Skip to main content
PMC home page
The EMBO Journal logoLink to The EMBO Journal
. 1998 Dec 1;17(23):7118–7127. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.23.7118

Localization of a protein-DNA interface by random mutagenesis.

M O'Neill 1, D T Dryden 1, N E Murray 1
PMCID: PMC1171058  PMID: 9843515

Abstract

The type I restriction and modification enzymes do not possess obvious DNA-binding motifs within their target recognition domains (TRDs) of 150-180 amino acids. To identify residues involved in DNA recognition, changes were made in the amino-TRD of EcoKI by random mutagenesis. Most of the 101 substitutions affecting 79 residues had no effect on the phenotype. Changes at only seven positions caused the loss of restriction and modification activities. The seven residues identified by mutation are not randomly distributed throughout the primary sequence of the TRD: five are within the interval between residues 80 and 110. Sequence analyses have led to the suggestion that the TRDs of type I restriction enzymes include a tertiary structure similar to the TRD of the HhaI methyltransferase, and to a model for a DNA-protein interface in EcoKI. In this model, the residues within the interval identified by the five mutations are close to the protein-DNA interface. Three additional residues close to the DNA in the model were changed; each substitution impaired both activities. Proteins from twelve mutants were purified: six from mutants with partial or wild-type activity and six from mutants lacking activity. There is a strong correlation between phenotype and DNA-binding affinity, as determined by fluorescence anisotropy.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (411.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Abadjieva A., Webb M., Patel J., Zinkevich V., Firman K. Deletions within the DNA recognition subunit of M.EcoR124I that identify a region involved in protein-protein interactions between HsdS and HsdM. J Mol Biol. 1994 Aug 5;241(1):35–43. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1994.1471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Appleyard R K. Segregation of New Lysogenic Types during Growth of a Doubly Lysogenic Strain Derived from Escherichia Coli K12. Genetics. 1954 Jul;39(4):440–452. doi: 10.1093/genetics/39.4.440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bickle T. A., Brack C., Yuan R. ATP-induced conformational changes in the restriction endonuclease from Escherichia coli K-12. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1978 Jul;75(7):3099–3103. doi: 10.1073/pnas.75.7.3099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chen A., Powell L. M., Dryden D. T., Murray N. E., Brown T. Tyrosine 27 of the specificity polypeptide of EcoKI can be UV crosslinked to a bromodeoxyuridine-substituted DNA target sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995 Apr 11;23(7):1177–1183. doi: 10.1093/nar/23.7.1177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cheng X., Blumenthal R. M. Finding a basis for flipping bases. Structure. 1996 Jun 15;4(6):639–645. doi: 10.1016/s0969-2126(96)00068-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Choo Y., Klug A. Physical basis of a protein-DNA recognition code. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 1997 Feb;7(1):117–125. doi: 10.1016/s0959-440x(97)80015-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cowan G. M., Gann A. A., Murray N. E. Conservation of complex DNA recognition domains between families of restriction enzymes. Cell. 1989 Jan 13;56(1):103–109. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90988-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dryden D. T., Cooper L. P., Murray N. E. Purification and characterization of the methyltransferase from the type 1 restriction and modification system of Escherichia coli K12. J Biol Chem. 1993 Jun 25;268(18):13228–13236. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dryden D. T., Cooper L. P., Thorpe P. H., Byron O. The in vitro assembly of the EcoKI type I DNA restriction/modification enzyme and its in vivo implications. Biochemistry. 1997 Feb 4;36(5):1065–1076. doi: 10.1021/bi9619435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fried M. G. Measurement of protein-DNA interaction parameters by electrophoresis mobility shift assay. Electrophoresis. 1989 May-Jun;10(5-6):366–376. doi: 10.1002/elps.1150100515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Fuller-Pace F. V., Bullas L. R., Delius H., Murray N. E. Genetic recombination can generate altered restriction specificity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Oct;81(19):6095–6099. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.19.6095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Fuller-Pace F. V., Cowan G. M., Murray N. E. EcoA and EcoE: alternatives to the EcoK family of type I restriction and modification systems of Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol. 1985 Nov 5;186(1):65–75. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(85)90257-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Fürste J. P., Pansegrau W., Frank R., Blöcker H., Scholz P., Bagdasarian M., Lanka E. Molecular cloning of the plasmid RP4 primase region in a multi-host-range tacP expression vector. Gene. 1986;48(1):119–131. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(86)90358-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gann A. A., Campbell A. J., Collins J. F., Coulson A. F., Murray N. E. Reassortment of DNA recognition domains and the evolution of new specificities. Mol Microbiol. 1987 Jul;1(1):13–22. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1987.tb00521.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gough J. A., Murray N. E. Sequence diversity among related genes for recognition of specific targets in DNA molecules. J Mol Biol. 1983 May 5;166(1):1–19. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(83)80047-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Grant S. G., Jessee J., Bloom F. R., Hanahan D. Differential plasmid rescue from transgenic mouse DNAs into Escherichia coli methylation-restriction mutants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Jun;87(12):4645–4649. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.12.4645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Heyduk T., Lee J. C. Application of fluorescence energy transfer and polarization to monitor Escherichia coli cAMP receptor protein and lac promoter interaction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Mar;87(5):1744–1748. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.5.1744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hill J. J., Royer C. A. Fluorescence approaches to study of protein-nucleic acid complexation. Methods Enzymol. 1997;278:390–416. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(97)78021-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ho S. N., Hunt H. D., Horton R. M., Pullen J. K., Pease L. R. Site-directed mutagenesis by overlap extension using the polymerase chain reaction. Gene. 1989 Apr 15;77(1):51–59. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(89)90358-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Jameson D. M., Sawyer W. H. Fluorescence anisotropy applied to biomolecular interactions. Methods Enzymol. 1995;246:283–300. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(95)46014-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. King G., Murray N. E. Restriction alleviation and modification enhancement by the Rac prophage of Escherichia coli K-12. Mol Microbiol. 1995 May;16(4):769–777. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1995.tb02438.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Klimasauskas S., Kumar S., Roberts R. J., Cheng X. HhaI methyltransferase flips its target base out of the DNA helix. Cell. 1994 Jan 28;76(2):357–369. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90342-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Lange C., Wild C., Trautner T. A. Identification of a subdomain within DNA-(cytosine-C5)-methyltransferases responsible for the recognition of the 5' part of their DNA target. EMBO J. 1996 Mar 15;15(6):1443–1450. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Meister J., MacWilliams M., Hübner P., Jütte H., Skrzypek E., Piekarowicz A., Bickle T. A. Macroevolution by transposition: drastic modification of DNA recognition by a type I restriction enzyme following Tn5 transposition. EMBO J. 1993 Dec;12(12):4585–4591. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1993.tb06147.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Messing J., Gronenborn B., Müller-Hill B., Hans Hopschneider P. Filamentous coliphage M13 as a cloning vehicle: insertion of a HindII fragment of the lac regulatory region in M13 replicative form in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Sep;74(9):3642–3646. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.9.3642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Nagaraja V., Shepherd J. C., Bickle T. A. A hybrid recognition sequence in a recombinant restriction enzyme and the evolution of DNA sequence specificity. Nature. 1985 Jul 25;316(6026):371–372. doi: 10.1038/316371a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Powell L. M., Connolly B. A., Dryden D. T. The DNA binding characteristics of the trimeric EcoKI methyltransferase and its partially assembled dimeric form determined by fluorescence polarisation and DNA footprinting. J Mol Biol. 1998 Nov 13;283(5):947–961. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1998.2142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Powell L. M., Dryden D. T., Murray N. E. Sequence-specific DNA binding by EcoKI, a type IA DNA restriction enzyme. J Mol Biol. 1998 Nov 13;283(5):963–976. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1998.2143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Powell L. M., Dryden D. T., Willcock D. F., Pain R. H., Murray N. E. DNA recognition by the EcoK methyltransferase. The influence of DNA methylation and the cofactor S-adenosyl-L-methionine. J Mol Biol. 1993 Nov 5;234(1):60–71. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Reidhaar-Olson J. F., Sauer R. T. Combinatorial cassette mutagenesis as a probe of the informational content of protein sequences. Science. 1988 Jul 1;241(4861):53–57. doi: 10.1126/science.3388019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Rhodes D., Schwabe J. W., Chapman L., Fairall L. Towards an understanding of protein-DNA recognition. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1996 Apr 29;351(1339):501–509. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1996.0048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Spee J. H., de Vos W. M., Kuipers O. P. Efficient random mutagenesis method with adjustable mutation frequency by use of PCR and dITP. Nucleic Acids Res. 1993 Feb 11;21(3):777–778. doi: 10.1093/nar/21.3.777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Sturrock S. S., Dryden D. T. A prediction of the amino acids and structures involved in DNA recognition by type I DNA restriction and modification enzymes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997 Sep 1;25(17):3408–3414. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.17.3408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Taylor I. A., Webb M., Kneale G. G. Surface labelling of the type I methyltransferase M.EcoR124I reveals lysine residues critical for DNA binding. J Mol Biol. 1996 Apr 26;258(1):62–73. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Thorpe P. H., Ternent D., Murray N. E. The specificity of sty SKI, a type I restriction enzyme, implies a structure with rotational symmetry. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997 May 1;25(9):1694–1700. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.9.1694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Webb J. L., King G., Ternent D., Titheradge A. J., Murray N. E. Restriction by EcoKI is enhanced by co-operative interactions between target sequences and is dependent on DEAD box motifs. EMBO J. 1996 Apr 15;15(8):2003–2009. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Weiserova M., Firman K. Isolation of a non-classical mutant of the DNA recognition subunit of the type I restriction endonuclease R.EcoR124I. Biol Chem. 1998 Apr-May;379(4-5):585–589. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Wharton R. P., Ptashne M. Changing the binding specificity of a repressor by redesigning an alpha-helix. Nature. 1985 Aug 15;316(6029):601–605. doi: 10.1038/316601a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Wilson G. G., Murray N. E. Restriction and modification systems. Annu Rev Genet. 1991;25:585–627. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.25.120191.003101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Zhou Y. H., Zhang X. P., Ebright R. H. Random mutagenesis of gene-sized DNA molecules by use of PCR with Taq DNA polymerase. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991 Nov 11;19(21):6052–6052. doi: 10.1093/nar/19.21.6052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Zinkevich V., Heslop P., Glover S. W., Weiserova M., Hubácek J., Firman K. Mutation in the specificity polypeptide of the type I restriction endonuclease R.EcoK that affects subunit assembly. J Mol Biol. 1992 Oct 5;227(3):597–601. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(92)90210-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The EMBO Journal are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES