Abstract
Metabolic differences between males and females have been well documented across many species. However, the molecular basis of these differences and how they impact tolerance to nutrient deprivation is still under investigation. In this work, we use Drosophila melanogaster to demonstrate that sex-specific differences in fat tissue metabolism are driven, in part, by dimorphic expression of the Integrated Stress Response (ISR) transcription factor, ATF4. We found that female fat tissues have higher ATF4 activity than their male counter parts under homeostatic conditions. This dimorphism was partly due to a female bias in transcript abundance of specific ATF4 splice isoforms. We found that the canonical sex determinants transformer (tra) and doublesex (dsx) drive such dimorphic ATF4 transcript abundance. These differences persist in a genetic model of nutrient deprivation, where female animals showed greater resistance to lethality than males in an ATF4-dependent manner. These results suggest that higher ATF4 activity confers higher tolerance to stress in females. Together, our data describe a previously unknown facet of ISR signaling wherein sexual identity of adipose tissue confers differential stress tolerance in males and females. Since energy storage mechanisms are known to be dimorphic and have been linked to ATF4 regulation, our studies provide a mechanistic starting point for understanding how sexual identity influences metabolic disease outcomes.
Keywords: ATF4, transformer, adipose, dimorphism, splicing, doublesex, methioninase, stress
Introduction
Sex differences in metabolism have been well documented across many species1, and several of these differences are ascribed to the sexually dimorphic nature of adipose tissue2,3. Population studies across geographies have demonstrated that females bear more adipose tissue and total higher body fat than men4–6. The clinical ramifications of such dimorphic adipose tissue biology include substantial sex differences in susceptibility to metabolic diseases and cardiovascular disorders7, though females and males show different vulnerabilities to different metabolic stressors. For example, as of 2018 (national Center for Health Statistics, Center for Disease Control) the female incidence of severe obesity was 67% higher than the male incidence8,9, which has been attributed in part to higher efficiency of fat storage mechanisms in females compared with males10. However, males show a higher predisposition to diabetes and insulin resistance11. Obesity has also been shown to be coincident with, or a comorbidity, for multiple metabolic disorders, including diabetes, polycystic ovarian syndrome, and cardiovascular disease12–14, with females being especially vulnerable to these comorbidities15. While efforts from several groups have made strides in establishing the molecular differences in male and female adipose tissue16–19, these clinical findings underscore the importance of understanding the molecular basis of metabolic sex differences, and specifically how sexually dimorphic gene expression influences adipose tissue physiology and metabolic disease.
In the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster, sexual dimorphism in metabolic tissues impacts development and various aspects of physiology including fecundity, immunity, and lifespan2,20,21. As with mammalian sexual dimorphism, metabolic sex differences in Drosophila are regulated by the sexual identity of fat tissues. Drosophila adipocytes comprise the “fat body”, a highly metabolic organ that performs fat- and liver-like functions. Female identity of Drosophila larval adipocytes instructs larger body size due to increased secretion of insulin-like peptides from the brain relative to males22. Additionally, sexual identity of the Akh-producing cells in the adult brain (analogous to pancreatic a-cells in mammals23) regulates fat metabolism24,25. Sex differences in lipid metabolism are also partially dependent on sex differences in abundance of the insect hormone 20-hydroxyecdysone (20E), which primes adult females for higher triglyceride and glycogen stores compared with males26.
In Drosophila, sex differences in metabolic tissues are directed by effectors of the canonical sex determination pathway22,27–29, wherein X chromosome number determines expression of the RNA-binding protein Sex-lethal (Sxl)30,31: females (bearing two X chromosomes) express Sxl, whereas males (with one X chromosome) do not. In somatic cells, female-specific Sxl action yields alternative splicing of transformer (tra) RNA such that full-length Tra protein is only produced in females32,33. Tra binding to mRNA leads to production of female splice variants of the transcripts encoding two key sexual differentiation factors, doublesex and fruitless34–37. Dsx and Fru gene products effect numerous aspects of somatic sexual differentiation, including body size, gonad and genitalia development, gametogenesis, feeding, and courtship behavior38–42.
In Drosophila, female sexual identity confers higher resistance to a variety of stressors compared with males43–45. Canonical sex determinants like Tra and Dsx alter the transcriptional landscape of many somatic tissues46, though their effects on mediators of stress response signaling are understudied. In this study, we focus on the Integrated Stress Response (ISR), an evolutionarily conserved signaling pathway that elicits adaptive responses to diverse cellular stressors via the transcription factor ATF447. Loss of ATF4 results in increased susceptibility to stressors such as nutrient deprivation and proteotoxicity48,49, among others. Studies in many species, including Drosophila melanogaster, have demonstrated that caloric restriction improves lifespan in an ATF4-dependent manner50–52; in Drosophila, female adult lifespan is more responsive to dietary restriction than male lifespan53. Further, highly metabolic tissues such as the fat (‘fat body’ in Drosophila) rely upon constitutive activation of ATF4 under physiological conditions49,51,54,55 and the sexual identity of the fat body has been reported to modify dimorphic stress tolerance29. However, whether ISR/ATF4 activity is dimorphic has not yet been examined.
Here, we show that female Drosophila fat body exhibits a higher basal level of ISR activity than the male fat body due to sex-biased expression of ATF4. This sex bias is regulated downstream of the canonical sex determinants Tra and Dsx. Further, we find that the female-bias in resistance to nutrient deprivation is at least partly mediated by dimorphic ATF4 expression in the fat body. Summarily, our findings suggest that increased activation of ISR signaling in female fat tissues confers a health and/or survival advantage. By uncovering this new facet of ISR signaling, our work establishes a framework for understanding the molecular links between sexual identity and stress tolerance.
Results
Homeostatic ATF4 signaling is sexually dimorphic in larval fat tissues
We and others have previously reported homeostatic ATF4 activity in the third-instar larval fat body48,51,56. To determine whether this is sex-biased, we utilized an enhancer trap line, Thor-lacZ, which we have previously shown to be reflective of ATF4 transcriptional activity51,57. We observed 85% higher b-galactosidase abundance in female wandering third-instar fat bodies compared with males at the same stage (Fig. 1A–C; Fig. S1A). Since Thor (Drosophila ortholog of the 4E-BP gene) expression can also be regulated downstream of the transcription factor FOXO58,59, we verified potential dimorphic ATF4 activity in the fat body using a transgenic in vivo reporter for ATF4 activity that contains an intronic element from the Thor locus (containing two ATF4 binding sites) driving DsRed expression51 (4EBPintron-DsRed). This reporter is demonstrably ATF4-responsive and unaffected by decreased FOXO expression51. Consistent with a dimorphism in Thor-lacZ expression, we found 4EBPintron-DsRed expression to be 67% higher (p<0.0001) in females compared with males (Fig. 1D–F; Fig. S1B). Since DsRed protein produced from this construct was frequently observed in the cytoplasm, we generated another reporter, 4EBPintron-GFP, using the same 4EBPintron element that faithfully drives GFP expression only in the nucleus (Fig. S1C–D). Reassuringly, using this reporter we also observed 63% higher 4EBPintron activity (p<0.0001) in female adipocytes compared with male adipocytes (Fig. S1C–E).
Figure 1. ATF4 activity is sexually dimorphic in larval adipocytes.
(A-B) Representative immunofluorescence images of male (A) and female (B) larval fat tissues carrying a Thor-lacZ enhancer trap reporter. The inserted lacZ gene encodes β-galactosidase (β-gal) gene and carries a nuclear localization signal. In these animals, β-gal abundance is a proxy for Thor expression, which appears higher in female adipocytes (B”) than male adipocytes (A”).
(C) Quantification of nuclear β-gal fluorescence intensity in A-B.
(D-E) Representative immunofluorescence images of male (D) and female (E) larval fat tissues carrying a transgenic 4EBPintron-DsRed reporter.
(F) Quantification of nuclear DsRed intensity in D-E.
Here and throughout the study, experiments were performed on fat body from wandering 3rd instar larvae unless otherwise specified.
Here and throughout the study, in all quantifications of confocal images such as C and F, statistical significance was determined using a two-tailed Student’s t-test with Welch’s correction for unequal standard deviations; statistical significance is denoted as follows: *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001; ****p<0.0001.
In confocal images, DAPI (magenta) labels nuclei. Scale bars = 50 μm.
ATF4 (crc) mRNA expression is sexually dimorphic in larval adipocytes in an isoform-specific manner
We reasoned that the higher levels in ATF4 reporter expression observed in female fat body in Fig. 1 and S1 could be due to differences in ATF4 mRNA abundance. Drosophila ATF4 is encoded by the cryptocephal (crc) gene; qPCR analyses of fat bodies revealed higher levels of both Thor and crc mRNA in female fat bodies in comparison to male fat bodies (Fig. 2A). There are four annotated crc splice isoforms (according to D.mel genome annotation, dm6 assembly; Fig. 2B): crc-RA, crc-RB, crc-RE, and crc-RF. The experiment in Fig. 2A used primers that detect a common exon-exon junction across all isoforms (Fig. 2B, black arrowheads). To examine whether specific crc isoforms contributed to dimorphic ATF4 expression, we designed primers across unique exon-exon junctions that allowed us to distinguish the longer isoforms crc-RA/RE/RF (Fig. 2B, green arrowheads), separately crc-RE (which bears a unique exon, Fig. 2B, blue arrowheads), and the shortest isoform crc-RB (Fig. 2B, purple arrowheads). Interestingly, we found a female bias in crc isoform abundance using primers that detect RA/RE/RF isoforms (Fig. 2C), while crc-RE primers did not reveal dimorphic abundance (Fig. 2C). We also observed dimorphism in crc-RB transcript abundance (Fig. 2C), indicating that both long- and short- isoforms of ATF4 contribute to dimorphic ISR activity. It is worth mentioning that the only annotated difference between crc-RA and crc-RF is a 23-bp region absent from exon 4 of the RF isoform but included in the RA isoform (Fig. 2B); we were unable to resolve this difference using qPCR or RT-PCR techniques. From these data, we conclude that ATF4 signaling is female-biased in the larval fat body due to greater abundance of crc-RA/F/B isoforms in females compared with males.
Figure 2. ATF4 mRNA abundance in larval adipocytes is sexually dimorphic in an isoform-specific manner.

(A) mRNA abundance of Thor and crc in fat bodies from male/female wandering 3rd instar larvae as determined by qRT-PCR.
(B) Schematic of ATF4 (crc) mRNA isoforms. Orange regions represent ATF4-coding sequences, and gray regions represent all other mRNA exons. Black lines represent intronic regions (exon/intron lengths are not drawn to scale). Pan-isoform primers are indicated with black arrowheads; isoform-specific primers are indicated with blue (RE), green (RA/E/F), or purple (RB) arrowheads.
(C) mRNA abundance of specific crc isoforms as determined by qRT-PCR.
Here and throughout this study, α-Tub84B was used as a reference gene for qPCR analyses and statistical significance was determined using ratio-paired two-tailed Student’s t-test.
Female-biased ATF4 expression is regulated by canonical sex determinants
We next sought to determine whether dimorphic ATF4 expression and activity are established by somatic sex determinants in adipocytes. Canonical sex determination is regulated primarily by the evolutionarily conserved transcription factor Doublesex (Dsx), the founding member of the Doublesex/Mab-3-related transcription factor (DMRT) family60. The dsx locus encodes two protein isoforms: a male-specific effector (DsxM) and a female-specific effector (DsxF). The cellular decision to express either Dsx isoform is instructed by a splicing cascade downstream of the female-specific RNA-binding proteins Sex-lethal (Sxl)61 and Transformer (Tra)62. Thus, manipulating tra expression elicits sex transformation in a cell-autonomous manner, such that loss of tra masculinizes XX cells and over-expression of tra results in feminization of XY cells22,27,40. We found that homozygous tra mutant females (w1118; 4EBPintron-GFP/+; tra1/traKO) showed a substantial 59% reduction (p<0.0001) in ATF4 reporter activity in adipocytes compared with adipocytes from control females (w1118; 4EBPintron-GFP/+; +) (Fig. 3A). We also examined this effect by depleting tra in the female larval fat body (Dcg-GAL4, UAS-GFP/UAS-traRNAi; 4EBPintron-DsRed/+), which led to a modest 8% reduction (p<0.0001) in 4EBPintron-DsRed expression (Fig. S2). We next tested whether tra depletion affected crc mRNA expression in the fat body. In agreement with our earlier finding that sexually dimorphic ATF4 activity results from higher ATF4 expression in female fat body, we found these tissues also had significantly reduced crc transcript abundance upon tra depletion (Fig. 3B). This reduction was observed for all isoforms we tested (Fig. 3C–E), including crc-RE, despite the lack of sexual dimorphism in RE abundance in control animals. We attribute the differences in the magnitude of effects on 4EBPintron-DsRed versus crc mRNA in Dcg>traRNAi animals (Fig. 3A vs B) to the perdurance of DsRed protein. To test whether the converse is also true (that feminization of male fat body leads to elevated ATF4 activity), we expressed tra in male fat body using Dcg-GAL4. Indeed, feminization of male fat body (Dcg-GAL4, UAS-GFP/UAS-traF; 4EBPintron-DsRed/+) more than doubled ATF4 reporter activity (137% increase relative to control male fat body, p<0.0001) (Fig. 3F, S3A–C) and nearly doubled crc transcript abundance (86% increase relative to control male fat body, p<0.0001) for all isoforms tested (Fig. 3G–J).
Figure 3. Female sexual identity of larval adipocytes drives higher ATF4 expression in females.
(A) Quantification of nuclear 4EBPintron-GFP fluorescence intensity in control (w1118) or tra-null (tra1/traKO) larval adipocytes.
(B-E) qPCR analysis on total and isoform-specific crc mRNA abundance in control (lucRNAi) and genetically masculinized (traRNAi) adipocytes.
(F) Quantification of nuclear fluorescence intensity of 4EBPintron-DsRed reporter expression in control (lucRNAi) and genetically feminized (traF) larval fat body.
(G-J) qPCR analysis on total and isoform-specific crc mRNA abundance in tissues from F.
(K) Quantification of nuclear fluorescence intensity of 4EBPintron-DsRed reporter expression in control (lucRNAi) larval fat body and following dsx or nito knockdown in adipocytes.
(L) qPCR analysis on total crc mRNA abundance in tissues from K.
All experiments in (A-L) utilize the fat body driver Dcg-GAL4.
While Dsx is the most well-studied Tra target, there are other effectors of secondary sexual differentiation22,27. Thus, we specifically tested whether Dsx also instructs fat body ATF4 expression similar to Tra. The dsx gene encodes both male and female Dsx splice isoforms, and loss of dsx in either sex is known to produce intersex phenotypes46,63. We thus hypothesized that if dimorphic ATF4 expression is regulated by Dsx, then dsx knockdown would decrease ATF4 activity in female fat body and increase ATF4 activity in male fat body. Indeed, dsx depletion (Dcg-GAL4, UAS-GFP/UAS-dsxRNAi; 4EBPintron-DsRed/+) led to a 25% reduction (p<0.0001) in ATF4 reporter activity in female fat body and a 73% increase (p<0.0001) in ATF4 reporter activity in male fat body (Fig. 3K, S3D–E, G–H). This was accompanied by a 54% reduction (p<0.0001) in crc transcript abundance following dsx knockdown in female fat body (Fig. 3L). A comprehensive analysis of Dsx genomic occupancy previously led to the identification of numerous putative direct Dsx transcriptional targets46, one of which was crc. DamID-seq performed on HA-tagged DsxF in female fat body revealed occupancy in regulatory regions within the crc locus46. In addition, bioinformatic analysis using an experimentally determined position weight matrix for Dsx identified multiple high-scoring Dsx binding sequences in the crc locus46. These analyses present a strong case for direct transcriptional regulation of crc by Dsx in the larval fat body.
To further interrogate the sex determinants that govern dimorphic ATF4 activity, we assayed for ATF4 expression and activity upon loss of the RNA-binding protein Spenito (Nito), which effects female sexual identity in the larval fat body19 by promoting female splicing of Sxl and Tra64 (and via Tra regulation can influence Dsx isoform expression) and. Thus, we sought to test whether dimorphic crc expression in fat body is Nito-dependent. We saw that nito depletion in female adipocytes (Dcg-GAL4, UAS-GFP/UAS-nitoRNAi; 4EBPintron-DsRed/+) caused a 59% reduction (p<0.0001) in ATF4 reporter activity (Fig. 3K, Fig. S3F) and a 76% reduction (p<0.0001) in crc transcript abundance, similar to the levels observed in control male fat body (Fig. 3L). Taken together, our results indicate that sexually dimorphic ATF4 activity in larval fat body is instructed by sexual identity in a cell-autonomous manner, likely via direct transcriptional regulation of ATF4 by Dsx. However, the difference in the magnitude of DsRed reduction between tra mutant versus Dcg>traRNAi adipocytes (Fig. 3A vs S2) suggest we cannot exclude possible non-autonomous roles for sexual identity in regulating dimorphic ATF4 activity in the fat body.
Chronic nutrient deprivation stress in fat tissue causes developmental lethality in males
Studies on starvation resistance in Drosophila and mammals have revealed that female adipocytes are more tolerant to periods of nutrient scarcity65,66. Dietary methionine deprivation has been shown to activate ISR and induce ATF4 expression47. Since dietary restriction has systemic effects, we instead used a genetic model of nutrient deprivation in the fat body that allows for cell-autonomous methionine depletion in Drosophila melanogaster67. In this model, ectopic expression of the bacterial enzyme Methioninase leads to increased catabolism and consequent depletion of the amino acid methionine. Consistent with previous reports of ATF4 reporter induction upon methionine deprivation51, we observed that methioninase over-expression (Dcg-GAL4/+; UAS-methioninase/+) led to higher Thor mRNA induction in both male and female adipocytes in comparison to control animals (Dcg-GAL4/+; UAS-lacZ/+) (Fig. S4A).
Since females are more resilient during periods of nutrient scarcity in Drosophila21,68–70, we reasoned that inducing methioninase expression in the fat during development may differentially impact male and female survival to adulthood. To test this, we performed 24-hour egg lays with equal numbers of age-matched parents and counted the number of adult animals that emerged from each egg lay. Interestingly, methioninase expression in the fat body (Dcg-GAL4, UAS-GFP/+; UAS-methioninase/4EBPintron-DsRed) led to a significantly fewer eclosed males in comparison to control (Dcg-GAL4, UAS-GFP/+; UAS-lacZ/4EBPintron-DsRed) (Fig. 4A). The developmental lethality we observed occurred largely in the pharate stage, immediately preceding eclosion of adults. In contrast, ectopic methioninase expression had a much milder effect on the number of eclosed females (Fig. 4A), supporting the notion that females are more resilient to nutrient deprivation. As with many GAL4 drivers employed for tissue-specific gene expression71, Dcg-GAL4 expression is not restricted to fat tissues during development or adulthood72,73. Thus, we assessed developmental lethality from methioninase expression using two other widely employed fat body drivers: R4-GAL4 and 3.1 Lsp2-GAL4. We found that methioninase expression using either of these fat body drivers phenocopied, to varying degrees, the male developmental lethality observed using Dcg-GAL4 (Fig. 4B–C). Thus, we conclude our developmental lethality phenotypes are primarily due to fat body-autonomous methioninase expression.
Figure 4. Chronic nutrient deprivation stress causes developmental lethality in males.
(A-C) Quantification of males and females eclosed following a 24-hr egg lay from Dcg-GAL4 (A), R4-GAL4 (B), or 3.1 Lsp2-GAL4 (C) females crossed to either UAS-lacZ (lacZ) or UAS-methioninase (met’ase) males.
(D) Quantification of males and females eclosed following a 24-hr egg lay from Dcg-GAL4 females crossed to males of the indicated genotypes (x-axis) to test protective role of ATF4 in preventing female lethality during methioninase expression.
Statistical significance in A-E was evaluated using a series of unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-tests with Welch’s correction.
In performing genetic nutrient deprivation experiments using Dcg-GAL4, we observed that severity of Methioninase-induced developmental lethality increased in subsequent iterations, in that successive 24-hour egg lays performed using the same parents over a three-day period exhibited progressively more severe developmental lethality (Fig. S4B–D). We postulate that this is not due to a decline in the fertility of the female parent, since we did not observe a decrease in the total number of progeny produced in the control (>lacZ) crosses (Fig. S4B–D). These observations led us to question whether “leaky”, GAL4-independent UAS expression caused sufficient methioninase expression (which all tissues could theoretically experience), to contribute to the observed developmental lethality. To test this, we examined 4EBPintron-GFP activity in animals carrying UAS-lacZ or UAS-methioninase absent of a GAL4 driver. We were surprised to find that UAS-methioninase alone nearly doubled ATF4 reporter activity in both male and female larval fat body compared with UAS-lacZ animals (Fig. S4E). To assess whether leaky methioninase expression contributed to the observed developmental lethality in Dcg>methioninase animals, we collected UAS-lacZ and UAS-methioninase embryos (absent of any GAL4 transgene) over a 24-hr period and quantified the number of animals that progressed into adulthood. Reassuringly, despite the increased ATF4 activity observed in the presence of UAS-methioninase, this increase was not sufficient to cause developmental lethality in males (Fig. S4F). Thus, we conclude that GAL4-mediated methioninase expression in the fat effected the majority of observed developmental lethality in males in Fig. 4A–C.
We next tested whether female sex identity of the fat body and/or higher ATF4 activity therein offer a protective role for females during chronic nutrient deprivation. Since females are more starvation-resistant than males21,68,70, we predicted that masculinizing female fat body (via tra knockdown) would increase developmental lethality with methioninase expression. As shown in Fig. 4A, female adult eclosion rate was not significantly affected by methioninase expression (Fig. S4G, second bar, Dcg-GAL4/UAS-lacZRNAi;UAS-methioninase/+) in comparison to control females (Fig. S4G, first bar, Dcg-GAL4/UAS-lacZRNAi;UAS-lacZ/+). We observed that masculinization of the fat body via tra knockdown was sufficient to decrease viability of female animals to adult upon methioninase expression (Dcg-GAL4/UAS-traRNAi;UAS-methioninase/+, Fig. S4G). Finally, we tested whether female resilience to methioninase expression relies on higher ATF4 expression. Interestingly, simultaneous depletion of ATF4 and expression of methioninase (Fig. 4D, Dcg-GAL4/UAS-ATF4RNAi;UAS-methioninase/+) resulted in a significant increase in female developmental lethality compared with females expressing methioninase and a control transgene (Dcg-GAL4/UAS-ATF4RNAi;UAS-lacZ/+). Such loss of ATF4 did not appear to further impact the already reduced eclosion rates seen in males with methioninase expression (Fig. 4D, compare sixth bar to eighth). Taken together, our data support a model wherein high ATF4 activity in female fat body, instructed by cellular sexual identity, confers a protective role to female animals under nutrient deprivation stress.
Discussion
In this study, we demonstrate that the Integrated Stress Response is sexually dimorphic in larval adipocytes. This dimorphism has implications for sexually dimorphic adipose tissue physiology, wherein the sexual identity of the fat confers a survival advantage to females under nutrient deprivation stress in an ATF4-dependent manner. A growing body of work has established that chromosomally female (XX) animals exhibit higher survival during periods of nutrient scarcity compared with chromosomally male (XY) animals65,66. Despite examples of this in both clinical and model organism studies, research is still ongoing to identify the molecular and/or physiological differences between male and female adipocytes that drive sexually dimorphic survival under stress. Our work links previously unreported dimorphic expression of the transcription factor ATF4 in the fat body to survival under nutrient deprivation stress, providing an important molecular clue into the physiology underlying sexually dimorphic stress tolerance.
We used two types of readouts – enhancer-based ATF4 reporter expression and ATF4 (crc) mRNA abundance – to demonstrate that ATF4 expression is female-biased in larval adipocytes (Fig. 1, S1, 2). Using tissue-specific loss-of-function experiments, we found that this dimorphism relies on cell-autonomous sexual identity instruction by the canonical sex determinants Tra, Dsx, and Nito (Fig. 3, S2–3). Finally, we determined that dimorphic ATF4 expression in the fat underlies sex-biased survival to nutrient deprivation stress: we saw that genetic methionine depletion via methioninase expression in the fat body caused developmental lethality disproportionately in males (Fig. 4A–C, S4B) and that the survival advantage conferred to females relied both on the sexual identity of adipocytes and on higher basal ATF4 expression therein (Fig. 4D, S4F). In summary, our findings implicate fat body ATF4 function in directing sex-specific physiology in Drosophila melanogaster. Because the Drosophila fat body is analogous to both adipocytes and hepatocytes in mammals, the regulation of ATF4 activity by sexual identity in adipocytes can likely be extended to further understand sexually dimorphic functions of ISR in mammalian fat and liver.
Sexual dimorphism in metabolic tissues
Increased energy storage capabilities have been implicated in female starvation resistance68,69,74, and such sex differences in energy metabolism have been shown and/or presumed to affect long-term disease susceptibilities, such as a higher incidence of obesity in females8,9,10 and higher male predisposition to diabetes and insulin resistance11. Males and females are differentially sensitive to changes in the abundance of specific energy sources75–77 (e.g., carbohydrates versus protein). A clearer understanding of the transcriptional outputs that fuel such sex differences would enable us to better understand energy metabolism in the context of whole organism physiology. Such an understanding might also clarify seeming contradictions in sex-specific physiology, such as the fact that females are more resilient to metabolic disease under some conditions while exhibiting increased disease risk in others15,78,79. Future work on molecular dimorphisms in adipocyte gene expression will provide new insights into how sex-specific adipocyte functions might underly disease vulnerabilities.
Sexually dimorphic physiology and behavior are instructed by genetic and transcriptional programs via downstream effectors of Tra, most of which are instructed by the transcription factors Dsx and Fru. In addition to expression differences between males and females, dimorphism in hormones such as 20E underly various aspects of sex-specific physiology. For example, recent work has demonstrated that female-biased plasticity of the adult intestine post-mating depends on high circulating 20E levels, which are higher in females than in males80. In larvae, female-biased expression of Ecdysone receptor (EcR), which regulates transcription of 20E-promoting gene targets upon binding to 20E, is essential for proper specification of the somatic gonad and maintenance of gametogenic potential in the adult81. EcR is expressed broadly in larval and adult tissues, including in the fat and ovary. EcR promotes a female metabolic state in the ovary by regulating expression of genes that support lipid biosynthesis and uptake26. ATF4 and EcR have been shown to physically interact in vitro82, raising the possibility of cooperation between ISR and EcR signaling pathways to promote a female metabolic state.
Metabolic pathways in lipogenic tissues like the fat and intestine drive many aspects of sex-specific physiology1. Research from over six decades ago establishes that in humans, a minimum requirement of fat stores within adipose tissue is required for onset of the fertile period in adolescence83. The prevailing thought is that evolutionary pressures led to a heavy reliance of the female reproductive system on metabolic tissues such as the fat and liver to produce metabolites/hormones84. In this paradigm, male metabolic tissues are less responsive to such evolutionary pressure due to the lower energetic cost of sperm production relative to egg production. The energetic “tradeoff” of this evolutionary pressure might underly consequent dimorphism in metabolic disease risk, wherein female metabolic tissues that have evolved to more efficiently store and utilize excess dietary fats show lower incidence of cardiometabolic disorders in comparison to males7,14,78,79. In extending our fundamental discoveries in this work to the clinical realm, an enticing postulation is that the dimorphism in ATF4 activity and/or adipose tissue physiology might contribute to the lower cardiometabolic risks reported in female humans. An important caveat that must be mentioned here is that not all stress resilience favors a female bias. For example, in a cohort of diabetic patients, females present a higher of developing cardiovascular disease3. Thus, future work in model organisms and humans will enable us to test the above postulation and its caveats.
ATF4 induction in the fat enables adaptive response to nutrient deprivation
We found that higher ATF4 activity in females rendered them more resistant to metabolic stress imposed by methioninase expression (Fig. 4; Fig. S4). Curiously, despite higher basal levels of ATF4 activity in female adipocytes, we did not observe Thor induction to a higher degree in female fat body than in male fat body upon methioninase expression in comparison to adipocytes with control (lacZ) expression (Fig. S4A). This could reflect a limitation of our readout, which defines ATF4 activity quantitatively based on abundance of one known ATF4 target gene, Thor (Drosophila 4E-BP). While Thor induction is a widely employed readout for ATF4 activity, there may be other relevant target genes, yet unidentified, that are differentially expressed in males and females during nutrient deprivation stress. Future studies will examine transcriptional differences in male and female fat body during stress and degree of reliance on ATF4 activity.
Amino acid restriction has been shown to trigger ISR activation in Drosophila and ATF4 is known to be critical for mediating the response to such nutritional stress48,51. ISR activation is differentially sensitive to individual amino acids, though methionine deprivation robustly activates PERK- and GCN2-mediated ISR signaling85. Methioninase is bacteria-derived and catalyzes the conversion of sulfur-containing amino acids like methionine into a-keto acids, producing ammonia as a byproduct86. In the simplest interpretation, Methioninase expression results in methionine-deprivation, thus activating GCN2/ATF4 signaling. However, our study does not rule out the possibility that male-biased lethality upon methioninase over-expression is driven by the accumulation of α-ketomethionine, ammonia, or other downstream metabolites that result from processing of methionine. Interestingly, recent work has shown that elevated ammonia levels stimulate lipogenesis in the mammalian liver via ATF4 induction87, suggesting ammonia could be a minor contributor to the ATF4 induction we observe upon Methioninase induction.
A potential role for ATF4 in regulating sexually dimorphic fat storage
Sexual dimorphism in fat storage mechanisms has been well documented19,20,24–26. Recent work by several groups48,49,54,88,89 has underscored the importance of ATF4 activity for homeostatic function, even in the absence of an obvious ‘stressor’ such as ER stress, dietary changes, immune challenge, or oxidative stress. One consensus from these recent studies underscores a role for ATF4 in lipid metabolism; loss of ATF4 is consistently found to lower overall stored fats in mice and Drosophila49,54,55. However, the total fat measurements in these studies did not include sex as a biological variable90,91, which is likely a major contributing factor to why the dimorphic nature of ATF4 signaling in fat tissues has previously gone unreported. We have recently shown that in the adult fat body, homeostatic ATF4 activity promotes the lipid droplet breakdown required for yolk synthesis49. Since lipid mobilization from larval fat body enables progression through metamorphosis92, our data support a model wherein sexually dimorphic ATF4 activity in larval adipocytes equips females with a higher capacity for lipid mobilization during this critical developmental period. Interestingly, sex differences in fat breakdown in adult Drosophila are influenced by dimorphic expression of transcripts encoding the TAG lipase, brummer (bmm), which is higher in adult male flies than in adult females24. We recently showed that the bmm locus contained several ATF4 binding sites, and a GFP reporter driven by these sites was de-repressed upon deletion of the binding sites49. Together, these observations lead us to hypothesize that dimorphic expression of lipid metabolism genes, potentially driven by ATF4, might underly sex differences in adipose tissue physiology. In addition, these principles could very well extend beyond the larval fat body, which we extensively test herein, to other dimorphic tissues that rely heavily on metabolic genes, such as the intestine and the brain.
In summary, our work establishes that part of the sexual differentiation program instructed by Tra/Dsx during development includes establishing higher basal ISR activity in female versus male adipocytes. Our findings indicate that increased resilience to nutritional stress in females can be ascribed, in part, to dimorphic ATF4 activity. Since ISR signaling is sensitive to changes in nutrient availability56, we propose that sexually dimorphic ISR signaling in Drosophila fat tissues may underly physiologically important molecular differences in metabolic dependency between males and females. Future work will investigate these differences at the molecular level, how they drive sex-biased stress resistance, and whether such processes govern metabolic sex differences and stress tolerance in mammals, including humans.
Limitations of the study
Specificity of GAL4 lines:
Much of our results in this work rely on the use of Dcg-GAL4 as a larval fat body driver, which enables robust transgene expression but is also expressed outside the fat body. Using UAS-GFP as a readout, we reliably observed Dcg-GAL4 activity in both larval and adult adipocytes. However, we also found Dcg-GAL4 activity in larval and adult hemocytes, which is consistent with previous reports93. The issue of tissue specificity is not limited to Dcg-GAL4: R4-GAL4 was expressed in larval fat body, hemocytes, and gonads. In contrast, 3.1 Lsp2-GAL4 was faithfully fat-specific at all stages observed – absent from hemocytes, intestines, and gonads in both wandering L3 larvae and young adults – though its activity was low in larval tissues. Lsp2 expression in the fat increases substantially in pupal stages such that 3.1 Lsp2-GAL4 activity is detectable in the adult fat body, consistent with previously reported Lsp2 transcript abundance across developmental stages94. Despite these issues, we believe our primary results to be robust, though we cannot fully exclude the possibility of fat body non-autonomous roles in experiments that utilize GAL4-mediated transgene expression.
Purity of larval fat body isolates for qPCR analyses:
For all qPCR experiments in this manuscript, we dissected fat body from staged wandering third instar larvae and are careful to not include any other larval tissue. The exception to this is the larval gonad, which is embedded in the fat body. Based on 4EBPintron-GFP reporter expression, we have found consistently that ATF4 activity is undetectable in larval gonads. Thus, we do not expect gonadal gene expression to be a significant contributor of the mRNA transcripts analyzed in this study. Since the gonad cannot be removed without considerably damaging the fat body, we elected to retain the gonad in our RNA preparations for qPCR. Indeed, our qPCR results demonstrating that ATF4 in the fat body is dimorphic is supported by visualization of enhancer-based reporters (Fig. 1; Fig. S1), they do not exclude the possibility that some of these sex differences in crc mRNA are due to differences in the gonad.
Methods
Fly stocks and husbandry
The transgenic and mutant lines used in this study are publicly available via Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center, Vienna Drosophila Resource Center, or were sourced from other labs. See Table S1 for the complete list of lines used. 4EBPintron-GFP transgenic flies were generated for this study; methods for construct design and transgenesis are described below.
Flies were reared on standard nutrient-rich agar medium containing cornmeal, molasses and yeast (LabExpress Inc., Ann Arbor, MI). All fly stocks were maintained at room temperature, and experimental crosses were reared in incubators at 24°C on a 12hr light/dark cycle.
Immunostaining
Larval fat bodies were dissected in 1x PBS and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 minutes at room temperature (RT) and washed twice in PBST (1xPBS + 0.1% Tween-20). For Thor-lacZ activity detection, samples were incubated overnight at 4°C with mouse anti-b-gal primary antibody (40–1a, 1:40, DSHB), followed by two washes in PBST and incubation with goat anti-mouse Alexa647 (1:500, Invitrogen) and DAPI (300 nM) for 20 mins in the dark at RT. For all other samples, fixation and the first two washes were immediately followed by DAPI incubation for 20 mins in the dark at RT. Samples were then washed twice in PBS and mounted in Vectashield (Fisher Scientific). Microscopy was performed using a Nikon A1 confocal microscope using a 20x objective lens.
Generation of 4EBPintron-GFP transgenic animals
A 424-bp intronic element of the Thor (4EBP) locus, previously characterized to contain ATF4 binding sites (Kang 2017), was ligated into pStinger-attB via restriction cloning into SphI-XhoI sites. The resulting 4EBPintron-GFP plasmid was then injected into Drosophila melanogaster embryos for stable genomic integration into the attP14 landing site (The Best Gene, Inc., Chino Hills, CA, USA). Primers used for cloning can be found in Table S1.
Quantitative RT-PCR (qPCR)
Larval fat body was isolated from the posterior half of 3–4 animals per replicate for qPCR analyses. Number of animals per replicate/genotype was controlled within each experiment. Fat body preps included larval gonads and trivial amounts of Malphigian tubule tissue; thus, some of the RNA isolated for qPCR analysis represent contaminant transcript from these tissues. This is discussed further in the “Limitations of this study“ section. aTub84B was employed as a housekeeping gene for qPCR analyses, since levels do not vary significantly between males and females95.
Developmental lethality assays
Assays were performed in triplicate at 24°C, with each assay vial containing 12 females and 3 males. To set up each assay, adults were anesthetized using CO2 and the correct number of females and males of each genotype were added to the assay vial. These assay parents were housed for 48 hours prior to assay to acclimate and recover from CO2 treatment. To perform the assay, parents were transferred by flipping into fresh vials containing nutrient-rich food (as described above). After 24 hours, parents were removed and flipped into new assay vials for a subsequent egg lay. For all egg lays, male parents were heterozygous for each listed allele, over a balancer. For example, control male genotype was UAS-lacZRNAi/CyO; UAS-lacZ/TM6B. F1 adults of the correct genotype were then isolated and quantified for analyses. The cumulative male and female progeny that hatched from eggs laid during a 24-hour period were counted beginning 10 days following egg lay and for the following 5 days (to allow time for possible developmental delays). Animals were isolated at 0–2 days of age, at which time no lethality of eclosed adults was observed in any of the tested genotypes; this assay was not designed to capture adult lethality that might occur later than 2 days post-eclosion.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to the Center for Biological Imaging at the University of Pittsburgh for imaging assistance and access to equipment and to Dr. Andrey Parkhitko (University of Pittsburgh) for helpful discussion. Additionally, we thank the Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center (BDSC, Bloomington, IN), the Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank (DSHB, Iowa City, IA), the Vienna Drosophila Resource Center (VDRC, Vienna, Austria), and the Transgenic RNAi Project (Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, MA) for making available reagents needed for this study. D.V. was funded by NIH R00EY029013 and NIH R35GM150516; L.G. was funded by NIH T32DK063922 and NIH K99GM149982.
References
- 1.Mauvais-Jarvis F. Sex differences in energy metabolism: natural selection, mechanisms and consequences. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 20, 56–69 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Millington J. W. & Rideout E. J. Sex differences in Drosophila development and physiology. Curr. Opin. Physiol. 6, 46–56 (2018). [Google Scholar]
- 3.Yoshida Y. et al. Sex differences in the progression of metabolic risk factors in diabetes development. JAMA Netw. Open 5, e2222070 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Womersley J. A comparison of the skinfold method with extent of “overweight” and various weight-height relationships in the assessment of obesity. Br. J. Nutr. 38, 271–284 (1977). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Wells J. C. K. Sexual dimorphism of body composition. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 21, 415–430 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Mansour M. F., Chan C.-W. J., Laforest S., Veilleux A. & Tchernof A. Sex differences in body fat distribution. in Adipose Tissue Biology (ed. Symonds M. E.) 257–300 (Springer International Publishing, 2017). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-52031-5_8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Meloni A. et al. Gender differences and cardiometabolic risk: the importance of the risk factors. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 24, (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kelly T., Yang W., Chen C. S., Reynolds K. & He J. Global burden of obesity in 2005 and projections to 2030. Int J Obes (Lond) 32, 1431–1437 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hales C. M., Carroll M. D., Fryar C. D. & Ogden C. L. Prevalence of Obesity and Severe Obesity Among Adults: United States, 2017–2018. (2020). [PubMed]
- 10.Karastergiou K., Smith S. R., Greenberg A. S. & Fried S. K. Sex differences in human adipose tissues - the biology of pear shape. Biol. Sex Differ. 3, 13 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Mauvais-Jarvis F. Sex differences in metabolic homeostasis, diabetes, and obesity. Biol. Sex Differ. 6, 14 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Narayan K. M. V., Boyle J. P., Thompson T. J., Gregg E. W. & Williamson D. F. Effect of BMI on lifetime risk for diabetes in the U.S. Diabetes Care 30, 1562–1566 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Barber T. M., Hanson P., Weickert M. O. & Franks S. Obesity and polycystic ovary syndrome: implications for pathogenesis and novel management strategies. Clin. Med. Insights Reprod. Health 13, 1179558119874042 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Richard A. J., White U., Elks C. M. & Stephens J. M. Adipose tissue: physiology to metabolic dysfunction. in Endotext (eds. Feingold K. R. et al.) (MDText.com, Inc., 2000). [Google Scholar]
- 15.Manrique-Acevedo C., Chinnakotla B., Padilla J., Martinez-Lemus L. A. & Gozal D. Obesity and cardiovascular disease in women. Int J Obes (Lond) 44, 1210–1226 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Gesta S. et al. Evidence for a role of developmental genes in the origin of obesity and body fat distribution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103, 6676–6681 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Grove K. L., Fried S. K., Greenberg A. S., Xiao X. Q. & Clegg D. J. A microarray analysis of sexual dimorphism of adipose tissues in high-fat-diet-induced obese mice. Int J Obes (Lond) 34, 989–1000 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.MacCannell A. D. V. et al. Sexual dimorphism in adipose tissue mitochondrial function and metabolic flexibility in obesity. Int J Obes (Lond) 45, 1773–1781 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Diaz A. V., Stephenson D., Nemkov T., D’Alessandro A. & Reis T. Spenito-dependent metabolic sexual dimorphism intrinsic to fat storage cells. Genetics 225, (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Shingleton A. W. & Vea I. M. Sex-specific regulation of development, growth and metabolism. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 138, 117–127 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lin Y.-C., Zhang M., Chang Y.-J. & Kuo T.-H. Comparisons of lifespan and stress resistance between sexes in Drosophila melanogaster. Heliyon 9, e18178 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Rideout E. J., Narsaiya M. S. & Grewal S. S. The Sex Determination Gene transformer Regulates Male-Female Differences in Drosophila Body Size. PLoS Genet. 11, e1005683 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Hughson B. N. The Glucagon-Like Adipokinetic Hormone in Drosophila melanogaster - Biosynthesis and Secretion. Front. Physiol. 12, 710652 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Wat L. W. et al. A role for triglyceride lipase brummer in the regulation of sex differences in Drosophila fat storage and breakdown. PLoS Biol. 18, e3000595 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Wat L. W., Chowdhury Z. S., Millington J. W., Biswas P. & Rideout E. J. Sex determination gene transformer regulates the male-female difference in Drosophila fat storage via the adipokinetic hormone pathway. eLife 10, (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Sieber M. H. & Spradling A. C. Steroid signaling establishes a female metabolic state and regulates SREBP to control oocyte lipid accumulation. Curr. Biol. 25, 993–1004 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Hudry B., Khadayate S. & Miguel-Aliaga I. The sexual identity of adult intestinal stem cells controls organ size and plasticity. Nature 530, 344–348 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hudry B. et al. Sex differences in intestinal carbohydrate metabolism promote food intake and sperm maturation. Cell 178, 901–918.e16 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Argue K. J. & Neckameyer W. S. Altering the sex determination pathway in Drosophila fat body modifies sex-specific stress responses. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 307, R82–92 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Bell L. R., Horabin J. I., Schedl P. & Cline T. W. Positive autoregulation of sex-lethal by alternative splicing maintains the female determined state in Drosophila. Cell 65, 229–239 (1991). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Erickson J. W. & Quintero J. J. Indirect effects of ploidy suggest X chromosome dose, not the X:A ratio, signals sex in Drosophila. PLoS Biol. 5, e332 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Inoue K., Hoshijima K., Sakamoto H. & Shimura Y. Binding of the Drosophila sex-lethal gene product to the alternative splice site of transformer primary transcript. Nature 344, 461–463 (1990). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Boggs R. T., Gregor P., Idriss S., Belote J. M. & McKeown M. Regulation of sexual differentiation in D. melanogaster via alternative splicing of RNA from the transformer gene. Cell 50, 739–747 (1987). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Inoue K., Hoshijima K., Higuchi I., Sakamoto H. & Shimura Y. Binding of the Drosophila transformer and transformer-2 proteins to the regulatory elements of doublesex primary transcript for sex-specific RNA processing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89, 8092–8096 (1992). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Lynch K. W. & Maniatis T. Assembly of specific SR protein complexes on distinct regulatory elements of the Drosophila doublesex splicing enhancer. Genes Dev. 10, 2089–2101 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Heinrichs V., Ryner L. C. & Baker B. S. Regulation of sex-specific selection of fruitless 5’ splice sites by transformer and transformer-2. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18, 450–458 (1998). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.McKeown M., Belote J. M. & Baker B. S. A molecular analysis of transformer, a gene in Drosophila melanogaster that controls female sexual differentiation. Cell 48, 489–499 (1987). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Le Bras S. & Van Doren M. Development of the male germline stem cell niche in Drosophila. Dev. Biol. 294, 92–103 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Chatterjee S. S., Uppendahl L. D., Chowdhury M. A., Ip P.-L. & Siegal M. L. The female-specific doublesex isoform regulates pleiotropic transcription factors to pattern genital development in Drosophila. Development 138, 1099–1109 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Grmai L., Hudry B., Miguel-Aliaga I. & Bach E. A. Chinmo prevents transformer alternative splicing to maintain male sex identity. PLoS Genet. 14, e1007203 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Camara N., Whitworth C., Dove A. & Van Doren M. Doublesex controls specification and maintenance of the gonad stem cell niches in Drosophila. Development 146, (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Demir E. & Dickson B. J. fruitless splicing specifies male courtship behavior in Drosophila. Cell 121, 785–794 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Chandegra B., Tang J. L. Y., Chi H. & Alic N. Sexually dimorphic effects of dietary sugar on lifespan, feeding and starvation resistance in Drosophila. Aging (Albany NY) 9, 2521–2528 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Pomatto L. C. D. et al. The Mitochondrial Lon Protease Is Required for Age-Specific and Sex-Specific Adaptation to Oxidative Stress. Curr. Biol. 27, 1–15 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Pomatto L. C. D., Tower J. & Davies K. J. A. Sexual dimorphism and aging differentially regulate adaptive homeostasis. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 73, 141–149 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Clough E. et al. Sex- and tissue-specific functions of Drosophila doublesex transcription factor target genes. Dev. Cell 31, 761–773 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Costa-Mattioli M. & Walter P. The integrated stress response: From mechanism to disease. Science 368, (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Vasudevan D., Katow H., Huang H.-W., Tang G. & Ryoo H. D. A protein-trap allele reveals roles for Drosophila ATF4 in photoreceptor degeneration, oogenesis and wing development. Dis. Model. Mech. 15, (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Grmai L., Michaca M., Lackner E., Nampoothiri V P N. & Vasudevan D. Integrated stress response signaling acts as a metabolic sensor in fat tissues to regulate oocyte maturation and ovulation. Cell Rep. 43, 113863 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Li W., Li X. & Miller R. A. ATF4 activity: a common feature shared by many kinds of slow-aging mice. Aging Cell 13, 1012–1018 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Kang M.-J. et al. 4E-BP is a target of the GCN2-ATF4 pathway during Drosophila development and aging. J. Cell Biol. 216, 115–129 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Steffen K. K. et al. Yeast life span extension by depletion of 60s ribosomal subunits is mediated by Gcn4. Cell 133, 292–302 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Magwere T., Chapman T. & Partridge L. Sex differences in the effect of dietary restriction on life span and mortality rates in female and male Drosophila melanogaster. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 59, 3–9 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Seo J. et al. Atf4 regulates obesity, glucose homeostasis, and energy expenditure. Diabetes 58, 2565–2573 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Wang C. et al. ATF4 regulates lipid metabolism and thermogenesis. Cell Res. 20, 174–184 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Kosakamoto H. et al. Sensing of the non-essential amino acid tyrosine governs the response to protein restriction in Drosophila. Nat. Metab. 4, 944–959 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Brown B., Mitra S., Roach F. D., Vasudevan D. & Ryoo H. D. The transcription factor Xrp1 is required for PERK-mediated antioxidant gene induction in Drosophila. eLife 10, (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Jünger M. A. et al. The Drosophila forkhead transcription factor FOXO mediates the reduction in cell number associated with reduced insulin signaling. J. Biol. 2, 20 (2003). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Puig O., Marr M. T., Ruhf M. L. & Tjian R. Control of cell number by Drosophila FOXO: downstream and feedback regulation of the insulin receptor pathway. Genes Dev. 17, 2006–2020 (2003). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Hildreth P. E. Doublesex, recessive gene that transforms both males and females of drosophila into intersexes. Genetics 51, 659–678 (1965). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Sánchez L. & Nöthiger R. Sex determination and dosage compensation in Drosophila melanogaster: production of male clones in XX females. EMBO J. 2, 485–491 (1983). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Belote J. M., McKeown M., Boggs R. T., Ohkawa R. & Sosnowski B. A. Molecular genetics of transformer, a genetic switch controlling sexual differentiation in Drosophila. Dev. Genet. 10, 143–154 (1989). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Nagoshi R. N. & Baker B. S. Regulation of sex-specific RNA splicing at the Drosophila doublesex gene: cis-acting mutations in exon sequences alter sex-specific RNA splicing patterns. Genes Dev. 4, 89–97 (1990). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Yan D. & Perrimon N. spenito is required for sex determination in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112, 11606–11611 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Chauhan V., Anis A. & Chauhan A. Effects of starvation on the levels of triglycerides, diacylglycerol, and activity of lipase in male and female drosophila melanogaster. J. Lipids 2021, 5583114 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Suchacki K. J. et al. The effects of caloric restriction on adipose tissue and metabolic health are sex- and age-dependent. eLife 12, (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Parkhitko A. A. et al. A genetic model of methionine restriction extends Drosophila health- and lifespan. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 118, (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Zwaan B. J., Bijlsma R. & Hoekstra R. F. On the developmental theory of ageing. I. starvation resistance and longevity in Drosophila melanogaster in relation to pre-adult breeding conditions. Heredity 66 (Pt 1), 29–39 (1991). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Jikumaru M. et al. Effect of starvation on the survival of male and female mice. Physiol. Chem. Phys. Med. NMR 39, 247–257 (2007). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Gerofotis C. D. et al. Age, sex, adult and larval diet shape starvation resistance in the Mediterranean fruit fly: an ecological and gerontological perspective. Sci. Rep. 9, 10704 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Weaver L. N., Ma T. & Drummond-Barbosa D. Analysis of gal4 expression patterns in adult drosophila females. G3 (Bethesda) 10, 4147–4158 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Asha H. et al. Analysis of Ras-induced overproliferation in Drosophila hemocytes. Genetics 163, 203–215 (2003). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Armstrong A. R., Laws K. M. & Drummond-Barbosa D. Adipocyte amino acid sensing controls adult germline stem cell number via the amino acid response pathway and independently of Target of Rapamycin signaling in Drosophila. Development 141, 4479–4488 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Lee K. P. & Jang T. Exploring the nutritional basis of starvation resistance inDrosophila melanogaster. Funct. Ecol. 28, 1144–1155 (2014). [Google Scholar]
- 75.Millington J. W. et al. A low-sugar diet enhances Drosophila body size in males and females via sex-specific mechanisms. Development 149, (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Tarnopolsky M. A., Atkinson S. A., Phillips S. M. & MacDougall J. D. Carbohydrate loading and metabolism during exercise in men and women. J. Appl. Physiol. 78, 1360–1368 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Braun B. et al. Women at altitude: carbohydrate utilization during exercise at 4,300 m. J. Appl. Physiol. 88, 246–256 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Pi-Sunyer F. X. The epidemiology of central fat distribution in relation to disease. Nutr. Rev. 62, S120–6 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Yusuf S. et al. Obesity and the risk of myocardial infarction in 27,000 participants from 52 countries: a case-control study. Lancet 366, 1640–1649 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Ahmed S. M. H. et al. Fitness trade-offs incurred by ovary-to-gut steroid signalling in Drosophila. Nature 584, 415–419 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Grmai L., Jimenez E., Baxter E. & Van Doren M. Steroid signaling controls sex-specific development in an invertebrate. BioRxiv (2023) doi: 10.1101/2023.12.22.573099. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Gauthier S. A., VanHaaften E., Cherbas L., Cherbas P. & Hewes R. S. Cryptocephal, the Drosophila melanogaster ATF4, is a specific coactivator for ecdysone receptor isoform B2. PLoS Genet. 8, e1002883 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Frisch R. E. & McArthur J. W. Menstrual cycles: fatness as a determinant of minimum weight for height necessary for their maintenance or onset. Science 185, 949–951 (1974). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Della Torre S. & Maggi A. Sex differences: A resultant of an evolutionary pressure? Cell Metab. 25, 499–505 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Wanders D. et al. Role of GCN2-Independent Signaling Through a Noncanonical PERK/NRF2 Pathway in the Physiological Responses to Dietary Methionine Restriction. Diabetes 65, 1499–1510 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Kreis W. & Hession C. Isolation and purification of L-methionine-alpha-deamino-gamma-mercaptomethane-lyase (L-methioninase) from Clostridium sporogenes. Cancer Res. 33, 1862–1865 (1973). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Song Q. et al. Gut-derived ammonia contributes to alcohol-related fatty liver development via facilitating ethanol metabolism and provoking ATF4-dependent de novo lipogenesis activation. Metab. Clin. Exp. 151, 155740 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Masuoka H. C. & Townes T. M. Targeted disruption of the activating transcription factor 4 gene results in severe fetal anemia in mice. Blood 99, 736–745 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Hewes R. S., Schaefer A. M. & Taghert P. H. The cryptocephal gene (ATF4) encodes multiple basic-leucine zipper proteins controlling molting and metamorphosis in Drosophila. Genetics 155, 1711–1723 (2000). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Mank J. E. & Rideout E. J. Developmental mechanisms of sex differences: from cells to organisms. Development 148, (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Miguel-Aliaga I. Let’s talk about (biological) sex. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 23, 227–228 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Wang S. et al. 20-hydroxyecdysone reduces insect food consumption resulting in fat body lipolysis during molting and pupation. J. Mol. Cell Biol. 2, 128–138 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Sapar M. L. et al. Phosphatidylserine Externalization Results from and Causes Neurite Degeneration in Drosophila. Cell Rep. 24, 2273–2286 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.modENCODE Consortium et al. Identification of functional elements and regulatory circuits by Drosophila modENCODE. Science 330, 1787–1797 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.De Groef S. et al. Reference genes to study the sex-biased expression of genes regulating Drosophila metabolism. Sci. Rep. 14, 9518 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Suh J. M. et al. An RGS-containing sorting nexin controls Drosophila lifespan. PLoS ONE 3, e2152 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.



