Abstract
SPDC photon-pairs exhibit spatial correlations which can be measured using detector arrays sensitive to single photons. However, these detector arrays have multiple readout modes and in order to optimise detection it is important to select the optimum mode to detect the correlations against a background of optical and electronic noise. These quantum correlations enable applications in imaging, sensing, communication, and optical processing. Here we compare the measurement of spatial correlations for a broad range of readout modes of an EMCCD camera and attempt to characterise the optimal readout mode for our purposes. This assessment is important for the use of detector arrays of different types for use in quantum, low-light, enhanced resolution, imaging systems.
Keywords: Quantum optics, Quantum enhanced imaging, Sensor readout
Subject terms: Quantum optics, Imaging and sensing, Optical sensors
Introduction
Quantum enhanced imaging schemes are designed to take advantage of correlations between entangled photon-pairs to improve imaging beyond classical limits1–3. Photon-pairs generated by Spontaneous Parametric Down-Conversion (SPDC) are generated by the absorption of a single pump photon leading to the emission of photon-pairs within a non-linear crystal. These photon-pairs obey conservation of energy which results in position correlations in the image plane and anti-correlation in their transverse momentum which results in position anti-correlations in the far-field plane4. These spatial correlations have been measured, and their violation of the EPR paradox quantified, using a number of different detector technologies such as EMCCD cameras5–9, ICCD cameras10,11, SPAD arrays12–15, and time-tagging event driven detectors16,17. Furthermore, these detector technologies have been applied to perform quantum imaging and encompass a range of improvements including those able to image through background noise and loss18–25, improve image resolution26,27, ghost imaging28–31, sub-shot-noise imaging32–34, imaging through scattering media35,36, phase imaging37, hyperspectral imaging38, 3D imaging and ranging39,40.
We have previously compared the number of frames required to identify spatial correlations between SPDC photon-pairs for two different detector types; namely an EMCCD detector and a photon number resolving qCMOS detector41. In that work, we identified that the EMCCD detector excels in the low illumination regimes and that the photon number resolving detector possesses an advantage for pixel occupancy rate at which multiple photon events are registered per pixel. The advantage of the qCMOS detector is that the low readout noise enables photon number resolution at
per pixel per frame. In contrast, when run at optimum sensitivity, the EMCCD detector is effectively restricted to 0 or 1 photon in each pixel per frame42,43. When using the EMCCD detector, it is also important to ensure that the optimal readout mode is selected to enable the detection of single photons and also allow for the identification of the photon-pairs.
In the work presented here, we utilise an EMCCD camera (Andor iXon Ultra 897) to detect spatially correlated photon-pairs generated by SPDC. The number of frames required to identify the correlation peak with a peak-to-noise ratio
is assessed for 60 different readout modes varying pre-amp gain, horizontal-shift speed, and vertical-shift speed readout parameters. Evaluations to determine the optimal readout mode for the detection of characteristics under investigation will enable the enhancements offered by quantum imaging schemes to be maximised, potentially allowing for an increase in the speed at which these quantum technologies are adopted.
Experimental setup
The experimental setup is as shown in Fig. 1. The pump beam is a laser at
expanded to
in diameter and collimated. The pump beam is then incident upon a BBO crystal of thickness
cut for type-II parametric downconversion at the degenerate wavelength of
. Immediately after the downconversion crystal, the remaining pump beam is removed by a pair of dichroic mirrors to reduce the autofluorescence of the subsequent optical components so as to minimise their contribution to increased background noise. The downconverted light at
is selected for by a
interference filter mounted such that it may be tilted to adjust the bandpass, and a second
interference filter is mounted on the detector to exclude both residual pump light and any background light sources. By tilting the first interference filter its bandpass wavelengths may be modified, shifting them to a shorter wavelength and making the filter symmetric about the degenerate wavelength. In the far-field, the effect of tilting the interference filter on the downconversion beams can be observed and used to obtain equally sized collapsed beams, such that the full extent of the detected portions of the downconverted beams contain momentum anticorrelated photon-pairs. In type-II downconversion, the SPDC beams are spatially separated in the far-field of the downconversion crystal, due to their having orthogonal polarisation and the birefringence of the downconversion crystal. The far-field plane of the downconversion crystal is imaged onto the EMCCD detector demagnified by a factor of 2.
Fig. 1.
Schematic of the experimental setup. A
laser pumps a BBO crystal cut for type-II degenerate downconversion to generate downconverted photon-pairs at
. Lenses
demagnify the far-field plane of the downconversion crystal by a factor of 2 onto the EMCCD detector.
Correlation peak
The strength of transverse momentum correlation is given by Eq. 1 and derived from the transverse momentum uncertainty in the pump and therefore dependent on
the size of the pump beam,
the wavenumber of the pump beam, and f the focal length of the lens used to Fourier transform from the plane of the crystal to the plane of the detector44–46. The detected width of the correlation peak in the far-field may be larger than this theoretically calculated size due to the limited numerical aperture of the optical system, defocus effects, and optical aberrations such astigmatism resulting from the inclined filters. For our experimental configuration, the width of the correlation peak on the camera was observed to be
,
pixels.
![]() |
1 |
Readout options
The detector used in this experiment is an Andor iXon Ultra 897. The impacts of the different readout parameters will be briefly detailed from the hardware manual such that the impact of changing modes might be considered in our analysis47. Vertical shift speed is the time in
to shift a row of pixels down towards the shift register. Faster vertical shift speeds result in lower Clock Induced Charge (CIC) but reduced efficiency of charge transfer. This reduced efficiency can be compensated for by adjusting the vertical clock amplitude but this results in increased CIC and so the range of vertical clock amplitudes are not considered here. Horizontal shift speed is the rate in
at which the pixels are read from the shift register into the gain register. Lower speeds exhibit reduced readout noise but reduce the overall frame-rate of the camera and total exposure time. The choice of readout modes also impacts the dynamic range of the detector but as the EMCCD cameras are operated under low illumination conditions in our SPDC experiments we do not need to consider these effects. Our choice of readout parameters in our previous works was based upon choosing a low standard deviation in dark frames readout noise and balancing this with an overall readout speed in order to maintain throughput. The read-out time and therefore throughput is dependent mostly on the horizontal shift speed with values of 0.02 s for 17 MHz, 0.03 s for 10 MHz, 0.06 s for 5 MHz, 0.3 s for 1 MHz.
Results
As in our previous work41 we identify the presence of the correlation peak by assessing a peak to noise ratio (
) on the temporally subtracted correlation peak and defining visibility at a value of
within a radius of 3 pixels of the centre pixel. We apply low-pass filter (
) so as to prevent noise spikes from being identified as the correlation peak incorrectly. We then calculate the correlation peaks calculated over 10, 000 frames for each of the combinations of vertical shift (0.3 μs, 0.5 μs, 0.9 μs, 1.7 μs, 3.3 μs), horizontal shift (17 MHz, 10 MHz, 5 MHz, 1 MHz), and pre-amp gain (
) for a fixed EM gain of 1000 and vertical amplitude 0 V for a total of 60 different readout modes.
High pixel occupancy rate illumination regime
For an illumination level that equates to
events per pixel per frame (measured in the readout mode of; vertical shift 1.7 μs, horizontal shift
, pre-amp gain 1, and EM gain 1000), a series of correlation peaks calculated over 10, 000 frames for each of the combinations of readout modes acquired with a pre-amp gain of 1 are presented in Fig. 2. The pixel occupancy rate for this illumination level for each of the readout modes for pre-amp gain of 1 are shown in Table 1. It can be seen that for vertical shift 0.3 μs the correlation peak on the first row of Fig. 2 and image of the total sum of frames on the first row of Fig. 3 are not visible above the noise level. This is due to charge transfer being ineffective for a vertical clock amplitude of 0 V for this vertical shift speed. For vertical shift of 0.5 μs the correlation peak on the second row of Fig. 2 and image of the total sum of frames on the second row of Fig. 3 are visible but exhibit the effects of charge smearing which is a consequence of a vertical clock amplitude of 0 V.
Fig. 2.
High pixel occupancy rate illumination regime: correlation peak array. A series of correlation peaks acquired in the high pixel occupancy rate illumination regime. Each correlation peak is calculated using 10, 000 camera frames for the subset of combinations of readout modes acquired with a pre-amp gain of 1. The vertical shift speed decreases by row and the horizontal shift speed decreases by column. The camera frames used to generate the correlation peaks are presented as their sum in Fig. 3. The x and y axes represent displacement in the cross-correlation.
Table 1.
High pixel occupancy rate illumination regime: Binarised pixel pixel occupancy rate. This table presents the pixel occupancy rate and occupancy rate to dark noise ratio as measured by binarising at a value of
analogue counts for the data to calculate the correlation peaks presented Fig. 2.
| Horizontal shift | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17 MHz | 10 MHz | 5 MHz | 1 MHz | ||
| Vertical shift | 0.3 μs | 0.0002 | 0.0008 | 0.0013 | 0.0040 |
|
|
|
|
||
| 0.5 μs | 0.0129 | 0.0537 | 0.1247 | 0.5779 | |
|
|
|
|
||
| 0.9 μs | 0.0146 | 0.0566 | 0.1311 | 0.5927 | |
|
|
|
|
||
| 1.7 μs | 0.0163 | 0.0586 | 0.1343 | 0.5863 | |
|
|
|
|
||
| 3.3 μs | 0.0203 | 0.0663 | 0.1442 | 0.5957 | |
|
|
|
|
||
Fig. 3.
High pixel occupancy rate illumination regime: sum of frames array. A series of full-frame images acquired in the high SPDC illumination regime by summing the analogue output of 10, 000 frames for the subset of combinations of readout modes acquired with a pre-amp gain of 1. The vertical shift speed decreases by row and the horizontal shift speed decreases by column. The x and y axes correspond to pixels on the detector.
In Fig. 4 the average number of frames required to satisfy the
condition is presented for vertical shifts of 0.9 μs, 1.7 μs, 3.3 μs, horizontal shifts of 17 MHz, 10 MHz, 5 MHz, 1 MHz, and pre-amp gain
are presented in a series of bar charts. It can be seen from the data presented in Fig. 4 that for combinations that equate to slower readout (vertical shifts of 0.9 μs, 1.7 μs, 3.3 μs, and horizontal shifts of 10 MHz, 5 MHz, 1 MHz), that the number of frames required to meet the
condition is of order
frames. For these vertical readout speeds the horizontal shift speed of
requires between around
frames to satisfy the
condition so around
the number of frames required for the slower horizontal shift readout speeds. It is for this horizontal shift speed of
also that the effects of different pre-amp gain modes becomes apparent with pre-amp gain of 1 requiring almost twice as many frames compared to pre-amp gain modes 2 and 3. For a vertical shift speed of
there is a large increase in the number of frames required to meet the
condition. This increase in the number of frames required is as might be expected from the smearing present on the correlation peaks in the second row of Fig. 2 which is a result of reduced charge transfer efficiency. For 10 MHz, 5 MHz, 1 MHz (
) frames on average are required to meet the
condition across the different pre-amp gain modes. For
frames on average are required to determine the presence of a correlation peak depending on the pre-amp gain mode. The effects of readout noise due to reducing the horizontal shifts are evident in the bar charts presented in Fig. 4, however, the effects of increased CIC as a consequence of reducing the vertical shift speed are less pronounced.
Fig. 4.
High pixel occupancy rate illumination regime: average number of frames to meet the
condition for different noise modes. The average number of frames required to meet the
condition for different noise modes acquired in the high SPDC illumination regime spilt by vertical shift speeds. The values are calculated from 10, 000 frames per readout mode.
Low pixel occupancy rate illumination regime
For an illumination level at which the number of photon events is close to equivalent to detector noise events (determined in the readout mode of vertical shift
, horizontal shift
, pre-amp gain 1, and EM gain 1000), a series of correlation peaks calculated over 10, 000 frames for each of the combinations of readout modes for pre-amp gain of 1 are presented in Fig. 5. pixel occupancy rate and ratios of binarised illumination to detector noise for this illumination level for each of the readout modes for pre-amp gain of 1 are shown in Table 2. It can be seen again that for vertical shift 0.3 μs there is readout noise such that the correlation peak on the first row of Fig. 5 and image of the total sum of frames on the first row of Fig. 6 are not visible and only noise appears to be present. This is again due to charge transfer being ineffective for a vertical clock amplitude of
for this vertical shift speed. For further fast combinations of readout modes that include a vertical shift of 0.5 μs the correlation peaks are visible for slower horizontal shifts of
and
but exhibit the effects of charge smearing which is a consequence of a vertical clock amplitude of
. For a horizontal shift
there is also increased readout noise and the correlation peaks on the second row of Fig. 5 are either not visible, smeared, or barely visible. The reduced visibility of the correlation peak is to be expected because there is a lower proportion of the total analogue counts per frame correspond to correlated photon-pair events. The volume of the correlation peak is twice the number of pair events
48 and so with fewer photon-pairs, there is increased relative shot-noise in the subtracted correlation peaks.
Fig. 5.
Low pixel occupancy rate illumination regime: correlation peak array. A series of correlation peaks obtained using analogue output data from frames acquired in the low pixel occupancy rate illumination regime. Each correlation peak is calculated using 10, 000 camera frames for the subset of combinations of readout modes acquired with a pre-amp gain of 1. The vertical shift speed decreases by row and the horizontal shift speed decreases by column. The camera frames used to generate the correlation peaks are presented as their sum in Fig. 6. The x and y axes represent displacement in the cross-correlation.
Table 2.
Low pixel occupancy rate illumination regime: Binarised pixel pixel occupancy rate. This table presents the pixel occupancy rate and occupancy rate to dark noise ratio as measured by binarising at a value of
analogue counts for the data to calculate the correlation peaks presented Fig. 5.
| Horizontal shift | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17 MHz | 10 MHz | 5 MHz | 1 MHz | ||
| Vertical shift | 0.3 μs | 0.0002 | 0.0007 | 0.0013 | 0.0045 |
|
|
|
|
||
| 0.5 μs | 0.0008 | 0.0035 | 0.0073 | 0.0395 | |
|
|
|
|
||
| 0.9 μs | 0.0011 | 0.0041 | 0.0083 | 0.0417 | |
|
|
|
|
||
| 1.7 μs | 0.0018 | 0.0055 | 0.0102 | 0.0431 | |
|
|
|
|
||
| 3.3 μs | 0.0042 | 0.0112 | 0.0175 | 0.0524 | |
|
|
|
|
||
Fig. 6.
Low pixel occupancy rate illumination regime: sum of frames array. A series of full-frame images acquired in the low SPDC illumination regime by summing the analogue output of 10, 000 frames for the subset of combinations of readout modes acquired with a pre-amp gain of 1. The vertical shift speed decreases by row and the horizontal shift speed decreases by column. The x and y axes correspond to pixels on the detector.
In Fig. 7 the average number of frames required to satisfy the
condition is presented for vertical shifts of (0.5 μs, 0.9 μs, 1.7 μs, 3.3 μs, horizontal shifts of 17 MHz, 10 MHz, 5 MHz, 1 MHz, and pre-amp gain (
) are presented in a series of bar charts. For a horizontal shift of
for each of the presented vertical shifts and for a vertical shift of 0.3 μs for each of the presented horizontal shifts, few peaks were identified per mode combination as shown in Fig. 7. The dearth of identifiable correlation peaks for these readout modes is displayed in Fig. 5. This is with the apparent exception of
horizontal shift 0.9 μs vertical shift which required 3000 frames on average to meet the
condition.
Fig. 7.
Low pixel occupancy rate illumination regime: average number of frames to meet the
condition for different noise modes. The average number of frames required to meet the
condition in the low pixel occupancy rate illumination regime for different noise modes spilt by vertical shift speeds. The values are calculated from 10, 000 frames per readout mode.
The data presented in Fig. 7 shows that for slower readout speeds (vertical shifts of 0.9 μs, 1.7 μs, 3.3 μs) readouts at
require up to
frames, readouts at
require
frames, and readouts at
require
frames to meet the
condition. Vertical shift speed of
require an increased number of frames for each mode to determine the presence of a correlation peak when compared to other readout modes presented here as might be expected from the smearing present on the correlation peaks in the second row of Fig. 5. For each vertical shift speed there is a decrease in the number of frames required as the horizontal shift speed is reduced. This is expected because the readout noise reduces with reduced readout speed, in addition to more photon events being collected per frame. The effects of reducing the vertical shift speed from 0.9 μs to 1.7 μs to 3.3 μs is more evident in the low pixel occupancy rate illumination regime due to the increased proportion of detector events that correspond to CIC than for the high pixel occupancy rate illumination regime. Therefore, the number of frames required to meet the
condition is increased in this low pixel occupancy illumination regime.
Low pixel occupancy rate illumination regime: binarised frames
We now apply the same analysis to binarised frames obtained under the low pixel occupancy rate illumination regime to assess whether there is a similar trend as we would expect given our previous work41 in which we reported that binarised EMCCD data has an advantage over analogue data in terms of the average number of frames required to meet the
condition for pixel occupancy rates of
events per pixel per frame. The correlation peaks calculated using binarised frames shown in Fig. 8 present a similar form and trend across the different combinations of readout modes as those for the analogue data presented in Fig. 5. For the binarised data presented in Fig. 9 on average
the number of frames on average are required to identify the presence of a correlation peak when compared to that for the analogue data presented in the preceding section. It can also be seen in Fig. 10 that binarising the images cleans up the fixed pattern noise, streaking, and charge smearing present for the average sum of frames when compared to those for non-binarised data in the low pixel occupancy rate illumination regime in the preceding section.
Fig. 8.
Binarised low pixel occupancy rate illumination regime: correlation peak array. A series of correlation peaks obtained from binarised frames acquired in the low pixel occupancy rate illumination regime. Each correlation peak is calculated using 10, 000 camera frames for the subset of combinations of readout modes acquired with a pre-amp gain of 1. The vertical shift speed decreases by row and the horizontal shift speed decreases by column. The camera frames used to generate the correlation peaks are presented as their sum in Fig. 10. The x and y axes represent displacement in the cross-correlation.
Fig. 9.
Binarised low pixel occupancy rate illumination regime: average number of frames to meet the
condition for different noise modes. The average number of frames required to meet the
condition for different noise modes for binarised frames acquired in the low pixel occupancy rate illumination regime spilt by vertical shift speeds. The values are calculated from 10, 000 frames per readout mode.
Fig. 10.
Binarised low pixel occupancy rate illumination regime: sum of frames array. A series of full-frame images acquired in the low SPDC illumination regime by summing the binarised output (at an analogue value of
analogue counts) of 10, 000 frames for a subset of the combinations of readout modes pre-amp gain of 1. The vertical shift speed decreases by row and the horizontal shift speed decreases by column. The x and y axes correspond to pixels on the detector.
For our experiments detecting single photon-events and identifying photon-pairs is necessary to realise the advantages of using a SPDC source. As such, we assess the resulting contrast for the AND-images calculated from the 10, 000 acquired frames for each of the modes that are presented in Fig. 11 and present the image contrast in Table 3. Due to the low number of frames acquired and the resulting low number of AND-events overall, we use AND-images as opposed to the temporally subtracted AND-images here. Image contrast is assessed for the quantum illuminated bird regions of the image with respect to the background. For the data presented in Fig. 11 this contrast metric is maximised for a pre-amp gain of 1 using settings of vertical shift 0.9 μs and a horizontal shift
. Across all of the combinations tested, the optimal balance of resulting AND-image contrast, rejection of additional readout noise, and speed of acquisition would in fact appear to be for a vertical shift of 0.9 μs, a horizontal shift of
, pre-amp gain of 1, and EM gain 1000. This readout setting differs from that which we used in our previous work which measured using the readout settings; vertical shift 1.7 μs, horizontal shift
, pre-amp gain 1, and EM gain 1000. Our previous criteria selected for a low standard deviation in the output analogue counts calculated from dark frames in addition to rejecting modes that feature charge smearing and fixed pattern noise. By using the method presented in this work we have found a mode that results in an improved image assessment metric in the form of resulting AND-image contrast, also whilst maintaining the same data throughput as we had previously.
Fig. 11.
Binarised low pixel occupancy rate illumination regime: AND images array. A series of AND-images acquired by performing the AND-operation to select spatially correlated photon-pairs in binarised frames obtained in the low pixel occupancy rate illumination regime. The images are the result of performing the AND-operation on 10, 000 frames and summing the output. This data represents the subset of combinations of readout modes acquired with a pre-amp gain of 1. The vertical shift speed decreases by row and the horizontal shift speed decreases by column. The x and y axes correspond to pixels on the detector.
Table 3.
Binarised low pixel occupancy rate illumination regime: AND-image contrast. Calculated contrast between the quantum illuminated bird and the background for the series of AND-images acquired using binarised frames in the low pixel occupancy rate illumination regime summed over 10, 000 frames for a subset of the combinations of readout modes acquired with a pre-amp gain of 1 presented in Fig. 11.
| Horizontal shift | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17 MHz | 10 MHz | 5 MHz | 1 MHz | ||
| Verticall shift | 0.3 μs | – | – | – | – |
| 0.5 μs | 0.42 | 0.37 | 0.45 | 0.51 | |
| 0.9 μs | 0.67 | 0.59 | 0.65 | 0.69 | |
| 1.7 μs | 0.41 | 0.43 | 0.52 | 0.62 | |
| 3.3 μs | 0.10 | 0.15 | 0.23 | 0.47 | |
Discussion
We compared the different readout modes for an EMCCD detector when used to observe spatial correlations and we found that many of the modes require a similar number of frames to meet our visibility criterion. For the detector used in this work the performance of the camera was most affected by the faster shift speeds being more sensitive to the choice of pre-amplifier gain mode but for slower readout modes
horizontal shift and
vertical shift combinations of readout all require of order 10 frames to satisfy the
condition in the high pixel occupancy rate illumination regime. The average number of frames required to meet the
condition is greater in the low pixel occupancy rate illumination regime due to the photon events comprising a reduced proportion of the overall detector readout that also includes sensor noises. This leads to the effects of sensor noise becoming evident as demonstrated by the presence of fixed pattern noises in Fig. 6. The effect of these noises can be mitigated by then binarising the frames as shown in Fig. 10. The effects of binarisation results in a reduction by a factor of
in the number of frames required to meet the
condition. These results indicate that when conducting such an experiment it is best to initially deselect readout modes that are either completely incompatible with the experiment or inefficient for the purposes of identifying the detector events required. A combination of other constraints might better define the optimal readout modes of the detector, for example the readout speed restricts the frame rate and therefore places a limit on the timescales of processes that might be observed and also limits the data throughput of the system as is the case for the
readout modes presented in this work. Using the method presented here to optimise detector readout settings based on the targeted imaging assessment metric in the illumination regime in which we typically operate our experiments has enabled an improvement in said metric when compared to our previously used readout settings. Previously, the detector readout setting was selected based on a relatively low standard deviation in the analogue counts for dark frames, in addition to rejecting modes that feature charge smearing and fixed pattern noise. Optimising for these seemingly sensible criteria did not necessarily optimise for single photon detection of photon-pairs and the resulting AND-image contrast. In optimising for the experimental assessment metric, in the form of resulting AND-image contrast, we were able to achieve an improvement whilst also maintaining the same data throughput as we had previously.
The detector has a quantum detection efficiency that varies with wavelength. As such, the wavelength used and the subsequent event rate at the detector will affect the number of frames required to acquire a correlation peak and meet the PTNR condition. For example, the quantum efficiency of our Andor iXon Ultra 897 EMCCD detector with a back-illuminated sensor with fringe suppression and dual anti-reflection coated sensor (#EXF) is stated at
to be
, and at
to be
. Due to the lower quantum efficiency at
we would expect that the number of frames required to meet the PTNR condition increases due to a reduced photon detection efficiency and therefore lower photon-pair coincidence rate, but for the relative differences between the different readout modes to hold. We hope that the approach demonstrated here can help inform researchers to perform initial tests that are directly related to the effects that they are trying to measure in order to identify optimal detector readout parameters prior to conducting their experiments. This method of selecting readout parameters could find use in the case of detectors with an increased number of readout parameters or those that are continuously adjustable.
Materials and methods
Our experiential procedure is similar to that reported in Roberts et al.41 and is summarised here. The laser source used was a JDSU xCyte CY-355-150 Nd:YAG laser with quasicontinuous output at
with power output at
, a pulse repetition of
, and a pulse width of
. The spatial filter used to expand and collimate the pump beam comprises of a
lens, a 50 μm pinhole, and a
lens. The downconversion source was a BBO non-linear crystal cut for type-II downconversion at degenerate wavelength of
. Downconversion crystal dimensions
. The EMCCD camera used was an Andor Ultra 897 of pixel size 16 × 16 μm with
pixel fill-factor. The camera was cooled to − 90 °C using peltier and water cooling. Exposure time for each readout mode was set to the minimum. Chroma T4551pxt dichroic mirrors with a cutoff wavelength of
and
transmission at
were used to remove the pump beam. The tilt adjustable interference filter is a Chroma ET710/10m interference filter, with a
bandpass with a top-hat profile centred at
(
efficiency). The fixed interference filter positioned on the camera is a Semrock FF01-711/25 interference filter, with a
bandpass with a top-hat profile centred at
(
efficiency).
Acknowledgements
This work was funded by the UK EPSRC (QuantIC EP/M01326X/1). K.R. acknowledges the financial support from the EPSRC (QuantIC EP/T517896/1) and industrial partners Teledyne e2v and Andor. T.G. acknowledges the financial support from the EPSRC (EP/SO19472/1). O.W. acknowledges the financial support from the EPSRC (EP/R513222/1). M.J.P. acknowledges the financial support from the Royal Society (RSRP/R1/211013P).
Author contributions
M.J.P. conceptualized and supervised the project. K.R. performed the experimental investigation. All authors performed formal analysis of the results and wrote and revised the manuscript.
Data availability
Data required to evaluate the conclusions in this paper are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare the following competing interests: The studentship of K.R. is sponsored in part by Teledyne e2v and Andor. The authors declare no further competing or non-competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Genovese, M. Real applications of quantum imaging. J. Opt.18, 073002. 10.1088/2040-8978/18/7/073002 (2016). [Google Scholar]
- 2.Meda, A. et al. Photon-number correlation for quantum enhanced imaging and sensing. J. Opt.19, 094002. 10.1088/2040-8986/aa7b27 (2017). [Google Scholar]
- 3.Moreau, P.-A., Toninelli, E., Gregory, T. & Padgett, M. J. Imaging with quantum states of light. Nat. Rev. Phys.1, 367–380. 10.1038/s42254-019-0056-0 (2019). [Google Scholar]
- 4.Burnham, D. C. & Weinberg, D. L. Observation of simultaneity in parametric production of optical photon pairs. Phys. Rev. Lett.25, 84–87. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.25.84 (1970). [Google Scholar]
- 5.Devaux, F., Mougin-Sisini, J., Moreau, P. A. & Lantz, E. Towards the evidence of a purely spatial Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox in images: Measurement scheme and first experimental results. Eur. Phys. J. D[SPACE]10.1140/epjd/e2012-20695-2 (2012). [Google Scholar]
- 6.Edgar, M. et al. Imaging high-dimensional spatial entanglement with a camera. Nat. Commun.3, 984. 10.1038/ncomms1988 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Moreau, P.-A., Mougin-Sisini, J., Devaux, F. & Lantz, E. Realization of the purely spatial Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox in full-field images of spontaneous parametric down-conversion. Phys. Rev. A86, 010101. 10.1103/PhysRevA.86.010101 (2012). [Google Scholar]
- 8.Moreau, P.-A., Devaux, F. & Lantz, E. Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox in twin images. Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 160401. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.160401 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lantz, E., Denis, S., Moreau, P.-A. & Devaux, F. Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox in single pairs of images. Opt. Express23, 26472. 10.1364/OE.23.026472 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Jedrkiewicz, O. et al. Detection of sub-shot-noise spatial correlation in high-gain parametric down conversion. Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 243601. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.243601 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Jedrkiewicz, O. et al. Quantum spatial correlations in high-gain parametric down-conversion measured by means of a CCD camera. J. Mod. Opt.53, 575–595. 10.1080/09500340500217670 (2006). [Google Scholar]
- 12.Unternährer, M., Bessire, B., Gasparini, L., Stoppa, D. & Stefanov, A. Coincidence detection of spatially correlated photon pairs with a monolithic time-resolving detector array. Opt. Express24, 28829–28841. 10.1364/OE.24.028829 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Eckmann, B. et al. Characterization of space-momentum entangled photons with a time resolving CMOS SPAD array. Opt. Express28, 31553. 10.1364/OE.401260 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ndagano, B. et al. Imaging and certifying high-dimensional entanglement with a single-photon avalanche diode camera. NPJ Quant. Inf.6, 94. 10.1038/s41534-020-00324-8 (2020). [Google Scholar]
- 15.Courme, B., Cameron, P., Faccio, D., Gigan, S. & Defienne, H. Manipulation and certification of high-dimensional entanglement through a scattering medium. PRX Quant.4, 010308. 10.1103/PRXQuantum.4.010308 (2023). [Google Scholar]
- 16.Zhang, Y. et al. Multidimensional quantum-enhanced target detection via spectrotemporal-correlation measurements. Phys. Rev. A101, 053808. 10.1103/PhysRevA.101.053808 (2020). [Google Scholar]
- 17.Courme, B. et al. Quantifying high-dimensional spatial entanglement with a single-photon-sensitive time-stamping camera. Opt. Lett.48, 3439. 10.1364/OL.487182 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lopaeva, E. D. et al. Experimental realisation of quantum illumination. Phys. Rev. Lett.[SPACE]10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.153603 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Toninelli, E., Gregory, T., Moreau, P.-A. & Padgett, M. J. Beating classical imaging limits with entangled photons. In Optical, Opto-Atomic, and Entanglement-Enhanced Precision Metrology (eds Shahriar, S. M. & Scheuer, J.) (SPIE, San Francisco, United States, 2019). 10.1117/12.2515497. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Gregory, T., Moreau, P.-A., Toninelli, E. & Padgett, M. J. Imaging through noise with quantum illumination. Sci. Adv.6, eaay2652. 10.1126/sciadv.aay2652 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Gregory, T., Moreau, P.-A., Mekhail, S., Wolley, O. & Padgett, M. J. Noise rejection through an improved quantum illumination protocol. Sci. Rep.11, 21841. 10.1038/s41598-021-01122-8 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Gregory, T. et al. Quantum illumination correlation peak integration. In Quantum Technology: Driving Commercialisation of an Enabling Science IV, (SPIE (eds Padgett, M. J. et al.) (Glasgow, United Kingdom, 2023). 10.1117/12.3004190. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Defienne, H., Zhao, J., Charbon, E. & Faccio, D. Full-field quantum imaging with a single-photon avalanche diode camera. Phys. Rev. A103, 042608. 10.1103/PhysRevA.103.042608 (2021). [Google Scholar]
- 24.Wolley, O., Gregory, T., Beer, S., Higuchi, T. & Padgett, M. Quantum imaging with a photon counting camera. Sci. Rep.12, 8286. 10.1038/s41598-022-10037-x (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Johnson, S., McMillan, A., Frick, S., Rarity, J. & Padgett, M. Hiding images in noise. Opt. Express31, 5290. 10.1364/OE.480881 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Toninelli, E. et al. Resolution-enhanced quantum imaging by centroid estimation of biphotons. Optica6, 347. 10.1364/OPTICA.6.000347 (2019). [Google Scholar]
- 27.Defienne, H. et al. Pixel super-resolution with spatially entangled photons. Nat. Commun.13, 3566. 10.1038/s41467-022-31052-6 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Aspden, R. S., Tasca, D. S., Boyd, R. W. & Padgett, M. J. EPR-based ghost imaging using a single-photon-sensitive camera. New J. Phys.15, 073032. 10.1088/1367-2630/15/7/073032 (2013). [Google Scholar]
- 29.Morris, P. A., Aspden, R. S., Bell, J. E. C., Boyd, R. W. & Padgett, M. J. Imaging with a small number of photons. Nat. Commun.6, 5913. 10.1038/ncomms6913 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Moreau, P.-A. et al. Imaging Bell-type nonlocal behavior. Sci. Adv.5, eaaw2563. 10.1126/sciadv.aaw2563 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Gili, V. F. et al. Quantum ghost imaging based on a “looking back’’ 2D SPAD array. Appl. Opt.62, 3093. 10.1364/AO.487084 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Brida, G., Genovese, M. & Berchera, I. R. Experimental realization of sub-shot-noise quantum imaging. Nat. Photonics4, 227–230. 10.1038/nphoton.2010.29 (2010). [Google Scholar]
- 33.Blanchet, J.-L., Devaux, F., Furfaro, L. & Lantz, E. Measurement of sub-shot-noise correlations of spatial fluctuations in the photon-counting regime. Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 233604. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.233604 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Toninelli, E. et al. Sub-shot-noise shadow sensing with quantum correlations. Opt. Express25, 21826. 10.1364/OE.25.021826 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Gnatiessoro, S., Mosset, A., Lantz, E. & Devaux, F. Imaging spatial quantum correlations through a thin scattering medium. OSA Contin.2, 3393. 10.1364/OSAC.2.003393 (2019). [Google Scholar]
- 36.Defienne, H. et al. Single-photon entanglement generation by wavefront shaping in a multiple-scattering medium. Opt. Lett.39, 6090. 10.1364/OL.39.006090 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Ortolano, G. et al. Quantum enhanced non-interferometric quantitative phase imaging. Light Sci. Appl.12, 171. 10.1038/s41377-023-01215-1 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Zhang, Y., England, D. & Sussman, B. Snapshot hyperspectral imaging with quantum correlated photons. Opt. Express31, 2282. 10.1364/OE.462587 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Zhang, Y., Orth, A., England, D. & Sussman, B. Ray tracing with quantum correlated photons to image a three-dimensional scene. Phys. Rev. A105, L011701. 10.1103/PhysRevA.105.L011701 (2022). [Google Scholar]
- 40.Zhao, J. et al. Light detection and ranging with entangled photons. Opt. Express30, 3675. 10.1364/OE.435898 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Roberts, K., Wolley, O., Gregory, T. & Padgett, M. J. A comparison between the measurement of quantum spatial correlations using qCMOS photon-number resolving and electron multiplying CCD camera technologies. Sci. Rep.14, 14687. 10.1038/s41598-024-64674-5 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Basden, A. G., Haniff, C. A. & Mackay, C. D. Photon counting strategies with low-light-level CCDs. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.345, 985–991. 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.07020.x (2003). [Google Scholar]
- 43.Lantz, E., Blanchet, J.-L., Furfaro, L. & Devaux, F. Multi-imaging and Bayesian estimation for photon counting with EMCCDs. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.386, 2262–2270. 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13200.x (2008). [Google Scholar]
- 44.Brambilla, E., Gatti, A., Bache, M. & Lugiato, L. A. Simultaneous near-field and far-field spatial quantum correlations in the high-gain regime of parametric down-conversion. Phys. Rev. A69, 023802. 10.1103/PhysRevA.69.023802 (2004). [Google Scholar]
- 45.Tasca, D. S., Edgar, M. P., Izdebski, F., Buller, G. S. & Padgett, M. J. Optimizing the use of detector arrays for measuring intensity correlations of photon pairs. Phys. Rev. A[SPACE]10.1103/PhysRevA.88.013816 (2013). [Google Scholar]
- 46.Moreau, P.-A., Toninelli, E., Gregory, T. & Padgett, M. J. Ghost imaging using optical correlations. Laser Photonics Rev.12, 1700143. 10.1002/lpor.201700143 (2017). [Google Scholar]
- 47.Oxford Instruments: Andor. iXon Ultra 897 Hardware Guide . https://andor.oxinst.com/downloads/uploads/ iXon_Ultra_Hardware_User_Guide-1.pdf. Accessed: 18/08/2024.
- 48.Toninelli, E., Moreau, P.-A., Gregory, T. & Padgett, M. J. A model for the detection of spatially correlated biphotons using a photon-counting camera. arXiv:1911.10562 [physics, physics:quant-ph] 10.48550/arXiv.1911.10562 (2019).
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Data required to evaluate the conclusions in this paper are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.




















































