and canals. Yao et al. [3] effectively improved the efficiency and stability of the water turbine by improving the basic parameters of the S -type water turbine and increasing the auxiliary agency. Kumar et al. [4] found that the efficiency of energy capture could be improved by changing the cross-section profile shape of the twisted Savonius rotor. Ostos et al. [5] introduced a novel configuration to improve the performance of traditional Savonius blades. Salleh et al. [6] improved power performance by changing the longitudinal position of the pushing blades and returning blades.Mao et al. [7] studied the influence of blade arc Angle on the performance of a typical two-blade Savonius wind turbine, which improved the power generation efficiency of the turbine by using transient computational fluid dynamics method.Kerikous et al. [8] performed a number of transient computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations using Star-CCM+ to maximize the output power of the Savonis turbine by modifying 12 parameters of the blade profile. Dos Santos et al. [9] developed a computational model to study the savonius turbine turbulent flow problem,and simulate an oscillating water column device. Li et al. [10] studied vertical axis wind turbines. The force distribution of the blades under different vertical axis turbine configurations is obtained, and the torque coefficient and power coefficient are obtained. The wake impact of nearby objects on the vertical axis wind turbine is analyzed. Tutar et al. [11] studied the generation and propagation of conventional water waves and the performance of Savonius rotor with three blades on its horizontal axis.Talukdar et al. [12] found that resistance Savonius fluid power turbine (SHT) has the huge potential of small-scale power generation with free flowing water. Patel et al. [1316] studied the influence of overlap ratio, aspect ratio, flow velocity and geometrical parameters of the water channel on the hydrodynamic performance of the turbine. A theoretical study for predicting the hydrodynamic performance of vertical Savonius turbines is also introduced.Wu et al. [17] proposed a one -way opening valve -type Savonius rotor design. The results showed that the curvature radius of the blade was large and the opening rate was small.

Yao et al. [18] studied the maximum power coefficient and tip speed ratio of S-type turbines under tidal flow energy by changing different geometric parameters. Rizki et al. [19] studied that Savonius turbine has a high power coefficient (CP) in the range of low tip speed ratio (TSR), and CP decreases with the increase of TSR. Wu et al. [20] studied the rotation mechanism of the S -type water turbine in the wave field in the form of vertical shaft layout. Huang et al. [21] studied the application of the S-type turbine in the form of a horizontal axis layout on the floating breakwater, and completed the practice of energy capture of S-type turbine in wave field. Li et al. [22] studied wave energy capture of S-type hydraulic turbines under different control strategies, mainly from different installed phase angles, different wave cycles, and different control speeds.

Based on the research of domestic and foreign scholars on S-type turbine, the performance of S-type turbine under air flow condition is studied mainly by improving its shape parameters. In recent years, more and more scholars have studied and analyzed the hydrodynamic performance of S-type turbines in tidal energy capture.And S-type turbines are mainly used in wind field and low velocity flow field. The motion path of water particles in the flow field is smooth. However, the water particles of the wave may be elliptical or circular depending on the depth and wave characteristics. As shown in Table 1, S-type turbines have different characteristics of capturing energy in different scenarios.The discussion about whether S-type turbine is suitable for wave field, and the research on the rotational performance and energy capture performance of S-type turbine in wave field are relatively few.Therefore, this paper studies the energy capture performance based on S-type turbine. By studying the layout of S-type turbine, changing the depth of wave field of S-type turbine into water, and studying its hydrodynamic performance under different wave conditions. The results have a certain reference value for guiding the application practice of S-type turbine.

Table 1. Comparative analysis of key points of S-type turbine.

Model Application scenarios Characteristic Energy
S-type turbine Wave field The velocity and direction of water particles change in a wave field Wave energy
Flow field The velocity and direction of water particles in a pure flow field are constant Tidal current energy
Wind field Wind energy

2.Geometry and property parameter definitions

2.1 geometric model

The S-type turbine has two semi-circular blades and two end plates. The three-dimensional model and physical drawings of the S-type turbine are shown in Figs 1 and 2. It has a simple structure and is widely used in flow field, including wind field and flow field, but relatively few applications in wave field. The S-type turbine is a resistance type runner driven by the pressure difference between the front and rear blades. In deep water wave condition, the motion path of water particles is circular. Water particles drive the S-shaped blades, which turn the turbine, as shown in Fig 3. According to the wave data and engineering application background in the middle and far seas, combined with the size of the experimental tank and the generated waveform, the geometric ratio of the experimental model is 1:5. The geometric characteristics and hydrodynamic parameters of the S-type turbine are shown in Tables 2 and 3.

Fig 1. Three -dimensional model.

Fig 1

Fig 2. Physical model of the blade group.

Fig 2

Fig 3. Water turbine movement diagram.

Fig 3

Table 2. S -type water turbine geometric characteristics.

Parameter Value Unit
Turbine diameter 0.5 m
Blade radius 0.15 m
Blade thickness 0.002 m
Turbine height 0.61 m
Blade shape Semicircle /
Overlap rate 0.15 /
Turbine volume 0.0006 m3
Moment of inertia of turbine (0.05, 0.09,0.11) kg·m2

Table 3. Experimental condition parameter table.

Parameter Symbol Value Unit
Depth of water D 1 2 m
Sink length L 70 m
Sink width W 3.8 m
Sink depth D 2 3 m
Wave height h 0.03,0.06,0.09,0.12 m
Wave period T 1.4–2.0 s

2.2 S-type turbine energy conversion model

When a S-turbine captures tidal energy, its hydrodynamic performance is usually judged by power coefficient, torque coefficient and tip speed ratio because the water flow is uniform. However, for the study of S-turbine under the action of waves, the speed and direction of water particles change all the time. Therefore, energy is used to judge the performance of S-turbine.From the principle of conservation of energy, the generated wave energy (incident wave energy) is converted into reflected wave energy, transmitted wave energy, loss of wave energy and kinetic energy to drive S-type turbine. As shown in Eq (1). [23].

Pwave=Pc+Pr+Pt+Ps (1)

Where Pwave is the incident wave power, Pc is the dissipation power, Pr is the reflected wave power, Pt is the transmitted wave power, Ps is the S-type turbine power [23].

Incident wave power formula

Pwave=18ρgHi2Cg=132πρg2Hi2T (2)

Where ρ is the water density, g is the gravitational acceleration, Hi is the incident wave height, Cg is the group velocity, Cg=12c, c is wave velocity, c=gT2π,T is the incident wave period.

Reflected wave power and transmitted wave power are related to wave height. To calculate the power of S-type turbine, its moment of inertia and its angular velocity need to be measured. Therefore, it is necessary to install sensors in physical experiments and set their motion parameters in simulation experiments

The formula for calculating the moment of inertia of the S-type turbine is as follows

I=Jt=Ji+Jd=2×(1202πRλR2dl+mil2)+30R2πr3hρdr=mi(d2)2+2mi(de2)2+3md(Dd2)2 (3)

Where mi is the turbine mass, md is the end disc mass, d is the blade diameter, e is the overlap ratio, Dd is the end disc diameter.

The formula for calculating the rotational energy of the S-type turbine is:

Ws=12Iω2 (4)

Where, Ws is the energy of the turbine, I is the moment of inertia of the turbine, and ω is the speed of the turbine.

The formula for calculating the power of the S-type turbine is:

Ps=Tn9550 (5)

The capture efficiency of the turbine is Cp

Cp=PsPwave=WsWwave (6)

The remainder is dissipated power

Pc=PwavePrPtPs=132πρg2(Hi2Hr2Ht2)Tn9550 (7)

Where T is a torque and n is a rotating speed.

3. Numerical simulation

3.1 Simulation domain size and boundary conditions

In order to prevent the flume boundary from interfering with the result, the data distance needs to be set sufficiently large. The length of the numerical simulation area is 30 λ and the width is 2 L. According to the experimental specification, the waveform is relatively flat at the distance of 10 λ. Therefore, the S-type turbine is set 10 λ away from the left boundary, as shown in Fig 4. At the same time, typical boundary conditions are adopted. The speed inlet is set at the left boundary. The right boundary is set as the pressure outlet, and the damping wave elimination is set, and the wave elimination length is 2 λ, to prevent the interference of the reflected wave on the S-type turbine. The upper and lower boundaries are set as symmetric planes, and the S-type turbine is centered to avoid boundary conditions affecting the experimental results. The S-type turbine is set to the wall. The incident wave is linear.

Fig 4. Computational domain and boundary conditions.

Fig 4

3.2 Meshing and simulation model selection

In the solution calculation, because the S-type turbine is rotating, the calculation domain grid is divided into two parts (background grid and overlapping grid). As shown in Fig 5A. Tangential mesh and prismatic layer mesh are used for background mesh, and polyhedral mesh and prismatic layer mesh are used for overlapping mesh. The polyhedral grid of overlapping regions is shown in Fig 5B. One of the slices is shown in Fig 5C. In order to ensure the precision of interface interpolation and reduce the numerical transmission error, 16 layers of prisms are arranged at the blade, as shown in Fig 5D. In order to verify the independence of the grid, the size of the first layer of grid is adjusted, and the thickness of the first layer is set to 1mm, 0.8mm, 0.4mm, 0.2mm respectively. The difference between the calculated results of the average power coefficient (TSR = 0.9) of the S-type turbine under the best working conditions is less than 2%. Finally, the thickness of the first layer of mesh was set to about 0.2mm, the growth rate was set to 1.2, and the y+ value of the blade wall was controlled between 60 and 144. The number of overlapping grids is 71783, the number of background grids is 5955364, and the total number of calculation domain grids is set to 6027147. The residual of each numerical calculation is lower than 10−5, which is in the convergence of the calculation, otherwise the software will make errors, which is easy for the operator to adjust.

Fig 5. Fluid domain meshing diagram.

Fig 5

Grid division starts with the coordinate (0,0,0) as the center, considering the size of the first layer of basic grid will affect the overall grid number, but also to improve computing efficiency. At the same time of mesh refinement, the maximum power coefficient and maximum tip speed ratio were studied, as shown in Table 4. After the third adjustment, Cp almost reached a constant level, and TSR was basically stable. Thus, the grid independence is achieved. This level of refinement corresponds to 70,201 units, 202,470 faces, and 32,150 vertices.

Table 4. Details of mesh refinement levels.

Refinement level No. of cells No. of faces No. of Verts Max Cp Max TSR
1 21081 59843 23541 0.09 0.86
2 28824 81832 32150 0.14 0.9
3 46570 132186 50875 0.18 1
4 70201 202470 77035 0.19 1

Reynolds Average Navid Stokes (RANS) standard k-ε model was used to simulate turbulence, and high-wall processing function method was used. Choose an implicit unsteady model. Euler multiphase flow has two phases, including air and water. The multi-model global protection method across overlapping grid interfaces is improved by using overlapping multinomial protection. In the spatial discretization, the momentum and turbulence of the governing equation adopt the second-order upwind scheme. Time dispersion is a first order implicit scheme. Each time step is 0.01s, and each time step is iterated 15 times and calculated 30s. Ensure that the rotation Angle of the turbine is less than 1° in a time step. The semi-implicit pressure correlation equation (SIMPLE) algorithm is used to solve the pressure-velocity coupling numerically. Each time step iterates 15 times. The standard for residual convergence is 10−5.

3.3 Simulation validation

Based on the simulation research of S-type turbine, the physical experiment was carried out in Ningbo Institute of Technology of Zhejiang University.The physical experiment of S-type turbine is carried out in a tank of 70 m in length, 4 m in width and 3 m in depth. The left side of the tank is provided with a wave making system. A wave elimination net is set on the right side of the tank to absorb transmitted waves and reduce the generation of reflected waves. Dynamic torque sensor, whose model number is DYN201, is driven by synchronous wheel and synchronous belt to collect speed and torque of S-type turbine. The S-turbine test device is located at more than ten wavelengths of the wave generator. The resulting wave can be observed to be stable. The experimental framework is shown in Fig 6. The physical experimental tank is shown in Fig 7. The absorbing beach is shown in Fig 8.

Fig 6. Experiment framework.

Fig 6

Fig 7. Physical experiment tank.

Fig 7

Fig 8. Absorbing beach.

Fig 8

Pool wave is linear wave with different period. S-type turbine submerged in water. By changing turbine layout, the performance of S-type turbine under different working conditions is analyzed. Wave-making is done with a shake plate, as shown in Fig 9. Servo motor drives ball screw to move back and forth. The shaker pushes the wave to produce a stable waveform. Due to the boundary effect and the viscosity and gravity of water, the wave-making of shaken plate will have waveform attenuation and deformation. Therefore, data collection begins after 10 stable waveforms. The experimental arrangement is shown in Fig 10.

Fig 9. Wave-making system.

Fig 9

Fig 10. Testing site.

Fig 10

4 Results analysis

The main evaluation indicators of the hydrodynamic performance of the S-type turbine are the angular velocity of the S-type turbine in the wave field and the kinetic energy obtained by the S-type turbine. The rotational angular velocity and the obtained energy of the S-type turbine in the wave field are one of the important indicators to measure the energy conversion of the S-type turbine. The greater the rotational speed obtained by the S-type turbine in the wave field, the better the adaptability of the S-type turbine to the flow velocity of the wave field, which is more conducive to the capture of wave energy. The greater the energy obtained by the S-turbine, the higher the efficiency of wave energy conversion. This study mainly focuses on the effects of S-turbine layout, relative water entry depth D/h, different wave periods in wave field and external factors on the hydrodynamic performance of S-turbine.

4.1 Influence of arrangement of S-type turbines

For the research on the arrangement of S-type turbines, the vertical axis installation method and the horizontal axis installation method of the S-type turbine are studied, followed by the positive S-type installation method and the reverse S-type installation method facing the wave surface.

The vertical axis installation and the horizontal axis installation of the S-type turbine determine the difference in the force surface of the S-type turbine. The horizontally arranged and vertically arranged S-type turbines were studied in the wave field with wave heights of 0.06 m, 0.09 m and 0.12 m, as shown in Figs 11 and 12.

Fig 11. Horizontal arrangement of S-type turbines.

Fig 11

Fig 12. Vertical arrangement of S-type turbines.

Fig 12

The rotational angular velocity function is set on the simulation software to obtain the rotational speed of S-type turbine. By writing a custom function, the energy of the S-type turbine is calculated, mainly the kinetic energy of the turbine. The calculation formula is shown in Eq (4). The angular velocity is measured by dynamic torque sensor in physical experiment.Through the comparison of the energy captured by the horizontally arranged S-type turbine and the vertically arranged S-type turbine, the experimental results are shown in Fig 13. Under the same c onditions, the horizontal S-type runner can capture the energy of the wave well. A horizontal S-turbine captures more than twice as much energy as a vertical turbine. At the same time, the higher the wave height, the greater the energy captured by the S-turbine. The energy capture at 0.12m is 30% more than that at 0.09m. After the S-type turbine is stabilized, the captured energy changes periodically.

Fig 13. Energy diagram of simulation experiment.

Fig 13

To study the opening orientation of the wave facing side of S-type turbines, as shown in Figs 14 and 15, the S-type turbines were installed forward and reversely.

Fig 14. Reverse S-type water turbine.

Fig 14

Fig 15. Positive S-type water turbine.

Fig 15

The energy capture under different wave fields is compared and analyzed. As shown in Fig 16, the higher the wave height, the greater the energy capture of the reverse S-type arrangement and the positive S-type arrangement. Moreover, the energy capture of the reverse S-type arrangement is significantly greater than that of the positive S-type arrangement. Because the reverse S-type arrangement accords with the movement path of water particles in the wave field, it is easier to drive the S-type turbine to rotate. Therefore, the energy obtained by the Reverse S-type turbine is more than twice that obtained by the positive S-type turbine in the experiment.

Fig 16. Energy diagram of simulation experiment.

Fig 16

For the research on the rotation speed of the forward and reverse arrangement of the S-type turbine, as shown in Fig 17, the reverse S-type turbine on the wave-facing side has a faster rotation speed than the forward S-type turbine, and the higher the wave height, the more obvious the maximum value of the rotation speed, the greater the speed change, the greater the speed fluctuation. In the scheme of forward and reverse S-shaped arrangement on the seaward side, under the conditions of wave heights of 0.06 and 0.03, it has better periodicity, but the reverse rotation speed is greater than the forward rotation speed. The energy captured at the wave height of 0.06 m is obviously higher than that at the wave height of 0.03 m. The test condition with wave height of 0.06 m was verified by physical experiment. After the wave is stabilized and the S-type turbine is running smoothly, the experimental data of physical experiment and simulation experiment are shown in Fig 18. In the physical experiment, due to the viscosity of water, the error of turbine installation, the friction of bearing and transmission efficiency, the energy measured in the physical experiment is slightly smaller than that in the simulation experiment.

Fig 17. Rotation diagram of physical experiment.

Fig 17

Fig 18. Experimental verification diagram.

Fig 18

4.2 Influence of relative water entry depth D/h

For the study of the S-type turbine in the wave field, the relative water entry depth is a dimensionless research factor, and the relative water entry depth is the ratio of the water entry depth to the wave height. According to the research of literature 23 [23], this paper selects the water entry depth of about 0.75d for research. When the water entry depth is unchanged and D = 0.2 m, the wave height h is changed, as shown in Table 5. Observe the rotation of the S-shaped runner at different water depth relative to wave height.

Table 5. Experimental parameter table.

Parameter D (m) h (m) D/h
value 0.2 0 /
0.03 6.67
0.06 3.33
0.09 2.22
0.12 1.67
0.15 0.06 2.5
0.2 3.33
0.25 4.17
0.3 5

The experimental results are shown in Fig 19. Under the condition of a certain depth of water, the speed of S-type turbine changes greatly with the change of wave height. When h = 0.12 m and 0.09 m, the rotational speed is relatively large, but the velocity changes are unstable. When h = 0 m, the S-turbine is almost impossible to spin. Under the condition of h = 0.6m, the rotational speed is relatively stable and relatively large.

Fig 19. Fixed water entry depth speed diagram.

Fig 19

At the same time, to verify the optimal water entry depth, the rotation of the S-type turbine in the wave field with the wave height of 0.06 m was studied when the water entry depth was 0.15 m, 0.2 m, 0.25 m, and 0.3 m, as shown in Fig 20.

Fig 20. Fixed wave height and rotational speed diagram.

Fig 20

Under the condition of a certain wave height, the water entry depth of S-type turbine is changed, and the relative wave height rotation of S-type runner is observed under different water entry depth. Where the water depth is 0.15m and 0.2m, the S-type turbine speed is larger. When the water depth is 0.25m and 0.3m, the speed of S-type turbine is small. It can be seen from the standard deviation of speed that the speed at 0.2m water depth is more stable than that at 0.15m water depth. When the wave is high, due to the viscosity of water, the deeper the installation depth of S-type turbine, the speed is significantly reduced. When the installation depth of S-type turbine is shallow, the speed fluctuation is large.

4.3 The effect of period

Since the S-type turbine is composed of two blades, in the process of its rotation, the wave crest will inevitably impinge the wave energy on the blades of the S-type turbine, driving the S-type turbine to rotate. Due to the particularity of its structure and the motion of water particles in the theory of waves, the rotation movement of the S-type water turbine is related to the wave cycle.To study the impact of the wave cycle on the S -type water turbine, the first -class S -type water turbine will be used to study through physical experiments.

The first-stage S-type turbines were experimentally studied in the wave field with wave periods of 1.4 s, 1.6 s, 1.8 s, and 2 s, respectively. The experimental results are shown in Fig 21. As can be seen from the figure, the wave frequency decreases as the wave period increases in turn. The wave frequency is about twice that of an S-turbine. At the same time, the frequency difference is minimum when the wave period is 1.8 s. It is more accurately verified that each wave drives one blade on the S-turbine, and the most suitable wave period is 1.8 s.

Fig 21. Rotational frequency difference diagram of primary turbine.

Fig 21

5.Discussion

Based on the study of the key factors in wave field of S-type turbine, the energy capture experiment is carried out under different wave conditions with the wave facing side as the anti-S horizontal axis. The daily energy capture diagram of a single S-turbine under the action of wave field is shown in Fig 22.

Fig 22. Daily power generation.

Fig 22

The calculated results are presented in the form of daily energy generation. It can be seen from the data that compared with the other two arrangements, the energy capture effect of the horizontal axis reverse S-type arrangement is significant. The captured energy decreases with the decrease of wave height.

At the same time, in order to compare the hydrodynamic performance of the S-type turbine, its characteristics are evaluated using the maximum Cp and the maximum TSR, as shown in Table 6.

Table 6. Performance table of S-type turbine.

Parameter h (m) D/h Max Cp Max TSR
Horizontal arrangement Reverse S 0 / 0.01 0.1
0.03 6.67 0.14 0.5
0.06 3.33 0.18 0.9
0.09 2.22 0.22 1
0.12 1.67 0.2 1
Forward S 0.06 2.5 0.01 0.12
3.33 0.02 0.32
4.17 0.02 0.2
5 0.03 0.15
Vertical arrangement / 0.06 3.33 0.1 0.6

The maximum TSR of the horizontal axis and vertical axis arrangement of S-type turbine is different under the action of wave, the main reason is whether the operation mode of S-type turbine conforms to the motion trajectory of wave particles. But the energy capture coefficient is an intuitive index to measure whether wave energy is captured. The energy capture effect of the S-type turbine with horizontal axis arrangement is better than that of the positive S-type turbine in wave field. In the wave field, the effective impact duration of the wave is short, and the maximum TSR is relatively small, which is the main reason for the low energy capture efficiency of the S-turbine with vertical axis arrangement.

6. Conclusions

The operation of modern Marine facilities is increasingly dependent on energy. The offshore turbine can effectively capture and transform wave energy and promote the development of S-type turbine and the study of application environment. The current research trend mainly starts from optimizing the structure and the applicable environment of the turbine. In this paper, we mainly discuss the installation optimization of S-type turbine, the operation condition in wave field environment, and the influence of wave field environmental parameters on S-type turbine. Based on the motion mechanism of S-type turbine in wave field and through numerical simulation and physical test, the following conclusions can be drawn.

  1. It is found that the maximum energy captured by S-turbine with horizontal axis is 3 times that of vertical axis in wave field. On the wave side, the energy captured by the horizontal axis inverted S-turbine is more than 6 times that of the horizontal axis positive S-turbine. In wave energy capture, consideration of the installation of S-type turbines is a crucial factor. At the same time, as the wave height decreases, the captured wave energy also decreases.

  2. The speed of the S-turbine is related to the depth of entry relative to the wave height. The S-type turbine has a fluctuating velocity in the wave field. When the water depth is constant, the higher the wave height, the higher the speed of S-type turbine. As the wave height decreases, the S-turbine begins to rotate smoothly. When the wave height tends to 0, the speed of S-type turbine tends to 0, and the captured energy tends to 0. At the same time, because the S-turbine rotates at a pulsating speed, although a large blade tip speed ratio can be achieved instantaneously, the wave energy efficiency captured is not the maximum.

  3. The higher the wave height, the more powerful the wave energy. The deeper you go, the stickier the water is. For the study of relative wave height and water entry depth D/h, both wave height and water entry depth will affect the rotation of S-type turbine. The S-type turbine rotates well when the wave height is 0.06 m and the water depth is 0.2 m. The dimensionless coefficient of the water depth relative to the wave height is about 3.33.

  4. When the first-stage S-type turbine starts to rotate smoothly, the rotation of the S-type turbine is related to the wave period, the rotation frequency is close to 1/2 of the wave frequency. This rotation characteristic is related to its structure. The crest of each wave cycle impinges on the blades of the S-type turbine, causing the turbine to rotate.

Future studies need to consider other influencing factors. The actual ocean wave field is a kind of wave coupling field.It is necessary to consider the applicability of S-type turbine in a variety of wave fields. Water depth at high tide and low tide should be taken into account in the installation of S-turbine.

Supporting information

S1 Data

(XLSX)

pone.0310478.s001.xlsx (1.6MB, xlsx)
S1 Nomenclature

(DOCX)

pone.0310478.s002.docx (14.5KB, docx)

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This research was co-funded by the following three projects: Ningbo 2035 science and technology innovation Yongjiang key research and development project,2024Z266; Ningbo Natural Science Foundation Project, 2023J172; and Ningbo Municipal Major Science and Technology Research and Unveiling Project, 20212ZDYF020015.

References

  • 1.Narendra T.;Agnimitra.;Yogesh K.;Mithinga ,B.CFD analysis of performance improvement of the Savonius water turbine by using an impinging jet duct design.Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering,2019,27(04):794–801. doi: 10.1016/j.cjche.2018.11.014 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kumar A.;Saini R.P. Performance parameters of Savonius type hydrokinetic turbine–A Review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2016;64:289–310. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.06.005 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Yao J.J,;LI F.S.;Chen J.H.;Su Z.X.;Yu J.Research on a vertical-axis drag-type Savonius hydrokinetic turbine. Journal of Harbin Engineering University,2020,41(02):298–308. 10.11990/jheu.201905056. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kumar A.; Saini R.P. Performance analysis of a single stage modified Savonius hydrokinetic turbine having twisted blades. Renew. Energy 2017, 113, 461–478. 10.1016/j.renene.2017.06.020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ostos I.;Ruiz I.;Gajic M.;Gomez W.;Bonilla A.;Collazos C. A modified novel blade configuration proposal for a more efficient VAWT using CFD tools. Energy Convers Manage 2019;180:733–46. 10.1016/j.enconman.2018.11.025. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Salleh M.B.;Kamaruddin N.M.;Mohamed-Kassim Z. The effects of deflector longitudinal position and height on the power performance of a conventional Savonius turbine. Energy Convers Manage 2020;226:113584. 10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113584. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Mao Z.Y.; Tian W. Effect of the blade arc angle on the performance of a Savonius wind turbine. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 2015, 7(5). 10.1177/1687814015584247. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kerikous E.;Thévenin D. Optimal shape of thick blades for a hydraulic Savonius turbine. Renew. Energy 2019, 134, 629–638. 10.1016/j.renene.2018.11.037. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Dos Santos A.L.; Fragassa C.; Santos A.L.G.; Vieira R.S.; Rocha L.A.O.; Conde J.M.P.; et al. Development of a Computational Model for Investigation of and Oscillating Water Column Device with a Savonius Turbine.J. Mar. Sci. Eng.2022,10, 79. 10.3390/jmse10010079. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Li Z.;Han R.; Gao P.;Wang C. Analysis and implementation of a drag-type vertical-axis wind turbine for small distributed wind energy systems. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 2019, 11(1). 10.1177/1687814019825709. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Tutar M;Veci I. Performance analysis of a horizontal axis 3-bladed Savonius type wave turbine in an experimental wave flume (EWF). Renewable Energy 2016;86:8–25. 10.1016/j.renene.2015.07.079. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Talukdar P.K.;Sardar A.;Kulkarni V.;Saha U.K. Parametric analysis of model Savonius hydrokinetic turbines through experimental and computational investigations. Energy Convers Manage 2018;158:36–49. 10.1016/j.enconman.2017.12.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Patel V.;Shah K. Effect of Flow Velocity on the Performance of the Savonius Hydrokinetic Turbine. Recent Advances in Manufacturing, Automation, Design and Energy Technologies 2022. 10.1007/978-981-16-4222-7_86. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Patel V.;Bhat G.;Eldho T.I.;Prabhu S.V. Influence of overlap ratio and aspect ratio on the performance of Savonius hydrokinetic turbine. Int J Energy Res 2017;41(6):829–44. 10.1002/er.v41.610.1002/er.3670. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Patel V;Eldho T.,I.;Prabhu S.V. Performance enhancement of a Darrieus hydrokinetic turbine with the blocking of a specific flow region for optimum use of hydropower[J].Renewable energy, 2019, 135(MAY):1144–1156. 10.1016/j.renene.2018.12.074. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Patel V.;Eldho T.,I.;Prabhu S.,V. Theoretical study on the prediction of the hydrodynamic performance of a Savonius turbine based on stagnation pressure and impulse momentum principle.Energy Conversion & Management, 2018. 10.1016/j.enconman.2018.04.065 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wu Y.Q.;Song R.Y.;Cui Y.G.;Cai Z.L.;Chen K.X. Hydrodynamic performance of Savonius turbine with one-way open valve. Journal of Ningbo university(NSEE), 2021,34(03):1–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Yao J.; Li F.; Chen J.; Yuan Z.; Mai W. Parameter Analysis of Savonius Hydraulic Turbine Considering the Effect of Reducing Flow Velocity. Energies 2020, 13, 24. 10.3390/en13010024. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Irfin Rizki,Adiwidodo Satworo,Yudiyanto Eko et al.The Effect of Deflector Angle on the Performance of Turbine Combination Darrieus-Savonius.Engineering Innovations,2024,11,75–82. 10.4028/p-SfjZn0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wu Y.J.;Song R.Y. Zheng D.;Wu Y.Q.;Chen X.G. Study on hydrodynamic characteristics of Savonius rotor. The Ocean Engineering,2020,38(02):143–150. 10.16483/j.issn.1005-9865.2020.02.017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Huang F.P.;Gong G.F.;Yang C.J.;Yang H.Y. Simulation and experimental study of energy-capturing and wave-dissipating floating breakwater with S type blade. Journal of Zhejiang University(Engineering Science),2021,55(05):866–874. 10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2021.05.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Li F.S.;Yao J.J.;Chen J.H.;Jin H.;Yuan Z. Performance analysis of Savonius hydrokinetic turbine capturing wave energy under different operating strategies. Energy conversion & management,2022,251. 10.1016/j.enconman.2021.115006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Huang F.P.;Gong K.;Liu Z.S. Chen J.H.;Huang Y.C.Experimental Research on A New Type of Floating Breakwater for Wave-Absorbing and Energy-Capturing. China Ocean Engineering, 2020, 34(6): 817–827. 10.1007/s13344-020-0074-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Niaz Bahadur Khan

24 Jun 2024

PONE-D-24-12338Research on hydrodynamic performance of S-type Turbine based on linear wavePLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Wang,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

  1. A lot of literature is available on the subject. Author should discuss the finding of the earlier research and also discuss the limitations of those studies. The literature study can be enhanced by adding recent relevant references. Literature review should be improved and table should also be included which provide summary about the relevant previous research. Also, make the current literature review well structured.

  2. How you define the domain size? Will the wall disturb the flow?

  3. How you justify the value of y+ between 60 and 144? Is there any wall function?

  4. Rewrite section 3.2 in technical manners. Only mentioning the number of nodes/elements are not sufficient. Also explain the CFL value for this case

  5. Quality of the results/graphs are not upto the mark. This should be improved.

  6. Novelty, choice of numerical model and meshing details are not explained well.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Aug 08 2024 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Niaz Bahadur Khan, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

1. When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Please note that PLOS ONE has specific guidelines on code sharing for submissions in which author-generated code underpins the findings in the manuscript. In these cases, all author-generated code must be made available without restrictions upon publication of the work. Please review our guidelines at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/materials-and-software-sharing#loc-sharing-code and ensure that your code is shared in a way that follows best practice and facilitates reproducibility and reuse.

3. Thank you for stating the following in your Competing Interests section: "NO authors have competing interests."

Please complete your Competing Interests on the online submission form to state any Competing Interests. If you have no competing interests, please state "The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.", as detailed online in our guide for authors at http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submit-now 

This information should be included in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

4. We note that your Data Availability Statement is currently as follows: "All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files."

Please confirm at this time whether or not your submission contains all raw data required to replicate the results of your study. Authors must share the “minimal data set” for their submission. PLOS defines the minimal data set to consist of the data required to replicate all study findings reported in the article, as well as related metadata and methods (https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-minimal-data-set-definition).

For example, authors should submit the following data:

- The values behind the means, standard deviations and other measures reported;

- The values used to build graphs;

- The points extracted from images for analysis.

Authors do not need to submit their entire data set if only a portion of the data was used in the reported study.

If your submission does not contain these data, please either upload them as Supporting Information files or deposit them to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. For a list of recommended repositories, please see https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/recommended-repositories.

If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially sensitive information, data are owned by a third-party organization, etc.) and who has imposed them (e.g., an ethics committee). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent. If data are owned by a third party, please indicate how others may request data access.

5. PLOS requires an ORCID iD for the corresponding author in Editorial Manager on papers submitted after December 6th, 2016. Please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field. This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager. Please see the following video for instructions on linking an ORCID iD to your Editorial Manager account: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xcclfuvtxQ

Additional Editor Comments:

1. A lot of literature is available on the subject. Author should discuss the finding of the earlier research and also discuss the limitations of those studies. The literature study can be enhanced by adding recent relevant references. Literature review should be improved and table should also be included which provide summary about the relevant previous research. Also, make the current literature review well structured.

2. How you define the domain size? Will the wall disturb the flow?

3. How you justify the value of y+ between 60 and 144? Is there any wall function?

4. Rewrite section 3.2 in technical manners. Only mentioning the number of nodes/elements are not sufficient. Also explain the CFL value for this case

5. Quality of the results/graphs are not upto the mark. This should be improved.

6. Novelty, choice of numerical model and meshing details are not explained well.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Presented paper investigated the hydrodynamic performance of a Savonius type turbine (S-type turbine) in a wave field.

The method of combining numerical simulation with physical experiment is adopted. Based on linear wave theory and turbulence model, Star CCM+ numerical simulation software is used for digital modelling, and overlapping grid technology is used for grid modelling.

The research results show that the S-type turbine must design a reasonable layout according to the wave field conditions.

Eq 4, how much is the moment of inertia of the turbine, I?

What is figure 5? it does not mean anything!

Table 3, what is TSR (Tip speed ratio)? or more detailed data of other related parameters? For example, U and inflow velocity or speed?

Fig 14 h is wave height, and wave period is T. In table 2 please show it.

Fig 17, obtain the average energy, how much for each case?

Fig 19, obtain the average values of the energy. omega is turbine angular velocity? Is that right?

Finally, compare the absorbed power for the forward and reverse turbine. Which one is better? What is the RPM? What is TSR? Add a table and show all average parameters of power, energy, etc corresponding to speed and TSR and some more else.

Reviewer #2: The work is presented on an interesting topic and fits the theme of PLOS ONE. There are several notes that authors need to take into account before publishing.

1. The background needs to be improved. In the analyzed works of other authors, the advantages and disadvantages of the reviewed studies should be presented. Based on the background results, it is necessary to clearly justify the choice of research tool. The goals and objectives of the study should be more clearly formulated.

2. Many questions on numerical modeling. There is no validation and verification process in your work. The choice of network is questionable, since the power factor is not a suitable value for determining the main parameters of turbine operation. The choice of the turbulence model is not justified in any way. No test results. There is no description of boundary conditions.

3. What is the error of the experimental data obtained?

How was it determined?

4. The design of the figures needs to be redesigned; the data curves should not fall on the numerical values ​​of the axes.

5. Conclusions should be concise and clear, contain specific quantitative data, all discussions should be after the figures.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Hassan Ghassemi

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2025 Jan 3;20(1):e0310478. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310478.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


31 Jul 2024

1. A lot of literature is available on the subject. Author should discuss the finding of the earlier research and also discuss the limitations of those studies. The literature study can be enhanced by adding recent relevant references. Literature review should be improved and table should also be included which provide summary about the relevant previous research. Also, make the current literature review well structured.

Some changes have been made to the references. I made a table to show how innovative the research was. At the same time, it also shows the difference between S-type turbine under wave action and pure flow action. Mainly under the action of waves, the velocity size and direction of water particles are changed, while under the action of pure flow, it is considered that the velocity size and direction of water particles are unchanged.

2. How you define the domain size? Will the wall disturb the flow?

According to the experimental rules of Chinese flume, a large enough distance is set before and after the S-type turbine to observe the experimental phenomenon of the S-type turbine. Symmetry planes are set on both sides of the fluid calculation domain, considering that the S-type turbine will be applied in the form of array in practical applications. Therefore, this setting will reduce the computation effort. Secondly, the gradient of physical quantities such as the normal velocity on the symmetric plane of the boundary conditions is 0. So it doesn't interfere with the flow of water.

3. How you justify the value of y+ between 60 and 144? Is there any wall function?

The surface of S-type turbine needs wall treatment, and the fluid movement near the wall affected by it can be divided into three sub-layers: viscous bottom layer, logarithmic rate layer and buffer layer. The fluid in the viscous bottom layer is in contact with the wall surface, and the viscosity is dominant, almost laminar flow movement. The average flow rate is determined by fluid density, viscosity, wall distance and shear force. The fluid in the logarithmic rate layer is in the outermost layer, dominated by the flow shear stress, so that the turbulent state is fully developed, and the velocity distribution is close to the logarithmic rate. The effect of the viscous force on the transition layer between the buffer layer and the log-rate layer is similar to that of the turbulent shear stress, and the flow condition is complicated and the thickness is very small.

When y+<5, it belongs to the viscous bottom layer, and the velocity is linearly distributed,u*=y. If 5<y+<30, it belongs to the buffer layer. When 30<y+<500, it belongs to the log-rate layer, and the velocity is distributed log-rate along the wall normal direction, u+=2.5In y+.

The value of y+ can be set as a function of y+ in a computational simulation, so the value of y+ can be observed between 60 and 140.

4. Rewrite section 3.2 in technical manners. Only mentioning the number of nodes/elements are not sufficient. Also explain the CFL value for this case

The simulation details are restated and the convergence residuals are less than 10−5

5. Quality of the results/graphs are not upto the mark. This should be improved.

The resulting graph has been updated.

6. Novelty, choice of numerical model and meshing details are not explained well.

The novelty of this paper is mainly the application of S-type turbine in wave field. Wave field is different from pure flow field. In a pure flow field, we think that the velocity magnitude and direction of the particle are constant at input, oriented, and change when encountering resistance or damping. In the wave field, the velocity and direction of water particles vary, as shown in Figure 3. In the mesh division, STAR-ccm+ software has a variety of mesh forms, polyhedral mesh, tetrahedral mesh, cut body mesh and other mesh forms. Compared with other grid forms, polyhedral mesh is more suitable for complex structure and mechanism motion.

Reviewer #1: Presented paper investigated the hydrodynamic performance of a Savonius type turbine (S-type turbine) in a wave field.

The method of combining numerical simulation with physical experiment is adopted. Based on linear wave theory and turbulence model, Star CCM+ numerical simulation software is used for digital modelling, and overlapping grid technology is used for grid modelling.

The research results show that the S-type turbine must design a reasonable layout according to the wave field conditions.

1.Eq 4, how much is the moment of inertia of the turbine, I?

S-type turbine moment of inertia is (0.05, 0.09,0.11)

2.What is figure 5? it does not mean anything!

Figure 5 has been deleted.

3.Table 3, what is TSR (Tip speed ratio)? or more detailed data of other related parameters? For example, U and inflow velocity or speed?

Tip velocity ratio is also an important index to measure turbine performance. The author originally considered that in the wave field, the speed and direction of the motion of water particles are not fixed, and wanted to use the power coefficient to characterize the performance of the turbine. At the suggestion of the reviewer, the maximum blade tip ratio can be used to characterize the performance index of the turbine.

4.Fig 14 h is wave height, and wave period is T. In table 2 please show it.

Symbol indicated

5.Fig 17, obtain the average energy, how much for each case?

The author further explains in Figure 23, and Figure 17 shows the energy of the kinetic energy of the turbine under the action of the wave, because its speed is not stable under the action of the wave. This is also what the author wants to reveal the details of the movement of the S-type turbine under the action of waves.

6.Fig 19, obtain the average values of the energy. omega is turbine angular velocity? Is that right?

The energy obtained is the steady rotation of the S-turbine, but this energy is fluctuating. Specifically, the kinetic energy of the S-turbine, if the energy is to be used, it needs to be converted into electricity. This paper mainly studies the first-order S-type turbine. If it is replaced with second-order S-type turbine or third-order S-type turbine, the energy curve will be smoother. This is what our team will work on next.

7.Finally, compare the absorbed power for the forward and reverse turbine. Which one is better? What is the RPM? What is TSR? Add a table and show all average parameters of power, energy, etc corresponding to speed and TSR and some more else.

The authors added tables to the results discussion.

Reviewer #2:The work is presented on an interesting topic and fits the theme of PLOS ONE. There are several notes that authors need to take into account before publishing.

1. The background needs to be improved. In the analyzed works of other authors, the advantages and disadvantages of the reviewed studies should be presented. Based on the background results, it is necessary to clearly justify the choice of research tool. The goals and objectives of the study should be more clearly formulated.

In this paper, the S-type turbine is further discussed, and the table is added to facilitate the author to read and understand.

2. Many questions on numerical modeling. There is no validation and verification process in your work. The choice of network is questionable, since the power factor is not a suitable value for determining the main parameters of turbine operation. The choice of the turbulence model is not justified in any way. No test results. There is no description of boundary conditions.

Perhaps our description of the work is not enough, STAR-ccm+ software provides a relatively rich grid forms, such as polyhedral mesh, tetrahedral mesh, cut body mesh, etc. The S-type turbine we studied adopts polyhedral mesh, mainly for the complex structure and movement. The Renomean Nevistox k-e model is selected because it meets most of the calculation requirements, and there is no strong swirl, buoyant flow, neutral stratified flow and other conditions in the S-type turbine. k-e,RNG k-e and Realizable k-e models have been used by many researchers to study the rotation of S-type turbines.

3. What is the error of the experimental data obtained?

How was it determined?

The S-type turbine is an unstable rotation under the action of waves, and there are data fluctuations and randomness, which will result in some experimental errors. Therefore, the author uses the method of averaging to calculate the energy capture power of the turbine, and the results are further discussed in the fifth part.

4. The design of the figures needs to be redesigned; the data curves should not fall on the numerical values of the axes.

The diagram has been redrawn.

5. Conclusions should be concise and clear, contain specific quantitative data, all discussions should be after the figures.

The author has recalibrated the conclusions.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

pone.0310478.s003.docx (22.6KB, docx)

Decision Letter 1

Niaz Bahadur Khan

2 Sep 2024

Research on hydrodynamic performance of S-type Turbine based on linear wave

PONE-D-24-12338R1

Dear Dr. Wang,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice will be generated when your article is formally accepted. Please note, if your institution has a publishing partnership with PLOS and your article meets the relevant criteria, all or part of your publication costs will be covered. Please make sure your user information is up-to-date by logging into Editorial Manager at Editorial Manager® and clicking the ‘Update My Information' link at the top of the page. If you have any questions relating to publication charges, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Niaz Bahadur Khan, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: This is good topic and good paper. It is revised well and can be accepted. In some cases, there are some questionable but it is not important.

Reviewer #2: The explanations and changes made by the authors to the work dispelled some of my misconceptions. The article looks like an organic finished product for publication.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Hassan Ghassemi

Reviewer #2: No

**********

Acceptance letter

Niaz Bahadur Khan

31 Oct 2024

PONE-D-24-12338R1

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Wang,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

If revisions are needed, the production department will contact you directly to resolve them. If no revisions are needed, you will receive an email when the publication date has been set. At this time, we do not offer pre-publication proofs to authors during production of the accepted work. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few weeks to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr Niaz Bahadur Khan

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Data

    (XLSX)

    pone.0310478.s001.xlsx (1.6MB, xlsx)
    S1 Nomenclature

    (DOCX)

    pone.0310478.s002.docx (14.5KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    pone.0310478.s003.docx (22.6KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES