Skip to main content
Alzheimer's & Dementia logoLink to Alzheimer's & Dementia
. 2025 Jan 3;20(Suppl 3):e085873. doi: 10.1002/alz.085873

Sensitive methods to define subtle memory decline capture intra‐individual hippocampal atrophy and increased cortical volumes in preclinical Alzheimer’s

David López‐Martos 1,2,, Raffaele Cacciaglia 1,3,4, Marc Suárez‐Calvet 1,4,5,6, Marta Milà‐Alomà 1,7,8, Carolina Minguillon 1,4,9, Henrik Zetterberg 10,11,12,13,14,15, Kaj Blennow 12,16, Juan Domingo Gispert 1,6,17,18, Oriol Grau‐Rivera 1,5,9,19, Gonzalo Sánchez‐Benavides 2,9,20; for the ALFA study
PMCID: PMC11710621

Abstract

Background

Objective Subtle Cognitive Decline (obj‐SCD) can be identified through standardized neuropsychological tests and may precede the development of Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI). Nevertheless, current clinical and research criteria lack a standardized protocol for identifying obj‐SCD. This study introduces cutting‐edge sensitive methods to characterize obj‐SCD, defined through Alzheimer’s disease (AD) biomarker‐based longitudinal cognitive performance in episodic memory. Neurocognitive characterization of obj‐SCD is supported by Voxel‐Based Morphometry (VBM) analyses, examining longitudinal changes in Grey Matter volume (GMv) at the preclinical stage of the Alzheimer’s continuum.

Method

Three hundred cognitively unimpaired (CU) individuals (mean age: 60, SD: 4.76) from the ALFA+ cohort study (three‐year follow‐up) were included. AT(N) profiles were defined at baseline with Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) biomarkers. AD biomarker‐based reliable change indices adjusted for practice effect (A‐T‐[N]‐ longitudinal performance as reference) were computed for the assessment of episodic memory (Free‐Cued Selective Reminding Test, Memory Binding Test, Wechsler Memory Scale‐IV). Considering the relationship between the number of neuropsychological measures and the base rate of impaired scores, obj‐SCD was defined as longitudinal biomarker‐based performance below ‐1.645 SD (<5th percentile) in at least 3/11 variables. Magnetic Resonance Imaging scans were performed with 3T‐scanner and a high‐resolution 3D T1‐weighted sequence (voxel‐size: 0.75mm3). Intra‐individual changes in GMv were voxel‐wise computed using longitudinal scans, smoothed at 8mm3. The associations between obj‐SCD and GMv changes were analyzed with VBM linear regression models, selecting a voxel‐wise statistical threshold of p<0.005 with a cluster‐extent correction of 100 voxels.

Result

According to the above‐defined criteria 19 (6.33%) participants exhibited episodic memory obj‐SCD, with significant differences considering AT profiles (Table‐1). Episodic memory obj‐SCD was associated with longitudinal reductions of GMv bilaterally in the hippocampus and the left cerebellum, as well as widespread increments of GMv involving AD‐vulnerable cortical regions (Table‐2, Figure‐1).

Conclusion

Episodic memory obj‐SCD captured longitudinal changes in GMv indicative of AD‐progression (i.e., hippocampus). These results suggested that episodic memory obj‐SCD is a consistent marker of AD‐related impairment. Characterizing obj‐SCD enhances preclinical stage identification, with implications for advancing early detection and intervention strategies in Alzheimer’s disease, informing about an elevated risk of AD‐dementia in an otherwise CU population.


graphic file with name ALZ-20-e085873-g001.jpg

graphic file with name ALZ-20-e085873-g002.jpg

graphic file with name ALZ-20-e085873-g003.jpg


Articles from Alzheimer's & Dementia are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES