Skip to main content
PMC home page
The EMBO Journal logoLink to The EMBO Journal
. 1998 Oct 1;17(19):5757–5765. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.19.5757

Srb/mediator proteins interact functionally and physically with transcriptional repressor Sfl1.

W Song 1, M Carlson 1
PMCID: PMC1170903  PMID: 9755175

Abstract

Srb/mediator proteins that are associated with RNA polymerase II holoenzyme have been implicated in transcriptional repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We show here that the defect in repression of SUC2 caused by mutation of SRB8, SRB9, SRB11, SIN4 or ROX3 is suppressed by increased dosage of the SFL1 gene, and the genetic behavior of the sfl1Delta mutation provides further evidence for a functional relationship. Sfl1 acts on SUC2 through a repression site located immediately 5' to the TATA box, and Sfl1 binds this DNA sequence in vitro. Moreover, LexA-Sfl1 represses transcription of a reporter, and repression is reduced in an srb9 mutant. Finally, we show that Sfl1 co-immunoprecipitates from cell extracts with Srb9, Srb11, Sin4 and Rox3. We propose that Sfl1, when bound to its site, interacts with Srb/mediator proteins to inhibit transcription by RNA polymerase II holoenzyme.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (329.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Balciunas D., Ronne H. Three subunits of the RNA polymerase II mediator complex are involved in glucose repression. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995 Nov 11;23(21):4421–4425. doi: 10.1093/nar/23.21.4421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barberis A., Pearlberg J., Simkovich N., Farrell S., Reinagel P., Bamdad C., Sigal G., Ptashne M. Contact with a component of the polymerase II holoenzyme suffices for gene activation. Cell. 1995 May 5;81(3):359–368. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90389-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Carlson M. Genetics of transcriptional regulation in yeast: connections to the RNA polymerase II CTD. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 1997;13:1–23. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.13.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Carlson M., Osmond B. C., Neigeborn L., Botstein D. A suppressor of SNF1 mutations causes constitutive high-level invertase synthesis in yeast. Genetics. 1984 May;107(1):19–32. doi: 10.1093/genetics/107.1.19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chao D. M., Gadbois E. L., Murray P. J., Anderson S. F., Sonu M. S., Parvin J. D., Young R. A. A mammalian SRB protein associated with an RNA polymerase II holoenzyme. Nature. 1996 Mar 7;380(6569):82–85. doi: 10.1038/380082a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chen S., West R. W., Jr, Johnson S. L., Gans H., Kruger B., Ma J. TSF3, a global regulatory protein that silences transcription of yeast GAL genes, also mediates repression by alpha 2 repressor and is identical to SIN4. Mol Cell Biol. 1993 Feb;13(2):831–840. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.2.831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cooper J. P., Roth S. Y., Simpson R. T. The global transcriptional regulators, SSN6 and TUP1, play distinct roles in the establishment of a repressive chromatin structure. Genes Dev. 1994 Jun 15;8(12):1400–1410. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.12.1400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Covitz P. A., Song W., Mitchell A. P. Requirement for RGR1 and SIN4 in RME1-dependent repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1994 Nov;138(3):577–586. doi: 10.1093/genetics/138.3.577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Edmondson D. G., Smith M. M., Roth S. Y. Repression domain of the yeast global repressor Tup1 interacts directly with histones H3 and H4. Genes Dev. 1996 May 15;10(10):1247–1259. doi: 10.1101/gad.10.10.1247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Farrell S., Simkovich N., Wu Y., Barberis A., Ptashne M. Gene activation by recruitment of the RNA polymerase II holoenzyme. Genes Dev. 1996 Sep 15;10(18):2359–2367. doi: 10.1101/gad.10.18.2359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Fujita A., Kikuchi Y., Kuhara S., Misumi Y., Matsumoto S., Kobayashi H. Domains of the SFL1 protein of yeasts are homologous to Myc oncoproteins or yeast heat-shock transcription factor. Gene. 1989 Dec 28;85(2):321–328. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(89)90424-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Greenblatt J. RNA polymerase II holoenzyme and transcriptional regulation. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1997 Jun;9(3):310–319. doi: 10.1016/s0955-0674(97)80002-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Guarente L., Hoar E. Upstream activation sites of the CYC1 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae are active when inverted but not when placed downstream of the "TATA box". Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Dec;81(24):7860–7864. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.24.7860. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Guarente L. Yeast promoters and lacZ fusions designed to study expression of cloned genes in yeast. Methods Enzymol. 1983;101:181–191. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(83)01013-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gustafsson C. M., Myers L. C., Li Y., Redd M. J., Lui M., Erdjument-Bromage H., Tempst P., Kornberg R. D. Identification of Rox3 as a component of mediator and RNA polymerase II holoenzyme. J Biol Chem. 1997 Jan 3;272(1):48–50. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.1.48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hanes S. D., Brent R. DNA specificity of the bicoid activator protein is determined by homeodomain recognition helix residue 9. Cell. 1989 Jun 30;57(7):1275–1283. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90063-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hanna-Rose W., Hansen U. Active repression mechanisms of eukaryotic transcription repressors. Trends Genet. 1996 Jun;12(6):229–234. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(96)10022-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hengartner C. J., Thompson C. M., Zhang J., Chao D. M., Liao S. M., Koleske A. J., Okamura S., Young R. A. Association of an activator with an RNA polymerase II holoenzyme. Genes Dev. 1995 Apr 15;9(8):897–910. doi: 10.1101/gad.9.8.897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Himmelfarb H. J., Pearlberg J., Last D. H., Ptashne M. GAL11P: a yeast mutation that potentiates the effect of weak GAL4-derived activators. Cell. 1990 Dec 21;63(6):1299–1309. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90425-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Jiang Y. W., Stillman D. J. Involvement of the SIN4 global transcriptional regulator in the chromatin structure of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1992 Oct;12(10):4503–4514. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.10.4503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Johnson A. D. The price of repression. Cell. 1995 Jun 2;81(5):655–658. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90524-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Keleher C. A., Redd M. J., Schultz J., Carlson M., Johnson A. D. Ssn6-Tup1 is a general repressor of transcription in yeast. Cell. 1992 Feb 21;68(4):709–719. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90146-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kim Y. J., Björklund S., Li Y., Sayre M. H., Kornberg R. D. A multiprotein mediator of transcriptional activation and its interaction with the C-terminal repeat domain of RNA polymerase II. Cell. 1994 May 20;77(4):599–608. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90221-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Koleske A. J., Young R. A. An RNA polymerase II holoenzyme responsive to activators. Nature. 1994 Mar 31;368(6470):466–469. doi: 10.1038/368466a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kuchin S., Carlson M. Functional relationships of Srb10-Srb11 kinase, carboxy-terminal domain kinase CTDK-I, and transcriptional corepressor Ssn6-Tup1. Mol Cell Biol. 1998 Mar;18(3):1163–1171. doi: 10.1128/mcb.18.3.1163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kuchin S., Yeghiayan P., Carlson M. Cyclin-dependent protein kinase and cyclin homologs SSN3 and SSN8 contribute to transcriptional control in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Apr 25;92(9):4006–4010. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.9.4006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Laurent B. C., Carlson M. Yeast SNF2/SWI2, SNF5, and SNF6 proteins function coordinately with the gene-specific transcriptional activators GAL4 and Bicoid. Genes Dev. 1992 Sep;6(9):1707–1715. doi: 10.1101/gad.6.9.1707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Legrain P., Dokhelar M. C., Transy C. Detection of protein-protein interactions using different vectors in the two-hybrid system. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994 Aug 11;22(15):3241–3242. doi: 10.1093/nar/22.15.3241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Li Y., Bjorklund S., Jiang Y. W., Kim Y. J., Lane W. S., Stillman D. J., Kornberg R. D. Yeast global transcriptional regulators Sin4 and Rgr1 are components of mediator complex/RNA polymerase II holoenzyme. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Nov 21;92(24):10864–10868. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.24.10864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Liao S. M., Zhang J., Jeffery D. A., Koleske A. J., Thompson C. M., Chao D. M., Viljoen M., van Vuuren H. J., Young R. A. A kinase-cyclin pair in the RNA polymerase II holoenzyme. Nature. 1995 Mar 9;374(6518):193–196. doi: 10.1038/374193a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Lutfiyya L. L., Johnston M. Two zinc-finger-containing repressors are responsible for glucose repression of SUC2 expression. Mol Cell Biol. 1996 Sep;16(9):4790–4797. doi: 10.1128/mcb.16.9.4790. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Maldonado E., Shiekhattar R., Sheldon M., Cho H., Drapkin R., Rickert P., Lees E., Anderson C. W., Linn S., Reinberg D. A human RNA polymerase II complex associated with SRB and DNA-repair proteins. Nature. 1996 May 2;381(6577):86–89. doi: 10.1038/381086a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Myers L. C., Gustafsson C. M., Bushnell D. A., Lui M., Erdjument-Bromage H., Tempst P., Kornberg R. D. The Med proteins of yeast and their function through the RNA polymerase II carboxy-terminal domain. Genes Dev. 1998 Jan 1;12(1):45–54. doi: 10.1101/gad.12.1.45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Nehlin J. O., Ronne H. Yeast MIG1 repressor is related to the mammalian early growth response and Wilms' tumour finger proteins. EMBO J. 1990 Sep;9(9):2891–2898. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb07479.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Neish A. S., Anderson S. F., Schlegel B. P., Wei W., Parvin J. D. Factors associated with the mammalian RNA polymerase II holoenzyme. Nucleic Acids Res. 1998 Feb 1;26(3):847–853. doi: 10.1093/nar/26.3.847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Nonet M. L., Young R. A. Intragenic and extragenic suppressors of mutations in the heptapeptide repeat domain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae RNA polymerase II. Genetics. 1989 Dec;123(4):715–724. doi: 10.1093/genetics/123.4.715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Ossipow V., Tassan J. P., Nigg E. A., Schibler U. A mammalian RNA polymerase II holoenzyme containing all components required for promoter-specific transcription initiation. Cell. 1995 Oct 6;83(1):137–146. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90242-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Ozcan S., Vallier L. G., Flick J. S., Carlson M., Johnston M. Expression of the SUC2 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is induced by low levels of glucose. Yeast. 1997 Feb;13(2):127–137. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0061(199702)13:2<127::AID-YEA68>3.0.CO;2-#. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Pan G., Aso T., Greenblatt J. Interaction of elongation factors TFIIS and elongin A with a human RNA polymerase II holoenzyme capable of promoter-specific initiation and responsive to transcriptional activators. J Biol Chem. 1997 Sep 26;272(39):24563–24571. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.39.24563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Piruat J. I., Chávez S., Aguilera A. The yeast HRS1 gene is involved in positive and negative regulation of transcription and shows genetic characteristics similar to SIN4 and GAL11. Genetics. 1997 Dec;147(4):1585–1594. doi: 10.1093/genetics/147.4.1585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Rose M. D., Novick P., Thomas J. H., Botstein D., Fink G. R. A Saccharomyces cerevisiae genomic plasmid bank based on a centromere-containing shuttle vector. Gene. 1987;60(2-3):237–243. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(87)90232-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Rosenblum-Vos L. S., Rhodes L., Evangelista C. C., Jr, Boayke K. A., Zitomer R. S. The ROX3 gene encodes an essential nuclear protein involved in CYC7 gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Nov;11(11):5639–5647. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.11.5639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Roth S. Y. Chromatin-mediated transcriptional repression in yeast. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1995 Apr;5(2):168–173. doi: 10.1016/0959-437x(95)80004-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Sakai A., Shimizu Y., Kondou S., Chibazakura T., Hishinuma F. Structure and molecular analysis of RGR1, a gene required for glucose repression of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1990 Aug;10(8):4130–4138. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.8.4130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Sarokin L., Carlson M. Short repeated elements in the upstream regulatory region of the SUC2 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1986 Jul;6(7):2324–2333. doi: 10.1128/mcb.6.7.2324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Sarokin L., Carlson M. Upstream region of the SUC2 gene confers regulated expression to a heterologous gene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1985 Oct;5(10):2521–2526. doi: 10.1128/mcb.5.10.2521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Sarokin L., Carlson M. Upstream region required for regulated expression of the glucose-repressible SUC2 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1984 Dec;4(12):2750–2757. doi: 10.1128/mcb.4.12.2750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Schultz J., Carlson M. Molecular analysis of SSN6, a gene functionally related to the SNF1 protein kinase of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1987 Oct;7(10):3637–3645. doi: 10.1128/mcb.7.10.3637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Shimizu M., Li W., Shindo H., Mitchell A. P. Transcriptional repression at a distance through exclusion of activator binding in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Feb 4;94(3):790–795. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.3.790. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Song W., Treich I., Qian N., Kuchin S., Carlson M. SSN genes that affect transcriptional repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae encode SIN4, ROX3, and SRB proteins associated with RNA polymerase II. Mol Cell Biol. 1996 Jan;16(1):115–120. doi: 10.1128/mcb.16.1.115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Sorger P. K., Nelson H. C. Trimerization of a yeast transcriptional activator via a coiled-coil motif. Cell. 1989 Dec 1;59(5):807–813. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90604-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Sternberg P. W., Stern M. J., Clark I., Herskowitz I. Activation of the yeast HO gene by release from multiple negative controls. Cell. 1987 Feb 27;48(4):567–577. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90235-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Stillman D. J., Dorland S., Yu Y. Epistasis analysis of suppressor mutations that allow HO expression in the absence of the yeast SW15 transcriptional activator. Genetics. 1994 Mar;136(3):781–788. doi: 10.1093/genetics/136.3.781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Surosky R. T., Strich R., Esposito R. E. The yeast UME5 gene regulates the stability of meiotic mRNAs in response to glucose. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 May;14(5):3446–3458. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.5.3446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Thompson C. M., Koleske A. J., Chao D. M., Young R. A. A multisubunit complex associated with the RNA polymerase II CTD and TATA-binding protein in yeast. Cell. 1993 Jul 2;73(7):1361–1375. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90362-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Treitel M. A., Carlson M. Repression by SSN6-TUP1 is directed by MIG1, a repressor/activator protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Apr 11;92(8):3132–3136. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.8.3132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Tzamarias D., Struhl K. Distinct TPR motifs of Cyc8 are involved in recruiting the Cyc8-Tup1 corepressor complex to differentially regulated promoters. Genes Dev. 1995 Apr 1;9(7):821–831. doi: 10.1101/gad.9.7.821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Vallier L. G., Carlson M. Synergistic release from glucose repression by mig1 and ssn mutations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1994 May;137(1):49–54. doi: 10.1093/genetics/137.1.49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Wahi M., Johnson A. D. Identification of genes required for alpha 2 repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1995 May;140(1):79–90. doi: 10.1093/genetics/140.1.79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Williams F. E., Varanasi U., Trumbly R. J. The CYC8 and TUP1 proteins involved in glucose repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae are associated in a protein complex. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Jun;11(6):3307–3316. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.6.3307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Yang X., Hubbard E. J., Carlson M. A protein kinase substrate identified by the two-hybrid system. Science. 1992 Jul 31;257(5070):680–682. doi: 10.1126/science.1496382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The EMBO Journal are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES