Skip to main content
European Journal of Sport Science logoLink to European Journal of Sport Science
. 2025 Jan 7;25(2):e12247. doi: 10.1002/ejsc.12247

The use of individualised, media‐based sleep hygiene education for professional female footballers

Julie Gooderick 1,2,, Russ Clash 3, Harry Fisher 2, Neil Maxwell 1, Mark Hayes 1
PMCID: PMC11706236  PMID: 39776218

Abstract

Sleep hygiene can be defined as practicing habits that facilitate sleep; poor sleep hygiene is common among elite athletes, and improving this can be one way to enhance sleep indices. Given the large inter‐individual variability of sleep, there is a need for further investigation into individualised sleep hygiene for elite female athletes, with consideration for the practical application of the method. Using a self‐controlled time series design with repeated measures, n = 16 professional female footballers completed a 9‐week study during mid‐season. Monitoring of sleep (actigraphy, self‐report) occurred at week 1, 4, 7 and 9—a control period occurred at week 2 and 3, and a subsequent intervention period occurred at weeks 5 and 6. Based on baseline sleep monitoring, media‐based messages were designed with the purpose of giving a singular sleep hygiene message; all participants received these individualised messages daily across the 2‐week intervention period at a standardised time of 8.00 p.m., with the intention of them actioning the sleep hygiene point. One‐way analysis of variance with repeated measures was conducted to assess the differences between control period, intervention period and follow‐up for each measured variable. Significant differences were observed post‐intervention for sleep efficiency (p < 0.001) and sleep latency (p < 0.001), whereas the athlete sleep behaviour questionnaire score significantly improved in the follow‐up period (week 9) post intervention (p = 0.039). This is the first study to present this novel method of individualised sleep hygiene education for elite female athletes and is also the first study to demonstrate the use of sleep hygiene interventions to improve sleep factors for female athletes' mid‐season. This demonstrates a promising, time‐efficient approach to sleep hygiene education, with a potentially wide scope of application, as well as demonstrating there is indeed potential for elite female athletes to gain sleep improvements mid‐season.

Keywords: health, recovery, relaxation, team sport

Highlights

  • Sleep hygiene education can be effectively delivered via media messaging to professional female athletes, giving a time‐ and resource‐efficient method of sleep enhancement

  • This can improve the sleep of professional female footballers

  • Professional female footballers can gain sleep improvements mid‐season

1. INTRODUCTION

Sleep hygiene can be defined as practising habits that facilitate sleep and avoiding behaviours that inhibit sleep (Mastin et al., 2006)—it is a simple, non‐invasive, low‐cost strategy which can be used to enhance both sleep quality and sleep duration (SD). Poor sleep hygiene is common among athletes for a variety of reasons such as scheduling constraints and lifestyle factors (Halson, 2019), with Sargent et al. (2021) reporting only 3% of athletes report satisfaction with their sleep. Many aspects of physical performance are positively affected by sleep (Walsh et al., 2021, Mah et al., 2011, Schwartz & Simon, 2015). Costa et al. (2022) stated the importance of sleep for emotional regulation and maintaining overall mental health in athletes, as well as reducing potential illness and injury risk. Despite this knowledge, more than 70% of athletes are regularly operating in a sleep debt (Sargent et al., 2021); therefore, strategies for sleep enhancement must be considered a priority by coaches. Sleep hygiene education is one such method that has been demonstrated to be an effective tool to enhance athletes' sleep (Caia et al., 2018).

O’Donnell and Driller (2017) found that sleep hygiene education resulted in significantly improved total sleep time (mean improvement 22.3 ± 39.9 min), wake variance and wake episode duration for elite netballers. These findings are supported by Caia et al. (2018) and Driller et al. (2019), who both demonstrated sleep hygiene education sessions to be effective for improving sleep factors for elite male rugby players and elite male cricketers, respectively. Despite the vast inter‐ and intra‐individual variation of sleep (Costa et al., 2019), only very few studies have utilised an individualised sleep hygiene education approach within athletic populations. Driller et al. (2019) provided 30‐min individualised sleep hygiene education for 9 male cricketers, during which athletes were given feedback on their baseline sleep measurements, as well as practical tips to resolve any self‐reported issues. In terms of the measured sleep variables pre‐to‐ post, there were significant improvements in sleep efficiency (SE) % (5%, d = 1.38, very large), latency (−29 min, d = −0.85, large) and sleep onset variance (−28 min, d = −0.88, large) following the intervention. In a case study of a male academy footballer, Edinborough et al. (2023) found an individualised sleep hygiene education intervention, based on participant discussion around self‐reported issues, as well as general sleep hygiene advice, to be effective in improving awakening per night (Pre: 7.9 ± 3, Post: 4.5 ± 1.9, −43%) and waking per hour (Pre: 1.2 ± 0.5, Post: 0.6 ± 0.2, −50%), coinciding with an improvement in the athletes' self‐report of Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index.

Football presents many contextual challenges in relation to sleep, specifically the recurring circumstances of travel, fixture congestion and evening matches, which together are likely to compromise recovery (Fullagar et al., 2016). Furthermore, with the suggestion that match demands for female players vary according to playing position, score line and final result (Martinez‐Hernandez et al., 2024), an individualised approach towards recovery interventions may be warranted. Studies have reported more prominent intra‐individual variation in SE and onset latency in professional footballers, as well as wider athletic populations (Leeder et al., 2012) compared to age‐matched non‐athletic controls (Whitworth‐Turner et al., 2018). Given the amount of individual variation within sleep and lifestyle factors, an individualised approach would seem logical where possible, yet this approach is not commonly used, perhaps due to the potential lack of resources or increased time‐burden on coaches within sporting environments. The cause of such individual variation is likely multifactorial yet commonly overlooked. Indeed, Fullagar et al. (2016) suggested habitual tendencies render the prescription of generic sleep recommendations illogical. Previously, differences have been highlighted between male and female sleep factors, with female sex cited as a risk factor for poor sleep (Walsh et al., 2021); therefore, there is a need for investigations into individualised sleep optimisation approaches for female athletes.

With time pressures on coaches within elite sport high, novel, time‐efficient methods of sleep hygiene education which can also be individualised warrant investigation. Recent research has shown a move towards more novel methods of sleep hygiene education; Hassanin et al. (2023) used sleep hygiene videos (2.44–3.27 min long) with fifth and sixth grade children (n = 49) with the cartoon videos designed to educate on the importance of sleep and practical tips. The authors observed a positive change in the Pittsburgh sleep quality index score, 13.6% improvement in SD, 10.9% improvement in sleep disturbance and 22% improvement in sleep latency (SL). Similarly, in a pre‐intervention study, Putri (2023) described the initial trials of sleep hygiene videos (3–6 min long) for the elderly, with all videos delivered via WhatsApp for the reasons of cost and time efficiency. To the authors’ knowledge, no research exists on the development and use of media‐based sleep hygiene delivery to athletes, yet this could provide a practical, time‐efficient method of sleep hygiene education with a broad scope of use. Walsh et al. (2021) highlighted that sleep hygiene education should be delivered multiple times throughout a season, a notion further supported by the evident transient effects of singular bouts of sleep hygiene education in athletes (Caia et al., 2018; Vitale et al., 2019). Therefore, given the lack of time and/or resources was the most cited barrier to sleep monitoring from a range of practitioners working within elite sport (Hough et al., 2021) and that approx. 70% of athletes use their electronic device in the evening (Knufinke et al., 2018),the development of media‐based sleep hygiene education that facilitates repeated exposure to sleep hygiene education with minimal additional coach workload warrants investigation.

Gaps in the literature around time‐efficient, individualised sleep hygiene interventions for professional athletes were identified. Additionally, the lack of research on professional female athletes has previously been highlighted as a key gap in the literature (Paul et al., 2023), which, given females are likely to report a worse sleep status than males (Walsh et al., 2021), led to considering professional female athletes as a primary demographic for this study. Sleep hygiene strategies have previously been used within other athlete populations (Driller et al., 2019) and have been successful in enhancing sleep indices. Liang et al. (2024) noted gamification and technology‐based interventions may increase engagement with sleep hygiene strategies. Therefore, the aim of this study was to ascertain the efficacy of delivering visual media‐based sleep hygiene education (using both animated Graphics Interchange Format (GIF) and single sentence messaging) and whether this could positively affect athletes' sleep indices.

2. METHOD

Sixteen professional female footballers (age range 21–29 years, mean age 24.4 ± 2.6 years) gave informed consent and volunteered to take part (Figure 1). All participants were currently playing regularly in Women's Super League (WSL), which is the highest level of women's football in the United Kingdom; n = 6 were established international players for their respective countries. All players were part of the same club. Full demographics are detailed below in Table 1.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Recruitment process for the study.

TABLE 1.

Participant demographics.

Participant demographics
Mean SD
Age (years) 24.4 2.6
Height (cm) 168.3 9.1
Mass (kg) 64.6 10.1
Weekly training hours (football) 10.1 3.9
Weekly training hours (gym based) 3.1 0.6

During the study, a total of 8 WSL matches were played, with mean playing time of 68.7 ± 35.9 min. The typical daily schedule for players is presented in Figure 2 below, with variations occurring in the presented schedule on the day pre‐ and post‐match. Individual players varied in the length of time spent in physiotherapy and gym environments, depending on individual needs that week.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

A typical training day schedule for all players within the study, with variations occurring to this usual routine on the days pre‐ and post‐match.

Across all participants, n = 8 reported regularly taking hormonal contraceptives (type unspecified), whereas n = 8 were classified as naturally menstruating women (according to the definition by Elliot‐Sale et al. (2021), as having a menstrual cycle lengths ≥21 days and ≤35 days, but without confirmed ovulation). Prior to the commencement of the study, all participants were informed of study requirements and gave informed consent. Participants were excluded if they reported a pre‐existing sleep disorder, had a current long‐term injury (>1 month), had a menstrual cycle outside the range of 21–35 days or did not give informed consent. Institutional ethical approval was issued (approval number 2023–12896) in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki 1964 (revised 2013).

2.1. Experimental approach

A self‐controlled time series design, with repeated measures, was used; each participant completed a control period and an intervention period, meaning each participant could act as their own control across the study duration. This approach was taken due to the relatively small sample size available to maximise statistical power (Petersen et al., 2016) and is well suited for hypothesis generation and preliminary testing of novel interventions where a strong evidence base does not yet exist (Brown et al., 2020). A schematic of the study method is presented below in Figure 3.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Schematic of the study method detailing the week‐by‐week approach (SM: Sleep monitoring, SH: sleep hygiene).

2.2. Sleep monitoring weeks 1, 4, 7 and 9

All participants were allocated an actigraph (GeneActiv Original, Activinsights, Cambridge UK), which they were instructed to wear continuously during monitoring weeks. The device contains a triaxial MEMS‐accelerometer with a range of ±8 g and a sensitivity of ≥0.004 g (te Lindert & Van Someren, 2013). It recorded both motion‐related and gravitational acceleration and has a linear and equal sensitivity along the three axes. Devices were set with a sampling rate of 50 Hz and participants were instructed to wear the device on whichever wrist they felt more comfortable with (Driller et al., 2017). Every week where sleep data was collected, each morning, participants were asked to provide self‐reported sleep quality (Likert scale response) and ‘lights out’ time and wake up time via a Microsoft Forms questionnaire sent by email to each participant. No missing data was identified during monitoring weeks.

All participants completed the athlete sleep behaviour questionnaire (ASBQ) (Driller et al., 2018) to determine current sleep behaviours and sleep hygiene practices. The survey asks participants to rate on a Likert scale how frequently they engage in specific behaviours (never = 1, rarely = 2, sometimes = 3, frequently = 4 and always = 5). Scores were summed to provide an ASBQ global score; higher scores were considered indicative of worse sleep habits and sleep hygiene. The ASBQ has previously been demonstrated to have acceptable test‐retest reliability (ICC = 8.87, coefficient of variation = 6.4%, Driller et al., 2018). In week 1, participants completed the reduced morningness:eveningness questionnaire (rMEQ, Adan & Almirall, 1991), with scores summed to determine chronotype classification as reported in Adan and Almirall (1991): definitely morning type (22–25), moderate morning type (18–21), neither type (12–17), moderate evening type (8–11) and definitely evening type (4–7). The rMEQ has previously been validated against actigraphy (Natale et al., 2006) and has been shown to have good reliability (α = 0.71) (Tonetti & Natale, 2019).

2.3. Control period week 2 and 3

Participants were instructed to carry on with daily routines as normal. No information was given to participants regarding their baseline sleep data recorded from week 1.

2.4. Sleep hygiene education weeks 5 and 6

Baseline sleep data for all participants was reviewed; any item scored above a ‘3 = sometimes’ on the ASBQ was identified as an area for improvement and was reviewed in conjunction with actigraph data to determine the optimal approach for improvement. These identified areas were viewed holistically, as suggested by Mastin et al. (2006), therefore incorporating brief discussions (10 min) with each participant allowed sleep hygiene factors to be viewed in context, with the aim of understanding individual daily routines and habits.

2.5. Development of media‐based sleep hygiene education tool

Previous literature commonly adopts a generic approach to sleep hygiene education, with education sessions designed to cover multiple aspects of sleep hygiene, which may or may not be relevant to all participants (Caia et al., 2018; O’Donnell and Driller et al., 2017). The approach to education adopted within this study looked to identify key problem areas from athletes' sleep data and then subsequently develop media‐based messages specific to individual participants areas for improvement. For each participant, target areas of sleep hygiene were identified from the data (via the review of ASBQ data and individual participant discussion around perceived issues, reviewed by the lead researcher who has specific expertise (Doctor of Philosophy) in athlete sleep hygiene), from which a GIF was developed from Adobe Stock Library videos. A suitable video was chosen, which was then converted into a GIF for the purpose of giving a concise, simple message. The message was accompanied by a purposely short text to facilitate a high engagement rate (Hassanin et al., 2023). Where participants had multiple areas for improvement, priority was given towards active behaviours in the evening, in conjunction with knowledge around participants' daily routines and researcher expertise. Prior to the start of the intervention period, a 10‐min group briefing session informed participants that they would be receiving a daily message via WhatsApp for the next two weeks, from which they should try and initiate the action point within the message, that evening. Interpretation of baseline sleep data alongside individual participant discussions presented the following areas for sleep hygiene improvement across all participants (Table 2separate file).

TABLE 2.

Summary of individualised advice provided to players within the intervention period.

Issue and observation method Strategy Content of recommendation (Gif image and wording) Rationale Number of participants for which this was used (n)
Technology use before bed (ASBQ) Screens away 30 min before bed

graphic file with name EJSC-25-e12247-g010.jpg

Screens away 30 min before bed.

Limiting phone use 30 min before lights improved sleep duration (Fullagar et al., 2016), reduces sleep latency and improved sleep quality (He et al., 2021). Social media use before bed has a negative effect on sleep quality (Watkins et al., 2022). 15
Poor sleep regularity (ASBQ, actigraph) Maintain regular bedtimes

graphic file with name EJSC-25-e12247-g011.jpg

Choose a bedtime and stick to it daily.

Consistency in sleep timing is key for improving sleep efficiency in athletes (Halson et al., 2022). Sleep regularity shown to have positive effects on sleep duration (Phillips et al., 2017). 12
Evening stress, worrying about sports performance (ASBQ, discussion) Evening stretching routine

graphic file with name EJSC-25-e12247-g002.jpg

Go through recovery stretches this evening before bed a

Stretching in the evening can reduce sleep latency and promote the onset of sleep (Bender et al., 2024; D’Aurea et al., 2019). Short stretching beneficial for reducing anxiety (Montero‐Marin et al., 2015). 9
Poor evening routine and long sleep latency (ASBQ, actigraph, discussion) Reading in bed before sleep onset

graphic file with name EJSC-25-e12247-g001.jpg

Make reading your final activity before sleeping.

Reading in bed increases melatonin concentration compared to tablet use (Jones et al., 2021) and may improve sleep quality (Finucane et al., 2021). 4
Bedroom environment (ASBQ, discussion) Maintain a cool, dark and quiet bedroom

graphic file with name EJSC-25-e12247-g007.jpg

Ensure your bedroom is cool, dark and quiet.

Bedroom environment should be cool (17–23°) (Caddick et al., 2018; Pan et al., 2012) dark (complete blackness) (Caddick et al., 2018) and quiet (<35 dB) (Caddick et al., 2018) to optimise sleep quality (Brown et al., 2002). 3
Evening light exposure (ASBQ, discussion) Use lamps in the evening

graphic file with name EJSC-25-e12247-g005.jpg

Turn off the main light! Use lamps this evening.

Bright evening light can suppress melatonin secretion, negatively impacting sleep latency and sleep quality (Bender et al., 2024) 2
Evening caffeinated drinks b (ASBQ, discussion) Replace with non‐caffeinated herbal tea or water

graphic file with name EJSC-25-e12247-g004.jpg

Replace evening caffeine with herbal tea or water.

Caffeine consumption <6 h before bed has disruptive effects on sleep (Drake et al., 2013). 2
a

Participants were familiar with a recovery stretching routine aimed at relaxation which was used within their usual training environment as part of the recovery protocol.

b

No evening matches were scheduled during the intervention period; therefore, evening caffeine use in this context refers to the habitual consumption of caffeinated drinks as a lifestyle choice rather than a performance‐enhancement effort.

2.6. Sleep hygiene message delivery

Each participant was allocated 3 messages based on the interpretation of their individual sleep data; only one was sent per day, which was texted directly to the participant's phone. Another message from their allocation would then be sent the following night and so on. When all their allocation had been used, the first one was sent again in a rotation across the intervention period. The timing of the messages was aimed to optimise the impact with all messages sent in the early evening (8.00 p.m.), giving 2.3 ± 0.65 h between timings of messages and bedtimes. This aimed to give enough time for the participants to action the point and consider the point as part of their evening routine. Technical coaches had informal conversations with participants during the intervention period (during regular scheduled training sessions) to discuss any potential issues and ensure messages were being received—no participants raised any concerns. Coaches continued to verbally encourage adherence throughout the intervention period. Adherence to the intervention was monitored via a subjective report the following morning. Specifically, participants were asked to provide a simple ‘yes’ or ‘no’ as to whether they implemented the suggested action and provide a subjective value of how difficult it was for them to implement the sleep hygiene suggestion the previous night (0 = very difficult to 10 = very easy), as demonstrated by Vitale et al. (2019). This was reported via Microsoft Forms.

2.7. Statistical analyses

Descriptive statistics (mean ± SD) were calculated for all variables. Data was checked for normality using Shapiro–Wilk tests and inspection of skewness–kurtosis. Once data met assumptions for parametric statistical analyses, one‐way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with repeated measures was conducted to assess the differences between control period, intervention period and follow‐up for each measured variable. Tukey's Post Hoc tests were used to determine where any potential significance lay between the weeks. Partial Eta squared was reported for ANOVA analysis to give an indication of effect size, with values of 0.01, 0.06 and 0.14 considered as small, medium and large effect sizes, respectively (Lakens, 2013). The data was a median split for each measured variable, with the percentage change presented to demonstrate differences between pre‐ and post‐data for each group plus effect sizes to show the magnitude of change. Threshold effect sizes for percentage changes were considered as follows, based on Hopkins et al. (2009): trivial ≤0.2, small >0.2, >0.6 moderate, and >1.2, ≥2.0 very large.

3. RESULTS

A total of 448 observations were taken from 16 participants across a 9‐week period (4 different testing weeks). The chronotype distribution of participants was as follows: definite evening type n = 1, moderate evening type n = 3, neither type n = 7, moderate morning type n = 4 and definite morning type n = 1. No significant differences were observed between weeks 1 and 4 for any monitored variable (control period).

3.1. Adherence and ease of implementation

Total adherence to the intervention was 97% across all participants. Participants graded the ease of following all recommendations 7.00 ± 2.19 on the 10‐point scale. Table 3 below presents the mean ease of the implementation score for each sleep hygiene suggestion.

TABLE 3.

Mean ± SD participants subjective rating for the ease of implementation of each suggestion on the 10‐point scale (0 being very difficult, 10 being very easy).

Sleep hygiene suggestion Mean ease of implementation score Standard deviation
Screens away 30 min before bed 5.17 0.65
Maintain regular bedtimes 4.06 1.11
Evening stretching routine 8.64 0.6
Reading in bed before sleep onset 8.52 0.79
Maintain a cool, dark, quiet bedroom 5.1 0.58
Use lamps in the evening 9.29 0.86
Replace evening caffeine with alternatives 8.35 0.86

Abberivation: SD, sleep duration.

Figure 4 below presents individual and mean data for each measured variable.

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

A–E: Scatter plots indicating the spread of data and means for each measured variable. *p < 0.05 for inter‐week differences from the control period to post‐intervention. Plot C and E, a decrease in mean value indicates an improvement than the indices.

In terms of significantly improved sleep measures, SE significantly increased between weeks 4 and 7 (F (3, 444) = 10.2, p < 0.001, ηp2 = = 0.12) and between weeks 4 and 9 (p < 0.001). SL significantly decreased (indicating a more favourable SL) between weeks 4 and 7 (F (3, 444) = 13.6, p < 0.001, ηp2 = = 0.08) and between weeks 4 and 9 (p < 0.001). Self‐reported ASBQ scores significantly decreased (indicating more favourable sleep behaviours) between weeks 4 and 9 (F (3, 60) = 5.69, p = 0.039, ηp2 = = 0.22).

The median split of data for each measured variable demonstrated those starting with lower baseline scores across all variables and showed a greater percentage change following the intervention period (Figure 5 and Table 4).

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5

Individual data plots for each measured variable.

TABLE 4.

Median split data percentage changes for the upper and lower halves of the data across all variables following the intervention period and follow‐up period.

Median group Week 4‐7 (%) Effect size Week 7‐9 (%) Effect size
Sleep duration Upper 5 1.0, moderate −0.1 0.2, trivial
Lower 12 1.4, large −1.3 0.6, small
Sleep efficiency Upper 2 0.5, small −0.9 0.1, trivial
Lower 16.3 3.1, very large −1.6 0.6, moderate
Sleep latency Upper 16.8 1.6, large −11 0.9, moderate
Lower 19.7 1.8, large −2.9 2.4, very large
Sleep quality Upper 3.1 0.3, small −0.3 0.1, trivial
Lower 2.1 0.2, small −0.9 0.1, trivial
ASBQ Upper 3.1 0.4, small 1.9 0.3, small
Lower 20.9 5.3, very large 5.4 0.6, moderate

For all variables across the intervention period apart from sleep quality, the lower split of participants demonstrated greater percentage improvements than the upper split.

4. DISCUSSION

The aim of this study was to ascertain the efficacy of delivering media‐based sleep hygiene education (using both animated GIF and single sentence messaging) and whether this could positively affect female athletes' sleep indices. The main findings were that using media‐based sleep hygiene education across a 2‐week period had significant positive effects on SE, latency and ASBQ scores. Therefore, initial evidence highlights a promising strategy for an individualised sleep hygiene education intervention, demonstrating a time‐efficient method of improving the sleep of professional female footballers during mid‐season. Furthermore, in terms of practical application, this strategy may provide the opportunity for athletes to access specialist advice in sleep without the potential constraint of resources or location for both parties.

Visual media, to portray an educational message, has several advantages, namely that the message conveyed is packaged attractively so that it will be easily remembered by the audience, is not limited by distance or time, and can be repeated (Maramis, 2013). Tuong et al. (2014) showed that media interventions were variably effective in modifying health behaviours depending on the target behaviours to be influenced—results of the present study suggest sleep behaviours may indeed be modifiable by visual media interventions, with female athletes in the present study demonstrating improvements in SE (week 4–7 improvement +2.9%), SL (week 4–7 improvement −3.6 min) and ASBQ score (week 4–9 improvement −4.2 reduction on the ASBQ score). This concurs with Asih et al. (2024), who concluded sleep hygiene education, delivered via an animation video as a first‐line strategy, to be beneficial in improving sleep hygiene practices, although it should be noted that Asih et al. (2024) investigated a different population (pregnant women, n = 108). Similarly, Nisa et al. (2021) advocated the use of WhatsApp messaging to increase knowledge and attitudes around sleep among adolescents (n = 82, 40 intervention, 42 control). To the authors’ knowledge, this study is the first to apply this novel method of sleep hygiene education to an athlete population.

Previous ease of implementation to sleep hygiene interventions has been reported as 6.35 ± 2.7 on the 10‐point scale by Vitale et al. (2019). In comparison, the present study reports a subjective grading of 7.00 ± 2.19, suggesting the messages used in the present study may be easier to implement than the combination of in‐person education and leaflet used by Vitale et al. (2019). Adherence and ease of implementation are not commonly reported in sleep hygiene studies, with Harada et al. (2016), the only other study to present similar information, reporting an intervention index to sleep hygiene education, which correlated to improvements in football performance (r = 0.42, p = 0.0003). Reporting this measure may be of value in the practical application of the work, giving reassurance to practitioners regarding the efficacy of such approaches; indeed, Li et al. (2024) stated that any recovery approach is only viable with successful athlete engagement, which is likely to be higher if an athlete perceives that the intervention is relatively easy to implement.

Jenkins et al. (2021) concluded that the delivery of generalised, group‐based sleep hygiene education mid‐season had no effect on sleep parameters for professional rugby players; the authors alluded that sleep hygiene education may only be useful during times in the season with lower stressors, such as pre‐season. Similarly, comparable studies demonstrating positive results of sleep hygiene interventions were also conducted pre‐season (Driller et al., 2019; O’Donnell & Driller, 2017). To the authors’ knowledge, Caia et al. (2018) is the only study demonstrating positive effects on sleep hygiene delivery in mid‐season for professional athletes (rugby), although this was a male cohort. Given the differences in sleep between males and females, both in terms of sleep indices and sleep hygiene factors (Silva et al., 2019), it could be postulated that differences between sexes may be evident in the response to sleep hygiene interventions. It should also be noted that the approach used by Caia et al. (2018) was a median split, meaning those who slept less and had worse sleep habits received sleep hygiene education, while those who slept more received no sleep hygiene education (control group). While this approach is logical from a practical perspective (as individuals with a worse sleep status may benefit more from improvement), the absence of a balanced control group means this may not give an accurate representation of the effectiveness of sleep hygiene education mid‐season. Furthermore, that approach may ultimately lead to different long‐term benefits across a team. The present study adds to the knowledge around the potential usefulness of sleep hygiene education mid‐season for professional athletes, demonstrating an alternative, effective method and is the first study to present this information for professional female athletes. Therefore, coaches are encouraged to consider sleep enhancement strategies for female athletes' mid‐season, with the present study demonstrating the application of media‐based sleep hygiene education to be an effective method of doing so.

Electronic device use in the evening may serve as a distraction before sleep, potentially resulting in the device being used into usual bedtimes (Jones et al., 2021), and this factor should be considered around the timing of media‐based sleep reminders to remove the risk of the intervention becoming a counterproductive in confounding a common issue for problematic sleep. Indeed, Monma et al. (2023) reported 77% of judo athletes (mean age 22.9 ± 3.1) used their phones in bed after lights out, with a prevalence of poor sleep 40.7%. In the present study, messages were sent at a standardised time of 8.00 p.m., which aimed to allow time for actioning the message while also being cognisant of the potential for negative effects of phone use closer to bedtime. In a larger cohort, the time of messaging could be individualised further to be more impactful with the potential for automated messaging to be set up for each athlete from a centralised system, ensuring this remains a simple and viable method for coaches of larger groups. However, given the success of the intervention in the present study with messages sent 2.3 ± 0.65 h pre‐bedtime, practical recommendations would be for coaches to adopt similar timings for group‐based delivery.

When looking at the data median split, it is interesting to note that participants within the lower scoring group across all variables apart from self‐reported sleep quality had the greater magnitude of improvement compared to those in the upper group (Figure 4, Table 4). Dunican et al. (2023) delivered sleep hygiene education to recreational swimmers (n = 11 male, n = 13 female) and found no significant differences in sleep pre‐post. The authors alluded to a potential ceiling effect for sleep hygiene education, given that the pre‐test data showed sleep factors that were close to optimal recommendations. This may explain the difference in the magnitude of improvements in the present study, with those starting from a lower baseline having greater potential for improvement than those who were already close to recommendations. These results support the previous postulation from Vitale et al. (2019), who suggested sleep hygiene interventions may be of greater benefit for athletes reporting poor baseline sleep behaviours. Poor baseline sleep habits have been regularly reported within football cohorts (Fullagar et al., 2016; Nedelec et al., 2015) with cultural constraints around sleep, such as variable sleep timings, match outcome‐related stress and match timings, suggested as negative influences on sleep habits (Nedelec et al., 2015), which are likely to be repeated stressors throughout the season. Considering this, it is likely that many players may benefit from such an intervention as presented within this study.

During the follow‐up period (week 9), results showed a decrease in SD (5 min decrease), efficiency (1% decrease), latency (6 min increase) and quality (compared to week 7), although SD, efficiency and latency were still improved from baselines. Sleep hygiene interventions have commonly been shown to have transient improvements; Caia et al. (2018) found sleep indices were comparable to baseline 1‐month post sleep hygiene education for professional male rugby players. This notion is further demonstrated by Vitale et al. (2019) who implemented a 45‐min group‐based sleep hygiene session prior to an evening football match, with sleep factors monitoring 1‐ and 2‐night post‐intervention. The authors demonstrated comparable sleep factors to baseline 2 days post sleep hygiene intervention. Results of the present study suggest a slower decay effect than Vitale et al. (2019), likely due to methodological differences, with Vitale et al. (2019) implementing a singular bout of sleep hygiene education. This could infer the use of repeating sleep hygiene messages to be of greater benefit for maintaining sleep improvements than singular inputs. The sleep hygiene strategy used within the present study is conducive to intervention ‘top ups’ and thus a longitudinal study over greater duration (i.e., over a season) may be relevant in determining an intervention period followed by a ‘maintenance period’ approach.

5. LIMITATIONS AND FUTURE RESEARCH

Sample size was limited in this study due to athlete availability and overall squad size, and the study would benefit from being repeated with a larger subject group to increase statistical power. The method of sleep hygiene education used in this study means the success of the intervention cannot be attributed to a single change in athlete behaviour; therefore, further research is suggested to determine the level of impact each message may have. This would allow for a more targeted, and potentially more efficient and effective, approach to be implemented. Additionally, future research should aim to determine a minimal dose response. Investigating athletes from different sports and within different environments would be beneficial to understand the efficacy of this strategy among different cohorts, while a longer intervention and follow‐up period may be of interest to determine whether effects can be sustained throughout a season. As there was some evidence of a decay effect following this intervention, determining the amount of ‘top ups’ required to sustain improved sleep factors would be useful in presenting more detailed practical guidance. Finally, further research should look to conduct the study with a sample size suitable to determine whether chronotype preferences affect responsiveness to the intervention—this study did not meet minimum sample size requirements to run multiple regression analysis to determine this (Jenkins & Quintana‐Ascencio, 2020), yet it would be of value within the process of athlete screening and monitoring, and in order to potentially prioritise intervention.

6. CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, this study is the first to present a novel, media‐based method of sleep hygiene education for professional female athletes, which has shown to have significant positive effects on SE, latency and ASBQ scores across a 2‐week intervention period during mid‐season. This demonstrates a promising, time‐efficient approach to sleep hygiene education with a potentially wide scope of application. A potential future hypothesis for further investigation would be that media‐based sleep hygiene delivery to professional athletes is more effective on improving a variety of sleep factors than in‐person delivery due to the repeated nature and the timing of the delivery.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

ETHIC STATEMENT

Ethical approval was sought from all participants prior to commencing the study. Institutional ethical approval was issued from the University of Brighton, UK (approval number 2023‐12896‐Gooderick) in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki 1964 (revised 2013).

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The authors would like to thank all players who volunteered to take part in this research. No authors received any funding for this project.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

Data is available from the lead author, Julie Gooderick, upon reasonable request.

REFERENCES

  1. Adan, A. , and Almirall H.. 1991. “Horne and Östberg Morningness‐Eveningness Questionnaire: A Reduced Scale.” Personality and Individual Differences 12(3): 241–253. 10.1016/0191-8869(91)90110-w. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Asih, F. R. , Pondaang M. F., and I’anah F. C.. 2024. “Education with Animation Video and Flyer Improving Pregnant Women Behavior of Sleep Hygiene: Which One More Effective?” Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat 19(3): 456–461. 10.15294/kemas.v19i3.45813. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bender, A. M. , Lambing K. A., and Singh M.. 2024. “Basics of Sleep Problems and Sleep Disorders for Athletes and Sport Professionals.” In Sleep and Sport, 63–71. Academic Press. [Google Scholar]
  4. Brown, C. A. , Rivard A., Reid K., Dick B., Bellmore L., Qin P., Prasad V., and Wang Y.. 2020. “Effectiveness of Hand Self‐Shiatsu to Promote Sleep in Young People with Chronic Pain: A Case Series Design.” International Journal of Therapeutic Massage & Bodywork 13(4): 3. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brown, F. C. , W. C. Buboltz, Jr , and Soper B.. 2002. “Relationship of Sleep Hygiene Awareness, Sleep Hygiene Practices, and Sleep Quality in University Students.” Behavioral Medicine 28(1): 33–38. 10.1080/08964280209596396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Caddick, Z. A. , Gregory K., Arsintescu L., and Flynn‐Evans E. E.. 2018. “A Review of the Environmental Parameters Necessary for an Optimal Sleep Environment.” Building and Environment 132: 11–20. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.01.020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Caia, J. , Scott T. J., Halson S. L., and Kelly V. G.. 2018. “The Influence of Sleep Hygiene Education on Sleep in Professional Rugby League Athletes.” Sleep Health 4(4): 364–368. 10.1016/j.sleh.2018.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Costa, J. , Figueiredo P., Nakamura F. Y., and Brito J.. 2022. “The Importance of Sleep in Athletes.” In Exercise Physiology. IntechOpen. [Google Scholar]
  9. Costa, J. A. , Brito J., Nakamura F. Y., Figueiredo P., Oliveira E., and Rebelo A.. 2019. “Sleep Patterns and Nocturnal Cardiac Autonomic Activity in Female Athletes Are Affected by the Timing of Exercise and Match Location.” Chronobiology International 36(3): 360–373. 10.1080/07420528.2018.1545782. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. D'Aurea, C., G. Passos, M. Santana, S. Youngstedt, D. Poyares, A. De Souza, et al. 2018. “Effects of Resistance Exercise and Stretching on Sleep of Patients with Chronic Insomnia.” Sleep 41: A146–A146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Drake, C. , Roehrs T., Shambroom J., and Roth T.. 2013. “Caffeine Effects on Sleep Taken 0, 3, or 6 Hours before Going to Bed.” Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine 9(11): 1195–1200. 10.5664/jcsm.3170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Driller, M. W. , Lastella M., and Sharp A. P.. 2019. “Individualized Sleep Education Improves Subjective and Objective Sleep Indices in Elite Cricket Athletes: A Pilot Study.” Journal of Sports Sciences 37(17): 2021–2025. 10.1080/02640414.2019.1616900. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Driller, M. W. , Mah C. D., and Halson S. L.. 2018. “Development of the Athlete Sleep Behavior Questionnaire: a Tool for Identifying Maladaptive Sleep Practices in Elite Athletes.” Sleep Science 11(01): 37–44. 10.5935/1984-0063.20180009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Driller, M. W. , O'Donnell S., and Tavares F.. 2017. “What Wrist Should You Wear Your Actigraphy Device on? Analysis of Dominant vs. Non‐dominant Wrist Actigraphy for Measuring Sleep in Healthy Adults.” Sleep Science 10(03): 132–135. 10.5935/1984-0063.20170023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Dunican, I. C. , Perry E., Maisey G., Nesci E., and Roberts S.. 2023. “Sleep Hygiene Education for Improving Sleep in Ultra‐marathon Swimmers: Guidance for Coaches and Swimmers.” International Journal of Sports Science and Coaching 18(4): 1018–1024. 10.1177/17479541231152196. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Edinborough, L. , Bruce‐low S., Hill J., Woodhouse J., Jarvis M., and Pedlar C.. 2023. “Day Type and Start Time May Influence Sleep in Adolescent Professional Football Players.” International Journal of Sports Medicine 44(05): 336–343. 10.1055/a-1974-5441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Elliott‐Sale, K. J. , Minahan C. L., de Jonge X. A. K. J., Ackerman K. E., Sipilä S., Constantini N. W., Lebrun C. M., and Hackney A. C.. 2021. “Methodological Considerations for Studies in Sport and Exercise Science with Women as Participants: a Working Guide for Standards of Practice for Research on Women.” Sports Medicine 51(5): 843–861. 10.1007/s40279-021-01435-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Finucane, E. , O’Brien A., Treweek S., Newell J., Das K., Chapman Sarah, Wicks P., et al. 2021. “Does Reading a Book in Bed Make a Difference to Sleep in Comparison to Not Reading a Book in Bed? the People’s Trial—An Online, Pragmatic, Randomised Trial.” Trials 22: 1–13. 10.1186/s13063-021-05831-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Fullagar, H. H. K. , Skorski S., Duffield R., Julian R., Bartlett J., and Meyer T.. 2016. “Impaired Sleep and Recovery after Night Matches in Elite Football Players.” Journal of Sports Sciences 34(14): 1333–1339. 10.1080/02640414.2015.1135249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Halson, S. L. 2019. “Sleep Monitoring in Athletes: Motivation, Methods, Miscalculations and Why it Matters.” Sports Medicine 49(10): 1487–1497. 10.1007/s40279-019-01119-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Halson, S. , Johnson R., Appaneal R., Rogers M., Toohey L., Drew M., et al. 2022. “Sleep Quality in Elite Athletes; Normative Values, Reliability and Understanding Contributions to Poor Sleep.” Sports Medicine: 1–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Harada, T. , Wada K., Tsuji F., Krejci M., Kawada T., Noji T., Nakade M., and Takeuchi H.. 2016. “Intervention Study Using a Leaflet Entitled ‘three Benefits of “Go to Bed Early! Get up Early! and Intake Nutritionally Rich Breakfast!” a Message for Athletes’ to Improve the Soccer Performance of University Soccer Team.” Sleep and Biological Rhythms 14(S1): 65–74. 10.1007/s41105-015-0035-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Hassanin, E. , Peters S., and Rotimi F.. 2023. “Can Introduction of Sleep Hygiene Videos Improve Sleep and Concentration in 5th and 6th Graders? Interventional Study.” Egyptian Pediatric Association Gazette 71(1): 72. 10.1186/s43054-023-00218-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. He, L. , Zhao W., Gao Y., Gao X., and Lei X.. 2021. “The Effect of COVID‐19 Lockdowns on Sleep Time Perception: Comparing Actigraphy and Sleep Diary Measures.” International Journal of Psychophysiology 167: 86–93. 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2021.07.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Hopkins, W. G. , Marshall S. W., Batterham A. M., and Hanin J.. 2009. “Progressive Statistics for Studies in Sports Medicine and Exercise Science.” Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise 41(1): 3–12. 10.1249/mss.0b013e31818cb278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Hough, P. , North J. S., Patterson S. D., and Pedlar C.. 2021. “Monitoring Athletes Sleep: a Survey of Current Trends Amongst Practitioners.” The Journal of Sport and Exercise Science 5(4): pp277–284. [Google Scholar]
  27. Jenkins, C. D. R. , Moody J. A., P. J. Byrne, and Esformes J. I.. 2021. Acute Effects of In‐Season Sleep Hygiene Education on Elite Rugby Union Athletes. ARC Journal of Research in Sports Medicine 5(1): 21–28. [Google Scholar]
  28. Jenkins, D. G. , and Quintana‐Ascencio P. F.. 2020. “A Solution to Minimum Sample Size for Regressions.” PLoS One 15(2): e0229345. 10.1371/journal.pone.0229345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Jones, M. J. , Dawson B., Eastwood P. R., Halson S. L., Miller J., Murray K., Dunican I. C., Landers G. J., and Peeling P.. 2021. “Influence of Electronic Devices on Sleep and Cognitive Performance during Athlete Training Camps.” The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 35(6): 1620–1627. 10.1519/jsc.0000000000002991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Knufinke, M. , Nieuwenhuys A., Maase K., Moen M. H., Geurts S. A., Coenen A. M., and Kompier M. A.. 2018. “Effects of Natural Between‐Days Variation in Sleep on Elite Athletes’ Psychomotor Vigilance and Sport‐specific Measures of Performance.” Journal of Sports Science and Medicine 17(4): 515. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Lakens, D. 2013. “Calculating and Reporting Effect Sizes to Facilitate Cumulative Science: a Practical Primer for t‐Tests and ANOVAs.” Frontiers in Psychology 4: 863. 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Leeder, J. , Glaister M., Pizzoferro K., Dawson J., and Pedlar C.. 2012. “Sleep Duration and Quality in Elite Athletes Measured Using Wristwatch Actigraphy.” Journal of Sports Sciences 30(6): 541–545. 10.1080/02640414.2012.660188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Li, S. , Kempe M., and Lemmink K. A. P. M.. 2024. “Recovery Strategies in Endurance Sports: A Survey in Coaches and Athletes.” International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance 1(aop): 1–11. 10.1123/ijspp.2024-0032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Liang, Z. , Melcer E., Hoang N. H., and Khotchasing K.. 2024. “Sleep Hygiene Games and Gamification: where Are We and where Are We Heading.” PLOS Digital Health: 1–13. [Google Scholar]
  35. Mah, C. D. , Mah K. E., Kezirian E. J., and Dement W. C.. 2011. “The Effects of Sleep Extension on the Athletic Performance of Collegiate Basketball Players.” Sleep 34(7): 943–950. 10.5665/sleep.1132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Maramis, W. 2013. Ilmu Perilaku Dalam Pelayanan Kesehatan. Surabaya: Airlangga University Press. [Google Scholar]
  37. Martínez‐Hernández, D. , Quinn M., and Jones P.. 2024. “Most Common Movements Preceding Goal Scoring Situations in Female Professional Soccer.” Science and Medicine in Football 8(3): 260–268. 10.1080/24733938.2023.2214106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Mastin, D. F. , Bryson J., and Corwyn R.. 2006. “Assessment of Sleep Hygiene Using the Sleep Hygiene Index.” Journal of Behavioral Medicine 29(3): 223–227. 10.1007/s10865-006-9047-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Monma, T. , Matsui T., Inoue K., Masuchi K., Okada T., Tamura M., Ishii T., Satoh M., Tokuyama K., and Takeda F.. 2023. “Prevalence and Risk Factors of Poor Subjective Sleep Quality in Elite Judo Athletes.” Sleep and Biological Rhythms 21(3): 289–297. 10.1007/s41105-023-00444-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Montero‐Marin, J. , Tops M., Manzanera R., Piva Demarzo M. M., Álvarez de Mon M., and García‐Campayo J.. 2015. “Mindfulness, Resilience, and Burnout Subtypes in Primary Care Physicians: The Possible Mediating Role of Positive and Negative Affect.” Frontiers in Psychology 6: 1895. 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Natale, V. , Esposito M. J., Martoni M., and Fabbri M.. 2006. “Validity of the Reduced Version of the Morningness‐Eveningness Questionnaire.” Sleep and Biological Rhythms 4(1): 72–74. 10.1111/j.1479-8425.2006.00192.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  42. Nedelec, M. , Halson S., Abaida A., Ahmaidi S., and Dupont G.. 2015. “Stress, Sleep and Recovery in Elite Soccer: a Critical Review of the Literature.” Sports Medicine 45: 1387–1400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Nisa, K. , Herini E. S., and Hartini S. R. I.. 2021. “Improving Adolescent's Knowledge and Attitudes Regarding Sleep through Video Education.” International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research (09752366) 13(3). [Google Scholar]
  44. O’Donnell, S. , and Driller M. W.. 2017. “Sleep‐hygiene Education Improves Sleep Indices in Elite Female Athletes.” International Journal of Exercise Science 10(4): 522–530. 10.70252/dnol2901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Pan, L. , Lian Z., and Lan L.. 2012. “Investigation of Sleep Quality under Different Temperatures Based on Subjective and Physiological Measurements.” HVAC & R Research 18(5): 1030–1043. 10.1080/10789669.2012.667037. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  46. Paul, R. W. , Sonnier J. H., Johnson E. E., Hall A. T., Osman A., Connors G. M., Freedman K. B., and Bishop M. E.. 2023. “Inequalities in the Evaluation of Male versus Female Athletes in Sports Medicine Research: a Systematic Review.” The American Journal of Sports Medicine 51(12): 3335–3342. 10.1177/03635465221131281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Petersen, I. , Douglas I., and Whitaker H.. 2016. “Self Controlled Case Series Methods: an Alternative to Standard Epidemiological Study Designs.” Bmj 354: i4515. 10.1136/bmj.i4515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Phillips, A. J. K. , Clerx W. M., O’Brien C. S., Sano A., Barger L. K., Picard R. W., Lockley S. W., Klerman E. B., and Czeisler C. A.. 2017. “Irregular Sleep/wake Patterns Are Associated with Poorer Academic Performance and Delayed Circadian and Sleep/wake Timing.” Scientific Reports 7(1): 3216. 10.1038/s41598-017-03171-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Putri, Y. U. 2023. “Development of Educational Video to Improve Sleep Hygiene and Sleep Quality Among the Elderly.” In The 6th International Conference on Vocational Education Applied Science and Technology (ICVEAST 2023), 117–122. Atlantis Press. [Google Scholar]
  50. Sargent, C. , Lastella M., Halson S. L., and Roach G. D.. 2021. “How Much Sleep Does an Elite Athlete Need?” International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance 16(12): 1746–1757. 10.1123/ijspp.2020-0896. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Schwartz, J. , and R. D. Simon, Jr . 2015. “Sleep Extension Improves Serving Accuracy: A Study with College Varsity Tennis Players.” Physiology and Behavior 151: 541–544. 10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.08.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Silva, A. , Narciso F. V., Rosa J. P., Rodrigues D. F., da Silva Cruz A. Â., Tufik S., Viana F., et al. 2019. “Gender Differences in Sleep Patterns and Sleep Complaints of Elite Athletes.” Sleep Science 12(04): 242–248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. te Lindert, B. H. W. , and Van Someren E. J. W.. 2013. “Sleep Estimates Using Microelectromechanical Systems (MEMS).” Sleep 36(5): 781–789. 10.5665/sleep.2648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Tonetti, L. , and Natale V.. 2019. “Discrimination between Extreme Chronotypes Using the Full and Reduced Version of the Morningness‐Eveningness Questionnaire.” Chronobiology International 36(2): 181–187. 10.1080/07420528.2018.1525392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Tuong, W. , Larsen E. R., and Armstrong A. W.. 2014. “Videos to Influence: a Systematic Review of Effectiveness of Video‐Based Education in Modifying Health Behaviors.” Journal of Behavioral Medicine 37(2): 218–233. 10.1007/s10865-012-9480-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Vitale, J. A. , La Torre A., Banfi G., and Bonato M.. 2019. “Acute Sleep Hygiene Strategy Improves Objective Sleep Latency Following a Late‐Evening Soccer‐specific Training Session: A Randomized Controlled Trial.” Journal of Sports Sciences 37(23): 2711–2719. 10.1080/02640414.2019.1661938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Walsh, N. P. , Halson S. L., Sargent C., Roach G. D., Nédélec M., Gupta L., Leeder J., et al. 2021. “Sleep and the Athlete: Narrative Review and 2021 Expert Consensus Recommendations.” British Journal of Sports Medicine 55(7): 356–368. 10.1136/bjsports-2020-102025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Watkins, R. A. , Sugimoto D., Hunt D., Oldham J., Cacolice P. A., and Stracciolini A.. 2022. “Association of Social Media Use on Sleep Quality and Performance Among Collegiate Athletes.” Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine 32(5): 486–492. 10.1097/jsm.0000000000000964. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Whitworth‐Turner, C. , Di Michele R., Muir I., Gregson W., and Drust B.. 2018. “A Comparison of Sleep Patterns in Youth Soccer Players and Non‐athletes.” Science and Medicine in Football 2(1): 3–8. 10.1080/24733938.2017.1366040. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data is available from the lead author, Julie Gooderick, upon reasonable request.


Articles from European Journal of Sport Science are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES