Skip to main content
PMC home page
The EMBO Journal logoLink to The EMBO Journal
. 1998 Oct 15;17(20):6028–6038. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.20.6028

Nucleosome structure of the yeast CHA1 promoter: analysis of activation-dependent chromatin remodeling of an RNA-polymerase-II-transcribed gene in TBP and RNA pol II mutants defective in vivo in response to acidic activators.

J M Moreira 1, S Holmberg 1
PMCID: PMC1170929  PMID: 9774346

Abstract

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae CHA1 gene encodes the catabolic L-serine (L-threonine) dehydratase. We have previously shown that the transcriptional activator protein Cha4p mediates serine/threonine induction of CHA1 expression. We used accessibility to micrococcal nuclease and DNase I to determine the in vivo chromatin structure of the CHA1 chromosomal locus, both in the non-induced state and upon induction. Upon activation, a precisely positioned nucleosome (nuc-1) occluding the TATA box and the transcription start site is removed. A strain devoid of Cha4p showed no chromatin alteration under inducing conditions. Five yeast TBP mutants defective in different steps in activated transcription abolished CHA1 expression, but failed to affect induction-dependent chromatin rearrangement of the promoter region. Progressive truncations of the RNA polymerase II C-terminal domain caused a progressive reduction in CHA1 transcription, but no difference in chromatin remodeling. Analysis of swi1, swi3, snf5 and snf6, as well as gcn5, ada2 and ada3 mutants, suggested that neither the SWI/SNF complex nor the ADA/GCN5 complex is involved in efficient activation and/or remodeling of the CHA1 promoter. Interestingly, in a sir4 deletion strain, repression of CHA1 is partly lost and activator-independent remodeling of nuc-1 is observed. We propose a model for CHA1 activation based on promoter remodeling through interactions of Cha4p with chromatin components other than basal factors and associated proteins.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (433.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Allison L. A., Moyle M., Shales M., Ingles C. J. Extensive homology among the largest subunits of eukaryotic and prokaryotic RNA polymerases. Cell. 1985 Sep;42(2):599–610. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90117-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Almer A., Hörz W. Nuclease hypersensitive regions with adjacent positioned nucleosomes mark the gene boundaries of the PHO5/PHO3 locus in yeast. EMBO J. 1986 Oct;5(10):2681–2687. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1986.tb04551.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Aparicio O. M., Billington B. L., Gottschling D. E. Modifiers of position effect are shared between telomeric and silent mating-type loci in S. cerevisiae. Cell. 1991 Sep 20;66(6):1279–1287. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90049-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Barberis A., Pearlberg J., Simkovich N., Farrell S., Reinagel P., Bamdad C., Sigal G., Ptashne M. Contact with a component of the polymerase II holoenzyme suffices for gene activation. Cell. 1995 May 5;81(3):359–368. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90389-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Barlev N. A., Candau R., Wang L., Darpino P., Silverman N., Berger S. L. Characterization of physical interactions of the putative transcriptional adaptor, ADA2, with acidic activation domains and TATA-binding protein. J Biol Chem. 1995 Aug 18;270(33):19337–19344. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.33.19337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bornaes C., Ignjatovic M. W., Schjerling P., Kielland-Brandt M. C., Holmberg S. A regulatory element in the CHA1 promoter which confers inducibility by serine and threonine on Saccharomyces cerevisiae genes. Mol Cell Biol. 1993 Dec;13(12):7604–7611. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.12.7604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Brownell J. E., Zhou J., Ranalli T., Kobayashi R., Edmondson D. G., Roth S. Y., Allis C. D. Tetrahymena histone acetyltransferase A: a homolog to yeast Gcn5p linking histone acetylation to gene activation. Cell. 1996 Mar 22;84(6):843–851. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81063-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Buratowski S. The basics of basal transcription by RNA polymerase II. Cell. 1994 Apr 8;77(1):1–3. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90226-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cairns B. R. Chromatin remodeling machines: similar motors, ulterior motives. Trends Biochem Sci. 1998 Jan;23(1):20–25. doi: 10.1016/s0968-0004(97)01160-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Candau R., Berger S. L. Structural and functional analysis of yeast putative adaptors. Evidence for an adaptor complex in vivo. J Biol Chem. 1996 Mar 1;271(9):5237–5245. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.9.5237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Corden J. L., Cadena D. L., Ahearn J. M., Jr, Dahmus M. E. A unique structure at the carboxyl terminus of the largest subunit of eukaryotic RNA polymerase II. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Dec;82(23):7934–7938. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.23.7934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Espelund M., Stacy R. A., Jakobsen K. S. A simple method for generating single-stranded DNA probes labeled to high activities. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990 Oct 25;18(20):6157–6158. doi: 10.1093/nar/18.20.6157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Fascher K. D., Schmitz J., Hörz W. Structural and functional requirements for the chromatin transition at the PHO5 promoter in Saccharomyces cerevisiae upon PHO5 activation. J Mol Biol. 1993 Jun 5;231(3):658–667. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Fedor M. J., Kornberg R. D. Upstream activation sequence-dependent alteration of chromatin structure and transcription activation of the yeast GAL1-GAL10 genes. Mol Cell Biol. 1989 Apr;9(4):1721–1732. doi: 10.1128/mcb.9.4.1721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gaudreau L., Schmid A., Blaschke D., Ptashne M., Hörz W. RNA polymerase II holoenzyme recruitment is sufficient to remodel chromatin at the yeast PHO5 promoter. Cell. 1997 Apr 4;89(1):55–62. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80182-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Godde J. S., Nakatani Y., Wolffe A. P. The amino-terminal tails of the core histones and the translational position of the TATA box determine TBP/TFIIA association with nucleosomal DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995 Nov 25;23(22):4557–4564. doi: 10.1093/nar/23.22.4557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Han M., Grunstein M. Nucleosome loss activates yeast downstream promoters in vivo. Cell. 1988 Dec 23;55(6):1137–1145. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90258-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Holmberg S., Schjerling P. Cha4p of Saccharomyces cerevisiae activates transcription via serine/threonine response elements. Genetics. 1996 Oct;144(2):467–478. doi: 10.1093/genetics/144.2.467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Horiuchi J., Silverman N., Marcus G. A., Guarente L. ADA3, a putative transcriptional adaptor, consists of two separable domains and interacts with ADA2 and GCN5 in a trimeric complex. Mol Cell Biol. 1995 Mar;15(3):1203–1209. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.3.1203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Horiuchi J., Silverman N., Piña B., Marcus G. A., Guarente L. ADA1, a novel component of the ADA/GCN5 complex, has broader effects than GCN5, ADA2, or ADA3. Mol Cell Biol. 1997 Jun;17(6):3220–3228. doi: 10.1128/mcb.17.6.3220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Imbalzano A. N., Kwon H., Green M. R., Kingston R. E. Facilitated binding of TATA-binding protein to nucleosomal DNA. Nature. 1994 Aug 11;370(6489):481–485. doi: 10.1038/370481a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Joliot V., Demma M., Prywes R. Interaction with RAP74 subunit of TFIIF is required for transcriptional activation by serum response factor. Nature. 1995 Feb 16;373(6515):632–635. doi: 10.1038/373632a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kimmerly W. J., Rine J. Replication and segregation of plasmids containing cis-acting regulatory sites of silent mating-type genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae are controlled by the SIR genes. Mol Cell Biol. 1987 Dec;7(12):4225–4237. doi: 10.1128/mcb.7.12.4225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kingston R. E., Bunker C. A., Imbalzano A. N. Repression and activation by multiprotein complexes that alter chromatin structure. Genes Dev. 1996 Apr 15;10(8):905–920. doi: 10.1101/gad.10.8.905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Klages N., Strubin M. Stimulation of RNA polymerase II transcription initiation by recruitment of TBP in vivo. Nature. 1995 Apr 27;374(6525):822–823. doi: 10.1038/374822a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Klein C., Struhl K. Increased recruitment of TATA-binding protein to the promoter by transcriptional activation domains in vivo. Science. 1994 Oct 14;266(5183):280–282. doi: 10.1126/science.7939664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Knezetic J. A., Luse D. S. The presence of nucleosomes on a DNA template prevents initiation by RNA polymerase II in vitro. Cell. 1986 Apr 11;45(1):95–104. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90541-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kobayashi N., Boyer T. G., Berk A. J. A class of activation domains interacts directly with TFIIA and stimulates TFIIA-TFIID-promoter complex assembly. Mol Cell Biol. 1995 Nov;15(11):6465–6473. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.11.6465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Kuo M. H., Brownell J. E., Sobel R. E., Ranalli T. A., Cook R. G., Edmondson D. G., Roth S. Y., Allis C. D. Transcription-linked acetylation by Gcn5p of histones H3 and H4 at specific lysines. Nature. 1996 Sep 19;383(6597):269–272. doi: 10.1038/383269a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Laybourn P. J., Kadonaga J. T. Role of nucleosomal cores and histone H1 in regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase II. Science. 1991 Oct 11;254(5029):238–245. doi: 10.1126/science.254.5029.238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Lee M. S., Garrard W. T. Transcription-induced nucleosome 'splitting': an underlying structure for DNase I sensitive chromatin. EMBO J. 1991 Mar;10(3):607–615. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb07988.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Li G., Chandler S. P., Wolffe A. P., Hall T. C. Architectural specificity in chromatin structure at the TATA box in vivo: nucleosome displacement upon beta-phaseolin gene activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Apr 14;95(8):4772–4777. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.8.4772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Liao S. M., Taylor I. C., Kingston R. E., Young R. A. RNA polymerase II carboxy-terminal domain contributes to the response to multiple acidic activators in vitro. Genes Dev. 1991 Dec;5(12B):2431–2440. doi: 10.1101/gad.5.12b.2431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Lin Y. S., Ha I., Maldonado E., Reinberg D., Green M. R. Binding of general transcription factor TFIIB to an acidic activating region. Nature. 1991 Oct 10;353(6344):569–571. doi: 10.1038/353569a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Lohr D., Hopper J. E. The relationship of regulatory proteins and DNase I hypersensitive sites in the yeast GAL1-10 genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1985 Dec 9;13(23):8409–8423. doi: 10.1093/nar/13.23.8409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Lorch Y., LaPointe J. W., Kornberg R. D. Nucleosomes inhibit the initiation of transcription but allow chain elongation with the displacement of histones. Cell. 1987 Apr 24;49(2):203–210. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90561-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Lu Q., Wallrath L. L., Elgin S. C. The role of a positioned nucleosome at the Drosophila melanogaster hsp26 promoter. EMBO J. 1995 Oct 2;14(19):4738–4746. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb00155.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Marcus G. A., Horiuchi J., Silverman N., Guarente L. ADA5/SPT20 links the ADA and SPT genes, which are involved in yeast transcription. Mol Cell Biol. 1996 Jun;16(6):3197–3205. doi: 10.1128/mcb.16.6.3197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Meisterernst M., Horikoshi M., Roeder R. G. Recombinant yeast TFIID, a general transcription factor, mediates activation by the gene-specific factor USF in a chromatin assembly assay. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Dec;87(23):9153–9157. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.23.9153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Moazed D., Kistler A., Axelrod A., Rine J., Johnson A. D. Silent information regulator protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a SIR2/SIR4 complex and evidence for a regulatory domain in SIR4 that inhibits its interaction with SIR3. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Mar 18;94(6):2186–2191. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.6.2186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Nonet M., Sweetser D., Young R. A. Functional redundancy and structural polymorphism in the large subunit of RNA polymerase II. Cell. 1987 Sep 11;50(6):909–915. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90517-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Orphanides G., Lagrange T., Reinberg D. The general transcription factors of RNA polymerase II. Genes Dev. 1996 Nov 1;10(21):2657–2683. doi: 10.1101/gad.10.21.2657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Pazin M. J., Kadonaga J. T. SWI2/SNF2 and related proteins: ATP-driven motors that disrupt protein-DNA interactions? Cell. 1997 Mar 21;88(6):737–740. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81918-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Petersen J. G., Kielland-Brandt M. C., Nilsson-Tillgren T., Bornaes C., Holmberg S. Molecular genetics of serine and threonine catabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1988 Jul;119(3):527–534. doi: 10.1093/genetics/119.3.527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Pfaff S. L., Taylor W. L. Xenopus TFIIIA gene transcription is dependent on cis-element positioning and chromatin structure. Mol Cell Biol. 1998 Jul;18(7):3811–3818. doi: 10.1128/mcb.18.7.3811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Pollard K. J., Peterson C. L. Role for ADA/GCN5 products in antagonizing chromatin-mediated transcriptional repression. Mol Cell Biol. 1997 Nov;17(11):6212–6222. doi: 10.1128/mcb.17.11.6212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Pérez-Ortin J. E., Estruch F., Matallana E., Franco L. DNase I sensitivity of the chromatin of the yeast SUC2 gene for invertase. Mol Gen Genet. 1986 Dec;205(3):422–427. doi: 10.1007/BF00338077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Pérez-Ortín J. E., Estruch F., Matallana E., Franco L. Fine analysis of the chromatin structure of the yeast SUC2 gene and of its changes upon derepression. Comparison between the chromosomal and plasmid-inserted genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1987 Sep 11;15(17):6937–6956. doi: 10.1093/nar/15.17.6937. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Ramos F., Wiame J. M. Occurrence of a catabolic L-serine (L-threonine) deaminase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Eur J Biochem. 1982 Apr;123(3):571–576. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1982.tb06570.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Roth S. Y., Dean A., Simpson R. T. Yeast alpha 2 repressor positions nucleosomes in TRP1/ARS1 chromatin. Mol Cell Biol. 1990 May;10(5):2247–2260. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.5.2247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Saleh A., Lang V., Cook R., Brandl C. J. Identification of native complexes containing the yeast coactivator/repressor proteins NGG1/ADA3 and ADA2. J Biol Chem. 1997 Feb 28;272(9):5571–5578. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.9.5571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Scafe C., Chao D., Lopes J., Hirsch J. P., Henry S., Young R. A. RNA polymerase II C-terminal repeat influences response to transcriptional enhancer signals. Nature. 1990 Oct 4;347(6292):491–494. doi: 10.1038/347491a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Schild C., Claret F. X., Wahli W., Wolffe A. P. A nucleosome-dependent static loop potentiates estrogen-regulated transcription from the Xenopus vitellogenin B1 promoter in vitro. EMBO J. 1993 Feb;12(2):423–433. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1993.tb05674.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Schjerling P., Holmberg S. Comparative amino acid sequence analysis of the C6 zinc cluster family of transcriptional regulators. Nucleic Acids Res. 1996 Dec 1;24(23):4599–4607. doi: 10.1093/nar/24.23.4599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Seipel K., Georgiev O., Gerber H. P., Schaffner W. Basal components of the transcription apparatus (RNA polymerase II, TATA-binding protein) contain activation domains: is the repetitive C-terminal domain (CTD) of RNA polymerase II a "portable enhancer domain"? Mol Reprod Dev. 1994 Oct;39(2):215–225. doi: 10.1002/mrd.1080390215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Sheldon M., Reinberg D. Transcriptional activation. Tuning-up transcription. Curr Biol. 1995 Jan 1;5(1):43–46. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(95)00014-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Stargell L. A., Struhl K. A new class of activation-defective TATA-binding protein mutants: evidence for two steps of transcriptional activation in vivo. Mol Cell Biol. 1996 Aug;16(8):4456–4464. doi: 10.1128/mcb.16.8.4456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Stargell L. A., Struhl K. Mechanisms of transcriptional activation in vivo: two steps forward. Trends Genet. 1996 Aug;12(8):311–315. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(96)10028-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Stargell L. A., Struhl K. The TBP-TFIIA interaction in the response to acidic activators in vivo. Science. 1995 Jul 7;269(5220):75–78. doi: 10.1126/science.7604282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Straka C., Hörz W. A functional role for nucleosomes in the repression of a yeast promoter. EMBO J. 1991 Feb;10(2):361–368. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb07957.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Stringer K. F., Ingles C. J., Greenblatt J. Direct and selective binding of an acidic transcriptional activation domain to the TATA-box factor TFIID. Nature. 1990 Jun 28;345(6278):783–786. doi: 10.1038/345783a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Struhl K. Histone acetylation and transcriptional regulatory mechanisms. Genes Dev. 1998 Mar 1;12(5):599–606. doi: 10.1101/gad.12.5.599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Svaren J., Hörz W. Transcription factors vs nucleosomes: regulation of the PHO5 promoter in yeast. Trends Biochem Sci. 1997 Mar;22(3):93–97. doi: 10.1016/s0968-0004(97)01001-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Thomas G. H., Elgin S. C. Protein/DNA architecture of the DNase I hypersensitive region of the Drosophila hsp26 promoter. EMBO J. 1988 Jul;7(7):2191–2201. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1988.tb03058.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Tjian R., Maniatis T. Transcriptional activation: a complex puzzle with few easy pieces. Cell. 1994 Apr 8;77(1):5–8. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90227-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Usheva A., Maldonado E., Goldring A., Lu H., Houbavi C., Reinberg D., Aloni Y. Specific interaction between the nonphosphorylated form of RNA polymerase II and the TATA-binding protein. Cell. 1992 May 29;69(5):871–881. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90297-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Verdone L., Camilloni G., Di Mauro E., Caserta M. Chromatin remodeling during Saccharomyces cerevisiae ADH2 gene activation. Mol Cell Biol. 1996 May;16(5):1978–1988. doi: 10.1128/mcb.16.5.1978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Vincenz C., Fronk J., Tank G. A., Langmore J. P. Nucleoprotein hybridization: a method for isolating active and inactive genes as chromatin. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991 Mar 25;19(6):1325–1336. doi: 10.1093/nar/19.6.1325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Winston F., Carlson M. Yeast SNF/SWI transcriptional activators and the SPT/SIN chromatin connection. Trends Genet. 1992 Nov;8(11):387–391. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(92)90300-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Workman J. L., Roeder R. G. Binding of transcription factor TFIID to the major late promoter during in vitro nucleosome assembly potentiates subsequent initiation by RNA polymerase II. Cell. 1987 Nov 20;51(4):613–622. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90130-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Workman J. L., Taylor I. C., Kingston R. E. Activation domains of stably bound GAL4 derivatives alleviate repression of promoters by nucleosomes. Cell. 1991 Feb 8;64(3):533–544. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90237-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Wu C., Wong Y. C., Elgin S. C. The chromatin structure of specific genes: II. Disruption of chromatin structure during gene activity. Cell. 1979 Apr;16(4):807–814. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(79)90096-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Xiao H., Friesen J. D., Lis J. T. A highly conserved domain of RNA polymerase II shares a functional element with acidic activation domains of upstream transcription factors. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Nov;14(11):7507–7516. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.11.7507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Xiao H., Friesen J. D., Lis J. T. Recruiting TATA-binding protein to a promoter: transcriptional activation without an upstream activator. Mol Cell Biol. 1995 Oct;15(10):5757–5761. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.10.5757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. del Olmo M. L., Sogo J. M., Franco L., Pérez-Ortín J. E. Chromatin structure of the yeast FBP1 gene: transcription-dependent changes in the regulatory and coding regions. Yeast. 1993 Nov;9(11):1229–1240. doi: 10.1002/yea.320091110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The EMBO Journal are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES