Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The EMBO Journal logoLink to The EMBO Journal
. 1997 Jul 1;16(13):3787–3796. doi: 10.1093/emboj/16.13.3787

Crystal structure of a deubiquitinating enzyme (human UCH-L3) at 1.8 A resolution.

S C Johnston 1, C N Larsen 1, W J Cook 1, K D Wilkinson 1, C P Hill 1
PMCID: PMC1170002  PMID: 9233788

Abstract

Ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolases catalyze the removal of adducts from the C-terminus of ubiquitin. We have determined the crystal structure of the recombinant human Ubiquitin C-terminal Hydrolase (UCH-L3) by X-ray crystallography at 1.8 A resolution. The structure is comprised of a central antiparallel beta-sheet flanked on both sides by alpha-helices. The beta-sheet and one of the helices resemble the well-known papain-like cysteine proteases, with the greatest similarity to cathepsin B. This similarity includes the UCH-L3 active site catalytic triad of Cys95, His169 and Asp184, and the oxyanion hole residue Gln89. Papain and UCH-L3 differ, however, in strand and helix connectivity, which in the UCH-L3 structure includes a disordered 20 residue loop (residues 147-166) that is positioned over the active site and may function in the definition of substrate specificity. Based upon analogy with inhibitor complexes of the papain-like enzymes, we propose a model describing the binding of ubiquitin to UCH-L3. The UCH-L3 active site cleft appears to be masked in the unliganded structure by two different segments of the enzyme (residues 9-12 and 90-94), thus implying a conformational change upon substrate binding and suggesting a mechanism to limit non-specific hydrolysis.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (771.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baker R. T., Tobias J. W., Varshavsky A. Ubiquitin-specific proteases of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cloning of UBP2 and UBP3, and functional analysis of the UBP gene family. J Biol Chem. 1992 Nov 15;267(32):23364–23375. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bradbury E. M. Reversible histone modifications and the chromosome cell cycle. Bioessays. 1992 Jan;14(1):9–16. doi: 10.1002/bies.950140103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Carmona E., Dufour E., Plouffe C., Takebe S., Mason P., Mort J. S., Ménard R. Potency and selectivity of the cathepsin L propeptide as an inhibitor of cysteine proteases. Biochemistry. 1996 Jun 25;35(25):8149–8157. doi: 10.1021/bi952736s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chau V., Tobias J. W., Bachmair A., Marriott D., Ecker D. J., Gonda D. K., Varshavsky A. A multiubiquitin chain is confined to specific lysine in a targeted short-lived protein. Science. 1989 Mar 24;243(4898):1576–1583. doi: 10.1126/science.2538923. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chen Z. J., Parent L., Maniatis T. Site-specific phosphorylation of IkappaBalpha by a novel ubiquitination-dependent protein kinase activity. Cell. 1996 Mar 22;84(6):853–862. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81064-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ciechanover A., Schwartz A. L. The ubiquitin-mediated proteolytic pathway: mechanisms of recognition of the proteolytic substrate and involvement in the degradation of native cellular proteins. FASEB J. 1994 Feb;8(2):182–191. doi: 10.1096/fasebj.8.2.8119489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Coulombe R., Grochulski P., Sivaraman J., Ménard R., Mort J. S., Cygler M. Structure of human procathepsin L reveals the molecular basis of inhibition by the prosegment. EMBO J. 1996 Oct 15;15(20):5492–5503. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cygler M., Sivaraman J., Grochulski P., Coulombe R., Storer A. C., Mort J. S. Structure of rat procathepsin B: model for inhibition of cysteine protease activity by the proregion. Structure. 1996 Apr 15;4(4):405–416. doi: 10.1016/s0969-2126(96)00046-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Drenth J., Kalk K. H., Swen H. M. Binding of chloromethyl ketone substrate analogues to crystalline papain. Biochemistry. 1976 Aug 24;15(17):3731–3738. doi: 10.1021/bi00662a014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gregori L., Poosch M. S., Cousins G., Chau V. A uniform isopeptide-linked multiubiquitin chain is sufficient to target substrate for degradation in ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis. J Biol Chem. 1990 May 25;265(15):8354–8357. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Haas A. L., Katzung D. J., Reback P. M., Guarino L. A. Functional characterization of the ubiquitin variant encoded by the baculovirus Autographa californica. Biochemistry. 1996 Apr 30;35(17):5385–5394. doi: 10.1021/bi9524981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Henchoz S., De Rubertis F., Pauli D., Spierer P. The dose of a putative ubiquitin-specific protease affects position-effect variegation in Drosophila melanogaster. Mol Cell Biol. 1996 Oct;16(10):5717–5725. doi: 10.1128/mcb.16.10.5717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hershko A., Ciechanover A. The ubiquitin system for protein degradation. Annu Rev Biochem. 1992;61:761–807. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.61.070192.003553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hicke L., Riezman H. Ubiquitination of a yeast plasma membrane receptor signals its ligand-stimulated endocytosis. Cell. 1996 Jan 26;84(2):277–287. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80982-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Holm L., Sander C. Protein structure comparison by alignment of distance matrices. J Mol Biol. 1993 Sep 5;233(1):123–138. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Huang Y., Baker R. T., Fischer-Vize J. A. Control of cell fate by a deubiquitinating enzyme encoded by the fat facets gene. Science. 1995 Dec 15;270(5243):1828–1831. doi: 10.1126/science.270.5243.1828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Jones T. A., Zou J. Y., Cowan S. W., Kjeldgaard M. Improved methods for building protein models in electron density maps and the location of errors in these models. Acta Crystallogr A. 1991 Mar 1;47(Pt 2):110–119. doi: 10.1107/s0108767390010224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Liu C. C., Miller H. I., Kohr W. J., Silber J. I. Purification of a ubiquitin protein peptidase from yeast with efficient in vitro assays. J Biol Chem. 1989 Dec 5;264(34):20331–20338. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Mahajan R., Delphin C., Guan T., Gerace L., Melchior F. A small ubiquitin-related polypeptide involved in targeting RanGAP1 to nuclear pore complex protein RanBP2. Cell. 1997 Jan 10;88(1):97–107. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81862-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Matthews B. W. Solvent content of protein crystals. J Mol Biol. 1968 Apr 28;33(2):491–497. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(68)90205-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Olvera J., Wool I. G. The carboxyl extension of a ubiquitin-like protein is rat ribosomal protein S30. J Biol Chem. 1993 Aug 25;268(24):17967–17974. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Ozkaynak E., Finley D., Solomon M. J., Varshavsky A. The yeast ubiquitin genes: a family of natural gene fusions. EMBO J. 1987 May;6(5):1429–1439. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1987.tb02384.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Pickart C. M., Rose I. A. Ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase acts on ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal amides. J Biol Chem. 1985 Jul 5;260(13):7903–7910. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Ramakrishnan V., Biou V. Treatment of multiwavelength anomalous diffraction data as a special case of multiple isomorphous replacement. Methods Enzymol. 1997;276:538–557. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Rashin A. A., Iofin M., Honig B. Internal cavities and buried waters in globular proteins. Biochemistry. 1986 Jun 17;25(12):3619–3625. doi: 10.1021/bi00360a021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Schechter I., Berger A. On the size of the active site in proteases. I. Papain. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1967 Apr 20;27(2):157–162. doi: 10.1016/s0006-291x(67)80055-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Schröder E., Phillips C., Garman E., Harlos K., Crawford C. X-ray crystallographic structure of a papain-leupeptin complex. FEBS Lett. 1993 Jan 2;315(1):38–42. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(93)81128-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Storer A. C., Ménard R. Catalytic mechanism in papain family of cysteine peptidases. Methods Enzymol. 1994;244:486–500. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(94)44035-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Turk D., Podobnik M., Kuhelj R., Dolinar M., Turk V. Crystal structures of human procathepsin B at 3.2 and 3.3 Angstroms resolution reveal an interaction motif between a papain-like cysteine protease and its propeptide. FEBS Lett. 1996 Apr 22;384(3):211–214. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(96)00309-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Turk D., Podobnik M., Popovic T., Katunuma N., Bode W., Huber R., Turk V. Crystal structure of cathepsin B inhibited with CA030 at 2.0-A resolution: A basis for the design of specific epoxysuccinyl inhibitors. Biochemistry. 1995 Apr 11;34(14):4791–4797. doi: 10.1021/bi00014a037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Weber D. J., Gittis A. G., Mullen G. P., Abeygunawardana C., Lattman E. E., Mildvan A. S. NMR docking of a substrate into the X-ray structure of staphylococcal nuclease. Proteins. 1992 Aug;13(4):275–287. doi: 10.1002/prot.340130402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Wilkinson K. D., Deshpande S., Larsen C. N. Comparisons of neuronal (PGP 9.5) and non-neuronal ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolases. Biochem Soc Trans. 1992 Aug;20(3):631–637. doi: 10.1042/bst0200631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Wilkinson K. D., Tashayev V. L., O'Connor L. B., Larsen C. N., Kasperek E., Pickart C. M. Metabolism of the polyubiquitin degradation signal: structure, mechanism, and role of isopeptidase T. Biochemistry. 1995 Nov 7;34(44):14535–14546. doi: 10.1021/bi00044a032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Zhu Y., Carroll M., Papa F. R., Hochstrasser M., D'Andrea A. D. DUB-1, a deubiquitinating enzyme with growth-suppressing activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Apr 16;93(8):3275–3279. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.8.3275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The EMBO Journal are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES