Skip to main content
PMC home page
The EMBO Journal logoLink to The EMBO Journal
. 1998 Sep 1;17(17):4909–4919. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.17.4909

Active site mutants in the six regulatory particle ATPases reveal multiple roles for ATP in the proteasome.

D M Rubin 1, M H Glickman 1, C N Larsen 1, S Dhruvakumar 1, D Finley 1
PMCID: PMC1170820  PMID: 9724628

Abstract

A family of ATPases resides within the regulatory particle of the proteasome. These proteins (Rpt1-Rpt6) have been proposed to mediate substrate unfolding, which may be required for translocation of substrates through the channel that leads from the regulatory particle into the proteolytic core particle. To analyze the role of ATP hydrolysis in protein breakdown at the level of the individual ATPase, we have introduced equivalent site-directed mutations into the ATPbinding motif of each RPT gene. Non-conservative substitutions of the active-site lysine were lethal in four of six cases, and conferred a strong growth defect in two cases. Thus, the ATPases are not functionally redundant, despite their multiplicity and sequence similarity. Degradation of a specific substrate can be inhibited by ATP-binding-site substitutions in many of the Rpt proteins, indicating that they co-operate in the degradation of individual substrates. The phenotypic defects of the different rpt mutants were strikingly varied. The most divergent phenotype was that of the rpt1 mutant, which was strongly growth defective despite showing no general defect in protein turnover. In addition, rpt1 was unique among the rpt mutants in displaying a G1 cell-cycle defect. Proteasomes purified from an rpt2 mutant showed a dramatic inhibition of peptidase activity, suggesting a defect in gating of the proteasome channel. In summary, ATP promotes protein breakdown by the proteasome through multiple mechanisms, as reflected by the diverse phenotypes of the rpt mutants.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (330.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adams G. M., Falke S., Goldberg A. L., Slaughter C. A., DeMartino G. N., Gogol E. P. Structural and functional effects of PA700 and modulator protein on proteasomes. J Mol Biol. 1997 Oct 31;273(3):646–657. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1997.1334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Arendt C. S., Hochstrasser M. Identification of the yeast 20S proteasome catalytic centers and subunit interactions required for active-site formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Jul 8;94(14):7156–7161. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.14.7156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Armon T., Ganoth D., Hershko A. Assembly of the 26 S complex that degrades proteins ligated to ubiquitin is accompanied by the formation of ATPase activity. J Biol Chem. 1990 Dec 5;265(34):20723–20726. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bachmair A., Finley D., Varshavsky A. In vivo half-life of a protein is a function of its amino-terminal residue. Science. 1986 Oct 10;234(4773):179–186. doi: 10.1126/science.3018930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Baumeister W., Walz J., Zühl F., Seemüller E. The proteasome: paradigm of a self-compartmentalizing protease. Cell. 1998 Feb 6;92(3):367–380. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80929-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Beal R. E., Toscano-Cantaffa D., Young P., Rechsteiner M., Pickart C. M. The hydrophobic effect contributes to polyubiquitin chain recognition. Biochemistry. 1998 Mar 3;37(9):2925–2934. doi: 10.1021/bi972514p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Berezutskaya E., Bagchi S. The human papillomavirus E7 oncoprotein functionally interacts with the S4 subunit of the 26 S proteasome. J Biol Chem. 1997 Nov 28;272(48):30135–30140. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.48.30135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Berger J. M., Gamblin S. J., Harrison S. C., Wang J. C. Structure and mechanism of DNA topoisomerase II. Nature. 1996 Jan 18;379(6562):225–232. doi: 10.1038/379225a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Beyer A. Sequence analysis of the AAA protein family. Protein Sci. 1997 Oct;6(10):2043–2058. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560061001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bradford M. M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976 May 7;72:248–254. doi: 10.1006/abio.1976.9999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Campbell C. L., Tanaka N., White K. H., Thorsness P. E. Mitochondrial morphological and functional defects in yeast caused by yme1 are suppressed by mutation of a 26S protease subunit homologue. Mol Biol Cell. 1994 Aug;5(8):899–905. doi: 10.1091/mbc.5.8.899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Chu-Ping M., Vu J. H., Proske R. J., Slaughter C. A., DeMartino G. N. Identification, purification, and characterization of a high molecular weight, ATP-dependent activator (PA700) of the 20 S proteasome. J Biol Chem. 1994 Feb 4;269(5):3539–3547. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Coux O., Tanaka K., Goldberg A. L. Structure and functions of the 20S and 26S proteasomes. Annu Rev Biochem. 1996;65:801–847. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.65.070196.004101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. DeMartino G. N., Moomaw C. R., Zagnitko O. P., Proske R. J., Chu-Ping M., Afendis S. J., Swaffield J. C., Slaughter C. A. PA700, an ATP-dependent activator of the 20 S proteasome, is an ATPase containing multiple members of a nucleotide-binding protein family. J Biol Chem. 1994 Aug 19;269(33):20878–20884. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ditzel L., Löwe J., Stock D., Stetter K. O., Huber H., Huber R., Steinbacher S. Crystal structure of the thermosome, the archaeal chaperonin and homolog of CCT. Cell. 1998 Apr 3;93(1):125–138. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81152-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Dubiel W., Ferrell K., Pratt G., Rechsteiner M. Subunit 4 of the 26 S protease is a member of a novel eukaryotic ATPase family. J Biol Chem. 1992 Nov 15;267(32):22699–22702. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Dubiel W., Ferrell K., Rechsteiner M. Peptide sequencing identifies MSS1, a modulator of HIV Tat-mediated transactivation, as subunit 7 of the 26 S protease. FEBS Lett. 1993 Jun 1;323(3):276–278. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(93)81356-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Fenton W. A., Horwich A. L. GroEL-mediated protein folding. Protein Sci. 1997 Apr;6(4):743–760. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560060401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Finley D., Ozkaynak E., Varshavsky A. The yeast polyubiquitin gene is essential for resistance to high temperatures, starvation, and other stresses. Cell. 1987 Mar 27;48(6):1035–1046. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90711-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Fraser R. A., Rossignol M., Heard D. J., Egly J. M., Chambon P. SUG1, a putative transcriptional mediator and subunit of the PA700 proteasome regulatory complex, is a DNA helicase. J Biol Chem. 1997 Mar 14;272(11):7122–7126. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.11.7122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Fu H., Sadis S., Rubin D. M., Glickman M., van Nocker S., Finley D., Vierstra R. D. Multiubiquitin chain binding and protein degradation are mediated by distinct domains within the 26 S proteasome subunit Mcb1. J Biol Chem. 1998 Jan 23;273(4):1970–1981. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.4.1970. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Fujimuro M., Tanaka K., Yokosawa H., Toh-e A. Son1p is a component of the 26S proteasome of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEBS Lett. 1998 Feb 20;423(2):149–154. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(98)00084-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Gerlinger U. M., Gückel R., Hoffmann M., Wolf D. H., Hilt W. Yeast cycloheximide-resistant crl mutants are proteasome mutants defective in protein degradation. Mol Biol Cell. 1997 Dec;8(12):2487–2499. doi: 10.1091/mbc.8.12.2487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Ghislain M., Udvardy A., Mann C. S. cerevisiae 26S protease mutants arrest cell division in G2/metaphase. Nature. 1993 Nov 25;366(6453):358–362. doi: 10.1038/366358a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Gietz R. D., Sugino A. New yeast-Escherichia coli shuttle vectors constructed with in vitro mutagenized yeast genes lacking six-base pair restriction sites. Gene. 1988 Dec 30;74(2):527–534. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(88)90185-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Glickman M. H., Rubin D. M., Fried V. A., Finley D. The regulatory particle of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae proteasome. Mol Cell Biol. 1998 Jun;18(6):3149–3162. doi: 10.1128/mcb.18.6.3149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Gorbalenya A. E., Koonin E. V., Donchenko A. P., Blinov V. M. Two related superfamilies of putative helicases involved in replication, recombination, repair and expression of DNA and RNA genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1989 Jun 26;17(12):4713–4730. doi: 10.1093/nar/17.12.4713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Gorbalenya A. E., Koonin E. V. Viral proteins containing the purine NTP-binding sequence pattern. Nucleic Acids Res. 1989 Nov 11;17(21):8413–8440. doi: 10.1093/nar/17.21.8413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Gordon C., McGurk G., Dillon P., Rosen C., Hastie N. D. Defective mitosis due to a mutation in the gene for a fission yeast 26S protease subunit. Nature. 1993 Nov 25;366(6453):355–357. doi: 10.1038/366355a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Gottesman S., Maurizi M. R., Wickner S. Regulatory subunits of energy-dependent proteases. Cell. 1997 Nov 14;91(4):435–438. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80428-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Groll M., Ditzel L., Löwe J., Stock D., Bochtler M., Bartunik H. D., Huber R. Structure of 20S proteasome from yeast at 2.4 A resolution. Nature. 1997 Apr 3;386(6624):463–471. doi: 10.1038/386463a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Heinemeyer W., Fischer M., Krimmer T., Stachon U., Wolf D. H. The active sites of the eukaryotic 20 S proteasome and their involvement in subunit precursor processing. J Biol Chem. 1997 Oct 3;272(40):25200–25209. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.40.25200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Heinemeyer W., Kleinschmidt J. A., Saidowsky J., Escher C., Wolf D. H. Proteinase yscE, the yeast proteasome/multicatalytic-multifunctional proteinase: mutants unravel its function in stress induced proteolysis and uncover its necessity for cell survival. EMBO J. 1991 Mar;10(3):555–562. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb07982.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Hershko A., Ciechanover A. The ubiquitin system for protein degradation. Annu Rev Biochem. 1992;61:761–807. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.61.070192.003553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Hershko A., Leshinsky E., Ganoth D., Heller H. ATP-dependent degradation of ubiquitin-protein conjugates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Mar;81(6):1619–1623. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.6.1619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Higuchi R., Krummel B., Saiki R. K. A general method of in vitro preparation and specific mutagenesis of DNA fragments: study of protein and DNA interactions. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988 Aug 11;16(15):7351–7367. doi: 10.1093/nar/16.15.7351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Hoffman L., Rechsteiner M. Activation of the multicatalytic protease. The 11 S regulator and 20 S ATPase complexes contain distinct 30-kilodalton subunits. J Biol Chem. 1994 Jun 17;269(24):16890–16895. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Hoffman L., Rechsteiner M. Nucleotidase activities of the 26 S proteasome and its regulatory complex. J Biol Chem. 1996 Dec 20;271(51):32538–32545. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.51.32538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Hough R., Pratt G., Rechsteiner M. Purification of two high molecular weight proteases from rabbit reticulocyte lysate. J Biol Chem. 1987 Jun 15;262(17):8303–8313. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Hutter K. J., Eipel H. E. Microbial determinations by flow cytometry. J Gen Microbiol. 1979 Aug;113(2):369–375. doi: 10.1099/00221287-113-2-369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Johnson E. S., Ma P. C., Ota I. M., Varshavsky A. A proteolytic pathway that recognizes ubiquitin as a degradation signal. J Biol Chem. 1995 Jul 21;270(29):17442–17456. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.29.17442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Kominami K., Okura N., Kawamura M., DeMartino G. N., Slaughter C. A., Shimbara N., Chung C. H., Fujimuro M., Yokosawa H., Shimizu Y. Yeast counterparts of subunits S5a and p58 (S3) of the human 26S proteasome are encoded by two multicopy suppressors of nin1-1. Mol Biol Cell. 1997 Jan;8(1):171–187. doi: 10.1091/mbc.8.1.171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Larsen C. N., Finley D. Protein translocation channels in the proteasome and other proteases. Cell. 1997 Nov 14;91(4):431–434. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80427-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Lin P., Cardillo T. S., Richard L. M., Segel G. B., Sherman F. Analysis of mutationally altered forms of the Cct6 subunit of the chaperonin from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1997 Dec;147(4):1609–1633. doi: 10.1093/genetics/147.4.1609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Lin P., Sherman F. The unique hetero-oligomeric nature of the subunits in the catalytic cooperativity of the yeast Cct chaperonin complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Sep 30;94(20):10780–10785. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.20.10780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Lindsley J. E., Wang J. C. Study of allosteric communication between protomers by immunotagging. Nature. 1993 Feb 25;361(6414):749–750. doi: 10.1038/361749a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Lucero H. A., Chojnicki E. W., Mandiyan S., Nelson H., Nelson N. Cloning and expression of a yeast gene encoding a protein with ATPase activity and high identity to the subunit 4 of the human 26 S protease. J Biol Chem. 1995 Apr 21;270(16):9178–9184. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.16.9178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Löwe J., Stock D., Jap B., Zwickl P., Baumeister W., Huber R. Crystal structure of the 20S proteasome from the archaeon T. acidophilum at 3.4 A resolution. Science. 1995 Apr 28;268(5210):533–539. doi: 10.1126/science.7725097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. McDonald H. B., Byers B. A proteasome cap subunit required for spindle pole body duplication in yeast. J Cell Biol. 1997 May 5;137(3):539–553. doi: 10.1083/jcb.137.3.539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Mian I. S. Sequence similarities between cell regulation factors, heat shock proteins and RNA helicases. Trends Biochem Sci. 1993 Apr;18(4):125–127. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Peters J. M., Cejka Z., Harris J. R., Kleinschmidt J. A., Baumeister W. Structural features of the 26 S proteasome complex. J Mol Biol. 1993 Dec 20;234(4):932–937. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Pickart C. M. Targeting of substrates to the 26S proteasome. FASEB J. 1997 Nov;11(13):1055–1066. doi: 10.1096/fasebj.11.13.9367341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Richmond C., Gorbea C., Rechsteiner M. Specific interactions between ATPase subunits of the 26 S protease. J Biol Chem. 1997 May 16;272(20):13403–13411. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.20.13403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Rock K. L., Gramm C., Rothstein L., Clark K., Stein R., Dick L., Hwang D., Goldberg A. L. Inhibitors of the proteasome block the degradation of most cell proteins and the generation of peptides presented on MHC class I molecules. Cell. 1994 Sep 9;78(5):761–771. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(94)90462-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Rubin D. M., Coux O., Wefes I., Hengartner C., Young R. A., Goldberg A. L., Finley D. Identification of the gal4 suppressor Sug1 as a subunit of the yeast 26S proteasome. Nature. 1996 Feb 15;379(6566):655–657. doi: 10.1038/379655a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Russell S. J., Sathyanarayana U. G., Johnston S. A. Isolation and characterization of SUG2. A novel ATPase family component of the yeast 26 S proteasome. J Biol Chem. 1996 Dec 20;271(51):32810–32817. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.51.32810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. SIMPSON M. V. The release of labeled amino acids from the proteins of rat liver slices. J Biol Chem. 1953 Mar;201(1):143–154. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Schnall R., Mannhaupt G., Stucka R., Tauer R., Ehnle S., Schwarzlose C., Vetter I., Feldmann H. Identification of a set of yeast genes coding for a novel family of putative ATPases with high similarity to constituents of the 26S protease complex. Yeast. 1994 Sep;10(9):1141–1155. doi: 10.1002/yea.320100903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Sears C., Olesen J., Rubin D., Finley D., Maniatis T. NF-kappa B p105 processing via the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. J Biol Chem. 1998 Jan 16;273(3):1409–1419. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.3.1409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Seeger M., Gordon C., Ferrell K., Dubiel W. Characteristics of 26 S proteases from fission yeast mutants, which arrest in mitosis. J Mol Biol. 1996 Nov 1;263(3):423–431. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Sung P., Higgins D., Prakash L., Prakash S. Mutation of lysine-48 to arginine in the yeast RAD3 protein abolishes its ATPase and DNA helicase activities but not the ability to bind ATP. EMBO J. 1988 Oct;7(10):3263–3269. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1988.tb03193.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Swaffield J. C., Bromberg J. F., Johnston S. A. Alterations in a yeast protein resembling HIV Tat-binding protein relieve requirement for an acidic activation domain in GAL4. Nature. 1992 Jun 25;357(6380):698–700. doi: 10.1038/357698a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Varshavsky A. The N-end rule. Cell. 1992 May 29;69(5):725–735. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90285-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Walker J. E., Saraste M., Runswick M. J., Gay N. J. Distantly related sequences in the alpha- and beta-subunits of ATP synthase, myosin, kinases and other ATP-requiring enzymes and a common nucleotide binding fold. EMBO J. 1982;1(8):945–951. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1982.tb01276.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Young P., Deveraux Q., Beal R. E., Pickart C. M., Rechsteiner M. Characterization of two polyubiquitin binding sites in the 26 S protease subunit 5a. J Biol Chem. 1998 Mar 6;273(10):5461–5467. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.10.5461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. van Nocker S., Sadis S., Rubin D. M., Glickman M., Fu H., Coux O., Wefes I., Finley D., Vierstra R. D. The multiubiquitin-chain-binding protein Mcb1 is a component of the 26S proteasome in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and plays a nonessential, substrate-specific role in protein turnover. Mol Cell Biol. 1996 Nov;16(11):6020–6028. doi: 10.1128/mcb.16.11.6020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The EMBO Journal are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES