ABSTRACT
To discover new factors that are involved in iron acquisition by Legionella pneumophila, we used RNA-Seq to identify the genes that are most highly induced when virulent strain 130b is cultured in a low-iron chemically defined medium. Among other things, this revealed 14915, a heretofore uncharacterized gene that is predicted to be transcriptionally regulated by Fur and to encode a novel, ~15 kDa protein. 14915 was present in all L. pneumophila strains examined and had homologs in a subset of the other Legionella species. Compatible with it containing a classic signal sequence, the 14915 protein was detected in bacterial culture supernatants in a manner dependent upon the L. pneumophila type II secretion system. Thus, we designated 14915 as IrsA for iron-regulated, secreted protein A. Based on mutant analysis, the irsA gene was not required for optimal growth of strain 130b in low-iron media. However, after discovering that the commonly used laboratory-derived strain Lp02 has a much greater requirement for iron, we uncovered a growth-enhancing role for IrsA after examining an Lp02 mutant that lacked both IrsA and the Fe2+-transporter FeoB. The irsA mutant of 130b, but not its complemented derivative, did, however, display increased biofilm formation on both plastic and agar surfaces, and compatible with this, the mutant hyper-aggregated. Thus, IrsA is a novel, iron-regulated exoprotein that modulates biofilm formation and, under some circumstances, promotes growth in low-iron conditions. For this study, we determined and deposited in the database a complete and fully assembled genome sequence for strain 130b.
IMPORTANCE
The bacterium Legionella pneumophila is the principal cause of Legionnaires’ disease, a potentially fatal form of pneumonia that is increasing in incidence. L. pneumophila exists in many natural and human-made water systems and can be transmitted to humans through inhalation of contaminated water droplets. L. pneumophila flourishes within its habitats by spreading planktonically, assembling into biofilms, and growing in larger host cells. Iron acquisition is a key determinant for L. pneumophila persistence in water and during infection. We previously demonstrated that L. pneumophila assimilates iron both by secreting a non-protein iron chelator (siderophore) and by importing iron through membrane transporters. In this study, we uncovered a novel, secreted protein that is highly iron-regulated, promotes L. pneumophila’s growth in low-iron media, and impacts biofilm formation. We also identified uncharacterized, IrsA-related proteins in other important human and animal pathogens. Thus, our results have important implications for understanding iron assimilation, biofilm formation, and pathogenesis.
KEYWORDS: Legionella pneumophila, RNA-Seq, iron acquisition, FeoB, T2SS, type II secretion, biofilm, autoaggregation
INTRODUCTION
The Gram-negative bacterium Legionella pneumophila is the main agent of Legionnaires’ disease, a form of pneumonia that is both increasing in incidence and especially problematic for immunocompromised and elderly individuals (1, 2). In natural and human-made water systems, L. pneumophila survives planktonically, as a constituent of biofilms and as an intracellular parasite of numerous types of amoebae (3, 4). Humans are primarily infected with L. pneumophila by the inhalation of contaminated water droplets that are produced by a variety of aerosol-generating devices (5). Pneumonia ensues following bacterial growth in alveolar macrophages and the onset of extensive inflammation and tissue destruction (6). In both protozoan and mammalian host cells, L. pneumophila replicates in a unique, membrane-bound compartment (Legionella-containing vacuole [LCV]), and this infectious process occurs, in large part, through the action of the Dot/Icm type IV protein secretion system (T4SS) (7). L. pneumophila also utilizes a type II protein secretion system (T2SS) to flourish extracellularly, form biofilms, and grow in host cells (8, 9). Iron acquisition is yet another determinant for L. pneumophila persistence in water systems, intracellular infection of host cells, and virulence (10, 11).
As one of its main modes of iron acquisition, L. pneumophila imports ferrous iron through the FeoB inner membrane transporter, which is encoded by the feoABC operon (12, 13). Indeed, feoB mutants are impaired for growth in low-iron media, biofilm formation, infection of amoebae and macrophages, and survival in the lungs of experimentally infected animals (12, 14). To facilitate its acquisition of Fe2+, L. pneumophila secretes homogentisic acid which polymerizes to form a melanin-like pigment that acts as an extracellular ferric reductase (15–17). Another facilitator of L. pneumophila ferrous iron acquisition and growth in low-iron conditions is the protein MavN/IroT, which, during intracellular infection, can be delivered into the membrane of the LCV by the Dot/Icm T4SS and therein serve as a transporter of Fe2+ and other cations (14, 18–21). As a second major pathway for iron uptake, L. pneumophila secretes a Fe3+-chelating siderophore known as rhizoferrin (22, 23). Detected when L. pneumophila is grown in a deferrated chemically defined medium, rhizoferrin is synthesized by the siderophore synthetase LbtA and then exported via the membrane protein LbtB (22, 24–27). Subsequently, ferri-rhizoferrin is imported by the combined action of the outer membrane receptor LbtU and the inner membrane transporter LbtC (28, 29). From phenotypic analyses of an lbtA mutant and an lbtA feoB mutant, we determined that rhizoferrin is necessary for the optimum growth of L. pneumophila in low-iron media, in host cells, and in the lungs of mice (14, 28–30). Additionally, rhizoferrin, like FeoB-mediated ferrous transport, can promote biofilm formation by L. pneumophila (14). L. pneumophila regulates the expression of its lbtABC, lbtU, feoABC, and mavN/iroT genes through the action of Fur, which is a transcriptional repressor when iron levels are sufficiently elevated and is itself modulated by CsrA (12, 18, 19, 28, 29, 31–34). The growth of L. pneumophila in low-iron conditions and the production of siderophore activity by the bacterium are also promoted by cytochrome c4 and the cytochrome c maturation (ccm) locus, although the manner in which this occurs remains largely unknown (10, 35–37). As is the case for many other bacteria, L. pneumophila has yet additional factors that are induced by low-iron conditions and/or promote growth in iron-deplete media or during intracellular infection (10). Among these factors are (i) a putative second siderophore synthetase that is Fur-regulated, shares sequence similarly with LbtA, and promotes macrophage infection (FrgA), (ii) a paralog of LbtU that can aid in ferri-siderophore uptake (LbtP), (iii) a putative membrane-associated, peptide transporter that fosters growth in low-iron media (IraB), (iv) hemin utilization and a surface hemin-binding protein, (v) a T2SS-dependent, secreted metalloprotease that can degrade the mammalian iron-binding protein transferrin (ProA), (vi) the twin-arginine translocon, which enhances growth in low-iron conditions presumably due to its role in protein secretion (TatB), (vii) a periplasmic, multi-copper oxidase that aids growth in the presence of Fe3+ sources (McoL), (viii) cell-associated ferric reductases that may reduce imported ferric iron or ferri-siderophore (Cfr, Pfr), (ix) an iron-regulated, mini-ferritin-like protein (DpsL), and (x) homologs of pyoverdine synthesis genes that are iron-regulated and hyperexpressed in biofilms (PvcA, PvcB) (10, 26, 29, 32, 38–48). In the current study, we have uncovered a novel, highly iron-regulated protein (to be designated as IrsA, for iron-regulated, secreted protein A) that is secreted by the T2SS and impacts L. pneumophila’s ability to grow in low-iron conditions and to form biofilm.
RESULTS
RNA-Seq analysis of L. pneumophila strain 130b grown in a low-iron, chemically defined medium
To uncover “new” factors that might be linked to rhizoferrin or other aspects of L. pneumophila iron acquisition, we performed a transcriptomic analysis of L. pneumophila grown in media containing different levels of iron. Specifically, we cultured wild-type (WT) strain 130b, a clinical isolate belonging to serogroup-1, in chemically defined medium (CDM) that lacks any iron added to the base medium (CDM – Fe) vs in CDM that includes an iron supplement of 5 µM ferric pyrophosphate (CDM + Fe) and then using RNA-Seq analysis identified those transcripts that are more highly expressed in the iron-deplete cultures. The CDM base consists of the 20 amino acids (aas) (with cystine replacing cysteine), α-ketoglutarate, glutathione, pyruvate, nine trace metals other than iron, KH2PO4, NaCl, and MOPS buffer. As alluded to earlier, CDM − Fe is the medium that has been used for the detection and purification of L. pneumophila rhizoferrin (22–25). Utilizing inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), we determined that the level of iron in our CDM – Fe was equal to 0.14 µM. There has been only one prior effort at using transcriptomics to identify iron-regulated genes of L. pneumophila, and that study used microarrays to find RNAs that are more highly expressed when strain Paris is grown for 30 min or 3 h in a complex medium (i.e., buffered yeast extract, BYE) that was supplemented with an iron chelator (i.e., 20 µM deferoxamine, DFX) (18). As a prelude to our transcriptomic analysis, we determined the complete and fully assembled genome sequence for L. pneumophila strain 130b, since a previous genomic study had only reported a draft sequence for that strain (49). For our investigation, we employed CDM – Fe cultures and CMD + Fe cultures that had been grown for ~4 h to mid-log phase, since quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) analysis determined that the induction of known iron acquisition genes (e.g., lbtA and lbtU) is greatest during the mid-log phase as compared to the late-log and early-stationary phases (Fig. S1). In total, the RNA-Seq analysis uncovered 56 genes that were notably more expressed (≥2-fold) in the bacteria grown in CDM – Fe as compared to the bacteria grown to a similar extent in CDM + Fe, i.e., genes induced by iron depletion (Fig. 1A and B). This was in addition to finding eight genes that were notably more expressed (≥2-fold) in those samples grown in CDM + Fe, i.e., genes repressed upon iron depletion (Fig. 1A and C). Table S1 contains the full data set of all RNAs detected in the samples. We gave our immediate attention to the 10 genes that were most induced upon iron depletion (Fig. 1A and B). Not surprisingly, four of the genes that were most induced in the low-iron condition were the genes known to be involved in rhizoferrin synthesis (lbtA), export (lbtB), or import (lbtC, lbtU) (26, 28, 29). The lbtA gene stood out as being the most hyperexpressed showing a 397-fold induction in low iron, followed by lbtB at 172-fold induction, lbtC at 60-fold induction, and lbtU at 14-fold induction. Incidentally, although lbtA, lbtB, and lbtC are known to exist in an operon (that is separate from lbtU) (28, 29), the variation in their induction levels most likely reflects degradation of transcripts from their 3´ ends. The second-most induced gene overall (at 252-fold) was frgA, the previously defined Fur-regulated gene that promotes intracellular infection and encodes a protein homologous to LbtA (26, 32). The fifth-most induced gene (at 52-fold) was mavN/iroT, another previously described iron-regulated gene that promotes growth in low-iron media and during intracellular infection (18, 19). Also expectedly, the feoA, feoB, and feoC genes that are linked to ferrous iron transport (12) were found to be induced 7- to 14-fold upon growth in CDM − Fe. All of the aforementioned nine genes had been detected in the microarray analysis of strain Paris grown in DFX-containing BYE broth (18). Other iron-related genes that were induced (~3- to 4-fold) by low-iron conditions in both our examination and the prior microarray study were eight genes in an operon beginning with sufA that promote the incorporation of iron-sulfur clusters into select proteins (Fig. 1B) (18, 43, 50, 51). However, our analysis, most importantly, uncovered a gene, i.e., open reading frame (ORF) “14915,” that had not been previously reported and was induced 38-fold in the low-iron growth condition (Fig. 1A and B). Given its novelty, 14915 became the focus of our attention.
Fig 1.
Identification of L. pneumophila genes that are induced by bacterial growth in deferrated CDM. On three independent occasions, L. pneumophila wild-type strain 130b was grown to mid-log phase in either CDM lacking any added iron (CDM – Fe) or CDM containing 5 µM added ferric pyrophosphate (CDM + Fe), and then RNAs isolated from the three biological replicates per growth condition were subjected to RNA-Seq analysis. (A) Volcano plot depicting the response of L. pneumophila genes to bacterial growth in CDM – Fe vs growth in CDM + Fe. Orange dots to the right of the vertical orange line denote the genes that were more highly expressed by at least twofold (P < 0.05) during growth in CDM – Fe. Blue dots to the left of the vertical blue line denote the genes that were more highly expressed by at least twofold (P < 0.05) during growth in CDM + Fe. Red dots indicate those genes that were more modestly affected by changes in iron, and black dots signify genes whose expression was not impacted at all by iron levels. The names or ORF designation for the 10 genes that were most highly induced by iron depletion are indicated in the upper right portion of the plot. (B) Table presenting the ORF designation/gene name, protein product/annotation, and fold induction (P < 0.05) for the 56 genes that were induced by growth in deferrated medium. (C) Table showing the ORF designation/gene name, protein product/annotation, and fold induction (P < 0.05) for the eight genes that were induced by growth in ferrated medium. (A–C) As per NCBI, the names for all the ORFs in the complete 130b genome formally consist of the prefix “ABXK18_” followed by a three- to five-digit number, e.g., “ABXK18_XXXXX.” For simplicity, the graph and tables provide only the numerical part of the ORF designation.
Transcription of the 14915 gene is highly responsive to iron levels
Examination of the L. pneumophila 130b genome indicated that 14915 is a monocistronic gene that is predicted to encode a 144-amino-acid protein (Fig. 2A). Upstream of 14915 was mcoL, which, as noted in the Introduction, encodes a multi-copper oxidase that can promote L. pneumophila growth in the presence of ferric iron sources (44, 52). Downstream of 14915 was a gene annotated as corA and predicted to encode a magnesium/cobalt uptake transporter (53, 54). To verify our RNA-Seq results, we utilized qRT-PCR to further compare the levels of 14915 transcripts in CDM – Fe cultures vs CDM + Fe cultures. This experiment confirmed that 14915 is highly induced (~100-fold) by iron depletion, showing a level of induction that was greater than that of lbtU and feoB but less than that of lbtA and frgA (Fig. 2B), a result that was in-line with the RNA-Seq data. Further examination of the strain 130b genome revealed that the promoter region for 14915 has a putative binding site for Fur (“Fur box”) (Fig. 2A). Figure S2 presents an alignment of the predicted Fur box for 14915 with the previously predicted Fur boxes for lbtABC, lbtU, frgA, mavN/iroT, and feoABC (18), i.e., the other genes that were most highly induced by iron depletion (Fig. 1B). Thus, 14915 transcription is likely repressed by Fur during L. pneumophila growth in high-iron conditions but de-repressed and greatly expressed when the bacterium is in low-iron environments.
Fig 2.
Genetic locus, iron-regulated transcription, and phylogenetic distribution of the 14915 gene. (A) Depiction of the chromosomal locus of L. pneumophila strain 130b that encodes 14915. In the gene map presented at the top, the arrows indicate the relative length of each gene and the direction of their transcription. The lower line is the nucleotide sequence upstream of the 14915 ORF, showing its predicted promoter region (i.e., −10 box and −35 box, spaced 17 bp apart) and the putative binding site for the Fur repressor. (B) Effect of low-iron growth conditions on the induction of 14915 expression. WT strain 130b was grown to mid-log phase in either CDM lacking added iron (CDM − Fe) or CDM containing 5 µM added ferric pyrophosphate (CDM + Fe), and then mRNA levels for each of the five indicated genes were determined by qRT-PCR using, as the templates isolated, whole-cell RNA from three biological replicates (examined in triplicate). Presented are the means and standard deviations for the fold increases in transcript levels when comparing samples from CDM − Fe to those from CDM + Fe. (C) Distribution of genes encoding 14915/IrsA homologs within species of Legionella and related genera. (Center) A maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree for unique species in the orders Berkiellales, Coxiellales, Diplorickettsiales, DSM-16500, Francisellales, Legionellales, and Piscirickettsiales. Scale, one amino acid substitution per site. Legionella species colored in red have been associated with human disease, and those in black have not (yet) been linked to disease. Non-Legionella species that belong to other genera are colored in brown. (Outer rings) The presence of a gene corresponding to 14915/irsA (pink squares), lbtA (purple), or feoB (gold) absence (white) are indicated, as determined using BLASTP.
The 14915 gene is uniquely distributed in the Legionellales
BLASTP analysis identified genes/putative proteins corresponding to 14915/14915 in 56 out of 56 other sequenced strains of L. pneumophila examined (Table S2), including the frequently studied strains Philadelphia-1 (i.e., ORF lpg0266), Paris (lpp0340), Lens (lpl0318), and Corby (lpc0342) (55–57). The average aa identity of the proteins in the different strains to the 14915 protein of strain 130b was 94.27%. The level of gene/protein conservation implied that 14915 and its homologs serve an important role for L. pneumophila. Incidentally, for the other strains examined, there was synteny at the 14915 locus (Fig. 2A) and strong sequence conservation for the predicted McoL and CorA proteins (Table S2). Based on further BLASTP results, proteins closely related to 14915 were also encoded by strains representing 20 of the other sequenced species of Legionella (Fig. 2C). The level of relatedness to 14915 ranged from 72% aa identity (E = 8e − 73) to a protein in Legionella norrlandica to 47% aa identity (E = 1e − 42) to a protein in Legionella bozemanae. The distribution of the 14915-like genes across the Legionella genus was notably different from that of other genes that were substantially induced upon iron depletion, including lbtA and feoB (Fig. 2C) as well as lbtB, lbtC, lbtU, and mavN/iroT (14), suggesting that 14915 might not be involved in the same aspect of iron acquisition or metabolism as these other factors. Hypothetical proteins related to 14915 were also encoded by strains representing a handful of other species in the Legionellales and related orders, including Aquicella siphonis (E = 3e − 32, 43% aa identity), Coxiella burnetii (E = 2e − 19, 39% aa identity), Piscirickettsia salmonis (E = 3e − 17, 34% aa identity), Facilibium subflavum, (E = 3e − 12, 34% aa identity), Cysteiniphilum halobium (E = 3e − 12, 32% aa identity), and Piscirickettsia litoralis (E = 3e − 12, 38% aa identity) (Fig. 2C). Finally, predicted proteins with similarity to 14915 were detected in a strain of Vibrio sinus (E = 3e − 15, 34% aa identity), several species of dinoflagellates belonging to the Symbiodinium genus (e.g., E = 2e − 19, 33% aa identity for Symbiodinium microadriaticum), and two species of rotifers in Adineta (e.g., E = 2e − 14, 35% aa identity for Adineta ricciae). Overall, BLASTP searches did not reveal significant similarity between 14915 and any known or characterized protein. Thus, we used AlphaFold 3 (58) to predict the 3-D structure of 14915. When this model (Fig. S3) was submitted to the DALI server (59), it did not yield significant matches to any known structures. Taken together, these data suggested that 14915 is representative of a heretofore uncharacterized group of proteins and therefore might possess a novel function.
14915 is a secreted protein and substrate of the L. pneumophila T2SS
Based on SignalP analysis, 14915 has a 19-aa signal sequence at its N-terminus and therefore is undoubtedly transported out of the cytoplasm and into the periplasm by the Sec translocon. PSORTb analysis further suggested a subsequent extracellular localization for 14915. As noted in the Introduction, L. pneumophila expresses a T2SS, an envelope-spanning apparatus that transports proteins destined to be secreted from the periplasm into the extracellular milieu (8, 9). Thus, compatible with the fact that prior proteomic analyses of L. pneumophila culture supernatants had only examined legionellae grown in rich, iron-replete media, e.g., standard BYE broth (60–63), we posited that 14915 is a heretofore uncharacterized secreted protein and substrate of the T2SS. To test this hypothesis, we engineered a C-terminal 6-histidine (6xHis)-tagged version of 14915, introduced the construct into WT strain 130b, and then examined culture supernatants for the presence of 14915 using anti-His antibodies and immunoblotting, analogously to what we and others have done to determine the T2SS dependency of exoproteins in various other bacteria (64–67). Initially, not much of the protein was observed in the WT supernatants (Fig. 3, top panel). We postulated that 14915 and/or its tag were cleaved/degraded by the T2SS-dependent metalloprotease ProA, which is the major secreted protein in BYE broth cultures of L. pneumophila and is well known to cleave/degrade a range of other secreted proteins (8, 68). Indeed, when we examined supernatants from a proA mutant of strain 130b (69), the 14915–6xHis protein was easily seen on the immunoblot, migrating at its predicted size (Fig. 3, top panel). That the antibodies also recognized a slightly smaller form of protein suggested that 14915 might be cleaved after it is secreted into the supernatant. The protein was not detected when we examined culture supernatants of a lspF mutant that completely lacks the T2SS (70) (Fig. 3, top panel), strongly suggesting that 14915 is secreted via the T2SS, i.e., if it was secreted by a means other than the T2SS, then it would have been seen in the lspF mutant supernatants since they lack ProA. When we examined cell pellets derived from these same samples, all strains showed similar levels of 14915 protein (Fig. 3, bottom panel), indicating that the low amount and absence of the protein in the supernatants of the WT strain and the lspF mutant were not due to an unexpected lack of gene expression. Thus, 14915 is a secreted protein and substrate of the L. pneumophila T2SS. We designated the corresponding gene/protein as irsA/IrsA.
Fig 3.
Detection of 14915 protein in culture supernatants of L. pneumophila strains and the effect of the T2SS on that protein secretion. Wild-type strain 130b (WT), proA mutant AA200 (proA), and lspF mutant NU275 (lspF) each containing an isopropyl ß-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG)-inducible 14915 gene that encodes 14915 with a C-terminal 6xHis tag were inoculated into BYE broth and incubated for 1 h of protein induction. Cell-free culture supernatants concentrated 20-fold were subjected to 15% SDS-PAGE and then immunoblotted using anti-His antibodies (top panel). Cell pellets obtained from the same cultures were subjected to 4%–20% SDS-PAGE and the same immunoblot analysis (bottom panel). The left-most lane contained pre-stained molecular weight markers (MWM), whose sizes (in kDa) are noted. Presented here are the (only) portions of the blots showing proteins recognized by the antibodies, i.e., the 14915–6xHis protein. These results are representative of the outcome of at least three independent experiments, which also included 2 and 3 h of IPTG induction.
IrsA promotes the growth of L. pneumophila in low-iron media
Since 14915/irsA was uncovered because of its hyperexpression in low-iron conditions, we posited that its protein product promotes L. pneumophila iron acquisition. To begin to test this hypothesis, we constructed a mutant of strain 130b that specifically lacks irsA and then tested the new mutant for growth in low-iron media. The irsA mutant grew similarly to parental WT when it was plated onto buffered charcoal yeast extract (BCYE) agar, the nutrient-rich, solid medium that is traditionally used to grow L. pneumophila (71). However, the mutant also showed a normal efficiency of plating when grown on BCYE agar that either lacked its usual iron supplement (i.e., ferric pyrophosphate) or was further depleted of available iron by the inclusion of the ferric iron chelator DFX or the ferrous iron chelator di-pyridyl (DIP) (Fig. 4A). The irsA mutant of strain 130b also grew comparably to its parental strain when they were inoculated into CDM – Fe broth (Fig. 4B). These results indicated that IrsA is not required for the growth of strain 130b in commonly used low-iron conditions. We considered the possibility that IrsA might be functionally redundant with ferri-rhizoferrin and FeoB-mediated ferrous iron transport, L. pneumophila’s main modes of iron assimilation during growth on bacteriological media (14). To test this possibility, we constructed and tested a mutant of strain 130b lacking both irsA and lbtA as well as a 130b mutant lacking both irsA and feoB. However, when cultured on low-iron BCYE agar (Fig. 4C) or in CDM − Fe broth (Fig. S4), the irsA lbtA mutant grew comparably to the lbtA mutant and the irsA feoB mutant grew similarly to the feoB mutant, indicating that IrsA is not functionally redundant with ferri-rhizoferrin or FeoB under these standard growth conditions.
Fig 4.
Effect of irsA mutations on the growth L. pneumophila strain 130b in bacteriological media containing decreasing amounts of available iron. (A) Following 3 days of growth on BCYE agar at 37°C, WT strain 130b (WT) and irsA mutant NU470 (irsA) were suspended in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) to an OD660 = 0.3, and then 10 µL aliquots taken from a series of 10-fold dilutions were spotted onto BCYE agar that either contained its standard supplement of ferric pyrophosphate (+Fe supplement), lacked that iron supplement (−Fe supplement), lacked that supplement and instead had the iron chelator DFX added (−Fe supp + DFX), or lacked that supplement and instead had iron chelator DIP added (−Fe supp + DIP). Following incubation for 5 days at 37°C, images were taken of the areas of bacterial growth. (B) Following pre-culture in non-iron-supplemented BYE broth, WT 130b (circles) and irsA mutant NU470 (squares) were inoculated into either CDM that did not have any added iron (CDM − Fe, solid lines) or CDM that had 5 µM ferric pyrophosphate added (CDM + Fe, dashed lines) and incubated at 37°C with shaking. At the indicated times, bacterial growth was monitored spectrophotometrically. The data presented are the means and standard deviations from six technical replicates. (C) Following 3 days of growth on BCYE agar at 37°C, WT strain 130b (WT), irsA mutant NU470 (irsA), feoB mutant NU458 (feoB), irsA feoB mutant NU474 (irsA feoB), lbtA mutant NU302 (lbtA), and irsA lbtA mutant NU472 (irsA lbtA) were resuspended in PBS to an OD660 = 0.3, and then 10 µL aliquots taken from a series of dilutions were spotted onto either BCYE agar that had or lacked its added iron supplement (for comparing the feoB mutant to the irsA feoB mutant in the two left-most panels) or BCYE agar that lacked the iron supplement and had or lacked added DFX (for comparing the lbtA mutant to the irsA lbtA mutant in the two right-most panels). The images in panels (A) and (C) derive from the same representative experiment. However, the comparisons of WT and the irsA mutant to the other mutants were placed in the separate (C) to make the comparisons between the many strains easier to discern. Thus, the images for WT and the irsA mutant on BCYE + Fe supp., BCYE – Fe supp., and BCYE – Fe supp. + DFX are duplicated in (A) and in the different parts of (C). For (A–C), the presented data are representative of the results from >3 independent experiments.
A commonly used strain in the L. pneumophila field is strain Lp02, which is a laboratory-derived variant of the clinical isolate Philadelphia-1 (72–80). Prompted by our long-standing interest in assessing the iron requirements and modes of iron acquisition of different strains of L. pneumophila (12, 14, 15, 17, 18, 24, 26, 29, 31, 32, 35, 38, 40, 41, 44), we discovered that strain Lp02 exhibits an ~100- to 10,000-fold reduced efficiency of plating on low-iron BCYE agar media relative to its parent Philadelphia-1 and WT strain 130b (Fig. 5A). Incidentally, impaired growth on low-iron media was not observed when we tested strain JR-32, which is another commonly used derivative of Philadelphia-1 (81) (Fig. S5). We suspected that Lp02’s impaired growth on low-iron media was due, at least partly, to the ~45 kb deletion (encompassing the lvh T4SS, among other loci) and/or one or more of the point mutations or small deletions (affecting rpsL, ndh, leuS, nuoG, and thyA) that exist in the Lp02 genome (81–83). Since the reported mutations in Lp02 do not encompass rhizoferrin-associated genes (lbtABC, lbtU), the ferrous transport operon (feoABC), the other genes that were most highly induced by iron deprivation (frgA, mavN/iroT), or other genes that we found promote L. pneumophila growth on low-iron media (e.g., ccmC, iraB, lbtP, lly, tatB) (17, 29, 36, 40, 43), we reasoned that Lp02 lacks an uncharacterized factor(s) that promotes iron assimilation, and therefore, the strain might prove useful for uncovering a role for irsA. Thus, we generated an irsA mutant of strain Lp02 and tested it for growth on agar media with decreasing amounts of available iron. However, the new mutant did not display impaired growth on BCYE agar lacking the usual iron supplement, and only showed a relatively modest defect on some non-iron-supplemented media that had added iron chelator (Fig. 5B). Adopting the logic that we had applied for studying strain 130b, we made and tested an Lp02 mutant lacking both irsA and lbtA. This double mutant was no more impaired for growth on the low-iron BCYE agar than was the Lp02 mutant lacking only lbtA (Fig. 5B). However, a newly made Lp02 mutant lacking both irsA and feoB was significantly more impaired for growth on low-iron BCYE agar than was an Lp02 mutant lacking only feoB, e.g., the double mutant had a 100- to 1,000-fold reduced efficiency of plating on BCYE agar having only one-quarter of its usual iron supplement (Fig. 5C). Moreover, the growth defect of the Lp02 irsA feoB mutant was reversed when we reintroduced an intact copy of irsA (Fig. 5C). Thus, IrsA promotes L. pneumophila growth in low-iron media, at least under some circumstances.
Fig 5.
Relative growth of L. pneumophila strain Lp02 on low-iron media and the effect of irsA mutations on the growth of Lp02 on low-iron media. (A) Following growth on thymidine-supplemented BCYE agar, WT strain 130b (130b), WT strain Philadelphia-1 (Phil-1), and the Phil-1 derivative Lp02 (Lp02) were suspended in PBS to an OD660 = 0.3, and then 10 µL aliquots taken from a series of 10-fold dilutions were spotted onto thymidine-supplemented BCYE agar that either lacked the standard ferric pyrophosphate supplement (BCYE − iron supplement) or lacked the supplement and instead had increasing concentrations of the ferric iron chelator DFX added (BCYE − iron supplement + DFX). Following incubation for 5 days at 37°C, images were taken of the areas of bacterial growth. (B) Following growth on thymidine-supplemented BCYE agar, strain Lp02 (Lp02) and its derivatives that additionally lacked either irsA (i.e., strain NU476) (irsA), lbtA (NU480) (lbtA), or irsA and lbtA (NU484) (irsA lbtA) were spotted onto thymidine-supplemented BCYE agar that had decreasing amounts of available iron as indicated in (A) and their subsequent growth monitored as above. (C) Following growth on thymidine-supplemented BCYE agar, strain Lp02, its derivatives that also lacked either irsA, feoB (i.e., NU478) (feoB), or feoB and irsA (NU482) (irsA feoB), and NU482 containing a plasmid-carried irsA gene (irsA feoB + pirsA) were spotted (as above) onto thymidine-supplemented BCYE agar that either had the standard ferric pyrophosphate supplement (BCYE + iron supplement) or had only 25%, 5%, or 0% of the ferric pyrophosphate added along with 0.5 mM IPTG. The images in panels (A–C) derive from the same representative experiment. However, the comparisons of Lp02 to its various mutant derivatives were placed in the (B) and (C) to make the comparisons between the many strains easier to discern. Thus, the image for Lp02 on BCYE – Fe supp. + 6 µM DFX is duplicated in (A) and (B), and the images for Lp02 and its irsA mutant on BCYE – Fe supp. are duplicated in (B) and (C). For (A–C), the presented data are representative of the results from >3 independent experiments.
IrsA impedes or down-regulates L. pneumophila biofilm formation
To begin to gauge the impact of IrsA on the environmental persistence and pathogenesis of WT strains of L. pneumophila, we examined the mutants of strain 130b lacking irsA for their capacity to infect amoebae and macrophages and to form biofilms. Neither the irsA mutant nor the irsA lbtA mutant was defective for infection of Acanthamoeba castellanii or human U937 cells (Fig. 6), indicating that IrsA is not required for optimal intracellular infection by L. pneumophila, even in the absence of rhizoferrin synthesis. The irsA feoB mutant was no more impaired for infection than was the feoB mutant (Fig. 6), indicating that IrsA is also not required for intracellular infection by strain 130b in the absence of FeoB-mediated ferrous transport. However, the irsA mutant exhibited a higher level of biofilm formation on plastic surfaces than its parent did, and this was observed whether the legionellae were incubated in BYE broth (Fig. 7A) or in CDM broth (Fig. S6). Moreover, the hyper-biofilm phenotype of the irsA mutant was seen across a range of available iron concentrations (Fig. 7A; Fig. S6). The heightened biofilm levels shown by the mutant were reversed upon reintroduction of an intact irsA gene (Fig. 7A), confirming that IrsA impedes or down-regulates biofilm formation by L. pneumophila. Since the irsA mutant of strain 130b grew typically in the media that were used in these assays (above), the greater amount of biofilm observed here was not simply due to greater numbers of mutant bacteria following introduction into the plastic wells. With L. pneumophila and others, biofilm-linked phenotypes can also be observed by spotting an aliquot of bacteria unto an agar surface and then observing the pattern of outgrowth over the surface (14, 84, 85). When we performed this assay, the irsA mutant, but not its complemented derivative, exhibited a central area of growth that conveyed more elaborate structures (Fig. 7B). The extent of the mutant’s biofilm-like pattern was more dramatic and most clearly discerned on those agar plates that contained lower amounts of available iron (Fig. 7B), a result that is compatible with the induction of irsA expression in low-iron (Fig. 1 and 2). Considering these findings, we next examined whether the irsA mutant also displays increased auto-aggregation. Like many other bacteria, L. pneumophila gradually forms auto-aggregates when it is suspended in non-agitated liquid in a glass tube, with the bacterial cells eventually settling to the bottom of the tube, thereby reducing the suspension’s optical density (OD) (86, 87). Upon 1–8 h of incubation in 10% BYE broth, a suspension of WT 130b did not show a decrease in OD; however, after 24 h of incubation, evidence of aggregation was seen, as expected (Fig. 8A). In marked contrast, the irsA mutant, but not its complemented derivative, appeared to aggregate as early as 3 h after inoculation, and the OD of the mutant’s suspension continued to rapidly decrease over the next 5 h (Fig. 8A). Moreover, the mutant phenotype persisted out to the 24-h endpoint of the experiment (Fig. 8A). The mutant’s apparent hyper-aggregation was also evident by visual detection of a sediment in the bottom of the tubes (data not shown). When the tubes containing the bacteria were vortexed, the OD of the irsA mutant’s suspension matched that of WT, further indicating that the mutant’s phenotype was not simply due to its increased lysis. Finally, the hyper-aggregated nature of the irsA mutant was evident by microscopic examination (Fig. 8B). Taken together, these data indicated that IrsA impedes or down-regulates biofilm formation and auto-aggregation by L. pneumophila. We hypothesize that the hyper-aggregative nature of the irsA mutant explains, at least in part, the hyper-biofilm phenotype of the mutant.
Fig 6.
Effect of irsA mutations on infection of amoebae and human macrophages by L. pneumophila strain 130b. (A) A. castellanii were infected with either wild-type strain 130b (WT) or the irsA mutant NU470 (irsA), and then at 0, 24, 48, and 72 h post-inoculation, net bacterial growth (number of CFU at the denoted time/number of CFU at t = 0) was determined by plating aliquots of the supernatant on BCYE agar. Since L. pneumophila does not grow in the assay medium, any increases in CFU are the result of growth in the acanthamoebae. (B) Monolayers of differentiated U937 cells were inoculated with WT or the irsA mutant NU470. After a 2-h incubation to allow for bacterial entry, the infected wells were washed to remove remaining extracellular bacteria, and then at 0, 24, 48, and 72 h post-inoculation, the macrophages were lysed, bacterial numbers in the infected wells determined by plating, and net bacterial growth obtained as above. Since L. pneumophila does not grow in the assay medium, any increases in CFU are the result of growth within the macrophages. (C) WT, irsA mutant NU470, lbtA mutant NU302 (lbtA), irsA lbtA mutant NU472 (irsA lbtA), feoB mutant NU458 (feoB), and irsA feoB mutant NU474 (irsA feoB) were used to infect A. castellanii (left) or differentiated U937 cells (right), and net bacterial growth determined as above. In (A–C), the values presented are the means and standard deviations obtained from three technical replicates and are representative of the results obtained from three independent experiments.
Fig 7.
Effect of IrsA on biofilm formation by L. pneumophila strain 130b. (A) Following 3 days of growth on BCYE agar without iron supplement at 37°C, WT strain 130b (WT), irsA mutant NU470 (irsA), and NU470 containing a plasmid-carried irsA gene (irsA/pirsA) were resuspended to an OD660 of ~0.2 in either BYE broth containing its customary ferric pyrophosphate supplement (BYE + Fe supplement), BYE broth lacking that iron supplement (BYE – Fe supplement), or BYE broth that lacked the iron supplement but had added 3 µM DFX (BYE – Fe supp + 3 µM DFX), and then the suspensions were added into the wells of a 96-well, plastic microtiter plate. After 2 days at 30°C, the amount of biofilm formed was determined by staining with crystal violet as read at 600 nm. The reading obtained from control wells containing only medium is indicated by the horizontal dashed line. Data presented are the means and standard deviations from six technical replicates and are representative of three independent experiments. Asterisks indicate differences in the levels of biofilm formation between the mutant and the other two strains: **, P < 0.01; ****, P < 0.0001. (B) Bacterial strains, as indicated in (A), were spotted onto the surface of BCYE agar either containing either its customary iron supplement (+ Fe supplement), lacking that iron supplement (– Fe supplement), or lacking the iron supplement but instead containing 4 µM (– Fe supplement + DFX). Following incubation for 8 days at 37°C, images were taken of the areas of bacterial growth. The presented data are representative of the results from three independent experiments.
Fig 8.
Effect of IrsA on auto-aggregation by L. pneumophila strain 130b. (A) Following 3 days of growth on BCYE agar at 37°C, WT strain 130b (WT), irsA mutant NU470 (irsA), and NU470 containing a plasmid-carried irsA gene (irsA/pirsA) were suspended in 10% BYE broth to an OD660 of ~1.0. Five-milliliter aliquots were added to glass tubes, and bacterial sedimentation at 30°C was assessed by measuring drops in the OD660 of the suspensions. The data presented are the means and standard deviations from three technical replicates and are representative of three independent experiments. Asterisks indicate that the mutant behaved differently from the other two strains at all time points after 2 h: **, P < 0.01. (B) Following static incubation, as indicated in (A), strain aggregation was assessed at t = 4 h by microscopically examining an aliquot taken from the mid-point in the tube. The scale bar corresponds to 10 µm.
DISCUSSION
First and foremost, the RNA-Seq analysis that began the current study allowed us to uncover IrsA, which, based on subsequent experimentation, is an iron-regulated/repressed, secreted protein that appears to have a novel role in L. pneumophila growth and biofilm formation. As mentioned earlier, irsA (expression) had not been detected in the one prior transcriptomic analysis of L. pneumophila grown in an iron-deplete medium (vs iron-replete medium) (18). We suspect that this most likely occurred because that past study examined L. pneumophila grown in a yeast extract broth containing added iron chelator but was otherwise rich with nutrients, whereas our study examined L. pneumophila grown in a chemically defined broth that not only lacked added iron but consisted of only free amino acids and other trace metals. Thus, we hypothesize that, during planktonic growth, irsA expression mostly occurs when both iron levels and other (complex) nutrients levels are low. However, it is also conceivable that irsA was previously overlooked because the past study employed microarrays to detect transcripts rather than the RNA-Seq approach used here. Looking beyond irsA, our RNA analysis further documented, by another method, the often-large degree to which iron levels modulate the expression of the known rhizoferrin-related genes, the feoB operon, frgA, mavN/iroT, and the sufA operon linked to iron-sulfur cluster proteins (12, 18, 19, 26, 28, 29, 32). The present study also identified a variety of other genes that are induced during L. pneumophila growth in low-iron conditions (Fig. 1B). Some of these, including nrdB/rir1 and nrdA/rir2 that encode a ribonucleotide-diphosphate reductase, had been revealed in the prior microarray study (18). More interestingly, however, the current RNA-Seq analysis uncovered a variety of other genes (besides irsA) whose induction by low iron had not been observed before. Notable among these was a gene annotated as cyaA, which maps directly downstream of lbtC and is predicted to encode an inner membrane spanning, class III adenylate cyclase that has a histidine kinase sensor domain (88, 89). Given its 2.9-fold induction by low-iron conditions (Fig. 1B), proximity to the lbtABC operon, and the fact that some adenylate cyclases are linked to the regulation of siderophores and/or other forms of bacterial iron uptake (90, 91), we hypothesize that this gene (and by extension, cAMP levels) influences rhizoferrin and/or another mode(s) of L. pneumophila iron acquisition. Also notable among the genes that were newly identified as being induced (two- to fivefold) by low-iron conditions (Fig. 1B) are (i) a set of genes related to biotin synthesis, suggesting that another form of iron-sulfur cluster biogenesis might be occurring in L. pneumophila (92), (ii) hspC2, which we recently determined promotes both thermal tolerance and intracellular infection (93), and (iii) chiA, which we previously showed encodes a T2SS-dependent chitinase/mucinase that can promote lung infection (60, 94). Finally, and also significant for a further understanding of infection by L. pneumophila, our transcriptomic analysis revealed 18 T4SS effector genes (i.e., ceg18, ravN, lem27, ceg7, ravI, lpg2395, ceg29, lgt3/legC5, lpg1106, ceg23, sidD, legC3/ppeA, lem13/ppeB, ceg14/sidL, ceg22, vipE, ravK, legA7/ankZ) (63, 95–113) that are induced ~2- to 4-fold by low-iron conditions (Fig. 1B). Thus, the impact of low-iron growth conditions on the expression of T4SS effectors extends well beyond the previously described induction of MavN/IroT (18–20). Yet, many of these genes, unlike mavN/iroT, do not have a Fur box in their promoter regions, implying that their regulation by iron is indirect and (also) involves another transcriptional regulator(s) and environmental signal(s). Thus, in addition to launching further studies of IrsA, the results obtained here provide a springboard for multiple, other lines of inquiry.
Given that bacteria generally have many modes of iron (metal) assimilation and that the importance of a given assimilation pathway is often only evident when other pathways are disabled by mutation, it is not illogical that the role of IrsA in promoting L. pneumophila growth in low-iron conditions was discerned through mutation of Lp02, a lab-adapted strain that is known to harbor a variety of mutations in its genome (81, 83) and, as we documented here, has difficulties growing on low-iron media. Since the role of irsA in the Lp02 background was especially revealed by finding a greater growth defect on low-iron BCYE agar for an irsA feoB mutant (vs an feoB mutant), we posit IrsA has a role that is functionally complementary to FeoB/Fe2+ uptake and thus may entail the assimilation of Fe3+ or heme/hemin-containing compounds in the medium’s yeast extract. Because an irsA lbtA mutant of Lp02 was not different from an lbtA (rhizoferrin synthesis) mutant of Lp02, we infer that any possible role for IrsA in ferri-siderophore acquisition does not involve rhizoferrin but rather the activity of a yet-to-be-defined siderophore. Although a role for IrsA in iron acquisition would appear to be the simplest explanation for both the induction of irsA expression when L. pneumophila is grown in iron-deplete media and the growth defect of the Lp02 irsA feoB mutant, it is also conceivable that IrsA is involved in the acquisition of other metals that might substitute for iron as a cofactor when the available iron levels are too low (114). Finally, it is possible that IrsA is not involved in the acquisition of iron or other metal(s) but in some novel way helps L. pneumophila adapt its physiology to low-iron conditions. Given that there are no characterized homologs of IrsA in other bacteria, future studies aimed at deciphering the action of IrsA should prove highly innovative. It will be informative to also discern which of the many gene losses in strain Lp02 are responsible for that strain’s poorer growth on low-iron media, as another possible means toward unearthing new factors involved in iron assimilation.
Even though this study achieved its original goal of identifying a new factor involved in L. pneumophila’s growth in low-iron conditions, the most dramatic effect of IrsA was observed in the context of biofilm formation. Indeed, mutation of irsA alone resulted in a marked increase in biofilm formation, and moreover, this effect was seen in an otherwise virulent, WT strain (130b) background. Thus, IrsA appears to either directly impede or indirectly down-regulate biofilm formation. Based on our additional phenotyping of the irsA mutant, we suspect that this effect is due at least in part to IrsA inhibiting L. pneumophila auto-aggregation. These data suggest that IrsA may, in some situations, modify the surface traits of L. pneumophila. Curiously, the increased biofilm formation and hyper-aggregation phenotype of the irsA mutant (but not its complemented derivative) was evident across a range of iron levels, implying that the iron/Fur-mediated repression of irsA is changed or not entirely operative in biofilms. We have not observed this sort of dis-linkage before, i.e., feoB and lbtA feoB mutants of strain 130b that were impaired for iron acquisition and growth in low-iron bacteriological media were also impaired for biofilm formation on plastic and agar surfaces (14). Thus, in the context of biofilms, the expression of irsA may be (more) subject to other environmental signals or regulators, which could include other metals and nutrients, c-di-GMP, quorum-sensing, and oxidative stress, among others (3, 115–117). Hence, it will be exciting for future investigations to also explore IrsA expression within biofilms and investigate how this secreted protein modulates cell-cell interactions and biofilm formation.
The identification of IrsA as a substrate of the L. pneumophila T2SS represents a notable new connection between iron-related functions and biofilms and the bacterial T2SS. Indeed, prior to our study, the number of such linkages has been relatively few (118). In the case of iron-related functions and T2SS, there are the instances of degradation of host transferrin by the L. pneumophila exoprotein ProA, the degradation of hemoglobin by VvpE secreted by Vibrio vulnificus, the impact of a secreted lipase on pyoverdine regulation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa, a possible connection to siderophore receptors in Pseudoalteromonas tunicata, the reduction of Fe3+ by Shewanella oneidensis, and the secretion of iron-binding IbpS which provides protection to Dickeya dadantii against reactive oxygen species (42, 118–123). Regarding past connections between biofilms and T2SS, there are examples of the secretion system promoting biofilm formation by Acinetobacter baumannii, enteropathogenic Escherichia coli, L. pneumophila, Marinobacter hydrocarbonoclasticus, P. aeruginosa, and Vibrio cholerae (118, 124–128). For L. pneumophila, the Lcl protein has been identified as facilitating biofilm formation (129, 130). Thus, the relationship between the L. pneumophila T2SS and biofilm formation is a complex one, with some exoproteins (e.g., Lcl) promoting and others (e.g., IrsA) impeding biofilm formation. Undoubtedly, the T2SS provides L. pneumophila with the ability to adapt to diverse growth conditions that exist in its environment. The documentation of IrsA as a substrate of the L. pneumophila T2SS also brings the number of characterized L. pneumophila T2SS-dependent exoproteins to 26, with still dozens more being predicted by in silico analysis and proteomic assessments of WT culture supernatants (8, 60–63). That IrsA was encoded within the genomes of ~30% of other Legionella species is compatible with what we have seen for known T2SS substrates, whose prevalences across the genus range from 11% to 100% (8). However, the fact that many of these other species are known to be pathogenic for humans (Fig. 2C) reinforces the argument for further investigation into IrsA function. Although they are presently few in number, the IrsA-related proteins encoded by non-Legionella bacteria are also similarly noteworthy, e.g., these proteins might impact the pathogenesis of P. salmonis, a major pathogen of fish, and/or C. burnetii, the zoonotic agent of human Q fever (131, 132). Previously, we observed that some of the T2SS substrates of L. pneumophila have eukaryotic-like domains, with the related proteins in eukaryotes occurring in fungi, algae, amoebae, and cnidarians (8). Thus, the detection of IrsA-related proteins in rotifers and dinoflagellates provides a new example of the intriguing relationship between the secreted proteins of L. pneumophila and proteins in environmental eukaryotes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
L. pneumophila strains, bacteriological media, and extracellular growth assays
L. pneumophila WT strain 130b (American Type Culture Collection [ATCC] strain BAA-74; also known as AA100 or Wadsworth) was previously described as were its lbtA mutant NU302, feoB mutant NU458, proA mutant AA200, and lspF mutant NU275 (14, 26, 70, 133). Other previously described strains that were used in this study were L. pneumophila WT strain Philadelphia-1 (ATCC 33152) (134), strain Lp02, a laboratory-generated variant of Philadelphia-1 (9, 72), and strain JR-32, another derivative of Philadelphia-1 (81). These various strains and all newly made L. pneumophila mutants (below) were routinely grown at 37°C on BCYE agar or in BYE broth (71). In order to assess the response of WT and mutant L. pneumophila to variations in available iron, bacteria were inoculated into CDM broth (22–25) containing differing amounts of added iron and then either the extent of growth was determined by changes in the OD660 of the cultures, as previously done (14), or the changes in gene expression were examined as experimentally detailed below. As before (14, 28, 29), bacteria were also examined for their efficiency of plating on BCYE agar that either contained its standard added iron supplement (i.e., 330 µM ferric pyrophosphate), contained 25% or 5% of that iron supplement, entirely lacked that supplement, or lacked that supplement and instead had increasing amounts of the iron chelators DFX or DIP added. Unless otherwise noted, chemicals were from Sigma-Aldrich.
Measurement of iron levels
Quantification of iron in CDM broth containing no added iron (CDM – Fe) was accomplished using ICP-MS, as we previously did for non-iron-supplemented BYE broth (14, 135). On three occasions, 1.0 mL of CDM that had no added iron (CDM – Fe) was treated with concentrated trace-grade nitric acid at 65°C to allow for complete digestion. Ultra-pure H2O was then added to produce a solution of 5% nitric acid in a total volume of 10 mL. A 100 ng/g mixed element standard including Fe was made in 5% nitric acid (vol/vol) to a total volume of 50 mL. ICP-MS was done on a computer-controlled (QTEGRA software) Thermo iCapQ ICP-MS operating in KED mode and equipped with an ESI SC-2DX PrepFAST autosampler. Internal standard was added in-line using the PrepFAST system. Online dilution was carried out by the PrepFAST system and used to make a calibration curve consisting of 100, 50, 25, 10, 2, and 1 ppb Fe. Each sample was acquired using one survey run (10 sweeps) and three main (peak jumping) runs (40 sweeps). Isotopes selected for analysis were 56,57Fe, and, as internal standards for data interpolation and machine stability, 45Sc, 89Y, and 115In. The Fe levels obtained for the three replicates were 0.1573 µM, 0.1315 µM, and 0.1319 µM, giving an average value of 0.1402 µM.
Complete genome sequencing of L. pneumophila strain 130b
We determined the complete and fully assembled genome sequence of strain 130b, analogously to what we recently did for the genome of Legionella cardiaca strain H63T (136). Following the growth of strain 130b on standard BCYE agar, genomic DNA (gDNA) was isolated using the Promega Maxwell 16 system. The gDNA was then sequenced using Illumina and PacBio platforms. For the Illumina platform, short-read libraries were made with a Roche KAPA HyperPrep kit and sequenced using 150 bp paired-end reads on the NovaSeq 6000 system. For the PacBio platform, the gDNA was fragmented to an average size of approx. 11 kb with Covaris g-TUBE. After the DNA was cleaned with SPRIselect beads, library construction proceeded using the SMRTbell Express Template Prep Kit 2.0 (PacBio), which comprises ss-DNA overhang removal, damage repair, end repair/A-tailing, and barcoded overhang adaptor ligation. The library was pooled with other libraries on an equimolar basis and then size selected on a BluePippin instrument with an 8 kb cutoff value. The pool was then purified with SPRIselect beads, quantified with a Qubit 4.0 fluorometer, and evaluated with an Agilent Fragment Analyzer. The final library pool was sequenced with PacBio Sequel II v.3.0 chemistry and a single-molecule real-time (SMRT) Cell 8M on a Sequel I instrument at an on-plate concentration of 85 pM. Illumina reads were quality filtered using a combination of Illumina RTA v.1.8.70.0 and Trimmomatic v.0.38.0 (137). PacBio reads were quality filtered using FastQC v.0.72 (138). For Illumina sequencing, 62,679,165 reads were generated with ~151× coverage, and for PacBio sequencing, there were 134,282 reads (N50, 13,379 bp). The resulting raw sequences were handled using PacBio SMRTLink v.6.0, including demultiplexing by Lima v.1.11.0 (139). Genome assembly was done using the PacBio HGAP4 assembler, which contains overlap determination, followed by consensus polishing by Pilon 1.24 (140) using Illumina 150 bp paired-end reads made from the same gDNA. Rotation of the chromosome was done using the IGS automated prokaryotic annotation pipeline (141). The assembly yielded a single closed, circular chromosome. Gene annotation was done using the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline v.6.4 (142–144). The L. pneumophila strain 130b genome assembly contains a single 3,538,602 bp contig (~37.92× coverage) with a G + C content of 38.5% and is predicted to encode 3,193 proteins.
qRT-PCR and RNA-Seq analyses
L. pneumophila WT strain 130b was grown at 37°C in CDM with 5 µM ferric pyrophosphate added (CDM + Fe) and CDM without any added iron (CDM – Fe) to either mid-log (OD660 = 0.7), late-log (OD660 = 1.0), or early-stationary (OD660 = 1.5), and then total RNA was isolated using the GeneJet RNA purification kit (Thermo Fisher) as previously done (93). qRT-PCR was performed as before (93). Primers used for the current qRT-PCR analysis were designed using the Primer-BLAST tool on the NCBI website (145) for the lbtA (AL31 and AL32), lbtU (AL33 and AL34), feoB (AL35 and AL36), frgA (AL37 and AL38), and 14915/irsA (AL39 and AL40) genes, and are listed in Table S3. Prior to the RNA-Seq analysis, the quality and quantity of the RNA samples were verified using the Agilent Bio-analyzer 2100. RNA-Seq libraries were generated using the Universal Prokaryotic RNA-Seq Library Preparation Kit (NuGEN), strictly according to the manufacturer’s instructions. This process included rRNA depletion, purification and fragmentation of the remaining RNA, cDNA synthesis, 3’ end adenylation, Illumina adapter ligation, library PCR amplification, and validation. Sequencing of the libraries, including the production of single-end, 75 bp reads, was done using the Illumina HiSEQ4000.The quality of the DNA reads was evaluated using FastQC (138). Adapters were trimmed and reads of poor quality or aligning to rRNA sequences were filtered. The cleaned reads were aligned to the reference genome using STAR (146). Read counts for each gene were calculated using HTseq-count (147) in conjunction with a gene annotation file obtained from NCBI accession number GCA_041734345.1, i.e., the complete and assembled genome sequence of strain 130b (see above). Normalization and differential expression were determined using DESeq2 (148). The cutoff for determining significantly differentially expressed genes (i.e., from CMD + Fe cultures vs CDM – Fe cultures) was an FDR-adjusted P-value less than 0.05.
Immunoblot analysis of L. pneumophila culture supernatants
To track the secretion of 14915/IrsA, a 6xHis tag was added to the C-terminus of the protein. As a first step in making the plasmid construct encoding this tagged protein, primers AL65 and AL66 were used to amplify, from 130b genomic DNA, a ~484 bp fragment containing the intact 14915 ORF with 3´−6xHIS. After the PCR product was digested with EcoRI and KpnI, the 14915–6xHis containing fragment was cloned into pMMB2002, a plasmid which encodes chloramphenicol (Cm) resistance and is stably maintained by L. pneumophila (28). PCR using the vector-specific primer pair OR77 and OR78 confirmed that the newly made plasmid (i.e., p14915-6xHis) carried 14915–6xHis. Plasmid p14915-6xHis was electroporated (149) into the WT strain 130b, its proA mutant AA200, and its lspF mutant NU275, and transformants containing p14915-6xHis were obtained by plating on BCYE agar containing Cm. Following overnight growth in standard BYE broth, the strains encoding 14915–6xHis were inoculated to an OD660≅ 0.3 in 70 mL of BYE broth (in a 250 mL flask) containing 0.1 mM IPTG (in order to induce expression of the tagged protein) and then incubated at 37°C with shaking for 1 to 3 h. Supernatants were collected by centrifugation of the cultures at 5,000 × g for 15 min at room temperature, followed by filtration through 0.22 µm syringe filters (EMD Millipore). The cell-free supernatants were concentrated 20-fold by isopropanol precipitation, as previously described (150), and suspended in Laemmli sample buffer. The cell pellets resulting from the centrifugation of the cultures were also recovered and suspended in Laemmli buffer. Samples of the concentrated supernatants and cell pellets (corresponding to equal amounts of culture per strain examined) were subjected to SDS-PAGE and then immunoblotted first with a 1:10,000 dilution of rabbit anti-6xHis antibody (Invitrogen cat # PA1-983B) in 1% skim milk-Tris-buffered saline (TBST). The secondary antibody used was IRDye 680 goat anti-rabbit IgG antibody (LI-COR Biosciences) at a 1:20,000 dilution in milk-TBST. Treated membranes were imaged using LI-COR Biosciences Odessey Fc Imaging System, as before (151).
Mutant constructions
New mutants of strain 130b that contain a deletion in irsA were constructed by allelic exchange, analogous to the generation of various other mutants of L. pneumophila (14, 93, 152). To begin, a DNA fragment consisting of an FLP recombination target-flanked kanamycin (Kn)-resistance cassette bounded on the one side by the ~600 bp of sequences upstream of irsA ORF and flanked on the other side by the ~600 bp of sequences downstream of the irsA ORF was synthesized (Twist Bioscience). Five micrograms of the linear DNA containing the mutagenized irsA allele was used for natural transformation of either WT strain 130b or a previously made lbtA mutant of 130b as indicated below. Bacteria putatively containing an inactivated irsA gene were obtained by plating the transformation mixture onto BCYE agar containing Kn. Verification of mutagenized irsA within the Kn-resistant colonies was done by PCR using the primer pair AL41 and AL42. Finally, following transformation with pBSFLP, a sacB-containing counterselectable vector that also encodes the Flp recombinase and a gentamicin (Gm)-resistance gene, mutants harboring an unmarked deletion within irsA (and lacking pBSFLP) were recovered by plating the transformation mixture onto BCYE agar containing 5% sucrose and were scored for loss of resistance to both Kn and Gm (93). The mutants were verified by sequencing of the PCR amplicon obtained using primers AL43 and AL44. The new irsA mutants obtained were designated as NU470 and NU471. To construct mutants lacking both irsA and lbtA, we introduced the mutagenized irsA allele (above) into the previously made lbtA mutant NU302 (26). The genotype of the irsA lbtA mutants (NU472, NU473) was verified by PCR using primers AL41 and AL42. To construct mutants lacking both irsA and feoB, we used the allelic exchange to introduce a mutagenized feoB allele (14) into irsA mutant NU470. The genotype of the irsA feoB mutants (NU474, NU475) was verified by PCR using primers AL25 and AL26.
New mutants of strain Lp02 that contain deletions in irsA, feoB, and/or lbtA were also constructed by using a form of allelic exchange. To begin, mutagenized alleles of irsA (i.e., lpg0266), feoB (lpg2657) and lbtA (lpg1325) were generated using overlap extension PCR (OE-PCR) as previously done (14, 93, 152). Approx. 800 bp fragments of the 5´ and 3´ regions flanking the target ORFs were PCR amplified from Lp02 gDNA using Platinum SuperFi II DNA polymerase (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and primers AL45 and AL46 for 5´ irsA, AL47 and AL48 for 3´ irsA, AL53 and AL54 for 5´ feoB, AL55 and AL56 for 3´ feoB, AL59 and AL18 for 5´ lbtA, and AL60 and AL61 for 3´ lbtA. A Kn-resistance cassette flanked by Flp recombination target sites was PCR-amplified from pKD4 using primers AL49 and AL50 for use in the eventual mutation of irsA, AL57 and AL58 for eventual mutation of feoB, or AL23 and AL62 for eventual mutation of lbtA. We then performed two-step OE-PCR to combine the 5´ and 3´ regions of irsA, the 5´ and 3´ regions of feoB, and the 5´ and 3´ regions of lbtA with the respective Kn-resistance cassettes. PCR products corresponding to the correct target size were gel purified, and 1 µg of linear DNA containing the recombinant allele carrying the antibiotic cassette was used for natural transformation of either Lp02 or a mutant of Lp02 as indicated below. Lp02 bacteria putatively containing an inactivated irsA, feoB, or lbtA gene were obtained by plating the transformation mixture onto BCYE agar containing Kn. Verification of an altered irsA gene was done by PCR using the primer pair AL49 and AL50, confirmation of mutated feoB was done by PCR using the primer pair AL25 and AL26, and confirmation of mutated lbtA was done by PCR using the primer pair AL27 and AL28. Then, following transformation with pBSFLP, mutants harboring the desired unmarked deletion (and lacking pBSFLP) were recovered by plating onto BCYE agar containing sucrose, scored for loss of resistance to both Kn and Gm, and finally verified by PCR using the gene-specific primers. The Lp02 irsA mutants obtained were designated as NU476 and NU477, the Lp02 feoB mutants generated were named NU478 and NU479, and the Lp02 lbtA mutants obtained were designated as NU480 and NU481. To make Lp02 mutants lacking both irsA and feoB, we used allelic exchange to introduce the mutagenized Lp02 feoB allele (above) into irsA mutant NU476. The genotype of the irsA feoB mutants (designated as NU482, NU483) was verified by PCR using primers AL51 and AL52. To construct Lp02 mutants lacking both irsA and lbtA, we similarly introduced the mutagenized Lp02 lbtA allele into irsA mutant NU476. The genotype of the irsA lbtA mutants (NU484, NU485) was verified by PCR using primers AL27 and AL28
Complementation analysis
Genetic complementation of the irsA mutants was done by reintroducing an intact copy of the irsA gene on a plasmid, as has been done before for complementation of various other mutants of L. pneumophila (14, 69). To that end, an 828 bp fragment containing the intact irsA ORF with its ~200 bp upstream and downstream (but no other intact gene or sRNA) was amplified from 130b DNA using primers AL63 and AL64. After the PCR product was digested with EcoRI and KpnI, the irsA-containing fragment was cloned into pMMBGent, a plasmid which encodes Gm resistance and is stably maintained by L. pneumophila (153). PCR using the vector-specific primer pair OR77 and OR78 confirmed that the newly made plasmid (i.e., pirsA) carried irsA. Plasmid pirsA was electroporated (149) into the 130b irsA mutant NU470, and transformants containing pirsA were obtained by plating on BCYE agar containing Gm. In a similar way, a 435 bp fragment containing the intact irsA ORF was amplified from Lp02 DNA using primers AL65 and AL67 and then ligated into the Cm-resistant vector pMMB2002. Finally, the resulting plasmid was electroporated into the Lp02 irsA feoB mutant NU482, and transformants obtained by plating on BCYE agar containing Cm.
Intracellular infection assays
A. castellanii (ATCC 30234) amoebae were axenically maintained as before (154, 155). Human U937 cells (ATCC CRL-1593.2) were maintained and differentiated to a macrophage-like state using phorbol myristate acetate, as previously done (152, 156). The amoebae were inoculated with L. pneumophila and intracellular infection monitored, as before (14, 154). Briefly, bacteria that had been grown on BCYE agar for 3 days at 37°C were inoculated onto amoebal monolayers at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) equal to 0.1, and then 0, 24, 48, and 72 h later, aliquots taken from the co-culture supernatants were plated for CFU on BCYE agar. Differentiated U937 cells were inoculated with L. pneumophila strains and intracellular infection examined as before (14, 152). Briefly, bacteria that had been grown on BCYE agar for 3 days at 37°C were added into wells containing the U937 cells at a MOI = 0.5, and the bacteria centrifuged onto the monolayers. After a 2-h incubation to allow for bacterial entry, the infected wells were washed to remove remaining extracellular bacteria. At 0, 24, 48, and 72 h post-inoculation, the monolayers were lysed, and aliquots taken from the lysates were plated for CFU on BCYE agar.
Biofilm assays
The ability of L. pneumophila strains to form biofilm on plastic surfaces was determined using crystal violet staining, as we and others have done before (14, 47, 115, 157). Briefly, bacteria were suspended to an OD660 = 0.2 in BYE or CDM broth containing differing amounts of available iron, and 200 µL aliquots of the suspensions were placed into the wells of a 96-well, polystyrene microtiter plate. After 2 days of static incubation at 30°C, 40 µL of 0.25% crystal violet was added for 15 min. After the wells were washed with ddH20, the plates were allowed to air dry. Biofilm was observable as a blue ring around the walls of the inoculated wells (158). To quantitate the biofilm’s mass, 300 µL of 30% acetic acid was added into the wells to solubilize the crystal violet, and then 200 µL aliquots were transferred into another microtiter plate and read at 600 nm using a Synergy H1 plate reader (Biotek). As done before to assess L. pneumophila growth patterns on an agar surface (14), bacteria that had been grown for ~12 h in BYE broth were resuspended in PBS to an OD660 = 0.2, and then 20 µL aliquots were spotted onto BCYE agar. After 5 days of incubation at 37°C, photographic images of the bacterial growth were acquired.
Aggregation assay
The ability of L. pneumophila strains to undergo auto-aggregation was assessed as before with some slight modifications (86, 87). To begin, the various bacterial strains that had been grown for 3 days on BCYE agar were suspended in 10% BYE broth/90% ddH20 to an OD660 of ~1.0 (n = 3). Five-milliliter aliquots of the suspensions were then transferred into borosilicate glass tubes (13 × 100 mm) and incubated statically in an air incubator set at 30°C. Over the course of a 24-h period, bacterial sedimentation was determined by measuring drops in the OD660 of the suspensions and by the visual observation of pellets forming in the bottom of the tubes. The presence of L. pneumophila aggregates was also determined by obtaining a 5 µL aliquot of the bacterial suspension from half-way down the tube and then examining that sample under brightfield microscopy.
In silico analyses
The identification of promoter regions, ORFs, and the presence of Fur boxes in promoter regions of L. pneumophila genes was done as before (18, 159). Predictions regarding the secreted nature of proteins encoded within the L. pneumophila genome were done using SignalP and PSORTb, analogously to prior examinations of secreted proteins (118, 160). Genomes and associated metadata for unique species of the orders Berkiellales, Coxiellales, Diplorickettsiales, DSM-16500, Francisellales, Legionellales, and Piscirickettsiales were identified either from the NCBI RefSeq genome database (161) or the Genome Taxonomy Database (162). An all-against-all BLAST was performed from all ORF amino acid sequences of the 154 collected genomes using DIAMOND (v.2.0.13.151) (163). The Markov Clustering Algorithm (164) was then used to identify clusters of gene families from BLASTP results (E-value threshold <10−7) using an inflation parameter value of 1.5. Amino acid sequences from gene families with greater than three homologs were aligned separately using MAFFT (v.7.407) (165) with the “--auto” parameter, and excess unaligned amino acids were trimmed using Clipkit (v.2.1.1) (166) with default parameters. GNU Parallel (167) was used to parallelize both the MAFFT alignment and Clipkit trimming steps. Gene trees were inferred from each trimmed alignment using the software package ParGenes (168), yielding maximum likelihood trees for each gene family with RAxML-NG (169). Using the gene trees inferred from ParGenes, a species tree was then estimated using the SpeciesRax (170) software package, via the GeneRax (171) executable, v.2.0.4. A predicted structure for IrsA was made using AlphaFold 3 (58) and rendered with ChimeraX software (v.1.4) (172). To discern possible relationships to known structures, we submitted the predicted structure to the DALI server (v.5) (59), as we have done before to study other bacterial proteins (93, 173).
Statistical methods
As noted in the figure legends, each experiment utilized ≥3 technical replicates, and the values gained were given as the means and standard deviations. Unless indicated differently above, P-values were determined by the Student’s t-test (14, 93). As noted in figure legends, repeat experiments (biological replicates) were done for confirmation.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank members of the Cianciotto lab past and present for much helpful advice, especially Ping-Dong Liang for assistance with the ICP-MS determinations, and Hilary Truchan for assisting with genome sequencing.
A.E.L. was partly supported by NIH training grants T32 AI007476 and R25 GM079300. Overall support for this work came from NIH grant R01 AI139054 awarded to N.P.C.
Contributor Information
Nicholas P. Cianciotto, Email: n-cianciotto@northwestern.edu.
Sébastien P. Faucher, McGill University, Quebec, Canada
DATA AVAILABILITY
The complete assembly of the strain 130b genome is under GenBank accession number GCA_041734345.1, and raw reads have been submitted to NCBI’s SRA under accession number SAMN42206255. Raw reads for RNA seq have been submitted to NCBI’s SRA under accession numbers SRR30641454-SRR30641459. The sequence for the 14915/irsA gene of strain 130b has also been specifically deposited at the NCBI, i.e., BankIt2869790 irsA: PQ315881.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
The following material is available online at https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.02313-24.
Fig S1 to S6; Tables S2 and S3.
Full dataset from RNA Seq analysis.
ASM does not own the copyrights to Supplemental Material that may be linked to, or accessed through, an article. The authors have granted ASM a non-exclusive, world-wide license to publish the Supplemental Material files. Please contact the corresponding author directly for reuse.
REFERENCES
- 1. Viasus D, Gaia V, Manzur-Barbur C, Carratalà J. 2022. Legionnaires' disease: update on diagnosis and treatment. Infect Dis Ther 11:973–986. doi: 10.1007/s40121-022-00635-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Barskey AE, Derado G, Edens C. 2022. Rising incidence of legionnaires' disease and associated epidemiologic patterns, United States, 1992-2018. Emerg Infect Dis 28:527–538. doi: 10.3201/eid2803.211435 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Hochstrasser R, Michaelis S, Brülisauer S, Sura T, Fan M, Maaß S, Becher D, Hilbi H. 2022. Migration of Acanthamoeba through Legionella biofilms is regulated by the bacterial Lqs-LvbR network, effector proteins and the flagellum. Environ Microbiol 24:3672–3692. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.16008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Nisar MA, Ross KE, Brown MH, Bentham R, Whiley H. 2020. Legionella pneumophila and protozoan hosts: implications for the control of hospital and potable water systems. Pathogens 9:286. doi: 10.3390/pathogens9040286 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. van Heijnsbergen E, Schalk JAC, Euser SM, Brandsema PS, den Boer JW, de Roda Husman AM. 2015. Confirmed and potential sources of Legionella reviewed. Environ Sci Technol 49:4797–4815. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b00142 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Mondino S, Schmidt S, Rolando M, Escoll P, Gomez-Valero L, Buchrieser C. 2020. Legionnaires' disease: state of the art knowledge of pathogenesis mechanisms of Legionella. Annu Rev Pathol Mech Dis 15:439–466. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pathmechdis-012419-032742 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Graham CI, MacMartin TL, de Kievit TR, Brassinga AKC. 2024. Molecular regulation of virulence in Legionella pneumophila. Mol Microbiol 121:167–195. doi: 10.1111/mmi.15172 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. White RC, Cianciotto NP. 2019. Assessing the impact, genomics and evolution of type II secretion across a large, medically important genus: the Legionella type II secretion paradigm. Microb Genom 5:doi. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000273 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Ghosal D, Kim KW, Zheng H, Kaplan M, Truchan HK, Lopez AE, McIntire IE, Vogel JP, Cianciotto NP, Jensen GJ. 2019. In vivo structure of the Legionella type II secretion system by electron cryotomography. Nat Microbiol 4:2101–2108. doi: 10.1038/s41564-019-0603-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Cianciotto NP. 2015. An update on iron acquisition by Legionella pneumophila: new pathways for siderophore uptake and ferric iron reduction. Future Microbiol 10:841–851. doi: 10.2217/fmb.15.21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Cullom AC, Martin RL, Song Y, Williams K, Williams A, Pruden A, Edwards MA. 2020. Critical review: propensity of premise plumbing pipe materials to enhance or diminish growth of Legionella and other opportunistic pathogens. Pathogens 9:957. doi: 10.3390/pathogens9110957 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Robey M, Cianciotto NP. 2002. Legionella pneumophila feoAB promotes ferrous iron uptake and intracellular infection. Infect Immun 70:5659–5669. doi: 10.1128/IAI.70.10.5659-5669.2002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Petermann N, Hansen G, Schmidt CL, Hilgenfeld R. 2010. Structure of the GTPase and GDI domains of FeoB, the ferrous iron transporter of Legionella pneumophila. FEBS Lett 584:733–738. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2009.12.045 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Lopez AE, Grigoryeva LS, Barajas A, Cianciotto NP. 2023. Legionella pneumophila rhizoferrin promotes bacterial biofilm formation and growth within amoebae and macrophages. Infect Immun 91:e0007223. doi: 10.1128/iai.00072-23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Chatfield CH, Cianciotto NP. 2007. The secreted pyomelanin pigment of Legionella pneumophila confers ferric reductase activity. Infect Immun 75:4062–4070. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00489-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Flydal MI, Chatfield CH, Zheng H, Gunderson FF, Aubi O, Cianciotto NP, Martinez A. 2012. Phenylalanine hydroxylase from Legionella pneumophila is a thermostable enzyme with a major functional role in pyomelanin synthesis. PLoS One 7:e46209. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046209 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Zheng H, Chatfield CH, Liles MR, Cianciotto NP. 2013. Secreted pyomelanin of Legionella pneumophila promotes bacterial iron uptake and growth under iron-limiting conditions. Infect Immun 81:4182–4191. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00858-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Portier E, Zheng H, Sahr T, Burnside DM, Mallama C, Buchrieser C, Cianciotto NP, Héchard Y. 2015. IroT/mavN, a new iron-regulated gene involved in Legionella pneumophila virulence against amoebae and macrophages. Environ Microbiol 17:1338–1350. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.12604 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Isaac DT, Laguna RK, Valtz N, Isberg RR. 2015. MavN is a Legionella pneumophila vacuole-associated protein required for efficient iron acquisition during intracellular growth. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112:E5208–E5217. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1511389112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Christenson ET, Isaac DT, Yoshida K, Lipo E, Kim JS, Ghirlando R, Isberg RR, Banerjee A. 2019. The iron-regulated vacuolar Legionella pneumophila MavN protein is a transition-metal transporter. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 116:17775–17785. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1902806116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Abeyrathna SS, Abeyrathna NS, Thai NK, Sarkar P, D’Arcy S, Meloni G. 2019. IroT/MavN is a Legionella transmembrane Fe(II) transporter: metal selectivity and translocation kinetics revealed by in vitro real-time transport. Biochemistry 58:4337–4342. doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.9b00658 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Burnside DM, Wu Y, Shafaie S, Cianciotto NP. 2015. The Legionella pneumophila siderophore legiobactin is a polycarboxylate that is identical in structure to rhizoferrin. Infect Immun 83:3937–3945. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00808-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Burnside DM, Cianciotto NP. 2019. Analysis of iron requirements and siderophore production. Methods Mol Biol 1921:3–19. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-9048-1_1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Liles MR, Scheel TA, Cianciotto NP. 2000. Discovery of a nonclassical siderophore, legiobactin, produced by strains of Legionella pneumophila. J Bacteriol 182:749–757. doi: 10.1128/JB.182.3.749-757.2000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Starkenburg SR, Casey JM, Cianciotto NP. 2004. Siderophore activity among members of the Legionella genus. Curr Microbiol 49:203–207. doi: 10.1007/s00284-004-4342-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Allard KA, Viswanathan VK, Cianciotto NP. 2006. lbtA and lbtB are required for production of the Legionella pneumophila siderophore legiobactin. J Bacteriol 188:1351–1363. doi: 10.1128/JB.188.4.1351-1363.2006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Li B, Deng X, Kim SH, Buhrow L, Tomchick DR, Phillips MA, Michael AJ. 2021. Alternative pathways utilize or circumvent putrescine for biosynthesis of putrescine-containing rhizoferrin. J Biol Chem 296:100146. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA120.016738 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Chatfield CH, Mulhern BJ, Burnside DM, Cianciotto NP. 2011. Legionella pneumophila LbtU acts as a novel, TonB-independent receptor for the legiobactin siderophore. J Bacteriol 193:1563–1575. doi: 10.1128/JB.01111-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Chatfield CH, Mulhern BJ, Viswanathan VK, Cianciotto NP. 2012. The major facilitator superfamily-type protein LbtC promotes the utilization of the legiobactin siderophore by Legionella pneumophila. Microbiology (Reading) 158:721–735. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.055533-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Allard KA, Dao J, Sanjeevaiah P, McCoy-Simandle K, Chatfield CH, Crumrine DS, Castignetti D, Cianciotto NP. 2009. Purification of Legiobactin and importance of this siderophore in lung infection by Legionella pneumophila. Infect Immun 77:2887–2895. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00087-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Hickey EK, Cianciotto NP. 1994. Cloning and sequencing of the Legionella pneumophila fur gene. Gene 143:117–121. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(94)90615-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Hickey EK, Cianciotto NP. 1997. An iron- and fur-repressed Legionella pneumophila gene that promotes intracellular infection and encodes a protein with similarity to the Escherichia coli aerobactin synthetases. Infect Immun 65:133–143. doi: 10.1128/iai.65.1.133-143.1997 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Pérard J, Covès J, Castellan M, Solard C, Savard M, Miras R, Galop S, Signor L, Crouzy S, Michaud-Soret I, de Rosny E. 2016. Quaternary structure of fur proteins, a new subfamily of tetrameric proteins. Biochemistry 55:1503–1515. doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.5b01061 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Sahr T, Rusniok C, Impens F, Oliva G, Sismeiro O, Coppée J-Y, Buchrieser C. 2017. The Legionella pneumophila genome evolved to accommodate multiple regulatory mechanisms controlled by the CsrA-system. PLoS Genet 13:e1006629. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006629 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Viswanathan VK, Kurtz S, Pedersen LL, Abu-Kwaik Y, Krcmarik K, Mody S, Cianciotto NP. 2002. The cytochrome c maturation locus of Legionella pneumophila promotes iron assimilation and intracellular infection and contains a strain-specific insertion sequence element. Infect Immun 70:1842–1852. doi: 10.1128/IAI.70.4.1842-1852.2002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Naylor J, Cianciotto NP. 2004. Cytochrome c maturation proteins are critical for in vivo growth of Legionella pneumophila. FEMS Microbiol Lett 241:249–256. doi: 10.1016/j.femsle.2004.10.028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Yip ES, Burnside DM, Cianciotto NP. 2011. Cytochrome c4 is required for siderophore expression by Legionella pneumophila, whereas cytochromes c1 and c5 promote intracellular infection. Microbiology (Reading) 157:868–878. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.046490-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. O’Connor TJ, Zheng H, VanRheenen SM, Ghosh S, Cianciotto NP, Isberg RR. 2016. Iron limitation triggers early egress by the intracellular bacterial pathogen Legionella pneumophila. Infect Immun 84:2185–2197. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01306-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Pope CD, O’Connell W, Cianciotto NP. 1996. Legionella pneumophila mutants that are defective for iron acquisition and assimilation and intracellular infection. Infect Immun 64:629–636. doi: 10.1128/iai.64.2.629-636.1996 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Viswanathan VK, Edelstein PH, Pope CD, Cianciotto NP. 2000. The Legionella pneumophila iraAB locus is required for iron assimilation, intracellular infection, and virulence. Infect Immun 68:1069–1079. doi: 10.1128/IAI.68.3.1069-1079.2000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. O’Connell WA, Hickey EK, Cianciotto NP. 1996. A Legionella pneumophila gene that promotes hemin binding. Infect Immun 64:842–848. doi: 10.1128/iai.64.3.842-848.1996 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. James BW, Mauchline WS, Dennis PJ, Keevil CW. 1997. A study of iron acquisition mechanisms of Legionella pneumophila grown in chemostat culture. Curr Microbiol 34:238–243. doi: 10.1007/s002849900176 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Rossier O, Cianciotto NP. 2005. The Legionella pneumophila tatB gene facilitates secretion of phospholipase C, growth under iron-limiting conditions, and intracellular infection. Infect Immun 73:2020–2032. doi: 10.1128/IAI.73.4.2020-2032.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Huston WM, Naylor J, Cianciotto NP, Jennings MP, McEwan AG. 2008. Functional analysis of the multi-copper oxidase from Legionella pneumophila. Microbes Infect 10:497–503. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2008.01.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Poch MT, Johnson W. 1993. Ferric reductases of Legionella pneumophila. Biometals 6:107–114. doi: 10.1007/BF00140111 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Yu MJ, Ren J, Zeng YL, Zhou SN, Lu YJ. 2009. The Legionella pneumophila Dps homolog is regulated by iron and involved in multiple stress tolerance. J Basic Microbiol 49 Suppl 1:S79–86. doi: 10.1002/jobm.200800357 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Hindré T, Brüggemann H, Buchrieser C, Héchard Y. 2008. Transcriptional profiling of Legionella pneumophila biofilm cells and the influence of iron on biofilm formation. Microbiology (Reading, Engl) 154:30–41. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.2007/008698-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Faucher SP, Mueller CA, Shuman HA. 2011. Legionella pneumophila transcriptome during intracellular multiplication in human macrophages. Front Microbiol 2:60. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2011.00060 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Schroeder GN, Petty NK, Mousnier A, Harding CR, Vogrin AJ, Wee B, Fry NK, Harrison TG, Newton HJ, Thomson NR, Beatson SA, Dougan G, Hartland EL, Frankel G. 2010. Legionella pneumophila strain 130b possesses a unique combination of type IV secretion systems and novel Dot/Icm secretion system effector proteins. J Bacteriol 192:6001–6016. doi: 10.1128/JB.00778-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Paxhia MD, Swanson MS, Downs DM. 2021. Functional characterization of the HMP-P synthase of Legionella pneumophila (Lpg1565). Mol Microbiol 115:539–553. doi: 10.1111/mmi.14622 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Xu XL, Grant GA. 2016. Mutagenic and chemical analyses provide new insight into enzyme activation and mechanism of the type 2 iron-sulfur l-serine dehydratase from Legionella pneumophila. Arch Biochem Biophys 596:108–117. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2016.03.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Sharma KK, Singh D, Mohite SV, Williamson PR, Kennedy JF. 2023. Metal manipulators and regulators in human pathogens: a comprehensive review on microbial redox copper metalloenzymes "multicopper oxidases and superoxide dismutases" Int J Biol Macromol 233:123534. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.123534 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Moomaw AS, Maguire ME. 2008. The unique nature of Mg2+ channels. Physiology (Bethesda) 23:275–285. doi: 10.1152/physiol.00019.2008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Ahn SY, Lee SJ, Yoon SI. 2024. Structural and biochemical analysis of the unique interactions of the Campylobacter jejuni CorA channel protein with divalent cations. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 723:150166. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2024.150166 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Chien M, Morozova I, Shi S, Sheng H, Chen J, Gomez SM, Asamani G, Hill K, Nuara J, Feder M, et al. 2004. The genomic sequence of the accidental pathogen Legionella pneumophila. Science 305:1966–1968. doi: 10.1126/science.1099776 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Cazalet C, Rusniok C, Brüggemann H, Zidane N, Magnier A, Ma L, Tichit M, Jarraud S, Bouchier C, Vandenesch F, Kunst F, Etienne J, Glaser P, Buchrieser C. 2004. Evidence in the Legionella pneumophila genome for exploitation of host cell functions and high genome plasticity. Nat Genet 36:1165–1173. doi: 10.1038/ng1447 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Glöckner G, Albert-Weissenberger C, Weinmann E, Jacobi S, Schunder E, Steinert M, Hacker J, Heuner K. 2008. Identification and characterization of a new conjugation/type IVA secretion system (trb/tra) of Legionella pneumophila Corby localized on two mobile genomic islands. Int J Med Microbiol 298:411–428. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2007.07.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Abramson J, Adler J, Dunger J, Evans R, Green T, Pritzel A, Ronneberger O, Willmore L, Ballard AJ, Bambrick J, et al. 2024. Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3. Nature New Biol 630:493–500. doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07487-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Holm L. 2020. Using dali for protein structure comparison. Methods Mol Biol 2112:29–42. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-0270-6_3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. DebRoy S, Dao J, Söderberg M, Rossier O, Cianciotto NP. 2006. Legionella pneumophila type II secretome reveals unique exoproteins and a chitinase that promotes bacterial persistence in the lung. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:19146–19151. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0608279103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Galka F, Wai SN, Kusch H, Engelmann S, Hecker M, Schmeck B, Hippenstiel S, Uhlin BE, Steinert M. 2008. Proteomic characterization of the whole secretome of Legionella pneumophila and functional analysis of outer membrane vesicles. Infect Immun 76:1825–1836. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01396-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. De Buck E, Höper D, Lammertyn E, Hecker M, Anné J. 2008. Differential 2-D protein gel electrophoresis analysis of Legionella pneumophila wild type and Tat secretion mutants. Int J Med Microbiol 298:449–461. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2007.06.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Aurass P, Gerlach T, Becher D, Voigt B, Karste S, Bernhardt J, Riedel K, Hecker M, Flieger A. 2016. Life stage-specific proteomes of Legionella pneumophila reveal a highly differential abundance of virulence-associated Dot/Icm effectors. Mol Cell Proteomics 15:177–200. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M115.053579 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. DuMont AL, Karaba SM, Cianciotto NP. 2015. Type II secretion-dependent degradative and cytotoxic activities mediated by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia serine proteases StmPr1 and StmPr2. Infect Immun 83:3825–3837. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00672-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. DuMont AL, Cianciotto NP. 2017. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia serine protease StmPr1 induces matrilysis, anoikis, and protease-activated receptor 2 activation in human lung epithelial cells. Infect Immun 85:e00544-17. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00544-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Park BR, Zielke RA, Wierzbicki IH, Mitchell KC, Withey JH, Sikora AE. 2015. A metalloprotease secreted by the type II secretion system links Vibrio cholerae with collagen. J Bacteriol 197:1051–1064. doi: 10.1128/JB.02329-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Shutinoski B, Schmidt MA, Heusipp G. 2010. Transcriptional regulation of the Yts1 type II secretion system of Yersinia enterocolitica and identification of secretion substrates. Mol Microbiol 75:676–691. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06998.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Scheithauer L, Karagöz MS, Mayer BE, Steinert M. 2023. Protein sociology of ProA, Mip and other secreted virulence factors at the Legionella pneumophila surface. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 13:1140688. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1140688 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. White RC, Gunderson FF, Tyson JY, Richardson KH, Portlock TJ, Garnett JA, Cianciotto NP. 2018. Type II secretion-dependent aminopeptidase LapA and acyltransferase PlaC are redundant for nutrient acquisition during Legionella pneumophila intracellular infection of amoebas. MBio 9:e00528-18. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00528-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Rossier O, Starkenburg SR, Cianciotto NP. 2004. Legionella pneumophila type II protein secretion promotes virulence in the A/J mouse model of Legionnaires’ disease pneumonia. Infect Immun 72:310–321. doi: 10.1128/IAI.72.1.310-321.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Chatfield CH, Cianciotto NP. 2013. Culturing, media, and handling of Legionella. Methods Mol Biol 954:151–162. doi: 10.1007/978-1-62703-161-5_7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Berger KH, Isberg RR. 1993. Two distinct defects in intracellular growth complemented by a single genetic locus in Legionella pneumophila. Mol Microbiol 7:7–19. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1993.tb01092.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Tanner JR, Li L, Faucher SP, Brassinga AKC. 2016. The CpxRA two-component system contributes to Legionella pneumophila virulence. Mol Microbiol 100:1017–1038. doi: 10.1111/mmi.13365 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Schmölders J, Manske C, Otto A, Hoffmann C, Steiner B, Welin A, Becher D, Hilbi H. 2017. Comparative proteomics of purified pathogen vacuoles correlates intracellular replication of Legionella pneumophila with the small GTPase Ras-related protein 1 (Rap1). Mol Cell Proteomics 16:622–641. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M116.063453 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Ghosal D, Jeong KC, Chang YW, Gyore J, Teng L, Gardner A, Vogel JP, Jensen GJ. 2019. Molecular architecture, polar targeting and biogenesis of the Legionella Dot/Icm T4SS. Nat Microbiol 4:1173–1182. doi: 10.1038/s41564-019-0427-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Park D, Chetrit D, Hu B, Roy CR, Liu J. 2020. Analysis of Dot/Icm Type IVB secretion system subassemblies by cryoelectron tomography reveals conformational changes induced by DotB binding. MBio 11:e03328-19. doi: 10.1128/mBio.03328-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Sheedlo MJ, Durie CL, Chung JM, Chang L, Roberts J, Swanson M, Lacy DB, Ohi MD. 2021. Cryo-EM reveals new species-specific proteins and symmetry elements in the Legionella pneumophila Dot/Icm T4SS. Elife 10:e70427. doi: 10.7554/eLife.70427 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Song L, Luo J, Wang H, Huang D, Tan Y, Liu Y, Wang Y, Yu K, Zhang Y, Liu X, Li D, Luo ZQ. 2022. Legionella pneumophila regulates host cell motility by targeting Phldb2 with a 14-3-3ζ-dependent protease effector. Elife 11. doi: 10.7554/eLife.73220 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Ellis NA, Myers KS, Tung J, Davidson Ward A, Johnston K, Bonnington KE, Donohue TJ, Machner MP. 2023. A randomized multiplex CRISPRi-Seq approach for the identification of critical combinations of genes. Elife 12:RP86903. doi: 10.7554/eLife.86903 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Bass AR, Egan MS, Alexander-Floyd J, Lopes Fischer N, Doerner J, Shin S. 2023. Human GBP1 facilitates the rupture of the Legionella-containing vacuole and inflammasome activation. MBio 14:e0170723. doi: 10.1128/mbio.01707-23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Rao C, Benhabib H, Ensminger AW. 2013. Phylogenetic reconstruction of the Legionella pneumophila Philadelphia-1 laboratory strains through comparative genomics. PLoS One 8:e64129. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064129 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Brassinga AKC, Hiltz MF, Sisson GR, Morash MG, Hill N, Garduno E, Edelstein PH, Garduno RA, Hoffman PS. 2003. A 65-kilobase pathogenicity island is unique to Philadelphia-1 strains of Legionella pneumophila. J Bacteriol 185:4630–4637. doi: 10.1128/JB.185.15.4630-4637.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Khodr A, Kay E, Gomez-Valero L, Ginevra C, Doublet P, Buchrieser C, Jarraud S. 2016. Molecular epidemiology, phylogeny and evolution of Legionella. Infect Genet Evol 43:108–122. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2016.04.033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Lee H, Im H, Hwang SH, Ko D, Choi SH. 2023. Two novel genes identified by large-scale transcriptomic analysis are essential for biofilm and rugose colony development of Vibrio vulnificus. PLoS Pathog 19:e1011064. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1011064 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Baggett NS, Bronson AS, Cabeen MT. 2021. SOS-independent pyocin production in P. aeruginosa is induced by XerC recombinase deficiency. MBio 12:e0289321. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02893-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Kessler A, Schell U, Sahr T, Tiaden A, Harrison C, Buchrieser C, Hilbi H. 2013. The Legionella pneumophila orphan sensor kinase LqsT regulates competence and pathogen-host interactions as a component of the LAI-1 circuit. Environ Microbiol 15:646–662. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2012.02889.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Abdel-Nour M, Duncan C, Prashar A, Rao C, Ginevra C, Jarraud S, Low DE, Ensminger AW, Terebiznik MR, Guyard C. 2014. The Legionella pneumophila collagen-like protein mediates sedimentation, autoaggregation, and pathogen-phagocyte interactions. Appl Environ Microbiol 80:1441–1454. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03254-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Newton HJ, Sansom FM, Dao J, Cazalet C, Bruggemann H, Albert-Weissenberger C, Buchrieser C, Cianciotto NP, Hartland EL. 2008. Significant role for ladC in initiation of Legionella pneumophila infection. Infect Immun 76:3075–3085. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00209-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Bassler J, Schultz JE, Lupas AN. 2018. Adenylate cyclases: receivers, transducers, and generators of signals. Cell Signal 46:135–144. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2018.03.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90. Kim CM, Ahn YJ, Kim SJ, Yoon DH, Shin SH. 2016. Temperature change induces the expression of vuuA encoding vulnibactin receptor and crp encoding cyclic AMP receptor protein in Vibrio vulnificus. Curr Microbiol 73:54–64. doi: 10.1007/s00284-016-1026-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91. Ritzert JT, Minasov G, Embry R, Schipma MJ, Satchell KJF. 2019. The cyclic AMP receptor protein regulates quorum sensing and global gene expression in Yersinia pestis during planktonic growth and growth in biofilms. MBio 10:e02613-19. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02613-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92. Lachowicz JC, Lennox-Hvenekilde D, Myling-Petersen N, Salomonsen B, Verkleij G, Acevedo-Rocha CG, Caddell B, Gronenberg LS, Almo SC, Sommer MOA, Genee HJ, Grove TL. 2024. Discovery of a biotin synthase that utilizes an auxiliary 4Fe-5S cluster for sulfur insertion. J Am Chem Soc 146:1860–1873. doi: 10.1021/jacs.3c05481 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93. Campbell JA, Cianciotto NP. 2022. Legionella pneumophila Cas2 promotes the expression of small heat shock protein c2 that is required for thermal tolerance and optimal intracellular infection. Infect Immun 90:e0036922. doi: 10.1128/iai.00369-22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94. Rehman S, Grigoryeva LS, Richardson KH, Corsini P, White RC, Shaw R, Portlock TJ, Dorgan B, Zanjani ZS, Fornili A, Cianciotto NP, Garnett JA. 2020. Structure and functional analysis of the Legionella pneumophila chitinase ChiA reveals a novel mechanism of metal-dependent mucin degradation. PLoS Pathog 16:e1008342. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1008342 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95. Luo J, Ruan X, Huang Z, Li Z, Ye L, Wu Y, Zhen X, Ouyang S. 2022. Structural basis for the dual catalytic activity of the Legionella pneumophila ovarian tumor (OTU) domain deubiquitinase LotA. J Biol Chem 298:102414. doi: 10.1016/j.jbc.2022.102414 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96. Liu S, Luo J, Zhen X, Qiu J, Ouyang S, Luo ZQ. 2020. Interplay between bacterial deubiquitinase and ubiquitin E3 ligase regulates ubiquitin dynamics on Legionella phagosomes. Elife 9:e58114. doi: 10.7554/eLife.58114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97. Ma K, Zhen X, Zhou B, Gan N, Cao Y, Fan C, Ouyang S, Luo ZQ, Qiu J. 2020. The bacterial deubiquitinase Ceg23 regulates the association of Lys-63-linked polyubiquitin molecules on the Legionella phagosome. J Biol Chem 295:1646–1657. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA119.011758 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98. Shin D, Bhattacharya A, Cheng Y-L, Alonso MC, Mehdipour AR, van der Heden van Noort GJ, Ovaa H, Hummer G, Dikic I. 2020. Bacterial OTU deubiquitinases regulate substrate ubiquitination upon Legionella infection. Elife 9. doi: 10.7554/eLife.58277 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99. Belyi Y. 2020. Targeting eukaryotic mRNA translation by Legionella pneumophila. Front Mol Biosci 7:80. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2020.00080 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100. Perpich JD, Kalia A, Price CTD, Jones SC, Wong K, Gehring K, Kwaik YA. 2017. Divergent evolution of Di-lysine ER retention vs. farnesylation motif-mediated anchoring of the AnkB virulence effector to the Legionella-containing vacuolar membrane. Sci Rep 7:5123. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-05211-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101. Zhu W, Hammad LA, Hsu F, Mao Y, Luo ZQ. 2013. Induction of caspase 3 activation by multiple Legionella pneumophila Dot/Icm substrates. Cell Microbiol 15:1783–1795. doi: 10.1111/cmi.12157 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102. Altman E, Segal G. 2008. The response regulator CpxR directly regulates expression of several Legionella pneumophila icm/dot components as well as new translocated substrates. J Bacteriol 190:1985–1996. doi: 10.1128/JB.01493-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103. Hershkovitz D, Chen EJ, Ensminger AW, Dugan AS, Conway KT, Joyce AC, Segal G, Isberg RR. 2024. Genetic evidence for a regulated cysteine protease catalytic triad in LegA7, a Legionella pneumophila protein that impinges on a stress response pathway. bioRxiv:2024.03.17.585421. doi: 10.1101/2024.03.17.585421 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104. Lin YH, Lucas M, Evans TR, Abascal-Palacios G, Doms AG, Beauchene NA, Rojas AL, Hierro A, Machner MP. 2018. RavN is a member of a previously unrecognized group of Legionella pneumophila E3 ubiquitin ligases. PLoS Pathog 14:e1006897. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006897 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105. Shi X, Halder P, Yavuz H, Jahn R, Shuman HA. 2016. Direct targeting of membrane fusion by SNARE mimicry: convergent evolution of Legionella effectors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113:8807–8812. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1608755113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106. Guo Z, Stephenson R, Qiu J, Zheng S, Luo ZQ. 2014. A Legionella effector modulates host cytoskeletal structure by inhibiting actin polymerization. Microbes Infect 16:225–236. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2013.11.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107. Liu Y, Zhu W, Tan Y, Nakayasu ES, Staiger CJ, Luo ZQ. 2017. A Legionella effector disrupts host cytoskeletal structure by cleaving actin. PLoS Pathog 13:e1006186. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006186 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108. de Felipe KS, Pampou S, Jovanovic OS, Pericone CD, Ye SF, Kalachikov S, Shuman HA. 2005. Evidence for acquisition of Legionella type IV secretion substrates via interdomain horizontal gene transfer. J Bacteriol 187:7716–7726. doi: 10.1128/JB.187.22.7716-7726.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109. Shohdy N, Efe JA, Emr SD, Shuman HA. 2005. Pathogen effector protein screening in yeast identifies Legionella factors that interfere with membrane trafficking. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:4866–4871. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0501315102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110. Zusman T, Aloni G, Halperin E, Kotzer H, Degtyar E, Feldman M, Segal G. 2007. The response regulator PmrA is a major regulator of the icm/dot type IV secretion system in Legionella pneumophila and Coxiella burnetii. Mol Microbiol 63:1508–1523. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.05604.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111. O’Connor TJ, Boyd D, Dorer MS, Isberg RR. 2012. Aggravating genetic interactions allow a solution to redundancy in a bacterial pathogen. Science 338:1440–1444. doi: 10.1126/science.1229556 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112. de Felipe KS, Glover RT, Charpentier X, Anderson OR, Reyes M, Pericone CD, Shuman HA. 2008. Legionella eukaryotic-like type IV substrates interfere with organelle trafficking. PLoS Pathog 4:e1000117. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113. Tascón I, Li X, Lucas M, Nelson D, Vidaurrazaga A, Lin Y-H, Rojas AL, Hierro A, Machner MP. 2020. Structural insight into the membrane targeting domain of the Legionella deAMPylase SidD. PLoS Pathog 16:e1008734. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1008734 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114. Murdoch CC, Skaar EP. 2022. Nutritional immunity: the battle for nutrient metals at the host-pathogen interface. Nat Rev Microbiol 20:657–670. doi: 10.1038/s41579-022-00745-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115. Marin C, Kumova OK, Ninio S. 2022. Characterization of a novel regulator of biofilm formation in the pathogen Legionella pneumophila. Biomolecules 12:225. doi: 10.3390/biom12020225 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116. Butucel E, Balta I, McCleery D, Popescu CA, Iancu T, Pet I, Marcu A, Horablaga NM, Stef L, Corcionivoschi N. 2022. The effect citrox BCL on Legionella pneumophila mechanisms of biofilm formation, oxidative stress and virulence. Antioxidants (Basel) 11:2186. doi: 10.3390/antiox11112186 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117. Abu Khweek A, Amer AO. 2018. Factors mediating environmental biofilm formation by Legionella pneumophila. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 8:38. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2018.00038 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118. Cianciotto NP, White RC. 2017. Expanding role of type II secretion in bacterial pathogenesis and beyond. Infect Immun 85:e00014-17. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00014-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119. Hwang W, Lee NY, Kim J, Lee MA, Kim KS, Lee KH, Park SJ. 2011. Functional characterization of EpsC, a component of the type II secretion system, in the pathogenicity of Vibrio vulnificus. Infect Immun 79:4068–4080. doi: 10.1128/IAI.05351-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120. Funken H, Knapp A, Vasil ML, Wilhelm S, Jaeger KE, Rosenau F. 2011. The lipase LipA (PA2862) but not LipC (PA4813) from Pseudomonas aeruginosa influences regulation of pyoverdine production and expression of the sigma factor PvdS. J Bacteriol 193:5858–5860. doi: 10.1128/JB.05765-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121. Evans FF, Raftery MJ, Egan S, Kjelleberg S. 2007. Profiling the secretome of the marine bacterium Pseudoalteromonas tunicata using amine-specific isobaric tagging (iTRAQ). J Proteome Res 6:967–975. doi: 10.1021/pr060416x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122. DiChristina TJ, Moore CM, Haller CA. 2002. Dissimilatory Fe(III) and Mn(IV) reduction by Shewanella putrefaciens requires ferE, a homolog of the pulE (gspE) type II protein secretion gene. J Bacteriol 184:142–151. doi: 10.1128/JB.184.1.142-151.2002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123. Liu L, Gueguen-Chaignon V, Gonçalves IR, Rascle C, Rigault M, Dellagi A, Loisel E, Poussereau N, Rodrigue A, Terradot L, Condemine G. 2019. A secreted metal-binding protein protects necrotrophic phytopathogens from reactive oxygen species. Nat Commun 10:4853. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12826-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124. Hernandes RT, De la Cruz MA, Yamamoto D, Girón JA, Gomes TAT. 2013. Dissection of the role of pili and type 2 and 3 secretion systems in adherence and biofilm formation of an atypical enteropathogenic Escherichia coli strain. Infect Immun 81:3793–3802. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00620-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125. Johnson TL, Fong JC, Rule C, Rogers A, Yildiz FH, Sandkvist M. 2014. The type II secretion system delivers matrix proteins for biofilm formation by Vibrio cholerae. J Bacteriol 196:4245–4252. doi: 10.1128/JB.01944-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126. Ennouri H, d’Abzac P, Hakil F, Branchu P, Naïtali M, Lomenech A-M, Oueslati R, Desbrières J, Sivadon P, Grimaud R. 2017. The extracellular matrix of the oleolytic biofilms of Marinobacter hydrocarbonoclasticus comprises cytoplasmic proteins and T2SS effectors that promote growth on hydrocarbons and lipids. Environ Microbiol 19:159–173. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.13547 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127. Elhosseiny NM, Elhezawy NB, Attia AS. 2019. Comparative proteomics analyses of Acinetobacter baumannii strains ATCC 17978 and AB5075 reveal the differential role of type II secretion system secretomes in lung colonization and ciprofloxacin resistance. Microb Pathog 128:20–27. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2018.12.039 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128. Passmore IJ, Nishikawa K, Lilley KS, Bowden SD, Chung JCS, Welch M. 2015. Mep72, a metzincin protease that is preferentially secreted by biofilms of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Bacteriol 197:762–773. doi: 10.1128/JB.02404-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129. Mallegol J, Duncan C, Prashar A, So J, Low DE, Terebeznik M, Guyard C. 2012. Essential roles and regulation of the Legionella pneumophila collagen-like adhesin during biofilm formation. PLoS One 7:e46462. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046462 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130. Rehman S, Antonovic AK, McIntire IE, Zheng H, Cleaver L, Baczynska M, Adams CO, Portlock T, Richardson K, Shaw R, Oregioni A, Mastroianni G, Whittaker SB-M, Kelly G, Lorenz CD, Fornili A, Cianciotto NP, Garnett JA. 2024. The Legionella collagen-like protein employs a distinct binding mechanism for the recognition of host glycosaminoglycans. Nat Commun 15:4912. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-49255-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131. Dragan AL, Voth DE. 2020. Coxiella burnetii: international pathogen of mystery. Microbes Infect 22:100–110. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2019.09.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132. Rozas M, Enríquez R. 2014. Piscirickettsiosis and Piscirickettsia salmonis in fish: a review. J Fish Dis 37:163–188. doi: 10.1111/jfd.12211 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133. Stewart CR, Rossier O, Cianciotto NP. 2009. Surface translocation by Legionella pneumophila: a form of sliding motility that is dependent upon type II protein secretion. J Bacteriol 191:1537–1546. doi: 10.1128/JB.01531-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134. Brenner DJ, Steigerwalt AG, McDade JE. 1979. Classification of the Legionnaires' disease bacterium: Legionella pneumophila, genus novum, species nova, of the family Legionellaceae, familia nova. Ann Intern Med 90:656. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-90-4-656 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135. Jenner GA, Longerich HP, Jackson SE, Fryer BJ. 1990. ICP-MS — A powerful tool for high-precision trace-element analysis in Earth sciences: evidence from analysis of selected U.S.G.S. reference samples. Chem Geol 83:133–148. doi: 10.1016/0009-2541(90)90145-W [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 136. Lopez AE, Mayoral J, Cianciotto NP. 2023. Complete genome sequence of Legionella cardiaca strain H63T, isolated from a case of native valve endocarditis. Microbiol Resour Announc 12:e0017523. doi: 10.1128/mra.00175-23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. 2014. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30:2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138. Andrews S. 2010. FastQC: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. Babraham Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom. [Google Scholar]
- 139. Kolmogorov M, Yuan J, Lin Y, Pevzner PA. 2019. Assembly of long, error-prone reads using repeat graphs. Nat Biotechnol 37:540–546. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0072-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140. Walker BJ, Abeel T, Shea T, Priest M, Abouelliel A, Sakthikumar S, Cuomo CA, Zeng Q, Wortman J, Young SK, Earl AM. 2014. Pilon: an integrated tool for comprehensive microbial variant detection and genome assembly improvement. PLoS One 9:e112963. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112963 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141. Galens K, Orvis J, Daugherty S, Creasy HH, Angiuoli S, White O, Wortman J, Mahurkar A, Giglio MG. 2011. The IGS standard operating procedure for automated prokaryotic annotation. Stand Genomic Sci 4:244–251. doi: 10.4056/sigs.1223234 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142. Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP, Zaslavsky L, Lomsadze A, Pruitt KD, Borodovsky M, Ostell J. 2016. NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 44:6614–6624. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw569 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143. Haft DH, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Brover V, Chetvernin V, O’Neill K, Li W, Chitsaz F, Derbyshire MK, Gonzales NR, Gwadz M, Lu F, Marchler GH, Song JS, Thanki N, Yamashita RA, Zheng C, Thibaud-Nissen F, Geer LY, Marchler-Bauer A, Pruitt KD. 2018. RefSeq: an update on prokaryotic genome annotation and curation. Nucleic Acids Res 46:D851–D860. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx1068 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144. Li W, O’Neill KR, Haft DH, DiCuccio M, Chetvernin V, Badretdin A, Coulouris G, Chitsaz F, Derbyshire MK, Durkin AS, Gonzales NR, Gwadz M, Lanczycki CJ, Song JS, Thanki N, Wang J, Yamashita RA, Yang M, Zheng C, Marchler-Bauer A, Thibaud-Nissen F. 2021. RefSeq: expanding the Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline reach with protein family model curation. Nucleic Acids Res 49:D1020–D1028. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa1105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145. Ye J, Coulouris G, Zaretskaya I, Cutcutache I, Rozen S, Madden TL. 2012. Primer-BLAST: a tool to design target-specific primers for polymerase chain reaction. BMC Bioinformatics 13:134. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-13-134 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146. Dobin A, Davis CA, Schlesinger F, Drenkow J, Zaleski C, Jha S, Batut P, Chaisson M, Gingeras TR. 2013. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 29:15–21. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147. Anders S, Pyl PT, Huber W. 2015. HTSeq--a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics 31:166–169. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu638 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148. Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. 2014. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol 15:550. doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149. Stewart CR, Burnside DM, Cianciotto NP. 2011. The surfactant of Legionella pneumophila is secreted in a TolC-dependent manner and is antagonistic toward other Legionella species. J Bacteriol 193:5971–5984. doi: 10.1128/JB.05405-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150. Truchan HK, Christman HD, White RC, Rutledge NS, Cianciotto NP. 2017. Type II secretion substrates of Legionella pneumophila translocate out of the pathogen-occupied vacuole via a semipermeable membrane. MBio 8:e00870-17. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00870-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151. Nozick SH, Ozer EA, Medernach R, Kochan TJ, Kumar R, Mills JO, Wunderlink RG, Qi C, Hauser AR. 2024. Phenotypes of a Pseudomonas aeruginosa hypermutator lineage that emerged during prolonged mechanical ventilation in a patient without cystic fibrosis. mSystems 9:e0048423. doi: 10.1128/msystems.00484-23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152. White RC, Cianciotto NP. 2016. Type II secretion is necessary for optimal association of the Legionella-containing vacuole with macrophage Rab1B but enhances intracellular replication mainly by Rab1B-independent mechanisms. Infect Immun 84:3313–3327. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00750-16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153. Hammer BK, Swanson MS. 1999. Co-ordination of Legionella pneumophila virulence with entry into stationary phase by ppGpp. Mol Microbiol 33:721–731. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1999.01519.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154. Tyson JY, Pearce MM, Vargas P, Bagchi S, Mulhern BJ, Cianciotto NP. 2013. Multiple Legionella pneumophila Type II secretion substrates, including a novel protein, contribute to differential infection of the amoebae Acanthamoeba castellanii, Hartmannella vermiformis, and Naegleria lovaniensis. Infect Immun 81:1399–1410. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00045-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155. White RC, Truchan HK, Zheng H, Tyson JY, Cianciotto NP. 2019. Type II secretion promotes bacterial growth within the Legionella-containing vacuole in infected amoebae. Infect Immun 87:e00374-19. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00374-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156. Grigoryeva LS, Cianciotto NP. 2021. Human macrophages utilize a wide range of pathogen recognition receptors to recognize Legionella pneumophila, including Toll-Like Receptor 4 engaging Legionella lipopolysaccharide and the Toll-like Receptor 3 nucleic-acid sensor. PLoS Pathog 17:e1009781. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1009781 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157. Peterson CP, Sauer C, Chatfield CH. 2018. The extracellular polymeric substances of Legionella pneumophila biofilms contain amyloid structures. Curr Microbiol 75:736–744. doi: 10.1007/s00284-018-1440-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158. O’Toole GA. 2011. Microtiter dish biofilm formation assay. J Vis Exp 47:2437. doi: 10.3791/2437 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159. Coppens L, Lavigne R. 2020. SAPPHIRE: a neural network based classifier for σ70 promoter prediction in Pseudomonas. BMC Bioinformatics 21:415. doi: 10.1186/s12859-020-03730-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160. Karaba SM, White RC, Cianciotto NP. 2013. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia encodes a type II protein secretion system that promotes detrimental effects on lung epithelial cells. Infect Immun 81:3210–3219. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00546-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161. O’Leary NA, Wright MW, Brister JR, Ciufo S, Haddad D, McVeigh R, Rajput B, Robbertse B, Smith-White B, Ako-Adjei D, et al. 2016. Reference sequence (RefSeq) database at NCBI: current status, taxonomic expansion, and functional annotation. Nucleic Acids Res 44:D733–D745. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv1189 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162. Parks DH, Chuvochina M, Rinke C, Mussig AJ, Chaumeil PA, Hugenholtz P. 2022. GTDB: an ongoing census of bacterial and archaeal diversity through a phylogenetically consistent, rank normalized and complete genome-based taxonomy. Nucleic Acids Res 50:D785–D794. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab776 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163. Buchfink B, Reuter K, Drost HG. 2021. Sensitive protein alignments at tree-of-life scale using DIAMOND. Nat Methods 18:366–368. doi: 10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164. Van Dongen S. 2008. Graph clustering via a discrete uncoupling process. SIAM J Matrix Anal Appl 30:121–141. doi: 10.1137/040608635 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 165. Katoh K, Misawa K, Kuma K, Miyata T. 2002. MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res 30:3059–3066. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkf436 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166. Steenwyk JL, Buida TJ, Li Y, Shen X-X, Rokas A. 2020. ClipKIT: a multiple sequence alignment trimming software for accurate phylogenomic inference. PLoS Biol 18:e3001007. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167. Tange O. 2011. GNU parallel: the command-line power tool. Login Usenix Mag 36
- 168. Morel B, Kozlov AM, Stamatakis A. 2019. ParGenes: a tool for massively parallel model selection and phylogenetic tree inference on thousands of genes. Bioinformatics 35:1771–1773. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty839 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169. Kozlov AM, Darriba D, Flouri T, Morel B, Stamatakis A. 2019. RAxML-NG: a fast, scalable and user-friendly tool for maximum likelihood phylogenetic inference. Bioinformatics 35:4453–4455. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz305 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170. Morel B, Schade P, Lutteropp S, Williams TA, Szöllősi GJ, Stamatakis A. 2022. SpeciesRax: a tool for maximum likelihood species tree inference from gene family trees under duplication, transfer, and loss. Mol Biol Evol 39:msab365. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msab365 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171. Morel B, Kozlov AM, Stamatakis A, Szöllősi GJ. 2020. GeneRax: a tool for species-tree-aware maximum likelihood-based gene family tree inference under gene duplication, transfer, and loss. Mol Biol Evol 37:2763–2774. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msaa141 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172. Pettersen EF, Goddard TD, Huang CC, Meng EC, Couch GS, Croll TI, Morris JH, Ferrin TE. 2021. UCSF ChimeraX: structure visualization for researchers, educators, and developers. Protein Sci 30:70–82. doi: 10.1002/pro.3943 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173. Cobe BL, Dey S, Minasov G, Inniss N, Satchell KJF, Cianciotto NP. 2024. Bactericidal effectors of the Stenotrophomonas maltophilia type IV secretion system: functional definition of the nuclease TfdA and structural determination of TfcB. MBio 15:e0119824. doi: 10.1128/mbio.01198-24 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Fig S1 to S6; Tables S2 and S3.
Full dataset from RNA Seq analysis.
Data Availability Statement
The complete assembly of the strain 130b genome is under GenBank accession number GCA_041734345.1, and raw reads have been submitted to NCBI’s SRA under accession number SAMN42206255. Raw reads for RNA seq have been submitted to NCBI’s SRA under accession numbers SRR30641454-SRR30641459. The sequence for the 14915/irsA gene of strain 130b has also been specifically deposited at the NCBI, i.e., BankIt2869790 irsA: PQ315881.








