Abstract
The rise of antimicrobial-resistant microorganisms (AMR) poses a significant global challenge to human health and economic stability. In response, various scientific communities are seeking safe alternatives to antibiotics. This study comprehensively investigates the antibacterial effects of red dye derived from Monascus purpureus against three bacterial pathogens: Salmonella typhimurium ATCC14028, Escherichia coli ATCC8739, and Enterococcus faecalis ATCC25923. The dye was extracted from the Monascus purpureus ATCC16436 strain, using 1 mg of red dye in 1 ml of DMSO to achieve a concentration of 1000 µg/ml. The chemical profile of the red dye extract was analyzed using GC–MS analysis, confirming the presence of several bioactive antimicrobial compounds, including aspidospermidin-17-ol, 1-acetyl-16-methoxy, octanoic acid, and hexadecanoic acid methyl ester. The extract was tested against the bacterial strains at varying concentrations to determine the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBC). The results demonstrated significant antibacterial activity, with the highest MIC and MBC values of 6.25/12.5 µg/ml against S. typhimurium. The antibacterial activity of the red dye was compared to five conventional antibiotics using the disc diffusion method, revealing superior effectiveness, particularly against S. typhimurium, with an inhibition zone measuring 20 ± 0.22 mm. Scanning electron microscopy was employed to explore the mechanism of action of the red dye extract, highlighting its impact on bacterial plasma membrane permeability and its interference with cellular energy production. These findings suggest that the Monascus purpureus-derived red dye extract represents a promising natural alternative to conventional antibiotics, demonstrating potent antibacterial activity and potential as a novel therapeutic agent in combating antimicrobial resistance.
Keywords: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR), Bactericidal activity, Foodborne pathogens, Membrane permeability, Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC)
Introduction
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a critical issue identified by the World Health Organization (WHO) as “a global public health concern” (Aslam et al. 2018). AMR has severe implications globally, contributing to increased morbidity and mortality from bacterial infections and necessitating urgent actions to address the issue (Abdelaziz Abdelmoneim et al. 2024). Over the past three decades, the approval rate of new antibiotics has declined, while antibiotic-resistant bacterial pathogens continue to emerge (Aslam et al. 2018). Furthermore, these pathogens are increasingly acquiring additional resistance mechanisms, resulting in the rise of multidrug-resistant (MDR), extensively drug-resistant (XDR), and pan drug-resistant (PDR) bacteria, which are resistant to all available antibiotics (Maarouf et al. 2023). While AMR mainly arises from the use of antibiotics and antimicrobials, substantial evidence indicates that its proliferation is also driven by poor local sanitation, pollution, and various non-usage factors, with the natural environment playing a significant role in its spread (Collignon et al. 2018; Graham et al. 2019). Living organisms participate in a complex network of interactions with their environment, maintaining a dynamic balance essential for life on Earth. Disruptions to this equilibrium can significantly harm ecosystems and the species within them (Teiba et al. 2024a, b). Microorganisms are found everywhere in the biosphere and play a crucial role in shaping their environments with their effects being beneficial, harmful, or sometimes subtle (Prosser et al. 2007). Despite the positive contributions of bacteria to human life and other organisms, certain bacterial species are responsible for numerous diseases in humans, animals, and other living beings. These pathogenic bacteria can cause a wide range of illnesses, from mild fevers to life-threatening conditions (MOFEED ET AL. 2022).
Salmonella typhimurium, a rod-shaped bacterium, poses a significant risk to human health as a leading cause of foodborne illness (Pławińska-Czarnak et al. 2023). Known as salmonellosis, this illness manifests with gastrointestinal symptoms such as diarrhea, abdominal cramps, and fever (Ali et al. 2024). Unlike its relative Salmonella typhi, which causes typhoid fever and invades the bloodstream, S. typhimurium typically results in less severe disease but can cause severe infections in young children, the elderly, and immunocompromised individuals (Crump and Mintz 2010; Scallan et al. 2011). Contaminated poultry products are a primary source of infection, highlighting the importance of proper food handling and cooking practices (Shaji et al. 2023).
Escherichia coli has a dual relationship with its host (Gambushe et al. 2022). While many strains coexist harmlessly in the intestines of humans and animals, aiding digestion (Flint et al. 2012), pathogenic strains can cause systemic infections due to specific virulence factors (Pokharel et al. 2023). These pathogenic strains disrupt the digestive system by producing toxins, leading to symptoms like abdominal cramps, diarrhea, and vomiting (Amemiya et al. 2023). Food contamination remains a common transmission route, underscoring the need for stringent hygiene practices to prevent infection (Denamur et al. 2021).
Enterococcus faecalis functions as both a commensal and a pathogen, with its pathogenicity often linked to host vulnerability, excessive intestinal growth, or medical devices (Archambaud et al. 2024; Repoila et al. 2022). Although traditionally considered an extracellular pathogen, E. faecalis can adhere to and enter mammalian cells, albeit less efficiently than intracellular enteropathogens, relying on carbohydrate-mediated adhesion (Ayobami et al. 2020; Comerlato et al. 2013). It is a leading cause of enterococcal infections, including healthcare-associated infections such as urinary tract infections, bacteremia, and endocarditis (Ben Braïek and Smaoui 2019). The emergence of antibiotic-resistant strains makes E. faecalis infections particularly challenging to treat (Boccella et al. 2021).
These three bacterial species highlight the concerning increase in antibiotic resistance and underscore the critical need for proper hygiene and food handling to prevent infections. The growing concerns about antibiotic overuse have spurred interest in sustainable, environmentally friendly alternatives derived from biological sources (El Basuini et al. 2024, 2022).
Natural food colorants are generally considered significantly better than synthetic dyes, which can sometimes be toxic and may trigger various allergic reactions and intolerances upon ingestion (Chaudhary et al. 2024). Additionally, many natural biopigments offer health benefits, including anti-cancer, antimicrobial, and therapeutic properties. They also often function as antioxidants, contributing further to human health (Chaudhary et al. 2022; Kiki 2023). In East Asian countries, Monascus pigments have been used as natural food colorants and additives for centuries. Produced by various Monascus species, these pigments can improve the color and sensory attributes of food (Haque et al. 2016). Additionally, due to their perceived health benefits, Monascus pigments are also being considered for medicinal use.
Microorganisms, especially the fungus Monascus purpureus, have been extensively utilized to produce natural red biopigments in response to growing consumer demand. M. purpureus, a filamentous fungus, is highly adaptable and generates various bioactive compounds, including flavonoids, phenols, tannins, and other secondary metabolites like biopigments (Kaur et al. 2023). Research has shown that consuming fermented rice with Monascus purpureus may help manage cholesterol levels, diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, and may even aid in cancer prevention (Kalaivani et al. 2010).
While Monascus purpureus red dye is well-known for its effectiveness as a food colorant and its potential benefits in human and animal medicine, its antimicrobial mechanisms are still not well understood. Therefore, this study aims to explore the antibacterial effects of red dye and its mode of action against three specific bacterial species: S. typhimurium, E. coli, and E. faecalis.
Materials and methods
Source and extraction of red dye
The source fungal strain
The Monascus purpureus strain ATCC16436 utilized in this study was obtained from the Microbiological Resources Center (MIRCEN) in Cairo, Egypt, which is part of the Egyptian microbial culture collection (ENCC), recognized for its ability to produce red pigments.
Composition of fungal culture media and culture properties
Potato dextrose agar was employed for the activation and short-term preservation of the fungal strain. To prepare the modified minimal medium (Embaby et al. 2018; Hamdiyati et al. 2016), 4 mL was combined with 3.0 g of rice grains per 100 mL. The medium consisted of 0.5 g each of NH4SO4, NH4NO3, KNO3, and peptone, along with 0.2 g of KH2PO4, K2HPO4, 0.2 g of MgSO4, 0.001 mM of ZnSO4, and 0.002 mM of MnSO4. This modified minimal medium served as the primary medium for the biosynthesis of Monascus pigments, with the final pH adjusted to (4.5). Potato dextrose agar plates were inoculated with fungal spores and then incubated in a static incubator (JSGI-100T, Korea) at 30 °C for 7 days.
Extraction of red dye
A suspension of the fungal spores was prepared using sterile water, which was subsequently diluted and adjusted to a concentration of 2 × 104 using a hemacytometer. Monascus pigments were extracted using a slightly modified procedure based on previous reports (Babitha et al. 2007). At the end of the incubation period, 20 mL of 96% ethanol was added to the fermented cake, and the mixture was incubated for 2 h while being agitated at 180 rpm. After incubation, the mixture was filtered through Whatman paper #1.0. The resulting filtrate was then centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 10 min. The supernatant was collected and stored at 4 °C for further processing. For obtaining extract for antibacterial activity test, 1 mg of red dye was extracted using 1 ml of DMSO to obtain 1000 µg/ml solution.
Chemical profiling of the red dye
Chemical profiling of the red dye sample was conducted using a Trace GC-TSQ mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, USA) equipped with a direct capillary column TG–5MS (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 µm film thickness). The column oven temperature was initially set at 50 °C, then raised at a rate of 5 °C/min to 250 °C, where it was held for 2 min. It was further increased to a final temperature of 300 °C at a rate of 30 °C/min and held for another 2 min. The injector and MS transfer line temperatures were maintained at 270 °C and 260 °C, respectively. Helium was used as the carrier gas at a constant flow rate of 1 mL/min. The solvent delay was set to 4 min, and 1 µL of diluted samples was injected automatically using an autosampler AS1300 in split mode. EI mass spectra were recorded at an ionization voltage of 70 eV over the range of m/z 50–650 in full scan mode, with the ion source temperature set at 200 °C. Components were identified by comparing their mass spectra to those in the WILEY 09 and NIST 14 mass spectral databases.
Anti-bacterial activity
Bacterial strains
The antibacterial activity of the red dye extract was assessed against three bacterial strains: S. typhimurium ATCC 14028, E. coli ATCC8739, and Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 25923, which were obtained from the Global Bioresource Center (ATCC, USA).
Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and Bactericidal concentration (MBC)
The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) were determined using 96-well microplates following the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute method (CLSI Ver. 2016 available at: https://asm.org/getattachment/2594ce26-bd44-47f6-8287-0657aa9185ad/Kirby-Bauer-Disk-Diffusion-Susceptibility-Test-Protocol-pdf.pdf) with a slight modifications according to Humphries et al. (2018). A bacterial inoculum of 1.5 × 108 CFU/mL was added to each well. Various concentrations of the red dye extract were prepared in DMSO (200, 100, 50, 25, 12.5, 6.25, 3.125, 1.562, 0.781, and 0.390 μg/mL) and tested against the three bacterial strains in Mueller–Hinton broth (Oxoid, USA). For each assay, three wells containing bacterial suspension without the red dye served as growth controls, while three additional wells without bacterial inoculum acted as background controls. The optical density (O.D.) was measured at 620 nm using a microtiter plate reader (Thermo Scientific, USA). The MIC values were determined as the concentrations that inhibited over 95% of bacterial growth, while the MBC values were identified as those that killed more than 99% of the bacterial strains.
Comparison of antibacterial activity of red dye and conventional antibiotics
The comparison was conducted using the disc diffusion method following the protocol established by Surendra et al. (2011). Pure bacterial cultures were obtained by culturing the tested organisms in 1.5 mL of brain heart infusion broth (Oxoid, USA). After 24 h of incubation at 37 °C, the strains were streaked onto brain heart infusion agar for an additional 24 h. Several colonies from the solid culture were then inoculated into 10 mL of sterile saline solution to achieve a cell concentration of 0.5 McFarland standard (1.5 × 105 CFU/mL). A sterile cotton swab was used to evenly spread the bacterial cultures on Mueller–Hinton agar (MH, Oxoid, USA) plates.
Cellulose discs (6.3 mm diameter) were impregnated with red dye at the highest concentration used in this study (200 μg/mL) and placed on the agar surface. The test was performed in triplicate. After a 24-h incubation period at 37 °C, the plates were examined, and the inhibition zones were measured to determine the average inhibition zone.
Additionally, antibiotic discs including ciprofloxacin (CIP; 5 µg), azithromycin (AZM; 15 µg), streptomycin (S; 10 µg), ampicillin-sulbactam (A/S; 10/10 µg), and clarithromycin (CLR; 15 µg) were added to the plates. The plates were incubated again at 37 °C for 24 h, after which the inhibition zones were measured, and the results were reported as the mean inhibition zone in millimeters.
Cellular structure of the tested bacterial strains
To investigate malformations in bacterial cellular structures, the tested bacteria were inoculated in nutrient broth (NB) media (Merck Millipore, Germany) containing red dye extract at a final concentration of 200 μg/mL and incubated at 37 °C for 12 h, with control samples included. Following incubation, the bacteria were centrifuged and fixed using a formalin-glutaraldehyde fixative (4F1G) in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.4). The bacterial specimens underwent further fixation with 1% osmium tetroxide in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.4).
Subsequently, the fixed specimens were dehydrated through a series of acetone concentrations. The specimens were then coated with gold–palladium using a Polaron E500 sputter coater (Polaron Equipment Ltd., England). Finally, the bacterial specimens were examined using a scanning electron microscope (JEOL JSM 35C).
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using one-way analysis of variance (one-way ANOVA) followed by Duncan's multiple range test. All experiments were conducted in triplicate, with statistical significance set at p < 0.01. Data was analyzed using SPSS® software (Version 27) to identify significant differences among means across all analyses.
Results
Chemical profiling of red dye
The chemical analysis of the red dye extract was performed using the GC–MS method. The obtained chromatogram is clearly illustrated in Fig. 1. A total of 24 molecules were identified in the red dye extract. Among the identified molecules, several bioactive compounds were well known for their different biological activities including antimicrobial, antiviral, antiprotozoal, and anticancer activities. The chemical molecules composition of the red dye with their IUPAC name, molecular formula, retention time, % area, and mass are shown in Table 1.
Fig. 1.
GC–MS chromatogram of Monascus purpureus-derived red dye extract
Table 1.
Chemical profiling of Monascus purpureus-derived red dye extract
| No | Compound | RT | %Area | Molecular formula | Mass |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ASPIDOSPERMIDIN-17-OL,1-ACETYL-16-METHOXY- | 5.23 | 0.32 | C22H30N2O3 | 370 |
| 2 | ETHANIMIDOTHIOIC ACID, 2-(DIMETHYLAMINO)-N-[[(METHYLAMINO)CARBONYL]OXY]-2-OXO-, METHYL ESTER | 5.35 | 0.55 | C7H13N3O3S | 219 |
| 3 | Octanoic acid, 7-oxo- | 5.56 | 0.20 | C8H14O3 | 158 |
| 4 | Hexadecanoic acid, methyl ester | 27.26 | 2.76 | C17H34O2 | 270 |
| 5 | n-Hexadecanoic acid | 28.14 | 12.76 | C16H32O2 | 256 |
| 6 | 17-Octadecynoic acid, TMS derivative | 29.83 | 0.52 | C21H40O2Si | 352 |
| 7 | 9,12-Octadecadienoic acid, methylester, (E,E)- | 30.38 | 1.55 | C19H34O2 | 294 |
| 8 | 9-Octadecenoic acid (Z)-, methylester | 30.56 | 2.10 | C19H36O2 | 296 |
| 9 | 9-Octadecenoic acid (Z)-, methylester | 30.67 | 0.64 | C19H36O2 | 296 |
| 10 | Oleic Acid | 31.42 | 62.48 | C18H34O2 | 288 |
| 11 | Octadecanoic acid | 31.87 | 10.38 | C18H36O2 | 282 |
| 12 | 9-OCTADECENOIC ACID (Z)- | 32.25 | 0.72 | C18H34O2 | 282 |
| 13 | 9,12-Octadecadienoyl chloride, (Z,Z)- | 32.32 | 0.69 | C18H31ClO | 298 |
| 14 | HI-OLEIC SAFFLOWER OIL | 32.46 | 0.44 | C21H22O11 | 450 |
| 15 | 2-AMINOETHANETHIOL HYDROGEN SULFATE (ESTER) | 32.53 | 0.38 | C2H7NO3S2 | 157 |
| 16 | 13,16-Octadecadienoic acid, methylester | 32.60 | 0.40 | C19H34O2 | 294 |
| 17 | 17-Octadecynoic acid | 32.72 | 0.54 | C18H32O2 | 280 |
| 18 | Cyclopentaneundecanoic acid | 32.84 | 0.37 | C16H30O2 | 254 |
| 19 | 8,11,14-Eicosatrienoic acid, (Z,Z,Z)- | 33.03 | 0.37 | C20H34O2 | 306 |
| 20 | cis-5,8,11,14,17-Eicosapentaenoicacid | 39.65 | 0.87 | C20H30O2 | 302 |
| 21 | 9,12,15-OCTADECATRIENOIC ACID, | 40.88 | 0.22 | C27H52O4Si2 | 496 |
| 22 | TRIDEUTERIOMETHYL10-EPOXY-7-ETHYL-3,11-DIMETHYLTRIDECA-2,6-DIENOATE | 41.13 | 0.18 | C18H27D3O3 | 297 |
| 23 | 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3, TMSderivative | 41.41 | 0.30 | C30H52O3Si | 488 |
| 24 | CHOLEST-5-EN-3-YL(9Z)-9-OCTADECENOATE # | 41.51 | 0.25 | C45H78O2 | 650 |
Antibacterial activity of red dye
The red dye extract demonstrated significant antibacterial effects against all three tested strains (Table 2). It showed the strongest activity against S. typhimurium, with minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) values of 6.25 and 12.5 µgml−1, respectively. The extract also exhibited considerable antibacterial activity against E. faecalis, with MIC and MBC values of 50 and 100 µgml−1. The weakest activity was observed against E. coli, both with MIC and MBC values of 100 µgml−1.
Table 2.
The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) of Monascus purpureus-derived red dye against the three tested bacterial strains
| Bacterial Strain | MIC/MBC (µgml−1) |
|---|---|
| S. typhimurium ATCC14028 | 6.25/12.5 |
| E. coli ATCC8739 | 100/100 |
| E. faecalis ATCC25923 | 50/100 |
Antibacterial activity of red dye against antibiotics
Compared to traditionally used antibiotics, the red dye demonstrated a notable antibacterial effect against the tested strains (Fig. 2). The bacterial strains exhibited varying levels of sensitivity to the antibiotics used in this study (Fig. 3). Notably, the strains were only resistant to ampicillin-sulbactam. The findings are summarized in Table 3. The red dye extract demonstrated potent antibacterial activity against all tested strains, with inhibition zones ranging from 15 to 20 mm in diameter. The highest antimicrobial activity was observed against S. typhimurium, producing an inhibition zone of 20 ± 0.22 mm, followed by E. faecalis (18 ± 0.15 mm) and E. coli (15 ± 0.15 mm).
Fig. 2.

Antimicrobial activity of Monascus purpureus-derived red dye by disc diffusion method against: ASalmonella typhimurium (zone of inhibition: 20 mm), BEscherichia coli (zone of inhibition: 15 mm), and CEnterococcus faecalis (zone of inhibition: 18 mm)
Fig. 3.

Zone of inhibition comparison between red dye (RD) and conventional antibiotics using disc diffusion method against: ASalmonella typhimurium, BEscherichia coli, and CEnterococcus faecalis
Table 3.
The in vitro antibacterial activity of Monascus purpureus-derived red dye extract and conventional antibiotics was evaluated using the disc diffusion method. Results are presented as the mean inhibition zone in millimeters (mm) ± standard deviation (n = 3)
| Bacterial strain | RD | CIP | AZM | S | A/S | CLR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S. typhimurium ATCC14028 | 20 ± 0.22 | 15 ± 0.08 | 8 ± 0.08 | 12 ± 0.15 | R | 11 ± 0.09 |
| E. coli ATCC8739 | 15 ± 0.15 | 15 ± 0.2 | 7 ± 0.1 | 14 ± 0.11 | R* | 10 ± 0.08 |
| E. faecalis ATCC25923 | 18 ± 0.15 | 18 ± 0.07 | 9 ± 0.06 | 17 ± 0.24 | R | 17 ± 0.21 |
A/S: ampicillin-sulbactam (10/10 µg); AZM: azithromycin (15 µg); CIP: ciprofloxacin (5 µg); CLR: clarithromycin (15 µg); R: resistant (No inhibition zone detected); RD: red dye; S: streptomycin (10 µg)
Cellular structure of pathogenic strains
To thoroughly assess the bactericidal effect of the red dye on the three bacterial strains, their morphology was analyzed using scanning electron microscopy at the highest concentration of red dye (200 µgml−1) compared to the control. Control S. typhimurium cells were normally a rod-like bacillus shape with a smooth surface and a rigid, well-defined structure. After treatment with the red dye, these cells became enlarged and malformed, showing tiny holes and dents across most of the population (Fig. 4).
Fig. 4.

SEM micrographs illustrate the cytomorphology of Salmonella typhimurium: A before treatment (control) and B after treatment with Monascus purpureus-derived red dye extract
Control E. coli cells appeared as normal rods with a smooth, well-defined surface. In contrast, the treated E. coli cells were predominantly degraded, exhibiting a ragged, shrunk, and wrinkled appearance, with noticeable dents and holes on their surfaces; some cells appeared hollow with empty ends (Fig. 5).
Fig. 5.

SEM micrographs illustrate the cytomorphology of Escherichia coli: A before treatment (control) and B after treatment with Monascus purpureus-derived red dye extract
The control micrographs of E. faecalis revealed oval cells with smooth surfaces, typically arranged in pairs. However, treatment with the red dye caused malformation, resulting in shrunk and ragged cells with various tiny holes and dents on their surfaces (Fig. 6).
Fig. 6.

SEM micrographs illustrate the cytomorphology of Enterococcus faecalis: A before treatment (control) and B after treatment with Monascus purpureus-derived red dye extract
Discussion
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) refers to the ability of microorganisms to withstand the effects of various antimicrobial agents, particularly antibiotics. While AMR is a natural evolutionary process, the misuse and overuse of antibiotics has significantly exacerbated the problem (Tang et al. 2023). In 2019, AMR was directly linked to approximately 1.27 million deaths, with projections estimating over 10 million deaths annually by 2050 if current trends continue (Tang et al. 2023). In 2020, the WHO warned that without significant changes in antibiotic usage, AMR could evolve into a global health crisis comparable to a pandemic (Nieuwlaat et al. 2021).
Recently, researchers have increasingly focused on natural products as potential alternatives to traditional antibiotics (El Basuini et al. 2022). This study examines the red dye from Monascus purpureus as a potential antimicrobial agent, particularly against three bacterial pathogens. Biochemical analysis of the red dye identified a highly bioactive component. GC–MS profiling revealed various bioactive molecules, including aspidospermidin-17-ol, 1-acetyl-16-methoxy, octanoic acid, hexadecanoic acid methyl ester, and cyclopentaneundecanoic acid. These compounds are associated with broad-spectrum antimicrobial properties, as well as antiviral, anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory, and anticancer activities; and some are used in commercially available therapeutics (Chaudhary et al. 2024; Wang et al. 2021).
The GC–MS analysis also indicated a high content of free fatty acids (FFAs), particularly oleic acid, which constituted approximately 62% of the chemical composition of the red dye extract. Free fatty acids are well-known for their antimicrobial, especially antibacterial, properties. Many organisms utilize the antibacterial effects of FFAs to protect themselves against parasitic or pathogenic bacteria (Desbois and Smith 2010).
In this study, the results from the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) tests demonstrated strong antibacterial activity of the red dye against all three tested strains, with the dye particularly showing the most effectiveness against S. typhimurium. There is limited published data on the antibacterial activity of Monascus red dye against the specific bacterial species examined in this study. But similar antibacterial activity findings have been reported in previous studies, especially regarding Bacillus subtilis ATCC 6633 and Escherichia coli MG1655 (Husakova et al. 2024). Additionally, Chaudhary et al. (2022) demonstrated antibacterial activity of the Monascus red dye against Bacillus cereus, Escherichia coli at concentration of 200 µg ml.−1
The extracted red pigment exhibited substantial antimicrobial efficacy across all examined bacterial isolates, demonstrating inhibition zones with diameters ranging between 15 and 20 mm. Maximum growth inhibition was evidenced against Salmonella typhimurium, yielding a zone of inhibition measuring 20 ± 0.22 mm in diameter, followed by Enterococcus faecalis and Escherichia coli, displaying inhibition zones of 18 ± 0.15 mm and 15 ± 0.15 mm in diameter, respectively. When compared with five conventional antibiotics, the bacterial strains exhibited sensitivity to four antimicrobial agents but demonstrated complete resistance to ampicillin-sulbactam. Among the tested antibiotics, ciprofloxacin demonstrated the highest efficacy, while azithromycin showed minimal inhibitory effects. These findings align with previous investigations (Čujová et al. 2014; Tanuwidjaja et al. 2021), suggesting that the red dye extract could serve as a promising alternative antimicrobial agent, given its superior inhibitory effects compared to several conventional antibiotics.
To further investigate the impact of the red dye on bacterial cell structure, microscopic examinations were conducted. Electron micrographs of the tested strains compared to control cells revealed notable malformations in cytomorphology. The treated strains exhibited ragged, shrunken, and wrinkled appearances, in contrast to the well-defined, smooth surfaces of the control cells.
The SEM results provide valuable insights into the mechanism by which the red dye affects bacterial cells, indicating that it may increases membrane permeability and leads to ATP loss. This aligns with findings from the GC–MS profiling, which suggests that free fatty acids (FFAs) in the red dye disrupt cellular energy production (Alamsjah et al. 2009). The antibacterial action of FFAs may result also stem from several factors, including inhibition of enzyme activity, impairment of nutrient uptake, production of peroxidation and auto-oxidation degradation products, or direct lysis of bacterial cells (Desbois and Smith 2010; Drake et al. 2008).
In the context of escalating antimicrobial resistance (AMR), this study unveils the promising potential of Monascus purpureus-derived red dye as a versatile antimicrobial agent with broad applicational prospects. The extract's significant antibacterial efficacy against Salmonella typhimurium, Enterococcus faecalis, and Escherichia coli, coupled with superior inhibition compared to conventional antibiotics, suggests transformative implications across multiple domains. Beyond clinical applications, this natural compound holds substantial potential in agricultural settings for crop protection, livestock health management, and food preservation. The diverse bioactive metabolites identified through GC–MS analysis indicate broader applications in sustainable agriculture, potentially offering an eco-friendly alternative to synthetic antimicrobial interventions. Future research should explore its utility in developing natural biopesticides, enhancing livestock disease management strategies, and creating innovative food safety technologies, positioning this Monascus purpureus-derived red dye as a promising multifunctional solution in addressing contemporary challenges of microbial control across interdisciplinary fields.
Acknowledgements
The corresponding authors would like to thank King Salman International University, Egypt and Tanta University, Egypt for supporting this research.
Abbreviations
- A/S
Ampicillin-sulbactam
- AMR
Antimicrobial resistance
- ATCC
American type culture collection
- ATP
Adenosine triphosphate
- AZM
Azithromycin
- CIP
Ciprofloxacin
- CLR
Clarithromycin
- E. coli
Escherichia coli
- E. faecalis
Enterococcus faecalis
- ENCC
Egyptian microbial culture collection
- FFAs
Free fatty acids
- GC-MS
Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry
- MBC
Minimum bactericidal concentration
- MDR
Multidrug-resistant
- MIC
Minimum inhibitory concentration
- MIRCEN
Microbiological resources center
- NB
Nutrient broth
- PDR
Pan drug-resistant
- S
Streptomycin
- S. typhimurium
Salmonella typhimurium
- SEM
Scanning electron microscopy
- SPSS
Statistical package for the social sciences
- WHO
World Health Organization
- XDR
Extensively drug-resistant
Author contributions
I.I.T. and E.H.E.-B. conceived and designed the research. I.I.T., I.M., and E.H.E.-B. conducted experiments. I.I.T., M.I.Y., A.H., and E.H.E.-B. contributed new reagents or analytical tools. I.I.T., I.M., M.I.Y., A.H., and E.H.E.-B. analyzed the data. I.I.T. and E.H.E.-B. wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript.
Funding
Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB).
Data availability
The authors confirm the data that support the findings of this paper are available from the authors upon request.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
All authors approved the final manuscript and the submission to this journal.
Competing interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Islam I. Teiba, Email: islam.tayba@agr.tanta.edu.eg
Emad H. El-Bilawy, Email: emad.elbilawy@ksiu.edu.eg
References
- Abdelaziz Abdelmoneim S, Mohamed Ghazy R, Anwar Sultan E, Hassaan MA, Anwar Mahgoub M (2024) Antimicrobial resistance burden pre and post-COVID-19 pandemic with mapping the multidrug resistance in Egypt: a comparative cross-sectional study. Sci Rep 14:7176. 10.1038/s41598-024-56254-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Alamsjah MA, Hirao S, Ishibashi F, Oda T, Fujita Y (2009) Algicidal activity of polyunsaturated fatty acids derived from Ulva fasciata and U. pertusa (Ulvaceae, Chlorophyta) on phytoplankton. In: Borowitzka MA, Critchley AT, Kraan S, Peters A, Sjøtun K, Notoya M (eds) Nineteenth International Seaweed Symposium: Proceedings of the 19th International Seaweed Symposium, held in Kobe, J. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp 263–270. 10.1007/978-1-4020-9619-8_33
- Ali MS, Na S-H, Moon B-Y, Kang HY, Kang H-S, Kim S-J, Kim T-S, Heo Y-E, Hwang Y-J, Yoon SS, Lim S-K (2024) Antimicrobial resistance profiles and molecular characteristics of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium isolates from food animals during 2010–2021 in South Korea. Foodborne Pathog Dis 21:634–642. 10.1089/fpd.2023.0128 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Amemiya K, Rozak DA, Dankmeyer JL, Dorman WR, Marchand C, Fetterer DP, Worsham PL, Purcell BK (2023) Shiga-toxin-producing strains of Escherichia coli O104:H4 and a strain of O157:H7, which can cause human hemolytic uremic syndrome, differ in biofilm formation in the presence of CO(2) and in their ability to grow in a novel cell culture medium. Microorganisms 11. 10.3390/microorganisms11071744 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Archambaud C, Nunez N, da Silva RAG, Kline KA, Serror P (2024) Enterococcus faecalis: an overlooked cell invader. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 88:e0006924. 10.1128/mmbr.00069-24 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Aslam B, Wang W, Arshad MI, Khurshid M, Muzammil S, Rasool MH, Nisar MA, Alvi RF, Aslam MA, Qamar MU, Salamat MKF, Baloch Z (2018) Antibiotic resistance: a rundown of a global crisis. Infect Drug Resist 11:1645–1658. 10.2147/IDR.S173867 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ayobami O, Willrich N, Reuss A, Eckmanns T, Markwart R (2020) The ongoing challenge of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis in Europe: an epidemiological analysis of bloodstream infections. Emerg Microbes Infect 9:1180–1193. 10.1080/22221751.2020.1769500 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Babitha S, Soccol CR, Pandey A (2007) Solid-state fermentation for the production of Monascus pigments from jackfruit seed. Bioresour Technol 98:1554–1560. 10.1016/j.biortech.2006.06.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ben Braïek O, Smaoui S (2019) Enterococci: between emerging pathogens and potential probiotics. Biomed Res Int 2019:5938210. 10.1155/2019/5938210 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boccella M, Santella B, Pagliano P, De Filippis A, Casolaro V, Galdiero M, Borrelli A, Capunzo M, Boccia G, Franci G (2021) Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Enterococcus Species: a retrospective cohort study in Italy. Antibiotics. 10.3390/antibiotics10121552 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chaudhary V, Katyal P, Kaur J, Bhatia S, Singh S, Poonia AK, Puniya AK, Raposo A, Yoo S, Han H, Alturki HA, Kumar A (2024) Bioactive activity and safety analysis of Monascus red biopigment. Food Biosci 57:103523. 10.1016/j.fbio.2023.103523 [Google Scholar]
- Chaudhary V, Katyal P, Panwar H, Kaur J, Aluko RE, Puniya AK, Poonia AK (2022) Antioxidative, anti-inflammatory, and anticancer properties of the red biopigment extract from Monascus purpureus (MTCC 369). J Food Biochem 46:e14249. 10.1111/jfbc.14249 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Collignon P, Beggs JJ, Walsh TR, Gandra S, Laxminarayan R (2018) Anthropological and socioeconomic factors contributing to global antimicrobial resistance: a univariate and multivariable analysis. Lancet Planet Heal 2:e398–e405. 10.1016/S2542-5196(18)30186-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Comerlato CB, de Resende MCC, Caierão J, d’Azevedo PA (2013) Presence of virulence factors in Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium susceptible and resistant to vancomycin. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 108:590–595. 10.1590/s0074-02762013000500009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Crump JA, Mintz ED (2010) Global trends in typhoid and paratyphoid Fever. Clin Infect Dis 50:241–246. 10.1086/649541 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Čujová S, Bednárová L, Slaninová J, Straka J, Čeřovský V (2014) Interaction of a novel antimicrobial peptide isolated from the venom of solitary bee Colletes daviesanus with phospholipid vesicles and Escherichia coli cells. J Pept Sci 20:885–895. 10.1002/psc.2681 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Denamur E, Clermont O, Bonacorsi S, Gordon D (2021) The population genetics of pathogenic Escherichia coli. Nat Rev Microbiol 19:37–54. 10.1038/s41579-020-0416-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Desbois AP, Smith VJ (2010) Antibacterial free fatty acids: activities, mechanisms of action and biotechnological potential. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 85:1629–1642. 10.1007/s00253-009-2355-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Drake DR, Brogden KA, Dawson DV, Wertz PW (2008) Thematic review series: skin lipids. Antimicrobial lipids at the skin surface. J Lipid Res 49:4–11. 10.1194/jlr.R700016-JLR200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- El Basuini MF, El-Bilawy EH, Kari ZA, Raza SHA, Tapingkae W, Van Doan H, Dawood MAO (2022) Pharmacotherapeutic potential of astaxanthin: Human and animal targeting roles– A review. Ann Anim Sci 22:829–838. 10.2478/aoas-2022-0017 [Google Scholar]
- El Basuini MF, Zalat RYI, El-Hais AM, Soliman AA, Amer AA, Gewaily M, Gabr SA, Zaineldin AI, Dossou S, Teiba II, El-Ratel IT, El-Bilawy EH, Mamdouh I, Shehata AI (2024) Bee venom enhances performance and immune function in thinlip mullet: A promising approach for sustainable aquaculture. Fish Shellfish Immunol 151:109713. 10.1016/j.fsi.2024.109713 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Embaby AM, Hussein MN, Hussein A (2018) Monascus orange and red pigments production by Monascus purpureus ATCC16436 through co-solid state fermentation of corn cob and glycerol: An eco-friendly environmental low cost approach. PLoS ONE 13:e0207755. 10.1371/journal.pone.0207755 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Flint HJ, Scott KP, Louis P, Duncan SH (2012) The role of the gut microbiota in nutrition and health. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 9:577–589. 10.1038/nrgastro.2012.156 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gambushe SM, Zishiri OT, El Zowalaty ME (2022) Review of Escherichia coli O157:H7 prevalence, pathogenicity, heavy metal and antimicrobial resistance, African perspective. Infect Drug Resist 15:4645–4673. 10.2147/IDR.S365269 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Graham DW, Bergeron G, Bourassa MW, Dickson J, Gomes F, Howe A, Kahn LH, Morley PS, Scott HM, Simjee S, Singer RS, Smith TC, Storrs C, Wittum TE (2019) Complexities in understanding antimicrobial resistance across domesticated animal, human, and environmental systems. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1441:17–30. 10.1111/nyas.14036 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hamdiyati Y, Kusnadi K, Yuliani LA (2016) Effect of Monascus purpureus inoculum concentration on pigment production in jackfruit seed flour substrate. In: AIP Conference Proceedings. AIP Publishing
- Haque MA, Kachrimanidou V, Koutinas A, Lin CSK (2016) Valorization of bakery waste for biocolorant and enzyme production by Monascus purpureus. J Biotechnol 231:55–64. 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2016.05.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Humphries RM, Ambler J, Mitchell SL, Castanheira M, Dingle T, Hindler JA, Koeth L, Sei K (2018) CLSI methods development and standardization working group best practices for evaluation of antimicrobial susceptibility tests. J Clin Microbiol 56. 10.1128/JCM.01934-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Husakova M, Orlandi VT, Bolognese F, Branska B, Patakova P (2024) screening antibacterial photodynamic effect of Monascus red yeast rice (Hong-Qu) and mycelium extracts. Curr Microbiol 81:183. 10.1007/s00284-024-03725-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kalaivani M, Sabitha R, Kalaiselvan V, Rajasekaran A (2010) Health benefits and clinical impact of major nutrient, red yeast rice: a review. Food Bioprocess Technol 3:333–339. 10.1007/s11947-009-0197-8 [Google Scholar]
- Kaur M, Goel M, Mishra RC, Lahane V, Yadav AK, Barrow CJ (2023) Characterization of the red biochromes produced by the endophytic fungus Monascus purpureus CPEF02 with antimicrobial and antioxidant activities. Fermentation. 10.3390/fermentation9040328 [Google Scholar]
- Kiki MJ (2023) Biopigments of microbial origin and their application in the cosmetic industry. Cosmetics 10:47. 10.3390/cosmetics10020047 [Google Scholar]
- Maarouf L, Amin M, Evans BA, Abouelfetouh A (2023) Knowledge, attitudes and behaviour of Egyptians towards antibiotic use in the community: can we do better? Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 12:50. 10.1186/s13756-023-01249-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mofeed J, Deyab M, Mohamed A, Moustafa M, Negm S, El-Bilawy E (2022) Antimicrobial activities of three seaweeds extract against some human viral and bacterial pathogens. Biocell 46:247–261. 10.32604/biocell.2022.015966
- Nieuwlaat R, Mbuagbaw L, Mertz D, Burrows LL, Bowdish DME, Moja L, Wright GD, Schünemann HJ (2021) Coronavirus disease 2019 and antimicrobial resistance: parallel and interacting health emergencies. Clin Infect Dis 72:1657–1659. 10.1093/cid/ciaa773 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pławińska-Czarnak J, Wódz K, Guzowska M, Rosiak E, Nowak T, Strzałkowska Z, Kwieciński A, Kwieciński P, Anusz K (2023) Comparison of phenotype and genotype virulence and antimicrobial factors of Salmonella Typhimurium isolated from human milk. Int J Mol Sci 24. 10.3390/ijms24065135 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Pokharel P, Dhakal S, Dozois CM (2023) The diversity of Escherichia coli pathotypes and vaccination strategies against this versatile bacterial pathogen. Microorganisms 11. 10.3390/microorganisms11020344 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Prosser JI, Bohannan BJM, Curtis TP, Ellis RJ, Firestone MK, Freckleton RP, Green JL, Green LE, Killham K, Lennon JJ, Osborn AM, Solan M, van der Gast CJ, Young JPW (2007) The role of ecological theory in microbial ecology. Nat Rev Microbiol 5:384–392. 10.1038/nrmicro1643 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Repoila F, Le Bohec F, Guérin C, Lacoux C, Tiwari S, Jaiswal AK, Santana MP, Kennedy SP, Quinquis B, Rainteau D, Juillard V, Furlan S, Bouloc P, Nicolas P, Miyoshi A, Azevedo V, Serror P (2022) Adaptation of the gut pathobiont Enterococcus faecalis to deoxycholate and taurocholate bile acids. Sci Rep 12:8485. 10.1038/s41598-022-12552-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Scallan E, Hoekstra RM, Angulo FJ, Tauxe RV, Widdowson M-A, Roy SL, Jones JL, Griffin PM (2011) Foodborne illness acquired in the United States–major pathogens. Emerg Infect Dis 17:7–15. 10.3201/eid1701.p11101 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shaji S, Selvaraj RK, Shanmugasundaram R (2023) Salmonella infection in poultry: a review on the control strategies. Microorganisms 11. 10.3390/microorganisms11112814 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Surendra NS, Jayaram GN, Reddy MS (2011) Antimicrobial activity of crude venom extracts in honeybees (Apis cerana, Apis dorsata, Apis florea) tested against selected pathogens. African J Microbiol Res 5:2765–2772. 10.5897/AJMR11.593 [Google Scholar]
- Tang KWK, Millar BC, Moore JE (2023) Antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Br J Biomed Sci 80:11387. 10.3389/bjbs.2023.11387 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tanuwidjaja I, Svečnjak L, Gugić D, Levanić M, Jurić S, Vinceković M, Mrkonjić Fuka M (2021) Chemical Profiling and Antimicrobial Properties of Honey Bee (Apis mellifera L.) Venom. Molecules 26. 10.3390/molecules26103049 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Teiba II, El-Bilawy EH, Abouelsaad IA, Shehata AI, Alhoshy M, Habib YJ, Abu-Elala NM, EL-Khateeb N, Belal EB, Hussain WAM, (2024a) The role of marine bacteria in modulating the environmental impact of heavy metals, microplastics, and pesticides: a comprehensive review. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 10.1007/s11356-024-35520-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Teiba II, El-Bilawy EH, Elsheery NI, Rastogi A (2024b) Microbial allies in agriculture: harnessing plant growth-promoting microorganisms as guardians against biotic and abiotic stresses. Horticulturae 10:12. 10.3390/horticulturae10010012 [Google Scholar]
- Wang P, Chen S, Wei C, Yan Q, Sun Y-Z, Yi G, Li D, Fu W (2021) Monascus purpureus M-32 improves growth performance, immune response, intestinal morphology, microbiota and disease resistance in Litopenaeus vannamei. Aquaculture 530:735947. 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2020.735947 [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The authors confirm the data that support the findings of this paper are available from the authors upon request.

