Abstract
The Amazon rainforest is the world’s most diverse ecosystem, full of fauna and flora. Among the trees that make up the forest are the rubber trees of the genus Hevea (H. brasiliensis and H. guianensis), which stand out for the industrial use of latex. It was previously shown that endophytic fungi colonize the leaves, stems, and roots of Hevea spp. In this study, 47 Penicillium spp. and three Talaromyces spp. isolates were analyzed using specific DNA barcodes: internal transcribed spacers region (ITS), β-tubulin (BenA), calmodulin (CaM), and the DNA-dependent RNA polymerase II second largest subunit (RPB2) genes and additionally, for species delimitation, the genealogical concordance phylogenetic species recognition (GCPSR) criteria were applied. The phylogenetic analyses placed the Penicillium isolates into four sections Lanata-Divaricata, Sclerotiora, Citrina, and Fasciculata. The morphological and molecular characteristics resulted in the discovery of five new species (P. heveae sp. nov., P. acrean sp. nov., P. aquiri sp. nov., P. amazonense sp. nov., and P. pseudomellis sp. nov.). The five new species were also compared to closely related species, with observations on morphologically distinguishing features and colony appearances. Bayesian inference and maximum likelihood analysis have supported the placement of P. heveae sp. nov. as a sister group to P. globosum; P. acrean sp. nov. and P. aquiri sp. nov. as sister groups to P. sumatrense; P. amazonense sp. nov. closely related to isolates of P. rolfsii, and P. pseudomellis sp. nov. closely related to P. mellis. The study of endophytic Penicillium species of rubber trees and the description of five new taxa of Penicillium sect. Citrina, Lanata-Divaricata, and Sclerotiora as endophytes add to the fungal biodiversity knowledge in native rubber trees. Reports of fungi in native tropical plants may reveal taxonomic novelties, potential pathogen control agents, and producers of molecular bioactive compounds of medical and agronomic interest.
Keywords: DNA barcoding, Endophyte, Hevea spp., Taxonomy
Introduction
The Amazon rainforest is the largest center of biodiversity in the world. Rubber trees (Hevea brasiliensis and Hevea guianensis) are endemic to the Brazilian Amazon Forest and are commercially exploited in other regions of Brazil and in Asian countries [1]. The rubber trees are of great economic importance because they are producers of natural latex [1, 2]. In addition, they are host to various microorganisms, including endophytic species [2–6].
Endophytic fungi have been isolated from various plant species and are studied because of their wide taxonomic and functional diversity. They produce bioactive compounds (secondary metabolites) that are involved in a variety of applications, including biocontrol of plant pathogens and insects, promotion of plant growth, and reduction of pollution from chemical pesticides in agricultural farms [7, 8]. They are also involved in important beneficial human activities and diverse biotechnological processes. Furthermore, they produce antioxidant and anticancer compounds [9].
Previous studies on the diversity of endophytic fungi in rubber trees from the Brazilian Amazon Forest showed a great abundance of isolates of the genus Penicillium in their leaves, stems, and roots [3, 4]. Penicillium is one of the most common fungal genera, inhabiting diverse habitats and commonly found inside plants and animals, in soil, in the air, and in food products. It has a worldwide distribution and a large economic impact on human life, where it is applied in several areas, including pharmaceuticals, agronomy, and biotechnology [7, 10–17].
The genus Penicillium (Ascomycota, Pezizomycotina, Sordariomycetes, Eurotiales, Aspergillaceae) was first described by Link (1809), based on morphological traits [18–21].
In the major Penicillium monographs published later, a polyphasic approach for species recognition was applied [22]. Phenotypic, physiological characters combined with DNA sequences were used for species delimitation, following this sectional classification. The most recent list included 354 Penicillium and 88 Talaromyces species [23]. According to current estimates, the genus has over 480 Penicillium spp. [24, 25]. Houbraken et al. [24] reestablished the classification series in a phylogenetic re-evaluation of numerous taxa in the order Eurotiales, with smaller sections. Several sections and new species were described and approached with the exact set of genes used for multi-locus sequence type, namely: internal transcribed spacers region (ITS), β-tubulin (BenA), calmodulin (CaM), and the DNA-dependent RNA polymerase II second largest subunit (RPB2). Visagie et al. [23], [26], [27] suggested a Genealogical Concordance Phylogenetic Species Recognition (GCPSR) criteria based on the sequence dataset of these four loci. The GCPSR concept [28, 29] has been used for species delimitation in several fungal groups like Trichoderma and Penicillium [30, 31]. Additional, phenotype features, such as standard conidiophore branching, culture appearance, conidia features, soluble pigments, or exudates, can be interpreted as informative characters and added to their correlation with robustly analyzed DNA sequence data [23].
Because of the importance of knowing the species of endophytic microorganisms that colonize rubber trees in the Brazilian Amazon Forest, and the potential that isolates of the genus Penicillium may have as agents of biological control, growth promotors, and producers of secondary metabolites of industrial, medical and agricultural interest, this study aims to identify endophytic Penicillium species from rubber trees of the Brazilian Amazon rainforest using morphological, cultural and phylogenies (single-loci and multi-locus) approaches.
Materials and methods
Sample collection
The collection and fungal isolation were performed in Brazil in 2014 in the Brazilian Amazon Forest, Acre (AC), and Amazonas (AM) states. Endophytic Penicillium spp. and Talaromyces spp. were isolated from the leaves, stems, and roots of Hevea brasiliensis [4] and Hevea guianensis [3]. The methodology for collection and fungal isolation was done following [32], [33], and [34] and has been detailed and reported by Araújo et al. [3, 4]. After obtaining pure cultures, these were preserved in silica gel [35]; all the isolates are kept in the collection of Fungi at the Laboratory of Molecular Genetics and Microorganisms, Bioagro (Instituto de Biotecnologia Aplicado à Agropecuária), Universidade Federal de Viçosa, MG, Brazil. A total of 50 isolates from the Penicillium and Talaromyces genera were used in this study (Table 1). Representative specimens of new taxa were deposited in the Herbarium of the Universidade Federal de Viçosa (Herbarium VIC), and the respective isolates deposited in the culture collection Coleção Octávio de Almeida Drumond (COAD) hosted in Universidade Federal de Viçosa. The dried cultures of the endophytic fungus growing on potato dextrose agar (PDA) are deposited as holotypes.
Table 1.
Endophytes isolated from leaves, stems, and roots of Hevea spp. in the Amazon Forest
| Species | Isolates | Plant tissues | State | Host | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Penicillium section Fasciculata | |||||
| Penicillium crustosum | 37F27C-AM | Stem | Amazonas | Hevea brasiliensis | Araújo et al. [4] |
| Penicillium crustosum | 314F2C-AM | Stem | Amazonas | Hevea brasiliensis | Araújo et al. [4] |
| Penicillium section Lavanata-Divaricata | |||||
| Penicillium amazonense sp. nov. | COAD3477 | Root | Amazonas | Hevea brasiliensis | Araújo et al. [4] |
| Penicillium amazonense sp. nov. | COAD3476 | Stem | Amazonas | Hevea brasiliensis | Araújo et al. [4] |
| Penicillium heveaesp. nov | COAD3468 | Leaf | Acre | Hevea brasiliensis | Araújo et al. [4] |
| Penicillium heveaesp. nov | COAD3467 | Root | Amazonas | Hevea brasiliensis | Araújo et al. [4] |
| Penicillium cataractum | 507F5R-AM | Root | Amazonas | Hevea brasiliensis | Araújo et al. [4] |
| Penicilliumsection Sclerotiora | |||||
| Penicillium sp. | 213F5C-AC | Stem | Acre | Hevea brasiliensis | Araújo et al. [4] |
| Penicillium sp. | 728F5C-AC | Stem | Acre | Hevea brasiliensis | Araújo et al. [4] |
| Penicillium pseudomellis sp. nov. | COAD3475 | Stem | Amazonas | Hevea brasiliensis | Araújo et al. [4] |
| Penicillium pseudomellis sp. nov. | COAD3474 | Stem | Amazonas | Hevea brasiliensis | Araújo et al. [4] |
| Penicillium section Citrina | |||||
| Penicillium shearii | 637F5R-AM | Root | Amazonas | Hevea brasiliensis | Araújo et al. [4] |
| Penicillium paxilli | 7F5R-AM | Root | Amazonas | Hevea brasiliensis | Araújo et al. [4] |
| Penicillium aquiri sp. nov | COAD3464 | Stem | Acre | Hevea brasiliensis | Araújo et al. [4] |
| Penicillium aquiri sp. nov | COAD3465 | Stem | Acre | Hevea brasiliensis | Araújo et al. [4] |
| Penicillium aquiri sp. nov | COAD3466 | Stem | Acre | Hevea brasiliensis | Araújo et al. [4] |
| Penicillium sp. | 197F3C-AC | Stem | Acre | Hevea guianensis | Araújo et al. [3] |
| Penicillium acrean sp. nov | COAD3462 | Stem | Acre | Hevea brasiliensis | Araújo et al. [4] |
| Penicillium acrean sp. nov | COAD3463 | Root | Acre | Hevea brasiliensis | Araújo et al. [4] |
| Penicillium steckii | 667F7R-AM | Root | Amazonas | Hevea brasiliensis | Araújo et al. [4] |
| Penicillium citrinum | 294F7F-AC | Leaf | Acre | Hevea brasiliensis | Araújo et al. [4] |
| Penicillium citrinum | 211F7F-AC | Leaf | Acre | Hevea brasiliensis | Araújo et al. [4] |
| Penicillium citrinum | 212F14F-AC | Leaf | Acre | Hevea brasiliensis | Araújo et al. [4] |
| Penicillium citrinum | 564F2R-AC | Root | Acre | Hevea brasiliensis | Araújo et al. [4] |
| Penicillium citrinum | 360F5R-AC | Root | Acre | Hevea brasiliensis | Araújo et al. [4] |
| Penicillium citrinum | 202F8R-AC | Root | Acre | Hevea guianensis | Araújo et al. [3] |
| Penicillium citrinum | 694F8R-AC | Root | Acre | Hevea guianensis | Araújo et al. [3] |
| Penicillium citrinum | 752F8R-AC | Root | Acre | Hevea guianensis | Araújo et al. [3] |
| Penicillium citrinum | 753F8R-AC | Root | Acre | Hevea guianensis | Araújo et al. [3] |
| Penicillium citrinum | 755F8R-AC | Root | Acre | Hevea guianensis | Araújo et al. [3] |
| Penicillium citrinum | 756F8R-AC | Root | Acre | Hevea guianensis | Araújo et al. [3] |
| Penicillium citrinum | 798F8R-AC | Root | Acre | Hevea guianensis | Araújo et al. [3] |
| Penicillium citrinum | 171F9R-AC | Root | Acre | Hevea guianensis | Araújo et al. [3] |
| Penicillium citrinum | 689F9R-AC | Root | Acre | Hevea guianensis | Araújo et al. [3] |
| Penicillium citrinum | 198F11R-AC | Root | Acre | Hevea brasiliensis | Araújo et al. [4] |
| Penicillium citrinum | 524F11R-AC | Root | Acre | Hevea brasiliensis | Araújo et al. [4] |
| Penicillium citrinum | 562F11R-AC | Root | Acre | Hevea brasiliensis | Araújo et al. [4] |
| Penicillium citrinum | 624F12R-AC | Root | Acre | Hevea brasiliensis | Araújo et al. [4] |
| Penicillium citrinum | 629F14F-AM | Leaf | Amazonas | Hevea brasiliensis | Araújo et al. [4] |
| Penicillium citrinum | 287F18F-AM | Leaf | Amazonas | Hevea brasiliensis | Araújo et al. [4] |
| Penicillium citrinum | 684F9C-AM | Stem | Amazonas | Hevea brasiliensis | Araújo et al. [4] |
| Penicillium citrinum | 174F20C-AM | Stem | Amazonas | Hevea brasiliensis | Araújo et al. [4] |
| Penicillium citrinum | 634F20C-AM | Stem | Amazonas | Hevea brasiliensis | Araújo et al. [4] |
| Penicillium citrinum | 767F20C-AM | Stem | Amazonas | Hevea brasiliensis | Araújo et al. [4] |
| Penicillium citrinum | 652F22C-AM | Stem | Amazonas | Hevea brasiliensis | Araújo et al. [4] |
| Penicillium citrinum | 298F4R-AM | Root | Amazonas | Hevea brasiliensis | Araújo et al. [4] |
| Penicillium citrinum | 477F10R-AM | Root | Amazonas | Hevea brasiliensis | Araújo et al. [4] |
| Talaromyces | |||||
| Talaromyces siamensis | 86F10R-AM | Root | Amazonas | Hevea brasiliensis | Araújo et al. [4] |
| Talaromyces thailandensis | 623F7R-AM | Root | Amazonas | Hevea brasiliensis | Araújo et al. [4] |
| Talaromyces amestolkiae | 705F18F-AC | Leaf | Acre | Hevea brasiliensis | Araújo et al. [4] |
Morphological observations
The new species of endophytic Penicillium were identified based on morphological characteristics and culture appearance. For fungal growth rate assays, the medium and conditions described in [23] were used: Czapek yeast autolysate agar (CYA), malt extract agar (MEA), yeast extract sucrose agar (YES), CYA supplemented with 5% NaCl (CYAS), oatmeal agar (OA), and creatine sucrose agar (CREA). The mycelial disks were placed in 90 mm Petri dishes containing 20 mL of each medium and incubated for seven days at 25 °C in darkness. However, the fungal growth rate in the CYA medium was evaluated at three different temperatures. Isolates were grown on OA to examine sexual reproductive states, and Petri dishes were incubated for 21 days; on CREA to examine acid production, where the color reaction was observed; and on CYAS to examine the effect of low water activity. The plates were cultured as described above, and the mycelial diameter was measured using a caliper. Each culture medium was tested in triplicate. The microcultures were performed on MEA for observations of the reproductive structures of the isolates. Microscopic examinations were performed using Olympus BX50 and BX53 microscopes equipped with a Q-Color 5 digital camera. Reproductive structures were measured, and photomicrographs were obtained using cellSens dimension 1.9 software (Olympus Corporation, Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan).
DNA extraction, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and sequencing
Isolates were grown on a YM (Yeast Malt Agar) culture medium (0.2% yeast extract, 1% malt extract, and 1.5% agar) to 25 °C ± 2 °C for ten days. About 50 mg of fungi mycelium was transferred to sterile microtubes with 0.2 mL of glass beads (425 to 600 μm), and DNA was extracted using the Wizard Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and the modifications proposed [36]. The DNA extracted was quantified and evaluated for purity by spectrophotometry (A260/A280 ratio) (Nanodrop 2000, Thermo Scientific). Four primer pairs ITS1/ITS4 [37], Bt2a/Bt2b [38], CMD5/CMD6 and CF1/CF4 [39, 40] and fRPB2-5 F/fRPB2-7R [41] were used to amplify four regions, ITS, BenA, CaM, and RPB2. The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplifcations were performed in a total reaction volume of 12.5 µl, including 0.25 µl of each primer, 1.25 µl of BSA, 6.25 of Taq polymerase [including dNTPs], 0.25 µl of genomic DNA [30 ng/µl]; 0.25 µl DMSO and 4 µl of sterile ultrapure water. The primers detailed and yours respectively conditions for amplifications are listed in the Table 2. The amplification products were separated using 1.2% agarose gel electrophoresis. Finally, the products were purified and sequenced by Macrogen Inc., South Korea (http://dna.macrogen.com).
Table 2.
PCR primers and conditions used for DNA amplification
| Gene/locus | Primer | Sequence (5’ to 3’) | PCR | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| conditions | ||||
| ITS | ITS 1 | TCCGTAGGTGAACCTGCGG | 3 min at 95 °C; 36 cycles of 1 min at 95 °C, 1 min at 51 °C and 1 min at 72 °C; 7 min at 72 °C | White et al. [37] |
| ITS 4 | TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC | White et al. [37] | ||
| BenA | Bt2a | GGT AAC CAA ATC GGT GCT GCT TTC | 3 min at 95 °C; 36 cycles of 1 min at 95 °C, 1 min at 55 °C and 1 min at 72 °C; 7 min at 72 °C | Glass and Donaldson [38] |
| Bt2b | ACC CTC AGT GTA GTG ACC CTT GGC | Glass and Donaldson [38] | ||
| CaM | CMD5 | CCG AGT ACA AGG ARG CCT TC | 3 min at 95 °C; 36 cycles of 1 min at 95 °C, 1 min at 57 °C, 59–60 °C, and 1 min at 72 °C; 7 min at 72 °C | Hong et al. [39] |
| CMD6 | CCG ATR GAG GTC ATR ACG TGG | Hong et al. [39] | ||
| CaM | CF1 | GCC GAC TCT TTG ACY GAR GAR | 3 min at 95 °C; 36 cycles of 1 min at 95 °C, 1 min at 57 °C, 59–60 °C, and 1 min at 72 °C; 7 min at 72 °C | Peterson et al. [40] |
| CF4 | TTT YTG CAT CAT RAG YTG GAC | Peterson et al. [40] | ||
| RPB2 | frpb2–5 F | GAYGAYMGWGATCAYTTYGG | 3 min at 95 °C; 36 cycles of 1 min at 95 °C, 1 min at 55 °C to each second with increment of 0.2 °C and 1 min at 72 °C; 7 min at 72 °C | Liu et al. [41] |
| frpb2–7R | CCCATRGCTTGYTTRCCCAT | Liu et al. [41] |
Phylogenetic analysis
The DNA sequences obtained (sense and antisense) were assembled in contig sequences and manually corrected using the DNA BASER sequence assembly v3.x 2012 software system (Heracle BioSoft SRL Romania, http//www.DnaBaser.com). The sequence similarities were determined using a National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) BLASTn search, which allowed the identification of isolates belonging to Penicillium and Talaromyces genera. The sequences of the ITS region (ITS1-5.8 S-ITS2) and each gene sequence (BenA, CaM, and RPB2) were deposited in the NCBI nucleotide database - GenBank. The MUSCLE was used to align 107 sequences (Table 3) using the Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA v.6) software [42]. The NEXUS file was interleaved using the Paup 4b10 software system [43] to verify whether it was possible to concatenate the data set. The single and multi-locus sequence datasets were analyzed using Bayesian inference (BI) and maximum likelihood (ML) analyses.
Table 3.
Isolates and NCBI GenBank accession numbers used in this study
| Species | Isolate | ITS | BenA | CaM | RPB2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Penicillium section Fasciculata | Accession Number | ||||
| Penicillium crustosum | 37F27C-AM | MT140340 | MW820826 | MW928613 | MW820828 |
| Penicillium crustosum | 314F2C-AM | MG751235 | MW820827 | MW928614 | MW820829 |
| Isolates GenBank | GenBank Accession Number | ||||
| Penicillium crustosum | CBS 115,503T | MH862985 | MN969379 | – | MN969114 |
| Penicillium crustosum | CV0241 | – | JX091536 | JX141576 | MN149972 |
| Penicillium crustosum | CV0251 | – | JX091530 | JX141577 | MN149969 |
| Penicillium commune | NRRL35686 | EF200099 | EF198566 | EF198594 | EF198602 |
| Penicillium commune | CBS 311.48T | NR111143 | – | KU896829 | – |
| Penicillium section Lanata-Divaricata | Accession Number | ||||
| Penicillium amazonensesp. nov. | COAD3477 | MG751238 | MW820832 | MW820830 | – |
| Penicillium amazonensesp. nov. | COAD3476 T | MT140343 | MW820833 | MW820831 | OK087392 |
| Penicillium cataractum | 507F5R-AM | MT140320 | MW928620 | MW928615 | MW820839 |
| Penicillium heveae sp. nov. | COAD3468 | MT140319 | MW928621 | MW928616 | OK087393 |
| Penicillium heveae sp. nov | COAD3467 T | MG751217 | MW928622 | MW928617 | OK087394 |
| Isolates GenBank | GenBank Accession Number | ||||
| Penicillium rolfsii | CBS 368.48T | NR111669 | GU981667 | MN969294 | KC346314 |
| Penicillium rolfsii | A1S3-D87 | KJ767061 | KJ767045 | – | – |
| Penicillium rolfsii | DI16-115 | LT558937 | LT559054 | – | – |
| Penicillium flaviroseum | NN072393 | KY495020 | KY495129 | KY494960 | KY495073 |
| Penicillium flaviroseum | NN072483T | KY495032 | KY495141 | KY494972 | KY495083 |
| Penicillium camponotum | NN072444 | KY494996 | KY495105 | KY494936 | KY495054 |
| Penicillium camponotum | NN058252 | KY495026 | KY495135 | KY494966 | KY495077 |
| Penicillium piscarium | CBS220030 | KC346342 | KC346319 | KC346333 | KC346309 |
| Penicillium piscarium | CBS 362.48T | NR111507 | GU981668 | MN969288 | KF296451 |
| Penicillium cataractum | KAS2271 | KT887865 | KT887826 | KT887787 | – |
| Penicillium cataractum | KAS2270 | KT887864 | KT887825 | KT887786 | – |
| Penicillium cataractum | KAS2145T | KT887847 | KT887808 | KT887769 | MN969180 |
| Penicillium globosum | NN072354T | KY495014 | KY495123 | MN969330 | KY495067 |
| Penicillium globosum | NN072461 | KY495014 | KY495127 | KY494958 | KY495067 |
| Penicillium globosum | NN072506 | KY495018 | KY495123 | KY494954 | KY495071 |
| Penicillium guangxiense | NN044175T | KY494985 | KY495094 | KY494925 | KY495045 |
| Penicillium guangxiense | NN044180 | KY494986 | KY495095 | KY494926 | – |
| Penicillium griseoflavum | NN072331T | KY495011 | KY495120 | KY494951 | KY495064 |
| Penicillium mariae-crucis | CBS 271.83T | NR111506 | GU981630 | MN969275S | SKF296439 |
| Penicillium section Sclerotiora | Accession Number | ||||
| Penicillium meliponae | 213F5C-AC | MG751229 | MW928623 | MW928618 | MW928611 |
| Penicillium sp. | 728F5C-AC | MT140334 | MW928624 | MW928619 | MW928612 |
| Penicillium pseudomellis sp. nov. | COAD3475 | MT140342 | MW820836 | MW820834 | OK087391 |
| Penicillium pseudomellis sp. nov. | COAD3474 T | MG751237 | MW820837 | MW820835 | MW820838 |
| Isolates GenBank | GenBank Accession Number | ||||
| Penicillium maximae | NRRL2060T | ||||
| Penicillium austrosinicum | HMAS 248,734T | NR153272 | KX885041 | KX885051 | KX885032 |
| Penicillium guanacastense | DAOM239912 | NR111673 | JN625967 | JN626010 | KX961295 |
| Penicillium adametzii | CBS 209.28T | NR103661 | JN625957 | KC773796 | JN121455 |
| Penicillium adametzii | KAS 3463 | JN714930 | JN625958 | – | – |
| Penicillium adametzioides | CBS 313.59T | NR103660 | JN799642 | JN686387 | JN406578 |
| Penicillium adametzioides | DAOM 239,916 | JN686434 | JN799643 | JN686388 | – |
| Penicillium mellis | CBS 142,499 | MN431398 | MN969417 | MN969327 | – |
| Penicillium jacksonii | DAOM 239,937T | JN686437 | JN686368 | JN686391 | – |
| Penicillium jacksonii | CN 014E8 | MT949919 | MT957426 | MT957466 | MT957492 |
| Penicilliums sclerotiorum | CBS 287.36T | JN626132 | JN626001 | JN626044 | JN406585 |
| Penicilliums ulleungdoense | KACC 48,990T | MN640087 | MN737487 | MN745074 | MN756007 |
| Penicillium section Citrina | Accession Number | ||||
| Penicillium shearii | 637F5R-AM | MG751269 | MZ369099 | MW972083 | OK087395 |
| Penicillium paxilli | 7F5R-AM | MG751275 | MZ369092 | MW972076 | OK073978 |
| Penicillium aquiri sp. nov | COAD3464 T | MT137536 | MZ369093 | MW972077 | OK073979 |
| Penicillium aquiri sp. nov | COAD3465 | MT137537 | MZ369094 | MW972078 | OK073980 |
| Penicillium aquiri sp. nov | COAD3466 | MT137539 | MZ369095 | MW972079 | OK073981 |
| Penicillium sp. | 197F3C-AC | MK026989 | MZ369097 | MW972081 | OK105118 |
| Penicillium acrean sp. nov | COAD3462 | MT137533 | MZ369096 | MW972080 | OK105117 |
| Penicillium acrean sp. nov | COAD3463 T | MT137535 | MZ369098 | MW972082 | OK105119 |
| Penicillium steckii | 667F7R-AM | MG751263 | MZ369100 | MW972084 | OK105120 |
| Penicillium citrinum | 171F9R-AC | MK026982 | MZ369126 | MW972085 | MZ369101 |
| Penicillium citrinum | 174F20C-AM | MT137319 | MZ369127 | MW972086 | MZ369102 |
| Penicillium citrinum | 198F11R-AC | MT137313 | MZ369128 | MW972087 | MZ369103 |
| Penicillium citrinum | 202F8R-AC | MZ410306 | MZ369129 | MW972088 | MZ369104 |
| Penicillium citrinum | 211F7F-AC | MT137316 | MZ369130 | MW972089 | MZ369105 |
| Penicillium citrinum | 212F14F-AC | MT137317 | MZ369131 | MW972090 | MZ369106 |
| Penicillium citrinum | 287F18F-AM | MT137314 | MZ369132 | MW972091 | MZ369107 |
| Penicillium citrinum | 294F7F-AC | MT137328 | MZ369133 | MW972092 | MZ369108 |
| Penicillium citrinum | 298F4R-AM | MT137321 | MZ369134 | MW972093 | MZ369109 |
| Penicillium citrinum | 360F5R-AC | MT137327 | MZ369135 | MW972094 | MZ369110 |
| Penicillium citrinum | 477F10R-AM | MT137320 | MZ369136 | MW972095 | MZ369111 |
| Penicillium citrinum | 524F11R-AC | MT137329 | MZ369137 | MW972096 | MZ369112 |
| Penicillium citrinum | 562F11R-AC | MT137326 | MZ369138 | MW972097 | MZ369113 |
| Penicillium citrinum | 564F2R-AC | MT137322 | MZ369139 | MW972098 | MZ369114 |
| Penicillium citrinum | 624F12R-AC | MT137324 | MZ369140 | MW972099 | MZ369115 |
| Penicillium citrinum | 629F14F-AM | MT137323 | MZ369141 | – | MZ369116 |
| Penicillium citrinum | 634F20C-AM | MT137325 | MZ369142 | – | MZ369117 |
| Penicillium citrinum | 652F22C-AM | MT137318 | MZ369143 | MW972101 | – |
| Penicillium citrinum | 684F9C-AM | MT137315 | MZ369144 | MW972102 | – |
| Penicillium citrinum | 689F9R-AC | MZ410307 | MZ369145 | MW972103 | MZ369118 |
| Penicillium citrinum | 694F8R-AC | MZ410308 | MZ369146 | MW972104 | MZ369119 |
| Penicillium citrinum | 752F8R-AC | MZ410309 | MZ369147 | MW972105 | MZ369120 |
| Penicillium citrinum | 753F8R-AC | MZ410310 | MZ369148 | MW972106 | MZ369121 |
| Penicillium citrinum | 755F8R-AC | MZ410311 | MZ369149 | MW972107 | MZ369122 |
| Penicillium citrinum | 756F8R-AC | MZ410312 | MZ369150 | – | MZ369123 |
| Penicillium citrinum | 767F20C-AM | MG751187 | MZ369151 | – | MZ369124 |
| Penicillium citrinum | 798F8R-AC | MZ410313 | MW972108 | MZ369125 | |
| Isolates GenBank | GenBank Accession Number | ||||
| Penicillium shearii | CBS 290.48T | NR111495 | JN606840 | EU644068 | JN121482 |
| Penicillium shearii | CBS 578.70 | MH859858 | JN606852 | JN606575 | – |
| Penicillium shearii | CBS 343.54 | MH857352 | JN606843 | JN606565 | – |
| Penicillium paxilli | CBS 360.48T | NR111483 | JN606844 | MN969310 | JN606610 |
| Penicillium paxilli | CBS 162.96 | JN606804 | JN606545 | – | |
| Penicillium sumatrense | CBS 281.36T | NR119812 | JN606639 | MN969301 | – |
| Penicillium sumatrense | NRRL 779 | AF033424 | EF198503 | EF198522 | EF198541 |
| Penicillium christenseniae | CBS126236T | MH875447 | JN606680 | JN606373 | JN606624 |
| Penicillium cosmopolitanum | CBS126995T | MH864380 | JN606733 | JN606472 | MH875822 |
| Penicillium dokdoense | CNUFCDDS111 | MG906868 | MH243037 | MH243031 | – |
| Penicillium raphiae | CBS126234T | MH875446 | JN606657 | MN969292 | JN606619 |
| Penicillium westtingii | CBS231.28T | GU944601 | – | MN969312 | JN606625 |
| Penicillium westtingii | CBS127006 | – | JN606730 | JN606498 | – |
| Penicillium steckii | CBS 260.55T | NR111488 | GU944522 | MN969300 | JN606602 |
| Penicillium citrinum | CBS 139.45T | MH856132 | GU944545 | MN969245 | JF417416 |
| Penicillium citrinum | CBS 122,452 | GU944576 | GU944543 | GU944630 | – |
| Penicillium citrinum | CBS 232.38 | MH855952 | – | GU944633 | JN121463 |
| Talaromyces | Accession Number | ||||
| Talaromyces siamensis | 86F10R-AM | MT140331 | MW820840 | MW820841 | MW820842 |
| Talaromyces thailandensis | 623F7R-AM | MG751282 | MW820843 | MW820844 | MW928610 |
| Talaromyces amestolkiae | 705F18F-AC | MG751225 | MW820845 | MW820846 | MW820847 |
| Isolates GenBank | GenBank Accession Number | ||||
| Talaromyces siamensis | CBS 475.88T | NR103683 | JX091379 | KF741960 | KM023279 |
| Talaromyces thailandensis | CBS 133,147T | NR147428 | JX494294 | KF741940 | KM023307 |
| Talaromyces amestolkiae | CBS 132,695T | JX965228 | JX965338 | JX965199 | JX965297 |
| Talaromyces amestolkiae | CBS 26,393 | JN899315 | JX315625 | JX315653 | JX315707 |
(–) DNA sequence not found in databases. The isolates proposed as new taxa are colored red
The most suitable substitution model selected for BI analyses was determined for each partition using the MrModeltest v2.3 software system [44] based on the lowest Akaike information criterion (AIC) value. Nucleotide substitution models in the trees were GTR (general time reversible model) + I (proportion of invariable sites) + G(gamma distribution) for ITS and CaM, SYM (symmetrical model) + I + G for RPB2, and HKY (Hasegawa-Kishino-Yano) + I + G for BenA. The alignment was phylogenetically analyzed for all trees on the CIPRES web portal using Mr.Bayes 3.2.6 [45]. Four MCMC chains were run simultaneously, starting from random trees for 50,000,000 generations. The first 2,500 trees were discarded as the burn-in phase of each analysis. Posterior probabilities [46] were determined from a majority-rule consensus tree with the remaining 7,500 trees. Convergence of the log-likelihoods was analyzed with TRACER v. 1.7 [47], and no lack of convergence was detected. For ML analyses, the tree was generated in Sequence matrix v1.8125 [48] and Aliview [49] and estimated in the CIPRES Science Gateway Platform using RaxML-HPC v.8. [50]. The phylogenetic tree’s chain stabilities were assessed using the bootstrap re-sampling strategy with 1,000 bootstrap test replicates.
The resulting tree topologies using the two methods (ML and BI) were visualized using FigTree [51]. BootstrapL values (≥ 70%) of the ML analyses, as well as posterior probability scores (≥ 0.95) from a Bayesian analysis of the same dataset, are indicated at well-supported nodes together with thickened branches. The species Talaromyces spp. was used as an outgroup. The topologies obtained using the two methods were then compared, and the phylogram layout was exported and edited in CorelDraw20 graphic program.
Results
Identification, phylogeny analysis, and the GCPSR concept
Sequence similarity analyses of the ITS region and the BenA, CaM, and RPB2 genes using BLASTn confirmed that among 50 endophytic isolates of H. brasiliensis and H. guianensis, 47 isolates belong to the genus Penicillium and three isolates belong to the genus Talaromyces (Tables 1 and 3). Phylogenetic analyses were made for all isolates and the new taxa; in addition to molecular studies, its morphological and cultural features are described here.
Five isolates belonging to the Penicillium section Lanata-Divaricata were isolated from leaves, stems, and roots of H. brasiliensis samples. Four isolates belonging to section Sclerotiora were isolated from stem samples. The section Citrina was represented by 36 isolates from leaves, stems, and roots samples in Hevea spp. In addition, two isolates belonging to section Fasciculata were isolated from stems. Three Talaromyces isolates were obtained from the leaves and roots of H. brasiliensis.
Phylogenetic analyses (Figs. 1, 2, 3 and 4) were inferred using single-locus (ITS, BenA, CaM, or RPB2) as well as concatenated sequence datasets (Fig. 5). The isolates including five new taxa were recognized in their respective clades based on the previously accepted GCPSR concept. Thus, the clade was present in all the single-locus topologies (ITS, BenA, CaM, and RPB2) and concatenated sequence datasets by applying genealogical concordance. In contrast, genealogical non-discordance (or discordance) was not observed as a clade must be well supported, as judged by BI and ML, by at least one single-locus genealogy and not contradicted in any other single-locus topology (Figs. 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5). Phylogenetic trees and DNA sequence alignment data were deposited in the TreeBASE repository and can be viewed in Study 29,646.
Fig. 1.
Phylogeny based on the ITS sequences for species classified in Penicillium spp. and Talaromyces spp. Bootstrap values (≥ 70%) of the ML analyses, as well as posterior probability scores (≥ 0.95) from a BI of the same dataset, are indicated at well-supported nodes together with thickened branches. The scale bar represents the expected substitutions per site (0.03). Isolates belonging to the known species obtained in this study are in bold. Isolates of the new species described in this study are shown in bold red. Holotype labeled with an asterisk. The tree was rooted in three species of Talaromyces.“–” indicates a lack of support
Fig. 2.

Phylogeny based on the CaM sequences for species classified in Penicillium spp. and Talaromyces spp. Bootstrap values (≥ 70%) of the ML analyses, as well as posterior probability scores (≥ 0.95) from a BI of the same dataset, are indicated at well-supported nodes together with thickened branches. The scale bar represents the expected substitutions per site (0.02). Isolates belonging to the known species obtained in this study are in bold. Isolates of the new species described in this study are shown in bold red. Holotype labeled with an asterisk. The tree was rooted in three species of Talaromyces.“–” indicates a lack of support
Fig. 3.

Phylogeny based on the BenA sequences for species classified in Penicillium spp. and Talaromyces spp. Bootstrap values (≥ 70%) of the ML analyses, as well as posterior probability scores (≥ 0.95) from a BI of the same dataset, are indicated at well-supported nodes together with thickened branches. The scale bar represents the expected substitutions per site (0.03). Isolates belonging to the known species obtained in this study are in bold. Isolates of the new species described in this study are shown in bold red. Holotype labeled with an asterisk. The tree was rooted in three species of Talaromyces.“–” indicates a lack of support
Fig. 4.
Phylogeny based on the RPB2 sequences for species classified in Penicillium spp. and Talaromyces spp. Bootstrap values (≥ 70%) of the ML analyses, as well as posterior probability scores (≥ 0.95) from a BI of the same dataset, are indicated at well-supported nodes together with thickened branches. The scale bar represents the expected substitutions per site (0.06). Isolates belonging to the known species obtained in this study are in bold. Isolates of the new species described in this study are shown in bold red. Holotype labeled with an asterisk. The tree was rooted in three species of Talaromyces.“–” indicates a lack of support
Fig. 5.

Phylogeny based on the combined CaM, BenA, and RPB2 data set for species classified in Penicillium spp. and Talaromyces spp. Bootstrap values (≥ 70%) of the ML analyses, as well as posterior probability scores (≥ 0.95) from a BI of the same dataset, are indicated at well-supported nodes together with thickened branches. The scale bar represents the expected substitutions per site (0.02). The isolates from known species obtained in this study are in bold. The new species’ isolates described in this study are in bold red. Holotype labeled with an asterisk. The Talaromyces spp. was chosen as an outgroup.“–” indicates a lack of support
The phylogenetic trees revealed the presence of 13 different Penicillium species, including the new taxa of Penicillium belonging to sections Citrina, Lanata-Divaricata, and Sclerotiora, and three different Talaromyces species endophytes of Hevea spp. All phylograms showed the biggest number of endophytic isolates phylogenetically close to Penicillium citrinum in section Citrina. Of the total number of endophytic fungi investigated (Figs. 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5), P. citrinum isolates were more abundant in the roots of H. guianensis and H. brasiliensis (202F8R–AC, 694F8R–AC, 752F8R–AC, 753F8R–AC, 755F8R–AC, 756F8R–AC, 798F8R–AC, 171F9R–AC, 689F9R–AC, 564F2R–AC, 360F5R–AC, 198F11R–AC, 524F11R–AC, 562F11R–AC, 624F12R–AC) and the roots of H. brasiliensis (298F4R–AM, 477F10R–AM). Penicillium citrinum is present, but in less abundance, in the leaves of H. brasiliensis (629F14F–AM, 287F18F–AM, 294F7F–AC, 211F7F–AC, 212F14F–AC) and the stems of H. brasiliensis (684F9C–AM, 174F20C–AM, 634F20C–AM, 767F20C–AM, 652F22C–AM) (Figs. 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5; Table 1).
Additionally, isolates from several closely related species from the Citrina section have been found. Three isolates (7F5R–AM, 637F5R–AM, and 667F7R–AM) from roots were phylogenetically close to Penicillium paxilli, Penicillium shearii and Penicillium steckii, respectively. The 197F3C-AC isolate (stems of H. guianensis) was phylogenetically close to P. sumatrense. Penicillium aquiri sp. nov. of the stems of H. brasiliensis and Penicillium acrean sp. nov., of the stems and roots of H. brasiliensis (Figs. 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5; Table 1).
The individual phylogenetic tree for the BenA, CaM, and RPB2 genes showed that isolates of Penicillium acrean sp. nov. and isolates of Penicillium aquiri sp. nov. are closely related to isolates of P. sumatrense; however, different clades, with high posterior probability value (> 0.95), high bootstrap percentage (> 70%) (Figs. 2, 3 and 4), and concatenated sequence datasets (Fig. 5), with the posterior probability and bootstrap values equal to 1 and 100, respectively, are proposed as new taxa. The isolate 197F3C–AC establishes phylogenetic relationships with Penicillium aquiri sp. nov. in a tree based on ITS, BenA, and CaM (Figs. 1, 2 and 3). It has formed an independent clade in the phylogenetic tree of the RPB2 (Fig. 4) and concatenated sequence datasets (Fig. 5), with the posterior probability and bootstrap values equal to 1 and 97, respectively. This isolate was kept as Penicillium sp. for a better future evaluation with the collection of more isolates.
In the section Lanata-Divaricata, has been grouped five endophytic isolates of H. brasiliensis, three of which, 507F5R-AM, Penicillium heveae sp. nov. and Penicillium amazoense sp. nov. are obtained from the roots, and one isolate of Penicillium amazonense sp. nov. from the stems. The isolate of Penicillium heveae sp. nov. was obtained from the stems of H. brasiliensis from Acre (Table 1). In the BI and ML trees, the Penicillium amazonense sp. nov. isolates established phylogenetic relationships with P. rolfsii, a relative to this species. However, the isolates Penicillium amazonense sp. nov., an independent clade formed in the individual phylogenetic tree for ITS, BenA, and CaM (Figs. 1, 2 and 3) and concatenated sequence datasets (Fig. 5), are proposed as a new taxon named here as Penicillium amazonense sp. nov.
Penicillium heveae sp. nov. isolates were grouped in a distinct clade and related to Penicillium globosum and Penicillium cataractum. The clade containing the new taxa was consistent and well-defined in the phylogenetic tree using ITS, BenA, CaM, and RPB2 sequences (Figs. 1, 2, 3 and 4) and concatenated sequence datasets (Fig. 5) clustered into one distinct clade that received high support within the section Lanata-Divaricata and named here as Penicillium heveae sp. nov. The isolate 507F5R–AM demonstrated a close relationship between isolates of Penicillium cataractum in the phylogenetic tree of the ITS, BenA, CaM, and RPB2 (Figs. 1, 2, 3 and 4) and concatenated sequence datasets (Fig. 5) and demonstrated high support. Thus, we chose to keep as Penicillium sp. for future morphological characterization of more isolates.
Four isolates were classified in the section Sclerotiora, all obtained from stems of H. brasiliensis. Two isolates, 213F5C–AC and 728F5C–AC, were closely related to Penicillium austrosinicum and Penicillium maximae determined by analysis of single-locus and concatenated sequence datasets. And, others two isolates of Penicillium pseudomellis sp. nov. establishes phylogenetic relationships with Penicillium mellis in all datasets analyzed (Figs. 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5; Table 1).
In the section Fasciculata, the isolates 37F27C–AM and 314F2C–AM, endophytic of H. brasiliensis, were closely related to Penicillium crustosum. As an outgroup, the isolates 86F10R–AM, 623F7R–AM, and 705F18F–AC were closely related to species Talaromyces siamensis, Talaromyces thailandensis, and Talaromyces amestolkiae, respectively, with a well-supported branch distinct from species already described (Figs. 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5). The T. siamensis and T. thailandensis isolates are endophytic to the root of H. brasiliensis, and the isolate T. amestolkiae is endophytic to the leaf of H. brasiliensis (Figs. 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5; Table 1).
The ITS region has poor discriminatory power in the sections described here. The sequences BenA, CaM, and RPB2 easily distinguish the new species, and the multi-locus analysis was robust and valuable for distinguishing among closely related species. We decided to retain some isolates, such as Penicillium sp., which could be the topic of future research to confirm species-level classification.
Taxonomy
Penicillium acrean K. S. Araujo, J. L. Alves & M. V. Queiroz, sp. nov. Figure 6.
Fig. 6.
Penicillium acrean sp. nov. from Hevea brasiliensis (VIC47584). a – d Seven-day-old cultures, 25 °C, left to right; first row, all obverse, CYA, MEA, YES, CREA; second row CYA reverse, MEA reverse, YES reverse, CREA reverse. e – f Colony appearances: YES: seven days, 25 ºC; and MEA: seven days, 25 ºC. g – i Conidiophores and phialides (MEA). j – k Conidia. Scale bars: a – d = 20 mm; e – f = 5 mm; g – i = 20 μm; j – k = 10 μm
MycoBank: MB845368.
Type: Brazil, Acre state, Chico Mendes reserve, coordinates 10°50'4" S / 68°23'12.7" W, isolated from H. brasiliensis on 26 July 2014 K.S. Araujo (holotype VIC47585, preserved as metabolically inactive culture; ex-type living culture COAD3463). Barcode sequences are deposited at GenBank under accession number: ITS = MT137535, BenA = MZ369096, CaM = MW972080, RPB2 = OK105117.
Etymology: Named after Acre, the state where the holotype was collected. The specific epithet “acrean” refers to the state of Acre, Brazil.
Description: Conidiophores monoverticillate; stipes smooth walled, 32–63 × 2.5–3 μm; phialides ampulliform, 3–7 per stipe, 8–11 × 2.5–3 μm; conidia smooth, globose to subglobose, 2–3 × 2.5–3 μm.
Culture characteristics: colony diameter after seven days (mm) at 25 °C: CYA 30–32; MEA 31–33; YES 35–37; OA 30–35; CREA 30–35; CYAS 38–40. CYA 30 °C 37–47. CYA 37 °C no growth. CYA, 25 °C: Colonies centrally circular, moderately deep; radially and concentric sulcate, dull green and in some sections red, velvety texture; margins entire, thin, sparse, and white; sporulation dense; soluble pigments absent; reverse lightly sulcate and radial, orange to red centrally, around pure yellow and in the edge a very thin, transparent and amber halo. CYA, 30 °C: Colonieslightly sulcate, glaucous blue-green to greenish grey; margins entire, dense, white; cottony texture; sporulation dense; soluble pigments absent; reverse pure yellow centrally and straw around. CYA, 37 °C, no growth. YES, 25 °C: Colonies centrally sunken, mycelia white to straw, radial and concentric sulcate, mixed mycelia dull green to olivaceous grey with straw; margin narrow and entire mycelia white; floccose texture; sporulation moderately dense; soluble pigments absent; reverse scarlet to red centrally, orange around and straw in the ends. OA, 25 °C: Colonies dull green; margins low, wide, and entire; cottony texture; sporulation dense; soluble pigments absent; reverse the entire buff. CREA, 25 °C: Colonies strong to moderate acid production. MEA, 25 °C: Colonies raised with aerial mycelia of velvety texture; radially sulcate, dull green; margins low, narrow, whole, white, in edge a very thin and transparent mycelia halo; sporulation dense; soluble pigments absent; reverse slight crimped, orange to scarlet centrally and margins straw to pure yellow.
Other materials examined: Brazil, Acre state, Rio Branco, a native reserve of Embrapa, coordinates 10°02’21.9” S / 67°40’46.2” W, isolated on 26 July 2014 K.S. Araujo (VIC47584, COAD3462).
Habitat and host range: endophytes in the stems (COAD3462) and roots (COAD3463) of living wild Hevea brasiliensis trees.
Notes: Penicillium acrean sp. nov. are closely related to isolates of Penicillium sumatrense, belonging to section Citrina, whose fungi are characterized by shared symmetrically biverticillate conidiophores, flask-shaped phialides, and conidial size and ornamentation. However, Penicillium acrean sp. nov. differs morphologically from the related species P. sumatrense by the majority of monoverticillate conidiophores (low proportion biverticillate), the smaller size of stipes; conidia smaller, smooth-walled, globose to subglobose while P. sumatrense showed stipes up to 200 μm long; conidia finely roughened walled, subglobose to broadly ellipsoidal (Table 4). Differences can also be verified in phenotypic characters, such as the colonies’ diameters, appearance, and color in different conditions and culture media. For example: On CREA at 25 °C, the new taxa showed a moderate growth rate (27–32 mm) and a moderate to strong production of acid compared, while the related species, P. sumatrense, was described with a slower growth rate (15–23 mm) and acid production absent (Fig. 6; Table 4).
Table 4.
Morphological differences of new taxa of Penicillium described as endophytes from Hevea spp. and closely related species
| Features | Species | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P. acrean sp. nov. – VIC47584 | P. aquiri sp. nov. – VIC47586 | P. sumatrense – CBS281.36 | P. heveae sp. nov. – VIC47589 | P. globosum – CBS 144,639 | P. pseudomellis sp. nov. – VIC49378 | P. mellis – CBS 142,499 | P. amazonense sp. nov. – VIC49381 | P. rolfsii – CBS 368.48 | |
| Conidiophore (arranged) | monoverticillate with a low proportion biverticillate | biverticillate | biverticillate | majority divaricate with a low proportion biverticillate | mono- and biverticillate with a low proportion divaricate | Monoverticillate | Strictly Monoverticillate | Divaricate | Biverticillate |
| Stipes (length–width–µm) | 32 – 63 × 2.5–3 μm | 13 – 51 × 2–3 μm | up to 200 × 2–3 μm | 127 – 355 × 2–3 μm | 50 – 160 × 3–4 μm | 117–163 × 2–3 μm | 25 – 40 × 2–3.5 μm | 72 – 247 × 2–3 μm | 36 – 510 × 2.4–3.2 μm |
| Metulae per stipe/branch | 2 – 3 | 3 – 6 | 3 – 5 | 3 – 4 | 2 – 5 | 2 – 5 | |||
| Metulae (length–width–µm) | 12 – 15 × 2.5–3 μm | 10 – 16 × 2–3 μm | 10 – 12 × 2–3 μm | 7 – 20 × 3–4 μm | 12 – 15 × 2.5–3 μm | 8.8 – 12.8 × 2.4– 3.8 | |||
| Phialide (shape) | ampulliform | ampulliform | ampulliform | ampulliform with short neck | ampulliform with short neck | ampulliform | ampulliform | ampulliform | ampulliform |
| Phialide per Stipe | 3 – 7 | 4 – 8 | 4 – 8 | 3 – 19 | 3 – 8 | 3 – 9 | |||
| Phialide (length–width–µm) | 8 – 11 × 2.5–3 μm | 9 – 11 × 2.5–3 μm | 8 – 10 × 3–3.5 μm | 7 – 11 × 2–3 μm | 7 – 13 × 2–4 μm | 6–10 × 2.5–3 μm | 6.5 – 9 × 2–3 μm | 8 – 11 × 2.5–3 μm | 7.2 – 11.2 × 2.4– 3.8 |
| Conidia (wall) | smooth | smooth | finelly roughened | smooth | smooth | rough-walled | smooth | smooth | smooth |
| Conidia (shape) | globose to subglobose | globose to subglobose | subglobose to broadly ellipsoidal | globose | globose to subglobose | subglobose | globose to subglobose | fusiform to ellipsoid | fusiform to ellipsoid |
| Conidia (length–width–µm) | 2–3 × 2.5–3 μm | 2–3 × 2.5–3 μm | 3–4 × 2–4 μm | 2–3 × 2.5–3 μm | 3–4 × 2–4 μm | 2–4 × 2.5–3 μm | 2–3 μm (width) | 2 – 4 × 2.5–3 μm | 2.4 – 5.6 × 2–4 μm |
| Conditions | Colony on OA after 21 days (mm) | ||||||||
| 25 °C | 30 – 35 | 30 – 36 | 26 – 28 | 35 – 38 | 24 – 25 | 50 – 55 | 45 – 50 | ||
| Colony on MEA after one week (mm) | |||||||||
| 25 °C | 31 – 33 | 31 – 33 | 27 – 36 | 30 – 33 | 21 – 24 | 32 – 34 | 28 – 30 | 50 – 60 | 56 – 60 |
| Colony on CREA after 7 days (mm) | |||||||||
| 25 °C | 30 – 34.5 | 25.5 – 29 | 15 – 23 | 23 – 36 | 17 – 20 | 13 – 15 | 10 – 11 | 27 – 32 | 30 – 31 |
| Colony on YES after 7 days (mm) | |||||||||
| 25 °C | 35 – 37 | 31 – 33 | 26 – 47 | 38.5 – 42.5 | 17 – 19 | 32 – 34 | 34 –36 | 55 – 60 | 65 – 70 |
| Colony on CYAs after 7 days (mm) | |||||||||
| 25 °C | 38 – 40 | 37.5 – 39.5 | 0.9 – 1.1 | 29.5 – 35 | 14 – 15 | 30 – 32 | 26 – 27 | 43.5 – 53 | 40 – 41 |
| Colony on CYA after 7 days (mm) | |||||||||
| 25 °C | 30 – 32 | 23 – 25 | 33 – 42 | 30 – 33 | 21 – 22 | 28 – 30 | 29 – 30 | 52 – 56 | 52 – 60 |
| 30 °C | 37 – 46.5 | 27 – 27.5 | 10 – 25 | 33 – 41 | 27 – 37 | 29 – 31 | 33 – 35 | 38 – 42 | 65 – 70 |
| 37 °C | no growth | no growth | no growth | no growth | 3 – 7 | no growth | 2 – 4 | 20 – 29 | 43 – 45 |
Penicillium aquiri K. S. Araujo, J. L. Alves & M. V. Queiroz, sp. nov. Figure 7.
Fig. 7.
Penicillium aquiri sp. nov. from Hevea brasiliensis (VIC47586). a – d Seven-day- old cultures, 25 °C, left to right; first row, all obverse, CYA, MEA, YES, CREA; second row CYA reverse, MEA reverse, YES reverse, CREA reverse. e – f colony appearances: YES: seven days, 25 ºC; and MEA: seven days, 25 ºC. g – i Conidiophores and phialides (MEA). j Conidia. K Cluster of conidia. Scale bars: a – d = 20 mm; e – f = 10 mm; g – i = 20 μm; j – k = 10 μm
MycoBank: MB845369.
Type: Brazil. Acre state, Chico Mendes reserve, coordinates 10°50'00.7" S / 68°23'12.7" W, isolated on July 2014 K.S. Araujo (holotype VIC47586, preserved as metabolically inactive culture; ex-type living culture COAD3464). Barcode sequences are deposited at GenBank under accession numbers: ITS = MT137536, BenA = MZ369093, CaM = MW972077, RPB2 = OK073979.
Etymology: Named after Acre, the state where the holotype was collected. The name Acre originated from the word “Aquiri”, present in the native language of the Apurinã Indians, the region’s original inhabitants.
Description: Conidiophores biverticillate; stipes smooth walls, 13–51 × 2–3 μm; metulae 2–3 per stipe, 12–15 × 2.5–3 μm; phialides ampuliform, 4 – 8 per stipe, 9–11 × 2.5–3 μm; conidia smooth walled, globose to subglobose, 2–3 × 2.5–3 μm.
Culture characteristics in culture: colony diameter, after seven days, in mm at 25 °C: CYA 23–25; MEA 31–33; YES 31–33; OA 30–36; CREA 26–29; CYAS 38–40. CYA 30 °C 27–28. CYA 37 °C no growth. CYA, 25 °C: Colonies centrally raised and velvety greyish blue-green to olivaceous grey, followed by few sulcate radiations dull green; margins flat, entire, olivaceous grey and velvety texture; halo flat and white; sporulation dense; soluble pigments absent; reverse centrally slightly crimped and with well-marked halo and irregular radiations, straw to sulfur yellow and pale-yellow edges. CYA, 30 °C: Colonies sulcate centrally, greenish grey; margins low and sparse; mycelia white; velvety texture; sporulation dense; soluble pigments absent; reverse slightly crimped, straw to sulfur yellow and white in the ends. YES, 25 °C: Colonies with a cavity in the center, crimped sulcate, olivaceous grey to greenish grey, floccose texture; margins flat and thin, white; sporulation dense; soluble pigments absent; reverse straw, and the center is sulfur yellow. CREA, 25 °C: Colonies no acid produced. MEA, 25 °C: Colonies moderately deep at center, raised aerial mycelia around this central cavity, radially sulcate, mycelia in the center and intermediate zone grayish green; margins low, whole, white, velvety texture; sporulation dense; soluble pigments absent; reverse radially and concentric rings, the center raised, beige to yellow.
Other materials examined: Brazil, Acre state, Cruzeiro do Sul, coordinates: 7°44'04.7" S / 72°49'43.7" W, isolated on 26 July 2014 K.S. Araujo (VIC47587, COAD3465). Brazil. State of Acre, Sena Madureira, coordinates: 9°08'01.7" S/68°57'04.7"W, isolated on 26 July 2014 K.S. Araujo (VIC47588, COAD3466).
Habitat and host range: endophytes in the stems of living wild Hevea brasiliensis trees.
Notes: Penicillium aquiri sp. nov. showed a moderate to dense sporulation at all culturable media. The radial growth rate on CYA was 23–25 mm at 25 °C and soluble pigments absent, while Penicillium sumatrense showed a fast growth rate (33–34 mm), soluble pigments in most isolates; however, in some isolates, weakly produced and light brown colored. On CYA at 30 °C, P. aquiri sp. nov. showed a larger growth (27–28 mm) than P. sumatrense (10–25 mm). The colonies of P. sumatrense on CYA 30 °C reverse show beige to beige brown compared to new taxa, whose reverse is straw to sulfur yellow and has a brown center halo [52]. Penicillium aquiri sp. nov. colony showed a fast growth rate (44–53 mm) on CYAS at 25 °C while P. sumatrense showed a limited growth rate (0.9–1.1 mm). On CREA at 25 °C, the new taxa have moderate growth (27–32 mm) and moderate to strong acid production compared to related species, P. sumatrense, with slow growth (15–23 mm) and acid production absent. On YES at 25 °C, Penicillium aquiri sp. nov. has fast growth (55–60 mm). The related species already mentioned also has fast growth (26–47 mm); however, it is different in appearance and color of the colony, with radially sulcate mycelium inconspicuous and dull green. Reverse sulcate, yellow. Penicillium aquiri sp. nov. on MEA at 25 °C showed a fast growth rate (45–50 mm) compared to P. sumatrense, which had a slower growth rate (27–36 mm), and is different in appearance and color to the new taxa [53]. Micromorphological characters: P. aquiri sp. nov. showed smaller stipes; conidia smaller, smooth-walled, globose to subglobose, while P. sumatrense showed stipes up to 200 μm long; conidia finely roughened walled, subglobose to broadly ellipsoidal (Fig. 7; Table 4).
Penicillium amazonense K. S. Araujo, J. L. Alves & M. V. Queiroz, sp. nov. Figure 8.
Fig. 8.
Penicillium amazonense sp. nov. from Hevea brasiliensis (VIC 49381). a – d Seven-day-old cultures, 25 °C, left to right; first row, all obverse, CYA, MEA, YES, CREA; second row CYA reverse, MEA reverse, YES reverse, CREA reverse. e – f Colony appearances: MEA: seven days, 25 ºC; and YES: seven days, 25 ºC. In MEA: g – h Stipes. i Hyphae anastomosis. j A cluster of stipes. K Conidia. l A cluster of conidia. Scale bars: a – d = 20 mm; e – f = 10 mm; g – i = 20 μm; j – l = 10 μm
MycoBank: MB845612.
Type: Brazil. Amazonas state, Itacoatiara, coordinates 03°02'37.6" S / 058°30'11.8" W, isolated on 26 July 2014 K.S. Araujo (holotype: VIC49381, preserved as metabolically inactive culture; ex-type living culture COAD3476). Barcode sequences are deposited at GenBank under accession number: ITS = MT140343, BenA = MW820833, CaM = MW820831, RPB2 = OK087392.
Etymology: Named after Amazonas, the state where the holotype was collected. The specific epithet “amazonense” refers to the state of Amazonas, Brazil.
Description: Conidiophores divaricate; stipes lightly roughed walls, 72–247 × 2–3 μm; metulae 2–5 per stipe, 12–15 × 2.5–3 μm; phialides ampulliform with short neck, 4–8 per stipe, 8–11 × 2.5–3 μm; conidia smooth walled, fusiform to ellipsoidal, 2–4 × 2.5–3 μm.
Culture characteristics: colony diameter, after seven days, in mm at 25 °C: CYA 52–56; MEA 50–60; YES 55–60; OA 50–55; CREA 27–32; CYAS 44–53. CYA 30 °C 38–42. CYA 37 °C 20–29. CYA, 25 °C: Colonies centrally olivaceous grey, pulvinate texture; around mycelia mixed sulfur yellow and olivaceous grey, radiate and sulcate; margins with mycelia white, flat, cottony texture; sporulation dense; soluble pigments absent; reverse slightly crimped, light orange to pure yellow. CYA, 30 °C: Colonies sulcate centrally, olivaceous buff to smoke grey, texture pulvinate; margins low and sparse; sporulation dense; soluble pigments absent. YES, 25 °C: Colonies growing crateriform, mycelia glaucous blue-green to greenish grey; texture velvety; sporulation dense; soluble pigments absent; reverse crateriform, light orange to pure yellow in the ends. CREA, 25 °C: Colonies no acid produced. MEA, 25 °C: Colonies mixed sulcate and concentric areas, mycelia greenish yellow-green with glaucous blue-green; texture velvety; sporulation dense; soluble pigments absent; the reverse is slightly crimped, orange centrally and pure yellow in ends.
Other materials examined: Brazil, Amazonas state, Itacoatiara, coordinates 03°08'58.9" S / 058°26'16.8" W, isolated on 26 July 2014 K.S. Araujo (VIC49382, COAD3477).
Habitat and host range: endophytes in the stems (COAD3476) and roots (COAD3477) of living wild Hevea brasiliensis trees.
Notes: Penicillium rolfsii is a closely related species to the new taxa proposed here. Penicillium rolfsii produce terminal biverticillate conidiophores with rough-walled stipes. Colony growth rates and conidial shapes are most useful for distinguishing among the species in this clade and grow well on CYA at 37 °C, compared to the generally poor growth observed for other species in the clade, such as Penicillium amazonense sp. nov. [26]. Additionally, the new taxa differ by majority production of conidiophore divaricate (Fig. 8; Table 4).
Penicillium heveae K. S. Araujo, J. L. Alves & M. V. Queiroz, sp. nov. Figure 9.
Fig. 9.
Penicillium heveae sp. nov. from Hevea brasiliensis (VIC47589). a – d Seven-day-old cultures, 25 °C, left to right; first row, all obverse, CYA, MEA, YES, CREA; second row CYA reverse, MEA reverse, YES reverse, CREA reverse. e – d Colony appearances: YES: seven days, 25 ºC; and MEA: seven days, 25 ºC. g – i Conidiophores and phialides (MEA). j Conidia. K Cluster of conidia. Scale bars: a – d = 20 mm; e – f = 10 mm; g – i = 20 μm; j = 10 μm; k = 5 μm
MycoBank: MB845367.
Type: Brazil. Amazonas state, Itacoatiara, hydrographic basin, coordinates 03°24'34.00" S / 058°29'18.3" W, isolated on 26 July 2014 K.S. Araujo (holotype VIC47589, preserved as metabolically inactive culture; ex-type culture COAD3467). Barcode sequences are deposited at GenBank under accession number: ITS = MG751217, BenA = MW928622, CaM = MW928617, RPB2 = OK087394.
Etymology: Named after Heveae, the host where the holotype was collected.
Description: Conidiophores majority divaricate and occasionally biverticillate; stipes smooth walled, 127–355 × 2–3 μm; metulae, 3–5 per verticil, 10–12 × 2–3 μm; phialides ampulliform with a short neck, 4–8 per stipe, 7–11 × 2–3 μm; conidia smooth walled, globose, 2–3 × 2.5–3 μm.
Culture characteristics: colony diameter, after seven days, in mm at 25 °C: CYA 30–33; MEA 30–33; YES 39–43; OA 35–40; CREA 23–36; CYAS 30–35. CYA 30 °C 33–41. CYA 37 °C no growth. CYA, 25 °C: Colonies centrally deep and around it an elevated ring, and in the intermediate zone, moderately furrowed growth, glaucous grey to greenish grey and some areas of elevated mycelium white to grayish; velvety texture; margins low, wide, whole, white; sporulation dense; soluble pigments absent; reverse sulfur yellow. CYA 30 °C: Colonies deep, and crater sulcate, greenish grey to olivaceous grey centrally and white around; margin low, narrow and sparse, mycelia white; sporulation dense; velvety texture in the center and floccose at margins; reverse sulfur yellow and buff in the ends. CYA 37 °C: no growth. YES, 25 °C: Colonies crimped sulcate, pistachio green to glaucous with some stretches of white mycelium; velvety texture; sporulation moderately dense; soluble pigments absent; sporulation dense; irregular margins, flat and white; reverse crimped, sulfur yellow, margins with flat and white mycelium. CREA, 25 °C: little to moderate acid produced. MEA 25 °C: Colonies mixed highly convex–flat in centers, mixed mycelia olivaceous grey–white; cottony texture; sporulation dense; soluble pigments absent; margins low, wide, and entire, mixed pale olivaceous grey–white; reverse radial mixed convex–flat, sulfur yellow and a very thin and transparent mycelium halo in the edge.
Other materials examined: Brazil, Acre state, Sena Madureira, hydrographic basin, coordinates 9°08'01.7" S / 68°57'04.7" W, isolated on 26 July 2014 K.S. Araujo (COAD 3468, VIC 47590).
Habitat and host range: endophytes in the leaves (COAD3468) and roots (COAD3467) of living wild Hevea brasiliensis trees.
Notes: Penicillium heveae sp. nov. are closely related to isolates of Penicillium globosum and Penicillium cataractum. In this section, the isolates are marked by producing terminally biverticillate conidiophores with rough walls [27]. The new taxa produce mostly divaricate conidiophores on MEA. Conidiophores of P. heveae are larger in length, and smaller in width in contrast to the conidiophores of P. globosum. Penicillium heveae showed the faster colony growth rate on both media: MEA at 25 °C (30–33 mm vs. 21–24 mm), YES at 25 °C (39–43 mm vs. 17–19 mm), CREA at 25 °C (23–36 mm vs. 17–20 mm), CYA at 25 °C (30–33 mm vs. 21–22 mm), CYA at 30 °C (33–41 mm vs. 27–37 mm), CYAs at 25 °C (30–35 mm vs. 14–15 mm), than P. globosum. CYA at 37 °C showed no growth while P. globosum was 3–7 mm (Fig. 9; Table 4).
Penicillium pseudomellis K. S. Araujo, J. L. Alves & M. V. Queiroz, sp. nov. Figure 10.
Fig. 10.
Penicillium pseudomellis sp. nov. from Hevea brasiliensis (VIC49378). a – d Seven-day-old cultures, 25 °C, left to right; first row, all obverse, CYA, MEA, YES, CREA; second row CYA reverse, MEA reverse, YES reverse, CREA reverse. e – f colony appearances: MEA: seven days, 25 ºC; and YES: seven days, 25 ºC. g – i Conidiophores and phialides (MEA). j The apex of stipes and conidia. K Cluster of conidia. Scale bars: a – d = 20 mm; e – f = 10 mm; g – i = 20 μm; j – k = 10 μm
MycoBank MB845726.
Type: Brazil. Amazonas state, Itacoatiara, coordinates 03°02'40.4" S / 058°30'09.7" W, isolated on 26 July K.S. Araujo (holotype: VIC49381). Ex-type living culture COAD3474. Barcode sequences are deposited at GenBank under accession number: ITS = MT751237, BenA = MW820837, CaM = MW820835, RPB2 = MW820838.
Etymology: indicating its phylogenetic proximity to P. mellis.
Description: Conidiophores divaricate; stipes smooth walls, 117–163 × 2–3 μm; metulae 2–5 per stipe, 15–27 × 5–8 μm; phialides navicular to ampulliform with a short neck, 4–6 per stipe, 6–10 × 2.5–3 μm; conidia smooth, globose, 2–4 × 2.5–3 μm.
Culture characteristics: colony diameter, after seven days, in mm at 25 °C: CYA 28–30; MEA 32–34; YES 32–34; OA 35–38; CREA 13–15; CYAS 33–36. CYA 30 °C 29–31. CYA 37 °C 5–7. CYA, 25 °C: Colonies centrally raised, irregular, velvety texture; around lightly sulcate, radial mixed pale olivaceous grey–white; margins flat, entire, white; sporulation dense; soluble pigments absent; reverse centrally slightly convex, concentric, straw, around sulfur yellow to pale yellow edges. CYA, 30 °C: Colonies sulcate centrally, around radial sulcate, glaucous blue–green to greenish grey; sporulation dense; soluble pigments absent; margins flat and sparse, mycelia white, velvety texture; reverse slightly radial crimped, straw to sulfur yellow and white in the ends. YES, 25 °C: Colonies raised in the center, crimped sulcate, pale olivaceous grey to greenish grey, velvety texture; margins flat and thin, lightly sulcate white; sporulation dense; soluble pigments absent; reverse irregularly sulcate, sulfur yellow to pure yellow. CREA, 25 °C: little acid produced. MEA, 25 ° C: Colonies lightly raised, with several small holes, grayish white, low, narrow, whole, white at the center, radially and concentrically sulcate and cottony texture, abundant sporulation, in the ends a very thin halo, transparent; reverse, concentric and radiate growth, pale yellow and yellowish to orangish brown at the border.
Other materials examined: Brazil, Amazonas state, Itacoatiara, coordinates 03°02'40.4" S / 058°30'09.7" W, isolated on 26 July by K.S. Araujo (VIC49382, COAD3477).
Habitat and host range: endophytes in the stems of living wild Hevea brasiliensis trees.
Notes: Penicillium pseudomellis sp. nov. is a phylogenetically distinct species. It is distinguished from other members of the section Sclerotiora, such as Penicillium mellis [54] by not observing to produce sclerotia on CYA, MEA, and OA. Regarding micromorphology, the new taxa had larger stipes, whereas P. mellis had smaller stipes [55] (Fig. 10; Table 4).
Discussion
Penicillium and Taloromyces are well-known cosmopolitan filamentous genera found in food, air, soil, and other substrates. Most play various roles in natural ecosystems, agriculture, and biotechnology, and reporting novel occurrences and new endophytic species may be crucial. Penicillium species, particularly endophytes, have been the subject of numerous studies to describe new antimicrobial compounds and other biological functions for agricultural, biotechnological, and pharmaceutical applications [14].
In [56], Pitt and Samson published a list of names in use for the Trichocomaceae family. Later, the list was updated, and this version contained all recognized species and their synonyms [57]; most listed species belonged to the Penicillium and Aspergillus genera. Updating these lists would be needed because there have been several modifications since the list is from the 2000s. The primary reason for changes was the transition from a dual to a single-name naming system, which resulted in changes to several teleomorph genera. In the twenty-first century, new perspectives for the taxonomy of Penicillium and Talaromyces have been described. The sections accepted in Penicillium were studied using a polyphasic approach or multigene phylogenies [24, 58–60]; and species classified in the Talaromyces section were described [60, 61].
This study’s 47 different isolates of Penicillium are endophytic of the rubber tree native to the Brazilian Amazon Forest (Table 1), isolated from leaves, stems, and roots. Like many other Eurotiales species, Penicillium can be distinguished based on morphological features and growth temperature [23]. The five new taxa were identified and characterized based on morphological and molecular analysis, and the other species depict new occurrences for Hevea spp. Although species of the genus Penicillium have clearly defined morphological traits, and their name derives from the fact that they resemble a “small paint-brush” [62], the molecular identification of species of the genus Penicillium has proven a useful tool and that is currently in widespread usage. Phylogenetic analyses were carried out using primer pair sequences (ITS, BenA, CaM, and RPB2) to investigate the relationships among the endophytic fungi of the genus Penicillium isolated from rubber trees, and Penicillium spp. were included in sections Lanata-Divaricata, Citrina, Fasciculata, and Sclerotiora.
The BenA gene is often used as a secondary barcode sequence to identify Penicillium at the species level since it is a region easily amplified and can distinguish closely related species [23, 63]. Other secondary barcodes that can be auxiliary in identifying Penicillium isolates at the species level are the CaM and RPB2 genes. Several researchers suggest using single and multilocus analysis with datasets including ITS, BenA, CaM, and RPB2 to identify new species [23, 24].
The isolates from the section Citrina were the most representative (72%), with 36 isolates, being P. citrinum (27), identified by single and multi-locus molecular datasets. Penicillium citrinum is frequently reported in the literature as an endophytic species [64–66]. Several applications of the endophytic P. citrinum have been extensively studied, such as plant growth promotion [67], the pharmacological activity of polyketides [68, 69] and the development of antibacterial and antiviral drugs [14, 70]. In studies performed by Gazis and Chaverri [5], 33 fungi belonging to the genus Penicillium were obtained. However, P. citrinum was not isolated from the leaves and stems of rubber trees in Peru. P. citrinum has been collected in studies of the diversity of endophytic fungi on Vellozia gigante, an endemic plant to rupestrian fields in Brazil [65]. The hosts’ geographic position and interspecific competition of fungi most likely contributed to identifying different Penicillium species amongst the rubber trees in Brazil and Peru; this indicates our contribution in describing new occurrences of this endophytic species in Hevea spp.
Penicillium acrean sp. nov. and Penicillium aquiri sp. nov. were described in section Citrina according to the results shown in the phylogenetics trees obtained by BI and ML analysis (Figs. 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5) along with morphological characterization shown in the Taxonomy section (Figs. 6 and 7, respectively). Houbraken et al. [53] used a combined dataset of BenA, CaM, RPB2, and ITS sequences to analyze more than 250 isolates in connection to the species of Penicillium section Citrina. They asserted that the species Penicillium of the section Citrina share the production of symmetrically biverticillate conidiophores, flask-shaped phialides, with 7–9 μm long and relatively small conidia (2–3 μm). They also mention that the phenotypic characteristics for differentiating species are relevant, such as growth rates, colors, and colony appearance on the agar media CYA, MEA, and YES. Penicillium aquiri sp. nov. and P. acrean share with P. sumatrense the inability to grow at 37 °C.
This new species in the section Citrina shares phenotypic characteristics of the species of the section Citrina. It is necessary to emphasize that they differ from P. sumatrense in the size of conidiophores, the conidia characteristics, and the appearance and color of the colonies of the culture media used for evaluation according to what is described in the section Taxonomy and Figs. 6 and 7. Penicillium sumatrense has a worldwide distribution, preferentially for subtropical regions. Its main habitat is soil, and it has also been isolated from marine environments [71]; besides being an endophyte of several hosts, such as Garcinia multiflora, where it produces metabolites with promising antioxidant, antimicrobial and anticancer biological activities [72]. Furthermore, Penicillium sumatrense was first reported in China as causing a serious Blue Mold on Sparasis crispa, and it is considered a commercial threat to mushrooms [73].
The genus Talaromyces was first described by Benjamin (1955) as a teleomorph known for producing soft, yellow ascomata made of intertwined hyphae [61]. Several species from Penicillium were transferred into Talaromyces following the single name nomenclature [74] and by recent studies on an overview of the order Eurotiales [24]. Talaromyces spp. were accommodated in a monophyletic clade and separated from the Penicillium spp. clades in all phylogenetic trees. Species of this genus possess a wide distribution and were recently reported as an endophyte endemic to the Brazilian tropical dry forest, with the potential to produce bioactive compounds [75]. In our study, three isolates (86F10R–AM; 623F7R–AM, and 705F18F–AC) obtained from roots and leaves on H. brasiliensis were phylogenetically close to T. siamensis, T. thailandensis, and T. amestolkiae, respectively. The ITS barcodes could reliably separate Penicillium and Talaromyces. The secondary genes (BenA, CaM, and RPB2) were complementary and important for taxon identification, clearly delineated the same topologies, and can be used for identifying species within these genera.
Section Lanata-Divaricata is a wide section in Penicillium and was described by numerous investigations [26, 27, 30, 52]. Penicillium rolfsii was already described as endophytic in several plants, such as papaya [76]. Interestingly, this study obtained two isolates of Penicillium amazonense close to P. rolfsii and are proposed here as new taxa. Curiously, all documented species of the Lanata-Divaricata section are either acid-preferential or acid-tolerant, including P. globosum, which was collected and first described by Diao et al. [30] from a diversity of acidic soils (pH 4–6.5) in China. Additional materials were obtained from different continents, most collected from soils, but the species P. globosum has not yet been described as endophytic. Most of the species in this section grow quickly and form widely spread colonies, with the production of strongly divaricate and monoverticilate conidiophores [52], or the isolates are marked by producing terminally biverticillate conidiophores which are rough walled [27, 30]. The new species related to this clade displayed similar characteristics, including the size and color of the conidia and conidiophore (Table 4). Penicillium heveae sp. nov. is distinguished from P. globosum by differences in the arrangement of conidiophores and the shape of conidia, and is thus, described as a new taxon.
The screening of several fungal endophytes from Ginkgo biloba, a native plant from China, showed Penicillium cataractum displaying strong activity with the isolation of four new compounds exhibiting potency against bacterial pathogens [77]. The isolate 507F5R-AM obtained in this study was phylogenetically close to P. cataractum, and it is the first report of an endophyte of H. brasiliensis in Brazil.
Endophytes of the genus Penicillium (section Fasciculata), for example, Penicillium chrysogenum and Penicillium crustosum, were assessed for biotechnological purposes and by their plant growth promotion capability [7]. The isolates 37F27C-AM and 314F2C-AM obtained in this study were phylogenetically close to P. crustosum. For the first time, P. crustosum is identified as an endophyte of H. brasiliensis, and further research into its secondary metabolites may be useful for science and biotechnological purpose.
Hevea brasiliensis and H. guianensis harbor a wide diversity of endophytic Penicillium and Talaromyces species in their tissues. Our results highlight the presence of miscellaneous endophytic species of the genus Penicillium (P. citrinum, P. cataractum, P. rolfsii, P. mellis, P. paxilli and P. shearii) as well as five new endophytic species (P. acrean sp. nov., P. aquiri sp. nov. P. amazonense sp. nov., P. heveae sp. nov., and P. pseudomellis sp. nov.) in H. brasiliensis, a native of the Amazon Forest. This description of five new taxa of Penicillium section Citrina, Lanata-Divaricata, and Sclerotiora as endophytes add to our fungal biodiversity knowledge in native rubber trees. Additional studies on the production of extracellular enzymes and antimicrobial compounds can be carried out since Penicillium spp. produces bioactive molecules for drug development against neglected tropical diseases. The isolation and identification of endophytic fungi in tropical plants have revealed species with potential for use in the biocontrol of these diseases in rubber trees, and the ability of the new Penicillium species identified in this study to promote the growth of plants and control phytopathogens are being investigated. In addition, transformants expressing fluorescent proteins are being using to monitor root colonization by new species. In the future, it will be determinate whether these new species benefit their host and whether they can be used as a bioproduct.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) – Finance Code 001, the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), and the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG). In addition, we are grateful to Tomás Gomes Reis Veloso for the teachings on the imaging programs.
Author contributions
MVdQ supervised the execution, and reviewed and edited the manuscript; KSA collected the material, isolation, preservation of fungal isolates; DNA extraction, PCR, gene sequencing, phylogenetic analysis, contributed to morphological characterization and wrote the initial draft of the publication; JLA contributed to the holotype deposits in the herbarium (VIC) and culture (COAD) collections, editing of images and tables, sequence deposits in databases (Genbank and treebase), as well as contributed to morphological and molecular characterization (phylogenetic analysis) and written updates to the initial draft of the publication. KSA, OLP, and JLA analyzed the results of the bioinformatics analysis and general data analysis; All authors have given their approval to this version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research was supported by Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) – Finance Code 001, the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), and the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG) for financing the project and granting the scholarships.
Data availability
The biological reference material was deposited and available in official collections and DNA sequences at GenBank. Code availability Not applicable.
Declarations
Ethical approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Competing interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Kaliane Sírio Araújo and Janaina Lana Alves contributed equally to this work.
References
- 1.Gasparotto L, Figueredo S, Rezende JCP, Alves FF (2012) Doenças da Seringueira no Brasil. Embrapa Brasília, Brasil [Google Scholar]
- 2.Rocha ACS, Garcia D, Uetanabaro APT, Carneiro RTO, Araújo IS, Mattos CRR, Góes-Neto A (2011) Foliar endophytic fungi from Hevea brasiliensis and their antagonism on Microcyclus ulei. Fungal Divers 47:75–84. 10.1007/s13225-010-0044-2 [Google Scholar]
- 3.Araújo KS, Brito VN, Veloso TGR, Leite TS, Pereira OL, Mizubuti ESG, de Queiroz MV (2018) Diversity of culturable endophytic fungi of Hevea guianensis: a latex producer native tree from the Brazilian Amazon. Afr J Microbiol Res 12:953–964. 10.5897/ajmr2018.8980 [Google Scholar]
- 4.Araújo KS, Brito VN, Veloso TGR, de Leite TS, Alves JL, da Hora Junior BT, Moreno HLA, Pereira OL, Mizubuti ESG, de Queiroz MV (2020) Diversity and distribution of endophytic fungi in different tissues of Hevea brasiliensis native to the Brazilian Amazon Forest. Mycol Prog 19:1057–1068. 10.1007/s11557-020-01613-4 [Google Scholar]
- 5.Gazis R, Chaverri P (2010) Diversity of fungal endophytes in leaves and stems of wild rubber trees (Hevea brasiliensis) in Peru. Fungal Ecol 3:240–254. 10.1016/j.funeco.2009.12.001 [Google Scholar]
- 6.Brito VN, Alves JL, Araújo KS, Leite TS, Queiroz CB, Pereira OL, de Queiroz MV (2023) Endophytic Trichoderma species from rubber trees native to the Brazilian Amazon, including four new species. Front Microbiol 14:1095199. 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1095199 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hassan SE (2017) Plant growth-promoting activities for bacterial and fungal endophytes isolated from medicinal plant of Teucrium polium L. J Adv Res 8(6):687–695. 10.1016/j.jare.2017.09.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Li Z, Wen W, Qin M, He Y, Xu D, Li L (2022) Biosynthetic mechanisms of secondary metabolites promoted by the interaction between endophytes and plant hosts. Front Microbiol 13:928967. 10.3389/fmicb.2022.928967 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kalimuthu AK, Parasuraman P, Sivakumar P, Murugesan S, Arunachalam S, Pandian SRK, Ravishankar V, Ammunje DN, Sampath M, Panneerselvam T, Kunjiappan S (2022) In silico, in vitro screening of antioxidant and anticancer potentials of bioactive secondary metabolites from an endophytic fungus (Curvularia sp.) from Phyllanthus niruri L. Environ. Sci Pollut Res 29:48908–48925. 10.1007/s11356-022-19249-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Samson RA, Houbraken J, Thrane U, Frisvad JC, Andersen B (2010) Food and indoor Fungi, CBS laboratory manual series 2. CBS-Fungal Biodiversity Centre, Utrecht [Google Scholar]
- 11.Liang R, Yang Q, Li Y, Yin G, Zhao G (2024) Morphological and phylogenetic analyses reveal two new Penicillium species isolated from the ancient Great Wall Loess in Beijing, China. Front Microbiol 15:1329299. 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1329299 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Jurado M, Vicente CJ (2020) Penicillium commune affects textural properties and water distribution of hard and extra-hard cheeses. J Dairy Res 87(1):117–122. 10.1017/S0022029919000906 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Akaniro IR, Chibuike IV, Onwujekwe EC, Gbadamosi FA, Enyi DO, Onwe ON (2023) Penicillium species as chassis for biomanufacturing and environmental sustainability in the modern era: Progress, challenges, and future perspective. Fungal Biol Rev 46:100326. 10.1016/j.fbr.2023.100326 [Google Scholar]
- 14.Toghueo RMK, Boyom FF (2020) Endophytic Penicillium species and their agricultural, biotechnological, and pharmaceutical applications. 3 Biotech 10:107. 10.1007/s13205-020-2081-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.da Silva IJS, Sousa TF, de Queiroz CA, Castro GS, Caniato FF, Medeiros LS, Angolini CFF, Hanada RE, Koolen HHF, da Silva GF (2023) Penicillium amapaense sp. nov., section Exilicaulis, and new records of Penicillium labradorum in Brazil isolated from Amazon River sediments with potential applications in agriculture and biotechnology. Mycol Progress 22:23. 10.1007/s11557-023-01868-7 [Google Scholar]
- 16.Yan J, Wang P, Wang L, Jin Q, Ali AS, He Y, Wang Y, Sun Y, Li A, Adwy W, Ahmed RH, Han X (2023) Bio-decolorization of synthetic dyes by a novel endophytic fungus Penicillium janthinellum LM5 from blueberry pulp. Biochem Eng J 195:108909. 10.1016/j.bej.2023.108909 [Google Scholar]
- 17.Qin X, Xu J, An X, Yang J, Wang Y, Dou M, Wang M, Huang J, Fu Y (2024) Insight of endophytic fungi promoting the growth and development of woody plants. Crit Rev Biotechnol 44(1):78–99. 10.1080/07388551.2022.2129579 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Thom C, Church MB, May OE, Raines MA (1930) The Penicillia. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 1–644 [Google Scholar]
- 19.Raper KB, Thom C (1949) A Manual of the Penicillia. The Williams & Wilkins Company, Baltimore [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ramírez C (1982) Manual and atlas of the Penicillia. Elsevier Biomedical, Amsterdam [Google Scholar]
- 21.Frisvad JC, Filtenborg O (1990) Revision of Penicillium Subgenus Furcatum based on secondary metabolites and conventional characters. In: Samson RA, Pitt JI (eds) Modern concepts in Penicillium and Aspergillus classification. Plenum, New York, pp 159–172 [Google Scholar]
- 22.Frisvad JC, Samson RA (2004) Polyphasic taxonomy of Penicillium Subgenus Penicillium: a guide to identification of food and air-borne terverticillate Penicillia and their mycotoxins. Stud Mycol 1:1–173 [Google Scholar]
- 23.Visagie CM, Houbraken J, Frisvad JC, Hong SB, Klaassen CHW, Perrone G, Seifert KA, Varga J, Yaguchi T, Samson RA (2014) Identification and nomenclature of the genus Penicillium. Stud Mycol 78:343–371. 10.1016/j.simyco.2014.09.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Houbraken J, Kocsubé S, Visagie CM, Yilmaz N, Wang XC, Meijer M, Kraak B, Hubka V, Bensch K, Samson RA, Frisvad JC (2020) Classification of Aspergillus, Penicillium, Talaromyces and related genera (Eurotiales): an overview of families, genera, subgenera, sections, series and species. Stud Mycol 95:5–169. 10.1016/j.simyco.2020.05.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Torres-Garcia D, Gené J, García D (2022) New and interesting species of Penicillium (Eurotiomycetes, Aspergillaceae) in freshwater sediments from Spain. MycoKeys 86:103. 10.3897/mycokeys.86.73861 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Visagie CM, Houbraken J, Seifert KA, Samson RA, Jacobs K (2015) Four new Penicillium species isolated from the fynbos biome in South Africa, including a multigene phylogeny of section Lanata-Divaricata. Mycol Prog 14(10):1–23. 10.1007/s11557-015-1118-z [Google Scholar]
- 27.Visagie CM, Renaud JB, Burgess KMN, Malloch DW, Clark D, Ketch L, Urb M, Louis-Seize G, Assabgui R, Sumarah MW, Seifert KA (2016) Fifteen new species of Penicillium. Pers: Mol Phylogeny Evol 36:247–280. 10.3767/003158516X691627 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Taylor JW, Jacobson DJ, Kroken S, Kasuga T, Geiser DM, Hibbeti DS, Fisher MC (2000) Phylogenetic species recognition and species concepts in fungi. Fungal Genet Biol 31:21–32. 10.1006/fgbi.2000.1228 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Dettman JR, Jacobson DJ, Turner E, Pringle A, Taylor JW (2003) Reproductive isolation and phylogenetic divergence in Neurospora: comparing methods of species recognition in a model eukaryote. Evolution 57(12):2721–2741. 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb01515.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Diao YZ, Chen Q, Jiang XZ, Houbraken J, Barbosa RN, Cai L, Wu WP (2019) Penicillium section Lanata-Divaricata from acidic soil. Cladistics 35. 514–549. 10.1111/cla.12365 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 31.Rodriguez MCH, Evans HC, de Abreu LM, Macedo DM, Ndacnou MK, Bekele KB, Barreto RW (2021) New species and records of Trichoderma isolated as mycoparasites and endophytes from cultivated and wild coffee in Africa. Sci Rep 11:1–30. 10.1038/s41598-021-84111-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Wirsel SGR, Leibinger W, Ernst M, Mendgen K, Mendgen K (2001) Genetic diversity of fungi closely associated with common reed. New Phytol 149:589–598. 10.1046/j.1469-1372001.00038.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Evans HC, Holmes KA, Thomas SE (2003) Endophytes and mycoparasites associated with an indigenous forest tree, Theobroma gileri, in Ecuador and a preliminary assessment of their potential as biocontrol agents of cocoa diseases. Mycol Prog 2:149–160. 10.1007/s11557-006-0053-4 [Google Scholar]
- 34.Leite TS, Cnossen-Fassoni A, Pereira OL, Mizubuti ESG, Araújo EF, Queiroz VQ (2013) Novel and highly diverse fungal endophytes in soybean revealed by the consortium of two different techniques. J Microbiol 51:56–69. 10.1007/s12275-013-2356-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Dhingra OB, Sinclair JB (1995) Basic Plant Pathology Methods. 2nd Edition, CRC Press, Boca Raton
- 36.Pinho DB, Firmino AL, Ferreira-Junior WG, Pereira OL (2012) An efficient protocol for DNA extraction from Meliolales and the description of Meliola centellae sp. nov. Mycotaxon 122:333–345. 10.5248/122.333 [Google Scholar]
- 37.White TM, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA for phylogenetics M.A. In: Innis DH, Gelfand JJ, Sninsky TJ, White (eds) PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. Academic, San Diego, CA, pp 315–321
- 38.Glass NL, Donaldson GC (1995) Development of primer sets designed for use with the PCR to amplify conserved genes from filamentous ascomycetes. Appl Environ Microbiol 61(4):1323–1330. 10.1128/aem.61.4.1323-1330 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 39.Hong SB, Go SJ, Shin HD, Frisvad JC, Samson RA (2005) Polyphasic taxonomy of Aspergillus fumigatus and related species. Mycologia 97(6):1316–1329. 10.1080/15572536.2006.11832738 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Peterson SW (2008) Phylogenetic analysis of aspergillus species using DNA sequences from four loci. Mycologia 100:205–226. 10.1080/15572536.2008.11832477 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Liu YJ, Whelen S, Hall BD (1999) Phylogenetic relationships among ascomycetes: evidence from an RNA polymerase II subunit. Mol Biol Evol 16:1799–1808. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026092 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S (2013) MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol 30:2725–2729. 10.1093/molbev/mst197 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Swofford DL, Waddell PJ, Huelsenbeck JP, Foster PG, Lewis PO, Rogers JS (2001) Bias in phylogenetic estimation and its relevance to the choice between parsimony and likelihood methods. Syst Biol 50:525–539. 10.1080/106351501750435086 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Nylander JAA (2004) MrModeltest v2. Program distributed by the author. Evolutionary Biology Centre Uppsala Univ 2:1–2 [Google Scholar]
- 45.Miller MA, Pfeiffer W, Schwartz T (2012) The CIPRES science gateway: enabling high-impact science for phylogenetics researchers with limited resources. In: Stewart C. (ed.) Proceedings of the 1st Conference of the Extreme Science and Engineering Discovery Environment: Bridging from the extreme to the campus and beyond. USA, Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 1–8
- 46.Rannala B, Yang Z (1996) Probability distribution of Molecular Evolutionary Trees: a New Method of phylogenetic inference. J Mol Evol 43:304–311. 10.1007/pl00006090 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Rambaut A, Drummond AJ, Xie D, Baele G, Suchard MA (2018) Posterior summarization in bayesian phylogenetics using Tracer 1.7. Syst Biol 67(5):901–904. 10.1093/sysbio/syy032 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Vaidya G, Lohman DJ, Meier R (2011) SequenceMatrix: Concatenation Software for the fast assembly of Multi-gene datasets with Character Set and Codon Information. Cladistics 27:171–180. 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2010.00329.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Larsson A (2014) AliView: a fast and lightweight alignment viewer and editor for large datasets. Bioinformatics 30(22):3276–3278. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu531 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Stamatakis A (2014) RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30:1312–1313. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Rambaut A (2016) FigTree, version 1.4.3. Edinburgh. Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh
- 52.Houbraken J, Samson RA (2011) Phylogeny of Penicillium and the segregation of Trichocomaceae into three families. Stud Mycol 70:1–51. 10.3114/sim.2011.70.01 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Houbraken J, Frisvad JC, Samson RA (2011) Taxonomy of Penicillium section Citrina. Stud Mycol 70:53–138. 10.3114/sim.2011.70.02 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Barbosa RN, Bezerra JDP, Souza-Motta CM, Frisvad JC, Samson RA, Oliveira NT, Houbraken J (2018) New Penicillium and Talaromyces species from honey, pollen and nests of stingless bees. Antonie Leeuwenhoek 111:1883–1912. 10.1007/s10482-018-1081-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Visagie CM, Houbraken J, Rodriques C, Silva Pereira C, Dijksterhuis J, Seifert KA, Jacobs K, Samson RA (2013) Five new Penicillium species in section Sclerotiora: A tribute to the Dutch Royal family. Pers: Mol Phylogeny Evol Fungi 31: 42–62. 10.3767/003158513X667410 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 56.Pitt JI, Samson RA (1993) Species names currently in use in the Trichocomaceae (Fungi, Eurotiales). Regnum Veg 128:13–57 [Google Scholar]
- 57.Pitt JI, Samson RA, Frisvad JC (2000) List of accepted species and their synonyms in the family Trichocomaceae. In: Integration of modern taxonomic methods for Aspergillus and Penicillium classification (Samson RA,Pitt JI, eds). Harwood Academic Publishers, Amsterdam, pp. 9–49
- 58.Houbraken J, Visagie CM, Meijer M, Houbraken J, Visagie CM, Meijer M, Frisvad JC, Busby PE, Pitt JI, Seifert KA, Louis-Seize G, Demirel R, Yilmaz N, Jacobs K, Christensen M, Samson RA (2014) A taxonomic and phylogenetic revision of Penicillium section aspergilloides. Stud Mycol 78:373–451. 10.1016/j.simyco.2014.09.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Peterson SW, Jurjević Ž, Frisvad JC (2015) Expanding the species and chemical diversity of Penicillium section Cinnamopurpurea. PLoS ONE 10(4):e0121987. 10.1371/journal.pone.0121987 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Visagie CM, Yilmaz N, Kocsubé S, Frisvad JC, Hubka V, Samson RA, Houbraken J (2024) A review of recently introduced aspergillus, Penicillium, Talaromyces and other Eurotiales species. Stud Mycol 107:1–66. 10.3114/sim.2024.107.01 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Yilmaz N, Visagie CM, Houbraken J, Frisvad JC, Samson RA (2014) Polyphasic taxonomy of the genus Talaromyces. Stud Mycol 78(1):175–341. 10.1016/j.simyco.2014.08.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Link HF (1809) Observationes in Ordines plantarum naturales. Dissertation Ima (Berlin) Ges. NatKde, Berlin 3: 1–42
- 63.Laich F, Andrade J (2016) Penicillium pedernalense sp. nov., isolated from whiteleg shrimp heads waste compost. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 66:4382–4388. 10.1099/ijsem.0.001360 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Liu J, Xu M, Zhu MY, Feng Y (2015) Chemoreversal metabolites from the endophytic fungus Penicillium citrinum isolated from a mangrove Avicennia marina. Nat Prod Commun 10(7): 1203–1205. 10.1177/1934578X150100071 [PubMed]
- 65.Ferreira MC, Cantrell CL, Wedge DE, Gonçalves VN, Jacob MR, Khan S, Rosa CA, Rosa LH (2017) Diversity of the endophytic fungi associated with the ancient and narrowly endemic neotropical plant Vellozia gigantea from the endangered Brazilian rupestrian grasslands. Biochem Syst Ecol 71:163–169. 10.1016/j.bse.2017.02.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 66.Toghueo RMK, Kemgne EAM, Eke P, Kanko MIM, Dize D, Sahal D, Boyom FF (2019) Antiplasmodial potential and GC–MS fingerprint of endophytic fungal extracts derived from Cameroonian Annona muricata. J Ethnopharmacol 235:111–121. 10.1016/j.jep.2019.02.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Khan SA, Hamayun M, Yoon H, Kim HY, Suh SJ, Hwang SK, Kim JM, Lee IJ, Choo YS, Yoon UH et al (2008) Plant growth promotion and Penicillium Citrinum. BMC Microbiol 8:1–10. 10.1186/1471-2180-8-231 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Lai D, Brötz-Oesterhelt H, Müller WE, Wray V, Proksch P (2013) Bioactive polyketides and alkaloids from Penicillium citrinum, a fungal endophyte isolated from Ocimum tenuiflorum. Fitoterapia 91:100–106. 10.1016/j.fitote.2013.08.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Wang X, Wang H, Liu T, Xin Z (2014) A PKS I gene-based screening approach for the discovery of a new polyketide from Penicillium citrinum Salicorn 46. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 98(11):4875–4885. 10.1007/s00253-014-5572-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Zheng CJ, Huang GL, Xu Y, Song XM, Yao J, Liu H, Wang RP, Sun XP (2016) A new benzopyrans derivatives from a mangrovederived fungus Penicillium citrinum from the South China Sea. Nat Prod Res 30(7):821–825. 10.1080/14786419.2015.1072712 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Malmstrom J, Christophersen C, Frisvad JC (2000) Secondary metabolites characteristic of Penicillium citrinum, Penicillium steckii and related species. Phytochemistry 54: 301–309. 10.1016/S0031-9422(00)00106-0 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 72.Xu Y, Wang L, Zhu G, Zuo M (2019) New phenylpyridone derivatives from the Penicillium sumatrense GZWMJZ-313, a fungal endophyte of Garcinia multiflora. Chin Chem Lett 30:431–434. 10.1016/j.cclet.2018.08.015 [Google Scholar]
- 73.Liu J, Li X, Lu J (2018) First Report of Blue Mold on Sparassis crispa caused by Penicillium sumatrense in China. Plant Dis 102(11):2380–2380. 10.1094/PDIS-12-17-1908-PDN [Google Scholar]
- 74.Samson RA, Yilmaz N, Houbraken J, Spierenburg H, Seifert KA, Peterson SW, Varga J, Frisvad JC (2011) Phylogeny and nomenclature of the genus Talaromyces and taxa accommodated in Penicillium Subgenus Biverticillium. Stud Mycol 70:159–183. 10.3114/sim.2011.70.04 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Silva LF, Freire KTLS, Araújo-Magalhães GR, Agamez-Montalvo GS, Sousa MA, Costa-Silva TA, Paiva LM, Pessoa-Junior A, Bezerra JDP, Souza-Motta CM (2018) Penicillium and Talaromyces endophytes from Tillandsia catimbauensis, a bromeliad endemic in the Brazilian tropical dry forest, and their potential for L-asparaginase production. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 34(11):162. 10.1007/s11274-018-2547-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Wang F, Zhang R, Yuan Z, Chen P (2021) Biological prevention and control of pitaya fruit canker disease using endophytic fungi isolated from papaya. Arch Microbiol 203(7):4033–4040. 10.1007/s00203-021-02378-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Wu YY, Zhang TY, Zhang MY, Cheng J, Zhang YX (2018) An endophytic fungi of Ginkgo biloba L. produces antimicrobial metabolites as potential inhibitors of FtsZ of Staphylococcus aureus. Fitoterapia 128:265–271. 10.1016/j.ftote.2018.05.033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The biological reference material was deposited and available in official collections and DNA sequences at GenBank. Code availability Not applicable.







