Skip to main content
PMC home page
The EMBO Journal logoLink to The EMBO Journal
. 1999 May 4;18(9):2638–2647. doi: 10.1093/emboj/18.9.2638

DNA translocation blockage, a general mechanism of cleavage site selection by type I restriction enzymes.

P Janscak 1, M P MacWilliams 1, U Sandmeier 1, V Nagaraja 1, T A Bickle 1
PMCID: PMC1171343  PMID: 10228175

Abstract

Type I restriction enzymes bind to a specific DNA sequence and subsequently translocate DNA past the complex to reach a non-specific cleavage site. We have examined several potential blocks to DNA translocation, such as positive supercoiling or a Holliday junction, for their ability to trigger DNA cleavage by type I restriction enzymes. Introduction of positive supercoiling into plasmid DNA did not have a significant effect on the rate of DNA cleavage by EcoAI endonuclease nor on the enzyme's ability to select cleavage sites randomly throughout the DNA molecule. Thus, positive supercoiling does not prevent DNA translocation. EcoR124II endonuclease cleaved DNA at Holliday junctions present on both linear and negatively supercoiled substrates. The latter substrate was cleaved by a single enzyme molecule at two sites, one on either side of the junction, consistent with a bi-directional translocation model. Linear DNA molecules with two recognition sites for endonucleases from different type I families were cut between the sites when both enzymes were added simultaneously but not when a single enzyme was added. We propose that type I restriction enzymes can track along a DNA substrate irrespective of its topology and cleave DNA at any barrier that is able to halt the translocation process.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (252.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adler S. P., Nathans D. Studies of SV 40 DNA. V. Conversion of circular to linear SV 40 DNA by restriction endonuclease from Escherichia coli B. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1973 Mar 19;299(2):177–188. doi: 10.1016/0005-2787(73)90340-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Allen D. J., Makhov A., Grilley M., Taylor J., Thresher R., Modrich P., Griffith J. D. MutS mediates heteroduplex loop formation by a translocation mechanism. EMBO J. 1997 Jul 16;16(14):4467–4476. doi: 10.1093/emboj/16.14.4467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Burckhardt J., Weisemann J., Yuan R. Characterization of the DNA methylase activity of the restriction enzyme from Escherichia coli K. J Biol Chem. 1981 Apr 25;256(8):4024–4032. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Davies G. P., Powell L. M., Webb J. L., Cooper L. P., Murray N. E. EcoKI with an amino acid substitution in any one of seven DEAD-box motifs has impaired ATPase and endonuclease activities. Nucleic Acids Res. 1998 Nov 1;26(21):4828–4836. doi: 10.1093/nar/26.21.4828. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dreier J., MacWilliams M. P., Bickle T. A. DNA cleavage by the type IC restriction-modification enzyme EcoR124II. J Mol Biol. 1996 Dec 13;264(4):722–733. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dryden D. T., Cooper L. P., Murray N. E. Purification and characterization of the methyltransferase from the type 1 restriction and modification system of Escherichia coli K12. J Biol Chem. 1993 Jun 25;268(18):13228–13236. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dryden D. T., Cooper L. P., Thorpe P. H., Byron O. The in vitro assembly of the EcoKI type I DNA restriction/modification enzyme and its in vivo implications. Biochemistry. 1997 Feb 4;36(5):1065–1076. doi: 10.1021/bi9619435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dryden D. T., Sturrock S. S., Winter M. Structural modelling of a type I DNA methyltransferase. Nat Struct Biol. 1995 Aug;2(8):632–635. doi: 10.1038/nsb0895-632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Endlich B., Linn S. The DNA restriction endonuclease of Escherichia coli B. I. Studies of the DNA translocation and the ATPase activities. J Biol Chem. 1985 May 10;260(9):5720–5728. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Eskin B., Linn S. The deoxyribonucleic acid modification and restriction enzymes of Escherichia coli B. II. Purification, subunit structure, and catalytic properties of the restriction endonuclease. J Biol Chem. 1972 Oct 10;247(19):6183–6191. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Eskin B., Linn S. The deoxyribonucleic acid modification and restriction enzymes of Escherichia coli B. J Biol Chem. 1972 Oct 10;247(19):6192–6196. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Fuller-Pace F. V., Bullas L. R., Delius H., Murray N. E. Genetic recombination can generate altered restriction specificity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Oct;81(19):6095–6099. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.19.6095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gorbalenya A. E., Koonin E. V. Endonuclease (R) subunits of type-I and type-III restriction-modification enzymes contain a helicase-like domain. FEBS Lett. 1991 Oct 21;291(2):277–281. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(91)81301-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gubler M., Bickle T. A. Increased protein flexibility leads to promiscuous protein--DNA interactions in type IC restriction-modification systems. EMBO J. 1991 Apr;10(4):951–957. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb08029.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gubler M., Braguglia D., Meyer J., Piekarowicz A., Bickle T. A. Recombination of constant and variable modules alters DNA sequence recognition by type IC restriction-modification enzymes. EMBO J. 1992 Jan;11(1):233–240. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05046.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Janscak P., Abadjieva A., Firman K. The type I restriction endonuclease R.EcoR124I: over-production and biochemical properties. J Mol Biol. 1996 Apr 19;257(5):977–991. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Janscak P., Bickle T. A. The DNA recognition subunit of the type IB restriction-modification enzyme EcoAI tolerates circular permutions of its polypeptide chain. J Mol Biol. 1998 Dec 11;284(4):937–948. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1998.2250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Janscak P., Dryden D. T., Firman K. Analysis of the subunit assembly of the typeIC restriction-modification enzyme EcoR124I. Nucleic Acids Res. 1998 Oct 1;26(19):4439–4445. doi: 10.1093/nar/26.19.4439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kong H. Analyzing the functional organization of a novel restriction modification system, the BcgI system. J Mol Biol. 1998 Jun 19;279(4):823–832. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1998.1821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kong H., Morgan R. D., Maunus R. E., Schildkraut I. A unique restriction endonuclease, BcgI, from Bacillus coagulans. Nucleic Acids Res. 1993 Feb 25;21(4):987–991. doi: 10.1093/nar/21.4.987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kong X. P., Onrust R., O'Donnell M., Kuriyan J. Three-dimensional structure of the beta subunit of E. coli DNA polymerase III holoenzyme: a sliding DNA clamp. Cell. 1992 May 1;69(3):425–437. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90445-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Koo H. S., Claassen L., Grossman L., Liu L. F. ATP-dependent partitioning of the DNA template into supercoiled domains by Escherichia coli UvrAB. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Feb 15;88(4):1212–1216. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.4.1212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kovalsky O. I., Grossman L., Ahn B. The topodynamics of incision of UV-irradiated covalently closed DNA by the Escherichia coli Uvr(A)BC endonuclease. J Biol Chem. 1996 Dec 27;271(52):33236–33241. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.52.33236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kusano K., Sakagami K., Yokochi T., Naito T., Tokinaga Y., Ueda E., Kobayashi I. A new type of illegitimate recombination is dependent on restriction and homologous interaction. J Bacteriol. 1997 Sep;179(17):5380–5390. doi: 10.1128/jb.179.17.5380-5390.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. LaMarr W. A., Sandman K. M., Reeve J. N., Dedon P. C. Large scale preparation of positively supercoiled DNA using the archaeal histone HMf. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997 Apr 15;25(8):1660–1661. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.8.1660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Liu L. F., Wang J. C. Supercoiling of the DNA template during transcription. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Oct;84(20):7024–7027. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.20.7024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. McCulloch R., Coggins L. W., Colloms S. D., Sherratt D. J. Xer-mediated site-specific recombination at cer generates Holliday junctions in vivo. EMBO J. 1994 Apr 15;13(8):1844–1855. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06453.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Meisel A., Mackeldanz P., Bickle T. A., Krüger D. H., Schroeder C. Type III restriction endonucleases translocate DNA in a reaction driven by recognition site-specific ATP hydrolysis. EMBO J. 1995 Jun 15;14(12):2958–2966. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb07296.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Meselson M., Yuan R. DNA restriction enzyme from E. coli. Nature. 1968 Mar 23;217(5134):1110–1114. doi: 10.1038/2171110a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Murray N. E., Batten P. L., Murray K. Restriction of bacteriophage lambda by Escherichia coli K. J Mol Biol. 1973 Dec 15;81(3):395–407. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(73)90149-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Murray N. E., Daniel A. S., Cowan G. M., Sharp P. M. Conservation of motifs within the unusually variable polypeptide sequences of type I restriction and modification enzymes. Mol Microbiol. 1993 Jul;9(1):133–143. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1993.tb01675.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Murray N. E., Gough J. A., Suri B., Bickle T. A. Structural homologies among type I restriction-modification systems. EMBO J. 1982;1(5):535–539. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1982.tb01205.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Ostrander E. A., Benedetti P., Wang J. C. Template supercoiling by a chimera of yeast GAL4 protein and phage T7 RNA polymerase. Science. 1990 Sep 14;249(4974):1261–1265. doi: 10.1126/science.2399463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Price C., Pripfl T., Bickle T. A. EcoR124 and EcoR124/3: the first members of a new family of type I restriction and modification systems. Eur J Biochem. 1987 Aug 17;167(1):111–115. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1987.tb13310.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Rosamond J., Endlich B., Linn S. Electron microscopic studies of the mechanism of action of the restriction endonuclease of Escherichia coli B. J Mol Biol. 1979 Apr 25;129(4):619–635. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(79)90472-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Starich M. R., Sandman K., Reeve J. N., Summers M. F. NMR structure of HMfB from the hyperthermophile, Methanothermus fervidus, confirms that this archaeal protein is a histone. J Mol Biol. 1996 Jan 12;255(1):187–203. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Studier F. W., Bandyopadhyay P. K. Model for how type I restriction enzymes select cleavage sites in DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Jul;85(13):4677–4681. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.13.4677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Studier F. W., Rosenberg A. H., Dunn J. J., Dubendorff J. W. Use of T7 RNA polymerase to direct expression of cloned genes. Methods Enzymol. 1990;185:60–89. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(90)85008-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Suri B., Shepherd J. C., Bickle T. A. The EcoA restriction and modification system of Escherichia coli 15T-: enzyme structure and DNA recognition sequence. EMBO J. 1984 Mar;3(3):575–579. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1984.tb01850.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Szczelkun M. D., Dillingham M. S., Janscak P., Firman K., Halford S. E. Repercussions of DNA tracking by the type IC restriction endonuclease EcoR124I on linear, circular and catenated substrates. EMBO J. 1996 Nov 15;15(22):6335–6347. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Szczelkun M. D., Janscak P., Firman K., Halford S. E. Selection of non-specific DNA cleavage sites by the type IC restriction endonuclease EcoR124I. J Mol Biol. 1997 Aug 8;271(1):112–123. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1997.1172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Taylor A. F., Smith G. R. Action of RecBCD enzyme on cruciform DNA. J Mol Biol. 1990 Jan 5;211(1):117–134. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(90)90015-E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Taylor I., Patel J., Firman K., Kneale G. Purification and biochemical characterisation of the EcoR124 type I modification methylase. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992 Jan 25;20(2):179–186. doi: 10.1093/nar/20.2.179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Titheradge A. J., Ternent D., Murray N. E. A third family of allelic hsd genes in Salmonella enterica: sequence comparisons with related proteins identify conserved regions implicated in restriction of DNA. Mol Microbiol. 1996 Nov;22(3):437–447. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Tsaneva I. R., Müller B., West S. C. ATP-dependent branch migration of Holliday junctions promoted by the RuvA and RuvB proteins of E. coli. Cell. 1992 Jun 26;69(7):1171–1180. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90638-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Webb J. L., King G., Ternent D., Titheradge A. J., Murray N. E. Restriction by EcoKI is enhanced by co-operative interactions between target sequences and is dependent on DEAD box motifs. EMBO J. 1996 Apr 15;15(8):2003–2009. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Weiserova M., Janscak P., Benada O., Hubácek J., Zinkevich V. E., Glover S. W., Firman K. Cloning, production and characterisation of wild type and mutant forms of the R.EcoK endonucleases. Nucleic Acids Res. 1993 Feb 11;21(3):373–379. doi: 10.1093/nar/21.3.373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Willcock D. F., Dryden D. T., Murray N. E. A mutational analysis of the two motifs common to adenine methyltransferases. EMBO J. 1994 Aug 15;13(16):3902–3908. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06701.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Woodcock D. M., Crowther P. J., Doherty J., Jefferson S., DeCruz E., Noyer-Weidner M., Smith S. S., Michael M. Z., Graham M. W. Quantitative evaluation of Escherichia coli host strains for tolerance to cytosine methylation in plasmid and phage recombinants. Nucleic Acids Res. 1989 May 11;17(9):3469–3478. doi: 10.1093/nar/17.9.3469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Yang L., Jessee C. B., Lau K., Zhang H., Liu L. F. Template supercoiling during ATP-dependent DNA helix tracking: studies with simian virus 40 large tumor antigen. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Aug;86(16):6121–6125. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.16.6121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Yang X., Vologodskii A. V., Liu B., Kemper B., Seeman N. C. Torsional control of double-stranded DNA branch migration. Biopolymers. 1998;45(1):69–83. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0282(199801)45:1<69::AID-BIP6>3.0.CO;2-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Yuan R., Hamilton D. L., Burckhardt J. DNA translocation by the restriction enzyme from E. coli K. Cell. 1980 May;20(1):237–244. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(80)90251-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Yuan R., Heywood J., Meselson M. ATP hydrolysis by restriction endonuclease from E. coli K. Nat New Biol. 1972 Nov 8;240(97):42–43. doi: 10.1038/newbio240042a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Zerbib D., Colloms S. D., Sherratt D. J., West S. C. Effect of DNA topology on Holliday junction resolution by Escherichia coli RuvC and bacteriophage T7 endonuclease I. J Mol Biol. 1997 Aug 1;270(5):663–673. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1997.1157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The EMBO Journal are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES