Abstract
Objective:
Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive from of breast cancer and is associated with poor prognosis. Tumor microenvironment of breast cancer consists of a wide range of cell types, including tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). Accumulating evidence indicate that TILs play a crucial role in cancer progression and resistance to standard chemotherapy.
Method:
We used online computational tools to evaluate the prognostic significance of CD247 and CD4 in TNBC.
Results:
TNBC patients with lower expression of CD247 and CD4 have much shorter relapse- free survival and overall survival than the patients with higher expression of these genes. CD247 and CD4 expression show a strong positive correlation with tumor-infiltrating dendritic cells, B-cells, CD4+, CD8+, and neutrophils.
Conclusion:
We’ve concluded that low levels of CD247 and CD4 may stop immune cells from entering the area around the tumor, which stops cancer cells from being killed and gives the patient a bad outlook. These findings suggest that CD247 and CD4 may be useful biomarkers or as a target to understand the progression of TNBC. Our findings also suggest that CD247 and CD4 targeted therapeutics should be explored in detail, and could be a potentially used as atreatment strategy for TNBC.
Key Words: Breast Cancer, Triple-negative breast cancer, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, tumor microenvironment
Introduction
Breast cancer is the foremost cause of cancer-related deaths in women worldwide [1]. In 2020, 2.3 million women were diagnosed, and 685,000 died due to breast cancer [2]. In the United States alone, 271,270 new cases of breast cancer were reported in 2019, with 42,260 fatalities [3]. It is predicted that by the year 2030 the global annual incidence of breast cancer will rise to 3.2 million [4]. Based on the expression of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), and Ki-67, breast carcinoma is characterized into four distinct molecular subtypes [5]. Luminal A subtype, having ER+, PR+, HER2-, and low expression of Ki-67, comprises 40% of breast cancers [6]. Luminal B subtype, ER+, PR+, HER2+/-, and high expression of Ki-67, whereas, HER2 positive (HER2+) subtype, is hormone receptor negative (ER and/or PR negative) and HER2+. Lastly, triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC) subtype is negative for ER, PR and HER2 [7]. The receptor status and subtypes also have implication on tumor aggression and response therapy.
About 10-15% of breast cancer are TNBC, and have poor prognosis and high recurrence rates [8]. TNBCs tumors are heterogeneous, biologically more aggressive and are generally larger in size [9]. TNBC patients are usually younger than the patients with other subtypes types of breast cancer. In patients with TNBC the expression of Ki-67 is significantly high and associated with lymph node metastasis [10]. Due to their aggressive characteristics and lack of targeted therapies, TNBCs still remains a major clinical challenge [11]. Chemotherapy is used to treat primary and metastatic diseases, and targeted therapies, including immunotherapy, are emerging treatment modalities for TNBCs [12]. TNBCs are a broad group of malignancies that are further classified into six different subtypes based on their molecular heterogeneity and the gene expression profile, basal-like subtypes (BL 1 and BL2), immunomodulatory (IM), mesenchymal, mesenchymal stem-like and luminal androgen receptor subtype. Previous studies have shown that the basal-like subtype of TNBC have downregulation of T-cells, B-cells and natural killer cells which is associated with worse prognosis of the patients [13].
CD247, also known as T-cell antigen receptor (TCR)-Z, or CD3 Zeta-chain, is a 16-kDa molecule that is a key component of the TCR complex. CD3 zeta chain plays an essential role in the activation of the antigenic peptides that are presented by the human leukocyte antigen on antigen-presenting cells [14]. The downregulation of CD247 often correlates with reduced expression of other T-cell-associated signal-transducing molecules like ZAP-70 and p56lck [15], decreased calcium flux [16] and T-cell clearance. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) have been linked to better outcomes for women with breast cancer [17]. Several Investigations demonstrated that innate immune cells (neutrophils, macrophages, dendritic cells, innate lymphocytes, NK cells, and myeloid inhibitory cells) and adaptive immune cells (T cells and B cells) contribute to tumor progression when present in the tumor microenvironment. Higher CD4+ T cell infiltration in tumors is associated with better overall survival and reduced recurrence rates in early-stage breast cancer [18]. Thus, the tumor microenvironment is a barrier to effector immune cells and reduces the effectiveness of NK cells and adaptive T cells [19]. The decreased expression of CD247 is associated with changed T-cell responsiveness and proliferation capacity [20]. Reduced levels of CD247 in TILs and peripheral blood cells are correlated with a number of cancers, including gastric carcinoma, head and neck cancer, and bladder cancer [21].
The Insilco analysis of publicly available data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) is an unbiased approach that can predict outcome when applied to appropriately selected cohorts and adapt to analyze the involvement of genes in cancer progression. We combined multi-perspective databases to analyze the prognostic role of CD247 and CD4 genes and their association with TILs with special emphasis on the TNBC subtype.
Materials and Methods
Kaplan–Meier Survival Analysis
The KM Plotter accessible at http://kmplot.com/analysis/, is an online database containing microarray gene expression data and survival data generated from the Gene Expression Omnibus and the TCGA [22]. This approach has been widely used to assess the impact of gene on the rate of survival across more than 20 distinct cancer types [23]. We used this database to investigate the relationship between gene-specific mRNA expression with relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) of breast cancer, and intrinsic subtypes of breast cancer. We also assessed RFS in Pietenpol subtypes of TNBC with respect to the clinical stage. The investigation was restricted on the breast cancer subtypes of 2277 luminal A patients, 1451 luminal B patients, 846 basal type patients, and 315 Her-2 patients [24].
Gene Expression Analysis using UALCAN Database
UALCAN is used to analyze gene expression and to evaluate promoter DNA methylation from the TCGA data of various types of cancer [25]. It was used to analyze gene expression of CD4 and CD247 in breast tumors and normal tissues. Using TCGA transcriptome and clinical patient data, UALCAN enables researchers to study the expression level of genes, not only to compare primary tumor with normal tissue samples, but also to compare across different tumor subgroups as defined by pathological cancer stage, tumor grade, and other clinic-pathologic features [25].
c-Bioportal for Cancer Genomics
The c-BioPortal is a repository of multidimensional cancer genomics data sets, with data from over 5,000 tumor samples from 20 different types of cancer [26]. Mutation analysis of genes of tumor-infiltrating immune markers such as CD247, CD8, CD3D, PDCD1, CD3E, MS4A2, and CD3E was performed by applying this tool to the publicly available whole exome sequencing data of breast cancer patients. The Oncoprints were obtained from cBioportal upon querying the database specifically for the copy number alterations of selected genes in the samples from the analyzed tumor types.
Analysis of Tumor Immunological Features of TIL Using TIMER
The TIMER is an online computational tool for the evaluation of tumor immune cells in the publicly available TCGA database [27]. TIMER database consists of 10879 samples of 32 cancer types from the TCGA database to evaluate immune infiltrate abundance. TIMER2.0 also provides an ‘estimation component’ to infer immune infiltrates on user-provided expression profiles using multiple algorithms association between immune infiltrates and gene expression. These estimated tumor immune infiltrate populations have been associated with genomic and transcriptomic changes in the tumors, providing insight into tumor-immune interactions [28]. The association between the expression of CD247 and CD4 genes with TILs in breast cancer with tumor-infiltrating immune cells (B cells, CD4+ T cells, CD8+ cells, macrophages, neutrophils and dendritic cells), were selected for correlation by TIMER. Tumor purity was taken into consideration when calculating the Spearman’s correlation. P-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant [29].
Results
CD247 and CD4 lower expression leads to poor survival in Breast cancer patients
Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes play a crucial role in tumor growth and progression of a variety of cancers [30]. To determine the prognostic value of CD247 and CD4 in BC, Kaplan-Meier survival curves were plotted (Figure 1). The mRNA expression of CD247 was significantly correlated with OS and RFS of breast cancer patients in GEO, EGA and TCGA databases (Figure 1, A and B). According to the survival analyses, the upper quartile survival of breast cancer patients with lower expression of CD247 in RFS was 41.04 months as compared to 61 months with higher expression cohort. We also compared the upper quartile survival in OS of BC. Survival analysis showed that the low expression cohort, the upper quartile survival was 74.07 as compared to 138 months in the high expression cohort (Table 1).
Figure 1.
Prognostic Value of CD247 and CD4 T-cell markers in Breast Cancer. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were plotted from the publicly available KM plotter database. RFS (A) and OS (B) analysis of CD247 in breast cancer. RFS (C) and OS (D) of CD4 expression in breast cancer.
Table 1.
Correlation between mRNA Expression of CD247 and CD4 with Relapse Free Survival and Overall Survival in Breast Cancer.
| Genes | Survival | P-value | HR | CI | Low expression cohort (months) | High expression Cohort (months) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CD247
210031_at |
RFS | 7.70E-07 | 0.77 | 0.7-0.86 | 41.04 | 61 |
| OS | 0.00059 | 0.72 | 0.59-0.87 | 74.07 | 138 | |
|
CD4
203547_at |
RFS | 3.10E-09 | 0.74 | 0.67-0.82 | 40.34 | 62.7 |
| OS | 0.00025 | 0.7 | 0.58-0.85 | 69.99 | 135.88 |
The prognostic value of CD4 was significantly correlated to OS and RFS (Figure 1, C and D). Analysis showed that the upper quartile survival of breast cancer patients with lower expression of CD4 in RFS is 40.34 months as compared to 62.7 months with high expression. In OS the upper quartile survival in low expression cohort was 69.99 months as compared to 135.88 months with high expression cohort.
The Prognostic value of CD247 and CD4 is associated with luminal B and Basal subtype of BC
Next, we determined the prognostic value of CD247 in different intrinsic subtype, pathological grade and lymph node status of breast cancer (Figure 2). CD247 showed a high predictive value in basal and luminal B subtypes of BC (Figure 2, B and D). In the basal subtype of BC, the upper quartile RFS in low expression of CD247 was 16.6 months as compared to 38 months in high expression cohort. In luminal B the upper quartile survival was 146.5 months in the low expression cohort and 228.85 months in high expression cohort (Table 2).
Figure 2.
Low Expression of CD247 is Significantly associated with Relapse Free Survival (RFS) of Patients with Luminal B and Basal Like Breast Cancer. (A-D), Kaplan-Meier survival curves (RFS) plotted for intrinsic subtypes of BC.
Table 2.
Correlation between mRNA Expression of CD247 and CD4 with Relapse Free Survival in Different Intrinsic Subtypes of Breast Cancer
| Gene | Intrinsic Subtype | No. of patients |
Hazard Ratio | P value | RFS (in Months) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low expression Cohort | High expression Cohort | |||||
| Luminal A | 4929 | 0.89 | 0.15 | 216.66 | 228.85 | |
| CD247 | Luminal B | 1491 | 0.68 | 2.40E-05 | 146.5 | 171.43 |
| HER2+ | 315 | 0.55 | 0.0011 | 17 | 25.76 | |
| Basal | 846 | 0.61 | 1.30E-05 | 16.6 | 38 | |
| Luminal A | 2277 | 0.087 | 0.082 | 73 | 90 | |
| CD4 | Luminal B | 1491 | 0.72 | 0.0002 | 146.5 | 171.43 |
| HER2+ | 315 | 0.56 | 0.0014 | 16.3 | 37 | |
| Basal | 846 | 0.051 | 6.70E-09 | 15.28 | 44.22 | |
Further, interestingly, CD4 also showed the high prognostic values in luminal B and basal subtypes of BC. The upper quartile survival of luminal B subtype with lower expression of CD4 in RFS is 146.5 months as compared to 171.43 months within high expression cohort (Figure 3). In case of basal subtype, the upper quartile survival in the low expression cohort was 15.28 months as compared to 44.22 months with high expression cohort. There was a three-fold difference in the RFS period between the CD4 low expression cohort vs. the high expression cohort in the basal subtype of breast cancer (Table 2).
Figure 3.
Low Expression of CD4 is Significantly associated with Relapse Free Survival (RFS) of Patients with Luminal B, Basal like and HER2+ subtype Breast Cancer. (A-D), Kaplan-Meier survival curves (RFS) plotted for intrinsic subtypes of BC.
After obtaining the prominent prognostic values of CD247 and CD4 in basal subtypes of breast cancer, we further determined the prognostic values of CD247 among Pietenpol subtypes of TNBC. Pietenpol subtypes is the molecular classification of TNBC subtypes into six categories i.e BL 1 and BL2, immunomodulatory (IM), mesenchymal, mesenchymal stem-like and luminal androgen receptor subtype [9]. Despite having low sample size, luminal androgen receptor showed a significant association of CD247 expression with RFS (Figure 4 F). In CD4, basal like-1, Mesenchymal and luminal androgen receptor subtype showed a significant association with RFS (Figure 5A, D and F). Among the Peitenpol subtype of TNBC, there was a five-fold differencein the survival period (RFS) between the CD4 low expression cohorts vs. high expression cohort in the basal-like 1 subtype of TNBC (Table 3).
Figure 4.
Prognostic Role of mRNA Expression of CD247, A (n=251), B (n=101), C (n=300), D (211), E(n=81), and F (n=253) with Relapse Free Survival (RFS) in Pietenpol Subtypes of Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC).
Figure 5.
Prognostic Role of mRNA Expression of CD4, A (n=251), B (n=101), C (n=300), D (211), E (n=81), and F (n=253) with Relapse Free Survival (RFS) in Pietenpol Subtypes of Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC).
Table 3.
Correlation between mRNA Expression of CD247 and CD4 with Relapse Free Survival (RFS) in Pietenpol Subtypes of Triple Negative Breast Cancer.
| Gene | TNBC Subtype |
No. of patients | Hazard Ratio | P value | RFS (in Months) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low expression Cohort | High expression Cohort | |||||
| Basal-like(BL1) | 251 | 0.73 | 0.15 | 18.35 | 29 | |
| CD247 | Basal Like (BL2) | 101 | 1.29 | 0.4 | 18 | 19 |
| Immunomodulatory | 300 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 67.09 | 84.23 | |
| Mesenchymal | 211 | 0.71 | 0.09 | 14.64 | 17.45 | |
| Mesenchymal stem-like (MSL) | 81 | 0.86 | 0.68 | 18 | 34.8 | |
| Luminal androgen receptor | 253 | 0.61 | 0.01 | 14.7 | 26.15 | |
| Basal-like (BL1) | 251 | 0.42 | 9.90E-05 | 14.85 | 77.28 | |
| CD4 | Basal Like (BL2) | 101 | 0.83 | 0.54 | 18.18 | 19 |
| Immunomodulatory (IM) | 300 | 0.56 | 0.01 | 35 | 114.96 | |
| Mesenchymal (M) | 211 | 0.54 | 0.0026 | 12.56 | 25 | |
| Mesenchymal stem-like (MSL) | 81 | 1.16 | 0.68 | 25 | 24 | |
| Luminal androgen receptor (LAR) | 253 | 0.56 | 0.0033 | 16 | 27 | |
Expression of CD4 and CD247 in primary breast cancer is decreased
Once we found that CD247 and CD4 expression are associated with the survival outcome of breast cancer patients, we wanted to further characterize the expression of these genes in primary tumor and normal tissue. To investigate the expression of CD247 and CD4 in breast cancer, we performed a group analysis of clinical pathological features of BC in OncoDB database. Analysis showed that the mRNA levels of CD247 and CD4 were significantly higher in normal tissue than in tumor tissue (Figure 6A and B). Further, the gene expression was analyzed by UALCAN database. Interestingly; UALCAN data also suggested that the expression levels of CD247 and CD4 were higher in normal tissue as compared to the tumor tissue (Figure 6C and D). Thus, OncoDB data is consistent with data derived fromUALCAN database with respect to CD4 and CD247 data base.
Figure 6.
mRNA Expression of CD4 and CD247 was Analyzed in Normal Tissue and Primary Tumor from Breast Cancer Patients. (A and B), normal tissue (N=114) and primary breast tumor (N=1135) patients were analyzed by publically available oncoDB database. C and D, normal tissue (N=114) and primary breast tumor (N=1097) patients were analyzed from publicaly available UALCAN database. (P<0.05)
Somatic mutations in CD247 and CD4 genes were uncommon
The c-BioPortal was used to analyze the somatic mutations in the gene CD247 and CD4 in patients with breast cancer. To explore the contribution of genetic alterations, mutation analysis of tumor-infiltrating immune markers such as CD247, CD8, CD3D, PDCD1, CD3E, MS4A2, and CD3E was performed by applying the cBioPortal (www.cbioportal.com) tool to the publicly available whole exome sequencing data of breast cancer patients. Among these genes, CD247 and CD4 genes were highly mutated in 21% and 2.6%, respectively (Figure 7) respectively, whereas other genes were mutated in less than 1.0%, in patients with breast cancer, where most of these alterations were due to the gene amplification.
Figure. 7.
Genetic Alteration in CD247 and CD4 Genes were Analyzed in BC Patients (N= 2051) by c-Bioportal Database. Data is shown in the Oncoprint format.
Expression of CD247 and CD4 correlates with TILs BC
The role of CD247 and CD4 in the regulation of infiltration of the immune cells into tumor stroma in breast cancer has not yet explored. CD247 is highly expressed in T-cells and NK cells, thus to clarify the TNBC microenvironment and how CD247 and CD4 might affect the tumor heterogeneity and prognosis, we investigated the association of CD247 and CD4 expression with immune infiltration level in breast cancer. TIMER 2.0 databases was used to estimate the immune infiltration in breast cancer. In basal subtype of BC, expression of CD247 was positively associated with infiltration B cell (r = 0.691, p = 6.88e-19), CD8+ T cell (r = 0.51, p = 1.67e-09), CD4+ T cell (r = 0.25, p = 8.4e-10), neutrophil (r = 0.533, p = 2.00-e09), and dendritic cell (r = 0.63, p = 5.87e-14) (Figure 8A). In addition we evaluated CD4 expression with immune infiltrating cell markers. The results indicated that CD4 expression was correlated with B cell (r = 0.564, p = 9.24e-12), CD8+ T cell (r = 0.509, p = 1.82e-09), CD4+ T cell (r = 0.702, p = 2.1e-19), macrophage (r = 0.298, p = 6.80e-04) neutrophil (r = 0.854, p = 2.39e-32), and dendritic cell (r = 0.63, p = 5.87e-14) (Figure 8B). In summary, the above findings suggested that CD247 and CD4 expression affect the tumor microenvironment by regulating tumor immune cell infiltration and leads to a poor prognosis.
Figure 8.
Correlations between CD4 and CD247 Expression and Immune Cell Infiltration in Various Breast Cancer Subtypes. (A) Correlations between CD4 (A), CD247 (B) expression and the infiltration of B cells, CD8+T cells, CD4+T cells, macrophages, in BRCA-Luminal A, BRCA-Luminal B, BRCA-basal, BRCA-HER2, breast cancer subtypes.
Discussion
The microenvironment of breast cancer comprises a range of cell types, including TILs. Accumulating evidence indicates that TILs play a critical role in cancer progression and carcinogenesis [14]. The level of TILs positively associate with the survival outcome of TNBC [31]. Immune cell infiltration in TME varies widely and affects patient’s prognosis in terms of OS and RFS. Infiltrating immune cells affects tumors development and metastasis through different signaling pathways [15]. Further, numerous gene alterations have been identified by comparing tumors and normal tissues and cell markers CD4 and CD247 showed positive correlation with TILs in TNBC. However, how CD247, CD4 and correlated with TNBC microenvironment and leading to tumor heterogeneity has not thoroughly studied.
TNBCs are clinically aggressive subtypes with high risk of metastasis to visceral organs without particular geographic distribution [32, 33].The presence of TILs within the TME is considered to be an indication of the host immune response to tumors antigens [34]. It was hypothesized that CD247 could be the basis of T-lymphocyte cell functional deficit. Phosphorylation of CD247 is an essential step in the intracellular signaling pathway leading to T-lymphocyte activation [35]. The function of CD247 enhances the TCR signaling cascade and it is necessary for assemble of the TCR/CD3 complex on the surface of T lymphocytes [36]. It is well-known that an inactive CD247 leads to impaired T cell activation upon engagement of the TCR [37]. Downregulation of CD247 has been described in many malignancies such as melanoma, cervical, pancreatic, ovarian, breast, and head and neck cancer. Such abnormal expression of CD247 is related with differentiation and classification in ovarian cancer [21, 38, 36]
The CD4 expressed by a subpopulation of monocytes creating a potential bias in the assessment of CD4 as a specific T-cell marker [39]. The CD4-expressing monocytes are primarily investigated in terms of HIV infection and are known to trigger macrophage differentiation, but are also mostly found in peripheral blood and with lower density than seen on T cells. The TCR-CD3 complex on the surface of T lymphocytes is essential for the adaptive immune response. [40]. Upon activation by antigen-presenting cells (APCs), TCR-mediated signals are transmitted across the cell membrane by the CD3 chains (CD3D, CD3E, CD3G and CD3Z). All CD3 chains contain immune receptor tyrosine - based activation motifs in their cytoplasm domain. Upon TCR engagement, these motifs become phosphorylated by Src family protein tyrosine kinases LCK and FYN, resulting in the activation of downstream signaling pathways [35, 41]. CD3Z ITAMs phosphorylation creates multiple docking sites for the protein kinase ZAP70 leading to ZAP70 phosphorylation and its conversion into a catalytically active enzyme. Thus, in initial stage decreased expression of CD3 zeta and impairment of T-cell function were detected in tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes [20].
CD247, also known as T-cell antigen receptor zeta (TCR-Z) or CD3 zeta-chain (CD3), is an integral element of T-cell Receptor (TCR) complex that is crucial component in the structure, expression and function of TCR and NK cell-activating receptor [35]. CD247 recruits tyrosine kinases, which in turn triggers a number of downstream signaling cascades that potentially activate T-cells [42]. CD247 is essential for the activation of antigenic peptide presented by the human leukocyte antigen on APCs or tumor cells. Downregulation of CD247 is often found to be followed by reduced expression of other T-cell-associated signal-transuding molecules, like ZAP-70 and p56lck, decreased calcium flux and T-cell apoptosis [16]. The ability of cancer cells to evade the action of the immune system is one of the most challenging aspects of cancer and its treatment. Decreased CD247 expression is linked to several types of cancer, such as renal carcinoma, gastric carcinoma, melanoma, breast cancer, pancreatic cancer, cervical cancer, ovarian cancer, head and neck cancer, B-cell lymphoma, and B-cell lymphoma [21, 36].
The presence of TILs is associated with a better prognosis in cancer patients as it is an indication that the patient’s immune system is functioning and is reacting to the cancer antigens. A recent study showed that the expression of CD247 in peripheral blood lymphocytes from patients with ovarian cancer is decreased compared with ovarian cyst patients and the expression of CD247 in tumor infiltrating lymphocytes with cancer tissue is decreased compared with adjacent tissues. This showed that abnormal expression of CD247 was related with differentiation and classification in ovarian cancer [35]. In breast cancer, data is not available on the correlation between CD247 expression and breast cancer stages. According to the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis the low mRNA expression of CD247 is associated with worse prognosis in breast cancer. The amplification and transcriptional upregulation of CD247 has a high correlation with their mRNA expression. Survival analysis indicated that high mRNA expression of CD247 was associated with good prognosis in patients with breast cancer, specifically in basal subtype of breast cancer. Thus, CD247 amplification predicts good survival outcome in BC.
CD247 and CD4 are the critical components of T- cell receptors. Our findings for the first time link the prognostic significance of these surface immune markers to the poor prognosis of TNBC. The low levels of CD247 and CD4 provide a significant indication of decreased infiltration of immune cells into the TME. This observation has implications on cancer cell clearance and subsequent immune evasion of these cells leading to increased metastasis. This result in much shorter relapse- free survival and overall survival of TNBC patients compared to the patients with higher expression of these genes. CD247 and CD4 may be relevant as a biomarker for the progression of TNBC and can be potentially targeted as a potential treatment strategy for TNBC.
Acknowledgements
Ankit Pateriya is a recipient of a Senior Research Fellowship from the Indian Council of Medical Research (No. 3/2/2/72022-NCD-III), Government of India.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Ethical clearance
Not required as no biological samples or specimen was used in this study.
Abbreviations
BC: Breast cancer
EGA: European genome-phenome archive
GEO: Gene Expression Omnibus
OS: Overall survival
RFS: Relapse-free survival
TCGA: The cancer genome atlas
TNBC: Triple-negative breast cancer
TCR: T-cell receptor
TILs: Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes
ZAP 70: Zeta-chain associated protein kinase 70kDa
Author Contribution Statement
AS and AK: Conception, study design, interpretation of data, and critical evaluation of the manuscript. AP and RN: Analysis and interpretation of data.AS, AK, AP and RN: Preparation of the Manuscript. All authors concur with the final version of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: Globocan estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–49. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Anderson BO, Ilbawi AM, Fidarova E, Weiderpass E, Stevens L, Abdel-Wahab M, et al. The global breast cancer initiative: A strategic collaboration to strengthen health care for non-communicable diseases. Lancet Oncol. 2021;22(5):578–81. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00071-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.DeSantis CE, Ma J, Gaudet MM, Newman LA, Miller KD, Goding Sauer A, et al. Breast cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019;69(6):438–51. doi: 10.3322/caac.21583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ginsburg O, Bray F, Coleman MP, Vanderpuye V, Eniu A, Kotha SR, et al. The global burden of women’s cancers: A grand challenge in global health. Lancet. 2017;389(10071):847–60. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31392-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Yersal O, Barutca S. Biological subtypes of breast cancer: Prognostic and therapeutic implications. World J Clin Oncol. 2014;5(3):412–24. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v5.i3.412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Sorlie T, Tibshirani R, Parker J, Hastie T, Marron JS, Nobel A, et al. Repeated observation of breast tumor subtypes in independent gene expression data sets. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100(14):8418–23. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0932692100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Deepak KGK, Vempati R, Nagaraju GP, Dasari VR, S N, Rao DN, et al. Tumor microenvironment: Challenges and opportunities in targeting metastasis of triple negative breast cancer. Pharmacol Res. 2020;153:104683. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2020.104683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Boyle P. Triple-negative breast cancer: Epidemiological considerations and recommendations. Ann Oncol. 2012;23 Suppl 6:vi7–12. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mds187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lehmann BD, Bauer JA, Chen X, Sanders ME, Chakravarthy AB, Shyr Y, et al. Identification of human triple-negative breast cancer subtypes and preclinical models for selection of targeted therapies. J Clin Invest. 2011;121(7):2750–67. doi: 10.1172/JCI45014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Nishat L. Expression of ki-67 and e-cadherin in triple negative breast cancer: A hospital based study. 2024 [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bianchini G, Balko JM, Mayer IA, Sanders ME, Gianni L. Triple-negative breast cancer: Challenges and opportunities of a heterogeneous disease. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2016;13(11):674–90. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Korlimarla A, Ps H, Prabhu J, Ragulan C, Patil Y, Vp S, et al. Comprehensive characterization of immune landscape of indian and western triple negative breast cancers. Transl Oncol. 2022;25:101511. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2022.101511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Burstein MD, Tsimelzon A, Poage GM, Covington KR, Contreras A, Fuqua SA, et al. Comprehensive genomic analysis identifies novel subtypes and targets of triple-negative breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21(7):1688–98. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-0432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Germain RN, Stefanová I. The dynamics of t cell receptor signaling: Complex orchestration and the key roles of tempo and cooperation. Annu Rev Immunol. 1999;17:467–522. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.17.1.467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kurt RA, Urba WJ, Smith JW, Schoof DD. Peripheral t lymphocytes from women with breast cancer exhibit abnormal protein expression of several signaling molecules. Int J Cancer. 1998;78(1):16–20. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0215(19980925)78:1<16::aid-ijc4>3.0.co;2-#. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Whiteside TL. Immune cells in the tumor microenvironmen Mechanisms responsible for functional and signaling defects. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1998;451:167–71. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Locy H, Verhulst S, Cools W, Waelput W, Brock S, Cras L, et al. Assessing tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in breast cancer: A proposal for combining immunohistochemistry and gene expression analysis to refine scoring. Front Immunol. 2022;13:794175. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.794175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Schmidt M, Weyer-Elberich V, Hengstler JG, Heimes AS, Almstedt K, Gerhold-Ay A, et al. Prognostic impact of cd4-positive t cell subsets in early breast cancer: A study based on the finher trial patient population. Breast Cancer Res. 2018;20(1):15 . doi: 10.1186/s13058-018-0942-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hinshaw DC, Shevde LA. The tumor microenvironment innately modulates cancer progression. Cancer Res. 2019;79(18):4557–66. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-18-3962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Baniyash M. Tcr zeta-chain downregulation: Curtailing an excessive inflammatory immune response. Nat Rev Immunol. 2004;4(9):675–87. doi: 10.1038/nri1434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Upreti D, Zhang ML, Bykova E, Kung SK, Pathak KA. Change in cd3ζ-chain expression is an independent predictor of disease status in head and neck cancer patients. Int J Cancer. 2016;139(1):122–9. doi: 10.1002/ijc.30046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Győrffy B. Transcriptome-level discovery of survival-associated biomarkers and therapy targets in non-small-cell lung cancer. Br J Pharmacol. 2024;181(3):362–74. doi: 10.1111/bph.16257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Liu Y, Pan B, Qu W, Cao Y, Li J, Zhao H. Systematic analysis of the expression and prognosis relevance of fbxo family reveals the significance of fbxo1 in human breast cancer. Cancer Cell Int. 2021;21(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s12935-021-01833-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Mishra A, Pateriya A, Mishra AK, Shrivastava A. Prognostic significance of autophagy related genes in estrogen receptor positive tamoxifen treated breast cancer. Bioinformation. 2020;16(9):710–8. doi: 10.6026/97320630016710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Chandrashekar DS, Bashel B, Balasubramanya SAH, Creighton CJ, Ponce-Rodriguez I, Chakravarthi B, et al. Ualcan: A portal for facilitating tumor subgroup gene expression and survival analyses. Neoplasia. 2017;19(8):649–58. doi: 10.1016/j.neo.2017.05.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Cerami E, Gao J, Dogrusoz U, Gross BE, Sumer SO, Aksoy BA, et al. The cbio cancer genomics portal: An open platform for exploring multidimensional cancer genomics data. Cancer Discov. 2012;2(5):401–4. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-12-0095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Li T, Fan J, Wang B, Traugh N, Chen Q, Liu JS, et al. Timer: A web server for comprehensive analysis of tumor-infiltrating immune cells. Cancer Res. 2017;77(21):e108–e10. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-0307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Li T, Fu J, Zeng Z, Cohen D, Li J, Chen Q, et al. Timer2 0 for analysis of tumor-infiltrating immune cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48(W1):W509–w14. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Salgado R, Denkert C, Demaria S, Sirtaine N, Klauschen F, Pruneri G, et al. The evaluation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (tils) in breast cancer: Recommendations by an international tils working group 2014. Ann Oncol. 2015;26(2):259–71. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdu450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Whiteside TL. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and their role in solid tumor progression. Exp Suppl. 2022;113:89–106. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-91311-3_3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.García-Teijido P, Cabal ML, Fernández IP, Pérez YF. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in triple negative breast cancer: The future of immune targeting. Clin Med Insights Oncol. 2016;10(Suppl 1):31–9. doi: 10.4137/CMO.S34540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Singh D, Roy N, Maiti S. Epidemiology, pattern of recurrence and survival in triple-negative breast cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Care. 2020;5:87–94. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Khanal S, Singh Y, Sayami G, Ozaki A. Profile and outcome of triple negative breast cancer at a tertiary care university hospital in nepal. Asian Pac J Cancer Care. 2020;5:101–5. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Wang J, Tian S, Sun J, Zhang J, Lin L, Hu C. The presence of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (tils) and the ratios between different subsets serve as prognostic factors in advanced hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. BMC Cancer. 2020;20(1):731 . doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07234-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Ye W, Zhou Y, Xu B, Zhu D, Rui X, Xu M, et al. Cd247 expression is associated with differentiation and classification in ovarian cancer. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019;98(51):e18407. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Ishigami S, Natsugoe S, Tokuda K, Nakajo A, Higashi H, Iwashige H, et al. Cd3-zetachain expression of intratumoral lymphocytes is closely related to survival in gastric carcinoma patients. Cancer. 2002;94(5):1437–42. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Lundholm M, Mayans S, Motta V, Löfgren-Burström A, Danska J, Holmberg D. Variation in the cd3 zeta (cd247) gene correlates with altered t cell activation and is associated with autoimmune diabetes. J Immunol. 2010;184(10):5537–44. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0904012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Pappas J, Wolfson AD, Jung WJ, Oleszak EL, Helm CW, Freedman RS, et al. Differential expression of cd3zeta message and protein in tumor infiltrating lymphocytes from solid tumor specimens and malignant ascites from patients with ovarian carcinoma. Anticancer Res. 2009;29(11):4673–82. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Roberts CA, Dickinson AK, Taams LS. The interplay between monocytes/macrophages and cd4(+) t cell subsets in rheumatoid arthritis. Front Immunol. 2015;6:571. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Shah K, Al-Haidari A, Sun J, Kazi JU. T cell receptor (tcr) signaling in health and disease. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2021;6(1):412 . doi: 10.1038/s41392-021-00823-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Iwashima M, Irving BA, van Oers NS, Chan AC, Weiss A. Sequential interactions of the tcr with two distinct cytoplasmic tyrosine kinases. Science. 1994;263(5150):1136–9. doi: 10.1126/science.7509083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Chan AC, Desai DM, Weiss A. The role of protein tyrosine kinases and protein tyrosine phosphatases in t cell antigen receptor signal transduction. Annu Rev Immunol. 1994;12:555–92. doi: 10.1146/annurev.iy.12.040194.003011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]








