Skip to main content
Microbial Cell Factories logoLink to Microbial Cell Factories
. 2025 Jan 5;24:7. doi: 10.1186/s12934-024-02619-3

Unveiling the potential of spirulina algal extract as promising antibacterial and antibiofilm agent against carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae: in vitro and in vivo study

Mohamed I Selim 1, Tarek El-banna 1, Fatma Sonbol 1, Walaa A Negm 2, Engy Elekhnawy 1,
PMCID: PMC11700449  PMID: 39755644

Abstract

Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae poses a severe risk to global public health, necessitating the immediate development of novel therapeutic strategies. The current study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of the green algae Arthrospira maxima (commercially known as Spirulina) both in vitro and in vivo against carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae. In this study, thirty carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae isolates were collected, identified, and then screened for their susceptibility to several antibiotics and carbapenemase production genes using PCR. Both blaKPC and blaOXA-48 genes were the most predominant detected carbapenemase genes in the tested isolates. The phytochemical profiling of A. maxima algal extract was conducted using LC–MS/MS in a positive mode technique. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of the algal extract ranged from 500 to 1000 µg/mL. The algal extract also resulted in decreasing the membrane integrity and distortion in the bacterial cells as revealed by scanning electron microscope. The bioactive compounds that were responsible for the antibacterial action were fatty acids, including PUFAs, polysaccharides, glycosides, peptides, flavonoids, phycocyanin, minerals, essential amino acids, and vitamins. Moreover, A. maxima algal extract revealed an antibiofilm activity by crystal violet assay and qRT-PCR. A murine pneumonia model was employed for the in vivo assessment of the antibacterial action of the algal extract. A. maxima showed a promising antibacterial action which was comparable to the action of colistin (standard drug). This was manifested by improving the pulmonary architecture, decreasing the inflammatory cell infiltration, and fibrosis after staining with hematoxylin and eosin and Masson’s trichrome stain. Using immunohistochemical investigations, the percentage of the immunoreactive cells significantly decreased after using monoclonal antibodies of the tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin six. So, A. maxima may be considered a new candidate for the development of new antibacterial medications.

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name 12934_2024_2619_Figa_HTML.jpg

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12934-024-02619-3.

Keywords: Carbapenem-resistance genes, Biofilm, Multidrug resistance, Pneumonia, LC/MS, qRT-PCR

Introduction

In recent years, antibiotic resistance has become a significant issue that poses a challenge to medical personnel [1]. The multidrug-resistant microorganisms (superbugs) are almost resistant to most antibiotics available in the pharmaceutical market. Unfortunately, pharmaceutical companies cannot cope with the speedy spreading of multidrug-resistant bacteria by providing new drugs [2]. K. pneumoniae is an opportunistic, Gram-negative, non-motile, and enteric bacteria [3]. It is a part of the normal microbiome in healthy people residing in mucosal surfaces like the gastrointestinal tract and oropharynx but can spread to other tissues. It can trigger severe infections like pneumonia and other miscellaneous infections such as meningitis, septicemia, and purulent abscesses, especially in immunocompromised patients, newborns, or those at high risk in hospitals and clinics [4]. It is responsible for hospital-acquired infections, including pneumonia, urinary tract infections (UTIs), and bloodstream infections [5]. The extensive use of antibiotics contributed to the repeated outbreaks of multidrug-resistant K. pneumoniae [6].

Carbapenems are among the widely used antibiotics to treat K. pneumoniae infections. However, when they are overused or misused, they often contribute to the spreading of carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae. Three primary mechanisms are responsible for carbapenem resistance, and they are carbapenemase production, efflux pump, and porin alterations. However, the production of plasmid-mediated carbapenemase enzyme remains the essential mechanism of the pathogen’s resistance towards carbapenems [7]. The main genes responsible for carbapenemase production are bla-K. pneumonia carbapenemase (blaKPC), bla-oxacillin hydrolyzing enzymes-48 (blaOXA-48), bla-New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase (blaNDM), bla-Verona integron-mediated metallo-β-lactamase (blaVIM), and bla-active on imipenem (blaIMP) [8].

Among the new approaches to fight against antibiotic resistance using natural sources like green algae as antibacterials [9]. Arthrospira maxima (spirulina) is a blue-green algae (cyanobacterium) that has a commercial interest as a food supplement and it gained growing attention in recent years. It has several bioactive compounds which are suggested to be responsible for its antioxidant and immune-enhancing activities. These compounds include c-phycocyanin, a high protein content with all essential amino acids, essential fatty acids, minerals, pigments, carotenoids, flavonoids, and vitamins [10]. A. maxima has also shown various other pharmacologic effects like antibacterial [11], antifungal potential [12], and antiviral [13] actions. Its antibacterial action could be attributed to its bioactive substances like polysaccharides and phycocyanin, which break down bacterial cell walls, cause oxidative stress, and deprive cells of vital metals [14].

This study aimed to assess the antibacterial and antibiofilm activities of A. maxima extract against carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae isolates in vitro and in vivo using a pneumonia model in mice.

Material and methods

Identification of carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae and antibiotic susceptibility testing

Collection of carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae isolates

A total number of 30 clinical carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae isolates were recovered from different clinical samples collected from Mansoura University Hospitals, Mansoura International Hospital, and Cairo University Hospitals. Samples were drawn from blood, wound, urine, sputum, and pus as shown in Table S1. Recovered K. pneumoniae isolates were identified and tested for carbapenem resistance by antibiotic breakpoint detection. According to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) 2020, the bacterial isolate is considered to be resistant if it had a minimum inhibitory concentration ≥ 4 μg/mL to meropenem. Isolates were then cultured in nutrient broth (Himedia, India) and stored in glycerol stock (50% glycerol/nutrient broth) at −80 °C until used for further studies.

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing

Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion technique was performed on Muller-Hinton agar (Himedia, India) for screening of the antimicrobial susceptibility [15, 16]. Meropenem (MEM, 10 µg) and imipenem (IPM, 10 µg) discs were used for confirmation of the presence of carbapenem resistance. Fifteen antibiotics representing different antibiotic classes were tested and they were colistin (CL, 10 µg), gentamicin (CN, 120 µg), amikacin (AK, 30 µg), cefazolin (CZ, 30 µg), cefuroxime (CXM, 30 µg), cefotaxime (CTX, 30 µg), ceftriaxone (CRO, 30 µg), ceftazidime (CAZ, 30 µg), cefepime (FEP, 30 µg), ciprofloxacin (CIP, 5 µg), levofloxacin (LEV, 5 µg), doxycycline (DO, 30 µg), piperacillin/tazobactam (TPZ, 100/10 µg), ampicillin/sulbactam (SAM, 10/10 µg), and cotrimoxazole (SXT, 23.75/1.25 µg).

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)

K. pneumoniae isolates were subjected to PCR assay to detect the carbapenem resistance genes: blaVIM, blaIMP, blaNDM-1, blaKPC, and blaOXA-48 [17] as previously reported (supplementary file). The primer sequence for the tested genes is shown in Table S2.

After completion of the process, the PCR product was allowed to run on agarose gel electrophoresis. The PCR products, the DNA ladder, and the negative control were loaded to 1.2% agarose gel and the power supply was set to 80 V for one hour. After completion, the gel was inspected for results on a UV transilluminator. Positive results were indicated by the detection of single sharp bands with a definite amplicon size for each gene.

Preparation and characterization of A. maxima

Preparation of the extract

The blue-green algae A. maxima were obtained from Swanf Commercial and Trade Co., Ltd., China. A. maxima classification was carried out by Dr. Esraa Ammar at the Faculty of Science and it was assigned an ascension number 2022–01-PG-W-67. Classic cold maceration extraction was done using 100 g of dry A. maxima algal powder inside a closed container along with ethanol as a solvent for 72 h (three times, each one liter of ethanol) with stirring at regular intervals at room temperature. The mixture was then filtered, and the solvent was evaporated under vacuum at 40 °C. A rationale for ethanol solvent selection is this a polar solvent can enhance the yield of polyphenolic and flavonoid-based antibacterial agents.

For sample preparation for the phytochemical study, a one-milliliter solution of deionized water, methanol, and acetonitrile (50: 25: 25) was used to reconstitute a weighed part of the residue (50 mg). The dissolved sample was vortexed for two minutes, ultra-sonicated for 10 min, and centrifuged for another 10 min at 1000 rpm. To inject 10 µL of the sample solution at a concentration of 1 µg/µL, dilution was done using the reconstitution solvent. The remaining extract was kept in a refrigerator for further biological investigations.

Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS)

LC–MS/MS analysis of A. maxima extract was performed as reported before [18, 19]. The positive electrospray ionization approach was applied for the detection of the various phytoconstituents of the A. maxima extract and the targeted constituents were identified by comparing LC/MS data with previously published substances and reference databases [2022].

In vitro screening for the antimicrobial activity and antibiofilm action of A. maxima

Antibacterial potential of A. maxima

The broth microdilution method [2325] was carried out to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of A maxima’s extract dissolved in 5% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) against carbapenem-resistant K. Pneumoniae beginning with a concentration of 4000 μg/mL in the first well (highest concentration) of each row in a 96-well-microtiter plate. Serial two-fold dilution was performed till the tenth well (lowest concentration = 7.81 µg/mL) for the algal extract using nutrient broth as a positive control in the 11th well (the bacterial culture and nutrient broth) and negative control in the 12th well (nutrient broth only). A standard control row was used in which only a solution of 5% DMSO, which was used as a solvent for A. maxima, was added to the first well and two-fold serially diluted. After incubating of plates at 37 °C for 24 h, plates were inspected by ELISA reader (Robonik, India) at wavelength 630 nm. The MIC values were identified as the lowest concentration of algae at which no visible growth of bacteria after incubation of plates at 37 °C for 24 h. The test was repeated three times.

Impact of A. maxima on membrane properties of K. pneumoniae

Cell membrane integrity of K. pneumoniae was elucidated before and subsequent treatment with the algal extract (at 0.5 MIC) by observing the discharge of both DNA and RNA from the cells to the external medium [18, 26, 27]. After centrifugating overnight bacterial suspensions, the formed pellets were resuspended in sodium chloride solution (0.5%) followed by measuring absorbance at 260 nm using a UV/Vis spectrophotometer (SHIMADZU, Japan).

Scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis

SEM (JEOL, Japan) was used to reveal the effect of the algal extract on the K. pneumoniae morphology as previously explained [28].

Antibiofilm action of A. maxima using crystal violet and qRT-PCR

Crystal violet assay was employed to unveil the potential antibiofilm impact of the algal extract as previously explained [29, 30] (supplementary file).

For the molecular investigation of the potential antibiofilm impact of the algal extract on the expression of the biofilm genes (treC, fimA, and mrkA) in the tested K. pneumoniae isolates, qRT-PCR was employed as previously reported [31] (supplementary file). The primer sequences are mentioned in Table S3 using 23srRNA as a housekeeping gene [28].

In vivo antibacterial action of A. maxima

Animals and experimental design

Twenty male albino mice with weights ranging between 21 and 25 g were purchased from Abo Rawash farm in Cairo, Egypt. They were housed for a week under standard conditions of temperature (22–25 °C), humidity (40–60%), and 12-h light–dark cycles. Animals were kept in plastic cages with wire mesh covers and received a standard pellet diet and filtered water throughout the experimental period. The experiments were carried out following the guidelines of the Animal Ethics Committee in the Faculty of Pharmacy at Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt (approval no. TP/RE/4/24 p-002).

A representative colistin-susceptible K. pneumoniae isolate was cultured overnight and then adjusted to 4–6 × 107 CFU/mL. Animals were anesthetized and pneumonia was induced by intranasal dripping of 40 μL of K. pneumoniae suspension. After 24 h, animals were separated into four groups (n = 5) as follows: group I served as negative control (not infected and received 0.9% saline), and group II was infected and treated with intranasal 0.9% saline to serve as positive control group. Group III was infected and treated with intranasal colistin solution (61.5 mg/kg) to serve as a standard drug-treated group. Group IV was infected and treated with intranasal algal suspension (30 mg/kg). All groups were treated for three consecutive days [32]. On the 4th day, all animals were euthanized, and lungs were extracted and subjected to histopathological and immunohistochemical investigation.

Histopathological and immunohistochemical staining

After sacrificing mice, 10% buffered formalin was used for the fixation of extracted lung specimens for 24 h. After dehydration of lung specimens with ethanol, they were embedded in paraffin wax. Preparation of five-micrometer thick sections was made and stained with both hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) [33, 34] and Masson’s trichrome stain for collagen fibers detection. Immunohistochemistry employed monoclonal antibodies for the detection of interleukin six (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) [35, 36].

Statistical analysis

The results were demonstrated as mean ± standard deviations (SD) as the tests were performed in triplicate. Data’s statistical analysis was executed through one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using computerized Graph Pad Prism 8. The level of significance was considered at p < 0.05.

Results

Antibiotic susceptibility testing of the carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae isolates and detection of carbapenem-resistance genes

Carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae isolates were collected from blood, wound, urine, sputum, and pus (Fig. 1). The recovered isolates were collected from 14 (46.67%) males and 16 (53.33%) females.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Pie chart revealing the different specimen types

All 30 (100%) tested isolates were resistant to meropenem and imipenem by broth microdilution method using meropenem. The carbapenem resistance was confirmed by the disk diffusion method using disks of both meropenem and imipenem. All isolates were resistant to ampicillin/sulbactam, piperacillin/tazobactam, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, cefazolin, cefuroxime, cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, ceftazidime and cefepime. Only two isolates (6.67%) were resistant to colistin while 24 (80%) isolates were resistant to gentamicin. Twenty-eight (93.33%) isolates were resistant to amikacin while twenty-nine isolates (96.67%) were resistant to sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim. Moreover, 17 isolates (56.67%) showed resistance against doxycycline (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Heat map revealing the antibiotic susceptibility of the tested isolates

PCR

The PCR results (Table S4 and Fig. 3) revealed that the most predominant carbapenemase resistance genes were KPC and NDM-1. Twenty-five isolates (83.33%) harbored both the KPC and NDM-1 genes. The second prevailing gene was VIM in 24 (80%) of the isolates. OXA-48 was also common being carried by 23 (76.67%) of the isolates. However, IMP was absent in all the tested isolates.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Electropherogram of the PCR amplified products

LC/MS

A total of 23 compounds were detected in A. maxima extract using LC–ESI–MS/MS (positive mode). The main substances were amino acids, indoles, alkaloids, terpenoids, fatty acids, flavonoids, and carboxylic acids. The metabolite profile is presented in Table 1, while Fig. 4 shows the total ion chromatograms (TIC) of A. maxima algal extract positive ion mode.

Table 1.

Phytochemical profiling of A. maxima algal extract by LC–MS/MS analysis (positive mode ESI)

Peak NO Rt (min) Precursor m/z Metabolite name Structure Adduct ion MS/MS Molecular formula
1 1.08 146.16 Spermidine graphic file with name 12934_2024_2619_Figb_HTML.gif [M + H]+ 58.06, 72.08, 84.08, 112.11, 129.13 C7H19N3
2 1.27 162.11 Carnitine graphic file with name 12934_2024_2619_Figc_HTML.gif [M + H]+ 60.08, 85.02, 102.09, 103.03 C7H15NO3
3 1.35 139.05 Urocanic acid graphic file with name 12934_2024_2619_Figd_HTML.gif [M + H]+ 66.03, 93.04, 121.04 C6H6N2O2
4 1.58 86.09 Piperidin graphic file with name 12934_2024_2619_Fige_HTML.gif [M + H]+ 56.06, 57.05, 69.06 C5H11N
5 1.73 124.03 Nicotinic acid graphic file with name 12934_2024_2619_Figf_HTML.gif [M + H]+ 78.03, 80.04, 106.02 C6H5NO2
6 2.08 130.04 Pyroglutamic acid graphic file with name 12934_2024_2619_Figg_HTML.gif [M + H]+ 56.04, 84.04 C5H7NO3
7 2.54 190.07 N-Acetylglutamate graphic file with name 12934_2024_2619_Figh_HTML.gif [M + H]+ 84.04, 130.04, 148.06, 172.06 C7H11NO5
8 2.87 166.08 L-(-)-Phenylalanine graphic file with name 12934_2024_2619_Figi_HTML.gif [M + H]+ 77.03, 103.05, 120.08 C9H11NO2
9 3.93 298.09 5'-methyl thioadenosine graphic file with name 12934_2024_2619_Figj_HTML.gif [M + H]+ 119.03, 136.06, 145.03, 163.04 C11H15N5O3S
10 4.87 245.12 Pyrrolo[1,2-a]pyrazine-1,4-dione, hexahydro-3-(phenylmethyl)- graphic file with name 12934_2024_2619_Figk_HTML.gif [M + H]+ 70.06, 72.08, 98.06, 137.07, 169.13 C14H16N2O2
11 5.7 116.07 L-proline graphic file with name 12934_2024_2619_Figl_HTML.gif [M + H]+ 70.06, 75.03, 81.03 C5H9NO2
12 6.08 211.14 Cyclo (leucyloprolyl) graphic file with name 12934_2024_2619_Figm_HTML.gif [M + H]+ 70.06, 86.09, 98.06, 114.09, 154.07, 183.14 C11H18N2O2
13 7.19 211.09 Sinapyl alcohol graphic file with name 12934_2024_2619_Fign_HTML.gif [M + H]+ 211.09, 193.08, 165.09, 151.04, 119.08, 91.05 C11H14O4
14 7.93 197.11 Loliolide graphic file with name 12934_2024_2619_Figo_HTML.gif [M + H]+ 79.05, 107.08, 133.10, 161.09, 179.10 C11H16O3
15 8.13 146.06 3-formylindole graphic file with name 12934_2024_2619_Figp_HTML.gif [M + H]+ 65.02, 91.04, 118.06 C9H7NO
16 8.93 163.11 Nicotine graphic file with name 12934_2024_2619_Figq_HTML.gif [M + H]+ 53, 57, 79, 91, 105, 115, 120, 128, 132, 135, 145, 163 C10H14N2
17 12.73 269.02 Formononetin graphic file with name 12934_2024_2619_Figr_HTML.gif [M + H]+ 116, 125,167, 191, 209, 269 C16H12O4
18 15.18 223.20 Anthracene-9-carboxylic acid graphic file with name 12934_2024_2619_Figs_HTML.gif [M + H]+ 104.95, 121.05, 185.01, 210.92 C15H10O2
19 17.73 285.08 Acacetin graphic file with name 12934_2024_2619_Figt_HTML.gif [M + H]+ 128.06, 207.06, 241.04, 242.05,270.05, 285.07 C16H12O5
20 19.87 279.16 Dibutyl phthalate graphic file with name 12934_2024_2619_Figu_HTML.gif [M + H]+ 150.02, 149.02, 121.02 C16H22O4
21 23.21 403.23 Acetyl tributyl citrate graphic file with name 12934_2024_2619_Figv_HTML.gif [M + H]+ 403.23, 361.21, 329.15, 259.15, 185.07, 157.01, 139.00, 129.01, 111.00 C20H34O8
22 23.9 455.38 Oleanonic acid graphic file with name 12934_2024_2619_Figw_HTML.gif [M + H]+ 455.34, 437.33, 359.25, 205.19, 147.12, 121.09, 95.08 C30H46O3
23 26.45 317.11 3 3′ 4' 5-Tetrahydroxy-7-methoxy flavone graphic file with name 12934_2024_2619_Figx_HTML.gif [M + H]+ 81.09, 177.00, 19,514, 282.02, 317.04 C16H12O7

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

The total ion chromatograms (TIC) of A. maxima algal extract positive ion mode

A. maxima’s extract antibacterial and antibiofilm activities (in vitro)

The MICs for the A. maxima algal extract against the tested carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae isolates ranged from 500 to 1000 μg/mL (Table S5).

Exploring the cell membrane integrity of K. pneumoniae isolates before and after treatment with 0.5 MIC of the algal extract revealed a substantial decrease (p < 0.05) in the cell membrane integrity of all treated isolates. Figure 5 exhibits an interpretative example because the absorbance of DNA and RNA was remarkably higher (p < 0.05) after treatment with the algal extract. This means that the cell membrane integrity was notably declined (p < 0.05) after treatment.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

A chart revealing a significant decrease in the membrane integrity of the tested K. pneumoniae isolate represented by the significant increase in the absorbance

SEM analysis of the cell morphology of the tested isolates before and after being treated with the algal extract reveals a distortion and damage in the treated bacterial cells induced by A. maxima algal extract (Fig. 6).

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Scanning electron micrograph revealing the cell morphology of K. pneumoniae isolate before (A and C) and after (B and D) treatment

The antibiofilm activity of the algal extract was elucidated using crystal violet assay. The A. maxima algal extract inhibited biofilm formation in 68. 75% of the biofilm forming isolates (Figure S1).

Thus, qRT-PCR was employed to reveal the impact of the A. maxima algal extract on the gene expression of the biofilm encoding genes to study its effect at the molecular level. Interestingly, the A. maxima algal extract was found to downregulate the biofilm genes in 50% of the isolates (Fig. 7).

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

The impact of the algal extract on the gene expression of the biofilm genes

In vivo pneumoniae model

H&E and Masson’s trichrome staining micrographs of the lung tissue sections are revealed in Figs. 8 and 9.

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8

H&E staining of lung sections. A, a Control negative group, showing normal pulmonary architecture with alveoli that are surrounded and separated from each other by thin interalveolar septa, bronchiole, and bronchial arteriole. B, b Control positive group, showing distortion in the pulmonary architecture, epithelial damage of the lung bronchi, small sized alveoli due to thickening of interalveolar septa, mononuclear cellular infiltration in septa and around the bronchi, and thick congested pulmonary arteriole. C, c Standard treatment group, showing partial restoration of pulmonary architecture with larger alveoli separated by thinner interalveolar septa, normal bronchi and bronchial arteriole, and minimal inflammatory cells infiltration. D, d Test treatment group, showing partial restoration of pulmonary architecture with larger alveoli separated by thinner interalveolar septa, normal bronchi and bronchial arteriole, and no inflammatory cells infiltration. Black arrow: bronchiole, blue arrow: alveoli, red arrow: Inflammatory cells infiltration, green arrow: pulmonary arteriole. Upper raw original magnification 10 × , lower raw 40 × and scale bar 100 µm and 20 µm, respectively

Fig. 9.

Fig. 9

Masson’s trichrome staining of lung sections A, a Control negative group, showing no fibrosis except few spots in the bronchial wall. B, b Control positive group, showing fibrosis in the bronchi walls and some alveolar septa. C, c Standard treatment group, showing less fibrosis in the bronchi walls. D, d Test treatment group, showing minimal fibrosis. Black arrow: fibrosis. Upper raw original magnification 10 × , lower raw 40 × and scale bar 100 µm and 20 µm, respectively

Figures 10 and 11 reveal the IL-6 and TNF-α immunohistochemical staining micrographs of the lung tissue sections of the different experimental groups.

Fig. 10.

Fig. 10

IL-6 immunohistochemical staining of lung tissue sections A, a Control negative group, indicating no immunoreactivity in the alveolar walls. B, b Control positive group, revealing fierce cytoplasmic immunoreactivity in the alveolar walls. C, c Standard treatment group, showing mild cytoplasmic immunoreactivity. D, d Test treatment group, showing mild cytoplasmic immunoreactivity. Upper raw original magnification 10 × , lower raw 40 × and scale bar 100 µm and 20 µm, respectively

Fig. 11.

Fig. 11

TNF-α immunohistochemical staining micrographs of lung tissue sections of A, a Control negative group, indicating no immunoreactivity in the alveolar walls. B, b Control positive group revealing fierce cytoplasmic immunoreactivity in the alveolar walls. C, c Standard treatment group, showing mild cytoplasmic immunoreactivity. D, d Test treatment group, showing mild cytoplasmic immunoreactivity. Upper raw original magnification 10 × , lower raw 40 × and scale bar 100 µm and 20 µm, respectively

The area percentage of the collagen fibers revealed by Masson’s trichrome stain and the area percentage of IL-6 and TNF-α revealed by the immunohistochemical studies are demonstrated in Fig. 12

Fig. 12.

Fig. 12

Area percentages of the A collagen fibers, B IL-6, and C TNF-α. The single asterisk demonstrates a substantial change (p < 0.05). The abbreviation (NS) means a non-significant change (p > 0.05)

Discussion

K. pneumoniae is considered one of the most predominant Gram-negative bacteria which results in serious nosocomial infections. The situation often exacerbate when these infections are caused by MDR pathogen, which restricts the available therapy options [37]. Resistance to carbapenems among the family Enterobacteriaceae, especially K. pneumoniae, has been emerged as a global concern in the last decade. This is due to the rapid outbreak of carbapenemase producing strains which represent a fatal threat to the public health [38]. Carbapenemases are considered the primary factor which lead to the incidence of extensive resistance and their acquisition and dissemination which possibly warns a pan-drug resistance in the near future [39]. Previous studies documented firm relationships between hospitals and acquisition of carbapenem-resistant bacteria [4042].

In this study, all tested isolates exhibited resistance to two carbapenems (meropenem and imipenem). Former studies have depicted similar results in Egypt. Mohamed Gandor et al. reported that 100% of the tested K. pneumoniae isolates were resistant to imipenem and meropenem [43]. Another Egyptian study in Mansoura University Hospitals showed 42 (33.6%) of 125 isolates were resistant to carbapenems [44]. Moreover, another previous investigation in Suez Canal University Hospitals showed a prevalence of 44.3% of carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae isolates [45]. In addition, previous study from the Egyptian National Cancer Institute reported a lower incidence of 13.9% carbapenem resistance among K. pneumoniae [46]. A study conducted in USA reported that 83% of isolates were carbapenem-resistant [47]. This high incidence of carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae observed in the current study may be credited to the heavy usage of carbapenems as an empirical therapy in intensive care units and hospital wards at these institutions.

The blaKPC and blaOXA-48 genes were the most prevalent carbapenemase genes among carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae [48]. However, new Delhi metallo-β-lactamase (NDM) has been previously proclaimed to be prevailing during the latter decade, which accounted for 11% and 30% of cases of carbapenem resistance in Europe [49] and China [50], respectively. Moreover, blaNDM has been the leading carbapenemase in pediatric patients in China and several other countries [51]. Results of this study are disturbing as molecular studies showed a double or triple carbapenemase gene combination in most isolates (blaNDM-1, blaKPC, blaOXA-48) where 90% of the K. pneumoniae isolates encoded at least two carbapenemase genes. Both blaKPC and blaNDM-1 were the most predominant carbapenem resistance genes in the current study as they were identified in 83.3% of the tested isolates. The second prevailing gene was blaVIM which was harbored by 80% of the 30 isolates. The third in line was blaOXA-48 which was identified in 76.6% of the isolates. Remarkably, neither of the tested 30 isolates harbored the blaIMP gene. A former study reported that blaKPC gene was the most predominant gene among the tested 42 carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae isolates. This agrees with a published study in Bahrain reporting that 95.8% of the isolates were harboring blaNDM-1. A Turkish study reported that carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae isolates had blaNDM-1 and blaOXA-48 in 38.9% and 81.05% of the isolates respectively. A Saudi Arabian study reported that 80.9% of carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae isolates encoded triple resistance genes (blaKPC, blaNDM-1, and blaOXA-48) meanwhile 19.04% of them encoded double resistance genes (blaKPC and blaOXA-48) or (blaNDM-1, blaOXA-48). Additionally, previous studies reported that carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae isolates recovered from different hospitals in Saudi Arabia and other countries in the Arabian Peninsula were reported to be blaOXA-48 and blaNDM carriers [52, 53].

Such problematic bacteria that represent a great barrier to the clinical treatment of multidrug-resistant infections need to be continuously investigated to explore novel therapeutic options. Thus, here we aimed at elucidating the potential antibacterial action of A. maxima algal extract against the studied bacterial isolates.

A. maxima (spirulina) has been used for a long time as an additive in healthy food. Subsequently, the commercial production of spirulina has acquired a global interest because of its various benefits. Spirulina could inhibit the growth of multiple microorganisms owing to its high content of bioactive constituents that exhibit antimicrobial activity [54] like phycocyanin and polysaccharides that harm bacterial cell walls and cause oxidative stress that break down bacterial DNA and proteins. Additionally, it produces an alkaline antioxidant-rich environment that inhibits infections and promotes the growth of good bacteria. Thus, spirulina is a good choice as an antibacterial agent in foods and supplements [14]. In the current study, the LC/MS analysis revealed different phytochemicals such as flavonoids, terpenoids, fatty acids, indoles, and carboxylic acids.

Our study findings revealed that A. maxima extract had antibacterial activity against carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae isolates with MIC values ranging from 500 to 1000 µg/mL. This is lower than that reported by a previous study which reported that the MIC values of spirulina ethanolic extract to be 1000–2000 µg/mL [55]. Nainangu et al. [56] reported that the methanol-chloroform extracts of Oscillatoria sp. SSCM01 exhibited a higher antibacterial activity than Phormidium sp. SSCM02. Oscillatoria sp. SSCM01 exhibited higher inhibition activity of bacterial growth at 31.2 μg/mL and 7.8 μg/mL as MIC value against Staphylococcus aureus, Salmonella typhi, respectively, and for Candida albicans at 125 μg/mL.

Here, we investigated the potential effect of the A. maxima algal extract on the membrane integrity and bacterial morphology using SEM. Interestingly, we found that there was a notable decline in the bacterial cell membrane integrity and distortion of the bacterial cells after treatment with the A. maxima algal extract which had a detrimental effect on the bacterial cells due to leakage of the cytoplasmic content. Similar results were revealed by Alshuniaber et al. [21].

The biofilm-forming capability of the isolates, a major aspect of K. pneumoniae’s pathogenicity, was also explored. Biofilm is a major virulence factor that contributes hugely to the spread of antibiotic resistance among bacterial isolates, particularly, K. pneumoniae [57]. Biofilms enable the bacterial cells to attach to the host surfaces, escape the immune system, and resist antibiotics, which induce a significant risk for the host [58]. Here, the antibiofilm action of the A. maxima algal extract was investigated using crystal violet assay. We found that the A. maxima algal extract inhibited biofilm formation in 68.75% of the biofilm-forming isolates. Also, the algal extract was found to downregulate the biofilm genes (treC, fimA, and mrkA) in 50% of the isolates. K. pneumoniae isolates form biofilms with the aid of type 1 and type 3 pili. The fimA and mrkA genes encode the major fimbrial subunits [59]. Moreover, the treC gene affects biofilm formation by modulating the production of capsular polysaccharides [60]. Consistent with the findings from previous related studies [61, 62], the current investigation revealed a notable inhibitory effect on the biofilm formation ability of the tested isolates after treatment with A. maxima algal extract.

A substantial antibacterial action of A. maxima was observed in the employed pneumonia model in mice. H&E staining, Masson’s trichrome staining, and immunohistochemistry of lung tissue sections showed that the A. maxima algal extract had a curing effect that was comparable to colistin, with mild cytoplasmic immunoreactivity and minimal fibrosis. A previous study reported that spirulina had mitigated the lung injury induced by radiation in rats [63]. A. maxima is suggested to stimulate the immune system and has anti-inflammatory and antioxidant activity.

In autoimmune illnesses and other immunological and inflammatory processes, IL-6 stimulates T-cell differentiation and B-cell proliferation, which can intensify chronic inflammatory responses. Increased IL-6 levels are correlated with the severity of disorders such as rheumatoid arthritis and autoimmune encephalitis, making IL-6 a crucial focus in these conditions [64]. As a main originator of inflammatory signaling, TNF-α triggers a cascade that includes IL-6 and other cytokines, particularly in acute and chronic inflammatory disorders such as inflammatory bowel disease and psoriasis [65]. This is attributed to its bioactive compounds which belong to different chemical classes that are reported to have many pharmacological activities and these classes include indoles [66], monoterpenoids [67], phenolics [67], and carboxylic acids [68]. A previous study performed by Manivannan et al. [69] revealed the anti-inflammatory action of compounds isolated from cyanobacteria which is comparable to our study.

Conclusion

In addition to its known nutritional properties, our in vivo and in vitro study results revealed potential antibacterial and antibiofilm activities of A. maxima against the tested carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae isolates. Moreover, A. maxima markedly decreased the inflammation that was triggered by the induced infection. Further clinical studies are recommended to confirm our results to study their safety and efficacy in humans as effective alternative natural products. Accordingly, these friendly algae could have the potential to be considered in future investigations as an important nutraceutical supplement to combat infections caused by problematic multidrug-resistant bacteria.

Supplementary Information

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Author contributions

M.I.S, W.A.N, and E.E. wrote the main manuscript text and prepared the figures. T.E and F.S. revised the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Funding

Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB). Not applicable.

Availability of data and materials

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was conducted according to the guidelines approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Pharmacy, Tanta University. The approval code is TP/RE/4/24 p-002. Consent to participate is not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Chen H-Y, Jean S-S, Lee Y-L, Lu M-C, Ko W-C, Liu P-Y, Hsueh P-R. Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales in long-term care facilities: a global and narrative review. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021;11:601968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Parmanik A, Das S, Kar B, Bose A, Dwivedi GR, Pandey MM. Current treatment strategies against multidrug-resistant bacteria: a review. Curr Microbiol. 2022;79:388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Abbas R, Chakkour M, Zein El Dine H, Obaseki EF, Obeid ST, Jezzini A, Ghssein G, Ezzeddine Z. General overview of Klebsiella pneumonia: epidemiology and the role of siderophores in its pathogenicity. Biology. 2024;13:78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hanada S, Pirzadeh M, Carver KY, Deng JC. Respiratory viral infection-induced microbiome alterations and secondary bacterial pneumonia. Front Immunol. 2018;9:418009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Trześniewska-Ofiara Z, Mendrycka M, Cudo A, Szmulik M, Woźniak-Kosek A. Hospital urinary tract infections in healthcare units on the example of Mazovian specialist hospital ltd. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022;12:891796. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Paula-Ramos L, da Rocha Santos CE, Camargo Reis Mello D, Nishiama Theodoro L, De Oliveira FE, Back Brito GN, Junqueira JC, Jorge AOC, de Oliveira LD. Klebsiella pneumoniae planktonic and biofilm reduction by different plant extracts: in vitro study. Sci World J. 2016. 10.1155/2016/3521413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Nordmann P, Poirel L. Epidemiology and diagnostics of carbapenem resistance in gram-negative bacteria. Clin Infect Dis. 2019;69:S521–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Shugart A, Mahon G, Huang JY, Karlsson M, Valley A, Lasure M, Gross A, Pattee B, Vaeth E, Brooks R. Carbapenemase production among less-common Enterobacterales genera: 10 US sites, 2018. JAC-Antimicrob Resist. 2021;3:137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.El-Sayed AI, El-Sheekh MM, Makhlof ME. Synergistic antibacterial effects of Ulva lactuca methanolic extract alone and in combination with different antibiotics on multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae isolate. BMC Microbiol. 2023;23:106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Salmeán GG, Castillo LHF, Chamorro-Cevallos G. Nutritional and toxicological aspects of Spirulina (Arthrospira). Nutrición Hospitalaria. 2015;32:34–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Elshouny WAE-F, El-Sheekh MM, Sabae SZ, Khalil MA, Badr HM. Antimicrobial activity of spirulina platensis against aquatic bacterial isolates. J Microbiol Biotechnol Food Sci. 2017;6:1203. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gheda S, Abd El-Zaher EH, Abou-Zeid AM, Bedair NA, Pereira LJ. Potential activity of Arthrospira platensis as antioxidant, cytotoxic and antifungal against some skin diseases: topical cream application. Marine Drugs. 2023;21:160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Cirne-Santos CC, Barros CS, da Silva ACR, Kurpan D, Oliveira WSC, Vasconcellos BM, de Palmer Paixão ICN, Moreira MF, de Valle AF. Arthrospira maxima extract prevents and cures Zika virus infection: in vitro analysis with VERO cells. Algal Res. 2024;79:103479. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wu Q, Liu L, Miron A, Klímová B, Wan D, Kuča K. The antioxidant, immunomodulatory, and anti-inflammatory activities of Spirulina: an overview. Arch Toxicol. 2016;90:1817–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Alherz FA, Negm WA, Elekhnawy E, El-Masry TA, Haggag EM, Alqahtani MJ, Hussein IA. Silver nanoparticles prepared using encephalartos laurentianus de wild leaf extract have inhibitory activity against candida albicans clinical isolates. J Fungi. 2022;8:1005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Binsuwaidan R, Sultan AA, Negm WA, Attallah NG, Alqahtani MJ, Hussein IA, Shaldam MA, El-Sherbeni SA, Elekhnawy E. Bilosomes as nanoplatform for oral delivery and modulated in vivo antimicrobial activity of lycopene. Pharmaceuticals. 2022;15:1043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Aboelsuod KM, Sonbol F, El-Banna T, Elgaml A. Emergence of multidrug-resistant carbapenemases and MCR-1 producing pseudomonas aeruginosa in Egypt. J Pure Appl Microbiol. 2023;17:486. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Attallah NG, El-Sherbeni SA, El-Kadem AH, Elekhnawy E, El-Masry TA, Elmongy EI, Altwaijry N, Negm WA. Elucidation of the metabolite profile of Yucca gigantea and assessment of its cytotoxic, antimicrobial, and anti-inflammatory activities. Molecules. 2022;27:1329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Elmongy EI, Negm WA, Elekhnawy E, El-Masry TA, Attallah NG, Altwaijry N, Batiha GE-S, El-Sherbeni SA. Antidiarrheal and antibacterial activities of Monterey cypress phytochemicals: in vivo and in vitro approach. Molecules. 2022;27:346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Attallah NGM, Negm WA, Elekhnawy E, Elmongy EI, Altwaijry N, El-Haroun H, El-Masry TA, El-Sherbeni SA. Elucidation of phytochemical content of cupressus macrocarpa leaves: in vitro and in vivo antibacterial effect against methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates. Antibiotics. 2021;10:890. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Alshuniaber MA, Krishnamoorthy R, AlQhtani WH. Antimicrobial activity of polyphenolic compounds from Spirulina against food-borne bacterial pathogens. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2021;28:459–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Selim MI, Sonbol FI, El-Banna TE, Negm WA, Elekhnawy E. Antibacterial and wound healing potential of biosynthesized zinc oxide nanoparticles against carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: an in vitro and in vivo study. Microb Cell Factories. 2024;23:281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Abdelaziz A, Sonbol F, Elbanna T, El-Ekhnawy E. Exposure to sublethal concentrations of benzalkonium chloride induces antimicrobial resistance and cellular changes in Klebsiellae pneumoniae clinical isolates. Microb Drug Resist. 2019;25:631–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Alqahtani MJ, Elekhnawy E, Negm WA, Mahgoub S, Hussein IA. Encephalartos villosus Lem. Displays a strong in vivo and in vitro antifungal potential against Candida glabrata clinical isolates. J Fungi. 2022;8:521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Abdel Bar FM, Alossaimi MA, Elekhnawy E, Alzeer MAA, Abo Kamer A, Moglad E, ElNaggar MH. Anti-quorum sensing and anti-biofilm activity of Pelargonium× hortorum root extract against Pseudomonas aeruginosa: combinatorial effect of catechin and gallic acid. Molecules. 2022;27:7841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Alotaibi B, Mokhtar FA, El-Masry TA, Elekhnawy E, Mostafa SA, Abdelkader DH, Elharty ME, Saleh A, Negm WA. Antimicrobial activity of Brassica rapa L. flowers extract on gastrointestinal tract infections and antiulcer potential against indomethacin-induced gastric ulcer in rats supported by metabolomics profiling. J Inflamm Res. 2021;14:7411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Elekhnawy E, Sonbol F, Abdelaziz A, Elbanna T. An investigation of the impact of triclosan adaptation on Proteus mirabilis clinical isolates from an Egyptian university hospital. Braz J Microbiol. 2021;52:927–37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Geng X, Yang Y-J, Li Z, Ge W-B, Xu X, Liu X-W, Li J-Y. Fingolimod inhibits exopolysaccharide production and regulates relevant genes to eliminate the biofilm of K. pneumoniae. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25:1397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Attallah NG, Al-Fakhrany OM, Elekhnawy E, Hussein IA, Shaldam MA, Altwaijry N, Alqahtani MJ, Negm WA. Anti-biofilm and antibacterial activities of cycas media R. Br secondary metabolites: in silico, in vitro, and in vivo approaches. Antibiotics. 2022;11:993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Attallah NG, Negm WA, Elekhnawy E, Altwaijry N, Elmongy EI, El-Masry TA, Alturki EA, Yousef DA, Shoukheba YM. Antibacterial activity of Boswellia sacra Flueck. Oleoresin extract against Porphyromonas gingivalis periodontal pathogen. Antibiotics. 2021;10:859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Mahrous SH, El-Balkemy FA, Abo-Zeid NZ, El-Mekkawy MF, El Damaty HM, Elsohaby I. Antibacterial and anti-biofilm activities of cinnamon oil against multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from pneumonic sheep and goats. Pathogens. 2023;12:1138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Blasco L, Ambroa A, Trastoy R, Bleriot I, Moscoso M, Fernández-Garcia L, Perez-Nadales E, Fernández-Cuenca F, Torre-Cisneros J, Oteo-Iglesias J. In vitro and in vivo efficacy of combinations of colistin and different endolysins against clinical strains of multi-drug resistant pathogens. Sci Rep. 2020;10:7163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Al-Kuraishy HM, Al-Gareeb AI, Albogami SM, Jean-Marc S, Nadwa EH, Hafiz AA, Negm AW, Kamal M, Al-Jouboury M, Elekhnawy E. Potential therapeutic benefits of metformin alone and in combination with sitagliptin in the management of type 2 diabetes patients with COVID-19. Pharmaceuticals. 2022;15:1361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Attallah NG, Mokhtar FA, Elekhnawy E, Heneidy SZ, Ahmed E, Magdeldin S, Negm WA, El-Kadem AH. Mechanistic insights on the in vitro antibacterial activity and in vivo hepatoprotective effects of salvinia auriculata aubl against methotrexate-induced liver injury. Pharmaceuticals. 2022;15:549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Alotaibi B, El-Masry TA, Elekhnawy E, El-Kadem AH, Saleh A, Negm WA, Abdelkader DH. Aqueous core epigallocatechin gallate PLGA nanocapsules: Characterization, antibacterial activity against uropathogens, and in vivo reno-protective effect in cisplatin induced nephrotoxicity. Drug Delivery. 2022;29:1848–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Selim HM, Negm WA, Hawwal MF, Hussein IA, Elekhnawy E, Ulber R, Zayed A. Fucoidan mitigates gastric ulcer injury through managing inflammation, oxidative stress, and NLRP3-mediated pyroptosis. Int Immunopharmacol. 2023;120:110335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Bassetti M, Righi E, Carnelutti A, Graziano E, Russo A. Multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae: challenges for treatment, prevention and infection control. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2018;16:749–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Tängdén T, Giske C. Global dissemination of extensively drug-resistant carbapenemase-producing E nterobacteriaceae: clinical perspectives on detection, treatment and infection control. J Intern Med. 2015;277:501–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.de Man TJ, Lutgring JD, Lonsway DR, Anderson KF, Kiehlbauch JA, Chen L, Walters MS, Sjölund-Karlsson M, Rasheed JK, Kallen A. Genomic analysis of a pan-resistant isolate of Klebsiella pneumoniae, United States 2016. MBio. 2018. 10.1128/mbio.00440-00418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Cao Z, Yue C, Kong Q, Liu Y, Li J. Risk factors for a hospital-acquired carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infection: a five-year retrospective study. Infect Drug Resist. 2022;15:641–54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Sampah J, Owusu-Frimpong I, Aboagye FT, Owusu-Ofori A. Prevalence of carbapenem-resistant and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in a teaching hospital in Ghana. PLoS ONE. 2023;18:e0274156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Hassoun-Kheir N, Hussien K, Karram M, Saffuri M, Badaan S, Peleg S, Aboelhega W, Warman S, Alon T, Pollak D. Clinical significance and burden of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) colonization acquisition in hospitalized patients. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2023;12:129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Mohamed Gandor NH, Amr GE-S, Eldin Algammal SMS, Ahmed AA. Characterization of carbapenem-resistant K. Pneumoniae isolated from intensive care units of Zagazig University Hospitals. Antibiotics. 2022. 10.3390/antibiotics11081108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Moemen D, Masallat DT. Prevalence and characterization of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from intensive care units of Mansoura University hospitals. Egypt J Basic Appl Sci. 2017;4:37–41. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.El-Sweify MA, Gomaa NI, El-Maraghy NN, Mohamed HA. Phenotypic detection of carbapenem resistance among Klebsiella pneumoniae in Suez Canal University Hospitals, Ismailiya, Egypt. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2015;4:10–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Ashour HM, El-Sharif A. Species distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of gram-negative aerobic bacteria in hospitalized cancer patients. J Transl Med. 2009;7:1–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Marquez P, Terashita D, Dassey D, Mascola L. Population-based incidence of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae along the continuum of care, Los Angeles County. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2013;34:144–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Jiang M, Li H, Liu X, Shen N, Zhou Y, Song W, Wang X, Cao Q, Zhou Z. Genomic analysis revealed the international and domestic transmission of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in Chinese pediatric patients. Microbiol Spectr. 2023;11:e03213-03222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Grundmann H, Glasner C, Albiger B, Aanensen DM, Tomlinson CT, Andrasević AT, Cantón R, Carmeli Y, Friedrich AW, Giske CG. Occurrence of carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli in the European survey of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (EuSCAPE): a prospective, multinational study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017;17:153–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Han R, Shi Q, Wu S, Yin D, Peng M, Dong D, Zheng Y, Guo Y, Zhang R, Hu F. Dissemination of carbapenemases (KPC, NDM, OXA-48, IMP, and VIM) among carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae isolated from adult and children patients in China. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2020;10:314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Fang D, Jie L, Yan W, Jin S, Zhen JH, Ping C, Yang Z, Han SJ, Guo YL, Song WQ. A five-year surveillance of carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae in a pediatric hospital in China reveals increased predominance of NDM-1. Biomed Environ Sci. 2017;30:562–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Jamal WY, Albert MJ, Rotimi VO. High prevalence of New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase-1 (NDM-1) producers among carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in Kuwait. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0152638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Al-Agamy MH, Aljallal A, Radwan HH, Shibl AM. Characterization of carbapenemases, ESBLs, and plasmid-mediated quinolone determinants in carbapenem-insensitive Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae in Riyadh hospitals. J Infect Public Health. 2018;11:64–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Gentscheva G, Nikolova K, Panayotova V, Peycheva K, Makedonski L, Slavov P, Radusheva P, Petrova P, Yotkovska I. Application of Arthrospira platensis for medicinal purposes and the food industry: a review of the literature. Life. 2023;13:845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Abdel-Moneim A-ME, El-Saadony MT, Shehata AM, Saad AM, Aldhumri SA, Ouda SM, Mesalam NM. Antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of Spirulina platensis extracts and biogenic selenium nanoparticles against selected pathogenic bacteria and fungi. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2022;29:1197–209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Nainangu P, Antonyraj APM, Subramanian K, Kaliyaperumal S, Gopal S, Renuka PS. In vitro screening of antimicrobial, antioxidant, cytotoxic activities, and characterization of bioactive substances from freshwater cyanobacteria Oscillatoria sp. SSCM01 and Phormidium sp. SSCM02. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol. 2020;29:101772. [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Li L, Gao X, Li M, Liu Y, Ma J, Wang X, Yu Z, Cheng W, Zhang W, Sun H. Relationship between biofilm formation and antibiotic resistance of Klebsiella pneumoniae and updates on antibiofilm therapeutic strategies. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2024;14:1324895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Bano S, Hassan N, Rafiq M, Hassan F, Rehman M, Iqbal N, Ali H, Hasan F, Kang Y-Q. Biofilms as battlefield armor for bacteria against antibiotics: challenges and combating strategies. Microorganisms. 2023;11:2595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Alcántar-Curiel MD, Blackburn D, Saldaña Z, Gayosso-Vázquez C, Iovine N, De la Cruz MA, Girón JA. Multi-functional analysis of Klebsiella pneumoniae fimbrial types in adherence and biofilm formation. Virulence. 2013;4:129–38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Wu M-C, Lin T-L, Hsieh P-F, Yang H-C, Wang J-T. Isolation of genes involved in biofilm formation of a Klebsiella pneumoniae strain causing pyogenic liver abscess. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e23500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.El-Sapagh S, El-Shenody R, Pereira L, Elshobary M. Unveiling the potential of algal extracts as promising antibacterial and antibiofilm agents against multidrug-resistant pseudomonas aeruginosa: in vitro and in silico studies including molecular docking. Plants. 2023;12:3324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.LewisOscar F, Nithya C, Bakkiyaraj D, Arunkumar M, Alharbi NS, Thajuddin N. Biofilm inhibitory effect of Spirulina platensis extracts on bacteria of clinical significance. Proc Natl Acad Sci India Sect B Biol Sci. 2017;87:537–44. [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Ahmadvand MH, Nikzad S, Changizi V, Pashaki AS, Najafi M, Mirzaei F. Evaluation of the mitigation effect of spirulina against lung injury induced by radiation in rats. Curr Radiopharm. 2023;16:71–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Grebenciucova E, VanHaerents S. Interleukin 6: at the interface of human health and disease. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1255533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Webster J, Vucic D. The balance of tnf mediated pathways regulates inflammatory cell death signaling in healthy and diseased tissues. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2020;8(365):2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Zhang S-S, Tan Q-W, Guan L-P. Antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, and analgesic activities and mechanisms of quinolines, indoles and related derivatives. Mini Rev Med Chem. 2021;21:2261–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Alexandrino TD, Moya AMTM, de Medeiros TDM, Morari J, Velloso LA, Leal RF, Maróstica MR, Pastore GM, Cazarin CBB, Bicas JL. Anti-inflammatory effects of monoterpenoids in rats with TNBS-induced colitis. PharmaNutrition. 2020;14:100240. [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Mahmood F, Khan JA, Mahnashi MH, Jan MS, Javed MA, Rashid U, Sadiq A, Hassan SS, Bungau S. Anti-inflammatory, analgesic and antioxidant potential of new (2 S, 3 S)-2-(4-isopropylbenzyl)-2-methyl-4-nitro-3-phenylbutanals and their Corresponding carboxylic acids through in vitro, in silico and in vivo studies. Molecules. 2022;27:4068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Manivannan P, Muralitharan G, Balaji NP. Prediction aided in vitro analysis of octa-decanoic acid from Cyanobacterium Lyngbya sp. as a proapoptotic factor in eliciting anti-inflammatory properties. Bioinformation. 2017;13:301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.


Articles from Microbial Cell Factories are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES