Skip to main content
PMC home page
The EMBO Journal logoLink to The EMBO Journal
. 1998 Mar 2;17(5):1446–1453. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.5.1446

An embryonic demethylation mechanism involving binding of transcription factors to replicating DNA.

K Matsuo 1, J Silke 1, O Georgiev 1, P Marti 1, N Giovannini 1, D Rungger 1
PMCID: PMC1170492  PMID: 9482741

Abstract

In vertebrates, transcriptionally active promoters are undermethylated. Since the transcription factor Sp1, and more recently NF-kappaB, have been implicated in the demethylation process, we examined the effect of transcription factors on demethylation by injecting in vitro methylated plasmid DNA into Xenopus fertilized eggs. We found that various transactivation domains, including a strong acidic activation domain from the viral protein VP16, can enhance demethylation of a promoter region when fused to a DNA binding domain which recognizes the promoter. Furthermore, demethylation occurs only after the midblastula transition, when the general transcription machinery of the host embryo becomes available. Nevertheless, transcription factor binding need not be followed by actual transcription, since demethylation is not blocked by alpha-amanitin treatment. Finally, replication of the target DNA is a prerequisite for efficient demethylation since only plasmids that carry the bovine papilloma virus sequences which support plasmid replication after the midblastula transition are demethylated. No demethylation is detectable in the oocyte system where DNA is not replicated. These results suggest that, in the Xenopus embryo, promoters for which transcription factors are available are demethylated by a replication-dependent, possibly passive mechanism.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (331.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bendig M. M., Williams J. G. Replication and expression of Xenopus laevis globin genes injected into fertilized Xenopus eggs. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Oct;80(20):6197–6201. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.20.6197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bird A. P. CpG-rich islands and the function of DNA methylation. Nature. 1986 May 15;321(6067):209–213. doi: 10.1038/321209a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bird A., Taggart M., Macleod D. Loss of rDNA methylation accompanies the onset of ribosomal gene activity in early development of X. laevis. Cell. 1981 Nov;26(3 Pt 1):381–390. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90207-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bird A. The essentials of DNA methylation. Cell. 1992 Jul 10;70(1):5–8. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90526-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brandeis M., Frank D., Keshet I., Siegfried Z., Mendelsohn M., Nemes A., Temper V., Razin A., Cedar H. Sp1 elements protect a CpG island from de novo methylation. Nature. 1994 Sep 29;371(6496):435–438. doi: 10.1038/371435a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Busslinger M., deBoer E., Wright S., Grosveld F. G., Flavell R. A. The sequence GGCmCGG is resistant to MspI cleavage. Nucleic Acids Res. 1983 Jun 11;11(11):3559–3569. doi: 10.1093/nar/11.11.3559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cooper D. N., Taggart M. H., Bird A. P. Unmethylated domains in vertebrate DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1983 Feb 11;11(3):647–658. doi: 10.1093/nar/11.3.647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Courey A. J., Tjian R. Analysis of Sp1 in vivo reveals multiple transcriptional domains, including a novel glutamine-rich activation motif. Cell. 1988 Dec 2;55(5):887–898. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90144-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Etkin L. D., Balcells S. Transformed Xenopus embryos as a transient expression system to analyze gene expression at the midblastula transition. Dev Biol. 1985 Mar;108(1):173–178. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(85)90019-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Frank D., Lichtenstein M., Paroush Z., Bergman Y., Shani M., Razin A., Cedar H. Demethylation of genes in animal cells. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1990 Jan 30;326(1235):241–251. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1990.0008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gardiner-Garden M., Frommer M. CpG islands in vertebrate genomes. J Mol Biol. 1987 Jul 20;196(2):261–282. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(87)90689-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gerber H. P., Seipel K., Georgiev O., Höfferer M., Hug M., Rusconi S., Schaffner W. Transcriptional activation modulated by homopolymeric glutamine and proline stretches. Science. 1994 Feb 11;263(5148):808–811. doi: 10.1126/science.8303297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hagen G., Müller S., Beato M., Suske G. Sp1-mediated transcriptional activation is repressed by Sp3. EMBO J. 1994 Aug 15;13(16):3843–3851. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06695.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Harland R. M., Laskey R. A. Regulated replication of DNA microinjected into eggs of Xenopus laevis. Cell. 1980 Oct;21(3):761–771. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(80)90439-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hoey T., Weinzierl R. O., Gill G., Chen J. L., Dynlacht B. D., Tjian R. Molecular cloning and functional analysis of Drosophila TAF110 reveal properties expected of coactivators. Cell. 1993 Jan 29;72(2):247–260. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90664-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Howlett S. K., Reik W. Methylation levels of maternal and paternal genomes during preimplantation development. Development. 1991 Sep;113(1):119–127. doi: 10.1242/dev.113.1.119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hug M., Silke J., Georgiev O., Rusconi S., Schaffner W., Matsuo K. Transcriptional repression by methylation: cooperativity between a CpG cluster in the promoter and remote CpG-rich regions. FEBS Lett. 1996 Feb 5;379(3):251–254. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(95)01521-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hyrien O., Méchali M. Chromosomal replication initiates and terminates at random sequences but at regular intervals in the ribosomal DNA of Xenopus early embryos. EMBO J. 1993 Dec;12(12):4511–4520. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1993.tb06140.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Höller M., Westin G., Jiricny J., Schaffner W. Sp1 transcription factor binds DNA and activates transcription even when the binding site is CpG methylated. Genes Dev. 1988 Sep;2(9):1127–1135. doi: 10.1101/gad.2.9.1127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Iguchi-Ariga S. M., Schaffner W. CpG methylation of the cAMP-responsive enhancer/promoter sequence TGACGTCA abolishes specific factor binding as well as transcriptional activation. Genes Dev. 1989 May;3(5):612–619. doi: 10.1101/gad.3.5.612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Jost J. P. Nuclear extracts of chicken embryos promote an active demethylation of DNA by excision repair of 5-methyldeoxycytidine. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 May 15;90(10):4684–4688. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.10.4684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Jost J. P., Siegmann M., Sun L., Leung R. Mechanisms of DNA demethylation in chicken embryos. Purification and properties of a 5-methylcytosine-DNA glycosylase. J Biol Chem. 1995 Apr 28;270(17):9734–9739. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.17.9734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kafri T., Gao X., Razin A. Mechanistic aspects of genome-wide demethylation in the preimplantation mouse embryo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Nov 15;90(22):10558–10562. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.22.10558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Keshet E., Cedar H. Effect of CpG methylation on Msp I. Nucleic Acids Res. 1983 Jun 11;11(11):3571–3580. doi: 10.1093/nar/11.11.3571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kingsley C., Winoto A. Cloning of GT box-binding proteins: a novel Sp1 multigene family regulating T-cell receptor gene expression. Mol Cell Biol. 1992 Oct;12(10):4251–4261. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.10.4251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kirillov A., Kistler B., Mostoslavsky R., Cedar H., Wirth T., Bergman Y. A role for nuclear NF-kappaB in B-cell-specific demethylation of the Igkappa locus. Nat Genet. 1996 Aug;13(4):435–441. doi: 10.1038/ng0895-435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. La Volpe A., Taggart M., Macleod D., Bird A. Coupled demethylation of sites in a conserved sequence of Xenopus ribosomal DNA. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1983;47(Pt 2):585–592. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1983.047.01.069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Levine A., Cantoni G. L., Razin A. Methylation in the preinitiation domain suppresses gene transcription by an indirect mechanism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Nov 1;89(21):10119–10123. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.21.10119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Lichtenstein M., Keini G., Cedar H., Bergman Y. B cell-specific demethylation: a novel role for the intronic kappa chain enhancer sequence. Cell. 1994 Mar 11;76(5):913–923. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90365-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Lusky M., Botchan M. R. Characterization of the bovine papilloma virus plasmid maintenance sequences. Cell. 1984 Feb;36(2):391–401. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90232-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Macleod D., Charlton J., Mullins J., Bird A. P. Sp1 sites in the mouse aprt gene promoter are required to prevent methylation of the CpG island. Genes Dev. 1994 Oct 1;8(19):2282–2292. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.19.2282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Marin M., Karis A., Visser P., Grosveld F., Philipsen S. Transcription factor Sp1 is essential for early embryonic development but dispensable for cell growth and differentiation. Cell. 1997 May 16;89(4):619–628. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80243-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Marini N. J., Benbow R. M. Differential compartmentalization of plasmid DNA microinjected into Xenopus laevis embryos relates to replication efficiency. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Jan;11(1):299–308. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.1.299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Mastrangelo I. A., Courey A. J., Wall J. S., Jackson S. P., Hough P. V. DNA looping and Sp1 multimer links: a mechanism for transcriptional synergism and enhancement. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Jul 1;88(13):5670–5674. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.13.5670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Matthias P. D., Bernard H. U., Scott A., Brady G., Hashimoto-Gotoh T., Schütz G. A bovine papilloma virus vector with a dominant resistance marker replicates extrachromosomally in mouse and E. coli cells. EMBO J. 1983;2(9):1487–1492. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1983.tb01612.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Newport J., Kirschner M. A major developmental transition in early Xenopus embryos: I. characterization and timing of cellular changes at the midblastula stage. Cell. 1982 Oct;30(3):675–686. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90272-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Nichols A., Rungger-Brändle E., Muster L., Rungger D. Inhibition of Xhox1A gene expression in Xenopus embryos by antisense RNA produced from an expression vector read by RNA polymerase III. Mech Dev. 1995 Jul;52(1):37–49. doi: 10.1016/0925-4773(95)00387-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Ogryzko V. V., Schiltz R. L., Russanova V., Howard B. H., Nakatani Y. The transcriptional coactivators p300 and CBP are histone acetyltransferases. Cell. 1996 Nov 29;87(5):953–959. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)82001-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Park P., Copeland W., Yang L., Wang T., Botchan M. R., Mohr I. J. The cellular DNA polymerase alpha-primase is required for papillomavirus DNA replication and associates with the viral E1 helicase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Aug 30;91(18):8700–8704. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.18.8700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Paroush Z., Keshet I., Yisraeli J., Cedar H. Dynamics of demethylation and activation of the alpha-actin gene in myoblasts. Cell. 1990 Dec 21;63(6):1229–1237. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90418-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Prioleau M. N., Huet J., Sentenac A., Méchali M. Competition between chromatin and transcription complex assembly regulates gene expression during early development. Cell. 1994 May 6;77(3):439–449. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90158-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Radtke F., Hug M., Georgiev O., Matsuo K., Schaffner W. Differential sensitivity of zinc finger transcription factors MTF-1, Sp1 and Krox-20 to CpG methylation of their binding sites. Biol Chem Hoppe Seyler. 1996 Jan;377(1):47–56. doi: 10.1515/bchm3.1996.377.1.47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Rollins M. B., Andrews M. T. Morphogenesis and regulated gene activity are independent of DNA replication in Xenopus embryos. Development. 1991 Jun;112(2):559–569. doi: 10.1242/dev.112.2.559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Rusconi S., Schaffner W. Transformation of frog embryos with a rabbit beta-globin gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Aug;78(8):5051–5055. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.8.5051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Schmid M., Steinbeisser H., Trendelenburg M. F., Lipps H. J. A bovine papillomavirus type-1 (BPV-1) containing plasmid replicates extrachromosomally in Xenopus embryos. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990 Apr 25;18(8):2196–2196. doi: 10.1093/nar/18.8.2196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Seipel K., Georgiev O., Schaffner W. Different activation domains stimulate transcription from remote ('enhancer') and proximal ('promoter') positions. EMBO J. 1992 Dec;11(13):4961–4968. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05603.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Silke J., Rother K. I., Georgiev O., Schaffner W., Matsuo K. Complex demethylation patterns at Sp1 binding sites in F9 embryonal carcinoma cells. FEBS Lett. 1995 Aug 21;370(3):170–174. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(95)00830-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Stott K., Blackburn J. M., Butler P. J., Perutz M. Incorporation of glutamine repeats makes protein oligomerize: implications for neurodegenerative diseases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Jul 3;92(14):6509–6513. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.14.6509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Su W., Jackson S., Tjian R., Echols H. DNA looping between sites for transcriptional activation: self-association of DNA-bound Sp1. Genes Dev. 1991 May;5(5):820–826. doi: 10.1101/gad.5.5.820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Svaren J., Schmitz J., Hörz W. The transactivation domain of Pho4 is required for nucleosome disruption at the PHO5 promoter. EMBO J. 1994 Oct 17;13(20):4856–4862. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06812.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Weiss A., Keshet I., Razin A., Cedar H. DNA demethylation in vitro: involvement of RNA. Cell. 1996 Sep 6;86(5):709–718. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80146-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Westin G., Gerster T., Müller M. M., Schaffner G., Schaffner W. OVEC, a versatile system to study transcription in mammalian cells and cell-free extracts. Nucleic Acids Res. 1987 Sep 11;15(17):6787–6798. doi: 10.1093/nar/15.17.6787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Wong J., Shi Y. B., Wolffe A. P. A role for nucleosome assembly in both silencing and activation of the Xenopus TR beta A gene by the thyroid hormone receptor. Genes Dev. 1995 Nov 1;9(21):2696–2711. doi: 10.1101/gad.9.21.2696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Xu L., Rungger D., Georgiev O., Seipel K., Schaffner W. Different potential of cellular and viral activators of transcription revealed in oocytes and early embryos of Xenopus laevis. Biol Chem Hoppe Seyler. 1994 Feb;375(2):105–112. doi: 10.1515/bchm3.1994.375.2.105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Zhao J., Benbow R. M. Inhibition of DNA replication in cell-free extracts of Xenopus laevis eggs by extracts of Xenopus laevis oocytes. Dev Biol. 1994 Jul;164(1):52–62. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1994.1179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The EMBO Journal are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES