Skip to main content
International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology logoLink to International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology
. 2025 Jan 7;75(1):006595. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.006595

Leptospira gorisiae sp. nov, L. cinconiae sp. nov, L. mgodei sp. nov, L. milleri sp. nov and L. iowaensis sp. nov: five new species isolated from water sources in the Midwestern United States

Camila Hamond 1,*, Bienvenido Tibbs-Cortes 2, Luis G V Fernandes 2, Karen LeCount 1, Ellie J Putz 2, Tammy Anderson 1, Patrick Camp 1, Tod Stuber 1, Jessica Hicks 1, Hans van der Linden 3, Priscyla dos Santos Ribeiro 3, Darrell O Bayles 2, Linda K Schlater 1, Jarlath E Nally 2
PMCID: PMC11706286  PMID: 39773342

Abstract

Isolates of Leptospira spp. were cultured from water sources at five different sites in central Iowa in the Midwestern United States and characterized by whole-genome sequencing. Isolates were helix-shaped and motile. Genome sequence analyses determined that the isolates could be clearly distinguished from other species described in the genus Leptospira and included one species that belonged to the pathogen subclade P1, one species that belonged to the pathogen subclade P2 and three species that belonged to the saprophyte subclade S1. The names Leptospira gorisiae sp. nov. (type strain WS92.C1T=NVSL-WS92.C1T=KIT0303T), Leptospira cinconiae sp. nov. (type strain WS58.C1T=NVSL-WS58.C1T=KIT0304T), Leptospira mgodei sp. nov. (type strain WS4.C2T=NVSL.WS4.C2T=KIT0305T), Leptospira iowaensis sp. nov. (type strain WS39.C2T=NVSL-WS39.C2T=KIT0306T) and Leptospira milleri sp. nov. (type strain WS60.C2T=NVSL-WS60.C2T=KIT0307T) are proposed.

Keywords: Leptospira, leptospirosis, pathogen, saprophyte, water source, whole-genome sequencing

Introduction

Leptospirosis is a global zoonotic disease that causes significant morbidity and mortality in human and animal populations [1]. Animal leptospirosis can significantly impact production on farms due to infertility, abortions, stillbirths, weak offspring and decreased milk production [2]. The most common way that humans or animals contract leptospirosis is by exposure to soil or water contaminated with the urine of reservoir animals infected with pathogenic Leptospira [1,3].

The genus Leptospira is diverse and divided into 69 species [4,8]. Phylogenomic analysis separates the genus into two clades: the S clade that contains noninfective saprophytes isolated from the environment and the P clade that contains pathogens/intermediates responsible for infections in humans and animals. Each S and P clade is further subdivided into two subclades: subclades S1 and S2 contain 23 and 5 species, respectively, while subclades P1 and P2 contain 20 and 21 species, respectively. More recently, three new species belonging to subclade S1 were isolated from environmental biofilms [9].

The discovery of novel species of Leptospira, particularly species belonging to the pathogen subclades P1 and P2, is critical for the development of efficacious detection and diagnostic tools [4]. Here, we describe five new species of Leptospira that were isolated from water sources in central Iowa, the analyses of which indicate that two new species are predicted to be pathogenic and three new species are saprophytes.

Isolation

Leptospira strains WS4, WS39, WS58, WS60 and WS92 were originally isolated from water sources collected in Iowa, United States, as previously described [3]. In brief, a 250 µl aliquot of each water sample was inoculated at the time of collection into 5 ml of HAN (Hornsby–Alt–Nally) liquid media [10]. In the laboratory, 500 µl of the inoculated media was then used to inoculate 2×5 ml of HAN media containing STAFF (sulfamethoxazole, 40 µg ml−1; trimethoprim, 20 µg ml−1; amphotericin B, 5 µg ml−1; fosfomycin, 400 µg ml−1; and 5-fluorouracil, 100 µg ml−1) [11] and incubated at 29 °C. Positive cultures were characterized by whole-genome sequencing. To generate clonal isolates of type strains in accordance with guidelines from the Subcommittee on the Taxonomy of Leptospiraceae and to ensure that type strains for new species represent one single species of Leptospira, cultures of each new species were propagated in HAN media at 29 and 37 °C, diluted to 104 leptospires per ml, and 100 µl then used to inoculate separate HAN media agar plates that were also incubated at 29 and 37 °C. Individual colonies were detectable on agar plates by 10 days (Supplementary Fig. S1, available in the online Supplementary Material) and single colonies were selected to act as type strains. Type strains designated WS4.C2T, WS39.C2T and WS92.C1T were selected from agar plates incubated at 29 °C, and type strains designated WS58.C1T and WS60.C2T were selected from agar plates incubated at 37 °C.

Phenotype

Strains WS4, WS39, WS58, WS60 and WS92 presented with similar morphologies and motility to that of other members of the genus Leptospira when visualized by transmission electron microscopy (Fig. 1) and dark-field microscopy. Representative cells (N=10) of strain WS4 were 12.35±2.91 µm long, 0.16 µm in diameter, with a wavelength of ~0.47 µm (Fig. 1a). Cells (N=10) of WS39 were 14.9±2.08 µm long, 0.17 µm in diameter, with a wavelength of ~0.64 µm (Fig. 1b). Cells (N=10) of WS58 were 16.15±1.18 µm long, 0.15 µm in diameter, with a wavelength of ~0.71 µm (Fig. 1c). Cells (N=10) of WS60 were 18.5±1.2 µm long, 0.18 µm in diameter, with a wavelength of ~0.71 µm (Fig. 1d). Cells (N=10) of WS92 were 14.42±4.34 µm long, 0.12 µm in diameter, with a wavelength of ~0.55 µm (Fig. 1e). Strains WS4, WS39 and WS92 grew better on HAN agar plates incubated at 29 °C, while strains WS58 and WS60 grew better on HAN agar plates incubated at 37 °C (Supplementary Fig. S1).

Fig. 1. Representative images of new species of Leptospira by transmission electron microscopy. (a) Leptospira mgodei sp. nov., (b) Leptospira iowaensis sp. nov., (c) Leptospira cinconiae sp. nov., (d) Leptospira milleri sp. nov. and (e) Leptospira gorisiae sp. nov.

Fig. 1.

All type strains selected from single colonies on HAN agar plates grew well (>108 leptospires per ml) in HAN liquid media incubated at 29 °C (Fig. 2). Strains WS39.C2T, WS58.C1T, WS60.C2T and WS92.C1T also grew well (>108 leptospires per ml) in HAN media incubated at 37 °C and EMJH media incubated at 29 °C. However, strain WS4.C2T grew relatively poorly in HAN media incubated at 37 °C and EMJH media incubated at 29 °C (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2. Growth curves of type strains Leptospira mgodei strain WS4.C2T (clade S1), Leptospira iowaensis strain WS39.C2T (clade S1), Leptospira cinconiae strain WS58C.1T (clade P2), Leptospira millerii strain WS60.C2T (clade S1) and Leptospira gorisiae WS92.C1T (clade P1). Leptospires were inoculated in EMJH and HAN media at the conventional temperature of 29 °C, and in HAN media at 37 °C, in triplicate, at an initial concentration of 105 cells per ml and counted daily by dark-field microscopy.

Fig. 2.

Proteins and LPS

Leptospires (mid-late log phase, 1–3×108 leptospires per ml) were harvested by centrifugation (10 000×g, 4 °C, 30 min), washed twice with PBS and processed for one-dimensional (1-D) sodium dodecyl-sulphate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis on 12% acrylamide gels (BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA) as per manufacturer’s guidelines. Proteins were visualized with Sypro Ruby (Invitrogen) and LPS was visualized with Pro-Q Emerald 300 (Invitrogen) as per manufacturer’s guidelines. For immunoblotting, samples were transferred by semi-dry transfer (Amersham TE77 PWR) to Immobilon-P transfer membranes (Millipore, 220 Bedford, MA, USA) and blocked overnight at 4 °C with Starting Block (PBS) blocking buffer (Thermo Fisher). Membranes were individually incubated with indicated antisera diluted in blocking buffer (anti-LipL32 at 1 : 4000, anti-LipL21 at 1 : 2000 and anti-LipL41 at 1 : 4000) [12,13], followed by incubation with horseradish-peroxidase anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G conjugate (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) diluted 1 : 4000 in blocking buffer. Bound conjugates were detected using Clarity Western ECL substrate (BioRad) and images were acquired using a Bio-Rad ChemiDoc MP imaging system. Strains WS4.C2T, WS39.C2T and WS60.C2T have similar protein profiles to that of the saprophyte L. biflexa serovar Patoc (Fig. 3a), while strain WS92.C1T has a similar protein profile to that of the pathogen L. interrogans serovar Copenhageni strain L1-130 (Fig. 3a). Strains WS58.C1T and WS92.C1T express the outer membrane lipoprotein LipL32 that is conserved among pathogenic species of Leptospira (Fig. 3b). The pathogen-associated outer membrane proteins LipL41 and LipL21 are also expressed by strain WS92.C1T (Fig. 3b). Each new species also presents with different LPS profiles (Fig. 3c).

Fig. 3. Representative images showing total protein profile, (a) immunoblotting with anti-LipL32, anti-LipL21 and anti-LipL41, (b) and total LPS profiles. (c) About 5 µg of each strain was loaded per lane. Molecular mass markers are indicated.

Fig. 3.

Genome features

Closed genomes were generated for all type strains. DNA was extracted from 5 ml of culture using the Maxwell RSC Purefood Purification Pathogen kit (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA) for Illumina Genome Sequencing or the Nanobind CBB Big DNA Kit (Circulomics, Baltimore, MD, USA) for Nanopore Genome Sequencing. Samples were prepared for sequencing on the Illumina MiSeq platform using the Illumina DNA prep sample method and sequenced using a 2×250 v2 paired-end chemistry cartridge per the manufacturer’s instructions. Prior to Nanopore sequencing, the PacBio Short Read Eliminator Kit XS was used to select fragments longer than 10 kb, following the manufacturer’s instructions. The size-selected DNA was indexed and barcoded using the Oxford Nanopore Native Barcoding Kit 24 V14 (SQK-NBD114.24) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Samples were pooled and loaded onto a Nanopore flow cell FLO-MIN114 and run for 72 h.

BBDuk was used to trim residual sequencing adapters from raw Illumina reads and to perform quality trimming of both ends of each read to a PHRED quality score of 30. After trimming, reads with an average PHRED quality score of <30 and a length <150 bp were discarded [14]. Long reads less than 1000 bp were discarded using Filtlong, and subsequently the worst 5% of reads in terms of quality score were also removed from the dataset [15]. Trycycler v0.5.5 was used to generate a high-quality hybrid assembly for each new species following the vignette at https://github.com/rrwick/Trycycler/wiki/Generating-assemblies [16]. Briefly, for each species, 12 long-read subsets were generated. Flye, Minasm and Raven were each used to assemble four subsets each into draft contigs [17,19]. Draft contigs from the 12 assembled subsets were then clustered and visually inspected, and contigs within the same cluster were circularized, oriented to the same start position and aligned against each other using the Trycycler ‘reconcile’ command. Contigs that failed to circularize or align were removed from the analysis. In total, 2 contigs from WS4, 5 contigs from WS39, 2 contigs from WS58, 5 contigs from WS60 and 3 contigs from WS92 were removed. The initial (not subset) cleaned long reads were then aligned against the contig clusters and used to generate consensus long read assemblies. These were then polished with the cleaned Illumina data using Polypolish to generate high-quality genomes for each species [20]. The final genomes were subsequently annotated with Prokka. Using the rotate package, contigs representing chromosome I were reoriented to begin with dnaA, while contigs representing chromosome II were reoriented to begin with soJ or parA [21]. Genomes were submitted to NCBI for deposition and final annotation via the NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline [22,24].

The minimum coverage for any genome was 229× (WS39.C2T), and all contigs were circularized and closed, yielding complete chromosomes and plasmids. Closed genomes ranged in size from 3 873 836 nt in the case of WS60.C2T to 4 527 809 in the case of WS92.C1T. In addition to chromosomes I and II, WS4.C2T, WS39.C2Tand WS92.C1T each possessed one plasmid, and WS60.C2T was found to harbour two plasmids. WS60.C2T also had both the largest and smallest plasmids with sizes of 113 167 nt and 55 184 nt, respectively. Total annotated CDSs per genome ranged from 3585 (WS60.C2T) to 4059 (WS92.C1T) (Table 1).

Table 1. Genome features for Leptospira mgodei strain WS4.C2T, Leptospira iowaensis strain WS39.C2T, Leptospira cinconiae strain WS58.C1T, Leptospira milleri strain WS60.C2T and Leptospira gorisiae strain WS92.C1T.

Species Strain Assembly size (nt) Chr 1(nt) Chr II(nt) Plasmid I(nt) Plasmid II(nt) Coverage G+C content No. of CDS
L. mgodei WS4.C2T 4,041,414 3,711,287 293,914 66,213 na 685× 39.00 mol% 3764
L. iowaensis WS39.C2T 4,065,238 3,720,064 273,036 72,138 na 229× 37.00 mol% 3823
L. cinconiae WS58.C1T 4,092,442 3,719,482 372,960 na na 407× 41.76 mol% 3756
L. milleri WS60.C2T 3,873,836 3,436,525 268,960 113,167 55,184 342× 38.70 mol% 3585
L. gorisiae WS92.C1T 4,527,809 4,056,702 407,834 63,273 na 429× 41.50 mol% 4059

Genome phylogenetics

Genome analyses, as indicated below, indicated that each type strain represents a new species, which were named as follows: WS4.C2T = L. mgodei, WS39.C2T = L. iowaensis, WS58.C1T = L. cinconiae, WS60.C2T = L. milleri, WS92.C1T = L. gorisiae.

For phylogenetic analysis based on the 16S rRNA gene, the full 16S rRNA gene sequence was extracted from the genome of each of the 5 new species as well as the 69 reference genomes of all Leptospira species (Supplementary Table S1, downloaded from https://leptosociety.org/resources/ on 20 June 2024) using Barrnap [25]. The resultant sequences were aligned using MAFFT v7.505 with the l-INS-I method with 1000 iterative refinements [26,27]. This generated an alignment file that was then used for phylogenetic tree construction via IQ-TREE [28]. The ModelFinder method of IQ-TREE was enabled and identified TN+F+I+R2 as the best-fit model [29]. Bootstrap approximation using UFBOOT was performed with 1000 replicates, and the -bnni option was enabled to mitigate severe violations of the chosen model during bootstrapping [30]. The resulting tree was visualized using the Interactive Tree of Life v5 [31]. For easier visualization, the tree is presented rooted at the midpoint with some clades collapsed in Fig. 4; the same tree unrooted with all taxa visible is provided in Supplementary Fig. S2. Based on 16S rRNA gene phylogeny, L. cinconiae and L. gorisiae fall within the pathogenic subclades P2 and P1, respectively. The remaining novel species are shown to belong to the saprophytic clade, but 16S rRNA gene phylogeny is not capable of delineating between members of the S1 and S2 subclades (Figs 4 and Supplementary Fig. S2).

Fig. 4. An abbreviated version of the 16S rRNA gene-based consensus tree displaying the phylogenetic relationships between reference Leptospira species (black text labels) and the five novel species introduced in this work (red text labels). The tree was visualized using the Interactive Tree of Life, and some clades are collapsed for brevity (grey triangles). The tree is rooted at the midpoint and has a log-likelihood of −4844. Totally, 1000 bootstrap replicates were performed for consensus tree construction, and nodes with bootstrap values below 70% are indicated with a red circle.

Fig. 4.

For phylogenomic analysis, PanACoTA v1.3.1 was utilized to identify a core genome among all 74 (novel and reference) Leptospira species [32]. The thresholds for MASH distance, maximum L90 of a genome and maximum number of contigs per genome were adjusted to ensure that all 74 genomes were kept during the ‘prepare’ and ‘annotate’ modules of PanACoTA. All annotated protein-coding sequences across genomes were next grouped into families by the ‘pangenome’ module based on a minimum amino acid similarity threshold of 50%; the number of members of each protein family in each genome was subsequently quantified. From this information, a strict persistent genome was generated consisting of the 714 protein families that were represented by a single homolog in each of the 74 genomes. The homologs within each family were subsequently aligned using MAFFT within PanACoTA. Alignments were trimmed to retain parsimony informative sites and remove gap sites using the ‘kpi-smart-gap’ method of ClipKIT v2.3.0 [33]. PhyKIT v1.19.9 was used to concatenate all 714 trimmed alignments and generate a partition file [34]; these were then used as input for phylogenetic tree construction via IQ-TREE v2.3.0 [28,35]. Within IQ-TREE, ModelFinder was used to identify the optimal edge-proportional partition model prior to tree reconstruction with UFBOOT using 1000 bootstraps. As with the 16S rRNA gene phylogeny, the tree was visualized in the Interactive Tree of Life, and abbreviated and complete versions of the tree are provided (Figs 5 and Supplementary Fig. S3, respectively). The phylogenetic location of the five novel species as determined by the phylogenomic method agrees with the 16S rRNA gene phylogeny, and the increased resolution of the phylogenomic method demonstrates that the three saprophytic species belong to the S1 subclade (Figs 4 and Supplementary Fig. S2).

Fig. 5. An abbreviated version of the core genome consensus tree (based on 714 protein-coding sequences) displaying the phylogenetic relationship between reference Leptospira species (black text labels) and the five novel species introduced in this work (red text labels). The tree was visualized using the Interactive Tree of Life, and some clades are collapsed for brevity (grey triangles). The tree is rooted at the midpoint and has a log-likelihood of −3 834 073. Totally 1000 bootstrap replicates were performed for consensus tree construction, and clades with bootstrap values below 95% are collapsed (blue triangles, blue box with red text indicates bootstrap value).

Fig. 5.

The average nucleotide identity (ANI) for each of the five new species against reference genomes for each species (Supplementary Table S1) was calculated using the OrthoANI algorithm [36] implemented in Python [37] and all were well below the 95% threshold recommended for new species delineation (Fig. 6 and Supplementary Table S2) [38,39]. For L. gorisiae strain WS92.C1T, the closest ANI was 79% for L. tipperaryensis. For L. cinconiae strain WS58.C1T, the closest ANI was 87% for L. johnsonii. For L. mgodei strain WS4.C2T, the closest ANI was 89% for L. abararensis. For L. iowaensis strain WS39.C2T, the closest ANI was 83% for L. ellinghausen. For L. milleri strain WS60.C2T, the closest ANI was 81% for L. ellinghausen.

Fig. 6. Heatmap displaying the ANI (as calculated by OrthoANI) between the genomes of the five novel species introduced in this work and the existing reference Leptospira species. Numeric ANI values calculated by OrthoANI used to generate Fig. 6 are provided in Supplementary Table S2.

Fig. 6.

Serotyping

Strains WS4.C2T, WS39.C2T, WS58.C1T, WS60.C2T and WS92.C1T were serotyped using the MAT method with a panel of 48 polyclonal rabbit reference antisera representing over 29 serogroups and Leptonema (Supplementary Table S3) [40]. No significant titres were detected for strains WS4.C2T, WS39.C2T, WS58.C1T or WS92.C1T, representing subclades S1, S1, P2 and P1, respectively. Strain WS60.C2T of subclade S1 had a titre of 1 : 1280 for serogroup Tarassovi, but additional testing with monoclonal antibodies was negative for any serovar within this serogroup.

Description of Leptospira mgodei sp. nov.

Leptospira mgodei (mgo’de.i. N.L. gen. n. mgodei, named in honour of Georgies Mgode, a Tanzanian leptospirologist who made significant contributions to the study of human and animal leptospirosis) (Subclade S1).

Cells are 12.35±2.91 µm long and 0.16 µm in diameter, presenting with a wavelength of ~0.47 µm; cells are thin and helical-shaped, with hooked and/or spiral ends to which flagella are inserted. Cells are highly motile and grow better in HAN media at 29 °C compared to EMJH media at 29 °C or HAN media at 37 °C. When cells are seeded onto HAN solid media and incubated at 29 and 37 °C, colonies can be observed at 10 days only at 29 °C . The genomic G+C content of the type strain WS4.C2T (=NVSL-WS4.C2 T=KIT0305T) is 39.00 mol%.

Description of Leptospira iowaensis sp. nov.

Leptospira iowaensis (i.o.wa.en’sis. N.L. fem. adj. iowaensis, of Iowa, named after the state from which the isolate was recovered) (Subclade S1).

Cells are 14.9±2.08 µm long and 0.17 µm in diameter, presenting with a wavelength of ~0.64 µm; cells are thin and helical-shaped, with hooked and/or spiral ends to which flagella are inserted. Cells are highly motile and display vigorous growth at 29 °C (EMJH and HAN) and at 37 °C (HAN media). When cells are seeded onto HAN solid media and incubated at 29 and 37 °C, colonies can be observed at 10 days only at 29 °C. The genomic G+C content of the type strain WS39.C2T (=NVSL-WS39.C2 T=KIT0306T) is 37.00 mol%.

Description of Leptospira cinconiae sp. nov.

Leptospira cinconiae (cin.co’ni.ae. N.L. gen. n. cinconiae, named in honour of Marina Cinco, an Italian leptospirologist who made significant contributions to the study of human and animal leptospirosis) (Subclade P2).

Cells are 16.15±1.18 µm long and 0.15 µm in diameter, presenting with a wavelength of ~0.71 µm; cells are thin and helical-shaped, with hooked and/or spiral ends to which flagella are inserted. Cells are highly motile and display vigorous growth at 29 °C in both EMJH and HAN media and at 37 °C in HAN media. When cells are seeded onto HAN solid media and incubated at 29 and 37 °C, colonies can be observed at 10 days. The genomic G+C content of the type strain WS58.C2T (=NVSL-WS58.C1T=KIT0304T) is 41.76 mol%.

Description of Leptospira milleri sp. nov.

Leptospira milleri (mil’le.ri. N.L. gen. n. milleri, named in honour of James N. Miller, an American spirochetologist who made significant contributions to the study of Treponema, Leptospira and Borrelia) (Subclade S1).

Cells are 18.5±1.2 µm long and 0.18 µm in diameter, presenting with a wavelength of ~0.71 µm; cells are thin and helical-shaped, with hooked and/or spiral ends to which flagella are inserted. Cells are highly motile and display vigorous growth at 29 °C in EMJH and HAN media and at 37 °C in HAN media. When cells are seeded onto HAN solid media and incubated at 29 and 37 °C, colonies can be observed at 10 days. The genomic G+C content of the type strain WS60.C2T (=NVSL-WS60.C2 T=KIT0307T) is 38.70 mol%.

Description of Leptospira gorisiae sp. nov.

Leptospira gorisiae (go.ris’i.ae. N.L. gen. gorisiae, named in honour of Marga Goris, a Dutch leptospirologist who made significant contributions to the study of human and animal leptospirosis) (Subclade P1).

Cells are 14.42±4.34 µm long and 0.12 µm in diameter, presenting with a wavelength of ~0.55 µm; cells are thin and helical-shaped, with hooked and/or spiral ends to which flagella are inserted. Cells are highly motile and display vigorous growth at 29 °C in EMJH and HAN media and at 37 °C in HAN media. When cells are seeded onto HAN solid media and incubated at 29 and 37 °C, colonies can be observed at 10 days only at 29 °C. The genomic G+C content of the type strain WS92.C1T (=NVSL-WS92.C1T=KIT0303T) is 41.50 mol%.

The GenBank accession numbers for 16S rRNA sequences for L. cinconiae strain WS58.C1T, L. gorisiae strain WS92.C1T, L. iowaensis strain WS39.C2T, L. mgodei strain WS4.C2T and L. milleri strain WS60.C2T are PQ066384, PQ066385, PQ066386, PQ066387 and PQ066388, respectively, and the GenBank accession numbers for their genomes are CP162137-CP162138, CP162130-CP162132, CP162142-CP162144, CP162139-CP162141 and CP162133-CP162136, respectively.

16S GenBank Accession Numbers:

#Accession Sequence ID
PQ066384 Leptospira_cinconiae_WS58.C1
PQ066385 Leptospira_gorisiae_WS92.C1
PQ066386 Leptospira_iowaensis_WS39.C2
PQ066387 Leptospira_mgodei_WS4.C2
PQ066388 Leptospira_milleri_WS60.C2

Genome GenBank Accession Numbers:

Genome accession Raw read accession BioProject BioSample.name
CP162130-CP162132 SAMN42533266 PRJNA1136487 Leptospira_gorisiae_WS92.C1
CP162133-CP162136 SAMN42533265 PRJNA1136487 Leptospira_milleri_WS60.C2
CP162137-CP162138 SAMN42533264 PRJNA1136487 Leptospira_cinconiae_WS58.C1
CP162139-CP162141 SAMN42533263 PRJNA1136487 Leptospira_mgodei_WS4.C2
CP162142-CP162144 SAMN42533262 PRJNA1136487 Leptospira_iowaensis_WS39.C2

supplementary material

Uncited Supplementary Material 1.
DOI: 10.1099/ijsem.0.006595
Uncited Supplementary Material 2.
ijsem-75-06595-s002.xlsx (89.8KB, xlsx)
DOI: 10.1099/ijsem.0.006595

Acknowledgements

USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. This research was supported in part by an appointment to the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Research Participation Program administered by the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) through an interagency agreement between the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). ORISE is managed by ORAU under DOE contract number DE-SC0014664. All opinions expressed in this article are the authors’ and do not necessarily reflect the policies and views of USDA, DOE or ORAU/ORISE. The authors would like to thank Judith Stasko for transmission electron microscopy expertise and Prof. Aharon Oren at The Hebrew University of Jerusalem for reviewing the nomenclature of the new species.

Abbreviations

ANI

average nucleotide identity

CDS

coding DNA sequence

ECL

enhanced chemiluminesence

EMJH

Ellinghausen McCullough Johnson Harris

NCBI

National Center for Biotechnology Information

Footnotes

Funding: This research was supported by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service.

Contributor Information

Camila Hamond, Email: camila.hamond@usda.gov.

Bienvenido Tibbs-Cortes, Email: bienvenido.tibbs-cortes@usda.gov.

Luis G. V. Fernandes, Email: luis.fernandes@usda.gov.

Karen LeCount, Email: karen.j.lecount@usda.gov.

Ellie J. Putz, Email: ellie.putz@usda.gov.

Tammy Anderson, Email: tammy.m.anderson@usda.gov.

Patrick Camp, Email: patrick.m.camp@usda.gov.

Tod Stuber, Email: tod.p.stuber@usda.gov.

Jessica Hicks, Email: jessica.a.hicks@usda.gov.

Hans van der Linden, Email: h.vanderlinden@amsterdamumc.nl.

Priscyla dos Santos Ribeiro, Email: priscyla.ribeiro@amsterdamumc.nl.

Darrell O. Bayles, Email: darrell.bayles@usda.gov.

Linda K. Schlater, Email: linda.schlater.dvm@gmail.com.

Jarlath E. Nally, Email: jarlath.nally@usda.gov.

References

  • 1.Bharti AR, Nally JE, Ricaldi JN, Matthias MA, Diaz MM, et al. Leptospirosis: a zoonotic disease of global importance. Lancet Infect Dis. 2003;3:757–771. doi: 10.1016/s1473-3099(03)00830-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ellis WA. Animal leptospirosis. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2015;387:99–137. doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-45059-8_6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hamond C, LeCount K, Anderson T, Putz EJ, Stuber T, et al. Isolation and characterization of saprophytic and pathogenic strains of Leptospira from water sources in the Midwestern United States. Front Water. 2024;6 doi: 10.3389/frwa.2024.1278088. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Vincent AT, Schiettekatte O, Goarant C, Neela VK, Bernet E, et al. Revisiting the taxonomy and evolution of pathogenicity of the genus Leptospira through the prism of genomics. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019;13:e0007270. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Casanovas-Massana A, Hamond C, Santos LA, de Oliveira D, Hacker KP, et al. Leptospira yasudae sp. nov. and Leptospira stimsonii sp. nov., two new species of the pathogenic group isolated from environmental sources. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2020;70:1450–1456. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.003480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Korba AA, Lounici H, Kainiu M, Vincent AT, Mariet J-F, et al. Leptospira ainlahdjerensis sp. nov., Leptospira ainazelensis sp. nov., Leptospira abararensis sp. nov. and Leptospira chreensis sp. nov., four new species isolated from water sources in Algeria. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2021;71 doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.005148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Parte AC, Sardà Carbasse J, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Reimer LC, Göker M. List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature (LPSN) moves to the DSMZ. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2020;70:5607–5612. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.004332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Fernandes LGV, Stone NE, Roe CC, Goris MGA, van der Linden H, et al. Leptospira sanjuanensis sp. nov., a pathogenic species of the genus Leptospira isolated from soil in Puerto Rico. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2022;72 doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.005560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Dos Santos Ribeiro P, Carvalho NB, Aburjaile F, Sousa T, Veríssimo G, et al. Environmental biofilms from an urban community in Salvador, Brazil, shelter previously uncharacterized saprophytic Leptospira. Microb Ecol. 2023;86:2488–2501. doi: 10.1007/s00248-023-02253-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hornsby RL, Alt DP, Nally JE. Isolation and propagation of leptospires at 37 °C directly from the mammalian host. Sci Rep. 2020;10:9620. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-66526-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Chakraborty A, Miyahara S, Villanueva SYAM, Saito M, Gloriani NG, et al. A novel combination of selective agents for isolation of Leptospira species. Microbiol Immunol. 2011;55:494–501. doi: 10.1111/j.1348-0421.2011.00347.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hamond C, Adam EN, Stone NE, LeCount K, Anderson T, et al. Identification of equine mares as reservoir hosts for pathogenic species of Leptospira. Front Vet Sci. 2024;11:1346713. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1346713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Nally JE, Whitelegge JP, Bassilian S, Blanco DR, Lovett MA. Characterization of the outer membrane proteome of Leptospira interrogans expressed during acute lethal infection. Infect Immun. 2007;75:766–773. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00741-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bushnell B. BBMap. 2022. https://sourceforge.net/projects/bbmap
  • 15.Wick RR. Filtlong. 2021. https://github.com/rrwick/Filtlong
  • 16.Wick RR, Judd LM, Cerdeira LT, Hawkey J, Méric G, et al. Trycycler: consensus long-read assemblies for bacterial genomes. Genome Biol. 2021;22:266. doi: 10.1186/s13059-021-02483-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Li H. Minimap and miniasm: fast mapping and de novo assembly for noisy long sequences. Bioinformatics. 2016;32:2103–2110. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Vaser R, Šikić M. Time- and memory-efficient genome assembly with Raven. Nat Comput Sci . 2021;1:332–336. doi: 10.1038/s43588-021-00073-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kolmogorov M, Yuan J, Lin Y, Pevzner PA. Assembly of long, error-prone reads using repeat graphs. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37:540–546. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0072-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wick RR, Holt KE. Polypolish: short-read polishing of long-read bacterial genome assemblies. PLOS Comput Biol. 2022;18:e1009802. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Durbin R, De Sanctis B, Blumer M. Rotate: a command-line program to rotate circular DNA sequences to start at a given position or string. Wellcome Open Res. 2023;8:401. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.19568.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Li W, O’Neill KR, Haft DH, DiCuccio M, Chetvernin V, et al. RefSeq: expanding the Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline reach with protein family model curation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49:D1020–D1028. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa1105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Haft DH, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Brover V, Chetvernin V, et al. RefSeq: an update on prokaryotic genome annotation and curation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46:D851–D860. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx1068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP, et al. NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:6614–6624. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Seemann T. Barrnap. 2018. https://github.com/tseemann/barrnap
  • 26.Katoh K, Misawa K, Kuma K, Miyata T. MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30:3059–3066. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkf436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Katoh K, Standley DM. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30:772–780. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Minh BQ, Schmidt HA, Chernomor O, Schrempf D, Woodhams MD, et al. IQ-TREE 2: new models and efficient methods for phylogenetic inference in the genomic era. Mol Biol Evol. 2020;37:1530–1534. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msaa015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kalyaanamoorthy S, Minh BQ, Wong TKF, von Haeseler A, Jermiin LS. ModelFinder: fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nat Methods. 2017;14:587–589. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hoang DT, Chernomor O, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ, Vinh LS. UFBoot2: improving the ultrafast bootstrap approximation. Mol Biol Evol. 2018;35:518–522. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msx281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Letunic I, Bork P. Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v5: an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49:W293–W296. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Perrin A, Rocha EPC. PanACoTA: a modular tool for massive microbial comparative genomics. NAR Genom Bioinform . 2021;3:lqaa106. doi: 10.1093/nargab/lqaa106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Steenwyk JL, Buida TJ, III, Li Y, Shen X-X, Rokas A. ClipKIT: a multiple sequence alignment trimming software for accurate phylogenomic inference. PLOS Biol. 2020;18:e3001007. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Steenwyk JL, Buida TJ, III, Labella AL, Li Y, Shen X-X, et al. PhyKIT: a broadly applicable UNIX shell toolkit for processing and analyzing phylogenomic data. Bioinformatics. 2021;37:2325–2331. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Mo YK, Lanfear R, Hahn MW, Minh BQ. Updated site concordance factors minimize effects of homoplasy and taxon sampling. Bioinformatics. 2023;39 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Lee I, Ouk Kim Y, Park SC, Chun J. OrthoANI: an improved algorithm and software for calculating average nucleotide identity. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2016;66:1100–1103. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.000760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Larralde M. A Python implementation of the OrthoANI algorithm for nucleotide identity measurement. 2021. https://github.com/althonos/orthoani
  • 38.Goris J, Konstantinidis KT, Klappenbach JA, Coenye T, Vandamme P, et al. DNA-DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2007;57:81–91. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.64483-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:19126–19131. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0906412106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Dikken H, Kmety E. Serological typing methods of leptospires. Methods Microbiol. 1978;11:259–307. doi: 10.1016/S0580-9517(08)70493-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Uncited Supplementary Material 1.
DOI: 10.1099/ijsem.0.006595
Uncited Supplementary Material 2.
ijsem-75-06595-s002.xlsx (89.8KB, xlsx)
DOI: 10.1099/ijsem.0.006595

Articles from International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Society for General Microbiology and the International Union of Microbiological Societies

RESOURCES