Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2025 Jan 3;20(1):e0316644. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316644

A NOTCH3 pathogenic variant influences osteogenesis and can be targeted by antisense oligonucleotides in induced pluripotent stem cells

Ernesto Canalis 1,2,3,*, Jungeun Yu 1,3,¤, Lauren Schilling 3, Paymaan Jafar-nejad 4, Michele Carrer 4
Editor: Md Shaifur Rahman5
PMCID: PMC11698389  PMID: 39752389

Abstract

Lateral Meningocele Syndrome (LMS), a disorder associated with NOTCH3 pathogenic variants, presents with neurological, craniofacial and skeletal abnormalities. Mouse models of the disease exhibit osteopenia that is ameliorated by the administration of Notch3 antisense oligonucleotides (ASO) targeting either Notch3 or the Notch3 mutation. To determine the consequences of LMS pathogenic variants in human cells and whether they can be targeted by ASOs, induced pluripotent NCRM1 and NCRM5 stem (iPS) cells harboring a NOTCH36692-93insC insertion were created. Parental iPSCs, NOTCH36692-93insC and isogenic controls, free of chromosomal aberrations as determined by human CytoSNP850 array, were cultured under conditions of neural crest, mesenchymal and osteogenic cell differentiation. The expected cell phenotype was confirmed by surface markers and a decline in OCT3/4 and NANOG mRNA. NOTCH36692-93insC cells displayed enhanced expression of Notch target genes HES1, HEY1, 2 and L demonstrating a NOTCH3 gain-of-function. There was enhanced osteogenesis in NOTCH36692-93insC cells as evidenced by increased mineralized nodule formation and ALPL, BGLAP and BSP expression. ASOs targeting NOTCH3 decreased both NOTCH3 wild type and NOTCH36692-93insC mutant mRNA by 40% in mesenchymal and 90% in osteogenic cells. ASOs targeting the NOTCH3 insertion decreased NOTCH36692-93insC by 70–80% in mesenchymal cells and by 45–55% in osteogenic cells and NOTCH3 mRNA by 15–30% and 20–40%, respectively. In conclusion, a NOTCH3 pathogenic variant causes a modest increase in osteoblastogenesis in human iPS cells in vitro and NOTCH3 and NOTCH3 mutant specific ASOs downregulate NOTCH3 transcripts associated with LMS.

Introduction

Lehman Syndrome or Lateral Meningocele Syndrome (LMS) (OMIM 130720) is a rare and devastating disorder characterized by meningoceles and numerous skeletal manifestations, including craniofacial developmental defects, short stature, scoliosis and osteopenia [13]. The syndrome is associated with mutations, insertions or short deletions in exon 33 of NOTCH3 upstream of the proline (P)-, glutamic acid (E)-, serine (S)-, threonine (T)-rich (PEST) domain [4, 5]. The mutations lead to the premature termination of a protein product lacking sequences required for the ubiquitination and degradation of the NOTCH3 intracellular domain (NICD) so that the protein is stable and a gain-of-NOTCH3 function ensues. The inheritance of the disorder is autosomal dominant although de novo heterozygous mutations may occur [2]. The incidence of LMS is unknown and less than 100 cases have been reported. Treatment for this genetic disorder affecting the skeleton is not available.

LMS is one of many disorders that are associated with specific gene mutations that present with devastating clinical manifestations [6, 7]. Unfortunately, there is no practical or effective intervention that corrects the genetic abnormality, leading to the unsuccessful management of subjects afflicted by these disorders. Gene editing has been proposed to correct mutations in mice and humans [8, 9]. However, gene editing is not readily available for therapeutic intervention, and ethical concerns have been raised regarding genome editing in human embryos [1012]. A specific tissue could be targeted with vectors with preferential affinity for the tissue affected to replace the mutant DNA with repaired DNA, an approach that also has been challenging [13].

Antisense oligonucleotides (ASO) are a novel and potential therapeutic approach to downregulate wild type and mutant transcripts. ASOs have been successful in the targeting and downregulation of mutant genes in the liver, central and peripheral nervous system and retina [1420]. ASOs are synthetic single-stranded nucleic acids that by binding to target mRNA by Watson-Crick pairing they cause the degradation of mRNA by RNase H [21, 22]. As such, ASOs are of potential value in conditions where a gain-of-function exists since gene downregulation could correct the functional outcome. Previously, we demonstrated the effectiveness of ASOs targeting either wild type or mutant Notch3 in mice and skeletal cells from mice harboring a Notch3 mutation resulting in a gain-of-function analogous to the one observed in LMS [23, 24].

An attractive application of induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cell technology is that it allows the isolation of patient-derived cells that carry the genetic alterations associated with specific disorders or the creation of stocks of established iPS cell lines harboring specific mutations. iPS cells provide an experimental system not only to study the pathogenesis of the disease but also to devise therapeutic strategies [25]. Although the mutations present in individuals with LMS are in exon 33 of NOTCH3, not every family line harbors the same mutation, and this is often the case with monogenic disorders [4]. Therefore, ASOs targeting each mutation would need to be designed and tested for their effectiveness in downregulating the NOTCH3 mutant transcript. This would require ample supply of cells from afflicted individuals so that ASOs specific to the pathogenic variant can be tested to document efficacy. A practical approach is the establishment of stocks of iPS cells from affected individuals or the introduction of specific mutations in stocks of iPS cells to be tested for ASO effectiveness on mutant transcript downregulation and cellular behavior.

The intent of the current study was to create and establish iPS cell lines harboring a NOTCH3 pathogenic variant found in LMS and define their cellular behavior and differentiation to the osteogenic lineage. In addition, ASOs targeting either the wild type or NOTCH3 pathogenic variant were tested to determine their effectiveness in downregulating NOTCH3.

Materials and methods

Induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells

NIH control reference line (NCRM)1 and NCRM5 were generated by the NIH Regenerative Medicine Program and obtained through RUCDR Infinite Biologics (Piscataway, NJ) [26]. NCRM1 and NCRM5 cells are derived from male CD14+ cord blood by episomal integration and are well-characterized pluripotent cells devoid of chromosomal structural aberrations.

Human NOTCH3 mutant iPS cells were created at the University of Connecticut Cell and Engineering Core (Farmington, CT). To introduce the NOTCH36692-93insC insertion into NOTCH3, the databases http://www.rgenome.net and https://chopchop.cbu.uib.no were utilized to evaluate potential single guide (sg)RNAs. NOTCH3 sgRNA 5’-AGAGGTCAAGGCCAGGACTA-3’ was selected because of its high score with minimum off-target effects. This guide RNA targets the intron upstream of exon 33 containing the mutation and was cloned into pSpCas9(BB)-2A-Puro (PX459v2, Addgene 62988, Watertown, MA). Homology arms flanking a neomycin selection cassette flanked by loxP sites were cloned into a targeting vector so that the guide RNA sequence would be split by the cassette to prevent further DNA cleavage following the targeting of the 3’ homology arm contained either in the NOTCH36692-93insC mutant or the wild type sequence to be targeted (Fig 1). NCRM1 and NCRM5 iPS cells were nucleofected using a Lonza 4d Nucleofector and primary kit P3 following manufacturer’s protocols (Lonza, Basel, Switzerland). Cells were grown and clones established, and genomic DNA was screened for vector-targeting and positive clones were analyzed by DNA sequencing to determine genotype and the presence or absence of the NOTCH36692-93insC insertion. Depending on the breakpoint occurring during homologous directed repair, cells could harbor the mutation, if the breakpoint was at the end of the homology arm or harbor a wild type allele if the breakpoint occurred at the insertion site. Clones were transfected with a Cre-IRES-PuroR vector (Addgene 30205) to delete the neomycin selection cassette and loxP recombination verified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Homozygous, and heterozygous clones and wild type isogenic controls were obtained. Absence of genetic aberrations was verified using the Infinium CytoSNP-850K v1.3 BeadChip microarray (Illumina; San Diego, CA) at the University of Connecticut Center for Genome Innovation (Storrs, CT) in accordance with manufacturer’s instructions. Parental NCRM1 and NOTCH3 mutant and isogenic control NCRM1 cells harbored a 602.9 kilobase gain in chromosome 20 Band 20q11.21-20q11.21 position 29, 804, 293–30, 407, 232.

Fig 1. Targeting of NOTCH3 and creation of NOTCH36692_93insC mutant induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells.

Fig 1

In Panel A, NCRM1 and NCRM5 cells were nucleofected with pSPCas9(BB)-2A-Puro to deliver Cas9 and the targeting vector, containing the NOTCH36692-93insC insertion depicted above in Band C or isogenic control. The neo selection cassette (in A) was deleted following nucleofection of Cre-IRES-PuroR. Breakpoints in homologous directed repair in the homology arm (C) would include the mutation and breakpoint in the insertion (B) would create a wild type allele. In Panel B, DNA sequencing of Notch36692-93insC homozygous and heterozygous mutant and NOTCH3 isogenic control NCRM1 and NCRM5 iPS cells.

iPS cell culture and in vitro osteogenesis

NCRM1 and NCRM5 iPS cells with and without the NOTCH36692-93insC insertion were seeded on matrigel-coated plates (STEMCELL Technologies, Vancouver, Canada or Geltrex, Waltham, MA) and cultured in mTeSR Plus (STEMCELL Technologies) medium at 37°C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere and manually passaged twice a week with the aid of a 28-gauge needle using an enzyme-free cell dissociation solution at 37°C and streaked through the well for colony formation [2628]. For neural crest differentiation, cells were cultured on laminin-521 (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA) for 6 days and the culture medium was replaced twice a week with basal STEMdiff™ APEL™ differentiation medium (STEMCELL Technologies) supplemented with 5 μM glycogen synthase inhibitor (GSKi) (CHIR992021, Stemgent, Lexington, MA) and 10 μM transforming growth factor (TGF)β inhibitor (SB431542, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) (Fig 2) [27, 28]. Cells were detached by adding Stempro Accutase (Thermo Fisher) and selected for CD34KDRCD271+PDGFRa surface markers by fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) [29]. Following sorting, cells were plated at a 1–2 x 106 cells/10 cm2 density on laminin-521 (Thermo Fisher) coated dishes in the presence of STEMdiff™ APEL™ Medium, 10 μM TGFβ inhibitor, 10 μM Rho kinase (ROCK) inhibitor (Y-27632, STEMCELL Technologies) and antibiotic-antimycotic cocktail (Thermo Fisher) for 24 h. To induce mesenchymal cell differentiation, cells were cultured for one week on laminin-521 coated plates and for one week on Cell Bind coated plates (Thermo Fisher) in MSC NutriStem XF medium (Sartorius, Gottingen, Germany) [28]. Mesenchymal cell differentiation was verified by the presence of CD44+CD73+CD105+CD31CD45 surface markers by flow cytometry.

Fig 2. NCRM1 and NCRM5 induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells differentiate into neural crest and mesenchymal cell lineage in vitro.

Fig 2

iPS cells were cultured in STEMdiff™ APEL™ medium in the presence of GSK and TGFβ inhibitors, selected for KDRCD34CD271+PDGFRa by FACS and cultured in the presence of ROCK and TGFβ inhibitors for 24 h. Cells were transferred to Laminin-521 and Cell Bind coated plates in the presence of NutriStem XF medium for 2 weeks and osteogenic culture conditions for 4 weeks. Panel A shows the cell differentiation scheme. Panels B and C show the neural crest cells and surface markers following FACS. Panel D shows mesenchymal cells and surface markers determined by flow cytometry and Panel E shows mineralized nodules stained with alizarin red following osteogenesis. Bars in the right corner of images in B and E represent 500 μm, and in D 200 μm.

To induce osteogenic differentiation, mesenchymal cells were grown to confluence on Cell Bind coated plates in NutriStem XF medium and switched to Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) (Thermo Fisher), 10% fetal bovine serum (Atlanta Biologicals, Laurenceville, GA), 100 nM dexamethasone, 50 ng/ml ascorbic acid, 10 mM β-glycerophosphate (all from Sigma-Aldrich) [30]. Medium was replaced twice a week and cells were cultured for up to 4 weeks. To determine the presence of mineralized nodules, cultured cells were fixed and stained with alizarin red at various times during the culture period.

NOTCH3 antisense oligonucleotides (ASO)

ASOs targeting the NOTCH3 or the NOTCH36692-93insC mutant pre-mRNA and a non-targeting control ASO that does not hybridize to any specific mRNA in the human or mouse transcriptome sequence were designed and synthesized by Ionis Pharmaceuticals (Carlsbad, CA). The ASO targeting human NOTCH3 has a central segment of eight DNA nucleotides flanked on each side by five nucleotides with 2′-O-(2-methoxyethyl) (MOE) ribose sugar modifications, and contains phosphodiester or phosphorothioate backbone linkages [31]. The ASOs targeting NOTCH36692-93insC have a central segment of ten DNA nucleotides flanked on each side by three nucleotides with 2′4′-constrained 2′-O-ethyl (cEt) modifications and contain phosphorothioate backbone linkages. NOTCH3 mutant or control ASOs at various doses and periods of time were added directly to mesenchymal cells before and after they were exposed to culture medium under osteogenic conditions for 2 weeks as indicated in text and legends.

Quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR)

Cellular RNA was extracted with the RNeasy kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA), following manufacturer’s protocols [3235]. The iScript RT-PCR kit (BioRad, Hercules, CA) was used to reverse transcribe equal amounts of RNA which was then amplified in the presence of specific primers (IDT) (Table 1) with the SsoAdvanced Universal SYBR Green Supermix or the iQ SYBR Green Supermix (BioRad) at 60°C for 35 cycles. Transcript copy number was estimated by comparison with serial dilutions of cDNA of the genes examined obtained from Thermo Fisher Scientific or Dharmacon (Lafayette, CO). In experiments designed with the intent to determine an effect on NOTCH36692-93insC transcripts by an ASO, fluorescent tagged products were used to conduct RT-PCR. Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase was used to reverse transcribe total RNA and NOTCH3 cDNA was amplified by qPCR in the presence of SsoAdvanced Universal Probes Supermix (BioRad), NOTCH3 and NOTCH3 mutant primers and HEX labeled NOTCH3 and FAM labeled NOTCH36692-93insC probes (BioRad) for 10 secs at 95°C followed by 30 secs at 60°C and repeated for 45 cycles [36]. Copy number of NOTCH3 or NOTCH36692-93insC was estimated by comparison to a serial dilution of a 100 to 200 base pair (bp) synthetic DNA fragment (IDT) harboring (or not) the 6692-93insC in the NOTCH3 locus cloned into pcDNA3.1(-) (Thermo Fisher) by isothermal single reaction assembly using reagents available commercially (New England BioLabs, Ipswich, MA) [37]. Transcripts are expressed as copy number corrected for HPRT expression.

Table 1. Primers used for qRT-PCR determinations.

GenBank accession numbers identify transcript recognized by primer pairs.

Gene Strand Sequence GenBank Accession Number
ACP5 Forward 5’-ATGAGAATGGCGTGGGCTAC-3’ NM_001111034.3
Reverse 5’-GTGCCGCTTTGAGGGGTC-3’
ALPL Forward 5’-GCAGACATTCTCAAAGCCTCTT-3’ NM_000478
Reverse 5’-TCTGGAGAAATACGTTCGCTAGA-3’
BGLAP Forward 5’-AAAGGTGCAGCCTTTGTGTC-3’ NM_199173
Reverse 5’-GGTCTCTTCACTACCTCGCT-3’
BSP Forward 5’-CGAGCCTATGAAGATGAGT-3’ NM_004967
Reverse 5’-GGTGGTGGTAGTAATTCTGA-3’
FOXC2 Forward 5’-TTGAGAACTCGACCCTCG-3’ NM_005251
Reverse 5’-CTGCGTGGCGATAGAGAG-3’
GSC Forward 5’-CAGACAGACGATGCTACT-3’ NM_173849
Reverse 5’-TCCTCGTTCCTCTTTCTC-3’
HES1 Forward 5’-CAACCCACCTCTCTTCCCTC-3’ NM_005524
Reverse 5’-TTCTCTCCCAGTATTCAAGTTCCT-3’
HEY1 Forward 5’-CCCAACTACATCTTCCCAGA-3’ NM_001040708
Reverse 5’-TCTCAATTATTCCTCTCCGTCTT-3’
HEY2 Forward 5’-GGGGTAAAGGCTACTTTGAC-3’ NM_012259
Reverse 5’-AACTTCTGTTAGGCACTCTC-3’
HEYL Forward 5’-GATCACTTGAAAATGCTCCAT-3’ NM_014571
Reverse 5’-GGCATCAAAGAATCCTGTCC-3’
HPRT Forward 5’-CCTGGCGTCGTGATTAGTG-3’ NM_000194.3
Reverse 5’-CCCTTTCCAAATCCTCAGCATAA-3’
NANOG Forward 5’-CAGTCTGGACACTGGCTGAA -3’ NLM_024865
Reverse 5’-CTCGCTGATTAGGCTCCAAC -3’
NOTCH1 Forward 5’-TGGACGACAACCAGAATGA-3’ NM_017617
Reverse 5’-CCTCGAACCGGAACTTCTT-3’
NOTCH2 Forward 5’-GGCTATGAACCCTGTGTAAA-3’ NM_024408
Reverse 5’-CTTCTGGACATTTGCAGTATC-3’
NOTCH3 Forward 5’-GAGGTCGTTGCACCCAGC-3’ NM_000435
Reverse 5’-AGTGACAGGGGTCCTCCAG-3’
NOTCH4 Forward 5’-GCATTGGTCTCAAGGCACTGAA-3’ NM_004557
Reverse 5’-CCTGAGCACATCACAACTCCATC-3’
OCT3/4 Forward 5’-TGTACTCCTCGGTCCCTTTC-3’ NM_002701
Reverse 5’-TCCAGGTTTTCTTTCCCTAGC-3’
RUNX2 Forward 5’-CAAGCAGAATTTAGCAGAGAT-3’ NM_001024630.4
Reverse 5’-AGAAGGACCAGAGAACAAG-3’
SOX10 Forward 5’-CCTCTCCTAGCCACTCTA-3’ NM_006941
Reverse 5’-TTATTATGTGGAATGCTTAATGC-3’
SP7 Forward 5’-CTCAACAACTCTGGGCAAAG-3’ NM_001173467
Reverse 5’-GGAGGCTGAAAGGTCACT-3’
WNT1 Forward 5’-CTTCGGCAAGATCGTCAA-3’ NM_005430.4
Reverse 5’-GATGGAACCTTCTGAGCA-3’

Statistics

Data are expressed as means ± SD and as individual sample values of technical replicates. Statistical significant differences were determined by either unpaired t test for pairwise comparisons or by two-way analysis of variance for multiple comparisons with Holm Šidák post-hoc analysis employing the GraphPad Prism version 10.2.0 for Windows 10 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA).

Results

Creation of NOTCH36692-93insC mutant cells

CRISPR/Cas9 technology was used to introduce a single base pair insertion at c.6692_93insC in NOTCH3 in both NCRM1 and NCRM5 cells. The insertion predicts a premature termination upstream of the PEST domain of NOTCH3 duplicating the pathogenic variant found in a subject afflicted by LMS and functionally replicated in the Notch3em1Ecan mouse mutant [38, 39]. NCRM1 and NCRM5 cells homozygous and heterozygous for the c.6692_93insC were obtained and verified by DNA sequencing and stocks created to be used for testing (Fig 1). Isogenic controls and heterozygous and homozygous NOTCH36692-93insC cells retained genomic stability and were absent of chromosomal aberrations as determined by the human CytoSNP-850 array.

NCRM1 and NCRM5 cells differentiate into mesenchymal and osteogenic cells in vitro

Parental NCRM1 and NCRM5 cells were cultured in STEMdiff™ APEL™ medium in the presence of GSK and TGFβ inhibitors to direct their differentiation to cells of the neural crest [28, 29]. Cells were selected for the neural crest markers CD34KDRCD271+PDGFRa- by FACS and grown further on Laminin-521 and Cell Bind coated plates to induce mesenchymal cell differentiation (Fig 2). Mesenchymal cells were identified by the absence of CD45 and CD31 surface markers and the detection of CD44+CD73+CD105+ by flow cytometry and were transferred to osteogenic medium for differentiation [28, 40]. The pluripotent cell gene markers OCT3/4 and NANOG were detected in parental iPS cells but were virtually undetectable in neural crest and mesenchymal cells verifying loss of pluripotency and evidence of cell differentiation (Fig 3A). Following differentiation, NCRM1 and NCRM5 neural crest cells expressed GSC and SOX10 and mesenchymal cells expressed FOXC2 transcripts (Fig 3A) [29, 4143]. The NOTCH36692-93insC pathogenic variant did not alter the differentiation of either NCRM1 or NCRM5 cells to neural crest or mesenchymal cells (Fig 3B). Culture of mesenchymal cells under osteogenic conditions induced their differentiation toward osteoblasts and formed mineralized nodules (Figs 2 and 4) and expressed ALPL, BGLAP, RUNX2 and low levels of SP7, genes associated with osteoblasts. RUNX2 declined and ALPL increased as the culture progressed over a 4-week period (Fig 4). ACP5, an osteoclast gene marker, was detected during the initial phase of the culture and declined during osteoblast differentiation. NOTCH1, NOTCH2 and NOTCH3, but not NOTCH4, transcripts were detected in NCRM1 and NCRM5 cells during osteogenic differentiation.

Fig 3. NCRM1 and NCRM5 induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells differentiate into neural crest and the mesenchymal cell lineage in vitro.

Fig 3

iPS cells were cultured it STEMdiff™ APEL™ medium in the presence of GSK and TGFβ inhibitors, selected for KDRCD34CD271+PDGFRa by FACS and cultured in the presence of ROCK and TGFβ inhibitors for 24 h. Cells were transferred to Laminin-521 and Cell Bind coated plates in the presence of NutriStem XF medium for 2 weeks. Panel A shows pluripotent cell gene markers OCT3/4 and NANOG, neural crest gene markers GSC and SOX10 and mesenchymal cell marker FOXC2 mRNA expressed as copy number corrected for HPRT in undifferentiated parental NCRM1 (white bars) and NCRM5 (black bars) iPS cells, neural crest and mesenchymal cells (MSC). Panel B shows mesenchymal cell surface markers determined by flow cytometry of NCRM1 and NCRM5 parental cells (left) and iPS cells harboring a NOTCH36692-93insC insertion and isogenic controls following neural crest and mesenchymal cell differentiation. Individual values are shown, and bars and ranges represent means ± SD; n = 4 technical replicates.

Fig 4. NCRM1 and NCRM5 induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells differentiate to the osteoblast lineage.

Fig 4

NCRM1 (white bars) and NCRM5 (black bars) iPS cells were cultured to induce neural crest and mesenchymal cell differentiation as described in Figs 2 and 3 and transferred to osteogenic medium for 4 weeks. In Panel A, SP7, RUNX2, ALPL, BGLAP, ACP5, NOTCH1, NOTCH2 and NOTCH3 mRNA levels were determined at the indicated times. Transcript levels are expressed as copy number following correction for HPRT copy number. Individual values are shown, and bars and ranges represent means ± SD; n = 4 technical replicates. In Panel B, mineralized nodules stained with alizarin red obtained after 4 weeks of culture in osteogenic medium. Bars in the right corner represent 200 μm. NOTCH4 was not detected.

NOTCH36692-93insC pathogenic variant causes a modest enhancement of osteoblastogenesis in vitro

To determine the impact of the NOTCH36692-93insC insertion on osteoblast cell differentiation, homozygous NCRM1 (Fig 5) and NCRM5 (Fig 6) cells for the insertion and isogenic controls were cultured under osteogenic conditions. NOTCH3 mRNA was detected in control and mutant cells throughout the culture since the RT-PCR could not discriminate a single 6692-93insC. NOTCH36692-93insC transcripts were detected only in iPS cells harboring the pathogenic variant allele and as expected, the level of expression was higher in homozygous than in heterozygous NOTCH36692-93insC clones (not shown). NOTCH36692-93insC cells expressed higher levels of HEY1, HEY2 and HEYL transcripts than isogenic controls during the first 2 weeks of culture in NCRM1 and throughout the culture period in NCRM5 mutant cells demonstrating that the NOTCH3 insertion resulted in a gain-of-Notch function (Figs 5 and 6). Accordingly, there was a short-lived induction of ALPL and BGLAP in NCRM1 mutant cells (Fig 5) and a more sustained increased expression of ALPL and BSP in NCRM5 cells harboring the NOTCH36692-93insC insertion compared to isogenic controls (Fig 6). There was greater formation of mineralized nodules in NOTCH36692-93insC NCRM1 and NCRM5 cells than in isogenic control cells (Figs 5 and 6). WNT1 was not detected in either wild type or NOTCH36692_93insC, NCRM1 or NCRM5 iPS cells.

Fig 5. NOTCH36692_93insC causes a NOTCH3 gain-of-function and a modest enhancement of osteogenesis in NCRM1 induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells.

Fig 5

iPS cells harboring a NOTCH36692_93insC insertion in both alleles (INS/INS, black bars) and isogenic controls (WT/WT white bars) were cultured under conditions that induce neural crest and mesenchymal cell differentiation and transferred to osteogenic medium for 4 weeks. In Panel A, NOTCH3, NOTCH36692_93insC, HES1, HEY1, HEY2, HEYL, ALPL and BGLAP mRNA levels were determined at the indicated times. Transcript levels are expressed as copy number following correction for HPRT copy number. Individual values are shown, and bars and ranges represent means ± SD; n = 4 technical replicates. In Panel B, mineralized nodules stained with alizarin red after 3 weeks of culture in osteogenic medium. Bars in the right corner represent 200 μm. *Significantly different between NOTCH36692_93insC and control cells by ANOVA, p < 0.05.

Fig 6. NOTCH36692_93insC causes a NOTCH3 gain-of-function and a modest enhancement of osteogenesis in NCRM5 induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells.

Fig 6

iPS cells harboring a NOTCH36692_93insC insertion in both alleles (INS/INS, black bars) and isogenic controls (WT/WT, white bars) were cultured under conditions that induce neural crest and mesenchymal cell differentiation and transferred to osteogenic medium for 4 weeks. In Panel A, NOTCH3 (in isogenic controls), NOTCH36692_93insC (in NOTCH3 mutant iPS cells), HES1, HEY1, HEY2, HEYL, ALPL, BGLAP and BSP mRNA levels were determined at the indicated times. Transcript levels are expressed as copy number following correction for HPRT copy number. Individual values are shown, and bars and ranges represent means ± SD; n = 4 technical replicates. In Panel B, mineralized nodules stained with alizarin red obtained following 3 and 4 weeks of culture in osteogenic medium. Bars in the right corner represent 200 μm. *Significantly different between NOTCH36692_93insC and control cells by ANOVA, p < 0.05.

NOTCH3 ASOs downregulate NOTCH3 expression in mesenchymal and osteogenic cells

To determine the effect of NOTCH3 ASOs in control and NOTCH36692-93insC cells, ASOs targeting NOTCH3 and the NOTCH36692-93insC pre-mRNA were designed and synthesized (Fig 7). The effect of NOTCH3 ASOs was tested initially in undifferentiated iPS NOTCH36692-93insC and isogenic control cells, but neither the addition of NOTCH3 nor NOTCH3 mutant ASOs to the culture medium downregulated NOTCH3 or NOTCH36692-93insC transcripts, possibly because of limited ASO internalization by undifferentiated iPS cells (not shown). In subsequent experiments, NOTCH3 and NOTCH3 mutant ASOs were tested in mesenchymal and following culture under osteogenic conditions for 2 weeks (osteogenic cells). NOTCH3 ASOs added to the culture medium at 20 and 50 μM for 72 h downregulated NOTCH3 and NOTCH36692-93insC transcripts to an equal extent (30–40%) in mesenchymal and ~90% in osteogenic cells (Fig 8). The addition of one of the 10 ASOs designed to target mutant NOTCH3 to the culture medium of mesenchymal cells downregulated NOTCH36692-93insC mRNA and downregulated NOTCH3 wild type mRNA modestly indicating specificity for the NOTCH3 insertion (Fig 8). The NOTCH3 mutant ASO at 10 μM and 20 μM downregulated NOTCH36692-93insC by 70–80% in mesenchymal cells and by 44–55% in osteogenic cells. The effect was more pronounced for NOTCH36692-93insC than for NOTCH3 wild type mRNA, which was downregulated by 15–30% in mesenchymal cells and 20–40% in osteogenic cells. As expected, the NOTCH36692-93insC transcript was not detected in control wild type cells. To verify the activity of NOTCH3 ASOs, they were tested for their effects on canonical targets of Notch signaling in osteogenic cells. HEY1, HEY2, and HEYL mRNA expression was increased in NOTCH36692-93insC cells, and the effect was reversed by the ASO targeting NOTCH3 at 50 μM and the ASO targeting NOTCH36692-93insC at 20 μM (Fig 9). However, some of these changes did not reach statistical significance due to a small sample size (n = 3) and variability. The results suggest a reversal of the enhanced signal activation observed in LMS mutant cells.

Fig 7. Ten antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) targeting the NOTCH36692_93insC pre-mRNA were designed to degrade the mutant transcript.

Fig 7

Green lines represent the site targeted by each ASO. The colored letter represents the NOTCH36692_93insC insertion harbored by mutant cells compared to wild type human NOTCH3. The wild type human NOTCH3 pre-mRNA sequence is depicted at the top of the figure.

Fig 8. NOTCH3 and NOTCH3 mutant antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) downregulate NOTCH36692-93insC mutant transcripts.

Fig 8

Control and NOTCH3 ASOs targeting NOTCH3 or the NOTCH36692_93insC insertion were tested for their effects on NOTCH3 and NOTCH36692_93insC mRNA expression in NCRM1 mesenchymal cells before (left) and following the exposure to osteogenic medium for 14 days (right). NOTCH3 and NOTCH36692_93insC mRNA levels were obtained 72 h after the addition of control, NOTCH3 or NOTCH3 mutant ASOs at the indicated concentrations to the culture medium. Transcript levels are expressed as NOTCH3 (upper panels) and NOTCH36692-93insC (lower panels) copy number following correction for HPRT copy number. Individual values are shown, and bars and ranges represent means ± SD n = 3 technical replicates. *Significantly different between NOTCH3 ASO or mutant NOTCH3 ASO and control ASO by unpaired t test, p < 0.05.

Fig 9. NOTCH3 and NOTCH3 mutant antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) downregulate Notch target genes.

Fig 9

Control and NOTCH3 ASOs targeting NOTCH3 (N3) at 50 μM or the NOTCH36692_93insC insertion (mN3) at 20 μM were tested for their effects on HEY1, HEY2 and HEYL mRNA expression in NCRM1 mesenchymal cells exposed to osteogenic conditions for 2 weeks 72 h after ASO addition to the culture. Control ASO was added at the same concentration. Transcript levels are expressed as HEY1, HEY2 and HEYL copy number following correction for HPRT copy number following treatment with NOTCH3 (upper panel) or NOTCH3 mutant ASO (lower panel). Individual values are shown, and bars and ranges represent means ± SD; n = 3 technical replicates. Bars and p values indicate significant differences between NOTCH36692_93insC and control cells, and between NOTCH3 ASO or mutant NOTCH3 ASO and control ASO by ANOVA.

Discussion

The present studies were conducted to determine whether a NOTCH3 pathogenic variant found in LMS or Lehman Syndrome had a phenotypic impact on mesenchymal and osteogenic cell differentiation. In addition, the work tested whether NOTCH3 and its pathogenic variant could be downregulated in human cells in vitro by the administration of ASOs. The current findings confirm in human iPS cells that a pathogenic variant harbored in LMS results in a gain-of-Notch function as evidenced by increased expression of the canonical target genes HES1, HEY1, HEY2 and HEYL. The results confirm observations reported in mouse models of LMS termed Notch3em1Ecan that presented with a NOTCH3 gain-of-function and osteopenia secondary to an increase in receptor activator of NF-κB ligand (RANKL) in cells of the osteoblast lineage [38]. The number and function of osteoblasts was not affected in Notch3em1Ecan mice and in vitro experiments did not reveal either enhanced or suppressed osteoblastogenesis. In contrast to these findings, iPS cells harboring an LMS pathogenic variant exhibited a modest enhancement in osteogenesis as evidenced by an increase in mineralized nodule formation and select gene markers associated with the osteoblast phenotype. The effect was more evident and sustained in NCRM5 than in NCRM1 cells harboring the NOTCH3 pathogenic variant, but the reasons for the difference were not explored. NCRM1 cells harbor a 602.9 kilobase gain in chromosome 20 Band 20q11.21-20q11.21 position 29, 804, 293–30, 407, 232 although whether this could influence their phenotype is unknown. The modest discrepancy between human and mouse cells might be related to different culture models since the cells from Notch3em1Ecan mice were studied in primary cultures following the isolation of relatively mature cells of the osteoblast lineage [38]. It is possible that the outcome observed in iPS cells is due to an effect of NOTCH3 in an immature, less differentiated cell or to the fact that often the effects of Notch are cell-context dependent.

The current work also was undertaken to determine whether ASOs could be developed to target and downregulate a NOTCH3 pathogenic variant in iPS cells. One of the ASOs tested downregulated the NOTCH36692-93insC with a more modest effect on wild type NOTCH3 transcripts in mesenchymal and osteogenic cell cultures indicating a degree of specificity. In addition, ASOs targeting either wild type or mutant NOTCH3 alleles decreased the induction of canonical Notch target genes observed in NOTCH36692-93insC cells. Although some of the changes did not achieve statistical significance due to a small sample size, the results would suggest at least a partial reversal of the NOTCH3 gain-of-function observed in cells harboring the LMS pathogenic variant and provide evidence of a biological effect. It was not possible to test the long-term effects of NOTCH3 ASOs on the osteogenic phenotype of NOTCH36692-93insC cells because the phenotype was modest and the prolonged exposure of cells to the ASO resulted in cellular toxicity.

Various approaches have been reported to downregulate signaling by Notch receptors. However, often they lack specificity to Notch activity or to a specific Notch receptor. Antibodies targeting the negative regulatory region (NRR) of Notch prove to be an exception and in previous work, we demonstrated that anti-NOTCH2 NRR and anti-NOTCH3 NRR antibodies reverse skeletal phenotypic manifestations of Notch2tm1.1Ecan, a mouse model of Hajdu Cheney Syndrome (HCS) and of Notch3em1Ecan, a mouse model of LMS [44, 45]. A limitation of anti-Notch NRR antibodies is the fact that they do not discriminate between the wild type and mutant forms of the receptor and by causing a substantial downregulation of Notch signaling their administration may result in gastrointestinal toxicity.

Previously, we have shown the in vitro and in vivo ability of Notch2 ASOs to downregulate Notch2 expression and as a result improve the osteopenia of mice harboring a Notch2 gain-of-function mutation found in HCS [46]. We also reported that ASOs targeting either Notch3 or Notch3 mutants replicating the pathogenic variant of LMS, inhibit Notch3 mRNA and improve the cortical osteopenia found in Notch3em1Ecan mice [23, 24]. The present work confirms the feasibility of the approach and extends the findings to a human, albeit in vitro, model.

There are limitations in the present work. Phenotypic alterations of experimental and control iPS cells and testing of ASOs were conducted in vitro for markers of osteogenesis and no assays were conducted to verify bone formation in vivo [47]. The enhancement of osteoblastogenesis by the NOTCH3 LMS pathogenic variant was modest. The phenotypic impact of the NOTCH36692-93insC variant and the effects of Notch3 ASOs were assessed in cells of the osteoblast lineage and not in the myeloid/osteoclast lineage because NOTCH3 is not expressed in this lineage either in human or murine cells and NOTCH3 does not have direct effects on osteoclastogenesis [6, 39]. Indeed, NOTCH1 and NOTCH2 transcripts are detected in iPS cells differentiating toward the myeloid/osteoclast lineage whereas low/undetectable levels of NOTCH3 and NOTCH4 are found (Canalis, et al., unpublished observations). Because only iPS cells derived from umbilical blood of male subjects were studied, one should not extrapolate the results observed to iPS cells derived from female individuals or iPS cells from other sources.

In conclusion, a NOTCH3 pathogenic variant found in LMS causes a modest enhancement of osteogenesis in iPS cells in vitro, and ASOs can be used to target and downregulate NOTCH3 and an LMS pathogenic variant in human iPS cells.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Drs. Pamela Robey and Fahad Kidwai for helpful advice, Magda Mocarska and Emily Denker for technical assistance, Mary Yurczak for secretarial support, and Emily Denker for creating figures for the manuscript.

Abbreviations

The abbreviations used are ASO

antisense oligonucleotides

bp

base pair

cEt

constrained ethyl

DMEM

Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium

FACS

fluorescence activated cell sorting

GSKi

glycogen synthase inhibitor

iPS

induced pluripotent stem

LMS

Lateral Meningocele Syndrome

MSC

mesenchymal cells

MOE

methoxyethyl

NCRM

NIH control reference line

NRR

negative regulatory region

NC

neural crest

NICD

NOTCH3 intracellular domain

PCR

polymerase chain reaction

PEST

proline (P)-, glutamic acid (E)-, serine (S)-, threonine (T)-rich

qRT-PCR

quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction

RANKL

receptor activator of NF-κB ligand

sg

single guide

TGF

transforming growth factor

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS) [AR076747 (EC) and AR072987 (EC)]. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. he funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Lehman RA, Stears JC, Wesenberg RL, Nusbaum ED. Familial osteosclerosis with abnormalities of the nervous system and meninges. J Pediatr. 1977;90(1):49–54. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(77)80763-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Gripp KW, Scott CI Jr, Hughes HE, Wallerstein R, Nicholson L, States L, et al. Lateral meningocele syndrome: three new patients and review of the literature. Am J Med Genet. 1997;70(3):229–39. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Avela K, Valanne L, Helenius I, Makitie O. Hajdu-Cheney syndrome with severe dural ectasia. Am J Med Genet A. 2011;155A(3):595–8. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.33510 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gripp KW, Robbins KM, Sobreira NL, Witmer PD, Bird LM, Avela K, et al. Truncating mutations in the last exon of NOTCH3 cause lateral meningocele syndrome. Am J Med Genet A. 2015;167A(2):271–81. Epub 2014/11/15. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.36863 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gripp KW. Lateral meningocele syndrome and Hajdu-Cheney syndrome: different disorders with overlapping phenotypes. Am J Med Genet A. 2011;155A(7):1773–4; author reply 5. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.34075 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Canalis E. Notch in skeletal physiology and disease. OsteoporosInt. 2018;29(12):2611–21. doi: 10.1007/s00198-018-4694-3 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6494455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Morello R. Osteogenesis imperfecta and therapeutics. Matrix Biol. 2018;71–72:294–312. doi: 10.1016/j.matbio.2018.03.010 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6133774. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Porteus MH. A New Class of Medicines through DNA Editing. New Engl J Med. 2019;380(10):947–59. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1800729 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Savic N, Schwank G. Advances in therapeutic CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing. Transl Res. 2016;168:15–21. doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2015.09.008 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Tabebordbar M, Zhu K, Cheng JKW, Chew WL, Widrick JJ, Yan WX, et al. In vivo gene editing in dystrophic mouse muscle and muscle stem cells. Science (New York, NY). 2016;351(6271):407–11. doi: 10.1126/science.aad5177 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4924477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Nelson CE, Hakim CH, Ousterout DG, Thakore PI, Moreb EA, Castellanos Rivera RM, et al. In vivo genome editing improves muscle function in a mouse model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Science (New York, NY). 2016;351(6271):403–7. doi: 10.1126/science.aad5143 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4883596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Daley GQ, Lovell-Badge R, Steffann J. After the Storm—A Responsible Path for Genome Editing. New Engl J Med. 2019;380(10):897–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1900504 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Long C, Amoasii L, Mireault AA, McAnally JR, Li H, Sanchez-Ortiz E, et al. Postnatal genome editing partially restores dystrophin expression in a mouse model of muscular dystrophy. Science (New York, NY). 2016;351(6271):400–3. doi: 10.1126/science.aad5725 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4760628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Murray SF, Jazayeri A, Matthes MT, Yasumura D, Yang H, Peralta R, et al. Allele-Specific Inhibition of Rhodopsin With an Antisense Oligonucleotide Slows Photoreceptor Cell Degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015;56(11):6362–75. doi: 10.1167/iovs.15-16400 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5104522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Shy ME. Antisense oligonucleotides offer hope to patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1A. J Clin Invest. 2018;128(1):110–2. doi: 10.1172/JCI98617 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5749496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Carroll JB, Warby SC, Southwell AL, Doty CN, Greenlee S, Skotte N, et al. Potent and selective antisense oligonucleotides targeting single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the Huntington disease gene / allele-specific silencing of mutant huntingtin. Mol Ther. 2011;19(12):2178–85. doi: 10.1038/mt.2011.201 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3242664. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Limmroth V, Barkhof F, Desem N, Diamond MP, Tachas G, Group ATLS. CD49d antisense drug ATL1102 reduces disease activity in patients with relapsing-remitting MS. Neurology. 2014;83(20):1780–8. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000926 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4240428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.McCampbell A, Cole T, Wegener AJ, Tomassy GS, Setnicka A, Farley BJ, et al. Antisense oligonucleotides extend survival and reverse decrement in muscle response in ALS models. J Clin Invest. 2018;128(8):3558–67. doi: 10.1172/JCI99081 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6063493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zhao HT, Damle S, Ikeda-Lee K, Kuntz S, Li J, Mohan A, et al. PMP22 antisense oligonucleotides reverse Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1A features in rodent models. J Clin Invest. 2018;128(1):359–68. doi: 10.1172/JCI96499 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5749515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Zhu C, Kim K, Wang X, Bartolome A, Salomao M, Dongiovanni P, et al. Hepatocyte Notch activation induces liver fibrosis in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Sci Transl Med. 2018;10(468). doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aat0344 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Bennett CF, Baker BF, Pham N, Swayze E, Geary RS. Pharmacology of Antisense Drugs. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2017;57:81–105. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-010716-104846 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Cerritelli SM, Crouch RJ. Ribonuclease H: the enzymes in eukaryotes. FEBS J. 2009;276(6):1494–505. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2009.06908.x ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2746905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Canalis E, Mocarska M, Schilling L, Jafar-Nejad P, Carrer M. Antisense oligonucleotides targeting a NOTCH3 mutation in male mice ameliorate the cortical osteopenia of lateral meningocele syndrome. Bone. 2023;177:116898. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2023.116898 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC10591917. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Canalis E, Carrer M, Eller T, Schilling L, Yu J. Use of antisense oligonucleotides to target Notch3 in skeletal cells. PLoS One. 2022;17(5):e0268225. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268225 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9089911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Robinton DA, Daley GQ. The promise of induced pluripotent stem cells in research and therapy. Nature. 2012;481(7381):295–305. doi: 10.1038/nature10761 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3652331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kidwai F, Edwards J, Zou L, Kaufman DS. Fibrinogen Induces RUNX2 Activity and Osteogenic Development from Human Pluripotent Stem Cells. Stem Cells. 2016;34(8):2079–89. doi: 10.1002/stem.2427 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5097445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Tan JY, Sriram G, Rufaihah AJ, Neoh KG, Cao T. Efficient derivation of lateral plate and paraxial mesoderm subtypes from human embryonic stem cells through GSKi-mediated differentiation. Stem Cells Dev. 2013;22(13):1893–906. doi: 10.1089/scd.2012.0590 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3685395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Fukuta M, Nakai Y, Kirino K, Nakagawa M, Sekiguchi K, Nagata S, et al. Derivation of mesenchymal stromal cells from pluripotent stem cells through a neural crest lineage using small molecule compounds with defined media. PLoS One. 2014;9(12):e112291. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112291 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4251837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kidwai F, Mui BWH, Arora D, Iqbal K, Hockaday M, de Castro Diaz LF, et al. Lineage-specific differentiation of osteogenic progenitors from pluripotent stem cells reveals the FGF1-RUNX2 association in neural crest-derived osteoprogenitors. Stem Cells. 2020;38(9):1107–23. doi: 10.1002/stem.3206 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7484058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kawaguchi J. Generation of osteoblasts and chondrocytes from embryonic stem cells. Methods Mol Biol. 2006;330:135–48. doi: 10.1385/1-59745-036-7:135 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Shen W, De Hoyos CL, Sun H, Vickers TA, Liang XH, Crooke ST. Acute hepatotoxicity of 2’ fluoro-modified 5-10-5 gapmer phosphorothioate oligonucleotides in mice correlates with intracellular protein binding and the loss of DBHS proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46(5):2204–17. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky060 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5861398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Canalis E, Schilling L, Yee SP, Lee SK, Zanotti S. Hajdu Cheney Mouse Mutants Exhibit Osteopenia, Increased Osteoclastogenesis and Bone Resorption. J Biol Chem. 2016;291:1538–51. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M115.685453 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4722436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Zanotti S, Yu J, Sanjay A, Schilling L, Schoenherr C, Economides AN, et al. Sustained Notch2 signaling in osteoblasts, but not in osteoclasts, is linked to osteopenia in a mouse model of Hajdu-Cheney syndrome. J Biol Chem. 2017;292(29):12232–44. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M117.786129 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5519372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Nazarenko I, Lowe B, Darfler M, Ikonomi P, Schuster D, Rashtchian A. Multiplex quantitative PCR using self-quenched primers labeled with a single fluorophore. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30(9):e37. doi: 10.1093/nar/30.9.e37 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Nazarenko I, Pires R, Lowe B, Obaidy M, Rashtchian A. Effect of primary and secondary structure of oligodeoxyribonucleotides on the fluorescent properties of conjugated dyes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30(9):2089–195. doi: 10.1093/nar/30.9.2089 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC113842. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kutyavin IV, Afonina IA, Mills A, Gorn VV, Lukhtanov EA, Belousov ES, et al. 3’-minor groove binder-DNA probes increase sequence specificity at PCR extension temperatures. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28(2):655–61. Epub 1999/12/22. doi: 10.1093/nar/28.2.655 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC102528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Gibson DG, Young L, Chuang RY, Venter JC, Hutchison CA, 3rd, Smith HO. Enzymatic assembly of DNA molecules up to several hundred kilobases. Nat Methods. 2009;6(5):343–5. Epub 2009/04/14. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1318 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Canalis E, Yu J, Schilling L, Yee SP, Zanotti S. The lateral meningocele syndrome mutation causes marked osteopenia in mice. J Biol Chem. 2018;293(36):14165–77. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA118.004242 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCtm1.PMC6130932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Canalis E. The Skeleton of Lateral Meningocele Syndrome. Front Genet. 2020;11:620334. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2020.620334 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7841456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Ramos T L., Sánchez-Abarca LI, Muntión S, Preciado S, Puig N, López-Ruano G, et al. MSC surface markers (CD44, CD73, and CD90) can identify human MSC-derived extracellular vesicles by conventional flow cytometry. Cell Communication and Signaling. 2016;14(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12964-015-0124-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Simoes-Costa M, Bronner ME. Establishing neural crest identity: a gene regulatory recipe. Development. 2015;142(2):242–57. doi: 10.1242/dev.105445 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4302844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Schulte-Merker S, Hammerschmidt M, Beuchle D, Cho KW, De Robertis EM, Nusslein-Volhard C. Expression of zebrafish goosecoid and no tail gene products in wild-type and mutant no tail embryos. Development. 1994;120(4):843–52. doi: 10.1242/dev.120.4.843 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.You W, Fan L, Duan D, Tian L, Dang X, Wang C, et al. Foxc2 over-expression in bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells stimulates osteogenic differentiation and inhibits adipogenic differentiation. Mol Cell Biochem. 2014;386(1–2):125–34. doi: 10.1007/s11010-013-1851-z . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Canalis E, Sanjay A, Yu J, Zanotti S. An Antibody to Notch2 Reverses the Osteopenic Phenotype of Hajdu-Cheney Mutant Male Mice. Endocrinology. 2017;158(4):730–42. doi: 10.1210/en.2016-1787 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5460801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Yu J, Siebel CW, Schilling L, Canalis E. An antibody to Notch3 reverses the skeletal phenotype of lateral meningocele syndrome in male mice. J Cell Physiol. 2020;235(1):210–20. doi: 10.1002/jcp.28960 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6778702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Canalis E, Grossman TR, Carrer M, Schilling L, Yu J. Antisense oligonucleotides targeting Notch2 ameliorate the osteopenic phenotype in a mouse model of Hajdu-Cheney syndrome. J Biol Chem. 2020;295(12):3952–64. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA119.011440 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7086019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Phillips MD, Kuznetsov SA, Cherman N, Park K, Chen KG, McClendon BN, et al. Directed differentiation of human induced pluripotent stem cells toward bone and cartilage: in vitro versus in vivo assays. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2014;3(7):867–78. doi: 10.5966/sctm.2013-0154 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4073820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Md Shaifur Rahman

21 Aug 2024

PONE-D-24-20556A NOTCH3 Pathogenic Variant Influences Osteogenesis and can be Targeted by Antisense Oligonucleotides in Induced Pluripotent Stem CellsPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Canalis,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process

Please submit your revised manuscript by Oct 05 2024 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Md Shaifur Rahman, Ph.D

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. We noticed you have some minor occurrence of overlapping text with the following previous publication(s), which needs to be addressed:

Antisense oligonucleotides targeting a NOTCH3 mutation in male mice ameliorate the cortical osteopenia of lateral meningocele syndrome - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2023.116898

(among others)

In your revision ensure you cite all your sources (including your own works), and quote or rephrase any duplicated text outside the methods section. Further consideration is dependent on these concerns being addressed.

3. Please note that funding information should not appear in any section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form. Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript.

4. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure: 

   "This work was supported by the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS) [AR076747 (EC) and AR072987 (EC)].  The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health."

Please state what role the funders took in the study.  If the funders had no role, please state: "The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript." 

If this statement is not correct you must amend it as needed. 

Please include this amended Role of Funder statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

5. Thank you for stating the following in the Competing Interests section: 

   "EC, JY, LS have no competing interests; PJ and MC are paid employees of Ionis Pharmaceuticals." 

We note that one or more of the authors are employed by a commercial company: Ionis Pharmaceuticals 

a. Please provide an amended Funding Statement declaring this commercial affiliation, as well as a statement regarding the Role of Funders in your study. If the funding organization did not play a role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript and only provided financial support in the form of authors' salaries and/or research materials, please review your statements relating to the author contributions, and ensure you have specifically and accurately indicated the role(s) that these authors had in your study. You can update author roles in the Author Contributions section of the online submission form.

Please also include the following statement within your amended Funding Statement. 

“The funder provided support in the form of salaries for authors [insert relevant initials], but did not have any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The specific roles of these authors are articulated in the ‘author contributions’ section.”

If your commercial affiliation did play a role in your study, please state and explain this role within your updated Funding Statement. 

b. Please also provide an updated Competing Interests Statement declaring this commercial affiliation along with any other relevant declarations relating to employment, consultancy, patents, products in development, or marketed products, etc.  

Within your Competing Interests Statement, please confirm that this commercial affiliation does not alter your adherence to all PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials by including the following statement: "This does not alter our adherence to  PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.” (as detailed online in our guide for authors http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/competing-interests) . If this adherence statement is not accurate and  there are restrictions on sharing of data and/or materials, please state these. Please note that we cannot proceed with consideration of your article until this information has been declared.

Please include both an updated Funding Statement and Competing Interests Statement in your cover letter. We will change the online submission form on your behalf.

6. We note that your Data Availability Statement is currently as follows: All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Please confirm at this time whether or not your submission contains all raw data required to replicate the results of your study. Authors must share the “minimal data set” for their submission. PLOS defines the minimal data set to consist of the data required to replicate all study findings reported in the article, as well as related metadata and methods (https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-minimal-data-set-definition).

For example, authors should submit the following data:

- The values behind the means, standard deviations and other measures reported;

- The values used to build graphs;

- The points extracted from images for analysis.

Authors do not need to submit their entire data set if only a portion of the data was used in the reported study.

If your submission does not contain these data, please either upload them as Supporting Information files or deposit them to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. For a list of recommended repositories, please see https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/recommended-repositories.

If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially sensitive information, data are owned by a third-party organization, etc.) and who has imposed them (e.g., an ethics committee). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent. If data are owned by a third party, please indicate how others may request data access.

7. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The authors present an interesting approach to simulate LMS in iPS cells. Their differentiation towards an osteogenic linage is analyzed. Antisense oligonucleotids were used to counter the NOTCH3 gain-of-funtion mutation in LMS iPS cells.

The work is a novel approach and of particular interest, since the same group already analyzed LMS in a mouse model in depth. Thus, I think it is a great step by the group to further investigate LMS in human cells, now. iPS cells have not been frequently used by bone researches and bear great potential. The protocols and experiments are in detail explained and are understandable to the reader. I have only very minor comments, which the authors might re-think:

- introduction: mention the incidence of LMS

- Table 1: Did you also analyze WNT1? - it interaction with the Notch pathway is well described. It would be interesting to see at least how it is indirectly influenced by a NOTCH3 overexpression.

- only osteoblastic genes were measured in qRT-PCR. At least one osteoclastic marker gene (ACP5, OPG or CD68...) would be interesting

- The figures are in very bad quality. I guess this is due to the editorialmanager program, otherwise resolution must be improved

- Figure 2: add a scale bar to the microscopic pictures, it is not clear at which the resolution the images are taken

- Figure 5: I recommend to add a title or give at least the hint in the figure itself that it is NCRM1 cells and Figure 6 is NCRM5. Otherwise, the almost alike looking figures are confusing to the reader.

-Figure 5/6: Level the axis/Y-bar of Notch3 Wildtype and Notch3 Mutant. The first bar only goes up to 10x10^1 and the mutant´s bar to 30. By leveling the bar, gain-of-function mechanism is straight to see at the first glance

Figure 9: The usage of * and # is awkward. I recommend bars, connecting the columns which are compared. This is by far clearer to the reader.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2025 Jan 3;20(1):e0316644. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316644.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


29 Aug 2024

August 29, 2024

Md Shaifur Rahman, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Rahman:

In accordance with your letter of August 21, 2024, we would like to submit a revised version of the manuscript entitled “A NOTCH3 Pathogenic Variant Influences Osteogenesis and can be Targeted by Antisense Oligonucleotides in Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells” (PONE-D-24-20556) to be considered for publication by PLOS ONE.

Journal Requirements:

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming.

PLOS ONE style requirements have been ensured.

2. We noticed you have some minor occurrence of overlapping text with the following previous publication(s), which needs to be addressed - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2023.116898.

We have compared the current work with our previous publication and whenever possible have corrected the minor occurrences of overlapping.

3. Please note that funding information should not appear in any section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form.

Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript.

Funding information was removed from the text of the manuscript.

4. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure: "This work was supported by the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS) [AR076747 (EC) and AR072987 (EC)]. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health."

On our behalf, we request to update the Role of Funder Statement to:

“This work was supported by the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS) [AR076747 (EC) and AR072987 (EC)]. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. The funding institute had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Ionis Pharmaceuticals [PJ and MC] provided antisense oligonucleotides and guidance for the use of the antisense oligonucleotides, PJ and MC discussed the study design with other authors but did not have any additional role in data collection and analysis for, or initial preparation of, the manuscript. The specific roles of these authors are articulated in the ‘author contributions’ section.”

5. Thank you for stating the following in the Competing Interests section: "EC, JY, LS have no competing interests; PJ and MC are paid employees of Ionis Pharmaceuticals."

We note that one or more of the authors are employed by a commercial company: Ionis Pharmaceuticals

a. Please provide an amended Funding Statement declaring this commercial affiliation, as well as a statement regarding the Role of Funders in your study.

Under Funding Statement, we now include “Ionis Pharmaceuticals [PJ and MC] provided antisense oligonucleotides and guidance for the use of the antisense oligonucleotides, and discussed the study design with other authors but did not have any additional role in data collection and analysis for, or the initial preparation of, the manuscript. The specific roles of these authors are articulated in the ‘author contributions’ section.”

The roles of all authors have been verified.

b. Please also provide an updated Competing Interests Statement declaring this commercial affiliation along with any other relevant declarations relating to employment, consultancy, patents, products in development, or marketed products, etc.

Please include both an updated Funding Statement and Competing Interests Statement in your cover letter. We will change the online submission form on your behalf.

Updated Funding Statement is included under 4.

Please update Competing Interest Statement as follows:

PJ and MC are paid employees of Ionis Pharmaceuticals. Please note that the synthesis and applications of antisense oligonucleotides may be covered by patent(s) filed by Ionis Pharmaceuticals. Individuals wanting to obtain antisense oligonucleotides from Ionis Pharmaceuticals are required to contact Ionis Pharmaceuticals directly.

This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.” as detailed in http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/competing-interests

6. We note that your Data Availability Statement is currently as follows: All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

All figures contain individual actual values used to calculate means ± SD. Images are representative images of the culture, and no specific points were extracted for their creation.

Please note that the synthesis and applications of antisense oligonucleotides may be covered by patent(s) filed by Ionis Pharmaceuticals.

7. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct.

Reference list has been reviewed.

Reviewer #1:

The authors present an interesting approach to simulate LMS in iPS cells. Their differentiation towards an osteogenic linage is analyzed. Antisense oligonucleotides were used to counter the NOTCH3 gain-of-function mutation in LMS iPS cells.

The work is a novel approach and of particular interest, since the same group already analyzed LMS in a mouse model in depth. Thus, I think it is a great step by the group to further investigate LMS in human cells, now. iPS cells have not been frequently used by bone researchers and bear great potential. The protocols and experiments are in detail explained and are understandable to the reader. I have only very minor comments, which the authors might re-think:

- introduction: mention the incidence of LMS

The incidence of LMS is unknown and less than 100 cases have been reported. This is now stated in the introduction, end of paragraph 1, line 49.

- Table 1: Did you also analyze WNT1? - it interaction with the Notch pathway is well described. It would be interesting to see at least how it is indirectly influenced by a NOTCH3 overexpression.

As requested, we performed RT-PCR for WNT1 in control and NOTCH3 mutant cells. Please see Table 1. WNT1 was not detected in either wild type or NOTCH3 mutant cells and this is stated in the text of the revised manuscript (page 15, paragraph 1, line 273).

- only osteoblastic genes were measured in qRT-PCR. At least one osteoclastic marker gene (ACP5, OPG or CD68...) would be interesting

We now include data on the expression of the osteoclast gene marker ACP5 in Figure 4 and cite the information in the text in page 13, paragraph 1, line 231.

- The figures are in very bad quality. I guess this is due to the editorial manager program, otherwise resolution must be improved

Unfortunately, the quality of the figures declines when the paper is uploaded into the PLOS ONE website and the solution rests with the publisher.

- Figure 2: add a scale bar to the microscopic pictures, it is not clear at which the resolution the images are taken.

A scale bar is now added to the pictures in Figure 2, and images in all figures of the paper.

- Figure 5: I recommend to add a title or give at least the hint in the figure itself that it is NCRM1 cells and Figure 6 is NCRM5. Otherwise, the almost alike looking figures are confusing to the reader.

We now identify NCRM1 or NCRM5 cells in the body of each figure.

-Figure 5/6: Level the axis/Y-bar of Notch3 Wildtype and Notch3 Mutant. The first bar only goes up to 10x10^1 and the mutant´s bar to 30. By leveling the bar, gain-of-function mechanism is straight to see at the first glance.

We now show copy number x 1010 for both NOTCH3 and NOTCH36692-93insC in Figure 5. In Figure 6, we show copy number x 101 for NOTCH3 and copy number x10 for NOTCH36692-93insC otherwise bars could not be seen for the mutant transcript at the same y-axis scale.

Figure 9: The usage of * and # is awkward. I recommend bars, connecting the columns which are compared. This is by far clearer to the reader.

* and # were removed and we now include lines connecting the columns being compared.

Sincerely yours,

Ernesto Canalis, M.D.

Professor of Orthopaedics and Medicine

Director, Center for Skeletal Research

Co-Director, Musculoskeletal Institute

Attachment

Submitted filename: Reply to Reviewer_PONE-D-24-20556.docx

pone.0316644.s001.docx (126.6KB, docx)

Decision Letter 1

Md Shaifur Rahman

16 Dec 2024

A NOTCH3 Pathogenic Variant Influences Osteogenesis and can be Targeted by Antisense Oligonucleotides in Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells

PONE-D-24-20556R1

Dear Prof. Dr. Canalis,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice will be generated when your article is formally accepted. Please note, if your institution has a publishing partnership with PLOS and your article meets the relevant criteria, all or part of your publication costs will be covered. Please make sure your user information is up-to-date by logging into Editorial Manager at Editorial Manager® and clicking the ‘Update My Information' link at the top of the page. If you have any questions relating to publication charges, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Md Shaifur Rahman, Ph.D

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Acceptance letter

Md Shaifur Rahman

20 Dec 2024

PONE-D-24-20556R1

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Canalis,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

If revisions are needed, the production department will contact you directly to resolve them. If no revisions are needed, you will receive an email when the publication date has been set. At this time, we do not offer pre-publication proofs to authors during production of the accepted work. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few weeks to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Md Shaifur Rahman

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Reply to Reviewer_PONE-D-24-20556.docx

    pone.0316644.s001.docx (126.6KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES