ABSTRACT
The rhizospheres of plants and soil microorganisms are intricately interconnected. Tea trees are cultivated extensively on the karst plateau of Guizhou Province, China; however, the understanding of the interactions among fungal communities, community taxa, and diseases impacting tea tree in the soil rhizosphere is limited. Our aim is to offer insights for the advancement of modern agriculture in ecologically fragile karst tea gardens, as well as microbiomics concepts for green and sustainable environmental development. This study utilized the internal transcribed spacer high-throughput sequencing technology to explore the symbiotic relationship between rhizosphere fungi and plant disease feedback in multiple tea estates across the Guizhou Plateau. The ecological preferences and environmental thresholds of fungi were investigated via environmental variables. Furthermore, a correlation was established between different taxa and individual soil functions. Research has indicated that tea leaf blight disrupts symbiotic connections among fungal groups. For various taxa, we found that numerous taxa consistently maintained core positions within the community, whereas rare taxa were able to stabilize due to a high proportion of positive effects. Additionally, abundant taxa presented a wider range of environmental feedback, whereas the rare taxon diversity presented a stronger positive association with the soil Z score. This study contributes to our understanding of the importance of rare taxa in plant rhizosphere soil processes. Emphasis should be placed on the role of rare taxa in pest and disease control within green agriculture while also strengthening systematic development and biogeographical research related to rare taxa in this region.
IMPORTANCE
In this study, based on internal transcribed spacer high-throughput sequencing, fungal communities in the rhizosphere soil of tea trees and their interactions with the environment in karst areas were reported, and the symbiotic relationships of different fungal taxa and their feedback to the environment were described in detail by using the knowledge of microbial ecology. On this basis, it was found that tea tree diseases affect the symbiotic relationships of fungal taxa. At the same time, we found that rare taxa have stronger cooperative relationships in response to environmental changes and explored their participation in soil processes based on fungal trait sets. This study will provide basic data for the development of modern agriculture in tea gardens and theoretical basis for the sustainable prevention and control of tea tree diseases.
KEYWORDS: rhizosphere fungi, rare taxa, cooccurrence network, individual soil function, tea tree, karst
INTRODUCTION
The population characteristics of ecosystems often include a high concentration of abundant taxa (AT) groups, a large number of rare taxa (RT), and low niche occupancy rates (1), which are widespread from the macro population to the micro world (2, 3). Previous studies have shown that identifying the diverse distribution patterns, relationships, and functional properties of AT and RT in various natural ecosystems (4, 5) and social phenomena (6) is always possible. Therefore, exploring the interaction between AT and RT and their involvement in environmental processes can help researchers understand microbially driven ecological processes and functions.
Microbial communities participate in soil processes and geochemical cycles (7) and are essential for maintaining ecosystem stability (8). With constant advancements in the microbial sequencing technology, studies on the interaction mechanisms between distinct microbial groups and their coupling with the environment have become popular. Recent studies have shown that bacterial diversity and specific bacterial groups are key driving factors for soil multifunctionality in temperate arid and semiarid mountain ecosystems (9). The interaction between pathogenic and mycorrhizal fungi in soil networks can explain the coexistence of aboveground and underground biological communities in forest ecosystems (10). In eukaryotes, fungi are very different from bacteria in prokaryotes, such as filamentous fungi that grow on hyphae and are larger in size (11). Certain types of fungi in the soil infiltrate plant tissues through plant roots or spread at the spore level, forming extensive symbiotic relationships with host plants (12, 13). Moreover, fungi play a fundamental ecological role in mediating plant mineral nutrition and alleviating nutrient limitations in other organisms and constitute a key group in ecological restoration research in ecologically fragile areas. The high physiological and morphological plasticity of fungi can improve the availability of soil nutrients and the absorption of crop nutrients along environmental gradients (14). However, there is limited research on the rich and rare taxa in agricultural ecosystems in ecologically fragile areas, such as karst areas, and little is known about the interaction mechanisms of rare taxa in soil fungal communities and their interactions with abiotic factors.
Tea is the oldest and most popular caffeinated beverage worldwide, with tremendous economic, therapeutic, and cultural significance (15). The Guizhou Plateau has a long history of tea tree (Camellia sinensis) cultivation (16, 17), with unique karst landforms, diverse climates, and abundant precipitation, which effectively protect tea tree resources in this region (18). Colletotrichum camelliae is a phytopathogenic fungus that causes brown blight in tea trees (19). This disease results in significant production and economic losses to the yield of some sensitive cultivated tea varieties (20). Currently, there are few studies on the rhizosphere fungi of tea gardens in karst areas affected by disease, and it is not clear how different taxa of fungi interact with each other and how they participate in environmental processes. It is understood that disease-induced changes in plant performance can trigger a series of indirect changes in the rhizosphere environment, significantly affecting the composition and assembly mechanism of the rhizosphere microbial community (21). Owing to the low ecological carrying capacity of karst regions (22), the transformation of traditional agriculture to a modern agricultural development model is particularly urgent (23), and green and sustainable agricultural measures need to be further optimized. Therefore, theoretical studies on the diversity of rhizosphere fungi in tea trees and their interactions are particularly important.
This study aimed to examine (i) the composition and diversity of rhizosphere fungal communities under the influence of tea brown blight disease, (ii) the occupancy and co-occurrence relationships of different fungal taxa, (iii) the ecological preferences of abundant and rare taxa groups and their response to the environment, and (iv) the relationships between different fungal taxa and individual soil functions. The research results provide support for the geographical distribution of soil microorganisms in tea gardens in karst areas and for green prevention and control in the future.
RESULTS
General distribution patterns of different fungal taxa
We first described the fungal community and its diversity and evaluated the abundance occupancy relationship of different fungal taxa, as well as the differences in fungal species in the rhizosphere soil between healthy and diseased tea trees. After rigorous data processing (flattening the sequencing data and filtering out OTUs with reads less than 20 to reduce the ground error caused by low-frequency OTUs in subsequent analysis), 1091 OTUs belonging to 14 phyla, 34 classes, 70 orders, 127 families, and 199 genera were identified. At the phylum level, the top three phyla in terms of relative abundance were Ascomycota (51.05%), Basidiomycota (23.69%), and Mortierellomycota (3.99%), with the exception of unclassified OTUs, and the composition of the main fungal phyla was generally consistent within a given species (GSP: given species; GSP includes abundant taxa [AT], intermediate taxa [IT], and rare taxa [RT]) (Fig. S1 to S3). For the GSP, the richness of the categorical ordinals annotated as RT > IT > AT was as expected, and a large portion of the OTUs were classified as RT (62.33%), whereas AT accounted for 10.17% of the total OTUs (Table 1). The abundance occupancy relationship can be used to generate supporting hypotheses for core microbiome members from microbial data sets, prioritizing these taxa for subsequent research. The abundance–occupancy relationship (Fig. 1) indicated that RT had a stronger positive correlation than the other taxa (RT > IT > AT), with all ATs occupying more than 50% of the loci. At 100% occupancy sites, there was only one OTU of RT, whereas AT occupied the vast majority of 100% of the sites. The α diversity data revealed that tea leaf blight affected the fungal community diversity, but this effect was not significant (Fig. S4).
TABLE 1.
Taxa | OTUs | Phylum | Class | Order | Family | Genus |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whole | 1091 | 14 | 34 | 70 | 127 | 199 |
AT | 111 | 3 | 8 | 20 | 34 | 41 |
IT | 300 | 9 | 20 | 43 | 67 | 76 |
RT | 680 | 14 | 34 | 62 | 109 | 137 |
Orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) is a multivariate statistical analysis method mainly used for classification and feature selection, which can effectively identify the key variables that affect group classification. Using OPLS-DA, we investigated differences in different fungal taxa in the rhizosphere soils of healthy and diseased tea trees. The results indicate that in AT, differential statistical screening identified a downregulated OTU (t test, P < 0.05) (Fig. S5a), and the OPLS-DA score better distinguished between healthy and diseased soil samples (R2Y = 0.863, Q2Y = 0.204), explaining 86.3% of the classification information (Fig. S5b). The permutation test revealed that the slopes of the two fitting lines were positive (R2 = 0.79 and Q2 < 0), indicating a certain degree of overfitting (Fig. S6d). Notably, RT screened more OTUs (Fig. S6a), which had a certain degree of overfitting in OPLS-DA (Fig. S6b and d). At the same time, the distance between samples was smaller, but there were more species dispersion values and less aggregation than in AT (Fig. S5c and S6c).
Rhizosphere fungal ecological co-occurrence network analysis
Cooccurrence networks were used to analyze the potential interaction relationships of the GSP. AT had more nodes and links than RT (Table S1). The average weighted degree, graph density, and average clustering coefficient of AT were greater than those of RT (Table S2; Fig. 2). Notably, the species in RT presented a more positive (95.23%) tendency toward cooperation. Compared with AT, RT results in a larger and more complex network topology with an increase in the number of links and nodes (Fig. 2b). From the perspective of the topological structure at the phylum level, the AT network exhibited ladder-like characteristics, where dominant species dominated (Fig. 2c). Although Ascomycota accounted for 40.59% of RT, there was no dominant tendency, and its topological center parameters were not significantly different from those of Basidiomycota (Fig. 2d).
The fungal co-occurrence network can reveal the ecological relationships between fungal communities and speculate on the interactions between species. Here, we constructed a fungal network using correlation coefficients |r| > 0.65 and P < 0.05 to characterize the interaction relationships between GSPs (Table S2; Fig. 3a). In fungal communities, there are extensive positive correlations (positive) between different taxa (AT, IT, and RT), with a high proportion of 95.23% between IT and RT, but the proportion of positive correlations between RT and AT is the smallest (Table 2; Fig. 3b). Notably, although RT has a large group, its cooperative relationship with AT is weaker than that between IT and AT (links: 1198 < 1372), whereas there is a broad connection between IT and RT (links: 3950). From the perspective of topology, the position of AT as the dominant species was not reflected in the topology data, and its difference from that of IT was not significant. However, the topology data for RT were significantly related to both AT and IT (Fig. 3c). Under the influence of tea leaf blight, there was a downwards trend in the positive correlation links in the fungal network, and the main topological data were lower than those in the healthy sample network (Table S3).
TABLE 2.
GSP | Total links | Positive links | Negative links | Positive correlations (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
AT-AT | 435 | 356 | 79 | 81.84 |
AT-IT | 1372 | 1073 | 299 | 78.21 |
AT-RT | 1198 | 919 | 279 | 76.71 |
IT-IT | 2121 | 1741 | 380 | 82.08 |
IT-RT | 3950 | 3255 | 695 | 82.41 |
RT-RT | 4132 | 3935 | 197 | 95.23 |
Response of different fungal taxa to the environment
In order to clarify the relationship between soil fungi and the environment, we not only measured the hydrogen (pH), electrical conductance (EC), and soil organic matter (SOM) that are closely related to soil quality, but also emphasized the mutual relationship between soil available nutrients (quick-acting phosphorus, available potassium, and alkaline hydrolyzed nitrogen) and fungal communities. To obtain information on potential traits, we attempted to define the ecological preferences of each OTU via Spearman’s correlations between fungal taxa and environmental variables (Table 3). Fungal community traits were acquired via the “Hmisc” package in R. Here (Fig. 4), both AT and RT presented similar phylogenetic diversities, although they were dominated by Basidiomycota, Ascomycota, and Mortierellomycota. Among them, AT included 12 genera of fungi, including Saitozyma, Fusarium, and Trichoderma, whereas the RT group included nine genera of fungi. Moreover, the correlation between rare taxonomic groups and the environment was slightly greater than that between AT (ecological preference point RT: 50 > AT: 42) and the environment. Notably, both AT and RT had identical ecological preferences for OC (negative) and AK (positive) in terms of their OTU traits (Fig. 4). In RT, except for OTUs that did not display ecological preferences, the ecological preferences of the other OTUs for pH (native) and EC (positive) were completely consistent (Fig. 4b).
TABLE 3.
Tax/Env | pH | EC | OC | OP | AP | AK | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
+ | NA | − | + | NA | − | + | NA | − | + | NA | − | + | NA | − | + | NA | − | ||
AT | OTUs | 16 | 72 | 23 | 25 | 71 | 15 | 5 | 83 | 23 | 21 | 71 | 19 | 19 | 90 | 2 | 19 | 88 | 4 |
Average | −0.0631 | 0.0901 | −0.1622 | 0.0180 | 0.1532 | 0.1351 | |||||||||||||
IT | OTUs | 46 | 167 | 87 | 85 | 172 | 43 | 20 | 215 | 65 | 37 | 206 | 57 | 43 | 252 | 5 | 61 | 219 | 20 |
Average | −0.1367 | 0.14 | −0.15 | −0.6667 | 0.1267 | 0.1367 | |||||||||||||
RT | OTUs | 69 | 487 | 124 | 121 | 513 | 46 | 42 | 550 | 88 | 43 | 545 | 92 | 48 | 614 | 18 | 78 | 565 | 37 |
Average | −0.0809 | 0.1103 | −0.0676 | −0.0721 | 0.0441 | 0.0603 | |||||||||||||
Total | OTUs | 131 | / | 234 | 231 | / | 104 | 67 | / | 176 | 101 | / | 168 | 110 | / | 25 | 158 | / | 61 |
For example, the positive and negative correlations of OUT with pH were defined as acid- or alkaline-preferred correlations. “+” is denoted as “1” in the data set representing a positive correlation; “NA“ is denoted as “0“ in the data set representing no correlation; and “−” is denoted as "−1" in the data set representing a negative correlation; “/” means that the indicator is not applicable here.
To identify the environmental thresholds for fungal communities in relation to each variable, we assessed the accumulating Z+ (positive response species generated by changes along environmental gradients) and Z− (negative response species generated by changes along environmental gradients) points of change via the “TITAN2” package (Fig. 5 and 6). We did not add IT and RT here to eliminate the interference caused by the “double zero problem.” The results revealed that the response of reducing taxa to EC enrichment lagged behind that of increasing taxa, whereas the process of AK enrichment had the opposite effect. The overall responses of most species to the various environmental gradients were consistent (Fig. 5). Moreover, the distribution maps of negatively and positively responsive species along the environmental gradient revealed that the gradient changes in pH and OC caused an increase in negatively responsive species, whereas EC and AK showed opposite trends (Fig. 6). Notably, all the response species, with the exception of the unidentified OTUs, belonged to Ascomycota and Basidiomycota, and OTU000059 (unclassified) and OTU000095 (Ascomycota) responded to all the environmental variables (Table S4; Fig. 6).
We further evaluated the relationships between GSP diversity (α and β diversities) and individual soil functions (Table S6; Fig. 7 and 8). By evaluating the relationships between α diversity and individual soil functions through an overall sample analysis (N = 20), we found a significant negative correlation between soil pH and both AT (R2 = 0.212, P < 0.05) and RT (R2 = 0.203, P < 0.05). Soil EC, an important indicator, was significantly positively correlated with both AT (R2 = 0.312, P < 0.05) and RT (R2 = 0.212, P < 0.05). Interestingly, the RT α diversity was also significantly positively correlated with soil AP (R2 = 0.389, P < 0.01) and AK (R2 = 0.226, P < 0.05) and significantly negatively correlated with soil OC (R2 = 0.205, P < 0.05). However, there was no significant correlation between the IT (P > 0.05) and individual soil functions. From the β diversity perspective, only RT had a significant negative correlation with soil AP (R2 = 0.389, P < 0.05), whereas the other GSPs were not significantly correlated with individual soil function.
DISCUSSION
Tea tree diseases lead to the emergence of indicator species in different taxa of rhizosphere fungi
Soil is an essential biological matrix in nature, and plant root exudates that are released into the soil can affect soil properties. Rhizosphere and ectorhizosphere soils were the first to respond to this phenomenon because it was proved that root exudates from plants can enhance the abundance of beneficial taxa for specific plant species, thereby affecting the composition and function of soil microorganisms (24). This study revealed that the available nutrient content was affected by tea tree diseases. The AP and AK contents of healthy samples were slightly lower than those of diseased samples (Table S1) possibly because tea tree diseases cause poor absorption of nutrients that cannot be utilized. Moreover, certain pathogenic microorganisms can also consume nutrients in the soil, leading to nutrient imbalance. This phenomenon has also been observed in previous studies (25). Importantly, unhealthy tea tree soil frequently becomes acidified (Table S1), which directly changes the soil environment and leads to changes in the beneficial microbial population (26). These changes are not conducive to the reproduction of beneficial microorganisms but accelerate the emergence of other harmful fungi (27, 28). This indicates the importance of management methods based on modern agriculture as a basic concept by utilizing ecological principles and methods. Consequently, the stability of ecosystems and the sustainability of agricultural production can be achieved. Organic fertilizers, pesticides, and biological control methods can be used to improve the soil quality, protect the ecological environment, promote biodiversity, and enhance the quality of agricultural products, further reflecting the irreplaceability of soil as a biological substrate.
Ascomycota and Basidiomycota were the main phyla of fungi belonging to GSP (Fig. S1 to S3), indicating that fungal taxa have a certain degree of stability at relatively high levels and are not affected by tea tree diseases. In GSP, compared with that in IT, the proportion of Ascomycota in AT generally decreased, whereas that of Basidiomycota generally increased. Some members of the phylum Basidiomycota form mycorrhizal fungi in symbiosis with plants (29), which is beneficial for crop cultivation. Some basidiomycetes can cause diseases in forests and garden plants (30), resulting in economic losses. The abundance‒occupancy relationship is a critical indicator for studying fungal community relationships as a core or host-specific group. A greater abundance of AT had a wider distribution, whereas a lower occupancy rate of RT implied a greater elimination risk (Fig. 1). Previous studies support this viewpoint (31). In addition, OPLS-DA demonstrated (Fig. S5 to S6) that tea tree diseases have a significant effect on fungal communities, and AT screening revealed that the genus Penicillium was significantly present in the affected samples (M). Penicillium belongs to the heterotrophic aerobic type, which can cause plant Penicillium disease, causing the formation of large areas of disease spots in plants and plant death in severe cases (32). In RT, two families, namely, Bulleribasidiaceae and Phyllosticaceae, were present in the diseased sample (M), and Phyllosticaceae can cause plant leaf blight (33).
Compared with nonfungi, fungi have relatively high symbiotic rates
Microbial network relationships are driven by multiple factors, such as crossfeeding, legacy effects, and environmental filtering (34). Microorganisms often exist in symbiotic forms that are conducive to the construction of complex ecological networks (35). Our results revealed a relatively positive correlation in the RT (95.23%) network, and the significance test of the topological structure revealed that AT still played a core role in the community (Table S2; Fig. 2). Previous studies on the network relationships of soil microbial communities in the Hexi Corridor region of China have shown that most of the network links within the taxa are positively correlated (36), which is consistent with our findings.
RT is crucial for the construction of microbial networks and serves as an indicator of the evolution of soil processes and vegetation succession (4, 5). In this study, we found that the internal connections between the RT taxa were the closest and mostly positive (Fig. 3a and b). Studies have shown that rare taxa have important ecological functions, including element cycling, pollutant degradation, and host health (37). There were fewer connections between AT and RT, and the proportion of negative correlations was greater than that between the other groups (Table 2). RT was located at the center of the network and tended to cooperate with the intermediate taxa (IT) (Fig. 3a and b). The reasons for their lower cooperation with AT are partly their abundance‒occupancy relationships (Fig. 1) and partly the key role that they may be playing in enhancing the stress resistance of fungal communities, as well as maintaining their structure and stability (38). The key role of RT is self-evident. Generally speaking, abundant and rare taxa exhibit different responses to environmental changes, while rare taxa are more sensitive (39). Studies have shown that RT with flexible and diverse taxa can improve the selection efficiency of key taxa rather than relying solely on the input of new microbial taxa under environmental interference (40). Notably, tea leaf blight increased the negative correlation between species of different taxa in the fungal network, and the topological structure became loose (Table S3). This means that the resource competition between taxa caused by plant diseases intensifies, thereby disrupting community stability.
Environmental response of abundant and rare taxa
Soil microbes have significant ecological functions in the soil nutrient cycle and plant mineral nutrition (41). However, because of their susceptibility to environmental changes, external environmental changes frequently result in changes in variety and community structure (42, 43). Here, we discuss the ecological preferences of soil microorganisms for the external environment. First, we observed that, compared with RT (19.75%) (Table S5), AT (28.68%) exhibited a broader ecological preference for environmental variables. This can also explain why, compared with RT, AT has greater adaptability to environmental changes and can effectively utilize a wider range of resources. Research on other agricultural ecosystems supports this view (31). Interestingly, among the top 25 OTUs in terms of the relative abundances of AT and RT, the response of RT to the environmental variables was slightly greater than that of AT (Fig. 4). This phenomenon can be explained by the efficient selection of RT, which can stabilize it in the community and increase its occupancy rate, rather than by continuously updating RT through environmental intervention. In addition, the response traits of the AP and AK preferences in fungal communities are relatively conserved (Table S5; Fig. 4), and previous studies have shown that root exudates can affect soil available nutrients during plant growth stages (44). Therefore, revealing the ecological preferences of fungal communities for available nutrients can be used to evaluate the effects of soil feedback on plant growth. Soil microorganisms affect the transformation and supply of nitrogen and other nutrients. An environmental threshold analysis revealed more negatively responsive species along the pH gradient in AT compared with positively responsive species (Fig. 5 and 6). This is due to the fact that tea trees are well-suited for acidic soil, and environments with excessively high or low pH levels hinder nutrient absorption (45, 46). A reasonable pH (4.0–4.8) is beneficial for improving disease resistance.
This study focuses on the relationships between GSP and the individual soil functions of different environmental variables (Fig. 7 and 8). Standardized Z-scores for the environmental parameters revealed that individual soil functions and fungal α diversity differed surprisingly across taxa, as supported by similar studies on bacteria and fungi (9, 47). There are several possible explanations for this phenomenon. First, the linear relationship between fungal community diversity and individual soil functions depends on the proportion of positive and negative species that respond to environmental gradients. Our ordinary least squares fitting trend was consistent with the environmental threshold analysis, which explains this issue. Second, as the relative abundance and occupancy of species increase, certain species with specific functions in relatively high-abundance taxa (AT and IT) may play a reduced role in the community, and the active cooperation of RT gradually increases the community stability. Another explanation is that AT and plant roots compete for scarce nutrients, especially in karst areas where nitrogen and phosphorus limitations were more prominent in our study. This hypothesis is supported by previous research (48). In addition, this phenomenon indicates that the relationships between different fungal taxa and individual soil functions manifest as differences in the ecological niche complementarity and stochastic processes of community ecology (49).
From the perspectives of fungal involvement in co-occurring network construction and soil ecological functions, the interaction between rare fungal groups is crucial for determining the community composition and maintaining the ecosystem multifunctionality (50). Our research has found that species within rare taxa have more positive interactions, indicating the importance of species interactions within rare fungal subpopulations in supporting ecosystem function and stability (51). In addition, the cooperation of rare taxa may play a crucial role in their survival in tea garden soil (acidic). Most fungi characterized by hyphal growth are interconnected and form a network through hyphae, providing timely feedback on environmental changes, which helps share resources and coordinate microbial activities (52). Therefore, closely monitoring the cooperation between rare fungal groups can provide solutions for environmental disturbances, including plant diseases and extreme weather events, and enhance the resilience of microbial communities, even soil quality (53).
Conclusions
Our study mainly focused on disease-mediated fungal changes in the rhizosphere soil of tea trees in karst tea garden ecosystems, as well as the interaction mechanisms of different fungal taxa and their responses to the environment. Our results provide reliable evidence that tea tree diseases increase fungal species richness but decrease fungal diversity, and that the distance between samples is significantly different. The results also revealed that the abundance of AT is closely related to its core position in the community, while the positive relationship between RT enables it to be stable in the community rather than being input from the external environment, which helps us focus on RT in maintaining plant root health. Importantly, RT has a more linear relationship with environmental variables, which also means that it plays a positive role in soil processes and their interactions with plants, especially in karst areas where carbon and nitrogen limitations are more prominent. In this study, we particularly emphasized the symbiotic relationship between RT and its response to the environment. The study of rhizosphere soil in tea gardens in karst areas via a large-scale geographic analysis will contribute to understanding the biogeographic pattern of RT and its relationship with the environment as a reference for the refined management of modern agriculture in karst areas.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study sites
This study was conducted in a tea garden (26°51′75″N, 106°38′38″E, and 27°08′47″N, 107°35′16″E) in the Qianzhong Karst Plateau area in 2023 during a period of high incidence of tea tree diseases (June). The study area is located in the highland area of the dissolved mound depression, with typical subtropical humid tea garden ecosystems. Four sampling sites were set up in Qingzhen City (QS) and Weng’an County (WS), covering both the healthy (H) and diseased (M) areas of the tea gardens, with five biological replicates set up at each site and basically the same cultivation history and species in all the tea gardens (Fig. S7).
Sample collection
All four sampling sites were located in areas with a relatively rich vegetation diversity. Sampling sites H and S were selected according to the actual tea tree incidence. The sampling sites, where the vegetation communities were relatively well established, were chosen to minimize the impact of human activities and animal infestation. Four sampling points (four points × each point sampled via the five-point method) were chosen. Each biological replicate consisted of a mixture of rhizosphere soils from a single mini-sample plot (1 m × 1 m), with a distance of at least 50 m between each sampling plot.
After the samples were prepared according to the sample plot and sample point setup, we collected rhizosphere and ectorhizosphere (for the determination of soil environmental factors) soil samples from healthy and diseased tea trees for subsequent analyses on the basis of microbial sequencing via internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequencing and determination of soil chemical properties, respectively. The disinfection of the shovels and medical scissors with 75% alcohol and of the sampling equipment and the replacement of medical gloves were required for each sampling session. The rhizosphere soil samples used for field collection were as follows: (1) the root system of the tea tree was cut; the attachments were shaken in time; and 1 mm of attached soil was retained; and (2) 50 mL centrifuge tubes were filled, and the samples were stored in a liquid nitrogen tank to bring them back to the laboratory for spare parts. Ectorhizosphere soil collection: after the tea tree roots were obtained, excess soil was manually shaken from the roots and thoroughly homogenized to form a mixed sample representing the ectorhizosphere soil (a 2 mm-diameter mesh sieve was used to filter the impurities, gravel, and apomictic material from the ectorhizosphere soil). Rhizosphere soil was extracted from field-collected roots in the laboratory. The roots were placed in a 50 mL centrifuge tube and washed with 3 mL of phosphate-buffered saline at 180 rpm for 20 min to remove the soil from the root surface. The mixture was subsequently centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 20 min; the supernatant was removed; and the sediment was collected for extraction. The ectorhizosphere soils were dried naturally, and then chemically characterized.
Determination of soil chemical properties and functional assessment
The soil organic matter (SOM) content was assessed using an external heating method with potassium dichromate, while the alkali diffusion method was employed for determining the soil alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen (AN). For the assessment of soil available phosphorus (AP), sodium bicarbonate leaching combined with molybdenum–antimony colorimetry was utilized, and ammonium acetate leaching, followed by atomic absorption spectrometry, was applied to detect soil available potassium (AK). The pH and the electrical conductivity (EC) of a soil–water slurry at a 1:2.5 weight-to-volume ratio were measured according to established protocols (54). The results are presented in Table S7. In this study, six soil indicators (pH, EC, SOM, AN, AP, and AK), which are good indicators of tea tree soil productivity, fertility, and other factors in tea gardens, were used to assess individual soil functions. The relationships between biodiversity and soil functioning have been characterized in previous studies via single functions (55), turnover (56, 57), averaging (58), and single thresholds (59). Individual soil functions were quantified via Z-score conversion (9).
Meta-second-generation amplicon
DNA extraction and PCR amplification
DNA was extracted from the target soil samples via HiPure Soil DNA Kit (Magen, Guangzhou, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The fungal ITS1 region was amplified via the primer pair ITS1 F KYO2 (5′-TAGAGGAAGTAAAAGTCGTAA-3′)/ITS86R (5′-TTCAAAGATTCGATGATTCAC-3′) (60). The related PCR reagents were purchased from New England Biolabs (USA).
Illumina sequencing
The amplification product quality was assessed via 2% agarose gel, and the PCR products were purified via AMPure XP Beads (Beckman, CA, USA) and quantified via Qubit 3.0. The sequencing libraries were constructed via Illumina DNA Prep Kit (Illumina, CA, USA). The library quality was checked via ABI StepOnePlus Real-time PCR System (Life Technologies, Foster City, CA, USA). The qualified libraries were pooled via PE250 mode of NovaSeq 6000 for online sequencing. The raw sequences were submitted to the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (accession number PRJNA1036117).
Bioinformatics analysis
FASTP (version 0.18.0) for filtering raw data (61) and FLASH (version 1.2.11) for sequence splicing (clean reads [62] were merged into tags at a minimum overlap of 10 bp and a maximum mismatch rate of 2% threshold), tag filtering with reference to Qiime’s (63) tag quality control processes (64), and UPARSE (version 9.2.64) for clustering dechimeras (65).
Data processing
OTUs containing fewer than 20 reads were discarded to avoid random effects in RT identification (30, 35). All samples were rigorously standardized prior to the analysis. On the basis of previous studies (66), we defined taxa on the basis of the relative abundance of fungal OTUs: i) OTUs with a relative abundance of more than 0.1% of the total number of sequences were defined as “abundant” taxa (AT); ii) OTUs with relative abundances below 0.01% were defined as “rare” taxa (RT); and iii) OTUs with a relative abundance between 0.01% and 0.1% were considered “intermediate” taxa (IT).
The abundance–occupancy relationship was used to explain the diversity changes and the spatial distributions of different taxa, where the occupancy calculation formula is as follows (67):
where S is the OTU; H is the habitat; and occupancy represents the ratio of the number of samples with S (NsitesS, H) appearing in the OTU (S) in habitat H to the total number of samples with H (NsitesH).
Orthogonal partial least squares-discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) was used to perform a differential analysis on samples via the “ropls” package (68). A permutation test was performed for external verification. The “reshape2” package was used for the cooccurring network analysis of fungal taxa (use = “pairwise,” method = “Spearman,” adjust = “FDR,” alpha = 0.05; correlation threshold: r = 0.65, P = 0.05). MEGA 11 was used to process the OTU sequences and construct the phylogenetic treesconstructed via the neighbor-joining method (time = 1000). To obtain potential traits, Spearman from the “Hmisc” package was used to calculate the correlation between the relative abundance of rare or abundant OTUs and environmental variables, determine the ecological preferences of each OTU (69), and form a fungal community trait data set. A chiplot (https://www.chiplot.online/) was used to construct a heatmap of the OTU ecological preferences and phylogenetic trees. The ecological threshold of a community under specific environmental gradients is quantified (minSplt = 3) via the “TITAN2” package (70). The physical and chemical properties of the soil were used to calculate the individual soil functions, and a scale function was used for data standardization. The Z-score calculation formula for the ecosystem parameters (single indicators) is as follows:
where is the Z-score of the ecosystem (single indicator) parameter j in plot i, with a range of i between 1 and 20 and a range of j between 1 and 6; is the numerical value of the ecosystem (single indicator) parameters; is the average value of the j-th ecosystem (single indicator) parameter at 20 sampling points; and is the standard deviation of the average value of the j-th ecosystem (single indicator) parameter at 20 sampling points.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We are grateful for the sequencing platform of Gene Denovo Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Guangzhou, China). Moreover, we would like to express our gratitude to Dr. Xiaoxiao Chen from the College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University for providing valuable suggestions during the writing process of the paper.
Contributor Information
Yuehua Song, Email: songyuehua@163.com.
Bernadette J. Connors, Dominican University New York, Orangeburg, New York, USA
ETHICS APPROVAL
The experimental samples were collected, and permission was obtained from tea garden managers.
DATA AVAILABILITY
The raw sequences were submitted to the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (accession number PRJNA1036117).
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
The following material is available online at https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.01889-24.
ASM does not own the copyrights to Supplemental Material that may be linked to, or accessed through, an article. The authors have granted ASM a non-exclusive, world-wide license to publish the Supplemental Material files. Please contact the corresponding author directly for reuse.
REFERENCES
- 1. Magurran AE, Henderson PA. 2003. Explaining the excess of rare species in natural species abundance distributions. Nature New Biol 422:714–716. doi: 10.1038/nature01547 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Buckling A, Kassen R, Bell G, Rainey PB. 2000. Disturbance and diversity in experimental microcosms. Nature New Biol 408:961–964. doi: 10.1038/35050080 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Kurm V, van der Putten WH, Weidner S, Geisen S, Snoek BL, Bakx T, Hol WHG. 2019. Competition and predation as possible causes of bacterial rarity. Environ Microbiol 21:1356–1368. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.14569 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Cooper RO, Vavra JM, Cressler CE. 2021. Targeted manipulation of abundant and rare taxa in the Daphnia magna microbiota with antibiotics impacts host fitness differentially. mSystems 6:e00916-20. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00916-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Yang Y, Cheng KX, Li KH, Jin Y, He XQ. 2022. Deciphering the diversity patterns and community assembly of rare and abundant bacterial communities in a wetland system. Sci Total Environ 838:156334. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156334 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Freeman J, Robinson E, Beckman NG, Bird D, Baggio JA, Anderies JM. 2020. The global ecology of human population density and interpreting changes in paleo-population density. J Archaeol Sci 120:105168. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2020.105168 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Xu NH, Hu H, Wang Y, Zhang ZY, Zhang Q, Ke MJ, Lu T, Penuelas J, Qian HF. 2023. Geographic patterns of microbial traits of river basins in China. Sci Total Environ 871:162070. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162070 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Zhang HJ, Dong LZ, Yao XD, Wang W. 2023. Soil fertility shifts the relative importance of saprotrophic and mycorrhizal fungi for maintaining ecosystem stability. Glob Chang Biol 29:1206–1216. doi: 10.1111/gcb.16540 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Yang Y, Qiu K, Xie Y, Li X, Zhang S, Liu W, Huang Y, Cui L, Wang S, Bao P. 2023. Geographical, climatic, and soil factors control the altitudinal pattern of rhizosphere microbial diversity and its driving effect on root zone soil multifunctionality in mountain ecosystems. Sci Total Environ 904:166932. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166932 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Liang M, Shi L, Burslem DFRP, Johnson D, Fang M, Zhang X, Yu S. 2021. Soil fungal networks moderate density-dependent survival and growth of seedlings. New Phytol 230:2061–2071. doi: 10.1111/nph.17237 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Powell JR, Karunaratne S, Campbell CD, Yao H, Robinson L, Singh BK. 2015. Deterministic processes vary during community assembly for ecologically dissimilar taxa. Nat Commun 6:8444. doi: 10.1038/ncomms9444 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Fernandes EG, Pereira OL, da Silva CC, Bento CBP, de Queiroz MV. 2015. Diversity of endophytic fungi in glycine max. Microbiol Res 181:84–92. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2015.05.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Zhong F, Fan X, Ji W, Hai Z, Hu N, Li X, Liu G, Yu C, Chen Y, Lian B, Wei H, Zhang J. 2022. Soil fungal community composition and diversity of culturable endophytic fungi from plant roots in the reclaimed area of the eastern coast of China. JoF 8:124. doi: 10.3390/jof8020124 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Lilleskov EA, Hobbie EA, Horton TR. 2011. Conservation of ectomycorrhizal fungi: exploring the linkages between functional and taxonomic responses to anthropogenic N deposition. Fungal Ecol 4:174–183. doi: 10.1016/j.funeco.2010.09.008 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Xia EH, Zhang HB, Sheng J, Li K, Zhang QJ, Kim C, Zhang Y, Liu Y, Zhu T, Li W, et al. 2017. The tea tree genome provides insights into tea flavor and independent evolution of caffeine biosynthesis. Mol Plant 10:866–877. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2017.04.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Wei C, Yang H, Wang S, Zhao J, Liu C, Gao L, Xia E, Lu Y, Tai Y, She G, et al. 2018. Draft genome sequence of Camellia sinensis var. sinensis provides insights into the evolution of the tea genome and tea quality. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 115:E4151–E4158. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1719622115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Niu SZ, Song QF, Koiwa H, Qiao DH, Zhao DG, Chen ZW, Liu X, Wen XP. 2019. Genetic diversity, linkage disequilibrium, and population structure analysis of the tea plant (Camellia sinensis) from an origin center, Guizhou plateau, using genome-wide SNPs developed by genotyping-by-sequencing. BMC Plant Biol 19:328. doi: 10.1186/s12870-019-1917-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Xu HY, Yu C. 2022. Transcriptomic analysis reveals crucial biological pathways associated with cold response in Camellia weiningensis in Guizhou Province, China. Sci Hortic 295:110883. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2022.110883 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Pandey AK, Sinniah GD, Babu A, Tanti A. 2021. How the global tea industry copes with fungal diseases - challenges and opportunities. Plant Dis 105:1868–1879. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-09-20-1945-FE [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Cao R, Dong X, Zhao YC, Yin J. 2023. Effects of blister blight disease on endophytic microbial diversity and community structure in tea (Camellia sinensis) leaves. 3 Biotech 13:421. doi: 10.1007/s13205-023-03846-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Liu H, Sun FF, Peng JW, Shen MC, Li JG, Dong YH. 2022. Deterministic process dominated belowground community assembly when suffering tomato bacterial wilt disease. Agron 12:1024. doi: 10.3390/agronomy12051024 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Pu J, Zhao X, Miao P, Li S, Tan K, Wang Q, Tang W. 2020. Integrating multisource RS data and GIS techniques to assist the evaluation of resource-environment carrying capacity in karst mountainous area. J Mt Sci 17:2528–2547. doi: 10.1007/s11629-020-6097-0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Hadeid M, Bellal SA, Ghodbani T, Dari O. 2018. Agriculture in the Algerian south‒west Sahara: between modern agricultural development and traditional oasis agriculture permanencies. Cah Agric 27:15005. doi: 10.1051/cagri/2017060 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Dukunde A, Schneider D, Schmidt M, Veldkamp E, Daniel R. 2019. Tree species shape soil bacterial community structure and function in temperate deciduous forests. Front Microbiol 10:1519. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01519 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Chen FH, Xie YJ, Jia QW, Li SY, Li SY, Shen NK, Jiang MG, Wang YB. 2023. Effects of the continuous cropping and soilborne diseases of panax ginseng C. A. meyer on rhizosphere soil physicochemical properties, enzyme activities, and microbial communities. Agron 13:210. doi: 10.3390/agronomy13010210 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Zhang XM, Liu W, Zhang GM, Jiang L, Han XG. 2015. Mechanisms of soil acidification reducing bacterial diversity. Soil Biol Biochem 81:275–281. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.11.004 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Tayyab M, Yang ZQ, Zhang CF, Islam W, Lin WX, Zhang H. 2021. Sugarcane monoculture drives microbial community composition, activity and abundance of agricultural-related microorganisms. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:48080–48096. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-14033-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Pan WK, Tang S, Zhou JJ, Liu MJ, Xu M, Kuzyakov Y, Ma QX, Wu LH. 2022. Plant–microbial competition for amino acids depends on soil acidity and the microbial community. Plant Soil 475:457–471. doi: 10.1007/s11104-022-05381-w [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Santos-Silva C, Louro R. 2016. Assessment of the diversity of epigeous Basidiomycota under different soil-management systems in a montado ecosystem: a case study conducted in Alentejo. Agroforest Syst 90:117–126. doi: 10.1007/s10457-015-9800-3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Ellison MA, McMahon MB, Bonde MR, Palmer CL, Luster DG. 2016. In situ hybridization for the detection of rust fungi in paraffin embedded plant tissue sections. Plant Methods 12:37. doi: 10.1186/s13007-016-0137-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Jiao S, Lu YH. 2020. Abundant fungi adapt to broader environmental gradients than rare fungi in agricultural fields. Glob Chang Biol 26:4506–4520. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15130 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Urooj F, Farhat H, Ali SA, Ahmed M, Sultana V, Shams ZI, Ara J, Ehteshamul-Haque S. 2018. Role of endophytic penicillium species in suppressing the root rotting fungi of sunflower. Pak J Bot 50:1621–1628. [Google Scholar]
- 33. Wang CB, Wang TT, Ma CY, Xue H, Li Y, Piao CG, Jiang N. 2023. Phyllosticta rizhaoensis sp. nov. causing leaf blight of Ophiopogon japonicus in China. Fungal Syst Evol 11:43–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Faust K, Raes J. 2012. Microbial interactions: from networks to models. Nat Rev Microbiol 10:538–550. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2832 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Graham EB, Knelman JE, Schindlbacher A, Siciliano S, Breulmann M, Yannarell A, Beman JM, Abell G, Philippot L, Prosser J, et al. 2016. Microbes as engines of ecosystem function: when does community structure enhance predictions of ecosystem processes? Front Microbiol 7:214. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00214 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Duan YL, Wang XY, Wang LL, Lian J, Wang WF, Wu FS, Li YL, Li YQ. 2022. Biogeographic patterns of soil microbe communities in the deserts of the Hexi Corridor, northern China. CATENA 211:106026. doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2022.106026 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Jousset A, Bienhold C, Chatzinotas A, Gallien L, Gobet A, Kurm V, Küsel K, Rillig MC, Rivett DW, Salles JF, van der Heijden MGA, Youssef NH, Zhang X, Wei Z, Hol WHG. 2017. Where less may be more: how the rare biosphere pulls ecosystems strings. ISME J 11:853–862. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2016.174 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Qin ZR, Zhao ZH, Xia LL, Wang SY, Yu GW, Miao AH. 2022. Responses of abundant and rare prokaryotic taxa in a controlled organic contaminated site subjected to vertical pollution-induced disturbances. Sci Total Environ 853:158625. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158625 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Saladin B, Thuiller W, Graham CH, Lavergne S, Maiorano L, Salamin N, Zimmermann NE. 2019. Environment and evolutionary history shape phylogenetic turnover in European tetrapods. Nat Commun 10:249. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-08232-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Lynch MDJ, Neufeld JD. 2015. Ecology and exploration of the rare biosphere. Nat Rev Microbiol 13:217–229. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3400 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Fontaine S, Abbadie L, Aubert M, Barot S, Bloor JMG, Derrien D, Duchene O, Gross N, Henneron L, Le Roux X, Loeuille N, Michel J, Recous S, Wipf D, Alvarez G. 2024. Plant–soil synchrony in nutrient cycles: Learning from ecosystems to design sustainable agrosystems. Glob Chang Biol 30:e17034. doi: 10.1111/gcb.17034 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Erlandson S, Wei XJ, Savage J, Cavender-Bares J, Peay K. 2018. Soil abiotic variables are more important than salicaceae phylogeny or habitat specialization in determining soil microbial community structure. Mol Ecol 27:2007–2024. doi: 10.1111/mec.14576 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Leewis MC, Lawrence CR, Schulz MS, Tfaily MM, Ayala-Ortiz CO, Flores GE, Mackelprang R, McFarland JW. 2022. The influence of soil development on the depth distribution and structure of soil microbial communities. Soil Biol Biochem 174:108808. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2022.108808 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Zhao ML, Zhao J, Yuan J, Hale L, Wen T, Huang QW, Vivanco JM, Zhou JZ, Kowalchuk GA, Shen QR. 2021. Root exudates drive soil‐microbe‐nutrient feedbacks in response to plant growth. Plant Cell & Environment 44:613–628. doi: 10.1111/pce.13928 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Li SY, Li HX, Yang CL, Wang YD, Xue H, Niu YF. 2016. Rates of soil acidification in tea plantations and possible causes. Agric Ecosyst Environ 233:60–66. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2016.08.036 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Yan P, Wu L, Wang D, Fu J, Shen C, Li X, Zhang L, Zhang L, Fan L, Wenyan H. 2020. Soil acidification in Chinese tea plantations. Sci Total Environ 715:136963. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136963 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Schuldt A, Assmann T, Brezzi M, Buscot F, Eichenberg D, Gutknecht J, Härdtle W, He J-S, Klein A-M, Kühn P, et al. 2018. Biodiversity across trophic levels drives multifunctionality in highly diverse forests. Nat Commun 9:2989. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05421-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Schmidt H, Nunan N, Höck A, Eickhorst T, Kaiser C, Woebken D, Raynaud X. 2018. Recognizing patterns: spatial analysis of observed microbial colonization on root surfaces. Front Environ Sci 6:61. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2018.00061 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Luo WQ, Wang YS, Cahill JFJ, Luan FC, Zhong YL, Li YZ, Li BH, Chu CJ. 2024. Root‐centric β diversity reveals functional homogeneity while phylogenetic heterogeneity in a subtropical forest. Ecology 105:E4189. doi: 10.1002/ecy.4189 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Xue Y, Chen H, Yang JR, Liu M, Huang B, Yang J. 2018. Distinct patterns and processes of abundant and rare eukaryotic plankton communities following a reservoir cyanobacterial bloom. ISME J 12:2263–2277. doi: 10.1038/s41396-018-0159-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Wagg C, Schlaeppi K, Banerjee S, Kuramae EE, van der Heijden MGA. 2019. Fungal-bacterial diversity and microbiome complexity predict ecosystem functioning. Nat Commun 10:4841. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12798-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Peay KG, Kennedy PG, Talbot JM. 2016. Dimensions of biodiversity in the Earth mycobiome. Nat Rev Microbiol 14:434–447. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2016.59 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Wang C, Guo L, Shen RF. 2023. Rare microbial communities drive ecosystem multifunctionality in acidic soils of southern China. Agric, Ecosyst Environ, Appl Soil Ecol 189:104895. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2023.104895 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Widdig M, Heintz-Buschart A, Schleuss PM, Guhr A, Borer ET, Seabloom EW, Spohn M. 2020. Effects of nitrogen and phosphorus addition on microbial community composition and element cycling in a grassland soil. Soil Biol Biochem 151:108041. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.108041 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Emmett Duffy J, Paul Richardson J, Canuel EA. 2003. Grazer diversity effects on ecosystem functioning in seagrass beds. Ecol Lett 6:637–645. doi: 10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00474.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Hector A, Bagchi R. 2007. Biodiversity and ecosystem multifunctionality. Nature New Biol 448:188–190. doi: 10.1038/nature05947 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Isbell F, Calcagno V, Hector A, Connolly J, Harpole WS, Reich PB, Scherer-Lorenzen M, Schmid B, Tilman D, van Ruijven J, Weigelt A, Wilsey BJ, Zavaleta ES, Loreau M. 2011. High plant diversity is needed to maintain ecosystem services. Nature New Biol 477:199–202. doi: 10.1038/nature10282 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Mouillot D, Villéger S, Scherer-Lorenzen M, Mason NWH. 2011. Functional structure of biological communities predicts ecosystem multifunctionality. PLoS ONE 6:e17476. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017476 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Zavaleta ES, Pasari JR, Hulvey KB, Tilman GD. 2010. Sustaining multiple ecosystem functions in grassland communities requires higher biodiversity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:1443–1446. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0906829107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Scibetta S, Schena L, Abdelfattah A, Pangallo S, Cacciola SO. 2018. Selection and experimental evaluation of universal primers to study the fungal microbiome of higher plants. Phytobiomes J 2:225–236. doi: 10.1094/PBIOMES-02-18-0009-R [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Chen SF, Zhou YQ, Chen YR, Gu J. 2018. Fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics 34:i884–i890. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty560 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Magoč T, Salzberg SL. 2011. FLASH: fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 27:2957–2963. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr507 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, Bittinger K, Bushman FD, Costello EK, Fierer N, Peña AG, Goodrich JK, Gordon JI, et al. 2010. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat Methods 7:335–336. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.f.303 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Bokulich NA, Subramanian S, Faith JJ, Gevers D, Gordon JI, Knight R, Mills DA, Caporaso JG. 2013. Quality-filtering vastly improves diversity estimates from Illumina amplicon sequencing. Nat Methods 10:57–59. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2276 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Edgar RC. 2013. UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads. Nat Methods 10:996–998. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2604 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Liu L, Yang J, Yu Z, Wilkinson DM. 2015. The biogeography of abundant and rare bacterioplankton in the lakes and reservoirs of China. ISME J 9:2068–2077. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2015.29 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Dufrene M, Legendre P. 1997. Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecol Monogr 67:345. doi: 10.2307/2963459 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Chen J, Yi CM, Lu CY, Han JJ, Shi QY, Li JJ, Zhou J, Su XR. 2021. High DHA tuna oil alleviated cigarette smoking exposure induced lung inflammation via the regulation of gut microbiota and serum metabolites. J Funct Foods 82:104505. doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2021.104505 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Oliverio AM, Bradford MA, Fierer N. 2017. Identifying the microbial taxa that consistently respond to soil warming across time and space. Glob Chang Biol 23:2117–2129. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13557 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Baker ME, King RS. 2010. A new method for detecting and interpreting biodiversity and ecological community thresholds. Methods Ecol Evol 1:25–37. doi: 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2009.00007.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The raw sequences were submitted to the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (accession number PRJNA1036117).