Skip to main content
PMC home page
The EMBO Journal logoLink to The EMBO Journal
. 1999 Jan 4;18(1):198–211. doi: 10.1093/emboj/18.1.198

Activity regulation of a Hox protein and a role for the homeodomain in inhibiting transcriptional activation.

X Li 1, C Murre 1, W McGinnis 1
PMCID: PMC1171115  PMID: 9878063

Abstract

Hox proteins are transcription factors that assign positional identities along the body axis of animal embryos. Different Hox proteins have similar DNA-binding functions in vitro and require cofactors to achieve their biological functions. Cofactors can function by enhancement of the DNA-binding specificity of Hox proteins, as has been shown for Extradenticle (Exd). We present results supporting a novel mechanism for Hox cofactor function: regulation of transcriptional activation function. First, we provide evidence that the Hox protein Deformed (Dfd) can interact with simple DNA-binding sites in Drosophila embryos in the absence of Exd, but this binding is not sufficient for transcriptional activation of reporter genes. Secondly, either Dfd or a Dfd-VP16 hybrid mediate much stronger activation in embryos on a Dfd-Exd composite site than on a simple Dfd-binding site, even though the two sites possess similar Dfd-binding affinities. This suggests that Exd is required to release the transcriptional activation function of Dfd independently of Exd enhancement of Dfd-binding affinity on the composite site. Thirdly, transfection assays confirmed that Dfd possesses an activation domain, which is suppressed in a manner dependent on the presence of the homeodomain. The regulation of Hox transcriptional activation functions may underlie the different functional specificities of proteins belonging to this developmental patterning family.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (665.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aspland S. E., White R. A. Nucleocytoplasmic localisation of extradenticle protein is spatially regulated throughout development in Drosophila. Development. 1997 Feb;124(3):741–747. doi: 10.1242/dev.124.3.741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Azpiazu N., Morata G. Functional and regulatory interactions between Hox and extradenticle genes. Genes Dev. 1998 Jan 15;12(2):261–273. doi: 10.1101/gad.12.2.261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Baichwal V. R., Park A., Tjian R. The cell-type-specific activator region of c-Jun juxtaposes constitutive and negatively regulated domains. Genes Dev. 1992 Aug;6(8):1493–1502. doi: 10.1101/gad.6.8.1493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bertuccioli C., Fasano L., Jun S., Wang S., Sheng G., Desplan C. In vivo requirement for the paired domain and homeodomain of the paired segmentation gene product. Development. 1996 Sep;122(9):2673–2685. doi: 10.1242/dev.122.9.2673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Biggin M. D., McGinnis W. Regulation of segmentation and segmental identity by Drosophila homeoproteins: the role of DNA binding in functional activity and specificity. Development. 1997 Nov;124(22):4425–4433. doi: 10.1242/dev.124.22.4425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Brand A. H., Perrimon N. Targeted gene expression as a means of altering cell fates and generating dominant phenotypes. Development. 1993 Jun;118(2):401–415. doi: 10.1242/dev.118.2.401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Brown H. J., Sutherland J. A., Cook A., Bannister A. J., Kouzarides T. An inhibitor domain in c-Fos regulates activation domains containing the HOB1 motif. EMBO J. 1995 Jan 3;14(1):124–131. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb06982.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Capovilla M., Brandt M., Botas J. Direct regulation of decapentaplegic by Ultrabithorax and its role in Drosophila midgut morphogenesis. Cell. 1994 Feb 11;76(3):461–475. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90111-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Carey M. The enhanceosome and transcriptional synergy. Cell. 1998 Jan 9;92(1):5–8. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80893-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Carroll S. B. Homeotic genes and the evolution of arthropods and chordates. Nature. 1995 Aug 10;376(6540):479–485. doi: 10.1038/376479a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chan S. K., Jaffe L., Capovilla M., Botas J., Mann R. S. The DNA binding specificity of Ultrabithorax is modulated by cooperative interactions with extradenticle, another homeoprotein. Cell. 1994 Aug 26;78(4):603–615. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90525-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Chan S. K., Pöpperl H., Krumlauf R., Mann R. S. An extradenticle-induced conformational change in a HOX protein overcomes an inhibitory function of the conserved hexapeptide motif. EMBO J. 1996 May 15;15(10):2476–2487. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Chan S. K., Ryoo H. D., Gould A., Krumlauf R., Mann R. S. Switching the in vivo specificity of a minimal Hox-responsive element. Development. 1997 May;124(10):2007–2014. doi: 10.1242/dev.124.10.2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Chang C. P., Shen W. F., Rozenfeld S., Lawrence H. J., Largman C., Cleary M. L. Pbx proteins display hexapeptide-dependent cooperative DNA binding with a subset of Hox proteins. Genes Dev. 1995 Mar 15;9(6):663–674. doi: 10.1101/gad.9.6.663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Dennig J., Beato M., Suske G. An inhibitor domain in Sp3 regulates its glutamine-rich activation domains. EMBO J. 1996 Oct 15;15(20):5659–5667. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Dessain S., Gross C. T., Kuziora M. A., McGinnis W. Antp-type homeodomains have distinct DNA binding specificities that correlate with their different regulatory functions in embryos. EMBO J. 1992 Mar;11(3):991–1002. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05138.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Di Rocco G., Mavilio F., Zappavigna V. Functional dissection of a transcriptionally active, target-specific Hox-Pbx complex. EMBO J. 1997 Jun 16;16(12):3644–3654. doi: 10.1093/emboj/16.12.3644. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Dörfler P., Busslinger M. C-terminal activating and inhibitory domains determine the transactivation potential of BSAP (Pax-5), Pax-2 and Pax-8. EMBO J. 1996 Apr 15;15(8):1971–1982. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ekker S. C., Jackson D. G., von Kessler D. P., Sun B. I., Young K. E., Beachy P. A. The degree of variation in DNA sequence recognition among four Drosophila homeotic proteins. EMBO J. 1994 Aug 1;13(15):3551–3560. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06662.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Gehring W. J., Affolter M., Bürglin T. Homeodomain proteins. Annu Rev Biochem. 1994;63:487–526. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.63.070194.002415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Grieder N. C., Marty T., Ryoo H. D., Mann R. S., Affolter M. Synergistic activation of a Drosophila enhancer by HOM/EXD and DPP signaling. EMBO J. 1997 Dec 15;16(24):7402–7410. doi: 10.1093/emboj/16.24.7402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Gross C. T., McGinnis W. DEAF-1, a novel protein that binds an essential region in a Deformed response element. EMBO J. 1996 Apr 15;15(8):1961–1970. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Hanes S. D., Brent R. A genetic model for interaction of the homeodomain recognition helix with DNA. Science. 1991 Jan 25;251(4992):426–430. doi: 10.1126/science.1671176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Jaffe L., Ryoo H. D., Mann R. S. A role for phosphorylation by casein kinase II in modulating Antennapedia activity in Drosophila. Genes Dev. 1997 May 15;11(10):1327–1340. doi: 10.1101/gad.11.10.1327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Jiménez G., Pinchin S. M., Ish-Horowicz D. In vivo interactions of the Drosophila Hairy and Runt transcriptional repressors with target promoters. EMBO J. 1996 Dec 16;15(24):7088–7098. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kornberg T. B. Understanding the homeodomain. J Biol Chem. 1993 Dec 25;268(36):26813–26816. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Kowenz-Leutz E., Twamley G., Ansieau S., Leutz A. Novel mechanism of C/EBP beta (NF-M) transcriptional control: activation through derepression. Genes Dev. 1994 Nov 15;8(22):2781–2791. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.22.2781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kuziora M. A., McGinnis W. Autoregulation of a Drosophila homeotic selector gene. Cell. 1988 Nov 4;55(3):477–485. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90034-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Lai J. S., Herr W. Ethidium bromide provides a simple tool for identifying genuine DNA-independent protein associations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Aug 1;89(15):6958–6962. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.15.6958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Laughon A. DNA binding specificity of homeodomains. Biochemistry. 1991 Dec 3;30(48):11357–11367. doi: 10.1021/bi00112a001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Lawrence P. A., Morata G. Homeobox genes: their function in Drosophila segmentation and pattern formation. Cell. 1994 Jul 29;78(2):181–189. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90289-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Lefstin J. A., Yamamoto K. R. Allosteric effects of DNA on transcriptional regulators. Nature. 1998 Apr 30;392(6679):885–888. doi: 10.1038/31860. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Li X. Y., Green M. R. Intramolecular inhibition of activating transcription factor-2 function by its DNA-binding domain. Genes Dev. 1996 Mar 1;10(5):517–527. doi: 10.1101/gad.10.5.517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Li X., Gutjahr T., Noll M. Separable regulatory elements mediate the establishment and maintenance of cell states by the Drosophila segment-polarity gene gooseberry. EMBO J. 1993 Apr;12(4):1427–1436. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1993.tb05786.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Lu Q., Kamps M. P. Selective repression of transcriptional activators by Pbx1 does not require the homeodomain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Jan 9;93(1):470–474. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.1.470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Manak J. R., Mathies L. D., Scott M. P. Regulation of a decapentaplegic midgut enhancer by homeotic proteins. Development. 1994 Dec;120(12):3605–3619. doi: 10.1242/dev.120.12.3605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Manak J. R., Scott M. P. A class act: conservation of homeodomain protein functions. Dev Suppl. 1994:61–77. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Mann R. S., Abu-Shaar M. Nuclear import of the homeodomain protein extradenticle in response to Wg and Dpp signalling. Nature. 1996 Oct 17;383(6601):630–633. doi: 10.1038/383630a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Mann R. S., Chan S. K. Extra specificity from extradenticle: the partnership between HOX and PBX/EXD homeodomain proteins. Trends Genet. 1996 Jul;12(7):258–262. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(96)10026-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. McGinnis W., Krumlauf R. Homeobox genes and axial patterning. Cell. 1992 Jan 24;68(2):283–302. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90471-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Merrill V. K., Turner F. R., Kaufman T. C. A genetic and developmental analysis of mutations in the Deformed locus in Drosophila melanogaster. Dev Biol. 1987 Aug;122(2):379–395. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(87)90303-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Molenaar M., van de Wetering M., Oosterwegel M., Peterson-Maduro J., Godsave S., Korinek V., Roose J., Destrée O., Clevers H. XTcf-3 transcription factor mediates beta-catenin-induced axis formation in Xenopus embryos. Cell. 1996 Aug 9;86(3):391–399. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80112-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Neuteboom S. T., Murre C. Pbx raises the DNA binding specificity but not the selectivity of antennapedia Hox proteins. Mol Cell Biol. 1997 Aug;17(8):4696–4706. doi: 10.1128/mcb.17.8.4696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. O'Hara E., Cohen B., Cohen S. M., McGinnis W. Distal-less is a downstream gene of Deformed required for ventral maxillary identity. Development. 1993 Mar;117(3):847–856. doi: 10.1242/dev.117.3.847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Peifer M., Wieschaus E. Mutations in the Drosophila gene extradenticle affect the way specific homeo domain proteins regulate segmental identity. Genes Dev. 1990 Jul;4(7):1209–1223. doi: 10.1101/gad.4.7.1209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Phelan M. L., Rambaldi I., Featherstone M. S. Cooperative interactions between HOX and PBX proteins mediated by a conserved peptide motif. Mol Cell Biol. 1995 Aug;15(8):3989–3997. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.8.3989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Pinsonneault J., Florence B., Vaessin H., McGinnis W. A model for extradenticle function as a switch that changes HOX proteins from repressors to activators. EMBO J. 1997 Apr 15;16(8):2032–2042. doi: 10.1093/emboj/16.8.2032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Ptashne M., Gann A. Transcriptional activation by recruitment. Nature. 1997 Apr 10;386(6625):569–577. doi: 10.1038/386569a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Pöpperl H., Bienz M., Studer M., Chan S. K., Aparicio S., Brenner S., Mann R. S., Krumlauf R. Segmental expression of Hoxb-1 is controlled by a highly conserved autoregulatory loop dependent upon exd/pbx. Cell. 1995 Jun 30;81(7):1031–1042. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(05)80008-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Quong M. W., Massari M. E., Zwart R., Murre C. A new transcriptional-activation motif restricted to a class of helix-loop-helix proteins is functionally conserved in both yeast and mammalian cells. Mol Cell Biol. 1993 Feb;13(2):792–800. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.2.792. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Rauskolb C., Peifer M., Wieschaus E. extradenticle, a regulator of homeotic gene activity, is a homolog of the homeobox-containing human proto-oncogene pbx1. Cell. 1993 Sep 24;74(6):1101–1112. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90731-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Regulski M., Dessain S., McGinnis N., McGinnis W. High-affinity binding sites for the Deformed protein are required for the function of an autoregulatory enhancer of the Deformed gene. Genes Dev. 1991 Feb;5(2):278–286. doi: 10.1101/gad.5.2.278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Regulski M., McGinnis N., Chadwick R., McGinnis W. Developmental and molecular analysis of Deformed; a homeotic gene controlling Drosophila head development. EMBO J. 1987 Mar;6(3):767–777. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1987.tb04819.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Rubin G. M., Spradling A. C. Genetic transformation of Drosophila with transposable element vectors. Science. 1982 Oct 22;218(4570):348–353. doi: 10.1126/science.6289436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Sanson B., White P., Vincent J. P. Uncoupling cadherin-based adhesion from wingless signalling in Drosophila. Nature. 1996 Oct 17;383(6601):627–630. doi: 10.1038/383627a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Sun B., Hursh D. A., Jackson D., Beachy P. A. Ultrabithorax protein is necessary but not sufficient for full activation of decapentaplegic expression in the visceral mesoderm. EMBO J. 1995 Feb 1;14(3):520–535. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb07028.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Sánchez M., Jennings P. A., Murre C. Conformational changes induced in Hoxb-8/Pbx-1 heterodimers in solution and upon interaction with specific DNA. Mol Cell Biol. 1997 Sep;17(9):5369–5376. doi: 10.1128/mcb.17.9.5369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Tautz D., Pfeifle C. A non-radioactive in situ hybridization method for the localization of specific RNAs in Drosophila embryos reveals translational control of the segmentation gene hunchback. Chromosoma. 1989 Aug;98(2):81–85. doi: 10.1007/BF00291041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Triezenberg S. J., LaMarco K. L., McKnight S. L. Evidence of DNA: protein interactions that mediate HSV-1 immediate early gene activation by VP16. Genes Dev. 1988 Jun;2(6):730–742. doi: 10.1101/gad.2.6.730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Van Dijk M. A., Voorhoeve P. M., Murre C. Pbx1 is converted into a transcriptional activator upon acquiring the N-terminal region of E2A in pre-B-cell acute lymphoblastoid leukemia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Jul 1;90(13):6061–6065. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.13.6061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Vanario-Alonso C. E., O'Hara E., McGinnis W., Pick L. Targeted ribozymes reveal a conserved function of the Drosophila paired gene in sensory organ development. Mech Dev. 1995 Nov;53(3):323–328. doi: 10.1016/0925-4773(95)00448-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Vincent J. P., Kassis J. A., O'Farrell P. H. A synthetic homeodomain binding site acts as a cell type specific, promoter specific enhancer in Drosophila embryos. EMBO J. 1990 Aug;9(8):2573–2578. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb07438.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Walter J., Dever C. A., Biggin M. D. Two homeo domain proteins bind with similar specificity to a wide range of DNA sites in Drosophila embryos. Genes Dev. 1994 Jul 15;8(14):1678–1692. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.14.1678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Zeng C., Pinsonneault J., Gellon G., McGinnis N., McGinnis W. Deformed protein binding sites and cofactor binding sites are required for the function of a small segment-specific regulatory element in Drosophila embryos. EMBO J. 1994 May 15;13(10):2362–2377. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06520.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Zhu A., Kuziora M. A. Functional domains in the Deformed protein. Development. 1996 May;122(5):1577–1587. doi: 10.1242/dev.122.5.1577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. van Dijk M. A., Murre C. extradenticle raises the DNA binding specificity of homeotic selector gene products. Cell. 1994 Aug 26;78(4):617–624. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90526-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The EMBO Journal are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES