Skip to main content
Heliyon logoLink to Heliyon
. 2024 Dec 12;11(1):e41158. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41158

"Harnessing the power of soil microbes: Their dual impact in integrated nutrient management and mediating climate stress for sustainable rice crop production" A systematic review

Said H Marzouk a,, Damiano R Kwaslema b, Mohd M Omar c, Said H Mohamed d
PMCID: PMC11699367  PMID: 39758363

Abstract

Sustainable agricultural practices are essential to meet food demands for the increased population while minimizing the environmental impact. Considering rice as staple food for most of the world's population, it requires innovative approaches to ensure sustainable production. In this paper, we create a hypothesis that integrated nutrient management (INM) acts as a source of energy for microbes and improves the physical, chemical and biological properties of soils, but the current understanding of how soil microbiomes interact in integrated nutrient management toward mediating climate stress to support sustainable rice crop production is limited. Hence, we develop literature search through Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) to explore the hidden knowledge related to that question. The outcomes of the study are postulated as a viable option to minimize excessive chemical fertilizers and promote organic-based nutrient management that directly impacts microbial consortia. This review uncovered that plant-microbe interactions and nutrient transformation depend heavily on soil microbes while the abundance, diversity, and activity of soil microbiome is enhanced more with integrated nutrient management than with sole synthetic fertilizers. Through their ability to enhance nutrient availability and uptake, improve soil structure, heavy metal detoxification, salinity and drought tolerance, and suppress pathogens, they can alleviate abiotic stress associated with climate change. Therefore, optimization of microbial communities serves as a potential mechanism for INM to enhance rice yield and mitigate climate stress. This would improve soil health and enhance the resilience of the rice plant to climate change. However, despite various benefits obtained through INM and microbes in paddy production systems, the literature indicated that adoption of this technology is limited to smallholder farmers due to lack of knowledge, unavailability of sufficient organic materials and poor understanding of the long-term impacts associated with over-application of chemical fertilizers. Therefore, scientists must translate several research discoveries related to sustainable agriculture into simple language that can be adopted by farmers and future research should be a farmers-participatory approach to generate awareness investments and knowledge of farmers in adopting sustainability measures. Additionally, research could focus on identifying mechanisms by which microbiomes improve nutrient uptake and rice growth and how these mechanisms can be optimized through integrated nutrient management strategies with regard to climate stresses.

Keywords: Climate change, Plant-soil microbe interactions, Carbon sequestration, Food security, Integrated nutrients management, Soil health

1. Introduction

Microorganisms such as bacteria, fungi, viruses, archaea, and protists make up soil ecosystems [[1], [2], [3]] and play a crucial role in agricultural ecosystem health and productivity [4,5]. They perform variety of functions, including nutrient cycling, organic matter decomposition, disease suppression, plant growth promotion and resistance to stressors, such as drought and heavy metal pollution [6,7]. Climate change can disrupt microbiomes and negatively impact changes in specific functions performed by soil microbes [6]. Additionally, agricultural practices such as conventional tillage and severe application of chemical fertilizers have been shown to affect soil microbial communities [8,9]. However, using certain agricultural practices such as integrated nutrient management (INM), crop rotation, cover cropping, and reduced tillage can promote microbial health and improve nutrient cycling [[10], [11], [12], [13]]. Similarly, using microbial inoculants and other biostimulants can help to restore microbiomes that have been damaged by climate. Therefore, by understanding effective ways of managing soil microbiomes, it is possible to mitigate the effects of climate stress on nutrient cycling and enhance soil health [6,14].

Soil microbial communities are reported to be affected by climate change in terms of abundance and function [15,16]. The study by Fu et al. [4] demonstrated that both extreme and low temperatures alter relative abundance of soil microorganisms. According to Ref. [17], soil microbes play a significant role in maintaining soil organic carbon stocks (SOC), but climate change is likely to affect future predicted effects of soil temperature on soil total nitrogen pools if warming exceeds 2 °C. It is therefore imperative to mitigate climate change for sustainable agriculture and to understand how climate change affects specific microbial communities as well as to monitor microbial adaptation to altered stresses [16].

One of the most important food crops in the world is rice, which depends heavily on efficient nutrient management and climate resilience. However, currently, paddy production systems have experienced severe chemical fertilization particularly nitrogenous fertilizer [18,19]. This trend with continuous climate changes has led to severe deterioration in soil fertility and health [20], thereby changing soil moisture availability, increasing disease and pest incidences [21,22], and posing a negative impact on rice crop production and environmental safety [15,23]. Furthermore, it was projected that by 2050 approximately 22 % of the world's important crops will be negatively affected by climate change [24], particularly rice crops [25]. Considering the negative impacts of climate change, global demand for land resources and needs to enhance agricultural production several agricultural conservation measures have been established [26,27] such as climate-smart agriculture [26,28], conservation agriculture [29,30], integrated nutrients management practices (INM) [31,32], agro-forestry [33], integrated use of soil microbes such as phosphate solubilizing microorganisms (PSB) and potassium solubilizing microorganism (KSB) [[34], [35], [36]] and regenerative agriculture. Overall, basic concepts of conservation measures aim to increase crop performances while maintaining soil fertility and curtail high doses of applying chemical fertilizers for long-term sustainable crop production [[37], [38], [39]].

Integrated nutrient management (INM) can be defined as optimum use of native sources of nutrients (locally available resources) such as organic manure, crop residues, biological N fixation (eg. legumes and Azolla), and chemical fertilizer in a balanced manner to increase nutrients recovery and minimizes loss [40,41]. Rice crop production remains better with INM; however, organic fertilizers are slow-release and may not be enough to meet plant requirements. This is the main reason apart from being labor-intensive for farmers to prefer more chemical fertilizers [42]. INM has been demonstrated to enhance soil organic carbon (SOC), improve nutrient use efficiency, microbial activities and diversity, growth and grain yield of rice, and long-term environmental conservation compared to other soil management practices [[43], [44], [45]]. This practice also aids in proper utilization of chemical fertilizers that minimize loss, boost soil quality and supply immediate nutrition needed to rice crops [41,46]. Yet, to date, rather contentious results have been obtained regarding impacts of INM on soil microbial diversity and their contributions towards mediating climate stress in paddy production systems. Hence this study reviews, summarizes and report in detail the results of modern published papers from 2000 to 2023 to establish baseline of hidden values of microbes in INM practices for mediating climate stress in Paddy production systems.

2. Data collection and compilation

A systematic literature search was done through Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) followed by other researchers [39,47,48] from four databases Pub med, Scopus, PubMed Central, and Web of Science from January 2000 to January 2023 to outline impacts of microbes in INM practices for mediating climate stress in Paddy production systems using paper published in English language only (Fig. 1). Selection of years was done to obtain more recent publications with advanced methodology and statistical approaches. The search strings “soil microbes”, “climate stress”, “Integrated nutrient management” and “paddy” returned 670 articles. Articles with duplication and those that are out of scope were removed (Fig. 1). Articles included (116) were selected by checking abstracts and results that contained variables focusing on search titles, and valid experimental design and statistical analysis. We included results from any country related to scope.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Representation of literature search based on the PRISMA flow diagram, modified from other researcher.

3. Findings of the review

3.1. Benefits of integrated nutrient management practices (INM) on improving soil microbial health in paddy systems

Studies demonstrated that, Integrated Nutrient Management (INM) practices significantly enhance soil microbial health in paddy systems by combining organic and synthetic fertilizers, which provide diverse sources of organic carbon and nutrients. This approach improves soil physical properties, creating favorable conditions for microbial activity and diversity. INM increases microbial biomass carbon, nitrogen, and enzyme activities, which are crucial for nutrient cycling and soil health. For instance, research has proved that INM boosts microbial enzyme activities and enhances soil organic matter content, serving as a primary source of energy and nutrients for soil microbes [49,50]. Overall, INM practices lead to increased microbial populations and enzyme activities, particularly with the use of NPK + Azolla and NPK + FYM, thereby promoting a healthier and more productive soil ecosystem.

Paddy soils harbor diverse and active soil microbial communities that perform crucial functions such as nutrient cycling, organic matter decomposition, plant growth promotion, and disease suppression [50]. However, these soil microbial properties can be impaired by the intensive and continuous application of synthetic fertilizers, which can induce soil acidification, nutrient imbalance, organic matter depletion, and soil degradation [51,52]. To overcome these challenges, integrated nutrient management (INM), which combines organic manure and reduced synthetic fertilizer, has been advocated as a sustainable strategy to improve soil fertility and crop productivity in paddy systems [49,52,53]. This section highlights INM's contribution to improved microbiological indicators of soil health in paddy systems, including the associated mechanisms. The improvement of microbial properties is further viewed as a key mechanism by which INM enhances crop yields and mitigates climate stresses. Table 1 summarizes various research reports on beneficial effects of INM on soil microbial properties and associated mechanisms under paddy system. Most scientific studies on the matter have been conducted in Asian countries particularly India and China (Table 1), and less in Africa. Hence the transfer of this knowledge to other developing countries may be a good option to improve rice production and conserve soil fertility.

Table 1.

Summary of the effects of Integrated Nutrient Management (INM) on soil microbial properties and underlying mechanisms in paddy systems.

Nutrient Management Practices Duration Effects of INM on Soil Microbial Properties Mechanisms Underlying the Improvement of Soil Microbial Properties by INM References
Synthetic fertilizers (NPKS), farmyard manure (FYM), and NPKS + FYM 34 years INM increases microbial biomass carbon, microbial biomass nitrogen and enzyme activities (phosphatase and dehydrogenase, β-glucosidase, L-leucine aminopeptidase, N-acetyl-glucosaminidase, and β-cellobiosidase).
  • The direct supply of organic substrates from INM increases the activity and diversity of phosphate-solubilizing bacteria, which produce alkaline phosphatase to release phosphorus from organic matter.

  • Indirectly, balanced nutrient supply stimulates more plant growth and rhizodeposition, which provides more carbon substrates for soil microorganisms and increases their enzyme activities

[54]
Synthetic fertilizers (NPK), farmyard manure (FYM), and NPK + FYM 33 years INM more significantly increased soil microbial enzyme activities (acid and alkaline phosphatase, dehydrogenase, cellulase and protease) than other treatments.
  • Directly supply of organic substrates triggers increment in activities of soil microbial enzyme involved in N, P, and C cycling as evidenced by strong positive correlations between enzyme activities and soil organic carbon.

  • Indirectly, INM provides favorable physicochemical conditions such as soil pH, lower bulk density (increased porosity), and nutrient availability which enhances microbial growth and activities.

[57]
Synthetic fertilizers (NPK), and NPK + Azolla or FYM or Rice stubble 32 years INM using NPK + Azolla and NPK + FYM increased soil microbial population of bacteria and fungi by 76.8 % and 109.02 % respectively. Also increased microbial biomass carbon and soil enzyme activity.
  • Stimulation of microbial enzymes in presence of organic substrates supplied by INM.

  • NM improves the SOM content, a main source of energy and nutrients for soil microbes

[70]
Synthetic fertilizer (NPK), and NPK + FYM, green manure, wheat straw, or Sesbania aculeate 31 years INM reduced soil bulk density with increasing infiltration rate, water retention capacity, SOC, and TN, compared to the sole application of synthetic fertilizers and control.
  • NM improves the SOM content, a main source of energy and nutrients for soil microbes

[71]
Synthetic fertilizer (NPK), sole cattle slurry, and co-application of inorganic fertilizers with cattle slurry, household biowaste and biogas residues 25 years The application of organic fertilizers positively enhances enzyme activities. However, the sole application of synthetic fertilizers and disturbed tillage did not show any significance in microbial communities.
  • Directly supply of organic substrate through INM supplies source of carbon and energy for microbial growth and stimulates enzyme activities

[15]
Synthetic fertilizers (NPKSZn) + Poultry manure 33 years INM increased soil bacteria and improved soil organic carbon stock by 27.98 %
  • A positive correlation (r −0.94) was found between C content of mean weight diameter of water-stable aggregates and soil bacteria population, which provide evidence of vital contribution of soil bacteria for carbon sequestration

[72]
Synthetic fertilizer (NPK), and NPK + rice straw (NPKR) or Reduced NPK fertilizer and rice straw (L-NPKR) 21 years Both NPKR and L-NPKR significantly shifted overall soil bacterial composition, enriching the beneficial microbial groups i.e. Bradyrhizobiaceae and Rhodospirillaceae families. Altered the soil microbial functional structure with increased diversity and abundances of genes for carbon and nitrogen cycling compared to unfertilized control or sole SF or sole rice straw
  • Substrate availability triggers upregulation of genes encoding enzymes associated with N and C cycling.

  • The increment in functional genes for N and C cycling is attributed to enhanced abundance of functional bacterial communities such as Bradyrhizobiaceae and Rhodospirillaceae families for N and increased C substrate from INM.

[73]
Synthetic NPK fertilizer, poultry manure, and vermicompost 1 year Slight increases in organic and total carbon contents in soils were observed due to the addition of PM and VC at the rate of 5 t ha 1.
  • NM improves the SOM content, a main source of energy and nutrients for soil microbes

[45]

INM can enhance soil microbial health by providing diverse sources of organic carbon and nutrients, improving soil physical properties, and creating favorable conditions for microbial activity and diversity. Several studies have reported the positive effects of INM on soil microbial properties in paddy soils compared to sole synthetic fertilizers application. For example, Zhang et al. [54] found that INM increases microbial biomass carbon, microbial biomass nitrogen and enzyme activities (phosphatase and dehydrogenase, β-glucosidase, L-leucine aminopeptidase, N-acetyl-glucosaminidase, and β-cellobiosidase). The mechanisms underlying the improvement of soil microbial properties by INM include the direct supply of organic substrates which increases the activity and diversity of beneficial bacteria and indirectly stimulates more plant growth and rhizodeposition which provides more carbon substrates for soil microorganisms [55,56]. Saha et al. [57] also found that INM increased soil microbial enzyme activities (acid and alkaline phosphatase, dehydrogenase, cellulase and protease) more significantly than other treatments. These improvements are due to the direct supply of organic substrates which triggers an increment in activities of soil microbial enzymes involved in N, P, and C cycling as well as indirectly providing favorable physicochemical conditions such as soil pH and nutrient availability which enhances microbial growth and activities [57].

In addition to the studies mentioned earlier, several other studies have reported the positive effects of INM on soil microbial properties in paddy soils. For example, Gogoi et al. [52] found that INM using NPK + Azolla and NPK + FYM increased soil microbial population of bacteria and fungi by 76.8 % and 109.02 % respectively, as well as increased microbial biomass carbon and soil enzyme activity. The mechanisms underlying these improvements include the stimulation of microbial enzymes in the presence of organic substrates supplied from INM and the improvement of soil organic matter (SOM) content, which is a main source of energy and nutrients for soil microbes [52]. Tang et al. [58] reported that INM improved soil microbial community structure, while Xue et al. [59] found that INM reduced soil bulk density with increasing infiltration rate, water retention capacity, SOC, and TN compared to the sole application of synthetic fertilizers and control. Chen et al. [15] found that the application of organic fertilizers positively enhances enzyme activities, while Ding et al. [60] reported that both recommended rate of NPK + rice straw (NPKR) and reduced NPK fertilizer and rice straw (L-NPKR) significantly shifted overall soil bacterial composition, enriching beneficial microbial groups such as Bradyrhizobiaceae and Rhodospirillaceae families and altering the soil microbial functional structure with increased diversity and abundances of genes for carbon and nitrogen cycling compared to unfertilized control or sole synthetic fertilizer or sole rice straw. These improvements are attributed to substrate availability triggering upregulation of genes encoding enzymes associated with N and C cycling as well as enhanced abundance of functional bacterial communities for N and increased C substrate from INM [60]. Lian et al. [61] found that long-term application of organic manure or organic manure plus chemical fertilizer (INM) increased the abundances of Acidobacteria_Gp6 and Planctomycete compared to other treatments, while Urmi et al. [45] observed slight increases in organic and total carbon contents in soils due to the addition of poultry manure and vermicompost at the rate of 5 t ha−1.

Interestingly, from biochemical point of view, Integrated Nutrient Management (INM) enhances soil microbial health in paddy systems by stimulating various biochemical processes [62,63]. The addition of organic and inorganic nutrients boosts microbial metabolism, leading to increased enzyme production, such as cellulases and phosphatases, which aid in nutrient cycling and organic matter decomposition [55,64]. This process improves soil structure through microbial exudates that enhance soil aggregation. Additionally, INM promotes beneficial symbiotic relationships, like mycorrhizal associations, which improve nutrient uptake, and antagonistic interactions that protect plants from pathogens [55,65]. Overall, INM activates a complex biochemical machinery that enhances soil fertility and plant health.

The physical and chemical properties of soil significantly influence soil microbial properties and the effectiveness of Integrated Nutrient Management (INM) in paddy systems [66]. Soil texture and structure affect microbial habitats and aeration, with fine-textured soils providing stable environments for microbes [67]. Soil pH and organic matter content are crucial, as they determine nutrient availability and microbial diversity. For instance, neutral to slightly acidic pH levels support diverse microbial communities, while high soil organic matter enhances microbial activity by providing essential carbon sources [68]. INM practices improve these soil properties by adding organic and inorganic nutrients, which enhance soil structure, nutrient cycling, and microbial health. This creates a favorable environment for microbes, leading to better soil fertility and crop productivity [62,69].

However, some research gaps still need to be addressed to better understand the mechanisms and interactions of INM on soil microbial health and crop productivity in paddy soils. For example, the effects of different types and sources of organic manures, such as green manure, biochar, compost, biowaste, biogas residues, etc., on soil microbial properties and their interactions with synthetic fertilizers are not well studied. The influence of INM on soil functional genes, such as those involved in nitrogen cycling, carbon cycling, and stress response, is also not well understood. Moreover, the long-term effects of INM on soil microbial health under different climatic conditions, such as drought, flooding, salinity, etc., are also not well explored. Despite the promising nature of INM in promoting native soil microbiome, the review reveals a lack of studies on using rhizobacteria that boost plant growth as inoculum along with INM to mitigate climate stress in rice fields. Additionally, there is a lack of studies on the effects of INM on soil microbial properties in paddy systems in regions outside of Asia, particularly in Africa. Therefore, more studies are needed to fill these knowledge gaps and provide more insights into how INM improves soil microbial health and crop yield in paddy soils compared to synthetic fertilizers alone.

3.2. Effect of soil microbial nutrient recycling, yield and productivity in paddy system under integrated nutrient management (INM) practices

This section of the review sheds light on soil microbes' crucial role in nutrient recycling in paddy systems and their contribution to mitigation of climate stresses by examining existing literature. Furthermore, the review highlights the significance of harnessing the potential of soil microbes to enhance agricultural practices and promote sustainable paddy cultivation. The results provide valuable insights for researchers, policymakers, and farmers, guiding more informed decisions and innovative approaches to optimize nutrient utilization and improve overall productivity in paddy fields. Details of numerous research reports on soil microbial benefits under INM practices in rice crop production are summarized in Table 2. The studies summarized in this section employed several common research methodologies to evaluate the effects of INM practices on soil microbial nutrient recycling, yield, and productivity in paddy systems. These methodologies include field experiments, soil sampling and analysis and crop yield measurements. The nutrient management practices are categorized into organic and inorganic fertilizers. Among these practices, the combination of organic and inorganic fertilizers, often referred to as Integrated Nutrient Management (INM), is the most commonly used and has shown significant effects on soil health and crop productivity. Organic fertilizers, such as compost, farmyard manure, and green manure, provide a slow-release source of nutrients and improve soil organic matter content. They enhance soil structure, water retention, and microbial activity, creating a favorable environment for plant growth. Sole synthetic fertilizers such as urea, diammonium phosphate (DAP), and potassium chloride, offer an immediate supply of essential nutrients. They are crucial for meeting the nutrient demands of high-yielding rice varieties, especially during critical growth stages. The combination of organic and inorganic fertilizers in INM practices leverages the benefits of both types of fertilizers. Organic fertilizers improve soil health and microbial activity, while inorganic fertilizers provide the necessary nutrients for optimal crop growth. Studies have shown that INM practices significantly increase rice grain yield, nutrient uptake, and use efficiencies compared to the sole application of either organic or inorganic fertilizers.

Table 2.

Summary of the mechanisms underlying microorganisms' dual role in rice yield and climate stress relief under INM.

Summary of the mechanism underlying microorganisms under INM Nutrient management practices (Organic and inorganic fertilizers used) Impact on Rice Yield under INM Direct and indirect response in Alleviation of Climate Stress under INM References
Under INM Microorganisms facilitate decomposition of organic matter, leading to better nutrient cycling in the soil. Recommended inorganic fertilizers, poultry manure and vermicompost. Combined application of organic and inorganic fertilizers resulted in higher rice grain yield, nutrient uptake and use efficiencies, which were satisfactory compared to the control. Improved microbes enhance availability of essential nutrients to plants and improve their resistance to climate stressors [45]
Under INM abundance of Nitrogen-fixing bacteria (e.g., Rhizobium and Azotobacter) and cyanobacteria increases, which can convert atmospheric nitrogen into a useable form (ammonia or nitrates) that rice plants can utilize Azolla, synthetic N fertilizer. Compared to the full N rate, reduced N with Azolla increases N recovery by 46.5 and 39.1 %, and reduces NH3 volatilization by 52.3 and 64.3 % without decreasing grain yield. This process reduces the reliance on synthetic nitrogen fertilizers, reduces costs, and minimizes environmental pollution. [115]
Under INM Certain microorganisms play an important role in reducing greenhouse gas emissions, such as methane and nitrous oxide, from paddy fields. Azolla green manure, Poultry-litter biochar and inorganic fertilizers. Co- application of Azolla and biochar offers a novel approach to increasing rice grain yield and minimizing emissions. Additionally, combining Azolla and biochar significantly increased rice grain yield by 27.3%–75.0 %. This helps mitigate the contribution of rice cultivation to global warming and improve nutrient use efficiency [95]
Under INM certain microorganisms help plants in water-stressed conditions by improving their water use efficiency Biofertilizers and synthetic fertilizers The use of biofertilizers integrated with chemical fertilizers significantly increases the number of tillers, plant height, economic benefit, and grain yield compared to chemical fertilizers alone. They can assist in the synthesis of stress-responsive compounds and promote deeper root systems, allowing rice plants to access water from deeper soil layers. [116]
Under INM Microorganisms facilitate the decomposition of organic matter, leading to better nutrient cycling in the soil Applying organic manure with good agricultural practices (GAP). The average grain yields significantly increased by 1 t ha−1 in 2013 and 2.7 t ha−1 in 2014 when farmers practiced good agricultural practices compared to farmers' management practices. This enhances the availability of essential nutrients to plants, improving their resistance to climate stressors. [117]
Under INM microbial activities contribute to soil aggregation and the formation of stable aggregates and Beneficial microorganisms can act as natural biocontrol agents against plant pathogens, reducing disease incidence and severity Azolla, mucuna green manure, and inorganic fertilizers. Application of mucuna with N fertilizer significant (P < 0.05) increases 0.8 t ha−1 grain yield compared to control. Azolla incorporation increases grain yield by 1.4 t ha−1 which is not a significant difference with full N fertilizer alone. This improves soil structure, leading to better water infiltration and retention, reduced soil erosion, and increased drought tolerance of rice plants. Additionally, healthy plants are better equipped to cope with climate stresses. [118]
Under INM Nitrogen-fixing microorganisms contribute to nitrogen availability in the soil and reduce the need for synthetic nitrogen fertilizers with great potential in reducing methane and other greenhouse gas. Azolla with a recommended dose of N The highest grain yield of 3.95 t/ha with the highest straw and grain uptake of 75.4 kg N ha-1, 32.7 kg P ha-1, and 8.5 kg S ha-1 were recorded in the Azolla plot plus 40 kg N through urea. This, in turn, leads to lower greenhouse gas emissions and less energy consumption during fertilizer production and certain microorganisms can competitively exclude or suppress methane-producing bacteria, reducing methane emissions from flooded fields. [79]
Under INM certain microorganisms produce plant growth-promoting substances such as phytohormones (e.g., auxins, gibberellins) and siderophores Organic matter The yield of rice and wheat, microbial biomass carbon (MBC) and carbon stocks were significantly improved under organic matter application compared to full nitrogen dose. However, SOC stock loss in rice was higher than that in wheat. These substances stimulate root growth, improve nutrient uptake, and enhance the plant's ability to withstand biotic and abiotic stresses, resulting in increased rice yield. [32]
Under INM certain microorganisms, like phosphate-solubilizing bacteria and fungi, can release phosphorus from insoluble forms in the soil, making it available to rice plants. Phosphate rocks, organic matter, and synthetic fertilizers Applying phosphate rocks (eg. Minjingu) is an alternative method to minimize P deficiency in East Africa. Additionally, organic matter supplies N in soils and increases crop yields. This enhances phosphorus uptake and promotes better root development and overall plant growth. [46]
Under INM Some microorganisms act as biocontrol agents, controlling pests and diseases that can negatively impact rice yield. Rice straw, burnt rice husk and legume residue The highest grain yield of 3.40 t/ha was recorded in integrated nutrient application with burnt rice husk and legume residue compared to the soil with no residue treatments. certain entomopathogenic fungi can infect and kill insect pests, reducing crop damage and promoting healthier plant growth. [91]
Under INM Microorganisms, especially bacteria and fungi, decompose organic matter present in the soil and convert complex organic compounds into simpler mineral forms, releasing essential nutrients such as nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium. NPK and farm yard manure The application of NPK + FYM significantly increased the soil labile carbon, and water-soluble carbon; and reduces bulk density over control. This process, known as mineralization, makes these nutrients readily available for plant uptake, thus supporting rice growth and yield [43]
Under INM amendment microbial species richness which are often involved in degradation of complex organic compounds increased NPKS, composted cattle manure, composted swine manure Application of composted cattle manure improve soil fertility and crop yield in a submerged rice cropping system. This process improves soil structure, Organic carbon and increase rice yields in submerged environment [119]
Under INM Microbial activities contribute to soil aggregation and the formation of stable aggregates. Recommended rates of NPK, poultry manure, cow dung, and rice straw Application of cow dung, poultry manure, and rice straw resulted in 36, 28 and 37 % loss of applied C through emission and 10, 30 and 49 % sequestration, respectively. This improves soil structure, leading to better water infiltration and retention, reduced soil erosion, and increased drought tolerance of rice plants. [120]
Under INM and rotation with legumes, population of N-fixing microbes was increased and enhanced biological fixation and improved soil quality. 50 % of chemical fertilizers, legume crop (Vigna radiate) green manure, farmyard manure, wheat stubble. The use of INM significantly increases net nitrogen mineralization and improves NUE. Also enhances NH4+ availability and uptake by rice plants in highly reduced conditions. Finally increases SOC sequestration and subsequently maintains higher grain yield. Improved nutrient cycling and minimizes the need for chemical fertilization.
Increased NUE reduces N emission through volatilization and denitrification.
[42]

Under INM soil microbes play an important role in influencing plant productivity, mediating effects of climate and improving soil health [3,74,75]. The literature explored the impact of synthetic chemical fertilization on rice yields [54,[76], [77], [78]] but also revealed the adverse effects of intensive chemical use and extreme climatic factors on soil quality, fertility, biodiversity, and agricultural sustainability [2,79]. Various ecological stresses, including diseases eg. Rice Blast (Magnaportheoryzae), Bacterial Leaf Blight (Xanthomonas oryzaepv. oryzae), Sheath Blight (Rhizoctonia solani), Brown Spot (Bipolarisoryzae), Rice Yellow Mottle Virus (RYMV), and Bakanae Disease (Gibberellafujikuroi) [37,80], pests, weeds, drought, and salinity [[80], [81], [82]], have been identified as challenges in rice crop production systems. However, the study also acknowledges the crucial role of soil microbes in nutrient cycling, disease suppression, and stress tolerance. Integrated Nutrient Management (INM) practices have shown promise in harnessing the power of these microbes, leading to improved nutrient availability, plant health, and stress resilience, resulting in increased sustainable rice yields and food security [74,75]. Fig. 2 shows conceptualized contribution of improved soil microbial health attributes under integrated nutrient management.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Illustration showing a conceptualized contribution of improved soil microbial health attributes under INM.

The review further highlights the importance of organic and inorganic sources of fertilizers and the role of soil microbes in improving nutrient availability. Several organic fertilizers such as cow manure, Azolla compost, rice straw compost, rice straw biochar, burnt rice husk, legumes, vermicompost, and inorganic fertilizers such as urea, diammonium phosphate (DAP), calcium nitrate (CAN) were applied at different rates in rice crop production [[83], [84], [85]]. INM practices were found as an effective tool for improving microbial population that directly increasing nutrient use efficiency, enhancing crop performance, and mitigating ecological stresses like salinity and heavy metal pollution. Studies have demonstrated the positive impact of INM on nutrient supply capacity, microbial diversity, and enzyme activities in paddy soils, contributing to higher photo-assimilates and dry matter accumulation [2,32,38,40,86,87].

For example [88], performed two-year field experiments on the sole application of Azolla with reduced N-rate and observed that reduced N alone significantly decreases NH3-volatilization without an increase in grain yield compared to the full N rate, however, reduced N substituted with Azolla significantly decreased NH3-volatilization by 59.72 % thereby decreasing floodwater pH and temperature and significantly increasing nitrogen use efficiency by 23.73 % compared to control without reduction in grain yield. The grain yield increase due to the application of reduced N with different organic fertilizers was reported. For example, reducing N with velvet mucuna increases grain yield by 0.8 t ha−1 compared to control [89], cattle manure [90], burnt rice straw [91] and farm yard manure [92]. In long-term bases [93], observed that sole application of farm yard manure (FYM) and green manures (e.g. Lablab, cowpea and Stylosanthes guianensis) increase rice grain yields from 0.7 to 3.1 t ha−1 over control with more preservative effect when the two (farm yard manure and green manures) were combined. This review observed that different recommended rates of both organic and inorganic fertilizers were reported in different parts of the world (Table 2) and overall literature search indicated that the global price of inorganic fertilizers is increasing and becoming unaffordable for resource-poor smallholder farmers, particularly in Sub-Saharan Africa. Therefore, identifying the optimum dose of integrated nutrient application and soil microbes is required for an adequate supply of nutrients [94].

Another study by Ref. [95] observed that the co-application of Azolla and biochar offers a novel approach to increasing N and minimizing emissions in a rice production system, additionally, combining Azolla and biochar significantly increased rice grain yield by 27.3–75.0 %. The review further identified that INM enhanced the nutrient supply capacity of paddy soils thereby providing favorable environments to beneficiary microorganisms that favor vegetative growth resulting in higher photo-assimilates and dry matter accumulation [84,96].

Studies indicated that soil microbes improve availability of nutrients in the soil through various mechanisms such as mycorrhizal fungi that form extensive fungal hyphae with rice roots and enhance rice plant access to nutrients. Availability of essential nutrients contributes directly to rice yield. According to the findings of this review, phosphorus plays an important role in growth and development of rice crops [96,97], but its availability in paddy soils is often limited and become one of the most identified yield-limiting nutrients in lowland rice production systems over the world [46,98,99]. The study conducted by Ref. [100] points out some complicated chemistry in paddy production systems. In waterlogged conditions, the redox potential and soil pH decreased. This increases the solubility of iron (Fe3+to Fe2+) and manganese (Mn4+to Mn2+) and finally enhances P fixation [101]. However, being part of the problem, INM and the use of beneficiary microorganisms is also part of the solution to P deficiency in paddy production systems [35,102]. It was observed that the use of INM can significantly improve phosphorus use efficiency in paddy. For example, a study by Refs. [103,104] found that application of organic manures, such as farmyard manure, Azolla and vermicompost, along with chemical fertilizers, increased phosphorus use efficiency by 33–46 % compared to use of chemical fertilizers alone. Additionally, variety of soil microbes such as Azotobacter, Achromobacter, Rhizobium, Bacillus, Flavobacterium, Pseudomonas and Enterobacter dissolve fixed-P and other bacteria like acidophilic taxa can oxidize Fe (II) to Fe (III) and quickly hydrolyzes and precipitates as Fe (III)-hydroxides. These microbes were termed Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria (PSB) and have direct impact on increasing P use efficiency, minimizing iron toxicity in anaerobic conditions and improving crop yields [105]. Therefore, INM and phosphate solubilizing microorganisms may be a good option to increase P use efficiency in paddy production systems.

Potassium on the other hand is one of the three primary macronutrients required for plant growth and development its deficiency can adversely affect crop yield and quality [106]. like phosphorus, availability of potassium in soil is often limited. However, the use of organic sources such as farmyard manure and compost (INM) can provide a slow-release supply of potassium to the soil and improve its availability to rice plants leading to improved crop yields [64]. Additionally, use of biofertilizers, such as nitrogen-fixing bacteria and mycorrhizal fungi enhances uptake of potassium by plants. For example, a study by (Walia et al., 2010) and Yuan et al. [64] found that application of organic manures, such as pig manure and rice straw, along with chemical fertilizers, increased potassium use efficiency by 16–27 %, micronutrient contents (Zn, Cu, Fe, and Mn) and rice yield from 8.54 to 9.56 t ha−1compared to sole chemical fertilizers. Additionally, several bacteria species such as Bacillus, Arthrobacter, Paenibacillus, Acidithiobacillus, Pseudomonas and Enterobacter dissolve potassium from insoluble K-bearing minerals such as muscovite, orthoclase, feldspar, illite and biotite, into soil solution and enhance seed germination, vegetative growth and control water-use efficiency [64,107,108]. Although INM can be an effective strategy to improve potassium use efficiency, optimal combination of organic and inorganic sources of nutrients depends on several factors, therefore researchers should develop customized INM plans for proper supply of nutrients.

The current review discovered that Sulfur (S) is an essential secondary nutrient for plant growth and development, and its deficiency can lead to reduced rice crop yields and quality [42]. However, unlike N-P-K fertilizers, in most cases, S is excluded in balanced nutrition in paddy production. The use of Integrated Nutrient Management (INM) can improve soil organic matter content, which can increase availability of sulfur to plants. Inorganic sources of sulfur, such as sulfate-containing fertilizers, can also be used to supplement soil's sulfur supply [45]. Additionally, use of soil microbes such as bacteria and fungi, also play an essential role in sulfur cycling and certain microbes, such as sulfur-oxidizing bacteria, can convert elemental sulfur to sulfate, which can be more easily taken up by rice plants. Other microbes, such as mycorrhizal fungi, can form symbiotic relationships with plants and enhance sulfur uptake [109,110].

Micronutrients (iron, zinc, copper, manganese, and boron) at a concentration of less than 0.5 g/kg of plant dry matter are also essential for plant growth and development and their deficiency restricts productivity, sustainability and stability of soils and induce other physiological disorders to plants [111,112] assessed 25 years of continuous application of synthetic and organic fertilizers and observed that application of green manures along with inorganic fertilizers increases concentration of micronutrients in soil and enhances plant uptake. Several studies have also investigated the effects of integrated nutrient management (INM) and microbial inoculants on uptake of micronutrients that also result in higher rice grain yield [2,57,113,114]. Overall, the review underscores the significant role of soil microbes in nutrient cycling and their positive impact on yield and productivity in paddy systems. The integration of microbial-based INM practices provides a promising avenue for sustainable rice production and soil health conservation. Understanding the intricate relationship between soil microbes and nutrient availability is crucial for optimizing agricultural techniques and ensuring long-term food security.

3.3. Role of microbes and microbe-induced INM on climate stress mitigation in paddy production system

Understanding the effects of INM on soil microbial diversity and function under various climate scenarios is crucial for predicting and managing the consequences of climate change on paddy systems. Climate changes are projected to have global impacts, leading to shifts in regional temperatures and altered precipitation frequencies [24,121]. Among various sectors, agriculture is expected to be highly affected [25]. In this review, we explored strategies for climate mitigation, with a focus on minimizing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions through carbon sequestration [121]. We found a strong relationship between nutrient sources, Integrated Nutrient Management (INM), and soil microbes. Microbiomes were found to enhance nutrient uptake and improve plant growth, resulting in increased resilience to environmental stressors like drought, heat, and salinity, leading to better rice crop yields [122]. We view INM as a valuable tool to enrich soil microbiomes, enhancing the resilience of paddy production systems to climate stresses and ensuring food security.

Furthermore, our findings revealed that INM enhances soil fertility and health, leading to reduced reliance on chemical fertilization and subsequently minimizing GHG emissions from industrial fertilizer production. INM also contributes to carbon sequestration in the rice ecosystem [42]. Soil microbiomes play a critical role in cycling toxic heavy metals and gases, including methane, ammonia, and nitrous oxide, thereby contributing to GHG reduction [6]. Leveraging the interactions between soil microbes, plants, and the environment offers a promising approach to simultaneously enhance nutrient management and mitigate climate stress for sustainable rice crop production.

Soil microbes also exhibit responses to extreme climate events like droughts and floods, which are expected to become more frequent and severe due to climate change [123,124]. INM practices can enhance the diversity and function of soil microbes by providing balanced nutrient supply, organic matter, and beneficial microorganisms, leading to improved soil quality and plant health [125]. These practices increase the abundance and activity of nitrogen-fixing bacteria, phosphate-solubilizing bacteria and fungi, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AM), and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria, which help plants cope with climate stress regimes [32]. Additionally, INM can influence the sensitivity of soil microbes to extreme events and their contribution to greenhouse gas fluxes from paddy soils under climate change conditions [124]. Overall, the role of microbes and microbe-induced INM holds promise in mitigating climate stress and promoting sustainable rice production in the face of climate change challenges.

3.4. Some reported constraints that hinder the adoption of INM

The literature search identified that the use of Integrated Nutrient Management (INM) and Soil Beneficial Microbes can be hindered by several factors such as the unavailability of organic sources of nutrients eg. Farm yard manure, Azolla, and biofertilizers [30,39], lack of knowledge among farmers on the preparation and cycling of organic waste to produce quality compost [126] and the cost of INM and soil beneficial microbes can be high, which may make it difficult for farmers to afford [127]. Additionally, Using INM and soil-beneficial microbes can be time-consuming, as farmers need to be meticulous in their application and maintenance [42].

3.5. Conclusion and a way forward

This review has synthesized the current knowledge and evidence on the effects of integrated nutrient management (INM) and soil microbes on soil health, crop productivity, and climate resilience in paddy systems. The review has demonstrated that INM can provide multiple benefits for soil fertility, microbial activity, diversity, and function, as well as mitigate the negative impacts of excessive synthetic fertilizers and climate stress on soil and plant health. The review highlights the pivotal role of soil microbes in integrated nutrient management, where they significantly contribute to elevating rice yield and mitigating climate stress. These soil microbes actively enhance nutrient availability, stimulate plant growth, and facilitate adaptive responses to environmental stressors. Additionally, their involvement in regulating soil carbon cycling establishes a vital feedback loop to address climate change impacts effectively. Studies demonstrated that Long-term Integrated Nutrient Management (INM) practices, typically spanning several years, focus on enhancing soil microbial diversity, improving soil organic matter, and increasing nutrient use efficiency through sustained organic substrate provision, leading to long-term soil health and crop yield improvements. In contrast, short-term INM, usually lasting for a few years, aims to quickly boost microbial biomass and enzyme activities by providing a rapid supply of organic substrates, which enhances microbial activity and nutrient cycling in the short term. While both approaches aim to improve soil health and crop productivity, long-term INM offers more sustained benefits compared to the immediate but temporary effects of short-term INM. The review has identified some knowledge gaps and challenges that need to be addressed to optimize the potential of INM and soil microbes for sustainable rice production. Based on the findings of the review, we recommend the following actions for policymakers, researchers, and farmers.

  • i.

    Limited research exists to substantiate the influence of soil microbial properties on rice performance and climate mitigation within the context of integrated nutrient management practices, particularly in soils facing diverse abiotic stresses such as salinity, drought, and metal contamination, therefore more studies are recommended.

  • ii.

    Promote the adoption of INM practices that are suitable for different agroecological zones, soil types, and cropping systems, considering the local socio-economic and environmental conditions.

  • iii.

    Advocate research on development and dissemination of microbial inoculants and biofertilizers that can enhance the diversity and function of soil microbial communities and their beneficial effects on plant growth and stress tolerance.

  • iv.

    Monitor and evaluate the impacts of INM and soil microbes on soil quality, plant health, crop yield, GHG emissions, and carbon sequestration using standardized methods and indicators.

  • iv.

    Enhance the awareness and capacity of farmers, extension agents, and policymakers on the importance and benefits of INM and soil microbes for sustainable rice production and climate resilience.

  • v.

    Foster collaboration and knowledge sharing among stakeholders from different sectors and disciplines to facilitate the adoption and scaling up of INM and soil microbial technologies.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Said H. Marzouk: Writing – review & editing, Validation, Software, Methodology, Conceptualization. Damiano R. Kwaslema: Writing – review & editing, Methodology, Conceptualization. Mohd M. Omar: Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization. Said H. Mohamed: Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  • 1.Carey J.C., Tang J., Templer P.H., Kroeger K.D., Crowther T.W., Burton A.J., Dukes J.S., Emmett B., Frey S.D., Heskel M.A., Jiang L., Machmuller M.B., Mohan J., Panetta A.M., Reich P.B., Reinsch S., Wang X., Allison S.D., Bamminger C., Bridgham S., Collins S.L., de Dato G., Eddy W.C., Enquist B.J., Estiarte M., Harte J., Henderson A., Johnson B.R., Larsen K.S., Luo Y., Marhan S., Melillo J.M., Peñuelas J., Pfeifer-Meister L., Poll C., Rastetter E., Reinmann A.B., Reynolds L.L., Schmidt I.K., Shaver G.R., Strong A.L., Suseela V., Tietema A. Temperature response of soil respiration largely unaltered with experimental warming. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2016;113:13797–13802. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1605365113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Pattnaik S., Mohapatra B., Gupta A. Plant growth-promoting microbe mediated uptake of essential nutrients (Fe, P, K) for crop stress management: microbe–soil–plant continuum. Frontiers in Agronomy. 2021;3 doi: 10.3389/fagro.2021.689972. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Van Der Heijden M.G.A., Bardgett R.D., Van Straalen N.M. The unseen majority: soil microbes as drivers of plant diversity and productivity in terrestrial ecosystems. Ecol. Lett. 2008;11:296–310. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01139.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Fu F., Li J., Li Y., Chen W., Ding H., Xiao S. Simulating the effect of climate change on soil microbial community in an Abies georgei var. smithii forest. Front. Microbiol. 2023;14 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1189859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Khmelevtsova L.E., Sazykin I.S., Azhogina T.N., Sazykina M.A. Influence of agricultural practices on bacterial community of cultivated soils. Agriculture. 2022;12:371. doi: 10.3390/agriculture12030371. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Joshi H., duttand S., Choudhary P., Mundra S.L. Role of effective microorganisms (EM) in sustainable agriculture. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2019;8:172–181. doi: 10.20546/ijcmas.2019.803.024. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Pittol M., Scully E., Miller D., Durso L., Mariana Fiuza L., Valiati V.H. Bacterial community of the rice floodwater using cultivation-independent approaches. Int J Microbiol. 2018;2018:1–13. doi: 10.1155/2018/6280484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kaiser K., Wemheuer B., Korolkow V., Wemheuer F., Nacke H., Schöning I., Schrumpf M., Daniel R. Driving forces of soil bacterial community structure, diversity, and function in temperate grasslands and forests. Sci. Rep. 2016;6 doi: 10.1038/srep33696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ladha J.K., Dawe D., Ventura T.S., Singh U., Ventura W., Watanabe I. Long‐term effects of urea and green manure on rice yields and nitrogen balance. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2000;64:1993–2001. doi: 10.2136/sssaj2000.6461993x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Farmaha B.S., Sekaran U., Franzluebbers A.J. Cover cropping and conservation tillage improve soil health in the southeastern United States. Agron. J. 2022;114:296–316. doi: 10.1002/agj2.20865. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Quintarelli V., Radicetti E., Allevato E., Stazi S.R., Haider G., Abideen Z., Bibi S., Jamal A., Mancinelli R. Cover crops for sustainable cropping systems: a review. Agriculture. 2022;12:2076. doi: 10.3390/agriculture12122076. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kim N., Riggins C.W., Zabaloy M.C., Rodriguez-Zas S.L., Villamil M.B. Limited impacts of cover cropping on soil N-cycling microbial communities of long-term corn monocultures. Front. Microbiol. 2022;13 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.926592. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Angon P.B., Anjum N., Akter MstM., Kc S., Suma R.P., Jannat S. An overview of the impact of tillage and cropping systems on soil health in agricultural practices. Advances in Agriculture. 2023;2023:1–14. doi: 10.1155/2023/8861216. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Baaru M.W., Mungendi D.N., Bationo A., Verchot L., Waceke W. Advances in Integrated Soil Fertility Management in Sub-saharan Africa: Challenges and Opportunities. Springer; Netherlands, Dordrecht: 2007. Soil microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen as influenced by organic and inorganic inputs at Kabete, Kenya; pp. 827–832. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Chen X., Henriksen T.M., Svensson K., Korsaeth A. Long-term effects of agricultural production systems on structure and function of the soil microbial community. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2020;147 doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2019.103387. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Joos L., De Tender C. Soil under stress: the importance of soil life and how it is influenced by (micro)plastic pollution. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 2022;20:1554–1566. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2022.03.041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Zhou J., Wen Y., Rillig M.C., Shi L., Dippold M.A., Zeng Z., Kuzyakov Y., Zang H., Jones D.L., Blagodatskaya E. Restricted power: can microorganisms maintain soil organic matter stability under warming exceeding 2 degrees? Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 2023;32:919–930. doi: 10.1111/geb.13672. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Liu Y., Zang H., Ge T., Bai J., Lu S., Zhou P., Peng P., Shibistova O., Zhu Z., Wu J., Guggenberger G. Intensive fertilization (N, P, K, Ca, and S) decreases organic matter decomposition in paddy soil. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2018;127:51–57. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2018.02.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Seleiman M.F., Elshayb O.M., Nada A.M., El-leithy S.A., Baz L., Alhammad B.A., Mahdi A.H.A. Azolla compost as an approach for enhancing growth, productivity and nutrient uptake of oryza sativa L. Agronomy. 2022;12:416. doi: 10.3390/agronomy12020416. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ding W., He P., Zhang J., Liu Y., Xu X., Ullah S., Cui Z., Zhou W. Optimizing rates and sources of nutrient input to mitigate nitrogen, phosphorus, and carbon losses from rice paddies. J. Clean. Prod. 2020;256 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120603. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Semenov M.V., Krasnov G.S., Semenov V.M., van Bruggen A.H.C. Long-term fertilization rather than plant species shapes rhizosphere and bulk soil prokaryotic communities in agroecosystems. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2020;154 doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2020.103641. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Saud S., Wang D., Fahad S., Alharby H.F., Bamagoos A.A., Mjrashi A., Alabdallah N.M., AlZahrani S.S., AbdElgawad H., Adnan M., Sayyed R.Z., Ali S., Hassan S. Comprehensive impacts of climate change on rice production and adaptive strategies in China. Front. Microbiol. 2022;13 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.926059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Chung N.T., Jintrawet A., Promburom P. Impacts of seasonal climate variability on rice production in the central highlands of vietnam. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia. 2015;5:83–88. doi: 10.1016/j.aaspro.2015.08.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.IPCC: Sections . In: Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team. Lee H., Romero J., editors. IPCC; Geneva, Switzerland: 2023. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Campbell J.D., Taylor M.A., Stephenson T.S., Watson R.A., Whyte F.S. Future climate of the Caribbean from a regional climate model. Int. J. Climatol. 2011;31:1866–1878. doi: 10.1002/joc.2200. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Tong Q., Swallow B., Zhang L., Zhang J. The roles of risk aversion and climate-smart agriculture in climate risk management: evidence from rice production in the Jianghan Plain, China. Clim Risk Manag. 2019;26 doi: 10.1016/j.crm.2019.100199. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Arora M., Kaur A. Azolla pinnata, Aspergillus terreus and Eisenia fetida for enhancing agronomic value of paddy straw. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:1341. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-37880-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kurgat B.K., Lamanna C., Kimaro A., Namoi N., Manda L., Rosenstock T.S. Adoption of climate-smart agriculture technologies in Tanzania. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2020;4 doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2020.00055. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hong Z., Mkonda M.Y., He X. Conservation agriculture for environmental sustainability in A semiarid agroecological zone under climate change scenarios. Sustainability. 2018;10:1430. doi: 10.3390/su10051430. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Mtakwa P.W., Urio N.N., Wakonyo Muniale F.M., Mtakwa A.P., Lal R., Singh B.R. Soil Degradation and Restoration in Africa. vol. 2019. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group; Boca Raton, FL: 2019. Conservation agriculture in Tanzania; pp. 194–226. (Series: Advances in Soil Science). CRC Press. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Bilkis S., Islam M., Jahiruddin M., Rahaman M. Integrated use of manure and fertilizers increases rice yield, nutrient uptake and soil fertility in the boro-fallow-t.aman rice cropping pattern. SAARC Journal of Agriculture. 2018;15:147–161. doi: 10.3329/sja.v15i2.35159. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Padbhushan R., Sharma S., Kumar U., Rana D.S., Kohli A., Kaviraj M., Parmar B., Kumar R., Annapurna K., Sinha A.K., Gupta V.V.S.R. Meta-analysis approach to measure the effect of integrated nutrient management on crop performance, microbial activity, and carbon stocks in Indian soils. Front. Environ. Sci. 2021;9 doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2021.724702. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Nair P.R. The coming of age of agroforestry. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2007;87:1613–1619. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.2897. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Kwaslema D., Amuri N., Tindwa H. Minjingu phosphate rock solubilization and potential for use of Klebsiella variicola-MdE4 and Klebsiella variicola-MdG1 as biofertilizer for maize production. J. Cent. Eur. Agric. 2022;23:817–831. doi: 10.5513/JCEA01/23.4.3636. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Wiyono S., Istiaji B., Triwidodo H., Suryaningsih A. septiana: abundance of soil microbes, endophytic fungi and blast disease of paddy rice with three pest management practices. Biodiversitas. 2020;21 doi: 10.13057/biodiv/d210939. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Khoshru B., Nosratabad A.F., Mitra D., Chaithra M., Danesh Y.R., Boyno G., Chattaraj S., Priyadarshini A., Anđelković S., Pellegrini M., Guerra-Sierra B.E., Sinha S. Rock phosphate solubilizing potential of soil microorganisms: advances in sustainable crop production. Bacteria. 2023;2:98–115. doi: 10.3390/bacteria2020008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Balasubramanian V., Sie M., Hijmans R.J., Otsuka K. Increasing Rice Production in Sub-Saharan Africa: Challenges and Opportunities. Adv. Agron. 2007;94:55–133. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2113(06)94002-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Chittora D., Meena M., Barupal T., Swapnil P., Sharma K. Cyanobacteria as a source of biofertilizers for sustainable agriculture. Biochem Biophys Rep. 2020;22 doi: 10.1016/j.bbrep.2020.100737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Marzouk S.H., Tindwa H.J., Amuri N.A., Semoka J.M. An overview of underutilized benefits derived from Azolla as a promising biofertilizer in lowland rice production. Heliyon. 2023;9 doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Hassan Hussainy S.A., Arivukodi S. Performance of rice under integrated nutrient management: a review. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2020;9:1390–1404. doi: 10.20546/ijcmas.2020.904.165. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Mohanty S., Nayak A.K., Swain C.K., Dhal B.R., Kumar A., Kumar U., Tripathi R., Shahid M., Behera K.K. Impact of integrated nutrient management options on GHG emission, N loss and N use efficiency of low land rice. Soil Tillage Res. 2020;200 doi: 10.1016/j.still.2020.104616. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Bhardwaj A.K., Malik K., Chejara S., Rajwar D., Narjary B., Chandra P. Integration of organics in nutrient management for rice-wheat system improves nitrogen use efficiency via favorable soil biological and electrochemical responses. Front. Plant Sci. 2023;13 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1075011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Brar B.S., Singh K., Dheri G.S. Balwinder-Kumar: carbon sequestration and soil carbon pools in a rice?wheat cropping system: effect of long-term use of inorganic fertilizers and organic manure. Soil Tillage Res. 2013;128:30–36. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2012.10.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Liu M., Hu F., Chen X., Huang Q., Jiao J., Zhang B., Li H. Organic amendments with reduced chemical fertilizer promote soil microbial development and nutrient availability in a subtropical paddy field: the influence of quantity, type and application time of organic amendments. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2009;42:166–175. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2009.03.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Urmi T.A., Rahman MdM., Islam MdM., Islam MdA., Jahan N.A., Mia MdA.B., Akhter S., Siddiqui M.H., Kalaji H.M. Integrated nutrient management for rice yield, soil fertility, and carbon sequestration. Plants. 2022;11:138. doi: 10.3390/plants11010138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Mairura F.S., Musafiri C.M., Kiboi M.N., Macharia J.M., Ng’etich O.K., Shisanya C.A., Okeyo J.M., Okwuosa E.A., Ngetich F.K. Farm factors influencing soil fertility management patterns in Upper Eastern Kenya. Environmental Challenges. 2022;6 doi: 10.1016/j.envc.2021.100409. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Nassary E.K., Msomba B.H., Masele W.E., Ndaki P.M., Kahangwa C.A. Exploring urban green packages as part of Nature-based Solutions for climate change adaptation measures in rapidly growing cities of the Global South. J Environ Manage. 2022;310 doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Page M.J., McKenzie J.E., Bossuyt P.M., Boutron I., Hoffmann T.C., Mulrow C.D., Shamseer L., Tetzlaff J.M., Akl E.A., Brennan S.E., Chou R., Glanville J., Grimshaw J.M., Hróbjartsson A., Lalu M.M., Li T., Loder E.W., Mayo-Wilson E., McDonald S., McGuinness L.A., Stewart L.A., Thomas J., Tricco A.C., Welch V.A., Whiting P., Moher D. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;n71 doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Gezahegn A.M. Role of integrated nutrient management for sustainable maize production. International Journal of Agronomy. 2021;2021:1–7. doi: 10.1155/2021/9982884. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Luo X., Fu X., Yang Y., Cai P., Peng S., Chen W., Huang Q. Microbial communities play important roles in modulating paddy soil fertility. Sci. Rep. 2016;6 doi: 10.1038/srep20326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Liu E., Yan C., Mei X., He W., Bing S.H., Ding L., Liu Q., Liu S., Fan T. Long-term effect of chemical fertilizer, straw, and manure on soil chemical and biological properties in northwest China. Geoderma. 2010;158:173–180. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2010.04.029. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Gogoi B., Borah N., Baishya A., Dutta S., Nath D.J., Das R., Bhattacharryya D., Sharma K.K., Mishra G., Francaviglia R. Yield trends, soil carbon fractions and sequestration in a rice-rice system of North-East India: effect of 32 years of INM practices. Field Crops Res. 2021;272 doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2021.108289. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Singh K., Chand S., Yaseen Mohd. Integrated nutrient management in Indian basil (Ocimum basilicum) Ind. Crops Prod. 2014;55:225–229. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.02.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Zhang Q., Zhou W., Liang G., Wang X., Sun J., He P., Li L. Effects of different organic manures on the biochemical and microbial characteristics of albic paddy soil in a short-term experiment. PLoS One. 2015;10 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Song D., Chen L., Zhang S., Zheng Q., Ullah S., Zhou W., Wang X. Combined biochar and nitrogen fertilizer change soil enzyme and microbial activities in a 2-year field trial. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 2020;99 doi: 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2020.103212. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Ullah S., Ai C., Huang S., Zhang J., Jia L., Ma J., Zhou W., He P. The responses of extracellular enzyme activities and microbial community composition under nitrogen addition in an upland soil. PLoS One. 2019;14 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Saha S., Saha B., Seth T., Dasgupta S., Ray M., Pal B., Pati S., Mukhopadhyay S.K., Hazra G. Micronutrients availability in soil–plant system in response to long-term integrated nutrient management under rice–wheat cropping system. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2019;19:712–724. doi: 10.1007/s42729-019-00071-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Tang S., Ma Q., Marsden K.A., Chadwick D.R., Luo Y., Kuzyakov Y., Wu L., Jones D.L. Microbial community succession in soil is mainly driven by carbon and nitrogen contents rather than phosphorus and sulphur contents. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2023;180 doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2023.109019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Xue J.-F., Pu C., Liu S.-L., Chen Z.-D., Chen F., Xiao X.-P., Lal R., Zhang H.-L. Effects of tillage systems on soil organic carbon and total nitrogen in a double paddy cropping system in Southern China. Soil Tillage Res. 2015;153:161–168. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2015.06.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Ding F., Van Zwieten L., Zhang W., Weng Z., Shi S., Wang J., Meng J. A meta-analysis and critical evaluation of influencing factors on soil carbon priming following biochar amendment. J. Soils Sediments. 2018;18:1507–1517. doi: 10.1007/s11368-017-1899-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Lian H., Wang Z., Li Y., Xu H., Zhang H., Gong X., Qi H., Jiang Y. Straw strip return increases soil organic carbon sequestration by optimizing organic and humus carbon in aggregates of mollisols in northeast China. Agronomy. 2022;12:784. doi: 10.3390/agronomy12040784. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Mallikarjun M., Maity S.K. Effect of integrated nutrient management on soil biological properties in kharif rice. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2018;7:1531–1537. doi: 10.20546/ijcmas.2018.711.176. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Gupta G., Dhar S., Kumar A., Choudhary A.K., Dass A., Sharma V.K., Shukla L., Upadhyay P.K., Das A., Jinger D., Rajpoot S.K., Sannagoudar M.S., Kumar A., Bhupenchandra I., Tyagi V., Joshi E., Kumar K., Dwivedi P., Rajawat M.V.S. Microbes-mediated integrated nutrient management for improved rhizo-modulation, pigeonpea productivity, and soil bio-fertility in a semi-arid agro-ecology. Front. Microbiol. 2022;13 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.924407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Yuan G., Huan W., Song H., Lu D., Chen X., Wang H., Zhou J. Effects of straw incorporation and potassium fertilizer on crop yields, soil organic carbon, and active carbon in the rice–wheat system. Soil Tillage Res. 2021;209 doi: 10.1016/j.still.2021.104958. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Zhang T., Wang T., Liu K.S., Wang L., Wang K., Zhou Y. Effects of different amendments for the reclamation of coastal saline soil on soil nutrient dynamics and electrical conductivity responses. Agric. Water Manag. 2015;159:115–122. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2015.06.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Shah T.I., Shah A.M., Bangroo S.A., Sharma M.P., Aezum A.M., Kirmani N.A., Lone A.H., Jeelani M.I., Rai A.P., Wani F.J., Bhat M.I., Malik A.R., Biswas A., Ahmad L. Soil quality index as affected by integrated nutrient management in the himalayan foothills. Agronomy. 2022;12:1–16. doi: 10.3390/agronomy12081870. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Naylor D., McClure R., Jansson J. Trends in microbial community composition and function by soil depth. Microorganisms. 2022;10:540. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10030540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Tian Q., Jiang Y., Tang Y., Wu Y., Tang Z., Liu F. Soil pH and organic carbon properties drive soil bacterial communities in surface and deep layers along an elevational gradient. Front. Microbiol. 2021;12 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.646124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Bamboriya J.S., Purohit H.S., Naik B.S.S.S., Pramanick B., Bamboriya S.D., Bamboriya S.D., Doodhawal K., Sunda S.L., Medida S.K., Gaber A., Alsuhaibani A.M., Hossain A. Monitoring the effect of integrated nutrient management practices on soil health in maize-based cropping system. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2023;7 doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2023.1242806. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Gogoi B., Borah N., Baishya A., Nath D.J., Dutta S., Das R., Bhattacharyya D., Sharma K.K., Valente D., Petrosillo I. Enhancing soil ecosystem services through sustainable integrated nutrient management in double rice-cropping system of North-East India. Ecol Indic. 2021;132 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108262. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Sandhu P.S., Walia S.S., Gill R.S., Dheri G.S. Thirty-one years study of integrated nutrient management on physico-chemical properties of soil under rice–wheat cropping system. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2020:1641–1657. doi: 10.1080/00103624.2020.1791156. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Naher U.A., Haque M.M., Khan F.H., Ullah Sarkar M.I., Ansari T.H., Hossain M.B., Chandra Biswas J. Effect of long-term nutrient management practices on soil health and paddy yield of rice-rice-fallow cropping system in tropic humid climate. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 2021;107 doi: 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2021.103362. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Naher U.A., Hossain M.B., Haque M.M., Maniruzzaman M., Choudhury A.K., Biswas J.C. Effect of long-term nutrient management on soil organic carbon sequestration in rice–rice–fallow rotation. Curr. Sci. 2020;118:587–592. doi: 10.18520/cs/v118/i4/587-592. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Jacoby R., Peukert M., Succurro A., Koprivova A., Kopriva S. The role of soil microorganisms in plant mineral nutrition—current knowledge and future directions. Front. Plant Sci. 2017;8 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Mendes R., Garbeva P., Raaijmakers J.M. The rhizosphere microbiome: significance of plant beneficial, plant pathogenic, and human pathogenic microorganisms. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2013;37:634–663. doi: 10.1111/1574-6976.12028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Montemurro F., Diacono M. Towards a better understanding of agronomic efficiency of nitrogen: assessment and improvement strategies. Agronomy. 2016;6:31. doi: 10.3390/agronomy6020031. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Iqbal A., Ali I., Yuan P., Khan R., Liang H., Wei S., Jiang L. Combined application of manure and chemical fertilizers alters soil environmental variables and improves soil fungal community composition and rice grain yield. Front. Microbiol. 2022;13 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.856355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Haque M.M., Biswas J.C. Resources Use Efficiency in Agriculture. Springer; Singapore, Singapore: 2020. Long-term impact of fertilizers on soil and rice productivity; pp. 259–282. [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Hossain M.B., M.H.M.M.A.H.M.Z.I, A.T.M.S Use of Azolla as biofertilizer for cultivation of BR 26 rice in aus season. J. Biol. Sci. 2001;1:1120–1123. 1120-1123. [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Nkwabi J. Challenges for small scale rice farmers- A case study from Tanzania. Econ. Aff. 2021;66 doi: 10.46852/0424-2513.1.2021.19. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Masclaux-Daubresse C., Daniel-Vedele F., Dechorgnat J., Chardon F., Gaufichon L., Suzuki A. Nitrogen uptake, assimilation and remobilization in plants: challenges for sustainable and productive agriculture. Ann. Bot. 2010;105:1141–1157. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcq028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Omar M.M., Shitindi M.J., Massawe B.H.J., Fue K.G., Pedersen O., Meliyo J.L. Exploring farmers' perception, knowledge, and management techniques of salt-affected soils to enhance rice production on small land holdings in Tanzania. Cogent Food Agric. 2022;8 doi: 10.1080/23311932.2022.2140470. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Hidayat B., Rauf A., Sabrina T., Jamil A. Biochar and AZOLLA application on fertility of lead contaminated soil. Russ J Agric Socioecon Sci. 2020;105:134–142. doi: 10.18551/rjoas.2020-09.15. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Rivaie A.A., Isnaini S.M. Changes in soil N, P, K, rice growth and yield following the application of Azolla pinnata. Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare,. J Biol Agric Healthc. 2013;3:112–117. [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Razavipour T., Moghaddam S.S., Doaei S., Noorhosseini S.A., Damalas C.A. Azolla (Azolla filiculoides) compost improves grain yield of rice (Oryza sativa L.) under different irrigation regimes. Agric. Water Manag. 2018;209:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2018.05.020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Bhuvaneshwari K., Singh P.K. Response of nitrogen-fixing water fern Azolla biofertilization to rice crop. 3 Biotech. 2015;5:523–529. doi: 10.1007/s13205-014-0251-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Gupta G., Dhar S., Kumar A., Choudhary A.K., Dass A., Sharma V.K., Shukla L., Upadhyay P.K., Das A., Jinger D., Rajpoot S.K., Sannagoudar M.S., Kumar A., Bhupenchandra I., Tyagi V., Joshi E., Kumar K., Dwivedi P., Rajawat M.V.S. Microbes-mediated integrated nutrient management for improved rhizo-modulation, pigeonpea productivity, and soil bio-fertility in a semi-arid agro-ecology. Front. Microbiol. 2022;13 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.924407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Zhu W.-B., Zeng K., Tian Y.-H., Yin B. Coupling side-deep fertilization with Azolla to reduce ammonia volatilization while achieving a higher net economic benefits in rice cropping system. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2022;333 doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2022.107976. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Kaizzi C.K., Ssali H., Nansamba A., Vlek P.L.G. The potential benefits of Azolla, Velvet bean (Mucuna pruriens var. utilis) and N fertilizers in rice production under contrasting systems in eastern Uganda. Advances in Integrated Soil Fertility Management in sub-Saharan Africa: Challenges and Opportunities. 2007:423–434. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-5760-1_39. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Thomas C.L., Acquah G.E., Whitmore A.P., McGrath S.P., Haefele S.M. The effect of different organic fertilizers on yield and soil and crop nutrient concentrations. Agronomy. 2019;9:776. doi: 10.3390/agronomy9120776. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Flower K.C., Ward P.R., Passaris N., Cordingley N. Uneven crop residue distribution influences soil chemical composition and crop yield under long-term no-tillage. Soil Tillage Res. 2022;223 doi: 10.1016/j.still.2022.105498. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Chakraborty A., Chakrabarti K., Chakraborty A., Ghosh S. Effect of long-term fertilizers and manure application on microbial biomass and microbial activity of a tropical agricultural soil. Biol. Fertil. Soils. 2011;47:227–233. doi: 10.1007/s00374-010-0509-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Kwesiga J., Grotelüschen K., Senthilkumar K., Neuhoff D., Döring T.F., Becker M. Rice yield gaps in smallholder systems of the kilombero floodplain in Tanzania. Agronomy. 2020;10:1135. doi: 10.3390/agronomy10081135. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Andrianary B.H., Tsujimoto Y., Rakotonindrina H., Oo A.Z., Rabenarivo M., Ramifehiarivo N., Razakamanarivo H. Phosphorus application affects lowland rice yields by changing phenological development and cold stress degrees in the central highlands of Madagascar. Field Crops Res. 2021;271 doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2021.108256. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Kimani S.M., Bimantara P.O., Hattori S., Tawaraya K., Sudo S., Xu X., Cheng W. Co-application of poultry-litter biochar with Azolla has synergistic effects on CH4 and N2O emissions from rice paddy soils. Heliyon. 2020;6 doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Dhaliwal S.S., Sharma V., Shukla A.K., Verma V., Kaur M., Singh P., Gaber A., Hossain A. Effect of addition of organic manures on basmati yield, nutrient content and soil fertility status in north-western India. Heliyon. 2023;9 doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Khan F., Siddique A.B., Shabala S., Zhou M., Zhao C. Phosphorus plays key roles in regulating plants' physiological responses to abiotic stresses. Plants. 2023;12:2861. doi: 10.3390/plants12152861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Dhillon J., Torres G., Driver E., Figueiredo B., Raun W.R. World phosphorus use efficiency in cereal crops. Agron. J. 2017;109:1670–1677. doi: 10.2134/agronj2016.08.0483. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Kebeney S., Msanya B., Ng’etich W., Semoka J., Serrem C. Pedological characterization of some typical soils of busia county, western Kenya: soil morphology, physico-chemical properties, classification and fertility trends. Int J Plant Soil Sci. 2015;4:29–44. doi: 10.9734/IJPSS/2015/11880. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Fageria N.K., Carvalho G.D., Santos A.B., Ferreira E.P.B., Knupp A.M. Chemistry of lowland rice soils and nutrient availability. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2011;42:1913–1933. doi: 10.1080/00103624.2011.591467. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Fageria N.K., Santos A.B., Reis R.A. Agronomic evaluation of phosphorus sources in lowland rice production. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2014;45:2067–2091. doi: 10.1080/00103624.2014.911302. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Marlina N., Gofar N., Subakti A.H.P.K., Rohim A.M. Improvement of rice growth and productivity through balance application of inorganic fertilizer and biofertilizer in inceptisol soil of lowland swamp area. AGRIVITA Journal of Agricultural Science. 2014;36 doi: 10.17503/Agrivita-2014-36-1-p048-056. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Kalayu G. Phosphate solubilizing microorganisms: promising approach as biofertilizers. International Journal of Agronomy. 2019;2019:1–7. doi: 10.1155/2019/4917256. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Naher U.A., Othman R., Panhwar Q.A., Ismail M.R. Crop Production and Global Environmental Issues. Springer International Publishing; Cham: 2015. Biofertilizer for sustainable rice production and reduction of environmental pollution; pp. 283–291. [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Naher U.A., Biswas J.C., Maniruzzaman M., Khan F.H., Sarkar M.I.U., Jahan A., Hera M.H.R., Hossain M.B., Islam A., Islam M.R., Kabir M.S. Bio-organic fertilizer: a green technology to reduce synthetic N and P fertilizer for rice production. Front. Plant Sci. 2021;12 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.602052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Masni Z., Wasli M.E. Yield performance and nutrient uptake of red rice variety (MRM 16) at different NPK fertilizer rates. International Journal of Agronomy. 2019;2019:1–6. doi: 10.1155/2019/5134358. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Liang Q., Chen H., Gong Y., Yang H., Fan M., Kuzyakov Y. Effects of 15 years of manure and mineral fertilizers on enzyme activities in particle-size fractions in a North China Plain soil. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 2014;60:112–119. doi: 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2013.11.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Moharana P.C., Sharma B.M., Biswas D.R. Changes in the soil properties and availability of micronutrients after six-year application of organic and chemical fertilizers using STCR-based targeted yield equations under pearl millet-wheat cropping system. J. Plant Nutr. 2017;40:165–176. doi: 10.1080/01904167.2016.1201504. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Gahan J., Schmalenberger A. The role of bacteria and mycorrhiza in plant sulfur supply. Front. Plant Sci. 2014;5 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Masrahi A.S., Alasmari A., Shahin M.G., Qumsani A.T., Oraby H.F., Awad-Allah M.M.A. Role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and phosphate solubilizing bacteria in improving yield, yield components, and nutrients uptake of barley under salinity soil. Agriculture. 2023;13:537. doi: 10.3390/agriculture13030537. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Dhaliwal S.S., Naresh R.K., Mandal A., Singh R., Dhaliwal M.K. Dynamics and transformations of micronutrients in agricultural soils as influenced by organic matter build-up: a review. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators. 2019:1–2. doi: 10.1016/j.indic.2019.100007. 100007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Singh V., Ram N. Effect of 25 years of continuous fertilizer use on response to applied nutrients and uptake of micronutrients by rice-wheat-cowpea system. Cereal Res. Commun. 2005;33:589–594. doi: 10.1556/CRC.33.2005.2-3.124. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Kumawat A., Kumar D., Shivay Y.S., Bhatia A., Rashmi I., Yadav D., Kumar A. Long-term impact of biofertilization on soil health and nutritional quality of organic basmati rice in a typic ustchrept soil of India. Front. Environ. Sci. 2023;11 doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2023.1031844. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Kumar N., Chhokar R.S., Meena R.P., Kharub A.S., Gill S.C., Tripathi S.C., Gupta O.P., Mangrauthia S.K., Sundaram R.M., Sawant C.P., Gupta A., Naorem A., Kumar M., Singh G.P. Challenges and opportunities in productivity and sustainability of rice cultivation system: a critical review in Indian perspective. Cereal Res. Commun. 2022;50:573–601. doi: 10.1007/s42976-021-00214-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Yang G., Ji H., Liu H., Feng Y., Zhang Y., Chen L., Guo Z. Nitrogen fertilizer reduction in combination with Azolla cover for reducing ammonia volatilization and improving nitrogen use efficiency of rice. PeerJ. 2021;9 doi: 10.7717/peerj.11077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Daniel A.I., Fadaka A.O., Gokul A., Bakare O.O., Aina O., Fisher S., Burt A.F., Mavumengwana V., Keyster M., Klein A. Biofertilizer: the future of food security and food safety. Microorganisms. 2022;10:1220. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10061220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Senthilkumar K., Tesha B.J., Mghase J., Rodenburg J. Increasing paddy yields and improving farm management: results from participatory experiments with good agricultural practices (GAP) in Tanzania. Paddy Water Environ. 2018;16:749–766. doi: 10.1007/s10333-018-0666-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Kaizzi C.K., Ssali H., Nansamba A., Vlek L. The potential benefits of Azolla, Velvet bean (Mucuna pruriens var. utilis) and N fertilizers in rice production under contrasting systems in eastern Uganda. [DOI]
  • 119.Das S., Jeong S.T., Das S., Kim P.J. Composted cattle manure increases microbial activity and soil fertility more than composted swine manure in a submerged rice paddy. Front. Microbiol. 2017;8 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Rahman F., Rahman M.M., Rahman G.K.M.M., Saleque M.A., Hossain A.T.M.S., Miah M.G. Effect of organic and inorganic fertilizers and rice straw on carbon sequestration and soil fertility under a rice–rice cropping pattern. Carbon Manag. 2016;7:41–53. doi: 10.1080/17583004.2016.1166425. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.IPCC: Summary for Policymakers: Climate Change 2022_ Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability_Working Group II contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernamental Panel on Climate Change Working Group II Contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernamental Panel on Climate Chang. 2022 [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Paramesh V., Mohan Kumar R., Rajanna G.A., Gowda S., Nath A.J., Madival Y., Jinger D., Bhat S., Toraskar S. Integrated nutrient management for improving crop yields, soil properties, and reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2023;7 doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2023.1173258. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Williams M.A. Response of microbial communities to water stress in irrigated and drought-prone tallgrass prairie soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2007;39:2750–2757. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.05.025. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Wang C., Morrissey E.M., Mau R.L., Hayer M., Piñeiro J., Mack M.C., Marks J.C., Bell S.L., Miller S.N., Schwartz E., Dijkstra P., Koch B.J., Stone B.W., Purcell A.M., Blazewicz S.J., Hofmockel K.S., Pett-Ridge J., Hungate B.A. The temperature sensitivity of soil: microbial biodiversity, growth, and carbon mineralization. ISME J. 2021;15:2738–2747. doi: 10.1038/s41396-021-00959-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Jansson J.K., Hofmockel K.S. Soil microbiomes and climate change. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2020;18:35–46. doi: 10.1038/s41579-019-0265-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Wu Y., Luo Z., Qi L., Zhang R., Wang Y. A study of the relationship between initial grape yield and soil properties based on organic fertilization. Agronomy. 2024;14:861. doi: 10.3390/agronomy14040861. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Evans A.A., Florence N.O., Eucabeth B.O.M. Production and marketing of rice in Kenya: challenges and opportunities. J. Dev. Agric. Econ. 2018;10:64–70. doi: 10.5897/JDAE2017.0881. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Heliyon are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES