Skip to main content
PMC home page
The EMBO Journal logoLink to The EMBO Journal
. 1997 Jun 15;16(12):3744–3755. doi: 10.1093/emboj/16.12.3744

The isomeric preference of Holliday junctions influences resolution bias by lambda integrase.

M A Azaro 1, A Landy 1
PMCID: PMC1169998  PMID: 9218815

Abstract

Lambda site-specific recombination proceeds by a pair of sequential strand exchanges that first generate and then resolve a Holliday junction intermediate. A family of synthetic Holliday junctions with the branch point constrained to the center of the 7 bp overlap region was used to show that resolution of the top strands and resolution of the bottom strands are symmetrical but stereochemically distinct processes. Lambda integrase is sensitive to isomeric structure, preferentially resolving the pair of strands that are crossed in the protein-free Holliday junction. At the branch point of stacked immobile Holliday junctions, the number of purines is preferentially maximized in the crossed (versus continuous) strands if there is an inequality of purines between strands of opposite polarity. This stacking preference was used to anticipate the resolution bias of freely mobile junctions and thereby to reinforce the conclusions with monomobile junctions. The results provide a strong indication that in the complete recombination reaction a restacking of helices occurs between the top and bottom strand exchanges.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (523.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Altona C. Classification of nucleic acid junctions. J Mol Biol. 1996 Nov 8;263(4):568–581. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Arciszewska L. K., Grainge I., Sherratt D. J. Action of site-specific recombinases XerC and XerD on tethered Holliday junctions. EMBO J. 1997 Jun 16;16(12):3731–3743. doi: 10.1093/emboj/16.12.3731. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Arciszewska L. K., Sherratt D. J. Xer site-specific recombination in vitro. EMBO J. 1995 May 1;14(9):2112–2120. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb07203.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Arciszewska L., Grainge I., Sherratt D. Effects of Holliday junction position on Xer-mediated recombination in vitro. EMBO J. 1995 Jun 1;14(11):2651–2660. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb07263.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bennett R. J., West S. C. Resolution of Holliday junctions in genetic recombination: RuvC protein nicks DNA at the point of strand exchange. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Oct 29;93(22):12217–12222. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.22.12217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bennett R. J., West S. C. Structural analysis of the RuvC-Holliday junction complex reveals an unfolded junction. J Mol Biol. 1995 Sep 15;252(2):213–226. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1995.0489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bhattacharyya A., Murchie A. I., von Kitzing E., Diekmann S., Kemper B., Lilley D. M. Model for the interaction of DNA junctions and resolving enzymes. J Mol Biol. 1991 Oct 20;221(4):1191–1207. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(91)90928-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chen J. H., Churchill M. E., Tullius T. D., Kallenbach N. R., Seeman N. C. Construction and analysis of monomobile DNA junctions. Biochemistry. 1988 Aug 9;27(16):6032–6038. doi: 10.1021/bi00416a031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Clegg R. M., Murchie A. I., Lilley D. M. The solution structure of the four-way DNA junction at low-salt conditions: a fluorescence resonance energy transfer analysis. Biophys J. 1994 Jan;66(1):99–109. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(94)80765-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Clegg R. M., Murchie A. I., Zechel A., Carlberg C., Diekmann S., Lilley D. M. Fluorescence resonance energy transfer analysis of the structure of the four-way DNA junction. Biochemistry. 1992 May 26;31(20):4846–4856. doi: 10.1021/bi00135a016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Colloms S. D., McCulloch R., Grant K., Neilson L., Sherratt D. J. Xer-mediated site-specific recombination in vitro. EMBO J. 1996 Mar 1;15(5):1172–1181. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Craig N. L., Nash H. A. The mechanism of phage lambda site-specific recombination: site-specific breakage of DNA by Int topoisomerase. Cell. 1983 Dec;35(3 Pt 2):795–803. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90112-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Dixon J. E., Sadowski P. D. Resolution of immobile chi structures by the FLP recombinase of 2 microns plasmid. J Mol Biol. 1994 Oct 21;243(2):199–207. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1994.1647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Duckett D. R., Murchie A. I., Diekmann S., von Kitzing E., Kemper B., Lilley D. M. The structure of the Holliday junction, and its resolution. Cell. 1988 Oct 7;55(1):79–89. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90011-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Duckett D. R., Murchie A. I., Lilley D. M. The global folding of four-way helical junctions in RNA, including that in U1 snRNA. Cell. 1995 Dec 15;83(6):1027–1036. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90218-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Duckett D. R., Murchie A. I., Lilley D. M. The role of metal ions in the conformation of the four-way DNA junction. EMBO J. 1990 Feb;9(2):583–590. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb08146.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Franz B., Landy A. The Holliday junction intermediates of lambda integrative and excisive recombination respond differently to the bending proteins integration host factor and excisionase. EMBO J. 1995 Jan 16;14(2):397–406. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb07014.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kho S. H., Landy A. Dissecting the resolution reaction of lambda integrase using suicide Holliday junction substrates. EMBO J. 1994 Jun 1;13(11):2714–2724. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06562.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kitts P. A., Nash H. A. Homology-dependent interactions in phage lambda site-specific recombination. Nature. 1987 Sep 24;329(6137):346–348. doi: 10.1038/329346a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Landy A. Dynamic, structural, and regulatory aspects of lambda site-specific recombination. Annu Rev Biochem. 1989;58:913–949. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.58.070189.004405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lee J., Lee J., Jayaram M. Junction mobility and resolution of Holliday structures by Flp site-specific recombinase. Testing partner compatibility during recombination. J Biol Chem. 1995 Aug 11;270(32):19086–19092. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.32.19086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lilley D. M., Clegg R. M. The structure of the four-way junction in DNA. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 1993;22:299–328. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.22.060193.001503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Lu M., Guo Q., Seeman N. C., Kallenbach N. R. DNase I cleavage of branched DNA molecules. J Biol Chem. 1989 Dec 15;264(35):20851–20854. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Mizuuchi K., Weisberg R., Enquist L., Mizuuchi M., Buraczynska M., Foeller C., Hsu P. L., Ross W., Landy A. Structure and function of the phage lambda att site: size, int-binding sites, and location of the crossover point. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1981;45(Pt 1):429–437. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1981.045.01.057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Murchie A. I., Carter W. A., Portugal J., Lilley D. M. The tertiary structure of the four-way DNA junction affords protection against DNase I cleavage. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990 May 11;18(9):2599–2606. doi: 10.1093/nar/18.9.2599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Murchie A. I., Clegg R. M., von Kitzing E., Duckett D. R., Diekmann S., Lilley D. M. Fluorescence energy transfer shows that the four-way DNA junction is a right-handed cross of antiparallel molecules. Nature. 1989 Oct 26;341(6244):763–766. doi: 10.1038/341763a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Murchie A. I., Portugal J., Lilley D. M. Cleavage of a four-way DNA junction by a restriction enzyme spanning the point of strand exchange. EMBO J. 1991 Mar;10(3):713–718. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb08001.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Nunes-Düby S. E., Azaro M. A., Landy A. Swapping DNA strands and sensing homology without branch migration in lambda site-specific recombination. Curr Biol. 1995 Feb 1;5(2):139–148. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(95)00035-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Pargellis C. A., Nunes-Düby S. E., de Vargas L. M., Landy A. Suicide recombination substrates yield covalent lambda integrase-DNA complexes and lead to identification of the active site tyrosine. J Biol Chem. 1988 Jun 5;263(16):7678–7685. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Pöhler J. R., Giraud-Panis M. J., Lilley D. M. T4 endonuclease VII selects and alters the structure of the four-way DNA junction; binding of a resolution-defective mutant enzyme. J Mol Biol. 1996 Aug 2;260(5):678–696. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Stark W. M., Boocock M. R., Sherratt D. J. Catalysis by site-specific recombinases. Trends Genet. 1992 Dec;8(12):432–439. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Weisberg R. A., Enquist L. W., Foeller C., Landy A. Role for DNA homology in site-specific recombination. The isolation and characterization of a site affinity mutant of coliphage lambda. J Mol Biol. 1983 Oct 25;170(2):319–342. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(83)80151-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. de Massy B., Dorgai L., Weisberg R. A. Mutations of the phage lambda attachment site alter the directionality of resolution of Holliday structures. EMBO J. 1989 May;8(5):1591–1599. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb03543.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. von Kitzing E., Lilley D. M., Diekmann S. The stereochemistry of a four-way DNA junction: a theoretical study. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990 May 11;18(9):2671–2683. doi: 10.1093/nar/18.9.2671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The EMBO Journal are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES