Skip to main content
PMC home page
The EMBO Journal logoLink to The EMBO Journal
. 1997 Oct 1;16(19):5922–5929. doi: 10.1093/emboj/16.19.5922

The Na+-specific interaction between the LysR-type regulator, NhaR, and the nhaA gene encoding the Na+/H+ antiporter of Escherichia coli.

O Carmel 1, O Rahav-Manor 1, N Dover 1, B Shaanan 1, E Padan 1
PMCID: PMC1170223  PMID: 9312050

Abstract

We used partially purified NhaR and a highly purified His-tagged NhaR derivative to identify the cis-regulatory sequences of nhaA recognized by NhaR and to study the specific effect of Na+ on this interaction. Gel retardation assay with DNase I footprinting analysis showed that NhaR binds a region of nhaA which spans 92 bp and contains three copies of the conserved LysR-binding motif. Na+, up to 100 mM, had no effect on the binding of NhaR to nhaA. The dimethylsulfate methylation protection assay in vivo and in vitro, showed that bases G-92, G-60, G-29 and A-24 form direct contacts with NhaR; in the absence of added Na+ in vivo, these bases were protected but became exposed to methylation in a DeltanhaR strain; accordingly, these bases were protected in vitro by the purified His-tagged NhaR. 100 mM Na+, but not K+, removed the protection of G-60 conferred by His-tagged NhaR in vitro. Exposure of intact cells to 100 mM Na+, but not K+, exposed G-60. The maximal effect of Na+ in vitro was observed at 20 mM and was pH dependent, vanishing below pH 7.5. In contrast to G-60, G-92 was exposed to methylation by the ion only in vivo, suggesting a requirement for another factor existing only in vivo for this interaction. We suggest that NhaR is both sensor and transducer of the Na+ signal and that it regulates nhaA expression by undergoing a conformational change upon Na+ binding which modifies the NhaR-nhaA contact points.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (419.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Christman M. F., Storz G., Ames B. N. OxyR, a positive regulator of hydrogen peroxide-inducible genes in Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium, is homologous to a family of bacterial regulatory proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 May;86(10):3484–3488. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.10.3484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Dover N., Higgins C. F., Carmel O., Rimon A., Pinner E., Padan E. Na+-induced transcription of nhaA, which encodes an Na+/H+ antiporter in Escherichia coli, is positively regulated by nhaR and affected by hns. J Bacteriol. 1996 Nov;178(22):6508–6517. doi: 10.1128/jb.178.22.6508-6517.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Glaser G., Sarmientos P., Cashel M. Functional interrelationship between two tandem E. coli ribosomal RNA promoters. Nature. 1983 Mar 3;302(5903):74–76. doi: 10.1038/302074a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Goethals K., Van Montagu M., Holsters M. Conserved motifs in a divergent nod box of Azorhizobium caulinodans ORS571 reveal a common structure in promoters regulated by LysR-type proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Mar 1;89(5):1646–1650. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.5.1646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Goldberg E. B., Arbel T., Chen J., Karpel R., Mackie G. A., Schuldiner S., Padan E. Characterization of a Na+/H+ antiporter gene of Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 May;84(9):2615–2619. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.9.2615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Harel-Bronstein M., Dibrov P., Olami Y., Pinner E., Schuldiner S., Padan E. MH1, a second-site revertant of an Escherichia coli mutant lacking Na+/H+ antiporters (delta nhaA delta nhaB), regains Na+ resistance and a capacity to excrete Na+ in a delta microH(+)-independent fashion. J Biol Chem. 1995 Feb 24;270(8):3816–3822. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.8.3816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Henikoff S., Haughn G. W., Calvo J. M., Wallace J. C. A large family of bacterial activator proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Sep;85(18):6602–6606. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.18.6602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Karpel R., Alon T., Glaser G., Schuldiner S., Padan E. Expression of a sodium proton antiporter (NhaA) in Escherichia coli is induced by Na+ and Li+ ions. J Biol Chem. 1991 Nov 15;266(32):21753–21759. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Karpel R., Olami Y., Taglicht D., Schuldiner S., Padan E. Sequencing of the gene ant which affects the Na+/H+ antiporter activity in Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 1988 Jul 25;263(21):10408–10414. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kullik I., Stevens J., Toledano M. B., Storz G. Mutational analysis of the redox-sensitive transcriptional regulator OxyR: regions important for DNA binding and multimerization. J Bacteriol. 1995 Mar;177(5):1285–1291. doi: 10.1128/jb.177.5.1285-1291.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. LOWRY O. H., ROSEBROUGH N. J., FARR A. L., RANDALL R. J. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951 Nov;193(1):265–275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Murata T., Yamato I., Igarashi K., Kakinuma Y. Intracellular Na+ regulates transcription of the ntp operon encoding a vacuolar-type Na+-translocating ATPase in Enterococcus hirae. J Biol Chem. 1996 Sep 27;271(39):23661–23666. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.39.23661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Owen-Hughes T. A., Pavitt G. D., Santos D. S., Sidebotham J. M., Hulton C. S., Hinton J. C., Higgins C. F. The chromatin-associated protein H-NS interacts with curved DNA to influence DNA topology and gene expression. Cell. 1992 Oct 16;71(2):255–265. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90354-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Padan E., Schuldiner S. Molecular physiology of Na+/H+ antiporters, key transporters in circulation of Na+ and H+ in cells. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1994 Apr 28;1185(2):129–151. doi: 10.1016/0005-2728(94)90204-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Pan J. W., Macnab R. M. Steady-state measurements of Escherichia coli sodium and proton potentials at alkaline pH support the hypothesis of electrogenic antiport. J Biol Chem. 1990 Jun 5;265(16):9247–9250. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Rahav-Manor O., Carmel O., Karpel R., Taglicht D., Glaser G., Schuldiner S., Padan E. NhaR, a protein homologous to a family of bacterial regulatory proteins (LysR), regulates nhaA, the sodium proton antiporter gene in Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 1992 May 25;267(15):10433–10438. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Sasse-Dwight S., Gralla J. D. Footprinting protein-DNA complexes in vivo. Methods Enzymol. 1991;208:146–168. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(91)08012-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Tartaglia L. A., Storz G., Ames B. N. Identification and molecular analysis of oxyR-regulated promoters important for the bacterial adaptation to oxidative stress. J Mol Biol. 1989 Dec 20;210(4):709–719. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(89)90104-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Toledano M. B., Kullik I., Trinh F., Baird P. T., Schneider T. D., Storz G. Redox-dependent shift of OxyR-DNA contacts along an extended DNA-binding site: a mechanism for differential promoter selection. Cell. 1994 Sep 9;78(5):897–909. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(94)90702-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Tupper A. E., Owen-Hughes T. A., Ussery D. W., Santos D. S., Ferguson D. J., Sidebotham J. M., Hinton J. C., Higgins C. F. The chromatin-associated protein H-NS alters DNA topology in vitro. EMBO J. 1994 Jan 1;13(1):258–268. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06256.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The EMBO Journal are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES