Skip to main content
The EMBO Journal logoLink to The EMBO Journal
. 1997 May 1;16(9):2482–2492. doi: 10.1093/emboj/16.9.2482

Recognition of AUG and alternative initiator codons is augmented by G in position +4 but is not generally affected by the nucleotides in positions +5 and +6.

M Kozak 1
PMCID: PMC1169848  PMID: 9171361

Abstract

A primer extension (toeprinting) assay was used to monitor selection by ribosomes of the first versus the second AUG codon as a function of introducing mutations on the 3' side (positions +4, +5 and +6) of the first AUG codon. Six different flanking codons starting with G (GCG, GCU, GCC, GCA, GAU and GGA) strongly augmented selection of AUG#1 when compared with matched mRNAs that had A or C instead of G in position +4. Augmentation by G in position +4 failed only when it was combined with U in position +5, as in the sequence augGUA. In contrast with the usual enhancing effect of introducing G in position +4, most mutations in position +5 had no discernible effect, as shown with the series augANA (where N = C, A, G or U) and the series augCNA. AUG codon recognition was also unaffected by mutations in position +6, as shown by testing four mRNAs that had augCCN as the start site. Thus the primary sequence context that augments the recognition of AUG start codons does not appear generally to extend beyond G in position +4. When the toeprinting assay was used with mRNAs that initiate translation at CUG instead of AUG, cugGAU was not recognized better than cugGGU, contradicting the hypothesis that initiation at non-AUG codons might be favored by A instead of G in position +5.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (572.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bachmair A., Finley D., Varshavsky A. In vivo half-life of a protein is a function of its amino-terminal residue. Science. 1986 Oct 10;234(4773):179–186. doi: 10.1126/science.3018930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Boeck R., Kolakofsky D. Positions +5 and +6 can be major determinants of the efficiency of non-AUG initiation codons for protein synthesis. EMBO J. 1994 Aug 1;13(15):3608–3617. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06668.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Donahue T. F., Cigan A. M., Pabich E. K., Valavicius B. C. Mutations at a Zn(II) finger motif in the yeast eIF-2 beta gene alter ribosomal start-site selection during the scanning process. Cell. 1988 Aug 26;54(5):621–632. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(88)80006-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dorris D. R., Erickson F. L., Hannig E. M. Mutations in GCD11, the structural gene for eIF-2 gamma in yeast, alter translational regulation of GCN4 and the selection of the start site for protein synthesis. EMBO J. 1995 May 15;14(10):2239–2249. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb07218.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fajardo J. E., Shatkin A. J. Translation of bicistronic viral mRNA in transfected cells: regulation at the level of elongation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Jan;87(1):328–332. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.1.328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Flinta C., Persson B., Jörnvall H., von Heijne G. Sequence determinants of cytosolic N-terminal protein processing. Eur J Biochem. 1986 Jan 2;154(1):193–196. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1986.tb09378.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gonda D. K., Bachmair A., Wünning I., Tobias J. W., Lane W. S., Varshavsky A. Universality and structure of the N-end rule. J Biol Chem. 1989 Oct 5;264(28):16700–16712. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Grünert S., Jackson R. J. The immediate downstream codon strongly influences the efficiency of utilization of eukaryotic translation initiation codons. EMBO J. 1994 Aug 1;13(15):3618–3630. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06669.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hartz D., McPheeters D. S., Traut R., Gold L. Extension inhibition analysis of translation initiation complexes. Methods Enzymol. 1988;164:419–425. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(88)64058-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hatfield D., Matthews C. R., Rice M. Aminoacyl-transfer RNA populations in mammalian cells chromatographic profiles and patterns of codon recognition. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1979 Oct 25;564(3):414–423. doi: 10.1016/0005-2787(79)90032-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hatfield D., Varricchio F., Rice M., Forget B. G. The aminoacyl-tRNA population of human reticulocytes. J Biol Chem. 1982 Mar 25;257(6):3183–3188. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Irwin B., Heck J. D., Hatfield G. W. Codon pair utilization biases influence translational elongation step times. J Biol Chem. 1995 Sep 29;270(39):22801–22806. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.39.22801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kendall R. L., Bradshaw R. A. Isolation and characterization of the methionine aminopeptidase from porcine liver responsible for the co-translational processing of proteins. J Biol Chem. 1992 Oct 15;267(29):20667–20673. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kozak M. A consideration of alternative models for the initiation of translation in eukaryotes. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 1992;27(4-5):385–402. doi: 10.3109/10409239209082567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kozak M. Adherence to the first-AUG rule when a second AUG codon follows closely upon the first. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Mar 28;92(7):2662–2666. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.7.2662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kozak M. An analysis of 5'-noncoding sequences from 699 vertebrate messenger RNAs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1987 Oct 26;15(20):8125–8148. doi: 10.1093/nar/15.20.8125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kozak M. An analysis of vertebrate mRNA sequences: intimations of translational control. J Cell Biol. 1991 Nov;115(4):887–903. doi: 10.1083/jcb.115.4.887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kozak M. Bifunctional messenger RNAs in eukaryotes. Cell. 1986 Nov 21;47(4):481–483. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90609-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kozak M. Context effects and inefficient initiation at non-AUG codons in eucaryotic cell-free translation systems. Mol Cell Biol. 1989 Nov;9(11):5073–5080. doi: 10.1128/mcb.9.11.5073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kozak M. Downstream secondary structure facilitates recognition of initiator codons by eukaryotic ribosomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Nov;87(21):8301–8305. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.21.8301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kozak M. Evaluation of the fidelity of initiation of translation in reticulocyte lysates from commercial sources. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990 May 11;18(9):2828–2828. doi: 10.1093/nar/18.9.2828. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kozak M. Features in the 5' non-coding sequences of rabbit alpha and beta-globin mRNAs that affect translational efficiency. J Mol Biol. 1994 Jan 7;235(1):95–110. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(05)80019-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kozak M. Point mutations define a sequence flanking the AUG initiator codon that modulates translation by eukaryotic ribosomes. Cell. 1986 Jan 31;44(2):283–292. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90762-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kozak M., Shatkin A. J. Sequences and properties of two ribosome binding sites from the small size class of reovirus messenger RNA. J Biol Chem. 1977 Oct 10;252(19):6895–6908. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kozak M. The scanning model for translation: an update. J Cell Biol. 1989 Feb;108(2):229–241. doi: 10.1083/jcb.108.2.229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Lin F. T., MacDougald O. A., Diehl A. M., Lane M. D. A 30-kDa alternative translation product of the CCAAT/enhancer binding protein alpha message: transcriptional activator lacking antimitotic activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Oct 15;90(20):9606–9610. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.20.9606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Moerschell R. P., Hosokawa Y., Tsunasawa S., Sherman F. The specificities of yeast methionine aminopeptidase and acetylation of amino-terminal methionine in vivo. Processing of altered iso-1-cytochromes c created by oligonucleotide transformation. J Biol Chem. 1990 Nov 15;265(32):19638–19643. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Ossipow V., Descombes P., Schibler U. CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein mRNA is translated into multiple proteins with different transcription activation potentials. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Sep 1;90(17):8219–8223. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.17.8219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Peabody D. S. Translation initiation at an ACG triplet in mammalian cells. J Biol Chem. 1987 Aug 25;262(24):11847–11851. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Portis J. L., Spangrude G. J., McAtee F. J. Identification of a sequence in the unique 5' open reading frame of the gene encoding glycosylated Gag which influences the incubation period of neurodegenerative disease induced by a murine retrovirus. J Virol. 1994 Jun;68(6):3879–3887. doi: 10.1128/jvi.68.6.3879-3887.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Stewart A. E., Arfin S. M., Bradshaw R. A. Protein NH2-terminal asparagine deamidase. Isolation and characterization of a new enzyme. J Biol Chem. 1994 Sep 23;269(38):23509–23517. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Varshavsky A. The N-end rule. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1995;60:461–478. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1995.060.01.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Weyens G., Charlier D., Roovers M., Piérard A., Glansdorff N. On the role of the Shine-Dalgarno sequence in determining the efficiency of translation initiation at a weak start codon in the car operon of Escherichia coli K12. J Mol Biol. 1988 Dec 20;204(4):1045–1048. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(88)90061-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Zhang S. P., Zubay G., Goldman E. Low-usage codons in Escherichia coli, yeast, fruit fly and primates. Gene. 1991 Aug 30;105(1):61–72. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(91)90514-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. de Groot R. J., Rümenapf T., Kuhn R. J., Strauss E. G., Strauss J. H. Sindbis virus RNA polymerase is degraded by the N-end rule pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Oct 15;88(20):8967–8971. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.20.8967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The EMBO Journal are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES