Skip to main content
PMC home page
The EMBO Journal logoLink to The EMBO Journal
. 1998 Feb 16;17(4):1169–1181. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.4.1169

Efficient transposition of IS911 circles in vitro.

B Ton-Hoang 1, P Polard 1, M Chandler 1
PMCID: PMC1170465  PMID: 9463394

Abstract

An in vitro system has been developed which supports efficient integration of transposon circles derived from the bacterial insertion sequence IS911. Using relatively pure preparations of IS911-encoded proteins it has been demonstrated that integration into a suitable target required both the transposase, OrfAB, a fusion protein produced by translational frameshifting between two consecutive open reading frames, orfA and orfB, and OrfA, a protein synthesized independently from the upstream orfA. Intermolecular reaction products were identified in which one or both transposon ends were used. The reaction also generated various intramolecular transposition products including adjacent deletions and inversions. The circle junction, composed of abutted left and right IS ends, retained efficient integration activity when carried on a linear donor molecule, demonstrating that supercoiling in the donor molecule is not necessary for the reaction. Both two-ended integration and a lower level of single-ended insertions were observed under these conditions. The frequency of these events depended on the spacing between the transposon ends. Two-ended insertion was most efficient with a natural spacing of 3 bp. These results demonstrate that transposon circles can act as intermediates in IS911 transposition and provide evidence for collaboration between the two major IS911-encoded proteins, OrfA and OrfAB.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (467.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Abremski K., Frommer B., Wierzbicki A., Hoess R. H. Properties of a mutant Cre protein that alters the topological linkage of recombination products. J Mol Biol. 1988 Jul 5;202(1):59–66. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(88)90518-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Andrake M. D., Skalka A. M. Retroviral integrase, putting the pieces together. J Biol Chem. 1996 Aug 16;271(33):19633–19636. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.33.19633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bainton R. J., Kubo K. M., Feng J. N., Craig N. L. Tn7 transposition: target DNA recognition is mediated by multiple Tn7-encoded proteins in a purified in vitro system. Cell. 1993 Mar 26;72(6):931–943. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90581-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bainton R., Gamas P., Craig N. L. Tn7 transposition in vitro proceeds through an excised transposon intermediate generated by staggered breaks in DNA. Cell. 1991 May 31;65(5):805–816. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90388-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Baker T. A., Mizuuchi K. DNA-promoted assembly of the active tetramer of the Mu transposase. Genes Dev. 1992 Nov;6(11):2221–2232. doi: 10.1101/gad.6.11.2221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Benjamin H. W., Kleckner N. Excision of Tn10 from the donor site during transposition occurs by flush double-strand cleavages at the transposon termini. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 May 15;89(10):4648–4652. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.10.4648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bushman F. D., Craigie R. Activities of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) integration protein in vitro: specific cleavage and integration of HIV DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Feb 15;88(4):1339–1343. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.4.1339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chalmers R. M., Kleckner N. IS10/Tn10 transposition efficiently accommodates diverse transposon end configurations. EMBO J. 1996 Sep 16;15(18):5112–5122. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chandler M., Fayet O. Translational frameshifting in the control of transposition in bacteria. Mol Microbiol. 1993 Feb;7(4):497–503. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1993.tb01140.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Copeland W. C., Lam N. K., Wang T. S. Fidelity studies of the human DNA polymerase alpha. The most conserved region among alpha-like DNA polymerases is responsible for metal-induced infidelity in DNA synthesis. J Biol Chem. 1993 May 25;268(15):11041–11049. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Craig N. L. Transposon Tn7. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 1996;204:27–48. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-79795-8_2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Craigie R., Mizuuchi K. Role of DNA topology in Mu transposition: mechanism of sensing the relative orientation of two DNA segments. Cell. 1986 Jun 20;45(6):793–800. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90554-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Drelich M., Wilhelm R., Mous J. Identification of amino acid residues critical for endonuclease and integration activities of HIV-1 IN protein in vitro. Virology. 1992 Jun;188(2):459–468. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(92)90499-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gary P. A., Biery M. C., Bainton R. J., Craig N. L. Multiple DNA processing reactions underlie Tn7 transposition. J Mol Biol. 1996 Mar 29;257(2):301–316. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Haniford D., Kleckner N. Tn 10 transposition in vivo: temporal separation of cleavages at the two transposon ends and roles of terminal basepairs subsequent to interaction of ends. EMBO J. 1994 Jul 15;13(14):3401–3411. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06643.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Katzman M., Katz R. A., Skalka A. M., Leis J. The avian retroviral integration protein cleaves the terminal sequences of linear viral DNA at the in vivo sites of integration. J Virol. 1989 Dec;63(12):5319–5327. doi: 10.1128/jvi.63.12.5319-5327.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kleckner N., Chalmers R. M., Kwon D., Sakai J., Bolland S. Tn10 and IS10 transposition and chromosome rearrangements: mechanism and regulation in vivo and in vitro. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 1996;204:49–82. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-79795-8_3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lewis L. A., Grindley N. D. Two abundant intramolecular transposition products, resulting from reactions initiated at a single end, suggest that IS2 transposes by an unconventional pathway. Mol Microbiol. 1997 Aug;25(3):517–529. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1997.4871848.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Mizuuchi K. Polynucleotidyl transfer reactions in transpositional DNA recombination. J Biol Chem. 1992 Oct 25;267(30):21273–21276. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Mizuuchi K. Transpositional recombination: mechanistic insights from studies of mu and other elements. Annu Rev Biochem. 1992;61:1011–1051. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.61.070192.005051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Mizuuchi M., Mizuuchi K. Efficient Mu transposition requires interaction of transposase with a DNA sequence at the Mu operator: implications for regulation. Cell. 1989 Jul 28;58(2):399–408. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90854-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Olasz F., Stalder R., Arber W. Formation of the tandem repeat (IS30)2 and its role in IS30-mediated transpositional DNA rearrangements. Mol Gen Genet. 1993 May;239(1-2):177–187. doi: 10.1007/BF00281616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Plasterk R. H. The Tc1/mariner transposon family. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 1996;204:125–143. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-79795-8_6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Polard P., Chandler M. An in vivo transposase-catalyzed single-stranded DNA circularization reaction. Genes Dev. 1995 Nov 15;9(22):2846–2858. doi: 10.1101/gad.9.22.2846. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Polard P., Prère M. F., Chandler M., Fayet O. Programmed translational frameshifting and initiation at an AUU codon in gene expression of bacterial insertion sequence IS911. J Mol Biol. 1991 Dec 5;222(3):465–477. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(91)90490-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Polard P., Prère M. F., Fayet O., Chandler M. Transposase-induced excision and circularization of the bacterial insertion sequence IS911. EMBO J. 1992 Dec;11(13):5079–5090. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05615.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Polard P., Ton-Hoang B., Haren L., Bétermier M., Walczak R., Chandler M. IS911-mediated transpositional recombination in vitro. J Mol Biol. 1996 Nov 22;264(1):68–81. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Prère M. F., Chandler M., Fayet O. Transposition in Shigella dysenteriae: isolation and analysis of IS911, a new member of the IS3 group of insertion sequences. J Bacteriol. 1990 Jul;172(7):4090–4099. doi: 10.1128/jb.172.7.4090-4099.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Reimmann C., Haas D. The istA gene of insertion sequence IS21 is essential for cleavage at the inner 3' ends of tandemly repeated IS21 elements in vitro. EMBO J. 1990 Dec;9(12):4055–4063. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb07627.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Reimmann C., Moore R., Little S., Savioz A., Willetts N. S., Haas D. Genetic structure, function and regulation of the transposable element IS21. Mol Gen Genet. 1989 Feb;215(3):416–424. doi: 10.1007/BF00427038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Sekine Y., Eisaki N., Ohtsubo E. Translational control in production of transposase and in transposition of insertion sequence IS3. J Mol Biol. 1994 Feb 4;235(5):1406–1420. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1994.1097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Spielmann-Ryser J., Moser M., Kast P., Weber H. Factors determining the frequency of plasmid cointegrate formation mediated by insertion sequence IS3 from Escherichia coli. Mol Gen Genet. 1991 May;226(3):441–448. doi: 10.1007/BF00260657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Studier F. W., Moffatt B. A. Use of bacteriophage T7 RNA polymerase to direct selective high-level expression of cloned genes. J Mol Biol. 1986 May 5;189(1):113–130. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(86)90385-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Surette M. G., Chaconas G. Stimulation of the Mu DNA strand cleavage and intramolecular strand transfer reactions by the Mu B protein is independent of stable binding of the Mu B protein to DNA. J Biol Chem. 1991 Sep 15;266(26):17306–17313. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Surette M. G., Harkness T., Chaconas G. Stimulation of the Mu A protein-mediated strand cleavage reaction by the Mu B protein, and the requirement of DNA nicking for stable type 1 transpososome formation. In vitro transposition characteristics of mini-Mu plasmids carrying terminal base pair mutations. J Biol Chem. 1991 Feb 15;266(5):3118–3124. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Szeverényi I., Bodoky T., Olasz F. Isolation, characterization and transposition of an (IS2)2 intermediate. Mol Gen Genet. 1996 Jun 12;251(3):281–289. doi: 10.1007/BF02172518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Ton-Hoang B., Bétermier M., Polard P., Chandler M. Assembly of a strong promoter following IS911 circularization and the role of circles in transposition. EMBO J. 1997 Jun 2;16(11):3357–3371. doi: 10.1093/emboj/16.11.3357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Turlan C., Chandler M. IS1-mediated intramolecular rearrangements: formation of excised transposon circles and replicative deletions. EMBO J. 1995 Nov 1;14(21):5410–5421. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb00225.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Vos J. C., Plasterk R. H. Tc1 transposase of Caenorhabditis elegans is an endonuclease with a bipartite DNA binding domain. EMBO J. 1994 Dec 15;13(24):6125–6132. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06959.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Wang G., Xu X., Chen J. M., Berg D. E., Berg C. M. Inversions and deletions generated by a mini-gamma delta (Tn1000) transposon. J Bacteriol. 1994 Mar;176(5):1332–1338. doi: 10.1128/jb.176.5.1332-1338.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Weinert T. A., Schaus N. A., Grindley N. D. Insertion sequence duplication in transpositional recombination. Science. 1983 Nov 18;222(4625):755–765. doi: 10.1126/science.6314502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Zerbib D., Polard P., Escoubas J. M., Galas D., Chandler M. The regulatory role of the IS1-encoded InsA protein in transposition. Mol Microbiol. 1990 Mar;4(3):471–477. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1990.tb00613.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Zerbib D., Prentki P., Gamas P., Freund E., Galas D. J., Chandler M. Functional organization of the ends of IS1: specific binding site for an IS 1-encoded protein. Mol Microbiol. 1990 Sep;4(9):1477–1486. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. de la Cruz N. B., Weinreich M. D., Wiegand T. W., Krebs M. P., Reznikoff W. S. Characterization of the Tn5 transposase and inhibitor proteins: a model for the inhibition of transposition. J Bacteriol. 1993 Nov;175(21):6932–6938. doi: 10.1128/jb.175.21.6932-6938.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. van Gent D. C., Ramsden D. A., Gellert M. The RAG1 and RAG2 proteins establish the 12/23 rule in V(D)J recombination. Cell. 1996 Apr 5;85(1):107–113. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81086-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The EMBO Journal are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES