Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2025 Jan 7;20(1):e0313422. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313422

Effectiveness of menstrual hygiene management training to enhance knowledge, attitude, and practice among adolescents in Sindhupalchowk, Nepal

Swastika Shrestha 1,*, Saki Thapa 1, Bikram Bucha 2, Safal Kunwar 1, Bigyan Subedi 1, Aishwarya Rani Singh 3, Durga Datta Chapagain 4, Raghu Dhital 1, Maxine Caws 1
Editor: Alison Parker5
PMCID: PMC11706381  PMID: 39775536

Abstract

Background

Menstrual Health (MH) knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) are highly affected by access to information regarding menstruation. Despite being included in the school curriculum, Sexual and Reproductive Health (SRH) education is often not delivered in practice. School-based educational interventions have been shown to be effective in promoting MH.

Methods

A school-based study was conducted in Indrawati rural municipality of Sindhupalchowk district in Nepal. 427 participants (175 boys and 252 girls), aged 11–13, completed a questionnaire evaluating MH KAP before receiving a structured training module on MH provided by experienced trainers from Putali Nepal using the Menstrupedia tool. The questionnaire was repeated one month after the training. Pre and post intervention scores were compared to determine the effect of the intervention. Focus group discussions were also conducted to understand the perceptions of participants toward SRH teaching. Association of independent socio-demographic with dependent variables knowledge and attitude towards menstrual health were analyzed using MANOVA test. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare the median outcome of the pre and post-test attitude and knowledge. The maximum possible score was 6 for MH knowledge. The total attitude score ranged 14 to 70.

Results

The median knowledge score increased by 1 point (p = <0.001) and the median attitude score by 5 points (p = <0.001), one month after delivery of the intervention. Higher knowledge scores were significantly associated with Hindu religion, female gender, higher father’s literacy, and mothers in an informal occupation on multivariate analysis. Higher attitude scores were significantly associated with Hindu religion while lower attitude scores were associated with a mother in an informal occupation.

Conclusion

The Menstrupedia comic educational intervention improved knowledge and attitude towards menstruation among Nepali adolescents. A scale-up of the Menstrupedia based intervention would significantly change knowledge and attitude towards menstruation in Nepali adolescents.

Introduction

Menstrual health (MH) is an indispensable component of physical health and overall wellbeing in women. Although a normal physiological process, many cultures around the world view menstruation as a subject of taboo and have imposed various degrees of limitations on menstruating women [15]. Due to the stigma surrounding menstruation, adolescent girls in developing countries are often uninformed about, and thus are unprepared for, menarche. This leads to misconceptions and unhygienic practices during menstruation [6]. Attitude towards menstruation is affected by the social norms, expectations, and beliefs about how women should feel, act, and behave during the menstrual cycle [7]. This inevitably affects the MH of women and girls- which is defined as a state of complete physical, mental, and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity, in relation to the menstrual cycle [8].

Knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) regarding menstruation are interlinked and are highly affected by access to information regarding menstruation and MH [911]. Although the school curriculum in Nepal includes sexual and reproductive health (SRH) education, it is often not implemented, largely because teachers themselves are reluctant to discuss sensitive topics surrounding SRH [12, 13]. In such contexts educational interventions including both the students and teachers can be effective in promoting MH [1416].

MH education should not only include females. Men and boys play an important role in either supporting or preventing women and girls in managing menstruation effectively across different social arenas including, but not limited to, household, community, school and work, as boyfriends, husbands, fathers, brothers, students, peers, and teachers [17]. Thus, the intervention applied here included all adolescents, irrespective of their gender identities. The research evaluated the effectiveness of a structured training module using the Menstrupedia comic (www.menstrupedia.com). Menstrupedia is an adolescent friendly guide to periods which facilitates understanding of the dynamics of the menstrual cycle and the pubescent changes that occur in the body, thereby encouraging girls to take appropriate actions to manage their menstrual cycle and stay healthy and active whenever possible during their periods. We evaluated and compared the KAP regarding MH among school-going adolescents in Indrawati municipality of Sindapulchowk before and after the Menstrupedia training.

Underpinning Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) [18], MH is a right for every woman and girl. Imparting MH education is an essential step towards ensuring the right to MH for women and girls. Although a part of the school curriculum, schools in Nepal have not been able to deliver the SRH education effectively. In such context, development and evaluation of evidence-based interventions is crucial for supporting political commitment and investment in improving school-based teaching for MH and the broader comprehensive sexuality education (CSE) curriculum. Despite the severe and deeply rooted stigma surrounding menstruation in Nepal, which has multidimensional negative impacts on the lifelong wellbeing of women and girls, there is a paucity of published studies evaluating MH educational interventions in the Nepalese context. Therefore, we designed the present study to evaluate the effectiveness of a school-based menstrual education program in improving menstrual knowledge and attitude among adolescents in Nepal.

Materials and methods

Setting

This is a pre-post longitudinal school-based study conducted in Indrawati rural municipality of Sindhupalchowk district, Nepal where there is a high prevalence of underage marriage [19]. The district was also badly affected by the 2015 earthquake in Nepal, following which there were increases in the lack of segregated toilets, poor living conditions and lack of privacy for women and girls affecting their SRH [20].

Intervention

The intervention consisted of a structured training module using the Menstrupedia comic, which was taught to the students by experienced trainers from Putali Nepal (https://putali-nepal.com/). Putali Nepal is a non-governmental organization experienced in educational interventions to improve menstrual hygiene knowledge among adolescents and combat prevailing stigmas. The adolescents were provided with information on MH and menstrual hygiene management (MHM) using a sixty-minute animation video which incorporated characters featured in the Menstrupedia comic. The training sessions were conducted for each grade in their normal classrooms with students of all genders present. Each session consisted of no more than 30 students. The contents of the video introduced the adolescents to physical changes during puberty, healthy diet, menstruation, things to pay attention to during the first menstrual period, techniques to reduce menstrual cramping, the physiology of the menstrual cycle, premenstrual syndrome, use and management of sanitary pads. The students were encouraged to ask questions and participate in the games which were part of the training.

Study participants and sampling process

There are 12 government schools in Indrawati municipality, Sindhupalchowk. Assuming the baseline knowledge score of menstrual hygiene for students to be 50%, 385 students would be sufficient to estimate the true proportion in the study population with 95% confidence. However, due to COVID disruption to school attendance, we were unable to control the sample size of students completing both pre and post intervention questionnaires, and therefore the final matched pair analysis was performed on collected data without a predetermined power calculation.

The study was conducted in 9 of the 12 public schools in Indrawati municipality, Sindhupalchowk. The three excluded schools already had an alternative active intervention for MH and advocacy under the BNMT Amplify Change project. The study population included adolescent students aged 11–13 (classes 5, 6 and 7) attending the participating government schools in the municipality.

Ethics statement

Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the Nepal Health Research Council (NHRC) [Ethical review board (ERB) Protocol Registration number: 356/2021]. Approval was also obtained from the principals of the participating schools. The Menstrupedia classes were conducted according to a schedule agreed with the school authorities. The students from selected classes were verbally given information about the study and the confidentiality of their personal information, and then provided with an opportunity to ask questions. They were provided with a participant information sheet containing information regarding the study which included the contact number of the researcher so that the participants or parents/guardians could inquire if they had any questions regarding the study. Written informed consent was obtained from parents or guardians. Students also received an assent form to sign if they were willing to participate in the study. The students were asked to discuss the study with their parents and return the signed consent and assent forms.

Data collection instruments and procedures

The data collection was conducted between December 2021 and February 2022. A self-administered, structured, close-ended, and anonymous questionnaire consisting of questions on socio-demographic details, experience, knowledge, attitude, and practice regarding menstruation and menstrual hygiene was used as the study tool for the quantitative aspect of the study. The questionnaire was adapted to the Nepali context from published studies and open access tools [11, 2125]. The students were given as much time as required to complete the questionnaire under the supervision of the investigator. All students had normally completed within 45 minutes. Following the data collection, the students participated in the Menstrupedia comic-based teaching conducted by experienced facilitators from Putali Nepal in partnership with the class teachers. Questions from the participants relating to menstrual and reproductive health were discussed during the training. One month following the single training session, the same KAP questionnaire was completed by the students to gather the post intervention data on KAP.

The qualitative evaluation of the intervention consisted of six focus group discussions (FGDs), 3 with girls and 3 with boys, with selected students in the schools. Each FGD included either 10 boys or 10 girls. Among the students who were interested in participating in the FGDs and whose parents had consented to their participation, 60 were chosen randomly to be included in the FGD. The FGD included topics pertaining to the barriers to receiving effective SRH education/information in the school, preferences regarding delivery of SRH teaching and feedback regarding the Menstrupedia training session. The FGDs were conducted in the Nepali language and were recorded. Each FGD lasted approximately 40 min and was transcribed verbatim. The transcript was then translated into English by the researcher who took the interviews and was validated by the co-investigators. The corresponding author identified the codes and generated the themes which were validated by the project manager who is also one of the co-authors. The transcribed document was manually analyzed by reading and re-reading the document line by line to generate codes. An inductive approach was used to derive codes from the content of the transcripts. Significant statements were identified. The meanings of each significant statement were formulated into codes, based on related words or phrases that were mentioned by the interviewees. New codes were added as they emerged during the coding process. Coding was continued until no new codes were identified. After reviewing the codes, a list of themes was generated [26]. The document was shared online amongst the researchers to facilitate analysis and allow transparency between the coding and analysis work. Finally, the codes were discussed amongst the researchers until agreement was reached on the development of themes. Four major themes were identified: teaching style in the schools, use of multimedia resources for teaching, impact on MHM practice and attitude and co-education during the training.

Data analysis

There were seven questions related to the demographic variables, six multiple choice questions regarding knowledge, 35 questions regarding practice and fourteen statements regarding attitude on menstruation. Each correct response to knowledge questions was scored with one point, whereas any incorrect or ‘do not know’ response scored 0. The total knowledge score for each individual was calculated by adding the scores for each correct answer. Detailed practice questions (n = 35) were completed only by the girls who had reached menarche.

Attitude was evaluated using responses to 3 positive and 11 negative statements on Likert’s five-point scale. (strongly agree, agree, neutral, disagree or strongly disagree). The score of positive statement ranged from five to one (strongly agree-5, agree-4, neutral-3, disagree-2, strongly disagree-1 and do not know/cannot say- 0) and score for negative statement ranged from one to five (strongly agree-1, agree-2, neutral-3, disagree-4, strongly disagree-5 and don’t know/cannot say- 0). The total attitude score for each individual was calculated by adding the scores for each statement.

Pre-intervention test data was collected from a total of 580 participants, which included 266 boys and 314 girls. The large difference in individuals attending school in the pre and post intervention groups was caused by the COVID disruptions and significantly reduced our matched sample for analysis. There was a 19% (n = 111) loss to follow up in the post intervention data collection due to an upsurge in COVID cases which led to fewer students attending the school during the post intervention data collection time. Post-intervention test data was collected from a total of 469 participants, which included 201 boys and 268 girls. Among the participants 427 students (175 boys and 252 girls) participated in both the pre and post intervention tests. Pre-test data of the participants was used to analyze the menstrual hygiene practice as well as associations between the dependent variables (knowledge and attitude) with the independent variables (sociodemographic variables). Knowledge and attitude scores of only the participants who took both the pre and post tests were compared.

The data was entered using ODK data collection mobile software [27] by junior researchers: Sujata Adhikari and Bikram Bucha. Entries were checked for accuracy and completeness by Dr Swastika Shrestha. Data analysis was conducted on STATA version 13 [28]. Association of independent socio-demographic variables ethnicity, religion, parent’s education, parent’s occupation with dependent variables knowledge and attitude towards menstrual hygiene were analyzed using MANOVA test. A (probability value) P value of ≤ 0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant association. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare the median outcome of the pre and posttest attitude and knowledge.

Results

The sociodemographic variables

Sociodemographic variables of the participants in the pre-test group, post-test group and the matched analysis group are shown in Table 1.

Table 1. Sociodemographic variables of student sample.

Sociodemographic variables All pre-test participants All post-test participants Matched group
Frequency (%) Frequency (%) Frequency (%)
(N = 580) (N = 469) (N = 427)
Religion Hindu 400 (68.9%) 304 (64.8%) 281 (65.8%)
Buddhist 158 (27.2%) 139 (29.6%) 132 (30.9%)
Others 22 (3.7%) 26 (5.5%) 14 (3.2%)
Father’s literacy level Illiterate 61 (10.5%) 55 (11.7%) 41 (9.6%)
Basic literacy 233 (40.1%) 193 (41.1%) 171 (40.1%)
Primary school 197 (33.9%) 136 (29.0%) 142 (33.3%)
Secondary school or above 83 (14.3%) 72 (15.3%) 69 (16.6%)
No response 6 (1.0%) 13 (2.7%) 4 (0.9%)
Mother’s literacy level Illiterate 130 (22.4%) 126 (26.8%) 85 (19.9%)
Basic literacy 256 (44.1%) 204 (43.5%) 188 (44.0%)
Primary school 114 (19.7%) 82 (17.4%) 90 (21.1%)
Secondary school or above 67 (11.5%) 48 (10.2%) 55 (12.8%)
No response 13 (2.2%) 9 (1.9%) 9 (2.2%)
Father’s occupation Unemployed 27 (4.6%) 15 (3.2%) 20 (4.6%)
Formal employment 97 (16.7%) 76 (16.2%) 74 (17.3%)
Informal employment1 456 (78.6%) 378 (80.6%) 333 (77.9%)
Mother’s occupation Unemployed 162 (27.9%) 138 (29.4%) 118 (27.6%)
Formal employment 52 (8.7%) 50 (10.6%) 41 (9.6%)
Informal employment1 366 (63.1%) 281 (59.9%) 268 (2.7%)

1 Informal labour in the districts is mainly manual labour for men (eg. Construction work, sand mining) and carpet weaving, tailor, or stone sculpture for women.

MH knowledge

The maximum possible score was 6 for MH knowledge. A multivariate MANOVA test statistics was conducted for each predictor variable with knowledge (Table 2). The multivariate result was significant for Religion, F = 7.49, p = 0.0006; Mother’s occupation, F = 4.16, p = 0.01; Father’s literacy, F = 2.66, p = .04; and Gender F = 4.6, p = 0.03. For the pre-menstrupedia teaching group, there was a significant difference in menstrual knowledge score between the three religious groups: Hindu (n = 281), Buddhist (n = 132) or ‘other religion’ (n = 14). The median score for Hindus was 3, for buddhists 2, and for ‘other religious affiliation’ the median score was 2. There was no significant correlation between socioecomic status indicators (literacy level and educational status of parents) and religion among the participants, suggesting that this was not due to socioeconomic differences between the religious groups.

Table 2. Association of independent variables with menstrual knowledge for matched pretest group.

Demographic variable N (%) Median score MANOVA test Wilks’ lambda (P-value)
Religion
Hindu 281 (65.8%) 3 0.0006*
Buddhist 132 (30.9%) 2
Other 14 (3.2%) 2
Gender
Male 175 2 0.03*
Female 252 3
Father’s literacy
Illiterate 41 (9.6%) 2 0.04*
Basic 171 (40.4%) 2
Primary 142 (33.5%) 2
Secondary+ 69 (16.3%) 3
Mother’s literacy
Illiterate 85 (20.3%) 3 0.07
Basic 188 (44.9%) 2
Primary 90 (21.5%) 2
Secondary+ 55 (13.2%) 3
Father’s occupation Unemployed 20 (4.6%) 3 0.37
Formal employment 74 (17.3%) 2
Informal employment1 333 (77.9%) 2
Mother’s occupation Unemployed 118 (27.6%) 2 0.01*
Formal employment 41 (9.6%) 1
Informal employment 1 268 (62.7%) 3

1. Informal labour in the districts is mainly manual labour for men (eg. Construction work, sand mining) and carpet weaving, tailor or stone sculpture for women.

2. * Indicates a significant P-value (≤0.05)

Participants with a higher literacy level of fathers showed higher levels of menstrual knowledge. The median score of those whose fathers were ‘illiterate’, had ‘basic literacy’ or ‘primary level education’ was 2, while those whose father’s had ‘secondary level education or higher’ was 3. Girls and boys also had statistically significant difference in menstrual knowledge with the median knowledge score for boys being 2 and of the girls being 2.5. Employment status of the mothers also showed a statistically significant association with levels of menstrual knowledge. The median knowledge score of those whose mothers were ‘unemployed’ was 2, for those in ‘formal employement’ was 1.5, and those with ‘informal employment’ was 3.

Analysing only the matched group with both pre and post test intervention scores (N = 427), the post intervention knowledge score was statistically significantly higher than the pre-intervention knowledge score (Wilcoxon signed-rank test; z = -5.23, p = <0.001). The median knowledge score increased by 1 point in the post test. The median pre test score was 2, while the median post test score was 3. Among the 6 questions asked, correct responses did not increase for two of the questions, relating to the source of menstrual blood and the normal duration of menstruation ne (Fig 1).

Fig 1. The proportion of 427 students who gave correct answers to specific questions regarding menstrual knowledge before and after the Menstrupedia intervention.

Fig 1

MH attitude

The total attitude score (possible range = 14 to 70) was calculated by adding the responses to 14 Likert-scale (range = 1–5) attitude questions. A higher score represented a more positive attitude regarding menstruation. For the pre-test group, multivariate MANOVA test statistics showed that there was significant association of attitude with Religion, F = 5.93, p = 0.002; and Mother’s occupation, F = 3.35, p = 0.03 (Table 3). There was a significant difference in menstrual knowledge between the three religious groups: Hindu (n = 281), Bhuddist (n = 132) or other religion (n = 14). The median attitude score for the Hindu group was 35.5 (IQR = 29;43), for Bhuddists 31 (IQR = 25;39) and for ‘other religious affiliation’ the median score was 33.5 (IQR = 27;42). Employment status of the mothers also showed a significant association. The median attitude score of those whose mothers were unemployed was 36 (IQR = 30;44), with formal employement was 36 (IQR = 30;43), and those with informal employment was 34 (IQR = 27;40).

Table 3. Association of independent variables with menstrual attitude for the matched pretest group.

Demographic variable N (%) Median score MAVOVA test
Wilk’s lambda (P-value)
Religion
Hindu 281 (65.8%) 36 0.0002*
Buddhist 132 (30.9%) 32
Other 14 (3.2%) 33.5
Gender
Male 175 (40.9%) 37 0.15
Female 252 (59.1%) 34
Father’s literacy
Illiterate 41 (9.6%) 36 0.3
Basic 171 (40.4%) 33
Primary 142 (33.5%) 35
Secondary+ 69 (16.3%) 34
Mother’s literacy
Illiterate 85 (20.3%) 33 0.98
Basic 188 (44.9%) 34
Primary 90 (21.5%) 34.5
Secondary+ 55 (13.2%) 35
Father’s occupation1 Unemployed 20 (4.6%) 38 0.53
Formal employment 74 (17.3%) 36
Informal employment 333 (77.9%) 34
Mother’s occupation1 Unemployed 118 (27.6%) 36 0.03*
Formal employment 41 (9.6%) 37
Informal employment 268 (62.7%) 34

1. Informal labour in the districts is mainly manual labour for men (eg. Construction work, sand mining) and carpet weaving, tailor or stone sculpture for women.

* Indicates a significant P-value (≤0.05)

Analysing, only the matched group with both pre and post test intervention attitude scores (n = 427), the post intervention attitude score was statistically significantly higher than the pre-intervention attitude score (Wilcoxon signed rank test; z = -6.1, p = <0.001). The median attitude score increased by 5 points in the post test. The median pre test attitude score was 34, while the median post test attitude score was 39.

Menstrual hygiene practice

Responses to questions about MH practice are shown in Tables 4 and 5. Ninety percent of the girls (n = 58/64; 90.6%) reported being aware about menstruation before attaining their menarche. The majority of female participants cited (n = 44/64; 75.8%) mothers as a source of information, followed by friends (n = 35/64; 60.3%), teachers (n = 16/64; 27.6%), books (n = 15/64; 25.8%), media (n = 10/64; 17.2%) and others (n = 4/64; 6.9%). Disposable sanitary pads were the material used during menstruation both at home (n = 44/64; 68.7%) (n = 50/74; 67.5%) and at school (n = 49/64; 76.5%). Other most commonly used material at home was cloths (n = 14/64; 21.8%) while at school it was reusable sanitary pads (n = 15/64; 23.4%). Over half of the girls (n = 37/64; 57.8%) reported that their schools had the provision of only water and no soap available for handwashing. Less than one third (n = 18/64; 28.1%) reported having both soap and water in their schools. 1.5% (n = 1/64) reported having neither soap nor water for handwashing in their school. Regarding disposal of their menstrual materials while at home one third (n = 23/64; 35.9%) burnt the materials, and one third disposed of them in the household rubbish bin in the latrine (n = 20/64; 31.2%) while less common methods were disposing of sanitary materials by burying (n = 6/64; 9.3%) or throwing them into the latrine (n = 4/64; 6.6%)

Table 4. Menstrual hygiene practice of female post-intervention test participants who had reached menarche.

Menstrual hygiene practice N (%) Total N
Knew about menstruation before attaining menarche:
 1. Yes 58 (90.6%) 641
 2. No 6 (9.3%)
 3. No response 0
Source of information:
 1. Mother 44 (75.8%)
 2. Teacher 16 (27.6%)
 3. Friends 35 (60.3%)
 4. Books 15 (25.8%)
 5. Media 10 (17.2%) 58 2
 6. Others 4 (6.9%)

1 The total number of girls who had attained menarche.

2 The total number of girls who knew about menstruation before attaining menarche.

Table 5. Practice of the girls pre and post intervention.

Pretest practice Post test practice
Girls’ Menstrual hygiene practices N (%) Total N N (%) Total N
Materials used to absorb blood during menstruation (at home):
 1. Cloth/towel 22 (34.4%) 14 (21.8%)
 2. Disposable sanitary pad 37(57.8%) 44 (68.7%)
 3. Reusable sanitary pad 2 (3.1%) 641 7 (10.9%) 641
 4. Toilet paper 0 2 (3.1%)
 5. Cotton wool 0 1 (1.5%)
 6. Others 1 (1.6%) 1 (1.5%)
Materials used to absorb blood during menstruation (at school):
 1. Cloth/towel 11 (17.2%) 5 (7.8%)
 2. Disposable sanitary pad 42 (65.6%) 49 (76.5%)
 3. Reusable sanitary pad 5 (7.8%) 64 15 (23.4%) 64
 4. Toilet paper 1 (1.5%)
 5. Cotton wool 0
 6. Others 3 (4.7%) 0
Disposal of used disposable menstrual material after use at home:
 1. Into the latrine/toilet 6 (9.4%) 4 (6.6%)
 2. Burned 15(23.4%) 23(35.9%)
 3. Household rubbish (bin in latrine) 11(17.2%) 64 20 (31.2%) 64
 4. Household rubbish (bin not in the latrine) 2(3.1%) 5 (7.8%)
 5. Taken to community rubbish 0 0 4 (6.2%)
 6. Bush/waterway/buried the material 17(26.6%) 6 (9.3%)
 7. Did not dispose of any materials 9(14.1%) 1 (1.5%)
 8. Other 4(6.3%) 1 (1.5%)
Disposal of used disposable menstrual material after use at school:
 1. Transported home to dispose 16 (25%) 12 (18.7%)
 2. Into the latrine/toilet 9(14.1%) 10 (15.6%)
 3. Bin in the latrine/toilet 30(46.9%) 36 (56.2%)
 4. Bin onsite but outside of the latrine/toilet 1(1.5%) 64 1(1.5%) 64
 5. Community rubbish (not onsite) 00 1(1.5%)
 6. Bush/waterway/buried the material 1(1.5%) 2 (3.1%)
 7. Burned the material 0 0 0 0
 8. Other 7(10.9%) 2 (3.1%)
Provision of both soap and water available at the handwashing facilities in school:
 1. Yes, water and soap 20 (31.2%) 18 (28.1%)
 2. Water only 35 (54.6%) 64 37 (57.8%) 64
 3. Soap only 1 (1.5%) 8(12.5%)
 4. Neither water nor soap 8(12.5%) 1(1.5%)
Washed genitals using soap:
 1. Never 16 (25.0%) 44 (68.7%)
 2. Sometimes 19 (29.6%) 6 (9.3%)
 3. Every time 29 (45.3%) 64 13 (20.3%) 64
 4. No response 0 1 (1.5%)
Drying of the washed menstrual material:
 1. Outside (hanging in sun) 16(57.1%) 12 (70.5%)
 2. Outside (hidden) 10(35.7%) 282 4 (23.5%) 172
 3. Inside (hidden) 1(3.6%) 1 (5.8%)
 4. Other 1(3.6%) 0 0
Cover the menstrual material with another cloth when drying:
 1. Yes 11(39.3%) 8 (47.1%)
 2. No 16(57.1%) 28 9 (52.9%) 17
 3. No response 1(3.5%) 0
Restrictions followed in the household during menstruation:
 1. Not allowed to go to temple/participate in religious activities. 48(75%) 52 (81.2%)
 2. Not allowed to touch/sit with male member of family 11(17.2%) 20 (31.2%)
 3. Not allowed to enter the kitchen 17(26.5%) 64 16 (25.0%) 64
 4. Not allowed to touch plants 31(48.4%) 31(48.4%)
 5. Not allowed to touch books 3(4.7%) 5(7.8%)
 6. None of the above 5(7.8%) 4(6.2%)
 7. Others 2(3.1%) 0

1 The total number of girls who had attained menarche.

2 The total number of girls who used cloth pads as absorbent materials during their periods.

While at school the majority of the girls disposed of their menstrual materials in the toilet bins (n = 36/64; 56.2%) A little less than a fifth of the girls (n = 12/64; 18.7%) reported transporting the materials back home for disposal while 15.6% (n = 10/64) reported disposing of materials into the latrine. The majority of the girls (n = 12/17; 70.5%) who used cloths as their menstrual material described drying them outside hanging in the sun after washing, 23.5% (n = 4/17) dried the materials outside but hiding the materials from public view while 5.8%(n = 1/17) dried the cloths inside and hidden. 52.9% (n = 9/17) of the girls did not cover the cloth with other materials while drying while 47.1% (n = 8/17) covered the cloths when drying. The most common restriction followed during menstruation was not attending the temple or participating in religious activities (n = 52/64; 81.2%) followed by not being allowed to touch plants (n = 31/64; 48.4%), not being allowed to touch/sit with a male member of their family (n = 20/64; 31.2%), not being allowed to enter the kitchen (n = 16/64; 25.0%) and not being allowed to touch books (n = 5/64; 7.8%). Only 6.2% (n = 4/64) of the girls reported not having to follow any of the restrictions when they were menstruating. The pre and post intervention tests revealed that there were improved practices around managing menstrual cloths, however reporting of restrictive taboos increased.

Focus group discussions:

Four major themes were identified: teaching style in the schools, use of multimedia resources for teaching, impact on MHM practice and attitude and co-education during the training.

Teaching style in schools

SRH teaching practice in schools was explored during the FGDs. The students expressed discontent regarding the teaching methods surrounding SRH courses. They described teachers often having a one-way communication style of teaching, where the students were not encouraged to ask questions. Also, they described teachers using only verbal communication without visual aids to explain concepts. Students reflected that this approach made learning about organs that they could not see difficult.

The students shared that their teachers were hesitant to describe in detail about reproductive health and often laughed themselves during the lessons when teaching. The male students indicated that they would prefer a student friendly teaching environment where incorrect answers were not punished. Students stated that if teachers were not shy to talk about SRH issues then the students would have greater confidence talking about these issues. The students expressed that they would like it if the teachers incorporated learning games into the lessons.

“We want someone who would teach us more clearly. Our sir doesn’t make us understand the contents in the book as clearly as the trainers did.” (12 Yo female)

“It could be easier for us to ask about reproductive health with a female teacher and we won’t feel scared to ask.” (11yo female)

Use of multimedia resource for teaching

The students found the training session based on the Menstrupedia comic entertaining and informative. The use of multimedia during the teaching session was novel for the students, which they found interesting. Participants appreciated that the trainer stopped the video at times and asked questions, repeated the content, gave the students a chance to answer or pose questions on the content. Games included throughout the training were particularly popular with participants. The Menstrupedia comic was described as ‘fun to read’, with simple and understandable language.

The students expressed that if their schoolbooks also had similar pictures and stories, it would have been easier for them to learn and take interest in SRH issues. They felt that pictures, video, storytelling are better media to facilitate teaching SRH issues. The students shared that the lessons learnt in the Menstrupedia classes were more easily grasped than the routine lessons taught by the teachers because the Menstrupedia theme had a story and was taught in an interesting manner.

“Our teacher only teaches the content inside the book- whereas in training, we learned so many extra things. Videos were shown in the training which made it easy to understand the content.” (13 yo male)

Co-education during the training

We provided the training to all the adolescents, irrespective of gender identity, together in the same session. Male participants expressed that they preferred co-educational SRH lessons because they felt it would help decrease stigma and help students to talk about SRH issues with the opposite gender.

“If girls and boys aren’t kept together for a class that teaches sexual and reproductive health, the girls will feel shy to express their problems at home too. So, boys and girls should be kept together.” (12 yo male)

However, the opposite view was expressed by some of the female participants who preferred separate SRH training sessions for girls and boys because they felt awkward asking sensitive questions in front of the boys. Some of the boys mentioned that although it is important to learn and discuss SRH issues, it was also equally important to share SRH issues only with the people whom they trust.

It is better to teach boys and girls together in a class, but boys laugh during the class and we feel awkward to ask questions ….so it is also good to separate boys and girls during SRH classes.” (12yo, female)

Impact on MH practice and attitude

The girls found the training useful and reported remembering and incorporating many of the instructions provided. The training not only provided advice regarding menstrual hygiene practices to the adolescents but also explained the reasons for following the instructions. This appeared to help the girls reflect critically on their own personal MH practices. A higher proportion of participants reported drying their washed cloths used for absorbing blood in sunlight after the training (70.5% post Menstrupedia intervention compared to 57.1% pre-intervention). Prior to the training, some participants were embarrassed to dry these cloths in the open air, but the training provided them with the information as to why it was necessary to do so, and thus they changed their practice. They also mentioned that they did not use soap internally in the vagina when taking showers after being informed of potential disruption to vaginal pH and microbial balance during the training session. They also mentioned that they found learning about ways of proper disposal of the pads and about the exercises that could be done during their period useful. Participants also prepared themselves for menstruation beforehand by calculating the days of estimated date of menstruation as taught during the training.

“We didn’t use to dry underwear and cloth used in menstruation under direct sunlight in past. We used to feel shy to do so. After reading the Menstrupedia comic book we learned to dry our cloths that are used during menstruation under direct sunlight.” (13 yo female)

Knowledge has an impact on practice and attitude. The girls were better informed about MH and thus were more confident and less shy about discussing MH issues. They shared that the training helped them to not to feel shy when talking about menstruation, to ask for pads if menstruation occurs in school, and to teach others what they have learnt. The girls mentioned that after the training, they have been able to overcome their shyness regarding talking about menstruation.

“We used to get shy buying Sanitary pads in the past. Now after reading the Menstrupedia comic we know that menstruation is a normal phenomenon and it’s not the sin of god. Nowadays we don’t feel shy to buy Sanitary pad. We realized that we need to aware people about this.” (12 yo female)

Discussion

Almost all women and girls in Nepal live with restrictions to normal life and high levels of stigma surrounding menstruation [3]. Our study population was no exception, with 93.2% (n = 69/74) of girls reporting severe restrictive practices during menstruation, such as being forbidden to enter the kitchen, engage in normal communal social activities, touch male family members or even books. Such practices are deeply rooted traditions which have lifelong adverse consequences for socioeconomic and mental wellbeing. Changes in attitude and practice around menstruation can occur with educational interventions to increase knowledge, challenge taboos and facilitate discussion. The majority of adolescent girls obtain their first information surrounding menstruation from their mothers or other female relatives, and therefore increased knowledge, or persistent stigmas resulting from lack of education, will be passed to future generations.

We have demonstrated that a dynamic, interactive menstrual hygiene management lesson for adolescent students based on the Menstrupedia comic was effective in improving knowledge and attitude, and reducing persistent cultural stigmas surrounding menstruation. Knowledge of the physiological process and strategies for managing menstruation can foster a more positive attitude among women and girls [29]. The Menstrupedia-based training provided the students with the knowledge and facts about menstruation which reduced negative attitudes and perceptions around menstruation. Both knowledge and attitude scores increased significantly after the Menstrupedia-based training was delivered. This finding aligns with the results of other studies in Bangladesh and Indonesia [30, 31]. Our intervention included a one-time training session, the study from Bangladesh used a longer-term intervention with twelve lessons of 45 minutes each and the Indonesian study only provided students with a booklet for personal reading. Although the modality of the educational intervention varied in these studies, all of these studies showed improvement in menstrual knowledge and attitude following delivery of the interventions. A positive attitude towards menstruation can help women and girls have more positive experiences related to menstruation [32]. With a positive attitude towards menstruation, boys and men can help and support the females to manage menstruation effectively in different settings including household, community, school, and work [33], and discontinue negative harmful behaviours towards menstruating women and girls.

Improved practices around managing mestrual cloths were reported, but surprisingly reporting of restrictive taboos increased in the post intervention evaluation. This may have been due to the female participants feeling more comfortable sharing menstrual taboos practiced in their home after the group discussions.

The audio visual and interactive components of the Menstrupedia training were particularly reported as effective by the students in the FGDs. Studies have shown that audiovisual media are effective tools for learning [3437]. Students respond positively to audio visual medium which can effectively capture attention and increase interest of participants [38, 39]. The adolescents mentioned that they enjoyed watching the videos and wished that their teachers also used such media to teach, instead of the traditional method of only using textbooks. However, the majority of the schools included in the study did not have adequate equipment and/or audiovisual devices which prevented the teachers from using such methods. In the few schools which had audiovisual teaching facilities, students and teachers reported that few lessons were delivered using the resources. Frequent power outages, which also disrupted our training sessions, were a strong contributing factor to teachers not utilising the audio-visual aids. Reliability of the electricity supply in rural Nepal is increasing each year due to increased generation of hydropower and strengthening of the distribution network. Battery and generator backup could also be used to address these challenges during teaching delivery. The Menstrupedia comic is a physical book which can be distributed to students and used as the teaching resource for the lessons, but this approach is likely to be less engaging than the animated video, because the focus group discussion emphasized that the students particularly enjoyed the animated video format of the lessons.

Overall, levels of knowledge surrounding menstruation in our pre-intervention matched population were low. The majority of the participants did know know the cause of menstruation (63%, n = 269/427) and the interval of the menstrual cycle (73.7%, n = 315/427). Only 10.5% (n = 45/427) of the girls correctly responded that the menstrual blood originated from the uterus. Three quarters of the girls (75.8%; n = 44/64) obtained information about menstruation from their mothers. Over half of the girls (60.3%; n = 35/64) reported that their friends were a source of information regarding menstrual hygiene, while books (25.8%; n = 15/64) and teachers (27.6%; n = 16/64) were relatively minor sources of MH information. This is consistent with reports from other settings globally which report mothers, friends and teachers as the primary sources of information regarding menstruation [11, 4043]. The information on menstruation provided by mothers, which shapes the attitudes of the children, is often based on cultural myths and may be incomplete which helps perpetuate negative and distorted perceptions and practices of menstruation [44].

The MH knowledge of adolescents in our study population was also significantly associated with literacy level of the father. It is important that the parents, especially the mothers, who are the primary source of information, have adequate and accurate information about menstruation to perpetuate improved MH and eliminate taboos, stigma and shame in the next generation. If the adults surrounding the adolescents do not change their attitude towards menstruation, they will reinforce the persistence of negative practices within the household and wider community. Thus, it is necessary to also provide educational interventions to parents, grandparents teachers and community influencers regarding MH. Unfortunately, due to limited resources we were not able to expand the scope of the intervention in this project to include the broader community. However, the Menstrupedia comic tool should also be evaluated as a resource for facilitating adult education on MH.

The MH knowledge of participants was also found to be significantly associated with the mother’s occupation, although the the highest median score was among those with mothers in informal employment, possibly reflecting time available to spend interacting with children. However, the median attitude score was significantly lower in children of monthers who had informal employment. The reasons for this are unclear, but may be related to the social and cultural influences- as menstruation is affected by the social norms, expectations, and beliefs about how women should feel, act, and behave, during the menstrual cycle [45]. Ocupation is a marker of socioeconomic status and those with higher income jobs are likely to also have higher levels of information regarding topics such as menstruation which they are able to share with their daughters. An open discussion about sexual and reproductive health issues, including menstruation, is more likely to occur in educated families [46, 47].

Changing the deeply entrenched cultural stigmas surrounding menstruation requires long term, sustained approaches. Educational interventions such as the one used in this study act not only to provide information about menstruation and menstrual hygiene management but also as an advocacy program for MH. Class teachers were present in the classrooms when the training was delivered and developed their skills in regard to MH education. Teachers were able to see the high level of engagment by students during the interactive sessions. This could encourage the teachers to incorporate similar teaching formats to deliver future lessons. In addition, since friends were also found to be an important source of information, the students can benefit from a peer-to-peer education modality. Interventions such as the one applied in this research may facilitate more accurate sharing of peer-to-peer knowledge beyond the participants in the training. Evaluation of this was, however, beyond the funding scope of the present study, but will be important to include in future research evaluations of school-based MHM interventions.

MH education, even in the form of a short intervention, is effective in improving understanding and attitudes around menstruation among adolescents and facilitating the fundamental right to MH. Ideally, MH education is integrated in CSE within the school curriculum. However, even trained teachers are often initially embarrassed to deliver the curriculum content on SRH, exacerbated by the extreme cultural stigma surrounding menstruation in Nepali society. Thus, professional expert menstrual health trainers are more likely to be able to deliver an engaging teaching module on MH. Extensive efforts by NGOs to improve training of teachers to deliver MH and CSE modules within schools may help teachers deliver SRH education effectively. However, for the students to gain adequate MH information within the school, it is also imperative that schools provide a supportive environment in terms of including adolescent friendly SRH curriculums, providing relevant books or materials and most importantly training teachers adequately to have confidence in delivering high quality SRH education modules. Basic education on adolescent sexual and reproductive health has been included in the curriculum by the government of Nepal for all students from grades six through ten [48]. However, sex education is reported to be poorly implemented in most public schools in the country. Teachers face barriers such as lack of adequate teaching materials and lack of school and community support for teachers to provide proper SRH lessons in schools. These barriers result in poor quality of sex and reproductive health education [49]. Therefore, there is a need for teacher training programs on SRH education to boost teacher confidence and reduce information barriers.

The MH knowledge of participants were also found to be significantly associated with gender, with a higher median score for girls. Since girls go through menstruation, they have first hand experience and a more significant motivation to seek out information regarding menstruation. Boys generally obtain MHM information from informal sources such as overhearing conversations or observing cultural rituals. The weaknesses in the school-based SRH curriculum around menstruation can therefore particularly exclude boys from understanding menstruation [50]. The informal means of information provision regarding menstruation can perpetuate negative attitudes and cultural myths which in turn precipitates period-based teasing of female peers [51]. Thus, it is vital to include boys and men in discussions of menstruation in both school and home environments, so that they are able to understand menstruation and be allies in eliminating period stigma for future generations.

Menstrual knowledge and attitude were also found to be significantly different between the groups of adolescents according to the religion followed. Participants from families practicing Buddhism scored lowest. Only 6.2% (n = 4/64) of the girls reported following no restrictions at home during mestruation. Religious perceptions and restrictions during menstruation strongly influence attitudes towards menstruation which may be the reason why there was a significant difference in the attitude amongst adolescents following different religions. As a direct consequence of the shame and taboos around menstruation, hygiene facilities are inadequate to allow dignity during menstruation in most public spaces of Nepal, including schools. This is reflected in the fact that over 18% of the girls in our study reported having to take menstrual materials home for disposal. This indicates that not all girls are comfortable disposing their menstrual materials in the school, which could be due to the lack of facilities for washing and drying if they are using cloths or because they are not comfortable disposing of their pads in the dustbins, which are often located in a communal area rather than privately within the cubicle. Poor menstrual hygiene practices can cause reproductive and urinary tract infections and can be a significant predictor of many gynecological problems [52]. Schools can help the girls be comfortable managing their MHM materials by providing proper water and sanitation provisions. Minor alterations such as relocating disposal bins within each cubicle can also signficantly enhance MHM practices. This will both help the girls dispose of their MHM materials without embarasement as well as preventing clogging of the drainage system due to throwing of pads directly into latrines with inadequate plumbing.

Although majority of the girls hung their washed cloths used during menstruation out in the sun, 23.5%(n = 4/17) were wary of people seeing their menstrual material and thus hid it and many (n = 8/17;47.1%) covered the cloth with another layer of cloth when drying. This finding is similar to many studies conducted in the South Asian context, where women frequently report that they hang the menstrual cloths to dry with their clothes, but cover them with another item, so that they cannot be seen, or dry them in areas where no one will see the cloths [53, 54]. Girls and women often do this due to social restrictions, and taboos—which may lead to the reuse of material that has not been adequately sanitized. Bacterial vaginosis (BV) and reproductive tract infections (RTIs) have been reported to be more common in women with unhygienic menstrual hygiene management practices [55, 56]. These unhygenic practices can include improper drying of the cloths which are used as the absorbent material. Unsanitary practices during menstruation may be a result of lack of appropriate and sufficient information regarding menstrual hygiene. This may ultimately increase a woman’s susceptibility to reproductive tract infections and longer term gynecological complications.

Students showed improvement in the understanding of menstruation, its cause, interval between menstrual cycles and the average age at menarche following the Menstrupedia training. However, the training did not increase the proportion of students responding correctly to two questions. The first was a question regarding the source of menstrual blood. This may have been due to poor wording of the question, as a consequence of our limited evaluation of the questionnaire prior to the study. Some students may have interpreted the question to be regarding the exit channel for the menstrual blood from the body. Low general knowledge of female anatomy may also be responsible for the lack of clarity in responses to this question. The second question which failed to show an increase in correct responses was regarding the normal duration of menstruation. This may have been due to confusion between the various numbers given during the training for different aspects of the menstrual cycle, including the period between two menstrual cycles, age of menarche and normal duration of menstruation. It will be important to establish the reasons for these gaps in knowledge gain, and to refine the training to address the issues in future use of the Menstrupedia intervention.

Pretesting the questionnaire and the training could have improved the clarity of the questions and responses. However, we were limited in our ability to pretest both the Menstrupedia training and the evaluation questionnaire due to the COVID pandemic situation. However, each question and the response options were discussed with the students in detail during administration of the questionnaire. Some of the students may have given socially acceptable answers leading to response bias, despite being informed that the answers were not going to be shared with anyone in the school. This is suggested by the increased reporting of some menstrual stigma practices after the training, such as exclusion from the kitchen during menstruation. This may have been due either to an increased willingness to report stigmatizing practice within the family, or alternatively due to an increased recognition of such practices as stigmatizing. Two experienced expert trainers from Putali Nepal delivered the Menstrupedia training. The outcome of the intervention may have been dependent on the skills and ability of the trainers, and it will be necessary to evaluate variation in trainer outcomes during any scale-up of the intervention.

Conclusion

This study has highlighted that an engaging SRH educational intervention, such as the Menstrupedia comic has a positive impact on knowledge and attitude towards menstruation. It is necessary that parents and teachers take an active approach to educate adolescents, as they have many questions regarding their sexual and reproductive health. Educated parents, can impart menstrual knowledge to their children, which in turn can lead to positive perceptions towards menstruation. The study also highlighted that lack of sanitation facilities was a major barrier to good MH practice in Nepali schools, with over half of girls reporting that no soap was available in toilets. It is vital for schools to provide proper water and sanitation facilities to the students so that they can maintain proper hygiene practices during their menstruation.

Acknowledgments

The research team expresses gratitude to the all the participating schools’ principals and teachers for their cooperation which was essential for the successful conduction of the training classes and data collection for the research. We would also like to thank Ms. Sujata Adhikari who helped during the data entry of the paper-based data into ODK software.

Data Availability

Data cannot be shared publicly because consent was not obtained for public data sharing of full transcripts during the informed consent process, due to the sensitive nature of the questions. Data is securely stored in controlled access secure data storage at Birat Nepal Medical Trust (BNMT). Data is available from the BNMT data access Committee (contact: Kritika Dixit, research manager BNMT; kritika@bnmt.org.np) for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data.

Funding Statement

The research was funded by a personal funding made to the Birat Nepal Medical Trust by Mr Frank Guthrie. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript

References

  • 1.Nandi P. Menstrual Hygiene Practices Among Adolescent Girls and Women In India—A Systematic Review. Int J Food Nutr Sci. 2022;11:28–36. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Chew KS, Wong SSL, Hassan AK, Po KE, Zulkhairi N, Yusman NAL. Socio-Cultural and Religious Influences During Menstruation Among University Students. 2020. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Mukherjee A, Lama M, Khakurel U, Jha AN, Ajose F, Acharya S, et al. Perception and practices of menstruation restrictions among urban adolescent girls and women in Nepal: a cross-sectional survey. Reproductive health. 2020;17(1):1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hennegan J, Shannon AK, Rubli J, Schwab KJ, Melendez-Torres GJ. Women’s and girls’ experiences of menstruation in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and qualitative metasynthesis. PLoS Med. 2019;16(5):e1002803. Epub 20190516. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002803 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6521998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Coast E, Lattof SR, Strong J. Puberty and menstruation knowledge among young adolescents in low-and middle-income countries: a scoping review. International journal of public health. 2019;64:293–304. doi: 10.1007/s00038-019-01209-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Belayneh Z, Mekuriaw B. Knowledge and menstrual hygiene practice among adolescent school girls in southern Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. BMC public health. 2019;19(1):1–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hennegan J, Shannon AK, Rubli J, Schwab KJ, Melendez-Torres G. Women’s and girls’ experiences of menstruation in low-and middle-income countries: A systematic review and qualitative metasynthesis. PLoS medicine. 2019;16(5):e1002803. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002803 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hennegan J, Winkler IT, Bobel C, Keiser D, Hampton J, Larsson G, et al. Menstrual health: a definition for policy, practice, and research. Sexual and reproductive health matters. 2021;29(1):31–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Logeswari K, Parmar J, Suryawanshi DM. Socio-cultural barriers for menstrual hygiene management among adolescent school girls of southern India. International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health. 2021;8(4):1868. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Yalew M, Adane B, Arefaynie M, Kefale B, Damtie Y, Mitiku K, et al. Menstrual hygiene practice among female adolescents and its association with knowledge in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PloS one. 2021;16(8):e0254092. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254092 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Michael J, Iqbal Q, Haider S, Khalid A, Haque N, Ishaq R, et al. Knowledge and practice of adolescent females about menstruation and menstruation hygiene visiting a public healthcare institute of Quetta, Pakistan. BMC women’s health. 2020;20:1–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Pokharel S. Parents’, Students’ and Teachers’ Understanding of Sexuality Education. Education and Development. 2020;30(1):175–89. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Chavula MP, Zulu JM, Hurtig A-K. Factors influencing the integration of comprehensive sexuality education into educational systems in low-and middle-income countries: a systematic review. Reproductive health. 2022;19(1):196. doi: 10.1186/s12978-022-01504-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Rastogi S, Khanna A, Mathur P. Educational interventions to improve menstrual health: Approaches and challenges. International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health. 2021;33(5). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Santhanakrishnan I, Athipathy V. Impact of health education on menstrual hygiene: An intervention study among adolescent school girls. International Journal of Medical Science and Public Health. 2018;7(6):468. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Evans RL, Harris B, Onuegbu C, Griffiths F. Systematic review of educational interventions to improve the menstrual health of young adolescent girls. BMJ open. 2022;12(6):e057204. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057204 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Cavill S, Huggett C, Mott J. Engaging men and boys for gender-transformative WASH. 2022. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.UN. The 17 goals. 2024 [20/08/2024]. Available from: https://sdgs.un.org/goals.
  • 19.Roka B. Profile of Indrawati rural municipality 2019. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.WHO. Adolescent sexual and reproductive health programme to address equity, social determinants, gender and human rights in Nepal. 2017.
  • 21.Vyas S, Deepshikha D, Mahmood SE, Sharma P, Srivastava K, Shrotriya VP. Are menstrual knowledge outcome scores similar among rural and urban girls? Journal of Basic and Clinical Reproductive Sciences. 2017;6(1). doi: 10.4103/2278-960X.194486 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.UNICEF. Guidance on menstrual health and hygiene. 2019.
  • 23.St Children. Menstrual Hygiene Management operational guideline. 2015. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.SNV. Baseline survey on menstrual hygiene management (MHM) in school at Tigray, Amhara, SNNPR and Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia. 2014.
  • 25.Yagnik AS. Knowledge (K), attitude (a), and practice (P) of women and men about menstruation and menstrual practices in Ahmedabad, India: implications for health communication campaigns and interventions: Bowling Green State University; 2015. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Thomas DR. A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American journal of evaluation. 2006;27(2):237–46. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.ODK. Open Data Kit 2023 [cited 2023 28/11/2023]. Available from: https://getodk.org/.
  • 28.STATA. Statistical software for data science 2022 [September 15, 2022]. Available from: https://www.stata.com/.
  • 29.Jewitt S, Ryley H. It’sa girl thing: Menstruation, school attendance, spatial mobility and wider gender inequalities in Kenya. Geoforum. 2014;56:137–47. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Haque SE, Rahman M, Itsuko K, Mutahara M, Sakisaka K. The effect of a school-based educational intervention on menstrual health: an intervention study among adolescent girls in Bangladesh. BMJ open. 2014;4(7):e004607. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004607 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Rizkia M, Ungsianik T. Improving female adolescents’ knowledge, emotional response, and attitude toward menarche following implementation of menarcheal preparation reproductive health education. Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal. 2019;4(2):84. doi: 10.31372/20190402.1041 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Aflaq F, Jami H. Experiences and Attitudes Related to Menstruation among Female Students. Pakistan Journal of Psychological Research. 2012;27(2). [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kaur R, Kaur K, Kaur R. Menstrual hygiene, management, and waste disposal: practices and challenges faced by girls/women of developing countries. Journal of environmental and public health. 2018;2018. doi: 10.1155/2018/1730964 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Anwar AI, Zulkifli A, Syafar M, Jafar N. Effectiveness of counseling with cartoon animation audio-visual methods in increasing tooth brushing knowledge children ages 10–12 years. Enfermeria clinica. 2020;30:285–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Nicolaou C, Kalliris G. Audiovisual Media Communications in Adult Education: The case of Cyprus and Greece of Adults as Adult Learners. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education. 2020;10(4):967–94. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe10040069 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Rasul S, Bukhsh Q, Batool S. A study to analyze the effectiveness of audio visual aids in teaching learning process at uvniversity level. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2011;28:78–81. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Djannah SN, Sulistyawati S, Sukesi TW, Mulasari SA, Tentama F. Audio-Visual Media to Improve Sexual-Reproduction Health Knowledge among Adolescent. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education. 2020;9(1):138–43. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Idris AT, Shamsuddin IM, Arome AT, Aminu I. Use of audio-visual materials in teaching and learning of classification of living things among secondary school students in Sabon Gari LGA of Kaduna State. Plant. 2018;6(2):34. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Ho DTK, Intai R. Effectiveness of audio-visual aids in teaching lower secondary science in a rural secondary school. Asia Pacific Journal of Educators and Education. 2017;32:91–106. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Sangeetha N, Sivakumar K, Arulmani A, Kannan A, Choudhary AK. Menstrual problems among adolescent schoolgirls in East Delhi, India. 2021. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Shija A, Msovela J, Imelda C, Mgina E, Mugula A, Egidio A. Knowledge and Education Need on Puberty and Menstrual Health Among Adolescents’ Boys and Girls from Selected Secondary Schools From Kibaha Town Council. AIJR Abstracts. 2021:46. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Nautiyal H, Kumari A, Ranjana K, Singh S. Knowledge, Attitude and Practice towards Menstrual Hygiene among Adolescent Girls: A case study from Dehradun, Uttarakhand. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Ha M, Tal A, Alam M. Menstrual hygiene management practice among adolescent girls: an urban–rural comparative study in Rajshahi division, Bangladesh. BMC Women’s Health. 2022;22(1):1–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Adinma ED, Adinma J. Perceptions and practices on menstruation amongst Nigerian secondary school girls. African journal of reproductive health. 2008;12(1):74–83. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Botello-Hermosa A, Casado-Mejia R. Fears and concerns related to menstruation: a qualitative study from the perspective of gender. Texto & Contexto-Enfermagem. 2015;24:13–21. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Malango NT, Hegena TY, Assefa NA. Parent–adolescent discussion on sexual and reproductive health issues and its associated factors among parents in Sawla town, Gofa zone, Ethiopia. Reproductive Health. 2022;19(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12978-022-01414-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Abdissa D, Sileshi W. Parent-young communication on sexual and reproductive health issues and its associated factors: experience of students in Agaro Town, Ethiopia. Reproductive Health. 2023;20(1):1–10. doi: 10.1186/s12978-022-01553-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Shrestha RM, Otsuka K, Poudel KC, Yasuoka J, Lamichhane M, Jimba M. Better learning in schools to improve attitudes toward abstinence and intentions for safer sex among adolescents in urban Nepal. BMC Public Health. 2013;13(1):1–10. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-244 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Pokharel S, Adhikari A. Adolescent Sexuality Education in Nepal: Current Perspectives. Creative Education. 2021;12(7):1744–54. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Mason L, Sivakami M, Thakur H, Kakade N, Beauman A, Alexander KT, et al. ‘We do not know’: a qualitative study exploring boys perceptions of menstruation in India. Reproductive health. 2017;14:1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Benshaul-Tolonen A, Aguilar-Gomez S, Heller Batzer N, Cai R, Nyanza EC. Period teasing, stigma and knowledge: A survey of adolescent boys and girls in Northern Tanzania. PLoS One. 2020;15(10):e0239914. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239914 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Bank TW. Menstrual Health and Hygiene 2022 [cited 2022 03/08/2022]. Available from: https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/water/brief/menstrual-health-and-hygiene.
  • 53.Hennegan J, Nansubuga A, Akullo A, Smith C, Schwab KJ. The Menstrual Practices Questionnaire (MPQ): development, elaboration, and implications for future research. Global health action. 2020;13(1):1829402. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2020.1829402 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Mahajan T. Imperfect information in menstrual health and the role of informed choice. Indian Journal of Gender Studies. 2019;26(1–2):59–78. [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Torondel B, Sinha S, Mohanty JR, Swain T, Sahoo P, Panda B, et al. Association between unhygienic menstrual management practices and prevalence of lower reproductive tract infections: a hospital-based cross-sectional study in Odisha, India. BMC infectious diseases. 2018;18(1):1–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Ademas A, Adane M, Sisay T, Kloos H, Eneyew B, Keleb A, et al. Does menstrual hygiene management and water, sanitation, and hygiene predict reproductive tract infections among reproductive women in urban areas in Ethiopia? PLoS One. 2020;15(8):e0237696. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237696 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Alison Parker

14 Aug 2024

PONE-D-24-27175Effectiveness of menstrual hygiene management training to enhance knowledge, attitude, and practice among adolescents in Sindhupalchowk, Nepal.PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Shrestha,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Both reviewers have provided a thorough set of comments which need to be carefully addressed before the paper can be accepted.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Sep 28 2024 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Alison Parker

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. We suggest you thoroughly copyedit your manuscript for language usage, spelling, and grammar. If you do not know anyone who can help you do this, you may wish to consider employing a professional scientific editing service.  

The American Journal Experts (AJE) (https://www.aje.com/) is one such service that has extensive experience helping authors meet PLOS guidelines and can provide language editing, translation, manuscript formatting, and figure formatting to ensure your manuscript meets our submission guidelines. Please note that having the manuscript copyedited by AJE or any other editing services does not guarantee selection for peer review or acceptance for publication. 

Upon resubmission, please provide the following: 

● The name of the colleague or the details of the professional service that edited your manuscript

● A copy of your manuscript showing your changes by either highlighting them or using track changes (uploaded as a *supporting information* file)

● A clean copy of the edited manuscript (uploaded as the new *manuscript* file)

3. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure: The research was funded by a personal funding made to the Birat Nepal Medical Trust by Mr Frank Guthrie. 

Please state what role the funders took in the study.  If the funders had no role, please state: ""The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript."" 

If this statement is not correct you must amend it as needed. 

Please include this amended Role of Funder statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

4. We note that you have indicated that there are restrictions to data sharing for this study. For studies involving human research participant data or other sensitive data, we encourage authors to share de-identified or anonymized data. However, when data cannot be publicly shared for ethical reasons, we allow authors to make their data sets available upon request. For information on unacceptable data access restrictions, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions

Before we proceed with your manuscript, please address the following prompts:

a) If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially identifying or sensitive patient information, data are owned by a third-party organization, etc.) and who has imposed them (e.g., a Research Ethics Committee or Institutional Review Board, etc.). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent.

b) If there are no restrictions, please upload the minimal anonymized data set necessary to replicate your study findings to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. Please see http://www.bmj.com/content/340/bmj.c181.long for guidelines on how to de-identify and prepare clinical data for publication. For a list of recommended repositories, please see https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/recommended-repositories. You also have the option of uploading the data as Supporting Information files, but we would recommend depositing data directly to a data repository if possible.

Please update your Data Availability statement in the submission form accordingly.

5. We note you have included a table to which you do not refer in the text of your manuscript. Please ensure that you refer to Table 5 in your text; if accepted, production will need this reference to link the reader to the Table.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: This is an interesting paper about a MH intervention. The large sample size resulted in significant differences before and after however in reality the improvement was minimal by one point for knowledge ? the max was 6 and the baseline 2/3. the median post was 3 compared to 2. So they barely made 50%. I would have assumed the intervention would be very focused on the knowledge presented in the questions. In this case i would suggest if one particular question there was a marked improvement while others not? what was it that they did not grasp. Similarly the attitudes was significant in improvement but also when looking at the scores had not really risen that much when the max score could be 70. I would have expected this lack of real change to be discussed outside of the claims of significant differences.

It seemed with the cultural issues in play from the tables that really the parents and teachers needed the intervention more than the girls. The girls may have changed a little but its the system that needs to change to ensure teachers who are there daily can support and that parents ensure girls are not stigmatised during their menstrual cycle. There was no discussion about this and potential difficulties to change attitudes if parents and communities held views and opinions that treated girls so differently when menstruating.

There was a lot of small grammatical errors like full stops not at exact end of sentence on page 12.. On page 14 it says the majority of girls when the % was only 55.4 % which is rather just over half.

Table 4 title should end "who had reached menarche, not who had their periods. This table seems very long.

I was a bit confused about the discussion around Table 4 as this was baseline? or after intervention? did you look at any of these items after the intervention? it seems odd presented at the end.

Reviewer #2: Abstract

Please give the sample size, age group, who delivered the training, and a brief description of the knowledge and attitudes scores used. Also please briefly describe the statistical methods used.

Introduction

I suggest you use the phrase Menstrual Health throughout the paper, and cite the paper with the definition of this (Hennegan 2021)

Lines 54/55 – your sentence talks about menstruation “around the world” but your references are a systematic review from India and two individual studies. Why not cite a global systematic reviews of menstrual knowledge among adolescents in LMICs here e.g. the Chandra-Mouli 2017 paper, Coast 2019, Hennegan 2019 (currently your reference 5). Simlarly reference 7 seems a bit ‘random’ as a single study from Nigeria. Best to cite studies from Nepal or neighbouring countries, or systematic reviews.

Lines 64/65: Similarly for educational interventions for MHM you could cite Evans et al 2021.

Please be clearer about the evidence gap that you are filling with your study – what does it add to the existing literature?

Methods

Line 78: Why do you call this a cross-sectional study when it is a pre-post longitudinal study?

Lines 86: Please give a little more detail about the intervention e.g. how long was the video, was it shown in class? How many students watched? Did boys & girls watch together and discuss together? (you give this information later but it should be in the methods).

Lines 92-96: How did you select the schools? Did any refuse?

Lines 95: Were all students in the selected classes eligible, or did you select students in each class?

Lines 112: How did you assess whether the students correctly understood the meaning of the questions? Did you undertake any cognitive testing prior to the survey?

Lines 113: Why did you have a time limit of 45 minutes?

Lines 108: Did you consider using validated tools on menstrual health practices such as the self-efficacy tool validated in Bangladesh (Hunter et al 2021?). Or the Menstrual practice needs scale (Hennegan 2020)

Please include a sample size calculation

The quantitative analysis should adjust for within-school clustering (e.g. using mixed-effects linear regression). It’s not clear in the methods if the outcome was change in score, or endline score adjusted for baseline.

Why did you collect endline data from participants who were not seen at baseline?

Table 2 should give the mean score at baseline and endline for each exposure level, and the (adjusted) mean difference with a 95%CI. It is not sufficient to just give a p-value as this doesn’t tell us about the magnitude or direction of effect. The results text also needs more detail about scores. Why do you not show the results of the knowledge & attitudes in a Table, like you do for practices? You give more details in the discussion but these should be in the results.

Were there specific questions that were poorly answered initially and then improved? Please show the results more clearly e.g. a bar chart with the % answering correctly pre- and post.

It is not clear what the “correct” answer is in Table 5.

Discussion

This is good but often goes beyond the findings of the study e.g. you talk about WASH practices which improve MHM but your intervention did not include WASH improvements in school.

Given how deeply rooted the menstrual-related restrictions and attitudes are in Nepal, it seems surprising that a brief intervention can be effective – please comment on this and whether you expect it to be sustained. Also it would have been good to include FGDs among parents as I expect their knowledge & attitudes are very important?

Given the problems with audiovisual materials, how would you advise this kind of intervention is scaled up?

Line 378 – this sentence is not complete.

Please include discussion of whether MH education should be undertaken by teachers and integrated with puberty/SRH education, or by NGOs or others?

Please also include a paragraph on the limitations of the study, and compare the effects you found with those of other educational interventions.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2025 Jan 7;20(1):e0313422. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313422.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


19 Sep 2024

Dear Editor,

Thank you for the opportunity to revise our manuscript and submit the updated version. We also thank the reviewers for their generous comments on the manuscript. We have now edited the manuscript to address their concerns and present the response to the journal and the reviewers’ comments below. We hope that the manuscript is now suitable for publication.

Yours sincerely,

Dr Swastika Shrestha

On behalf of all the authors

Journal’s comments:

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming.

Thank you for the suggestion. We have ensured that the manuscript meets PLOS ONE’s style requirements.

2. We suggest you thoroughly copyedit your manuscript for language usage, spelling, and grammar. If you do not know anyone who can help you do this, you may wish to consider employing a professional scientific editing service.

Apologies for the typological errors in the manuscript. It was likely due to multiple versions of the manuscript which were made in track change mode. The revised manuscript has been copyedited by Dr Maxine Caws, Senior Researcher, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, UK.

3. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure: The research was funded by a personal funding made to the Birat Nepal Medical Trust by Mr Frank Guthrie. Please state what role the funders took in the study.

The research was kindly funded by Mr Frank Guthrie. We state that “The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript."

4. Before we proceed with your manuscript, please address the following prompts:

a) If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially identifying or sensitive patient information, data are owned by a third-party organization, etc.) and who has imposed them (e.g., a Research Ethics Committee or Institutional Review Board, etc.). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent.

We are not able to provide public access to the full dataset due to the sensitive nature of the topic in Nepali culture. We did not request permission to share transcripts from participants, or from the Nepal Health Research Council (Nepal Government authority responsible for approving all studies involving human participants in Nepal). Indeed, the adolescent participants were assured of confidentiality before participating, with a statement that data would only be reported in aggregate.

We state that "Data cannot be shared publicly because consent was not obtained for public data sharing of full transcripts during the informed consent process, due to the sensitive nature of the questions. Data is securely stored in controlled access secure data storage at Birat Nepal Medical Trust (BNMT). Data is available from the BNMT data access Committee (contact: Kritika Dixit, research manager BNMT; kritika@bnmt.org.np) for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data.”

5. We note you have included a table to which you do not refer in the text of your manuscript. Please ensure that you refer to Table 5 in your text; if accepted, production will need this reference to link the reader to the Table.

Apologies for the error. We have now referred table 5 in the text of the manuscript in Page 13 line 230.

Reviewer #1 comments:

1. This is an interesting paper about a MH intervention. The large sample size resulted in significant differences before and after however in reality the improvement was minimal by one point for knowledge ? the max was 6 and the baseline 2/3. the median post was 3 compared to 2. So they barely made 50%. I would have assumed the intervention would be very focused on the knowledge presented in the questions. In this case i would suggest if one particular question there was a marked improvement while others not? what was it that they did not grasp. Similarly the attitudes was significant in improvement but also when looking at the scores had not really risen that much when the max score could be 70. I would have expected this lack of real change to be discussed outside of the claims of significant differences.

Thank you for the important observation and the comment. The one-point increase in median score is a significant improvement, given the grading of only 1-6 in scores. The increased knowledge score was due to improved understanding of the cause of menstruation, the duration of the cycle and average age at menarche among the students. The knowledge of the students did not improve regarding the source of menstrual blood and the normal duration of bleeding. These were important aspects of the training which need revision to improve clarity and knowledge retention. We were limited in our ability to pretest both the Menstrupedia training and the evaluation questionnaire due to the COVID pandemic situation. We agree that these are important and valuable observations to facilitate refinement of the training material, and we have incorporated this into the discussion text in lines 466-477 as follows:

“Students showed improvement in the understanding of menstruation, its cause, interval between menstrual cycles and the average age at menarche following the Menstrupedia training. However, the training did not increase the proportion of students responding correctly to two questions. The first was a question regarding the source of menstrual blood. This may have been due to poor wording of the question, as a consequence of our limited evaluation of the questionnaire prior to the study. Some students may have interpreted the question to be regarding the exit channel for the menstrual blood from the body. Low general knowledge of female anatomy may also be responsible for the lack of clarity in responses to this question. The second question which failed to show an increase in correct responses was regarding the normal duration of menstruation. This may have been due to confusion between the various numbers given during the training for different aspects of the menstrual cycle, including the period between two menstrual cycles, age of menarche and normal duration of menstruation. It will be important to establish the reasons for these gaps in knowledge gain, and to refine the training to address the issues in future use of the Menstrupedia intervention.”

2. It seemed with the cultural issues in play from the tables that really the parents and teachers needed the intervention more than the girls. The girls may have changed a little but its the system that needs to change to ensure teachers who are there daily can support and that parents ensure girls are not stigmatised during their menstrual cycle. There was no discussion about this and potential difficulties to change attitudes if parents and communities held views and opinions that treated girls so differently when menstruating.

Thank you for the comment. We agree that this is a broad societal issue that requires a change in knowledge, attitude and practice across all sectors of society to eliminate harmful stigma and resulting practice. Due to limited funding available we were only able to test the Menstrupedia intervention as a school training module at this time. We are actively seeking funding for broader interventions on menstrual health and many NGOs are working in this space to address the issues across South Asian and African societies with such taboos. Indeed, it is often grandparents and priests who reinforce the persistence of such practices. We have elaborated on this topic in the discussion section from line number 388-393 as follows:

“If the adults surrounding the adolescents do not change their attitude towards menstruation, they will reinforce the persistence of negative practices within the household and wider community. Thus, it is necessary to also provide educational interventions to parents, grandparents teachers and community influencers regarding MH. Unfortunately, due to limited resources we were not able to expand the scope of the intervention in this project to include the broader community. However, the Menstrupedia comic tool should also be evaluated as a resource for facilitating adult education on MH.”

3. There was a lot of small grammatical errors like full stops not at exact end of sentence on page 12.

We apologize for these errors and have corrected the errors throughout the manuscript.

4. On page 14 it says the majority of girls when the % was only 55.4 % which is rather just over half.

Thank you for the comment. We have revised this text to incorporate the suggested change, and corrected the % value, in page 15-line number 236 as follows:

“Over half of the girls (n=37/64; 57.8%) reported that their schools had the provision of only water and no soap available for handwashing.”

5. Table 4 title should end "who had reached menarche, not who had their periods. This table seems very long.

Thank you for the comment. We agree and have revised the table title as suggested (line 241). We have simplified the data in table 4 and presented the breakdown of data for menstrual practice both pre and post intervention in table 5 to enable the reader to understand the menstrual health practice, and the areas which are challenging in the Nepali context. We believe this is important information arising from the study, but we are happy to transfer this to supplementary data if preferred by the editor. Final formatting of the table in print will reduce the apparent length.

6. I was a bit confused about the discussion around Table 4 as this was baseline? or after intervention? did you look at any of these items after the intervention? it seems odd presented at the end.

Thank you for the comment and apologies for the confusion. Table 4 is a post-intervention table. The Pre and posttest comparison table has been presented in table 5. However, no statistical test has been performed to compare these scores as some of the practices are the result of limitations in available resources/facilities, which are not necessarily incorrect in the context in which the girls are living. Thus, we have not scored the practice as correct or incorrect.

Reviewer #2 comments:

Abstract

1. Please give the sample size, age group, who delivered the training, and a brief description of the knowledge and attitudes scores used. Also please briefly describe the statistical methods used.

Thank you for the comment. We have added the suggested details to the abstract now in line number 23-32 as follows:

“Methods: A school-based study was conducted in Indrawati rural municipality of Sindhupalchowk district in Nepal. 427 participants (175 boys and 252 girls), aged 11-13, completed a questionnaire evaluating MH KAP before receiving a structured training module on MH provided by experienced trainers from Putali Nepal using the Menstrupedia tool. The questionnaire was repeated one month after the training. Pre and post intervention scores were compared to determine the effect of the intervention. Focus group discussions were also conducted to understand the perceptions of participants toward SRH teaching.

Association of independent socio-demographic with dependent variables- knowledge and attitude -towards menstrual health were analyzed using MANOVA test. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare the median outcome of the pre and post-test attitude and knowledge. The maximum possible score was 6 for MH knowledge. The total attitude score ranged 14 to 70.”

Introduction

2. I suggest you use the phrase Menstrual Health throughout the paper, and cite the paper with the definition of this (Hennegan 2021)

Thank you for the comment. We have edited the text to Menstrual Health and added the citation for the definition (lines 48-50) as follows:

“This inevitably affects the MH of women and girls- which is defined as a state of complete physical, mental, and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity, in relation to the menstrual cycle.”

3. Lines 54/55 – your sentence talks about menstruation “around the world” but your references are a systematic review from India and two individual studies. Why not cite a global systematic reviews of menstrual knowledge among adolescents in LMICs here e.g. the Chandra-Mouli 2017 paper, Coast 2019, Hennegan 2019 (currently your reference 5). Simlarly reference 7 seems a bit ‘random’ as a single study from Nigeria. Best to cite studies from Nepal or neighbouring countries, or systematic reviews.

Thank you for the suggestion. We have added the suggested references (line 44).

4. Lines 64/65: Similarly for educational interventions for MHM you could cite Evans et al 2021.

Thank you for the suggestion. We have added Evans et al 2021 as a reference in line 55.

5. Please be clearer about the evidence gap that you are filling with your study – what does it add to the existing literature?

We aimed to evaluate the Menstrupedia tool as a school-based intervention to improve knowledge surrounding menstrual health in school-based adolescents in rural Nepal. We faced significant challenges in the planned implementation due to the COVID pandemic situation, which affected the rigor of the study. In particular, school attendance was significantly disrupted, resulting in disparity between the children attending during pre- and post- intervention evaluation. However, despite this, we were able to show that the Menstrupedia training was a popular and engaging format with students, and the relatively short training significantly increased knowledge and attitude scores. The intervention warrants a larger scale comprehensive impact evaluation. There are few studies showing effectiveness of interventions for menstrual health knowledge among adolescents in south Asia, while there are many studies of stigma and impact on girls’ school attendance. We believe the development of evidence-based interventions and the generation of evidence supporting implementation is crucial for supporting political commitment and investment in changing school-based teaching for menstrual health and the broader comprehensive sexuality education curriculum. We have added clarification of the study purpose to the text (lines 66-75) as follows:

“Underpinning Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) (18), MH is a right for every woman and girl. Imparting MH education is an essential step towards ensuring the right to MH for women and girls. Although a part of the school curriculum, schools in Nepal have not been able to deliver the SRH education effectively. In such context, development and evaluation of evidence-based interventions is crucial for supporting political commitment and investment in improving school-based teaching for MH and the broader comprehensive sexuality education (CSE) curriculum. Despite the severe and deeply rooted stigma surrounding menstruation in Nepal, which has multidimensional negative impacts on the lifelong wellbeing of women and girls, there is a paucity of published studies evaluating MH educational interventions in the Nepalese context. Therefore, we designed the present study to evaluate the effectiveness of a school-based menstrual education program in improving menstrual knowledge and attitude among adolescents in Nepal.”

Methods

6. Line 78: Why do you call this a cross-sectional study when it is a pre-post longitudinal study?

Thank you for the comment. We have edited the text to ‘pre-post longitudinal study’ in place of ‘cross-sectional study’ (line 78) as follows:

“This is a pre-post longitudinal school-based study conducted in Indrawati rural municipality of Sindhupalchowk district, Nepal where there is a high prevalence of underage marriage.”

7. Lines 86: Please give a little more detail about the intervention e.g. how long was the video, was it shown in class? How many students watched? Did boys & girls watch together and discuss together? (you give this information later but it should be in the methods).

Thank you for the suggestion, we have added further details of the intervention to the methods text (lines 86-89) as follows:

“The adolescents were provided with inf

Decision Letter 1

Alison Parker

24 Oct 2024

Effectiveness of menstrual hygiene management training to enhance knowledge, attitude, and practice among adolescents in Sindhupalchowk, Nepal.

PONE-D-24-27175R1

Dear Dr. Shrestha,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice will be generated when your article is formally accepted. Please note, if your institution has a publishing partnership with PLOS and your article meets the relevant criteria, all or part of your publication costs will be covered. Please make sure your user information is up-to-date by logging into Editorial Manager at Editorial Manager® and clicking the ‘Update My Information' link at the top of the page. If you have any questions relating to publication charges, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Alison Parker

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Alison Parker

31 Oct 2024

PONE-D-24-27175R1

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Shrestha,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

If revisions are needed, the production department will contact you directly to resolve them. If no revisions are needed, you will receive an email when the publication date has been set. At this time, we do not offer pre-publication proofs to authors during production of the accepted work. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few weeks to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Alison Parker

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Data Availability Statement

    Data cannot be shared publicly because consent was not obtained for public data sharing of full transcripts during the informed consent process, due to the sensitive nature of the questions. Data is securely stored in controlled access secure data storage at Birat Nepal Medical Trust (BNMT). Data is available from the BNMT data access Committee (contact: Kritika Dixit, research manager BNMT; kritika@bnmt.org.np) for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES